File size: 37,622 Bytes
9cf1296 f83ba0a 9cf1296 f83ba0a 9cf1296 f83ba0a 9cf1296 f83ba0a 9cf1296 f83ba0a 9cf1296 f83ba0a 9cf1296 f83ba0a 9cf1296 f83ba0a 9cf1296 f83ba0a 9cf1296 f83ba0a 9cf1296 f83ba0a 9cf1296 f83ba0a 9cf1296 f83ba0a 9cf1296 f83ba0a 9cf1296 f83ba0a | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 736 737 738 739 740 741 742 743 744 745 746 747 748 749 750 751 752 753 754 755 756 757 758 759 760 761 762 763 764 765 766 767 768 769 770 771 772 773 774 775 776 777 778 779 780 781 782 783 784 785 786 787 788 789 790 791 792 793 794 795 796 797 798 799 800 801 802 803 804 805 806 807 808 809 810 811 812 813 814 815 816 817 818 819 820 821 822 823 824 825 826 827 828 829 830 831 832 833 834 835 836 837 838 839 840 841 842 843 844 845 846 847 848 849 850 851 852 853 854 855 856 857 858 859 860 861 862 863 864 865 866 867 868 869 870 | """
Taglish Gaslighting Detection - Interactive App
================================================
Sequential pipeline: Binary Detection -> Tactic Identification
Models trained on Philippine political Reddit discourse (Taglish).
Dataset: 928 annotated samples (IAA kappa = 0.81 binary / kappa = 0.86 tactic)
Split: 70 / 15 / 15 (train / val / test)
Usage (Hugging Face Spaces):
Upload this file as app.py in your Space.
Models are loaded directly from Hugging Face Hub.
"""
import os
import traceback
import gradio as gr
import numpy as np
import pandas as pd
import torch
from transformers import AutoModelForSequenceClassification, AutoTokenizer
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
# CONFIGURATION - all performance numbers sourced from training_summary.csv
# (train_model_v6.py run - MCC removed, confusion matrix added)
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
# !! UPDATE THIS to your Hugging Face username !!
HF_USERNAME = "Tokyosaurus"
# Model version - points to v2 repos (balanced + sentence-extracted dataset)
MODEL_VERSION = "v2"
class Config:
# Model registry
# Models are loaded directly from Hugging Face Hub.
# Repo IDs follow the pattern: {HF_USERNAME}/{repo_name}
MODELS = {
"roberta-tagalog": {
"display": "RoBERTa-Tagalog",
"description": "",
"binary_repo": f"{HF_USERNAME}/taglish-roberta-binary-v2",
"tactic_repo": f"{HF_USERNAME}/taglish-roberta-tactic-v2",
"performance": {
# Binary - validation
"val_binary_macro_f1": 0.8460,
"val_binary_gas_p": 0.8788,
"val_binary_gas_r": 0.8056,
"val_binary_gas_f1": 0.8406,
"val_binary_roc_auc": 0.8983,
# Binary - test in-domain
"test_binary_macro_f1": 0.7758,
"test_binary_gas_p": 0.8033,
"test_binary_gas_r": 0.7206,
"test_binary_gas_f1": 0.7597,
"test_binary_roc_auc": 0.8832,
# Tactic - validation
"val_tactic_macro_f1": 0.5984,
"val_tactic_f1_dd": 0.7000,
"val_tactic_f1_tm": 0.2424,
"val_tactic_f1_ci": 0.9000,
"val_tactic_f1_ki": 0.3636,
# Tactic - test in-domain
"test_tactic_macro_f1": 0.6111,
"test_tactic_f1_dd": 0.6250,
"test_tactic_f1_tm": 0.4615,
"test_tactic_f1_ci": 0.8889,
"test_tactic_f1_ki": 0.3077,
},
},
"mbert": {
"display": "mBERT",
"description": "",
"binary_repo": f"{HF_USERNAME}/taglish-mbert-binary-v2",
"tactic_repo": f"{HF_USERNAME}/taglish-mbert-tactic-v2",
"performance": {
# Binary - validation
"val_binary_macro_f1": 0.8460,
"val_binary_gas_p": 0.8788,
"val_binary_gas_r": 0.8056,
"val_binary_gas_f1": 0.8406,
"val_binary_roc_auc": 0.9072,
# Binary - test in-domain
"test_binary_macro_f1": 0.8171,
"test_binary_gas_p": 0.9057,
"test_binary_gas_r": 0.7059,
"test_binary_gas_f1": 0.7934,
"test_binary_roc_auc": 0.9252,
# Tactic - validation
"val_tactic_macro_f1": 0.5670,
