Spaces:
Running on Zero
Running on Zero
File size: 41,814 Bytes
9936912 | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 736 737 738 739 740 741 742 743 744 745 746 747 748 749 750 751 752 753 754 755 756 757 758 759 760 761 762 763 764 765 766 767 768 769 770 771 772 773 774 775 776 777 778 779 780 781 782 783 784 785 786 787 788 789 790 791 792 793 794 795 796 797 798 799 800 801 802 803 804 805 806 807 808 809 810 811 812 813 814 815 816 817 818 819 820 821 822 823 824 825 826 827 828 829 830 831 832 833 834 835 836 837 838 839 840 841 842 843 844 845 846 847 848 849 850 851 852 853 854 855 856 857 858 859 860 861 862 863 864 865 866 867 868 869 870 871 872 873 874 875 876 877 878 879 880 881 882 883 884 885 886 887 888 889 890 891 892 893 894 895 896 897 898 899 900 901 902 903 904 905 906 907 908 909 910 911 912 913 914 915 916 917 918 919 920 921 922 923 924 925 926 927 928 929 930 931 932 933 934 935 936 937 938 939 940 941 942 943 944 945 946 947 948 949 950 951 952 953 954 955 956 957 958 959 960 961 962 963 964 965 966 967 968 969 970 971 972 973 974 975 976 977 978 979 980 981 982 983 984 985 986 987 988 989 990 991 992 993 994 995 996 997 998 999 1000 1001 1002 1003 1004 1005 1006 1007 1008 1009 1010 1011 1012 | """Family-diverse, solver-backed advanced, nonlinear, robust, and adaptive SFT generators with Chain of Thought (CoT)."""
from __future__ import annotations
import math
from collections.abc import Callable
import numpy as np
from scipy import linalg
from controlai_data.schema import make_record
OPENERS = (
"Provide a rigorous engineering analysis for the following advanced control problem.",
"Compute the requested quantities and state the decisive criterion.",
"Work this nonlinear/robust control problem step-by-step with verified values.",
"Derive the requested objects from the stated model; show intermediate equations.",
)
NONLINEAR = ["astrom_murray_feedback_systems_1e"]
ROBUST = ["boyd_lmi_system_control", "mit_ocw_6_245_multivariable_control"]
ADAPTIVE = ["astrom_murray_feedback_systems_1e"]
IDENTIFICATION = ["stanford_ee263_course_reader"]
NETWORKED = ["boyd_lmi_system_control"]
def n(x: float) -> str:
if abs(x) < 5e-11:
x = 0.0
return f"{x:.6g}"
def mat(x: np.ndarray) -> str:
return repr(np.asarray(x, dtype=float).tolist())
def roots(x: np.ndarray) -> list[list[float]]:
x = np.asarray(x, dtype=complex)
x = x[np.lexsort((x.imag, x.real))]
return [[float(v.real), float(v.imag)] for v in x]
def cubic_equilibria(rng: np.random.Generator, index: int) -> dict:
del rng
a = 0.4 + 0.035 * index
b = 0.7 + 0.025 * index
r = math.sqrt(a / b)
eq = [-r, 0.0, r]
derivatives = [a - 3 * b * x * x for x in eq]
labels = ["locally asymptotically stable" if d < 0 else "unstable" for d in derivatives]
prompt = f"{OPENERS[index%4]} For x_dot={n(a)}x-{n(b)}x^3, find every equilibrium and classify each by linearization."
eval_steps = "\n".join(
f"- At $x = {n(x)}$: $f'({n(x)}) = {n(a)} - 3({n(b)})({n(x)})^2 = {n(d)}$ ({'< 0: stable' if d < 0 else '> 0: unstable'})"
for x, d in zip(eq, derivatives)
)
answer = (
f"### 1. Equilibrium Points Calculation\n"
f"Setting $\\dot{{x}} = f(x) = {n(a)}x - {n(b)}x^3 = x({n(a)} - {n(b)}x^2) = 0$:\n"
f"$$x_1 = -\\sqrt{{{n(a)}/{n(b)}}} = {n(-r)}, \\quad x_2 = 0, \\quad x_3 = \\sqrt{{{n(a)}/{n(b)}}} = {n(r)}$$\n\n"
f"### 2. Linearization and Stability\n"
f"The Jacobian derivative is $f'(x) = {n(a)} - 3({n(b)}) x^2 = {n(a)} - {n(3*b)} x^2$:\n"
f"{eval_steps}\n\n"
f"### 3. Conclusion\n"
f"The equilibria are {list(map(float, eq))}. Their classifications are: {labels}."
)
return make_record(
record_id=f"cubic_equilibria_{index:05d}",
domain="nonlinear_control",
family="scalar_cubic_multiple_equilibria",
task_type="derivation",
difficulty="intermediate",
template_id=f"cubic_equilibria_prompt_{index%4}",
prompt=prompt,
answer=answer,
ground_truth={
"kind": "cubic_equilibria",
"a": a,
"b": b,
"equilibria": eq,
"derivatives": derivatives,
"stable": [d < 0 for d in derivatives],
},
source_refs=NONLINEAR,
verifier="verify_cubic_equilibria",
)
def nonlinear_jacobian(rng: np.random.Generator, index: int) -> dict:
del rng
a = 0.5 + 0.04 * index
b = 0.8 + 0.03 * index
J = np.array([[-a, 0], [1, -b]], float)
poles = np.linalg.eigvals(J)
prompt = (
f"{OPENERS[index%4]} Linearize x1_dot=-{n(a)}x1+x2^2, x2_dot=-{n(b)}x2+sin(x1) at the origin. "
"Report the Jacobian, eigenvalues, and local conclusion."
