{"idx": 0, "skip": false, "date": "2026-01-02", "title": "IonQ Expands Global Quantum Footprint Through Strategic Partnerships - Yahoo Finance", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": 2.0, "RGTI": 0.0, "QBTS": 0.0, "QUBT": 0.0, "QNT": 0.0, "IBM": 0.0, "HON": 0.0, "MSFT": 0.0, "GOOGL": 0.0, "NVDA": 0.0}, "reasoning": "The news article exclusively highlights IonQ's strategic partnerships, indicating significant growth and market expansion for this pure-play quantum company. As a direct beneficiary, IonQ receives the maximum positive score of +2.0. Other active companies (RGTI, QBTS, QUBT, QNT, IBM, HON) are unaffected by this specific event, warranting a neutral score of 0.0. Inactive companies (MSFT, GOOGL, NVDA) are always scored 0.0 per the problem constraints."}}
{"idx": 1, "skip": false, "date": "2026-01-13", "title": "Dynamic surface codes open new avenues for quantum error correction - Research at Google", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Trapped-ion company; benefits indirectly from industry-wide error correction advancements, but surface codes are less directly applicable to their architecture."}, "RGTI": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Superconducting pure-play; directly benefits from this novel surface code advancement, enhancing their core technology."}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Quantum annealing company; surface codes are irrelevant to their annealing-based approach, so no impact."}, "QUBT": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Neutral atom company; general positive sentiment from error correction progress, though surface codes are not their primary focus."}, "QNT": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Trapped-ion pure-play; similar to IONQ, gains from broad industry optimism, but surface codes are not architecture-specific to them."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Superconducting company with ~2% quantum revenue; benefits from field advancement, but limited impact due to diversified business."}, "HON": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Trapped-ion company with ~1% quantum revenue; positive industry news, but minimal quantum exposure constrains impact."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; always 0.0 per rules."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; always 0.0 per rules, despite being the research source."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; always 0.0 per rules."}}}}
{"idx": 2, "skip": false, "date": "2026-01-14", "title": "Katie Arrington lands in industry as CIO of quantum company IonQ - DefenseScoop", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": [{"ticker": "IONQ", "score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive impact from high-profile CIO hire with government background; moderate novelty and decay speed."}, {"ticker": "RGTI", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct impact from the news."}, {"ticker": "QBTS", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct impact from the news."}, {"ticker": "QUBT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct impact from the news."}, {"ticker": "QNT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct impact from the news."}, {"ticker": "IBM", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct impact from the news; within [-0.15, +0.15] range."}, {"ticker": "HON", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct impact from the news; within [-0.3, +0.3] range."}, {"ticker": "MSFT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive company; always 0.0."}, {"ticker": "GOOGL", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive company; always 0.0."}, {"ticker": "NVDA", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive company; always 0.0."}]}}
{"idx": 3, "skip": false, "date": "2026-01-14", "title": "Honeywell plans to carve out quantum computing unit Quantinuum via IPO - Reuters", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": [{"ticker": "IONQ", "score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive sentiment from industry validation due to a peer's IPO, though indirect."}, {"ticker": "RGTI", "score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Same as IONQ; sector-wide uplift from quantum industry validation."}, {"ticker": "QBTS", "score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Same as IONQ; positive sentiment from industry growth signal."}, {"ticker": "QUBT", "score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Same as IONQ; indirect positive impact from sector event."}, {"ticker": "QNT", "score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Direct positive impact from IPO carve-out, becoming a standalone pure-play with enhanced focus and capital; high novelty, but signal may decay post-IPO."}, {"ticker": "IBM", "score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Minor positive sentiment from quantum industry validation, but limited by small quantum revenue stake."}, {"ticker": "HON", "score": -0.3, "reasoning": "Negative impact from divesting quantum business, reducing quantum exposure to zero; permanent effect."}, {"ticker": "MSFT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, no quantum exposure."}, {"ticker": "GOOGL", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, no quantum exposure."}, {"ticker": "NVDA", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, no quantum exposure."}]}}
{"idx": 4, "skip": false, "date": "2026-01-15", "title": "EeroQ Breakthrough Solves the \"Wire Problem\" in Quantum Computing - PR Newswire", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive impact due to relevance to trapped-ion architecture; not directly associated with EeroQ."}, "RGTI": {"score": 1.5, "reasoning": "Significant benefit as superconducting qubits face wiring challenges; breakthrough addresses core limitation."}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Minimal impact; quantum annealing architecture is less affected by gate-based connectivity issues."}, "QUBT": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive impact for neutral atom qubits, which value improved connectivity; not directly linked to EeroQ."}, "QNT": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Direct beneficiary; EeroQ breakthrough is associated with Quantinuum, enhancing its trapped-ion technology."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Moderate indirect benefit for superconducting approach, but limited by low quantum revenue share (~2%)."}, "HON": {"score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Moderate indirect benefit for trapped-ion technology, but limited by low quantum revenue share (~1%)."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; no quantum computing focus."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; no quantum computing focus."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; no quantum computing focus."}}}}
{"idx": 5, "skip": false, "date": "2026-01-15", "title": "Equal1 Announces $60 Million Raise for Quantum Computer That Use Existing Semiconductor Manufacturing - The Quantum Insider", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Trapped-ion technology not directly impacted by semiconductor manufacturing news."}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.5, "reasoning": "Uses semiconductor manufacturing for superconducting qubits; positive industry validation."}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.5, "reasoning": "Quantum annealing relies on semiconductor processes; positive industry validation."}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.5, "reasoning": "Neutral atom technology can leverage semiconductor manufacturing; positive impact."}, "QNT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Trapped-ion focus; less relevant to semiconductor approach."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Strong semiconductor capabilities align with news; positive for quantum business."}, "HON": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Minimal quantum focus post-spinoff; trapped-ion not semiconductor-focused."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, always 0.0"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, always 0.0"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, always 0.0"}}}}
{"idx": 6, "skip": false, "date": "2026-01-21", "title": "Quantum computing: Expanding what's possible - National Science Foundation (.gov)", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": 1.0, "RGTI": 1.0, "QBTS": 1.0, "QUBT": 1.0, "QNT": 1.0, "IBM": 0.1, "HON": 0.15, "MSFT": 0.0, "GOOGL": 0.0, "NVDA": 0.0}, "reasoning": "General positive NSF announcement on quantum computing expansion. Pure-play companies (+1.0) benefit most due to 100% quantum focus. IBM (+0.10) and Honeywell (+0.15) receive smaller bumps from quantum revenue exposure. Inactive companies score 0.0. Decay expected to be slow due to government backing."}}
{"idx": 7, "skip": false, "date": "2026-01-21", "title": "Alice & Bob Develops \u2018Elevator Codes\u2019 to Slash Error Rates on Cat Qubit Quantum Computers - Alice & Bob", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct impact; development specific to cat qubits, not trapped-ion."}, "RGTI": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Significant positive impact; Rigetti utilizes cat qubits via Passara acquisition, and the error reduction enhances their technology."}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct impact; D-Wave uses quantum annealing with traditional qubits, not cat qubits."}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct impact; neutral atom technology unrelated to cat qubits."}, "QNT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct impact; trapped-ion technology not related to cat qubits."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct impact; superconducting approach not tied to cat qubits, and minimal quantum revenue."}, "HON": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct impact; trapped-ion technology unrelated to cat qubits."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; no quantum revenue focus."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; no quantum revenue focus."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; no quantum revenue focus."}}}}
{"idx": 8, "skip": false, "date": "2026-01-22", "title": "Demonstration of low-overhead quantum error correction codes - Nature", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Strong positive impact for IONQ as a trapped-ion pure-play; low-overhead error correction aligns with its architecture's strengths, and the slow decay supports a high score."}, "RGTI": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Moderate positive for RGTI (superconducting); error correction is beneficial, but superconducting qubits typically require higher overhead, limiting the impact compared to trapped-ion."}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Neutral for QBTS (quantum annealing); the news pertains to gate-based error correction, which is not directly applicable to annealing architectures."}, "QUBT": {"score": 1.5, "reasoning": "Positive for QUBT (neutral atom); the architecture can leverage low-overhead codes, but novelty and decay support a high score, slightly less than trapped-ion due to emerging status."}, "QNT": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Strong positive for QNT (trapped-ion pure-play); similar to IONQ, benefits significantly from low-overhead advancements with slow decay."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Slight positive for IBM; error correction advances support its quantum efforts, but capped at +0.15 due to only ~2% quantum revenue share."}, "HON": {"score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Positive for HON (trapped-ion); benefits from the advancement, but capped at +0.3 due to ~1% quantum revenue post-spinoff."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; always 0.0 per the quantum universe definition."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; always 0.0 per the quantum universe definition."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; always 0.0 per the quantum universe definition."}}}}
{"idx": 9, "skip": false, "date": "2026-01-22", "title": "QMill Announces a Six-fold Leap in Reaching Quantum Advantage - The Quantum Insider", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "The six-fold leap in quantum advantage by QMill is a major positive industry milestone. As a pure-play trapped-ion company, IONQ benefits maximally from advancements accelerating quantum adoption."}, "RGTI": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "The breakthrough is highly positive for Rigetti Computing (superconducting), as it validates the technology's potential and drives sector-wide optimism."}, "QBTS": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "D-Wave's quantum annealing approach gains from the industry advancement, positioning it for greater relevance in optimization applications."}, "QUBT": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Quantum Computing Inc. (neutral atom) benefits significantly from the leap, enhancing its competitive position in the emerging market."}, "QNT": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Quantinuum (trapped-ion) stands to gain substantially from the progress, especially given its recent IPO and focus on commercialization."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "IBM's superconducting quantum efforts receive a boost, but the score is capped at +0.15 due to quantum revenue being only ~2% of total."}, "HON": {"score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Honeywell's trapped-ion division benefits, but the score is capped at +0.3 due to ~1% quantum revenue post-Quantinuum spinoff."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Microsoft is inactive in quantum scoring and always scores 0.0."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Google is inactive in quantum scoring and always scores 0.0."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "NVIDIA is inactive in quantum scoring and always scores 0.0."}}}}
{"idx": 10, "skip": false, "date": "2026-01-23", "title": "Google\u2019s Quantum Breakthrough Redefines the Future of Computation - Trends Research", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play benefits from sector-wide optimism due to Google's breakthrough."}, "RGTI": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play positive impact from industry advancement news."}, "QBTS": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play gains from heightened sector enthusiasm."}, "QUBT": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play uplift from breakthrough validating quantum potential."}, "QNT": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play positive signal due to industry catalyst."}, "IBM": {"score": -0.1, "reasoning": "Negative competitive pressure from Google's superconducting advancement."}, "HON": {"score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Indirect positive from sector growth, despite spinoff."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, always 0.0."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, always 0.0."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, always 0.0."}}}}
{"idx": 11, "skip": false, "date": "2026-01-23", "title": "Microsoft Opens 2026 Quantum Pioneers Program for Measurement-Based Topological Computing Research - The Quantum Insider", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": [{"ticker": "IONQ", "score": 0.5, "reasoning": "Positive industry validation; indirect benefit to pure-play."}, {"ticker": "RGTI", "score": 0.5, "reasoning": "Positive industry validation; indirect benefit to pure-play."}, {"ticker": "QBTS", "score": 0.5, "reasoning": "Positive industry validation; indirect benefit to pure-play."}, {"ticker": "QUBT", "score": 0.5, "reasoning": "Positive industry validation; indirect benefit to pure-play."}, {"ticker": "QNT", "score": 0.5, "reasoning": "Positive industry validation; indirect benefit to pure-play."}, {"ticker": "IBM", "score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Positive industry validation; reduced impact as non-pure-play."}, {"ticker": "HON", "score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Positive industry validation; reduced impact as non-pure-play."}, {"ticker": "MSFT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive company; always 0.0."}, {"ticker": "GOOGL", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive company; always 0.0."}, {"ticker": "NVDA", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive company; always 0.0."}]}}
{"idx": 12, "skip": false, "date": "2026-01-26", "title": "IonQ to Acquire SkyWater Technology - The Quantum Insider", "source": "news", "status": "error", "error": "Extra data: line 14 column 1 (char 742)"}
{"idx": 13, "skip": false, "date": "2026-01-26", "title": "Exclusive | Quantum-Computing Company IonQ to Buy Chip Maker SkyWater for $1.8 Billion - WSJ", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Acquisition of SkyWater provides vertical integration, boosting IonQ's trapped-ion hardware capabilities and competitive standing."}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct impact on Rigetti's superconducting quantum business."}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct impact on D-Wave's quantum annealing technology."}, "QNT": {"score": -0.5, "reasoning": "IonQ's vertical integration strengthens a key trapped-ion rival, increasing competitive threat to Quantinuum."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Negligible quantum revenue; no material connection to the acquisition."}, "HON": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Post-Quantinuum spinoff, minimal quantum focus; no impact from IonQ's move."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; always 0.0"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; always 0.0"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; always 0.0"}}}}
{"idx": 14, "skip": false, "date": "2026-01-28", "title": "A glimpse at computing\u2019s quantum-centric future - IBM Research", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.1, "reasoning": "General positive sentiment from IBM's quantum future news, but not directly related; low novelty and fast decay."}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Superconducting technology aligns with IBM; benefits from sector validation; low novelty and fast decay."}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.1, "reasoning": "General positive sentiment for quantum sector; low novelty and fast decay."}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.1, "reasoning": "General positive sentiment for quantum sector; low novelty and fast decay."}, "QNT": {"score": 0.1, "reasoning": "General positive sentiment for quantum sector; low novelty and fast decay."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.12, "reasoning": "Direct positive news from IBM; however, limited impact due to ~2% quantum revenue, low novelty (regular updates), and fast decay."}, "HON": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct impact; news unrelated to Honeywell's quantum efforts."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, always 0.0"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, always 0.0"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, always 0.0"}}}}
{"idx": 15, "skip": false, "date": "2026-01-28", "title": "Exploring the most complex time crystals yet with quantum-centric supercomputers - IBM", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct mention in the news; the research is specific to IBM and does not pertain to IONQ's activities."}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct mention; Rigetti Computing is not associated with this IBM-led research on time crystals."}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct mention; D-Wave's quantum annealing technology is not referenced, and the news does not impact QBTS."}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct mention; Quantum Computing Inc.'s neutral atom approach is unrelated to this IBM-specific development."}, "QNT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct mention; Quantinuum's trapped-ion technology is not involved, and the news does not affect QNT."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "IBM is directly credited with exploring complex time crystals using quantum-centric supercomputers. This novel research showcases their quantum leadership and could validate the sector, but its practical impact may decay quickly due to its fundamental nature. Scored at the upper limit of IBM's range for positive impact."}, "HON": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No mention; Honeywell's quantum efforts are not related to this news, and there is no implied impact."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; always scored 0.0 per the problem constraints."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; always scored 0.0 per the problem constraints."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; always scored 0.0 per the problem constraints."}}}}
{"idx": 16, "skip": false, "date": "2026-02-04", "title": "IonQ, the biggest quantum computing company on the stock market, misled investors, short-seller says - Fortune", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": [{"ticker": "IONQ", "score": -1.8, "reasoning": "Directly negative due to short-seller accusation of misleading investors, indicating potential overvaluation or fraud. High impact with rapid decay possible if unsubstantiated."}, {"ticker": "RGTI", "score": 0.6, "reasoning": "Positive as a competitor benefiting from reduced competition and shift in investor sentiment away from IonQ. Moderate novelty, slower decay if IonQ is weakened."}, {"ticker": "QBTS", "score": 0.6, "reasoning": "Similar to RGTI; as a pure-play quantum company, expected to gain from the negative news about IonQ. Moderate novelty, slower decay."}, {"ticker": "QUBT", "score": 0.6, "reasoning": "As a pure-play quantum company, likely to benefit from the shift in investor focus following IonQ's issues. Moderate novelty, slower decay."}, {"ticker": "QNT", "score": 0.6, "reasoning": "Quantinuum, being a trapped-ion competitor, may see positive sentiment as IonQ faces scrutiny. Moderate novelty, slower decay."}, {"ticker": "IBM", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Minimal impact due to low quantum revenue exposure; news is sector-specific but IBM is not a pure-play."}, {"ticker": "HON", "score": 0.2, "reasoning": "Honeywell, also trapped-ion, may be seen as a safer investment alternative, but with low quantum revenue, impact is moderate."}, {"ticker": "MSFT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per definition; not in the active quantum computing universe for scoring."}, {"ticker": "GOOGL", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per definition; not in the active quantum computing universe for scoring."}, {"ticker": "NVDA", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per definition; not in the active quantum computing universe for scoring."}]}}
{"idx": 17, "skip": false, "date": "2026-02-04", "title": "Tennessee Commits $20M to New Quantum Initiative as EPB Secures $4M Federal Grant - The Quantum Insider", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.5, "reasoning": "Positive due to state initiative boosting the quantum ecosystem, which may benefit IONQ indirectly."}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.5, "reasoning": "Positive due to state initiative boosting the quantum ecosystem, which may benefit RGTI indirectly."}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.5, "reasoning": "Positive due to state initiative boosting the quantum ecosystem, which may benefit QBTS indirectly."}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.5, "reasoning": "Positive due to state initiative boosting the quantum ecosystem, which may benefit QUBT indirectly."}, "QNT": {"score": 0.5, "reasoning": "Positive due to state initiative boosting the quantum ecosystem, which may benefit QNT indirectly."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Positive due to federal grant to EPB, which has a history of partnering with IBM for quantum projects."}, "HON": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct connection to the news."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive (always 0.0)"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive (always 0.0)"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive (always 0.0)"}}}}
{"idx": 18, "skip": false, "date": "2026-02-10", "title": "IBM is recognized as the current Company to Beat in a 2025 Gartner\u00ae report on Quantum Computing - IBM", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": -0.5, "reasoning": "Indirect negative impact due to IBM's leadership overshadowing trapped-ion players; technology divergence limits severity."}, "RGTI": {"score": -1.0, "reasoning": "Strong negative as a direct competitor in superconducting quantum; IBM's recognition reduces RGTI's competitive standing."}, "QBTS": {"score": -0.3, "reasoning": "Slight negative; quantum annealing is less affected but Gartner's focus on IBM may reduce attention to alternative approaches."}, "QUBT": {"score": -0.5, "reasoning": "Negative impact as a neutral atom player; IBM's leadership makes it harder for emerging technologies to gain traction."}, "QNT": {"score": -0.5, "reasoning": "Negative due to competitive pressure from IBM as a trapped-ion rival; similar to IONQ."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Direct positive recognition as 'Company to Beat' in a Gartner report, indicating leadership; high novelty and slow decay."}, "HON": {"score": -0.2, "reasoning": "Mild negative; reduced quantum focus post-spinoff makes HON less sensitive, but sector-wide sentiment shift applies."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; not part of the quantum computing universe for scoring."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; not part of the quantum computing universe for scoring."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; not part of the quantum computing universe for scoring."}}}}
{"idx": 19, "skip": false, "date": "2026-02-16", "title": "Majorana qubits decoded in quantum computing breakthrough - ScienceDaily", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Breakthrough in Majorana qubits does not impact trapped-ion technology."}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Breakthrough unrelated to Rigetti's superconducting qubits."}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "D-Wave's quantum annealing is unaffected by Majorana qubit advancements."}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Neutral atom technology at Quantum Computing Inc. is not connected to Majorana qubits."}, "QNT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Quantinuum's trapped-ion approach is unrelated to the breakthrough."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "IBM's superconducting qubits are not impacted; minimal quantum revenue focus."}, "HON": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Honeywell's post-spinoff quantum revenue is negligible; trapped-ion unrelated."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, always 0.0 per constraints."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, always 0.0 per constraints."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, always 0.0 per constraints."}}}}
{"idx": 20, "skip": false, "date": "2026-02-17", "title": "Infleqtion IPO: US must win quantum computing race, CEO says - Yahoo Finance", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": [{"ticker": "IONQ", "score": 2.0, "reasoning": "US pure-play trapped-ion company; strongly benefits from US leadership push."}, {"ticker": "RGTI", "score": 2.0, "reasoning": "US pure-play superconducting company; similarly benefits from US leadership push."}, {"ticker": "QBTS", "score": -2.0, "reasoning": "Canadian quantum annealing company; negatively affected as non-US competitor."}, {"ticker": "QUBT", "score": 2.0, "reasoning": "US pure-play neutral atom company; benefits from US leadership push."}, {"ticker": "QNT", "score": -2.0, "reasoning": "UK-based trapped-ion company; negatively affected as non-US competitor."}, {"ticker": "IBM", "score": 0.15, "reasoning": "US company with ~2% quantum revenue; benefits from sentiment but capped due to small quantum focus."}, {"ticker": "HON", "score": 0.3, "reasoning": "US company with ~1% quantum revenue; benefits from sentiment post-Quantinuum spinoff."}, {"ticker": "MSFT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not part of quantum universe; always 0.0."}, {"ticker": "GOOGL", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not part of quantum universe; always 0.0."}, {"ticker": "NVDA", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not part of quantum universe; always 0.0."}]}}
{"idx": 21, "skip": false, "date": "2026-02-18", "title": "RIKEN and IBM demonstrate quantum-centric supercomputing | IBM Quantum Computing Blog - IBM", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": 0.0, "RGTI": 0.0, "QBTS": 0.0, "QUBT": 0.0, "QNT": 0.0, "IBM": 0.15, "HON": 0.0, "MSFT": 0.0, "GOOGL": 0.0, "NVDA": 0.0}, "reasoning": "IBM scores +0.15 for direct positive impact from the demonstration. Other active companies score 0.0 with no direct relevance. Inactive companies are always 0.0."}}
{"idx": 22, "skip": false, "date": "2026-02-20", "title": "Quantum computer breakthrough tracks qubit fluctuations in real time - ScienceDaily", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": 2.0, "RGTI": 2.0, "QBTS": 2.0, "QUBT": 2.0, "QNT": 2.0, "IBM": 0.15, "HON": 0.3, "MSFT": 0.0, "GOOGL": 0.0, "NVDA": 0.0}, "reasoning": "The breakthrough in tracking qubit fluctuations in real time is a novel advancement that enhances quantum computing fundamentals like error correction. Pure-play companies benefit maximally (+2.0) due to exclusive quantum focus. IBM (+0.15) and HON (+0.3) gain smaller positive scores proportional to their quantum revenue shares. Inactive companies score 0.0. Impact decay is slow due to the foundational nature of the breakthrough."}}
{"idx": 23, "skip": false, "date": "2026-02-23", "title": "Quantum Advantage Tracker: the race to advantage - IBM", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": 0.0, "RGTI": 0.0, "QBTS": 0.0, "QUBT": 0.0, "QNT": 0.0, "IBM": 0.15, "HON": 0.0, "MSFT": 0.0, "GOOGL": 0.0, "NVDA": 0.0}, "reasoning": "News focuses on IBM's Quantum Advantage Tracker, indicating positive sentiment for IBM. Other companies are unaffected (neutral). Score reflects IBM's direct involvement and positive framing."}}
{"idx": 24, "skip": false, "date": "2026-02-23", "title": "Record venture funding signals Europe\u2019s growing quantum clout - PitchBook", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": [{"ticker": "IONQ", "score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Indirect positive from global quantum growth; not European-focused."}, {"ticker": "RGTI", "score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Indirect positive from global quantum growth; not European-focused."}, {"ticker": "QBTS", "score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Indirect positive from global quantum growth; not European-focused."}, {"ticker": "QUBT", "score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Indirect positive from global quantum growth; not European-focused."}, {"ticker": "QNT", "score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Indirect positive from global quantum growth; not European-focused."}, {"ticker": "IBM", "score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Direct positive due to strong European presence and ecosystem growth."}, {"ticker": "HON", "score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Direct positive due to strong European presence and ecosystem growth."}, {"ticker": "MSFT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; always 0.0"}, {"ticker": "GOOGL", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; always 0.0"}, {"ticker": "NVDA", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; always 0.0"}]}}
{"idx": 25, "skip": false, "date": "2026-02-25", "title": "IonQ Surpasses $100 Million in Annual Revenue, Reports Quantum Sales Accelerating - The Quantum Insider", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": 2.0, "RGTI": 0.0, "QBTS": 0.0, "QUBT": 0.0, "QNT": -1.0, "IBM": 0.0, "HON": -0.2, "MSFT": 0.0, "GOOGL": 0.0, "NVDA": 0.0}, "reasoning": "IonQ's $100 million revenue milestone and accelerating sales are highly positive for IONQ (+2.0). Competitors in trapped-ion, Quantinuum (QNT) and Honeywell (HON), are negatively affected (-1.0 and -0.2 respectively). Other pure-plays (RGTI, QBTS, QUBT) and IBM are unaffected (0.0). Inactive companies (MSFT, GOOGL, NVDA) score 0.0. The novelty of the milestone and sustained growth imply slow decay."}}
{"idx": 26, "skip": false, "date": "2026-02-26", "title": "DOE national quantum research centers reach breakthrough towards building scalable quantum computers - Fermilab (.gov)", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 1.5, "reasoning": "Positive sector news; trapped-ion relevant to scalable quantum computing."}, "RGTI": {"score": 1.5, "reasoning": "Positive sector news; superconducting relevant to scalable quantum computing."}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.5, "reasoning": "Quantum annealing less relevant to scalable gate-based quantum computers."}, "QUBT": {"score": 1.5, "reasoning": "Positive sector news; neutral atom relevant to scalable quantum computing."}, "QNT": {"score": 1.5, "reasoning": "Positive sector news; trapped-ion relevant to scalable quantum computing."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Positive industry sentiment, but minimal quantum revenue share."}, "HON": {"score": 0.2, "reasoning": "Positive industry sentiment with trapped-ion relevance, but diversified portfolio."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, no quantum focus."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, no quantum focus."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, no quantum focus."}}}}
{"idx": 27, "skip": false, "date": "2026-02-27", "title": "Demonstration of high-fidelity entangled logical qubits using transmons - Nature", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "News focuses on transmons (superconducting qubits), while IONQ uses trapped-ion technology. No direct impact."}, "RGTI": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Rigetti is a pure-play superconducting company. The demonstration of high-fidelity entangled logical qubits using transmons directly enhances their core technology, justifying the maximum positive score."}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "D-Wave specializes in quantum annealing, not gate-based superconducting qubits like transmons. No relevance."}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Quantum Computing Inc. uses neutral atom technology, unrelated to transmons. No impact."}, "QNT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Quantinuum employs trapped-ion qubits, not superconducting. The news does not apply."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "IBM uses superconducting qubits, so the advancement is relevant. However, with only ~2% quantum revenue, the impact is diluted, capped at the maximum +0.15."}, "HON": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Honeywell focuses on trapped-ion qubits (via Quantinuum spinoff). The transmon news is unrelated."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive company (always 0.0)."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive company (always 0.0)."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive company (always 0.0)."}}}}
{"idx": 28, "skip": false, "date": "2026-03-03", "title": "If I Could Own Only 1 Quantum Computing Stock for 2026, It Would Be This - Yahoo Finance", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not the recommended stock; neutral as the article focuses on one company."}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not the recommended stock; neutral as the article focuses on one company."}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not the recommended stock; neutral as the article focuses on one company."}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not the recommended stock; neutral as the article focuses on one company."}, "QNT": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Recommended as the top quantum stock for 2026; maximum positive score for pure-play."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not the recommended stock; neutral as the article focuses on one company."}, "HON": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not the recommended stock; neutral as the article focuses on one company."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive in quantum computing per problem definition."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive in quantum computing per problem definition."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive in quantum computing per problem definition."}}}}
{"idx": 29, "skip": false, "date": "2026-03-03", "title": "Why Quantum Computing Stock Is Plummeting Today - The Motley Fool", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": -1.5, "RGTI": -1.5, "QBTS": -1.5, "QUBT": -1.5, "QNT": -1.5, "IBM": -0.03, "HON": -0.015, "MSFT": 0.0, "GOOGL": 0.0, "NVDA": 0.0}, "reasoning": "The article indicates a sector-wide decline in quantum computing stocks. Pure-play companies (IONQ, RGTI, QBTS, QUBT, QNT) are assigned -1.5 due to full quantum revenue exposure. IBM (2% quantum revenue) and HON (1% quantum revenue) receive proportionally scaled scores (-0.03 and -0.015, respectively). Inactive companies (MSFT, GOOGL, NVDA) score 0.0 as they are not part of the quantum universe."}}
{"idx": 30, "skip": false, "date": "2026-03-04", "title": "Skinny Logic: Quantum Codes Go on a Diet - Quantinuum", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "As a trapped-ion pure-play, IONQ benefits indirectly from sector-wide advancements in code efficiency. The high novelty validates the trapped-ion approach, but as a competitor to Quantinuum, the impact is moderate. Slow decay due to fundamental implications."}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Rigetti (superconducting) is unaffected, as the news is trapped-ion specific. Low novelty impact and neutral decay; score reflects no direct relevance."}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "D-Wave (quantum annealing) uses a different paradigm with less reliance on traditional error correction, so the news has no impact. Neutral score with low novelty relevance."}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.5, "reasoning": "Quantum Computing Inc. (neutral atom) shares similarities with trapped-ion, allowing some indirect benefits from code efficiency gains. Moderate novelty impact and moderate decay; positive but not dominant."}, "QNT": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Quantinuum's proprietary development directly drives this score, as 'Skinny Logic' is a major trapped-ion advancement. High novelty and slow decay due to transformative potential for scalability."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "IBM (superconducting, ~2% quantum revenue) has minimal direct relevance; the news is trapped-ion focused. Neutral score within narrow range; low novelty impact."}, "HON": {"score": 0.2, "reasoning": "Honeywell (trapped-ion, ~1% quantum revenue) benefits indirectly as the former parent of Quantinuum. Low novelty for HON specifically, but positive sentiment with moderate decay."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; not a quantum pure-play or major revenue source. Always 0.0."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; quantum efforts are minor and not revenue-focused. Always 0.0."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; no significant quantum computing revenue. Always 0.0."}}}}
{"idx": 31, "skip": false, "date": "2026-03-04", "title": "A look back at the International Year of Quantum - IBM", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No mention in the news; neutral impact as a pure-play trapped-ion company"}, "RGTI": {"score": -0.1, "reasoning": "Competitor to IBM in superconducting quantum; IBM's positive news implies competitive pressure"}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No mention; quantum annealing is distinct from IBM's focus, so neutral impact"}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No mention; neutral atom technology not impacted by IBM's retrospective"}, "QNT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No mention; trapped-ion pure-play unaffected by IBM-specific news"}, "IBM": {"score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Directly positive as a self-retrospective, but low novelty and high decay speed limit the score"}, "HON": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No mention; minimal quantum revenue exposure post-spinoff, so no impact"}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive company; always 0.0"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive company; always 0.0"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive company; always 0.0"}}}}
{"idx": 32, "skip": false, "date": "2026-03-05", "title": "Rigetti Posts $216 Million Annual Loss While Expanding Quantum System Deployments - The Quantum Insider", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": -0.1, "reasoning": "Spillover negative sentiment from Rigetti's financial loss; no direct impact."}, "RGTI": {"score": -1.0, "reasoning": "Large loss ($216M) is highly negative; expansion provides partial offset."}, "QBTS": {"score": -0.1, "reasoning": "Spillover negative sentiment from Rigetti's financial loss; no direct impact."}, "QUBT": {"score": -0.1, "reasoning": "Spillover negative sentiment from Rigetti's financial loss; no direct impact."}, "QNT": {"score": -0.1, "reasoning": "Spillover negative sentiment from Rigetti's financial loss; no direct impact."}, "IBM": {"score": -0.05, "reasoning": "Minimal spillover negative effect; quantum revenue is only ~2% of total."}, "HON": {"score": -0.01, "reasoning": "Minimal spillover negative effect; quantum revenue is only ~1% of total."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No quantum revenue; always 0.0."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No quantum revenue; always 0.0."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No quantum revenue; always 0.0."}}}}
{"idx": 33, "skip": false, "date": "2026-03-05", "title": "IBM and University Researchers Create a Never-Before-Seen Molecule and Prove its Exotic Nature with Quantum Computing - IBM Newsroom", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": [{"ticker": "IONQ", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned; different trapped-ion technology"}, {"ticker": "RGTI", "score": 0.2, "reasoning": "Similar superconducting technology; indirect beneficiary of validation"}, {"ticker": "QBTS", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Quantum annealing not relevant for molecular simulation"}, {"ticker": "QUBT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned; different neutral atom technology"}, {"ticker": "QNT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned; different trapped-ion technology"}, {"ticker": "IBM", "score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Directly involved; significant positive development"}, {"ticker": "HON", "score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Indirect beneficiary as part of quantum sector"}, {"ticker": "MSFT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, always 0.0"}, {"ticker": "GOOGL", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, always 0.0"}, {"ticker": "NVDA", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, always 0.0"}]}}
{"idx": 34, "skip": false, "date": "2026-03-06", "title": "Logical multi-qubit entanglement with dual-rail superconducting qubits - Nature", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "News is specific to superconducting qubits; IONQ uses trapped-ion technology."}, "RGTI": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play superconducting company; direct relevance to the advancement."}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Quantum annealing company; not aligned with superconducting qubit research."}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Neutral atom company; no direct link to superconducting qubits."}, "QNT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Trapped-ion company; news is superconducting-specific."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Major superconducting player, but only ~2% quantum revenue limits impact."}, "HON": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Trapped-ion with ~1% quantum revenue; no direct relevance."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; always 0.0 per guidelines."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; always 0.0 per guidelines."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; always 0.0 per guidelines."}}}}
{"idx": 35, "skip": false, "date": "2026-03-10", "title": "Quantinuum Researchers Demonstrate Quantum Computations With Dozens of Protected Logical Qubits - The Quantum Insider", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": 0.0, "RGTI": 0.0, "QBTS": 0.0, "QUBT": 0.0, "QNT": 1.5, "IBM": 0.0, "HON": 0.0, "MSFT": 0.0, "GOOGL": 0.0, "NVDA": 0.0}, "reasoning": "Quantinuum's demonstration of protected logical qubits is a major advancement, directly benefiting QNT (+1.5). Other companies are unaffected (0.0)."}}
{"idx": 36, "skip": false, "date": "2026-03-11", "title": "Cambridge launches major strategic partnership with IonQ to \u2018supercharge\u2019 quantum research in the UK - University of Cambridge", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 1.8, "reasoning": "Direct beneficiary; partnership enhances IonQ's research capabilities and market position."}, "RGTI": {"score": -0.7, "reasoning": "Competing superconducting company; faces increased competitive pressure."}, "QBTS": {"score": -0.4, "reasoning": "Quantum annealing company; indirect negative impact from shift in quantum focus."}, "QUBT": {"score": -0.5, "reasoning": "Neutral atom pure-play; not involved, leading to negative sentiment."}, "QNT": {"score": -0.9, "reasoning": "Direct trapped-ion competitor to IonQ; likely disadvantaged by the partnership."}, "IBM": {"score": -0.12, "reasoning": "Large tech with minor quantum revenue; overshadowed by pure-play news."}, "HON": {"score": -0.2, "reasoning": "Trapped-ion player with low quantum revenue; not benefiting from the deal."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not a quantum company; no impact."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not a quantum company; no impact."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not a quantum company; no impact."}}, "novelty": 0.9, "decay_speed": 0.5}}
{"idx": 37, "skip": false, "date": "2026-03-12", "title": "Realizing Feynman\u2019s vision for the future of simulation | IBM Quantum Computing Blog - IBM", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": [{"ticker": "IONQ", "score": 0.4, "reasoning": "Positive due to sector-wide validation of quantum computing for simulation, though different technology (trapped-ion vs IBM's superconducting)."}, {"ticker": "RGTI", "score": 0.6, "reasoning": "Strong positive as same superconducting technology as IBM, benefiting from the validation and potential increased industry momentum."}, {"ticker": "QBTS", "score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Mild positive as simulation is a key application for quantum computing, though quantum annealing is a different approach than IBM's gate-based method."}, {"ticker": "QUBT", "score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Mild positive, similar to QBTS, as simulation advancements benefit the broader quantum sector despite different neutral atom technology."}, {"ticker": "QNT", "score": 0.4, "reasoning": "Positive due to sector-wide impact, with trapped-ion technology similar to IONQ, benefiting from the validation of quantum simulation."}, {"ticker": "IBM", "score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Direct positive from IBM's own announcement, with high novelty in realizing Feynman's vision for simulation, but limited by ~2% quantum revenue."}, {"ticker": "HON", "score": 0.2, "reasoning": "Slight positive as a quantum sector beneficiary, but reduced impact due to only ~1% quantum revenue post-spinoff and different trapped-ion technology."}, {"ticker": "MSFT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, no quantum revenue or relevance."}, {"ticker": "GOOGL", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, no quantum revenue or relevance."}, {"ticker": "NVDA", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, no quantum revenue or relevance."}], "overall_reasoning": "The news from IBM about realizing Feynman's vision for quantum simulation has high novelty, indicating a significant milestone in the field. The impact is expected to decay at a medium pace, as such fundamental advancements validate the quantum computing sector broadly. Scores reflect direct impact on IBM, strong relevance for superconducting peers (RGTI), and moderate positive effects on other pure-play and partial quantum companies based on technology alignment and sector validation."}}
{"idx": 38, "skip": false, "date": "2026-03-15", "title": "Infleqtion Completes IPO at $2.1B Valuation, Trades as INFQ", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": [{"ticker": "IONQ", "score": -1.5, "reasoning": "Negative due to scalability claims favoring neutral-atom over trapped-ion; pure-play status amplifies impact."}, {"ticker": "RGTI", "score": -1.5, "reasoning": "Negative due to scalability claims favoring neutral-atom over superconducting; pure-play status amplifies impact."}, {"ticker": "QBTS", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Neutral; quantum annealing approach not directly compared to gate-based methods mentioned."}, {"ticker": "QUBT", "score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Direct positive impact from IPO completion and scalability claims; pure-play status justifies maximum positive score."}, {"ticker": "QNT", "score": -1.5, "reasoning": "Negative due to scalability claims favoring neutral-atom over trapped-ion; pure-play status amplifies impact."}, {"ticker": "IBM", "score": -0.1, "reasoning": "Negative due to scalability claims against superconducting, but reduced impact from low quantum revenue share (~2%)."}, {"ticker": "HON", "score": -0.2, "reasoning": "Negative due to scalability claims against trapped-ion, but reduced impact from low quantum revenue share (~1%)."}, {"ticker": "MSFT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; no quantum revenue."}, {"ticker": "GOOGL", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; no quantum revenue."}, {"ticker": "NVDA", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; no quantum revenue."}]}}
{"idx": 39, "skip": false, "date": "2026-03-15", "title": "Better Quantum Computing Stock: Rigetti Computing vs. IonQ - Yahoo Finance", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Directly mentioned as a top quantum stock"}, "RGTI": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Directly mentioned as a top quantum stock"}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in news"}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in news"}, "QNT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in news"}, "IBM": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned; only ~2% quantum revenue"}, "HON": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned; only ~1% quantum revenue"}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive (always 0.0)"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive (always 0.0)"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive (always 0.0)"}}, "reasoning": "Article highlights IONQ and RGTI as leading quantum stocks, boosting their scores. No impact on others due to lack of mention or inactive status. Novelty is moderate with fast decay expected."}}
{"idx": 40, "skip": false, "date": "2026-03-16", "title": "What Is Quantum Error Correction & How Does It Work - The Quantum Insider", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.6, "reasoning": "Pure-play trapped-ion company; benefits from QEC advancements for scalability, but low novelty moderates score."}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.7, "reasoning": "Pure-play superconducting; QEC is critical for this architecture, justifying a higher score despite low novelty."}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.4, "reasoning": "Quantum annealing company; QEC less relevant as annealing uses different error handling, leading to a lower positive impact."}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.6, "reasoning": "Pure-play neutral atom; benefits from QEC advancements, similar to trapped-ion companies."}, "QNT": {"score": 0.6, "reasoning": "Pure-play trapped-ion; benefits from QEC, with score aligned with other pure-plays."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Large company with ~2% quantum revenue; QEC research is positive but has minimal impact due to low quantum focus."}, "HON": {"score": 0.2, "reasoning": "Trapped-ion with ~1% quantum revenue; benefits from QEC relevance but small quantum share limits score."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; always 0.0 per specifications."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; always 0.0 per specifications."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; always 0.0 per specifications."}}, "overall_reasoning": "The educational nature of the article on quantum error correction provides a modest positive sentiment for the quantum sector, emphasizing its importance for scalability. Low novelty results in subdued signals, with pure-play companies receiving higher scores (especially those in error-prone architectures like superconducting). Quantum annealing (QBTS) has reduced relevance, while non-pure-plays (IBM, HON) and inactive firms have minimal or zero impact. Slow decay is expected due to the foundational knowledge shared."}}
{"idx": 41, "skip": false, "date": "2026-03-16", "title": "Doubling down on open-access quantum computing - IBM", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": -0.5, "RGTI": -1.0, "QBTS": -0.5, "QUBT": -0.5, "QNT": -0.5, "IBM": 0.15, "HON": -0.1, "MSFT": 0.0, "GOOGL": 0.0, "NVDA": 0.0}, "reasoning": "IBM's announcement to double down on open-access quantum computing is a strong positive signal for IBM (+0.15) as it reinforces their leadership in quantum cloud accessibility. However, it intensifies competitive pressure on pure-play quantum companies: RGTI (-1.0) faces direct superconducting rivalry, while IONQ, QNT (trapped-ion), QBTS (annealing), and QUBT (neutral atom) each receive -0.5 due to indirect market competition. Honeywell (HON) is slightly negative (-0.1) as a trapped-ion player. Inactive tickers (MSFT, GOOGL, NVDA) score 0.0. The news has moderate novelty (continuation of existing strategy) and moderate decay speed (strategic shift with lasting industry impact)."}}
{"idx": 42, "skip": false, "date": "2026-03-16", "title": "PsiQuantum Integrates NVIDIA CUDA-Q for GPU-Accelerated Fault-Tolerant Simulation - Quantum Computing Report", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": 0.1, "RGTI": 0.1, "QBTS": 0.1, "QUBT": 0.1, "QNT": 0.1, "IBM": 0.0, "HON": 0.0, "MSFT": 0.0, "GOOGL": 0.0, "NVDA": 0.0}, "reasoning": "PsiQuantum's integration of CUDA-Q advances quantum simulation, mildly benefiting the pure-play ecosystem. Direct impact on active companies is low; scores reflect indirect ecosystem support."}}
{"idx": 43, "skip": false, "date": "2026-03-16", "title": "ORCA Computing Accelerates Photonic Simulation with NVIDIA cuTensorNet - Quantum Computing Report", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": [{"ticker": "IONQ", "score": -0.2, "reasoning": "Negative impact due to potential reduction in quantum advantage from improved classical simulation; pure-play sensitive to such threats."}, {"ticker": "RGTI", "score": -0.2, "reasoning": "Similar to IONQ; pure-play quantum company negatively affected by classical simulation progress."}, {"ticker": "QBTS", "score": -0.2, "reasoning": "Pure-play quantum annealing company; negative impact from reduced quantum differentiation."}, {"ticker": "QUBT", "score": -0.2, "reasoning": "Pure-play neutral atom company; scores negative due to competitive pressure from classical simulation."}, {"ticker": "QNT", "score": -0.2, "reasoning": "Pure-play trapped-ion company; negative sentiment from simulation advancement affecting quantum value proposition."}, {"ticker": "IBM", "score": -0.03, "reasoning": "Negative impact but minimized due to diversified business and low quantum revenue share (~2%)."}, {"ticker": "HON", "score": -0.03, "reasoning": "Similar to IBM; negative but small impact due to low quantum revenue (~1%) post-spinoff."}, {"ticker": "MSFT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, always 0.0; no relevance to quantum universe."}, {"ticker": "GOOGL", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, always 0.0; not part of quantum scoring universe."}, {"ticker": "NVDA", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, always 0.0; mentioned in news but excluded from scoring."}]}}
{"idx": 44, "skip": false, "date": "2026-03-17", "title": "How Alice & Bob Uses NVIDIA CUDA-Q to Accelerate Quantum Error Correction Research - Alice & Bob", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.4, "reasoning": "Positive for quantum error correction research, benefiting trapped-ion pure-play IONQ."}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.4, "reasoning": "Advancements in error correction research positively impact superconducting pure-play RGTI."}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Quantum annealing (D-Wave) is less directly tied to error correction; minor positive impact."}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.4, "reasoning": "Neutral atom pure-play QUBT benefits from progress in quantum error correction research."}, "QNT": {"score": 0.4, "reasoning": "Trapped-ion pure-play QNT gains from advancements in quantum error correction."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "IBM's quantum research leverages GPU tools like CUDA-Q, so benefits from acceleration in error correction."}, "HON": {"score": 0.2, "reasoning": "Honeywell's trapped-ion quantum business benefits from error correction research progress."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; always 0.0 per criteria."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; always 0.0 per criteria."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; always 0.0 per criteria, despite being the provider of CUDA-Q."}}, "novelty": "Moderate", "decay_speed": "Fast"}}
{"idx": 45, "skip": false, "date": "2026-03-17", "title": "UK must learn lessons from AI race and retain its quantum computing talent, says minister - The Guardian", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": -1.0, "reasoning": "No UK presence; negatively impacted by reduced access to global talent pool."}, "RGTI": {"score": -1.0, "reasoning": "US-based with no UK ties; similarly affected by talent retention policies."}, "QBTS": {"score": -1.0, "reasoning": "Canadian company; global talent pool reduction affects hiring potential."}, "QUBT": {"score": -1.0, "reasoning": "US-based; faces challenges in accessing UK talent."}, "QNT": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "UK-based pure-play; direct beneficiary of government talent retention efforts."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "UK operations benefit from talent retention; positive but limited by ~2% quantum revenue."}, "HON": {"score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Slight positive due to UK focus, but minimal impact post-Quantinuum spinoff (~1% quantum revenue)."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; no quantum focus per definition."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; no quantum focus per definition."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; no quantum focus per definition."}}}}
{"idx": 46, "skip": false, "date": "2026-03-17", "title": "ORCA Computing Advances Photonic Quantum Simulation with NVIDIA cuTensorNet - The Quantum Insider", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct impact; photonic quantum not core to IONQ's trapped-ion technology"}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct impact; photonic quantum not core to RGTI's superconducting technology"}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct impact; photonic quantum not core to QBTS's quantum annealing technology"}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct impact; photonic quantum not core to QUBT's neutral atom technology"}, "QNT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct impact; photonic quantum not core to QNT's trapped-ion technology"}, "IBM": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct impact; photonic quantum not core to IBM's superconducting focus, and NVDA inactive"}, "HON": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct impact; photonic quantum not core to HON's trapped-ion technology"}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, always 0.0"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, always 0.0"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, always 0.0; mentioned but not scored"}}}}
{"idx": 47, "skip": false, "date": "2026-03-17", "title": "QCentroid Combines QuantumOps Framework With NVIDIA CUDA-Q for Enterprise Quantum Workflows - The Quantum Insider", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": 0.0, "RGTI": 0.0, "QBTS": 0.0, "QUBT": 0.0, "QNT": 0.0, "IBM": 0.15, "HON": 0.0, "MSFT": 0.0, "GOOGL": 0.0, "NVDA": 0.0}, "reasoning": "Positive for IBM due to adoption of their QuantumOps framework; capped at +0.15. No impact on other companies."}}
{"idx": 48, "skip": false, "date": "2026-03-18", "title": "Classiq Accelerates Hybrid Quantum Application Development and Execution with NVIDIA CUDA-Q - The Quantum Insider", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.2, "reasoning": "Positive signal due to industry-wide software advancements improving quantum hardware accessibility. IONQ benefits as a pure-play trapped-ion provider."}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.2, "reasoning": "Similar positive impact from hybrid tools enhancing demand for quantum hardware. Rigetti, a superconducting pure-play, gains indirectly."}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.2, "reasoning": "D-Wave's quantum annealing technology benefits from improved hybrid application development, increasing hardware utility."}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.2, "reasoning": "Quantum Computing Inc. (neutral atom) sees a boost from broader industry software enablers driving hardware adoption."}, "QNT": {"score": 0.2, "reasoning": "Quantinuum (trapped-ion) gains from the same positive industry trend in hybrid tools."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.12, "reasoning": "IBM benefits as a hybrid quantum-classical leader; CUDA-Q integration enhances their platform. Score capped at +0.15 due to ~2% quantum revenue."}, "HON": {"score": 0.24, "reasoning": "Honeywell's trapped-ion hardware with cloud access benefits from hybrid tools. Score within +0.3 limit despite ~1% quantum revenue."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No impact; inactive and always 0.0."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No impact; inactive and always 0.0."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Mentioned in news but inactive; always 0.0."}}}}
{"idx": 49, "skip": false, "date": "2026-03-19", "title": "Here\u2019s How Rigetti (RGTI)\u2019s Shares Behaved After Jim Cramer Said \u201cIt\u2019s A Quantum GameStop\u201d In January 2025 - Yahoo Finance", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": [{"ticker": "IONQ", "score": 0.8}, {"ticker": "RGTI", "score": 1.5}, {"ticker": "QBTS", "score": 0.8}, {"ticker": "QUBT", "score": 0.8}, {"ticker": "QNT", "score": 0.8}, {"ticker": "IBM", "score": 0.15}, {"ticker": "HON", "score": 0.05}, {"ticker": "MSFT", "score": 0.0}, {"ticker": "GOOGL", "score": 0.0}, {"ticker": "NVDA", "score": 0.0}], "reasoning": "News is not highly novel (dated Jan 2025) but may reignite short-term interest. Decay speed is high due to meme-like nature; scores reflect moderate, decay-adjusted impact. RGTI highest due to direct mention; others benefit from sector effects."}}
{"idx": 50, "skip": false, "date": "2026-03-19", "title": "D-Wave Quantum Plunges 49% in 3 Months: Time to Sell as Losses Widen? - Yahoo Finance", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": -0.5, "RGTI": -0.5, "QBTS": -2.0, "QUBT": -0.5, "QNT": -0.5, "IBM": 0.0, "HON": 0.0, "MSFT": 0.0, "GOOGL": 0.0, "NVDA": 0.0}, "reasoning": "The article is a strong negative signal for QBTS (direct score: -2.0). Mild negative spillover (-0.5) is assigned to other pure-plays (IONQ, RGTI, QUBT, QNT) due to sector interconnectedness. IBM and HON are minimally affected (0.0) due to low quantum revenue exposure. Inactive companies (MSFT, GOOGL, NVDA) score 0.0."}}
{"idx": 51, "skip": false, "date": "2026-03-19", "title": "Largest Single-GPU Quantum Simulation on AMD by BlueQubit - AMD", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": [{"ticker": "IONQ", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "News about classical quantum simulation has no direct impact on IONQ's trapped-ion hardware. Neutral score."}, {"ticker": "RGTI", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Rigetti's superconducting hardware is unaffected by this simulation milestone. Neutral score."}, {"ticker": "QBTS", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "D-Wave's quantum annealing technology is unrelated to classical simulation. Neutral score."}, {"ticker": "QUBT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Quantum Computing Inc.'s neutral atom hardware is not impacted. Neutral score."}, {"ticker": "QNT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Quantinuum's trapped-ion hardware remains unaffected. Neutral score."}, {"ticker": "IBM", "score": 0.1, "reasoning": "IBM benefits from quantum simulation advancements supporting their software ecosystem (e.g., Qiskit), leading to a positive score."}, {"ticker": "HON", "score": 0.05, "reasoning": "Honeywell's quantum business sees modest indirect benefits from research progress, but less than IBM, resulting in a small positive score."}, {"ticker": "MSFT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive in quantum computing; always 0.0."}, {"ticker": "GOOGL", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive in quantum computing; always 0.0."}, {"ticker": "NVDA", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive in quantum computing; always 0.0. Note: GPU advancements do not affect scoring."}]}}
{"idx": 52, "skip": false, "date": "2026-03-20", "title": "Wall Street Is Wrong About This Quantum Computing Stock - Yahoo Finance", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": [{"ticker": "IONQ", "score": 1.5, "reasoning": "Positive sentiment for quantum sector; full impact as pure-play. High novelty and medium decay speed."}, {"ticker": "RGTI", "score": 1.5, "reasoning": "Positive sentiment for quantum sector; full impact as pure-play. High novelty and medium decay speed."}, {"ticker": "QBTS", "score": 1.5, "reasoning": "Positive sentiment for quantum sector; full impact as pure-play. High novelty and medium decay speed."}, {"ticker": "QUBT", "score": 1.5, "reasoning": "Positive sentiment for quantum sector; full impact as pure-play. High novelty and medium decay speed."}, {"ticker": "QNT", "score": 1.5, "reasoning": "Positive sentiment for quantum sector; full impact as pure-play. High novelty and medium decay speed."}, {"ticker": "IBM", "score": 0.03, "reasoning": "Positive sentiment for quantum sector; partial impact due to ~2% quantum revenue. High novelty and medium decay speed."}, {"ticker": "HON", "score": 0.02, "reasoning": "Positive sentiment for quantum sector; minimal impact due to ~1% quantum revenue. High novelty and medium decay speed."}, {"ticker": "MSFT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, always 0.0"}, {"ticker": "GOOGL", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, always 0.0"}, {"ticker": "NVDA", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, always 0.0"}]}}
{"idx": 53, "skip": false, "date": "2026-03-20", "title": "Alice & Bob Accelerates Quantum Error Correction with NVIDIA CUDA-Q - The Quantum Insider", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive impact; trapped-ion architecture benefits significantly from quantum error correction advances."}, "RGTI": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive impact; superconducting quantum computers heavily rely on error correction for scalability."}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.5, "reasoning": "Moderate positive impact; quantum annealing (D-Wave) has different error handling, so less directly affected."}, "QUBT": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive impact; neutral atom quantum computers benefit from improved error correction."}, "QNT": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive impact; trapped-ion architecture gains from error correction progress."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Positive but limited; small quantum revenue share caps impact despite relevance to IBM's quantum efforts."}, "HON": {"score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Positive impact; trapped-ion quantum group benefits, but smaller quantum focus post-spinoff reduces sensitivity."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; no quantum revenue per specifications."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; no quantum revenue per specifications."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; mentioned in news but not scored per specifications."}}, "reasoning": "The news highlights a novel acceleration in quantum error correction by Alice & Bob using NVIDIA CUDA-Q, with broad positive implications for gate-based quantum companies (e.g., IONQ, RGTI, QUBT, QNT, HON). IBM benefits less due to low quantum revenue. D-Wave (QBTS) sees reduced impact from annealing differences. Inactive companies score 0.0. Decay speed is medium, as the advance is foundational but news impact may fade."}}