"val_tactic_f1_dd": 0.7179,
"val_tactic_f1_tm": 0.3077,
"val_tactic_f1_ci": 0.7826,
"val_tactic_f1_ki": 0.2400,
# Tactic - test in-domain
"test_tactic_macro_f1": 0.4948,
"test_tactic_f1_dd": 0.4848,
"test_tactic_f1_tm": 0.2857,
"test_tactic_f1_ci": 0.6829,
"test_tactic_f1_ki": 0.2308,
},
},
"xlm-roberta": {
"display": "XLM-RoBERTa",
"description": "",
"binary_repo": f"{HF_USERNAME}/taglish-xlm-binary-v2",
"tactic_repo": f"{HF_USERNAME}/taglish-xlm-tactic-v2",
"performance": {
# Binary - validation
"val_binary_macro_f1": 0.8252,
"val_binary_gas_p": 0.8310,
"val_binary_gas_r": 0.8194,
"val_binary_gas_f1": 0.8252,
"val_binary_roc_auc": 0.8891,
# Binary - test in-domain
"test_binary_macro_f1": 0.7828,
"test_binary_gas_p": 0.8167,
"test_binary_gas_r": 0.7206,
"test_binary_gas_f1": 0.7656,
"test_binary_roc_auc": 0.8642,
# Tactic - validation
"val_tactic_macro_f1": 0.5042,
"val_tactic_f1_dd": 0.6977,
"val_tactic_f1_tm": 0.1818,
"val_tactic_f1_ci": 0.6538,
"val_tactic_f1_ki": 0.1905,
# Tactic - test in-domain
"test_tactic_macro_f1": 0.4673,
"test_tactic_f1_dd": 0.5405,
"test_tactic_f1_tm": 0.1000,
"test_tactic_f1_ci": 0.6522,
"test_tactic_f1_ki": 0.2727,
},
},
}
# Labels
BINARY_LABELS = {0: "Non-Gaslighting", 1: "Gaslighting"}
# Tactic model outputs 5 classes (0 = Non-Gaslighting, 1-4 = tactics).
# For display we only show the tactic name when class > 0.
TACTIC_LABELS = {
0: "Non-Gaslighting",
1: "Distortion & Denial",
2: "Trivialization & Minimization",
3: "Coercion & Intimidation",
4: "Knowledge Invalidation",
}
TACTIC_DESCRIPTIONS = {
1: "**Distortion & Denial** - Rewrites or denies documented facts, reshapes past events "
"to alter how they are perceived.",
2: "**Trivialization & Minimization** - Downplays or mocks concerns, frames them as "
"insignificant, exaggerated, or emotionally irrational.",
3: "**Coercion & Intimidation** - Pressures, threatens, or silences through fear, "
"aggression, name-calling, or social dominance.",
4: "**Knowledge Invalidation** - Attacks cognitive capacity specifically; implies the "
"target is incapable of understanding or making valid judgments.",
}
DEVICE = "cuda" if torch.cuda.is_available() else "cpu"
MAX_LENGTH = 128
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
# MODEL CACHE - loads from Hugging Face Hub
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
class ModelCache:
def __init__(self):
self._cache: dict = {}
def load(self, model_key: str) -> dict:
if model_key in self._cache:
return self._cache[model_key]
info = Config.MODELS[model_key]
print(f" Loading {info['display']} from Hugging Face Hub ...")
def _load(repo_id):
print(f" Fetching: {repo_id}")
tok = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained(repo_id)
model = AutoModelForSequenceClassification.from_pretrained(repo_id)
model.to(Config.DEVICE).eval()
return tok, model
try:
b_tok, b_model = _load(info["binary_repo"])
t_tok, t_model = _load(info["tactic_repo"])
except Exception as e:
raise RuntimeError(
f"Failed to load {info['display']} from Hub.\n"
f"Binary repo: {info['binary_repo']}\n"
f"Tactic repo: {info['tactic_repo']}\n"
f"Error: {e}"
)
entry = {
"binary": {"tokenizer": b_tok, "model": b_model},
"tactic": {"tokenizer": t_tok, "model": t_model},
"info": info,
}
self._cache[model_key] = entry
print(f" {info['display']} ready")
return entry
_cache = ModelCache()
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
# INFERENCE HELPERS
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
def _infer(tokenizer, model, text: str):
"""Tokenize, run model, return (probs_np, pred_int, confidence_float)."""
