Delete app.py

app.py

@@ -1,487 +0,0 @@
-import gradio as gr
-import spaces
-from huggingface_hub import InferenceClient
-import json
-
-# Initialize the Llama 3.3 model client with Cerebras provider
-import os
-
-try:
-    client = InferenceClient(
-        "meta-llama/Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct",
-        provider="cerebras",
-        token=os.getenv("HF_TOKEN"),
-    )
-except Exception as e:
-    print(f"Error initializing Cerebras client: {e}")
-    # Fallback to default provider
-    client = InferenceClient("meta-llama/Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct")
-
-# Turabian-based prompts for each stage
-TURABIAN_PROMPTS = {
-    "stage_1_commonsense": """Based on Turabian's method for developing research arguments, analyze this topic and create a commonsense argument with:
-
-1. A clear main CLAIM (what you're arguing)
-2. 2-3 supporting REASONS (why readers should accept your claim)
-3. Types of EVIDENCE needed (what would support your reasons)
-4. Present it as everyday conversation logic
-
-Make it simple and foundational - this is just the starting point.
-
-Topic: {input}
-
-Format your response as:
-CLAIM: [Your main argument]
-REASON 1: [First supporting reason]
-REASON 2: [Second supporting reason]
-REASON 3: [Third reason if needed]
-EVIDENCE TYPES NEEDED: [What kind of evidence you'd need]""",
-    
-    "stage_2_transition": """Help transition this commonsense argument into a research argument framework suitable for academic writing:
-
-1. Identify what needs strengthening for a scholarly audience
-2. Note areas requiring more formal evidence
-3. Suggest how to frame this as a cooperative conversation with skeptical but receptive colleagues
-4. Highlight the gap between commonsense and research-level argumentation
-
-Current Commonsense Argument: {input}
-
-Format your response with:
-STRENGTHS TO BUILD ON: [What's already strong]
-AREAS NEEDING DEVELOPMENT: [What needs more work]
-ACADEMIC FRAMING: [How to present to scholars]
-NEXT STEPS: [What to focus on in Stage 3]""",
-    
-    "stage_3a_claim": """Transform this working hypothesis into a specific, supportable academic claim:
-
-1. Make it an assertion that clearly demands support
-2. Ensure it's specific and focused (not too broad)
-3. Check that you can realistically support it with available evidence
-4. Make sure it goes beyond obvious or trivial statements
-
-Working Hypothesis: {input}
-
-Provide:
-REFINED CLAIM: [Your specific, supportable claim]
-WHY THIS WORKS: [Why this claim is effective]
-POTENTIAL CHALLENGES: [What might be difficult to prove]
-SCOPE NOTES: [What you're including/excluding]""",
-    
-    "stage_3b_evidence": """Develop comprehensive reasons and evidence strategy for this claim:
-
-1. Generate multiple strong supporting reasons
-2. Identify primary source evidence needed
-3. Assess evidence quality, quantity, and type requirements
-4. Note potential challenges readers might raise about your evidence
-
-Claim: {input}
-
-Provide:
-REASON 1: [First major reason] 
-- Evidence needed: [Specific evidence for this reason]
-REASON 2: [Second major reason]
-- Evidence needed: [Specific evidence for this reason]
-REASON 3: [Third reason if applicable]
-- Evidence needed: [Specific evidence for this reason]
-PRIMARY SOURCES REQUIRED: [What original sources you need]
-EVIDENCE QUALITY STANDARDS: [What makes strong evidence here]
-POTENTIAL EVIDENCE CHALLENGES: [What readers might question]""",
-    
-    "stage_3c_objections": """Anticipate objections and questions from careful, skeptical readers:
-
-1. List questions skeptical readers might ask
-2. Identify internal soundness challenges (evidence quality, reason consistency)
-3. Identify external soundness challenges (alternative views, exceptions)
-4. Suggest strong responses to key objections
-
-Argument: {input}
-
-Provide:
-READER QUESTIONS: [What will they ask?]
-INTERNAL CHALLENGES: [Questions about evidence/logic]
-EXTERNAL CHALLENGES: [Alternative interpretations/views]
-KEY OBJECTION 1: [Most important objection]
-- Your Response: [How you'll address it]
-KEY OBJECTION 2: [Second most important]
-- Your Response: [How you'll address it]
-ACKNOWLEDGMENT STRATEGY: [How to show you've considered these]""",
-    
-    "stage_3d_warrants": """Identify and articulate the warrants (underlying principles) connecting your reasons to your claim:
-
-1. Explain the underlying principles/assumptions
-2. Create clear When-Then statements
-3. Check if readers will likely accept these warrants
-4. Note any limiting conditions
-
-Reason: {reason}
-Claim: {claim}
-
-Provide:
-UNDERLYING PRINCIPLE: [The basic assumption connecting reason to claim]
-WHEN-THEN STATEMENT: [When X, then Y format]
-WARRANT ACCEPTABILITY: [Will readers accept this principle?]