{"idx": 54, "skip": false, "date": "2026-03-21", "title": "Infleqtion Achieves 12-Logical-Qubit Milestone for Q4Bio Biomarker Discovery - Quantum Computing Report", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned; no direct impact as the milestone is attributed to Quantinuum, a trapped-ion competitor."}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned; superconducting architecture differs from trapped-ion focus of the milestone."}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Quantum annealing architecture not relevant to logical qubit milestone; not mentioned."}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned; neutral atom architecture not associated with the news."}, "QNT": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Infleqtion likely refers to Quantinuum; achieving a 12-logical-qubit milestone is a major, novel breakthrough with slow decay due to its significance in error correction and quantum applications."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned; superconducting architecture differs, and only ~2% quantum revenue."}, "HON": {"score": 0.2, "reasoning": "Indirect benefit as former parent of Quantinuum; impact is modest due to spinoff."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; always 0.0 per problem statement."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; always 0.0 per problem statement."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; always 0.0 per problem statement."}}}}
{"idx": 55, "skip": false, "date": "2026-03-23", "title": "D-Wave Quantum Revenue Growth Highlights Rising Demand For Optimization Services - Yahoo Finance", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": 0.0, "RGTI": 0.0, "QBTS": 2.0, "QUBT": 0.0, "QNT": 0.0, "IBM": 0.15, "HON": 0.3, "MSFT": 0.0, "GOOGL": 0.0, "NVDA": 0.0}, "reasoning": "The news highlights D-Wave's (QBTS) revenue growth and rising demand for optimization services, directly benefiting QBTS with a maximum positive score of +2.0. The broader quantum sector, including IBM and HON, may see indirect benefits from increased market sentiment, warranting small positive scores (IBM: +0.15, HON: +0.3). Other pure-play companies (IONQ, RGTI, QUBT, QNT) are not directly impacted and receive neutral scores (0.0). Inactive companies (MSFT, GOOGL, NVDA) are unaffected (0.0)."}}
{"idx": 56, "skip": false, "date": "2026-03-25", "title": "Rigetti Computing Intends to Invest $100 Million in UK to Accelerate Quantum Computing Development - GlobeNewswire", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": [{"ticker": "IONQ", "score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Positive industry sentiment from Rigetti's investment, but not directly impacted."}, {"ticker": "RGTI", "score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Direct beneficiary of the $100 million investment; novel commitment justifies maximum positive score."}, {"ticker": "QBTS", "score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Positive industry sentiment, though not directly related to the news."}, {"ticker": "QUBT", "score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Positive industry sentiment, with no direct impact."}, {"ticker": "QNT", "score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Positive industry sentiment, as the investment validates the sector."}, {"ticker": "IBM", "score": 0.05, "reasoning": "Small positive impact from quantum ecosystem growth, but minimal quantum revenue."}, {"ticker": "HON", "score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Small positive impact from industry growth, though quantum is a small business segment post-spinoff."}, {"ticker": "MSFT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive company with no quantum focus; always 0.0."}, {"ticker": "GOOGL", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive company with no quantum focus; always 0.0."}, {"ticker": "NVDA", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive company with no quantum focus; always 0.0."}]}}
{"idx": 57, "skip": false, "date": "2026-03-25", "title": "QpiAI Achieves High-Speed Quantum Error Correction on Superconducting Systems with New Decoder Platform - The Quantum Insider", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": 0.0, "RGTI": 1.0, "QBTS": 0.0, "QUBT": 0.0, "QNT": 0.0, "IBM": 0.1, "HON": 0.0, "MSFT": 0.0, "GOOGL": 0.0, "NVDA": 0.0}, "reasoning": "The news highlights a superconducting-specific advancement by QpiAI, benefiting RGTI (directly) and IBM (indirectly). Other companies use different architectures and are unaffected."}}
{"idx": 58, "skip": false, "date": "2026-03-26", "title": "Quantum Computing Is on Its Way to Transforming Science. Inside IBM\u2019s Latest Breakthrough. - Barron's", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": [{"ticker": "IONQ", "score": 0.5}, {"ticker": "RGTI", "score": -1.5}, {"ticker": "QBTS", "score": 0.3}, {"ticker": "QUBT", "score": 0.4}, {"ticker": "QNT", "score": 0.5}, {"ticker": "IBM", "score": 0.15}, {"ticker": "HON", "score": 0.2}, {"ticker": "MSFT", "score": 0.0}, {"ticker": "GOOGL", "score": 0.0}, {"ticker": "NVDA", "score": 0.0}], "reasoning": "The news highlights IBM's breakthrough, leading to a positive score for IBM. RGTI is negatively affected due to competitive pressure in superconducting quantum computing. Other pure-play companies (IONQ, QBTS, QUBT, QNT) receive modest positive scores from sector-wide optimism, while HON benefits slightly. Inactive companies (MSFT, GOOGL, NVDA) score zero."}}
{"idx": 59, "skip": false, "date": "2026-03-26", "title": "IBM Quantum Computer Accurately Simulates Real Magnetic Materials, Reproducing National Laboratory Data - IBM Newsroom", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct impact; news pertains to superconducting qubits, not trapped-ion."}, "RGTI": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive impact; news validates superconducting technology used by RGTI."}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No impact; quantum annealing (used by D-Wave) is not relevant to this simulation."}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No impact; neutral atom technology not mentioned or involved."}, "QNT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct impact; trapped-ion technology not involved in this IBM achievement."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Direct positive impact; novel simulation achievement with slow decay due to research nature."}, "HON": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Minimal impact post-Quantinuum spinoff; no direct relevance to superconducting news."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; always 0.0"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; always 0.0"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; always 0.0"}}}}
{"idx": 60, "skip": false, "date": "2026-03-26", "title": "Quantum computers take a step into real materials science - IBM Research", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not directly affected by IBM's materials science research; neutral impact."}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Superconducting technology aligns with IBM's approach, but not mentioned; neutral impact."}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Quantum annealing less relevant for materials simulations; no direct benefit."}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Neutral atom approach not involved in the news; neutral impact."}, "QNT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Trapped-ion technology not linked to this IBM-specific development."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Positive news about materials science research; low novelty and medium decay lead to moderate positive score (max for IBM's range)."}, "HON": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Trapped-ion quantum business is small and not impacted by IBM's news."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive company; always 0.0."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive company; always 0.0."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive company; always 0.0."}}}}
{"idx": 61, "skip": false, "date": "2026-03-26", "title": "15+ Leading Quantum Computing Countries in 2026 - The Quantum Insider", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Positive industry report boosts pure-play sentiment, but impact is small due to low novelty and fast decay."}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Same as IONQ; broad-based industry optimism with minimal direct impact."}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Positive for pure-play quantum companies, though effect is subdued."}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.1, "reasoning": "General industry uplift, but no company-specific impact."}, "QNT": {"score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Pure-play benefit from optimistic industry report, though decay is fast."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.01, "reasoning": "Small positive from industry growth, but minimized by diversification (~2% quantum revenue) and fast decay."}, "HON": {"score": 0.01, "reasoning": "Modest uplift due to industry sentiment, offset by diversification and post-spinoff quantum focus (~1% revenue)."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; always 0.0 per definition."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; always 0.0 per definition."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; always 0.0 per definition."}}}}
{"idx": 62, "skip": false, "date": "2026-03-27", "title": "Rigetti Computing Intends to Invest $100 Million in UK to Accelerate Quantum Computing Development - The Quantum Insider", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct impact from Rigetti's investment; neutral score."}, "RGTI": {"score": 1.5, "reasoning": "Significant positive impact due to $100 million UK investment, accelerating development and growth."}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct impact from the news; neutral score."}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct impact from the news; neutral score."}, "QNT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct impact from Rigetti's investment; neutral score."}, "IBM": {"score": -0.1, "reasoning": "Slight negative due to increased competition in superconducting quantum computing."}, "HON": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct impact; quantum revenue is minimal post-spinoff."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; always 0.0."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; always 0.0."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; always 0.0."}}}}
{"idx": 63, "skip": false, "date": "2026-03-27", "title": "Quantum Computing Stocks IonQ, Rigetti Computing, and D-Wave Quantum Have Created Shockwaves With This $930 Million Warning to Wall Street - Yahoo Finance", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 1.5, "reasoning": "The article highlights IonQ as part of a $930 million event creating shockwaves, indicating a significant positive development for the company."}, "RGTI": {"score": 1.5, "reasoning": "The article highlights Rigetti Computing as part of a $930 million event creating shockwaves, indicating a significant positive development for the company."}, "QBTS": {"score": 1.5, "reasoning": "The article highlights D-Wave Quantum as part of a $930 million event creating shockwaves, indicating a significant positive development for the company."}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Quantum Computing Inc. (QUBT) is not mentioned in the article and shows no direct impact."}, "QNT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Quantinuum (QNT) is not mentioned in the article and shows no direct impact."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "IBM is not mentioned in the article; as a non-pure-play, it has minimal quantum exposure and no direct impact."}, "HON": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Honeywell is not mentioned in the article; as a non-pure-play, it has minimal quantum exposure and no direct impact."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Microsoft is inactive in quantum computing per the universe definition and always scores 0.0."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Google is inactive in quantum computing per the universe definition and always scores 0.0."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "NVIDIA is inactive in quantum computing per the universe definition and always scores 0.0."}}}}
{"idx": 64, "skip": false, "date": "2026-03-28", "title": "Is D-Wave Quantum\u2019s (QBTS) Insider Selling Undermining Its New Enterprise-Focused Quantum Narrative? - Yahoo Finance", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": 0.0, "RGTI": 0.0, "QBTS": -1.5, "QUBT": 0.0, "QNT": 0.0, "IBM": 0.0, "HON": 0.0, "MSFT": 0.0, "GOOGL": 0.0, "NVDA": 0.0}, "reasoning": "The news is specific to QBTS, with insider selling being a negative signal. QBTS score is -1.5 due to direct impact; others are unaffected (0.0). Novelty: high. Decay speed: medium."}}
{"idx": 65, "skip": false, "date": "2026-03-28", "title": "Chinese Researchers Demonstrate Logical Operations on Silicon Quantum Processor - The Quantum Insider", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "News unrelated to trapped-ion technology; neutral impact."}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "News unrelated to superconducting technology; neutral impact."}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "News unrelated to quantum annealing; neutral impact."}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "News unrelated to neutral atom technology; neutral impact."}, "QNT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "News unrelated to trapped-ion technology; neutral impact."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.12, "reasoning": "Demonstration validates IBM's silicon quantum efforts; positive impact."}, "HON": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "News unrelated to trapped-ion technology; neutral impact."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not a quantum-focused company; always 0.0."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not a quantum-focused company; always 0.0."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not a quantum-focused company; always 0.0."}}}}
{"idx": 66, "skip": false, "date": "2026-03-29", "title": "1 Unstoppable Quantum Computing Stock to Buy Before It Soars 200%, According to 1 Wall Street Analyst - The Motley Fool", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": 1.0, "RGTI": 1.0, "QBTS": 1.0, "QUBT": 1.0, "QNT": 2.0, "IBM": 0.15, "HON": 0.3, "MSFT": 0.0, "GOOGL": 0.0, "NVDA": 0.0}, "reasoning": "The article promotes a specific quantum stock as 'Unstoppable' with 200% surge potential. QNT is the primary beneficiary (+2.0) due to its relevance. Other pure-plays (IONQ, RGTI, QBTS, QUBT) receive +1.0 for sector optimism. IBM and HON get their max positive scores (+0.15 and +0.3). Inactive companies score 0.0. Novelty is moderate (analyst opinion), with likely fast decay due to hype."}}
{"idx": 67, "skip": false, "date": "2026-03-29", "title": "Quantum Computing\u2019s Next Major Breakthrough May Come From Australia - Forbes", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.2, "reasoning": "Pure-play trapped-ion company benefits modestly from general quantum optimism, but news is Australia-specific and speculative, limiting impact. Score within [-2.0, +2.0]."}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.2, "reasoning": "Pure-play superconducting company; similar modest positive from sector news, but no direct Australia link. Score within [-2.0, +2.0]."}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.2, "reasoning": "Pure-play quantum annealing company; general uplift from breakthrough news, but indirect and speculative. Score within [-2.0, +2.0]."}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.2, "reasoning": "Pure-play neutral atom company; positive sentiment from quantum progress, but no Australia connection. Score within [-2.0, +2.0]."}, "QNT": {"score": 0.2, "reasoning": "Pure-play trapped-ion company; minor boost from sector-wide optimism, news decay expected. Score within [-2.0, +2.0]."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.05, "reasoning": "Superconducting company with ~2% quantum revenue; small positive from general news, but decay rapid. Score within [-0.15, +0.15]."}, "HON": {"score": 0.05, "reasoning": "Trapped-ion company with ~1% quantum revenue; minor uplift from sector optimism, news not directly relevant. Score within [-0.3, +0.3]."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not a quantum-focused company; always 0.0."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not a quantum-focused company; always 0.0."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not a quantum-focused company; always 0.0."}}}}
{"idx": 68, "skip": false, "date": "2026-03-29", "title": "This quantum computing breakthrough may not be what it seemed - ScienceDaily", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": [{"ticker": "IONQ", "score": -1.5, "reasoning": "Pure-play trapped-ion quantum company; highly sensitive to negative sentiment about quantum breakthroughs, leading to a moderate negative score."}, {"ticker": "RGTI", "score": -1.5, "reasoning": "Pure-play superconducting quantum company; similarly impacted by sector-wide skepticism, resulting in a moderate negative score."}, {"ticker": "QBTS", "score": -1.5, "reasoning": "Pure-play quantum annealing company; full quantum revenue exposure makes it vulnerable to negative news, justifying a moderate negative score."}, {"ticker": "QUBT", "score": -1.5, "reasoning": "Pure-play neutral atom quantum company; significant impact from generalized quantum skepticism, warranting a moderate negative score."}, {"ticker": "QNT", "score": -1.5, "reasoning": "Pure-play trapped-ion quantum company (IPO'd June 2026); highly affected by negative sentiment, leading to a moderate negative score."}, {"ticker": "IBM", "score": -0.15, "reasoning": "Superconducting company with ~2% quantum revenue; less sensitive due to diversified business, but still slightly negative due to sector impact."}, {"ticker": "HON", "score": -0.2, "reasoning": "Trapped-ion company with ~1% quantum revenue post-Quantinuum spinoff; reduced exposure limits impact, but still moderately negative."}, {"ticker": "MSFT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; no quantum computing involvement, always 0.0."}, {"ticker": "GOOGL", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; no quantum computing involvement, always 0.0."}, {"ticker": "NVDA", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; no quantum computing involvement, always 0.0."}]}}
{"idx": 69, "skip": false, "date": "2026-03-29", "title": "BlackRock funds provide about $57 million to IQM Quantum Computers ahead of US IPO - Reuters", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": [{"ticker": "IONQ", "score": 0.2}, {"ticker": "RGTI", "score": 0.3}, {"ticker": "QBTS", "score": 0.1}, {"ticker": "QUBT", "score": 0.1}, {"ticker": "QNT", "score": 0.2}, {"ticker": "IBM", "score": 0.05}, {"ticker": "HON", "score": 0.05}, {"ticker": "MSFT", "score": 0.0}, {"ticker": "GOOGL", "score": 0.0}, {"ticker": "NVDA", "score": 0.0}], "reasoning": "The funding of IQM by BlackRock is positive for the quantum sector, indicating institutional confidence. RGTI benefits most due to shared superconducting technology. IONQ and QNT (trapped-ion) receive moderate scores, while QBTS (annealing) and QUBT (neutral atom) are less impacted. IBM and HON, with minor quantum exposure, see small positives. Inactive companies score 0.0. Novelty is high; decay speed is moderate as IPO-related effects may subside over weeks."}}
{"idx": 70, "skip": false, "date": "2026-03-30", "title": "Google Opens Early Access to \u2018Willow\u2019 Quantum Processor, Invites Experimental Proposals - The Quantum Insider", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Positive due to overall industry growth; minimal direct competition (different technology)."}, "RGTI": {"score": -1.0, "reasoning": "Strong negative as a direct competitor in superconducting technology."}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Positive due to overall industry growth; different technology (annealing)."}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Positive due to overall industry growth; different technology (neutral atom)."}, "QNT": {"score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Positive due to overall industry growth; different technology (trapped-ion)."}, "IBM": {"score": -0.1, "reasoning": "Negative as a competitor (same technology) gains ground."}, "HON": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Neutral; news is about a different technology (superconducting vs trapped-ion)."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, always 0.0."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, always 0.0."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, always 0.0."}}}}
{"idx": 71, "skip": false, "date": "2026-03-30", "title": "Google's 105-qubit Willow quantum processor opens for early access - SDxCentral", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": -0.5, "reasoning": "Slight negative due to increased superconducting competition; trapped-ion differentiation limits impact."}, "RGTI": {"score": -1.5, "reasoning": "Strong negative as direct superconducting competitor to Google; market share pressure."}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Neutral; quantum annealing approach not directly impacted by superconducting progress."}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Neutral; neutral atom technology distinct from superconducting."}, "QNT": {"score": -0.5, "reasoning": "Slight negative; similar to IONQ, superconducting gains may affect market perception."}, "IBM": {"score": -0.1, "reasoning": "Negative; direct competitor in superconducting qubits."}, "HON": {"score": -0.1, "reasoning": "Slight negative; minimal quantum revenue exposure and trapped-ion focus."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; always 0.0 per definition."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; always 0.0 per definition."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; always 0.0 per definition."}}}}
{"idx": 72, "skip": false, "date": "2026-03-31", "title": "Can D-Wave Quantum (QBTS) Double From Here On? One Analyst Thinks So - Yahoo Finance", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": 0.0, "RGTI": 0.0, "QBTS": 2.0, "QUBT": 0.0, "QNT": 0.0, "IBM": 0.0, "HON": 0.0, "MSFT": 0.0, "GOOGL": 0.0, "NVDA": 0.0}, "reasoning": "The article focuses solely on QBTS with a bullish analyst sentiment, warranting a +2.0 score. Other companies are unaffected (0.0). The news is novel but may decay moderately as the market assesses the analyst's forecast."}}
{"idx": 73, "skip": false, "date": "2026-03-31", "title": "The Best Quantum Computing Stock to Buy With $1,000 Right Now - Yahoo Finance", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.5, "reasoning": "Positive sector sentiment from the article, but not the recommended 'best' stock."}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.5, "reasoning": "Positive sector sentiment from the article, but not the recommended 'best' stock."}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.5, "reasoning": "Positive sector sentiment from the article, but not the recommended 'best' stock."}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.5, "reasoning": "Positive sector sentiment from the article, but not the recommended 'best' stock."}, "QNT": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Identified as the 'best' stock to buy; maximum positive signal for a pure-play."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Modest positive sentiment from sector focus; constrained by low quantum revenue share."}, "HON": {"score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Modest positive sentiment from sector focus; constrained by low quantum revenue post-spinoff."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; not part of the quantum computing universe."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; not part of the quantum computing universe."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; not part of the quantum computing universe."}}}}
{"idx": 74, "skip": false, "date": "2026-03-31", "title": "Caltech Team Finds Useful Quantum Computers Could Be Built with as Few as 10,000 Qubits - Caltech", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 1.5, "reasoning": "Positive news reduces qubit requirement for useful quantum computers, benefiting pure-play IONQ (trapped-ion) significantly due to 100% quantum revenue exposure."}, "RGTI": {"score": 1.5, "reasoning": "Positive news accelerates quantum timeline, benefiting pure-play RGTI (superconducting) with 100% quantum revenue exposure."}, "QBTS": {"score": 1.5, "reasoning": "Positive news is broadly beneficial for pure-play QBTS (quantum annealing), despite architecture differences, due to 100% quantum revenue exposure."}, "QUBT": {"score": 1.5, "reasoning": "Positive news reduces qubit barrier, benefiting pure-play QUBT (neutral atom) with 100% quantum revenue exposure."}, "QNT": {"score": 1.5, "reasoning": "Positive news is highly relevant for pure-play QNT (trapped-ion) with 100% quantum revenue exposure, as it indicates faster path to utility."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Mildly positive for IBM, but impact is muted due to only ~2% quantum revenue exposure; news may encourage investment in its quantum efforts."}, "HON": {"score": 0.2, "reasoning": "Slightly positive for HON, with trapped-ion focus, but impact is limited to ~1% quantum revenue exposure post-spinoff."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No quantum revenue; unaffected by the news."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No quantum revenue; unaffected by the news."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No quantum revenue; unaffected by the news."}}}}
{"idx": 75, "skip": false, "date": "2026-04-01", "title": "Bear of the Day: D-Wave Quantum (QBTS) - Yahoo Finance", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No news related to IONQ; neutral sentiment."}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No news related to RGTI; neutral sentiment."}, "QBTS": {"score": -2.0, "reasoning": "Bear of the Day designation by Yahoo Finance, indicating strong negative sentiment for this pure-play company."}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No news related to QUBT; neutral sentiment."}, "QNT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No news related to QNT; neutral sentiment."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No news related to IBM; neutral sentiment. Limited quantum revenue exposure (~2%)."}, "HON": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No news related to HON; neutral sentiment. Limited quantum revenue exposure (~1%)."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive company; always scored 0.0."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive company; always scored 0.0."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive company; always scored 0.0."}}}}
{"idx": 76, "skip": false, "date": "2026-04-01", "title": "Assessing D-Wave Quantum (QBTS) Valuation After Record Bookings And New Government Solutions Unit - Yahoo Finance", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.5, "reasoning": "Positive sentiment from sector optimism due to D-Wave's success"}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.5, "reasoning": "Positive sentiment from sector optimism due to D-Wave's success"}, "QBTS": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Direct positive impact from record bookings and new government solutions unit"}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.5, "reasoning": "Positive sentiment from sector optimism due to D-Wave's success"}, "QNT": {"score": 0.5, "reasoning": "Positive sentiment from sector optimism due to D-Wave's success"}, "IBM": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Small positive exposure from quantum sector optimism"}, "HON": {"score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Small positive exposure from quantum sector optimism"}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, no quantum focus"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, no quantum focus"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, no quantum focus"}}}}
{"idx": 77, "skip": false, "date": "2026-04-02", "title": "Better Quantum Computing Stock: D-Wave Quantum vs. Rigetti Computing - Yahoo Finance", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": 0.0, "RGTI": 0.5, "QBTS": 0.5, "QUBT": 0.0, "QNT": 0.0, "IBM": 0.0, "HON": 0.0, "MSFT": 0.0, "GOOGL": 0.0, "NVDA": 0.0}, "reasoning": "The Yahoo Finance article compares QBTS and RGTI as better quantum computing stocks, boosting investor interest moderately. Low novelty and fast decay justify +0.5 for both mentioned companies; others unaffected."}}
{"idx": 78, "skip": false, "date": "2026-04-02", "title": "\u2018It\u2019s a real shock\u2019: quantum-computing breakthroughs pose imminent risks to cybersecurity - Nature", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": 2.0, "RGTI": 2.0, "QBTS": 2.0, "QUBT": 2.0, "QNT": 2.0, "IBM": 0.15, "HON": 0.3, "MSFT": 0.0, "GOOGL": 0.0, "NVDA": 0.0}, "reasoning": "Quantum breakthroughs posing cybersecurity risks drive industry validation and demand. Pure-plays score max positive; IBM/HON score within their ranges. Inactive firms = 0.0."}}
{"idx": 79, "skip": false, "date": "2026-04-02", "title": "Novel approach to quantum error correction portends a scalable future for quantum computing - Phys.org", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play trapped-ion company; direct beneficiary of quantum error correction advancements."}, "RGTI": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play superconducting company; major impact from error correction progress."}, "QBTS": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play quantum annealing company; general advance supports ecosystem scalability."}, "QUBT": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play neutral atom company; high impact from broad quantum error correction news."}, "QNT": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play trapped-ion company; similar to IONQ, significant benefit from this development."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Small superconducting quantum division (~2% revenue); positive industry sentiment but limited exposure."}, "HON": {"score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Trapped-ion quantum efforts (~1% revenue); higher impact than IBM due to focus, but still minor."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No quantum focus; always 0.0."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No quantum focus; always 0.0."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No quantum focus; always 0.0."}}}}
{"idx": 80, "skip": false, "date": "2026-04-02", "title": "Google Issues \u2018Q-Day\u2019 Warning. What It Means. - Barron's", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": 1.0, "RGTI": 1.0, "QBTS": 0.5, "QUBT": 1.0, "QNT": 1.0, "IBM": 0.15, "HON": 0.3, "MSFT": 0.0, "GOOGL": 0.0, "NVDA": 0.0}, "reasoning": "The article warns of an impending 'Q-Day' where quantum computers could break encryption, increasing urgency for quantum-resistant solutions. This boosts investment interest in pure-play quantum companies (IONQ, RGTI, QBTS, QUBT, QNT) due to heightened sector visibility. IBM benefits slightly from its quantum efforts, but its score is capped at +0.15. Honeywell (HON) gains as a trapped-ion player. D-Wave (QBTS) scores lower (+0.5) as quantum annealing is less relevant for encryption-breaking. Inactive companies (MSFT, GOOGL, NVDA) score 0.0. Scores are within specified ranges."}}
{"idx": 81, "skip": false, "date": "2026-04-03", "title": "Better Quantum Computing Stock: D-Wave Quantum vs. Rigetti Computing - The Motley Fool", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": 0.0, "RGTI": 1.0, "QBTS": 1.0, "QUBT": 0.0, "QNT": 0.0, "IBM": 0.0, "HON": 0.0, "MSFT": 0.0, "GOOGL": 0.0, "NVDA": 0.0}, "reasoning": {"overall_reasoning": "The article directly compares Rigetti Computing (RGTI) and D-Wave Quantum (QBTS), assigning them positive scores of +1.0 each for increased relevance and potential upside from the discussion. Other companies are not mentioned, resulting in 0.0 scores. Novelty is medium (5/10) as it is an investment opinion without new technological developments. Decay speed is fast (8/10) due to the transient nature of financial opinions."}}}
{"idx": 82, "skip": false, "date": "2026-04-03", "title": "IBM quantum processor achieves highest fidelity calculations for the longest period of time on record - Live Science", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": -0.2, "reasoning": "Indirect negative impact due to IBM's advancement potentially reducing focus on trapped-ion"}, "RGTI": {"score": -0.3, "reasoning": "Negative as IBM's achievement directly competes with superconducting approach"}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Neutral, quantum annealing is a different paradigm"}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Neutral, neutral atom approach not affected"}, "QNT": {"score": -0.2, "reasoning": "Indirect negative impact as trapped-ion may face increased competition"}, "IBM": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Direct positive impact from technical milestone"}, "HON": {"score": -0.1, "reasoning": "Slightly negative as trapped-ion company with lower quantum revenue exposure"}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, not part of quantum universe"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, not part of quantum universe"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, not part of quantum universe"}}}}
{"idx": 83, "skip": false, "date": "2026-04-03", "title": "SpinQ Technology Secures Nearly 1 Billion Chinese Yuan in Series C Funding to Scale Industrial Superconducting Quantum Computing - The Quantum Insider", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": [{"ticker": "IONQ", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No relation; IONQ focuses on trapped-ion technology, unrelated to the superconducting funding news."}, {"ticker": "RGTI", "score": 1.5, "reasoning": "Positive; the funding validates the superconducting sector and boosts industry sentiment, despite competitive implications."}, {"ticker": "QBTS", "score": 0.5, "reasoning": "Positive; D-Wave's superconducting annealing technology aligns with the industrial focus, though less direct than gate-based approaches."}, {"ticker": "QUBT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No relation; Quantum Computing Inc. uses neutral atom technology, not superconducting."}, {"ticker": "QNT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No relation; Quantinuum focuses on trapped-ion technology, unrelated to the news."}, {"ticker": "IBM", "score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Small positive; IBM's superconducting efforts benefit from sector validation, but its low quantum revenue share limits impact."}, {"ticker": "HON", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No relation; Honeywell focuses on trapped-ion technology for quantum solutions."}, {"ticker": "MSFT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; not part of the quantum computing universe for scoring."}, {"ticker": "GOOGL", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; not part of the quantum computing universe for scoring."}, {"ticker": "NVDA", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; not part of the quantum computing universe for scoring."}]}}
{"idx": 84, "skip": false, "date": "2026-04-04", "title": "Is Rigetti Computing the Best Quantum Computing Stock to Buy Right Now? - The Motley Fool", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": -1.0, "reasoning": "Implied inferior to RGTI due to the article's focus on Rigetti as the best pure-play; moderate decay expected."}, "RGTI": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Directly recommended as the best quantum stock; strong positive signal with high novelty but fast decay due to opinion-based content."}, "QBTS": {"score": -1.0, "reasoning": "Implied inferior to RGTI; moderate decay expected as part of sector sentiment."}, "QUBT": {"score": -1.0, "reasoning": "Implied inferior to RGTI; moderate decay expected as part of sector sentiment."}, "QNT": {"score": -1.0, "reasoning": "Implied inferior to RGTI; moderate decay expected as part of sector sentiment."}, "IBM": {"score": -0.1, "reasoning": "Partial quantum exposure (2%); negatively affected by RGTI's promotion; slow decay due to diversified business."}, "HON": {"score": -0.1, "reasoning": "Partial quantum exposure (1%); negatively affected by RGTI's promotion; slow decay due to diversified business."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No quantum exposure; unaffected."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No quantum exposure; unaffected."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No quantum exposure; unaffected."}}}}
{"idx": 85, "skip": false, "date": "2026-04-04", "title": "SpinQ Technology Secures 1 Billion CNY ($145.3M USD) Series C Funding to Expand Superconducting and NMR Hardware Lines - Quantum Computing Report", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Neutral, as SpinQ's funding for superconducting and NMR hardware does not impact IONQ's trapped-ion focus."}, "RGTI": {"score": -1.5, "reasoning": "Negative due to direct competition in superconducting hardware, potentially reducing Rigetti's market position."}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Neutral, as D-Wave's quantum annealing technology is unrelated to superconducting or NMR hardware."}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Neutral, as Quantum Computing Inc.'s neutral atom approach is not affected by this news."}, "QNT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Neutral, as Quantinuum's trapped-ion technology is not impacted by superconducting or NMR developments."}, "IBM": {"score": -0.1, "reasoning": "Slightly negative, as SpinQ's superconducting expansion may increase competition in IBM's quantum hardware business, though quantum revenue is a small portion of IBM's total."}, "HON": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Neutral, as Honeywell's trapped-ion quantum business is unrelated to superconducting or NMR hardware."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, always 0.0"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, always 0.0"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, always 0.0"}}}}
{"idx": 86, "skip": false, "date": "2026-04-06", "title": "Why The Quantum Computing Industry Needs Logical Qubit Standards - Forbes", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Positive for IONQ as trapped-ion technology aligns with logical qubit standards needs, but low novelty and fast decay limit the score."}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Positive for RGTI as superconducting qubits are key for logical qubit development, though impact is moderated by low novelty."}, "QBTS": {"score": -0.3, "reasoning": "Negative for QBTS (D-Wave) as quantum annealing does not focus on logical qubits, highlighting a potential mismatch with industry standards."}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Positive for QUBT as neutral atom technology supports scalable error correction, benefiting from standards, but with low novelty."}, "QNT": {"score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Positive for QNT (Quantinuum) as trapped-ion qubits are well-suited for logical qubit standards, though impact is moderate."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Slightly positive for IBM due to its leadership in quantum standards, but limited by its small quantum revenue share and low novelty."}, "HON": {"score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Slightly positive for HON as a trapped-ion player, but impact is capped by its low quantum revenue post-spinoff and fast decay."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; no quantum computing focus, score always 0.0."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; no quantum computing focus, score always 0.0."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; no quantum computing focus, score always 0.0."}}}}
{"idx": 87, "skip": false, "date": "2026-04-07", "title": "AI Helped Spark a Quantum Breakthrough. The World 'Is Not Prepared' - Time Magazine", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 1.8, "reasoning": "Pure-play trapped-ion company; benefits directly from the quantum breakthrough."}, "RGTI": {"score": 1.8, "reasoning": "Pure-play superconducting company; general positive impact from industry advancement."}, "QBTS": {"score": 1.8, "reasoning": "Pure-play quantum annealing company; gains from the breakthrough's broad implications."}, "QUBT": {"score": 1.8, "reasoning": "Pure-play neutral atom company; positive sentiment from the news."}, "QNT": {"score": 1.8, "reasoning": "Pure-play trapped-ion company; enhanced by AI involvement in the breakthrough."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Strong AI and quantum capabilities; scores maximum positive but limited by non-pure-play status."}, "HON": {"score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Trapped-ion player with quantum focus; scores maximum positive but constrained by low quantum revenue."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; always 0.0 per definition."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; always 0.0 per definition."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; always 0.0 per definition."}}}}
{"idx": 88, "skip": false, "date": "2026-04-07", "title": "China\u2019s Quantum Sector Sees Investment Surge as Larger Funding Rounds Return - The Quantum Insider", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": 0.5, "RGTI": 0.5, "QBTS": 0.5, "QUBT": 0.5, "QNT": 0.5, "IBM": 0.0, "HON": 0.0, "MSFT": 0.0, "GOOGL": 0.0, "NVDA": 0.0}, "reasoning": "Increased investment in China's quantum sector validates the industry globally, benefiting pure-play companies (moderate positive). IBM and HON have minimal quantum exposure, resulting in neutral impact. Inactive companies score 0.0."}}
{"idx": 89, "skip": false, "date": "2026-04-08", "title": "Rigetti Announces General Availability of 108-Qubit System - The Quantum Insider", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": [{"ticker": "IONQ", "score": 0.0}, {"ticker": "RGTI", "score": 2.0}, {"ticker": "QBTS", "score": 0.0}, {"ticker": "QUBT", "score": 0.0}, {"ticker": "QNT", "score": 0.0}, {"ticker": "IBM", "score": -0.15}, {"ticker": "HON", "score": 0.0}, {"ticker": "MSFT", "score": 0.0}, {"ticker": "GOOGL", "score": 0.0}, {"ticker": "NVDA", "score": 0.0}], "reasoning": "Rigetti's announcement has high novelty as a key advancement in quantum computing. RGTI scores +2.0 for direct positive impact. IBM scores -0.15 due to competitive pressure in superconducting qubits. Other companies score 0.0 with no direct impact. Inactive tickers are always 0.0. The signal's impact may decay at a medium pace as the market adjusts."}}
{"idx": 90, "skip": false, "date": "2026-04-08", "title": "Quantum computers keep losing data. This breakthrough finally tracks it - ScienceDaily", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": [{"ticker": "IONQ", "score": 1.5, "reasoning": "The breakthrough in tracking quantum data loss is positive for pure-play companies like IONQ, which focuses on trapped-ion technology. This could lead to improved coherence and device performance, accelerating quantum advancements."}, {"ticker": "RGTI", "score": 2.0, "reasoning": "As a pure-play superconducting quantum company, Rigetti stands to benefit significantly from advances in tracking decoherence, a major challenge in their technology. This breakthrough addresses a core limitation, potentially speeding up progress."}, {"ticker": "QBTS", "score": 1.0, "reasoning": "D-Wave's quantum annealing technology may see benefits from better tracking of data loss, though the impact might be less direct than for gate-based quantum computing. Still, any progress in quantum reliability is positive."}, {"ticker": "QUBT", "score": 1.5, "reasoning": "Quantum Computing Inc., focusing on neutral atom technology, would benefit from this breakthrough as it addresses a core challenge in quantum systems, potentially improving qubit stability and performance."}, {"ticker": "QNT", "score": 1.5, "reasoning": "Quantinuum, a trapped-ion pure-play, is positively impacted by advancements in tracking decoherence, which can enhance system reliability and contribute to longer operational lifetimes."}, {"ticker": "IBM", "score": 0.15, "reasoning": "IBM's quantum efforts, though only ~2% of revenue, could benefit from this research. However, the impact is muted by their diversified business, limiting the overall effect."}, {"ticker": "HON", "score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Honeywell's small quantum business (post-Quantinuum spinoff) may see a slight positive effect from the general advancement in quantum computing, but their exposure is minimal (~1% of revenue)."}, {"ticker": "MSFT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, always 0.0"}, {"ticker": "GOOGL", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, always 0.0"}, {"ticker": "NVDA", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, always 0.0"}]}}
{"idx": 91, "skip": false, "date": "2026-04-09", "title": "Horizon Quantum To Acquire IonQ 256-Qubit Trapped-Ion System - The Quantum Insider", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": [{"ticker": "IONQ", "score": 2.0}, {"ticker": "RGTI", "score": 0.0}, {"ticker": "QBTS", "score": 0.0}, {"ticker": "QUBT", "score": 0.0}, {"ticker": "QNT", "score": 0.0}, {"ticker": "IBM", "score": 0.0}, {"ticker": "HON", "score": 0.3}, {"ticker": "MSFT", "score": 0.0}, {"ticker": "GOOGL", "score": 0.0}, {"ticker": "NVDA", "score": 0.0}], "reasoning": "The news indicates Honeywell (HON) acquiring IonQ (IONQ), a major event with high novelty. IONQ scores +2.0 as the target, HON scores +0.3 as the acquirer. Other companies are unaffected (0.0). Signal decay is slow due to long-term implications."}}
{"idx": 92, "skip": false, "date": "2026-04-10", "title": "Study Finds Exponential Quantum Advantage in Machine Learning Tasks - The Quantum Insider", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play trapped-ion company; directly benefits from quantum advantage in ML tasks."}, "RGTI": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play superconducting company; directly benefits from quantum advantage in ML tasks."}, "QBTS": {"score": 1.8, "reasoning": "Quantum annealing company; benefits from ML tasks involving optimization, but exponential advantage is more typical for gate-based architectures."}, "QUBT": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play neutral atom company; gate-based quantum computing benefits from ML advantage."}, "QNT": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play trapped-ion company; benefits from quantum advantage in ML."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Superconducting company with ~2% quantum revenue; positive impact but limited scale."}, "HON": {"score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Trapped-ion company with ~1% quantum revenue post-spinoff; positive impact but limited scale."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; always 0.0"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; always 0.0"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; always 0.0"}}}}
{"idx": 93, "skip": false, "date": "2026-04-11", "title": "Quantum Computing Is Beginning to Take Shape \u2014 Here Are Three Recent Breakthroughs - Discover Magazine", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": [{"ticker": "IONQ", "score": 1.5, "reasoning": "Pure-play trapped-ion company; general positive news about quantum breakthroughs justifies a high positive score (+1.5) due to full sector exposure. Moderate novelty and fast decay expected."}, {"ticker": "RGTI", "score": 1.5, "reasoning": "Pure-play superconducting company; similar rationale as IONQ, with high positive score (+1.5) reflecting full quantum focus. Moderate novelty and fast decay."}, {"ticker": "QBTS", "score": 1.5, "reasoning": "Pure-play quantum annealing company (D-Wave); benefits from general positive sentiment, score +1.5. Moderate novelty and fast decay."}, {"ticker": "QUBT", "score": 1.5, "reasoning": "Pure-play neutral atom company; general breakthroughs boost sentiment, score +1.5. Moderate novelty and fast decay."}, {"ticker": "QNT", "score": 1.5, "reasoning": "Pure-play trapped-ion company (IPO'd 2026); full quantum focus justifies +1.5. Moderate novelty and fast decay."}, {"ticker": "IBM", "score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Superconducting company with ~2% quantum revenue; general positive news has limited impact, score +0.10 (within [-0.15, +0.15] range). Moderate novelty and fast decay."}, {"ticker": "HON", "score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Trapped-ion company with ~1% quantum revenue post-spinoff; lower exposure reduces impact, score +0.15 (within [-0.3, +0.3] range). Moderate novelty and fast decay."}, {"ticker": "MSFT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; no quantum focus, always 0.0."}, {"ticker": "GOOGL", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; no quantum focus, always 0.0."}, {"ticker": "NVDA", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; no quantum focus, always 0.0."}]}}
{"idx": 94, "skip": false, "date": "2026-04-11", "title": "AI Decoder Could Cut Quantum Errors by Up to 17\u00d7, Study Finds - The Quantum Insider", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": 2.0, "RGTI": 2.0, "QBTS": 1.5, "QUBT": 2.0, "QNT": 2.0, "IBM": 0.15, "HON": 0.3, "MSFT": 0.0, "GOOGL": 0.0, "NVDA": 0.0}, "reasoning": "The AI decoder news is a major positive for quantum computing, especially gate-based systems. Pure-play companies (IONQ, RGTI, QUBT, QNT) score +2.0 for high relevance. QBTS (annealing) scores +1.5 due to less direct impact. IBM and HON score max positives (+0.15, +0.3) for their quantum segments. Inactive firms score 0.0."}}
{"idx": 95, "skip": false, "date": "2026-04-13", "title": "Prediction: This Will Be Rigetti Computing's Stock Price in 1 Year - The Motley Fool", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Article is specific to Rigetti; no direct impact on IonQ"}, "RGTI": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Bullish prediction about Rigetti's stock price; low novelty, decay expected over time"}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Article is specific to Rigetti; no direct impact on D-Wave"}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Article is specific to Rigetti; no direct impact on Quantum Computing Inc"}, "QNT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Article is specific to Rigetti; no direct impact on Quantinuum"}, "IBM": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Article is specific to Rigetti; no direct impact on IBM's quantum division"}, "HON": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Article is specific to Rigetti; no direct impact on Honeywell's quantum division"}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, always 0.0"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, always 0.0"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, always 0.0"}}}}
{"idx": 96, "skip": false, "date": "2026-04-13", "title": "Gauge theory could give quantum error correction a boost - Physics World", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 1.5, "reasoning": "Trapped-ion architecture has lower error rates but benefits moderately from QEC advancements for scalability. Score reflects moderate positive impact within pure-play range."}, "RGTI": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Superconducting architecture has high error rates and relies heavily on QEC; gauge theory advance could significantly boost Rigetti's technology. Score is maximum positive for pure-play."}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.5, "reasoning": "Quantum annealing paradigm is less dependent on traditional QEC; gauge theory has minimal direct impact on D-Wave's approach. Score is low positive for pure-play."}, "QUBT": {"score": 1.5, "reasoning": "Neutral atom qubits have moderate error rates; benefits from QEC improvements for scalability. Score reflects moderate positive impact within pure-play range."}, "QNT": {"score": 1.5, "reasoning": "Trapped-ion architecture similar to IONQ; benefits moderately from QEC advancements. Quantinuum's pure-play status justifies score within range."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Superconducting leader with strong QEC focus; benefits from the advance, but limited by ~2% quantum revenue capping impact at maximum positive."}, "HON": {"score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Trapped-ion with minor quantum revenue post-spinoff; moderate benefit from QEC, but capped at maximum positive due to low quantum focus."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive in quantum computing; no relevance to the news."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive in quantum computing; no relevance to the news."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive in quantum computing; no relevance to the news."}}}}
{"idx": 97, "skip": false, "date": "2026-04-13", "title": "Exponential Quantum Advantage in Processing Massive Classical Data - Quantum Computing Report", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": 1.5, "RGTI": 1.5, "QBTS": 0.5, "QUBT": 1.0, "QNT": 1.5, "IBM": 0.15, "HON": 0.3, "MSFT": 0.0, "GOOGL": 0.0, "NVDA": 0.0}, "reasoning": "The news reports an exponential quantum advantage in processing massive classical data, a significant development for gate-based quantum computing technologies (trapped-ion, superconducting, neutral atom). Companies using these technologies (IONQ, RGTI, QUBT, QNT, HON, IBM) receive positive signals. D-Wave (QBTS) using quantum annealing is less relevant for general classical data processing. Pure-play companies (IONQ, RGTI, QBTS, QUBT, QNT) get higher scores within [-2.0, +2.0], while IBM (max +0.15) and HON (max +0.3) are capped. Inactive companies (MSFT, GOOGL, NVDA) score 0.0. The report nature may cause rapid decay, but the initial signal is positive."}}
{"idx": 98, "skip": false, "date": "2026-04-14", "title": "IonQ Selected for DARPA\u2019s Heterogeneous Architectures for Quantum (HARQ) Program - The Quantum Insider", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Directly selected for DARPA HARQ program, significant positive catalyst with high novelty and moderate decay."}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned; no direct impact from the news."}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned; no direct impact from the news."}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned; no direct impact from the news."}, "QNT": {"score": -1.0, "reasoning": "Competitor in trapped-ion not selected; negative impact with high relevance."}, "IBM": {"score": -0.05, "reasoning": "Major quantum player not selected; minor negative due to small quantum revenue share."}, "HON": {"score": -0.2, "reasoning": "Trapped-ion player not selected; negative impact with moderate relevance."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; no quantum focus per definition."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; no quantum focus per definition."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; no quantum focus per definition."}}}}
{"idx": 99, "skip": false, "date": "2026-04-14", "title": "D-Wave CEO says Nvidia should be 'shaking in their boots' as quantum computing battles AI GPUs - Yahoo Finance", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": [{"ticker": "IONQ", "score": 1.5, "reasoning": "General positive sentiment for quantum industry; benefits from CEO's bullish narrative on quantum vs. AI, though not directly mentioned."}, {"ticker": "RGTI", "score": 1.5, "reasoning": "General positive sentiment for quantum industry; Rigetti, as a pure-play superconducting company, gains from the broader competitive narrative."}, {"ticker": "QBTS", "score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Direct positive mention; D-Wave CEO's statement positions the company as a leader in quantum vs. AI, driving maximum sentiment impact."}, {"ticker": "QUBT", "score": 1.5, "reasoning": "General positive sentiment for quantum industry; Quantum Computing Inc. benefits from the increased attention on quantum capabilities."}, {"ticker": "QNT", "score": 1.5, "reasoning": "General positive sentiment; Quantinuum, as a pure-play with recent IPO, may see amplified impact from sector optimism."}, {"ticker": "IBM", "score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Positive for quantum sector, but limited to ~2% quantum revenue, capping impact at maximum for its range."}, {"ticker": "HON", "score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Positive for quantum sector, but only ~1% quantum revenue post-spinoff; benefits indirectly from industry narrative."}, {"ticker": "MSFT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; always 0.0 per specification, no relevance to news."}, {"ticker": "GOOGL", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; always 0.0 per specification."}, {"ticker": "NVDA", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; always 0.0 per specification, despite negative mention in news."}]}}
{"idx": 100, "skip": false, "date": "2026-04-14", "title": "Why D-Wave Quantum Stock Took off Like a Rocket Today - Yahoo Finance", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": -1.0, "RGTI": -1.0, "QBTS": 2.0, "QUBT": -1.0, "QNT": -1.0, "IBM": -0.1, "HON": -0.1, "MSFT": 0.0, "GOOGL": 0.0, "NVDA": 0.0}, "reasoning": "QBTS receives +2.0 for the direct positive news impact. Pure-play competitors (IONQ, RGTI, QUBT, QNT) are penalized -1.0 due to competitive threat. IBM and HON are slightly negative (-0.1) as quantum incumbents. Inactive tickers are 0.0. The effect decays quickly, especially for QBTS."}}
{"idx": 101, "skip": false, "date": "2026-04-15", "title": "IonQ (IONQ) Soars 21% on Nvidia Quantum Computing Support - Yahoo Finance", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": 2.0, "RGTI": 0.0, "QBTS": 0.0, "QUBT": 0.0, "QNT": 0.0, "IBM": 0.0, "HON": 0.0, "NVDA": 0.0, "MSFT": 0.0, "GOOGL": 0.0}, "reasoning": "IonQ directly benefits from the news with a 21% surge, justifying the maximum +2.0 score for a pure-play. Other companies are unaffected as the news is specific to IonQ. Inactive tickers are always 0.0."}}
{"idx": 102, "skip": false, "date": "2026-04-15", "title": "Why Rigetti Computing Stock Keeps Going Up - Yahoo Finance", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": [{"ticker": "IONQ", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct mention; neutral impact despite positive sector sentiment."}, {"ticker": "RGTI", "score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive, specific coverage; moderate impact due to low novelty (analyzes ongoing trends)."}, {"ticker": "QBTS", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct mention; neutral impact."}, {"ticker": "QUBT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct mention; neutral impact."}, {"ticker": "QNT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct mention; neutral impact."}, {"ticker": "IBM", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct mention; competitor news has neutral impact on non-pure-play."}, {"ticker": "HON", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct mention; competitor news has neutral impact on non-pure-play."}, {"ticker": "MSFT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, always 0.0"}, {"ticker": "GOOGL", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, always 0.0"}, {"ticker": "NVDA", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, always 0.0"}]}}
{"idx": 103, "skip": false, "date": "2026-04-15", "title": "Rigetti Computing Is Skyrocketing Today -- Is the Quantum Stock a Buy Right Now? - Yahoo Finance", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": 0.0, "RGTI": 2.0, "QBTS": 0.0, "QUBT": 0.0, "QNT": 0.0, "IBM": 0.0, "HON": 0.0, "MSFT": 0.0, "GOOGL": 0.0, "NVDA": 0.0}, "reasoning": "The news article specifically highlights Rigetti Computing (RGTI) with the term 'skyrocketing,' indicating a highly positive event for the company. As a pure-play quantum company, RGTI receives the maximum positive score of +2.0. No other companies are mentioned or implied in the article, so all other active companies (IONQ, QBTS, QUBT, QNT, IBM, HON) score 0.0. Inactive companies (MSFT, GOOGL, NVDA) are always 0.0. The novelty is high (timely and specific), but the signal may decay within days as market attention shifts."}}
{"idx": 104, "skip": false, "date": "2026-04-15", "title": "Rigetti (RGTI), Quantum Stocks Climb \u2018Double-Digits\u2019 on Nvidia Support - Yahoo Finance", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 1.5, "reasoning": "As a pure-play quantum company, IONQ benefits from the general surge in quantum stocks mentioned in the article, though not specifically highlighted. Score is moderate due to implied broad industry positivity."}, "RGTI": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Directly mentioned in the article with a double-digit climb attributed to Nvidia support, indicating the strongest positive sentiment. Score is at the pure-play maximum."}, "QBTS": {"score": 1.5, "reasoning": "As a pure-play quantum company, QBTS benefits from the general surge in quantum stocks mentioned in the article, though not specifically highlighted. Score is moderate due to implied broad industry positivity."}, "QUBT": {"score": 1.5, "reasoning": "As a pure-play quantum company, QUBT benefits from the general surge in quantum stocks mentioned in the article, though not specifically highlighted. Score is moderate due to implied broad industry positivity."}, "QNT": {"score": 1.5, "reasoning": "As a pure-play quantum company, QNT benefits from the general surge in quantum stocks mentioned in the article, though not specifically highlighted. Score is moderate due to implied broad industry positivity."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "IBM benefits from the quantum stock surge and potential indirect effects from Nvidia's support in hybrid computing, but its limited quantum revenue share caps the signal at the upper bound of its range."}, "HON": {"score": 0.3, "reasoning": "HON benefits from the quantum stock surge and its trapped-ion technology relevance, with a slightly higher score than IBM due to its quantum focus, but capped at the upper bound of its range."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "MSFT is inactive (not primarily a quantum company) and always scores 0.0 per definition."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "GOOGL is inactive (not primarily a quantum company) and always scores 0.0 per definition."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "NVDA's support triggered the quantum stock surge, but it is inactive (not primarily a quantum company) and always scores 0.0 per definition."}}}}
{"idx": 105, "skip": false, "date": "2026-04-15", "title": "Why D-Wave Quantum Stock Keeps Going Up - Yahoo Finance", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": 0.1, "RGTI": 0.1, "QBTS": 1.5, "QUBT": 0.1, "QNT": 0.1, "IBM": 0.0, "HON": 0.0, "MSFT": 0.0, "GOOGL": 0.0, "NVDA": 0.0}, "reasoning": "Positive news about D-Wave (QBTS) justifies a high score (+1.5). Other pure-plays receive a small spillover (+0.1) due to sector validation. IBM and HON are minimally affected (0.0). Inactive companies score 0.0."}}
{"idx": 106, "skip": false, "date": "2026-04-15", "title": "Why Quantum Computing Stock Keeps Going Up - Yahoo Finance", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play quantum company; positive sentiment from sector trend, but low novelty moderates score to +1.0."}, "RGTI": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play quantum company; positive sentiment from sector trend, but low novelty moderates score to +1.0."}, "QBTS": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play quantum company; positive sentiment from sector trend, but low novelty moderates score to +1.0."}, "QUBT": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play quantum company; positive sentiment from sector trend, but low novelty moderates score to +1.0."}, "QNT": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play quantum company; positive sentiment from sector trend, but low novelty moderates score to +1.0."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Small quantum revenue share (~2%); positive sentiment justifies maximum score for IBM (+0.15)."}, "HON": {"score": 0.2, "reasoning": "Small quantum revenue share (~1%) but wider score range; positive sentiment with low novelty moderates score to +0.2."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; no quantum focus, always 0.0."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; no quantum focus, always 0.0."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; no quantum focus, always 0.0."}}}}
{"idx": 107, "skip": false, "date": "2026-04-15", "title": "Why Quantum Computing Stock Keeps Going Up - The Motley Fool", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": 1.0, "RGTI": 1.0, "QBTS": 1.0, "QUBT": 1.0, "QNT": 1.0, "IBM": 0.1, "HON": 0.2, "MSFT": 0.0, "GOOGL": 0.0, "NVDA": 0.0}, "reasoning": "The article title indicates a positive sentiment for the quantum computing sector. However, it lacks novelty as it explains existing trends. The effect is expected to decay slowly. Since the article does not specify a particular company, all pure-play companies (IONQ, RGTI, QBTS, QUBT, QNT) are assigned a score of +1.0. IBM and HON, as partial quantum players, receive +0.1 and +0.2 respectively. Inactive companies (MSFT, GOOGL, NVDA) are assigned 0.0."}}
{"idx": 108, "skip": false, "date": "2026-04-16", "title": "Why Quantum Computing Stock Was Blasting Higher This Week - The Motley Fool", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": [{"ticker": "IONQ", "score": 1.5, "reasoning": "Positive sentiment from quantum computing stock rally; high decay expected due to short-lived financial news."}, {"ticker": "RGTI", "score": 1.5, "reasoning": "Positive sentiment from quantum computing stock rally; high decay expected due to short-lived financial news."}, {"ticker": "QBTS", "score": 1.5, "reasoning": "Positive sentiment from quantum computing stock rally; high decay expected due to short-lived financial news."}, {"ticker": "QUBT", "score": 1.5, "reasoning": "Positive sentiment from quantum computing stock rally; high decay expected due to short-lived financial news."}, {"ticker": "QNT", "score": 1.5, "reasoning": "Positive sentiment from quantum computing stock rally; high decay expected due to short-lived financial news."}, {"ticker": "IBM", "score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Small quantum exposure (~2%); positive sentiment but low weight and high decay."}, {"ticker": "HON", "score": 0.2, "reasoning": "Small quantum exposure (~1%); positive sentiment but low weight and high decay."}, {"ticker": "MSFT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No quantum focus; inactive in quantum universe."}, {"ticker": "GOOGL", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No quantum focus; inactive in quantum universe."}, {"ticker": "NVDA", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No quantum focus; inactive in quantum universe."}]}}
{"idx": 109, "skip": false, "date": "2026-04-16", "title": "How IBM Quantum is enabling healthcare and biology research - IBM", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": 0.5, "RGTI": 0.5, "QBTS": 0.3, "QUBT": 0.5, "QNT": 0.5, "IBM": 0.15, "HON": 0.1, "MSFT": 0.0, "GOOGL": 0.0, "NVDA": 0.0}, "reasoning": "News is positive for IBM (direct mention) and the broader quantum industry (spillover). Low novelty and medium decay speed lead to moderate scores. Pure-plays benefit similarly, except QBTS (different tech). HON gets minor positive as a competitor. Inactive companies score 0.0."}}
{"idx": 110, "skip": false, "date": "2026-04-17", "title": "How IonQ Became the Most Exciting Name in Quantum Computing This Week - inc.com", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Directly highlighted as the most exciting name; high novelty from recent advancements; positive signal with moderate decay."}, "RGTI": {"score": -1.0, "reasoning": "Competitor in superconducting segment; relative devaluation due to IonQ's prominence; low novelty for RGTI."}, "QBTS": {"score": -0.5, "reasoning": "Different quantum annealing technology; slight negative sentiment shift; low impact decay."}, "QUBT": {"score": -0.5, "reasoning": "Neutral atom technology; overshadowed by IonQ; minimal novelty impact."}, "QNT": {"score": -1.0, "reasoning": "Direct trapped-ion competitor; significant relative negative impact; low novelty for QNT."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned; minimal quantum revenue exposure; neutral impact."}, "HON": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned; small quantum revenue; no significant impact."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; not part of quantum computing universe."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; not part of quantum computing universe."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; not part of quantum computing universe."}}}}
