{ "schema_version": 2, "title": "Reproduction: Randomized Feasibility Methods for Constrained Optimization with Adaptive Step Sizes", "emoji": "🎯", "space_id": "amkkk/repro-randomized-feasibility-methods-for-constrained-bayesian-optimization", "paper": { "arxiv_id": "2601.20076" }, "tags": [ "icml2026-repro", "paper-1BchRVONfp" ], "updated_at": "2026-07-23T00:38:40+00:00", "root": { "slug": "index", "title": "Reproduction: Randomized Feasibility Methods for Constrained Optimization with Adaptive Step Sizes", "file": "pages/index.md", "children": [ { "slug": "executive-summary", "title": "Executive summary", "file": "pages/executive-summary/page.md", "children": [] }, { "slug": "claim-1-algorithm-2-gradient-method-with-adaptive-polyak-stepsize-linear-convergence-o-log-1-epsilon", "title": "Claim 1: Algorithm 2 gradient method with adaptive Polyak stepsize, linear convergence O(log(1/epsilon))", "file": "pages/claim-1-algorithm-2-gradient-method-with-adaptive-polyak-stepsize-linear-convergence-o-log-1-epsilon/page.md", "children": [] }, { "slug": "claim-2-algorithm-3-dows-with-randomized-feasibility-o-1-sqrt-t-rate", "title": "Claim 2: Algorithm 3 DoWS with randomized feasibility, O(1/sqrt(T)) rate", "file": "pages/claim-2-algorithm-3-dows-with-randomized-feasibility-o-1-sqrt-t-rate/page.md", "children": [] }, { "slug": "claim-3-algorithm-4-t-dows-removes-bounded-y-requirement-o-1-sqrt-t-up-to-log-factors", "title": "Claim 3: Algorithm 4 T-DoWS removes bounded Y requirement, O(1/sqrt(T)) up to log factors", "file": "pages/claim-3-algorithm-4-t-dows-removes-bounded-y-requirement-o-1-sqrt-t-up-to-log-factors/page.md", "children": [] }, { "slug": "claim-4-lemma-3-1-geometric-infeasibility-decay-under-randomized-feasibility-updates", "title": "Claim 4: Lemma 3.1 geometric infeasibility decay under randomized feasibility updates", "file": "pages/claim-4-lemma-3-1-geometric-infeasibility-decay-under-randomized-feasibility-updates/page.md", "children": [] }, { "slug": "claim-5-qcqp-simulations-confirm-theory-on-function-decay-and-infeasibility-reduction", "title": "Claim 5: QCQP simulations confirm theory on function decay and infeasibility reduction", "file": "pages/claim-5-qcqp-simulations-confirm-theory-on-function-decay-and-infeasibility-reduction/page.md", "children": [] }, { "slug": "claim-6-svm-classification-on-3-datasets-algorithms-3-4-vs-primal-dual-baseline", "title": "Claim 6: SVM classification on 3 datasets, Algorithms 3-4 vs primal-dual baseline", "file": "pages/claim-6-svm-classification-on-3-datasets-algorithms-3-4-vs-primal-dual-baseline/page.md", "children": [] }, { "slug": "conclusion", "title": "Conclusion", "file": "pages/conclusion/page.md", "children": [] }, { "slug": "methods-provenance", "title": "Methods / provenance", "file": "pages/methods-provenance/page.md", "children": [] } ] }, "traces": [], "workspace": { "file": "workspace.json", "file_count": 0, "total_size": 0, "bucket_id": null }, "agent_view_tokens": 5818, "trace_view_tokens": 10, "workspace_view_tokens": 8, "revision": "8031b1ca467e7c3b8944" }