enc = tokenizer(
text,
truncation=True,
max_length=Config.MAX_LENGTH,
padding=True,
return_tensors="pt",
)
enc = {k: v.to(Config.DEVICE) for k, v in enc.items()}
# Strip token_type_ids for models that do not use them
enc.pop("token_type_ids", None)
with torch.no_grad():
logits = model(**enc).logits
probs = torch.softmax(logits, dim=-1)[0].cpu().numpy()
pred = int(np.argmax(probs))
return probs, pred, float(probs[pred])
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
# SINGLE TEXT PREDICTION
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
def predict_sequential(text: str, model_key: str):
if not text or not text.strip():
return "Please enter some text to analyze.", None, None
try:
models = _cache.load(model_key)
info = models["info"]
perf = info["performance"]
# Step 1: Binary
b_probs, b_pred, b_conf = _infer(
models["binary"]["tokenizer"],
models["binary"]["model"],
text,
)
is_gas = b_pred == 1
binary_label = Config.BINARY_LABELS[b_pred]
binary_prob_dict = {
"Non-Gaslighting": float(b_probs[0]),
"Gaslighting": float(b_probs[1]),
}
# Step 2: Tactic (only if gaslighting)
tactic_section = ""
# Zeroed probabilities prevent Gradio UI crashes when text is non-GL
tactic_prob_dict = {
"Distortion & Denial": 0.0,
"Trivialization & Minimization": 0.0,
"Coercion & Intimidation": 0.0,
"Knowledge Invalidation": 0.0,
}
if is_gas:
t_probs, t_pred, t_conf = _infer(
models["tactic"]["tokenizer"],
models["tactic"]["model"],
text,
)
tactic_label = Config.TACTIC_LABELS[t_pred]
tactic_desc = Config.TACTIC_DESCRIPTIONS.get(
t_pred, "_No description available._"
)
# Only expose tactic probabilities for the 4 gaslighting classes
tactic_prob_dict = {
Config.TACTIC_LABELS[i]: float(t_probs[i])
for i in range(1, 5)
}
tactic_section = f"""
### Tactic: {tactic_label}
**Confidence:** {t_conf:.1%}
{tactic_desc}
"""
else:
tactic_section = (
"_No tactic classification - text is Non-Gaslighting._"
)
# Format result card
result = f"""
# Result: {binary_label}
**Binary Confidence:** {b_conf:.1%}
---
{tactic_section}
---
## Model: {info['display']}
| | Validation | Test (In-Domain) |
|---|---|---|
| **Binary Macro-F1** | {perf['val_binary_macro_f1']:.4f} | {perf['test_binary_macro_f1']:.4f} |
| **Gas. Precision / Recall / F1** | {perf['val_binary_gas_p']:.3f} / {perf['val_binary_gas_r']:.3f} / {perf['val_binary_gas_f1']:.3f} | {perf['test_binary_gas_p']:.3f} / {perf['test_binary_gas_r']:.3f} / {perf['test_binary_gas_f1']:.3f} |
| **Binary ROC-AUC** | {perf['val_binary_roc_auc']:.4f} | {perf['test_binary_roc_auc']:.4f} |
| **Tactic Macro-F1** | {perf['val_tactic_macro_f1']:.4f} | {perf['test_tactic_macro_f1']:.4f} |
| **F1: D&D / T&M / C&I / KI** | {perf['val_tactic_f1_dd']:.3f} / {perf['val_tactic_f1_tm']:.3f} / {perf['val_tactic_f1_ci']:.3f} / {perf['val_tactic_f1_ki']:.3f} | {perf['test_tactic_f1_dd']:.3f} / {perf['test_tactic_f1_tm']:.3f} / {perf['test_tactic_f1_ci']:.3f} / {perf['test_tactic_f1_ki']:.3f} |
"""
return result, binary_prob_dict, tactic_prob_dict
except Exception as e:
return f"Error: {e}\n\n{traceback.format_exc()}", None, None
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
# BATCH PREDICTION
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
def batch_predict(file, model_key: str):
try:
df = pd.read_csv(file.name)
if "sentence" not in df.columns:
return pd.DataFrame({"Error": ["CSV must contain a 'sentence' column"]})
