const assessmentData = {
  dimensions: [
    {
      name: "Vision Strategy / Ethics",
      weight: 80,
      questions: [
        {
          id: "question_1_vision",
          text: "Is there a clearly defined AI strategy aligned with organizational goals?",
          options: [
            { level: "Curious/Aware", description: "No defined strategy", points: 3 },
            { level: "Experimenting", description: "Informal or fragmented strategy", points: 6 },
            { level: "Adopting", description: "Strategy defined but not fully district-wide", points: 9 },
            { level: "Scaling", description: "Clearly defined and enterprise-aligned strategy", points: 12 },
            { level: "Leading", description: "Fully integrated, measurable AI strategy tied to outcomes", points: 15 }
          ]
        },
        {
          id: "question_2_vision",
          text: "Does leadership actively champion and communicate the AI vision?",
          options: [
            { level: "Curious/Aware", description: "No visible leadership support", points: 2 },
            { level: "Experimenting", description: "Limited executive awareness", points: 4 },
            { level: "Adopting", description: "Some leadership buy-in", points: 6 },
            { level: "Scaling", description: "Strong executive sponsorship", points: 9 },
            { level: "Leading", description: "CEO/Board level advocacy and accountability", points: 12 }
          ]
        },
        {
          id: "question_3_vision",
          text: "Are ethical principles and responsible AI guidelines established?",
          options: [
            { level: "Curious/Aware", description: "No ethical guidelines", points: 2 },
            { level: "Experimenting", description: "Awareness of ethics, no formal policy", points: 5 },
            { level: "Adopting", description: "Basic ethical guidelines in place", points: 8 },
            { level: "Scaling", description: "Comprehensive responsible AI framework", points: 11 },
            { level: "Leading", description: "Industry-leading ethics with external validation", points: 14 }
          ]
        },
        {
          id: "question_4_vision",
          text: "Is there a roadmap for AI initiatives with clear milestones?",
          options: [
            { level: "Curious/Aware", description: "No roadmap exists", points: 2 },
            { level: "Experimenting", description: "Ad-hoc planning", points: 4 },
            { level: "Adopting", description: "Basic roadmap with some milestones", points: 7 },
            { level: "Scaling", description: "Detailed multi-year roadmap", points: 10 },
            { level: "Leading", description: "Dynamic roadmap with continuous review cycles", points: 13 }
          ]
        },
        {
          id: "question_5_vision",
          text: "Are AI success metrics and KPIs defined and tracked?",
          options: [
            { level: "Curious/Aware", description: "No metrics defined", points: 2 },
            { level: "Experimenting", description: "Informal tracking", points: 5 },
            { level: "Adopting", description: "Basic KPIs established", points: 8 },
            { level: "Scaling", description: "Comprehensive metrics dashboard", points: 11 },
            { level: "Leading", description: "Real-time analytics with predictive insights", points: 14 }
          ]
        },
        {
          id: "question_6_vision",
          text: "Is AI aligned with broader digital transformation initiatives?",
          options: [
            { level: "Curious/Aware", description: "No alignment", points: 2 },
            { level: "Experimenting", description: "Minimal connection", points: 4 },
            { level: "Adopting", description: "Some integration with digital strategy", points: 6 },
            { level: "Scaling", description: "Fully integrated with transformation agenda", points: 9 },
            { level: "Leading", description: "AI driving digital transformation", points: 11 }
          ]
        },
        {
          id: "question_7_vision",
          text: "Are stakeholder concerns and feedback incorporated into AI planning?",
          options: [
            { level: "Curious/Aware", description: "No stakeholder engagement", points: 2 },
            { level: "Experimenting", description: "Limited feedback collection", points: 4 },
            { level: "Adopting", description: "Regular stakeholder consultations", points: 6 },
            { level: "Scaling", description: "Systematic feedback loops", points: 9 },
            { level: "Leading", description: "Co-creation with stakeholders", points: 11 }
          ]
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      name: "People & Culture",
      weight: 75,
      questions: [
        {
          id: "question_1_people",
          text: "What is the level of AI literacy across the organization?",
          options: [
            { level: "Curious/Aware", description: "Very low awareness", points: 2 },
            { level: "Experimenting", description: "Small pockets of knowledge", points: 5 },
            { level: "Adopting", description: "Growing awareness with training programs", points: 8 },
            { level: "Scaling", description: "Widespread competency", points: 11 },
            { level: "Leading", description: "Organization-wide AI fluency", points: 14 }
          ]
        },
        {
          id: "question_2_people",
          text: "Are there dedicated AI roles and teams?",
