# Some people get DOOM to play on a fridge. I got it to play on a neural net.

Not "an AI that imagines DOOM frames." Not a video model hallucinating
something DOOM-ish. The actual 1993 DOOM — id Software's real, unmodified
code, compiled to real x86 machine instructions — executed by a computer whose
arithmetic and logic are **neural networks**, producing output **bit-identical**
to a normal CPU. Every pixel. Every byte of memory. Exact.

## The problem with neural networks (and why this should be possible)

Neural networks are approximators. They're brilliant at "close enough" —
recognizing a cat, finishing your sentence. But a CPU lives or dies on
*perfection*. If one addition out of a million comes back wrong by one bit,
the program doesn't get slightly worse — it crashes, or corrupts a save, or
draws garbage. 99.99% accurate arithmetic is 0% playable DOOM. So "run a real
program on neural networks" sounds like a category error.

The trick that makes it possible is stolen from how chips are actually built:

1. **Break the machine into tiny pieces** — the way silicon engineers do. An
   8-bit adder. A 1-bit shifter. An instruction decoder. Each piece is so
   small that you can list *every single input it could ever see* (an 8-bit
   adder with carry has exactly 131,072 possible inputs — a big number to a
   human, a tiny one to a computer).
2. **Train a small neural network on the complete list.** Not a sample — all
   of it.
3. **Test it on the complete list.** It passes only if it gets every single
   case right. 131,071 out of 131,072 is a fail. I retrain until N-of-N.
4. **Wire the verified pieces together** exactly like the chip wires its
   circuits: a 32-bit addition is four 8-bit neural adders passing a carry
   down the line; multiplication is shifted adds; division is repeated
   subtraction. Exact pieces, wired exactly, make an exact whole — *forever*,
   not just usually.

And when a piece is too big to enumerate? You never train it bigger — you
**decompose it further**. Multiplication wouldn't train as one network, so it
became a trivial "multiply a byte by one bit" network (512 cases) feeding an
adder tree, which is literally how hardware multiplies. Every time I hit a
wall in this project, the answer was more decomposition, never a bigger model.

## How I got here

**It started with a Game Boy.** First one neural 8-bit adder, verified exact.
Then a whole Game Boy CPU (512 instructions), a pixel pipeline, a memory
system — every functional unit a verified network. The proof bar kept rising:
the core passed the same test suites real emulator developers use
(SingleStepTests: 512,000 randomized cases; Blargg's hardware-validated
cpu_instrs: 11/11), and then a real cartridge game ran on it, with one full
frame replayed entirely through the neural units — bit-identical to a
conventional emulator, framebuffer and complete machine state.

- **13 neural units** for the x86: 8-bit add/subtract slices carrying all five
  x86 arithmetic flags, the logic ops, 1-bit shift slices, the multiplier
  slice, and the instruction-decode tables. Each verified over its complete
  domain.
- **An i386 core** wiring them together, validated by differential fuzzing
  against QEMU — 194 instruction templates, 2,560 randomized full-machine
  states, total agreement.
- **A tiny Linux** (an ELF loader and ~30 system calls) so the machine could
  run real programs, with every clock deterministic so any run can be replayed
  bit-for-bit.
- **DOOM itself**, cross-compiled to i386, booting through its full init
  chain to the title screen in 20 million instructions.

**The headline proof:** I froze the machine at the title frame and ran the
next frame — **5,952,699 instructions** — twice. Once with conventional math.
Once with every decode, add, shift, multiply, and divide computed by the
neural networks. 102 minutes of neural inference later: the framebuffer was
**bit-identical**, and so were all 128 MB of memory, every register, every
flag. Not similar. Identical.

**Then I made it playable.** Neural inference is slow, so the same wiring
diagram was ported to C — just the wiring; the neural units remain the
machine's ground truth — running at 77 million instructions/second. That's
the DOOM you can play above. And while you play, the original neural machine
doesn't go away: sampled instructions are continuously re-executed by the
neural units and compared against the live CPU. In a two-minute session,
**57,110 out of 57,110 audits came back exact**.

## What this is actually for

- **It's a proof about composition.** "Neural networks are unreliable" is a
  statement about monoliths. Exhaustively verified small networks, composed
  the way hardware composes circuits, are *components* — and you can build
  arbitrarily large exact systems out of them. A Game Boy. An x86. DOOM.
- **It's a proof about verification.** Every claim on this page is checkable,
  and most of them you can re-run yourself, right here: the GPU button above
  re-verifies all 525,000+ unit cases from the shipped weights in seconds;
  the segment button re-executes real DOOM code neurally and hashes the
  result against the golden reference; the microscope shows you individual
  neural nets computing individual instructions.
- **And the bug report says it all:** across the entire project — two CPU
  architectures, thousands of composed units — the test suites found exactly
  **one bug, and it was in hand-written glue code** (two entries swapped in a
  lookup table a human typed). No verified neural unit was ever wrong. The
  discipline of "enumerate, train, verify everything, compose" did exactly
  what it promised.

## Honest limits

The fully neural machine runs at ~1,000 instructions/second — the playable
DOOM above uses the C wiring with the neural units as its continuously-audited
specification, and the complete-frame neural proof is the offline 102-minute
run. The audits *sample* the instruction stream rather than checking all 60
million per minute. There's no sound, and the machine implements the subset
of a PC that DOOM needs (no floating point — DOOM never uses it). None of
these caveats touch the central claim: every comparison ever made between
this machine's neural units and ground truth — exhaustive, fuzzed, replayed,
or sampled live — has come back **exact**.

---

*Built brick by brick: one adder → a Game Boy → a real cartridge game →
an x86 → DOOM. The weights, the DOOM binary, the snapshot, and every proof
log ship with this Space.*