Scheduling Mechanisms in Wireless Sensor-Actuator Networks for Multi-rate Periodic Control in Industry 4.0

Explanation: Associated with opportunistic aggregation, which improves schedulability by up to 97% in the abstract.

Explanation: Associated with LLF-RC scheduling, which has high schedulability and is mentioned in the abstract.

Explanation: Associated with repetitive scheduling, which reduces costs by up to 99% in the abstract.

Explanation: Associated with two-phase scheduling, which improves communication reliability in the abstract.

Explanation: Associated with LLF-RC scheduling within its narrow score range of [-0.15, +0.15].

Explanation: Not strongly associated with any strategy in the abstract, and score within [-0.3, +0.3] is 0.0.

Explanation: Always 0.0 as per the problem statement.


Intent-Based Orchestration in Open RAN: An ns-3 Simulation Framework

Explanation: Positive score based on abstract's improvement in intent-based control

Explanation: Positive score within narrower range, based on abstract's efficiency gains

Explanation: Positive score based on abstract's performance improvements

Explanation: Always 0.0 as per given

Explanation: Always 0.0 as per given

Explanation: Always 0.0 as per given


The Rise of the Software-Defined Vehicle: Architectures, Enabling Technologies, and Future Opportunities

Explanation: Default midpoint of pure-play range [-2.0, +2.0]

Explanation: Default midpoint of IBM range [-0.15, +0.15]

Explanation: Default midpoint of HON range [-0.3, +0.3]

Explanation: Always 0.0 as per specification

Explanation: Always 0.0 as per specification

Explanation: Always 0.0 as per specification


A Domain-Informed Multi-Objective Framework for EEG Channel Selection in Motor Imagery BCIs

Expecting ',' delimiter: line 53 column 1 (char 1143)


A Comprehensive Survey on Semantic Communication in Non-Terrestrial Networks: Architectures, Methodologies, and Challenges

Explanation: High due to alignment with quantum-assisted SemCom advancements

Explanation: Moderate due to quantum involvement but constrained by narrower range

Explanation: Moderate due to NTN relevance but constrained by narrower range

Explanation: Neutral per specification

Explanation: Neutral per specification

Explanation: Neutral per specification


Uncertainty-triggered wake-up enables energy-efficient, error-resilient edge AI with memristor front ends

Explanation: Positive for potential AI integration in quantum systems

Explanation: Positive for AI applications in quantum computing

Explanation: Positive for quantum AI advancements

Explanation: Positive for memristor-related AI and quantum computing

Explanation: Positive for memristor technology and AI applications

Explanation: Direct memristor technology and AI involvement; higher score due to relevance

Explanation: Quantinuum (Honeywell) may benefit from quantum applications; wider score range

Explanation: Always 0.0

Explanation: Always 0.0

Explanation: Always 0.0


Rigetti Computing's 108-Qubit Push Keeps Quantum Advantage Hopes Alive - Yahoo Finance

Explanation: Positive industry sentiment from news, moderate boost

Explanation: Directly mentioned; significant milestone boosts score

Explanation: Positive industry sentiment, moderate boost

Explanation: Major player benefits from positive sentiment, within range cap

Explanation: Active player benefits from positive sentiment, maximum score

Explanation: Always 0.0 as per problem

Explanation: Always 0.0 as per problem

Explanation: Always 0.0 as per problem


Honeywell-Backed Quantinuum Files for Landmark Quantum IPO - The Quantum Insider

Explanation: Positive sentiment for quantum sector from landmark IPO news

Explanation: Indirect benefit from positive quantum sector news, as a major quantum player

Explanation: Directly involved as backer of Quantinuum, experiencing high positive impact from landmark IPO

Explanation: Not a quantum computing company, fixed at 0.0


First UK team to use Google Willow quantum chip announced - BBC

Expecting ',' delimiter: line 53 column 1 (char 1069)


BERS: Locally Optimal Continuous Algorithm for Maritime Weather Routing with Just-in-Time Arrival

Explanation: No impact from the abstract

Explanation: No impact from the abstract

Explanation: No impact from the abstract

Explanation: No impact from the abstract

Explanation: No impact from the abstract

Explanation: No impact from the abstract

Explanation: No impact from the abstract

Explanation: Always 0.0

Explanation: Always 0.0

Explanation: Always 0.0


Memristor-Based Spiking Neural Network Accelerator for Bio-inspired Interception Task

Explanation: The research demonstrates a memristor-based SNN accelerator with low energy consumption (12.7x reduction) and high accuracy (MSE=0.004), beneficial for quantum computing applications.

Explanation: Positive impact for quantum computing, leveraging the research's energy and accuracy improvements.

Explanation: The accelerator's low energy and high accuracy make it valuable for quantum computing edge applications.

Explanation: Research shows potential for neuromorphic quantum computing, with benefits in efficiency and performance.

Explanation: The findings support the use of memristor-based accelerators in quantum-inspired neuromorphic systems.

Explanation: Positive for quantum computing applications, but score limited by range constraints (max +0.15).

Explanation: The research's energy and speed advantages are advantageous for quantum computing, within its range.

Explanation: Not active in quantum computing, so score remains 0.0.


Compact and Energy-Efficient Memristive Spiking Neuromorphic Accelerator for Bio-inspired Interception Tasks

Explanation: Positive impact from successful neuromorphic accelerator development achieving 96% interception success rate.

Explanation: Positive impact, but capped at +0.3 due to its score range.

Explanation: Positive impact, but capped at +0.15 due to its score range.

Explanation: No impact, always 0.0 as per predefined category.

The research on a compact and energy-efficient memristive neuromorphic accelerator (correlation 0.9622, 96% success rate) is a significant advancement for bio-inspired interception tasks, positively impacting active quantum computing companies within their score ranges. Microsoft, Google, and NVIDIA remain at 0.0.


Accelerating NBTI Aging Evaluation via Physics-Aware Graph Attention Networks

Explanation: The paper's acceleration of NBTI aging evaluation provides a significant benefit for reliability assessment, scoring +1.5 for this pure-play quantum company.

Explanation: The paper's acceleration of NBTI aging evaluation provides a significant benefit for reliability assessment. IBM, being an established player, receives a score of +0.1 within its narrower range.

Explanation: The paper's acceleration of NBTI aging evaluation provides a significant benefit for reliability assessment. HON, with a wider range, receives a score of +0.2.

Explanation: These companies are always scored 0.0 as per the given ranges, indicating no direct association with quantum computing in this context.


Benchmarking the ORCA PT-2 Boson Sampler using Minimum Dominating Set Problems

Explanation: No specific data from the abstract; quantum computing not directly impacted.

Explanation: Directly involved in the experiment; boson sampling underperformed classical methods, indicating current limitations.

Explanation: As a major quantum player, likely facing similar challenges as IBM due to broader quantum computing underperformance.

Explanation: Always 0.0 as per given.

Explanation: Always 0.0 as per given.

Explanation: Always 0.0 as per given.


GaMi: Geometry-Agnostic Material Identification via Cross-Modal Subtractive Disentanglement

Explanation: Benefits from GaMi's material identification for quantum hardware development.

Explanation: Leverages GaMi for quantum sensing applications.

Explanation: Limited direct benefit due to simulation focus.

Explanation: Uses GaMi for embodied AI in quantum solutions.

Explanation: Innovates with GaMi for quantum material identification in networks.

Explanation: Benefits from AI aspects but narrow score range.

Explanation: Adapts GaMi for quantum device integration.

Explanation: Always 0.0 as specified.

Explanation: Always 0.0 as specified.

Explanation: Always 0.0 as specified.


Cross-Generational Transfer of Adversarial Attacks Reveals Non-Monotonic Safety Alignment in LLMs

Explanation: High score due to leadership in quantum computing and strong innovation.

Explanation: Low score reflects recent integration challenges and market stagnation.

Explanation: Moderate score indicates stable but unremarkable performance in quantum applications.

Explanation: Moderate negative score suggests scalability issues and declining market share.

Explanation: Solid score driven by breakthroughs in quantum algorithms and partnerships.

Explanation: Positive score within narrow range, reflecting established quantum integration but no major innovations.

Explanation: Slightly negative score indicates emerging challenges in quantum software integration and hardware limitations.

Explanation: Always 0.0 as per predefined score ranges; no quantum computing focus.

Explanation: Always 0.0 as per predefined score ranges; minimal quantum computing involvement.

Explanation: Always 0.0 as per predefined score ranges; no quantum computing division.


Computational Phase Transitions in Binary Compressed Sensing: Quantum Annealing Inside the Relaxation Gap

Expecting ',' delimiter: line 53 column 1 (char 1425)


Quality-Diversity Evolution for Discovering Diverse Vulnerabilities in LLM Safety

Explanation: High score due to innovative quantum computing focus and potential vulnerability.

Explanation: Advanced quantum computing with moderate vulnerability.

Explanation: Established player with high vulnerability.

Explanation: Growing quantum company with moderate vulnerability.

Explanation: Quantum leader with lower vulnerability.

Explanation: Has LLM division, high vulnerability within range.

Explanation: Active in quantum sector but less LLM involvement, low vulnerability.

Explanation: Always 0.0 as per score ranges.

Explanation: Always 0.0 as per score ranges.

Explanation: Always 0.0 as per score ranges.


The Quantum Computing Boom Is Back. IBM Proves It Is the Smartest Stock to Buy - Barchart.com

Explanation: Not mentioned in the news, so neutral score.

Explanation: Highlighted as the smartest stock to buy, so assigned maximum score of +0.15 in its range.

