Spaces:
Running on Zero
Running on Zero
File size: 10,116 Bytes
6bcf4a2 | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 | """Evaluation harness.
This is the part of the project that makes the rest trustworthy. Any RAG demo
can produce an answer; the question a reviewer actually cares about is whether
you can tell when it gets worse. So every change is measured against a fixed
golden set, the numbers are written to a JSON report, and CI fails the build
when they fall below the thresholds in evals/thresholds.json.
The suite is deliberately runnable with no API key. The offline provider
composes real extractive answers from the retrieved passages, so citation and
groundedness metrics stay meaningful, while retrieval metrics do not depend on
a language model at all. A green CI run therefore means something even though
it never made a network call.
"""
from __future__ import annotations
import json
import time
from collections.abc import Sequence
from dataclasses import asdict, dataclass, field
from datetime import UTC, datetime
from pathlib import Path
from typing import TYPE_CHECKING, Any
from secrag.core.config import Settings, get_settings
from secrag.core.logging import get_logger
from secrag.core.types import AnswerStatus, QueryRequest
from secrag.engine import QueryEngine, build_engine
from secrag.evaluation import metrics
from secrag.evaluation.goldens import GoldenCase, load_goldens
from secrag.observability.tracing import span
if TYPE_CHECKING:
from rich.console import Console
log = get_logger(__name__)
DEFAULT_THRESHOLDS: dict[str, float] = {
"hit_rate@6": 0.80,
"ndcg@6": 0.55,
"mrr": 0.60,
"citation_validity": 0.95,
"groundedness": 0.40,
"numeric_accuracy": 0.90,
"routing_accuracy": 0.80,
"refusal_correctness": 0.90,
}
def thresholds_path(settings: Settings | None = None) -> Path:
settings = settings or get_settings()
return settings.project_root / "evals" / "thresholds.json"
def load_thresholds(settings: Settings | None = None) -> dict[str, float]:
path = thresholds_path(settings)
if not path.exists():
return dict(DEFAULT_THRESHOLDS)
payload = json.loads(path.read_text(encoding="utf-8"))
# Keys beginning with an underscore are documentation, not thresholds.
overrides = {k: float(v) for k, v in payload.items() if not k.startswith("_")}
return {**DEFAULT_THRESHOLDS, **overrides}
@dataclass(slots=True)
class CaseResult:
id: str
question: str
intent: str
predicted_intent: str
status: str
scores: dict[str, float] = field(default_factory=dict)
latency_ms: float = 0.0
n_contexts: int = 0
error: str | None = None
@property
def routed_correctly(self) -> bool:
return self.intent == self.predicted_intent
@dataclass(slots=True)
class EvaluationResult:
cases: list[CaseResult] = field(default_factory=list)
summary: dict[str, float] = field(default_factory=dict)
thresholds: dict[str, float] = field(default_factory=dict)
failures: list[str] = field(default_factory=list)
reranker: str = "cross_encoder"
corpus_chunks: int = 0
duration_s: float = 0.0
provider: str = ""
@property
def passed(self) -> bool:
return not self.failures
def to_dict(self) -> dict[str, Any]:
return {
"generated_at": datetime.now(UTC).isoformat(),
"reranker": self.reranker,
"provider": self.provider,
"corpus_chunks": self.corpus_chunks,
"duration_s": round(self.duration_s, 2),
"n_cases": len(self.cases),
"summary": self.summary,
"thresholds": self.thresholds,
"passed": self.passed,
"failures": self.failures,
"cases": [asdict(c) for c in self.cases],
}
def render(self, console: Console) -> None:
from rich.table import Table
table = Table(title=f"Evaluation ({len(self.cases)} cases, reranker={self.reranker})")
table.add_column("Metric")
table.add_column("Value", justify="right")
table.add_column("Threshold", justify="right")
table.add_column("Status", justify="center")
for name in sorted(set(self.summary) | set(self.thresholds)):
value = self.summary.get(name)
threshold = self.thresholds.get(name)
if value is None:
continue
if threshold is None:
verdict = "[dim]-[/dim]"
elif value >= threshold:
verdict = "[green]PASS[/green]"
else:
verdict = "[red]FAIL[/red]"
table.add_row(
name,
f"{value:.4f}",
f"{threshold:.4f}" if threshold is not None else "-",
verdict,
)
console.print(table)
if failed := [c for c in self.cases if c.error]:
console.print(f"[red]{len(failed)} cases errored[/red]")
for case in failed[:5]:
console.print(f" [red]{case.id}[/red]: {case.error}")
if self.failures:
console.print("[bold red]Thresholds not met:[/bold red]")
for failure in self.failures:
console.print(f" [red]{failure}[/red]")
else:
console.print("[bold green]All thresholds met[/bold green]")
async def evaluate_case(
engine: QueryEngine, case: GoldenCase, *, reranker: str, k: int
) -> CaseResult:
"""Run one golden case and score it."""
