Spaces:
Running on Zero
Running on Zero
File size: 16,002 Bytes
d6b0b7a 4bb7968 d6b0b7a | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 | """
Physics-informed loss terms for streamflow prediction on the reach graph.
Four constraints, each tied to real structure the graph now actually
has (see src/graph/build_reach_graph.py):
1. confluence_mass_balance_loss -- new mass genuinely enters (is_confluence)
2. split_rejoin_conservation_loss -- no new mass, paired via braid_id
3. routing_consistency_loss -- travel-time lag from distance_km/elevation_drop_m
4. water_balance_loss -- P - ET - Q - deltaS ~= 0 per node
All four apply graph-wide, not just at the 27 gauged nodes -- that's the
actual mechanism by which sparse labels generalize to ~4,500 ungauged
nodes, not an incidental detail.
No model exists yet, so these are standalone functions operating on
whatever Q tensor a model eventually produces. They use only operations
that behave identically on a torch.Tensor or a plain numpy array
(indexing, elementwise arithmetic, sum, mean) so the same code path is
testable now with numpy and will work unchanged with real torch tensors
and real gradients once a model exists -- verified by testing this
module against numpy inputs directly.
"""
from typing import Dict, List, Optional, Tuple
import numpy as np
import pandas as pd
try:
import torch
_HAS_TORCH = True
except ImportError:
_HAS_TORCH = False
def _mse(residual):
"""
Mean squared residual, NaN-masked -- works identically on numpy or
torch. Real ground-truth Q is naturally, heavily NaN (only real
gauges with real observations ever have a value; confirmed against
real data: ~93.5% NaN for the reach graph's discharge tensor) --
without masking, ANY single NaN anywhere in the residual poisons
the entire mean to NaN, which isn't a rare edge case for this data,
it's the normal shape of it. Returns NaN only if truly nothing
usable exists (every entry NaN), which is a real "no data" signal
worth surfacing, not silently averaging to 0 and implying perfect
physics satisfaction when there was actually no evidence either way.
"""
if _HAS_TORCH and isinstance(residual, torch.Tensor):
mask = ~torch.isnan(residual)
if not mask.any():
return residual.sum() * float("nan")
return (residual[mask] ** 2).mean()
mask = ~np.isnan(residual)
if not mask.any():
return np.nan
return (residual[mask] ** 2).mean()
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
# 1. Confluence mass balance: Q_confluence ~= sum(Q_upstream_branches)
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
def build_confluence_index(nodes_df: pd.DataFrame, edges_df: pd.DataFrame) -> List[Tuple[int, List[int]]]:
"""
Precompute, once per graph (not per training step), which node
indices feed into each real confluence. Returns
[(confluence_idx, [upstream_idx, ...]), ...] using positional
indices into nodes_df (0..n-1), matching how a model's output
tensor would be laid out.
Splitting this out from the loss function itself means the loss can
just do array indexing every step -- the graph structure doesn't
change between training steps, so there's no reason to recompute
which nodes are involved in each confluence on every call.
"""
code_to_idx = {code: i for i, code in enumerate(nodes_df["station_code"])}
confluence_codes = set(nodes_df[nodes_df["is_confluence"]]["station_code"])
pairs = []
for conf_code in confluence_codes:
upstream = edges_df[edges_df["target"] == conf_code]["source"].tolist()
upstream_idx = [code_to_idx[u] for u in upstream if u in code_to_idx]
if len(upstream_idx) >= 2:
pairs.append((code_to_idx[conf_code], upstream_idx))
return pairs
def confluence_mass_balance_loss(Q, confluence_index: List[Tuple[int, List[int]]]):
"""
For each real confluence, predicted discharge there should
approximately equal the sum of its upstream branches' predicted
discharge -- new mass genuinely enters at a confluence (an
independent tributary catchment), so this is a straightforward sum,
unlike the split/rejoin case below.
Ignores travel time between the branches and the confluence (an
instantaneous-mass approximation) -- see routing_consistency_loss
for the piece that accounts for lag separately.
Args:
Q: predicted discharge, shape [n_nodes] (one timestep) or
[n_nodes, T] (multiple timesteps, this loss applies per
timestep the same way).
confluence_index: from build_confluence_index.
Returns:
Scalar loss (0.0, on the same array type as Q, if no confluences).
"""
if not confluence_index:
return Q.sum() * 0.0 # zero, but keeps dtype/type consistent (torch-safe)
residuals = []
for conf_idx, upstream_idx in confluence_index:
upstream_sum = Q[upstream_idx[0]]
for idx in upstream_idx[1:]:
upstream_sum = upstream_sum + Q[idx]
residuals.append(Q[conf_idx] - upstream_sum)
if _HAS_TORCH and isinstance(Q, torch.Tensor):
residual_stack = torch.stack(residuals)
else:
residual_stack = np.stack(residuals)
return _mse(residual_stack)
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
# 2. Split/rejoin conservation: Q_split ~= Q_rejoin (no new mass between them)
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
def build_braid_index(nodes_df: pd.DataFrame) -> List[Tuple[int, int]]:
"""
Precompute (split_idx, rejoin_idx) pairs from the saved braid_id
column (see build_reach_graph.py's pair_splits_and_rejoins). Same
precompute-once rationale as build_confluence_index.