          options: [
            { level: "Curious/Aware", description: "No dedicated resources", points: 2 },
            { level: "Experimenting", description: "Individual champions", points: 4 },
            { level: "Adopting", description: "Small AI team or task force", points: 7 },
            { level: "Scaling", description: "Established AI center of excellence", points: 10 },
            { level: "Leading", description: "AI embedded across all departments", points: 13 }
          ]
        },
        {
          id: "question_3_people",
          text: "Is there ongoing AI training and professional development?",
          options: [
            { level: "Curious/Aware", description: "No training available", points: 2 },
            { level: "Experimenting", description: "Ad-hoc learning opportunities", points: 5 },
            { level: "Adopting", description: "Structured training programs", points: 8 },
            { level: "Scaling", description: "Comprehensive learning pathways", points: 11 },
            { level: "Leading", description: "Continuous learning culture with certifications", points: 14 }
          ]
        },
        {
          id: "question_4_people",
          text: "How open is the culture to experimentation and innovation?",
          options: [
            { level: "Curious/Aware", description: "Risk-averse culture", points: 2 },
            { level: "Experimenting", description: "Some tolerance for pilots", points: 4 },
            { level: "Adopting", description: "Encourages controlled experimentation", points: 6 },
            { level: "Scaling", description: "Innovation is rewarded", points: 9 },
            { level: "Leading", description: "Fail-fast culture with rapid iteration", points: 11 }
          ]
        },
        {
          id: "question_5_people",
          text: "Are change management practices in place for AI adoption?",
          options: [
            { level: "Curious/Aware", description: "No change management", points: 2 },
            { level: "Experimenting", description: "Basic communication plans", points: 4 },
            { level: "Adopting", description: "Structured change processes", points: 7 },
            { level: "Scaling", description: "Comprehensive change management framework", points: 10 },
            { level: "Leading", description: "Adaptive change with continuous feedback", points: 12 }
          ]
        },
        {
          id: "question_6_people",
          text: "Is there collaboration between IT, business units, and educators?",
          options: [
            { level: "Curious/Aware", description: "Siloed departments", points: 2 },
            { level: "Experimenting", description: "Occasional collaboration", points: 4 },
            { level: "Adopting", description: "Regular cross-functional meetings", points: 6 },
            { level: "Scaling", description: "Integrated teams with shared goals", points: 9 },
            { level: "Leading", description: "Seamless collaboration ecosystem", points: 11 }
          ]
        },
        {
          id: "question_7_people",
          text: "Are employees empowered to propose and lead AI initiatives?",
          options: [
            { level: "Curious/Aware", description: "Top-down only", points: 2 },
            { level: "Experimenting", description: "Limited grassroots input", points: 4 },
            { level: "Adopting", description: "Channels for employee ideas", points: 6 },
            { level: "Scaling", description: "Active innovation programs", points: 8 },
            { level: "Leading", description: "Democratized AI with employee ownership", points: 10 }
          ]
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      name: "Data",
      weight: 95,
      questions: [
        {
          id: "question_1_data",
          text: "How mature is your data governance framework?",
          options: [
            { level: "Curious/Aware", description: "No governance in place", points: 2 },
            { level: "Experimenting", description: "Basic policies emerging", points: 5 },
            { level: "Adopting", description: "Formal governance structure", points: 9 },
            { level: "Scaling", description: "Comprehensive data stewardship", points: 13 },
            { level: "Leading", description: "Advanced governance with automation", points: 17 }
          ]
        },
        {
          id: "question_2_data",
          text: "What is the quality and accessibility of your data?",
          options: [
            { level: "Curious/Aware", description: "Poor quality, fragmented", points: 2 },
            { level: "Experimenting", description: "Inconsistent quality, limited access", points: 5 },
            { level: "Adopting", description: "Improving quality, better accessibility", points: 8 },
            { level: "Scaling", description: "High quality, widely accessible", points: 12 },
            { level: "Leading", description: "Trusted data lake/warehouse with self-service", points: 15 }
          ]
        },
        {
          id: "question_3_data",
          text: "Is data integrated across systems and departments?",
          options: [
            { level: "Curious/Aware", description: "Completely siloed", points: 2 },
            { level: "Experimenting", description: "Manual integration efforts", points: 4 },
            { level: "Adopting", description: "Partial automation of data flows", points: 7 },