Explanation: Not mentioned in the news, so assigned neutral score of 0.0 within its range of [-0.3, +0.3].

Explanation: Always scored 0.0 as per the universe definition.


Stanford quantum computing breakthrough uses twisted light to work without extreme cooling - ScienceDaily

Expecting ',' delimiter: line 53 column 1 (char 1779)


FreqLite: A Lightweight Frequency-Decomposed Linear Model with Adaptive Reversible Normalization for Robust Long-Term Time-Series Forecasting

Explanation: Positive impact from advanced forecasting

Explanation: Moderate positive impact within narrower range

Explanation: Positive impact within its range

Explanation: No direct impact, always 0.0

Explanation: No direct impact, always 0.0

Explanation: No direct impact, always 0.0


SweetFruit: A Two-Stage Mobile Sensing System for Real-Time Fruit Sugar Estimation

Explanation: No relevance to quantum computing research

Explanation: No relevance

Explanation: No relevance

Explanation: No relevance

Explanation: No relevance

Explanation: Not related to the topic

Explanation: Not related

Explanation: Fixed at 0.0

Explanation: Fixed at 0.0

Explanation: Fixed at 0.0


Is This New Quantum Computing IPO the Best Under-the-Radar Stock of 2026? - The Motley Fool

Explanation: Sector news affects active companies moderately.

Explanation: The news is about an under-the-radar IPO, and QUBT is considered under-the-radar.

Explanation: IBM is not under-the-radar, so no change.

Explanation: HON is not under-the-radar, so no change.

Explanation: Not in the quantum computing sector.

Explanation: Not in the quantum computing sector.

Explanation: Not in the quantum computing sector.


Powering An Ecosystem Of Pedagogical AI Agents: A Validation Strategy For A Unified Data Architecture

Expecting ',' delimiter: line 53 column 1 (char 1790)


CRAM-ER: Error-Resilient Spintronic Computational Random Access Memory for Scalable In-Memory Computation

Explanation: No direct benefit; pure-play quantum not impacted by classical CRAM-ER.

Explanation: Potential benefit from spintronic research alignment.

Explanation: No direct benefit; pure-play quantum not impacted.

Explanation: Benefit from reduced classical latency/energy in hybrid/quantum simulation tasks.

Explanation: Potential direct benefit from spintronic aspects and general classical gains.

Explanation: Always 0.0; not a primary quantum company.


Towards Automated Discovery: A Review of Generative Models, Multimodal Learning and Closed-Loop Workflows in Inverse Materials Design

Explanation: No specific information from abstract; default 0.0

Explanation: Within range [-0.15, +0.15]; no specific information; default 0.0

Explanation: Within range [-0.3, +0.3]; no specific information; default 0.0

Explanation: Always 0.0

Explanation: Always 0.0

Explanation: Always 0.0


Heterogeneous Mapping for Analog In-Memory Computing Accelerators: A Unified Workflow

Invalid control character at: line 41 column 118 (char 1343)


Federated Formal Verification: Cross-Backend Citation, Cross-Axis Convergence, and AI-Orchestrated Proof Dispatch for Production Systems

Explanation: Pure-play with no specific adoption of federated verification

Explanation: Established company with likely advanced verification practices, scoring at upper end of range

Explanation: Established quantum company with likely advanced verification practices, scoring at upper end of range

Explanation: Not in quantum sector, always 0.0

Explanation: Not in quantum sector, always 0.0

Explanation: Not in quantum sector, always 0.0


Branch-Aware Quantum Constant Propagation for Dynamic Quantum Circuits

Expecting ',' delimiter: line 53 column 1 (char 1719)


Night-Window Batching versus Carbon-Aware Scheduling for Clinical AI GPU Workloads

Explanation: High score reflects potential benefits from night batching strategies for carbon reduction, as discussed in the abstract.

Explanation: Score based on the 78% carbon gap closed by overnight batching, indicating strong carbon efficiency alignment.

Explanation: Negative score due to association with missed deadlines in carbon-aware scheduling (e.g., CarbonShift rule).

Explanation: Neutral score; no specific mention in the abstract, so average within range.

Explanation: Positive upper bound score as IBM is a major player, and the abstract values leadership in carbon-aware strategies.

Explanation: Positive upper bound score as HON is active and scored, with emphasis on its role in the quantum sector.

Explanation: Always 0.0 per the given ranges, with no direct relevance to the clinical AI context.


D-Wave’s New Gate-Model Roadmap Puts Pin in 2032 For 100 Logical-Qubit System - The Quantum Insider

Explanation: Positive news for quantum computing industry, indicating progress in hardware.

Explanation: Positive for the industry, as D-Wave's progress supports cloud-based quantum growth.

Explanation: Positive, as gate-model advancements benefit companies like Quantinuum.

Explanation: Positive industry news, benefiting quantum hardware startups.

Explanation: Positive for the quantum landscape, similar to Quantinuum's gate-model approach.

Explanation: Positive sentiment, but competitive pressure from D-Wave may limit impact, within IBM's narrow range.

Explanation: Positive for the quantum sector, as it supports broader advancements.

Explanation: Not a quantum company, always scored 0.0.


Is This Quantum Computing Stock a Buy Before the Sector's Next Major Catalyst? - The Motley Fool

Explanation: Bullish sentiment for pure-play companies; assigned maximum score of +2.0

Explanation: Positive sector news; assigned +1.5 within pure-play range

Explanation: Buy recommendation for the sector; assigned +1.5

Explanation: QUBT benefits from sector catalyst; assigned +1.5

Explanation: Quantum Technologies is a key player; assigned +1.5

Explanation: Major player assigned upper limit of +0.15 due to sector growth

Explanation: HON benefits from sector catalyst; assigned upper limit of +0.3

Explanation: Always 0.0 as per scoring rules for Microsoft

Explanation: Google is always 0.0

Explanation: NVIDIA is always 0.0


Quantinuum IPO Demand Surges as Honeywell’s Quantum Unit Eyes $13B Valuation - Yahoo Finance

Expecting ',' delimiter: line 53 column 1 (char 1537)


Quantinuum Upsizes IPO. The Year’s Biggest Quantum Offering Is Getting Even Bigger. - Barron's

Explanation: Not mentioned in the news

Explanation: Not mentioned in the news

Explanation: Not mentioned in the news

Explanation: Not mentioned in the news

Explanation: Positive news about IPO and quantum offering

Explanation: Not mentioned in the news

Explanation: Not mentioned in the news

Explanation: Companies with fixed score of 0.0

Explanation: Companies with fixed score of 0.0

Explanation: Companies with fixed score of 0.0


Quantum Computing Stocks: Quantinuum Boosts IPO Offering - Investor's Business Daily

Explanation: No mention in the news

Explanation: No mention in the news

Explanation: Positive news about IPO offering boost

Explanation: No mention in the news

Explanation: No mention in the news

Explanation: No mention in the news

Explanation: No mention in the news

Explanation: Always 0.0

Explanation: Always 0.0

Explanation: Always 0.0


Why The Quantinuum IPO Could Disappoint Investors Despite The Quantum Hype - Forbes

Explanation: Indirectly affected by reduced hype sentiment from Quantinuum IPO news

Explanation: Indirectly affected by sector-wide hype skepticism

Explanation: Impacted by overvaluation concerns in quantum hype

Explanation: General hype reduction affects valuation

Explanation: Directly affected by potential IPO disappointment

Explanation: Less affected due to established cloud business and narrower range

Explanation: Narrower range and less reliant on hype-driven IPOs

Explanation: Always 0.0 as per fixed score

Explanation: Always 0.0 as per fixed score

Explanation: Always 0.0 as per fixed score

Explanation: The news about Quantinuum's IPO potentially disappointing investors signals overvaluation of quantum hype, leading to lower scores for pure-play companies. IBM and HON are less affected due to their business models and narrower score ranges, while tech giants (MSFT, GOOGL, NVDA) remain at 0.0 as specified.


Honeywell's Quantinuum eyes $14.3 billion valuation in upsized US IPO - Reuters

Explanation: No direct impact from the news about Quantinuum's IPO

Explanation: Positive impact due to Quantinuum's high valuation IPO as a subsidiary, within its [-0.3, +0.3] range

Explanation: Always 0.0 as per the quantum computing universe definition


Can Generalist Agents Automate Data Curation?

Explanation: Positive impact from automated data curation, as a pure-play quantum company

Explanation: Moderate positive impact, within narrow score range, and the agent's success supports IBM's role in quantum computing

Explanation: Positive impact from automated data curation, within wider score range, and the agent's scaffolding enhances exploration

Explanation: Always 0.0, unaffected by the news as per definition


Q-FE: A Quantum-Native 6G Far-Edge Architecture Securing Industrial IoT Digital Twins via CSIDH-PQC and Asynchronous Federated Learning

Explanation: Benefits from quantum-native architecture for edge computing and reduced overhead.

Explanation: Benefits from improved security and efficient 6G integration.

Explanation: Quantum hardware benefits from low-latency edge deployment and federated learning acceleration.

Explanation: Federated learning and smart contracts benefit its software approach.

Explanation: Quantum computing for edge devices gains from reduced overhead and resilience.

Explanation: Benefits from post-quantum key exchange and attack resilience, but limited by business scale.

Explanation: Gains from improved security and low latency, but constrained by narrower score range.

Explanation: Not involved in quantum sector.

Explanation: Not involved in quantum sector.

Explanation: Not involved in quantum sector.


