Spaces:
Sleeping
Sleeping
File size: 3,971 Bytes
a559920 ceafbec a559920 ceafbec a559920 ceafbec a559920 ceafbec a559920 ceafbec a559920 ceafbec a559920 ceafbec a559920 |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 |
def specific_idea_sections():
return {
"problem_pain": {
"section": "problem_pain",
"display_name": "Problem & Pain Points",
"description": "Gather evidence that the stated problem exists, is painful, urgent, and repeated. Quantify impact if possible.",
"facets": ["frequency", "severity", "customer_types", "evidence"],
"example_queries": [
"\"<TOPIC>\" delays costs enterprise",
"\"<TOPIC>\" SLA breach case study"
]
},
"buyer_budget_owner": {
"section": "buyer_budget_owner",
"display_name": "Buyer & Budget Analysis",
"description": "Identify who buys/approves solutions. Which department owns the budget? Who influences decisions?",
"facets": ["buyers", "budget_lines", "decision_influencers"],
"example_queries": [
"\"<TOPIC>\" budget owner CIO",
"\"<TOPIC>\" procurement process"
]
},
"roi_story": {
"section": "roi_story",
"display_name": "ROI & Business Case",
"description": "Look for metrics and case studies showing ROI from similar solutions. Capture before/after comparisons.",
"facets": ["baseline_cost", "improved_metric", "before_after"],
"example_queries": [
"\"<TOPIC>\" ROI case study",
"\"<TOPIC>\" before after savings"
]
},
"defensibility": {
"section": "defensibility",
"display_name": "Defensibility & Moats",
"description": "Identify moats: data, integration depth, workflow lock-in, network effects. Contrast with incumbents.",
"facets": ["moats", "switching_costs", "integration_barriers", "data_lock_in"],
"example_queries": [
"\"<TOPIC>\" competitor analysis",
"\"<TOPIC>\" defensibility"
]
},
"comp_landscape": {
"section": "comp_landscape",
"display_name": "Competitive Landscape",
"description": "List competitors, substitutes, adjacent solutions. Map their positioning and weaknesses.",
"facets": ["competitors", "alternatives", "substitutes", "strengths_weaknesses"],
"example_queries": [
"\"<TOPIC>\" competitors",
"\"<TOPIC>\" alternatives substitutes"
]
},
"gtm_channels": {
"section": "gtm_channels",
"display_name": "Go-to-Market Channels",
"description": "Investigate possible GTM motions: PLG, integrations, channel partners, direct enterprise sales. Rank feasibility.",
"facets": ["plg", "integrations", "direct_sales", "partners"],
"example_queries": [
"\"<TOPIC>\" GTM strategy",
"\"<TOPIC>\" marketplace integration"
]
},
"risks": {
"section": "risks",
"display_name": "Risks & Threats",
"description": "Find risks: regulatory, security, adoption, BigTech incumbents solving it. Include 'if Google ships this tomorrow' thought.",
"facets": ["regulatory_risks", "security_risks", "adoption_risks", "incumbent_threats"],
"example_queries": [
"\"<TOPIC>\" security issues",
"\"BigTech\" <TOPIC> automation"
]
},
# "experiments_next_30d": {
# "section": "experiments_next_30d",
# "description": "Propose falsifiable experiments for this idea: landing pages, customer interviews, prototypes. Metrics for success.",
# "facets": ["experiments", "metrics", "timeline"],
# "example_queries": [
# "\"MVP <TOPIC>\" pilot study",
# "\"customer interviews\" <TOPIC> pain"
# ]
# },
} |