"""
code_to_idx = {code: i for i, code in enumerate(nodes_df["station_code"])}
pairs = []
for _, row in nodes_df[nodes_df["braid_id"].notna()].iterrows():
rejoin_code, split_code = row["station_code"], row["braid_id"]
if rejoin_code in code_to_idx and split_code in code_to_idx:
pairs.append((code_to_idx[split_code], code_to_idx[rejoin_code]))
return pairs
def split_rejoin_conservation_loss(Q, braid_index: List[Tuple[int, int]]):
"""
For each matched split/rejoin pair, predicted discharge should be
approximately equal at both ends -- the same water dividing into
parallel channels and recombining adds no new mass, unlike a real
confluence (see confluence_mass_balance_loss). This is a genuinely
different physical constraint, not a weaker version of the same one:
a model that learned "sum inflows" generically would get this wrong,
since a rejoin's two branches together should equal the SPLIT's
single value, not add something new on top of it.
Args:
Q: predicted discharge, shape [n_nodes] or [n_nodes, T].
braid_index: from build_braid_index.
Returns:
Scalar loss (0.0 if no braids in this graph).
"""
if not braid_index:
return Q.sum() * 0.0
split_idx = [s for s, _ in braid_index]
rejoin_idx = [r for _, r in braid_index]
residual = Q[split_idx] - Q[rejoin_idx]
return _mse(residual)
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
# 3. Routing: travel-time lag from real channel distance and slope
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
def estimate_travel_time_hours(
distance_km,
elevation_drop_m,
min_velocity_ms: float = 0.1,
max_velocity_ms: float = 3.0,
velocity_coefficient: float = 1.0,
) -> float:
"""
Rough channel-flow velocity from slope, in the spirit of Manning's
equation's slope dependence (v ~ sqrt(slope)) without the channel
geometry/roughness terms Manning's actually needs, which we don't
have real data for -- explicitly an approximation, not a full
hydraulic solve. Slope = elevation_drop_m / (distance_km * 1000).
Clamped to [min_velocity_ms, max_velocity_ms] since a near-zero or
negative slope (a virtually flat reach, or a data artifact) would
otherwise give a nonsensical near-infinite or negative travel time.
Returns:
Travel time in hours for water to traverse this edge.
"""
distance_m = distance_km * 1000.0
slope = np.clip(elevation_drop_m / np.maximum(distance_m, 1.0), 1e-6, None)
velocity = np.clip(velocity_coefficient * np.sqrt(slope) * 10.0, min_velocity_ms, max_velocity_ms)
return distance_m / velocity / 3600.0
def build_routing_index(
nodes_df: pd.DataFrame, edges_df: pd.DataFrame, timestep_hours: float = 24.0,
) -> List[Tuple[int, int, int]]:
"""
Precompute (upstream_idx, downstream_idx, lag_timesteps) for every
edge, rounding each edge's estimated travel time to the nearest
whole timestep -- e.g. a 30-hour travel time at a 24-hour (daily)
timestep rounds to a 1-step lag. An edge whose travel time rounds to
0 is still included (same-timestep routing, lag=0).
"""
code_to_idx = {code: i for i, code in enumerate(nodes_df["station_code"])}
pairs = []
for _, e in edges_df.iterrows():
if e["source"] not in code_to_idx or e["target"] not in code_to_idx:
continue
drop = e["elevation_drop_m"] if pd.notna(e["elevation_drop_m"]) else 0.1
hours = estimate_travel_time_hours(e["distance_km"], max(drop, 0.1))
lag = int(round(hours / timestep_hours))
pairs.append((code_to_idx[e["source"]], code_to_idx[e["target"]], lag))
return pairs
def routing_consistency_loss(Q, routing_index: List[Tuple[int, int, int]]):
"""
Q at a downstream node at time t should approximately equal Q at its
upstream node at time (t - lag), lag coming from real distance and
slope (build_routing_index) -- not just "conserve mass at the same
instant," which routing_consistency_loss's siblings above assume as
a simplification. This is the piece that makes that simplification
less necessary over time: a well-trained model satisfying this loss
is learning the actual travel-time behavior of each reach.
Args:
Q: predicted discharge, shape [n_nodes, T] -- REQUIRES a time
dimension, unlike the other three losses, since travel-time
lag is meaningless for a single instant.
routing_index: from build_routing_index.
Returns:
Scalar loss (0.0 if no edges have a usable lag within Q's time range).
