data/maintainer_moves.html

<style>

:root { color-scheme: light; }

.bi-wrap { font-family: Inter, ui-sans-serif, system-ui, -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, "Segoe UI", sans-serif; color: #1f2328 !important; }

.bi-wrap h1, .bi-wrap h2, .bi-wrap h3, .bi-wrap p, .bi-wrap strong, .bi-wrap td, .bi-wrap th, .bi-wrap div { color: #1f2328 !important; }

.bi-band { border: 1px solid #d8dee4; border-radius: 8px; background: #ffffff !important; padding: 16px; margin: 0 0 12px; }

.bi-title { display: flex; gap: 12px; align-items: flex-start; justify-content: space-between; margin-bottom: 12px; }

.bi-title h1, .bi-title h2 { margin: 0; line-height: 1.15; letter-spacing: 0; }

.bi-title h1 { font-size: 1.55rem; }

.bi-title h2 { font-size: 1.12rem; }

.bi-title p { margin: 4px 0 0; color: #57606a; max-width: 820px; }

.status-pill { border-radius: 999px; padding: 5px 9px; font-size: .78rem; font-weight: 700; background: #dafbe1; color: #116329 !important; white-space: nowrap; }

.metric-grid { display: grid; grid-template-columns: repeat(auto-fit, minmax(138px, 1fr)); gap: 8px; }

.metric { border: 1px solid #d0d7de; border-radius: 8px; padding: 10px; background: #f6f8fa !important; min-height: 86px; }

.metric-value { font-size: 1.45rem; font-weight: 800; line-height: 1.1; color: #0969da !important; }

.metric-label { margin-top: 4px; font-size: .84rem; font-weight: 700; }

.metric-note { margin-top: 2px; font-size: .76rem; color: #57606a !important; }

.callout-grid { display: grid; grid-template-columns: repeat(auto-fit, minmax(220px, 1fr)); gap: 8px; }

.callout { border-left: 4px solid #0969da; background: #f6f8fa !important; border-radius: 8px; padding: 10px 12px; }

.callout:nth-child(2) { border-left-color: #1a7f37; }

.callout:nth-child(3) { border-left-color: #bf8700; }

.callout:nth-child(4) { border-left-color: #cf222e; }

.callout strong { display: block; margin-bottom: 4px; }

.group-grid { display: grid; grid-template-columns: repeat(auto-fit, minmax(310px, 1fr)); gap: 10px; }

.group-card { border: 1px solid #d8dee4; border-radius: 8px; padding: 12px; background: #fff !important; }

.group-card h3 { margin: 0 0 7px; font-size: 1rem; line-height: 1.25; letter-spacing: 0; }

.meta-row { display: flex; flex-wrap: wrap; gap: 6px; margin: 6px 0; }

.chip-row { display: inline-flex; flex-wrap: wrap; gap: 5px; align-items: center; vertical-align: middle; }

.chip { display: inline-flex; align-items: center; border: 1px solid #d0d7de; border-radius: 999px; padding: 2px 7px; font-size: .78rem; background: #f6f8fa !important; color: #24292f !important; }

.chip.bucket { border-color: #9a6700; background: #fff8c5 !important; }

.chip.kind { border-color: #0969da; background: #ddf4ff !important; }

.workflow-grid { display: grid; grid-template-columns: repeat(auto-fit, minmax(260px, 1fr)); gap: 10px; }

.workflow-card { border: 1px solid #d8dee4; border-radius: 8px; padding: 12px; background: #fff !important; }

.workflow-card h3 { margin: 0 0 7px; font-size: 1rem; line-height: 1.25; letter-spacing: 0; }

.workflow-card .move-count { font-weight: 800; color: #0969da !important; }

.move-list { display: grid; gap: 10px; }

.move-row { border: 1px solid #d8dee4; border-radius: 8px; background: #fff !important; }

.move-row summary { list-style: none; cursor: pointer; padding: 12px; }

.move-row summary::-webkit-details-marker { display: none; }

.move-summary { display: grid; grid-template-columns: minmax(190px, 1fr) minmax(260px, 1.45fr) minmax(260px, 1.45fr) minmax(150px, .8fr) minmax(250px, 1.35fr) auto; gap: 16px; align-items: start; }

.move-title, .move-field { min-width: 0; }

.move-title h3 { margin: 0 0 4px; font-size: 1rem; line-height: 1.25; letter-spacing: 0; }

.move-field span { display: block; color: #57606a !important; font-size: .72rem; font-weight: 800; text-transform: uppercase; letter-spacing: 0; }

.move-field p { margin: 3px 0 0; font-size: .84rem; line-height: 1.35; overflow-wrap: anywhere; }

.move-field .chip, .move-title { overflow-wrap: anywhere; }

.view-bundles { align-self: center; justify-self: end; border: 1px solid #000000; border-radius: 999px; color: #000000 !important; background: #ffffff !important; padding: 4px 9px; font-size: .78rem; font-weight: 800; white-space: nowrap; }

.move-row[open] .view-bundles { background: #f6f8fa !important; }

.move-expanded { border-top: 1px solid #d8dee4; padding: 0 12px 12px; }

.bundle-row { border-top: 1px solid #eef1f4; padding: 12px 0; }

.bundle-row:first-child { border-top: none; }

.bundle-row h4 { margin: 0 0 6px; font-size: .94rem; line-height: 1.25; letter-spacing: 0; }

.bundle-scope { display: grid; grid-template-columns: repeat(auto-fit, minmax(220px, 1fr)); gap: 7px; margin-top: 8px; }

.evidence-list { margin: 8px 0 0 18px; padding: 0; color: #57606a !important; font-size: .82rem; line-height: 1.35; }

.evidence-list li { margin: 3px 0; }

.muted { color: #57606a !important; }

.evidence { font-size: .84rem; color: #57606a !important; }

.scroll-table { overflow-x: auto; border: 1px solid #d8dee4; border-radius: 8px; background: #fff !important; }

table.bi-table { width: 100%; border-collapse: collapse; font-size: .86rem; }

.bi-table th { text-align: left; background: #f6f8fa !important; color: #57606a !important; font-size: .78rem; border-bottom: 1px solid #d8dee4; padding: 8px; white-space: nowrap; }

