Update pages/4 Feature Engineering.py
Browse files- pages/4 Feature Engineering.py +16 -16
pages/4 Feature Engineering.py
CHANGED
|
@@ -9,10 +9,10 @@ st.markdown("""
|
|
| 9 |
To ensure the dataset was machine-learning ready, the following preprocessing steps were applied:
|
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
- **Encoding**:
|
| 12 |
-
- Categorical variables like
|
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
- **Scaling**:
|
| 15 |
-
Continuous variables such as
|
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
- **Feature Harmonization**:
|
|
@@ -24,17 +24,17 @@ To ensure the dataset was machine-learning ready, the following preprocessing st
|
|
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Following analysis and correlation review, these 11 features were selected for model training:
|
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
-
-
|
| 28 |
-
-
|
| 29 |
-
-
|
| 30 |
-
-
|
| 31 |
-
-
|
| 32 |
-
-
|
| 33 |
-
-
|
| 34 |
-
-
|
| 35 |
-
-
|
| 36 |
-
-
|
| 37 |
-
-
|
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
These features represent a strong balance between environmental, structural, and planning attributes of the project.
|
| 40 |
|
|
@@ -42,9 +42,9 @@ These features represent a strong balance between environmental, structural, and
|
|
| 42 |
|
| 43 |
### 🚫 Dropped Features:
|
| 44 |
|
| 45 |
-
-
|
| 46 |
-
-
|
| 47 |
-
-
|
| 48 |
|
| 49 |
The final feature set was used to train the **KNearestNeighbors Classifier**, enabling reliable classification of projects into **Low**, **Medium**, **High**,**Critical**.
|
| 50 |
""")
|
|
|
|
| 9 |
To ensure the dataset was machine-learning ready, the following preprocessing steps were applied:
|
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
- **Encoding**:
|
| 12 |
+
- Categorical variables like **Project_Type**, **Methodology_Used**, **Team_Experience_Level**, and **Requirement_Stability** were converted into numerical format using **OrdinalEncoder**, depending on model compatibility.
|
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
- **Scaling**:
|
| 15 |
+
Continuous variables such as **Project_Budget_USD**, **Complexity_Score**, and **Current_Phase_Duration_Months** were normalized using **StandardScaler** to bring features to the same scale and improve model convergence.
|
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
- **Feature Harmonization**:
|
|
|
|
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Following analysis and correlation review, these 11 features were selected for model training:
|
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
+
- **Project_Type**
|
| 28 |
+
- **Team_Size**
|
| 29 |
+
- **Project_Budget_USD**
|
| 30 |
+
- **Estimated_Timeline_Months**
|
| 31 |
+
- **Complexity_Score**
|
| 32 |
+
- **Stakeholder_Count**
|
| 33 |
+
- **Methodology_Used**
|
| 34 |
+
- **Team_Experience_Level**
|
| 35 |
+
- **External_Dependencies_Count**
|
| 36 |
+
- **Requirement_Stability**
|
| 37 |
+
- **Current_Phase_Duration_Months**
|
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
These features represent a strong balance between environmental, structural, and planning attributes of the project.
|
| 40 |
|
|
|
|
| 42 |
|
| 43 |
### 🚫 Dropped Features:
|
| 44 |
|
| 45 |
+
- **Unnamed: 0**: Index column without predictive significance
|
| 46 |
+
- **Past_Similar_Projects**: Removed due to data filtering and possible outliers
|
| 47 |
+
- **Resource_Availability**, **Technical_Debt_Level**, **Seasonal_Risk_Factor**: Removed during feature reduction (assumed from earlier steps)
|
| 48 |
|
| 49 |
The final feature set was used to train the **KNearestNeighbors Classifier**, enabling reliable classification of projects into **Low**, **Medium**, **High**,**Critical**.
|
| 50 |
""")
|