Quantum computing for accurate large-scale electronic-structure calculations: DFT-embedded, post-processed quantum-selected configuration interaction

Explanation: The research uses superconducting quantum computing, which is not relevant to IONQ's trapped-ion technology.

Explanation: Rigetti is a pure-play superconducting quantum company, and the research demonstrates a successful application of superconducting quantum computing for chemistry, indicating a strong positive signal.

Explanation: D-Wave specializes in quantum annealing, which is different from the gate-based superconducting approach used in the research for quantum chemistry simulations.

Explanation: Quantum Computing Inc. uses neutral atom technology, not superconducting, so the research has low relevance.

Explanation: Quantinuum focuses on trapped-ion technology, not superconducting, so the research is not directly applicable.

Explanation: IBM has a superconducting quantum business, but with only ~2% quantum revenue, the positive news has a limited positive impact, capped at the maximum for IBM.

Explanation: Honeywell's quantum efforts are in trapped-ion technology, not superconducting, so the research has no relevance.

Explanation: Microsoft is inactive in quantum computing as per the definition.

Explanation: Google is inactive in quantum computing as per the definition.

Explanation: NVIDIA is inactive in quantum computing as per the definition.


Rapid Gaussian Boson Sampling Circuit Screening for GKP States Creation via a Two-Stage Machine Learning Surrogate

Explanation: Negative impact as the news advances photonic quantum computing, a competing technology to trapped-ion, threatening IONQ's core business.

Explanation: Similar to IONQ, as superconducting QC faces competition from photonic advancements, impacting RGTI's pure-play position.

Explanation: Quantum annealing (D-Wave) is less directly affected by GKP advancements for gate-based QC, but overall market shifts pressure QBTS moderately.

Explanation: Neutral atom technology faces competition from photonic QC, negatively affecting QUBT's pure-play focus.

Explanation: Trapped-ion pure-play like IONQ, significantly impacted by competing photonic QC progress.

Explanation: Superconducting QC competition causes slight negative, but IBM's classical ML capabilities may benefit from the surrogate method, moderating the impact.

Explanation: Trapped-ion quantum business suffers from competition, but low quantum revenue (~1%) limits the negative effect.

Explanation: Inactive, no quantum relevance.

Explanation: Inactive, no quantum relevance.

Explanation: Inactive, no quantum relevance.


Shattering the Symmetry Trap in Fixed-Ansatz VQE: An Accelerated ADAPT-VQE Study of Three Pillar Molecules under Bravyi-Kitaev Mapping

Explanation: Research on improved ADAPT-VQE algorithms for quantum chemistry is highly relevant to IONQ's trapped-ion hardware, enhancing near-term applicability.

Explanation: ADAPT-VQE advancements directly benefit Rigetti's superconducting quantum computers for quantum chemistry simulations.

Explanation: Research focuses on gate-based VQE, not applicable to D-Wave's quantum annealing architecture.

Explanation: Neutral atom quantum computers (QUBT) can leverage ADAPT-VQE for efficient quantum chemistry, making the research highly relevant.

Explanation: Quantinuum's trapped-ion technology directly benefits from ADAPT-VQE improvements in quantum chemistry.

Explanation: Relevant to IBM's quantum chemistry work on superconducting qubits, but impact is limited by small quantum revenue share.

Explanation: Indirectly relevant through trapped-ion technology, but minimal direct impact due to low quantum revenue post-spinoff.

Explanation: Inactive; always 0.0 per scoring definition.


Magnetic flux as a quantized Lorentz pseudoscalar and its relation to electric charge quantization

Explanation: The paper's focus on magnetic flux quantization is highly relevant to superconducting quantum computing (RGTI, QBTS, IBM), yielding higher scores. Trapped-ion (IONQ, QNT, HON) and neutral atom (QUBT) companies receive modest positive scores for fundamental advancement, but with lower direct impact. Inactive companies score zero.


Double-bracket quantum algorithms for thermal state preparation

Explanation: General relevance for trapped-ion quantum computing in thermal state preparation; not specifically highlighted but beneficial.

Explanation: General relevance for superconducting quantum computing in thermal state preparation; not specifically highlighted but beneficial.

Explanation: High relevance due to direct application in quantum Boltzmann machines for generative modeling, a core competency of D-Wave.

Explanation: General relevance for neutral atom quantum computing in thermal state preparation; not specifically highlighted but beneficial.

Explanation: Modest relevance as IBM engages in quantum algorithms and thermal state research, but only ~2% quantum revenue.

Explanation: Modest relevance due to trapped-ion expertise, but only ~1% quantum revenue post-Quantinuum spinoff.

Explanation: Inactive; no quantum revenue focus.

Explanation: Inactive; no quantum revenue focus.

Explanation: Inactive; no quantum revenue focus.


Broadband AC Magnetic Field Sensing via Continuous wave optically detected magnetic resonance with NV Centers in diamond

Explanation: No direct relevance; focused on trapped-ion quantum computing, not sensing.

Explanation: No direct relevance; focused on superconducting quantum computing, not sensing.

Explanation: No direct relevance; focused on quantum annealing, not sensing.