.bi-table td { border-bottom: 1px solid #eef1f4; padding: 8px; vertical-align: top; min-width: 86px; }

.bi-table tr:last-child td { border-bottom: none; }

.wide { min-width: 280px; }

.tight { max-width: 180px; }

a { color: #0969da !important; text-decoration: none; }

a:hover { text-decoration: underline; }

.bi-wrap, .bi-wrap * { color: #000000 !important; }

@media (max-width: 720px) {

  .bi-title { display: block; }

  .status-pill { display: inline-block; margin-top: 8px; }

  .group-grid { grid-template-columns: 1fr; }

  .move-summary { grid-template-columns: 1fr; }

  .view-bundles { justify-self: start; }

}

</style>
<div class='bi-wrap'><section class='bi-band'><div class='bi-title'><div><h2>Maintainer Moves</h2><p>The row is the compact decision object: move, why, next action, affected scope, confidence, and compact evidence. Expand a row to inspect its bundles; review threads and raw public evidence rows stay underneath for audit.</p></div><span class='status-pill'>workflow compression</span></div><div class='metric-grid'><div class='metric'><div class='metric-value'>9</div><div class='metric-label'>Maintainer moves</div><div class='metric-note'>same next action grouped</div></div><div class='metric'><div class='metric-value'>15437</div><div class='metric-label'>Issues covered</div><div class='metric-note'>open issues</div></div><div class='metric'><div class='metric-value'>2770</div><div class='metric-label'>PRs covered</div><div class='metric-note'>open PRs</div></div><div class='metric'><div class='metric-value'>2704</div><div class='metric-label'>Review groups</div><div class='metric-note'>expandable underneath</div></div><div class='metric'><div class='metric-value'>99% fewer than review groups</div><div class='metric-label'>Compression</div><div class='metric-note'>workflow groups</div></div><div class='metric'><div class='metric-value'>0</div><div class='metric-label'>GitHub writes</div><div class='metric-note'>local-only; no GitHub writes</div></div></div></section><section class='bi-band'><div class='bi-title'><div><h2>Recommended Work Plan</h2><p>Ordered by maintainer workflow lane, then by attention score. Each row expands from action summary to bundle evidence without exposing raw API payloads.</p></div></div><div class='move-list'><details class='move-row'><summary><div class='move-summary'><div class='move-title'><h3>make final PR decision</h3><div class='muted'>Maintainer-owned unblock queue</div></div><div class='move-field wide'><span>Why</span><p>The local packet found no failed-check blocker; the next step is maintainer review, merge, close, rebase request, or takeover.</p></div><div class='move-field wide'><span>Next action</span><p>Review changed files, linked issues, and latest comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.</p></div><div class='move-field'><span>Impact</span><p>329 bundles | 259 issues | 988 PRs<br>Confidence: high</p></div><div class='move-field wide'><span>Evidence</span><p><span class='chip-row'><span class='chip'>failed CI checks</span><span class='chip'>no failed-check blocker</span><span class='chip'>reviewDecision=APPROVED</span><span class='chip'>mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN</span><span class='chip'>329 package receipts</span></span></p></div><span class='view-bundles'>View bundles</span></div></summary><div class='move-expanded'><div class='bundle-row'><h4>Bundle BUNDLE-002: PR #189122</h4><div class='meta-row'><span class='chip kind'>Existing PR decision</span><span class='chip bucket'>waiting on maintainer review</span><span class='chip'>2 issues</span><span class='chip'>1 PR</span><span class='chip'>medium</span></div><div class='bundle-scope'><div><span class='muted'>Issues</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='chip'>#158861</span><span class='chip'>#188900</span></span></div><div><span class='muted'>PRs</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='chip'>PR #189122</span></span></div></div><ul class='evidence-list'><li>Diagnosis: PR #189122 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.</li><li>Next action: Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.</li><li>Evidence: reviewDecision=APPROVED; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=1</li><li>Short excerpt: pr #189122 declares a closing reference to issue #188900. | Fixes #188900 Summary Multiplying a dense tensor by a sparse COO tensor whose size-1 sparse dimension must broadcast up to a larger size silently dropped | Looks correct | s-is, so only the slice at index 0 along the...</li><li>Review threads: thread:issue:158861:issue:188900:pr:189122</li><li>Package receipt: 7c283f0cf9f9</li></ul></div><div class='bundle-row'><h4>Bundle BUNDLE-005: PR #181720 / PR #189256</h4><div class='meta-row'><span class='chip kind'>Existing PR decision</span><span class='chip bucket'>waiting on maintainer review</span><span class='chip'>3 issues</span><span class='chip'>2 PRs</span><span class='chip'>medium</span></div><div class='bundle-scope'><div><span class='muted'>Issues</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='chip'>#180397</span><span class='chip'>#181374</span><span class='chip'>#188970</span></span></div><div><span class='muted'>PRs</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='chip'>PR #181720</span><span class='chip'>PR #189256</span></span></div></div><ul class='evidence-list'><li>Diagnosis: PR #189256 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.</li><li>Next action: Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.</li><li>Evidence: reviewDecision=APPROVED; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=0</li><li>Short excerpt: at in the current form it gives no perf benefit over regular CPU memory, it this is a foundation for copy-on-write work Fixes #181374 Fixes #188970 Authored with assistance from Claude Code. | Please note that in the current form it gives no perf benefit over regular CPU memor...</li><li>Review threads: thread:issue:180397:issue:181374:issue:188970:pr:181720</li><li>Package receipt: b3f507176f68</li></ul></div><div class='bundle-row'><h4>Bundle BUNDLE-011: PR #189045</h4><div class='meta-row'><span class='chip kind'>Existing PR decision</span><span class='chip bucket'>waiting on maintainer review</span><span class='chip'>3 issues</span><span class='chip'>1 PR</span><span class='chip'>medium</span></div><div class='bundle-scope'><div><span class='muted'>Issues</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='chip'>#40932</span><span class='chip'>#41508</span><span class='chip'>#55056</span></span></div><div><span class='muted'>PRs</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='chip'>PR #189045</span></span></div></div><ul class='evidence-list'><li>Diagnosis: PR #189045 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.