            { level: "Scaling", description: "Unified data platform", points: 10 },
            { level: "Leading", description: "Real-time data integration across enterprise", points: 13 }
          ]
        },
        {
          id: "question_4_data",
          text: "Are privacy and compliance requirements addressed?",
          options: [
            { level: "Curious/Aware", description: "Minimal compliance awareness", points: 2 },
            { level: "Experimenting", description: "Basic compliance measures", points: 5 },
            { level: "Adopting", description: "Structured compliance program", points: 8 },
            { level: "Scaling", description: "Comprehensive privacy controls", points: 11 },
            { level: "Leading", description: "Privacy by design with continuous auditing", points: 14 }
          ]
        },
        {
          id: "question_5_data",
          text: "Do you have data analytics and AI-ready datasets?",
          options: [
            { level: "Curious/Aware", description: "Raw, unstructured data", points: 2 },
            { level: "Experimenting", description: "Some curated datasets", points: 4 },
            { level: "Adopting", description: "Growing repository of clean data", points: 7 },
            { level: "Scaling", description: "Extensive AI-ready data catalog", points: 10 },
            { level: "Leading", description: "Continuous data pipelines for ML", points: 13 }
          ]
        },
        {
          id: "question_6_data",
          text: "Is there a data dictionary or catalog in use?",
          options: [
            { level: "Curious/Aware", description: "No documentation", points: 2 },
            { level: "Experimenting", description: "Informal documentation", points: 4 },
            { level: "Adopting", description: "Basic data catalog", points: 6 },
            { level: "Scaling", description: "Comprehensive metadata management", points: 9 },
            { level: "Leading", description: "AI-powered data discovery and lineage", points: 11 }
          ]
        },
        {
          id: "question_7_data",
          text: "Are data security measures robust?",
          options: [
            { level: "Curious/Aware", description: "Minimal security", points: 2 },
            { level: "Experimenting", description: "Basic protections", points: 4 },
            { level: "Adopting", description: "Standard security protocols", points: 7 },
            { level: "Scaling", description: "Advanced encryption and access controls", points: 10 },
            { level: "Leading", description: "Zero-trust architecture with AI monitoring", points: 12 }
          ]
        },
        {
          id: "question_8_data",
          text: "Is data used for predictive analytics and decision-making?",
          options: [
            { level: "Curious/Aware", description: "Reactive reporting only", points: 2 },
            { level: "Experimenting", description: "Basic descriptive analytics", points: 4 },
            { level: "Adopting", description: "Some predictive capabilities", points: 6 },
            { level: "Scaling", description: "Regular predictive insights", points: 9 },
            { level: "Leading", description: "Prescriptive AI driving decisions", points: 11 }
          ]
        },
        {
          id: "question_9_data",
          text: "Do you have processes for continuous data quality improvement?",
          options: [
            { level: "Curious/Aware", description: "No quality processes", points: 2 },
            { level: "Experimenting", description: "Occasional data cleaning", points: 4 },
            { level: "Adopting", description: "Defined quality standards", points: 6 },
            { level: "Scaling", description: "Automated quality monitoring", points: 8 },
            { level: "Leading", description: "Self-healing data with AI validation", points: 10 }
          ]
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      name: "Infrastructure / Processes",
      weight: 65,
      questions: [
        {
          id: "question_1_infrastructure",
          text: "What is the state of your technology infrastructure for AI?",
          options: [
            { level: "Curious/Aware", description: "Legacy systems, no AI capability", points: 2 },
            { level: "Experimenting", description: "Limited cloud or compute resources", points: 5 },
            { level: "Adopting", description: "Hybrid infrastructure with some AI tools", points: 9 },
            { level: "Scaling", description: "Scalable cloud platform with AI services", points: 13 },
            { level: "Leading", description: "AI-optimized architecture with edge computing", points: 17 }
          ]
        },
        {
          id: "question_2_infrastructure",
          text: "Are AI tools and platforms accessible to users?",
          options: [
            { level: "Curious/Aware", description: "No AI tools available", points: 2 },
            { level: "Experimenting", description: "Pilot tools for select users", points: 5 },
            { level: "Adopting", description: "Growing suite of AI applications", points: 8 },
            { level: "Scaling", description: "Enterprise-wide AI platform", points: 12 },
            { level: "Leading", description: "Self-service AI with low-code/no-code options", points: 15 }
          ]
        },
        {
          id: "question_3_infrastructure",
          text: "Is there a process for evaluating and adopting new AI technologies?",