Explanation: No direct relevance; focused on neutral atom quantum computing, not sensing.

Explanation: Some relevance; IBM has quantum sensing initiatives that could benefit from advancements in the field.

Explanation: Strong relevance; Honeywell is directly involved in NV center-based quantum sensing, and this research enhances their core technology.

Explanation: Inactive in quantum computing; no relevance.


Non-equilibrium quantum thermodynamics of a memory-bearing open-system process

Explanation: High relevance due to trapped-ion technology, which benefits from insights into quantum thermodynamics and memory effects.

Explanation: Superconducting qubits are applicable, but memory effects are less pronounced; moderate positive impact.

Explanation: Quantum annealing approach not aligned with gate-based focus; no impact.

Explanation: Neutral atom technology benefits from fundamental insights into quantum thermodynamics; positive impact.

Explanation: Trapped-ion technology directly relevant, similar to IONQ; strong positive signal.

Explanation: Fundamental research may slightly benefit IBM's quantum efforts, but small quantum revenue share limits impact.

Explanation: Trapped-ion system makes Honeywell relevant; positive impact within quantum segment.

Explanation: No quantum revenue; always 0.0.

Explanation: No quantum revenue; always 0.0.

Explanation: No quantum revenue; always 0.0.


No-go theorems on simulating uncertainty principle's signatures

Explanation: The paper reinforces the quantum advantage from uncertainty principles, directly supporting IONQ's trapped-ion technology as a pure-play quantum company.

Explanation: Rigetti's superconducting quantum processors benefit from the no-go theorems validating quantum uncertainty signatures, enhancing its pure-play position.

Explanation: D-Wave's quantum annealing exhibits quantum effects, but the focus on complementary instruments and unambiguous communication is less applicable than gate-based models, resulting in a moderate score.

Explanation: Quantum Computing Inc.'s neutral atom technology is gate-based and directly aligned with the uncertainty principles and complementary measurements discussed.

Explanation: Quantinuum's trapped-ion quantum computers leverage the uncertainty principle, and the no-go theorems affirm their quantum advantage as a pure-play entity.

Explanation: IBM's quantum efforts (superconducting) are supported by the paper's findings on quantum advantage, but the score is capped at the upper limit due to low quantum revenue share.

Explanation: Honeywell's trapped-ion quantum technology benefits from the reinforcement of uncertainty principles, with the score at the maximum for its quantum revenue share.

Explanation: Microsoft is inactive in the quantum computing universe for scoring purposes, always 0.0.

Explanation: Alphabet (Google) is inactive in the quantum computing universe for scoring purposes, always 0.0.

Explanation: NVIDIA is inactive in the quantum computing universe for scoring purposes, always 0.0.


Symmetry-adapted qubit encoding with complete active space and Bravyi--Kitaev mapping for quantum chemistry on a quantum computer

Explanation: Pure-play trapped-ion company; benefits directly from advancements in quantum chemistry simulations for gate-based quantum computers.

Explanation: Pure-play superconducting company; the paper's qubit encoding and circuit optimization methods are highly relevant to its quantum processors.

Explanation: Quantum annealing company; the paper focuses on gate-based methods, which are not applicable to annealers.

Explanation: Pure-play neutral atom company; leverages the new encoding for quantum chemistry simulations on gate-based systems.

Explanation: Pure-play trapped-ion company; similar relevance to IONQ for quantum chemistry improvements.

Explanation: Superconducting company with ~2% quantum revenue; relevant to quantum chemistry efforts, but impact limited by revenue share.

Explanation: Trapped-ion company with ~1% quantum revenue; benefits from advancements, but impact scaled by revenue share.

Explanation: Inactive, always 0.0

Explanation: Inactive, always 0.0

Explanation: Inactive, always 0.0


Engineered dissipation for faster adiabatic state preparation

Expecting property name enclosed in double quotes: line 1 column 2 (char 1)


Periodic Symmetry-Adapted Encoding: Qubit Reduction in Crystalline Electronic Structure

Explanation: High relevance for trapped-ion quantum simulation

Explanation: High relevance for superconducting quantum simulation

Explanation: Low relevance as quantum annealing is less suited for gate-based electronic structure simulation

Explanation: High relevance for neutral atom quantum simulation

Explanation: Relevant for superconducting quantum simulation but limited by ~2% quantum revenue

Explanation: Relevant for trapped-ion quantum simulation but limited by ~1% quantum revenue

Explanation: Inactive in quantum computing for this context


Tight relation between the physical effects of a quantum measurement and the information gained about an observable

Explanation: Incremental positive research on quantum measurement theory; high relevance for pure-play trapped-ion company.

Explanation: Incremental positive research; high relevance for pure-play superconducting company.

Explanation: Incremental positive research; high relevance for pure-play quantum annealing company.

Explanation: Incremental positive research; high relevance for pure-play neutral atom company.

Explanation: Incremental positive research; high relevance for pure-play trapped-ion company.

Explanation: Incremental positive research; lower relevance due to ~2% quantum revenue from superconducting.

Explanation: Incremental positive research; lower relevance due to ~1% quantum revenue from trapped-ion post-spinoff.