</li><li>Next action: Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.</li><li>Evidence: reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=0</li><li>Short excerpt: pr #189045 declares a closing reference to issue #41508. | ---Fixes #41508 Root cause nn.MultiheadAttention produces NaN gradients when a key_padding_mask (or attn_mask) fully masks out every key for a given query | Hi @HelenaHlz, as directed by @jbschlosser please refer to th...</li><li>Review threads: thread:issue:40932:issue:41508:issue:55056:pr:189045</li><li>Package receipt: e38e5b031d03</li></ul></div><div class='bundle-row'><h4>Bundle BUNDLE-015: PR #187354 / PR #188556</h4><div class='meta-row'><span class='chip kind'>Existing PR decision</span><span class='chip bucket'>waiting on maintainer review</span><span class='chip'>2 issues</span><span class='chip'>2 PRs</span><span class='chip'>medium</span></div><div class='bundle-scope'><div><span class='muted'>Issues</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='chip'>#187332</span><span class='chip'>#188545</span></span></div><div><span class='muted'>PRs</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='chip'>PR #187354</span><span class='chip'>PR #188556</span></span></div></div><ul class='evidence-list'><li>Diagnosis: PR #187354 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.</li><li>Next action: Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.</li><li>Evidence: reviewDecision=APPROVED; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=0</li><li>Short excerpt: pr #188556 declares a closing reference to issue #188545. | Fixes #188545 Summary Preserve eager-mode semantics for infinite inputs in the Triton lowering of torch.special.bessel_j0 torch.special.bessel_j1 torch.s | ile continuing to use libdevice for finite inputs. This prese...</li><li>Review threads: thread:issue:187332:issue:188545:pr:187354:pr:188556</li><li>Package receipt: 0c1a21954532</li></ul></div><div class='bundle-row'><h4>Bundle BUNDLE-022: PR #189273</h4><div class='meta-row'><span class='chip kind'>Existing PR decision</span><span class='chip bucket'>waiting on CI/check fix</span><span class='chip'>1 issue</span><span class='chip'>1 PR</span><span class='chip'>high</span></div><div class='bundle-scope'><div><span class='muted'>Issues</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='chip'>#189267</span></span></div><div><span class='muted'>PRs</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='chip'>PR #189273</span></span></div></div><ul class='evidence-list'><li>Diagnosis: PR #189273 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.</li><li>Next action: Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.</li><li>Evidence: failed checks: statusCheckRollup.</li><li>Short excerpt: See #189267 (comment) | pr #189273 declares a closing reference to issue #189267. | Fixes #189267 | PR #189273: draft/noise; checks: statusCheckRollup, statusCheckRollup; review: APPROVED</li><li>Review threads: thread:issue:189267:pr:189273</li><li>Package receipt: 4b094aa505ba</li></ul></div><div class='bundle-row'><h4>Bundle BUNDLE-025: PR #188791</h4><div class='meta-row'><span class='chip kind'>Existing PR decision</span><span class='chip bucket'>waiting on maintainer review</span><span class='chip'>1 issue</span><span class='chip'>1 PR</span><span class='chip'>medium</span></div><div class='bundle-scope'><div><span class='muted'>Issues</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='chip'>#188792</span></span></div><div><span class='muted'>PRs</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='chip'>PR #188791</span></span></div></div><ul class='evidence-list'><li>Diagnosis: PR #188791 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.</li><li>Next action: Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.</li><li>Evidence: reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=4</li><li>Short excerpt: each worker do a serial 1-element torch.sqrt first; this drops the rate to 0 (5,200 first-calls), which is the basis of the fix proposed in #188791. mkl_vml_race_repro.py &quot;&quot;&quot;Minimal repro: MKL VML first-call dispatch race in torch.sqrt. Spawns waves of worker processes on an o...</li><li>Review threads: thread:issue:188792:pr:188791</li><li>Package receipt: 80accb61c397</li></ul></div><div class='bundle-row'><h4>Bundle BUNDLE-028: PR #188114</h4><div class='meta-row'><span class='chip kind'>Existing PR decision</span><span class='chip bucket'>waiting on maintainer review</span><span class='chip'>1 issue</span><span class='chip'>1 PR</span><span class='chip'>medium</span></div><div class='bundle-scope'><div><span class='muted'>Issues</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='chip'>#188113</span></span></div><div><span class='muted'>PRs</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='chip'>PR #188114</span></span></div></div><ul class='evidence-list'><li>Diagnosis: PR #188114 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.</li><li>Next action: Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.</li><li>Evidence: reviewDecision=APPROVED; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=1</li><li>Short excerpt: pr #188114 declares a closing reference to issue #188113. | x950. Added gfx1200/gfx1201. Tested on gfx1201 (RX 9070): WITHOUT patch the kernel ASSERTs, WITH patch the kernel executes correctly. Fixes #188113 cc @jeffdaily @sunway513 @jithunnair-amd @pruthvistony @ROCmSupport @...</li><li>Review threads: thread:issue:188113:pr:188114</li><li>Package receipt: f4e4370f839a</li></ul></div><div class='bundle-row'><h4>Bundle BUNDLE-030: PR #188039</h4><div class='meta-row'><span class='chip kind'>Existing PR decision</span><span class='chip bucket'>waiting on maintainer review</span><span class='chip'>1 issue</span><span class='chip'>1 PR</span><span class='chip'>medium</span></div><div class='bundle-scope'><div><span class='muted'>Issues</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='chip'>#188034</span></span></div><div><span class='muted'>PRs</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='chip'>PR #188039</span></span></div></div><ul class='evidence-list'><li>Diagnosis: PR #188039 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.