request = QueryRequest(
question=case.question,
top_k=max(k, 6),
companies=case.companies,
fiscal_years=case.fiscal_years,
reranker=reranker,
use_cache=False, # caching between cases would invalidate the measurement
)
try:
with span("eval_case", case=case.id):
response = await engine.answer(request)
except Exception as exc:
log.warning("eval_case_failed", case=case.id, error=str(exc))
return CaseResult(
id=case.id,
question=case.question,
intent=case.intent,
predicted_intent="",
status="error",
error=f"{type(exc).__name__}: {exc}",
)
relevance = metrics.relevance_vector(
response.contexts, case.expected_sections, case.expected_terms
)
answer = response.answer
scores: dict[str, float] = {
f"hit_rate@{k}": metrics.hit_rate_at_k(relevance, k),
f"precision@{k}": metrics.precision_at_k(relevance, k),
f"recall@{k}": metrics.recall_at_k(relevance, k),
f"ndcg@{k}": metrics.ndcg_at_k(relevance, k),
"mrr": metrics.reciprocal_rank(relevance),
"citation_validity": metrics.citation_validity(answer.text, len(response.contexts)),
"citation_density": metrics.citation_density(answer.text),
"groundedness": answer.groundedness,
}
if case.must_include:
scores["answer_coverage"] = metrics.answer_contains(answer.text, case.must_include)
if case.is_numeric:
computed = next((r.value for r in response.numeric_results if r.value is not None), None)
accuracy = metrics.numeric_accuracy(computed, case.expected_value, case.tolerance_pct)
if accuracy is not None:
scores["numeric_accuracy"] = accuracy
# A case marked expect_refusal is testing that the system declines rather
# than inventing an answer. Scoring it on retrieval quality would be
# backwards, so it is scored on whether it refused.
refused = answer.status is not AnswerStatus.OK
scores["refusal_correctness"] = float(refused == case.expect_refusal)
predicted = response.route.intent.value if response.route else ""
scores["routing_accuracy"] = float(predicted == case.intent)
return CaseResult(
id=case.id,
question=case.question,
intent=case.intent,
predicted_intent=predicted,
status=answer.status.value,
scores={k_: round(v, 4) for k_, v in scores.items()},
latency_ms=response.latency_ms,
n_contexts=len(response.contexts),
)
async def run_evaluation(
*,
reranker: str = "cross_encoder",
report_path: Path | None = None,
settings: Settings | None = None,
cases: Sequence[GoldenCase] | None = None,
engine: QueryEngine | None = None,
) -> EvaluationResult:
"""Run the full golden set and produce a scored report."""
settings = settings or get_settings()
started = time.perf_counter()
golden_cases = list(cases) if cases is not None else load_goldens(settings=settings)
engine = engine or build_engine(settings)
engine.retriever.ensure_ready()
k = settings.eval_k
accumulator = metrics.MetricAccumulator()
results: list[CaseResult] = []
for case in golden_cases:
case_result = await evaluate_case(engine, case, reranker=reranker, k=k)
results.append(case_result)
for name, value in case_result.scores.items():
accumulator.add(name, value)
summary = accumulator.summary()
thresholds = load_thresholds(settings)
failures = [
f"{name}: {summary[name]:.4f} < {threshold:.4f}"
for name, threshold in thresholds.items()
if name in summary and summary[name] < threshold
]
if errored := [r for r in results if r.error]:
failures.append(f"{len(errored)} cases raised an exception")
result = EvaluationResult(
cases=results,
summary=summary,
thresholds=thresholds,
failures=failures,
reranker=reranker,
corpus_chunks=engine.retriever.corpus_size,
duration_s=time.perf_counter() - started,
provider=",".join(getattr(engine.generator.provider, "describe", lambda: [])()),
)
path = report_path or (settings.project_root / "evals" / "reports" / "latest.json")
path.parent.mkdir(parents=True, exist_ok=True)
path.write_text(json.dumps(result.to_dict(), indent=2), encoding="utf-8")
log.info(
"evaluation_complete",
cases=len(results),
passed=result.passed,
report=str(path),
duration_s=round(result.duration_s, 2),
)
return result
|