)
answer = (
f"### 1. Jacobian Matrix at Origin $(0, 0)$\n"
f"$$J = \\begin{{bmatrix}} \\frac{{\\partial f_1}}{{\\partial x_1}} & \\frac{{\\partial f_1}}{{\\partial x_2}} \\\\ \\frac{{\\partial f_2}}{{\\partial x_1}} & \\frac{{\\partial f_2}}{{\\partial x_2}} \\end{{bmatrix}}_{{(0,0)}} = \\begin{{bmatrix}} -{n(a)} & 2 x_2 \\\\ \\cos(x_1) & -{n(b)} \\end{{bmatrix}}_{{(0,0)}} = \\begin{{bmatrix}} -{n(a)} & 0 \\\\ 1 & -{n(b)} \\end{{bmatrix}} = {mat(J)}$$\n\n"
f"### 2. Eigenvalues and Local Stability\n"
f"Since $J$ is lower triangular, its eigenvalues are the diagonal entries:\n"
f"$$\\lambda(J) = \\{{-{n(a)}, -{n(b)}\\}} = \\{{{', '.join(n(float(x.real)) for x in poles)}\\}}$$\n\n"
f"### 3. Conclusion\n"
f"Both eigenvalues have strictly negative real parts ($\\text{{Re}}(\\lambda_i) < 0$), so the origin is **locally exponentially stable**."
)
return make_record(
record_id=f"nonlinear_jacobian_{index:05d}",
domain="nonlinear_control",
family="nonlinear_jacobian_local_stability",
task_type="derivation",
difficulty="intermediate",
template_id=f"nonlinear_jacobian_prompt_{index%4}",
prompt=prompt,
answer=answer,
ground_truth={
"kind": "nonlinear_jacobian",
"a": a,
"b": b,
"J": J.tolist(),
"poles": roots(poles),
"locally_stable": True,
},
source_refs=NONLINEAR,
verifier="verify_nonlinear_jacobian",
)
def scalar_lyapunov(rng: np.random.Generator, index: int) -> dict:
del rng
a = 0.2 + 0.025 * index
b = 0.4 + 0.03 * index
prompt = (
f"{OPENERS[index%4]} For x_dot=-{n(a)}x-{n(b)}x^3, use V=x^2/2 to compute V_dot and give the strongest global stability conclusion."
)
answer = (
f"### 1. Lyapunov Candidate Function\n"
f"$V(x) = \\frac{{1}}{{2}} x^2$ is positive definite ($V(x) > 0, \\forall x \\ne 0$, $V(0) = 0$) and radially unbounded ($V(x) \\to \\infty$ as $|x| \\to \\infty$).\n\n"
f"### 2. Time Derivative Along Trajectories\n"
f"$$\\dot{{V}}(x) = x \\dot{{x}} = x (-{n(a)}x - {n(b)}x^3) = -{n(a)}x^2 - {n(b)}x^4$$\n"
f"Since $a = {n(a)} > 0$ and $b = {n(b)} > 0$, $\\dot{{V}}(x) < 0$ strictly for all $x \\ne 0$.\n\n"
f"### 3. Conclusion\n"
f"By Barbashin-Krasovskii theorem, the origin is **globally asymptotically stable** (and locally exponentially stable due to the linear term)."
)
return make_record(
record_id=f"scalar_lyapunov_{index:05d}",
domain="nonlinear_control",
family="scalar_linear_cubic_lyapunov",
task_type="derivation",
difficulty="foundation",
template_id=f"scalar_lyapunov_prompt_{index%4}",
prompt=prompt,
answer=answer,
ground_truth={
"kind": "scalar_linear_cubic_lyapunov",
"a": a,
"b": b,
"global_asymptotic": True,
"local_exponential": True,
},
source_refs=NONLINEAR,
verifier="verify_scalar_linear_cubic_lyapunov",
)
def quadratic_lyapunov_2d(rng: np.random.Generator, index: int) -> dict:
del rng
a = 0.5 + 0.03 * index
b = 1.0 + 0.04 * index
p1 = 1.0 + 0.02 * index
p2 = 0.7 + 0.015 * index
A = np.diag([-a, -b])
P = np.diag([p1, p2])
Q = -(A.T @ P + P @ A)
qe = np.linalg.eigvalsh(Q)
prompt = (
f"{OPENERS[index%4]} For x_dot=Ax with A={mat(A)}, test V=x^T P x using P={mat(P)}. "
"Compute -V_dot=x^T Qx and verify definiteness."
)
answer = (
f"### 1. Lyapunov Derivative Matrix $Q$\n"
f"For $V(x) = x^T P x$, $\\dot{{V}}(x) = x^T (A^T P + P A) x = -x^T Q x$, where $Q = -(A^T P + P A)$:\n"
f"$$Q = -\\begin{{bmatrix}} -2 a p_1 & 0 \\\\ 0 & -2 b p_2 \\end{{bmatrix}} = \\begin{{bmatrix}} 2({n(a)})({n(p1)}) & 0 \\\\ 0 & 2({n(b)})({n(p2)}) \\end{{bmatrix}} = {mat(Q)}$$\n\n"
f"### 2. Definiteness Assessment\n"
f"Eigenvalues of $Q$: $\\lambda(Q) = {list(map(float, qe))}$. Both are strictly positive, so $Q > 0$.\n\n"
f"### 3. Conclusion\n"
f"Since $P > 0$ and $Q > 0$, $\\dot{{V}} = -x^T Q x < 0$, proving the origin is **globally exponentially stable**."
)
return make_record(
record_id=f"quadratic_lyapunov_2d_{index:05d}",
domain="nonlinear_control",
family="quadratic_lyapunov_matrix_derivative",
task_type="numerical",
difficulty="intermediate",
template_id=f"quadratic_lyapunov_2d_prompt_{index%4}",
prompt=prompt,
answer=answer,
ground_truth={
"kind": "quadratic_lyapunov",
"A": A.tolist(),
"P": P.tolist(),
"Q": Q.tolist(),
"Q_eigenvalues": qe.tolist(),
},
source_refs=NONLINEAR,
verifier="verify_quadratic_lyapunov",
)
def feedback_linearization(rng: np.random.Generator, index: int) -> dict:
del rng
a = 0.7 + 0.04 * index
c0 = 0.3 + 0.025 * index
b = 1.0 + 0.03 * index
k1 = 1.5 + 0.05 * index
k2 = 1.0 + 0.04 * index
poles = np.roots([1, k2, k1])
prompt = (
f"{OPENERS[index%4]} For x1_dot=x2, x2_dot=-{n(a)}sin(x1)-{n(c0)}x2+{n(b)}u, y=x1, "
f"derive an exact feedback-linearizing regulator giving y_ddot+{n(k2)}y_dot+{n(k1)}y=0."
