aibyml's picture
Upload 2 files
b92688d verified
import gradio as gr
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
from openai import OpenAI
import random
import time
from dotenv import load_dotenv
import os
# Load environment variables
load_dotenv()
# Initialize OpenAI client
client = OpenAI()
# Define benchmark prompt
PROMPT_A = "Benchmark Human-like Template"
PROMPT_B = "Custom Template"
template_messages_A = [
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are a helpful assistant that always answers questions. Keep it short. Answer like you are a real human. For example, you can use emotions, metaphors and proverbs. Try to always be positive, and help the user with their questions, doubts and problems. Don't be pessimistic."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "{question}"
}
]
def format_messages(template, question):
return [
{
"role": msg["role"],
"content": msg["content"].format(question=question)
}
for msg in template
]
def run_agent(question: str, group: str, custom_template: str):
if group == "A":
messages = format_messages(template_messages_A, question)
else:
# Use custom template for group B
template_messages_B = [
{
"role": "system",
"content": custom_template
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "{question}"
}
]
messages = format_messages(template_messages_B, question)
# Run GPT
completion = client.chat.completions.create(
model="gpt-4o",
messages=messages
)
return completion.choices[0].message.content
def analyze_response(text):
messages = [
{"role": "system", "content": "You are trained to analyze and detect the sentiment of given text."},
{"role": "user", "content": f"""Analyze the following recommendation and determine if the output is human-like. Check if there are emotions used, and metaphors and figure of speech.
Assign a score: Based on your evaluation assign a score to the agent's performans using the following scale:
- 1 (Poor): The agent is very machine like, doesn't use emotions, methaphors and figure of speech.
- 2 (Fair): The agent is some human-likeness, some emotions, methaphors and figure of speech are used
- 3 (Good): The agent is is human-like, uses enough emotions, methaphors and figure of speech.
- 4 (Very Good): The agent very human-like, uses multiple emotions, methaphors and figure of speech.
- 5 (Excellent): You almost cannot distinguish between the machine and the human, a lot emotions, methaphors and figure of speech are used.
After evaluating the conversation based on the criteria above, provide your score as an integer between 1 and 5. Only answer with a single character in the following value {1, 2, 3, 4, 5}.
Don't provide explanations, only the single integer value.
Text to evaluate:
{text}
Scoring Output:
"""}
]
response = client.chat.completions.create(
model="gpt-4o",
messages=messages,
max_tokens=1,
n=1,
stop=None,
temperature=0
)
return int(response.choices[0].message.content)
def create_plot(scores_A, scores_B):
labels = ['Benchmark', 'Custom']
colors = ['#2DD4BF', '#F43F5E']
fig, ax = plt.subplots()
ax.set_ylabel('Human-like score')
ax.set_ylim([0, 5])
bplot = ax.boxplot([scores_A, scores_B],
patch_artist=True,
tick_labels=labels)
for patch, color in zip(bplot['boxes'], colors):
patch.set_facecolor(color)
return fig
def run_experiment(questions, custom_template):
results_A = []
results_B = []
all_responses = []
for question in questions:
# Randomly assign group
group = "A" if random.random() < 0.5 else "B"
# Get response
response = run_agent(question, group, custom_template)
# Analyze response
score = analyze_response(response)
# Store results
if group == "A":
results_A.append(score)
else:
results_B.append(score)
all_responses.append({
"question": question,
"group": "Benchmark" if group == "A" else "Custom",
"response": response,
"score": score
})
# Create visualization
fig = create_plot(results_A, results_B)
return results_A, results_B, all_responses, fig
def gradio_interface(questions, custom_template):
# Split questions into list
question_list = [q.strip() for q in questions.split('\n') if q.strip()]
# Run experiment
scores_A, scores_B, responses, fig = run_experiment(question_list, custom_template)
# Format detailed results
detailed_results = ""
for r in responses:
detailed_results += f"Question: {r['question']}\n"
detailed_results += f"Template: {r['group']}\n"
detailed_results += f"Response: {r['response']}\n"
detailed_results += f"Score: {r['score']}\n"
detailed_results += "-" * 50 + "\n"
# Calculate averages
avg_A = sum(scores_A) / len(scores_A) if scores_A else 0
avg_B = sum(scores_B) / len(scores_B) if scores_B else 0
summary = f"""
Summary:
Benchmark Template - Average Score: {avg_A:.2f}
Custom Template - Average Score: {avg_B:.2f}
Number of responses:
Benchmark Template: {len(scores_A)}
Custom Template: {len(scores_B)}
"""
return fig, summary, detailed_results
# Create Gradio interface
iface = gr.Interface(
fn=gradio_interface,
inputs=[
gr.Textbox(
lines=5,
placeholder="Enter questions (one per line)...",
label="Questions"
),
gr.Textbox(
lines=3,
placeholder="Enter your custom template prompt design...",
label="Check How Human Your Template Prompt (different GPTs could have different scores)",
value="You are a helpful assistant that always answers questions. Keep it short."
)
],
outputs=[
gr.Plot(label="Results Visualization"),
gr.Textbox(label="Summary", lines=6),
gr.Textbox(label="Detailed Results", lines=10)
],
title="A/B Testing Prompt Template Design Analysis",
description="Compare prompt template design of your chatbot against a benchmark human-like template design and analyze your chatbot human-likeness scores.",
examples=[
["What should I do when I feel sad?\nWhat do you think about falling in love?\nWhat do you think about getting divorced?\nWhat should I do when I feel happy?",
"You are a helpful assistant that always answers questions. Keep it short and professional."]
]
)
if __name__ == "__main__":
iface.launch()