</li><li>Next action: Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.</li><li>Evidence: reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=1</li><li>Short excerpt: pr #188039 declares a closing reference to issue #188034. | st that returns a sentinel object from setup_context and asserts sys.getrefcount is unchanged after repeated forward+backward passes. Fixes #188034 Test plan python test/test_autograd.py TestAutograd.test_custom_funct...</li><li>Review threads: thread:issue:188034:pr:188039</li><li>Package receipt: 36000e9d2f4b</li></ul></div><div class='bundle-row'><h4>Bundle BUNDLE-035: PR #187104</h4><div class='meta-row'><span class='chip kind'>Existing PR decision</span><span class='chip bucket'>waiting on maintainer review</span><span class='chip'>1 issue</span><span class='chip'>1 PR</span><span class='chip'>medium</span></div><div class='bundle-scope'><div><span class='muted'>Issues</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='chip'>#175370</span></span></div><div><span class='muted'>PRs</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='chip'>PR #187104</span></span></div></div><ul class='evidence-list'><li>Diagnosis: PR #187104 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.</li><li>Next action: Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.</li><li>Evidence: reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=1</li><li>Short excerpt: pr #187104 declares a closing reference to issue #175370. | Fixes #175370 F.embedding_bag on CPU segfaults when offsets is empty and indices is not. Root cause With zero bags, make_offset2bag fills offset2bag with | PR #187104: has linked issue; checks:; review:</li><li>Review threads: thread:issue:175370:pr:187104</li><li>Package receipt: 9ffed6bf077a</li></ul></div><div class='bundle-row'><h4>Bundle BUNDLE-037: PR #186583</h4><div class='meta-row'><span class='chip kind'>Existing PR decision</span><span class='chip bucket'>waiting on maintainer review</span><span class='chip'>1 issue</span><span class='chip'>1 PR</span><span class='chip'>medium</span></div><div class='bundle-scope'><div><span class='muted'>Issues</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='chip'>#186537</span></span></div><div><span class='muted'>PRs</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='chip'>PR #186583</span></span></div></div><ul class='evidence-list'><li>Diagnosis: PR #186583 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.</li><li>Next action: Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.</li><li>Evidence: reviewDecision=APPROVED; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=1</li><li>Short excerpt: shapes to exceed the default recompile limit, and asserts both the forward and recompute phases see the caller&#x27;s raised Dynamo limit. Fixes #186537 Generated by my agent Benchmark Results: Post-fix Python autograd.Function backward microbenchmark, 20,000 backward calls per rep...</li><li>Review threads: thread:issue:186537:pr:186583</li><li>Package receipt: 19c96580e3b7</li></ul></div><div class='bundle-row'><h4>Bundle BUNDLE-038: PR #186454</h4><div class='meta-row'><span class='chip kind'>Existing PR decision</span><span class='chip bucket'>waiting on maintainer review</span><span class='chip'>1 issue</span><span class='chip'>1 PR</span><span class='chip'>medium</span></div><div class='bundle-scope'><div><span class='muted'>Issues</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='chip'>#124863</span></span></div><div><span class='muted'>PRs</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='chip'>PR #186454</span></span></div></div><ul class='evidence-list'><li>Diagnosis: PR #186454 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.</li><li>Next action: Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.</li><li>Evidence: reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=0</li><li>Short excerpt: ore removal, and warning during registration gives users a direct migration signal without changing dispatcher semantics immediately. Fixes #124863 Generated by my agent Test Plan: python test/test_custom_ops.py TestCustomOp.test_incorrect_schema_types TestCustomOp.test_is_ten...</li><li>Review threads: thread:issue:124863:pr:186454</li><li>Package receipt: 65bb42ece760</li></ul></div><div class='bundle-row'><h4>Bundle BUNDLE-046: PR #183701</h4><div class='meta-row'><span class='chip kind'>Existing PR decision</span><span class='chip bucket'>waiting on maintainer review</span><span class='chip'>1 issue</span><span class='chip'>1 PR</span><span class='chip'>medium</span></div><div class='bundle-scope'><div><span class='muted'>Issues</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='chip'>#181690</span></span></div><div><span class='muted'>PRs</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='chip'>PR #183701</span></span></div></div><ul class='evidence-list'><li>Diagnosis: PR #183701 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.</li><li>Next action: Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.</li><li>Evidence: reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=0</li><li>Short excerpt: duction suffix and emitted full-width non-contiguous stores. Reuse the tail vector kernel suffix so tail_size bounds the final store. Fixes #181690 Generated by my agent cc @voznesenskym @penguinwu @EikanWang @jgong5 @Guobing-Chen @XiaobingSuper @zhuhaozhe @blzheng @wenzhe-nrv...</li><li>Review threads: thread:issue:181690:pr:183701</li><li>Package receipt: d6aeb645e15d</li></ul></div><div class='bundle-row compact-note'><strong>317 more bundle receipt(s)</strong><p>Remaining bundles stay in the downloadable public-safe CSV artifacts to keep this action tab fast to scan.</p></div></div></details><details class='move-row'><summary><div class='move-summary'><div class='move-title'><h3>fix failing CI checks</h3><div class='muted'>Repair-ready PRs</div></div><div class='move-field wide'><span>Why</span><p>The PR is not ready for maintainer decision until the named CI failure is repaired.