)
answer = (
f"### 1. Relative Degree and Input-Output Differentiation\n"
f"- $\\dot{{y}} = \\dot{{x}}_1 = x_2$\n"
f"- $\\ddot{{y}} = \\dot{{x}}_2 = -{n(a)} \\sin(x_1) - {n(c0)} x_2 + {n(b)} u$\n"
f"Since $u$ appears explicitly in $\\ddot{{y}}$ and $b = {n(b)} \\ne 0$, the relative degree is $r = 2$ (full state).\n\n"
f"### 2. Feedback Linearizing Control Law\n"
f"Set $\\ddot{{y}} = v = -{n(k1)} y - {n(k2)} \\dot{{y}} = -{n(k1)} x_1 - {n(k2)} x_2$:\n"
f"$$-{n(a)} \\sin(x_1) - {n(c0)} x_2 + {n(b)} u = -{n(k1)} x_1 - {n(k2)} x_2$$\n"
f"$$u = \\frac{{{n(a)} \\sin(x_1) + {n(c0)} x_2 - {n(k1)} x_1 - {n(k2)} x_2}}{{{n(b)}}}$$\n\n"
f"### 3. Closed-Loop Linear Error Dynamics\n"
f"The resulting closed-loop error dynamics $\\ddot{{y}} + {n(k2)} \\dot{{y}} + {n(k1)} y = 0$ has poles:\n"
f"$$\\text{{Poles}} = \\{{{', '.join(f'{x.real:.6g}{x.imag:+.6g}j' for x in poles)}\\}}$$"
)
return make_record(
record_id=f"feedback_linearization_{index:05d}",
domain="nonlinear_control",
family="second_order_exact_feedback_linearization",
task_type="derivation",
difficulty="advanced",
template_id=f"feedback_linearization_prompt_{index%4}",
prompt=prompt,
answer=answer,
ground_truth={
"kind": "feedback_linearization",
"a": a,
"c": c0,
"b": b,
"k1": k1,
"k2": k2,
"closed_poles": roots(poles),
"relative_degree": 2,
},
source_refs=NONLINEAR,
verifier="verify_feedback_linearization",
)
def zero_dynamics(rng: np.random.Generator, index: int) -> dict:
del rng
a = 0.5 + 0.035 * index
c0 = 0.2 + 0.02 * index
prompt = (
f"{OPENERS[index%4]} Consider x1_dot=x2, x2_dot=u, x3_dot=-{n(a)}x3+{n(c0)}x1, y=x1. "
"Find the relative degree and zero dynamics, then classify minimum phase."
)
answer = (
f"### 1. Relative Degree\n"
f"Differentiating output $y = x_1$:\n"
f"- $\\dot{{y}} = x_2$\n"
f"- $\\ddot{{y}} = u$\n"
f"The control input $u$ appears in the 2nd derivative, so relative degree $r = 2$.\n\n"
f"### 2. Zero Dynamics Derivation\n"
f"Constraining output identically to zero: $y(t) = 0 \\implies x_1(t) = 0, \\dot{{y}}(t) = x_2(t) = 0, \\ddot{{y}}(t) = u(t) = 0$.\n"
f"The remaining unobservable internal dynamics for state $x_3$ is:\n"
f"$$\\dot{{x}}_3 = -{n(a)} x_3 + {n(c0)}(0) = -{n(a)} x_3$$\n\n"
f"### 3. Minimum Phase Classification\n"
f"The zero dynamics eigenvalue is $\\lambda = -{n(a)} < 0$ (strictly in LHP). Therefore the system is **minimum phase**."
)
return make_record(
record_id=f"zero_dynamics_{index:05d}",
domain="nonlinear_control",
family="relative_degree_and_zero_dynamics",
task_type="derivation",
difficulty="advanced",
template_id=f"zero_dynamics_prompt_{index%4}",
prompt=prompt,
answer=answer,
ground_truth={
"kind": "zero_dynamics",
"a": a,
"c": c0,
"relative_degree": 2,
"zero_pole": -a,
"minimum_phase": True,
},
source_refs=NONLINEAR,
verifier="verify_zero_dynamics",
)
def sliding_reachability(rng: np.random.Generator, index: int) -> dict:
del rng
dmax = 0.2 + 0.025 * index
k = dmax + 0.3 + 0.01 * index
eta = k - dmax
prompt = (
f"{OPENERS[index%4]} For s_dot=d(t)+u with |d(t)|<={n(dmax)}, use u=-{n(k)}sign(s). "
"Establish a worst-case reaching inequality and state whether k is sufficient."
)
answer = (
f"### 1. Sliding Mode Lyapunov Reachability Condition\n"
f"Using Lyapunov candidate $V(s) = \\frac{{1}}{{2}} s^2$ with sliding manifold $s=0$:\n"
f"$$\\dot{{V}} = s \\dot{{s}} = s (d(t) - {n(k)} \\text{{sgn}}(s)) = s d(t) - {n(k)} |s|$$\n\n"
f"### 2. Worst-Case Bounding\n"
f"Using $|s d(t)| \\le |s| d_{{\\max}} = {n(dmax)} |s|$:\n"
f"$$\\dot{{V}} \\le |s| ({n(dmax)} - {n(k)}) = -{n(eta)} |s| = -\\eta \\sqrt{{2 V}}$$\n"
f"Equivalently, $\\frac{{d|s|}}{{dt}} \\le -{n(eta)}$.\n\n"
f"### 3. Conclusion\n"
f"The manifold is reached in finite time $t_{{reach}} \\le \\frac{{|s(0)|}}{{{n(eta)}}}$. Since $k = {n(k)} > d_{{\\max}} = {n(dmax)}$, the gain $k$ is **sufficient**."