Explanation: No quantum focus; always 0.0.

Explanation: No quantum focus; always 0.0.

Explanation: No quantum focus; always 0.0.


Optimal convex approximation of quantum channels based on $α$-affinity

Explanation: Pure-play trapped-ion company; benefits from general advancements in quantum channel theory, though trapped-ion systems have lower noise sensitivity compared to superconducting.

Explanation: Pure-play superconducting company; high relevance due to direct application to noise models like amplitude-damping, which is critical for superconducting qubits.

Explanation: Pure-play quantum annealing company; less relevant as the paper focuses on unitary channels for gate-based quantum computing, not annealing-based systems.

Explanation: Pure-play neutral atom company; benefits similarly to trapped-ion companies from quantum channel advancements, with relevance to gate-based systems.

Explanation: Pure-play trapped-ion company (Quantinuum); same relevance as IONQ for quantum channel theory advancements.

Explanation: Diversified company with ~2% quantum revenue; positive impact from quantum research, but diluted due to small quantum focus.

Explanation: Diversified company with ~1% quantum revenue from trapped-ion; positive impact, but small due to low quantum share.

Explanation: Inactive, always 0.0 per specification.

Explanation: Inactive, always 0.0 per specification.

Explanation: Inactive, always 0.0 per specification.


Symmetries and overparametrization properties of Hamiltonian variational ansatzes for the $(1+1)$d $\mathbb{Z}_2$ lattice gauge theory


Information-Geometric Bound on the Robustness of Entanglement Generation

Explanation: The academic paper on entanglement generation and quantum Fisher information is a positive development for quantum computing. Pure-play companies (especially trapped-ion and superconducting) benefit most due to higher exposure, while quantum annealing (QBTS) is less directly relevant. Non-pure-play companies (IBM, HON) have lower scores due to smaller quantum revenue shares. Inactive companies score 0.0.


Learning Hamiltonians at Long Times

Explanation: Pure-play trapped-ion company; directly benefits from research on Hamiltonian learning for gate-based quantum computers.

Explanation: Pure-play superconducting company; directly benefits from the research.

Explanation: Quantum annealing company; not directly relevant to gate-based Hamiltonian learning.

Explanation: Pure-play neutral atom company; directly benefits as it uses gate-based quantum computing.

Explanation: Pure-play trapped-ion company (Quantinuum); directly benefits from the research.

Explanation: Superconducting company with ~2% quantum revenue; benefits from the research and the use of classical shadows, which IBM developed.

Explanation: Trapped-ion company with ~1% quantum revenue; benefits from the research but on a smaller scale.

Explanation: Inactive, no quantum focus.

Explanation: Inactive, no quantum focus.

Explanation: Inactive, no quantum focus.


Gauging the Spacetime Code

Explanation: Trapped-ion pure-play; highly relevant for fault tolerance and error correction discussed in the paper.

Explanation: Superconducting pure-play; maximum relevance for error correction due to high error rates in superconducting qubits.

Explanation: Quantum annealing; less relevant as the paper focuses on gate-based models like fault tolerance and circuit noise, not annealing.

Explanation: Neutral atom pure-play; relevant for emerging quantum technologies and error correction applications.

Explanation: Trapped-ion pure-play; strong relevance for fault tolerance and quantum error correction.

Explanation: Superconducting with ~2% quantum revenue; relevant for error correction but limited impact due to broader business focus.

Explanation: Trapped-ion with ~1% quantum revenue; relevant for quantum technologies but small contribution to business.

Explanation: Inactive in quantum computing universe; always 0.0.


Decoder-Consistent Hamiltonians for POVM-Based Quantum Relaxations

Explanation: Trapped-ion pure-play; benefits from advancements in quantum optimization algorithms.

Explanation: Superconducting pure-play; relevant to Hamiltonian-based quantum relaxations.

Explanation: Quantum annealing approach not directly related to gate-based Hamiltonian relaxations.

Explanation: Neutral atom pure-play; applicable to gate-based quantum computing and optimization.

Explanation: Trapped-ion pure-play; aligned with the research on quantum relaxations.

Explanation: Superconducting with partial quantum revenue; leader in quantum algorithms, positively impacted.

Explanation: Trapped-ion with partial quantum revenue; benefits from improved quantum optimization techniques.

Explanation: Inactive, always 0.0

Explanation: Inactive, always 0.0

Explanation: Inactive, always 0.0


Quantum Radar Cross Section with two-photon entangled states

Explanation: As a pure-play trapped-ion company, IONQ benefits from the emphasis on quantum entanglement for advanced applications like quantum radar, warranting a positive score within its range.

Explanation: Rigetti's superconducting qubits can generate entanglement, aligning with the research on biphoton QRCS, justifying a positive score.

Explanation: D-Wave's quantum annealing technology is not suited for entanglement-based quantum radar, resulting in a neutral score due to misalignment.

Explanation: Quantum Computing Inc. (neutral atom) can leverage entanglement capabilities for potential quantum radar applications, supporting a positive score.

Explanation: Quantinuum, as a trapped-ion pure-play, gains from the positive sentiment around quantum radar advancements, hence a positive score.