{"idx": 111, "skip": false, "date": "2026-04-17", "title": "Here's Why D-Wave Quantum Stock Soared This Week - Yahoo Finance", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.5, "reasoning": "Moderate positive spillover from sector optimism due to D-Wave news."}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.5, "reasoning": "Moderate positive spillover from sector optimism due to D-Wave news."}, "QBTS": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Direct positive impact; stock soared due to highlighted news."}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.5, "reasoning": "Moderate positive spillover from sector optimism due to D-Wave news."}, "QNT": {"score": 0.5, "reasoning": "Moderate positive spillover from sector optimism due to D-Wave news."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Small positive spillover; minimal quantum exposure."}, "HON": {"score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Small positive spillover; minimal quantum exposure."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive in quantum computing universe."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive in quantum computing universe."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive in quantum computing universe."}}}}
{"idx": 112, "skip": false, "date": "2026-04-17", "title": "Here is why Hewlett Packard is an Undervalued Quantum Computing Stock to Invest In - Yahoo Finance", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": -1.0, "reasoning": "Article focuses on HON, a non-pure-play, suggesting reduced investor focus on pure-play quantum companies like IONQ. Novelty high, decay moderate due to sentiment shift."}, "RGTI": {"score": -1.0, "reasoning": "Similar to IONQ, article emphasizes HON, negatively impacting pure-play perception. Novelty high, decay moderate."}, "QBTS": {"score": -1.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play quantum companies like QBTS may be seen as less favored compared to HON. Novelty high, decay moderate."}, "QUBT": {"score": -1.0, "reasoning": "Article about HON implies potential overvaluation of pure-plays like QUBT. Novelty high, decay moderate."}, "QNT": {"score": -1.0, "reasoning": "Focus on HON as undervalued may reduce perceived value of pure-play competitors like QNT. Novelty high, decay moderate."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in article; no direct impact. Novelty low for IBM, decay neutral."}, "HON": {"score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Directly praised as undervalued quantum stock; positive impact. Novelty high, decay slow due to fundamental analysis."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; always 0.0"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; always 0.0"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; always 0.0"}}}}
{"idx": 113, "skip": false, "date": "2026-04-17", "title": "Quantum-informed machine learning for predicting spatiotemporal chaos with practical quantum advantage - Science | AAAS", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": 1.8, "RGTI": 1.8, "QBTS": 0.2, "QUBT": 1.8, "QNT": 1.8, "IBM": 0.15, "HON": 0.3, "MSFT": 0.0, "GOOGL": 0.0, "NVDA": 0.0}, "reasoning": "The article highlights a gate-based quantum advantage for spatiotemporal chaos prediction, benefiting trapped-ion (IONQ, QNT), superconducting (RGTI, IBM), and neutral atom (QUBT) technologies with high scores. D-Wave's annealing (QBTS) is less relevant, resulting in a lower score. IBM and HON are capped due to low quantum revenue. Inactive companies score 0.0."}}
{"idx": 114, "skip": false, "date": "2026-04-19", "title": "Alliance Global Partners Holds Buy on Rigetti Computing (NASDAQ: RGTI) as Nvidia's (NVDA) Quantum Push Lifts the Sector - foreignpolicyjournal.com", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.6, "reasoning": "Positive due to sector lift from Nvidia's quantum push; not directly mentioned."}, "RGTI": {"score": 1.5, "reasoning": "Direct Buy rating from Alliance Global Partners due to sector strength from Nvidia's push."}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.6, "reasoning": "Positive due to sector lift from Nvidia's quantum push."}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.6, "reasoning": "Positive due to sector lift from Nvidia's quantum push."}, "QNT": {"score": 0.6, "reasoning": "Positive due to sector lift from Nvidia's quantum push."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.12, "reasoning": "Small positive from sector lift; superconducting player with low quantum revenue share."}, "HON": {"score": 0.24, "reasoning": "Small positive from sector lift; trapped-ion player with low quantum revenue share."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; no quantum focus, score always 0.0."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; no quantum focus, score always 0.0."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; mentioned in news but score always 0.0."}}}}
{"idx": 115, "skip": false, "date": "2026-04-19", "title": "Could These 3 New-to-Market Quantum Computing Firms Threaten D-Wave? - Yahoo Finance", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": [{"ticker": "IONQ", "score": 1.0, "reasoning": "As one of the new-to-market firms threatening D-Wave, IONQ gains positive sentiment from the news, indicating potential market disruption."}, {"ticker": "RGTI", "score": 1.0, "reasoning": "RGTI is positioned as a new-to-market threat to D-Wave, leading to a positive signal due to increased competitive positioning."}, {"ticker": "QBTS", "score": -1.5, "reasoning": "D-Wave faces direct threats from new entrants, resulting in a negative signal due to competitive pressure and potential market share loss."}, {"ticker": "QUBT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the news context; neutral impact as the article focuses on specific new firms."}, {"ticker": "QNT", "score": 1.0, "reasoning": "As a new-to-market firm (IPO'd June 2026), Quantinuum is highlighted as a potential threat to D-Wave, driving a positive signal."}, {"ticker": "IBM", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct relevance to the news; quantum revenue is small (~2%), so neutral impact."}, {"ticker": "HON", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct relevance; quantum revenue is minor (~1% post-spinoff), so neutral impact."}, {"ticker": "MSFT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive for quantum computing signals; always 0.0."}, {"ticker": "GOOGL", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive for quantum computing signals; always 0.0."}, {"ticker": "NVDA", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive for quantum computing signals; always 0.0."}]}}
{"idx": 116, "skip": false, "date": "2026-04-20", "title": "QuEra, Harvard, and MIT Demonstrate 2:1 Physical-to-Logical Qubit Ratio - Quantum Computing Report", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": 2.0, "RGTI": 1.0, "QBTS": 0.0, "QUBT": 0.0, "QNT": 2.0, "IBM": 0.0, "HON": 0.3, "MSFT": 0.0, "GOOGL": 0.0, "NVDA": 0.0}, "reasoning": "The news reports a breakthrough in quantum error correction with a 2:1 physical-to-logical qubit ratio, likely in trapped-ion technology (given QuEra's ties to Harvard and MIT). This significantly benefits pure-play trapped-ion companies IONQ and QNT, scoring them at the maximum +2.0. RGTI (superconducting) receives a moderate +1.0 as the sector-wide advancement is positive but less direct. QBTS (annealing) and QUBT (neutral atom) are unaffected (0.0). IBM (superconducting, minimal quantum revenue) scores 0.0. HON (trapped-ion, minimal quantum revenue) gets a capped +0.3. Inactive companies (MSFT, GOOGL, NVDA) score 0.0. The novelty is high, but decay may be rapid due to research-stage nature."}}
{"idx": 117, "skip": false, "date": "2026-04-21", "title": "IonQ Quantum Networking Breakthrough Raises Questions For Growth And Defense Upside - Yahoo Finance", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 1.8, "reasoning": "Directly mentioned; breakthrough in quantum networking indicates strong growth and defense potential, validating trapped-ion technology with high novelty and moderate decay."}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Superconducting technology; quantum networking not core to Rigetti's focus, minimal direct impact."}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Quantum annealing focus; misaligned with networking breakthrough, no significant effect."}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Neutral atom technology; no direct relevance to IonQ's networking advance, neutral impact."}, "QNT": {"score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Trapped-ion competitor; positive industry sentiment from breakthrough, but indirect and diluted by competitive dynamics."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Superconducting with low quantum revenue; networking not core, minimal relevance despite sector-wide implications."}, "HON": {"score": 0.2, "reasoning": "Trapped-ion technology; positive sentiment for sector, but small quantum revenue cushions impact; moderate decay expected."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; always 0.0 per specifications."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; always 0.0 per specifications."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; always 0.0 per specifications."}}}}
{"idx": 118, "skip": false, "date": "2026-04-21", "title": "Why Nvidia Is the Most Important Quantum Computing Stock of All - The Motley Fool", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": -0.1, "reasoning": "Article elevates NVDA as the most important quantum stock, suggesting reduced focus on pure-play companies like IONQ, leading to a slight negative signal. Novelty high, decay medium."}, "RGTI": {"score": -0.1, "reasoning": "Similar to IONQ, news implies diminished importance for pure-play RGTI, resulting in a negative signal. Novelty high, decay medium."}, "QBTS": {"score": -0.1, "reasoning": "Pure-play QBTS affected negatively by article's emphasis on NVDA over dedicated quantum firms. Novelty high, decay medium."}, "QUBT": {"score": -0.1, "reasoning": "Pure-play QUBT scores negatively due to article's claim, which may redirect investor focus. Novelty high, decay medium."}, "QNT": {"score": -0.1, "reasoning": "Pure-play QNT impacted similarly to other pure-plays, with article suggesting lower importance. Novelty high, decay medium."}, "IBM": {"score": -0.05, "reasoning": "Article's focus on NVDA may slightly reduce perceived value of IBM's quantum efforts, but IBM's diversified business cushions the impact. Novelty high, decay medium."}, "HON": {"score": -0.05, "reasoning": "Similar to IBM, HON's quantum relevance is slightly downgraded due to article, though less severely. Novelty high, decay medium."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "NVDA is inactive (always 0.0) despite positive news, as per classification."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "MSFT is inactive (always 0.0)."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "GOOGL is inactive (always 0.0)."}}}}
{"idx": 119, "skip": false, "date": "2026-04-21", "title": "QuEra-led Study Points to Ultra-High-Rate Quantum Error Correction Moving Closer to Practical Hardware - The Quantum Insider", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": 1.0, "RGTI": 1.0, "QBTS": 1.0, "QUBT": 2.0, "QNT": 1.0, "IBM": 0.15, "HON": 0.3, "MSFT": 0.0, "GOOGL": 0.0, "NVDA": 0.0}, "reasoning": "The news highlights a significant advancement in quantum error correction led by QuEra, a neutral atom-focused company. This directly benefits QUBT (neutral atom pure-play) with a high positive score (+2.0) due to its direct relevance. Other pure-play companies (IONQ, RGTI, QBTS, QNT) receive a moderate positive score (+1.0) as the breakthrough has broad industry implications. IBM and HON, with minor quantum exposure, receive their maximum allowable positive scores (+0.15 and +0.3) reflecting indirect benefits. Inactive companies (MSFT, GOOGL, NVDA) score 0.0 as they have no quantum focus. The novelty of the study suggests high initial impact, but decay is expected to be moderate due to the incremental nature of quantum advancements."}}
{"idx": 120, "skip": false, "date": "2026-04-21", "title": "IBM\u2019s Hanhee Paik on the new IBM-UIUC agreement - IBM Research", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": 0.0, "RGTI": 0.0, "QBTS": 0.0, "QUBT": 0.0, "QNT": 0.0, "IBM": 0.15, "HON": 0.0, "MSFT": 0.0, "GOOGL": 0.0, "NVDA": 0.0}, "reasoning": "News focuses on IBM's IBM-UIUC agreement, providing a positive sentiment for IBM (+0.15). No direct impact on other companies; pure-plays and HON score 0.0. Inactive tickers are 0.0."}}
{"idx": 121, "skip": false, "date": "2026-04-21", "title": "QMatter Raises $1.2 Million in Funding And Introduces Quantum Compression to Tackle Scaling - The Quantum Insider", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.2, "reasoning": "Positive industry news; QMatter's progress boosts sentiment for pure-play companies like IONQ. Novelty moderate-high, decay medium."}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.2, "reasoning": "Similar to IONQ; pure-play benefits from sector optimism."}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.2, "reasoning": "Pure-play quantum company; gains from general industry uplift."}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.2, "reasoning": "Pure-play status drives positive signal from quantum ecosystem growth."}, "QNT": {"score": 0.2, "reasoning": "As a pure-play, benefits from industry validation and innovation news."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Smaller signal due to only ~2% quantum revenue; overall positive for quantum division."}, "HON": {"score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Modest boost from industry news, but scaled down for ~1% quantum revenue post-spinoff."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, always 0.0"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, always 0.0"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, always 0.0"}}}}
{"idx": 122, "skip": false, "date": "2026-04-24", "title": "Quantum Computing Stocks IonQ, Rigetti, and D-Wave Have Soared Up to 72% in 7 Trading Sessions -- and You'll Likely Regret Chasing This Rally - Yahoo Finance", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": 1.5, "RGTI": 1.5, "QBTS": 1.5, "QUBT": 0.0, "QNT": 0.0, "IBM": 0.0, "HON": 0.0, "MSFT": 0.0, "GOOGL": 0.0, "NVDA": 0.0}, "reasoning": "Positive surge reported for IONQ, RGTI, QBTS (+1.5 each) with cautionary decay warning. No impact on others (0.0)."}}
{"idx": 123, "skip": false, "date": "2026-04-25", "title": "Google Quantum AI is Now Accepting Proposals for Early Access to their Willow Quantum Processor - Quantum Computing Report", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": 0.8, "RGTI": -2.0, "QBTS": 0.8, "QUBT": 0.8, "QNT": 0.8, "IBM": -0.15, "HON": 0.3, "MSFT": 0.0, "GOOGL": 0.0, "NVDA": 0.0}, "reasoning": "The news about Google's Willow quantum processor validates the growing quantum market, benefiting non-superconducting pure-plays (IONQ, QBTS, QUBT, QNT) and HON with positive scores. However, it intensifies competition for superconducting players, leading to a highly negative score for RGTI and a slightly negative score for IBM. Inactive companies (MSFT, GOOGL, NVDA) score 0.0."}}
{"idx": 124, "skip": false, "date": "2026-04-27", "title": "IonQ Partners with Florida LambdaRail on Secure Network Project - The Quantum Insider", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": [{"ticker": "IONQ", "score": 1.8, "reasoning": "Direct positive impact from partnership with Florida LambdaRail for a secure network project, which leverages IonQ's trapped-ion technology for quantum applications like cryptography. High novelty as a new industry collaboration."}, {"ticker": "RGTI", "score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Indirect positive as the news boosts overall quantum industry credibility, but Rigetti's superconducting focus is less aligned with secure network applications."}, {"ticker": "QBTS", "score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Indirect positive for industry sentiment, but D-Wave's quantum annealing is not optimized for secure network projects like cryptography."}, {"ticker": "QUBT", "score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Minor positive from general quantum ecosystem growth; neutral atom technology has broad applications but no direct link to this partnership."}, {"ticker": "QNT", "score": 0.4, "reasoning": "Secondary positive due to shared trapped-ion technology with IonQ, relevant for secure network applications like quantum cryptography. Moderate novelty."}, {"ticker": "IBM", "score": 0.05, "reasoning": "Very small positive from sector-wide sentiment, but quantum is a minor part of IBM's business (~2% revenue)."}, {"ticker": "HON", "score": 0.2, "reasoning": "Positive due to trapped-ion connection (Honeywell's quantum efforts), but reduced impact post-Quantinuum spinoff and non-pure-play status."}, {"ticker": "MSFT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; no quantum relevance per definition."}, {"ticker": "GOOGL", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; no quantum relevance per definition."}, {"ticker": "NVDA", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; no quantum relevance per definition."}]}}
{"idx": 125, "skip": false, "date": "2026-04-27", "title": "Quantum Art Extends Series A Funding to $140 Million with Participation from Global Financial Leaders - The Quantum Insider", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Positive sentiment for the quantum sector from a new application, but not directly tied to IONQ."}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Positive sentiment for the quantum sector from a new application, but not directly tied to RGTI."}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Positive sentiment for the quantum sector from a new application, but not directly tied to QBTS."}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Positive sentiment for the quantum sector from a new application, but not directly tied to QUBT."}, "QNT": {"score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Positive sentiment for the quantum sector from a new application, but not directly tied to QNT."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.03, "reasoning": "Positive sentiment for the quantum sector from a new application, but not directly tied to IBM."}, "HON": {"score": 0.06, "reasoning": "Positive sentiment for the quantum sector from a new application, but not directly tied to HON."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive in quantum computing universe."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive in quantum computing universe."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive in quantum computing universe."}}}}
{"idx": 126, "skip": false, "date": "2026-04-27", "title": "Quantum Computing Companies Are in a Race to Go Public - WSJ", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Highly positive for private pure-play IONQ, as the WSJ article directly covers the IPO race. Novelty high, decay medium."}, "RGTI": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Same as IONQ; relevant to Rigetti's IPO efforts."}, "QBTS": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Same as IONQ; D-Wave benefits from IPO trend focus."}, "QUBT": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Same as IONQ; positive for Quantum Computing Inc.'s go-public journey."}, "QNT": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive for Quantinuum as a sector leader, but less novel post-IPO. Decay medium."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Indirectly positive for IBM's quantum division, but minimal impact due to small revenue share. Decay medium."}, "HON": {"score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Similar to IBM; minor uplift from sector sentiment, but quantum is a small part of Honeywell."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not in quantum universe per definition; inactive."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not in quantum universe per definition; inactive."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not in quantum universe per definition; inactive."}}}}
{"idx": 127, "skip": false, "date": "2026-04-28", "title": "RGTI vs IONQ: Which Quantum Computing Stock Has More Upside? - Yahoo Finance", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": [{"ticker": "IONQ", "score": 1.5, "reasoning": "Directly mentioned in the article as having upside potential, leading to a strong positive signal."}, {"ticker": "RGTI", "score": 1.5, "reasoning": "Directly mentioned in the article as having upside potential, leading to a strong positive signal."}, {"ticker": "QBTS", "score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Not mentioned, but part of the quantum computing sector, resulting in minor positive sentiment from bullish sector news."}, {"ticker": "QUBT", "score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Not mentioned, but part of the quantum computing sector, resulting in minor positive sentiment from bullish sector news."}, {"ticker": "QNT", "score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Not mentioned, but part of the quantum computing sector, resulting in minor positive sentiment from bullish sector news."}, {"ticker": "IBM", "score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Small quantum exposure (~2% revenue); minor positive sentiment from sector news, but limited impact."}, {"ticker": "HON", "score": 0.2, "reasoning": "Small quantum exposure (~1% revenue); minor positive sentiment from sector news, with slightly higher focus than IBM."}, {"ticker": "MSFT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive company with no quantum relevance; always scores 0.0."}, {"ticker": "GOOGL", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive company with no quantum relevance; always scores 0.0."}, {"ticker": "NVDA", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive company with no quantum relevance; always scores 0.0."}], "novelty": "Low to medium (0.4); the article is a stock comparison of existing companies without new developments.", "decay_speed": "High (0.8); financial opinion pieces decay quickly as market attention shifts."}}
{"idx": 128, "skip": false, "date": "2026-04-29", "title": "Best Quantum Stock to Buy the Dip: Rigetti Computing (RGTI) or Quantum Computing (QUBT) - Yahoo Finance", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": 0.0, "RGTI": 1.5, "QBTS": 0.0, "QUBT": 1.5, "QNT": 0.0, "IBM": 0.0, "HON": 0.0, "MSFT": 0.0, "GOOGL": 0.0, "NVDA": 0.0}, "reasoning": "The Yahoo Finance article specifically recommends Rigetti Computing (RGTI) and Quantum Computing (QUBT) as the best quantum stocks to buy the dip, assigning a positive signal of +1.5 to each. Other companies are not mentioned and receive 0.0. The scores adhere to the specified ranges: pure-plays [-2.0, +2.0], HON [-0.3, +0.3], IBM [-0.15, +0.15], and inactive companies 0.0."}}
{"idx": 129, "skip": false, "date": "2026-04-29", "title": "Best Quantum Stock to Buy the Dip: Rigetti Computing (RGTI) or Quantum Computing (QUBT) - The Motley Fool", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": [{"ticker": "IONQ", "score": -1.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the recommendation, implying lower relative priority and potential market underperformance."}, {"ticker": "RGTI", "score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Explicitly recommended as a top stock to buy the dip, indicating strong positive sentiment with high novelty and moderate decay."}, {"ticker": "QBTS", "score": -1.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the recommendation, implying lower relative priority and potential market underperformance."}, {"ticker": "QUBT", "score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Explicitly recommended as a top stock to buy the dip, indicating strong positive sentiment with high novelty and moderate decay."}, {"ticker": "QNT", "score": -1.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the recommendation, implying lower relative priority and potential market underperformance."}, {"ticker": "IBM", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned; small quantum revenue share minimizes impact, resulting in neutral score."}, {"ticker": "HON", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned; small quantum revenue share minimizes impact, resulting in neutral score."}, {"ticker": "MSFT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive company, always scores 0.0."}, {"ticker": "GOOGL", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive company, always scores 0.0."}, {"ticker": "NVDA", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive company, always scores 0.0."}]}}
{"idx": 130, "skip": false, "date": "2026-04-29", "title": "Billionaires Have Chosen Their Favorite Quantum Computing Stock, and It's Not IonQ, Rigetti Computing, or D-Wave Quantum - Yahoo Finance", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": [{"ticker": "IONQ", "score": -1.5}, {"ticker": "RGTI", "score": -1.5}, {"ticker": "QBTS", "score": -1.5}, {"ticker": "QUBT", "score": 1.0}, {"ticker": "QNT", "score": 1.0}, {"ticker": "IBM", "score": 0.15}, {"ticker": "HON", "score": 0.3}, {"ticker": "MSFT", "score": 0.0}, {"ticker": "GOOGL", "score": 0.0}, {"ticker": "NVDA", "score": 0.0}], "reasoning": "The news article from Yahoo Finance reports that billionaires have a favorite quantum computing stock, explicitly excluding IONQ, Rigetti Computing (RGTI), and D-Wave Quantum (QBTS). This exclusion results in negative scores (-1.5) for these companies, as they are directly ruled out. The remaining active companies\u2014QUBT, QNT, IBM, and HON\u2014are potential favorites and receive positive scores. QUBT and QNT, as pure-play companies not excluded, score +1.0 each. IBM, with ~2% quantum revenue, scores its maximum positive value of +0.15. HON, with ~1% quantum revenue post-spinoff, scores its maximum positive value of +0.3. Inactive companies (MSFT, GOOGL, NVDA) score 0.0 as they are unaffected. The news is assessed as moderately novel (novelty score 0.6) as it provides insight into investor sentiment but is not a technical breakthrough. The signal is likely to decay quickly (decay speed 0.8) due to its sentiment-based nature, which may not sustain long-term impact."}}
{"idx": 131, "skip": false, "date": "2026-04-29", "title": "Breakthrough in experimental light-powered quantum computers could mean scaling them up is now far more viable - Live Science", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": [{"ticker": "IONQ", "score": 1.5, "reasoning": "Positive due to trapped-ion technology's reliance on light for control, enhancing scalability potential."}, {"ticker": "RGTI", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Neutral; superconducting technology not directly related to light-based breakthrough."}, {"ticker": "QBTS", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Neutral; quantum annealing approach not light-based and less affected."}, {"ticker": "QUBT", "score": 1.5, "reasoning": "Positive due to neutral atom technology's use of light for control, benefiting from scalability advances."}, {"ticker": "QNT", "score": 1.5, "reasoning": "Positive; trapped-ion technology leverages light, aligning with breakthrough's implications for scaling."}, {"ticker": "IBM", "score": -0.1, "reasoning": "Slightly negative; superconducting focus may face increased competition from emerging light-based technologies."}, {"ticker": "HON", "score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Positive due to trapped-ion light usage, but capped at +0.3 due to low quantum revenue share."}, {"ticker": "MSFT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; always 0.0 per definition."}, {"ticker": "GOOGL", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; always 0.0 per definition."}, {"ticker": "NVDA", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; always 0.0 per definition."}]}}
{"idx": 132, "skip": false, "date": "2026-04-30", "title": "Maryland Doubles Down on Quantum with IonQ HQ Funding and Startup Infrastructure - The Quantum Insider", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": [{"ticker": "IONQ", "score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Direct funding for headquarters, high positive impact on pure-play trapped-ion leader."}, {"ticker": "RGTI", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct connection; California-based superconducting firm unaffected."}, {"ticker": "QBTS", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No link; Canada-based quantum annealing firm unrelated."}, {"ticker": "QUBT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct tie; California-based neutral atom firm not impacted."}, {"ticker": "QNT", "score": 0.5, "reasoning": "Indirect benefit from trapped-ion sentiment and ecosystem growth, but not directly funded."}, {"ticker": "IBM", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Minimal impact; superconducting focus with low quantum revenue and no Maryland ties."}, {"ticker": "HON", "score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Slight indirect gain from trapped-ion ecosystem growth, but small quantum revenue post-spinoff."}, {"ticker": "MSFT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; no quantum revenue focus."}, {"ticker": "GOOGL", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; no quantum revenue focus."}, {"ticker": "NVDA", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; no quantum revenue focus."}], "novelty": "medium", "decay_speed": "slow"}}
{"idx": 133, "skip": false, "date": "2026-04-30", "title": "D-Wave Quantum (QBTS) to Host First-Ever Investor Day at the New York Stock Exchange - Yahoo Finance", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": [{"ticker": "IONQ", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct impact from the news; score neutral."}, {"ticker": "RGTI", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct impact from the news; score neutral."}, {"ticker": "QBTS", "score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Positive signal due to hosting first-ever Investor Day at NYSE, indicating high corporate visibility and investor interest. High novelty as it is the first such event for QBTS."}, {"ticker": "QUBT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct impact from the news; score neutral."}, {"ticker": "QNT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct impact from the news; score neutral."}, {"ticker": "IBM", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct impact; minimal quantum revenue share, so unaffected."}, {"ticker": "HON", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct impact; small quantum revenue share, so unaffected."}, {"ticker": "MSFT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, always 0.0"}, {"ticker": "GOOGL", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, always 0.0"}, {"ticker": "NVDA", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, always 0.0"}]}}
{"idx": 134, "skip": false, "date": "2026-04-30", "title": "Assessing D-Wave Quantum (QBTS) Valuation After Recent Volatility And Contrasting Shareholder Returns - Yahoo Finance", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": -0.3, "RGTI": -0.3, "QBTS": -1.5, "QUBT": -0.3, "QNT": -0.3, "IBM": -0.1, "HON": -0.2, "MSFT": 0.0, "GOOGL": 0.0, "NVDA": 0.0}, "reasoning": "Article focuses on QBTS volatility and shareholder returns, indicating negative sentiment. Direct impact on QBTS (-1.5). Mild sector spillover reduces other pure-plays by -0.3. IBM/HON have minimal exposure (-0.1/-0.2). Inactive companies score 0.0."}}
{"idx": 135, "skip": false, "date": "2026-04-30", "title": "The Best Quantum Computing Stock to Buy Right Now - The Motley Fool", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": 1.5, "RGTI": 1.5, "QBTS": 1.5, "QUBT": 1.5, "QNT": 1.5, "IBM": 0.1, "HON": 0.2, "MSFT": 0.0, "GOOGL": 0.0, "NVDA": 0.0}, "reasoning": "The Motley Fool's article recommending the 'best' quantum stock boosts sentiment across the quantum sector. Pure-play companies (IONQ, RGTI, QBTS, QUBT, QNT) receive high positive scores (1.5) as they are the most likely focus. IBM and HON, with small quantum exposure, get modest positives (0.1 and 0.2). Inactive companies score 0.0. Novelty is moderate; decay is expected to be moderate."}}
{"idx": 136, "skip": false, "date": "2026-04-30", "title": "IBM\u2019s Krishna Predicts First Real-World Quantum Advantage in 2026 - The Quantum Insider", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": [{"ticker": "IONQ", "score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive sentiment from IBM's prediction, indicating industry progress benefits pure-play companies."}, {"ticker": "RGTI", "score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive sentiment from IBM's prediction, indicating industry progress benefits pure-play companies."}, {"ticker": "QBTS", "score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive sentiment from IBM's prediction, indicating industry progress benefits pure-play companies."}, {"ticker": "QUBT", "score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive sentiment from IBM's prediction, indicating industry progress benefits pure-play companies."}, {"ticker": "QNT", "score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive sentiment from IBM's prediction, indicating industry progress benefits pure-play companies."}, {"ticker": "IBM", "score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Directly positive as IBM predicts quantum advantage, boosting their credibility."}, {"ticker": "HON", "score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Positive as a quantum player benefiting from industry optimism, though not pure-play."}, {"ticker": "MSFT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; no quantum focus."}, {"ticker": "GOOGL", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; no quantum focus."}, {"ticker": "NVDA", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; no quantum focus."}]}}
{"idx": 137, "skip": false, "date": "2026-04-30", "title": "Groove Quantum Demonstrates 18-Qubit Spin Processor and Secures Funding - The Quantum Insider", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"reasoning": "Groove Quantum's demonstration of an 18-qubit spin processor and funding is positive industry news. As Groove Quantum is not in the universe, the event signals general progress and investment, benefiting all active companies. Pure-plays get +0.3 for moderate impact; IBM (+0.05) and Honeywell (+0.1) get smaller scores due to diversified businesses. Inactive companies are always 0.0.", "signal_vector": [{"ticker": "IONQ", "score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Pure-play quantum company; positively impacted by industry growth sentiment."}, {"ticker": "RGTI", "score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Pure-play quantum company; positively impacted by industry growth sentiment."}, {"ticker": "QBTS", "score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Pure-play quantum company; positively impacted by industry growth sentiment."}, {"ticker": "QUBT", "score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Pure-play quantum company; positively impacted by industry growth sentiment."}, {"ticker": "QNT", "score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Pure-play quantum company; positively impacted by industry growth sentiment."}, {"ticker": "IBM", "score": 0.05, "reasoning": "Small quantum segment (~2% revenue); minor positive impact from industry news."}, {"ticker": "HON", "score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Small quantum segment (~1% revenue); moderate positive impact as a focused player."}, {"ticker": "MSFT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; always 0.0 per rules."}, {"ticker": "GOOGL", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; always 0.0 per rules."}, {"ticker": "NVDA", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; always 0.0 per rules."}]}}
{"idx": 138, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-01", "title": "IonQ\u2019s Quantum Freight Pilot Adds Real World Context For Investors - Yahoo Finance", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 1.5, "reasoning": "Positive news about IonQ's pilot program"}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct mention"}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct mention"}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct mention"}, "QNT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct mention"}, "IBM": {"score": -0.1, "reasoning": "Competitor's success may impact IBM's position"}, "HON": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Minimal quantum focus post-spinoff"}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive"}}}}
{"idx": 139, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-01", "title": "Why Quantum Stock IonQ Soared 56.5% In April - Yahoo Finance", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": 2.0, "RGTI": 0.0, "QBTS": 0.0, "QUBT": 0.0, "QNT": 1.0, "IBM": 0.0, "HON": 0.2, "MSFT": 0.0, "GOOGL": 0.0, "NVDA": 0.0}, "reasoning": "The news highlights IonQ's 56.5% stock surge, a novel event likely from company-specific factors. IonQ scores maximum +2.0. Quantinuum (QNT) benefits indirectly (+1.0) due to shared trapped-ion technology. Honeywell (HON) sees a modest +0.2 for similar reasons. Other pure-plays (RGTI, QBTS, QUBT) and IBM are unaffected (0.0). Inactive tickers (MSFT, GOOGL, NVDA) score 0.0. The signal may decay quickly due to market volatility."}}
{"idx": 140, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-02", "title": "IonQ CEO Says 2025 Marked Turning Point for Quantum Commercialization - The Quantum Insider", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Direct positive mention of IonQ CEO's statement on 2025 as a turning point for quantum commercialization, indicating strong industry growth prospects. Score at maximum due to direct impact and high novelty."}, "RGTI": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive industry sentiment from the turning point announcement benefits all pure-play companies, but no direct mention. Score moderate due to sector-wide optimism."}, "QBTS": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Similar to RGTI\u2014indirect benefit from industry growth outlook, but not specifically addressed in the news."}, "QUBT": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Indirect positive impact from the industry-wide commercialization theme; score reflects sector optimism."}, "QNT": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "As a pure-play, benefits from the industry turning point narrative; score is moderate due to indirect relevance."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Positive industry sentiment applies, but only ~2% quantum revenue dilutes impact. Score at upper limit of its range."}, "HON": {"score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Trapped-ion player benefits from sector growth, but ~1% quantum revenue post-spinoff limits score. Score at maximum for HON."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No quantum revenue; inactive per definition."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No quantum revenue; inactive per definition."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No quantum revenue; inactive per definition."}}}}
{"idx": 141, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-04", "title": "Will Quantum Hardware Milestones and Global Contracts Reshape Rigetti Computing's (RGTI) Investment Narrative? - Yahoo Finance", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned; no direct impact"}, "RGTI": {"score": 1.8, "reasoning": "Direct focus of article; hardware milestones and contracts are highly positive"}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned; different technology (annealing)"}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned; no impact"}, "QNT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned; no direct link"}, "IBM": {"score": -0.1, "reasoning": "Competitor in superconducting; potential contract losses may hurt"}, "HON": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned; trapped-ion but no connection"}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive"}}}}
{"idx": 142, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-04", "title": "Why D-Wave Quantum Stock Jumped 40% Last Month - Yahoo Finance", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": [{"ticker": "IONQ", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "News is specific to D-Wave; no direct impact on IONQ"}, {"ticker": "RGTI", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "News is specific to D-Wave; no direct impact on Rigetti"}, {"ticker": "QBTS", "score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Article explains D-Wave's 40% stock surge, indicating a major positive development for the company"}, {"ticker": "QUBT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "News is specific to D-Wave; no direct impact on Quantum Computing Inc."}, {"ticker": "QNT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "News is specific to D-Wave; no direct impact on Quantinuum"}, {"ticker": "IBM", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "News is specific to D-Wave; IBM is not a pure-play and unaffected"}, {"ticker": "HON", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "News is specific to D-Wave; HON is not a pure-play and unaffected"}, {"ticker": "MSFT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive company, always scored 0.0"}, {"ticker": "GOOGL", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive company, always scored 0.0"}, {"ticker": "NVDA", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive company, always scored 0.0"}]}}
{"idx": 143, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-04", "title": "The Best Quantum Computing Stocks to Buy in 2026 - Yahoo Finance", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": [{"ticker": "IONQ", "score": 1.8, "reasoning": "Pure-play quantum company; likely featured in 'best stocks' list with high positive sentiment. Score reduced from max due to high decay speed."}, {"ticker": "RGTI", "score": 1.8, "reasoning": "Pure-play quantum company; similar to IONQ, high impact from positive article. Decayed score."}, {"ticker": "QBTS", "score": 1.8, "reasoning": "Pure-play (quantum annealing); included in list with strong sentiment. Not at max due to decay."}, {"ticker": "QUBT", "score": 1.8, "reasoning": "Pure-play; benefits from positive article. High score with decay adjustment."}, {"ticker": "QNT", "score": 1.8, "reasoning": "Pure-play, recent IPO (June 2026); likely highlighted. Positive but decayed."}, {"ticker": "IBM", "score": 0.12, "reasoning": "Major player but only ~2% quantum revenue; lower score due to diversified business. Positive sentiment with decay."}, {"ticker": "HON", "score": 0.24, "reasoning": "Trapped-ion focus but ~1% quantum revenue; moderate positive score. Impact reduced by decay."}, {"ticker": "MSFT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; not quantum-focused, always 0.0."}, {"ticker": "GOOGL", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; not quantum-focused, always 0.0."}, {"ticker": "NVDA", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; not quantum-focused, always 0.0."}]}}
{"idx": 144, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-04", "title": "Quantum Breakthrough: New Algorithm Solves \u201cImpossible\u201d Materials in Seconds - SciTechDaily", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 1.8, "reasoning": "High novelty quantum breakthrough; trapped-ion pure-play benefits significantly from general uplift."}, "RGTI": {"score": 1.8, "reasoning": "High novelty quantum breakthrough; superconducting pure-play benefits significantly from general uplift."}, "QBTS": {"score": 1.8, "reasoning": "High novelty quantum breakthrough; quantum annealing applicable to materials problems benefits pure-play."}, "QUBT": {"score": 1.8, "reasoning": "High novelty quantum breakthrough; neutral atom pure-play benefits significantly from general uplift."}, "QNT": {"score": 1.8, "reasoning": "High novelty quantum breakthrough; trapped-ion pure-play benefits significantly from general uplift."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Positive quantum news, but limited impact due to ~2% quantum revenue share; slow decay from foundational advancement."}, "HON": {"score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Positive quantum news, but limited impact due to ~1% quantum revenue share; slow decay from foundational advancement."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; no quantum focus per definition."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; no quantum focus per definition."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; no quantum focus per definition."}}}}
{"idx": 145, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-04", "title": "IBM: A Decade of Quantum on the Cloud - IBM Newsroom", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": -0.1, "RGTI": -0.1, "QBTS": -0.1, "QUBT": -0.1, "QNT": -0.1, "IBM": 0.12, "HON": -0.1, "MSFT": 0.0, "GOOGL": 0.0, "NVDA": 0.0}, "reasoning": "The news highlights IBM's longstanding quantum cloud service, which is positive for IBM but lacks novelty (10-year anniversary). This may shift focus away from pure-play competitors (IONQ, RGTI, QBTS, QUBT, QNT) and Honeywell (HON), assigning them slight negative scores. IBM receives a modest positive signal (+0.12) within its limited range. Inactive companies (MSFT, GOOGL, NVDA) score 0.0."}}
{"idx": 146, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-04", "title": "A decade of quantum on the cloud - IBM", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.05, "reasoning": "Minor positive from sector growth; not directly mentioned"}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Modest positive as competitor; benefits from increased sector visibility"}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.05, "reasoning": "Minor positive from general quantum ecosystem optimism"}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.05, "reasoning": "Minor positive due to sector-wide sentiment lift"}, "QNT": {"score": 0.05, "reasoning": "Minor positive as a pure-play beneficiary of quantum growth"}, "IBM": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Direct positive impact from their cloud anniversary news"}, "HON": {"score": 0.05, "reasoning": "Minor positive; trapped-ion player benefiting from sector growth"}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; no quantum focus"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; no quantum focus"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; no quantum focus"}}}}
{"idx": 147, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-05", "title": "Is Rigetti Computing a Buy? - The Motley Fool", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the article; neutral impact."}, "RGTI": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Directly featured in a buy recommendation article from an investment advisory firm, indicating strong positive sentiment. Novelty is moderate, decay speed is slow."}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the article; neutral impact."}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the article; neutral impact."}, "QNT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the article; neutral impact."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned; minor quantum revenue (~2%), no direct impact."}, "HON": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned; minor quantum revenue (~1%), no direct impact."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, always 0.0."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, always 0.0."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, always 0.0."}}}}
{"idx": 148, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-05", "title": "Northland Believes Compute Demand For AI Leading Quantum Industry, Here\u2019s What it Thinks About Rigetti Computing (RGTI) - Yahoo Finance", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": [{"ticker": "IONQ", "score": 1.0, "reasoning": "General positive sentiment for the quantum industry due to AI compute demand, but not specifically mentioned. Novelty medium, decay medium."}, {"ticker": "RGTI", "score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Directly highlighted in the article, indicating strong leadership in AI-driven quantum growth. Novelty medium, decay medium."}, {"ticker": "QBTS", "score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Benefits from industry-wide positivity, but quantum annealing may have less direct AI relevance. Novelty medium, decay medium."}, {"ticker": "QUBT", "score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play gaining from sector optimism, though not cited. Novelty medium, decay medium."}, {"ticker": "QNT", "score": 1.0, "reasoning": "As a major pure-play, benefits from industry growth, but not specifically addressed. Novelty medium, decay medium."}, {"ticker": "IBM", "score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Quantum division aligns with AI trends, but limited quantum revenue caps impact. Novelty medium, decay medium."}, {"ticker": "HON", "score": 0.2, "reasoning": "Trapped-ion quantum business gains slight uplift, but not pure-play. Novelty medium, decay medium."}, {"ticker": "MSFT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, no quantum focus. Always 0.0."}, {"ticker": "GOOGL", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, no quantum focus. Always 0.0."}, {"ticker": "NVDA", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, no quantum focus. Always 0.0."}]}}
{"idx": 149, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-05", "title": "Is Nvidia\u2019s New Quantum Push Quietly Reframing D-Wave Quantum\u2019s (QBTS) Path to Commercial Scale? - Yahoo Finance", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned; no direct impact, neutral sentiment"}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned; no direct impact, neutral sentiment"}, "QBTS": {"score": -1.5, "reasoning": "Directly mentioned; negatively impacted by Nvidia's quantum push, reframing commercial path (high novelty, slow decay)"}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned; no direct impact, neutral sentiment"}, "QNT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned; no direct impact, neutral sentiment"}, "IBM": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned; small quantum revenue, neutral impact"}, "HON": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned; small quantum revenue, neutral impact"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, always 0.0"}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, always 0.0"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, always 0.0"}}}}
{"idx": 150, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-05", "title": "Here\u2019s What the Street Thinks About D-Wave Quantum (QBTS) Ahead of FQ1 2026 Earnings - Yahoo Finance", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": [{"ticker": "IONQ", "score": 0.2, "reasoning": "Positive spillover from quantum sector optimism due to QBTS earnings preview; not directly impacted."}, {"ticker": "RGTI", "score": 0.2, "reasoning": "Positive spillover from quantum sector optimism due to QBTS earnings preview; not directly impacted."}, {"ticker": "QBTS", "score": 1.8, "reasoning": "Direct positive impact from earnings preview; 'Street thinks' implies market optimism and attention, within pure-play range."}, {"ticker": "QUBT", "score": 0.2, "reasoning": "Positive spillover from quantum sector optimism due to QBTS earnings preview; not directly impacted."}, {"ticker": "QNT", "score": 0.2, "reasoning": "Positive spillover from quantum sector optimism due to QBTS earnings preview; not directly impacted."}, {"ticker": "IBM", "score": 0.04, "reasoning": "Small positive spillover as part of broader quantum ecosystem; limited quantum revenue share."}, {"ticker": "HON", "score": 0.07, "reasoning": "Small positive spillover similar to IBM; limited quantum revenue post-spinoff."}, {"ticker": "MSFT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, always 0.0 per specification."}, {"ticker": "GOOGL", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, always 0.0 per specification."}, {"ticker": "NVDA", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, always 0.0 per specification."}]}}
{"idx": 151, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-06", "title": "IonQ Reports $64.7 Million Q1 2026 Revenue Fueled by Quantum Contracts And System Sales - The Quantum Insider", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Direct positive impact from strong revenue report, validating trapped-ion technology and indicating high demand."}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.5, "reasoning": "General industry growth sentiment, as positive news in quantum sector can lift all players, though Rigetti is superconducting-based."}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.2, "reasoning": "Mild positive from industry growth, but D-Wave's quantum annealing technology is less directly impacted by IonQ's news."}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Minor positive due to sector optimism, though Quantum Computing Inc.'s neutral atom focus reduces direct relevance."}, "QNT": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive spillover for trapped-ion technology validation, as Quantinuum shares the same approach, though it is a competitor."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Small positive impact from industry growth, but quantum revenue is only ~2% of IBM's business, limiting sensitivity."}, "HON": {"score": 0.2, "reasoning": "Positive from trapped-ion validation, but Honeywell's quantum revenue is only ~1% post-spinoff, so impact is modest."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No quantum focus; always 0.0 per inactive status."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No quantum focus; always 0.0 per inactive status."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No quantum focus; always 0.0 per inactive status."}}}}
{"idx": 152, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-06", "title": "What is sample-based quantum diagonalization? - IBM Research", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": [{"ticker": "IONQ", "score": 0.1}, {"ticker": "RGTI", "score": 0.1}, {"ticker": "QBTS", "score": 0.1}, {"ticker": "QUBT", "score": 0.1}, {"ticker": "QNT", "score": 0.1}, {"ticker": "IBM", "score": 0.15}, {"ticker": "HON", "score": 0.0}, {"ticker": "MSFT", "score": 0.0}, {"ticker": "GOOGL", "score": 0.0}, {"ticker": "NVDA", "score": 0.0}], "reasoning": "The news article from IBM Research introduces a novel concept in quantum computing ('sample-based quantum diagonalization'), which is expected to positively impact the broader quantum sector. IBM receives the highest score (maximum for its range) as the originator. Pure-play quantum companies (IONQ, RGTI, QBTS, QUBT, QNT) receive a moderate positive score due to sector-wide advancements. Honeywell, while a quantum player, is not directly linked to this concept and scores neutrally. Inactive companies (MSFT, GOOGL, NVDA) score 0.0 as per definition."}}
{"idx": 153, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-07", "title": "Buying D-Wave Quantum Stock? 3 Things You Should Know First. - The Motley Fool", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No mention in the article; signal neutral."}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No mention in the article; signal neutral."}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.8, "reasoning": "Article focuses on buying QBTS stock, indicating moderate positive sentiment; novelty moderate, decay slow."}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No mention in the article; signal neutral."}, "QNT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No mention in the article; signal neutral."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No mention in the article; minimal quantum revenue share keeps score near zero."}, "HON": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No mention in the article; minimal quantum revenue share keeps score near zero."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive company; always 0.0."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive company; always 0.0."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive company; always 0.0."}}}}
{"idx": 154, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-07", "title": "Using quantum to understand the OS of the universe - IBM Research", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.05, "reasoning": "Indirect uplift from IBM's novel research; trapped-ion relevance"}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.05, "reasoning": "Indirect uplift; superconducting alignment with IBM"}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.05, "reasoning": "Indirect uplift; general quantum validation"}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.05, "reasoning": "Indirect uplift; general quantum validation"}, "QNT": {"score": 0.05, "reasoning": "Indirect uplift; trapped-ion relevance"}, "IBM": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Direct positive impact from proprietary research"}, "HON": {"score": 0.05, "reasoning": "Indirect uplift; trapped-ion relevance"}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive"}}}}
{"idx": 155, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-08", "title": "Rigetti\u2019s Largest Modular Quantum System Puts Cepheus 1 108Q In Focus - Yahoo Finance", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Positive sentiment from industry progress; not directly related but benefits from sector validation."}, "RGTI": {"score": 1.5, "reasoning": "Direct positive impact from own product launch (Cepheus 1 108Q); moderate novelty as 108 qubits is significant but not record-breaking; signal decays moderately due to expected industry progress."}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Positive sentiment from industry progress; quantum annealing not directly impacted but sector boost applies."}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Positive sentiment from industry progress; neutral atom technology not directly related but benefits from market excitement."}, "QNT": {"score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Positive sentiment from industry progress; trapped-ion competitor may see slight boost from sector validation."}, "IBM": {"score": -0.15, "reasoning": "Negative impact from increased superconducting competition; IBM's dominant position may mitigate but still pressured."}, "HON": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No significant impact; news unrelated to trapped-ion focus and minimal quantum revenue exposure."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; no quantum revenue."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; no quantum revenue."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; no quantum revenue."}}}}
{"idx": 156, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-09", "title": "D Wave Quantum Acquisition And Supremacy Milestone Test Commercial Potential - Yahoo Finance", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned; different architecture (trapped-ion vs. annealing), no direct impact."}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned; superconducting gate-based, no direct relation."}, "QBTS": {"score": 1.8, "reasoning": "Directly mentioned; acquisition and supremacy milestone testing commercial potential is a positive development with high impact."}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned; neutral atom pure-play, no direct relation."}, "QNT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned; trapped-ion pure-play, no direct impact."}, "IBM": {"score": -0.1, "reasoning": "Partial play (~2% quantum revenue); D-Wave's progress may indicate competitive pressure in quantum services, slight negative."}, "HON": {"score": -0.1, "reasoning": "Partial play (~1% quantum revenue); similar competitive pressure as IBM, slight negative."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, always 0.0."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, always 0.0."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, always 0.0."}}, "reasoning": "News specifically about D-Wave Quantum (QBTS) acquisition and supremacy milestone testing commercial potential. Positive for QBTS due to direct impact and novelty. Other pure-plays are neutral with no direct relation. IBM and HON face slight competitive pressure, hence minor negative scores. Inactive companies score 0.0. Signal may decay moderately as commercial validation continues."}}
{"idx": 157, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-09", "title": "Jim Cramer Says \u201cD-Wave Is the One That I Identified as Being the Best\u201d For Quantum - Yahoo Finance", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": -1.0, "RGTI": -1.0, "QBTS": 2.0, "QUBT": -1.0, "QNT": -1.0, "IBM": -0.15, "HON": -0.15, "MSFT": 0.0, "GOOGL": 0.0, "NVDA": 0.0}, "reasoning": "Jim Cramer's explicit endorsement of D-Wave (QBTS) as the 'best' assigns it a maximum positive score. Other pure-plays receive a moderate negative due to competitive overshadowing. IBM and Honeywell get minimal negatives as their quantum exposure is minor. Inactive companies score zero. Novelty is high, but impact decays rapidly as it's opinion-based."}}
{"idx": 158, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-09", "title": "IonQ: The Top Quantum Computing Stock for a Once-in-a-Generation Investment Opportunity - Yahoo Finance", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Directly featured as the top stock with high novelty and slower decay due to 'once-in-a-generation' implication."}, "RGTI": {"score": -1.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned; negative sentiment as a competitor to IonQ in quantum computing."}, "QBTS": {"score": -1.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned; negative sentiment as a competitor to IonQ in quantum computing."}, "QUBT": {"score": -1.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned; negative sentiment as a competitor to IonQ in quantum computing."}, "QNT": {"score": -1.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned; direct competitor with same trapped-ion technology, leading to negative sentiment."}, "IBM": {"score": -0.05, "reasoning": "Not mentioned; minimal quantum revenue, so slight negative sentiment from sector comparison."}, "HON": {"score": -0.2, "reasoning": "Not mentioned; trapped-ion player overshadowed by IonQ, leading to negative sentiment."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; no quantum focus."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; no quantum focus."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; no quantum focus."}}}}
{"idx": 159, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-10", "title": "Rigetti Q1 Revenue Misses Estimates, Cites Deployment Delays", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct impact from Rigetti's earnings miss; neutral signal."}, "RGTI": {"score": -1.8, "reasoning": "Significant negative due to revenue miss (~18%) and slower customer adoption; core issues affect pure-play valuation."}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No impact; quantum annealing technology differs from Rigetti's superconducting approach."}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No impact; neutral atom technology and company-specific news."}, "QNT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct impact; trapped-ion like IONQ, but news is Rigetti-specific."}, "IBM": {"score": -0.1, "reasoning": "Slight negative; Rigetti's struggles may raise sector concerns for superconducting qubits, but IBM's quantum revenue is small."}, "HON": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No impact; trapped-ion technology but low quantum revenue and unrelated to news."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; always 0.0 per specification."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; always 0.0 per specification."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; always 0.0 per specification."}}}}
{"idx": 160, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-10", "title": "3 Quantum Computing Stocks That Went Public in 2026 That You May Have Missed - The Motley Fool", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.5, "reasoning": "Pure-play quantum company; benefits from sector growth sentiment but not directly highlighted in the article, leading to a moderate positive score."}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.5, "reasoning": "Pure-play quantum company; similar to IONQ, gains from sector growth but not directly referenced, resulting in a moderate positive score."}, "QBTS": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Directly referenced as one of the three stocks that went public in 2026; high positive sentiment due to increased visibility and investor interest from the news."}, "QUBT": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Directly referenced as one of the three stocks that went public in 2026; high positive sentiment from the article highlighting its recent IPO."}, "QNT": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Directly referenced as one of the three stocks that went public in 2026; high positive sentiment due to the news emphasizing its recent IPO."}, "IBM": {"score": -0.05, "reasoning": "Established company with ~2% quantum revenue; news about pure-play IPOs may shift investor focus away, leading to a slight negative score."}, "HON": {"score": -0.1, "reasoning": "Established company with ~1% quantum revenue; similar to IBM, may be seen as less attractive compared to new pure-play IPOs, resulting in a slight negative score."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive in quantum universe; always scores 0.0."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive in quantum universe; always scores 0.0."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive in quantum universe; always scores 0.0."}}}}
{"idx": 161, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-10", "title": "Quantum firm hailed by Amgen tech leader as an \u2018extraordinary platform\u2019 plans IPO - Fierce Biotech", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": 0.0, "RGTI": 0.0, "QBTS": 0.0, "QUBT": 0.0, "QNT": 2.0, "IBM": -0.1, "HON": -0.2, "MSFT": 0.0, "GOOGL": 0.0, "NVDA": 0.0}, "reasoning": "The news describes a quantum firm praised by Amgen as an 'extraordinary platform' and planning an IPO, likely referring to Quantinuum (QNT). The endorsement indicates strong validation, leading to a +2.0 score for QNT. Competitors IBM and Honeywell receive slight negative scores (-0.1 and -0.2 respectively) due to competitive implications, but capped by their low quantum revenue exposure. Other companies are unaffected (0.0). Novelty is high; decay speed is medium due to IPO uncertainty."}}
{"idx": 162, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-11", "title": "While Everyone's Obsessed With the SpaceX IPO, These 3 Quantum Computing Stocks Just Quietly Went Public - The Motley Fool", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": 2.0, "RGTI": -0.5, "QBTS": -0.5, "QUBT": -0.5, "QNT": 2.0, "IBM": 0.1, "HON": 0.2, "MSFT": 0.0, "GOOGL": 0.0, "NVDA": 0.0}, "reasoning": "The news is novel due to the contrast with the SpaceX IPO focus. IONQ and QNT score +2.0 for IPO benefits. RGTI, QBTS, and QUBT score -0.5 due to competition. IBM and HON gain slight positive sentiment (+0.10 and +0.20). Inactive companies score 0.0. Impact may decay quickly."}}
{"idx": 163, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-11", "title": "Quantinuum Has Submitted a Preliminary S-1 Filing to the U.S. SEC for a Proposed Initial Public Offering (IPO) of their Common Stock - Quantum Computing Report", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": 0.8, "RGTI": 0.6, "QBTS": 0.4, "QUBT": 0.3, "QNT": 1.8, "IBM": 0.1, "HON": 0.2, "MSFT": 0.0, "GOOGL": 0.0, "NVDA": 0.0}, "reasoning": "Quantinuum's S-1 filing is a novel milestone validating the quantum sector, with medium decay due to its preliminary nature. QNT scores highest for direct impact. IONQ benefits as a trapped-ion peer. Other pure-plays get modest positive scores for sector validation. IBM and HON have minor positive scores from quantum revenue, with HON also influenced by spinoff context. Inactive companies score 0.0."}}
{"idx": 164, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-11", "title": "JUPITER supercomputer breaks world record with 50-qubit quantum simulation - ScienceDaily", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": -1.5, "reasoning": "Negative due to reduced perceived quantum advantage from classical simulation advancement; trapped-ion focus."}, "RGTI": {"score": -1.5, "reasoning": "Negative due to reduced perceived quantum advantage; superconducting focus."}, "QBTS": {"score": -1.5, "reasoning": "Negative due to reduced perceived quantum advantage; quantum annealing focus."}, "QUBT": {"score": -1.5, "reasoning": "Negative due to reduced perceived quantum advantage; neutral atom focus."}, "QNT": {"score": -1.5, "reasoning": "Negative due to reduced perceived quantum advantage; trapped-ion focus."}, "IBM": {"score": -0.1, "reasoning": "Slightly negative for quantum segment due to classical simulation progress, but minimal impact given ~2% quantum revenue."}, "HON": {"score": -0.2, "reasoning": "Negative for quantum segment due to classical simulation progress, but impact reduced by ~1% quantum revenue share."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive for quantum scoring."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive for quantum scoring."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive for quantum scoring."}}}}
{"idx": 165, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-12", "title": "IonQ, World Leading Quantum Company Opens New Quantum Computing R&D Lab in Boulder - Colorado Office of Economic Development and International Trade (.gov)", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Direct positive impact from opening a new R&D lab, reinforcing leadership position."}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.5, "reasoning": "Indirect positive sentiment from industry growth, despite different technology focus."}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.5, "reasoning": "Indirect positive from sector optimism, no direct impact."}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.5, "reasoning": "Indirect positive, benefiting from broader industry positivity."}, "QNT": {"score": -1.0, "reasoning": "Negative due to increased competitive pressure in the trapped-ion technology sector."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Small positive as a major industry player with minimal quantum revenue exposure."}, "HON": {"score": -0.2, "reasoning": "Slight negative as a trapped-ion competitor with reduced quantum focus post-Quantinuum spinoff."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, unaffected per definition."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, unaffected per definition."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, unaffected per definition."}}}}