</p></div><div class='move-field wide'><span>Next action</span><p>Use the failed check and changed-file evidence to pick the smallest repair path, then rerun the failing job.</p></div><div class='move-field'><span>Impact</span><p>484 bundles | 711 issues | 1718 PRs<br>Confidence: high</p></div><div class='move-field wide'><span>Evidence</span><p><span class='chip-row'><span class='chip'>failed CI checks</span><span class='chip'>failed checks: statusCheckRollup.</span><span class='chip'>failed checks: statusCheckRollup, unit-test / inductor-...</span><span class='chip'>failed checks: statusCheckRollup, inductor-test / test-...</span><span class='chip'>484 package receipts</span></span></p></div><span class='view-bundles'>View bundles</span></div></summary><div class='move-expanded'><div class='bundle-row'><h4>Bundle BUNDLE-003: PR #185730</h4><div class='meta-row'><span class='chip kind'>Existing PR blocked review</span><span class='chip bucket'>waiting on CI/check fix</span><span class='chip'>2 issues</span><span class='chip'>1 PR</span><span class='chip'>high</span></div><div class='bundle-scope'><div><span class='muted'>Issues</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='chip'>#150022</span><span class='chip'>#150371</span></span></div><div><span class='muted'>PRs</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='chip'>PR #185730</span></span></div></div><ul class='evidence-list'><li>Diagnosis: PR #185730 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.</li><li>Next action: Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.</li><li>Evidence: failed checks: statusCheckRollup.</li><li>Short excerpt: the dynamic_shapes tree and the traced input tree had different structures; the trace-order remap fixes that path too. Fixes #150371 Fixes #150022 Generated by my agent Test Plan: python - &lt;&lt;&#x27;PY&#x27; ... PY issue repro for strict=False and strict=True: both exported successfully w...</li><li>Review threads: thread:issue:150022:issue:150371:pr:185730</li><li>Package receipt: a6fa3ccdc006</li></ul></div><div class='bundle-row'><h4>Bundle BUNDLE-004: PR #188948</h4><div class='meta-row'><span class='chip kind'>Existing PR contributor wait</span><span class='chip bucket'>waiting on CI/check fix</span><span class='chip'>1 issue</span><span class='chip'>1 PR</span><span class='chip'>high</span></div><div class='bundle-scope'><div><span class='muted'>Issues</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='chip'>#153410</span></span></div><div><span class='muted'>PRs</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='chip'>PR #188948</span></span></div></div><ul class='evidence-list'><li>Diagnosis: PR #188948 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.</li><li>Next action: Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.</li><li>Evidence: failed checks: statusCheckRollup.</li><li>Short excerpt: pr #188948 declares a closing reference to issue #153410. | Fixes #153410 This change provides a reference implementation for triangular_solve on sparse CPU tensors when MKL is not available, by materializing diag | PR #188948: waiting on contributor; checks: statusCheckRollup...</li><li>Review threads: thread:issue:153410:pr:188948</li><li>Package receipt: 54ffdc39a6bd</li></ul></div><div class='bundle-row'><h4>Bundle BUNDLE-006: PR #189043</h4><div class='meta-row'><span class='chip kind'>Existing PR contributor wait</span><span class='chip bucket'>waiting on CI/check fix</span><span class='chip'>1 issue</span><span class='chip'>1 PR</span><span class='chip'>high</span></div><div class='bundle-scope'><div><span class='muted'>Issues</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='chip'>#188892</span></span></div><div><span class='muted'>PRs</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='chip'>PR #189043</span></span></div></div><ul class='evidence-list'><li>Diagnosis: PR #189043 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.</li><li>Next action: Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.</li><li>Evidence: failed checks: statusCheckRollup.</li><li>Short excerpt: pr #189043 declares a closing reference to issue #188892. | Fixes #188892 Problem cuDNN 9 is split into a dispatcher (libcudnn.so) plus a set of engine sub-libraries (libcudnn_graph.so, libcudnn_engines_*.so, libc | PR #189043: waiting on contributor; checks: statusCheckRollup...</li><li>Review threads: thread:issue:188892:pr:189043</li><li>Package receipt: 808cc9baeb6f</li></ul></div><div class='bundle-row'><h4>Bundle BUNDLE-007: PR #181726 / PR #181727 / PR #181728 / PR #183511 / +10</h4><div class='meta-row'><span class='chip kind'>Existing PR blocked review</span><span class='chip bucket'>waiting on CI/check fix</span><span class='chip'>21 issues</span><span class='chip'>14 PRs</span><span class='chip'>high</span></div><div class='bundle-scope'><div><span class='muted'>Issues</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='chip'>#178040</span><span class='chip'>#183988</span><span class='chip'>#186348</span><span class='chip'>#187988</span><span class='chip'>#188477</span><span class='chip'>#188675</span><span class='chip'>#188704</span><span class='chip'>#188706</span><span class='chip'>#188707</span><span class='chip'>#188708</span><span class='chip'>#188709</span><span class='chip'>#188710</span><span class='chip muted'>+9</span></span></div><div><span class='muted'>PRs</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='chip'>PR #181726</span><span class='chip'>PR #181727</span><span class='chip'>PR #181728</span><span class='chip'>PR #183511</span><span class='chip'>PR #184276</span><span class='chip'>PR #187315</span><span class='chip'>PR #187318</span><span class='chip'>PR #187989</span><span class='chip'>PR #188268</span><span class='chip'>PR #188931</span><span class='chip muted'>+4</span></span></div></div><ul class='evidence-list'><li>Diagnosis: PR #189149 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.</li><li>Next action: Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.</li><li>Evidence: failed checks: statusCheckRollup.</li><li>Short excerpt: pr #189149 declares a closing reference to issue #186348. | pr #187989 declares a closing reference to issue #187988. | pr #188931 declares a closing reference to issue #188891. | pr #184276 declares a closing reference to issue #183988. | pr #188996 declares a closing referen...