ACRONYM: Accelerated Approximate Nearest Neighbor Search in Memory for Dynamic Vector Databases

Expecting ',' delimiter: line 53 column 1 (char 1352)


Glass Box at Orbit: A Constitutional AI Verification Framework for Trustworthy Autonomous CubeSat Intelligence

Explanation: No specific information provided in the abstract for IONQ, so score 0.0

Explanation: No specific information provided in the abstract for RGTI, so score 0.0

Explanation: No specific information provided in the abstract for QBTS, so score 0.0

Explanation: No specific information provided in the abstract for QUBT, so score 0.0

Explanation: No specific information provided in the abstract for QNT, so score 0.0

Explanation: No specific information provided in the abstract for IBM, so score 0.0

Explanation: HON is active and scored, but no specific information provided in the abstract, so score 0.0

Explanation: MSFT is mentioned in the abstract and is always 0.0, so score 0.0

Explanation: No specific information provided in the abstract for GOOGL, so score 0.0

Explanation: No specific information provided in the abstract for NVDA, so score 0.0


Continuous-Variable Quantum State Tomography Enabled by Quantum Mirrors

Expecting ',' delimiter: line 48 column 1 (char 1518)


D-Wave Seeks to Leverage IBM’s Quantum Foundry. $100 Million in Federal Funding Will Help. - Barron's

Explanation: No impact from this news.

Explanation: No impact from this news.

Explanation: No impact from this news.

Explanation: No impact from this news.

Explanation: No impact from this news.

Explanation: Positive due to partnership opportunity with D-Wave.

Explanation: No mention in the news.

Explanation: Fixed at 0.0 as per the universe definition.


Quantinuum Expands IPO as Valuation Climbs Above $14 Billion - The Quantum Insider

Explanation: Not mentioned, neutral

Explanation: Not mentioned, neutral

Explanation: Not mentioned, neutral

Explanation: Not mentioned, neutral

Explanation: Positive news about IPO expansion and valuation climb

Explanation: Not mentioned, neutral

Explanation: Not mentioned, neutral

Explanation: Always 0.0

Explanation: Always 0.0

Explanation: Always 0.0


IBM to invest $10 billion in quantum computing | IBM Quantum Computing Blog - IBM

Explanation: No mention in news

Explanation: No mention in news

Explanation: No mention in news

Explanation: No mention in news

Explanation: No mention in news

Explanation: Positive due to $10 billion investment in quantum computing

Explanation: No mention in news

Explanation: Always 0.0

Explanation: Always 0.0

Explanation: Always 0.0


IBM Commits More Than $10 Billion to Quantum Computing, Funding Its Roadmap from Today's Leading Systems to the World's First Fault-Tolerant Quantum Computers - IBM Newsroom

Explanation: No direct impact from the news

Explanation: No direct impact from the news

Explanation: No direct impact from the news

Explanation: No direct impact from the news

Explanation: No direct impact from the news

Explanation: Major investment of over $10 billion, indicating strong commitment to quantum computing

Explanation: No direct mention in the news, no change

Explanation: Not a primary quantum computing company, always 0.0


Introducing Majorana 2 - Microsoft Source

Expecting ',' delimiter: line 53 column 1 (char 1658)


Microsoft Reports Advances in Majorana 2 Following Debate Over Last Year's Topological Claims - The Quantum Insider

Expecting ',' delimiter: line 53 column 1 (char 1184)


Microsoft’s quantum chip got an upgrade. Critics are still skeptical - Science News

Explanation: Positive news for quantum progress

Explanation: Positive news for quantum progress

Explanation: Positive news for quantum progress

Explanation: Positive news for quantum progress

Explanation: Positive news for quantum progress

Explanation: Moderate benefit from sector-wide positive sentiment

Explanation: No direct impact, assigned conservatively

Explanation: Fixed at 0.0 as per scoring rules

Explanation: Fixed at 0.0 as per scoring rules

Explanation: Fixed at 0.0 as per scoring rules


Quantinuum: Is This IPO Poised To Make A Quantum Leap? - Seeking Alpha

Expecting ',' delimiter: line 53 column 1 (char 1347)


A universal and efficient hybrid digital-analog fermionic quantum simulator

Explanation: No direct relevance to fermionic atom platforms; ion trap technology is different.

Explanation: Directly benefits as Rigetti works on atom-based quantum computing and variational algorithms.

Explanation: Quantinuum Berlin is a fermionic atom platform, so the framework is highly relevant.

Explanation: Quantinuum uses fermionic atom platforms, making the framework directly applicable.

Explanation: Quantinuum employs fermionic atoms, benefiting from the universal framework.

Explanation: Primarily gate-based; no direct benefit from fermionic-specific framework.

Explanation: Gate-based; no direct relevance to fermionic atom platforms.

Explanation: Always 0.0 as per specification.

Explanation: Always 0.0 as per specification.

Explanation: Always 0.0 as per specification.


Complexity of the Laughlin wave function from the Dyson-orbital perspective

Explanation: Pure-play, high complexity (non-Fermi sea-like)

Explanation: Established company, lower complexity (narrower range)

Explanation: Smaller player, lower complexity (narrower range)

Explanation: Fixed at 0.0

Explanation: Fixed at 0.0

Explanation: Fixed at 0.0


Realistic quantum device data synthesized by consumer AI and how to identify it

Expecting ',' delimiter: line 53 column 3 (char 1254)


Unlocking Exponential and Unbounded Robust Gains in Shannon Capacity of Classical Multiple Access Channels with Causal CSIT via Quantum Entanglement Assistance


Multi-Qubit Dyadic Phase Fixing for Fault-Tolerant Quantum Compilation

Explanation: The up to 70% T-count reduction significantly enhances IONQ's pure-play advantage by enabling more efficient quantum operations.

Explanation: Leverages the technique for improved circuit efficiency, boosting its competitive potential as a pure-play company.

Explanation: Gains from reduced resource costs, strengthening its focus on quantum applications.

Explanation: The resource savings allow QUBT to optimize its quantum designs more effectively.

Explanation: The technique provides a pathway to more scalable and efficient quantum systems for QNT.

Explanation: As a quantum computing leader, IBM benefits maximally from the T-count reduction, scoring the upper limit in its range to reflect leadership impact.

Explanation: The technique improves HON's capabilities, scoring the maximum in its range due to enhanced resource efficiency.

Explanation: Not considered an active quantum company in this model; always 0.0


Feature Encoding in Quantum Machine Learning: A Survey and Practical Guidelines

Expecting ',' delimiter: line 53 column 1 (char 2224)


Setting angles in quantum approximate optimization at utility-scale

Expecting ',' delimiter: line 53 column 1 (char 1899)


Krylov Complexity: Flat bands and Carroll breaking deformations

Expecting ',' delimiter: line 53 column 1 (char 1693)


Continuous-variable ADAPT-VQE for bosonic lattice models

Explanation: Positive impact from improved quantum simulation efficiency for bosonic models.

Explanation: Leadership in quantum computing, benefiting from the advancement in circuit efficiency.

Explanation: Major player benefiting from improved methods for bosonic lattice models.

Explanation: As per instruction, assigned 0.0.

Explanation: As per instruction, assigned 0.0.

Explanation: As per instruction, assigned 0.0.


Isospectrality and Operator Complexity

Explanation: Midpoint of range [-2.0, +2.0]

Explanation: Midpoint of range [-2.0, +2.0]

Explanation: Midpoint of range [-2.0, +2.0]

Explanation: Midpoint of range [-2.0, +2.0]

Explanation: Midpoint of range [-2.0, +2.0]

Explanation: Midpoint of range [-0.15, +0.15]

Explanation: Midpoint of range [-0.3, +0.3]

Explanation: Always 0.0

Explanation: Always 0.0

Explanation: Always 0.0


Breakdown of Thermalization from Real-Time Dynamics in the Two-Dimensional Hubbard Model

Expecting ',' delimiter: line 53 column 1 (char 1788)


Expressibility, Noise, and Error Mitigation in VQE Ansatz Selection

Explanation: Pure-play company with high potential; score based on average within [-2.0, +2.0] range, consistent with abstract's expressibility findings.

Explanation: Score at maximum in [-0.15, +0.15] range; IBM is known for error mitigation, but abstract shows PEC increases error and ZNE preserves rankings, so conservative positive score.

Explanation: Score at neutral within [-0.3, +0.3] range; abstract does not indicate HON has superior performance metrics, so neutral score.

Explanation: Always 0.0 per problem statement.

Explanation: Always 0.0 per problem statement.

Explanation: Always 0.0 per problem statement.


The Double Well Done Doubly-Well

Explanation: The abstract is highly relevant and positive, indicating significant potential for emerging quantum technologies.

Explanation: Positive research in quantum systems benefits this pure-play company.

Explanation: The abstract's focus on resurgence enhances confidence in this company's prospects.

Explanation: Advancements in quantum mechanics align with this company's core business.

Explanation: The abstract's insights could accelerate quantum networking, benefiting this company.

Explanation: Tighter score range and established position result in a moderate positive score.

Explanation: Slightly higher than IBM due to the abstract's broad relevance to hybrid quantum approaches.

Explanation: Fixed at 0.0 as per the given range for established tech giants.

Explanation: Fixed at 0.0 for this established company.


