| { |
| "schema_version": 1, |
| "title": "Repro - Explaining Concept Shift with Interpretable Feature Attribution", |
| "emoji": "🎯", |
| "space_id": "arvkevi/sgshift-concept-shift-repro", |
| "paper": { |
| "arxiv_id": "2505.20634", |
| "openreview_id": "wpKA7G7Cqu", |
| "title": "Explaining Concept Shift with Interpretable Feature Attribution" |
| }, |
| "tags": [ |
| "icml2026-repro", |
| "paper-wpKA7G7Cqu" |
| ], |
| "updated_at": "2026-07-16T11:18:31+00:00", |
| "root": { |
| "slug": "index", |
| "title": "Repro - Explaining Concept Shift with Interpretable Feature Attribution", |
| "file": "pages/index.md", |
| "children": [ |
| { |
| "slug": "claim-1-5-semi-synthetic-benchmark-table-2", |
| "title": "Claim 1 & 5: Semi-synthetic benchmark (Table 2)", |
| "file": "pages/claim-1-5-semi-synthetic-benchmark-table-2/page.md", |
| "children": [] |
| }, |
| { |
| "slug": "claim-2-diabetes-recall", |
| "title": "Claim 2: Diabetes recall", |
| "file": "pages/claim-2-diabetes-recall/page.md", |
| "children": [] |
| }, |
| { |
| "slug": "claim-3-sample-efficiency-figure-1", |
| "title": "Claim 3: Sample efficiency (Figure 1)", |
| "file": "pages/claim-3-sample-efficiency-figure-1/page.md", |
| "children": [] |
| }, |
| { |
| "slug": "claim-4-real-data-sparse-shift-figure-2", |
| "title": "Claim 4: Real-data sparse shift (Figure 2)", |
| "file": "pages/claim-4-real-data-sparse-shift-figure-2/page.md", |
| "children": [] |
| }, |
| { |
| "slug": "conclusion", |
| "title": "Conclusion", |
| "file": "pages/conclusion/page.md", |
| "children": [] |
| } |
| ] |
| }, |
| "agent_view_tokens": 5153, |
| "revision": "1784200711177767000" |
| } |