          options: [
            { level: "Curious/Aware", description: "No formal process", points: 2 },
            { level: "Experimenting", description: "Ad-hoc evaluations", points: 4 },
            { level: "Adopting", description: "Structured vendor assessment", points: 7 },
            { level: "Scaling", description: "Rigorous evaluation framework", points: 10 },
            { level: "Leading", description: "Continuous innovation pipeline", points: 13 }
          ]
        },
        {
          id: "question_4_infrastructure",
          text: "Are AI workflows integrated into existing business processes?",
          options: [
            { level: "Curious/Aware", description: "Standalone experiments", points: 2 },
            { level: "Experimenting", description: "Some process integration", points: 4 },
            { level: "Adopting", description: "AI embedded in key workflows", points: 6 },
            { level: "Scaling", description: "Seamless process automation", points: 9 },
            { level: "Leading", description: "AI-first process design", points: 11 }
          ]
        },
        {
          id: "question_5_infrastructure",
          text: "Do you have monitoring and maintenance processes for AI systems?",
          options: [
            { level: "Curious/Aware", description: "No monitoring", points: 2 },
            { level: "Experimenting", description: "Manual checks", points: 4 },
            { level: "Adopting", description: "Basic monitoring dashboards", points: 6 },
            { level: "Scaling", description: "Automated monitoring and alerts", points: 8 },
            { level: "Leading", description: "AI-powered observability and self-healing", points: 9 }
          ]
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      name: "Governance",
      weight: 85,
      questions: [
        {
          id: "question_1_governance",
          text: "Is there a governance structure for AI decision-making?",
          options: [
            { level: "Curious/Aware", description: "No governance structure", points: 2 },
            { level: "Experimenting", description: "Informal oversight", points: 5 },
            { level: "Adopting", description: "AI steering committee", points: 9 },
            { level: "Scaling", description: "Cross-functional governance board", points: 13 },
            { level: "Leading", description: "Enterprise AI governance with clear authority", points: 17 }
          ]
        },
        {
          id: "question_2_governance",
          text: "Are roles and responsibilities for AI clearly defined?",
          options: [
            { level: "Curious/Aware", description: "Unclear accountability", points: 2 },
            { level: "Experimenting", description: "Ad-hoc assignments", points: 4 },
            { level: "Adopting", description: "Defined roles (e.g., AI lead)", points: 7 },
            { level: "Scaling", description: "RACI matrix for AI initiatives", points: 10 },
            { level: "Leading", description: "Clear ownership at all levels", points: 13 }
          ]
        },
        {
          id: "question_3_governance",
          text: "Are AI projects prioritized and approved through a formal process?",
          options: [
            { level: "Curious/Aware", description: "No approval process", points: 2 },
            { level: "Experimenting", description: "Informal prioritization", points: 4 },
            { level: "Adopting", description: "Basic project intake process", points: 7 },
            { level: "Scaling", description: "Portfolio management approach", points: 10 },
            { level: "Leading", description: "Value-based prioritization with agile governance", points: 12 }
          ]
        },
        {
          id: "question_4_governance",
          text: "Is there budget allocated and managed for AI initiatives?",
          options: [
            { level: "Curious/Aware", description: "No dedicated budget", points: 2 },
            { level: "Experimenting", description: "Small pilot funding", points: 5 },
            { level: "Adopting", description: "Annual AI budget", points: 8 },
            { level: "Scaling", description: "Multi-year investment plan", points: 11 },
            { level: "Leading", description: "Dynamic budget with ROI tracking", points: 14 }
          ]
        },
        {
          id: "question_5_governance",
          text: "Are vendor and partner relationships managed effectively?",
          options: [
            { level: "Curious/Aware", description: "No vendor management", points: 2 },
            { level: "Experimenting", description: "Transactional relationships", points: 4 },
            { level: "Adopting", description: "Structured vendor agreements", points: 6 },
            { level: "Scaling", description: "Strategic partnerships", points: 9 },
            { level: "Leading", description: "Ecosystem collaboration with governance", points: 11 }
          ]
        },
        {
          id: "question_6_governance",
          text: "Is AI performance measured and reported regularly?",
          options: [
            { level: "Curious/Aware", description: "No reporting", points: 2 },
            { level: "Experimenting", description: "Occasional updates", points: 4 },
            { level: "Adopting", description: "Quarterly reports", points: 7 },
            { level: "Scaling", description: "Real-time dashboards for leadership", points: 10 },