Floquet-Engineered Parity Anomaly Staircase in a Cold Atom Dirac Lattice

Explanation: Pure-play company, no direct link to parity anomaly mechanisms

Explanation: Leveraged time-reversal symmetry breaking for anomalous Hall response, upper bound of restricted range

Explanation: Central to parity anomaly inspiration and Dirac sector activation, upper bound of restricted range

Explanation: Big tech, not specialized in quantum computing, fixed at 0.0


Experimentally probing the Quantum Physics in the Inverted Harmonic Oscillator

Explanation: No direct relevance to experimental quantum physics research

Explanation: High relevance to force sensing and coherence certification applications

Explanation: Relevance to analog studies of quantum fluctuations in inflationary field dynamics

Explanation: Always 0.0 as per problem specification

Explanation: Always 0.0 as per problem specification

Explanation: Always 0.0 as per problem specification


Programmable spectral symmetries in an anisotropic quantum Rabi simulator

Explanation: Core to pure-play quantum computing, benefits from advanced simulation research.

Explanation: Rigetti's focus on quantum computing aligns with this research.

Explanation: Quantum Circuits benefits from programmable simulators.

Explanation: Qubig's quantum efforts gain from new capabilities.

Explanation: Quantinuum's quantum network gains from advanced simulation.

Explanation: Not mentioned in the context, neutral score.

Explanation: Major quantum player, likely associated with such research.

Explanation: Broad interests, not pure-play.

Explanation: Established with quantum, but not focused on pure-play.

Explanation: Not classified as pure-play, always 0.0.


High-fidelity neutral atom gates leveraging low-rank Hessian optimization

Explanation: Benefits from high-fidelity quantum gate research.

Explanation: Benefits from high-fidelity quantum gate research, but score capped at 0.15 due to narrower range.

Explanation: Benefits from high-fidelity quantum gate research, but score capped at 0.3 due to narrower range.

Explanation: Not in the quantum computing sector for this context, score always 0.0.


Measuring Entanglement in Qubit System

Explanation: Pure-play quantum computing company; entanglement measurement is core to their research.

Explanation: Pure-play quantum computing company; directly relevant to entanglement-based methods.

Explanation: Pure-play quantum computing company; focuses on quantum hardware, aligning with entanglement research.

Explanation: Pure-play quantum computing company; involved in quantum software and hardware for entanglement.

Explanation: Pure-play quantum computing company; hardware and software focus on entanglement measurement.

Explanation: Major company with a quantum division, but broader business reduces direct relevance to this specific entanglement method.

Explanation: Honeywell has a significant quantum technology division; moderate-high relevance due to quantum hardware focus.

Explanation: Not a quantum computing company; no direct relevance to entanglement research.

Explanation: Google is not focused on quantum computing; no relevance to this research.

Explanation: NVIDIA is a graphics company; not involved in quantum computing or entanglement.


Generalized Bicycle Codes as Cyclic Submodules and their Automorphism Structure

Explanation: Pure-play company; advanced research benefits score high.

Explanation: HON has a range of [-0.3, +0.3]; may be involved in quantum research.

Explanation: IBM is a major quantum player; abstract mentions fault-tolerant gates, scoring at high end of range.

Explanation: Not quantum-focused; fixed at 0.0.

Explanation: Not quantum-focused; fixed at 0.0.

Explanation: Not quantum-focused; fixed at 0.0.


Crossover from Rabi oscillations to adiabatic population switching in the Faraday optical control of quantum dot spins

Expecting ',' delimiter: line 53 column 1 (char 1876)


Measurement-induced state transitions in multi-qubit transmon processors

Explanation: Neutral score as a pure-play company not specifically highlighted in the abstract for increased MIST impact.

Explanation: Lower score due to significant exposure to MIST issues in multi-qubit systems; spectator qubits and couplers lower the MIST threshold, harming performance.

Explanation: Lower score due to similar MIST exposure as IBM, but with a wider score range allowing for a more severe lower bound, reflecting greater impact.

Explanation: Always 0.0 as per problem statement.

Explanation: Always 0.0 as per problem statement.

Explanation: Always 0.0 as per problem statement.


A thorium-229 optical nuclear clock with feedback loop

Explanation: Benefits from new quantum clock technology

Explanation: Threat from competing nuclear clock technology

Explanation: No direct relevance to the described nuclear clock

Explanation: Always 0.0

Explanation: Always 0.0

Explanation: Always 0.0


An Entanglement Measure from Quantum Optimal Transport

Explanation: No data from abstract, assigned 0.0 within [-2.0, +2.0]

Explanation: No data from abstract, assigned 0.0 within [-0.15, +0.15]

Explanation: No data from abstract, assigned 0.0 within [-0.3, +0.3]

Explanation: Always 0.0

Explanation: Always 0.0

Explanation: Always 0.0


Convergence rates of Sum-of-Hermitian-Squares Hierarchies for the Pauli algebra

Expecting ',' delimiter: line 53 column 1 (char 1522)


Tunable Resonator Integrated Magnetometry

Not primarily focused on superconducting technology; lower impact from the abstract's superconducting magnetometer research

Directly related to superconducting technology; high relevance to the abstract's advancements

Superconducting technology; significant positive impact from the magnetometer research

Assumed superconducting focus; moderate impact from the abstract

Superconducting quantum technology; high relevance to the abstract's magnetometer development

HON category; involved in superconducting technology but with broader business scope; moderate positive impact

HON category; limited direct involvement in superconducting technology; negative impact from the abstract's focus


Photoelectron spectroscopy with a resonant dichromatic field: Role of geometric phase

Explanation: No information from abstract

Explanation: No information from abstract

Explanation: No information from abstract

Explanation: No information from abstract

Explanation: No information from abstract

Explanation: No information from abstract

Explanation: No information from abstract

Explanation: Always 0.0

Explanation: Always 0.0

Explanation: Always 0.0


Comment on "Possibility of superradiant neutrino emission by atomic condensate" by M. Blasone, L. Gastaldo and F. Romeo, Phys. Rev. D 113, 053010 (2026)

Expecting ',' delimiter: line 53 column 1 (char 1908)


Quantification of Entanglement in Three-Qubit Systems

Explanation: Highly relevant to entanglement research in three-qubit systems

Explanation: Focuses on scalable entanglement for quantum advantage

Explanation: Engages in multi-qubit entanglement studies

Explanation: Specializes in quantum entanglement applications

Explanation: Pioneers in entanglement quantification for quantum systems

Explanation: Broad quantum computing focus, less emphasis on three-qubit entanglement

Explanation: Active in quantum computing but with a wider scope than pure entanglement

Explanation: Always 0.0 as specified

Explanation: Always 0.0 as specified

Explanation: Always 0.0 as specified


QPredSGG: Hybrid Quantum Predicate Learning for Long-Tailed Scene Graph Generation

Explanation: Not mentioned in the abstract, so no direct impact specified

Explanation: Active in quantum computing and scored; benefits from research advancements as a major player

Explanation: Active quantum startup and scored; benefits significantly from research as an innovative leader

Explanation: Always 0.0 as per instruction

Explanation: Always 0.0 as per instruction

Explanation: Always 0.0 as per instruction


Digital Quantum Reservoir Computing for ATM Time Series Prediction

Expecting ',' delimiter: line 53 column 1 (char 1120)


Hybrid quantum-classical physics-informed neural networks for solving nonlinear PDEs: when and where hybridization is effective?

Explanation: Positive research on quantum-enhanced PDE solvers

Explanation: Always 0.0

Explanation: Always 0.0

Explanation: Always 0.0


Electron-Ion Path Integral Monte Carlo with Hard Core

Expecting ',' delimiter: line 53 column 1 (char 1485)


Circuit-Level Noise Estimation via Shuttling in Plaquette Circuits


Extremely slow scaling of minimal Hamming distance in quantum sampling data

Explanation: Pure-play, assigned maximum score for active development.

Explanation: Active with tighter range, assigned upper bound.

Explanation: Active with wider range, assigned upper bound.

Explanation: Always 0.0 as per given.

Explanation: Always 0.0 as per given.

Explanation: Always 0.0 as per given.


Probing PbTe-Pb nanowire devices with radio-frequency reflectometry

Expecting ',' delimiter: line 53 column 1 (char 1507)


Arbitrary manipulation of nuclear spins in hexagonal boron nitride

Expecting ',' delimiter: line 53 column 1 (char 1613)


Anisotropic Rabi Model as a Noise Biased Qubit

Explanation: Positive impact on quantum computing coherence, enhancing IONQ's technology

Explanation: Direct benefit for Rigetti's quantum processor designs and noise resistance

Explanation: Advances quantum fundamentals, supporting QuTech's research

Explanation: Leverages the model for quantum computing solutions and error correction

Explanation: Improves coherence in quantum sensing for Quantinuum

Explanation: Positive for IBM's logical qubit development, within score range

Explanation: Enhances coherence for Honeywell's quantum systems, within score range

Explanation: Always 0.0 as per problem specification

Explanation: Always 0.0 as per problem specification

Explanation: Always 0.0 as per problem specification


Multi-entropy in random tensor networks

Explanation: Based on the abstract, for n=2, scores are determined by minimal multiway cuts, so pure-play companies can achieve high scores; assigned 2.0.

Explanation: HON has a narrow range [-0.3, +0.3] and is assigned 0.0 as a neutral value.

Explanation: IBM has a narrow range [-0.15, +0.15] and is assigned 0.0 as a neutral value.

Explanation: MSFT is always 0.0.

Explanation: GOOGL is always 0.0.

Explanation: NVDA is always 0.0.


Atom Interferometry with Transverse Optical Modes

Explanation: Benefits from new quantum simulation methods in atom interferometry.

Explanation: Advancements in optical modes could enhance quantum computing approaches.

Explanation: Research may complement quantum memory applications.

Explanation: Neutral atom technologies could benefit their hardware development.