)
return make_record(
record_id=f"sliding_reachability_{index:05d}",
domain="nonlinear_control",
family="scalar_sliding_mode_reaching_bound",
task_type="derivation",
difficulty="intermediate",
template_id=f"sliding_reachability_prompt_{index%4}",
prompt=prompt,
answer=answer,
ground_truth={
"kind": "sliding_reachability",
"dmax": dmax,
"k": k,
"eta": eta,
"sufficient": True,
},
source_refs=NONLINEAR,
verifier="verify_sliding_reachability",
)
def small_gain(rng: np.random.Generator, index: int) -> dict:
del rng
g1 = 0.25 + 0.018 * index
g2 = 0.35 + 0.014 * index
product = g1 * g2
certified = product < 1
prompt = (
f"{OPENERS[index%4]} Two stable operators in feedback satisfy ||G1||<={n(g1)} and ||G2||<={n(g2)}. "
"Apply the small-gain theorem and report the product and certification result."
)
answer = (
f"### 1. Small Gain Theorem Criterion\n"
f"For feedback interconnection of stable operators $G_1$ and $G_2$, closed-loop input-output stability is guaranteed if the loop gain product satisfies:\n"
f"$$\\|G_1\\| \\cdot \\|G_2\\| < 1$$\n\n"
f"### 2. Norm Product Evaluation\n"
f"$$\\|G_1\\| \\cdot \\|G_2\\| = {n(g1)} \\times {n(g2)} = {n(product)}$$\n\n"
f"### 3. Conclusion\n"
f"Since the norm product is {n(product)} {'< 1' if certified else '>= 1'}, the small-gain theorem **{'certifies input-output stability' if certified else 'does not certify stability'}**."
)
return make_record(
record_id=f"small_gain_{index:05d}",
domain="robust_control",
family="small_gain_norm_product_test",
task_type="numerical",
difficulty="intermediate",
template_id=f"small_gain_prompt_{index%4}",
prompt=prompt,
answer=answer,
ground_truth={
"kind": "small_gain",
"g1": g1,
"g2": g2,
"product": product,
"certified": certified,
},
source_refs=ROBUST,
verifier="verify_small_gain",
)
def multiplicative_uncertainty(rng: np.random.Generator, index: int) -> dict:
del rng
scale = 0.5 + 0.025 * index
W = np.array([0.2, 0.45, 0.7, 0.9]) * scale
T = np.array([0.8, 0.65, 0.4, 0.2]) * (1 + 0.005 * index)
products = W * T
peak = float(np.max(products))
certified = peak < 1
prompt = (
f"{OPENERS[index%4]} For output-multiplicative uncertainty bounded at four frequencies by |W|={W.tolist()}, "
f"nominal |T|={T.tolist()}, apply the sampled robust-stability check max |WT|<1."
)
answer = (
f"### 1. Robust Stability Condition for Multiplicative Uncertainty\n"
f"Robust stability requires $|W(j\\omega) T(j\\omega)| < 1$ for all frequencies $\\omega$.\n\n"
f"### 2. Pointwise Evaluation\n"
f"The pointwise products $|W| \\cdot |T|$ across the 4 frequency points are:\n"
f"$${products.tolist()}$$\n"
f"The peak value is $\\max |W T| = {n(peak)}$.\n\n"
f"### 3. Conclusion\n"
f"Since the sampled peak is {n(peak)} {'< 1' if certified else '>= 1'}, the robust-stability condition **{'is satisfied' if certified else 'is violated'}** on this frequency grid."
)
return make_record(
record_id=f"multiplicative_uncertainty_{index:05d}",
domain="robust_control",
family="multiplicative_uncertainty_weighted_T_test",
task_type="numerical",
difficulty="advanced",
template_id=f"multiplicative_uncertainty_prompt_{index%4}",
prompt=prompt,
answer=answer,
ground_truth={
"kind": "weighted_peak",
"weight": W.tolist(),
"response": T.tolist(),
"products": products.tolist(),
"peak": peak,
"certified": certified,
"strict_bound": 1.0,
},
source_refs=ROBUST,
verifier="verify_weighted_peak",
)
def additive_uncertainty(rng: np.random.Generator, index: int) -> dict:
del rng
Wa = np.array([0.1, 0.2, 0.35, 0.6]) * (0.8 + 0.02 * index)
KS = np.array([0.7, 0.8, 0.9, 1.0]) * (0.9 + 0.004 * index)
products = Wa * KS
peak = float(np.max(products))
certified = peak < 1
prompt = (
f"{OPENERS[index%4]} An additive plant uncertainty satisfies |Delta_a|<=|W_a|. On a frequency grid, "
f"|W_a|={Wa.tolist()} and |KS|={KS.tolist()}. Check max |W_a K S|<1 and state the limitation."
)
answer = (
f"### 1. Robust Stability Condition for Additive Uncertainty\n"
f"For additive perturbation $|\\Delta_a| \\le |W_a|$, robust stability requires $|W_a(j\\omega) K(j\\omega) S(j\\omega)| < 1$.\n\n"
f"### 2. Pointwise Evaluation\n"
f"Pointwise products: {products.tolist()}\n"
f"Peak product: $\\max |W_a KS| = {n(peak)}$.\n\n"
f"### 3. Conclusion\n"
f"The grid condition **{'passes' if certified else 'fails'}** the sufficient robust stability inequality."
)
return make_record(
record_id=f"additive_uncertainty_{index:05d}",
domain="robust_control",
family="additive_uncertainty_weighted_KS_test",
task_type="numerical",
difficulty="advanced",
template_id=f"additive_uncertainty_prompt_{index%4}",
prompt=prompt,
answer=answer,
ground_truth={
"kind": "weighted_peak",
"weight": Wa.tolist(),
"response": KS.tolist(),
"products": products.tolist(),
"peak": peak,
"certified": certified,
"strict_bound": 1.0,
},
source_refs=ROBUST,
verifier="verify_weighted_peak",
)
def hinf_first_order(rng: np.random.Generator, index: int) -> dict:
del rng
gain = (-1 if index % 7 == 0 else 1) * (0.4 + 0.06 * index)
tau = 0.2 + 0.03 * index
hinf = abs(gain)
prompt = (
f"{OPENERS[index%4]} Compute the continuous-time H-infinity norm of stable G(s)={n(gain)}/({n(tau)}s+1) "
"and identify the frequency where the supremum occurs."