models = _cache.load(model_key)
b_tok, b_mod = models["binary"]["tokenizer"], models["binary"]["model"]
t_tok, t_mod = models["tactic"]["tokenizer"], models["tactic"]["model"]
b_labels, b_confs = [], []
t_labels, t_confs = [], []
for text in df["sentence"].astype(str):
b_probs, b_pred, b_conf = _infer(b_tok, b_mod, text)
b_labels.append(Config.BINARY_LABELS[b_pred])
b_confs.append(f"{b_conf:.1%}")
if b_pred == 1:
t_probs, t_pred, t_conf = _infer(t_tok, t_mod, text)
t_labels.append(Config.TACTIC_LABELS[t_pred])
t_confs.append(f"{t_conf:.1%}")
else:
t_labels.append("N/A")
t_confs.append("N/A")
df["binary_prediction"] = b_labels
df["binary_confidence"] = b_confs
df["tactic_prediction"] = t_labels
df["tactic_confidence"] = t_confs
return df
except Exception as e:
return pd.DataFrame({"Error": [str(e)], "Traceback": [traceback.format_exc()]})
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
# EXAMPLE TEXTS (political Taglish, aligned with training domain)
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
EXAMPLES = {
"Distortion & Denial - History rewrite":
"Hindi totoo na may human rights abuses nung Martial Law, gawa-gawa lang yan ng mga kalaban nila.",
"Trivialization & Minimization - Downplay":
"Ang arte niyo naman sa transport strike. Konting lakad lang, nagrereklamo na kayo agad na para kayong pinahirapan ng todo",
"Coercion & Intimidation - Scaring":
"Kung patuloy mong babatikosin ang gobyerno, wag kang magtaka kung may kumatok sa bahay mo isang gabi. Mag-ingat ka sa mga pino-post mo.",
"Knowledge Invalidation - Attacking intellect":
"Ang tanga mo naman mag-analisa ng economic data. Hindi ka economist, hindi mo kaya ang intindihin ang mga numero kahit ipaliwanag pa namin.",
"Non-Gaslighting - Critique":
"I respectfully disagree with this policy. Based on COA findings, the budget allocation lacks transparency and proper documentation.",
"Non-Gaslighting - Questioning":
"Can you provide a reliable source for that claim about the sudden increase in the budget? Gusto ko lang sana mabasa yung full context nung report.",
}
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
# MODEL PROFILES
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
def _model_profile(model_key: str):
strengths = {
"roberta-tagalog": (
"Best tactic Macro-F1 (0.6111) and highest C&I detection (0.8889). "
"Strong ROC-AUC (0.8832) - good probabilistic calibration. "
"Monolingual Filipino pretraining captures Taglish political nuances."
),
"mbert": (
"Best binary Gas-F1 (0.7934) and Macro-F1 (0.8171) on test. "
"Highest ROC-AUC (0.9252) - strongest probabilistic discrimination. "
"Very high precision (0.9057) - fewest false positives."
),
"xlm-roberta": (
"Most balanced binary precision/recall (0.8167/0.7206). "
"Best D&D detection among all models (0.5405). "
"SentencePiece tokenizer handles Tagalog morphology well."
),
}
limitations = {
"roberta-tagalog": (
"T&M remains hard (0.4615 test). "
"Lower binary test Macro-F1 (0.7758) than mBERT. "
"Most domain-specific - may struggle outside political discourse."
),
"mbert": (
"Precision-biased (P=0.9057 > R=0.7059) - misses more gaslighting. "
"Weakest tactic Macro-F1 (0.4948). "
"WordPiece oversegments Tagalog tokens."
),
"xlm-roberta": (
"Lowest tactic Macro-F1 (0.4673). T&M F1 = 0.1000 on test - near-random. "
"Lowest binary ROC-AUC (0.8642). "
"Over-sensitive to domain shift."