Explanation: IBM's superconducting quantum systems are used in quantum sensing (including radar applications), justifying the maximum positive score within its limited quantum revenue range.

Explanation: Honeywell's trapped-ion technology and quantum sensing initiatives make it relevant for quantum radar, warranting the maximum positive score within its range.

Explanation: Microsoft is inactive in quantum radar and scores 0.0 as per the inactive category.

Explanation: Google is inactive in quantum radar and scores 0.0 as per the inactive category.

Explanation: NVIDIA is inactive in quantum radar and scores 0.0 as per the inactive category.

Explanation: The research on quantum radar with entangled photons validates the potential of quantum technologies for sensing applications. Companies with entanglement strengths (trapped-ion, superconducting) and sensing focus (IBM, Honeywell) score positively, while D-Wave (annealing-focused) is neutral. Inactive companies score 0.0.


A Class of Multipartite Entangled States Based on State Transitions

Explanation: Positive due to high relevance of multipartite entanglement research to trapped-ion gate-based quantum computing.

Explanation: Positive due to high relevance of multipartite entanglement research to superconducting gate-based quantum computing.

Explanation: Lower positive score; quantum annealing architecture (D-Wave) is less directly applicable to gate-based entanglement states like T states.

Explanation: Positive due to high relevance of multipartite entanglement research to neutral atom gate-based quantum computing.

Explanation: Small positive score; relevant to superconducting quantum efforts, but limited by ~2% quantum revenue share.

Explanation: Small positive score; relevant to trapped-ion quantum efforts, but limited by ~1% quantum revenue share.

Explanation: Inactive; no quantum focus.

Explanation: Inactive; no quantum focus.

Explanation: Inactive; no quantum focus.


Thermalization with Gaussian Quantum Cellular Automata

Explanation: Research on thermalization in bosonic systems is relevant to IONQ's trapped-ion technology, which uses harmonic oscillator modes. Incremental advancement, so small positive score.

Explanation: Superconducting qubits involve bosonic modeling, making this research relevant to Rigetti's technology. Positive but incremental, so small positive score.

Explanation: Quantum annealing is less directly related to bosonic lattices and Gaussian quantum cellular automata. Minimal impact, so lower positive score.

Explanation: Neutral atom systems can be modeled with bosonic modes, so research is relevant. Positive for QUBT, small score due to incremental nature.

Explanation: Trapped-ion technology involves bosonic modes, making thermalization research relevant. Positive for Quantinuum, small score.

Explanation: Relevant to IBM's superconducting qubits, but with only ~2% quantum revenue, impact is smaller. Incremental research, so modest positive score.

Explanation: Honeywell's trapped-ion tech is relevant, but with ~1% quantum revenue post-spinoff, impact is limited. Small positive score.

Explanation: Not involved in quantum computing; always 0.0.


On the Cryptographic Structure Required for Verifying Qubits

Explanation: Trapped-ion pure-play; benefits from incremental advances in qubit verification, which enhances trust in quantum devices.

Explanation: Superconducting pure-play; similarly benefits from verification improvements, applicable to gate-based quantum computing.

Explanation: Quantum annealing pure-play; less relevant as the paper focuses on gate-based verification, not annealing paradigms.

Explanation: Neutral atom pure-play; gate-based technology aligns with the verification focus, providing incremental value.

Explanation: Trapped-ion pure-play; benefits similarly to other gate-based companies from verification advancements.

Explanation: Superconducting with ~2% quantum revenue; quantum division benefits, but low revenue share caps score at maximum positive.

Explanation: Trapped-ion with ~1% quantum revenue; quantum efforts benefit, but revenue share caps score at maximum positive.

Explanation: Not part of the quantum computing universe; always 0.0.


DAST: A VLM-LLM Framework for Cross-Interface Anomaly Detection in O-RAN

Explanation: Pure-play quantum company; no relevance to classical AI or O-RAN.

Explanation: Positive for IBM's AI business, which is a major revenue segment, despite minimal quantum relevance.

Explanation: Quantum is a small segment post-spinoff; no direct relevance to O-RAN or AI.

Explanation: Inactive in quantum computing universe; always 0.0.


Space-CIM: Enabling Compute-In-Memory Accelerators for Thermally-Constrained Space Platforms

Explanation: Trapped-ion technology operates at higher temperatures with better heat distribution, reducing thermal management challenges in space.

Explanation: Superconducting qubits require extreme cryogenic cooling, which is problematic under space thermal constraints due to limited radiative cooling.

Explanation: Quantum annealing systems need cryogenic cooling, facing similar thermal challenges as superconducting in space.

Explanation: Neutral atom technology offers improved thermal efficiency and lower cooling needs, potentially advantageous for space deployment.

Explanation: Trapped-ion approach, like IONQ, benefits from lower thermal sensitivity and better suitability for space environments.

Explanation: Superconducting quantum revenue (~2%) is negatively impacted by thermal constraints, but small proportion of overall business mitigates impact.

Explanation: Trapped-ion quantum revenue (~1%) may benefit from space suitability, though minor portion of business.

Explanation: Inactive, no quantum computing relevance.


