Spaces:
Sleeping
Sleeping
| { | |
| "task_id": 1, | |
| "name": "Basic Prioritization", | |
| "difficulty": "easy", | |
| "description": "Learn to respond to high-priority emails and ignore spam within a normal workday. Time budget is generous — agent can make minor mistakes and still recover. Scoring rewards relationship health (60%) over raw value (40%), teaching the agent that ignoring even one VIP costs more than skipping a spam email saves.", | |
| "num_emails": 20, | |
| "vip_count": 5, | |
| "normal_count": 10, | |
| "spam_count": 5, | |
| "time_budget": 480, | |
| "episode_length": 20, | |
| "avg_minutes_per_email": 24, | |
| "features": { | |
| "action_cost_asymmetry": true, | |
| "dynamic_followups": false, | |
| "time_pressure": "low", | |
| "sunset_penalty": false, | |
| "time_traps": false | |
| }, | |
| "what_agent_must_learn": [ | |
| "Respond to VIP emails — ignoring them costs relationship health", | |
| "Ignore Spam — responding wastes time with zero reward", | |
| "Short high-priority Normal emails are worth responding to", | |
| "Very long low-priority Normal emails may not be worth the time cost" | |
| ], | |
| "scoring": { | |
| "formula": "0.4 * value_efficiency + 0.6 * relationship_health", | |
| "value_efficiency_weight": 0.4, | |
| "relationship_health_weight": 0.6, | |
| "notes": "Relationship health is weighted higher to penalise ignoring VIPs. Value efficiency measures whether the agent responded to emails worth responding to." | |
| } | |
| } |