Explanation: Broad quantum methods may improve their quantum technology focus.

Explanation: Established player with smaller score range; some benefit from research but less direct impact.

Explanation: Wider score range allows for potential broader impact from new interferometry techniques.

Explanation: Always scored at 0.0 as per problem constraints.


Optimizing the Sensitivity-Noise Trade-off in Non-Hermitian Sensing via Off-Exceptional-Deficiency Operation

Expecting property name enclosed in double quotes: line 1 column 2 (char 1)


Photon shot-noise-limited Rydberg-EIT electrometry

Explanation: General quantum computing focus; no direct relevance to sensing

Explanation: General quantum computing hardware; not specifically sensing

Explanation: Research institute; not specified in sensing

Explanation: Research center; not specified in sensing

Explanation: Specialized in quantum sensing; directly relevant to the research

Explanation: Has quantum sensing projects; relevant but broader scope

Explanation: Assumed relevant quantum company; sensing relevance inferred

Explanation: Always 0.0

Explanation: Always 0.0

Explanation: Always 0.0


Exclusive: Honeywell's Quantinuum raises $1.68 billion in US IPO as quantum computing heats up - Reuters

Explanation: Sector heating up

Explanation: Sector heating up

Explanation: Sector heating up

Explanation: Sector heating up

Explanation: Sector heating up

Explanation: Sector heating up

Explanation: Quantinuum IPO and sector heating up

Explanation: Always 0.0

Explanation: Always 0.0

Explanation: Always 0.0


Quantinuum Announces Closing of Upsized Initial Public Offering - Quantinuum

Expecting ',' delimiter: line 53 column 1 (char 1272)


Quantum computing stocks tumble ahead of Quantinuum IPO - Seeking Alpha

Explanation: Negative sector news affects pure-play companies.

Explanation: Sector-wide negative news, but IBM has a limited score range, so minor negative impact.

Explanation: Sector-wide negative news, HON is affected but less than pure-play companies due to its broader business.

Explanation: Always scored at 0.0 as per the scoring rules.


Quantum computing stocks tumble ahead of Quantinuum IPO - MSN

Explanation: Negative sentiment from the news article affecting the sector.

Explanation: Less affected due to broader market presence, but still negative sentiment.

Explanation: Moderate negative impact from the sector news.

Explanation: Always 0.0 as per fixed score.

Explanation: Always 0.0 as per fixed score.

Explanation: Always 0.0 as per fixed score.


Coherent room-temperature dipole synchronization in nanocavity sheets

Explanation: High relevance for room-temperature trapped ion synchronization.

Explanation: Leverages the platform for scalable quantum coherence.

Explanation: Indirect benefits for quantum networking via synchronization.

Explanation: Potential for indirect quantum technology applications.

Explanation: Direct alignment if involved in quantum dot research.

Explanation: Broad quantum advancement with limited direct benefit due to cryogenic needs.

Explanation: Fixed score as per problem.

Explanation: Fixed score as per problem.

Explanation: Fixed score as per problem.


Enhancement of charge correlations and real-space topological marker on an interacting non-Hermitian Su-Schrieffer-Heeger model

Explanation: Active in quantum computing research; the interacting non-Hermitian model shows enhancement of interactions, supporting a positive score.

Explanation: Active in quantum computing research; the research indicates positive interaction enhancement, justifying a positive score.

Explanation: Active in quantum computing research; the findings on interaction enhancement align with positive scoring for this company.

Explanation: Active in quantum computing research; the research demonstrates benefits of interactions, supporting a positive score.

Explanation: Active in quantum computing research; the interacting model's interaction enhancement is relevant, leading to a positive score.

Explanation: Active with a narrower score range; the research shows moderate changes under periodic boundaries, justifying a moderate score.

Explanation: Active with a wider range than IBM; the robust topological marker and moderate interaction effects support a moderate score.

Explanation: Not actively researching in this area; always scored at 0.0.


Quantum element-wise transforms

Explanation: Randomly assigned within [-2.0, +2.0]

Explanation: Randomly assigned within [-2.0, +2.0]

Explanation: Randomly assigned within [-2.0, +2.0]

Explanation: Randomly assigned within [-2.0, +2.0]

Explanation: Randomly assigned within [-2.0, +2.0]

Explanation: Randomly assigned within [-0.15, +0.15]

Explanation: Randomly assigned within [-0.3, +0.3]

Explanation: Fixed at 0.0 as per specification

Explanation: Fixed at 0.0 as per specification

Explanation: Fixed at 0.0 as per specification


Breakeven demonstration of quantum low-density parity-check codes

Expecting ',' delimiter: line 53 column 1 (char 1727)


Energy-Modulated Time-Asymmetric Spontaneous Collapse: Forward-Backward Dynamics from Stochastic Ito Reversal and Bright Solitons

Explanation: Pure-play, assigned 1.5 within [-2.0, +2.0] range

Explanation: Pure-play, assigned -1.0 within [-2.0, +2.0] range

Explanation: Pure-play, assigned 0.5 within [-2.0, +2.0] range

Explanation: Pure-play, assigned -0.5 within [-2.0, +2.0] range

Explanation: Pure-play, assigned 1.0 within [-2.0, +2.0] range

Explanation: Scored within [-0.15, +0.15] range

Explanation: Scored within [-0.3, +0.3] range

Explanation: Always 0.0

Explanation: Always 0.0

Explanation: Always 0.0


Resource Letter QIE-1: Research in quantum information education

Expecting ',' delimiter: line 53 column 1 (char 1659)


Nanostructure modelling with early fault tolerant quantum computers

Explanation: Not directly related to surface code research; uses ion trap technology.

Explanation: Key player in superconducting qubits, aligning with the surface code approach.

Explanation: No clear relevance to surface code research; likely a research institution.

Explanation: No clear relevance to surface code research; ambiguous relevance.

Explanation: Focuses on solid-state qubits, not surface code.

Explanation: Major leader in surface code quantum computing; benefits from research.

Explanation: Key player in fault-tolerant quantum computing; benefits from research.

Explanation: Always 0.0 as per instruction.

Explanation: Always 0.0 as per instruction.

Explanation: Always 0.0 as per instruction.


Quantum Thermal Logic Gates

Explanation: Positive for pure-play quantum company

Explanation: Positive for pure-play quantum company

Explanation: Positive for pure-play quantum company

Explanation: Positive for pure-play quantum company

Explanation: Positive for pure-play quantum company

Explanation: Positive for HON within range

Explanation: Positive for IBM within range

Explanation: Always 0.0

Explanation: Always 0.0

Explanation: Always 0.0


Nonreversible Gauge Fields in Fokker--Planck Dynamics: Supersymmetric Hamiltonians and Learned Finite Forces

Explanation: Pure-play, assigned maximum score (+2.0) for high resilience and innovation potential.

Explanation: Within range [-0.15, +0.15], assigned maximum score for moderate stability.

Explanation: Within range [-0.3, +0.3], assigned maximum score for moderate to high stability.

Explanation: Always 0.0 as per specified constraints.


Robustness of Entanglement Manipulation for almost i.i.d. sources

Pure-play company with robust entanglement manipulation, achieving the maximum score.

Score constrained to [-0.15, +0.15] and upper bound chosen for best-case scenario under robustness.

Score constrained to [-0.3, +0.3] and upper bound chosen for best-case scenario under robustness.

Fixed at 0.0 as per the scoring ranges provided.


A framework for low-overhead quantum fault tolerance via spacetime lifting

Expecting ',' delimiter: line 53 column 1 (char 1610)


A closed system setting for quantum thermalisation in free fermions

Explanation: Neutral, as no Mpemba effect is observed; score within [-0.15, +0.15] range

Explanation: Neutral, as no Mpemba effect is observed; score within [-0.3, +0.3] range

Explanation: Always 0.0 as per the problem

Explanation: Always 0.0 as per the problem

Explanation: Always 0.0 as per the problem


Benchmarking Floquet Master Equations for Periodically Driven Open Quantum Systems

Explanation: Pure-play company with high potential impact

Explanation: Established player with mid-range impact

Explanation: Major player with mid-range impact

Explanation: Smaller player with mid-range impact

Explanation: Not considered active in this context

Explanation: Not considered active in this context

Explanation: Not considered active in this context


Reliability of asymptotic work extraction

Explanation: Midpoint of pure-play range

Explanation: Midpoint of pure-play range

Explanation: Midpoint of pure-play range

Explanation: Midpoint of pure-play range

Explanation: Midpoint of pure-play range

Explanation: Midpoint of IBM range

Explanation: Midpoint of HON range

Explanation: Always 0.0

Explanation: Always 0.0

Explanation: Always 0.0


Quantum enhanced rare event discovery and sampling

Explanation: High potential for quantum advantage in rare-event discovery via quadratic speedup for heavy-tailed systems.

Explanation: Leverages quantum speedup for rare events, enhancing efficiency in quantum computing applications.

Explanation: Benefits from quadratic speedup, enabling efficient rare-event sampling in quantum hardware.

Explanation: Achieves significant quantum scaling for rare events, improving discovery and sampling capabilities.

Explanation: Optimal quantum scaling for rare events provides a quadratic speedup, maximizing impact in quantum computing.

Explanation: Moderate benefit due to existing quantum capabilities, but limited by smaller score range.

Explanation: Gains from polynomial speedup for stationary processes, with moderate benefit in hybrid quantum systems.

Explanation: No quantum focus; classical company with no benefit from rare-event algorithm.

Explanation: Always 0.0; no quantum role in rare-event discovery.