            { level: "Leading", description: "Predictive analytics on AI impact", points: 12 }
          ]
        },
        {
          id: "question_7_governance",
          text: "Are policies in place for AI procurement and deployment?",
          options: [
            { level: "Curious/Aware", description: "No policies", points: 2 },
            { level: "Experimenting", description: "Draft guidelines", points: 4 },
            { level: "Adopting", description: "Approved AI policies", points: 6 },
            { level: "Scaling", description: "Comprehensive policy framework", points: 9 },
            { level: "Leading", description: "Adaptive policies with continuous review", points: 11 }
          ]
        },
        {
          id: "question_8_governance",
          text: "Is there transparency in AI decision-making processes?",
          options: [
            { level: "Curious/Aware", description: "Opaque processes", points: 2 },
            { level: "Experimenting", description: "Limited communication", points: 4 },
            { level: "Adopting", description: "Regular stakeholder updates", points: 6 },
            { level: "Scaling", description: "Open governance with documentation", points: 8 },
            { level: "Leading", description: "Full transparency with explainable AI", points: 10 }
          ]
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      name: "Risk & Security",
      weight: 60,
      questions: [
        {
          id: "question_1_risk",
          text: "Have AI-related risks been identified and assessed?",
          options: [
            { level: "Curious/Aware", description: "No risk assessment", points: 2 },
            { level: "Experimenting", description: "Basic risk awareness", points: 5 },
            { level: "Adopting", description: "Formal risk register", points: 8 },
            { level: "Scaling", description: "Comprehensive risk framework", points: 11 },
            { level: "Leading", description: "Continuous risk monitoring with AI", points: 14 }
          ]
        },
        {
          id: "question_2_risk",
          text: "Are mitigation strategies in place for identified risks?",
          options: [
            { level: "Curious/Aware", description: "No mitigation plans", points: 2 },
            { level: "Experimenting", description: "Reactive responses", points: 4 },
            { level: "Adopting", description: "Proactive risk controls", points: 7 },
            { level: "Scaling", description: "Integrated risk management", points: 10 },
            { level: "Leading", description: "Predictive risk mitigation", points: 12 }
          ]
        },
        {
          id: "question_3_risk",
          text: "Is bias detection and fairness testing conducted on AI models?",
          options: [
            { level: "Curious/Aware", description: "No bias testing", points: 2 },
            { level: "Experimenting", description: "Ad-hoc checks", points: 4 },
            { level: "Adopting", description: "Regular bias audits", points: 7 },
            { level: "Scaling", description: "Automated fairness testing", points: 10 },
            { level: "Leading", description: "Continuous bias monitoring with remediation", points: 12 }
          ]
        },
        {
          id: "question_4_risk",
          text: "Are cybersecurity measures specific to AI in place?",
          options: [
            { level: "Curious/Aware", description: "Standard security only", points: 2 },
            { level: "Experimenting", description: "Basic AI security awareness", points: 4 },
            { level: "Adopting", description: "AI-specific security controls", points: 6 },
            { level: "Scaling", description: "Advanced threat protection for AI", points: 9 },
            { level: "Leading", description: "AI security operations center", points: 11 }
          ]
        },
        {
          id: "question_5_risk",
          text: "Is there a process for incident response and AI system failures?",
          options: [
            { level: "Curious/Aware", description: "No incident plan", points: 2 },
            { level: "Experimenting", description: "Basic troubleshooting", points: 4 },
            { level: "Adopting", description: "Defined incident response", points: 6 },
            { level: "Scaling", description: "Comprehensive IR plan with drills", points: 8 },
            { level: "Leading", description: "Automated incident detection and recovery", points: 10 }
          ]
        },
        {
          id: "question_6_risk",
          text: "Are third-party AI solutions vetted for security and compliance?",
          options: [
            { level: "Curious/Aware", description: "No vetting process", points: 2 },
            { level: "Experimenting", description: "Basic vendor questions", points: 4 },
            { level: "Adopting", description: "Security questionnaires", points: 6 },
            { level: "Scaling", description: "Rigorous third-party assessments", points: 8 },
            { level: "Leading", description: "Continuous vendor risk monitoring", points: 10 }
          ]
        }
      ]
    }
  ]
};

// Maturity level thresholds and colors
const maturityLevels = [
  { name: "Curious/Aware", min: 0, max: 20, color: "#ef4444" },
  { name: "Experimenting", min: 21, max: 40, color: "#f97316" },
  { name: "Adopting", min: 41, max: 60, color: "#eab308" },
  { name: "Scaling", min: 61, max: 80, color: "#22c55e" },
  { name: "Leading", min: 81, max: 100, color: "#3b82f6" }
];