File size: 8,358 Bytes
099bec8
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
#!/usr/bin/env python
"""Run-1 specific trace demo: trained 0.6B (300 steps) vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct.

The trained model doesn't beat the larger instruct baseline on `final_score`
(both struggle to clear FormatCheck on held-out), but it DOES win clearly on
question efficiency, runtime, and avoidance of `<think>` token-waste. This
script picks a few comparable scenarios that make those wins legible.

Picks:
  - A scenario where 4B-Instruct hits the 6-question cap but the trained
    model hands back a plan in <=2 steps (efficiency win).
  - A scenario where 4B-Instruct succeeded (score > 0) β€” shows the gap that
    more training will close.
  - A scenario where the trained model attempted a plan but with the wrong
    schema β€” illustrates the failure mode for the writeup.

Usage:
    python scripts/make_trace_demo_run1.py \
        --base outputs/eval_qwen3-4b-instruct_n30.json \
        --trained outputs/run1_artifacts/eval_clarify-rl-grpo-qwen3-0-6b_n50_thinkfix.json \
        --out docs/trace_demo_run1.md
"""

from __future__ import annotations

import argparse
import json
from pathlib import Path
from typing import Any


def _load(path: str) -> dict[str, Any]:
    return json.loads(Path(path).read_text())


def _index(eval_dict: dict[str, Any]) -> dict[str, dict[str, Any]]:
    return {r["scenario_id"]: r for r in eval_dict.get("results", [])}


def _format_breakdown(bd: dict[str, float] | None) -> str:
    if not bd:
        return "_no breakdown_"
    parts = []
    for k in ("FormatCheckRubric", "FieldMatchRubric", "InfoGainRubric", "QuestionEfficiencyRubric", "HallucinationCheckRubric"):
        v = bd.get(k)
        if v is None:
            continue
        try:
            parts.append(f"{k.replace('Rubric','')}={float(v):.2f}")
        except (TypeError, ValueError):
            parts.append(f"{k}=?")
    return " Β· ".join(parts) if parts else "_no breakdown_"


def _render_messages(messages: list[dict[str, Any]] | None, max_chars: int = 350) -> str:
    if not messages:
        return "_(no messages captured)_"
    lines: list[str] = []
    for m in messages[:30]:
        role = m.get("role", "?")
        content = (m.get("content") or "").strip()
        if len(content) > max_chars:
            content = content[: max_chars - 1] + "…"
        if not content:
            continue
        lines.append(f"**{role}**: {content}")
    return "\n\n".join(lines)


def _pick_scenarios(
    base_idx: dict[str, dict[str, Any]],
    trained_idx: dict[str, dict[str, Any]],
) -> list[tuple[str, str]]:
    """Return list of (scenario_id, label) tuples β€” picks 3 illustrative cases."""
    common = sorted(set(base_idx) & set(trained_idx))
    picks: list[tuple[str, str]] = []

    base_winners = sorted(
        [sid for sid in common if (base_idx[sid].get("final_score") or 0) > 0],
        key=lambda s: -(base_idx[s].get("final_score") or 0),
    )
    if base_winners:
        picks.append((base_winners[0], "Untrained 4B WIN β€” gap that more training closes"))

    eff = sorted(
        common,
        key=lambda s: (
            (trained_idx[s].get("questions_asked") or 0)
            - (base_idx[s].get("questions_asked") or 0)
        ),
    )
    for sid in eff:
        if sid in {p[0] for p in picks}:
            continue
        delta = (base_idx[sid].get("questions_asked") or 0) - (trained_idx[sid].get("questions_asked") or 0)
        if delta >= 3:
            picks.append((sid, "Question efficiency win β€” trained asks far fewer"))
            break

    for sid in common:
        if sid in {p[0] for p in picks}:
            continue
        b = base_idx[sid]
        t = trained_idx[sid]
        if (t.get("questions_asked") or 0) >= 1 and (t.get("final_score") or 0) == 0:
            picks.append((sid, "Failure mode β€” trained submits wrong-schema plan"))
            break

    if len(picks) < 3 and common:
        for sid in common:
            if sid not in {p[0] for p in picks}:
                picks.append((sid, "Comparable scenario"))
            if len(picks) >= 3:
                break
    return picks[:3]


def _emit(out_path: Path, base: dict, trained: dict, picks: list[tuple[str, str]]) -> None:
    base_idx = _index(base)
    trained_idx = _index(trained)