{"idx": 166, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-12", "title": "Quantum Computing Stocks: Rigetti Falls On Q1 Earnings Report - Investor's Business Daily", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": [{"ticker": "IONQ", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned; no direct impact from the news."}, {"ticker": "RGTI", "score": -1.0, "reasoning": "Directly mentioned with negative news; Q1 earnings miss caused stock decline. Moderate impact with moderate novelty and decay speed."}, {"ticker": "QBTS", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned; no direct impact from the news."}, {"ticker": "QUBT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned; no direct impact from the news."}, {"ticker": "QNT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned; no direct impact from the news."}, {"ticker": "IBM", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned; quantum is a small part of business, so minimal impact."}, {"ticker": "HON", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned; quantum is a small part post-Quantinuum spinoff."}, {"ticker": "MSFT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, always 0.0"}, {"ticker": "GOOGL", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, always 0.0"}, {"ticker": "NVDA", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, always 0.0"}]}}
{"idx": 167, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-12", "title": "Quantum Computing stock surges after revenue beat - Yahoo Finance", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": 0.5, "RGTI": 0.5, "QBTS": 0.5, "QUBT": 0.5, "QNT": 2.0, "IBM": 0.1, "HON": 0.1, "MSFT": 0.0, "GOOGL": 0.0, "NVDA": 0.0}, "reasoning": "The revenue beat news is interpreted as originating from Quantinuum (QNT), leading to a high positive score (+2.0) for QNT. Other pure-play companies (IONQ, RGTI, QBTS, QUBT) receive moderate positive scores (+0.5) due to sector optimism. IBM and HON, with minor quantum revenue, get smaller positive scores (+0.1 each). Inactive companies (MSFT, GOOGL, NVDA) score 0.0. Novelty is high (fresh news), and decay speed is medium (earnings effects may fade over weeks)."}}
{"idx": 168, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-12", "title": "Why Quantum Computing Stock Ripped Higher Today - The Motley Fool", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": 2.0, "RGTI": 2.0, "QBTS": 2.0, "QUBT": 2.0, "QNT": 2.0, "IBM": 0.15, "HON": 0.3, "MSFT": 0.0, "GOOGL": 0.0, "NVDA": 0.0}, "reasoning": "The article's title suggests a sector-wide positive event with high novelty. Pure-play companies receive +2.0 (maximum). IBM and HON get their max positive scores (+0.15 and +0.3) due to partial exposure. Inactive companies are 0.0."}}
{"idx": 169, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-12", "title": "Quantum Computing Stocks: Quantinuum IPO Filing Bucks SPAC Trend - Investor's Business Daily", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive spillover from sector-wide sentiment due to IPO news, leveraging shared trapped-ion technology."}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.5, "reasoning": "Moderate positive sentiment from general quantum sector boost; superconducting tech not directly impacted."}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.5, "reasoning": "Moderate positive sentiment from general quantum sector boost; quantum annealing tech not directly impacted."}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.5, "reasoning": "Moderate positive sentiment from general quantum sector boost; neutral atom tech not directly impacted."}, "QNT": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Direct positive impact from own IPO filing news, signaling strength and market validation (pure-play max score)."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Minor positive sentiment from sector news, but limited by low quantum revenue exposure (~2%)."}, "HON": {"score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Positive due to retained stake in Quantinuum and alignment in trapped-ion technology; capped at HON max."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; no quantum computing focus or revenue."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; no quantum computing focus or revenue."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; no quantum computing focus or revenue."}}, "novelty": "High", "decay_speed": "Medium"}}
{"idx": 170, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-12", "title": "Larger-Than-Ever Single-GPU Quantum Simulation - AMD", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": -1.5, "reasoning": "Pure-play trapped-ion company; significant negative impact from classical simulation advancement."}, "RGTI": {"score": -1.5, "reasoning": "Pure-play superconducting company; significant negative impact from classical simulation advancement."}, "QBTS": {"score": -1.5, "reasoning": "Pure-play quantum annealing company; significant negative impact from classical simulation advancement."}, "QUBT": {"score": -1.5, "reasoning": "Pure-play neutral atom company; significant negative impact from classical simulation advancement."}, "QNT": {"score": -1.5, "reasoning": "Pure-play trapped-ion company; significant negative impact from classical simulation advancement."}, "IBM": {"score": -0.15, "reasoning": "Superconducting company with ~2% quantum revenue; minor negative impact due to diversified business."}, "HON": {"score": -0.3, "reasoning": "Trapped-ion company with ~1% quantum revenue; moderate negative impact due to smaller quantum focus."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; no quantum revenue."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; no quantum revenue."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; no quantum revenue."}}}}
{"idx": 171, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-13", "title": "As Revenue Surges Nearly 9,000%, the Quantum Computing Stock Story Is Still in the \u2018Early Stages\u2019 - Barchart.com", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": [{"ticker": "IONQ", "score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play quantum company; benefits fully from the 9,000% revenue surge (high novelty), but high decay speed due to early-stage risks."}, {"ticker": "RGTI", "score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play quantum company; full positive impact from sector growth, with high decay speed due to immaturity."}, {"ticker": "QBTS", "score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play quantum company; strong positive signal from revenue surge, but high decay expected in early stages."}, {"ticker": "QUBT", "score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play quantum company; maximally positive from the growth news, with high decay risk."}, {"ticker": "QNT", "score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play quantum company; full positive impact, high decay speed due to early-stage caution."}, {"ticker": "IBM", "score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Only ~2% quantum revenue; positive from sector surge but scaled down, with high decay speed."}, {"ticker": "HON", "score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Only ~1% quantum revenue; higher sensitivity to quantum news results in max positive score for HON, but high decay speed applies."}, {"ticker": "MSFT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; no quantum focus, score always 0.0."}, {"ticker": "GOOGL", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; no quantum focus, score always 0.0."}, {"ticker": "NVDA", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; no quantum focus, score always 0.0."}]}}
{"idx": 172, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-13", "title": "Quantum breakthrough could revolutionize teleportation and computing - ScienceDaily", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": 1.8, "RGTI": 1.8, "QBTS": 1.8, "QUBT": 1.8, "QNT": 1.8, "IBM": 0.1, "HON": 0.2, "MSFT": 0.0, "GOOGL": 0.0, "NVDA": 0.0}, "reasoning": "The quantum breakthrough is a highly novel positive development for the quantum industry, but its impact is expected to decay quickly. Pure-play companies (IONQ, RGTI, QBTS, QUBT, QNT) score high (+1.8) due to full focus on quantum technology. IBM (+0.1) and Honeywell (+0.2) score modestly due to smaller quantum segments. Inactive companies (MSFT, GOOGL, NVDA) score 0.0."}}
{"idx": 173, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-13", "title": "NVision raises $55 million to expand from quantum MRI into quantum computing - CTech", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.5, "reasoning": "Positive sector news; pure-play benefits more from validated market growth."}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.5, "reasoning": "Positive sector news; pure-play benefits more from validated market growth."}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.5, "reasoning": "Positive sector news; pure-play benefits more from validated market growth."}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.5, "reasoning": "Positive sector news; pure-play benefits more from validated market growth."}, "QNT": {"score": 0.5, "reasoning": "Positive sector news; pure-play benefits more from validated market growth."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.05, "reasoning": "Positive sector news; small quantum exposure leads to modest benefit."}, "HON": {"score": 0.03, "reasoning": "Positive sector news; small quantum exposure leads to modest benefit."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; no quantum focus."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; no quantum focus."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; no quantum focus."}}}}
{"idx": 174, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-14", "title": "Here is Why D-Wave Quantum Inc. (QBTS) is Among the Best Hardware Stocks to Buy for the AI PC Revolution - Yahoo Finance", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the article; neutral impact."}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the article; neutral impact."}, "QBTS": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Article explicitly recommends QBTS as a top hardware stock for the AI PC revolution, indicating strong positive sentiment. This is a novel angle for QBTS, and the buy recommendation may lead to slower decay."}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the article; neutral impact."}, "QNT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the article; neutral impact."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned; quantum is a small part of business (~2% revenue), so neutral within range."}, "HON": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned; quantum is a small part of business (~1% revenue post-spinoff), so neutral within range."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; always 0.0 per definition."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; always 0.0 per definition."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; always 0.0 per definition."}}}}
{"idx": 175, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-14", "title": "Nvidia, Microsoft, and IBM are pursuing 3 very different quantum strategies. Here's how they compare - qz.com", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": 0.0, "RGTI": 0.0, "QBTS": 0.0, "QUBT": 0.0, "QNT": 0.0, "IBM": 0.1, "HON": 0.0, "MSFT": 0.0, "GOOGL": 0.0, "NVDA": 0.0}, "reasoning": "The article compares quantum strategies of Nvidia, Microsoft, and IBM. Inactive companies (NVDA, MSFT, GOOGL) score 0.0. IBM receives +0.10 for positive perception in the comparison, within its allowed range. Pure-play companies (IONQ, RGTI, QBTS, QUBT, QNT) and HON are not affected, scoring 0.0."}}
{"idx": 176, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-14", "title": "2 Quantum Leaders Are Going Public. Their Paths to the Market Couldn\u2019t Be More Different. - Barron's", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Indirect positive sentiment from sector news; not directly mentioned."}, "RGTI": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Directly mentioned as a leader going public; strong positive impact."}, "QBTS": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Indirect positive sentiment from sector news; not directly mentioned."}, "QUBT": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Indirect positive sentiment from sector news; not directly mentioned."}, "QNT": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Directly mentioned as a leader going public; strong positive impact."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Minor positive sentiment as a quantum player; low quantum revenue share limits score."}, "HON": {"score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Slight positive as former parent of Quantinuum; minimal quantum revenue."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; no quantum relevance."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; no quantum relevance."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; no quantum relevance."}}}}
{"idx": 177, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-15", "title": "IonQ Achieves 35 Algorithmic Qubits on Latest Processor", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Direct positive impact; achieving 35 algorithmic qubits is a major milestone for trapped-ion quantum computing, enhancing IonQ's competitive position and near-term quantum advantage potential."}, "RGTI": {"score": -0.5, "reasoning": "Indirect negative; Rigetti's superconducting approach faces increased competitive pressure as IonQ's advancement validates high-fidelity qubits, potentially diverting market focus."}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Neutral; D-Wave's quantum annealing technology is architecturally different, so the impact is minimal despite the mention of optimization."}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.5, "reasoning": "Slight positive; the success reinforces the viability of high-fidelity qubits, which aligns with Quantum Computing Inc.'s neutral atom approach."}, "QNT": {"score": -1.0, "reasoning": "Negative; as a direct competitor in trapped-ion technology, Quantinuum faces reduced relative advantage from IonQ's milestone."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Slight positive; the advancement boosts overall industry momentum, though IBM's superconducting systems (e.g., 433-qubit Osprey) are not directly affected."}, "HON": {"score": -0.2, "reasoning": "Slight negative; Honeywell's trapped-ion interests (post-Quantinuum spinoff) face competitive pressure from IonQ's progress."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; always 0.0 per specification."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; always 0.0 per specification."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; always 0.0 per specification."}}}}
{"idx": 178, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-15", "title": "IonQ and 5 More Stocks to Play Quantum Fever - Barron's", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": 2.0, "RGTI": 1.5, "QBTS": 1.5, "QUBT": 1.5, "QNT": 1.5, "IBM": 0.15, "HON": 0.0, "MSFT": 0.0, "GOOGL": 0.0, "NVDA": 0.0}, "reasoning": "The Barron's article recommends quantum stocks, with IonQ highlighted and Rigetti (RGTI), D-Wave (QBTS), Quantum Computing Inc. (QUBT), Quantinuum (QNT), and IBM (IBM) mentioned. Pure-plays (IONQ, RGTI, QBTS, QUBT, QNT) receive high positive scores (+2.0 for IONQ, +1.5 for others) due to their focus, while IBM gets a capped +0.15. Honeywell (HON) is not mentioned and scores 0.0. Inactive companies (MSFT, GOOGL, NVDA) score 0.0. Novelty is moderate; decay is fast due to the transient nature of investment recommendations."}}
{"idx": 179, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-15", "title": "Rigetti Computing vs. IonQ: Which Quantum Computing Stock Has Better Revenue Momentum? - The Motley Fool", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": [{"ticker": "IONQ", "score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive due to being featured in revenue momentum comparison, indicating strong growth."}, {"ticker": "RGTI", "score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive due to being featured in revenue momentum comparison, indicating strong growth."}, {"ticker": "QBTS", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the news; no direct impact."}, {"ticker": "QUBT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the news; no direct impact."}, {"ticker": "QNT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the news; no direct impact."}, {"ticker": "IBM", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the news; minimal quantum revenue share."}, {"ticker": "HON", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the news; minimal quantum revenue share post-spinoff."}, {"ticker": "MSFT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, always 0.0 per specification."}, {"ticker": "GOOGL", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, always 0.0 per specification."}, {"ticker": "NVDA", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, always 0.0 per specification."}]}}
{"idx": 180, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-15", "title": "Rigetti Computing vs. IonQ: Which Quantum Computing Stock Has Better Revenue Momentum? - Yahoo Finance", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": 1.0, "RGTI": 1.0, "QBTS": 0.0, "QUBT": 0.0, "QNT": 0.0, "IBM": 0.0, "HON": 0.0, "MSFT": 0.0, "GOOGL": 0.0, "NVDA": 0.0}, "reasoning": "The article compares Rigetti (RGTI) and IonQ (IONQ) for revenue momentum, assigning them positive scores (+1.0) due to the focus on their growth. Novelty is high for RGTI and IONQ but low for others. The signal decays quickly (short-term) as revenue momentum news has transient market impact. Other companies score 0.0 as they are not discussed."}}
{"idx": 181, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-16", "title": "Meet the Quantum Computing Stock That Could Crush IonQ in 2026 - Yahoo Finance", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": -1.5, "reasoning": "Directly mentioned as being 'crushed,' indicating substantial competitive pressure and negative sentiment."}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No mention; superconducting focus doesn't align with trapped-ion narrative."}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No mention; quantum annealing is unrelated to the implied trapped-ion competition."}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No mention; neutral atom technology not implicated in the article."}, "QNT": {"score": 1.5, "reasoning": "Likely the 'crushing' stock due to recent IPO, trapped-ion focus, and favorable market positioning."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No mention; minimal quantum revenue share limits impact despite superconducting ties."}, "HON": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No mention; low quantum revenue exposure post-spinoff reduces relevance."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; no quantum revenue."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; no quantum revenue."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; no quantum revenue."}}}}
{"idx": 182, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-16", "title": "Prediction: This Quantum Computing Stock Will Be Up More Than 20% by the End of 2026 - The Motley Fool", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": 0.0, "RGTI": 0.0, "QBTS": 0.0, "QUBT": 0.0, "QNT": 1.5, "IBM": 0.0, "HON": 0.0, "MSFT": 0.0, "GOOGL": 0.0, "NVDA": 0.0}, "reasoning": "The news is a prediction from The Motley Fool that a specific quantum computing stock will rise by more than 20% by the end of 2026. Based on the context, including the recent IPO of Quantinuum (QNT) in June 2026 and its position as a pure-play quantum company, it is inferred that QNT is the subject of the prediction. Thus, QNT receives a positive score of +1.5, reflecting the bullish outlook. The score is not at the maximum (+2.0) because the prediction is forward-looking and not based on a novel event, reducing its immediate impact. Other companies are unaffected, resulting in scores of 0.0. Novelty is assessed as low (scale 1-10: 2) since it is an analytical prediction rather than a breakthrough. Decay speed is slow due to the long-term horizon (end of 2026), meaning the signal's influence may persist."}}
{"idx": 183, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-16", "title": "Meet the Quantum Computing Stock That Could Crush IonQ in 2026 - The Motley Fool", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": -1.5, "reasoning": "Explicitly mentioned as being 'crushed,' indicating negative sentiment."}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct mention; neutral."}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct mention; neutral."}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct mention; neutral."}, "QNT": {"score": 1.5, "reasoning": "Inferred as the crushing stock due to recent IPO, trapped-ion tech (aligned with IonQ), and pure-play status."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct mention; partial-play with low quantum revenue."}, "HON": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct mention; partial-play with low quantum revenue."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, always 0.0."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, always 0.0."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, always 0.0."}}}}
{"idx": 184, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-17", "title": "D-Wave: Riding Quantum Mania (NYSE:QBTS) - Seeking Alpha", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.5, "reasoning": "Moderate positive due to general quantum mania sentiment; not directly mentioned."}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.5, "reasoning": "Moderate positive due to general quantum mania sentiment; not directly mentioned."}, "QBTS": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Strong positive as directly mentioned in the article, riding quantum mania."}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.5, "reasoning": "Moderate positive due to general quantum mania sentiment; not directly mentioned."}, "QNT": {"score": 0.5, "reasoning": "Moderate positive due to general quantum mania sentiment; not directly mentioned."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Small positive from general mania; limited quantum revenue (~2%)."}, "HON": {"score": 0.2, "reasoning": "Small positive from general mania; small quantum exposure (~1%)."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, always 0.0."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, always 0.0."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, always 0.0."}}}}
{"idx": 185, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-17", "title": "Why Quantum Computing Stock Skyrocketed This Week - The Motley Fool", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": 2.0, "RGTI": 2.0, "QBTS": 2.0, "QUBT": 2.0, "QNT": 2.0, "IBM": 0.15, "HON": 0.3, "MSFT": 0.0, "GOOGL": 0.0, "NVDA": 0.0}, "reasoning": "The article indicates a novel, sector-wide positive event causing quantum stocks to surge. Pure-play companies (100% quantum revenue) score maximum +2.0. IBM (~2% quantum revenue) and HON (~1% quantum revenue) score their upper limits (+0.15 and +0.3). Inactive companies score 0.0. Impact may decay quickly if event-specific, but current signal reflects immediate positivity."}}
{"idx": 186, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-18", "title": "Prediction: D-Wave Quantum Stock (QBTS) Will Be Worth This Much by the End of 2026 - The Motley Fool", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": [{"ticker": "IONQ", "score": 0.0}, {"ticker": "RGTI", "score": 0.0}, {"ticker": "QBTS", "score": 1.0}, {"ticker": "QUBT", "score": 0.0}, {"ticker": "QNT", "score": 0.0}, {"ticker": "IBM", "score": 0.0}, {"ticker": "HON", "score": 0.0}, {"ticker": "MSFT", "score": 0.0}, {"ticker": "GOOGL", "score": 0.0}, {"ticker": "NVDA", "score": 0.0}], "reasoning": "Positive prediction specific to QBTS; moderate impact assigned. Other companies unaffected. Novelty: High. Decay speed: Medium."}}
{"idx": 187, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-18", "title": "3 Quantum Computing Stocks to Buy Right Now - Yahoo Finance", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 1.5, "reasoning": "Positive buy recommendation for quantum stocks; pure-play company."}, "RGTI": {"score": 1.5, "reasoning": "Positive buy recommendation for quantum stocks; pure-play company."}, "QBTS": {"score": 1.5, "reasoning": "Positive buy recommendation for quantum stocks; pure-play company."}, "QUBT": {"score": 1.5, "reasoning": "Positive buy recommendation for quantum stocks; pure-play company."}, "QNT": {"score": 1.5, "reasoning": "Positive buy recommendation for quantum stocks; pure-play company."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Positive buy recommendation for quantum stocks; IBM is a prominent quantum player and likely mentioned, so maximum positive score within its range."}, "HON": {"score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Positive buy recommendation for quantum stocks; Honeywell is a prominent quantum player and likely mentioned, so maximum positive score within its range."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, always 0.0."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, always 0.0."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, always 0.0."}}}}
{"idx": 188, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-18", "title": "Sector Snapshot: Quantum Computing Startup Investment Slows In 2026 While Public Markets Hold Strong - Crunchbase News", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": -1.5, "reasoning": "Private pure-play; negatively impacted by startup investment slowdown"}, "RGTI": {"score": -1.5, "reasoning": "Private pure-play; negatively impacted by startup investment slowdown"}, "QBTS": {"score": -1.5, "reasoning": "Private pure-play; negatively impacted by startup investment slowdown"}, "QUBT": {"score": -1.5, "reasoning": "Private pure-play; negatively impacted by startup investment slowdown"}, "QNT": {"score": 1.5, "reasoning": "Public pure-play; benefits from strong public markets"}, "IBM": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Public with ~2% quantum revenue; modest positive from strong public markets"}, "HON": {"score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Public with ~1% quantum revenue; modest positive from strong public markets"}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; not in quantum universe"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; not in quantum universe"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; not in quantum universe"}}}}
{"idx": 189, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-18", "title": "The Quantum Computing IPO Wall Street Hasn't Figured Out Yet -- but Should in 2026 - Yahoo Finance", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Indirect positive impact from sector growth due to the upcoming IPO narrative; not directly related."}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Similar to IONQ; benefits from sector optimism but no direct link to the IPO."}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Positive sector sentiment from the IPO news; indirect and modest impact."}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Modest positive due to quantum sector momentum; no direct connection to the IPO."}, "QNT": {"score": 1.8, "reasoning": "Directly tied to the IPO mentioned in the news; strong positive sentiment about future market recognition."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Small positive from sector attention, but minimal impact due to quantum revenue being only ~2% of total."}, "HON": {"score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Similar to IBM; minor uplift from quantum growth narrative, but quantum revenue is only ~1% post-spinoff."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No relevance to quantum computing or the IPO; always scored 0.0."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No connection to quantum themes; always scored 0.0."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive in quantum context; always scored 0.0."}}}}
{"idx": 190, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-19", "title": "Deep Tech to Space: Space Data Centers and AI Revolution at the Edge", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": 0.0, "RGTI": 0.0, "QBTS": 0.0, "QUBT": 0.0, "QNT": 0.0, "IBM": 0.0, "HON": 0.0, "MSFT": 0.0, "GOOGL": 0.0, "NVDA": 0.0}, "reasoning": "The article addresses space data centers and edge AI without referencing quantum computing. Thus, no significant impact is identified, leading to neutral scores for all quantum companies. Inactive companies (MSFT, GOOGL, NVDA) are unaffected and score 0.0 as per guidelines."}}
{"idx": 191, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-19", "title": "Set Shaping Theory as a Complementary Payload-Shaping Layer for Steganography", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "The research on Set Shaping Theory for steganography is unrelated to quantum computing and thus has no impact on IONQ."}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Rigetti Computing is unaffected by this non-quantum research, resulting in a neutral score."}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "D-Wave Quantum sees no relevance from this academic paper on classical steganography."}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Quantum Computing Inc. is not influenced by this research, as it does not pertain to quantum technologies."}, "QNT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Quantinuum remains neutral since the research is outside the quantum computing domain."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "IBM's quantum efforts are not impacted by this steganography research; the score is neutral within its range."}, "HON": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Honeywell's quantum division is unaffected, leading to a neutral score within its range."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per inactive status."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per inactive status."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per inactive status."}}}}
{"idx": 192, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-19", "title": "Inverse Design of Metasurface based Absorbers using Physics Guided Conditional Diffusion Models", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": [{"ticker": "IONQ", "score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Indirect relevance for trapped-ion microwave control; impact is modest for a pure-play startup."}, {"ticker": "RGTI", "score": 0.2, "reasoning": "Direct benefit for superconducting qubit hardware design, leveraging faster EM component optimization."}, {"ticker": "QBTS", "score": 0.2, "reasoning": "Applicable to quantum annealing hardware, improving EM design efficiency for flux qubits."}, {"ticker": "QUBT", "score": 0.05, "reasoning": "Limited applicability; neutral atom quantum primarily uses optical, not EM, control methods."}, {"ticker": "QNT", "score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Similar to IONQ, indirect benefit for trapped-ion systems via EM design tools."}, {"ticker": "IBM", "score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Highly relevant for superconducting quantum hardware design, with IBM's resources enabling quick adoption."}, {"ticker": "HON", "score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Strong benefit for trapped-ion quantum control hardware, leveraging reduced design time."}, {"ticker": "MSFT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive in direct quantum hardware scoring; always 0.0 per definition."}, {"ticker": "GOOGL", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive in direct quantum hardware scoring; always 0.0 per definition."}, {"ticker": "NVDA", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive in direct quantum hardware scoring; always 0.0 per definition."}]}}
{"idx": 193, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-19", "title": "Data Architectures for AI-Ready Interoperable Public Transportation Ecosystems", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": 0.0, "RGTI": 0.0, "QBTS": 0.0, "QUBT": 0.0, "QNT": 0.0, "IBM": 0.0, "HON": 0.0, "MSFT": 0.0, "GOOGL": 0.0, "NVDA": 0.0}, "reasoning": "The abstract addresses data architectures in public transportation, with no mention of quantum computing or its companies. Thus, it has no apparent impact on the quantum sector, resulting in neutral signals (0.0) for all active firms."}}
{"idx": 194, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-19", "title": "Prediction: Rigetti Computing Stock Will Be Worth This Much in 1 Year - The Motley Fool", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the article; no direct impact"}, "RGTI": {"score": 1.5, "reasoning": "Article is a prediction about Rigetti, interpreted as positive news for this pure-play company"}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the article; no direct impact"}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the article; no direct impact"}, "QNT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the article; no direct impact"}, "IBM": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned; only ~2% quantum revenue"}, "HON": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned; only ~1% quantum revenue post-spinoff"}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive in quantum computing; always 0.0"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive in quantum computing; always 0.0"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive in quantum computing; always 0.0"}}}}
{"idx": 195, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-19", "title": "Opinion | Quantum IPO wave is a milestone. It should also come with a warning - South China Morning Post", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": 0.8, "RGTI": 0.8, "QBTS": 0.8, "QUBT": 0.8, "QNT": 1.2, "IBM": 0.1, "HON": 0.05, "MSFT": 0.0, "GOOGL": 0.0, "NVDA": 0.0}, "reasoning": "The article's positive 'milestone' aspect boosts sentiment for pure-play quantum companies, with QNT most affected due to its recent IPO. The warning about risks slightly reduces scores. Companies with minimal quantum exposure (IBM, HON) see smaller impacts, while inactive firms are unaffected. Novelty is moderate; decay is fast due to the opinion format."}}
{"idx": 196, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-20", "title": "Demonstration of fault-tolerant quantum computation with 48 logical qubits", "source": "arxiv", "status": "error", "error": "Expecting property name enclosed in double quotes: line 1 column 2 (char 1)"}
{"idx": 197, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-20", "title": "Classification of Single and Mixed Partial Discharges under Switching Voltage Using an AWA-CNN Framework", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": [{"ticker": "IONQ", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "The news is about partial discharge classification in power electronics, which is unrelated to quantum computing. No impact on IONQ."}, {"ticker": "RGTI", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "The research on AWA-CNN for power electronics has no connection to Rigetti Computing's quantum activities. Score neutral at 0.0."}, {"ticker": "QBTS", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "D-Wave's quantum annealing is unaffected by this power systems research. No impact, score 0.0."}, {"ticker": "QUBT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Quantum Computing Inc. (neutral atom) has no relevance to this partial discharge topic. Score 0.0."}, {"ticker": "QNT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Quantinuum (trapped-ion) is not impacted by this non-quantum research. Neutral score 0.0."}, {"ticker": "IBM", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "IBM's quantum efforts (superconducting) are unrelated to this power electronics news. Score within [-0.15, +0.15] at 0.0."}, {"ticker": "HON", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Honeywell's trapped-ion quantum business has no ties to this research. Score within [-0.3, +0.3] at 0.0."}, {"ticker": "MSFT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive in quantum computing universe; always 0.0."}, {"ticker": "GOOGL", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive in quantum computing universe; always 0.0."}, {"ticker": "NVDA", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive in quantum computing universe; always 0.0."}]}}
{"idx": 198, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-20", "title": "IonQ Stock Analysis: Buy or Sell This Quantum Computing Stock? - The Motley Fool", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 1.5, "reasoning": "Positive stock analysis from The Motley Fool, indicating bullish sentiment for IonQ."}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned; no direct impact."}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned; no direct impact."}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned; no direct impact."}, "QNT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Competitor to IonQ, but no direct impact from this news."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No mention; quantum is a small part of business."}, "HON": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No mention; quantum is a small part post-Quantinuum spinoff."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, always 0.0."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, always 0.0."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, always 0.0."}}}}
{"idx": 199, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-20", "title": "How researchers built a record-setting quantum circuit - IBM", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play, no direct impact from IBM-specific news."}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play, no direct impact; competitive but not explicitly affected."}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play, no direct impact; different (annealing) architecture."}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play, no direct impact; neutral atom focus."}, "QNT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play, no direct impact; trapped-ion but independent."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Record-setting circuit achievement; direct positive impact."}, "HON": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Indirect architecture; no relevance to IBM's superconducting progress."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, always 0.0 per specifications."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, always 0.0 per specifications."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, always 0.0 per specifications."}}}}
{"idx": 200, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-21", "title": "Which Superconducting Qubit Model is Good Enough? From Effective Two-Level to Circuit-Based Hamiltonians for Pulse-Level Simulation", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": [{"ticker": "IONQ", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "IONQ focuses on trapped-ion technology, which is not related to the superconducting qubit research discussed in the paper. No impact expected."}, {"ticker": "RGTI", "score": 1.5, "reasoning": "RGTI is a pure-play superconducting company. The research on improving Hamiltonian models for pulse-level simulation can enhance their hardware control and software accuracy, leading to a strong positive impact on their competitive position."}, {"ticker": "QBTS", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "QBTS (D-Wave) specializes in quantum annealing, which uses different superconducting principles than the gate-based models discussed. Not relevant to this research."}, {"ticker": "QUBT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "QUBT focuses on neutral atom technology, which is unrelated to the superconducting qubit research. No impact expected."}, {"ticker": "QNT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "QNT (Quantinuum) uses trapped-ion technology, not superconducting, so the research has no direct relevance."}, {"ticker": "IBM", "score": 0.15, "reasoning": "IBM is a superconducting company, but with only ~2% quantum revenue. The research can improve their simulation tools and hardware modeling, but the impact is diluted by their broader business, resulting in a modest positive score."}, {"ticker": "HON", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "HON focuses on trapped-ion technology (post-Quantinuum spinoff) and is not impacted by superconducting-specific research."}, {"ticker": "MSFT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive company; always scores 0.0 as per definition."}, {"ticker": "GOOGL", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive company; always scores 0.0 as per definition."}, {"ticker": "NVDA", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive company; always scores 0.0 as per definition."}]}}
{"idx": 201, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-21", "title": "Automatic De-Quantization of Quantum Programs Using Constant Propagation", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.5, "reasoning": "Positive for quantum ecosystem; improves practicality of quantum programs, benefiting pure-play hardware providers."}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.5, "reasoning": "Pure-play beneficiary; enhanced software efficiency supports superconducting hardware adoption."}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.5, "reasoning": "Positive; though annealing architecture may have nuances, optimization improves overall quantum program robustness."}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.5, "reasoning": "Pure-play advantage; neutral atom hardware gains from increased program efficiency."}, "QNT": {"score": 0.5, "reasoning": "Pure-play trapped-ion; research supports practicality for near-term devices."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Strong positive; aligns with hybrid quantum-classical strategy (e.g., Qiskit), maximizing classical complementarity."}, "HON": {"score": 0.2, "reasoning": "Slight positive; trapped-ion hardware benefits, but limited quantum revenue reduces impact."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; no quantum revenue focus."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; no quantum revenue focus."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; no quantum revenue focus."}}}}
{"idx": 202, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-21", "title": "LCGuard: Latent Communication Guard for Safe KV Sharing in Multi-Agent Systems", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": -0.5, "RGTI": -0.5, "QBTS": -0.5, "QUBT": -0.5, "QNT": -0.5, "IBM": 0.0, "HON": 0.0, "MSFT": 0.0, "GOOGL": 0.0, "NVDA": 0.0}, "reasoning": "The LCGuard research improves classical multi-agent LLM systems, potentially reducing the need for quantum computing in AI tasks. This is negative for pure-play quantum companies but neutral for IBM and HON due to their AI strengths. Inactive companies score 0.0."}}
{"idx": 203, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-21", "title": "Quantum Genetic Optimization for Negative Selection Algorithms in Anomaly Detection", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": [{"ticker": "IONQ", "score": 1.5, "reasoning": "Trapped-ion gate-based quantum computing is directly relevant for implementing quantum genetic algorithms like QGNSA."}, {"ticker": "RGTI", "score": 1.5, "reasoning": "Superconducting gate-based quantum computing is applicable to quantum genetic algorithms, enhancing relevance."}, {"ticker": "QBTS", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Quantum annealing technology is not suitable for gate-based quantum genetic algorithms, resulting in low relevance."}, {"ticker": "QUBT", "score": 1.5, "reasoning": "Neutral atom gate-based quantum computing supports quantum genetic algorithms, contributing to positive scoring."}, {"ticker": "QNT", "score": 1.5, "reasoning": "Trapped-ion gate-based quantum computing is relevant for quantum algorithm applications like QGNSA."}, {"ticker": "IBM", "score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Quantum software ecosystem (Qiskit) is likely used for such algorithms, but score is capped at +0.15 due to ~2% quantum revenue."}, {"ticker": "HON", "score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Trapped-ion hardware is relevant, but score is capped at +0.3 due to ~1% quantum revenue post-spinoff."}, {"ticker": "MSFT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not a quantum computing company; always 0.0 per specification."}, {"ticker": "GOOGL", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not a quantum computing company; always 0.0 per specification."}, {"ticker": "NVDA", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not a quantum computing company; always 0.0 per specification."}]}}
{"idx": 204, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-21", "title": "dSABRE: A SABRE-Style Router for Multi-Core Distributed Quantum Computers", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play trapped-ion benefits significantly from routing efficiency gains."}, "RGTI": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play superconducting benefits significantly from routing efficiency gains."}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Quantum annealing irrelevant to gate-based circuit routing advancements."}, "QUBT": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play neutral atom benefits significantly from routing efficiency gains."}, "QNT": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play trapped-ion benefits significantly from routing efficiency gains."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Small positive impact due to relevance to distributed quantum, but limited by ~2% quantum revenue."}, "HON": {"score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Small positive impact for trapped-ion, but limited by ~1% quantum revenue."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No quantum focus, always 0.0."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No quantum focus, always 0.0."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No quantum focus, always 0.0."}}}}
{"idx": 205, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-21", "title": "D-Wave Quantum and Department of Commerce Sign Letter of Intent for $100 Million in CHIPS and Science Act Funding to Accelerate U.S. Leadership in Quantum Computing - Business Wire", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": 1.0, "RGTI": 1.0, "QBTS": 2.0, "QUBT": 1.0, "QNT": 1.0, "IBM": 0.15, "HON": 0.3, "MSFT": 0.0, "GOOGL": 0.0, "NVDA": 0.0}, "reasoning": "QBTS receives a direct positive impact (+2.0) from the funding Letter of Intent. Other U.S. pure-play quantum companies (IONQ, RGTI, QUBT, QNT) benefit indirectly from sector growth (+1.0 each). IBM and HON gain small positives (+0.15 and +0.3) due to quantum involvement. Inactive companies (MSFT, GOOGL, NVDA) have no impact (0.0). Novelty is high; decay speed is medium due to LoI execution risk."}}
{"idx": 206, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-21", "title": "Quantum stocks soar as U.S. plans $2 billion funding incentives and equity stakes - CNBC", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": 2.0, "RGTI": 2.0, "QBTS": 2.0, "QUBT": 2.0, "QNT": 2.0, "IBM": 0.15, "HON": 0.3, "MSFT": 0.0, "GOOGL": 0.0, "NVDA": 0.0}, "reasoning": "The U.S. funding and equity incentives are a major catalyst for the quantum sector. Pure-play companies (IONQ, RGTI, QBTS, QUBT, QNT) receive maximum positive scores (+2.0) due to 100% quantum focus. IBM and Honeywell get capped positive scores (+0.15 and +0.3) from their quantum divisions. Inactive companies (MSFT, GOOGL, NVDA) score 0.0."}}
{"idx": 207, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-21", "title": "Why Did Quantum Computing Stock Pop Today? - Yahoo Finance", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 1.5, "reasoning": "Pure-play quantum company; broad sector pop indicates high positive sentiment"}, "RGTI": {"score": 1.5, "reasoning": "Pure-play quantum company; broad sector pop indicates high positive sentiment"}, "QBTS": {"score": 1.5, "reasoning": "Pure-play quantum company; broad sector pop indicates high positive sentiment"}, "QUBT": {"score": 1.5, "reasoning": "Pure-play quantum company; broad sector pop indicates high positive sentiment"}, "QNT": {"score": 1.5, "reasoning": "Pure-play quantum company; broad sector pop indicates high positive sentiment"}, "IBM": {"score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Minor quantum exposure (~2% revenue); positive sector sentiment, but limited impact"}, "HON": {"score": 0.2, "reasoning": "Minor quantum exposure (~1% revenue); positive sector sentiment, but limited impact"}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; not part of quantum universe"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; not part of quantum universe"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; not part of quantum universe"}}}}
{"idx": 208, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-21", "title": "Quantum Dynamics Breakthrough Overturns Claim of \u2018Quantum Supremacy,\u2019 Opens New Research Directions - Simons Foundation", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": 2.0, "RGTI": 2.0, "QBTS": 2.0, "QUBT": 2.0, "QNT": 2.0, "IBM": -0.15, "HON": 0.3, "MSFT": 0.0, "GOOGL": 0.0, "NVDA": 0.0}, "reasoning": "The breakthrough overturns quantum supremacy, creating high optimism for pure-play companies (max positive scores) while negatively impacting IBM due to its reliance on supremacy claims. Honeywell benefits modestly from research momentum. Inactive companies score 0.0."}}
{"idx": 209, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-21", "title": "IBM and U.S. Department of Commerce Announce America\u2019s First Purpose-Built Quantum Foundry, Supported by Proposed $1 Billion CHIPS Award - IBM Newsroom", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": 0.0, "RGTI": -1.0, "QBTS": 0.0, "QUBT": 0.0, "QNT": 0.0, "IBM": 0.15, "HON": 0.1, "MSFT": 0.0, "GOOGL": 0.0, "NVDA": 0.0}, "reasoning": "IBM gains a major advantage from the quantum foundry award (+0.15). Rigetti (RGTI) is negatively impacted as a direct competitor (-1.0). Other pure-play companies (IONQ, QBTS, QUBT, QNT) are neutral (0.0). Honeywell (HON) has a slight positive sentiment boost (+0.1). Inactive companies (MSFT, GOOGL, NVDA) score 0.0."}}
{"idx": 210, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-21", "title": "Department of Commerce Announces Letters of Intent With 9 Companies for $2 Billion to Accelerate U.S. Leadership in Quantum Computing - National Institute of Standards and Technology (.gov)", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": [{"ticker": "IONQ", "score": 1.8, "reasoning": "Pure-play quantum company; significant beneficiary of U.S. funding initiative. High impact due to 100% quantum focus. Novelty high, decay medium."}, {"ticker": "RGTI", "score": 1.8, "reasoning": "Pure-play quantum company; significant beneficiary of U.S. funding initiative. High impact due to 100% quantum focus. Novelty high, decay medium."}, {"ticker": "QBTS", "score": 1.8, "reasoning": "Pure-play quantum company; significant beneficiary of U.S. funding initiative. High impact due to 100% quantum focus. Novelty high, decay medium."}, {"ticker": "QUBT", "score": 1.8, "reasoning": "Pure-play quantum company; significant beneficiary of U.S. funding initiative. High impact due to 100% quantum focus. Novelty high, decay medium."}, {"ticker": "QNT", "score": 1.8, "reasoning": "Pure-play quantum company; significant beneficiary of U.S. funding initiative. High impact due to 100% quantum focus. Novelty high, decay medium."}, {"ticker": "IBM", "score": 0.12, "reasoning": "Small quantum revenue share (~2%); positive impact from funding but diluted by non-quantum business. Score within lower range. Novelty high, decay medium."}, {"ticker": "HON", "score": 0.24, "reasoning": "Low quantum revenue post-spinoff (~1%); positive impact from funding but reduced due to minimal quantum focus. Score within lower range. Novelty high, decay medium."}, {"ticker": "MSFT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive for quantum scoring; no impact from quantum-specific news."}, {"ticker": "GOOGL", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive for quantum scoring; no impact from quantum-specific news."}, {"ticker": "NVDA", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive for quantum scoring; no impact from quantum-specific news."}]}}
{"idx": 211, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-21", "title": "Exclusive | U.S. to Award Quantum-Computing Firms $2 Billion and Take Equity Stakes - WSJ", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": [{"ticker": "IONQ", "score": 2.0}, {"ticker": "RGTI", "score": 2.0}, {"ticker": "QBTS", "score": 2.0}, {"ticker": "QUBT", "score": 2.0}, {"ticker": "QNT", "score": 2.0}, {"ticker": "IBM", "score": 0.15}, {"ticker": "HON", "score": 0.3}, {"ticker": "MSFT", "score": 0.0}, {"ticker": "GOOGL", "score": 0.0}, {"ticker": "NVDA", "score": 0.0}], "reasoning": "The news of a $2 billion U.S. funding program for quantum-computing firms with equity stakes is highly novel as an exclusive WSJ report, indicating new information not previously known. The likely decay speed is medium, as the impact of the funding will unfold gradually due to the scale of the investment and the time required for equity stake integration. Pure-play companies (IONQ, RGTI, QBTS, QUBT, QNT) receive maximum positive scores (+2.0) as they are most directly impacted by such targeted funding. IBM and HON receive positive scores (+0.15 and +0.3, respectively) but are capped at their upper limits due to their lower quantum revenue focus (~2% and ~1%). Inactive companies (MSFT, GOOGL, NVDA) score 0.0 as they are not part of the quantum computing universe for scoring purposes."}}
{"idx": 212, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-21", "title": "Atom Computing Signs Letter of Intent for $100 Million in U.S. Quantum Funding - The Quantum Insider", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": -0.8, "RGTI": -0.3, "QBTS": 0.0, "QUBT": -0.8, "QNT": 1.8, "IBM": -0.05, "HON": -0.1, "MSFT": 0.0, "GOOGL": 0.0, "NVDA": 0.0}, "reasoning": "The news indicates significant potential funding for Quantinuum (QNT), scoring it positively. Competitors IONQ and QUBT are negatively affected due to direct competition in atom-based quantum computing. RGTI and IBM, as less direct competitors, have smaller negative scores. HON is slightly negative as a competitor with a small quantum business. QBTS is unaffected being Canadian. MSFT, GOOGL, and NVDA are inactive. Novelty is high, but decay speed is faster due to the non-binding LOI nature."}}
{"idx": 213, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-21", "title": "IBM Shares Soar on US Funding for $2 Billion Quantum Push - Bloomberg.com", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": [{"ticker": "IONQ", "score": 0.6, "reasoning": "Pure-play trapped-ion company; benefits from industry-wide funding but not directly mentioned; moderate positive impact."}, {"ticker": "RGTI", "score": 0.8, "reasoning": "Pure-play superconducting company; high relevance due to shared technology with IBM and industry funding; strong positive impact."}, {"ticker": "QBTS", "score": 0.4, "reasoning": "Pure-play quantum annealing company; different technology focus may reduce direct benefit; positive but lower impact."}, {"ticker": "QUBT", "score": 0.5, "reasoning": "Pure-play neutral atom company; benefits from general funding but not directly mentioned; moderate positive impact."}, {"ticker": "QNT", "score": 0.6, "reasoning": "Pure-play trapped-ion company; similar to IONQ, benefits from industry funding; moderate positive impact."}, {"ticker": "IBM", "score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Directly mentioned in the news; shares soaring due to funding; maximum positive score for non-pure-play."}, {"ticker": "HON", "score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Trapped-ion technology with ~1% quantum revenue; indirect benefit from funding but not pure-play; capped score."}, {"ticker": "MSFT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; not part of quantum universe."}, {"ticker": "GOOGL", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; not part of quantum universe."}, {"ticker": "NVDA", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; not part of quantum universe."}]}}
{"idx": 214, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-22", "title": "Quantum-Adaptive KS($\\varphi$): A Parameterized Three-Qubit Gate Family Embedding Toffoli with Measurement-Free Phase Kickback and Intrinsic Error Non-Amplification", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "High relevance due to trapped-ion technology aligning with the gate's operations."}, "RGTI": {"score": 1.5, "reasoning": "Superconducting company; can implement the gate but with challenges, though error non-amplification is beneficial."}, "QBTS": {"score": -1.0, "reasoning": "Quantum annealing paradigm; not relevant to gate-based news."}, "QUBT": {"score": 1.5, "reasoning": "Neutral atom technology; compatible with gate operations and quantum-native features."}, "QNT": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Trapped-ion pure-play; direct relevance and high implementation potential."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Small quantum focus; superconducting company may benefit, but impact limited."}, "HON": {"score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Trapped-ion heritage, but minimal quantum revenue post-spinoff; low benefit."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not a quantum computing company."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not a quantum computing company."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not a quantum computing company."}}}}
{"idx": 215, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-22", "title": "Learning to Evaluate: Cost-Effective Model Evaluation on Unlabeled Data with Meta-Learning", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": [{"ticker": "IONQ", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play hardware company with no direct relevance to ML model evaluation framework."}, {"ticker": "RGTI", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play hardware company; no direct relevance to ML model evaluation."}, {"ticker": "QBTS", "score": 0.2, "reasoning": "Quantum annealing hardware used in optimization, which can relate to ML, but evaluation framework is indirect; low positive impact."}, {"ticker": "QUBT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play hardware company; no direct relevance to ML model evaluation."}, {"ticker": "QNT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play hardware company; no direct relevance to ML model evaluation."}, {"ticker": "IBM", "score": 0.15, "reasoning": "High relevance due to strong quantum ML focus and benchmarking tools; directly benefits from improved evaluation techniques."}, {"ticker": "HON", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Quantum hardware company with minimal ML involvement; no direct relevance."}, {"ticker": "MSFT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; always 0.0"}, {"ticker": "GOOGL", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; always 0.0"}, {"ticker": "NVDA", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; always 0.0"}]}}
{"idx": 216, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-22", "title": "SolarChain: Bridging Physical Law, Verifiable Trust, and Sustainable Markets for Urban Energy Resilience", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": [{"ticker": "IONQ", "score": 0.0}, {"ticker": "RGTI", "score": 0.0}, {"ticker": "QBTS", "score": 0.0}, {"ticker": "QUBT", "score": 0.0}, {"ticker": "QNT", "score": 0.0}, {"ticker": "IBM", "score": 0.0}, {"ticker": "HON", "score": 0.0}, {"ticker": "MSFT", "score": 0.0}, {"ticker": "GOOGL", "score": 0.0}, {"ticker": "NVDA", "score": 0.0}], "reasoning": "The SolarChain news pertains to renewable energy and blockchain technology, with no direct connection to quantum computing. The abstract's mention of 'first-principles calculations' could imply potential for quantum acceleration in energy simulations, but this is speculative and not emphasized. Thus, the news does not significantly impact quantum companies, resulting in neutral scores across the board."}}
{"idx": 217, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-22", "title": "Classical State Preparation for Variational Quantum Algorithms via Reinforcement Learning", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": [{"ticker": "IONQ", "score": 1.8, "reasoning": "Pure-play trapped-ion company; the advancement in VQA initialization directly enhances quantum computing efficiency and performance."}, {"ticker": "RGTI", "score": 1.8, "reasoning": "Pure-play superconducting company; benefits significantly from improved gate-based quantum algorithm initialization."}, {"ticker": "QBTS", "score": 0.2, "reasoning": "Pure-play quantum annealing company; minimal direct impact as the research targets gate-based VQAs, not annealing."}, {"ticker": "QUBT", "score": 1.8, "reasoning": "Pure-play neutral atom company; relevant gate-based improvement boosts potential for quantum applications."}, {"ticker": "QNT", "score": 1.8, "reasoning": "Pure-play trapped-ion company; directly benefits from enhanced VQA initialization methods."}, {"ticker": "IBM", "score": 0.12, "reasoning": "~2% quantum revenue company; quantum software (e.g., Qiskit) can integrate the method to improve algorithm performance."}, {"ticker": "HON", "score": 0.24, "reasoning": "~1% quantum revenue company (trapped-ion); gains from advancements in quantum algorithm initialization."}, {"ticker": "MSFT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; no quantum revenue."}, {"ticker": "GOOGL", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; no quantum revenue."}, {"ticker": "NVDA", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; no quantum revenue."}]}}
{"idx": 218, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-22", "title": "Why D-Wave Quantum Stock Keeps Going Up - The Motley Fool", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the news; no direct impact."}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the news; no direct impact."}, "QBTS": {"score": 1.5, "reasoning": "Directly positive news about D-Wave's stock performance; moderate novelty (ongoing trend), leading to slower decay."}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the news; no direct impact."}, "QNT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the news; no direct impact."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned; quantum computing is a small part of the business."}, "HON": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned; quantum computing is a small part of the business."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, always 0.0"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, always 0.0"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, always 0.0"}}}}
{"idx": 219, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-22", "title": "Why Does Quantum Computing Stock Keep Going Up? - The Motley Fool", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": [{"ticker": "IONQ", "score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play quantum company; article positive for sector, low novelty so moderate score."}, {"ticker": "RGTI", "score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play quantum company; same as IONQ, positive sentiment with low novelty."}, {"ticker": "QBTS", "score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play quantum annealing company; benefits from positive article, low novelty."}, {"ticker": "QUBT", "score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play neutral atom company; positive sector sentiment, low novelty."}, {"ticker": "QNT", "score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play trapped-ion company; article positive, low novelty so moderate score."}, {"ticker": "IBM", "score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Superconducting quantum efforts (~2% revenue); positive but smaller impact due to non-pure-play status and low novelty."}, {"ticker": "HON", "score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Trapped-ion quantum efforts (~1% revenue); positive sentiment but not pure-play, low novelty."}, {"ticker": "MSFT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive in quantum universe; always 0.0."}, {"ticker": "GOOGL", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive in quantum universe; always 0.0."}, {"ticker": "NVDA", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive in quantum universe; always 0.0."}]}}
{"idx": 220, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-22", "title": "Why Does Quantum Computing Stock Keep Going Up? - Yahoo Finance", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": 1.5, "RGTI": 1.5, "QBTS": 1.5, "QUBT": 1.5, "QNT": 1.5, "IBM": 0.1, "HON": 0.05, "MSFT": 0.0, "GOOGL": 0.0, "NVDA": 0.0}, "reasoning": "The article is a positive sentiment piece about the quantum computing sector, indicating ongoing bullish trends. Due to its general nature and lack of specific news, it has low novelty and is expected to decay quickly. Pure-play companies (IONQ, RGTI, QBTS, QUBT, QNT) receive a higher positive score (+1.5) as they are the core of quantum computing stocks. IBM and HON, with small quantum revenue shares, receive proportionally smaller positive scores (+0.1 and +0.05). Inactive companies (MSFT, GOOGL, NVDA) are unaffected (0.0)."}}
{"idx": 221, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-22", "title": "Breakingviews - Honeywell quantum IPO tests financial paradox - Reuters", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": -0.3, "RGTI": -0.3, "QBTS": -0.3, "QUBT": -0.3, "QNT": -1.0, "IBM": -0.1, "HON": -0.2, "MSFT": 0.0, "GOOGL": 0.0, "NVDA": 0.0}, "reasoning": "News about Honeywell's quantum IPO testing a financial paradox has negative implications for HON and QNT, with mild sector-wide effects on other pure-plays. IBM slightly down. Novelty high; decay speed medium."}}
{"idx": 222, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-24", "title": "Grow-Prune-Freeze Networks: Adaptive & Continual Learning Technique for Olfactory Navigation", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.3, "reasoning": "General advance in machine learning could increase demand for quantum hardware; pure-play status justifies moderate positive score."}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Similar to IONQ; relevant for quantum computing applications in machine learning, but no direct link to Rigetti's superconducting technology."}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.8, "reasoning": "High relevance due to direct applicability of optimization and navigation research to D-Wave's quantum annealing technology."}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Pure-play quantum company; benefits from general ML advancements that could drive quantum adoption."}, "QNT": {"score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Pure-play trapped-ion company; positive signal from potential quantum ML applications, but no specific connection."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Relevant for IBM's quantum ML efforts, but small quantum revenue share limits score magnitude."}, "HON": {"score": 0.2, "reasoning": "Trapped-ion quantum focus aligns with adaptive learning concepts; higher score than IBM due to greater quantum emphasis, but revenue share constrains it."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; no quantum revenue exposure."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; no quantum revenue exposure."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; no quantum revenue exposure."}}, "reasoning": "The Grow-Prune-Freeze research advances machine learning for continual adaptation and robotics, indirectly benefiting quantum companies by enabling better quantum ML applications. D-Wave (QBTS) is most impacted due to its focus on optimization. Pure-play companies gain from increased demand, while IBM and Honeywell have smaller scores due to low quantum revenue shares. Inactive companies score 0.0."}}
{"idx": 223, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-24", "title": "DBPnet: Damper Characteristics-Based Bayesian Physics-Informed Neural Network for Wheel Load Estimation", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": [{"ticker": "IONQ", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "The research is unrelated to trapped-ion quantum computing; it focuses on classical ML for automotive applications."}, {"ticker": "RGTI", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct connection to Rigetti's superconducting quantum technology; the paper is about classical neural networks."}, {"ticker": "QBTS", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "D-Wave's quantum annealing is not impacted by this classical ML research in vehicle dynamics."}, {"ticker": "QUBT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Quantum Computing Inc.'s neutral atom technology is unaffected by this automotive-focused paper."}, {"ticker": "QNT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Quantinuum's trapped-ion quantum business has no relevance to this classical ML advancement."}, {"ticker": "IBM", "score": 0.1, "reasoning": "IBM's small quantum division may benefit indirectly from AI advancements, as the company is a leader in both AI and quantum technologies."}, {"ticker": "HON", "score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Honeywell's quantum interests (via Quantinuum) could see indirect gains from broader AI progress, though its quantum revenue is minimal."}, {"ticker": "MSFT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not part of the quantum computing sector; always scored 0.0."}, {"ticker": "GOOGL", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not part of the quantum computing sector; always scored 0.0."}, {"ticker": "NVDA", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not part of the quantum computing sector; always scored 0.0."}]}}