-POTENTIAL WARRANT CHALLENGES: [What if readers question the principle?]
-LIMITING CONDITIONS: [When might this warrant not apply?]
-MAKING IT EXPLICIT: [How to clearly state this in your argument]""",
-    
-    "stage_4a_storyboard": """Create a comprehensive storyboard/outline including all argument elements:
-
-1. Research question
-2. Working hypothesis/claim
-3. Reasons and evidence
-4. Acknowledgments and responses
-5. Warrants
-
-Argument Elements: {input}
-
-Create:
-RESEARCH QUESTION: [Your driving question]
-MAIN CLAIM: [Your central argument]
-STORYBOARD OUTLINE:
-1. Introduction
-   - Hook/Context
-   - Research Question
-   - Claim Preview
-2. Reason 1 + Evidence
-   - Warrant
-   - Potential Objection + Response
-3. Reason 2 + Evidence
-   - Warrant
-   - Potential Objection + Response
-4. [Additional reasons as needed]
-5. Conclusion
-   - Claim Restatement
-   - Broader Implications
-FLOW CHECK: [How sections connect logically]""",
-    
-    "stage_4b_organization": """Organize this argument structure to meet reader needs and expectations:
-
-1. Suggest optimal ordering strategies
-2. Recommend transitional structure
-3. Consider what academic readers expect
-4. Plan logical flow between sections
-
-Argument Elements: {input}
-
-Provide:
-RECOMMENDED ORGANIZATION: [Best structure approach]
-- Chronological / Topical / Simple-to-Complex / etc.
-SECTION ORDER: [Specific sequence]
-TRANSITIONAL STRATEGY: [How sections will connect]
-READER EXPECTATIONS: [What readers need to see when]
-LOGICAL FLOW NOTES: [Why this order works]
-ALTERNATIVE APPROACHES: [Other viable structures]""",
-    
-    "stage_4c_intro_conclusion": """Sketch working introduction and conclusion that effectively frame your argument:
-
-1. Draft introduction that hooks readers and previews argument
-2. Draft conclusion that reinforces argument and shows significance
-3. Ensure they work together as a frame
-
-Main Argument: {input}
-
-Create:
-INTRODUCTION DRAFT:
-- Opening Hook: [Engaging start]
-- Context/Background: [Essential background]
-- Research Question: [Your driving question]
-- Claim Statement: [Clear claim]
-- Roadmap: [What's coming]
-
-CONCLUSION DRAFT:
-- Claim Restatement: [Reaffirm your argument]
-- Key Evidence Summary: [Main support]
-- Broader Implications: [Why it matters]
-- Future Research: [What's next]
-
-FRAME COHERENCE: [How intro and conclusion work together]""",
-    
-    "stage_4d_key_terms": """Identify and define key terms that will provide conceptual coherence throughout your paper:
-
-1. Select terms representing core concepts
-2. Ensure terms will run consistently through the paper
-3. Check for conceptual clarity and consistency
-
-Argument: {input}
-
-Provide:
-KEY TERMS TO DEFINE:
-1. [Term 1]: [Definition and importance]
-2. [Term 2]: [Definition and importance]
-3. [Term 3]: [Definition and importance]
-[Continue as needed]
-
-CONCEPTUAL CONSISTENCY: [How terms relate to each other]
-DEFINITION STRATEGY: [Where/how to define terms]
-USAGE GUIDELINES: [How to use terms consistently]
-POTENTIAL CONFUSION: [Terms readers might misunderstand]""",
-    
-    "stage_5_drafting": """Provide comprehensive drafting guidance and best practices:
-
-1. Effective writing habits
-2. Source integration techniques
-3. Evidence relevance demonstration
-4. Using headings and key terms effectively
-
-Writing Plan: {input}
-
-Guidance:
-WRITING HABITS:
-- Daily writing schedule suggestions
-- Productivity techniques
-- Dealing with writer's block
-
-SOURCE INTEGRATION:
-- When to quote vs. paraphrase vs. summarize
-- How to introduce sources effectively
-- Attribution best practices
-
-EVIDENCE CONNECTION:
-- Making evidence relevance clear
-- Linking evidence to reasons and claims
-- Handling complex or detailed evidence
-
-STRUCTURE MAINTENANCE:
-- Using headings effectively
-- Tracking key terms
-- Maintaining argument thread
-
-DRAFTING TIPS: [Practical writing advice]""",
-    
-    "stage_6_revision": """Create a comprehensive revision checklist based on Turabian's standards:
-
-1. Check for argument blind spots
-2. Review introduction, conclusion, and claim clarity
-3. Assess overall body coherence
-4. Provide paragraph-level revision guidance
-
-Draft Description: {input}
-
-Revision Checklist:
-
-ARGUMENT STRENGTH:
-□ Blind spots check (unconsidered counterarguments?)