)
answer = (
f"### 1. H-Infinity Norm Definition\n"
f"$$\\|G(s)\\|_\\infty = \\sup_{{\\omega \\in \\mathbb{{R}}}} |G(j\\omega)|$$\n\n"
f"### 2. Frequency Response Magnitude Analysis\n"
f"$$|G(j\\omega)| = \\frac{{|{n(gain)}|}}{{\\sqrt{{1 + ({n(tau)} \\omega)^2}}}}$$\n"
f"Since the denominator is strictly increasing with $|\\omega|$, the supremum occurs at DC ($\\omega = 0$ rad/s):\n"
f"$$\\|G\\|_\\infty = |G(j0)| = |{n(gain)}| = {n(hinf)}$$\n\n"
f"**Summary:** ||G||_infinity = {n(hinf)}, attained at omega = 0 rad/s."
)
return make_record(
record_id=f"hinf_first_order_{index:05d}",
domain="robust_control",
family="first_order_hinfinity_norm",
task_type="derivation",
difficulty="intermediate",
template_id=f"hinf_first_order_prompt_{index%4}",
prompt=prompt,
answer=answer,
ground_truth={
"kind": "hinf_first_order",
"gain": gain,
"tau": tau,
"hinf": hinf,
"peak_frequency": 0.0,
},
source_refs=ROBUST,
verifier="verify_hinf_first_order",
)
def kharitonov_cubic(rng: np.random.Generator, index: int) -> dict:
del rng
lows = np.array([1.0 + 0.02 * index, 2.0 + 0.03 * index, 3.0 + 0.04 * index, 1.0])
highs = lows + np.array([0.3, 0.4, 0.5, 0.2])
polys = np.array([
[lows[0], lows[1], highs[2], highs[3]],
[highs[0], highs[1], lows[2], lows[3]],
[highs[0], lows[1], lows[2], highs[3]],
[lows[0], highs[1], highs[2], lows[3]],
])
pole_sets = [np.roots(poly[::-1]) for poly in polys]
stable_flags = [bool(np.all(np.real(p) < 0)) for p in pole_sets]
robust = all(stable_flags)
prompt = (
f"{OPENERS[index%4]} A real cubic interval polynomial has ascending-power coefficient bounds a-={lows.tolist()}, "
f"a+={highs.tolist()}. Form the four Kharitonov polynomials and test their Hurwitz stability."
)
k_steps = []
for idx, (poly, poles, st) in enumerate(zip(polys, pole_sets, stable_flags), 1):
desc = poly[::-1]
hurwitz_test = desc[1] * desc[2] - desc[0] * desc[3]
k_steps.append(
f"- $K_{idx}(s) = {n(desc[0])}s^3 + {n(desc[1])}s^2 + {n(desc[2])}s + {n(desc[3])}$: "
f"Hurwitz condition $a_2 a_1 - a_3 a_0 = {n(desc[1])}\\times{n(desc[2])} - {n(desc[0])}\\times{n(desc[3])} = {n(hurwitz_test)} "
f"({'> 0: Hurwitz' if st else '<= 0: Unstable'})"
)
k_text = "\n".join(k_steps)
answer = (
f"### 1. Kharitonov Polynomial Formulation\n"
f"For interval polynomial $p(s) = [a_0^-, a_0^+] + [a_1^-, a_1^+]s + [a_2^-, a_2^+]s^2 + [a_3^-, a_3^+]s^3$, "
f"Kharitonov's theorem states the entire family is Hurwitz stable iff the 4 extreme polynomials are Hurwitz:\n\n"
f"{k_text}\n\n"
f"### 2. Conclusion\n"
f"The four ascending coefficient vectors are {polys.tolist()}. Their Hurwitz flags are {stable_flags}; "
f"therefore Kharitonov's theorem **{'certifies the whole interval family' if robust else 'does not certify the interval family as robustly Hurwitz'}**."
)
return make_record(
record_id=f"kharitonov_cubic_{index:05d}",
domain="robust_control",
family="kharitonov_cubic_interval_stability",
task_type="numerical",
difficulty="advanced",
template_id=f"kharitonov_cubic_prompt_{index%4}",
prompt=prompt,
answer=answer,
ground_truth={
"kind": "kharitonov_cubic",
"lower": lows.tolist(),
"upper": highs.tolist(),
"polynomials": polys.tolist(),
"poles": [roots(x) for x in pole_sets],
"stable_flags": stable_flags,
"robustly_hurwitz": robust,
},
source_refs=ROBUST,
verifier="verify_kharitonov_cubic",
)
def sensitivity_peak(rng: np.random.Generator, index: int) -> dict:
del rng
real = np.array([1.5, 0.8, 0.2, -0.3]) * (1 + 0.01 * index)
imag = np.array([-0.2, -0.6, -1.0, -0.4]) * (1 + 0.006 * index)
L = real + 1j * imag
S = 1 / (1 + L)
mags = np.abs(S)
peak = float(np.max(mags))
idx = int(np.argmax(mags))
prompt = (
f"{OPENERS[index%4]} Loop samples are L={[[float(x.real),float(x.imag)] for x in L]}. "
"Compute sampled |S|=|1/(1+L)|, its peak, and the peak sample index."
)
answer = (
f"### 1. Sensitivity Calculation\n"
f"$$S(j\\omega) = \\frac{{1}}{{1 + L(j\\omega)}}$$\n"
f"Sampled magnitudes $|S|$: {mags.tolist()}\n\n"
f"### 2. Peak Sensitivity\n"
f"Peak magnitude: **{n(peak)}** at zero-based index **{idx}**."
)
return make_record(
record_id=f"sensitivity_peak_{index:05d}",
domain="robust_control",
family="sampled_sensitivity_peak",
task_type="numerical",
difficulty="intermediate",
template_id=f"sensitivity_peak_prompt_{index%4}",
prompt=prompt,
answer=answer,
ground_truth={
"kind": "sampled_sensitivity_peak",
"L": [[float(x.real), float(x.imag)] for x in L],
"magnitudes": mags.tolist(),
"peak": peak,
"peak_index": idx,
},
source_refs=ROBUST,
verifier="verify_sampled_sensitivity_peak",
)
def pe_sincos(rng: np.random.Generator, index: int) -> dict:
del rng
omega = 0.5 + 0.05 * index
T = 2 * math.pi / omega
gram = (math.pi / omega) * np.eye(2)
prompt = (
f"{OPENERS[index%4]} For phi(t)=[sin({n(omega)}t), cos({n(omega)}t)]^T, integrate phi phi^T over one period and state a persistent-excitation lower bound."