{"idx": 224, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-24", "title": "XL-HD: Extended Learning in Hyperdimensional Computing via Deterministic Projections for In-Memory Accelerators", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play trapped-ion quantum company; no relevance to classical Hyperdimensional Computing advancements."}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play superconducting quantum company; this classical ML news does not impact core quantum hardware."}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play quantum annealing company; unrelated to Hyperdimensional Computing developments."}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play neutral atom quantum company; no connection to this academic ML paper."}, "QNT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play trapped-ion quantum company; this news is irrelevant to quantum technology."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "IBM benefits from advancements in ML and edge computing, which align with its quantum-inspired research and broader AI portfolio."}, "HON": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Minimal quantum revenue post-spinoff; this classical ML news has no material impact on its business."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; always 0.0 per problem definition."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; always 0.0 per problem definition."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; always 0.0 per problem definition."}}}}
{"idx": 225, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-25", "title": "DOE Announces $500M in Quantum Computing Research Funding", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Directly mentioned as an industry partner; pure-play with trapped-ion technology highly relevant to error correction research."}, "RGTI": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Directly mentioned as an industry partner; pure-play with superconducting technology highly relevant to error correction research."}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned; quantum annealing focus is less directly impacted by error correction research."}, "QUBT": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned; pure-play with neutral atom technology relevant to the research, but only indirect benefit from sector growth."}, "QNT": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned; pure-play with trapped-ion technology relevant to the research, but only indirect benefit from sector growth."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Mentioned as an industry partner, but limited impact due to only ~2% quantum revenue; capped at range maximum."}, "HON": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned and minimal quantum revenue; no direct relevance."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; always 0.0."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; always 0.0."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; always 0.0."}}}}
{"idx": 226, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-25", "title": "The Evolution of Digital Twins from Reactive to Agentic Systems", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": [{"ticker": "IONQ", "score": 1.5, "reasoning": "Trapped-ion quantum computing supports advanced simulations for agentic digital twins."}, {"ticker": "RGTI", "score": 1.5, "reasoning": "Superconducting quantum computing enables faster computational reasoning in evolving digital twins."}, {"ticker": "QBTS", "score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Quantum annealing directly optimizes digital twin simulations and operational efficiency."}, {"ticker": "QUBT", "score": 1.5, "reasoning": "Neutral atom quantum technology advances computational reasoning for autonomous systems."}, {"ticker": "QNT", "score": 1.5, "reasoning": "Trapped-ion quantum computing enhances digital twin capabilities through improved simulation."}, {"ticker": "IBM", "score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Small quantum business integrates with IBM's digital twin offerings for broader applications."}, {"ticker": "HON", "score": 0.2, "reasoning": "Quantum involvement supports industrial digital twin evolution through computational improvements."}, {"ticker": "MSFT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, always 0.0"}, {"ticker": "GOOGL", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, always 0.0"}, {"ticker": "NVDA", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, always 0.0"}]}}
{"idx": 227, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-25", "title": "Evaluating System-Level Fidelity with Peaked Random Circuits", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": [{"ticker": "IONQ", "score": 1.5, "reasoning": "Trapped-ion architecture validated by PRC benchmark application to AQT, positive impact."}, {"ticker": "RGTI", "score": 1.5, "reasoning": "Superconducting architecture validated by PRC benchmark application to IQM, positive impact."}, {"ticker": "QBTS", "score": -1.0, "reasoning": "Quantum annealing not suitable for PRCs (gate-based benchmark), negative impact."}, {"ticker": "QUBT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Neutral atom architecture not mentioned, no direct impact, neutral score."}, {"ticker": "QNT", "score": 1.5, "reasoning": "Trapped-ion pure-play benefits from validation of trapped-ion architecture via AQT testing."}, {"ticker": "IBM", "score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Superconducting architecture validated, but only ~2% quantum revenue, smaller positive impact."}, {"ticker": "HON", "score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Trapped-ion division includes AQT (directly tested with PRCs), strong positive impact."}, {"ticker": "MSFT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, always 0.0"}, {"ticker": "GOOGL", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, always 0.0"}, {"ticker": "NVDA", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, always 0.0"}]}}
{"idx": 228, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-25", "title": "PauLIB: A High-Performance Library for Processing Pauli Strings", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": 1.5, "RGTI": 1.5, "QBTS": 0.0, "QNT": 1.5, "IBM": -0.15, "HON": 0.3, "MSFT": 0.0, "GOOGL": 0.0, "NVDA": 0.0}, "reasoning": "PauLIB enhances the quantum software ecosystem, negatively impacting IBM due to Qiskit's underperformance in benchmarks. Trapped-ion (IONQ, QNT, HON) and superconducting (RGTI) hardware companies benefit from improved tools. D-Wave (QBTS) is less affected by Pauli string optimizations. MSFT, GOOGL, NVDA are inactive in quantum."}}
{"idx": 229, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-25", "title": "Native topological readout on qubit hardware: a Fibonacci-chain benchmark of measurement-compilation trade-offs", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.8, "reasoning": "Trapped-ion qubit technology may benefit from general advancements in quantum measurement techniques, though less directly than superconducting."}, "RGTI": {"score": 1.8, "reasoning": "Directly relevant to superconducting hardware; positive impact from research on NISQ processors and measurement improvements."}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Quantum annealing technology is not relevant to this gate-based research on qubit hardware."}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.8, "reasoning": "Neutral atom qubit technology may benefit from general advancements, as it is a qubit-native platform."}, "QNT": {"score": 0.8, "reasoning": "Trapped-ion qubit technology may benefit from general advancements, similar to IONQ."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Superconducting hardware relevance, but impact is diluted due to only ~2% quantum revenue."}, "HON": {"score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Trapped-ion technology with small quantum revenue (~1%) has minor positive impact from general advancements."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; not part of the quantum computing universe."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; not part of the quantum computing universe."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; not part of the quantum computing universe."}}}}
{"idx": 230, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-25", "title": "CMAP: Cross-Modal Adaptive Prompting for Multi-Domain Task-Incremental Learning", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": -1.0, "reasoning": "Classical ML advancement reduces near-term need for quantum in some applications, negatively impacting pure-play quantum companies."}, "RGTI": {"score": -1.0, "reasoning": "Classical ML advancement reduces near-term need for quantum in some applications, negatively impacting pure-play quantum companies."}, "QBTS": {"score": -1.0, "reasoning": "Classical ML advancement reduces near-term need for quantum in some applications, negatively impacting pure-play quantum companies."}, "QUBT": {"score": -1.0, "reasoning": "Classical ML advancement reduces near-term need for quantum in some applications, negatively impacting pure-play quantum companies."}, "QNT": {"score": -1.0, "reasoning": "Classical ML advancement reduces near-term need for quantum in some applications, negatively impacting pure-play quantum companies."}, "IBM": {"score": -0.15, "reasoning": "Classical ML advancement may reduce demand for quantum solutions, but impact is mitigated by IBM's small quantum revenue share (~2%)."}, "HON": {"score": -0.3, "reasoning": "Classical ML advancement may reduce demand for quantum solutions, but impact is mitigated by Honeywell's small quantum revenue share (~1%)."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No quantum relevance; always 0.0 per inactive status."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No quantum relevance; always 0.0 per inactive status."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No quantum relevance; always 0.0 per inactive status."}}}}
{"idx": 231, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-26", "title": "Intelligence as Managed Autonomy: Failure, Escalation, and Governance for Agentic AI Systems", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": 0.0, "RGTI": 0.0, "QBTS": 0.0, "QUBT": 0.0, "QNT": 0.0, "IBM": 0.1, "HON": 0.1, "MSFT": 0.0, "GOOGL": 0.0, "NVDA": 0.0}, "reasoning": "The paper on managed autonomy for AI systems is not quantum-specific. Pure-play quantum companies (IONQ, RGTI, QBTS, QUBT, QNT) score 0.0 due to no direct relevance. IBM and Honeywell receive small positive scores (+0.1) for potential indirect benefits to their AI businesses, which could support quantum initiatives. MSFT, GOOGL, and NVDA are always 0.0."}}
{"idx": 232, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-26", "title": "Powers and Limitations of Synchronous Self-Assembly", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 1.8, "reasoning": "As a pure-play trapped-ion company, IONQ could benefit significantly from advancements in synchronous self-assembly, which may enhance ion trap fabrication precision and scalability."}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.8, "reasoning": "Rigetti's superconducting qubits may see improved fabrication yields, but the direct relevance to self-assembly is lower compared to trapped-ion technologies, leading to a moderate positive score."}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.2, "reasoning": "D-Wave's quantum annealing technology is less directly impacted by self-assembly research, as it relies on fixed qubit arrays rather than dynamic assembly, resulting in a slight positive score."}, "QUBT": {"score": 1.8, "reasoning": "Quantum Computing Inc.'s neutral atom technology depends on precise atomic positioning, which could be substantially improved by synchronous self-assembly techniques, warranting a high positive score."}, "QNT": {"score": 1.8, "reasoning": "As a pure-play trapped-ion company, Quantinuum stands to gain from self-assembly advancements in ion trap manufacturing, similar to IONQ, justifying a strong positive score."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.1, "reasoning": "IBM's small quantum revenue share (from superconducting qubits) may see minor benefits from fabrication improvements, but its broader business dilutes the impact, leading to a low positive score."}, "HON": {"score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Honeywell's trapped-ion division could benefit from self-assembly advancements, but as a larger company with non-quantum operations, the effect is capped at the maximum positive score for its category."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Microsoft focuses on quantum software and cloud services, not hardware, making this research irrelevant to its quantum efforts."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Google's quantum efforts are minimal and not hardware-centric; self-assembly research has no material impact."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "NVIDIA provides GPUs for quantum simulation but has no direct hardware role, so the research is unrelated."}}, "reasoning": "The research on synchronous self-assembly suggests potential efficiency gains in quantum hardware fabrication, particularly benefiting trapped-ion (IONQ, QNT, HON) and neutral atom (QUBT) companies due to their reliance on precise atomic-scale control. Superconducting (RGTI, IBM) and quantum annealing (QBTS) technologies may see lesser benefits. Inactive companies (MSFT, GOOGL, NVDA) are unaffected as they lack quantum hardware focus."}}
{"idx": 233, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-26", "title": "Quantum Stocks Surge On U.S. Funding. Were Google, Microsoft, IonQ Snubbed? - Investor's Business Daily", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": -1.5, "reasoning": "Snubbed in U.S. funding, leading to negative sentiment despite overall sector surge; as a pure-play, the snub significantly impacts its score."}, "RGTI": {"score": 1.8, "reasoning": "Benefited from U.S. funding surge; not snubbed and as a U.S.-based pure-play, it gains strongly."}, "QBTS": {"score": 1.2, "reasoning": "Pure-play and benefits from sector surge, but as a Canadian company, it is less directly impacted by U.S. funding; score reflects indirect positivity."}, "QUBT": {"score": 1.8, "reasoning": "Pure-play, U.S.-based, and not snubbed; fully benefits from U.S. funding surge."}, "QNT": {"score": 1.8, "reasoning": "Pure-play, U.S.-based, and not snubbed; fully benefits from U.S. funding surge."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Small quantum revenue (~2%); some positive sentiment from sector surge, but limited impact due to non-pure-play status."}, "HON": {"score": 0.2, "reasoning": "Small quantum revenue (~1%); some positive sentiment from sector surge, but limited impact due to non-pure-play status and post-spinoff focus."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; always 0.0 per definition."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; always 0.0 per definition."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; always 0.0 per definition."}}}}
{"idx": 234, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-26", "title": "This Is the Quantum Computing Stock I'd Buy Before Any Other Right Now - Yahoo Finance", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not the recommended stock; neutral impact"}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not the recommended stock; neutral impact"}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not the recommended stock; neutral impact"}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not the recommended stock; neutral impact"}, "QNT": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Assumed as the recommended stock; maximum positive score"}, "IBM": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned; hybrid play with minimal quantum focus"}, "HON": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned; hybrid play with minimal quantum focus"}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; always 0.0"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; always 0.0"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; always 0.0"}}}}
{"idx": 235, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-26", "title": "Forget SpaceX: The Next Red-Hot IPO Is Here and It\u2019s a Quantum Computing Stock - 24/7 Wall St.", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": 1.0, "RGTI": 1.0, "QBTS": 1.0, "QUBT": 1.0, "QNT": 2.0, "IBM": 0.15, "HON": 0.3, "MSFT": 0.0, "GOOGL": 0.0, "NVDA": 0.0}, "reasoning": "The article is highly positive about an upcoming quantum computing IPO, inferred to be Quantinuum (QNT) due to its scheduled IPO. QNT receives +2.0 as the direct beneficiary. Other pure-plays (IONQ, RGTI, QBTS, QUBT) get +1.0 for sector optimism. IBM and HON receive their max positive scores (+0.15 and +0.3) due to sector validation. Inactive companies score 0.0."}}
{"idx": 236, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-26", "title": "Quantinuum Eyes $13 Billion Valuation Making It the Year\u2019s Biggest Quantum IPO - Barron's", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": [{"ticker": "IONQ", "score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive sector sentiment from major quantum IPO; benefits as a pure-play competitor. Medium decay expected as news fades."}, {"ticker": "RGTI", "score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Uplift from industry validation; similar to IONQ. Medium decay due to competitive implications."}, {"ticker": "QBTS", "score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play gain from investor interest; quantum annealing focus doesn't alter impact. Medium decay."}, {"ticker": "QUBT", "score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play competitor benefits from sector boost; neutral atom tech irrelevant to sentiment. Medium decay."}, {"ticker": "QNT", "score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Direct beneficiary of high-valuation IPO; high novelty sets benchmark. Slow decay due to lasting market impact."}, {"ticker": "IBM", "score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Small positive from industry growth; low quantum revenue exposure limits impact. Fast decay as news is sector-specific."}, {"ticker": "HON", "score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Positive from spin-off success (Quantinuum was former unit); trapped-ion heritage enhances relevance. Medium decay."}, {"ticker": "MSFT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not in quantum universe; always 0.0. No impact or decay."}, {"ticker": "GOOGL", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not in quantum universe; always 0.0. No impact or decay."}, {"ticker": "NVDA", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not in quantum universe; always 0.0. No impact or decay."}]}}
{"idx": 237, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-26", "title": "This new quantum stock could debut with a valuation of nearly $13 billion - MarketWatch", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.5, "reasoning": "Indirect positive sentiment from sector-wide quantum optimism; not directly mentioned but benefits from increased investor interest."}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.5, "reasoning": "Similar to IONQ; peer company benefits from bullish quantum sentiment implied by the news."}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.5, "reasoning": "Positive sector sentiment lifts all pure-play quantum companies, including D-Wave."}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.5, "reasoning": "Quantum Computing Inc. benefits from general optimism in the quantum sector."}, "QNT": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Directly related to the news; high IPO valuation indicates strong market confidence, justifying maximum positive score for a pure-play."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Minor positive effect from sector optimism, but limited by low quantum revenue exposure (~2%)."}, "HON": {"score": 0.2, "reasoning": "Indirect positive from spinoff (Quantinuum) validation; however, minimal quantum revenue (~1%) caps impact."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No quantum focus; always 0.0 per definition."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No quantum focus; always 0.0 per definition."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No quantum focus; always 0.0 per definition."}}}}
{"idx": 238, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-26", "title": "Forget IonQ: This New Quantum Computing IPO Could Be This Year's Dark Horse - Yahoo Finance", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": -1.5, "RGTI": 0.0, "QBTS": 0.0, "QUBT": 0.0, "QNT": 2.0, "IBM": 0.0, "HON": 0.0, "MSFT": 0.0, "GOOGL": 0.0, "NVDA": 0.0}, "reasoning": "The news article 'Forget IonQ: This New Quantum Computing IPO Could Be This Year's Dark Horse' from Yahoo Finance highlights a shift in the quantum computing landscape. IonQ (IONQ) is positioned as being overshadowed, likely due to delays or reduced prominence in its own IPO efforts, resulting in a negative score of -1.5. The 'new quantum computing IPO' is interpreted as Quantinuum (QNT), given its recent IPO (as per the universe definition) and its emergence as a dark horse, warranting a positive score of +2.0. Other pure-play companies (RGTI, QBTS, QUBT) are unaffected, scoring 0.0, as the news does not mention them. IBM and HON, with minimal quantum revenue, also score 0.0 as they are not implicated. Inactive companies (MSFT, GOOGL, NVDA) score 0.0 by definition. Novelty is high (score: 0.8) due to the unexpected shift from IonQ to QNT, challenging prior expectations. Decay speed is medium (score: 0.6) as IPO hype may fade quickly but QNT's long-term impact could persist if it delivers on performance."}}
{"idx": 239, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-26", "title": "Honeywell's Quantinuum targets $12.7 billion valuation in US IPO - Yahoo Finance", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": 0.5, "RGTI": 0.5, "QBTS": 0.5, "QUBT": 0.5, "QNT": 2.0, "IBM": 0.1, "HON": 0.1, "MSFT": 0.0, "GOOGL": 0.0, "NVDA": 0.0}, "reasoning": "The news of Quantinuum's IPO targeting a $12.7 billion valuation is a major positive event for QNT (+2.0) as it signifies market validation and capital access. Honeywell (HON) receives a modest positive (+0.1) due to its historical ties as the parent company post-spinoff, though its direct quantum revenue is minimal. Other pure-play competitors (IONQ, RGTI, QBTS, QUBT) gain moderate positive signals (+0.5) from sector-wide validation and increased investor interest. IBM benefits slightly (+0.1) as a sector leader, but its impact is muted by its diversified business. Inactive companies (MSFT, GOOGL, NVDA) are unaffected (0.0)."}}
{"idx": 240, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-27", "title": "Compile-Time Simplification of Classically Controlled Operations in Dynamic Circuits", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": [{"ticker": "IONQ", "score": 1.5, "reasoning": "Optimization enhances dynamic circuit efficiency for IONQ's trapped-ion systems."}, {"ticker": "RGTI", "score": 1.5, "reasoning": "Rigetti's superconducting quantum computers benefit from improved dynamic circuit performance."}, {"ticker": "QBTS", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "D-Wave's quantum annealing technology does not align with gate-based dynamic circuits, so minimal impact."}, {"ticker": "QUBT", "score": 1.5, "reasoning": "Quantum Computing Inc.'s neutral atom platform can leverage the optimization for better circuit efficiency."}, {"ticker": "QNT", "score": 1.5, "reasoning": "Quantinuum's trapped-ion systems benefit from enhanced dynamic circuit execution."}, {"ticker": "IBM", "score": 0.15, "reasoning": "IBM benefits from circuit optimizations, but impact is limited by its small quantum revenue share."}, {"ticker": "HON", "score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Honeywell's trapped-ion systems can improve performance, within its quantum revenue constraint."}, {"ticker": "MSFT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; no quantum hardware focus, always 0.0."}, {"ticker": "GOOGL", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; no quantum hardware focus, always 0.0."}, {"ticker": "NVDA", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; no quantum hardware focus, always 0.0."}]}}
{"idx": 241, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-27", "title": "Nonvolatile Charge-Domain Attention with HZO Ferroelectric Capacitors: A Simulation-Based Device-to-System Evaluation", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": -1.0, "reasoning": "The research on classical AI hardware improves energy efficiency for AI workloads, potentially reducing the relative advantage of quantum computing, warranting a negative signal for pure-play quantum companies."}, "RGTI": {"score": -1.0, "reasoning": "Similar to IONQ, the classical AI advancement poses a competitive threat, justifying a negative score for this pure-play quantum company."}, "QBTS": {"score": -1.0, "reasoning": "As a pure-play quantum company, the paper's focus on efficient classical AI diminishes the urgency for quantum adoption, leading to a negative signal."}, "QUBT": {"score": -1.0, "reasoning": "The research highlights classical improvements that could slow quantum adoption, resulting in a negative score for this neutral atom pure-play."}, "QNT": {"score": -1.0, "reasoning": "Quantinuum's quantum business may face reduced demand due to classical AI efficiencies, hence the negative signal."}, "IBM": {"score": -0.15, "reasoning": "Although IBM benefits from classical AI advancements, the negative impact on its quantum division (capped at -0.15) is minimal due to its diversified portfolio."}, "HON": {"score": -0.3, "reasoning": "Honeywell's quantum business could be indirectly harmed by classical AI gains, but the impact is capped at the lower bound of its range."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Microsoft is inactive in the quantum computing universe and always scores 0.0."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Google is inactive in the quantum computing universe and always scores 0.0."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "NVIDIA is inactive in the quantum computing universe and always scores 0.0."}}}}
{"idx": 242, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-27", "title": "Pasqal IPO: What to Know About the Quantum Start-Up Headed to the Nasdaq - Barron's", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": 1.0, "RGTI": 1.0, "QBTS": 1.0, "QUBT": 1.0, "QNT": 1.0, "IBM": 0.15, "HON": 0.3, "MSFT": 0.0, "GOOGL": 0.0, "NVDA": 0.0}, "reasoning": "Pasqal's IPO validates the quantum industry, boosting sentiment. Pure-plays (+1.0) benefit most; IBM (+0.15) and HON (+0.3) have smaller quantum segments. Inactive firms score 0.0. Novelty is high; decay may be moderate."}}
{"idx": 243, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-27", "title": "[Largest Quantum Computing IPO] Quantinuum to Go Public Soon\u2014Will the 'SpaceX Rally' Spill Over into Quantum Stocks? - Moomoo", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": [{"ticker": "IONQ", "score": 0.5, "reasoning": "Positive due to potential spillover from Quantinuum IPO, but uncertain and indirect."}, {"ticker": "RGTI", "score": 0.5, "reasoning": "Positive due to potential spillover from Quantinuum IPO, but uncertain and indirect."}, {"ticker": "QBTS", "score": 0.5, "reasoning": "Positive due to potential spillover from Quantinuum IPO, but uncertain and indirect."}, {"ticker": "QUBT", "score": 0.5, "reasoning": "Positive due to potential spillover from Quantinuum IPO, but uncertain and indirect."}, {"ticker": "QNT", "score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Direct positive impact from its own IPO, a major novel event in the quantum sector."}, {"ticker": "IBM", "score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Small positive from potential spillover, but limited by low quantum revenue share and uncertainty."}, {"ticker": "HON", "score": 0.2, "reasoning": "Small positive from potential spillover, with higher range allowing a modest score."}, {"ticker": "MSFT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, always 0.0 per definition."}, {"ticker": "GOOGL", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, always 0.0 per definition."}, {"ticker": "NVDA", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, always 0.0 per definition."}]}}
{"idx": 244, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-27", "title": "Quantinuum: $1.05 Billion IPO Filed For Quantum Computing Expansion - Pulse 2.0", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": -1.0, "RGTI": -1.0, "QBTS": -1.0, "QUBT": -1.0, "QNT": 2.0, "IBM": 0.15, "HON": 0.3, "MSFT": 0.0, "GOOGL": 0.0, "NVDA": 0.0}, "reasoning": "Quantinuum's $1.05 billion IPO filing is a major positive event for QNT (+2.0), validating the quantum market. As competitors, other pure-plays (IONQ, RGTI, QBTS, QUBT) receive -1.0 due to potential attention diversion and competitive pressure. IBM benefits modestly (+0.15) from sector validation, while Honeywell (+0.3) gains from positive spin-off legacy. Inactive companies (MSFT, GOOGL, NVDA) score 0.0."}}
{"idx": 245, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-28", "title": "Quantinuum Files S-1 for IPO, Reveals $43M Annual Revenue", "source": "sec_filing", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.7, "reasoning": "Positive sector sentiment from IPO validation, but some competitive pressure as both are trapped-ion players."}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.4, "reasoning": "Positive sector sentiment; less direct impact as superconducting architecture differs."}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.4, "reasoning": "Positive sector sentiment; quantum annealing focus reduces direct competition."}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.4, "reasoning": "Positive sector sentiment; neutral atom architecture sees indirect benefits."}, "QNT": {"score": 1.8, "reasoning": "Strong positive for Quantinuum; IPO filing validates growth, with $43M revenue and 200+ customers outweighing net loss concerns."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Minor positive sentiment from sector growth, but minimal impact due to ~2% quantum revenue focus."}, "HON": {"score": 0.25, "reasoning": "Positive from spinoff; unlocks value for Honeywell despite reduced quantum exposure post-spinoff."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; always 0.0 per specification."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; always 0.0 per specification."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; always 0.0 per specification."}}}}
{"idx": 246, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-28", "title": "World Models: A Comprehensive Survey of Architectures, Methodologies, Reasoning Paradigms, and Applications", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": [{"ticker": "IONQ", "score": 0.5, "reasoning": "The survey on world models drives interest in scientific and business simulations, where quantum computing excels, benefiting pure-play companies like IONQ."}, {"ticker": "RGTI", "score": 0.5, "reasoning": "Rigetti's quantum technology aligns with the survey's focus on world models for complex problem-solving, warranting a positive score."}, {"ticker": "QBTS", "score": 0.5, "reasoning": "D-Wave's annealing-based quantum computing is relevant for optimization in business applications highlighted in the survey."}, {"ticker": "QUBT", "score": 0.5, "reasoning": "Quantum Computing Inc. benefits from the expanded demand for quantum-enhanced world models in scientific domains."}, {"ticker": "QNT", "score": 0.5, "reasoning": "Quantinuum's trapped-ion systems are well-suited for the scientific modeling aspects discussed, supporting a positive score."}, {"ticker": "IBM", "score": 0.1, "reasoning": "IBM's quantum division can leverage the survey for promotion in scientific and business contexts, but the impact is limited by its small quantum revenue share."}, {"ticker": "HON", "score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Honeywell's quantum offering may see slight benefits from increased interest in world models, though diluted by its broader business."}, {"ticker": "MSFT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, always 0.0 per criteria."}, {"ticker": "GOOGL", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, always 0.0 per criteria."}, {"ticker": "NVDA", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, always 0.0 per criteria."}]}}
{"idx": 247, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-28", "title": "Scheduling Mechanisms in Wireless Sensor-Actuator Networks for Multi-rate Periodic Control in Industry 4.0", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": 0.0, "RGTI": 0.0, "QBTS": 0.0, "QUBT": 0.0, "QNT": 0.0, "IBM": 0.0, "HON": 0.0, "MSFT": 0.0, "GOOGL": 0.0, "NVDA": 0.0}, "reasoning": "The news article focuses on classical scheduling in wireless sensor networks for Industry 4.0, with no direct relevance to quantum computing. Thus, all scores are neutral (0.0) for active companies, and inactive companies remain at 0.0."}}
{"idx": 248, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-28", "title": "Intent-Based Orchestration in Open RAN: An ns-3 Simulation Framework", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": [{"ticker": "IONQ", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play quantum company; research on classical networking has no relevance."}, {"ticker": "RGTI", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play quantum company; research on classical networking has no relevance."}, {"ticker": "QBTS", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play quantum company; research on classical networking has no relevance."}, {"ticker": "QUBT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play quantum company; research on classical networking has no relevance."}, {"ticker": "QNT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play quantum company; research on classical networking has no relevance."}, {"ticker": "IBM", "score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Relevant to IBM's classical networking business (~98% of revenue). Positive research findings on efficiency suggest minor upside. Score capped at +0.15 due to low quantum exposure."}, {"ticker": "HON", "score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Relevant to Honeywell's industrial networking applications. Positive research findings suggest minor upside. Score capped at +0.3 due to low quantum exposure."}, {"ticker": "MSFT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; always scores 0.0."}, {"ticker": "GOOGL", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; always scores 0.0."}, {"ticker": "NVDA", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; always scores 0.0."}]}}
{"idx": 249, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-28", "title": "The Rise of the Software-Defined Vehicle: Architectures, Enabling Technologies, and Future Opportunities", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": [{"ticker": "IONQ", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "The news is about software-defined vehicles and does not relate to quantum computing, so no impact on IONQ's quantum business."}, {"ticker": "RGTI", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "The news is unrelated to quantum computing, so no impact on RGTI's quantum business."}, {"ticker": "QBTS", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "The news is about software-defined vehicles and has no relevance to quantum computing, so no impact on QBTS."}, {"ticker": "QUBT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "The abstract discusses SDVs, which is not connected to quantum computing, so no effect on QUBT."}, {"ticker": "QNT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "The news focuses on SDVs and does not mention quantum computing, so no impact on QNT."}, {"ticker": "IBM", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Although IBM has classical AI and cloud business relevant to SDVs, the news does not pertain to quantum computing, so no impact on IBM's quantum segment."}, {"ticker": "HON", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "The news is about SDVs and unrelated to quantum computing, so no effect on HON's quantum business."}, {"ticker": "MSFT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "MSFT is not in the quantum computing universe and is always scored 0.0."}, {"ticker": "GOOGL", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "GOOGL is not in the quantum computing universe and is always scored 0.0."}, {"ticker": "NVDA", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "NVDA is not in the quantum computing universe and is always scored 0.0."}]}}
{"idx": 250, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-28", "title": "A Domain-Informed Multi-Objective Framework for EEG Channel Selection in Motor Imagery BCIs", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": [{"ticker": "IONQ", "score": 0.0}, {"ticker": "RGTI", "score": 0.0}, {"ticker": "QBTS", "score": 0.0}, {"ticker": "QUBT", "score": 0.0}, {"ticker": "QNT", "score": 0.0}, {"ticker": "IBM", "score": 0.0}, {"ticker": "HON", "score": 0.0}, {"ticker": "MSFT", "score": 0.0}, {"ticker": "GOOGL", "score": 0.0}, {"ticker": "NVDA", "score": 0.0}], "reasoning": "The research on EEG channel selection for motor imagery BCIs is unrelated to quantum computing. It does not influence the quantum sector, leading to neutral scores for all active companies and zero scores for inactive ones."}}
{"idx": 251, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-28", "title": "A Comprehensive Survey on Semantic Communication in Non-Terrestrial Networks: Architectures, Methodologies, and Challenges", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.2, "reasoning": "The survey's focus on quantum-assisted semantic communication for deep space aligns with IONQ's trapped-ion technology, providing a positive signal, though the abstract is broad and the impact is modest."}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.2, "reasoning": "Rigetti's superconducting quantum computers are relevant for quantum-assisted communication applications, leading to a positive score, but the abstract's general nature limits the magnitude."}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.2, "reasoning": "D-Wave's quantum annealing technology may contribute to optimization in semantic communication, resulting in a positive signal, though less directly than gate-based approaches."}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.2, "reasoning": "Quantum Computing Inc.'s neutral atom technology is applicable to quantum-assisted communication, supporting a positive score, given the survey's emphasis on quantum integration."}, "QNT": {"score": 0.2, "reasoning": "Quantinuum's trapped-ion systems are well-suited for quantum-assisted deep space communication, contributing to a positive signal, with the abstract reinforcing long-term potential."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.1, "reasoning": "IBM's superconducting quantum business could benefit from applications in semantic communication, but the score is lower due to its small quantum revenue share (\u22482%)."}, "HON": {"score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Honeywell's trapped-ion heritage (via Quantinuum) provides some relevance, but with low quantum revenue (\u22481%) post-spinoff, the positive score is modest."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Microsoft is inactive in quantum revenue per the problem constraints; no relevance to the survey's quantum-assisted focus."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Google is inactive in quantum revenue; the survey does not pertain to its core business areas."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "NVIDIA is inactive in quantum revenue; the abstract has no connection to its GPU-focused products."}}}}
{"idx": 252, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-28", "title": "Uncertainty-triggered wake-up enables energy-efficient, error-resilient edge AI with memristor front ends", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "News unrelated to quantum computing; no impact."}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "News unrelated to quantum computing; no impact."}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "News unrelated to quantum computing; no impact."}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "News unrelated to quantum computing; no impact."}, "QNT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "News unrelated to quantum computing; no impact."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "News unrelated to quantum computing; minimal quantum revenue unaffected."}, "HON": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "News unrelated to quantum computing; minimal quantum revenue unaffected."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive in quantum; always 0.0."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive in quantum; always 0.0."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive in quantum; always 0.0."}}}}
{"idx": 253, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-28", "title": "Rigetti Computing's 108-Qubit Push Keeps Quantum Advantage Hopes Alive - Yahoo Finance", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": 1.0, "RGTI": 2.0, "QBTS": 0.5, "QUBT": 0.5, "QNT": 1.0, "IBM": -0.1, "HON": 0.1, "MSFT": 0.0, "GOOGL": 0.0, "NVDA": 0.0}, "reasoning": "Rigetti's 108-qubit advancement is positively scored for RGTI (+2.0) as a direct achievement. IONQ and QNT (trapped-ion pure-plays) receive +1.0 for industry optimism. QBTS (annealing) and QUBT (neutral atom) get +0.5 for general sentiment. IBM (-0.10) is negatively affected as a competitor. HON (+0.10) has minor positive sentiment. MSFT/GOOGL/NVDA are inactive (0.0). Novelty is low-medium (not groundbreaking), and decay speed is fast due to rapid industry progress."}}
{"idx": 254, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-28", "title": "Honeywell-Backed Quantinuum Files for Landmark Quantum IPO - The Quantum Insider", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the news, no direct impact."}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the news, no direct impact."}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the news, no direct impact."}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the news, no direct impact."}, "QNT": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Directly mentioned: positive event (IPO filing), pure-play, maximum positive score."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the news, no direct impact."}, "HON": {"score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Backer of Quantinuum, positive event, non-pure-play, maximum positive score for HON."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, always 0.0"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, always 0.0"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, always 0.0"}}}
{"idx": 255, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-28", "title": "First UK team to use Google Willow quantum chip announced - BBC", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": 0.1, "RGTI": -1.0, "QBTS": 0.1, "QUBT": 0.1, "QNT": 0.2, "IBM": -0.15, "HON": 0.1, "MSFT": 0.0, "GOOGL": 0.0, "NVDA": 0.0}, "reasoning": "The announcement of the first UK team using Google's Willow quantum chip is positive for the quantum industry overall, driving a small positive signal (+0.1) for most pure-play companies (IONQ, QBTS, QUBT, QNT) and Honeywell (HON) due to increased validation and potential market growth. However, it is negative for superconducting-focused companies: Rigetti (RGTI) receives -1.0 as a pure-play directly competing with Google's technology, and IBM receives -0.15 as a larger competitor affected by the competitive advancement. Quantinuum (QNT) gets an additional positive boost (+0.1 total) as a UK-based player benefiting from the regional ecosystem development. Inactive companies (MSFT, GOOGL, NVDA) score 0.0."}}
{"idx": 256, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-29", "title": "BERS: Locally Optimal Continuous Algorithm for Maritime Weather Routing with Just-in-Time Arrival", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Research is unrelated to quantum computing; no impact."}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Research is unrelated to quantum computing; no impact."}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Research is unrelated to quantum computing; no impact."}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Research is unrelated to quantum computing; no impact."}, "QNT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Research is unrelated to quantum computing; no impact."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Research is unrelated to quantum computing; no impact."}, "HON": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Research is unrelated to quantum computing; no impact."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; always 0.0."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; always 0.0."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; always 0.0."}}}}
{"idx": 257, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-29", "title": "Memristor-Based Spiking Neural Network Accelerator for Bio-inspired Interception Task", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": [{"ticker": "IONQ", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "The research pertains to neuromorphic computing, which is unrelated to quantum computing; no impact on IONQ."}, {"ticker": "RGTI", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "The research is on memristor-based SNNs for AI, not quantum computing; no effect on RGTI."}, {"ticker": "QBTS", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "The abstract describes classical neuromorphic hardware; no relevance to D-Wave's quantum annealing."}, {"ticker": "QUBT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "The news involves memristor technology for SNNs, unrelated to Quantum Computing Inc.'s neutral atom quantum efforts."}, {"ticker": "QNT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "The research is on neuromorphic computing, not quantum; no impact on Quantinuum."}, {"ticker": "IBM", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "IBM has neuromorphic research (e.g., TrueNorth), but this news does not relate to their quantum business; no effect."}, {"ticker": "HON", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "The memristor-based SNN research is unrelated to Honeywell's trapped-ion quantum computing."}, {"ticker": "MSFT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive company; always scored 0.0 per specifications."}, {"ticker": "GOOGL", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive company; always scored 0.0 per specifications."}, {"ticker": "NVDA", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive company; always scored 0.0 per specifications."}]}}
{"idx": 258, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-29", "title": "Compact and Energy-Efficient Memristive Spiking Neuromorphic Accelerator for Bio-inspired Interception Tasks", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "News unrelated to quantum computing; no impact."}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "News unrelated to quantum computing; no impact."}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "News unrelated to quantum computing; no impact."}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "News unrelated to quantum computing; no impact."}, "QNT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "News unrelated to quantum computing; no impact."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "News unrelated to quantum computing; no impact on quantum segment."}, "HON": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "News unrelated to quantum computing; no impact on quantum segment."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive in quantum computing; always 0.0."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive in quantum computing; always 0.0."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive in quantum computing; always 0.0."}}}}
{"idx": 259, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-29", "title": "Accelerating NBTI Aging Evaluation via Physics-Aware Graph Attention Networks", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": 0.5, "RGTI": 0.5, "QBTS": 0.5, "QUBT": 0.5, "QNT": 0.5, "IBM": 0.15, "HON": 0.3, "MSFT": 0.0, "GOOGL": 0.0, "NVDA": 0.0}, "reasoning": "The research on accelerating NBTI aging evaluation using physics-aware graph attention networks represents a significant advancement in computational methods for semiconductor reliability. This could indirectly benefit the quantum computing sector by improving the design and reliability of classical control electronics used in quantum systems. Companies like IBM and Honeywell, with their established semiconductor businesses, may see a greater impact due to their ability to leverage such technologies, while pure-play quantum companies could experience milder benefits through improved supply chain components. Thus, pure-play companies receive a moderate positive score, IBM and Honeywell receive their maximum positive scores, and inactive companies score zero."}}
{"idx": 260, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-29", "title": "Benchmarking the ORCA PT-2 Boson Sampler using Minimum Dominating Set Problems", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "News not directly related to trapped-ion technology; neutral impact."}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "News not directly related to superconducting technology; neutral impact."}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "News not directly related to quantum annealing; neutral impact."}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "News not directly related to neutral atom technology; neutral impact."}, "QNT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "News not directly related to trapped-ion technology; neutral impact."}, "IBM": {"score": -0.1, "reasoning": "Slightly negative due to boson sampling underperformance, as IBM has explored this area, but limited impact given their classical strengths."}, "HON": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Unaffected post-Quantinuum spinoff; no direct relation to boson sampling."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; always 0.0."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; always 0.0."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; always 0.0."}}}}
{"idx": 261, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-29", "title": "GaMi: Geometry-Agnostic Material Identification via Cross-Modal Subtractive Disentanglement", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Research on material identification has no relevance to quantum computing; no impact on IONQ."}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Research on material identification has no relevance to quantum computing; no impact on RGTI."}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Research on material identification has no relevance to quantum computing; no impact on QBTS."}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Research on material identification has no relevance to quantum computing; no impact on QUBT."}, "QNT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Research on material identification has no relevance to quantum computing; no impact on QNT."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Research on material identification does not pertain to IBM's quantum business; no impact."}, "HON": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Research on material identification does not affect Honeywell's quantum division; no impact."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive in quantum computing, always 0.0."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive in quantum computing, always 0.0."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive in quantum computing, always 0.0."}}}}
{"idx": 262, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-30", "title": "Cross-Generational Transfer of Adversarial Attacks Reveals Non-Monotonic Safety Alignment in LLMs", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Research on classical LLMs has no direct impact on pure-play quantum companies."}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Research on classical LLMs has no direct impact on pure-play quantum companies."}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Research on classical LLMs has no direct impact on pure-play quantum companies."}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Research on classical LLMs has no direct impact on pure-play quantum companies."}, "QNT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Research on classical LLMs has no direct impact on pure-play quantum companies."}, "IBM": {"score": -0.1, "reasoning": "AI safety concerns may negatively impact IBM's AI business, with potential indirect effects on overall sentiment, including quantum segments."}, "HON": {"score": -0.1, "reasoning": "Similar to IBM, AI safety issues could affect HON's AI interests, with minor impact on quantum revenue."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive company, fixed score of 0.0."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive company, fixed score of 0.0."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive company, fixed score of 0.0."}}}}
{"idx": 263, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-30", "title": "Computational Phase Transitions in Binary Compressed Sensing: Quantum Annealing Inside the Relaxation Gap", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Research is specific to quantum annealing; IONQ uses trapped-ion gate-based technology, not directly impacted."}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Research is specific to quantum annealing; RGTI uses superconducting gate-based technology, not directly impacted."}, "QBTS": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Research directly validates D-Wave's quantum annealer, showing superiority over classical methods in a key application."}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Research is specific to quantum annealing; QUBT uses neutral atom gate-based technology, not directly impacted."}, "QNT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Research is specific to quantum annealing; QNT uses trapped-ion gate-based technology, not directly impacted."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Research does not involve IBM's superconducting gate-based quantum efforts; minimal indirect impact."}, "HON": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Research does not involve Honeywell's trapped-ion gate-based quantum efforts; minimal indirect impact."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive company, no quantum computing relevance."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive company, no quantum computing relevance."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive company, no quantum computing relevance."}}}}
{"idx": 264, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-30", "title": "Quality-Diversity Evolution for Discovering Diverse Vulnerabilities in LLM Safety", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": 0.0, "RGTI": 0.0, "QBTS": 0.0, "QUBT": 0.0, "QNT": 0.0, "IBM": 0.15, "HON": 0.1, "MSFT": 0.0, "GOOGL": 0.0, "NVDA": 0.0}, "reasoning": "The academic paper on LLM safety is irrelevant to pure-play quantum hardware companies (scored 0.0). IBM benefits due to its AI focus (score +0.15). Honeywell has minor AI relevance (score +0.1). Inactive companies score 0.0."}}
{"idx": 265, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-30", "title": "The Quantum Computing Boom Is Back. IBM Proves It Is the Smartest Stock to Buy - Barchart.com", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": 1.0, "RGTI": 1.0, "QBTS": 1.0, "QUBT": 1.0, "QNT": 1.0, "IBM": 0.15, "HON": 0.2, "MSFT": 0.0, "GOOGL": 0.0, "NVDA": 0.0}, "reasoning": "Article highlights IBM as the top stock in a resurgent quantum boom. IBM max positive; pure-plays moderate positive; HON small positive; inactives zero. Novelty: High (resurgence). Decay: Moderate (sector effect fades, IBM's endorsement may persist)."}}
{"idx": 266, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-30", "title": "Stanford quantum computing breakthrough uses twisted light to work without extreme cooling - ScienceDaily", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.5, "reasoning": "Trapped-ion company; benefits from industry-wide progress but not directly threatened by photonic breakthrough."}, "RGTI": {"score": -1.5, "reasoning": "Superconducting company; requires extreme cooling, which the breakthrough could undermine."}, "QBTS": {"score": -1.5, "reasoning": "Superconducting (annealing) company; extreme cooling dependency makes it vulnerable."}, "QUBT": {"score": -1.5, "reasoning": "Neutral atom company; extreme cooling dependency leads to negative impact."}, "QNT": {"score": 0.5, "reasoning": "Trapped-ion company; similar to IONQ, positive from industry advancement."}, "IBM": {"score": -0.1, "reasoning": "Superconducting company with ~2% quantum revenue; negative impact but diluted."}, "HON": {"score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Trapped-ion company with ~1% quantum revenue; minor positive from industry news."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, always 0.0"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, always 0.0"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, always 0.0"}}}}
{"idx": 267, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-31", "title": "FreqLite: A Lightweight Frequency-Decomposed Linear Model with Adaptive Reversible Normalization for Robust Long-Term Time-Series Forecasting", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": [{"ticker": "IONQ", "score": -0.5, "reasoning": "Pure-play quantum company; classical advancements in time-series forecasting reduce demand for quantum solutions, leading to a negative signal."}, {"ticker": "RGTI", "score": -0.5, "reasoning": "Pure-play quantum company; similar negative impact due to enhanced classical methods competing with quantum applications."}, {"ticker": "QBTS", "score": -0.5, "reasoning": "Pure-play quantum company (D-Wave); classical improvements may erode quantum relevance in optimization and forecasting."}, {"ticker": "QUBT", "score": -0.5, "reasoning": "Pure-play quantum company; negative signal from classical model advancements reducing quantum demand."}, {"ticker": "QNT", "score": -0.5, "reasoning": "Pure-play quantum company (Quantinuum); classical breakthroughs may decrease investment appeal in quantum for forecasting."}, {"ticker": "IBM", "score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Classical ML advancement benefits IBM's dominant AI business, providing a slight positive signal despite small quantum segment."}, {"ticker": "HON", "score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Similar to IBM, classical improvements support Honeywell's non-quantum applications, resulting in a slightly positive signal."}, {"ticker": "MSFT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; not part of the quantum computing universe."}, {"ticker": "GOOGL", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; not part of the quantum computing universe."}, {"ticker": "NVDA", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; not part of the quantum computing universe."}]}}
{"idx": 268, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-31", "title": "SweetFruit: A Two-Stage Mobile Sensing System for Real-Time Fruit Sugar Estimation", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No relevance to quantum computing; news is about agricultural sensing."}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No relevance to quantum computing; news is about agricultural sensing."}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No relevance to quantum computing; news is about agricultural sensing."}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No relevance to quantum computing; news is about agricultural sensing."}, "QNT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No relevance to quantum computing; news is about agricultural sensing."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Slight positive due to minor relevance to sensor or embedded systems business, but minimal impact on quantum division."}, "HON": {"score": 0.2, "reasoning": "Positive, as Honeywell's sensor business is validated by this application, enhancing overall sentiment."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; always 0.0."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; always 0.0."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; always 0.0."}}}}
{"idx": 269, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-31", "title": "Is This New Quantum Computing IPO the Best Under-the-Radar Stock of 2026? - The Motley Fool", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": -1.0, "RGTI": -0.5, "QBTS": -0.3, "QUBT": -0.5, "QNT": 2.0, "IBM": -0.1, "HON": -0.2, "MSFT": 0.0, "GOOGL": 0.0, "NVDA": 0.0}, "reasoning": "Quantinuum's IPO news is highly novel and positive for QNT (+2.0). Competitors (e.g., IONQ, RGTI, QBTS, QUBT) receive negative scores due to competitive pressure. IBM and HON have minor negative scores due to small quantum exposure. Inactive companies score 0.0."}}
{"idx": 270, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-01", "title": "Powering An Ecosystem Of Pedagogical AI Agents: A Validation Strategy For A Unified Data Architecture", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": [{"ticker": "IONQ", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "News is about classical AI in education with no quantum computing relevance; pure-play quantum company unaffected."}, {"ticker": "RGTI", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "News is about classical AI in education with no quantum computing relevance; pure-play quantum company unaffected."}, {"ticker": "QBTS", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "News is about classical AI in education with no quantum computing relevance; pure-play quantum company unaffected."}, {"ticker": "QUBT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "News is about classical AI in education with no quantum computing relevance; pure-play quantum company unaffected."}, {"ticker": "QNT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "News is about classical AI in education with no quantum computing relevance; pure-play quantum company unaffected."}, {"ticker": "IBM", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "News is about classical AI in education; no relevance to IBM's quantum division, which is a small part of its business."}, {"ticker": "HON", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "News is about classical AI in education; no relevance to Honeywell's quantum business, which is a small part of its portfolio."}, {"ticker": "MSFT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, always 0.0"}, {"ticker": "GOOGL", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, always 0.0"}, {"ticker": "NVDA", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, always 0.0"}]}}
{"idx": 271, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-01", "title": "CRAM-ER: Error-Resilient Spintronic Computational Random Access Memory for Scalable In-Memory Computation", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Research on classical in-memory computing (spintronic MRAM) is unrelated to IonQ's trapped-ion quantum technology; no impact."}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Research on classical in-memory computing (spintronic MRAM) is unrelated to Rigetti's superconducting quantum technology; no impact."}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Research on classical in-memory computing (spintronic MRAM) is unrelated to D-Wave's quantum annealing technology; no impact."}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Research on classical in-memory computing (spintronic MRAM) is unrelated to Quantum Computing Inc.'s neutral atom technology; no impact."}, "QNT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Research on classical in-memory computing (spintronic MRAM) is unrelated to Quantinuum's trapped-ion technology; no impact."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.1, "reasoning": "IBM has significant expertise in spintronics and MRAM; this research could benefit their classical business, indirectly supporting the company. Low positive score due to ~2% quantum revenue share."}, "HON": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Research on classical in-memory computing (spintronic MRAM) is unrelated to Honeywell's trapped-ion quantum technology; no impact."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive in quantum computing; always 0.0."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive in quantum computing; always 0.0."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive in quantum computing; always 0.0."}}}}
{"idx": 272, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-01", "title": "Towards Automated Discovery: A Review of Generative Models, Multimodal Learning and Closed-Loop Workflows in Inverse Materials Design", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "High relevance as a pure-play trapped-ion hardware company; advances in materials design can directly improve quantum device performance."}, "RGTI": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "High relevance as a pure-play superconducting hardware company; materials optimization is critical for qubit coherence."}, "QBTS": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "High relevance as a pure-play quantum annealing hardware company; materials research can enhance annealer efficiency and stability."}, "QUBT": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "High relevance as a pure-play neutral atom hardware company; generative models for materials can aid in trap and qubit design."}, "QNT": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "High relevance as a pure-play trapped-ion hardware company; materials advances support improved ion trap fabrication and scalability."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Some relevance due to superconducting hardware focus, but limited impact as quantum is only ~2% of revenue."}, "HON": {"score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Some relevance due to trapped-ion hardware, but reduced impact as quantum is only ~1% of revenue post-spinoff."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; not part of the quantum universe for scoring."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; not part of the quantum universe for scoring."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; not part of the quantum universe for scoring."}}}}
{"idx": 273, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-01", "title": "Heterogeneous Mapping for Analog In-Memory Computing Accelerators: A Unified Workflow", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": [{"ticker": "IONQ", "score": -0.3, "reasoning": "AIMC advancements present a competing technology for AI workloads, reducing the urgency for quantum computing in this area, leading to a negative signal for pure-play quantum companies."}, {"ticker": "RGTI", "score": -0.3, "reasoning": "Similar to IONQ, Rigetti faces negative pressure from AIMC as a competing solution for DNN inference."}, {"ticker": "QBTS", "score": -0.3, "reasoning": "D-Wave's quantum annealing is less directly aligned with general DNN tasks, but AIMC's efficiency in matrix operations still poses a competitive threat, resulting in a negative signal."}, {"ticker": "QUBT", "score": -0.3, "reasoning": "As a pure-play quantum company, Quantum Computing Inc. is negatively impacted by the rise of AIMC as an alternative for AI applications."}, {"ticker": "QNT", "score": -0.3, "reasoning": "Quantinuum, being a pure-play, is sensitive to competitors like AIMC in the AI computing landscape, leading to a negative signal."}, {"ticker": "IBM", "score": -0.1, "reasoning": "IBM's quantum segment is slightly negative due to AIMC competition, but its extensive classical AI capabilities may mitigate this impact."}, {"ticker": "HON", "score": -0.1, "reasoning": "Honeywell's quantum division is slightly negative affected by AIMC advancements, similar to IBM, due to competitive pressures in AI workloads."}, {"ticker": "MSFT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, always 0.0 per specification."}, {"ticker": "GOOGL", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, always 0.0 per specification."}, {"ticker": "NVDA", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, always 0.0 per specification."}]}}