FQA: A Full-Space Quantization-Driven Architecture for Hardware-Efficient Piecewise Approximation of Nonlinear Activation Functions

Explanation: The FQA research improves hardware efficiency for piecewise approximation of activation functions, highly relevant to quantum machine learning. Pure-play companies (100% quantum revenue) score +1.8 for significant benefit. IBM (~2% quantum revenue) scores +0.036, proportional to revenue share. Honeywell (~1% quantum revenue) scores +0.018. Inactive companies score 0.0.


IonQ is the First Pure-Play Quantum Computing Company To Generate Over $100 Million in Revenue. Is the Stock Headed to $100? - Yahoo Finance

Explanation: Direct positive impact: IonQ achieved a $100M revenue milestone as the first pure-play, validating its business model and growth potential. High novelty as a sector first; impact may decay moderately over time as market digests the news.

Explanation: Moderate positive sentiment: As a pure-play, benefits from sector validation, but indirect as IonQ is the direct beneficiary. Revenue milestone signals market growth, though decay may be gradual.

Explanation: Moderate positive sentiment: Similar to RGTI, as a pure-play quantum company, gains from industry validation. No direct link to IonQ's milestone, but overall sentiment boost applies.

Explanation: Moderate positive sentiment: Pure-play quantum company; benefits from sector-wide optimism. Milestone reinforces long-term potential, though decay may occur as focus shifts.

Explanation: Moderate positive sentiment: As a pure-play, gains from industry validation. Trapped-ion technology alignment with IonQ may amplify impact slightly, but decay expected over weeks.

Explanation: Small positive sentiment: IBM benefits from broader quantum sector growth validation. Limited impact due to ~2% quantum revenue share; decay may be rapid as news is sector-specific.

Explanation: Maximum positive impact within range: HON (trapped-ion) benefits from IonQ's milestone due to technology similarity, validating the segment. Positive spillover effect; decay may be slower given shared tech focus.

Explanation: Inactive: No quantum revenue; news irrelevant per constraints.


Should You Buy D-Wave Quantum Stock While It's Under $35? - Yahoo Finance

Explanation: The article is a buy recommendation for D-Wave (QBTS), warranting a +1.0 score. Other companies are unaffected (0.0) as the news is company-specific with low novelty and short-term decay.


Should You Buy D-Wave Quantum Stock While It's Under $35? - The Motley Fool

Explanation: The article does not mention IONQ.

Explanation: The article does not mention RGTI.

Explanation: The article is a buy recommendation for D-Wave Quantum (QBTS), justifying a moderate positive score (+1.0) due to typical decay expectations.

Explanation: The article does not mention QUBT.

Explanation: The article does not mention QNT.

Explanation: The article does not mention IBM, and IBM is not a pure-play.

Explanation: The article does not mention HON, and HON is not a pure-play.

Explanation: MSFT is inactive and always 0.0.

Explanation: GOOGL is inactive and always 0.0.

Explanation: NVDA is inactive and always 0.0.


Quantinuum closes flat in Nasdaq debut, after upsized offering - CNBC

Explanation: Sector boost from Quantinuum's successful IPO; trapped-ion technology similarity

Explanation: Sector boost from increased investor interest; superconducting technology

Explanation: Sector boost from quantum industry momentum; quantum annealing technology

Explanation: Sector boost from positive quantum sentiment; neutral atom technology

Explanation: Direct positive impact from upsized offering; flat close is neutral

Explanation: Small positive from sector sentiment; limited quantum revenue share

Explanation: Positive as parent company of Quantinuum; trapped-ion technology boost

Explanation: Inactive; no quantum revenue focus

Explanation: Inactive; no quantum revenue focus

Explanation: Inactive; no quantum revenue focus

Explanation: Quantinuum's upsized offering signals strong investor demand (positive), but flat debut caps enthusiasm. Pure-plays receive moderate positive scores due to sector boost, with trapped-ion companies (IONQ, HON) slightly higher. Non-pure-plays (IBM, HON) have smaller impacts. Inactive companies score zero.


Quantinuum raises $1.68 billion in IPO that seeks to give quantum computing more street cred - MarketWatch

Explanation: As a pure-play trapped-ion company, IONQ benefits from the industry-wide credibility boost from Quantinuum's successful IPO. The positive sentiment enhances the sector's prospects, but the effect is moderate due to differing company specifics.

Explanation: RGTI, a pure-play superconducting company, gains from the heightened industry confidence driven by the IPO, though the impact is less direct than for trapped-ion peers.

Explanation: QBTS (quantum annealing) benefits from the general uplift in quantum computing credibility, but its distinct technology reduces direct linkage to the IPO event.

Explanation: QUBT, a neutral atom pure-play, sees a moderate positive effect from the sector-wide optimism, though not as pronounced as for direct competitors.

Explanation: Quantinuum's own $1.68 billion IPO is a major positive event, directly boosting its standing and valuation to the maximum allowable score.

Explanation: IBM benefits slightly from the industry credibility boost, but its minimal quantum revenue share (~2%) limits the impact, resulting in a low positive score.

Explanation: Honeywell, a trapped-ion player with ~1% quantum revenue, gains from Quantinuum's success (given historical ties) and sector optimism, but its score is capped at a low level.