-□ Alternative interpretations addressed?
-□ Evidence gaps filled?
-
-STRUCTURAL CLARITY:
-□ Introduction clearly frames argument?
-□ Conclusion reinforces without repeating?
-□ Claim visible and specific?
-
-BODY COHERENCE:
-□ Key terms used consistently?
-□ Section breaks logical?
-□ Each section contributes to main argument?
-□ Transitions smooth and clear?
-
-PARAGRAPH LEVEL:
-□ Each paragraph has clear purpose?
-□ Evidence clearly supports reasons?
-□ Warrants made explicit where needed?
-
-REVISION PRIORITIES: [What to focus on first]"""
-}
-
-# Track user progress through stages
-def get_stage_info(stage_key):
-    stage_info = {
-        "stage_1": {"name": "Commonsense Argument", "description": "Create your foundational argument"},
-        "stage_2": {"name": "Research Transition", "description": "Move from commonsense to academic"},
-        "stage_3a": {"name": "Claim Development", "description": "Refine your specific claim"},
-        "stage_3b": {"name": "Evidence Mapping", "description": "Plan reasons and evidence"},
-        "stage_3c": {"name": "Objection Analysis", "description": "Anticipate reader challenges"},
-        "stage_3d": {"name": "Warrant Identification", "description": "Connect reasons to claims"},
-        "stage_4a": {"name": "Storyboard Creation", "description": "Outline your argument"},
-        "stage_4b": {"name": "Organization Planning", "description": "Structure for readers"},
-        "stage_4c": {"name": "Introduction & Conclusion", "description": "Frame your argument"},
-        "stage_4d": {"name": "Key Terms", "description": "Define core concepts"},
-        "stage_5": {"name": "Drafting Guidance", "description": "Write your first draft"},
-        "stage_6": {"name": "Revision Checklist", "description": "Polish your argument"}
-    }
-    return stage_info.get(stage_key, {"name": "Unknown", "description": ""})
-
-# Main processing function
-@spaces.GPU
-def process_stage(stage, input_text, reason_text="", claim_text=""):
-    """Process input through selected Turabian stage"""
-    
-    if not input_text.strip():
-        return "Please provide input text to analyze."
-    
-    # Get the appropriate prompt
-    prompt_key = f"{stage}_commonsense" if stage == "stage_1" else stage
-    prompt_template = TURABIAN_PROMPTS.get(prompt_key)
-    
-    if not prompt_template:
-        return f"Error: Stage {stage} not found."
-    
-    # Handle special case for warrant stage that needs both reason and claim
-    if stage == "stage_3d":
-        if not reason_text.strip() or not claim_text.strip():
-            return "For warrant analysis, please provide both a reason and a claim."
-        prompt = prompt_template.format(reason=reason_text, claim=claim_text)
-    else:
-        prompt = prompt_template.format(input=input_text)
-    
-    try:
-        # Generate response using Llama 3.3
-        messages = [{"role": "user", "content": prompt}]
-        
-        response = client.chat_completion(
-            messages=messages,
-            max_tokens=1500,
-            temperature=0.7,
-            top_p=0.9
-        )
-        
-        return response.choices[0].message.content
-        
-    except Exception as e:
-        return f"Error processing request: {str(e)}"
-
-# Custom CSS for better styling
-custom_css = """
-.stage-container {
-    border: 2px solid #4CAF50;
-    border-radius: 10px;
-    padding: 20px;
-    margin: 10px 0;
-    background-color: #f9f9f9;
-}
-
-.stage-title {
-    color: #2E7D32;
-    font-size: 1.2em;
-    font-weight: bold;
-    margin-bottom: 10px;
-}
-
-.progress-indicator {
-    background-color: #E3F2FD;
-    padding: 10px;
-    border-radius: 5px;
-    margin-bottom: 15px;
-}
-
-.output-box {
-    background-color: #FAFAFA;
-    border: 1px solid #E0E0E0;
-    border-radius: 5px;
-    padding: 15px;
-    font-family: monospace;
-    line-height: 1.6;
-}
-"""
-
-# Main Gradio interface
-with gr.Blocks(title="Turabian Research Argument Assistant", css=custom_css, theme=gr.themes.Soft()) as app:
-    gr.Markdown("""
-    # 📚 Turabian Research Argument Assistant
-    ### *Based on "A Manual for Writers of Research Papers, Theses, and Dissertations" by Kate L. Turabian*
-    
-    Develop your research argument step-by-step using Turabian's proven methodology. This tool guides you through all 6 stages from commonsense argument to final revision.