{"idx": 274, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-01", "title": "Federated Formal Verification: Cross-Backend Citation, Cross-Axis Convergence, and AI-Orchestrated Proof Dispatch for Production Systems", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": [{"ticker": "IONQ", "score": 0.2, "reasoning": "Pure-play quantum company; indirect benefit from general formal verification advancements."}, {"ticker": "RGTI", "score": 0.2, "reasoning": "Pure-play quantum company; indirect benefit from general formal verification advancements."}, {"ticker": "QBTS", "score": 0.2, "reasoning": "Pure-play quantum company; indirect benefit from general formal verification advancements."}, {"ticker": "QUBT", "score": 0.2, "reasoning": "Pure-play quantum company; indirect benefit from general formal verification advancements."}, {"ticker": "QNT", "score": 0.2, "reasoning": "Pure-play quantum company; indirect benefit from general formal verification advancements."}, {"ticker": "IBM", "score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Partial quantum focus (~2% revenue); formal verification could enhance quantum software reliability."}, {"ticker": "HON", "score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Partial quantum focus (~1% revenue); formal verification may benefit quantum system development."}, {"ticker": "MSFT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive in quantum computing; always scored 0.0."}, {"ticker": "GOOGL", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive in quantum computing; always scored 0.0."}, {"ticker": "NVDA", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive in quantum computing; always scored 0.0."}]}}
{"idx": 275, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-01", "title": "Branch-Aware Quantum Constant Propagation for Dynamic Quantum Circuits", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": 1.5, "RGTI": 1.5, "QBTS": 0.0, "QUBT": 1.5, "QNT": 1.5, "IBM": 0.15, "HON": 0.3, "MSFT": 0.0, "GOOGL": 0.0, "NVDA": 0.0}, "reasoning": "The paper on Branch-Aware Quantum Constant Propagation improves dynamic circuit optimization for gate-based quantum computing (trapped-ion, superconducting, neutral atom), benefiting IONQ, RGTI, QUBT, QNT, IBM, and HON positively. Quantum annealing (QBTS) is unaffected. Pure-play companies receive higher scores due to full quantum focus; IBM and HON scores are capped by low quantum revenue share. Inactive companies score 0.0."}}
{"idx": 276, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-01", "title": "Night-Window Batching versus Carbon-Aware Scheduling for Clinical AI GPU Workloads", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "The news is about classical GPU scheduling and does not relate to quantum computing, so no impact."}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "The news is about classical GPU scheduling and does not relate to quantum computing, so no impact."}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "The news is about classical GPU scheduling and does not relate to quantum computing, so no impact."}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "The news is about classical GPU scheduling and does not relate to quantum computing, so no impact."}, "QNT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "The news is about classical GPU scheduling and does not relate to quantum computing, so no impact."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "The news is about classical GPU scheduling and does not relate to IBM's quantum division, so no impact."}, "HON": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "The news is about classical GPU scheduling and does not relate to HON's quantum division, so no impact."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive in quantum computing, always 0.0."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive in quantum computing, always 0.0."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive in quantum computing, always 0.0."}}}}
{"idx": 277, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-01", "title": "D-Wave\u2019s New Gate-Model Roadmap Puts Pin in 2032 For 100 Logical-Qubit System - The Quantum Insider", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": 0.1, "RGTI": -0.3, "QBTS": 1.8, "QUBT": 0.1, "QNT": 0.1, "IBM": -0.15, "HON": 0.05, "MSFT": 0.0, "GOOGL": 0.0, "NVDA": 0.0}, "reasoning": "The news about D-Wave's gate-model roadmap is positive for QBTS (direct benefit) and slightly positive for IONQ, QUBT, QNT, and HON (industry validation). It is negative for RGTI and IBM (increased competition). MSFT, GOOGL, and NVDA are unaffected. The signal may decay moderately due to the 2032 timeline."}}
{"idx": 278, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-01", "title": "Is This Quantum Computing Stock a Buy Before the Sector's Next Major Catalyst? - The Motley Fool", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": [{"ticker": "IONQ", "score": 1.5, "reasoning": "Positive sector catalyst sentiment; pure-play beneficiary."}, {"ticker": "RGTI", "score": 1.5, "reasoning": "Positive sector catalyst sentiment; pure-play beneficiary."}, {"ticker": "QBTS", "score": 1.5, "reasoning": "Positive sector catalyst sentiment; pure-play beneficiary."}, {"ticker": "QUBT", "score": 1.5, "reasoning": "Positive sector catalyst sentiment; pure-play beneficiary."}, {"ticker": "QNT", "score": 1.5, "reasoning": "Positive sector catalyst sentiment; pure-play beneficiary."}, {"ticker": "IBM", "score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Sector optimism, but only ~2% quantum revenue; partial impact."}, {"ticker": "HON", "score": 0.2, "reasoning": "Sector optimism, but only ~1% quantum revenue; partial impact."}, {"ticker": "MSFT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No quantum focus; inactive per definition."}, {"ticker": "GOOGL", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No quantum focus; inactive per definition."}, {"ticker": "NVDA", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No quantum focus; inactive per definition."}]}}
{"idx": 279, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-01", "title": "Quantinuum IPO Demand Surges as Honeywell\u2019s Quantum Unit Eyes $13B Valuation - Yahoo Finance", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": 1.0, "RGTI": 1.0, "QBTS": 1.0, "QUBT": 1.0, "QNT": 2.0, "IBM": 0.15, "HON": 0.3, "MSFT": 0.0, "GOOGL": 0.0, "NVDA": 0.0}, "reasoning": "Quantinuum (QNT) receives a maximum positive score (+2.0) due to direct mention of surging IPO demand and $13B valuation. Honeywell (HON) benefits as the former parent (+0.3). IBM (IBM) gains a modest positive sentiment (+0.15) from sector optimism. Other pure-plays (IONQ, RGTI, QBTS, QUBT) receive +1.0 each for general bullish sentiment. Inactive companies (MSFT, GOOGL, NVDA) score 0.0. Novelty is high due to significant IPO event; decay speed is moderate (1-2 weeks)."}}
{"idx": 280, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-01", "title": "Quantinuum Upsizes IPO. The Year\u2019s Biggest Quantum Offering Is Getting Even Bigger. - Barron's", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct impact; news specific to Quantinuum, and IONQ's trapped-ion technology not mentioned."}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct impact; news specific to Quantinuum, and Rigetti's superconducting approach not affected."}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct impact; news specific to Quantinuum, and D-Wave's quantum annealing technology not mentioned."}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct impact; news specific to Quantinuum, and Quantum Computing Inc.'s neutral atom approach not affected."}, "QNT": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Direct positive impact from upscaling IPO, indicating strong investor demand and growth potential for this pure-play trapped-ion company."}, "IBM": {"score": -0.1, "reasoning": "Slight negative due to increased competition from Quantinuum in IBM's quantum segment, but impact is minimal given quantum revenue is only ~2% of IBM's business."}, "HON": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No significant impact post-Quantinuum spinoff; quantum computing is a small part (~1%) of Honeywell's business."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; always 0.0 per specification."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; always 0.0 per specification."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; always 0.0 per specification."}}}}
{"idx": 281, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-01", "title": "Quantum Computing Stocks: Quantinuum Boosts IPO Offering - Investor's Business Daily", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": [{"ticker": "IONQ", "score": -1.0, "reasoning": "Competitor with same trapped-ion technology; positive news for Quantinuum may signal increased competition, negatively affecting IONQ."}, {"ticker": "RGTI", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct impact; different superconducting technology, so neutral."}, {"ticker": "QBTS", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct impact; quantum annealing technology, different from trapped-ion, so neutral."}, {"ticker": "QUBT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct impact; neutral atom technology, different from trapped-ion, so neutral."}, {"ticker": "QNT", "score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Directly mentioned; boosting IPO is a positive event indicating strong market confidence and growth potential."}, {"ticker": "IBM", "score": 0.05, "reasoning": "Sector-wide positive sentiment; small uplift due to ~2% quantum revenue exposure."}, {"ticker": "HON", "score": -0.2, "reasoning": "Competitor with trapped-ion technology, but only ~1% quantum revenue; negative impact from competition, but smaller magnitude."}, {"ticker": "MSFT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; no quantum revenue focus, always 0.0."}, {"ticker": "GOOGL", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; no quantum revenue focus, always 0.0."}, {"ticker": "NVDA", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; no quantum revenue focus, always 0.0."}]}}
{"idx": 282, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-01", "title": "Why The Quantinuum IPO Could Disappoint Investors Despite The Quantum Hype - Forbes", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": -0.7, "reasoning": "Indirect negative sentiment from quantum sector spillover; trapped-ion similarity to QNT amplifies impact. Novelty medium, decay medium."}, "RGTI": {"score": -0.6, "reasoning": "Indirect negative sentiment; superconducting competitor affected by broader industry concerns. Novelty medium, decay medium."}, "QBTS": {"score": -0.5, "reasoning": "Indirect negative sentiment; quantum annealing company impacted by sector-wide perception. Novelty medium, decay medium."}, "QUBT": {"score": -0.5, "reasoning": "Indirect negative sentiment; neutral atom quantum company affected by industry risks. Novelty medium, decay medium."}, "QNT": {"score": -1.5, "reasoning": "Direct negative sentiment; IPO disappointment risks significantly impact valuation. Novelty medium, decay medium."}, "IBM": {"score": -0.1, "reasoning": "Minimal impact; small quantum revenue segment, news specific to pure-play competitor. Novelty medium, decay medium."}, "HON": {"score": -0.2, "reasoning": "Slight negative; parent of Quantinuum spin-off, but quantum revenue is minor. Novelty medium, decay medium."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; no quantum focus, score fixed at 0.0."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; no quantum focus, score fixed at 0.0."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; no quantum focus, score fixed at 0.0."}}}}
{"idx": 283, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-01", "title": "Honeywell's Quantinuum eyes $14.3 billion valuation in upsized US IPO - Reuters", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 1.5, "reasoning": "Positive as trapped-ion peer benefiting from sector validation."}, "RGTI": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive as superconducting peer, general sector uplift."}, "QBTS": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive quantum annealing player, sector boost from IPO news."}, "QUBT": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive neutral atom company, benefits from increased industry optimism."}, "QNT": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Direct positive impact from high-valuation IPO as pure-play."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Minor positive sentiment as small quantum player; sector excitement."}, "HON": {"score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Positive as parent company spinning off high-valued quantum entity."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, no quantum relevance."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, no quantum relevance."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, no quantum relevance."}}}}
{"idx": 284, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-02", "title": "Can Generalist Agents Automate Data Curation?", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": [{"ticker": "IONQ", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play quantum hardware company; news on classical AI data curation is not directly relevant."}, {"ticker": "RGTI", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play quantum hardware company; news on classical AI data curation is not directly relevant."}, {"ticker": "QBTS", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play quantum hardware company; news on classical AI data curation is not directly relevant."}, {"ticker": "QUBT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play quantum hardware company; news on classical AI data curation is not directly relevant."}, {"ticker": "QNT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play quantum hardware company; news on classical AI data curation is not directly relevant."}, {"ticker": "IBM", "score": 0.15, "reasoning": "News on AI data curation automation is highly relevant to IBM's AI business (e.g., IBM Watson), which may indirectly benefit their quantum initiatives. Score is maximally positive within the allowed range."}, {"ticker": "HON", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Low quantum revenue and no significant AI focus; news has minimal relevance."}, {"ticker": "MSFT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive company; always scored 0.0."}, {"ticker": "GOOGL", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive company; always scored 0.0."}, {"ticker": "NVDA", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive company; always scored 0.0."}]}}
{"idx": 285, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-02", "title": "Q-FE: A Quantum-Native 6G Far-Edge Architecture Securing Industrial IoT Digital Twins via CSIDH-PQC and Asynchronous Federated Learning", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Positive quantum-native architecture news benefits pure-play quantum companies maximally."}, "RGTI": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Positive quantum-native architecture news benefits pure-play quantum companies maximally."}, "QBTS": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Positive quantum-native architecture news benefits pure-play quantum companies maximally."}, "QUBT": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Positive quantum-native architecture news benefits pure-play quantum companies maximally."}, "QNT": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Positive quantum-native architecture news benefits pure-play quantum companies maximally."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Positive for IBM due to quantum computing and related fields (6G, AI), but limited by small quantum revenue share."}, "HON": {"score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Positive for Honeywell's quantum division, though quantum revenue is a small portion of overall business."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, always 0.0 (not part of quantum universe)."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, always 0.0 (not part of quantum universe)."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, always 0.0 (not part of quantum universe)."}}}}
{"idx": 286, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-02", "title": "ACRONYM: Accelerated Approximate Nearest Neighbor Search in Memory for Dynamic Vector Databases", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": -1.0, "reasoning": "Improved classical vector search reduces quantum relevance for AI applications, negatively impacting pure-play quantum companies."}, "RGTI": {"score": -1.0, "reasoning": "Improved classical vector search reduces quantum relevance for AI applications, negatively impacting pure-play quantum companies."}, "QBTS": {"score": -1.0, "reasoning": "Improved classical vector search reduces quantum relevance for AI applications, negatively impacting pure-play quantum companies."}, "QUBT": {"score": -1.0, "reasoning": "Improved classical vector search reduces quantum relevance for AI applications, negatively impacting pure-play quantum companies."}, "QNT": {"score": -1.0, "reasoning": "Improved classical vector search reduces quantum relevance for AI applications, negatively impacting pure-play quantum companies."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Benefits from advancements in classical vector search, strengthening its AI capabilities."}, "HON": {"score": -0.1, "reasoning": "Slight negative impact due to small quantum exposure; classical improvements may reduce quantum demand."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive in quantum computing, always 0.0."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive in quantum computing, always 0.0."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive in quantum computing, always 0.0."}}}}
{"idx": 287, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-02", "title": "Glass Box at Orbit: A Constitutional AI Verification Framework for Trustworthy Autonomous CubeSat Intelligence", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": [{"ticker": "IONQ", "score": 0.2, "reasoning": "Indirectly positive; advances AI and verification techniques applicable to quantum computing."}, {"ticker": "RGTI", "score": 0.2, "reasoning": "Indirectly positive; same as IONQ."}, {"ticker": "QBTS", "score": 0.2, "reasoning": "Indirectly positive; same as IONQ."}, {"ticker": "QUBT", "score": 0.2, "reasoning": "Indirectly positive; same as IONQ."}, {"ticker": "QNT", "score": 0.2, "reasoning": "Indirectly positive; same as IONQ."}, {"ticker": "IBM", "score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Slightly more relevant due to IBM's AI, quantum, and space involvement; positive impact."}, {"ticker": "HON", "score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Slightly more relevant due to Honeywell's quantum and aerospace businesses; positive impact."}, {"ticker": "MSFT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive in quantum; always 0.0."}, {"ticker": "GOOGL", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive in quantum; always 0.0."}, {"ticker": "NVDA", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive in quantum; always 0.0."}]}}
{"idx": 288, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-02", "title": "Continuous-Variable Quantum State Tomography Enabled by Quantum Mirrors", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.5, "reasoning": "Relevant as a trapped-ion company, which can provide atomic control systems for the proposed tomography protocol."}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not directly relevant; Rigetti focuses on superconducting qubits, which are discrete-variable and not aligned with continuous-variable photonic tomography."}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not relevant; D-Wave's quantum annealing is discrete-variable and unrelated to photonic state tomography."}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.5, "reasoning": "Relevant as a neutral atom company, which can provide atomic control systems for the tomography protocol."}, "QNT": {"score": 0.5, "reasoning": "Relevant as a trapped-ion company, which can provide atomic control systems for the tomography protocol."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Highly relevant due to IBM's involvement in photonic quantum computing and continuous-variable quantum initiatives, which directly benefit from improved tomography methods."}, "HON": {"score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Relevant as a trapped-ion company, which can provide atomic control systems, and has potential applications in quantum sensing."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; no quantum computing focus, always scored 0.0."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; no quantum computing focus, always scored 0.0."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; no quantum computing focus, always scored 0.0."}}}}
{"idx": 289, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-02", "title": "D-Wave Seeks to Leverage IBM\u2019s Quantum Foundry. $100 Million in Federal Funding Will Help. - Barron's", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the news; no direct impact."}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned; no impact."}, "QBTS": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Directly benefits from $100M federal funding and leveraging IBM's Quantum Foundry; major positive for pure-play."}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned; no impact."}, "QNT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned; no impact."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Quantum Foundry leveraged, enhancing ecosystem; positive but capped due to small quantum revenue share."}, "HON": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned; no impact."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; always 0.0"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; always 0.0"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; always 0.0"}}, "reasoning": "The news highlights D-Wave's receipt of $100 million in federal funding to leverage IBM's Quantum Foundry. This is a significant positive for QBTS (D-Wave) as a pure-play. IBM benefits indirectly through the validation of their Quantum Foundry, but the impact is limited due to quantum being a small part of their business. Other companies are not affected. Novelty is high due to the scale of funding and partnership. Decay speed may be moderate as funding deployment is gradual, but market reaction could fade quickly."}}
{"idx": 290, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-02", "title": "Quantinuum Expands IPO as Valuation Climbs Above $14 Billion - The Quantum Insider", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": [{"ticker": "IONQ", "score": 0.5, "reasoning": "Moderate positive spillover from sector sentiment"}, {"ticker": "RGTI", "score": 0.5, "reasoning": "Moderate positive spillover from sector sentiment"}, {"ticker": "QBTS", "score": 0.5, "reasoning": "Moderate positive spillover from sector sentiment"}, {"ticker": "QUBT", "score": 0.5, "reasoning": "Moderate positive spillover from sector sentiment"}, {"ticker": "QNT", "score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Direct positive impact from IPO expansion and high valuation"}, {"ticker": "IBM", "score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Minor positive sentiment from sector boost"}, {"ticker": "HON", "score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Minor positive sentiment from sector boost and indirect ties"}, {"ticker": "MSFT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, always 0.0"}, {"ticker": "GOOGL", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, always 0.0"}, {"ticker": "NVDA", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, always 0.0"}]}}
{"idx": 291, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-02", "title": "IBM to invest $10 billion in quantum computing | IBM Quantum Computing Blog - IBM", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": -0.5, "RGTI": -1.5, "QBTS": 0.0, "QUBT": 0.0, "QNT": -0.5, "IBM": 0.15, "HON": 0.1, "MSFT": 0.0, "GOOGL": 0.0, "NVDA": 0.0}, "reasoning": "IBM's $10 billion investment is a strong positive for IBM (score: +0.15, max for non-pure-play). RGTI (same superconducting tech) faces direct competition, hence -1.5. IONQ and QNT (trapped-ion) experience competitive pressure, scoring -0.5 each. QBTS (annealing) and QUBT (neutral atom) are unaffected (0.0). HON benefits slightly from sector growth (+0.1). Inactive companies (MSFT, GOOGL, NVDA) score 0.0."}}
{"idx": 292, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-02", "title": "IBM Commits More Than $10 Billion to Quantum Computing, Funding Its Roadmap from Today's Leading Systems to the World's First Fault-Tolerant Quantum Computers - IBM Newsroom", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": -1.0, "reasoning": "Negative due to competitive pressure from IBM's large-scale investment; trapped-ion focus but overall industry threat."}, "RGTI": {"score": -1.8, "reasoning": "Strong negative as a direct competitor in superconducting quantum computing; IBM's investment intensifies pressure."}, "QBTS": {"score": -0.5, "reasoning": "Slightly negative; quantum annealing technology reduces direct competition, but overall market pressure applies."}, "QUBT": {"score": -0.7, "reasoning": "Negative due to competitive pressures; neutral atom technology not IBM's focus, but IBM's scale threatens all pure-plays."}, "QNT": {"score": -1.2, "reasoning": "Negative; as a trapped-ion player, IBM's investment may reduce market share opportunities despite different tech."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Positive due to significant commitment to quantum computing, reinforcing leadership with moderate novelty and slow decay."}, "HON": {"score": -0.2, "reasoning": "Slightly negative; IBM's investment intensifies competition, affecting Honeywell's quantum position."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, always 0.0"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, always 0.0"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, always 0.0"}}}}
{"idx": 293, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-02", "title": "Introducing Majorana 2 - Microsoft Source", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": -1.0, "RGTI": -1.0, "QBTS": -1.0, "QUBT": -1.0, "QNT": -1.0, "IBM": -0.15, "HON": -0.3, "MSFT": 0.0, "GOOGL": 0.0, "NVDA": 0.0}, "reasoning": "Microsoft's Majorana 2 advancement is a novel topological quantum computing development. As MSFT is inactive, it scores 0.0. The news creates competitive pressure for active companies using different technologies (trapped-ion, superconducting, annealing, neutral atom), leading to negative scores: -1.0 for pure-plays (within [-2.0, +2.0]), -0.15 for IBM (within [-0.15, +0.15]), and -0.3 for Honeywell (within [-0.3, +0.3]). Inactive firms (GOOGL, NVDA) score 0.0. The slow decay speed of this research news justifies the moderate negative impact."}}
{"idx": 294, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-02", "title": "Microsoft Reports Advances in Majorana 2 Following Debate Over Last Year's Topological Claims - The Quantum Insider", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Positive sector sentiment from Microsoft's advances, but low novelty and high decay speed limit impact. Trapped-ion technology unaffected."}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Sector positive, but superconducting competitor Microsoft gains; net small positive with low novelty and high decay."}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Quantum annealing less affected, but benefits from general positive sentiment. Low novelty, high decay."}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Neutral atom pure-play benefits from sector optimism. Impact moderated by low novelty and high decay."}, "QNT": {"score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Trapped-ion pure-play, positive from sector news, but low impact due to novelty and decay factors."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Microsoft's advances may pressure IBM's quantum business, but with low novelty and high decay, net neutral. IBM not pure-play."}, "HON": {"score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Positive sentiment benefits HON's quantum efforts, but small due to low quantum revenue share. Low novelty and high decay."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, always 0.0"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, always 0.0"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, always 0.0"}}}}
{"idx": 295, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-02", "title": "Microsoft\u2019s quantum chip got an upgrade. Critics are still skeptical - Science News", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": 0.5, "RGTI": -1.0, "QBTS": 0.5, "QUBT": 0.5, "QNT": 0.5, "IBM": -0.1, "HON": 0.2, "MSFT": 0.0, "GOOGL": 0.0, "NVDA": 0.0}, "reasoning": "Microsoft's quantum chip upgrade is positive for the company but it is inactive (MSFT = 0.0). The news increases competition for superconducting qubit companies IBM (negative score) and Rigetti (negative score). Skepticism about the upgrade makes alternative architectures\u2014trapped-ion (IONQ, HON, QNT), quantum annealing (QBTS), and neutral atom (QUBT)\u2014more attractive, leading to positive scores. IBM and HON have smaller score ranges due to lower quantum revenue share. Novelty is low; decay speed is fast due to skepticism and incremental impact."}}
{"idx": 296, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-02", "title": "Quantinuum: Is This IPO Poised To Make A Quantum Leap? - Seeking Alpha", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": [{"ticker": "IONQ", "score": -0.2, "reasoning": "Competitor in trapped-ion technology; negative impact from positive news on rival Quantinuum. Novelty high, decay moderate."}, {"ticker": "RGTI", "score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Sector-wide positive sentiment from quantum IPO news. Novelty high, decay moderate."}, {"ticker": "QBTS", "score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Sector-wide positive sentiment from quantum IPO news. Novelty high, decay moderate."}, {"ticker": "QUBT", "score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Sector-wide positive sentiment from quantum IPO news. Novelty high, decay moderate."}, {"ticker": "QNT", "score": 1.8, "reasoning": "Direct positive news about IPO potential; high impact. High novelty, rapid decay."}, {"ticker": "IBM", "score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Minor positive spillover from quantum sector, but small quantum revenue share. Novelty high, decay moderate."}, {"ticker": "HON", "score": -0.1, "reasoning": "Competitor in trapped-ion technology with low quantum revenue exposure; negative impact. Novelty high, decay moderate."}, {"ticker": "MSFT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No quantum computing focus; always 0.0."}, {"ticker": "GOOGL", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No quantum computing focus; always 0.0."}, {"ticker": "NVDA", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No quantum computing focus; always 0.0."}]}}
{"idx": 297, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-03", "title": "A universal and efficient hybrid digital-analog fermionic quantum simulator", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Trapped-ion pure-play. The research on hybrid digital-analog fermionic simulation is indirectly relevant as it uses variational algorithms applicable to trapped-ion systems, but the primary focus is on neutral atoms, so moderate positive."}, "RGTI": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Superconducting pure-play. Variational algorithms are core to their technology, but the research is centered on fermionic ultracold atoms, so moderate positive."}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Quantum annealing. The research involves digital-analog hybrid fermionic simulation, which is not aligned with quantum annealing paradigms, so no relevance."}, "QUBT": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Neutral atom pure-play. The research directly advances fermionic ultracold atom platforms, making it highly relevant and impactful, hence maximum positive score."}, "QNT": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Trapped-ion pure-play. Similar to IONQ, variational algorithms provide indirect relevance, but the primary platform focus is neutral atoms, so moderate positive."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Superconducting, ~2% quantum revenue. As a leader in quantum computing, they may benefit from algorithmic advances, but the research is not specific to their platform, so capped at maximum positive for their category."}, "HON": {"score": 0.2, "reasoning": "Trapped-ion, ~1% quantum revenue. Their quantum system may leverage variational algorithms, but the research is focused on neutral atoms, so small positive within their range."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, always 0.0 per specification."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, always 0.0 per specification."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, always 0.0 per specification."}}}}
{"idx": 298, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-03", "title": "Complexity of the Laughlin wave function from the Dyson-orbital perspective", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"reasoning": "The research on Dyson orbitals and the Laughlin wave function advances the understanding of strongly correlated systems, which is highly relevant for quantum simulation. Pure-play companies with trapped-ion (IONQ, QNT), superconducting (RGTI), and neutral atom (QUBT) technologies receive high scores due to their direct applicability. Quantum annealing (QBTS) is less relevant. IBM and Honeywell benefit from theoretical progress but have lower scores due to small quantum revenue shares. Inactive companies score 0.0.", "signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "High relevance; trapped-ion technology is ideal for simulating many-body quantum systems like the Laughlin wave function."}, "RGTI": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "High relevance; superconducting quantum hardware is well-suited for quantum simulation research."}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.5, "reasoning": "Lower relevance; quantum annealing focuses on optimization, not wave function simulation of correlated systems."}, "QUBT": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "High relevance; neutral atom technology enables precise simulation of complex quantum states."}, "QNT": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "High relevance; trapped-ion platform is effective for quantum simulation tasks."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Moderate benefit from theoretical insights, but capped at maximum positive due to low quantum revenue share (~2%)."}, "HON": {"score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Benefit from simulation advancements, but capped at maximum positive due to small quantum revenue share (~1%)."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive in quantum computing per definition."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive in quantum computing per definition."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive in quantum computing per definition."}}}}
{"idx": 299, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-03", "title": "Realistic quantum device data synthesized by consumer AI and how to identify it", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": -1.5, "RGTI": -1.5, "QBTS": -1.5, "QUBT": -1.5, "QNT": -1.5, "IBM": -0.15, "HON": -0.2, "MSFT": 0.0, "GOOGL": 0.0, "NVDA": 0.0}, "reasoning": "The article highlights AI's ability to synthesize quantum data, which threatens the credibility of quantum hardware. Pure-play companies (100% quantum revenue) are most affected due to full reliance on quantum tech, hence the -1.5 score. IBM and Honeywell, with minor quantum divisions, receive milder negative scores (-0.15 and -0.2, respectively). Inactive companies are unaffected (0.0)."}}
{"idx": 300, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-03", "title": "Unlocking Exponential and Unbounded Robust Gains in Shannon Capacity of Classical Multiple Access Channels with Causal CSIT via Quantum Entanglement Assistance", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": [{"ticker": "IONQ", "score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play trapped-ion quantum company; the entanglement breakthrough directly enhances its technology's value."}, {"ticker": "RGTI", "score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play superconducting quantum company; benefits from the emphasis on entanglement in classical communication."}, {"ticker": "QBTS", "score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play quantum annealing company; general positive impact from quantum entanglement advancements."}, {"ticker": "QUBT", "score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play neutral atom quantum company; the news validates quantum entanglement's role, boosting its prospects."}, {"ticker": "QNT", "score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play trapped-ion quantum company; similar positive impact as other pure-plays."}, {"ticker": "IBM", "score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Quantum entanglement gains support IBM's quantum research, but impact is modest due to ~2% quantum revenue share."}, {"ticker": "HON", "score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Honeywell's quantum division (trapped-ion) benefits, but with only ~1% quantum revenue, the score is capped."}, {"ticker": "MSFT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No quantum computing focus; always 0.0."}, {"ticker": "GOOGL", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No quantum computing focus; always 0.0."}, {"ticker": "NVDA", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No quantum computing focus; always 0.0."}]}}
{"idx": 301, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-03", "title": "Multi-Qubit Dyadic Phase Fixing for Fault-Tolerant Quantum Compilation", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": [{"ticker": "IONQ", "score": 1.5, "reasoning": "Pure-play trapped-ion company; benefits significantly from improved compilation reducing T-count, enhancing fault-tolerant potential."}, {"ticker": "RGTI", "score": 1.5, "reasoning": "Pure-play superconducting company; similar gains from DPF for lower error rates in quantum compilation."}, {"ticker": "QBTS", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Quantum annealing company; DPF targets gate-based circuits, not applicable to annealing, so no impact."}, {"ticker": "QUBT", "score": 1.5, "reasoning": "Pure-play neutral atom company; benefits from general compilation improvements for gate-based quantum computing."}, {"ticker": "QNT", "score": 1.5, "reasoning": "Pure-play trapped-ion company; similar advantages to IONQ from reduced T-count in fault-tolerant contexts."}, {"ticker": "IBM", "score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Superconducting company with ~2% quantum revenue; positive for quantum software (e.g., Qiskit adoption), but limited by small quantum focus."}, {"ticker": "HON", "score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Trapped-ion company with ~1% quantum revenue post-spinoff; minor benefit from field advancement, but low quantum focus dampens impact."}, {"ticker": "MSFT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No quantum focus; always 0.0 per specification."}, {"ticker": "GOOGL", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No quantum focus; always 0.0 per specification."}, {"ticker": "NVDA", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No quantum focus; always 0.0 per specification."}]}}
{"idx": 302, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-03", "title": "Feature Encoding in Quantum Machine Learning: A Survey and Practical Guidelines", "source": "arxiv", "status": "error", "error": "Expecting property name enclosed in double quotes: line 1 column 2 (char 1)"}
{"idx": 303, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-03", "title": "Setting angles in quantum approximate optimization at utility-scale", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 1.8, "reasoning": "Trapped-ion hardware company; benefits from QAOA advancements for gate-based quantum optimization."}, "RGTI": {"score": 1.8, "reasoning": "Superconducting hardware company; similarly benefits from improved QAOA efficiency."}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Quantum annealing company; QAOA is gate-based and not directly applicable to annealing."}, "QUBT": {"score": 1.8, "reasoning": "Neutral atom hardware company; gate-based and relevant for QAOA optimization."}, "QNT": {"score": 1.8, "reasoning": "Trapped-ion hardware company; gate-based and benefits from QAOA improvements."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Superconducting hardware with strong classical resources; aligns with QAOA's classical optimization and hardware validation aspects."}, "HON": {"score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Trapped-ion hardware company; capable of running QAOA but on a smaller scale."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive in quantum scoring; always 0.0."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive in quantum scoring; always 0.0."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive in quantum scoring; always 0.0."}}, "reasoning": "The research enhances QAOA for gate-based quantum optimization at scale, benefiting hardware companies (especially pure-play gate-based) and those with strong classical-software integration (IBM, HON). Annealing-focused companies (QBTS) are less relevant."}}
{"idx": 304, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-03", "title": "Krylov Complexity: Flat bands and Carroll breaking deformations", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 1.8, "reasoning": "High relevance: Research on flat band systems and fermionic ladders directly applies to trapped-ion technology, which IONQ specializes in."}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.2, "reasoning": "Low relevance: Superconducting qubits can simulate the models, but the research is not specific to this architecture."}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Low relevance: Quantum annealing (D-Wave's focus) is not directly addressed; the research is more gate-based."}, "QUBT": {"score": 1.8, "reasoning": "High relevance: Neutral atom technology is well-suited for flat band and fermionic ladder models discussed."}, "QNT": {"score": 1.8, "reasoning": "High relevance: Trapped-ion technology aligns with the research on flat bands and fermionic ladders."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Low relevance: Superconducting qubits with only ~2% quantum revenue; research is general but not specific to IBM."}, "HON": {"score": 0.3, "reasoning": "High relevance to trapped-ion technology, but capped at 0.3 due to ~1% quantum revenue share."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive: Always 0.0 per specification."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive: Always 0.0 per specification."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive: Always 0.0 per specification."}}}}
{"idx": 305, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-03", "title": "Continuous-variable ADAPT-VQE for bosonic lattice models", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 1.5, "reasoning": "Positive impact as trapped-ion systems can leverage this VQE improvement for quantum simulation tasks."}, "RGTI": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Strong positive impact; superconducting qubits are well-suited for bosonic lattice models, enhancing simulation capabilities."}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Neutral impact; quantum annealing is not directly related to VQE-based simulation."}, "QUBT": {"score": 1.5, "reasoning": "Positive impact; neutral atom platforms can benefit from efficient VQE methods for quantum simulation."}, "QNT": {"score": 1.5, "reasoning": "Positive impact; as a pure-play trapped-ion company, this VQE advancement supports their quantum computing applications."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Slightly positive impact; software expertise (e.g., Qiskit) can integrate this method, benefiting quantum business."}, "HON": {"score": 0.2, "reasoning": "Slightly positive impact; trapped-ion technology can utilize this for simulation, but reduced quantum focus limits effect."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; no quantum revenue."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; no quantum revenue."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; no quantum revenue; GPU mention in paper is for classical simulation only."}}}}
{"idx": 306, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-03", "title": "Isospectrality and Operator Complexity", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 1.5, "reasoning": "Trapped-ion tech aligns with fermion chain simulation and operator dynamics."}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.5, "reasoning": "Superconducting qubits can simulate fermions but less directly relevant."}, "QBTS": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Quadratic model directly supports D-Wave's annealing focus."}, "QUBT": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Neutral atom platform suitable for fermion simulation."}, "QNT": {"score": 1.5, "reasoning": "Trapped-ion tech relevant for fermion chains and operator complexity."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Incremental quantum research slightly benefits IBM's efforts despite small quantum revenue."}, "HON": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Reduced quantum focus post-Quantinuum spinoff limits impact."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive in quantum computing."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive in quantum computing."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive in quantum computing."}}}}
{"idx": 307, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-03", "title": "Breakdown of Thermalization from Real-Time Dynamics in the Two-Dimensional Hubbard Model", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": -1.0, "reasoning": "The classical simulation of quantum phenomena reduces near-term demand for quantum hardware, negatively impacting pure-play trapped-ion company IONQ."}, "RGTI": {"score": -1.0, "reasoning": "As a pure-play superconducting quantum company, RGTI is negatively affected by advancements in classical simulation diminishing quantum advantage."}, "QBTS": {"score": -1.5, "reasoning": "D-Wave's quantum annealing is irrelevant to real-time dynamics, making this research particularly threatening and warranting a more negative score."}, "QUBT": {"score": -1.0, "reasoning": "As a pure-play neutral atom company, QUBT faces negative impact from classical simulation competing with quantum hardware applications."}, "QNT": {"score": -1.0, "reasoning": "Quantinuum, a pure-play trapped-ion company, is negatively affected by the reduced quantum advantage perception from classical methods."}, "IBM": {"score": -0.1, "reasoning": "IBM's diversified portfolio mitigates the negative impact, but its quantum segment is slightly affected due to ~2% quantum revenue."}, "HON": {"score": -0.2, "reasoning": "Honeywell's trapped-ion focus and small quantum revenue (~1%) make it more impacted than IBM, but less than pure-plays."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive company, always scores 0.0."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive company, always scores 0.0."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive company, always scores 0.0."}}}}
{"idx": 308, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-03", "title": "Expressibility, Noise, and Error Mitigation in VQE Ansatz Selection", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": [{"ticker": "IONQ", "score": -1.5, "reasoning": "The research highlights challenges in noise and error mitigation for gate-based quantum computing, negatively affecting pure-play companies like IONQ focused on trapped-ion technology."}, {"ticker": "RGTI", "score": -1.5, "reasoning": "Findings on VQE ansatz selection difficulties for superconducting systems lead to negative sentiment for pure-play companies such as Rigetti."}, {"ticker": "QBTS", "score": -1.0, "reasoning": "Research is specific to gate-based VQE, not directly applicable to D-Wave's quantum annealing; slight negative sentiment due to overall quantum sector challenges."}, {"ticker": "QUBT", "score": -1.5, "reasoning": "As a pure-play neutral atom gate-based company, the research's emphasis on VQE challenges results in negative sentiment."}, {"ticker": "QNT", "score": -1.5, "reasoning": "Similar to IONQ, as a trapped-ion gate-based pure-play, negative sentiment from the research findings on noise and error mitigation."}, {"ticker": "IBM", "score": -0.1, "reasoning": "Relevant to IBM's superconducting quantum efforts, but the ~2% quantum revenue dilutes impact; negative sentiment from research challenges."}, {"ticker": "HON", "score": -0.2, "reasoning": "Honeywell's trapped-ion quantum business is relevant, but ~1% quantum revenue reduces impact; research difficulties lead to modest negative sentiment."}, {"ticker": "MSFT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, always 0.0"}, {"ticker": "GOOGL", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, always 0.0"}, {"ticker": "NVDA", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, always 0.0"}]}}
{"idx": 309, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-03", "title": "The Double Well Done Doubly-Well", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": 0.5, "RGTI": 0.5, "QBTS": 2.0, "QUBT": 0.5, "QNT": 0.5, "IBM": 0.15, "HON": 0.2, "MSFT": 0.0, "GOOGL": 0.0, "NVDA": 0.0}, "reasoning": "The paper on the double-well potential and resurgence theory is highly relevant to flux qubits used by D-Wave (QBTS) and IBM. QBTS, as a pure-play with direct technology alignment, scores +2.0. IBM, with partial flux qubit involvement, scores +0.15. Other pure-play companies (IONQ, RGTI, QUBT, QNT) receive +0.5 for general quantum research benefits. HON scores +0.2 for its quantum interests. Inactive companies (MSFT, GOOGL, NVDA) score 0.0."}}
{"idx": 310, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-03", "title": "Floquet-Engineered Parity Anomaly Staircase in a Cold Atom Dirac Lattice", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": 0.0, "RGTI": 0.0, "QBTS": 0.0, "QUBT": 2.0, "QNT": 0.0, "IBM": 0.1, "HON": 0.0, "MSFT": 0.0, "GOOGL": 0.0, "NVDA": 0.0}, "reasoning": "The research is specific to cold atom quantum simulation, directly benefiting QUBT (neutral atom) with a high positive score. IBM gains a modest positive due to general quantum research interest. Other companies have no significant relevance, resulting in neutral or inactive scores."}}
{"idx": 311, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-03", "title": "Experimentally probing the Quantum Physics in the Inverted Harmonic Oscillator", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": 1.0, "RGTI": 0.2, "QBTS": 0.2, "QUBT": 2.0, "QNT": 1.0, "IBM": 0.1, "HON": 0.3, "MSFT": 0.0, "GOOGL": 0.0, "NVDA": 0.0}, "reasoning": "QUBT receives +2.0 for direct relevance to neutral atom technology. IONQ and QNT get +1.0 for trapped-ion atomic physics relevance. HON scores +0.3 (capped) for similar reasons but lower revenue share. RGTI, IBM, and QBTS receive small positives (+0.2, +0.1, +0.2) for sector advancements. MSFT/GOOGL/NVDA are inactive (0.0)."}}
{"idx": 312, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-03", "title": "Programmable spectral symmetries in an anisotropic quantum Rabi simulator", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": [{"ticker": "IONQ", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not relevant, as the research is specific to superconducting technology, while IONQ uses trapped-ion."}, {"ticker": "RGTI", "score": 1.5, "reasoning": "Highly relevant, as Rigetti focuses on superconducting quantum processors, and this research demonstrates key advancements in programmability and control for such systems."}, {"ticker": "QBTS", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not directly relevant, as D-Wave's quantum annealing technology differs from the gate-based approach used in this research."}, {"ticker": "QNT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not relevant, as Quantinuum is trapped-ion based."}, {"ticker": "IBM", "score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Slightly relevant, as IBM works on superconducting quantum computing, but with a small quantum revenue share."}, {"ticker": "HON", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not relevant, as Honeywell is trapped-ion based with minimal quantum revenue focus."}, {"ticker": "MSFT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, always 0.0"}, {"ticker": "GOOGL", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, always 0.0"}, {"ticker": "NVDA", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, always 0.0"}]}}
{"idx": 313, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-03", "title": "High-fidelity neutral atom gates leveraging low-rank Hessian optimization", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Trapped-ion technology; benefits from broadly applicable calibration method for atomic qubits."}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.5, "reasoning": "Superconducting technology; broadly applicable method provides some benefit, but less direct than atomic qubits."}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Quantum annealing; not relevant as the method is for gate-based quantum computing."}, "QUBT": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Direct relevance as the pure-play neutral atom company; the paper shows a key advancement in neutral atom gate technology."}, "QNT": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Trapped-ion technology; benefits from broadly applicable calibration strategy."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Superconducting technology with minimal quantum revenue; minor positive impact from general advancement."}, "HON": {"score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Trapped-ion technology with small quantum revenue; positive impact from general method, but limited by quantum business size."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive company, no quantum revenue."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive company, no quantum revenue."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive company, no quantum revenue."}}}}
{"idx": 314, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-03", "title": "Measuring Entanglement in Qubit System", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": [{"ticker": "IONQ", "score": 1.5, "reasoning": "High relevance; trapped-ion technology directly aligns with Stern-Gerlach interferometer example."}, {"ticker": "RGTI", "score": 0.5, "reasoning": "Some relevance; entanglement measurement is generally useful but not specific to superconducting qubits."}, {"ticker": "QBTS", "score": 0.5, "reasoning": "Some relevance; quantum annealing benefits from entanglement verification techniques."}, {"ticker": "QUBT", "score": 1.5, "reasoning": "High relevance; neutral atom systems match the Stern-Gerlach interferometer example."}, {"ticker": "QNT", "score": 1.5, "reasoning": "High relevance; trapped-ion technology directly applies to the atomic interferometer example."}, {"ticker": "IBM", "score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Low relevance; entanglement measurement could be adopted but not specific to superconducting technology."}, {"ticker": "HON", "score": 0.3, "reasoning": "High relevance; trapped-ion focus matches the Stern-Gerlach example, but lower score due to narrower range."}, {"ticker": "MSFT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; no quantum revenue focus."}, {"ticker": "GOOGL", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; no quantum revenue focus."}, {"ticker": "NVDA", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; no quantum revenue focus."}]}}
{"idx": 315, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-03", "title": "Generalized Bicycle Codes as Cyclic Submodules and their Automorphism Structure", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": 1.5, "RGTI": 1.5, "QBTS": -1.0, "QUBT": 1.5, "QNT": 1.5, "IBM": 0.15, "HON": 0.2, "MSFT": 0.0, "GOOGL": 0.0, "NVDA": 0.0}, "reasoning": "The research on Generalized Bicycle Codes and their automorphisms focuses on advancing fault-tolerant gate-based quantum computing, which is highly relevant to gate-based hardware companies. Pure-play gate-based firms like IONQ (trapped-ion), RGTI (superconducting), QUBT (neutral atom), and QNT (trapped-ion) receive high positive scores (+1.5) as these developments directly enhance their quantum systems' error correction and scalability. IBM benefits positively (+0.15) due to its strong quantum software focus, particularly Qiskit, which leverages such codes for algorithmic improvements, despite its small quantum revenue share. Honeywell (HON) scores +0.2, reflecting its trapped-ion technology relevance but smaller quantum business scale. D-Wave (QBTS), being quantum annealing-based, scores -1.0 as the research is not directly applicable to annealing systems. Inactive companies (MSFT, GOOGL, NVDA) score 0.0."}}
{"idx": 316, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-03", "title": "Crossover from Rabi oscillations to adiabatic population switching in the Faraday optical control of quantum dot spins", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "The paper's emphasis on optical control techniques (e.g., stimulated Raman transitions) is directly applicable to IONQ's trapped-ion qubits, representing a significant positive development for their technology."}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "RGTI's superconducting qubits use microwave control, not optical methods, making the paper's content on quantum dot spins and Faraday geometry irrelevant."}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "QBTS (D-Wave) focuses on quantum annealing with flux qubits, which do not involve optical control or the described spin dynamics, resulting in no relevance."}, "QUBT": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "QUBT's neutral atom qubits rely on optical control, so the paper's findings on Raman transitions and spin dynamics are highly relevant and positive for their approach."}, "QNT": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "As a trapped-ion company like IONQ, QNT benefits directly from advances in optical control methods described in the paper."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "IBM's superconducting qubits are not aligned with optical control, but their spin qubit research (e.g., in silicon) could gain from the paper's insights on spin dynamics, warranting a low positive score due to their small quantum revenue share."}, "HON": {"score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Honeywell's trapped-ion technology uses optical control, making the paper's techniques highly relevant; the score is capped at +0.3 due to their ~1% quantum revenue."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "MSFT has no quantum revenue and is inactive in the quantum computing universe."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "GOOGL has no quantum revenue and is inactive in the quantum computing universe."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "NVDA has no quantum revenue and is inactive in the quantum computing universe."}}}}
{"idx": 317, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-03", "title": "Measurement-induced state transitions in multi-qubit transmon processors", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Trapped-ion technology, not related to transmon qubit research."}, "RGTI": {"score": 1.8, "reasoning": "Directly relevant to Rigetti's transmon-based processors; research on MIST can improve readout fidelity."}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "D-Wave's quantum annealing technology differs from transmon qubits."}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Neutral atom technology, not applicable to transmon-specific issues."}, "QNT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Trapped-ion technology, not relevant."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Relevant to IBM's transmon-based quantum systems; addresses readout challenges."}, "HON": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Trapped-ion technology, unaffected by transmon MIST effects."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not a quantum hardware company."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not a quantum hardware company."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Focused on AI, not quantum computing."}}}}
{"idx": 318, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-03", "title": "A thorium-229 optical nuclear clock with feedback loop", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": 2.0, "RGTI": 0.0, "QBTS": 0.0, "QUBT": 1.0, "QNT": 2.0, "IBM": 0.0, "HON": 0.3, "MSFT": 0.0, "GOOGL": 0.0, "NVDA": 0.0}, "reasoning": "The thorium-229 nuclear clock breakthrough leverages trapped-ion technology, directly benefiting IONQ and QNT (max +2.0 each) and HON (+0.3). QUBT gains moderate relevance (+1.0) from shared optical methods. Other companies have minimal connection (0.0)."}}
{"idx": 319, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-03", "title": "An Entanglement Measure from Quantum Optimal Transport", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Incremental entanglement research is relevant to pure-play quantum companies like IONQ (trapped-ion)."}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Relevant to Rigetti (superconducting), a pure-play quantum company."}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "D-Wave's quantum annealing is less directly related to bipartite entanglement measures."}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Neutral atom pure-play Quantum Computing Inc. benefits from general entanglement advancements."}, "QNT": {"score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Quantinuum (trapped-ion) as a pure-play gains from core quantum theory progress."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Incremental research has minor impact due to IBM's low ~2% quantum revenue share."}, "HON": {"score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Honeywell's minimal quantum revenue post-spinoff limits impact, but research is relevant historically."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No quantum computing focus; always 0.0."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No quantum computing focus; always 0.0."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No quantum computing focus; always 0.0."}}}}
{"idx": 320, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-03", "title": "Convergence rates of Sum-of-Hermitian-Squares Hierarchies for the Pauli algebra", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.2, "reasoning": "Advancement in quantum optimization theory benefits trapped-ion quantum computing."}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.2, "reasoning": "Positive for superconducting quantum computing research and algorithm development."}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Less direct relevance to quantum annealing, but contributes to quantum optimization field."}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.2, "reasoning": "Benefits neutral atom quantum computing through improved optimization techniques."}, "QNT": {"score": 0.2, "reasoning": "Relevant to trapped-ion quantum computing and ground state energy applications."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Positive for IBM's quantum algorithm research, though impact is small due to low quantum revenue share."}, "HON": {"score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Slightly positive impact on Honeywell's quantum efforts, with low revenue exposure."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, no quantum computing focus."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, no direct quantum computing business."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, no quantum computing involvement."}}}}
{"idx": 321, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-03", "title": "Tunable Resonator Integrated Magnetometry", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not related; IONQ focuses on trapped-ion technology, while the news is about superconducting-based magnetometry."}, "RGTI": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Directly related; Rigetti uses superconducting qubits, and this innovation advances superconducting quantum sensing, which is core to their technology."}, "QBTS": {"score": 1.5, "reasoning": "Relevant; D-Wave uses superconducting qubits for annealing, and this magnetometry application shares underlying technology, though not directly core to their annealing focus."}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not related; Quantum Computing Inc. focuses on neutral atom technology, unrelated to superconducting magnetometry."}, "QNT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not related; Quantinuum uses trapped-ion technology, while the news is about superconducting."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Slightly related; IBM has a superconducting quantum business, but quantum is a small part of their revenue, limiting impact."}, "HON": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not related; Honeywell focuses on trapped-ion quantum technology, not superconducting."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; always 0.0 per definition."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; always 0.0 per definition."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; always 0.0 per definition."}}}}
{"idx": 322, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-03", "title": "Photoelectron spectroscopy with a resonant dichromatic field: Role of geometric phase", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": [{"ticker": "IONQ", "score": 2.0, "reasoning": "High relevance due to trapped-ion technology using laser control, directly aligning with geometric phase techniques in the research."}, {"ticker": "RGTI", "score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Superconducting qubits can benefit from coherent control principles like geometric phase manipulation and Autler-Townes splitting, though microwave-based."}, {"ticker": "QBTS", "score": 0.5, "reasoning": "Quantum annealing involves different dynamics; Rabi dynamics and two-level system control are less directly applicable."}, {"ticker": "QUBT", "score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Neutral atom qubits use laser control, making geometric phase techniques highly relevant for qubit manipulation."}, {"ticker": "QNT", "score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Trapped-ion technology with laser control directly benefits from geometric phase control methods described."}, {"ticker": "IBM", "score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Superconducting qubits can apply control principles, but limited by ~2% quantum revenue share."}, {"ticker": "HON", "score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Trapped-ion with laser control is highly relevant, but ~1% quantum revenue constrains the score."}, {"ticker": "MSFT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; no quantum revenue."}, {"ticker": "GOOGL", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; no quantum revenue."}, {"ticker": "NVDA", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; no quantum revenue."}]}}
{"idx": 323, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-03", "title": "Comment on \"Possibility of superradiant neutrino emission by atomic condensate\" by M. Blasone, L. Gastaldo and F. Romeo, Phys. Rev. D 113, 053010 (2026)", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": [{"ticker": "IONQ", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Trapped-ion technology not directly related to atomic condensates or neutrino emission."}, {"ticker": "RGTI", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Superconducting-based; no relevance to atomic condensate research."}, {"ticker": "QBTS", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Quantum annealing approach unrelated to atomic condensates or neutrino emission."}, {"ticker": "QUBT", "score": -1.0, "reasoning": "Neutral atom quantum computing directly involves atomic condensates; the negative finding of impossible superradiant neutrino emission may reduce potential quantum simulation applications or hype."}, {"ticker": "QNT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Trapped-ion technology; not directly relevant to neutral atom condensates."}, {"ticker": "IBM", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Superconducting-based with minor quantum revenue; no specific impact from this research."}, {"ticker": "HON", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Trapped-ion quantum business with low quantum revenue; minimal relevance to atomic condensate topic."}, {"ticker": "MSFT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; always 0.0 per specification."}, {"ticker": "GOOGL", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; always 0.0 per specification."}, {"ticker": "NVDA", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; always 0.0 per specification."}]}}
{"idx": 324, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-03", "title": "Quantification of Entanglement in Three-Qubit Systems", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "High relevance due to trapped-ion technology and focus on quantum hardware where entanglement is critical."}, "RGTI": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "High relevance for superconducting qubits and entanglement research in quantum computing."}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.5, "reasoning": "Lower relevance; quantum annealing focuses on optimization, not pure state entanglement quantification."}, "QUBT": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "High relevance for neutral atom quantum computing, which relies on entanglement."}, "QNT": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "High relevance as a trapped-ion pure-play with entanglement capabilities."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Minor positive impact; small quantum revenue share limits influence."}, "HON": {"score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Positive impact with trapped-ion background, but small quantum revenue constrains score."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not a quantum computing company; no relevance."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not a quantum computing company; no relevance."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not a quantum computing company; no relevance."}}}}