)
answer = (
f"### 1. Persistent Excitation (PE) Gramian Integration\n"
f"Over one fundamental period $T = \\frac{{2\\pi}}{{\\omega}} = {n(T)}$ s:\n"
f"$$\\int_0^T \\phi(t) \\phi^T(t) dt = \\int_0^T \\begin{{bmatrix}} \\sin^2(\\omega t) & \\sin(\\omega t)\\cos(\\omega t) \\\\ \\sin(\\omega t)\\cos(\\omega t) & \\cos^2(\\omega t) \\end{{bmatrix}} dt = \\begin{{bmatrix}} T/2 & 0 \\\\ 0 & T/2 \\end{{bmatrix}} = \\frac{{\\pi}}{{\\omega}} I = {mat(gram)}$$\n\n"
f"### 2. Conclusion\n"
f"The regressor is persistently exciting with period $T = {n(T)}$ and lower bound $\\alpha = {n(math.pi/omega)}$."
)
return make_record(
record_id=f"pe_sincos_{index:05d}",
domain="adaptive_control",
family="sinusoidal_regressor_exact_pe_gramian",
task_type="derivation",
difficulty="intermediate",
template_id=f"pe_sincos_prompt_{index%4}",
prompt=prompt,
answer=answer,
ground_truth={
"kind": "pe_sincos",
"omega": omega,
"period": T,
"gramian": gram.tolist(),
"alpha_max": math.pi / omega,
},
source_refs=ADAPTIVE,
verifier="verify_pe_sincos",
)
def gradient_identifier(rng: np.random.Generator, index: int) -> dict:
del rng
theta = np.array([0.2 + 0.02 * index, -0.5 + 0.015 * index])
phi = np.array([1.0, 0.3 + 0.01 * index])
y = 0.8 + 0.025 * index
gamma = 0.4 + 0.01 * index
dt = 0.05 + 0.001 * index
error = float(y - phi @ theta)
next_theta = theta + dt * gamma * phi * error
prompt = (
f"{OPENERS[index%4]} Apply one Euler step of theta_dot=gamma phi(y-phi^T theta) using theta={theta.tolist()}, "
f"phi={phi.tolist()}, y={n(y)}, gamma={n(gamma)}, dt={n(dt)}."
)
answer = (
f"### 1. Parameter Estimation Error\n"
f"$$e(t) = y - \\phi^T \\theta = {n(y)} - ({n(float(phi @ theta))}) = {n(error)}$$\n\n"
f"### 2. Gradient Update Step (Euler Discretization)\n"
f"$$\\theta_{{k+1}} = \\theta_k + \\Delta t \\cdot \\gamma \\phi_k e_k = {theta.tolist()} + {n(dt)} \\times {n(gamma)} \\times {phi.tolist()} \\times {n(error)} = {next_theta.tolist()}$$\n\n"
f"**Summary:** theta_next = {next_theta.tolist()}."
)
return make_record(
record_id=f"gradient_identifier_{index:05d}",
domain="adaptive_control",
family="gradient_parameter_update_euler",
task_type="numerical",
difficulty="foundation",
template_id=f"gradient_identifier_prompt_{index%4}",
prompt=prompt,
answer=answer,
ground_truth={
"kind": "gradient_identifier",
"theta": theta.tolist(),
"phi": phi.tolist(),
"y": y,
"gamma": gamma,
"dt": dt,
"error": error,
"theta_next": next_theta.tolist(),
},
source_refs=ADAPTIVE,
verifier="verify_gradient_identifier",
)
def normalized_identifier(rng: np.random.Generator, index: int) -> dict:
del rng
theta = np.array([0.1 + 0.03 * index, 0.4 + 0.02 * index])
phi = np.array([1.0, 0.6 + 0.02 * index])
y = 0.5 + 0.04 * index
gamma = 0.3 + 0.01 * index
dt = 0.04 + 0.002 * index
denom = 1.0 + float(phi @ phi)
error = float(y - phi @ theta)
next_theta = theta + dt * (gamma * phi * error / denom)
prompt = (
f"{OPENERS[index%4]} Perform one Euler step of the normalized gradient identifier "
f"theta_dot=gamma phi(y-phi^T theta)/(1+||phi||^2) with theta={theta.tolist()}, phi={phi.tolist()}, y={n(y)}, gamma={n(gamma)}, dt={n(dt)}."
)
answer = (
f"### 1. Normalized Estimation Error\n"
f"- Output error: $e = y - \\phi^T \\theta = {n(error)}$\n"
f"- Normalization factor: $1 + \\|\\phi\\|^2 = 1 + {n(float(phi @ phi))} = {n(denom)}$\n\n"
f"### 2. Parameter Update\n"
f"$$\\theta_{{k+1}} = \\theta_k + \\Delta t \\frac{{\\gamma \\phi e}}{{1 + \\|\\phi\\|^2}} = {next_theta.tolist()}$$\n\n"
f"**Summary:** theta_next = {next_theta.tolist()}."
)
return make_record(
record_id=f"normalized_identifier_{index:05d}",
domain="adaptive_control",
family="normalized_gradient_parameter_update",
task_type="numerical",
difficulty="intermediate",
template_id=f"normalized_identifier_prompt_{index%4}",
prompt=prompt,
answer=answer,
ground_truth={
"kind": "normalized_identifier",
"theta": theta.tolist(),
"phi": phi.tolist(),
"y": y,
"gamma": gamma,
"dt": dt,
"denom": denom,
"error": error,
"theta_next": next_theta.tolist(),
},
source_refs=ADAPTIVE,
verifier="verify_normalized_identifier",
)
def regression_rank(rng: np.random.Generator, index: int) -> dict:
del rng
phi = np.array([[1.0, 0.5 + 0.05 * index], [1.0, 1.0 + 0.05 * index], [1.0, 1.5 + 0.05 * index]])
G = phi.T @ phi
rank = int(np.linalg.matrix_rank(G))
cond = float(np.linalg.cond(G))
prompt = (
f"{OPENERS[index%4]} For regressor matrix Phi={mat(phi)}, compute the Gram matrix G=Phi^T Phi, "
"its rank, and condition number; confirm parameter identifiability."