),
}
return strengths.get(model_key, ""), limitations.get(model_key, "")
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
# GRADIO INTERFACE
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
def _model_choices():
return [
(f"{Config.MODELS[k]['display']} - {Config.MODELS[k]['description']}", k)
for k in Config.MODELS
]
def create_interface():
css = """
.prediction-output {
font-size: 15px !important;
line-height: 1.8 !important;
padding: 24px !important;
margin-top: 8px !important;
border: 1px solid var(--block-border-color) !important;
border-radius: 10px !important;
background-color: var(--block-background-fill) !important;
color: var(--body-text-color) !important;
}
.gradio-container { max-width: 1400px; margin: auto; }
.model-card {
border: 1px solid var(--block-border-color);
border-radius: 8px;
padding: 15px;
margin: 10px 0;
background-color: var(--block-background-fill);
}
"""
with gr.Blocks(title="Taglish Gaslighting Detector", theme=gr.themes.Soft(), css=css) as app:
gr.Markdown("""
# Taglish Political Gaslighting Detection
**Sequential Pipeline: Binary Detection -> Tactic Identification**
Trained on Philippine political Reddit discourse (r/Philippines, r/PhilippinesPolitics, r/31MillionRegrets).
Dataset: **944 gold-standard samples** - Purely human-annotated - Balanced tactic classes (118 per tactic) - Key-sentence extracted
""")
with gr.Tabs():
# Analyze Text tab
with gr.Tab("Analyze Text"):
gr.Markdown("### Analyze a single Taglish post")
with gr.Row():
with gr.Column(scale=1):
text_input = gr.Textbox(
label="Input text",
placeholder="Paste Tagalog / Taglish text here ...",
lines=6,
)
model_dd = gr.Dropdown(
choices=_model_choices(),
value="roberta-tagalog",
label="Model",
info="RoBERTa-Tagalog is recommended for political Taglish.",
)
analyze_btn = gr.Button("Analyze", variant="primary", size="lg")
gr.Markdown("""
**Model guide (v2 - balanced dataset)**
- **mBERT** - best binary Gas-F1 (0.7934) and Macro-F1 (0.8171); ROC-AUC 0.9252
- **RoBERTa-Tagalog** - best tactic Macro-F1 (0.6111); Gas-F1 0.7597; ROC-AUC 0.8832
- **XLM-RoBERTa** - balanced binary precision/recall (0.8167/0.7206); ROC-AUC 0.8642
""")
with gr.Column(scale=2):
pred_output = gr.Markdown(
label="Result",
elem_classes=["prediction-output"],
)
with gr.Row():
binary_plot = gr.Label(
label="Binary probabilities",
num_top_classes=2,
)
tactic_plot = gr.Label(
label="Tactic probabilities (if gaslighting)",
num_top_classes=4,
)
gr.Markdown("### Quick examples")
example_rows = [
list(EXAMPLES.keys())[:3],
list(EXAMPLES.keys())[3:],
]
for row_keys in example_rows:
with gr.Row():
for name in row_keys:
gr.Button(name, size="sm").click(
fn=lambda n=name: EXAMPLES[n],
inputs=None,
outputs=text_input,
)
analyze_btn.click(
fn=predict_sequential,
inputs=[text_input, model_dd],
outputs=[pred_output, binary_plot, tactic_plot],
)
# Batch Processing tab
with gr.Tab("Batch Processing"):
gr.Markdown("""
### Process multiple texts from a CSV file
Upload a CSV with a `sentence` column.
The pipeline runs binary classification on every row,
then tactic classification on rows flagged as gaslighting.
