utils.py

import openai 
import os

def get_api_key(local = False):
    if local:
        from dotenv import load_dotenv
        load_dotenv()
    return os.getenv('OPEN_API_KEY')

def get_user_input(prompt):
    return input(prompt)

def choose_cooperation_type():
    choice = get_user_input("Please choose the cooperation type: \n" 
                            +"1. Sequential: human provide an answer first and then AI provide the answer based on it.\n" 
                            +"2. Parallel: human and AI give answers seperately and then AI does the merge.\n")
    if choice == '1':
        return 'sequential'
    elif choice == '2':
        return 'parallel'
    else:
        print("Invalid choice. Please try again.")
        return choose_cooperation_type()

def describe_task():
    task_description = get_user_input("Please describe your task: ")
    if task_description.strip() == "":
        # print("Task description cannot be empty. Please try again.")
        # return describe_task()
        task_description = "Write a poem about the moon in 3 lines."
    return task_description

def generate_text_with_gpt(prompts, api_key = None):
    """Generate text using the GPT-4o model."""
    if api_key:
        openai.api_key = api_key
    try:
        response = openai.ChatCompletion.create(
            model="gpt-4o",
            messages=[
                {"role": "system", "content": "Please perform the tasks as instructed, following the instructions carefully."},
                {"role": "user", "content": prompts}
            ]
        )
        return response['choices'][0]['message']['content']
    except Exception as e:
        print(f"Error occurred when generating texts: {e}")
        return ""


def generate_ai_initial_answer(task_description, api_key=None):
    prompt = f"Given the task: {task_description}, provide an answer: "
    return generate_text_with_gpt(prompt, api_key)

def merge_texts_parallel(task_description, human_text, ai_text, api_key = None):
    prompt = (
    "You are tasked with merging two answers into a single, coherent, and logically structured response. "
    "Your response should synthesize the strengths of both answers, eliminate redundancy, and ensure a logical flow."
    "Follow this structured chain of thought to guide your process:\n\n"
    "1. Understand the Task: Start by carefully analyzing the task description to ensure your final response aligns fully with the objective.\n"
    "2. Extract Key Points: Review both answers and identify the key ideas and arguments they present.\n"
    "3. Resolve Redundancies and Conflicts: Compare the two answers to eliminate repetitive content and resolve any contradictions.\n"
    "4. Integrate Seamlessly: Combine the extracted points into a single, unified response, ensuring a logical and coherent structure.\n"
    "5. Refine for Clarity: Polish the final response for clarity, conciseness, and alignment with the task description below.\n\n"
    "Task Description:\n"
    f"{task_description}\n\n"
    "Answer 1:\n"
    f"{human_text}\n\n"
    "Answer 2:\n"
    f"{ai_text}\n\n"
    "Provide the merged response below."
)
    return generate_text_with_gpt(prompt, api_key)

def merge_texts_sequential(task_description, human_text, api_key = None):
    prompt = (
    f"Given the task: {task_description}, here is the response provided by the human:\n"
    f"{human_text}\n\n"
    "Your task is to refine the human's response while ensuring that the final answer fully aligns with the objectives for this task."
    "Follow this logical chain of thought:\n"
    "1. Understand the Intent: Analyze the human's response to identify their key points and intended message.\n"
    "2. Evaluate Clarity: Check for any ambiguities, gaps, or unclear phrasing in the response.\n"
    "3. Improve Coherence: Ensure the response flows logically and connects ideas seamlessly.\n"
    "4. Enhance Precision: Refine wording to be concise and impactful while preserving the human's original intent.\n"
    "5. Check Alignment: Confirm that the final response accurately represents and strengthens the human's input without introducing unintended changes.\n\n"
    "Provide the refined response below."
)

    return generate_text_with_gpt(prompt, api_key)

def modify_with_suggestion(task_description, text, suggestions, api_key = None):
    prompt = (
    f"Given the task: {task_description}, the provided answer is:\n"
    f"{text}\n\n"
    f"The following suggestions have been made for improvement:\n"
    f"{suggestions}\n\n"
    "Your task is to modify the provided answer by systematically incorporating the suggestions while maintaining clarity, coherence, and alignment with the original task. "
    "Follow this logical chain of thought:\n"
    "1. Understand the Task: Reassess the original task description to ensure the modified answer remains aligned with the requirements.\n"
    "2. Analyze the Suggestions: Break down each suggestion to understand its purpose and how it improves the original answer.\n"
    "3. Apply Improvements: Integrate the suggestions into the answer thoughtfully, ensuring each one is addressed adequately.\n"
    "4. Ensure Coherence: Verify that the modified answer flows logically and maintains a clear structure.\n"
    "5. Preserve Integrity: Ensure the modified answer stays true to the original content while enhancing it as per the suggestions.\n\n"
    "Provide the improved answer below, clearly marked as the revised version."
)
    return generate_text_with_gpt(prompt, api_key)

def get_evaluation_with_gpt(task_description, text, api_key=None):
    prompt = (
    f"Given the task: {task_description}, the provided answer is:\n{text}\n\n"
    "You are tasked with evaluating the answer using a scale from 0 to 10 based on specific criteria. "
    "Follow a structured chain-of-thought approach for your evaluation to ensure thoroughness and objectivity:\n\n"
    "1. Understand the Criteria: Carefully review each evaluation criterion to ensure you fully grasp what is being assessed:\n"
    "   - Novelty: The uniqueness and originality of the ideas.\n"
    "   - Feasibility: The practicality and implementability of suggested actions.\n"
    "   - Inimitability: How difficult for competitors to replicate.\n"
    "   - Alignment: How aligned the ideas are with Airbnb’s business objectives and 17 SDGs.\n\n"
    "2. Analyze the Answer: Break down the answer into its key components and assess how well it meets each criterion.\n"
    "   - Identify strengths, weaknesses, and any gaps in the ideas provided.\n"
    "   - Consider the context of the task and whether the ideas are realistic and relevant.\n\n"
    "3. Assign Scores: Use the following scale to score each criterion:\n"
    "   - 0-2: Poor fit; the idea demonstrates minimal relevance to the criteria.\n"
    "   - 3-5: Partial fit; the idea shows some relevance but contains significant shortcomings.\n"
    "   - 6-8: Good fit; the idea aligns well with the criteria, showing clear relevance and thoughtfulness.\n"
    "   - 9-10: Excellent fit; the idea fully aligns with the criteria, demonstrating exceptional insight.\n"
    "   - Note: Use the entire scoring range (0-10) and avoid defaulting to mid-range scores. If the provided answer is vague or off-topic, assign scores between 0-5.\n\n"
    "4. Justify Each Score: Provide a brief explanation for each score, highlighting specific aspects of the answer that influenced your evaluation.\n\n"
    "You should format your output exactly as follows:\n"
    "Novelty: [Score] - [Justification]\n"
    "Feasibility: [Score] - [Justification]\n"
    "Inimitability: [Score] - [Justification]\n"
    "Alignment: [Score] - [Justification]\n\n"
    "Output your evaluation below:"
)

    return generate_text_with_gpt(prompt, api_key)

def display_merged_output(session_index, session_manager):
    session = session_manager.get_session(session_index)
    return session['merged_final_answer']