/**
* unit-thinking-truncation.mjs
*
* 测试 thinking 截断场景下的修复逻辑:
* 1. splitLeadingThinkingBlocks 未闭合时返回部分 thinkingContent(而非空字符串)
* 2. closeUnclosedThinking 在 assistantContext 中补全缺失的 标签
*/
import { splitLeadingThinkingBlocks } from '../dist/streaming-text.js';
// closeUnclosedThinking 是 handler 内部函数,不直接导出;改为内联一份相同实现做白盒测试
function closeUnclosedThinking(text) {
const opens = (text.match(//g) || []).length;
const closes = (text.match(/<\/thinking>/g) || []).length;
if (opens > closes) return text + '\n';
return text;
}
let passed = 0;
let failed = 0;
function test(name, fn) {
try {
fn();
console.log(` ✅ ${name}`);
passed++;
} catch (error) {
const message = error instanceof Error ? error.message : String(error);
console.error(` ❌ ${name}`);
console.error(` ${message}`);
failed++;
}
}
function assertEqual(actual, expected, message) {
if (actual !== expected) {
throw new Error(message || `Expected ${JSON.stringify(expected)}, got ${JSON.stringify(actual)}`);
}
}
function assertContains(actual, substring, message) {
if (!actual.includes(substring)) {
throw new Error(message || `Expected string to contain ${JSON.stringify(substring)}, got ${JSON.stringify(actual)}`);
}
}
// ==================== splitLeadingThinkingBlocks 测试 ====================
console.log('\n📦 splitLeadingThinkingBlocks — thinking 截断处理\n');
test('完整 thinking 块:complete=true,正确提取内容', () => {
const text = '\n我在思考这道题\n\n这是正文';
const result = splitLeadingThinkingBlocks(text);
assertEqual(result.startedWithThinking, true, 'startedWithThinking');
assertEqual(result.complete, true, 'complete');
assertEqual(result.thinkingContent, '我在思考这道题', 'thinkingContent');
assertEqual(result.remainder, '这是正文', 'remainder');
});
test('thinking 未闭合(截断):complete=false,仍返回部分 thinkingContent', () => {
const text = '\n开始深入分析这个问题,考虑各种边界情况……';
const result = splitLeadingThinkingBlocks(text);
assertEqual(result.startedWithThinking, true, 'startedWithThinking');
assertEqual(result.complete, false, 'complete 应为 false');
// ★ 修复前:thinkingContent 为 '';修复后应包含实际 thinking 内容
assertContains(
result.thinkingContent,
'开始深入分析这个问题',
'thinkingContent 应包含截断前的 thinking 内容,而不是空字符串',
);
assertEqual(result.remainder, '', 'remainder 应为空,不泄漏到正文');
});
test('thinking 未闭合:thinkingContent 不含 开标签本身', () => {
const text = '\n分析中……';
const result = splitLeadingThinkingBlocks(text);
if (result.thinkingContent.includes('')) {
throw new Error('thinkingContent 不应包含 开标签');
}
});
test('空 thinking 块未闭合( 后无内容):thinkingContent 为空字符串', () => {
const text = '';
const result = splitLeadingThinkingBlocks(text);
assertEqual(result.startedWithThinking, true, 'startedWithThinking');
assertEqual(result.complete, false, 'complete');
assertEqual(result.thinkingContent, '', 'thinkingContent 应为空字符串');
});
test('多个完整 thinking 块后接未闭合块:合并所有内容', () => {
const text = '第一段\n第二段截断中……';
const result = splitLeadingThinkingBlocks(text);
assertEqual(result.startedWithThinking, true, 'startedWithThinking');
assertEqual(result.complete, false, 'complete');
assertContains(result.thinkingContent, '第一段', '应包含第一段');
assertContains(result.thinkingContent, '第二段截断中', '应包含截断的第二段');
});
test('无 thinking 标签:startedWithThinking=false,remainder=原文', () => {
const text = '这是普通正文内容';
const result = splitLeadingThinkingBlocks(text);
assertEqual(result.startedWithThinking, false, 'startedWithThinking');
assertEqual(result.remainder, text, 'remainder 应为原文');
});
// ==================== closeUnclosedThinking 测试 ====================
console.log('\n📦 closeUnclosedThinking — 续写 assistantContext 补全标签\n');
test('无 thinking 标签:原文不变', () => {
const text = '这是正常的 assistant 上下文';
assertEqual(closeUnclosedThinking(text), text, '不含 thinking 标签时应原样返回');
});
test('thinking 已闭合:原文不变', () => {
const text = '思考内容\n正文内容';
assertEqual(closeUnclosedThinking(text), text, '已闭合时不应修改');
});
test('thinking 未闭合:自动追加 ', () => {
const text = '\n思考中,然后被截断了……';
const result = closeUnclosedThinking(text);
assertContains(result, '', '应补全 标签');
// 补全后 和 数量应相等
const opens = (result.match(//g) || []).length;
const closes = (result.match(/<\/thinking>/g) || []).length;
assertEqual(opens, closes, ' 和 数量应相等');
});
test('assistantContext 截断后的典型场景:... + 未闭合 thinking 尾部', () => {
// 模拟 fullResponse.slice(-2000),截到 thinking 中间(开标签不在窗口内)
const text = '...\n分析更多细节,考虑到边界情况……';
// 这段没有 ,closeUnclosedThinking 应原样返回
assertEqual(closeUnclosedThinking(text), text, '无开标签时不应修改');
});
test('assistantContext 包含完整 thinking 后接未闭合内容:补全标签', () => {
const text = '第一段完整\n第二段截断中……';
const result = closeUnclosedThinking(text);
const opens = (result.match(//g) || []).length;
const closes = (result.match(/<\/thinking>/g) || []).length;
assertEqual(opens, closes, '补全后开闭标签数量应相等');
});
// ==================== 汇总 ====================
console.log(`\n结果:${passed} 通过,${failed} 失败\n`);
if (failed > 0) process.exit(1);