Explanation: Not a quantum pure-play; excluded from scoring per the 'inactive' designation.


Quantum Stocks: New IPO Quantinuum Volatile In First Trading Day - Investor's Business Daily

Explanation: Positive sentiment from sector news, but not directly about IONQ.

Explanation: Positive sentiment from sector news, but not directly about RGTI.

Explanation: Positive sentiment from sector news, but not directly about QBTS.

Explanation: Positive sentiment from sector news, but not directly about QUBT.

Explanation: Directly mentioned as the IPO company; positive event with high novelty.

Explanation: Small positive spillover; minimal quantum revenue exposure.

Explanation: Inactive, always 0.0

Explanation: Inactive, always 0.0

Explanation: Inactive, always 0.0


Quantinuum to Debut on Nasdaq After Raising $1.68 Billion in IPO - The Quantum Insider

Explanation: Indirect positive impact; Quantinuum's IPO validates trapped-ion technology, benefiting the broader segment. Score reflects shared technological alignment.

Explanation: No significant impact; Quantinuum's IPO is in trapped-ion technology, while Rigetti uses superconducting. No direct relevance.

Explanation: No significant impact; D-Wave's quantum annealing approach is distinct from trapped-ion, and the news lacks direct relevance.

Explanation: No significant impact; Neutral atom technology differs from trapped-ion, and the IPO news is not directly related.

Explanation: Direct positive impact; Quantinuum's $1.68B IPO and Nasdaq debut represent major capital infusion and market validation, maximizing score for pure-play.

Explanation: Slight negative; Increased competition from a validated quantum player (Quantinuum) may pressure IBM's superconducting segment.

Explanation: Indirect positive; Quantinuum's roots in Honeywell's quantum efforts validate trapped-ion tech, but impact is muted due to spinoff and HON's low quantum revenue share.

Explanation: Inactive; Always 0.0 per specification.

Explanation: Inactive; Always 0.0 per specification.

Explanation: Inactive; Always 0.0 per specification.


Quantinuum Announces Pricing of Upsized Initial Public Offering - Quantinuum

Explanation: Positive spillover from shared trapped-ion technology; moderate novelty, moderate decay.

Explanation: Mild sector-wide uplift; low novelty, fast decay as unrelated to superconducting tech.

Explanation: No direct impact; low novelty, fast decay.

Explanation: Direct positive impact from IPO pricing; high novelty, moderate decay.

Explanation: Minor sector sentiment; low novelty, fast decay due to small quantum exposure.

Explanation: Slight positive as former parent; low novelty, fast decay.

Explanation: Inactive, no impact.

Explanation: Inactive, no impact.

Explanation: Inactive, no impact.


Honeywell's Quantinuum valued at $17.6 billion as shares rise in Nasdaq debut - Reuters

Explanation: Positive sentiment from industry validation; shared trapped-ion tech with QNT.

Explanation: Indirect positive from quantum sector uplift; different superconducting tech.

Explanation: Indirect positive from industry enthusiasm; quantum annealing approach.

Explanation: Indirect positive from quantum market validation; neutral atom tech.

Explanation: Direct positive impact from Nasdaq debut, high valuation, and rising shares.

Explanation: Minor positive from industry validation; low quantum revenue exposure.

Explanation: Positive spillover from Quantinuum's success as parent company.

Explanation: Inactive; no quantum focus per criteria.


Quantum computing’s biggest IPO arrives with a fizzle, not a pop - Yahoo Finance

Explanation: Sector-wide negative sentiment due to weak IPO of QNT, a pure-play competitor

Explanation: Directly mentioned: IPO underperformed (fizzle), indicating poor market reception

Explanation: Sector-wide negative sentiment, but minimal quantum revenue exposure

Explanation: Inactive, no quantum revenue

Explanation: Inactive, no quantum revenue

Explanation: Inactive, no quantum revenue


Quantinuum IPO: QNT stock is listing on the Nasdaq today in a closely watched quantum computing debut - Fast Company

Explanation: Positive industry validation from competitor's IPO; trapped-ion focus

Explanation: Positive industry validation; superconducting pure-play

Explanation: Positive industry validation; quantum annealing pure-play

Explanation: Positive industry validation; neutral atom pure-play

Explanation: Direct positive impact from own IPO; pure-play

Explanation: Minimal positive from industry growth; low quantum revenue exposure

Explanation: Positive from spin-off success; trapped-ion hybrid

Explanation: Inactive, no quantum relevance

Explanation: Inactive, no quantum relevance

Explanation: Inactive, no quantum relevance


Quantinuum IPO Lifts Quantum Computing Stocks - Gotrade

Explanation: The news of Quantinuum's (QNT) IPO lifting quantum computing stocks assigns a high positive signal (+2.0) to QNT due to direct impact and high novelty of the event. Other pure-play companies (IONQ, RGTI, QBTS, QUBT) receive a moderate positive signal (+1.0) from sector-wide sentiment, with medium novelty. IBM and HON, as partial quantum players, get minor positive signals (+0.15 and +0.3 respectively) from ecosystem uplift. Inactive companies (MSFT, GOOGL, NVDA) score 0.0. The signal is likely to decay quickly (fast decay speed) as IPO effects are typically short-lived.