)
answer = (
f"### 1. Regressor Gram Matrix\n"
f"$$G = \\Phi^T \\Phi = {mat(G)}$$\n\n"
f"### 2. Rank and Conditioning\n"
f"- $\\text{{rank}}(G) = {rank}$ out of 2 (full rank).\n"
f"- Condition number: $\\kappa(G) = {n(cond)}$.\n\n"
f"### 3. Conclusion\n"
f"Since $G$ is full rank, the parameters are **uniquely identifiable** by ordinary least squares."
)
return make_record(
record_id=f"regression_rank_{index:05d}",
domain="system_identification",
family="regressor_matrix_identifiability_rank",
task_type="numerical",
difficulty="intermediate",
template_id=f"regression_rank_prompt_{index%4}",
prompt=prompt,
answer=answer,
ground_truth={
"kind": "regression_rank",
"phi": phi.tolist(),
"G": G.tolist(),
"rank": rank,
"cond": cond,
"identifiable": rank == 2,
},
source_refs=IDENTIFICATION,
verifier="verify_regression_rank",
)
def arx_least_squares(rng: np.random.Generator, index: int) -> dict:
del rng
Phi = np.array([[-0.5, 1.0 + 0.02 * index], [-0.8, 1.2 + 0.02 * index], [-0.9, 1.1 + 0.02 * index]])
Y = np.array([[0.2 + 0.03 * index], [0.35 + 0.02 * index], [0.4 + 0.02 * index]])
theta = np.linalg.solve(Phi.T @ Phi, Phi.T @ Y)
residual = Y - Phi @ theta
res_norm = float(np.linalg.norm(residual))
prompt = (
f"{OPENERS[index%4]} Solve the batch least-squares ARX identification problem for Phi={mat(Phi)} "
f"and Y={mat(Y)}. Report parameter estimate theta_hat=(Phi^T Phi)^-1 Phi^T Y and residual 2-norm."
)
answer = (
f"### 1. Least Squares Normal Equations\n"
f"$$\\hat{{\\theta}} = (\\Phi^T \\Phi)^{{-1}} \\Phi^T Y = {mat(theta)}$$\n\n"
f"### 2. Residual Vector and Norm\n"
f"$$r = Y - \\Phi \\hat{{\\theta}} = {mat(residual)}$$\n"
f"$$\\|r\\|_2 = {n(res_norm)}$$\n\n"
f"**Summary:** theta_hat = {mat(theta)}, residual norm = {n(res_norm)}."
)
return make_record(
record_id=f"arx_least_squares_{index:05d}",
domain="system_identification",
family="noise_free_arx_least_squares",
task_type="numerical",
difficulty="intermediate",
template_id=f"arx_least_squares_prompt_{index%4}",
prompt=prompt,
answer=answer,
ground_truth={
"kind": "arx_least_squares",
"Phi": Phi.tolist(),
"Y": Y.tolist(),
"theta": theta.tolist(),
"residual_norm": res_norm,
},
source_refs=IDENTIFICATION,
verifier="verify_arx_least_squares",
)
def fopdt_step(rng: np.random.Generator, index: int) -> dict:
del rng
K = 1.2 + 0.05 * index
theta = 0.5 + 0.04 * index
tau = 1.0 + 0.08 * index
y_final = K
t_28 = theta + 0.356 * tau
t_63 = theta + tau
prompt = (
f"{OPENERS[index%4]} For a First-Order Plus Dead Time (FOPDT) model with K={n(K)}, delay theta={n(theta)} s, "
f"tau={n(tau)} s under unit step, find final value, t_28 (28.3% output), and t_63 (63.2% output)."
)
answer = (
f"### 1. FOPDT Step Response Formulas\n"
f"- Steady-state final value: $y_{{final}} = K = {n(y_final)}$\n"
f"- Time to 28.3% response: $t_{{28}} = \\theta + 0.356 \\tau = {n(theta)} + 0.356({n(tau)}) = {n(t_28)}\\text{{ s}}$\n"
f"- Time to 63.2% response: $t_{{63}} = \\theta + \\tau = {n(theta)} + {n(tau)} = {n(t_63)}\\text{{ s}}$\n\n"
f"**Summary:** y_final = {n(y_final)}, t_28 = {n(t_28)} s, t_63 = {n(t_63)} s."
)
return make_record(
record_id=f"fopdt_step_{index:05d}",
domain="system_identification",
family="fopdt_two_point_step_identification",
task_type="numerical",
difficulty="foundation",
template_id=f"fopdt_step_prompt_{index%4}",
prompt=prompt,
answer=answer,
ground_truth={
"kind": "fopdt_step",
"K": K,
"theta": theta,
"tau": tau,
"y_final": y_final,
"t_28": t_28,
"t_63": t_63,
},
source_refs=IDENTIFICATION,
verifier="verify_fopdt_step",
)
def residual_autocorrelation(rng: np.random.Generator, index: int) -> dict:
del rng
e = np.array([0.7 + 0.05 * index, 0.4 + 0.03 * index, -0.2, -0.5 - 0.02 * index, 0.1])
n_pts = len(e)
r0 = float(np.sum(e * e) / n_pts)
r1 = float(np.sum(e[:-1] * e[1:]) / n_pts)
rho1 = r1 / r0 if r0 > 1e-12 else 0.0
prompt = (
f"{OPENERS[index%4]} For identification residual sequence e={e.tolist()}, "
"compute sample variance r(0), lag-1 autocovariance r(1), and normalized lag-1 correlation rho(1)=r(1)/r(0)."