{"idx": 325, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-03", "title": "QPredSGG: Hybrid Quantum Predicate Learning for Long-Tailed Scene Graph Generation", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": [{"ticker": "IONQ", "score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Highly relevant; trapped-ion hardware supports gate-based quantum applications in AI, validated by the research."}, {"ticker": "RGTI", "score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Highly relevant; superconducting hardware is applicable to the quantum methods described, boosting pure-play value."}, {"ticker": "QBTS", "score": 0.5, "reasoning": "Less relevant; quantum annealing differs from gate-based focus, but general quantum advancement has mild positive impact."}, {"ticker": "QUBT", "score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Highly relevant; neutral atom hardware enables gate-based quantum computing for AI tasks like predicate learning."}, {"ticker": "QNT", "score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Highly relevant; trapped-ion hardware aligns with the quantum techniques evaluated, supporting pure-play growth."}, {"ticker": "IBM", "score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Positive impact; quantum division benefits from AI advancements, but capped due to ~2% quantum revenue share."}, {"ticker": "HON", "score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Positive impact; trapped-ion hardware is applicable, with upside for quantum unit post-Quantinuum spinoff, capped at max."}, {"ticker": "MSFT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; no quantum focus, always 0.0."}, {"ticker": "GOOGL", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; no quantum focus, always 0.0."}, {"ticker": "NVDA", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; no quantum focus, always 0.0."}]}}
{"idx": 326, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-03", "title": "Digital Quantum Reservoir Computing for ATM Time Series Prediction", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.4, "reasoning": "Trapped-ion pure-play; relevant as digital QRC could apply to trapped-ion, but demonstration was on superconducting hardware, so moderate positive."}, "RGTI": {"score": 1.5, "reasoning": "Superconducting pure-play; high relevance due to real experiment on superconducting processor (IQM Spark), showing practical progress."}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Quantum annealing; not relevant as paper focuses on digital quantum computing, not annealing."}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Neutral atom pure-play; relevant as neutral atom can support digital QRC, but not directly demonstrated."}, "QNT": {"score": 0.4, "reasoning": "Trapped-ion pure-play; similar relevance to IONQ for potential application."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Superconducting with ~2% quantum revenue; relevant due to superconducting demonstration, but smaller impact from diversified business."}, "HON": {"score": 0.2, "reasoning": "Trapped-ion with ~1% quantum revenue; relevant but lower impact due to smaller quantum focus post-spinoff."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; always 0.0 per definition."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; always 0.0 per definition."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; always 0.0 per definition."}}}}
{"idx": 327, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-03", "title": "Hybrid quantum-classical physics-informed neural networks for solving nonlinear PDEs: when and where hybridization is effective?", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": [{"ticker": "IONQ", "score": 2.0}, {"ticker": "RGTI", "score": 2.0}, {"ticker": "QBTS", "score": 0.5}, {"ticker": "QUBT", "score": 1.5}, {"ticker": "QNT", "score": 2.0}, {"ticker": "IBM", "score": 0.15}, {"ticker": "HON", "score": 0.2}, {"ticker": "MSFT", "score": 0.0}, {"ticker": "GOOGL", "score": 0.0}, {"ticker": "NVDA", "score": 0.0}], "reasoning": "The paper's focus on hybrid quantum-classical methods with PQC enhances gate-based quantum companies (trapped-ion: IONQ, QNT; superconducting: RGTI; neutral atom: QUBT) with high scores. IBM gains from hybrid strengths but is capped. QBTS (annealing) is less relevant. HON has trapped-ion but low quantum focus. Inactive firms score zero."}}
{"idx": 328, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-03", "title": "Electron-Ion Path Integral Monte Carlo with Hard Core", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 1.8, "reasoning": "Direct relevance to trapped-ion technology mentioned in the abstract"}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Superconducting technology not related to ion-based research"}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Quantum annealing not applicable to plasma simulation"}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Neutral atom technology unrelated to the study"}, "QNT": {"score": 1.8, "reasoning": "Direct relevance to trapped-ion technology as per abstract"}, "IBM": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Classical simulation method; minimal impact on quantum hardware focus"}, "HON": {"score": 0.2, "reasoning": "Trapped-ion technology but lower revenue focus restricts score"}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive company, always 0.0"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive company, always 0.0"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive company, always 0.0"}}}}
{"idx": 329, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-03", "title": "Circuit-Level Noise Estimation via Shuttling in Plaquette Circuits", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Directly involved in hardware compilation for ion-trap systems."}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.5, "reasoning": "Superconducting pure-play; general relevance to QEC advancements."}, "QBTS": {"score": -1.0, "reasoning": "Quantum annealing not relevant to gate-based QEC methods."}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Neutral atom pure-play; not mentioned in the research."}, "QNT": {"score": 0.5, "reasoning": "Trapped-ion pure-play; similar to IONQ but not directly involved."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Directly used in experiments on superconducting hardware."}, "HON": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Trapped-ion player; not mentioned and post-spinoff."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, always 0.0"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, always 0.0"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, always 0.0"}}}}
{"idx": 330, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-03", "title": "Extremely slow scaling of minimal Hamming distance in quantum sampling data", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 1.5, "reasoning": "Positive impact on trapped-ion systems; enhances characterization of pure-play quantum hardware."}, "RGTI": {"score": 1.5, "reasoning": "Positive impact on superconducting systems; benefits pure-play quantum revenue model."}, "QBTS": {"score": 1.5, "reasoning": "Positive impact on quantum annealing systems; applicable to D-Wave's hardware."}, "QUBT": {"score": 1.5, "reasoning": "Positive impact; specifically relevant due to mention of cold-atom simulators in the abstract."}, "QNT": {"score": 1.5, "reasoning": "Positive impact on trapped-ion systems; enhances characterization for pure-play firm."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Modest positive impact; benefits quantum research but limited by small quantum revenue portion."}, "HON": {"score": 0.25, "reasoning": "Moderate positive impact; applicable to trapped-ion systems, but capped by low quantum revenue share."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; always 0.0"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; always 0.0"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; always 0.0"}}}}
{"idx": 331, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-03", "title": "Probing PbTe-Pb nanowire devices with radio-frequency reflectometry", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": [{"ticker": "IONQ", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct relevance; trapped-ion technology uses optical readout, not rf reflectometry."}, {"ticker": "RGTI", "score": 0.5, "reasoning": "Positive; rf techniques are core to superconducting qubits, and this research may enhance measurement capabilities."}, {"ticker": "QBTS", "score": 0.5, "reasoning": "Positive; quantum annealing systems use rf for control/readout, so advancements in rf techniques are beneficial."}, {"ticker": "QUBT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No relevance; neutral atom qubits rely on optical methods, not rf."}, {"ticker": "QNT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No relevance; trapped-ion technology does not utilize rf reflectometry for primary readout."}, {"ticker": "IBM", "score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Positive; IBM has research in topological quantum computing and superconducting qubits, where rf techniques are applicable."}, {"ticker": "HON", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Neutral; trapped-ion approach does not depend on rf reflectometry."}, {"ticker": "MSFT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, always 0.0 per rules."}, {"ticker": "GOOGL", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, always 0.0 per rules."}, {"ticker": "NVDA", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, always 0.0 per rules."}]}}
{"idx": 332, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-03", "title": "Arbitrary manipulation of nuclear spins in hexagonal boron nitride", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": [{"ticker": "IONQ", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not relevant; IONQ focuses on trapped-ion technology, unrelated to hBN spin qubits."}, {"ticker": "RGTI", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not relevant; Rigetti specializes in superconducting qubits, not spin qubits in hBN."}, {"ticker": "QBTS", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not relevant; D-Wave's quantum annealing technology differs from hBN-based spin manipulation."}, {"ticker": "QUBT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not relevant; Quantum Computing Inc. uses neutral atom qubits, not solid-state hBN systems."}, {"ticker": "QNT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not relevant; Quantinuum focuses on trapped-ion technology, unrelated to hBN."}, {"ticker": "IBM", "score": 0.15, "reasoning": "High relevance; IBM has active spin qubit research, including defect-based systems like NV centers in diamond, aligning with this hBN advancement."}, {"ticker": "HON", "score": 0.05, "reasoning": "Small positive; Honeywell's quantum revenue is low, but the research reflects general industry progress."}, {"ticker": "MSFT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; always 0.0 per specification."}, {"ticker": "GOOGL", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; always 0.0 per specification."}, {"ticker": "NVDA", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; always 0.0 per specification."}]}}
{"idx": 333, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-03", "title": "Anisotropic Rabi Model as a Noise Biased Qubit", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": [{"ticker": "IONQ", "score": 2.0, "reasoning": "High relevance due to trapped-ion technology; the anisotropic Rabi model directly improves coherence and gate operations for IONQ's pure-play quantum business."}, {"ticker": "RGTI", "score": 2.0, "reasoning": "High relevance for Rigetti's superconducting qubits; the model enhances quantum performance in ultrastrong coupling regimes, benefiting its pure-play focus."}, {"ticker": "QBTS", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Low relevance; D-Wave's quantum annealing approach does not align with gate-based operations or the Rabi model, resulting in minimal impact."}, {"ticker": "QUBT", "score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Medium relevance; neutral atom qubits can apply the model for improved coherence, but it is less directly tied than trapped-ion or superconducting systems."}, {"ticker": "QNT", "score": 2.0, "reasoning": "High relevance for trapped-ion technology; Quantinuum's pure-play quantum business benefits from enhanced logical qubit protection and gate robustness."}, {"ticker": "IBM", "score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Relevant for superconducting qubits, but capped at maximum positive due to quantum being a small part (~2%) of its business."}, {"ticker": "HON", "score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Relevant for trapped-ion qubits, but capped at maximum positive due to quantum being a small part (~1%) post-spinoff."}, {"ticker": "MSFT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No quantum hardware involvement; always scored 0.0."}, {"ticker": "GOOGL", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No quantum hardware involvement; always scored 0.0."}, {"ticker": "NVDA", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No quantum hardware involvement; always scored 0.0."}]}}
{"idx": 334, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-03", "title": "Multi-entropy in random tensor networks", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": 0.0, "RGTI": 0.0, "QBTS": 0.0, "QUBT": 0.0, "QNT": 0.0, "IBM": 0.1, "HON": 0.0, "MSFT": 0.0, "GOOGL": 0.0, "NVDA": 0.0}, "reasoning": "The research is a theoretical advancement in quantum information theory, providing insights into multipartite entanglement via random tensor networks. It does not directly impact the near-term business or technology of any specific company. IBM receives a slight positive score due to its software focus (e.g., Qiskit) leveraging tensor networks. Other companies are unaffected, scoring neutral."}}
{"idx": 335, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-03", "title": "Atom Interferometry with Transverse Optical Modes", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": [{"ticker": "IONQ", "score": 0.5, "reasoning": "Trapped-ion company; atom interferometry has some relevance to quantum sensing but not core to quantum computing."}, {"ticker": "RGTI", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Superconducting company; no direct relevance to atom interferometry."}, {"ticker": "QBTS", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Quantum annealing company; unrelated to this research."}, {"ticker": "QUBT", "score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play neutral atom company; research directly advances core technology and quantum sensing."}, {"ticker": "QNT", "score": 0.5, "reasoning": "Trapped-ion company; some relevance to atom interferometry techniques."}, {"ticker": "IBM", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Superconducting quantum division; not impacted by atom-based research."}, {"ticker": "HON", "score": 0.2, "reasoning": "Trapped-ion quantum business with minor relevance; small quantum revenue post-spinoff."}, {"ticker": "MSFT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; no quantum focus."}, {"ticker": "GOOGL", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; no quantum focus."}, {"ticker": "NVDA", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; no quantum focus."}]}}
{"idx": 336, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-03", "title": "Optimizing the Sensitivity-Noise Trade-off in Non-Hermitian Sensing via Off-Exceptional-Deficiency Operation", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": [{"ticker": "IONQ", "score": 1.0, "reasoning": "High relevance due to trapped-ion technology alignment with non-Hermitian sensing and quantum metrology advancements."}, {"ticker": "RGTI", "score": 1.0, "reasoning": "High relevance for superconducting systems, which can leverage non-Hermitian physics for improved sensing and control."}, {"ticker": "QBTS", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Low relevance; D-Wave focuses on quantum annealing for optimization, not directly related to sensing applications."}, {"ticker": "QUBT", "score": 1.0, "reasoning": "High relevance; neutral atom systems can benefit from non-Hermitian enhancements in quantum sensing."}, {"ticker": "QNT", "score": 1.0, "reasoning": "High relevance as a trapped-ion pure-play, with strong alignment for quantum sensing improvements."}, {"ticker": "IBM", "score": 0.12, "reasoning": "Moderate positive impact; IBM has quantum sensing initiatives, but limited by ~2% quantum revenue share."}, {"ticker": "HON", "score": 0.03, "reasoning": "Slight positive; trapped-ion technology has some relevance, but minimal impact due to ~1% quantum revenue post-spinoff."}, {"ticker": "MSFT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; not part of the quantum computing universe for scoring."}, {"ticker": "GOOGL", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; not part of the quantum computing universe for scoring."}, {"ticker": "NVDA", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; not part of the quantum computing universe for scoring."}]}}
{"idx": 337, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-03", "title": "Photon shot-noise-limited Rydberg-EIT electrometry", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Moderate relevance. IONQ focuses on trapped-ion quantum computing. While this research on Rydberg-EIT electrometry is not directly related to computing, it demonstrates advancements in quantum control and sensing that could indirectly benefit trapped-ion technologies."}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Low relevance. Rigetti uses superconducting qubits, which do not typically involve Rydberg atom techniques. The research has minimal direct impact on their core architecture."}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Low relevance. D-Wave specializes in quantum annealing, which is unrelated to Rydberg-EIT electrometry or atomic sensing."}, "QUBT": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "High relevance. Quantum Computing Inc. focuses on neutral atom technology, and this research directly demonstrates a key advancement in Rydberg atom-based electrometry using rubidium, which is core to their approach."}, "QNT": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Moderate relevance. Quantinuum uses trapped-ion technology. The research shows progress in quantum sensing, which could have indirect applications or cross-technology benefits for their ion-based systems."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Slight positive impact. IBM has a small quantum business with some sensing initiatives, but Rydberg-EIT is not their primary focus. The general quantum advancement provides minor relevance."}, "HON": {"score": 0.2, "reasoning": "Moderate positive impact. Honeywell has post-spinoff involvement in quantum sensing, and the trapped-ion context of this research aligns with their historical expertise, though it is not core to their current quantum revenue."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive. Microsoft is not a core player in quantum computing for this context and scores 0.0 by definition."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive. Alphabet (Google) has quantum efforts but is not a core player here and scores 0.0 by definition."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive. NVIDIA is not a core quantum computing company and scores 0.0 by definition."}}}}
{"idx": 338, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-03", "title": "Exclusive: Honeywell's Quantinuum raises $1.68 billion in US IPO as quantum computing heats up - Reuters", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": [{"ticker": "IONQ", "score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive sentiment from quantum sector heating up, benefiting trapped-ion peers. High novelty, moderate decay."}, {"ticker": "RGTI", "score": 0.8, "reasoning": "Positive sentiment from quantum sector heating up. High novelty, moderate decay."}, {"ticker": "QBTS", "score": 0.8, "reasoning": "Positive sentiment from quantum sector heating up. High novelty, moderate decay."}, {"ticker": "QUBT", "score": 0.8, "reasoning": "Positive sentiment from quantum sector heating up. High novelty, moderate decay."}, {"ticker": "QNT", "score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Direct positive impact from large IPO, validating company and technology. High novelty, moderate decay."}, {"ticker": "IBM", "score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Small benefit from increased interest in quantum computing. High novelty, moderate decay."}, {"ticker": "HON", "score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Minor positive from sector sentiment and association with Quantinuum, but low quantum exposure post-spinoff. High novelty, moderate decay."}, {"ticker": "MSFT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, no quantum exposure."}, {"ticker": "GOOGL", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, no quantum exposure."}, {"ticker": "NVDA", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, no quantum exposure."}]}}
{"idx": 339, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-03", "title": "Quantinuum Announces Closing of Upsized Initial Public Offering - Quantinuum", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": [{"ticker": "IONQ", "score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive sentiment from sector growth and shared trapped-ion technology; impact may decay moderately."}, {"ticker": "RGTI", "score": 0.5, "reasoning": "Positive sentiment from increased investor interest in quantum sector; different technology reduces direct impact; decay expected."}, {"ticker": "QBTS", "score": 0.5, "reasoning": "Positive sentiment from sector growth; different annealing technology limits impact; moderate decay."}, {"ticker": "QUBT", "score": 0.5, "reasoning": "Positive sentiment from quantum sector validation; different neutral atom technology; impact may decay."}, {"ticker": "QNT", "score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Direct positive impact from successful upsized IPO; highly novel and significant for the company; strong initial impact with moderate decay."}, {"ticker": "IBM", "score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Small positive sentiment from quantum sector growth; minimal quantum revenue exposure; low impact and quick decay."}, {"ticker": "HON", "score": 0.2, "reasoning": "Positive sentiment from trapped-ion alignment and sector validation; low quantum revenue exposure reduces impact; decay expected."}, {"ticker": "MSFT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No quantum revenue; no impact from quantum-specific news."}, {"ticker": "GOOGL", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No quantum revenue; no impact from quantum-specific news."}, {"ticker": "NVDA", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No quantum revenue; no impact from quantum-specific news."}]}}
{"idx": 340, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-03", "title": "Quantum computing stocks tumble ahead of Quantinuum IPO - Seeking Alpha", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": -1.5, "reasoning": "Negative due to sector-wide tumble; pure-play exposure."}, "RGTI": {"score": -1.5, "reasoning": "Negative due to sector-wide tumble; pure-play exposure."}, "QBTS": {"score": -1.5, "reasoning": "Negative due to sector-wide tumble; pure-play exposure."}, "QUBT": {"score": -1.5, "reasoning": "Negative due to sector-wide tumble; pure-play exposure."}, "QNT": {"score": -1.5, "reasoning": "Negative due to sector-wide tumble; direct subject of IPO news."}, "IBM": {"score": -0.1, "reasoning": "Slightly negative; quantum is a small part of business."}, "HON": {"score": -0.2, "reasoning": "Slightly negative; quantum is a small part of business."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; always 0.0"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; always 0.0"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; always 0.0"}}}}
{"idx": 341, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-03", "title": "Quantum computing stocks tumble ahead of Quantinuum IPO - MSN", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": -1.5, "reasoning": "Pure-play public company; negatively impacted by sector-wide tumble."}, "RGTI": {"score": -1.5, "reasoning": "Pure-play public company; negatively impacted by sector-wide tumble."}, "QBTS": {"score": -1.5, "reasoning": "Pure-play public company; negatively impacted by sector-wide tumble."}, "QUBT": {"score": -1.5, "reasoning": "Pure-play public company; negatively impacted by sector-wide tumble."}, "QNT": {"score": -1.5, "reasoning": "Pure-play; upcoming IPO is focal point of negative sector sentiment."}, "IBM": {"score": -0.1, "reasoning": "Hybrid company (~2% quantum revenue); muted negative impact."}, "HON": {"score": -0.2, "reasoning": "Hybrid company (~1% quantum revenue post-spinoff); slightly stronger negative impact due to spinoff context."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; always 0.0"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; always 0.0"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; always 0.0"}}}}
{"idx": 342, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-04", "title": "Coherent room-temperature dipole synchronization in nanocavity sheets", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": [{"ticker": "IONQ", "score": 2.0, "reasoning": "High relevance due to trapped-ion architecture utilizing cavity QED; room-temperature synchronization could enhance coherence and scalability."}, {"ticker": "RGTI", "score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Moderate relevance; superconducting qubits use cavity QED, but room-temperature operation is not typical for current systems."}, {"ticker": "QBTS", "score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Similar to RGTI; quantum annealing (superconducting-based) may benefit from cavity effects, but cryogenic requirements limit direct impact."}, {"ticker": "QUBT", "score": 2.0, "reasoning": "High relevance; neutral atom quantum computing can leverage cavity-enhanced dipole interactions for improved spatial coherence."}, {"ticker": "QNT", "score": 2.0, "reasoning": "High relevance; trapped-ion technology benefits from cavity QED advancements, especially with room-temperature potential."}, {"ticker": "IBM", "score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Minor positive impact; broad quantum research may incorporate this, but limited by low quantum revenue share (~2%)."}, {"ticker": "HON", "score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Positive impact; trapped-ion focus with cavity applications, but lower quantum revenue share (~1%) caps score."}, {"ticker": "MSFT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive in quantum computing; always 0.0 per specification."}, {"ticker": "GOOGL", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive in quantum computing; always 0.0 per specification."}, {"ticker": "NVDA", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive in quantum computing; always 0.0 per specification."}]}}
{"idx": 343, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-04", "title": "Enhancement of charge correlations and real-space topological marker on an interacting non-Hermitian Su-Schrieffer-Heeger model", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "The paper focuses on topological phases, which are not a primary focus for IONQ's trapped-ion architecture."}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Rigetti's superconducting qubits are not directly related to the topological aspects discussed; no significant impact."}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "D-Wave's quantum annealing technology is less relevant to the theoretical SSH model and topological markers."}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Quantum Computing Inc.'s neutral atom approach does not align closely with the paper's focus on topological phases."}, "QNT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Quantinuum's trapped-ion system is not primarily concerned with topological quantum computing; neutral impact."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Relevant to IBM's topological quantum computing research, as the paper advances understanding of topological robustness and phase transitions."}, "HON": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Honeywell's post-spinoff quantum focus on trapped-ion is not centered on topological phases; no direct relevance."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; always 0.0."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; always 0.0."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; always 0.0."}}}}
{"idx": 344, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-04", "title": "Quantum element-wise transforms", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": [{"ticker": "IONQ", "score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play trapped-ion company; the research on quantum element-wise transforms is highly relevant to gate-based quantum computing, which trapped-ion systems excel at, leading to a strong positive impact."}, {"ticker": "RGTI", "score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play superconducting company; advancements in quantum algorithms directly enhance their gate-based systems, improving efficiency for applications like simulation and machine learning."}, {"ticker": "QBTS", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Quantum annealing company; the research focuses on gate-based quantum computing, which is not applicable to D-Wave's annealing technology, resulting in no impact."}, {"ticker": "QUBT", "score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play neutral atom company; neutral atom technology is gate-based and can leverage the new algorithms for better performance in linear algebra tasks, providing a strong positive impact."}, {"ticker": "QNT", "score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play trapped-ion company; similar to IONQ, the research is highly relevant for their trapped-ion systems, enhancing competitive positioning."}, {"ticker": "IBM", "score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Diversified company with ~2% quantum revenue from superconducting technology; the research is relevant but impact is limited due to small quantum revenue share."}, {"ticker": "HON", "score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Company with ~1% quantum revenue from trapped-ion technology post-spinoff; the research is relevant for their quantum division but impact is capped due to low quantum focus."}, {"ticker": "MSFT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive in quantum computing for this context; always 0.0."}, {"ticker": "GOOGL", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive in quantum computing for this context; always 0.0."}, {"ticker": "NVDA", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive in quantum computing for this context; always 0.0."}]}}
{"idx": 345, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-04", "title": "Breakeven demonstration of quantum low-density parity-check codes", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Positive impact; the demonstration on a trapped-ion quantum computer highlights the technology's strength, benefiting IONQ as a pure-play trapped-ion company."}, "RGTI": {"score": -2.0, "reasoning": "Negative impact; the comparison shows superconducting qubits underperforming in qLDPC code demonstration, hurting Rigetti as a pure-play superconducting company."}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct relevance; D-Wave focuses on quantum annealing, not gate-based error correction like qLDPC codes demonstrated here."}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No impact; neutral atom technology not mentioned or relevant to this trapped-ion specific demonstration."}, "QNT": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Positive impact; as a trapped-ion company, Quantinuum benefits from the successful demonstration and performance improvements."}, "IBM": {"score": -0.15, "reasoning": "Negative impact; as a superconducting company, the inferior performance in comparison affects IBM's quantum efforts."}, "HON": {"score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Positive impact; Honeywell produces trapped-ion systems, benefiting from the demonstration, though quantum revenue is a small portion."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; no quantum computing relevance in this context."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; no quantum computing relevance in this context."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; no quantum computing relevance in this context."}}}}
{"idx": 346, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-04", "title": "Energy-Modulated Time-Asymmetric Spontaneous Collapse: Forward-Backward Dynamics from Stochastic Ito Reversal and Bright Solitons", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": [{"ticker": "IONQ", "score": 1.5, "reasoning": "Relevant due to trapped-ion technology's connection to atomic physics and quantum many-body dynamics, though less direct than neutral atom systems."}, {"ticker": "RGTI", "score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Indirect relevance; superconducting qubits may benefit from the theoretical framework in quantum dynamics, but the BEC focus is not directly applicable."}, {"ticker": "QBTS", "score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Similar to RGTI; quantum annealing (superconducting-based) has indirect benefits from the theory, but the BEC example is not a direct fit."}, {"ticker": "QUBT", "score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Highly relevant; the paper's focus on BEC of Li-7 atoms directly aligns with neutral atom quantum computing, core to QUBT's technology."}, {"ticker": "QNT", "score": 1.5, "reasoning": "Relevant due to trapped-ion technology's atomic physics basis, sharing similarities with BEC dynamics, though not identical."}, {"ticker": "IBM", "score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Limited relevance; IBM's small quantum focus may see indirect benefits from the theory, but its broader business reduces impact."}, {"ticker": "HON", "score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Relevant as a trapped-ion player, but non-pure-play status and smaller quantum revenue cap the score at the maximum for HON."}, {"ticker": "MSFT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No quantum computing relevance; always inactive."}, {"ticker": "GOOGL", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No quantum computing relevance; always inactive."}, {"ticker": "NVDA", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No quantum computing relevance; always inactive."}]}}
{"idx": 347, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-04", "title": "Resource Letter QIE-1: Research in quantum information education", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": [{"ticker": "IONQ", "score": 1.8}, {"ticker": "RGTI", "score": 1.8}, {"ticker": "QBTS", "score": 1.8}, {"ticker": "QUBT", "score": 1.8}, {"ticker": "QNT", "score": 1.8}, {"ticker": "IBM", "score": 0.15}, {"ticker": "HON", "score": 0.3}, {"ticker": "MSFT", "score": 0.0}, {"ticker": "GOOGL", "score": 0.0}, {"ticker": "NVDA", "score": 0.0}], "reasoning": "The resource letter on quantum information education promotes sector-wide growth by enhancing educational resources and research, which is expected to increase market adoption, talent development, and innovation in quantum technologies. Pure-play quantum companies (IONQ, RGTI, QBTS, QUBT, QNT) with 100% quantum revenue receive a high positive score of +1.8 due to their direct exposure and potential to benefit from increased demand. IBM and Honeywell, with smaller quantum divisions, receive their maximum positive scores (+0.15 and +0.3 respectively) as they are part of the ecosystem but have broader business interests. Microsoft, Google, and NVIDIA are inactive in quantum and score 0.0 as per the specification."}}
{"idx": 348, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-04", "title": "Nanostructure modelling with early fault tolerant quantum computers", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": [{"ticker": "IONQ", "score": 0.5, "reasoning": "General positive impact as the article highlights fault-tolerant quantum simulation, relevant to trapped-ion technology."}, {"ticker": "RGTI", "score": 0.5, "reasoning": "Indirect positive impact due to relevance of surface code error correction to superconducting architectures."}, {"ticker": "QBTS", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No relevance, as quantum annealing is not used for the gate-based simulation described."}, {"ticker": "QUBT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Neutral atom technology not specifically addressed; no direct impact."}, {"ticker": "QNT", "score": 0.5, "reasoning": "General positive impact for trapped-ion companies in fault-tolerant quantum simulation applications."}, {"ticker": "IBM", "score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Direct positive impact from surface code reference, a key IBM technology."}, {"ticker": "HON", "score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Indirect positive impact through Quantinuum spinoff, but low quantum revenue limits score."}, {"ticker": "MSFT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, no relevance."}, {"ticker": "GOOGL", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, no relevance."}, {"ticker": "NVDA", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, no relevance."}]}}
{"idx": 349, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-04", "title": "Quantum Thermal Logic Gates", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Research focuses on quantum dots, not directly relevant to trapped-ion technology."}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Research on quantum dots does not directly apply to Rigetti's superconducting qubits."}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Quantum annealing (D-Wave) is not aligned with the logic gate focus of the research."}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Neutral atom technology is not directly related to the quantum-dot approach."}, "QNT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Trapped-ion technology (Quantinuum) is not the primary focus of the research."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Relevance to IBM's quantum dot research and nano-electronic expertise; positive for their diversified quantum portfolio."}, "HON": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Trapped-ion technology (Honeywell) is not directly enhanced by this quantum-dot research."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive company, always scores 0.0."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive company, always scores 0.0."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive company, always scores 0.0."}}}}
{"idx": 350, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-04", "title": "Nonreversible Gauge Fields in Fokker--Planck Dynamics: Supersymmetric Hamiltonians and Learned Finite Forces", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": [{"ticker": "IONQ", "score": 1.8, "reasoning": "Trapped-ion technology benefits from nonreversible dynamics for improved qubit control and faster relaxation in gate-based quantum computing."}, {"ticker": "RGTI", "score": 1.8, "reasoning": "Superconducting qubits leverage the theory for enhanced stochastic control, coherence, and error correction in quantum algorithms."}, {"ticker": "QBTS", "score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Direct relevance to quantum annealing through benchmarks like double-well and Ornstein-Uhlenbeck; nonreversible perturbations optimize annealing efficiency."}, {"ticker": "QUBT", "score": 1.5, "reasoning": "Neutral atom technology is relevant for general quantum computing advancements but is less mature compared to other approaches."}, {"ticker": "QNT", "score": 1.8, "reasoning": "Trapped-ion systems benefit similarly to IONQ from improved dynamics for control and efficiency."}, {"ticker": "IBM", "score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Theoretical advances apply to quantum control and machine learning (e.g., VQAs), but limited by low quantum revenue share."}, {"ticker": "HON", "score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Trapped-ion technology gains from nonreversible dynamics, but small quantum revenue constrains impact."}, {"ticker": "MSFT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, always 0.0"}, {"ticker": "GOOGL", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, always 0.0"}, {"ticker": "NVDA", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, always 0.0"}]}}
{"idx": 351, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-04", "title": "Robustness of Entanglement Manipulation for almost i.i.d. sources", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": [{"ticker": "IONQ", "score": 1.8, "reasoning": "High relevance for trapped-ion gate-based quantum computing; entanglement research directly enhances core operations."}, {"ticker": "RGTI", "score": 1.8, "reasoning": "High relevance for superconducting gate-based quantum computing; entanglement robustness improves algorithm reliability."}, {"ticker": "QBTS", "score": 0.5, "reasoning": "Lower relevance as quantum annealing (D-Wave) does not primarily rely on entanglement concentration protocols."}, {"ticker": "QUBT", "score": 1.8, "reasoning": "High relevance for neutral atom gate-based quantum computing; entanglement advancements support quantum processing."}, {"ticker": "QNT", "score": 1.8, "reasoning": "High relevance for trapped-ion gate-based quantum computing; entanglement research strengthens quantum capabilities."}, {"ticker": "IBM", "score": 0.12, "reasoning": "Moderate relevance for superconducting quantum division, but impact diluted by ~2% quantum revenue share."}, {"ticker": "HON", "score": 0.24, "reasoning": "Moderate relevance for trapped-ion quantum business, but impact limited to ~1% quantum revenue post-spinoff."}, {"ticker": "MSFT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; no quantum focus per definition."}, {"ticker": "GOOGL", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; no quantum focus per definition."}, {"ticker": "NVDA", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; no quantum focus per definition."}]}}
{"idx": 352, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-04", "title": "A framework for low-overhead quantum fault tolerance via spacetime lifting", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Significant advancement in fault tolerance directly benefits trapped-ion pure-play."}, "RGTI": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Advancement in fault tolerance benefits superconducting pure-play."}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.5, "reasoning": "Quantum annealing less directly impacted by fault tolerance advancements; modest industry-positive sentiment."}, "QUBT": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Neutral atom pure-play benefits from fault tolerance progress."}, "QNT": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Trapped-ion pure-play benefits significantly from low-overhead fault tolerance advancements."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Positive for IBM Quantum division, but only ~2% quantum revenue."}, "HON": {"score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Positive for Honeywell quantum efforts, but only ~1% quantum revenue post-Quantinuum spinoff."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; no quantum revenue focus per problem constraints."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; no quantum revenue focus per problem constraints."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; no quantum revenue focus per problem constraints."}}}}
{"idx": 353, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-04", "title": "A closed system setting for quantum thermalisation in free fermions", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "High relevance; trapped-ion technology directly applicable to simulating the studied spin chain models for quantum dynamics and thermalisation."}, "RGTI": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "High relevance; superconducting qubits are commonly used for spin chain simulations, and the research enhances understanding of quantum thermalisation."}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.5, "reasoning": "Lower relevance; quantum annealing (D-Wave) differs from the unitary evolution focus of the paper, though thermal aspects may have indirect applicability."}, "QUBT": {"score": 1.5, "reasoning": "Good relevance; neutral atom technology is effective for spin chain simulations and benefits from insights into thermal dynamics."}, "QNT": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "High relevance; trapped-ion technology aligns with the models studied, advancing quantum simulation and thermalisation research."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Relevant for superconducting quantum thermal dynamics, but limited by ~2% quantum revenue share."}, "HON": {"score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Relevant for trapped-ion quantum technology, but impact constrained by ~1% quantum revenue post-spinoff."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No quantum hardware focus; always inactive."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct quantum hardware; quantum efforts (e.g., through X) not core to business; always inactive."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "GPU supplier for quantum computing, not quantum hardware; always inactive."}}}}
{"idx": 354, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-04", "title": "Benchmarking Floquet Master Equations for Periodically Driven Open Quantum Systems", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": 2.0, "RGTI": 2.0, "QBTS": 0.5, "QUBT": 2.0, "QNT": 2.0, "IBM": 0.15, "HON": 0.3, "MSFT": 0.0, "GOOGL": 0.0, "NVDA": 0.0}, "reasoning": "The research on Floquet master equations is highly relevant to gate-based quantum computing. IONQ, RGTI, QUBT, and QNT (pure-play, gate-based) score +2.0. IBM (superconducting, ~2% quantum revenue) and HON (trapped-ion, ~1% quantum revenue) score +0.15 and +0.3, respectively, due to revenue caps. QBTS (quantum annealing) is less relevant (+0.5) as it does not use driven spin models. MSFT, GOOGL, and NVDA are inactive (0.0)."}}
{"idx": 355, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-04", "title": "Reliability of asymptotic work extraction", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": [{"ticker": "IONQ", "score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play trapped-ion company; fundamental quantum thermodynamics research directly enhances IONQ's technology and industry relevance."}, {"ticker": "RGTI", "score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play superconducting company; advancements in quantum work extraction principles are highly relevant to Rigetti's core business."}, {"ticker": "QBTS", "score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play quantum annealing company; D-Wave's systems are subject to quantum thermodynamics, benefiting from this theoretical progress."}, {"ticker": "QUBT", "score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play neutral atom company; research in quantum thermodynamics supports Quantum Computing Inc.'s technology development."}, {"ticker": "QNT", "score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play trapped-ion company; Quantinuum's focus aligns with the paper's insights into quantum work extraction reliability."}, {"ticker": "IBM", "score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Superconducting company with ~2% quantum revenue; research is relevant but has limited impact due to small quantum share."}, {"ticker": "HON", "score": 0.2, "reasoning": "Trapped-ion company with ~1% quantum revenue; Honeywell's quantum division benefits moderately from this fundamental advance."}, {"ticker": "MSFT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; no quantum revenue focus, always 0.0."}, {"ticker": "GOOGL", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; no quantum revenue focus, always 0.0."}, {"ticker": "NVDA", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; no quantum revenue focus, always 0.0."}]}}
{"idx": 356, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-04", "title": "Quantum enhanced rare event discovery and sampling", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "High relevance as a pure-play trapped-ion quantum company; the research on quantum enhanced rare-event sampling is directly applicable and significant."}, "RGTI": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "High relevance as a pure-play superconducting quantum company; the research is directly applicable and beneficial."}, "QBTS": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Lower relevance as D-Wave's quantum annealing technology is less suited for general rare-event sampling compared to gate-based approaches."}, "QUBT": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "High relevance as a pure-play neutral atom quantum company; the research is directly applicable and significant."}, "QNT": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "High relevance as a pure-play trapped-ion quantum company; the research is directly applicable and significant."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Low relevance due to small quantum revenue share, but the research is relevant for IBM's quantum division; score capped at maximum for partial quantum company."}, "HON": {"score": 0.3, "reasoning": "High relevance for Honeywell's trapped-ion quantum division, but score capped due to low quantum revenue share."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, no quantum focus."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, no quantum focus."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, no quantum focus."}}}}
{"idx": 357, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-04", "title": "Quantum Algorithms for Triangle Cut Sparsification", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play trapped-ion company benefiting significantly from quantum algorithm advancements."}, "RGTI": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play superconducting company benefiting significantly from quantum algorithm advancements."}, "QBTS": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Quantum annealing company; less directly impacted as the algorithm is gate-based."}, "QUBT": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play neutral atom company benefiting significantly from quantum algorithm advancements."}, "QNT": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play trapped-ion company benefiting significantly from quantum algorithm advancements."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Slight positive impact due to small quantum revenue share (~2%)."}, "HON": {"score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Slight positive impact due to small quantum revenue share (~1%) with trapped-ion focus."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; not a quantum computing company."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; not a quantum computing company."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; not a quantum computing company."}}}}
{"idx": 358, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-04", "title": "Non-equilibrium thermodynamics of collapse models in the strongly non-Gaussian regime", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": [{"ticker": "IONQ", "score": 1.2, "reasoning": "Trapped-ion technology enables precise control for testing fundamental quantum models like collapse theories, making this research highly relevant for understanding decoherence and heating."}, {"ticker": "RGTI", "score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Superconducting qubits face significant heating challenges; insights from non-equilibrium thermodynamics in collapse models can inform mitigation strategies."}, {"ticker": "QBTS", "score": 0.6, "reasoning": "Quantum annealing is less directly tied to collapse models, but foundational research on non-Gaussian dynamics has broad implications for quantum system behavior."}, {"ticker": "QUBT", "score": 1.1, "reasoning": "Neutral atom QC shares control similarities with trapped-ion systems, allowing potential applications in testing collapse models and improving system stability."}, {"ticker": "QNT", "score": 1.3, "reasoning": "Trapped-ion focus aligns with experimental tests of collapse models, providing strong relevance for addressing heating and non-equilibrium effects."}, {"ticker": "IBM", "score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Broad quantum research interests may benefit from foundational thermodynamics insights, but low quantum revenue share limits impact."}, {"ticker": "HON", "score": 0.2, "reasoning": "Trapped-ion heritage provides some relevance, but reduced quantum focus post-Quantinuum spinoff and small revenue share constrain the score."}, {"ticker": "MSFT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive (no quantum revenue)"}, {"ticker": "GOOGL", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive (no quantum revenue)"}, {"ticker": "NVDA", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive (no quantum revenue)"}]}}
{"idx": 359, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-04", "title": "Multiple Quantum Hypothesis Testing: One-Shot Pairwise Bounds and Sharp Asymptotics", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": [{"ticker": "IONQ", "score": 1.8, "reasoning": "Significant positive impact; advancement in quantum hypothesis testing directly benefits trapped-ion pure-play with 100% quantum revenue."}, {"ticker": "RGTI", "score": 1.8, "reasoning": "Significant positive impact; improvement in multiple quantum bounds relevant to superconducting pure-play with 100% quantum revenue."}, {"ticker": "QBTS", "score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Moderate positive impact; general quantum theory advancement, but less direct relevance to quantum annealing optimization-focused approach."}, {"ticker": "QUBT", "score": 1.8, "reasoning": "Significant positive impact; neutral atom pure-play benefits from improved quantum hypothesis testing bounds."}, {"ticker": "QNT", "score": 1.8, "reasoning": "Significant positive impact; trapped-ion pure-play with 100% quantum revenue gains from theoretical advancements."}, {"ticker": "IBM", "score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Slight positive impact; general sector advancement, but diluted by ~2% quantum revenue share."}, {"ticker": "HON", "score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Slight positive impact; trapped-ion involvement via Quantinuum, but diluted by ~1% quantum revenue post-spinoff."}, {"ticker": "MSFT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No impact; inactive, non-quantum-focused company."}, {"ticker": "GOOGL", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No impact; inactive, non-quantum-focused company."}, {"ticker": "NVDA", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No impact; inactive, non-quantum-focused company."}]}}
{"idx": 360, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-04", "title": "Semidefinite-programming hierarchies for classically simulable state families", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": -1.5, "reasoning": "Research on classical simulability negatively impacts all pure-play quantum companies, but trapped-ion (IONQ) is less affected than quantum annealing."}, "RGTI": {"score": -1.5, "reasoning": "Research on classical simulability negatively impacts all pure-play quantum companies; superconducting (RGTI) is moderately affected."}, "QBTS": {"score": -2.0, "reasoning": "Research is highly relevant to quantum annealing (QBTS/D-Wave), which is often simulable, leading to a strong negative impact."}, "QUBT": {"score": -1.5, "reasoning": "Research on classical simulability negatively impacts all pure-play quantum companies; neutral atom (QUBT) is moderately affected."}, "QNT": {"score": -1.5, "reasoning": "Research on classical simulability negatively impacts all pure-play quantum companies; trapped-ion (QNT) is moderately affected."}, "IBM": {"score": -0.15, "reasoning": "Research negatively impacts quantum claims, but IBM's low quantum revenue share caps the score at the lower bound."}, "HON": {"score": -0.3, "reasoning": "Research negatively impacts quantum claims, but HON's low quantum revenue share caps the score at the lower bound."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; no quantum focus, always 0.0."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; no quantum focus, always 0.0."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; no quantum focus, always 0.0."}}}}
{"idx": 361, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-04", "title": "Charge-Conjugation Violation and Population Asymmetry in Bipartite Fermionic Lattices", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": [{"ticker": "IONQ", "score": 0.5, "reasoning": "Indirect relevance; trapped-ion quantum computers can simulate many-body systems."}, {"ticker": "RGTI", "score": 0.5, "reasoning": "Indirect relevance; superconducting quantum computers can be used for such simulations."}, {"ticker": "QBTS", "score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Lower relevance; quantum annealing may not efficiently handle fermionic lattice models with charge-conjugation violation."}, {"ticker": "QUBT", "score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Direct relevance; paper explicitly mentions cold-atom quantum simulators for implementation."}, {"ticker": "QNT", "score": 0.5, "reasoning": "Indirect relevance; trapped-ion quantum computer capable of simulation."}, {"ticker": "IBM", "score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Small positive; IBM has quantum simulation capabilities."}, {"ticker": "HON", "score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Small positive; Honeywell has quantum simulation efforts, though primarily trapped-ion."}, {"ticker": "MSFT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, always 0.0"}, {"ticker": "GOOGL", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, always 0.0"}, {"ticker": "NVDA", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, always 0.0"}]}}
{"idx": 362, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-04", "title": "Ferroelectric brightening of spin forbidden dark excitons in a WSe2/hybrid perovskite heterostructure", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": 1.5, "RGTI": 0.5, "QBTS": 0.1, "QUBT": 1.5, "QNT": 1.5, "IBM": 0.1, "HON": 0.2, "MSFT": 0.0, "GOOGL": 0.0, "NVDA": 0.0}, "reasoning": "The research on ferroelectric brightening of dark excitons enables spin manipulation without magnetic fields, which is highly relevant to trapped-ion (IONQ, QNT, HON) and neutral atom (QUBT) technologies. Pure-play companies in these areas (IONQ, QNT, QUBT) receive high scores (+1.5). Superconducting (RGTI, IBM) and quantum annealing (QBTS) companies have lower relevance, receiving modest scores. Non-pure-play HON and IBM get smaller positive scores within their caps. Inactive companies score 0.0."}}
{"idx": 363, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-04", "title": "Deployed trusted-node quantum key distribution over 300 km with a multi-core fiber access link", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": [{"ticker": "IONQ", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct relevance to QKD or SNSPD technology; focuses on trapped-ion quantum computing."}, {"ticker": "RGTI", "score": 0.5, "reasoning": "Indirect benefit from SNSPD advancements, as Rigetti's superconducting quantum computers use similar detectors for readout, enhancing performance in high-loss scenarios."}, {"ticker": "QBTS", "score": 0.5, "reasoning": "Similar indirect benefit to RGTI; D-Wave's quantum annealing systems utilize SNSPDs, improving capabilities for quantum applications."}, {"ticker": "QUBT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Neutral atom quantum computing detection typically uses different methods; no direct relevance to QKD or SNSPDs."}, {"ticker": "QNT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Trapped-ion quantum computing unaffected by QKD-specific advancements; no significant link to SNSPDs or QKD deployment."}, {"ticker": "IBM", "score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Direct positive impact as IBM is a key QKD technology provider; the news validates scalable QKD deployment, aligning with IBM's quantum business."}, {"ticker": "HON", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No significant QKD involvement; focuses on trapped-ion quantum computing post-Quantinuum spinoff."}, {"ticker": "MSFT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; always 0.0 per specifications."}, {"ticker": "GOOGL", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; always 0.0 per specifications."}, {"ticker": "NVDA", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; always 0.0 per specifications."}]}}
{"idx": 364, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-04", "title": "Quantum-limited estimation of atmospheric turbulence via spatial mode decomposition", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": 2.0, "RGTI": 2.0, "QBTS": 0.0, "QUBT": 1.0, "QNT": 2.0, "IBM": 0.15, "HON": 0.3, "MSFT": 0.0, "GOOGL": 0.0, "NVDA": 0.0}, "reasoning": "The research advances quantum metrology, benefiting companies with quantum sensing capabilities. Trapped-ion (IONQ, QNT) and superconducting (RGTI) platforms are highly relevant (+2.0). Neutral atom (QUBT) has moderate relevance (+1.0). Quantum annealing (QBTS) is unrelated (0.0). IBM (+0.15) and HON (+0.3) contribute to quantum sensing but have smaller quantum revenue shares. Inactive companies score 0.0."}}
{"idx": 365, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-04", "title": "Efficient Quantum Circuit Construction of Controlled Time-Evolution for Arbitrary Pauli-Sum Hamiltonians", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Relevant to trapped-ion gate-based quantum computing; improves circuit efficiency."}, "RGTI": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Relevant to superconducting gate-based quantum computing; improves circuit efficiency."}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not relevant; quantum annealing does not utilize controlled time-evolution circuits."}, "QUBT": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Relevant to neutral atom gate-based quantum computing; improves circuit efficiency."}, "QNT": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Relevant to trapped-ion gate-based quantum computing; improves circuit efficiency."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Relevant to superconducting quantum computing but only ~2% quantum revenue; positive impact scaled."}, "HON": {"score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Relevant to trapped-ion quantum computing but only ~1% quantum revenue post-spinoff; positive impact scaled."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; always 0.0"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; always 0.0"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; always 0.0"}}}}
{"idx": 366, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-04", "title": "Forbidden transitions in superconducting artificial atoms", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Research on superconducting qubits not relevant to IONQ's trapped-ion technology."}, "RGTI": {"score": 1.8, "reasoning": "Rigetti uses superconducting qubits; research on forbidden transitions could significantly improve qubit control and performance."}, "QBTS": {"score": 1.6, "reasoning": "D-Wave uses superconducting qubits for annealing; fundamental research benefits the underlying technology."}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Neutral atom technology, unrelated to superconducting research."}, "QNT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Trapped-ion technology, not superconducting; no impact."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.12, "reasoning": "IBM uses superconducting qubits; research could advance the field, but impact is smaller due to non-quantum focus."}, "HON": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Trapped-ion technology, not superconducting; no impact."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, always 0.0"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, always 0.0"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, always 0.0"}}}}
{"idx": 367, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-04", "title": "Barbell Codes: qLDPC Codes for Superconducting Quantum Hardware", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": 0.0, "RGTI": 2.0, "QBTS": 0.0, "QUBT": 0.0, "QNT": 0.0, "IBM": 0.15, "HON": 0.0, "MSFT": 0.0, "GOOGL": 0.0, "NVDA": 0.0}, "reasoning": "The research on barbell codes targets superconducting hardware, benefiting RGTI (pure-play superconducting, +2.0) and IBM (superconducting with ~2% quantum revenue, +0.15). Other technologies (trapped-ion: IONQ, QNT, HON; quantum annealing: QBTS; neutral atom: QUBT) are unaffected (0.0). Inactive firms score 0.0."}}
{"idx": 368, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-04", "title": "Polymer quantum mechanics on compact configuration spaces", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": [{"ticker": "IONQ", "score": 0.5, "reasoning": "Incremental research on polymer quantum mechanics has general relevance to quantum computing theory, especially for trapped-ion systems which can model discrete lattices used in quantum simulation."}, {"ticker": "RGTI", "score": 0.5, "reasoning": "Superconducting qubit technology benefits from advances in quantum quantization theory, though the impact is moderate due to the incremental nature of the research."}, {"ticker": "QBTS", "score": 0.3, "reasoning": "As a quantum annealing company, relevance is lower since polymer quantization focuses on discrete systems, while annealing involves continuous evolution; however, general quantum theory improvements are slightly positive."}, {"ticker": "QUBT", "score": 0.5, "reasoning": "Neutral atom technology is well-suited for simulating lattice systems, making this research relevant for quantum simulation applications."}, {"ticker": "QNT", "score": 0.5, "reasoning": "Trapped-ion pure-play with a focus on quantum hardware benefits from foundational advances in quantum mechanics, though the research is incremental."}, {"ticker": "IBM", "score": 0.1, "reasoning": "With only ~2% quantum revenue, the impact of incremental research is diluted; however, it may slightly benefit IBM's quantum division through broader quantum theory insights."}, {"ticker": "HON", "score": 0.2, "reasoning": "Trapped-ion technology with ~1% quantum revenue post-spinoff; relevance is similar to IONQ but with a smaller quantum focus, resulting in a lower score."}, {"ticker": "MSFT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive in quantum computing; always 0.0"}, {"ticker": "GOOGL", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive in quantum computing; always 0.0"}, {"ticker": "NVDA", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive in quantum computing; always 0.0"}]}}
{"idx": 369, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-04", "title": "Quantum computing for accurate large-scale electronic-structure calculations: DFT-embedded, post-processed quantum-selected configuration interaction", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "The research uses superconducting quantum computing, which is not relevant to IONQ's trapped-ion technology."}, "RGTI": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Rigetti is a pure-play superconducting quantum company, and the research demonstrates a successful application of superconducting quantum computing for chemistry, indicating a strong positive signal."}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "D-Wave specializes in quantum annealing, which is different from the gate-based superconducting approach used in the research for quantum chemistry simulations."}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Quantum Computing Inc. uses neutral atom technology, not superconducting, so the research has low relevance."}, "QNT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Quantinuum focuses on trapped-ion technology, not superconducting, so the research is not directly applicable."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "IBM has a superconducting quantum business, but with only ~2% quantum revenue, the positive news has a limited positive impact, capped at the maximum for IBM."}, "HON": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Honeywell's quantum efforts are in trapped-ion technology, not superconducting, so the research has no relevance."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Microsoft is inactive in quantum computing as per the definition."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Google is inactive in quantum computing as per the definition."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "NVIDIA is inactive in quantum computing as per the definition."}}}}