"""
T = Q.shape[1]
residuals = []
for up_idx, down_idx, lag in routing_index:
if lag >= T:
continue # this edge's travel time exceeds the whole prediction window
if lag == 0:
residuals.append(Q[down_idx, :] - Q[up_idx, :])
else:
residuals.append(Q[down_idx, lag:] - Q[up_idx, :-lag])
if not residuals:
return Q.sum() * 0.0
if _HAS_TORCH and isinstance(Q, torch.Tensor):
residual_cat = torch.cat(residuals)
else:
residual_cat = np.concatenate(residuals)
return _mse(residual_cat)
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
# 4. Water balance: P - ET - Q - deltaS ~= 0, per node
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
def water_balance_loss(
Q_m3s,
precip_mm,
evap_mm,
catchment_area_km2,
period_days: float = 365.0,
delta_storage_m3: Optional[object] = None,
):
"""
Precipitation minus evapotranspiration minus discharge minus storage
change should balance to ~0, in volume terms, over the given period.
UNIT CONVERSION (the easy part to get subtly wrong): 1 mm of depth
over 1 km^2 is 1000 m^3 (1 km^2 = 1e6 m^2, 1 mm = 1e-3 m,
1e6 * 1e-3 = 1e3). P and ET (mm, over the period) get converted to
m^3 via catchment_area_km2 before comparing against Q, which is
converted from a rate (m^3/s) to a volume by multiplying by the
period length in seconds.
delta_storage_m3 defaults to zero (a steady-state approximation) --
we have no direct storage measurement (soil moisture, groundwater
volume change) in this project's data, only groundwater LEVEL at
sparse wells, which isn't the same thing as a basin-wide storage
volume. Treating deltaS as strictly zero is a real, named
approximation, not a hidden one -- pass a nonzero delta_storage_m3
if a proxy for it becomes available later (e.g. derived from
groundwater level trend where well coverage allows it).
Args:
Q_m3s: predicted discharge, shape [n_nodes] (period-average rate).
precip_mm, evap_mm: node features, already available.
catchment_area_km2: from catchment.py -- NaN for ungauged/unknown
catchments, in which case that node is excluded from this
loss entirely (silently including it with a wrong/zero area
would corrupt the term, not just add noise).
period_days: length of the period P/ET/Q are aggregated over.
delta_storage_m3: optional storage change; zero-array default.
Returns:
Scalar loss, computed only over nodes with a real catchment area.
"""
valid = ~np.isnan(catchment_area_km2) if not _HAS_TORCH or not isinstance(catchment_area_km2, torch.Tensor) \
else ~torch.isnan(catchment_area_km2)
period_seconds = period_days * 86400.0
Q_volume_m3 = Q_m3s * period_seconds
P_volume_m3 = precip_mm * catchment_area_km2 * 1000.0
ET_volume_m3 = evap_mm * catchment_area_km2 * 1000.0
dS = delta_storage_m3 if delta_storage_m3 is not None else (Q_m3s * 0.0)
residual = P_volume_m3 - ET_volume_m3 - Q_volume_m3 - dS
residual_valid = residual[valid]
if (residual_valid.shape[0] if hasattr(residual_valid, "shape") else len(residual_valid)) == 0:
return Q_m3s.sum() * 0.0
return _mse(residual_valid)
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
# Combined loss
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
def physics_informed_loss(
Q_supervised_pred, Q_supervised_true, gauged_mask,
Q_full, confluence_index, braid_index,
weights: Optional[Dict[str, float]] = None,
Q_timeseries=None, routing_index=None,
precip_mm=None, evap_mm=None, catchment_area_km2=None,
) -> Dict[str, float]:
"""
Combines the supervised loss (masked to gauged nodes) with all
physics terms that have the inputs to compute (routing and water
balance are optional -- they need a time dimension / climate data
respectively, which not every training step may have on hand).
Returns a dict of every individual term plus 'total', rather than
just the summed scalar -- so it's possible to see which physics
term is actually driving the loss during training, not just that
"the loss" went up or down.
"""
weights = weights or {"confluence": 1.0, "split_rejoin": 1.0, "routing": 1.0, "water_balance": 1.0}
supervised_residual = (Q_supervised_pred - Q_supervised_true)[gauged_mask]
losses = {"supervised": _mse(supervised_residual)}
losses["confluence"] = confluence_mass_balance_loss(Q_full, confluence_index)
losses["split_rejoin"] = split_rejoin_conservation_loss(Q_full, braid_index)
if Q_timeseries is not None and routing_index is not None:
losses["routing"] = routing_consistency_loss(Q_timeseries, routing_index)
if precip_mm is not None and evap_mm is not None and catchment_area_km2 is not None:
losses["water_balance"] = water_balance_loss(Q_full, precip_mm, evap_mm, catchment_area_km2)
total = losses["supervised"]
for name, w_key in [("confluence", "confluence"), ("split_rejoin", "split_rejoin"),
("routing", "routing"), ("water_balance", "water_balance")]:
if name in losses:
total = total + weights.get(w_key, 1.0) * losses[name]
losses["total"] = total
return losses |