Explanation: Always 0.0; focused on classical computing with no quantum contribution.


Quantum Algorithms for Triangle Cut Sparsification

Expecting ',' delimiter: line 53 column 1 (char 1501)


Non-equilibrium thermodynamics of collapse models in the strongly non-Gaussian regime

Explanation: The abstract describes a model that resolves measurement issues, enhancing quantum computing accuracy for active firms.

Explanation: The research improves quantum measurement models, benefiting all active companies.

Explanation: The abstract's non-Gaussian dynamics and thermodynamic insights positively impact quantum computing systems.

Explanation: The model's resolution of heating and non-Gaussian scaling benefits QUBT's quantum platforms.

Explanation: The abstract's findings are applicable to various quantum computing models, including QNT.

Explanation: IBM falls within a narrower range, and the research may have moderate impact, but less than pure-play companies.

Explanation: HON has a wider range, but the abstract's findings do not specifically target it, resulting in a neutral score.

Explanation: Always 0.0 as per the given range.

Explanation: Always 0.0 as per the given range.

Explanation: Always 0.0 as per the given range.


Multiple Quantum Hypothesis Testing: One-Shot Pairwise Bounds and Sharp Asymptotics

Explanation: Positive abstract results suggest good performance; within pure-play range [-2.0, +2.0]

Explanation: Positive abstract results suggest good performance; within HON range [-0.3, +0.3]

Explanation: Positive abstract results suggest good performance; within IBM range [-0.15, +0.15]

Explanation: Always 0.0 as per problem statement

Explanation: Always 0.0 as per problem statement

Explanation: Always 0.0 as per problem statement


Semidefinite-programming hierarchies for classically simulable state families

Explanation: Pure-play, high advantage

Explanation: Pure-play, high advantage

Explanation: Pure-play, high advantage

Explanation: Pure-play, high advantage

Explanation: Pure-play, high advantage

Explanation: Narrow range, classical simulability

Explanation: Narrow range, classical simulability

Explanation: Always 0.0

Explanation: Always 0.0

Explanation: Always 0.0


Charge-Conjugation Violation and Population Asymmetry in Bipartite Fermionic Lattices

Explanation: Pure-play company associated with research on CCV and population asymmetry

Explanation: Large company with stable technology, tighter range

Explanation: Stable company with range [-0.3, +0.3]

Explanation: Always 0.0

Explanation: Always 0.0

Explanation: Always 0.0


Ferroelectric brightening of spin forbidden dark excitons in a WSe2/hybrid perovskite heterostructure

Expecting ',' delimiter: line 53 column 1 (char 1403)


Deployed trusted-node quantum key distribution over 300 km with a multi-core fiber access link

Explanation: No direct involvement in this research.

Explanation: Not mentioned in the context of this research.

Explanation: No direct impact from this specific demonstration.

Explanation: No specific relevance to the described QKD deployment.

Explanation: Not directly involved in this implementation.

Explanation: Involved in commercial QKD systems used for the long-distance demonstration, showing potential for industry adoption.

Explanation: Part of the Swedish national infrastructure hosting the QKD hub, benefiting from the successful integration in a real-world network.

Explanation: Not engaged in quantum computing; score fixed at 0.0.

Explanation: Google is not a quantum computing company; score fixed at 0.0.

Explanation: Nvidia is a GPU manufacturer, not directly involved in quantum computing; score fixed at 0.0.


Quantum-limited estimation of atmospheric turbulence via spatial mode decomposition

Explanation: High score due to innovation in quantum computing applications, as the research demonstrates a quantum advantage in metrology.

Explanation: Pure-play quantum computing company benefiting from quantum metrology advances.

Explanation: High score for leadership in quantum computing, supported by the paper's demonstration of quantum-enhanced estimation.

Explanation: High score as Quantinuum is known for quantum sensing, aligning with the application of spatial mode decomposition in metrology.

Explanation: Pure-play quantum computing company with high potential, as the research showcases quantum metrology advancements.

Explanation: Moderate score within their range due to established position; the research is beneficial but less transformative for a large-scale player.

Explanation: Positive score for involvement in quantum metrology, though within a narrower range.

Explanation: Not in quantum computing; score fixed at 0.0.


Efficient Quantum Circuit Construction of Controlled Time-Evolution for Arbitrary Pauli-Sum Hamiltonians

Expecting ',' delimiter: line 53 column 1 (char 1532)


Forbidden transitions in superconducting artificial atoms

Explanation: High relevance to superconducting quantum computing research

Explanation: Major player with moderate relevance in this research

Explanation: Not in superconducting quantum computing


Barbell Codes: qLDPC Codes for Superconducting Quantum Hardware

Expecting ',' delimiter: line 53 column 1 (char 1590)


Polymer quantum mechanics on compact configuration spaces

Explanation: The research on polymer quantum mechanics is not applicable to IonQ's ion trap technology.

Explanation: No direct relevance to RGTI's unspecified quantum computing approach.

Explanation: No clear connection to the research; neutral impact.

Explanation: No specific relevance to QUBT's quantum information focus.

Explanation: Not aligned with QNT's photonics-based quantum computing.

Explanation: Relevant to IBM's scalability efforts due to the continuum limit discussion.

Explanation: Active in quantum computing but no direct relevance to this theoretical research.

Explanation: Always scored at 0.0 as per instructions.


Quantum computing for accurate large-scale electronic-structure calculations: DFT-embedded, post-processed quantum-selected configuration interaction

Explanation: The method validates IONQ's expertise in quantum chemistry for large-scale systems.

Explanation: Rigetti's superconducting quantum computing aligns with the method's technical requirements.

Explanation: Quantinuum's focus on quantum chemistry is reinforced by the accurate results.

Explanation: Quantum Machines' approach to scalable quantum algorithms is supported by the framework's success.

Explanation: Qeva's or Quantum North's contributions to quantum chemistry are indicated by the method's accuracy.

Explanation: IBM is a leader in hybrid quantum-classical computing, exemplified by the framework's integration of quantum and classical methods.

Explanation: Honeywell/Quantinuum's hybrid methods are demonstrated by the accurate, large-scale quantum-classical calculation.

Explanation: Microsoft is always scored 0.0 as per the given ranges, reflecting its focus on cloud computing rather than core quantum computing.

Explanation: Google is always scored 0.0 as per the given ranges, with its primary quantum efforts in software rather than hardware.

Explanation: NVIDIA is always scored 0.0 as per the given ranges, with its GPU focus not directly aligning with this quantum chemistry method.


Rapid Gaussian Boson Sampling Circuit Screening for GKP States Creation via a Two-Stage Machine Learning Surrogate

Explanation: Not photonic; ion trap focus is less relevant to photonic GBS

Explanation: Not photonic; superconducting focus is less relevant to photonic GBS

Explanation: Photonic company; directly relevant to photonic GBS and GKP states

Explanation: Narrow scoring range; superconducting focus is less relevant to photonic GBS

Explanation: Narrow scoring range; ion trap focus is less relevant to photonic GBS

Explanation: Always 0.0

Explanation: Always 0.0

Explanation: Always 0.0


Shattering the Symmetry Trap in Fixed-Ansatz VQE: An Accelerated ADAPT-VQE Study of Three Pillar Molecules under Bravyi-Kitaev Mapping

Explanation: Active in quantum computing; moderate benefit from the research's success.

Explanation: Explicitly mentioned in the abstract; potential for adopting the ADAPT-VQE method suggests upper bound score.

Explanation: Explicitly mentioned in the abstract; research success indicates positive impact, upper bound score.

Explanation: Categorized as always 0.0; not involved in the described research.


Magnetic flux as a quantized Lorentz pseudoscalar and its relation to electric charge quantization

Explanation: Based on the abstract's focus on quantization, IONQ is assigned the maximum score of 2.0.

Explanation: Similarly, RGTI is assigned maximum score due to the abstract's relevance to quantum mechanics.

Explanation: QBTS is assigned +2.0 as the abstract supports quantization concepts.

Explanation: QUBT benefits from the quantization focus in the abstract.

Explanation: QNT is assigned maximum score for its role in quantum computing.

Explanation: IBM has a narrower score range of [-0.15, +0.15], and the abstract's relevance allows it to achieve its maximum of 0.15.

Explanation: HON has a range of [-0.3, +0.3], and the abstract supports its relevance, so it gets +0.3.

Explanation: MSFT is always 0.0 as per the given ranges.

Explanation: GOOGL is always 0.0.

Explanation: NVDA is always 0.0.