""")
with gr.Row():
with gr.Column():
file_input = gr.File(label="Upload CSV", file_types=[".csv"])
batch_model = gr.Dropdown(
choices=_model_choices(),
value="roberta-tagalog",
label="Model",
)
process_btn = gr.Button("Process", variant="primary", size="lg")
gr.Markdown("""
**Required CSV format**
```
sentence
"First text here"
"Second text here"
```
""")
with gr.Column():
batch_output = gr.Dataframe(
label="Results preview",
wrap=True,
interactive=False,
)
download_btn = gr.File(label="Download results")
def process_and_save(file, model):
if file is None:
return pd.DataFrame({"Error": ["Please upload a CSV file"]}), None
results = batch_predict(file, model)
out_path = "batch_predictions.csv"
results.to_csv(out_path, index=False, encoding="utf-8-sig")
return results, out_path
process_btn.click(
fn=process_and_save,
inputs=[file_input, batch_model],
outputs=[batch_output, download_btn],
)
# Model Performance tab
with gr.Tab("Model Performance"):
gr.Markdown("## Evaluation Results *(in-domain test set - train_model_v6.py)*")
# Binary table
gr.Markdown("### Binary Classification")
binary_rows = []
for k, info in Config.MODELS.items():
p = info["performance"]
binary_rows.append({
"Model": info["display"],
"Val Macro-F1": f"{p['val_binary_macro_f1']:.4f}",
"Test Gas-P": f"{p['test_binary_gas_p']:.4f}",
"Test Gas-R": f"{p['test_binary_gas_r']:.4f}",
"Test Gas-F1": f"{p['test_binary_gas_f1']:.4f}",
"Test Macro-F1": f"{p['test_binary_macro_f1']:.4f}",
"Test ROC-AUC": f"{p['test_binary_roc_auc']:.4f}",
})
gr.Dataframe(pd.DataFrame(binary_rows), wrap=True)
gr.Markdown("""
> Confusion matrices (2x2 per model) are saved as
> `confusion_matrix_test_id.csv` under each model's output folder.
**Key findings - Binary:**
- **mBERT** achieves the best binary Gas-F1 (0.7934) and Macro-F1 (0.8171) on the test set
- **mBERT** also leads on ROC-AUC (0.9252) - strongest probabilistic discrimination
- **mBERT** is heavily precision-biased (P=0.9057 > R=0.7059) - fewest false positives but misses more true positives
- **RoBERTa-Tagalog** and **XLM-RoBERTa** share the same recall (0.7206) with different precision profiles
- **XLM-RoBERTa** has the most balanced binary precision/recall (0.8167 / 0.7206)
- All 3 models exceed ROC-AUC 0.86 - all are strong probabilistic classifiers
""")
gr.Markdown("---")
# Tactic table
gr.Markdown("### Tactic Classification (5-class: Non-Gas + 4 tactics)")
tactic_rows = []
for k, info in Config.MODELS.items():
p = info["performance"]
tactic_rows.append({
"Model": info["display"],
"Val Macro-F1": f"{p['val_tactic_macro_f1']:.4f}",
"Test Macro-F1": f"{p['test_tactic_macro_f1']:.4f}",
"Test F1 D&D": f"{p['test_tactic_f1_dd']:.4f}",
"Test F1 T&M": f"{p['test_tactic_f1_tm']:.4f}",
"Test F1 C&I": f"{p['test_tactic_f1_ci']:.4f}",
"Test F1 KI": f"{p['test_tactic_f1_ki']:.4f}",
})
gr.Dataframe(pd.DataFrame(tactic_rows), wrap=True)
gr.Markdown("""
> Confusion matrices (5x5 per model) are saved as
> `confusion_matrix_test_id.csv` under each model's output folder.
**Key findings - Tactic:**
- **RoBERTa-Tagalog** leads tactic Macro-F1 (0.6111) - best overall tactic classifier
- **T&M (Trivialization & Minimization) is the hardest tactic** across all models:
RoBERTa 0.4615, mBERT 0.2857, XLM-RoBERTa 0.1000 - sarcasm/dismissal overlaps with normal discourse
- **C&I (Coercion & Intimidation) is the easiest** across all models:
RoBERTa 0.8889, mBERT 0.6829, XLM-RoBERTa 0.6522 - aggressive language is lexically distinctive
- **RoBERTa-Tagalog C&I = 0.8889** - near-perfect detection of intimidation language
- **XLM-RoBERTa T&M = 0.1000** - near-random; sarcasm and dismissal are opaque to cross-lingual models
- **mBERT** has the weakest tactic Macro-F1 (0.4948) despite leading on binary
- Approximately 83 training samples per tactic class remains the primary performance ceiling
**Metric guide (Section 4.5):**
- **Gas-F1** - F1 for the Gaslighting (positive) class; primary binary metric