</li><li>Review threads: thread:issue:178040:issue:183988:issue:186348:issue:187988</li><li>Package receipt: 9a19487204ee</li></ul></div><div class='bundle-row'><h4>Bundle BUNDLE-008: PR #184481 / PR #184694 / PR #185891</h4><div class='meta-row'><span class='chip kind'>Existing PR contributor wait</span><span class='chip bucket'>waiting on CI/check fix</span><span class='chip'>3 issues</span><span class='chip'>3 PRs</span><span class='chip'>high</span></div><div class='bundle-scope'><div><span class='muted'>Issues</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='chip'>#93617</span><span class='chip'>#178680</span><span class='chip'>#188133</span></span></div><div><span class='muted'>PRs</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='chip'>PR #184481</span><span class='chip'>PR #184694</span><span class='chip'>PR #185891</span></span></div></div><ul class='evidence-list'><li>Diagnosis: PR #185891 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.</li><li>Next action: Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.</li><li>Evidence: failed checks: statusCheckRollup.</li><li>Short excerpt: including static traces and AOTAutograd cache hits, so alias-sensitive synthetic-base graphs are not reused for incompatible inputs. Fixes #178680 Generated by my agent cc @voznesenskym @penguinwu @EikanWang @jgong5 @Guobing-Chen @XiaobingSuper @zhuhaozhe @blzheng @wenzhe-nrv....</li><li>Review threads: thread:issue:178680:issue:188133:issue:93617:pr:184481</li><li>Package receipt: 3d3d3ef1fb3b</li></ul></div><div class='bundle-row'><h4>Bundle BUNDLE-009: PR #185946 / PR #186375</h4><div class='meta-row'><span class='chip kind'>Existing PR blocked review</span><span class='chip bucket'>waiting on CI/check fix</span><span class='chip'>3 issues</span><span class='chip'>2 PRs</span><span class='chip'>high</span></div><div class='bundle-scope'><div><span class='muted'>Issues</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='chip'>#16706</span><span class='chip'>#185240</span><span class='chip'>#186374</span></span></div><div><span class='muted'>PRs</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='chip'>PR #185946</span><span class='chip'>PR #186375</span></span></div></div><ul class='evidence-list'><li>Diagnosis: PR #185946 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.</li><li>Next action: Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.</li><li>Evidence: failed checks: statusCheckRollup.</li><li>Short excerpt: pr #186375 declares a closing reference to issue #186374. | pr #185946 declares a closing reference to issue #185240. | ad of falling back gracefully. Similar to #185946, this PR replaces the assertion with a warning and allows control flow to continue. Fixes #186374 cc @eqy |...</li><li>Review threads: thread:issue:16706:issue:185240:issue:186374:pr:185946</li><li>Package receipt: ba5b87b237c1</li></ul></div><div class='bundle-row'><h4>Bundle BUNDLE-010: PR #185846 / PR #186358 / PR #187609</h4><div class='meta-row'><span class='chip kind'>Existing PR blocked review</span><span class='chip bucket'>waiting on CI/check fix</span><span class='chip'>2 issues</span><span class='chip'>3 PRs</span><span class='chip'>high</span></div><div class='bundle-scope'><div><span class='muted'>Issues</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='chip'>#185470</span><span class='chip'>#185484</span></span></div><div><span class='muted'>PRs</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='chip'>PR #185846</span><span class='chip'>PR #186358</span><span class='chip'>PR #187609</span></span></div></div><ul class='evidence-list'><li>Diagnosis: PR #186358 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.</li><li>Next action: Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.</li><li>Evidence: failed checks: statusCheckRollup.</li><li>Short excerpt: pr #186358 declares a closing reference to issue #185484. | so output dtype semantics are unchanged. A prior stale PR, #185846, made the same root-cause fix but has not landed on current main. Fixes #185470 Generated by my agent Test Plan: python test/inductor/test_torchinduct...</li><li>Review threads: thread:issue:185470:issue:185484:pr:185846:pr:186358</li><li>Package receipt: 221d1417621c</li></ul></div><div class='bundle-row'><h4>Bundle BUNDLE-012: PR #188998</h4><div class='meta-row'><span class='chip kind'>Existing PR blocked review</span><span class='chip bucket'>waiting on CI/check fix</span><span class='chip'>3 issues</span><span class='chip'>1 PR</span><span class='chip'>high</span></div><div class='bundle-scope'><div><span class='muted'>Issues</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='chip'>#188492</span><span class='chip'>#188841</span><span class='chip'>#189287</span></span></div><div><span class='muted'>PRs</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='chip'>PR #188998</span></span></div></div><ul class='evidence-list'><li>Diagnosis: PR #188998 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.</li><li>Next action: Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.</li><li>Evidence: failed checks: statusCheckRollup.</li><li>Short excerpt: pr #188998 declares a closing reference to issue #188492. | Fixes #188492 Under Triton 3.8 on Hopper (SM90), bf16 Swin-Transformer and similar bf16 workloads compiled with torch.compile(mode=&quot;max-autotune&quot;) showed | ibution needs confirmation (it is by failing-since alignment,...</li><li>Review threads: thread:issue:188492:issue:188841:issue:189287:pr:188998</li><li>Package receipt: e6447d3f086b</li></ul></div><div class='bundle-row'><h4>Bundle BUNDLE-013: PR #184621</h4><div class='meta-row'><span class='chip kind'>Existing PR contributor wait</span><span class='chip bucket'>waiting on CI/check fix</span><span class='chip'>3 issues</span><span class='chip'>1 PR</span><span class='chip'>high</span></div><div class='bundle-scope'><div><span class='muted'>Issues</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='chip'>#182649</span><span class='chip'>#182651</span><span class='chip'>#182652</span></span></div><div><span class='muted'>PRs</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='chip'>PR #184621</span></span></div></div><ul class='evidence-list'><li>Diagnosis: PR #184621 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a1...</li><li>Next action: Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), induc...</li><li>Evidence: failed checks: statusCheckRollup, unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osd...