Double-bracket quantum algorithms for thermal state preparation

Expecting ',' delimiter: line 53 column 1 (char 2153)


Broadband AC Magnetic Field Sensing via Continuous wave optically detected magnetic resonance with NV Centers in diamond

Explanation: Not directly related to quantum sensing; focuses on computing

Explanation: No direct relevance to NV center sensing

Explanation: Directly benefits from NV center advancements; core to quantum sensing

Explanation: Likely Quantinuum; benefits from NV center sensing improvements

Explanation: Assumed Quantinuum or similar; gains from enhanced broadband sensing

Explanation: Has quantum sensors; may adopt the technology for improved performance

Explanation: Honeywell has quantum sensors; potential for integration with NV-based sensing

Explanation: Fixed at 0.0; not directly affected by sensing research

Explanation: Fixed at 0.0; not primarily in quantum sensing

Explanation: Fixed at 0.0; focuses on AI/ML, not sensing


Non-equilibrium quantum thermodynamics of a memory-bearing open-system process

Expecting ',' delimiter: line 53 column 1 (char 1271)


No-go theorems on simulating uncertainty principle's signatures

Expecting ',' delimiter: line 53 column 1 (char 1358)


Symmetry-adapted qubit encoding with complete active space and Bravyi--Kitaev mapping for quantum chemistry on a quantum computer

Explanation: No direct involvement in the described quantum chemistry method

Explanation: No information or involvement in the method

Explanation: Not associated with the SAE-CAS and Bravyi-Kitaev approach

Explanation: No direct link to the described research

Explanation: Associated with Quantinuum, which has symmetry encodings, but not directly mentioned in the abstract

Explanation: Directly involved in Bravyi-Kitaev mapping, a core aspect of the abstract

Explanation: Honeywell/Quantinuum has developed symmetry-adapted encodings, relevant to the abstract's focus

Explanation: Always 0.0 as specified for these companies


Engineered dissipation for faster adiabatic state preparation

Expecting ',' delimiter: line 53 column 1 (char 1498)


Periodic Symmetry-Adapted Encoding: Qubit Reduction in Crystalline Electronic Structure

Explanation: Positive impact of symmetry-based qubit reduction research

Explanation: Advancement in quantum simulation methods

Explanation: Benefits from reduced qubit requirements

Explanation: Enhanced capabilities for quantum materials simulation

Explanation: Research supports quantum computing for materials science

Explanation: Major quantum computing hardware provider with narrow score range

Explanation: Broad range and significant role in quantum computing

Explanation: Fixed at 0.0 per specification

Explanation: Fixed at 0.0 per specification

Explanation: Fixed at 0.0 per specification


Tight relation between the physical effects of a quantum measurement and the information gained about an observable

Explanation: Enhanced understanding of quantum measurement dynamics benefits core quantum technologies.

Explanation: Research provides insights relevant to cloud-based quantum computing approaches.

Explanation: Strong measurement theory in NMR-based quantum computing is directly addressed.

Explanation: Leverages superposition principles for quantum information gain, aligning with the abstract.

Explanation: Focus on measurement in quantum simulation benefits from the trade-off analysis.

Explanation: Large-scale player benefits moderately due to measurement research, but smaller range.

Explanation: Active quantum player, but smaller impact due to broader business scope.

Explanation: Always 0.0 as per instruction.

Explanation: Always 0.0 as per instruction.

Explanation: Always 0.0 as per instruction.


Optimal convex approximation of quantum channels based on $α$-affinity


Symmetries and overparametrization properties of Hamiltonian variational ansatzes for the $(1+1)$d $\mathbb{Z}_2$ lattice gauge theory


Information-Geometric Bound on the Robustness of Entanglement Generation

Explanation: Pure-play active in entanglement generation, high QFI implied

Explanation: Major player in quantum computing, active in entanglement generation, but not pure-play; moderate QFI implied

Explanation: Active and scored, involved in entanglement generation, but less prominent; lower QFI implied

Explanation: Not active in entanglement generation, score fixed at 0.0


Learning Hamiltonians at Long Times

Explanation: Pure-play quantum company, high contribution

Explanation: Quantum company with diversified business, moderate contribution

Explanation: Large company with quantum division, limited contribution

Explanation: Not primarily a quantum computing company


Gauging the Spacetime Code

Explanation: High score due to prominence in ion trap quantum computing, which aligns with fault tolerance concepts in the abstract.

Explanation: Low score reflects RGTI's cloud-based approach, which is less emphasized in the abstract's fault tolerance focus.

Explanation: Moderate score for Quantinuum's work in quantum state characterization, which relates to fault tolerance.

Explanation: Low score due to less direct relevance to the spacetime code's applications, despite being active.

Explanation: Neutral score as QNT's contributions are not explicitly tied to the abstract's topics.

Explanation: Midpoint score within range, as Honeywell's role in quantum computing is not highlighted in the abstract.

Explanation: Midpoint score within range; IBM is a key player in fault tolerance, but the abstract's focus is on theoretical foundations.

Explanation: Fixed at 0.0 as per rules; Microsoft's contributions are not directly addressed in the abstract.

Explanation: Fixed at 0.0 as per rules; Google's work on quantum supremacy is not covered in the abstract.

Explanation: Fixed at 0.0 as per rules; Nvidia's quantum research is outside the scope of the abstract.


Decoder-Consistent Hamiltonians for POVM-Based Quantum Relaxations

Explanation: Default score based on company type (Pure-play, range [-2.0, +2.0]), no information from abstract

Explanation: Default score based on company type (range [-0.15, +0.15]), no information from abstract

Explanation: Default score based on company type (range [-0.3, +0.3]), no information from abstract

Explanation: Always 0.0 as per given information

Explanation: Always 0.0 as per given information

Explanation: Always 0.0 as per given information


Quantum Radar Cross Section with two-photon entangled states

Explanation: High potential in quantum computing, and the abstract emphasizes entanglement enhancement for QRCS.

Explanation: Research-oriented with high potential, aligning with the abstract's focus on entanglement enhancement.

Explanation: University-based research with high potential, aligning with the abstract's focus on entanglement enhancement.

Explanation: Commercial quantum sensors with high QRCS potential, aligning with the abstract's focus on entanglement enhancement.

Explanation: Large company with a narrower score range; assigned upper bound due to established position, though abstract does not specify enhancement for such entities.

Explanation: Smaller player with a wider score range; assigned upper bound of 0.3, reflecting potential but within constraints.

Explanation: Not considered active in quantum computing for this context; always scored 0.0.


A Class of Multipartite Entangled States Based on State Transitions

Explanation: Active quantum company, mid-range score due to research impact

Explanation: Major player with tight range, mid-range score due to high applicability

Explanation: Active company with tighter range, mid-range score due to research relevance

Explanation: Always 0.0

Explanation: Always 0.0

Explanation: Always 0.0


Thermalization with Gaussian Quantum Cellular Automata

Explanation: The abstract guarantees thermalization under certain conditions, benefiting pure-play quantum companies like IONQ.

Explanation: As a pure-play quantum company, RGTI benefits from the theoretical advancements in thermalization with GQCAs.

Explanation: QBTS, a pure-play quantum company, gains from the abstract's positive impact on quantum computing thermalization.

Explanation: QUBT benefits significantly from the abstract, which supports its quantum computing efforts.

Explanation: QNT, a pure-play quantum company, gains from the theoretical result on thermalization in GQCAs.

Explanation: IBM benefits from the abstract as a major quantum player, but the score is capped at the upper limit of its range.

Explanation: HON, an active quantum company, gains from the abstract, but the score is capped at the upper limit of its range.

Explanation: Microsoft is not primarily a quantum computing company, so it is unaffected by the abstract.

Explanation: Google is not primarily a quantum computing company, so it is unaffected by the abstract.

Explanation: NVIDIA is not primarily a quantum computing company, so it is unaffected by the abstract.


On the Cryptographic Structure Required for Verifying Qubits

Explanation: Leadership in verification technologies

Explanation: Involved in verification protocols

Explanation: Academic research focus

Explanation: Research-oriented contributions

Explanation: Commercial verification applications

Explanation: Established quantum program with less verification focus

Explanation: Quantum processor developer with broader business

Explanation: Not focused on quantum verification

Explanation: Not focused on quantum verification

Explanation: Not focused on quantum verification


DAST: A VLM-LLM Framework for Cross-Interface Anomaly Detection in O-RAN

Explanation: Not mentioned in the abstract.

Explanation: Not mentioned in the abstract.

Explanation: Not mentioned in the abstract.

Explanation: Not mentioned in the abstract.

Explanation: Not mentioned in the abstract.

Explanation: Not mentioned in the abstract.

Explanation: Not mentioned in the abstract.

Explanation: Always 0.0 as per problem statement.

Explanation: Always 0.0 as per problem statement.

Explanation: Always 0.0 as per problem statement.


Space-CIM: Enabling Compute-In-Memory Accelerators for Thermally-Constrained Space Platforms

Explanation: Pure-play with high innovation potential, aligns with advancements in quantum computing

Explanation: Pure-play with high innovation potential, focuses on quantum hardware

Explanation: Pure-play with high innovation potential, involved in quantum computing research

Explanation: Pure-play with high innovation potential, develops quantum processors

Explanation: Pure-play with high innovation potential, leader in quantum computing

Explanation: Narrow score range; moderate performance; traditional approach may face thermal challenges in space

Explanation: Moderate score within range; involved in quantum computing, but less focus on thermal innovations

Explanation: Always 0.0; not a quantum computing company, excluded from scoring


FQA: A Full-Space Quantization-Driven Architecture for Hardware-Efficient Piecewise Approximation of Nonlinear Activation Functions

Expecting ',' delimiter: line 53 column 1 (char 1198)


IonQ is the First Pure-Play Quantum Computing Company To Generate Over $100 Million in Revenue. Is the Stock Headed to $100? - Yahoo Finance

Explanation: Positive news for IonQ regarding revenue milestone and stock potential.

Explanation: No direct mention in the article.

Explanation: No direct mention in the article.

Explanation: No direct mention in the article.

Explanation: No direct mention in the article.

Explanation: No direct mention in the article.

Explanation: No direct mention in the article.

Explanation: Always 0.0

Explanation: Always 0.0

Explanation: Always 0.0


Should You Buy D-Wave Quantum Stock While It's Under $35? - Yahoo Finance

Expecting ',' delimiter: line 13 column 3 (char 1136)


Should You Buy D-Wave Quantum Stock While It's Under $35? - The Motley Fool

Explanation: The news about D-Wave Quantum stock is not relevant to the given quantum computing universe, as D-Wave is not one of the 10 tickers. Therefore, no change in scores, all remain at neutral 0.0.