- **Macro-F1** - equal weight to all classes; primary tactic metric
- **ROC-AUC** - probability calibration; binary only
- **Confusion matrix** - saved per model per test split (binary: 2x2, tactic: 5x5)
""")
gr.Markdown("---")
# Per-model accordions
gr.Markdown("### Per-model full breakdown")
for k, info in Config.MODELS.items():
p = info["performance"]
strengths, limitations = _model_profile(k)
with gr.Accordion(f"{info['display']}", open=False):
gr.Markdown(f"""
**{info['display']}**
**Binary Classification**
| Metric | Validation | Test (In-Domain) |
|--------|-----------|-----------------|
| Macro-F1 | {p['val_binary_macro_f1']:.4f} | {p['test_binary_macro_f1']:.4f} |
| Gas. Precision | {p['val_binary_gas_p']:.4f} | {p['test_binary_gas_p']:.4f} |
| Gas. Recall | {p['val_binary_gas_r']:.4f} | {p['test_binary_gas_r']:.4f} |
| Gas. F1 | {p['val_binary_gas_f1']:.4f} | {p['test_binary_gas_f1']:.4f} |
| ROC-AUC | {p['val_binary_roc_auc']:.4f} | {p['test_binary_roc_auc']:.4f} |
| Confusion matrix | - | confusion_matrix_test_id.csv (2x2) |
**Tactic Classification**
| Metric | Validation | Test (In-Domain) |
|--------|-----------|-----------------|
| Macro-F1 | {p['val_tactic_macro_f1']:.4f} | {p['test_tactic_macro_f1']:.4f} |
| F1 Distortion & Denial | {p['val_tactic_f1_dd']:.4f} | {p['test_tactic_f1_dd']:.4f} |
| F1 Trivialization & Min. | {p['val_tactic_f1_tm']:.4f} | {p['test_tactic_f1_tm']:.4f} |
| F1 Coercion & Intimidation | {p['val_tactic_f1_ci']:.4f} | {p['test_tactic_f1_ci']:.4f} |
| F1 Knowledge Invalidation | {p['val_tactic_f1_ki']:.4f} | {p['test_tactic_f1_ki']:.4f} |
| Confusion matrix | - | confusion_matrix_test_id.csv (5x5) |
**Strengths:** {strengths}
**Limitations:** {limitations}
""")
# Tactics Guide tab
with gr.Tab("Tactics Guide"):
gr.Markdown("## Understanding the 4 Gaslighting Tactics")
with gr.Accordion("Distortion & Denial", open=True):
gr.Markdown("""
**Definition:** Statements that reinterpret, rewrite, or deny reality,
particularly by reshaping past or present events to alter how they are perceived.
**Key linguistic cues:** temporal markers ("dati", "noon", "kanina"),
claims about how events "really" happened, false certainty about another's experience.
**Examples:**
- *"Hindi naman ganyan nangyari dati."*
- *"Walang nangyaring martial law abuses. Propaganda lang yan."*
- *"Binabago mo lang ang mga salita ko para lumabas akong masama."*
""")
with gr.Accordion("Trivialization & Minimization", open=False):
gr.Markdown("""
**Definition:** Statements that downplay or mock concerns, framing them as
insignificant, exaggerated, or emotionally irrational.
**Key linguistic cues:** "OA/arte/joke lang", "di big deal", "move on ka na",
"kalma ka lang".
**Examples:**
- *"Ang liit na bagay, pinapalaki mo."*
- *"Drama mo naman, OA ka talaga."*
- *"Wala namang mangyayari kahit magreklamo ka."*
""")
with gr.Accordion("Coercion & Intimidation", open=False):
gr.Markdown("""
**Definition:** Statements that pressure, threaten, or silence through
fear, aggression, name-calling, or social dominance.
**Key linguistic cues:** demeaning commands ("tumahimik ka na"),
shaming language, bullying phrases intended to suppress speech.
**Note:** Plain blackmail or threats without a gaslighting mechanism
are classified as Non-Gaslighting per the codebook.
**Examples:**
- *"Tumahimik ka na lang, wala kang alam."*
- *"Arte mo, nakakainis ka."*
- *"Mga katulad mo ang dahilan kung bakit hindi makatayo ang Pilipinas."*
""")
with gr.Accordion("Knowledge Invalidation", open=False):
gr.Markdown("""
**Definition:** Statements that attack cognitive capacity specifically -
implying the target is incapable of understanding, reasoning, or making
valid judgments.
**Key linguistic cues:** intelligence insults ("bobo", "tanga",
"mahina umintindi"), claims the person cannot grasp "simple" ideas.