)
answer = (
f"### 1. Autocovariance and Correlation Calculations\n"
f"- Sample variance $r(0) = \\frac{{1}}{{N}} \\sum e_k^2 = {n(r0)}$\n"
f"- Lag-1 autocovariance $r(1) = \\frac{{1}}{{N}} \\sum e_k e_{{k+1}} = {n(r1)}$\n"
f"- Normalized lag-1 autocorrelation $\\rho(1) = \\frac{{r(1)}}{{r(0)}} = {n(rho1)}$\n\n"
f"**Summary:** r(0) = {n(r0)}, r(1) = {n(r1)}, rho(1) = {n(rho1)}."
)
return make_record(
record_id=f"residual_autocorrelation_{index:05d}",
domain="system_identification",
family="residual_normalized_autocorrelation",
task_type="numerical",
difficulty="foundation",
template_id=f"residual_autocorrelation_prompt_{index%4}",
prompt=prompt,
answer=answer,
ground_truth={
"kind": "residual_autocorrelation",
"e": e.tolist(),
"r0": r0,
"r1": r1,
"rho1": rho1,
},
source_refs=IDENTIFICATION,
verifier="verify_residual_autocorrelation",
)
def path_consensus(rng: np.random.Generator, index: int) -> dict:
del rng
L = np.array([[1.0, -1.0, 0.0], [-1.0, 2.0, -1.0], [0.0, -1.0, 1.0]])
eig = np.sort(np.linalg.eigvalsh(L))
lambda2 = float(eig[1])
prompt = (
f"{OPENERS[index%4]} For a 3-node path graph with Laplacian L={mat(L)}, compute its eigenvalues, "
"identify the algebraic connectivity lambda2, and state consensus convergence rate."
)
answer = (
f"### 1. Graph Laplacian Eigenvalues\n"
f"$$\\lambda(L) = {list(map(float, eig))}$$\n\n"
f"### 2. Algebraic Connectivity (Fiedler Eigenvalue)\n"
f"$$\\lambda_2(L) = {n(lambda2)}$$\n\n"
f"### 3. Conclusion\n"
f"Since the graph is connected, $\\lambda_1 = 0$ and $\\lambda_2 = {n(lambda2)} > 0$. "
f"The continuous consensus dynamics $\\dot{{x}} = -L x$ converges exponentially to the average consensus at asymptotic rate $\\lambda_2 = {n(lambda2)}$."
)
return make_record(
record_id=f"path_consensus_{index:05d}",
domain="networked_control",
family="path_graph_laplacian_algebraic_connectivity",
task_type="numerical",
difficulty="intermediate",
template_id=f"path_consensus_prompt_{index%4}",
prompt=prompt,
answer=answer,
ground_truth={
"kind": "path_consensus",
"L": L.tolist(),
"eigenvalues": eig.tolist(),
"lambda2": lambda2,
},
source_refs=NETWORKED,
verifier="verify_path_consensus",
)
def discrete_consensus(rng: np.random.Generator, index: int) -> dict:
del rng
eps = 0.2 + 0.02 * (index % 5)
L = np.array([[1.0, -1.0, 0.0], [-1.0, 2.0, -1.0], [0.0, -1.0, 1.0]])
P = np.eye(3) - eps * L
eig = np.sort(np.linalg.eigvalsh(P))[::-1]
sec = float(eig[1])
prompt = (
f"{OPENERS[index%4]} For step size epsilon={n(eps)} and 3-node path Laplacian L={mat(L)}, "
"form Perron matrix P=I-epsilon L, find its eigenvalues, and report the second largest eigenvalue module."
)
answer = (
f"### 1. Perron Matrix Construction\n"
f"$$P = I - \\epsilon L = {mat(P)}$$\n\n"
f"### 2. Eigenvalue Spectrum\n"
f"$$\\lambda(P) = {list(map(float, eig))}$$\n\n"
f"### 3. Convergence Factor\n"
f"The second largest eigenvalue module is $\\lambda_2(P) = {n(sec)} < 1$, ensuring geometric discrete consensus convergence."
)
return make_record(
record_id=f"discrete_consensus_{index:05d}",
domain="networked_control",
family="discrete_cycle_consensus_step_size",
task_type="numerical",
difficulty="intermediate",
template_id=f"discrete_consensus_prompt_{index%4}",
prompt=prompt,
answer=answer,
ground_truth={
"kind": "discrete_consensus",
"eps": eps,
"L": L.tolist(),
"P": P.tolist(),
"eigenvalues": eig.tolist(),
"second_eigenvalue": sec,
},
source_refs=NETWORKED,
verifier="verify_discrete_consensus",
)
FAMILIES: tuple[tuple[str, Callable[[np.random.Generator, int], dict]], ...] = (
("scalar_cubic_multiple_equilibria", cubic_equilibria),
("nonlinear_jacobian_local_stability", nonlinear_jacobian),
("scalar_linear_cubic_lyapunov", scalar_lyapunov),
("quadratic_lyapunov_matrix_derivative", quadratic_lyapunov_2d),
("second_order_exact_feedback_linearization", feedback_linearization),
("relative_degree_and_zero_dynamics", zero_dynamics),
("scalar_sliding_mode_reaching_bound", sliding_reachability),
("small_gain_norm_product_test", small_gain),
("multiplicative_uncertainty_weighted_T_test", multiplicative_uncertainty),
("additive_uncertainty_weighted_KS_test", additive_uncertainty),
("first_order_hinfinity_norm", hinf_first_order),
("kharitonov_cubic_interval_stability", kharitonov_cubic),
("sampled_sensitivity_peak", sensitivity_peak),
("sinusoidal_regressor_exact_pe_gramian", pe_sincos),
("gradient_parameter_update_euler", gradient_identifier),
("normalized_gradient_parameter_update", normalized_identifier),
("regressor_matrix_identifiability_rank", regression_rank),
("noise_free_arx_least_squares", arx_least_squares),
("fopdt_two_point_step_identification", fopdt_step),
("residual_normalized_autocorrelation", residual_autocorrelation),
("path_graph_laplacian_algebraic_connectivity", path_consensus),
("discrete_cycle_consensus_step_size", discrete_consensus),
)
def generate_advanced_v1(count_per_family: int, seed: int) -> list[dict]:
rng = np.random.default_rng(seed)
return [
generator(rng, index)
for _, generator in FAMILIES
for index in range(1, count_per_family + 1)
]
|