    base_label = "Qwen3-4B-Instruct (untrained)"
    trained_label = "Qwen3-0.6B GRPO (300 steps, run-1)"

    parts: list[str] = []
    parts.append(f"# Run-1 trace demo β€” {trained_label} vs {base_label}")
    parts.append("")
    parts.append("Three illustrative scenarios from the held-out eval set. Both models fail FormatCheck most of the time, but the trained 0.6B already shows clear behavioural shifts: fewer questions, no `<think>` token-waste, faster turnaround.")
    parts.append("")
    parts.append(f"- Base: `{base.get('summary', {}).get('model', 'Qwen/Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507')}` (n={base.get('summary', {}).get('scenarios_total', '?')})")
    parts.append(f"- Trained: `{trained.get('summary', {}).get('model', 'agarwalanu3103/clarify-rl-grpo-qwen3-0-6b')}` (n={trained.get('summary', {}).get('scenarios_total', '?')})")
    parts.append(f"- Avg questions: base **{base.get('summary', {}).get('avg_questions', '?'):.2f}**, trained **{trained.get('summary', {}).get('avg_questions', '?'):.2f}**")
    parts.append(f"- Eval runtime: base **{base.get('summary', {}).get('elapsed_s', 0):.0f}s** / 30 scenarios, trained **{trained.get('summary', {}).get('elapsed_s', 0):.0f}s** / 50 scenarios")
    parts.append("")
    parts.append("---")
    parts.append("")

    for i, (sid, label) in enumerate(picks, 1):
        b = base_idx[sid]
        t = trained_idx[sid]

        family = b.get("family", "?")
        difficulty = b.get("task_id", b.get("difficulty", "?"))
        request_full = (b.get("request") or t.get("request") or "")
        request = request_full.split("USER REQUEST:")[-1].strip()
        request = request.split("You have")[0].strip()
        if len(request) > 200:
            request = request[:200] + "…"

        parts.append(f"## {i}. {label}")
        parts.append("")
        parts.append(f"**Scenario:** `{sid}` β€” family=`{family}`, task=`{difficulty}`")
        parts.append("")
        parts.append(f"**Request:** {request}")
        parts.append("")
        parts.append("| Run | Score | Q's asked | Runtime | Rubric breakdown |")
        parts.append("|-----|-------|-----------|---------|------------------|")
        parts.append(
            f"| {base_label} | **{float(b.get('final_score', 0.0)):.2f}** | "
            f"{b.get('questions_asked', 0)} | "
            f"{b.get('elapsed_s', 0):.1f}s | "
            f"{_format_breakdown(b.get('score_breakdown'))} |"
        )
        parts.append(
            f"| {trained_label} | **{float(t.get('final_score', 0.0)):.2f}** | "
            f"{t.get('questions_asked', 0)} | "
            f"{t.get('elapsed_s', 0):.1f}s | "
            f"{_format_breakdown(t.get('score_breakdown'))} |"
        )
        parts.append("")
        parts.append(f"<details><summary><b>{base_label} trace</b></summary>")
        parts.append("")
        parts.append(_render_messages(b.get("messages")))
        parts.append("")
        parts.append("</details>")
        parts.append("")
        parts.append(f"<details><summary><b>{trained_label} trace</b></summary>")
        parts.append("")
        parts.append(_render_messages(t.get("messages")))
        parts.append("")
        parts.append("</details>")
        parts.append("")
        parts.append("---")
        parts.append("")

    out_path.parent.mkdir(parents=True, exist_ok=True)
    out_path.write_text("\n".join(parts))
    print(f"[ok] wrote {out_path}  ({len(picks)} scenarios, {out_path.stat().st_size} bytes)")


def main() -> None:
    parser = argparse.ArgumentParser(description=__doc__, formatter_class=argparse.RawDescriptionHelpFormatter)
    parser.add_argument("--base", required=True)
    parser.add_argument("--trained", required=True)
    parser.add_argument("--out", default="docs/trace_demo_run1.md")
    args = parser.parse_args()

    base = _load(args.base)
    trained = _load(args.trained)
    picks = _pick_scenarios(_index(base), _index(trained))
    if not picks:
        print("[warn] No comparable scenarios found")
        return
    _emit(Path(args.out), base, trained, picks)


if __name__ == "__main__":
    main()