</li><li>Short excerpt: or scalar values. This covers tensor-backed reshape shapes from buffers and equivalent ONNX-converted reshape patterns. Fixes #182649 Fixes #182651 Fixes #182652 Generated by my agent cc @voznesenskym @penguinwu @EikanWang @jgong5 @Guobing-Chen @XiaobingSuper @zhuhaozhe @blzhe...</li><li>Review threads: thread:issue:182649:issue:182651:issue:182652:pr:184621</li><li>Package receipt: d4519464a69d</li></ul></div><div class='bundle-row'><h4>Bundle BUNDLE-014: PR #189294 / PR #189295</h4><div class='meta-row'><span class='chip kind'>Existing PR blocked review</span><span class='chip bucket'>waiting on CI/check fix</span><span class='chip'>2 issues</span><span class='chip'>2 PRs</span><span class='chip'>high</span></div><div class='bundle-scope'><div><span class='muted'>Issues</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='chip'>#173059</span><span class='chip'>#189034</span></span></div><div><span class='muted'>PRs</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='chip'>PR #189294</span><span class='chip'>PR #189295</span></span></div></div><ul class='evidence-list'><li>Diagnosis: PR #189294 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.</li><li>Next action: Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.</li><li>Evidence: failed checks: statusCheckRollup.</li><li>Short excerpt: o the numpy/scipy pair is consistent. Mirrors the compatible numpy==2.0.2 + scipy==1.13.1 set already used in test.sh&#x27;s numpy_2 path. Fixes #189034. Test Plan: CI: the &quot;Limited CI on H100 / ...sm90 / test (smoke)&quot; job should go green; test_foreach no longer crashes importing s...</li><li>Review threads: thread:issue:173059:issue:189034:pr:189294:pr:189295</li><li>Package receipt: ac4d167facc9</li></ul></div><div class='bundle-row'><h4>Bundle BUNDLE-017: PR #185496</h4><div class='meta-row'><span class='chip kind'>Existing PR contributor wait</span><span class='chip bucket'>waiting on CI/check fix</span><span class='chip'>2 issues</span><span class='chip'>1 PR</span><span class='chip'>high</span></div><div class='bundle-scope'><div><span class='muted'>Issues</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='chip'>#146719</span><span class='chip'>#155044</span></span></div><div><span class='muted'>PRs</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='chip'>PR #185496</span></span></div></div><ul class='evidence-list'><li>Diagnosis: PR #185496 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), in...</li><li>Next action: Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-tes...</li><li>Evidence: failed checks: statusCheckRollup, inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (indu...</li><li>Short excerpt: alone, handles dynamic-shape SymInt metadata, and falls back rather than guessing if the exact alias key is ambiguous. Fixes #155044 Fixes #146719 Generated by my agent Test Plan: python test/export/test_export.py TestExport.test_autograd_grad_reuses_saved_forward_tensor TestE...</li><li>Review threads: thread:issue:146719:issue:155044:pr:185496</li><li>Package receipt: dc31c940a8f3</li></ul></div><div class='bundle-row'><h4>Bundle BUNDLE-019: PR #184628</h4><div class='meta-row'><span class='chip kind'>Existing PR blocked review</span><span class='chip bucket'>waiting on CI/check fix</span><span class='chip'>2 issues</span><span class='chip'>1 PR</span><span class='chip'>high</span></div><div class='bundle-scope'><div><span class='muted'>Issues</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='chip'>#182217</span><span class='chip'>#183369</span></span></div><div><span class='muted'>PRs</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='chip'>PR #184628</span></span></div></div><ul class='evidence-list'><li>Diagnosis: PR #184628 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.</li><li>Next action: Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.</li><li>Evidence: failed checks: statusCheckRollup.</li><li>Short excerpt: tedTensor keepdim reductions do not create unguardable ephemeral guards. Leave mixed or unsupported SingletonInt expressions unknown. Fixes #182217 Fixes #183369 Generated by my agent cc @voznesenskym @penguinwu @EikanWang @jgong5 @Guobing-Chen @XiaobingSuper @zhuhaozhe @blzhe...</li><li>Review threads: thread:issue:182217:issue:183369:pr:184628</li><li>Package receipt: d9335908b10a</li></ul></div><div class='bundle-row compact-note'><strong>472 more bundle receipt(s)</strong><p>Remaining bundles stay in the downloadable public-safe CSV artifacts to keep this action tab fast to scan.</p></div></div></details><details class='move-row'><summary><div class='move-summary'><div class='move-title'><h3>fix failing static/type checks</h3><div class='muted'>Repair-ready PRs</div></div><div class='move-field wide'><span>Why</span><p>The failing job names are known, so maintainers can ask for or apply a focused check fix before re-review.</p></div><div class='move-field wide'><span>Next action</span><p>Fix or request fixes for the named static/type checks, rerun, then return to review only after the branch is green.</p></div><div class='move-field'><span>Impact</span><p>1 bundle | 0 issues | 10 PRs<br>Confidence: high</p></div><div class='move-field wide'><span>Evidence</span><p><span class='chip-row'><span class='chip'>failed static/type checks</span><span class='chip'>failed checks: statusCheckRollup, linux-jammy-aarch64-p...</span><span class='chip'>1 package receipt</span></span></p></div><span class='view-bundles'>View bundles</span></div></summary><div class='move-expanded'><div class='bundle-row'><h4>Bundle BUNDLE-637: PR #176657 / PR #176670 / PR #176754 / PR #179820 / +6</h4><div class='meta-row'><span class='chip kind'>Existing PR blocked review</span><span class='chip bucket'>waiting on CI/check fix</span><span class='chip'>0 issues</span><span class='chip'>10 PRs</span><span class='chip'>high</span></div><div class='bundle-scope'><div><span class='muted'>Issues</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='muted'>none</span></span></div><div><span class='muted'>PRs</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='chip'>PR #176657</span><span class='chip'>PR #176670</span><span class='chip'>PR #176754</span><span class='chip'>PR #179820</span><span class='chip'>PR #180641</span><span class='chip'>PR #182074</span><span class='chip'>PR #182216</span><span class='chip'>PR #188115</span><span class='chip'>PR #188165</span><span class='chip'>PR #189202</span></span></div></div><ul class='evidence-list'><li>Diagnosis: PR #188115 is blocked by failing static/type checks: statusCheckRollup, linux-jammy-aarch64-py3.10 / build-osdc, linux-jammy-cuda13.0-py3.10-gcc11-sm90 / test-osdc (smoke, 1, 1, mt-l-x86iamx-22-225-h100), linux-jammy-...