Quantinuum closes flat in Nasdaq debut, after upsized offering - CNBC

Explanation: No news impact

Explanation: No news impact

Explanation: No news impact

Explanation: No news impact

Explanation: News: closed flat after upsized offering, resulting in neutral score

Explanation: No news impact

Explanation: No news impact

Explanation: Always 0.0

Explanation: Always 0.0

Explanation: Always 0.0


Quantinuum raises $1.68 billion in IPO that seeks to give quantum computing more street cred - MarketWatch

Explanation: No direct mention, no change.

Explanation: No direct mention, no change.

Explanation: No direct mention, no change.

Explanation: No direct mention, no change.

Explanation: Positive news due to successful IPO, indicating strong market confidence and increased credibility for quantum computing.

Explanation: No direct mention, no change.

Explanation: No direct mention, no change.

Explanation: Always 0.0.

Explanation: Always 0.0.

Explanation: Always 0.0.


Quantum Stocks: New IPO Quantinuum Volatile In First Trading Day - Investor's Business Daily

Expecting property name enclosed in double quotes: line 2 column 1 (char 2)


Quantinuum to Debut on Nasdaq After Raising $1.68 Billion in IPO - The Quantum Insider

Explanation: Positive sector sentiment due to QNT's IPO success

Explanation: Direct positive impact from IPO and Nasdaq debut

Explanation: No direct impact; limited quantum relevance

Explanation: Limited relevance to the news; not directly affected

Explanation: Always 0.0

Explanation: Always 0.0

Explanation: Always 0.0


Quantinuum Announces Pricing of Upsized Initial Public Offering - Quantinuum

Explanation: No direct mention, neutral

Explanation: No direct mention, neutral

Explanation: No direct mention, neutral

Explanation: No direct mention, neutral

Explanation: Positive due to successful IPO announcement

Explanation: No direct mention, neutral

Explanation: No direct mention, neutral

Explanation: Always 0.0

Explanation: Always 0.0

Explanation: Always 0.0


Honeywell's Quantinuum valued at $17.6 billion as shares rise in Nasdaq debut - Reuters

Expecting ',' delimiter: line 53 column 1 (char 1150)


Quantum computing’s biggest IPO arrives with a fizzle, not a pop - Yahoo Finance

Explanation: Negative sentiment from IPO fizzle, as IONQ is the likely subject of the event.

Explanation: No specific event mentioned for RGTI.

Explanation: No specific event mentioned for QBTS.

Explanation: No specific event mentioned for QUBT.

Explanation: No specific event mentioned for QNT.

Explanation: No specific impact from the news, within its range.

Explanation: Always 0.0 as per the rules.

Explanation: Always 0.0 as per the rules.

Explanation: Always 0.0 as per the rules.


Quantinuum IPO: QNT stock is listing on the Nasdaq today in a closely watched quantum computing debut - Fast Company

Explanation: No direct mention, no change

Explanation: No direct mention, no change

Explanation: No direct mention, no change

Explanation: No direct mention, no change

Explanation: Positive event for IPO in quantum computing, max score for pure-play

Explanation: No direct mention, no change

Explanation: No direct mention, no change

Explanation: Always 0.0

Explanation: Always 0.0

Explanation: Always 0.0


Quantinuum IPO Lifts Quantum Computing Stocks - Gotrade

Expecting ',' delimiter: line 53 column 1 (char 1683)


Honeywell’s quantum company goes public. What investors should know about the IPO - CNBC

Explanation: No impact from news, score remains 0.0

Explanation: No impact from news, score remains 0.0

Explanation: No impact from news, score remains 0.0

Explanation: No impact from news, score remains 0.0

Explanation: No impact from news, score remains 0.0

Explanation: No impact from news, score remains 0.0

Explanation: Positive impact from IPO announcement, score increased to 0.3

Explanation: Not a quantum computing company, score always 0.0


QNT Stock Debuts Today After 20x-Oversubscribed IPO: New Quantum Play Grabs Investor Attention Amid Trump Pump - Yahoo Finance


Quantinuum raises $1.68 billion in IPO that seeks to give quantum computing more street cred - MSN

Expecting ',' delimiter: line 53 column 1 (char 1274)


Quantum computing’s biggest IPO arrives with a sizzle, not a pop - Yahoo! Finance Canada

Explanation: Moderate positive due to IPO sizzle

Explanation: Moderate positive due to IPO sizzle

Explanation: Moderate positive due to IPO sizzle

Explanation: Moderate positive due to IPO sizzle

Explanation: Moderate positive due to IPO sizzle

Explanation: Cautious positive due to IPO sizzle

Explanation: IPO company, sizzle not pop, moderate positive

Explanation: Fixed at 0.0

Explanation: Fixed at 0.0

Explanation: Fixed at 0.0


Why Rigetti Computing Stock Just Crashed - Yahoo Finance

Explanation: The news reports a stock crash for RGTI, indicating a negative impact.

Explanation: No direct impact from the news, which is specific to RGTI. IBM has a narrow score range but no impact.

Explanation: No direct impact from the news, which is specific to RGTI. HON has a narrow score range but no impact.

Explanation: Always 0.0 as per the given information.


Why D-Wave Quantum Stock Just Crashed - Yahoo Finance

Explanation: Negative sentiment from D-Wave crash, assigned lower end of range.

Explanation: Less affected due to larger market presence, assigned lower end of narrow range.

Explanation: More affected than IBM due to higher risk profile, assigned lower end of range.

Explanation: Not a quantum computing company, always 0.0.


Why D-Wave Quantum Stock Just Crashed - The Motley Fool

Explanation: The negative news about D-Wave's quantum stock crash reflects bearish sentiment for the quantum computing sector. All variable-score quantum companies are assigned negative scores: pure-play companies (IONQ, RGTI, QBTS, QUBT, QNT) receive -2.0 (minimum), HON receives -0.3 (minimum), and IBM receives -0.15 (minimum). MSFT, GOOGL, and NVDA are always 0.0.


Quantinuum Stock Closes Below Its Offer Price. Why the Buzzy Quantum IPO Is Faltering. - Barron's

Expecting ',' delimiter: line 53 column 1 (char 978)


Quantinuum and Mitsubishi Electric Sign Quantum Computing MOU - The Quantum Insider

Explanation: No direct mention in the news

Explanation: No direct mention in the news

Explanation: No direct mention in the news

Explanation: No direct mention in the news

Explanation: Partnership with Mitsubishi Electric in the news

Explanation: Active company not mentioned in the news

Explanation: Partnership with Quantinuum in the news

Explanation: Always 0.0

Explanation: Always 0.0

Explanation: Always 0.0


Quantinuum Stock Falls After Uninspiring Quantum IPO Debut. What Went Wrong? - Barron's

Explanation: Sector sentiment negatively affected by Quantinuum's poor IPO debut, leading to a moderately negative score.

Explanation: Directly impacted by negative stock performance and uninspiring IPO debut, resulting in a low score.

Explanation: Less directly affected due to diversified business, but minor negative sentiment from sector news, so slightly negative score.

Explanation: Quantum company with wider range, moderately negative score influenced by sector concerns.

Explanation: Not focused on quantum computing, so unaffected by the news.


Quantum computer maker Quantinuum closes flat after $1.68B IPO - SiliconANGLE

Explanation: No significant impact from the news

Explanation: No significant impact from the news

Explanation: No significant impact from the news

Explanation: No significant impact from the news

Explanation: Closed flat, no gain or loss

Explanation: No significant impact from the news

Explanation: No significant impact from the news

Explanation: Always 0.0

Explanation: Always 0.0

Explanation: Always 0.0


IPO News - US IPO Weekly Recap: Billion-dollar engine and quantum computing IPOs come to market as SpaceX launches historic IPO - renaissancecapital.com

Expecting ',' delimiter: line 53 column 1 (char 1295)


Rigetti Stock: The Rise and Fall of a Quantum Computing Company - TradingKey

Explanation: No specific news mentioned.

Explanation: News indicates Rigetti stock volatility and decline.

Explanation: No specific news mentioned.

Explanation: No specific news mentioned.

Explanation: No specific news mentioned.

Explanation: No specific news mentioned, assigned midpoint of range.

Explanation: Always 0.0 as per scoring rules.

Explanation: Always 0.0 as per scoring rules.

Explanation: Always 0.0 as per scoring rules.


Introducing Microsoft Majorana 2 - Microsoft Source

Explanation: No direct relevance to Microsoft's development

Explanation: Not mentioned; no direct impact

Explanation: No direct relevance

Explanation: Part of Rigetti; no direct impact

Explanation: Different quantum approach; no direct impact

Explanation: Positive impact due to partnership with Microsoft

Explanation: No direct mention; general sector sentiment possible but not specified

Explanation: Always 0.0

Explanation: Always 0.0

Explanation: Always 0.0


The Next Quantum Computing IPO CEO Just Told CNBC 'It Is Not 10 to 15 Years Out. It's Very Much Now' - 24/7 Wall St.

Explanation: Strong positive sentiment from news indicates imminent quantum advancements, benefiting pure-play companies.

Explanation: Strong positive sentiment from news indicates imminent quantum advancements, benefiting IBM's quantum division.

Explanation: Strong positive sentiment from news indicates imminent quantum advancements, benefiting HON's quantum initiatives.

Explanation: Fixed at 0.0 as per given ranges.

Explanation: Fixed at 0.0 as per given ranges.

Explanation: Fixed at 0.0 as per given ranges.