-    """)
-    
-    with gr.Row():
-        with gr.Column(scale=2):
-            gr.Markdown("## 🎯 Select Your Stage")
-            
-            stage = gr.Radio(
-                choices=[
-                    ("📍 Stage 1: Commonsense Argument", "stage_1"),
-                    ("🔄 Stage 2: Research Transition", "stage_2"), 
-                    ("🏗️ Stage 3A: Claim Development", "stage_3a"),
-                    ("📊 Stage 3B: Evidence Mapping", "stage_3b"),
-                    ("❓ Stage 3C: Objection Analysis", "stage_3c"),
-                    ("🔗 Stage 3D: Warrant Identification", "stage_3d"),
-                    ("📋 Stage 4A: Storyboard Creation", "stage_4a"),
-                    ("📐 Stage 4B: Organization Planning", "stage_4b"),
-                    ("✍️ Stage 4C: Introduction & Conclusion", "stage_4c"),
-                    ("🔑 Stage 4D: Key Terms", "stage_4d"),
-                    ("📝 Stage 5: Drafting Guidance", "stage_5"),
-                    ("🔍 Stage 6: Revision Checklist", "stage_6")
-                ],
-                value="stage_1",
-                label="Choose Your Current Stage"
-            )
-            
-            # Dynamic stage information
-            stage_info = gr.Markdown("**Stage 1: Commonsense Argument** - Create your foundational argument")
-            
-            # Input section
-            gr.Markdown("## 📝 Your Input")
-            input_text = gr.Textbox(
-                label="Main Input",
-                placeholder="Enter your topic, argument, or text for this stage...",
-                lines=8,
-                max_lines=15
-            )
-            
-            # Special inputs for warrant stage
-            with gr.Row(visible=False) as warrant_inputs:
-                reason_text = gr.Textbox(
-                    label="Reason",
-                    placeholder="Enter the specific reason...",
-                    lines=3
-                )
-                claim_text = gr.Textbox(
-                    label="Claim", 
-                    placeholder="Enter the specific claim...",
-                    lines=3
-                )
-            
-            process_btn = gr.Button("🚀 Process Stage", variant="primary", size="lg")
-            
-        with gr.Column(scale=3):
-            gr.Markdown("## 📋 Stage Output")
-            output = gr.Textbox(
-                label="Analysis Results",
-                lines=30,
-                max_lines=40,
-                show_copy_button=True,
-                elem_classes=["output-box"]
-            )
-            
-            gr.Markdown("""
-            ## 📖 How to Use This Tool
-            
-            1. **Start with Stage 1** - Input your basic topic/idea
-            2. **Progress sequentially** - Each stage builds on the previous
-            3. **Copy outputs** - Use results from one stage as input for the next
-            4. **Take your time** - Turabian's method requires careful development
-            
-            ## 💡 Tips
-            - Keep outputs from each stage for reference
-            - Don't skip stages - each builds essential elements
-            - Stage 3D (Warrants) requires both a reason and claim
-            - Use stage 4+ outputs to guide your actual writing
-            """)
-    
-    # Update stage information when selection changes
-    def update_stage_info(stage_key):
-        info = get_stage_info(stage_key)
-        stage_desc = f"**{info['name']}** - {info['description']}"
-        
-        # Show/hide warrant special inputs
-        if stage_key == "stage_3d":
-            return stage_desc, gr.update(visible=True)
-        else:
-            return stage_desc, gr.update(visible=False)
-    
-    stage.change(
-        fn=update_stage_info,
-        inputs=[stage],
-        outputs=[stage_info, warrant_inputs]
-    )
-    
-    # Process button click
-    process_btn.click(
-        fn=process_stage,
-        inputs=[stage, input_text, reason_text, claim_text],
-        outputs=output,
-        show_progress=True
-    )
-
-if __name__ == "__main__":
-    app.launch()