Honeywell’s quantum company goes public. What investors should know about the IPO - CNBC

Explanation: Positive sentiment from quantum sector IPO event

Explanation: IPO of the company itself, significant positive event

Explanation: Small positive sentiment from quantum sector IPO event

Explanation: Spinoff of quantum business, no quantum revenue left

Explanation: Inactive

Explanation: Inactive

Explanation: Inactive


QNT Stock Debuts Today After 20x-Oversubscribed IPO: New Quantum Play Grabs Investor Attention Amid Trump Pump - Yahoo Finance

Explanation: The news focuses on QNT's highly oversubscribed IPO (20x), indicating strong investor demand and novelty for a new pure-play quantum company. This event is assigned the maximum positive score (+2.0) for QNT. Other pure-play competitors (IONQ, RGTI, QBTS, QUBT) receive a moderate positive (+0.5) due to sector-wide excitement from the event, though with lower novelty and faster decay. IBM and HON, as non-pure-plays, get a mild positive (+0.1) for similar reasons. Inactive companies (MSFT, GOOGL, NVDA) score 0.0 as per guidelines.


Quantinuum raises $1.68 billion in IPO that seeks to give quantum computing more street cred - MSN

Explanation: Quantinuum's $1.68 billion IPO is a major positive event for QNT (+2.0) as it validates the commercial potential of quantum computing. The spillover effect boosts credibility for pure-play competitors (IONQ, RGTI, QBTS, QUBT; each +1.0) and smaller gains for IBM (+0.15) and Honeywell (+0.3) due to their quantum segments. Inactive companies (MSFT, GOOGL, NVDA) score 0.0.


Quantum computing’s biggest IPO arrives with a sizzle, not a pop - Yahoo! Finance Canada

Explanation: Moderate positive impact from sector-wide sentiment due to successful quantum IPO; novelty high, decay moderate.

Explanation: Direct positive impact from successful IPO; high novelty as largest quantum IPO, fast decay likely.

Explanation: Small positive indirect impact from quantum sector sentiment; low novelty for IBM, slow decay.

Explanation: Small positive indirect impact from quantum sector sentiment; low novelty for HON, slow decay.

Explanation: Inactive, no quantum focus, no impact.

Explanation: Inactive, no quantum focus, no impact.

Explanation: Inactive, no quantum focus, no impact.


Why Rigetti Computing Stock Just Crashed - Yahoo Finance

Explanation: Indirectly benefits as a competitor in the quantum computing sector; trapped-ion focus may contrast with Rigetti's superconducting approach. Low novelty for sector dynamics, moderate decay.

Explanation: Directly impacted by stock crash news; high novelty and slow decay due to potential fundamental issues (e.g., financial or technological setbacks).

Explanation: No significant impact; quantum annealing focus (D-Wave) differs from Rigetti's gate-based approach. Low novelty, fast decay.

Explanation: Neutral atom technology not directly affected; minimal sector spillover. Low novelty, fast decay.

Explanation: Indirectly benefits as a competitor; trapped-ion focus may gain relative strength. Low novelty for sector, moderate decay.

Explanation: Minor quantum exposure (~2% revenue); potential sector-wide sentiment drag, but diversified business limits impact. Moderate novelty, moderate decay.

Explanation: Small quantum business post-Quantinuum spinoff (~1% revenue); no direct impact. Low novelty, fast decay.

Explanation: Inactive; no quantum revenue focus. Always 0.0.


Why D-Wave Quantum Stock Just Crashed - Yahoo Finance

Explanation: The news directly impacts QBTS with a -2.0 score due to the stock crash, indicating high novelty and moderate-slow decay from potential fundamental issues. Other companies score 0.0 as they are unaffected, with fast decay for any minor sentiment effects.


Why D-Wave Quantum Stock Just Crashed - The Motley Fool

Explanation: The news details a crash in D-Wave (QBTS) stock, a pure-play quantum company, warranting the maximum negative score of -2.0. Sector-wide concerns lead to moderate negative scores (-0.5) for other pure-plays (IONQ, RGTI, QUBT, QNT). Non-pure-play companies IBM (~2% quantum revenue) and HON (~1% quantum revenue) receive smaller negatives (-0.075 and -0.15) due to limited quantum exposure. Inactive companies (MSFT, GOOGL, NVDA) score 0.0 as they are unaffected.


Quantinuum Stock Closes Below Its Offer Price. Why the Buzzy Quantum IPO Is Faltering. - Barron's

Explanation: Quantinuum's IPO underperformance directly impacts QNT negatively (-2.0). Other pure-plays (IONQ, RGTI, QBTS, QUBT) are moderately affected (-0.5 each) due to sector sentiment. Honeywell (HON) is negatively impacted as Quantinuum's former parent (-0.2). IBM has minor exposure (-0.1). Inactive companies (MSFT, GOOGL, NVDA) are unaffected (0.0). Novelty is high; decay speed is medium.