{"idx": 370, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-04", "title": "Rapid Gaussian Boson Sampling Circuit Screening for GKP States Creation via a Two-Stage Machine Learning Surrogate", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": [{"ticker": "IONQ", "score": -1.5, "reasoning": "Negative impact as the news advances photonic quantum computing, a competing technology to trapped-ion, threatening IONQ's core business."}, {"ticker": "RGTI", "score": -1.5, "reasoning": "Similar to IONQ, as superconducting QC faces competition from photonic advancements, impacting RGTI's pure-play position."}, {"ticker": "QBTS", "score": -1.0, "reasoning": "Quantum annealing (D-Wave) is less directly affected by GKP advancements for gate-based QC, but overall market shifts pressure QBTS moderately."}, {"ticker": "QUBT", "score": -1.5, "reasoning": "Neutral atom technology faces competition from photonic QC, negatively affecting QUBT's pure-play focus."}, {"ticker": "QNT", "score": -1.5, "reasoning": "Trapped-ion pure-play like IONQ, significantly impacted by competing photonic QC progress."}, {"ticker": "IBM", "score": -0.1, "reasoning": "Superconducting QC competition causes slight negative, but IBM's classical ML capabilities may benefit from the surrogate method, moderating the impact."}, {"ticker": "HON", "score": -0.2, "reasoning": "Trapped-ion quantum business suffers from competition, but low quantum revenue (~1%) limits the negative effect."}, {"ticker": "MSFT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, no quantum relevance."}, {"ticker": "GOOGL", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, no quantum relevance."}, {"ticker": "NVDA", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, no quantum relevance."}]}}
{"idx": 371, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-04", "title": "Shattering the Symmetry Trap in Fixed-Ansatz VQE: An Accelerated ADAPT-VQE Study of Three Pillar Molecules under Bravyi-Kitaev Mapping", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Research on improved ADAPT-VQE algorithms for quantum chemistry is highly relevant to IONQ's trapped-ion hardware, enhancing near-term applicability."}, "RGTI": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "ADAPT-VQE advancements directly benefit Rigetti's superconducting quantum computers for quantum chemistry simulations."}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Research focuses on gate-based VQE, not applicable to D-Wave's quantum annealing architecture."}, "QUBT": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Neutral atom quantum computers (QUBT) can leverage ADAPT-VQE for efficient quantum chemistry, making the research highly relevant."}, "QNT": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Quantinuum's trapped-ion technology directly benefits from ADAPT-VQE improvements in quantum chemistry."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Relevant to IBM's quantum chemistry work on superconducting qubits, but impact is limited by small quantum revenue share."}, "HON": {"score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Indirectly relevant through trapped-ion technology, but minimal direct impact due to low quantum revenue post-spinoff."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; always 0.0 per scoring definition."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; always 0.0 per scoring definition."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; always 0.0 per scoring definition."}}}}
{"idx": 372, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-04", "title": "Magnetic flux as a quantized Lorentz pseudoscalar and its relation to electric charge quantization", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": 0.5, "RGTI": 1.5, "QBTS": 1.5, "QUBT": 0.5, "QNT": 0.5, "IBM": 0.12, "HON": 0.05, "MSFT": 0.0, "GOOGL": 0.0, "NVDA": 0.0}, "reasoning": "The paper's focus on magnetic flux quantization is highly relevant to superconducting quantum computing (RGTI, QBTS, IBM), yielding higher scores. Trapped-ion (IONQ, QNT, HON) and neutral atom (QUBT) companies receive modest positive scores for fundamental advancement, but with lower direct impact. Inactive companies score zero."}}
{"idx": 373, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-04", "title": "Double-bracket quantum algorithms for thermal state preparation", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 1.5, "reasoning": "General relevance for trapped-ion quantum computing in thermal state preparation; not specifically highlighted but beneficial."}, "RGTI": {"score": 1.5, "reasoning": "General relevance for superconducting quantum computing in thermal state preparation; not specifically highlighted but beneficial."}, "QBTS": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "High relevance due to direct application in quantum Boltzmann machines for generative modeling, a core competency of D-Wave."}, "QUBT": {"score": 1.5, "reasoning": "General relevance for neutral atom quantum computing in thermal state preparation; not specifically highlighted but beneficial."}, "QNT": {"score": 1.5, "reasoning": "General relevance for trapped-ion quantum computing in thermal state preparation; not specifically highlighted but beneficial."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Modest relevance as IBM engages in quantum algorithms and thermal state research, but only ~2% quantum revenue."}, "HON": {"score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Modest relevance due to trapped-ion expertise, but only ~1% quantum revenue post-Quantinuum spinoff."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; no quantum revenue focus."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; no quantum revenue focus."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; no quantum revenue focus."}}}}
{"idx": 374, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-04", "title": "Broadband AC Magnetic Field Sensing via Continuous wave optically detected magnetic resonance with NV Centers in diamond", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct relevance; focused on trapped-ion quantum computing, not sensing."}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct relevance; focused on superconducting quantum computing, not sensing."}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct relevance; focused on quantum annealing, not sensing."}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct relevance; focused on neutral atom quantum computing, not sensing."}, "QNT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct relevance; focused on trapped-ion quantum computing, not sensing."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Some relevance; IBM has quantum sensing initiatives that could benefit from advancements in the field."}, "HON": {"score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Strong relevance; Honeywell is directly involved in NV center-based quantum sensing, and this research enhances their core technology."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive in quantum computing; no relevance."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive in quantum computing; no relevance."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive in quantum computing; no relevance."}}}}
{"idx": 375, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-04", "title": "Non-equilibrium quantum thermodynamics of a memory-bearing open-system process", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "High relevance due to trapped-ion technology, which benefits from insights into quantum thermodynamics and memory effects."}, "RGTI": {"score": 1.5, "reasoning": "Superconducting qubits are applicable, but memory effects are less pronounced; moderate positive impact."}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Quantum annealing approach not aligned with gate-based focus; no impact."}, "QUBT": {"score": 1.5, "reasoning": "Neutral atom technology benefits from fundamental insights into quantum thermodynamics; positive impact."}, "QNT": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Trapped-ion technology directly relevant, similar to IONQ; strong positive signal."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Fundamental research may slightly benefit IBM's quantum efforts, but small quantum revenue share limits impact."}, "HON": {"score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Trapped-ion system makes Honeywell relevant; positive impact within quantum segment."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No quantum revenue; always 0.0."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No quantum revenue; always 0.0."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No quantum revenue; always 0.0."}}}}
{"idx": 376, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-04", "title": "No-go theorems on simulating uncertainty principle's signatures", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": [{"ticker": "IONQ", "score": 2.0, "reasoning": "The paper reinforces the quantum advantage from uncertainty principles, directly supporting IONQ's trapped-ion technology as a pure-play quantum company."}, {"ticker": "RGTI", "score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Rigetti's superconducting quantum processors benefit from the no-go theorems validating quantum uncertainty signatures, enhancing its pure-play position."}, {"ticker": "QBTS", "score": 1.0, "reasoning": "D-Wave's quantum annealing exhibits quantum effects, but the focus on complementary instruments and unambiguous communication is less applicable than gate-based models, resulting in a moderate score."}, {"ticker": "QUBT", "score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Quantum Computing Inc.'s neutral atom technology is gate-based and directly aligned with the uncertainty principles and complementary measurements discussed."}, {"ticker": "QNT", "score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Quantinuum's trapped-ion quantum computers leverage the uncertainty principle, and the no-go theorems affirm their quantum advantage as a pure-play entity."}, {"ticker": "IBM", "score": 0.15, "reasoning": "IBM's quantum efforts (superconducting) are supported by the paper's findings on quantum advantage, but the score is capped at the upper limit due to low quantum revenue share."}, {"ticker": "HON", "score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Honeywell's trapped-ion quantum technology benefits from the reinforcement of uncertainty principles, with the score at the maximum for its quantum revenue share."}, {"ticker": "MSFT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Microsoft is inactive in the quantum computing universe for scoring purposes, always 0.0."}, {"ticker": "GOOGL", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Alphabet (Google) is inactive in the quantum computing universe for scoring purposes, always 0.0."}, {"ticker": "NVDA", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "NVIDIA is inactive in the quantum computing universe for scoring purposes, always 0.0."}]}}
{"idx": 377, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-04", "title": "Symmetry-adapted qubit encoding with complete active space and Bravyi--Kitaev mapping for quantum chemistry on a quantum computer", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": [{"ticker": "IONQ", "score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play trapped-ion company; benefits directly from advancements in quantum chemistry simulations for gate-based quantum computers."}, {"ticker": "RGTI", "score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play superconducting company; the paper's qubit encoding and circuit optimization methods are highly relevant to its quantum processors."}, {"ticker": "QBTS", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Quantum annealing company; the paper focuses on gate-based methods, which are not applicable to annealers."}, {"ticker": "QUBT", "score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play neutral atom company; leverages the new encoding for quantum chemistry simulations on gate-based systems."}, {"ticker": "QNT", "score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play trapped-ion company; similar relevance to IONQ for quantum chemistry improvements."}, {"ticker": "IBM", "score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Superconducting company with ~2% quantum revenue; relevant to quantum chemistry efforts, but impact limited by revenue share."}, {"ticker": "HON", "score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Trapped-ion company with ~1% quantum revenue; benefits from advancements, but impact scaled by revenue share."}, {"ticker": "MSFT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, always 0.0"}, {"ticker": "GOOGL", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, always 0.0"}, {"ticker": "NVDA", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, always 0.0"}]}}
{"idx": 378, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-04", "title": "Engineered dissipation for faster adiabatic state preparation", "source": "arxiv", "status": "error", "error": "Expecting property name enclosed in double quotes: line 1 column 2 (char 1)"}
{"idx": 379, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-04", "title": "Periodic Symmetry-Adapted Encoding: Qubit Reduction in Crystalline Electronic Structure", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "High relevance for trapped-ion quantum simulation"}, "RGTI": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "High relevance for superconducting quantum simulation"}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.5, "reasoning": "Low relevance as quantum annealing is less suited for gate-based electronic structure simulation"}, "QUBT": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "High relevance for neutral atom quantum simulation"}, "QNT": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "High relevance for trapped-ion quantum simulation"}, "IBM": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Relevant for superconducting quantum simulation but limited by ~2% quantum revenue"}, "HON": {"score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Relevant for trapped-ion quantum simulation but limited by ~1% quantum revenue"}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive in quantum computing for this context"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive in quantum computing for this context"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive in quantum computing for this context"}}}}
{"idx": 380, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-04", "title": "Tight relation between the physical effects of a quantum measurement and the information gained about an observable", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": [{"ticker": "IONQ", "score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Incremental positive research on quantum measurement theory; high relevance for pure-play trapped-ion company."}, {"ticker": "RGTI", "score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Incremental positive research; high relevance for pure-play superconducting company."}, {"ticker": "QBTS", "score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Incremental positive research; high relevance for pure-play quantum annealing company."}, {"ticker": "QUBT", "score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Incremental positive research; high relevance for pure-play neutral atom company."}, {"ticker": "QNT", "score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Incremental positive research; high relevance for pure-play trapped-ion company."}, {"ticker": "IBM", "score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Incremental positive research; lower relevance due to ~2% quantum revenue from superconducting."}, {"ticker": "HON", "score": 0.2, "reasoning": "Incremental positive research; lower relevance due to ~1% quantum revenue from trapped-ion post-spinoff."}, {"ticker": "MSFT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No quantum focus; always 0.0."}, {"ticker": "GOOGL", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No quantum focus; always 0.0."}, {"ticker": "NVDA", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No quantum focus; always 0.0."}]}}
{"idx": 381, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-04", "title": "Optimal convex approximation of quantum channels based on $\u03b1$-affinity", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 1.5, "reasoning": "Pure-play trapped-ion company; benefits from general advancements in quantum channel theory, though trapped-ion systems have lower noise sensitivity compared to superconducting."}, "RGTI": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play superconducting company; high relevance due to direct application to noise models like amplitude-damping, which is critical for superconducting qubits."}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.5, "reasoning": "Pure-play quantum annealing company; less relevant as the paper focuses on unitary channels for gate-based quantum computing, not annealing-based systems."}, "QUBT": {"score": 1.5, "reasoning": "Pure-play neutral atom company; benefits similarly to trapped-ion companies from quantum channel advancements, with relevance to gate-based systems."}, "QNT": {"score": 1.5, "reasoning": "Pure-play trapped-ion company (Quantinuum); same relevance as IONQ for quantum channel theory advancements."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Diversified company with ~2% quantum revenue; positive impact from quantum research, but diluted due to small quantum focus."}, "HON": {"score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Diversified company with ~1% quantum revenue from trapped-ion; positive impact, but small due to low quantum share."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, always 0.0 per specification."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, always 0.0 per specification."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, always 0.0 per specification."}}}}
{"idx": 382, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-04", "title": "Symmetries and overparametrization properties of Hamiltonian variational ansatzes for the $(1+1)$d $\\mathbb{Z}_2$ lattice gauge theory", "source": "arxiv", "status": "error", "error": "Expecting property name enclosed in double quotes: line 1 column 2 (char 1)"}
{"idx": 383, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-04", "title": "Information-Geometric Bound on the Robustness of Entanglement Generation", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": 1.0, "RGTI": 1.0, "QBTS": 0.6, "QUBT": 1.0, "QNT": 1.0, "IBM": 0.1, "HON": 0.2, "MSFT": 0.0, "GOOGL": 0.0, "NVDA": 0.0}, "reasoning": "The academic paper on entanglement generation and quantum Fisher information is a positive development for quantum computing. Pure-play companies (especially trapped-ion and superconducting) benefit most due to higher exposure, while quantum annealing (QBTS) is less directly relevant. Non-pure-play companies (IBM, HON) have lower scores due to smaller quantum revenue shares. Inactive companies score 0.0."}}
{"idx": 384, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-04", "title": "Learning Hamiltonians at Long Times", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play trapped-ion company; directly benefits from research on Hamiltonian learning for gate-based quantum computers."}, "RGTI": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play superconducting company; directly benefits from the research."}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Quantum annealing company; not directly relevant to gate-based Hamiltonian learning."}, "QUBT": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play neutral atom company; directly benefits as it uses gate-based quantum computing."}, "QNT": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play trapped-ion company (Quantinuum); directly benefits from the research."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Superconducting company with ~2% quantum revenue; benefits from the research and the use of classical shadows, which IBM developed."}, "HON": {"score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Trapped-ion company with ~1% quantum revenue; benefits from the research but on a smaller scale."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, no quantum focus."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, no quantum focus."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, no quantum focus."}}}}
{"idx": 385, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-04", "title": "Gauging the Spacetime Code", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 1.8, "reasoning": "Trapped-ion pure-play; highly relevant for fault tolerance and error correction discussed in the paper."}, "RGTI": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Superconducting pure-play; maximum relevance for error correction due to high error rates in superconducting qubits."}, "QBTS": {"score": -0.5, "reasoning": "Quantum annealing; less relevant as the paper focuses on gate-based models like fault tolerance and circuit noise, not annealing."}, "QUBT": {"score": 1.2, "reasoning": "Neutral atom pure-play; relevant for emerging quantum technologies and error correction applications."}, "QNT": {"score": 1.8, "reasoning": "Trapped-ion pure-play; strong relevance for fault tolerance and quantum error correction."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Superconducting with ~2% quantum revenue; relevant for error correction but limited impact due to broader business focus."}, "HON": {"score": 0.2, "reasoning": "Trapped-ion with ~1% quantum revenue; relevant for quantum technologies but small contribution to business."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive in quantum computing universe; always 0.0."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive in quantum computing universe; always 0.0."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive in quantum computing universe; always 0.0."}}}}
{"idx": 386, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-04", "title": "Decoder-Consistent Hamiltonians for POVM-Based Quantum Relaxations", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"IONQ": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Trapped-ion pure-play; benefits from advancements in quantum optimization algorithms."}, "RGTI": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Superconducting pure-play; relevant to Hamiltonian-based quantum relaxations."}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Quantum annealing approach not directly related to gate-based Hamiltonian relaxations."}, "QUBT": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Neutral atom pure-play; applicable to gate-based quantum computing and optimization."}, "QNT": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Trapped-ion pure-play; aligned with the research on quantum relaxations."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Superconducting with partial quantum revenue; leader in quantum algorithms, positively impacted."}, "HON": {"score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Trapped-ion with partial quantum revenue; benefits from improved quantum optimization techniques."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, always 0.0"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, always 0.0"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, always 0.0"}}}
{"idx": 387, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-04", "title": "Quantum Radar Cross Section with two-photon entangled states", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "As a pure-play trapped-ion company, IONQ benefits from the emphasis on quantum entanglement for advanced applications like quantum radar, warranting a positive score within its range."}, "RGTI": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Rigetti's superconducting qubits can generate entanglement, aligning with the research on biphoton QRCS, justifying a positive score."}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "D-Wave's quantum annealing technology is not suited for entanglement-based quantum radar, resulting in a neutral score due to misalignment."}, "QUBT": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Quantum Computing Inc. (neutral atom) can leverage entanglement capabilities for potential quantum radar applications, supporting a positive score."}, "QNT": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Quantinuum, as a trapped-ion pure-play, gains from the positive sentiment around quantum radar advancements, hence a positive score."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "IBM's superconducting quantum systems are used in quantum sensing (including radar applications), justifying the maximum positive score within its limited quantum revenue range."}, "HON": {"score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Honeywell's trapped-ion technology and quantum sensing initiatives make it relevant for quantum radar, warranting the maximum positive score within its range."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Microsoft is inactive in quantum radar and scores 0.0 as per the inactive category."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Google is inactive in quantum radar and scores 0.0 as per the inactive category."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "NVIDIA is inactive in quantum radar and scores 0.0 as per the inactive category."}}, "reasoning": "The research on quantum radar with entangled photons validates the potential of quantum technologies for sensing applications. Companies with entanglement strengths (trapped-ion, superconducting) and sensing focus (IBM, Honeywell) score positively, while D-Wave (annealing-focused) is neutral. Inactive companies score 0.0."}}
{"idx": 388, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-04", "title": "A Class of Multipartite Entangled States Based on State Transitions", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 1.8, "reasoning": "Positive due to high relevance of multipartite entanglement research to trapped-ion gate-based quantum computing."}, "RGTI": {"score": 1.8, "reasoning": "Positive due to high relevance of multipartite entanglement research to superconducting gate-based quantum computing."}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.5, "reasoning": "Lower positive score; quantum annealing architecture (D-Wave) is less directly applicable to gate-based entanglement states like T states."}, "QUBT": {"score": 1.8, "reasoning": "Positive due to high relevance of multipartite entanglement research to neutral atom gate-based quantum computing."}, "QNT": {"score": 1.8, "reasoning": "Positive due to high relevance of multipartite entanglement research to trapped-ion gate-based quantum computing."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.12, "reasoning": "Small positive score; relevant to superconducting quantum efforts, but limited by ~2% quantum revenue share."}, "HON": {"score": 0.24, "reasoning": "Small positive score; relevant to trapped-ion quantum efforts, but limited by ~1% quantum revenue share."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; no quantum focus."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; no quantum focus."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; no quantum focus."}}}}
{"idx": 389, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-04", "title": "Thermalization with Gaussian Quantum Cellular Automata", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": [{"ticker": "IONQ", "score": 0.2, "reasoning": "Research on thermalization in bosonic systems is relevant to IONQ's trapped-ion technology, which uses harmonic oscillator modes. Incremental advancement, so small positive score."}, {"ticker": "RGTI", "score": 0.2, "reasoning": "Superconducting qubits involve bosonic modeling, making this research relevant to Rigetti's technology. Positive but incremental, so small positive score."}, {"ticker": "QBTS", "score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Quantum annealing is less directly related to bosonic lattices and Gaussian quantum cellular automata. Minimal impact, so lower positive score."}, {"ticker": "QUBT", "score": 0.2, "reasoning": "Neutral atom systems can be modeled with bosonic modes, so research is relevant. Positive for QUBT, small score due to incremental nature."}, {"ticker": "QNT", "score": 0.2, "reasoning": "Trapped-ion technology involves bosonic modes, making thermalization research relevant. Positive for Quantinuum, small score."}, {"ticker": "IBM", "score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Relevant to IBM's superconducting qubits, but with only ~2% quantum revenue, impact is smaller. Incremental research, so modest positive score."}, {"ticker": "HON", "score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Honeywell's trapped-ion tech is relevant, but with ~1% quantum revenue post-spinoff, impact is limited. Small positive score."}, {"ticker": "MSFT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not involved in quantum computing; always 0.0."}, {"ticker": "GOOGL", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not involved in quantum computing; always 0.0."}, {"ticker": "NVDA", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not involved in quantum computing; always 0.0."}]}}
{"idx": 390, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-04", "title": "On the Cryptographic Structure Required for Verifying Qubits", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": [{"ticker": "IONQ", "score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Trapped-ion pure-play; benefits from incremental advances in qubit verification, which enhances trust in quantum devices."}, {"ticker": "RGTI", "score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Superconducting pure-play; similarly benefits from verification improvements, applicable to gate-based quantum computing."}, {"ticker": "QBTS", "score": 0.5, "reasoning": "Quantum annealing pure-play; less relevant as the paper focuses on gate-based verification, not annealing paradigms."}, {"ticker": "QUBT", "score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Neutral atom pure-play; gate-based technology aligns with the verification focus, providing incremental value."}, {"ticker": "QNT", "score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Trapped-ion pure-play; benefits similarly to other gate-based companies from verification advancements."}, {"ticker": "IBM", "score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Superconducting with ~2% quantum revenue; quantum division benefits, but low revenue share caps score at maximum positive."}, {"ticker": "HON", "score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Trapped-ion with ~1% quantum revenue; quantum efforts benefit, but revenue share caps score at maximum positive."}, {"ticker": "MSFT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not part of the quantum computing universe; always 0.0."}, {"ticker": "GOOGL", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not part of the quantum computing universe; always 0.0."}, {"ticker": "NVDA", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not part of the quantum computing universe; always 0.0."}]}}
{"idx": 391, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-04", "title": "DAST: A VLM-LLM Framework for Cross-Interface Anomaly Detection in O-RAN", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": [{"ticker": "IONQ", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play quantum company; no relevance to classical AI or O-RAN."}, {"ticker": "RGTI", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play quantum company; no relevance to classical AI or O-RAN."}, {"ticker": "QBTS", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play quantum company; no relevance to classical AI or O-RAN."}, {"ticker": "QUBT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play quantum company; no relevance to classical AI or O-RAN."}, {"ticker": "QNT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play quantum company; no relevance to classical AI or O-RAN."}, {"ticker": "IBM", "score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Positive for IBM's AI business, which is a major revenue segment, despite minimal quantum relevance."}, {"ticker": "HON", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Quantum is a small segment post-spinoff; no direct relevance to O-RAN or AI."}, {"ticker": "MSFT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive in quantum computing universe; always 0.0."}, {"ticker": "GOOGL", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive in quantum computing universe; always 0.0."}, {"ticker": "NVDA", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive in quantum computing universe; always 0.0."}]}}
{"idx": 392, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-04", "title": "Space-CIM: Enabling Compute-In-Memory Accelerators for Thermally-Constrained Space Platforms", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": [{"ticker": "IONQ", "score": 1.5, "reasoning": "Trapped-ion technology operates at higher temperatures with better heat distribution, reducing thermal management challenges in space."}, {"ticker": "RGTI", "score": -1.5, "reasoning": "Superconducting qubits require extreme cryogenic cooling, which is problematic under space thermal constraints due to limited radiative cooling."}, {"ticker": "QBTS", "score": -1.5, "reasoning": "Quantum annealing systems need cryogenic cooling, facing similar thermal challenges as superconducting in space."}, {"ticker": "QUBT", "score": 0.5, "reasoning": "Neutral atom technology offers improved thermal efficiency and lower cooling needs, potentially advantageous for space deployment."}, {"ticker": "QNT", "score": 1.5, "reasoning": "Trapped-ion approach, like IONQ, benefits from lower thermal sensitivity and better suitability for space environments."}, {"ticker": "IBM", "score": -0.1, "reasoning": "Superconducting quantum revenue (~2%) is negatively impacted by thermal constraints, but small proportion of overall business mitigates impact."}, {"ticker": "HON", "score": 0.2, "reasoning": "Trapped-ion quantum revenue (~1%) may benefit from space suitability, though minor portion of business."}, {"ticker": "MSFT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, no quantum computing relevance."}, {"ticker": "GOOGL", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, no quantum computing relevance."}, {"ticker": "NVDA", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, no quantum computing relevance."}]}}
{"idx": 393, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-04", "title": "FQA: A Full-Space Quantization-Driven Architecture for Hardware-Efficient Piecewise Approximation of Nonlinear Activation Functions", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": 1.8, "RGTI": 1.8, "QBTS": 1.8, "QUBT": 1.8, "QNT": 1.8, "IBM": 0.036, "HON": 0.018, "MSFT": 0.0, "GOOGL": 0.0, "NVDA": 0.0}, "reasoning": "The FQA research improves hardware efficiency for piecewise approximation of activation functions, highly relevant to quantum machine learning. Pure-play companies (100% quantum revenue) score +1.8 for significant benefit. IBM (~2% quantum revenue) scores +0.036, proportional to revenue share. Honeywell (~1% quantum revenue) scores +0.018. Inactive companies score 0.0."}}
{"idx": 394, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-04", "title": "IonQ is the First Pure-Play Quantum Computing Company To Generate Over $100 Million in Revenue. Is the Stock Headed to $100? - Yahoo Finance", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Direct positive impact: IonQ achieved a $100M revenue milestone as the first pure-play, validating its business model and growth potential. High novelty as a sector first; impact may decay moderately over time as market digests the news."}, "RGTI": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Moderate positive sentiment: As a pure-play, benefits from sector validation, but indirect as IonQ is the direct beneficiary. Revenue milestone signals market growth, though decay may be gradual."}, "QBTS": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Moderate positive sentiment: Similar to RGTI, as a pure-play quantum company, gains from industry validation. No direct link to IonQ's milestone, but overall sentiment boost applies."}, "QUBT": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Moderate positive sentiment: Pure-play quantum company; benefits from sector-wide optimism. Milestone reinforces long-term potential, though decay may occur as focus shifts."}, "QNT": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Moderate positive sentiment: As a pure-play, gains from industry validation. Trapped-ion technology alignment with IonQ may amplify impact slightly, but decay expected over weeks."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Small positive sentiment: IBM benefits from broader quantum sector growth validation. Limited impact due to ~2% quantum revenue share; decay may be rapid as news is sector-specific."}, "HON": {"score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Maximum positive impact within range: HON (trapped-ion) benefits from IonQ's milestone due to technology similarity, validating the segment. Positive spillover effect; decay may be slower given shared tech focus."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive: No quantum revenue; news irrelevant per constraints."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive: No quantum revenue; news irrelevant per constraints."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive: No quantum revenue; news irrelevant per constraints."}}}}
{"idx": 395, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-04", "title": "Should You Buy D-Wave Quantum Stock While It's Under $35? - Yahoo Finance", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": 0.0, "RGTI": 0.0, "QBTS": 1.0, "QUBT": 0.0, "QNT": 0.0, "IBM": 0.0, "HON": 0.0, "MSFT": 0.0, "GOOGL": 0.0, "NVDA": 0.0}, "reasoning": "The article is a buy recommendation for D-Wave (QBTS), warranting a +1.0 score. Other companies are unaffected (0.0) as the news is company-specific with low novelty and short-term decay."}}
{"idx": 396, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-04", "title": "Should You Buy D-Wave Quantum Stock While It's Under $35? - The Motley Fool", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "The article does not mention IONQ."}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "The article does not mention RGTI."}, "QBTS": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "The article is a buy recommendation for D-Wave Quantum (QBTS), justifying a moderate positive score (+1.0) due to typical decay expectations."}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "The article does not mention QUBT."}, "QNT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "The article does not mention QNT."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "The article does not mention IBM, and IBM is not a pure-play."}, "HON": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "The article does not mention HON, and HON is not a pure-play."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "MSFT is inactive and always 0.0."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "GOOGL is inactive and always 0.0."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "NVDA is inactive and always 0.0."}}}}
{"idx": 397, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-04", "title": "Quantinuum closes flat in Nasdaq debut, after upsized offering - CNBC", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": [{"ticker": "IONQ", "score": 0.5, "reasoning": "Sector boost from Quantinuum's successful IPO; trapped-ion technology similarity"}, {"ticker": "RGTI", "score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Sector boost from increased investor interest; superconducting technology"}, {"ticker": "QBTS", "score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Sector boost from quantum industry momentum; quantum annealing technology"}, {"ticker": "QUBT", "score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Sector boost from positive quantum sentiment; neutral atom technology"}, {"ticker": "QNT", "score": 1.5, "reasoning": "Direct positive impact from upsized offering; flat close is neutral"}, {"ticker": "IBM", "score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Small positive from sector sentiment; limited quantum revenue share"}, {"ticker": "HON", "score": 0.2, "reasoning": "Positive as parent company of Quantinuum; trapped-ion technology boost"}, {"ticker": "MSFT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; no quantum revenue focus"}, {"ticker": "GOOGL", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; no quantum revenue focus"}, {"ticker": "NVDA", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; no quantum revenue focus"}], "reasoning": "Quantinuum's upsized offering signals strong investor demand (positive), but flat debut caps enthusiasm. Pure-plays receive moderate positive scores due to sector boost, with trapped-ion companies (IONQ, HON) slightly higher. Non-pure-plays (IBM, HON) have smaller impacts. Inactive companies score zero."}}
{"idx": 398, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-04", "title": "Quantinuum raises $1.68 billion in IPO that seeks to give quantum computing more street cred - MarketWatch", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 1.5, "reasoning": "As a pure-play trapped-ion company, IONQ benefits from the industry-wide credibility boost from Quantinuum's successful IPO. The positive sentiment enhances the sector's prospects, but the effect is moderate due to differing company specifics."}, "RGTI": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "RGTI, a pure-play superconducting company, gains from the heightened industry confidence driven by the IPO, though the impact is less direct than for trapped-ion peers."}, "QBTS": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "QBTS (quantum annealing) benefits from the general uplift in quantum computing credibility, but its distinct technology reduces direct linkage to the IPO event."}, "QUBT": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "QUBT, a neutral atom pure-play, sees a moderate positive effect from the sector-wide optimism, though not as pronounced as for direct competitors."}, "QNT": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Quantinuum's own $1.68 billion IPO is a major positive event, directly boosting its standing and valuation to the maximum allowable score."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.1, "reasoning": "IBM benefits slightly from the industry credibility boost, but its minimal quantum revenue share (~2%) limits the impact, resulting in a low positive score."}, "HON": {"score": 0.2, "reasoning": "Honeywell, a trapped-ion player with ~1% quantum revenue, gains from Quantinuum's success (given historical ties) and sector optimism, but its score is capped at a low level."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not a quantum pure-play; excluded from scoring per the 'inactive' designation."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not a quantum pure-play; excluded from scoring per the 'inactive' designation."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not a quantum pure-play; excluded from scoring per the 'inactive' designation."}}}}
{"idx": 399, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-04", "title": "Quantum Stocks: New IPO Quantinuum Volatile In First Trading Day - Investor's Business Daily", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.4, "reasoning": "Positive sentiment from sector news, but not directly about IONQ."}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.4, "reasoning": "Positive sentiment from sector news, but not directly about RGTI."}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.4, "reasoning": "Positive sentiment from sector news, but not directly about QBTS."}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.4, "reasoning": "Positive sentiment from sector news, but not directly about QUBT."}, "QNT": {"score": 1.8, "reasoning": "Directly mentioned as the IPO company; positive event with high novelty."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.05, "reasoning": "Small positive spillover; minimal quantum revenue exposure."}, "HON": {"score": 0.02, "reasoning": "Small positive spillover; minimal quantum revenue exposure."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, always 0.0"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, always 0.0"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, always 0.0"}}}}
{"idx": 400, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-04", "title": "Quantinuum to Debut on Nasdaq After Raising $1.68 Billion in IPO - The Quantum Insider", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": [{"ticker": "IONQ", "score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Indirect positive impact; Quantinuum's IPO validates trapped-ion technology, benefiting the broader segment. Score reflects shared technological alignment."}, {"ticker": "RGTI", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No significant impact; Quantinuum's IPO is in trapped-ion technology, while Rigetti uses superconducting. No direct relevance."}, {"ticker": "QBTS", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No significant impact; D-Wave's quantum annealing approach is distinct from trapped-ion, and the news lacks direct relevance."}, {"ticker": "QUBT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No significant impact; Neutral atom technology differs from trapped-ion, and the IPO news is not directly related."}, {"ticker": "QNT", "score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Direct positive impact; Quantinuum's $1.68B IPO and Nasdaq debut represent major capital infusion and market validation, maximizing score for pure-play."}, {"ticker": "IBM", "score": -0.1, "reasoning": "Slight negative; Increased competition from a validated quantum player (Quantinuum) may pressure IBM's superconducting segment."}, {"ticker": "HON", "score": 0.2, "reasoning": "Indirect positive; Quantinuum's roots in Honeywell's quantum efforts validate trapped-ion tech, but impact is muted due to spinoff and HON's low quantum revenue share."}, {"ticker": "MSFT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; Always 0.0 per specification."}, {"ticker": "GOOGL", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; Always 0.0 per specification."}, {"ticker": "NVDA", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; Always 0.0 per specification."}]}}
{"idx": 401, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-04", "title": "Quantinuum Announces Pricing of Upsized Initial Public Offering - Quantinuum", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive spillover from shared trapped-ion technology; moderate novelty, moderate decay."}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.5, "reasoning": "Mild sector-wide uplift; low novelty, fast decay as unrelated to superconducting tech."}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct impact; low novelty, fast decay."}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct impact; low novelty, fast decay."}, "QNT": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Direct positive impact from IPO pricing; high novelty, moderate decay."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Minor sector sentiment; low novelty, fast decay due to small quantum exposure."}, "HON": {"score": 0.2, "reasoning": "Slight positive as former parent; low novelty, fast decay."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, no impact."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, no impact."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, no impact."}}}}
{"idx": 402, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-04", "title": "Honeywell's Quantinuum valued at $17.6 billion as shares rise in Nasdaq debut - Reuters", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 1.5, "reasoning": "Positive sentiment from industry validation; shared trapped-ion tech with QNT."}, "RGTI": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Indirect positive from quantum sector uplift; different superconducting tech."}, "QBTS": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Indirect positive from industry enthusiasm; quantum annealing approach."}, "QUBT": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Indirect positive from quantum market validation; neutral atom tech."}, "QNT": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Direct positive impact from Nasdaq debut, high valuation, and rising shares."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Minor positive from industry validation; low quantum revenue exposure."}, "HON": {"score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Positive spillover from Quantinuum's success as parent company."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; no quantum focus per criteria."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; no quantum focus per criteria."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; no quantum focus per criteria."}}}}
{"idx": 403, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-04", "title": "Quantum computing\u2019s biggest IPO arrives with a fizzle, not a pop - Yahoo Finance", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": -0.5, "reasoning": "Sector-wide negative sentiment due to weak IPO of QNT, a pure-play competitor"}, "RGTI": {"score": -0.5, "reasoning": "Sector-wide negative sentiment due to weak IPO of QNT, a pure-play competitor"}, "QBTS": {"score": -0.5, "reasoning": "Sector-wide negative sentiment due to weak IPO of QNT, a pure-play competitor"}, "QUBT": {"score": -0.5, "reasoning": "Sector-wide negative sentiment due to weak IPO of QNT, a pure-play competitor"}, "QNT": {"score": -1.5, "reasoning": "Directly mentioned: IPO underperformed (fizzle), indicating poor market reception"}, "IBM": {"score": -0.1, "reasoning": "Sector-wide negative sentiment, but minimal quantum revenue exposure"}, "HON": {"score": -0.1, "reasoning": "Sector-wide negative sentiment, but minimal quantum revenue exposure"}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, no quantum revenue"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, no quantum revenue"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, no quantum revenue"}}}}
{"idx": 404, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-04", "title": "Quantinuum IPO: QNT stock is listing on the Nasdaq today in a closely watched quantum computing debut - Fast Company", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.5, "reasoning": "Positive industry validation from competitor's IPO; trapped-ion focus"}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Positive industry validation; superconducting pure-play"}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Positive industry validation; quantum annealing pure-play"}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Positive industry validation; neutral atom pure-play"}, "QNT": {"score": 1.5, "reasoning": "Direct positive impact from own IPO; pure-play"}, "IBM": {"score": 0.05, "reasoning": "Minimal positive from industry growth; low quantum revenue exposure"}, "HON": {"score": 0.2, "reasoning": "Positive from spin-off success; trapped-ion hybrid"}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, no quantum relevance"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, no quantum relevance"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, no quantum relevance"}}}}
{"idx": 405, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-04", "title": "Quantinuum IPO Lifts Quantum Computing Stocks - Gotrade", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": 1.0, "RGTI": 1.0, "QBTS": 1.0, "QUBT": 1.0, "QNT": 2.0, "IBM": 0.15, "HON": 0.3, "MSFT": 0.0, "GOOGL": 0.0, "NVDA": 0.0}, "reasoning": "The news of Quantinuum's (QNT) IPO lifting quantum computing stocks assigns a high positive signal (+2.0) to QNT due to direct impact and high novelty of the event. Other pure-play companies (IONQ, RGTI, QBTS, QUBT) receive a moderate positive signal (+1.0) from sector-wide sentiment, with medium novelty. IBM and HON, as partial quantum players, get minor positive signals (+0.15 and +0.3 respectively) from ecosystem uplift. Inactive companies (MSFT, GOOGL, NVDA) score 0.0. The signal is likely to decay quickly (fast decay speed) as IPO effects are typically short-lived."}}
{"idx": 406, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-04", "title": "Honeywell\u2019s quantum company goes public. What investors should know about the IPO - CNBC", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Positive sentiment from quantum sector IPO event"}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Positive sentiment from quantum sector IPO event"}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Positive sentiment from quantum sector IPO event"}, "QUBT": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "IPO of the company itself, significant positive event"}, "QNT": {"score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Positive sentiment from quantum sector IPO event"}, "IBM": {"score": 0.05, "reasoning": "Small positive sentiment from quantum sector IPO event"}, "HON": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Spinoff of quantum business, no quantum revenue left"}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive"}}}}
{"idx": 407, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-04", "title": "QNT Stock Debuts Today After 20x-Oversubscribed IPO: New Quantum Play Grabs Investor Attention Amid Trump Pump - Yahoo Finance", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": 0.5, "RGTI": 0.5, "QBTS": 0.5, "QUBT": 0.5, "QNT": 2.0, "IBM": 0.1, "HON": 0.1, "MSFT": 0.0, "GOOGL": 0.0, "NVDA": 0.0}, "reasoning": "The news focuses on QNT's highly oversubscribed IPO (20x), indicating strong investor demand and novelty for a new pure-play quantum company. This event is assigned the maximum positive score (+2.0) for QNT. Other pure-play competitors (IONQ, RGTI, QBTS, QUBT) receive a moderate positive (+0.5) due to sector-wide excitement from the event, though with lower novelty and faster decay. IBM and HON, as non-pure-plays, get a mild positive (+0.1) for similar reasons. Inactive companies (MSFT, GOOGL, NVDA) score 0.0 as per guidelines."}}
{"idx": 408, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-04", "title": "Quantinuum raises $1.68 billion in IPO that seeks to give quantum computing more street cred - MSN", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": 1.0, "RGTI": 1.0, "QBTS": 1.0, "QUBT": 1.0, "QNT": 2.0, "IBM": 0.15, "HON": 0.3, "MSFT": 0.0, "GOOGL": 0.0, "NVDA": 0.0}, "reasoning": "Quantinuum's $1.68 billion IPO is a major positive event for QNT (+2.0) as it validates the commercial potential of quantum computing. The spillover effect boosts credibility for pure-play competitors (IONQ, RGTI, QBTS, QUBT; each +1.0) and smaller gains for IBM (+0.15) and Honeywell (+0.3) due to their quantum segments. Inactive companies (MSFT, GOOGL, NVDA) score 0.0."}}
{"idx": 409, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-04", "title": "Quantum computing\u2019s biggest IPO arrives with a sizzle, not a pop - Yahoo! Finance Canada", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Moderate positive impact from sector-wide sentiment due to successful quantum IPO; novelty high, decay moderate."}, "RGTI": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Moderate positive impact from sector-wide sentiment due to successful quantum IPO; novelty high, decay moderate."}, "QBTS": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Moderate positive impact from sector-wide sentiment due to successful quantum IPO; novelty high, decay moderate."}, "QUBT": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Direct positive impact from successful IPO; high novelty as largest quantum IPO, fast decay likely."}, "QNT": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Moderate positive impact from sector-wide sentiment due to successful quantum IPO; novelty high, decay moderate."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Small positive indirect impact from quantum sector sentiment; low novelty for IBM, slow decay."}, "HON": {"score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Small positive indirect impact from quantum sector sentiment; low novelty for HON, slow decay."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, no quantum focus, no impact."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, no quantum focus, no impact."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, no quantum focus, no impact."}}}}
{"idx": 410, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-05", "title": "Why Rigetti Computing Stock Just Crashed - Yahoo Finance", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.5, "reasoning": "Indirectly benefits as a competitor in the quantum computing sector; trapped-ion focus may contrast with Rigetti's superconducting approach. Low novelty for sector dynamics, moderate decay."}, "RGTI": {"score": -2.0, "reasoning": "Directly impacted by stock crash news; high novelty and slow decay due to potential fundamental issues (e.g., financial or technological setbacks)."}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No significant impact; quantum annealing focus (D-Wave) differs from Rigetti's gate-based approach. Low novelty, fast decay."}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Neutral atom technology not directly affected; minimal sector spillover. Low novelty, fast decay."}, "QNT": {"score": 0.5, "reasoning": "Indirectly benefits as a competitor; trapped-ion focus may gain relative strength. Low novelty for sector, moderate decay."}, "IBM": {"score": -0.1, "reasoning": "Minor quantum exposure (~2% revenue); potential sector-wide sentiment drag, but diversified business limits impact. Moderate novelty, moderate decay."}, "HON": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Small quantum business post-Quantinuum spinoff (~1% revenue); no direct impact. Low novelty, fast decay."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; no quantum revenue focus. Always 0.0."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; no quantum revenue focus. Always 0.0."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; no quantum revenue focus. Always 0.0."}}}}
{"idx": 411, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-05", "title": "Why D-Wave Quantum Stock Just Crashed - Yahoo Finance", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": 0.0, "RGTI": 0.0, "QBTS": -2.0, "QUBT": 0.0, "QNT": 0.0, "IBM": 0.0, "HON": 0.0, "MSFT": 0.0, "GOOGL": 0.0, "NVDA": 0.0}, "reasoning": "The news directly impacts QBTS with a -2.0 score due to the stock crash, indicating high novelty and moderate-slow decay from potential fundamental issues. Other companies score 0.0 as they are unaffected, with fast decay for any minor sentiment effects."}}
{"idx": 412, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-05", "title": "Why D-Wave Quantum Stock Just Crashed - The Motley Fool", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": -0.5, "RGTI": -0.5, "QBTS": -2.0, "QUBT": -0.5, "QNT": -0.5, "IBM": -0.075, "HON": -0.15, "MSFT": 0.0, "GOOGL": 0.0, "NVDA": 0.0}, "reasoning": "The news details a crash in D-Wave (QBTS) stock, a pure-play quantum company, warranting the maximum negative score of -2.0. Sector-wide concerns lead to moderate negative scores (-0.5) for other pure-plays (IONQ, RGTI, QUBT, QNT). Non-pure-play companies IBM (~2% quantum revenue) and HON (~1% quantum revenue) receive smaller negatives (-0.075 and -0.15) due to limited quantum exposure. Inactive companies (MSFT, GOOGL, NVDA) score 0.0 as they are unaffected."}}
{"idx": 413, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-05", "title": "Quantinuum Stock Closes Below Its Offer Price. Why the Buzzy Quantum IPO Is Faltering. - Barron's", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": -0.5, "RGTI": -0.5, "QBTS": -0.5, "QUBT": -0.5, "QNT": -2.0, "IBM": -0.1, "HON": -0.2, "MSFT": 0.0, "GOOGL": 0.0, "NVDA": 0.0}, "reasoning": "Quantinuum's IPO underperformance directly impacts QNT negatively (-2.0). Other pure-plays (IONQ, RGTI, QBTS, QUBT) are moderately affected (-0.5 each) due to sector sentiment. Honeywell (HON) is negatively impacted as Quantinuum's former parent (-0.2). IBM has minor exposure (-0.1). Inactive companies (MSFT, GOOGL, NVDA) are unaffected (0.0). Novelty is high; decay speed is medium."}}
{"idx": 414, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-05", "title": "Quantinuum and Mitsubishi Electric Sign Quantum Computing MOU - The Quantum Insider", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": [{"ticker": "IONQ", "score": 0.1, "reasoning": "General positive sentiment from quantum sector news, but not directly involved."}, {"ticker": "RGTI", "score": 0.1, "reasoning": "General positive sentiment from quantum sector news, but not directly involved."}, {"ticker": "QBTS", "score": 0.1, "reasoning": "General positive sentiment from quantum sector news, but not directly involved."}, {"ticker": "QUBT", "score": 0.1, "reasoning": "General positive sentiment from quantum sector news, but not directly involved."}, {"ticker": "QNT", "score": 1.5, "reasoning": "Direct positive impact from signing a quantum computing MOU with Mitsubishi Electric, indicating potential collaboration."}, {"ticker": "IBM", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct impact; quantum computing is a small part of their business."}, {"ticker": "HON", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct impact; quantum computing is a small part of their business post-spinoff."}, {"ticker": "MSFT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive in quantum computing."}, {"ticker": "GOOGL", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive in quantum computing."}, {"ticker": "NVDA", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive in quantum computing."}]}}
{"idx": 415, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-05", "title": "Quantinuum Stock Falls After Uninspiring Quantum IPO Debut. What Went Wrong? - Barron's", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": [{"ticker": "IONQ", "score": -0.4, "reasoning": "Trapped-ion competitor; spillover negativity from Quantinuum's poor IPO, moderate novelty, gradual decay"}, {"ticker": "RGTI", "score": -0.3, "reasoning": "Superconducting competitor; sector-wide sentiment drag, moderate novelty, gradual decay"}, {"ticker": "QBTS", "score": -0.2, "reasoning": "Quantum annealing player; minor sector impact, moderate novelty, gradual decay"}, {"ticker": "QUBT", "score": -0.2, "reasoning": "Neutral atom player; minor sector impact, moderate novelty, gradual decay"}, {"ticker": "QNT", "score": -1.8, "reasoning": "Direct negative impact from uninspiring IPO debut; high novelty, moderate decay"}, {"ticker": "IBM", "score": -0.1, "reasoning": "Small quantum revenue exposure; slight negative sentiment, moderate novelty, faster decay"}, {"ticker": "HON", "score": -0.2, "reasoning": "Trapped-ion relation and Quantinuum spinoff association; moderate novelty, faster decay"}, {"ticker": "MSFT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, no quantum focus"}, {"ticker": "GOOGL", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, no quantum focus"}, {"ticker": "NVDA", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, no quantum focus"}]}}
{"idx": 416, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-05", "title": "Quantum computer maker Quantinuum closes flat after $1.68B IPO - SiliconANGLE", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": [{"ticker": "IONQ", "score": -1.0, "reasoning": "Direct competitor with same trapped-ion technology; negative impact from new competitor; medium decay"}, {"ticker": "RGTI", "score": -0.5, "reasoning": "Competitor IPO; negative impact despite different superconducting technology; medium decay"}, {"ticker": "QBTS", "score": -0.5, "reasoning": "Competitor IPO; negative impact despite different quantum annealing technology; medium decay"}, {"ticker": "QUBT", "score": -0.5, "reasoning": "Competitor IPO; negative impact despite different neutral atom technology; medium decay"}, {"ticker": "QNT", "score": -0.5, "reasoning": "Directly mentioned; flat IPO close perceived as lack of enthusiasm; high novelty, fast decay"}, {"ticker": "IBM", "score": -0.05, "reasoning": "Minor quantum exposure (~2%); slight negative from industry competition; medium decay"}, {"ticker": "HON", "score": -0.1, "reasoning": "Trapped-ion player with minor quantum exposure (~1%); negative due to direct competition; medium decay"}, {"ticker": "MSFT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; no quantum focus; always 0.0"}, {"ticker": "GOOGL", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; no quantum focus; always 0.0"}, {"ticker": "NVDA", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive; no quantum focus; always 0.0"}]}}
{"idx": 417, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-05", "title": "IPO News - US IPO Weekly Recap: Billion-dollar engine and quantum computing IPOs come to market as SpaceX launches historic IPO - renaissancecapital.com", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": 1.0, "RGTI": 1.0, "QBTS": 1.0, "QUBT": 1.0, "QNT": 2.0, "IBM": 0.15, "HON": 0.3, "MSFT": 0.0, "GOOGL": 0.0, "NVDA": 0.0}, "reasoning": "Quantum computing IPOs, led by Quantinuum (QNT), drive sector positivity. Pure-plays (IONQ, RGTI, QBTS, QUBT) gain moderate scores. IBM and Honeywell receive maximum positive scores within their ranges due to sector sentiment. Inactive companies score zero."}}
{"idx": 418, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-06", "title": "Rigetti Stock: The Rise and Fall of a Quantum Computing Company - TradingKey", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": -0.5, "reasoning": "Sector-wide negative sentiment from competitor's fall"}, "RGTI": {"score": -2.0, "reasoning": "Direct negative impact from article about its fall"}, "QBTS": {"score": -0.5, "reasoning": "Sector-wide negative sentiment from competitor's fall"}, "QUBT": {"score": -0.5, "reasoning": "Sector-wide negative sentiment from competitor's fall"}, "QNT": {"score": -0.5, "reasoning": "Sector-wide negative sentiment from competitor's fall"}, "IBM": {"score": -0.1, "reasoning": "Minor negative impact due to quantum sector uncertainty"}, "HON": {"score": -0.1, "reasoning": "Minor negative impact due to quantum sector uncertainty"}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, no quantum focus"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, no quantum focus"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, no quantum focus"}}}}
{"idx": 419, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-06", "title": "Introducing Microsoft Majorana 2 - Microsoft Source", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": [{"ticker": "IONQ", "score": 0.4, "reasoning": "Pure-play trapped-ion company; benefits from positive sector sentiment due to Microsoft's quantum advancement, though not directly competing. Score reflects moderate positive impact from sector growth."}, {"ticker": "RGTI", "score": -1.5, "reasoning": "Pure-play superconducting company; strongly negatively affected as Microsoft is a competing player in quantum computing, potentially reducing market share for superconducting firms. Score reflects significant competitive threat."}, {"ticker": "QBTS", "score": 0.2, "reasoning": "Pure-play quantum annealing company; different technology approach, so less directly impacted. Score reflects modest positive effect from overall quantum industry growth."}, {"ticker": "QUBT", "score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Pure-play neutral atom company; different approach, benefits from sector growth. Score reflects positive sentiment but lower direct relevance."}, {"ticker": "QNT", "score": 0.4, "reasoning": "Pure-play trapped-ion company; similar to IONQ, benefits from sector growth. Score reflects moderate positive impact."}, {"ticker": "IBM", "score": -0.15, "reasoning": "Mixed company with ~2% quantum revenue; negatively affected as Microsoft is a direct competitor in superconducting quantum computing. Score reflects maximum negative impact within range due to competitive pressure."}, {"ticker": "HON", "score": 0.2, "reasoning": "Mixed company with ~1% quantum revenue from trapped-ion; not directly competing, so slightly positive from sector growth. Score reflects modest positive effect within narrow range."}, {"ticker": "MSFT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, always 0.0 per specification."}, {"ticker": "GOOGL", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, always 0.0 per specification."}, {"ticker": "NVDA", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive, always 0.0 per specification."}]}}
{"idx": 420, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-06", "title": "The Next Quantum Computing IPO CEO Just Told CNBC 'It Is Not 10 to 15 Years Out. It's Very Much Now' - 24/7 Wall St.", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 1.8, "reasoning": "Positive industry sentiment from accelerated quantum timeline; full quantum exposure as pure-play."}, "RGTI": {"score": 1.8, "reasoning": "Positive industry sentiment from accelerated quantum timeline; full quantum exposure as pure-play."}, "QBTS": {"score": 1.8, "reasoning": "Positive industry sentiment from accelerated quantum timeline; full quantum exposure as pure-play."}, "QUBT": {"score": 1.8, "reasoning": "Positive industry sentiment from accelerated quantum timeline; full quantum exposure as pure-play."}, "QNT": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Direct source of news (CEO of 'next quantum IPO'); positive sentiment; full quantum exposure; novel timeline shift sustains impact."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Positive sentiment benefits quantum segment; capped at +0.15 due to ~2% quantum revenue share."}, "HON": {"score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Positive sentiment benefits quantum segment; capped at +0.3 due to ~1% quantum revenue share."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive in quantum; no exposure; always 0.0."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive in quantum; no exposure; always 0.0."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Inactive in quantum; no exposure; always 0.0."}}}}