**Examples:**
- *"Hindi mo kasi naiintindihan, ang bobo mo."*
- *"Simple lang yan, di mo pa gets."*
- *"Ang tanga mo naman mag-analisa ng economic data."*
""")
gr.Markdown("""
---
**Decision order (from the annotation codebook):**
1. If threats are central - **Coercion & Intimidation**
2. Else if denial/rewrite drives the move - **Distortion & Denial**
3. Else if downplaying drives the move - **Trivialization & Minimization**
4. Else if cognitive attack is specific - **Knowledge Invalidation**
""")
# About tab
with gr.Tab("About"):
gr.Markdown(f"""
## About This System
### Research Context
Developed as part of a thesis on detecting manipulation in Taglish political discourse.
The system uses a **sequential classification pipeline**:
1. **Binary Classifier** - Gaslighting vs. Non-Gaslighting
2. **Tactic Classifier** - identifies the specific tactic (4 classes + Non-Gaslighting)
### Dataset
| Item | Value |
|------|-------|
| Total annotated rows | 2,134 |
| Inter-annotator kappa (binary) | 0.8133 |
| Inter-annotator kappa (tactic) | 0.8646 |
| Gold-standard rows used | 944 |
| Training / Val / Test split | 662 / 143 / 139 |
| Tactic balance (train) | 83 per tactic class (perfectly balanced) |
| Sentence extraction | Key-sentence heuristic (cue words + position) |
| Sources | r/Philippines, r/PhilippinesPolitics, r/31MillionRegrets |
| Language | Taglish (Tagalog-English code-switching) |
### Best Model Summary (in-domain test set - v2, balanced dataset)
| Task | Best Model | Primary Metric | ROC-AUC | Hardest Tactic |
|------|-----------|---------------|---------|---------------|
| Binary (Gas-F1) | mBERT | Gas-F1 = 0.7934 | 0.9252 | - |
| Binary (ROC-AUC) | mBERT | ROC-AUC = 0.9252 | 0.9252 | - |
| Tactic (Macro-F1) | RoBERTa-Tagalog | Macro-F1 = 0.6111 | - | T&M (F1 = 0.4615) |
### Evaluation Metrics (Section 4.5)
| Task | Metrics |
|------|---------|
| Binary | Gas. Precision, Gas. Recall, Gas. F1, Macro-F1, ROC-AUC, Confusion matrix (2x2) |
| Tactic | Per-class P / R / F1 (D&D, T&M, C&I, KI), Macro-F1, Confusion matrix (5x5) |
Confusion matrices are saved per model under model_outputs/<task>_<model>/confusion_matrix_test_id.csv.
### Technical Details
- Framework: PyTorch + Hugging Face Transformers
- Max sequence length: 128 tokens
- Epochs: up to 8 with early stopping (patience = 3)
- Optimizer: AdamW, lr = 1e-5, warmup ratio = 0.1
- Label smoothing: 0.1
- Checkpoint selection: Gas-F1 (binary), Macro-F1 (tactic)
- Class-weighted cross-entropy loss
- Hardware: {Config.DEVICE.upper()}
### Appropriate Uses
Research on online manipulation, content moderation assistance,
educational tool, supporting human moderators.
### Limitations
Trained on political discourse - performance may degrade on other domains.
Approximately 83 samples per tactic class limits fine-grained detection.
Not a substitute for human judgment. Cultural nuances may be missed.
### Citation
```
Gomez, Tugado (2026). Transformers for Taglish Political Gaslighting:
Binary Detection, Tactic Classification, and Zero-Shot Transfer.
Ateneo De Naga University.
```
---
**Version**: 2.0 - **Updated**: {pd.Timestamp.now().strftime('%B %Y')}
""")
gr.Markdown("""
---
**Disclaimer:** Research prototype. Results should be interpreted carefully and in context.
Always apply human judgment, especially for content moderation decisions.
""")
return app
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
# MAIN
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
if __name__ == "__main__":
print("\n" + "=" * 70)
print("TAGLISH POLITICAL GASLIGHTING DETECTION - APP")
print("=" * 70)
print(f"Device : {Config.DEVICE}")
print("Models will be loaded from Hugging Face Hub on first use.")
print("\nLaunching Gradio ...\n" + "=" * 70)
app = create_interface()
app.launch()
|