Quantinuum and Mitsubishi Electric Sign Quantum Computing MOU - The Quantum Insider

Explanation: General positive sentiment from quantum sector news, but not directly involved.

Explanation: Direct positive impact from signing a quantum computing MOU with Mitsubishi Electric, indicating potential collaboration.

Explanation: No direct impact; quantum computing is a small part of their business.

Explanation: No direct impact; quantum computing is a small part of their business post-spinoff.

Explanation: Inactive in quantum computing.

Explanation: Inactive in quantum computing.

Explanation: Inactive in quantum computing.


Quantinuum Stock Falls After Uninspiring Quantum IPO Debut. What Went Wrong? - Barron's

Explanation: Trapped-ion competitor; spillover negativity from Quantinuum's poor IPO, moderate novelty, gradual decay

Explanation: Superconducting competitor; sector-wide sentiment drag, moderate novelty, gradual decay

Explanation: Quantum annealing player; minor sector impact, moderate novelty, gradual decay

Explanation: Neutral atom player; minor sector impact, moderate novelty, gradual decay

Explanation: Direct negative impact from uninspiring IPO debut; high novelty, moderate decay

Explanation: Small quantum revenue exposure; slight negative sentiment, moderate novelty, faster decay

Explanation: Trapped-ion relation and Quantinuum spinoff association; moderate novelty, faster decay

Explanation: Inactive, no quantum focus

Explanation: Inactive, no quantum focus

Explanation: Inactive, no quantum focus


Quantum computer maker Quantinuum closes flat after $1.68B IPO - SiliconANGLE

Explanation: Direct competitor with same trapped-ion technology; negative impact from new competitor; medium decay

Explanation: Competitor IPO; negative impact despite different superconducting technology; medium decay

Explanation: Competitor IPO; negative impact despite different quantum annealing technology; medium decay

Explanation: Competitor IPO; negative impact despite different neutral atom technology; medium decay

Explanation: Directly mentioned; flat IPO close perceived as lack of enthusiasm; high novelty, fast decay

Explanation: Minor quantum exposure (~2%); slight negative from industry competition; medium decay

Explanation: Trapped-ion player with minor quantum exposure (~1%); negative due to direct competition; medium decay

Explanation: Inactive; no quantum focus; always 0.0

Explanation: Inactive; no quantum focus; always 0.0

Explanation: Inactive; no quantum focus; always 0.0


IPO News - US IPO Weekly Recap: Billion-dollar engine and quantum computing IPOs come to market as SpaceX launches historic IPO - renaissancecapital.com

Explanation: Quantum computing IPOs, led by Quantinuum (QNT), drive sector positivity. Pure-plays (IONQ, RGTI, QBTS, QUBT) gain moderate scores. IBM and Honeywell receive maximum positive scores within their ranges due to sector sentiment. Inactive companies score zero.


Rigetti Stock: The Rise and Fall of a Quantum Computing Company - TradingKey

Explanation: Sector-wide negative sentiment from competitor's fall

Explanation: Direct negative impact from article about its fall

Explanation: Minor negative impact due to quantum sector uncertainty

Explanation: Inactive, no quantum focus

Explanation: Inactive, no quantum focus

Explanation: Inactive, no quantum focus


Introducing Microsoft Majorana 2 - Microsoft Source

Explanation: Pure-play trapped-ion company; benefits from positive sector sentiment due to Microsoft's quantum advancement, though not directly competing. Score reflects moderate positive impact from sector growth.

Explanation: Pure-play superconducting company; strongly negatively affected as Microsoft is a competing player in quantum computing, potentially reducing market share for superconducting firms. Score reflects significant competitive threat.

Explanation: Pure-play quantum annealing company; different technology approach, so less directly impacted. Score reflects modest positive effect from overall quantum industry growth.

Explanation: Pure-play neutral atom company; different approach, benefits from sector growth. Score reflects positive sentiment but lower direct relevance.

Explanation: Pure-play trapped-ion company; similar to IONQ, benefits from sector growth. Score reflects moderate positive impact.

Explanation: Mixed company with ~2% quantum revenue; negatively affected as Microsoft is a direct competitor in superconducting quantum computing. Score reflects maximum negative impact within range due to competitive pressure.

Explanation: Mixed company with ~1% quantum revenue from trapped-ion; not directly competing, so slightly positive from sector growth. Score reflects modest positive effect within narrow range.

Explanation: Inactive, always 0.0 per specification.

Explanation: Inactive, always 0.0 per specification.

Explanation: Inactive, always 0.0 per specification.


The Next Quantum Computing IPO CEO Just Told CNBC 'It Is Not 10 to 15 Years Out. It's Very Much Now' - 24/7 Wall St.

Explanation: Positive industry sentiment from accelerated quantum timeline; full quantum exposure as pure-play.

Explanation: Direct source of news (CEO of 'next quantum IPO'); positive sentiment; full quantum exposure; novel timeline shift sustains impact.

Explanation: Positive sentiment benefits quantum segment; capped at +0.15 due to ~2% quantum revenue share.

Explanation: Positive sentiment benefits quantum segment; capped at +0.3 due to ~1% quantum revenue share.

Explanation: Inactive in quantum; no exposure; always 0.0.