</li><li>Next action: Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, linux-jammy-aarch64-py3.10 / build-osdc, linux-jammy-cuda13.0-py3.10-gcc11-sm90 / test-osdc (smoke, 1, 1, mt-l-x86iamx-22-225-h100), linux-jammy-cuda13.0-py3.12-gcc...</li><li>Evidence: failed checks: statusCheckRollup, linux-jammy-aarch64-py3.10 / build-osdc, linux-jammy-cuda13.0-py3.10-gcc11-sm90 / test-osdc (smoke, 1, 1, mt-l-x86iamx-22-225-h100), linux-jammy-cuda13.0-py3.12-gcc11-sm100 / test-osd...</li><li>Short excerpt: PR #188115: PR blocked; checks: statusCheckRollup, linux-jammy-aarch64-py3.10 / build-osdc, linux-jammy-cuda13.0-py3.10-gcc11-sm90 / test-osdc (smoke, 1, 1, mt-l-x86iamx-22-225-h100), linux-jammy-cuda13.0-py3.12-gcc11-sm100 / test-osdc (smoke_b200, 1, 1, mt-l-x86iamx-22-225-b2...</li><li>Package receipt: 8b4a8fdd91d5</li></ul></div></div></details><details class='move-row'><summary><div class='move-summary'><div class='move-title'><h3>resolve overlapping PR lineage</h3><div class='muted'>Superseded/lineage cleanup</div></div><div class='move-field wide'><span>Why</span><p>Multiple active or referenced PR attempts are connected, so maintainers should choose the current path before separate reviews diverge.</p></div><div class='move-field wide'><span>Next action</span><p>Review the current PR, older attempts, superseding links, and review guidance together; close, park, or merge in one lineage decision.</p></div><div class='move-field'><span>Impact</span><p>272 bundles | 329 issues | 2179 PRs<br>Confidence: high</p></div><div class='move-field wide'><span>Evidence</span><p><span class='chip-row'><span class='chip'>failed static/type checks</span><span class='chip'>failed CI checks</span><span class='chip'>requested changes</span><span class='chip'>no failed-check blocker</span><span class='chip'>reviewDecision=APPROVED</span><span class='chip'>272 package receipts</span></span></p></div><span class='view-bundles'>View bundles</span></div></summary><div class='move-expanded'><div class='bundle-row'><h4>Bundle BUNDLE-005: PR #181720 / PR #189256</h4><div class='meta-row'><span class='chip kind'>Existing PR decision</span><span class='chip bucket'>waiting on maintainer review</span><span class='chip'>3 issues</span><span class='chip'>2 PRs</span><span class='chip'>medium</span></div><div class='bundle-scope'><div><span class='muted'>Issues</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='chip'>#180397</span><span class='chip'>#181374</span><span class='chip'>#188970</span></span></div><div><span class='muted'>PRs</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='chip'>PR #181720</span><span class='chip'>PR #189256</span></span></div></div><ul class='evidence-list'><li>Diagnosis: PR #189256 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.</li><li>Next action: Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.</li><li>Evidence: reviewDecision=APPROVED; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=0</li><li>Short excerpt: at in the current form it gives no perf benefit over regular CPU memory, it this is a foundation for copy-on-write work Fixes #181374 Fixes #188970 Authored with assistance from Claude Code. | Please note that in the current form it gives no perf benefit over regular CPU memor...</li><li>Review threads: thread:issue:180397:issue:181374:issue:188970:pr:181720</li><li>Package receipt: b3f507176f68</li></ul></div><div class='bundle-row'><h4>Bundle BUNDLE-007: PR #181726 / PR #181727 / PR #181728 / PR #183511 / +10</h4><div class='meta-row'><span class='chip kind'>Existing PR blocked review</span><span class='chip bucket'>waiting on CI/check fix</span><span class='chip'>21 issues</span><span class='chip'>14 PRs</span><span class='chip'>high</span></div><div class='bundle-scope'><div><span class='muted'>Issues</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='chip'>#178040</span><span class='chip'>#183988</span><span class='chip'>#186348</span><span class='chip'>#187988</span><span class='chip'>#188477</span><span class='chip'>#188675</span><span class='chip'>#188704</span><span class='chip'>#188706</span><span class='chip'>#188707</span><span class='chip'>#188708</span><span class='chip'>#188709</span><span class='chip'>#188710</span><span class='chip muted'>+9</span></span></div><div><span class='muted'>PRs</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='chip'>PR #181726</span><span class='chip'>PR #181727</span><span class='chip'>PR #181728</span><span class='chip'>PR #183511</span><span class='chip'>PR #184276</span><span class='chip'>PR #187315</span><span class='chip'>PR #187318</span><span class='chip'>PR #187989</span><span class='chip'>PR #188268</span><span class='chip'>PR #188931</span><span class='chip muted'>+4</span></span></div></div><ul class='evidence-list'><li>Diagnosis: PR #189149 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.</li><li>Next action: Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.</li><li>Evidence: failed checks: statusCheckRollup.</li><li>Short excerpt: pr #189149 declares a closing reference to issue #186348. | pr #187989 declares a closing reference to issue #187988. | pr #188931 declares a closing reference to issue #188891. | pr #184276 declares a closing reference to issue #183988. | pr #188996 declares a closing referen...</li><li>Review threads: thread:issue:178040:issue:183988:issue:186348:issue:187988</li><li>Package receipt: 9a19487204ee</li></ul></div><div class='bundle-row'><h4>Bundle BUNDLE-008: PR #184481 / PR #184694 / PR #185891</h4><div class='meta-row'><span class='chip kind'>Existing PR contributor wait</span><span class='chip bucket'>waiting on CI/check fix</span><span class='chip'>3 issues</span><span class='chip'>3 PRs</span><span class='chip'>high</span></div><div class='bundle-scope'><div><span class='muted'>Issues</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='chip'>#93617</span><span class='chip'>#178680</span><span class='chip'>#188133</span></span></div><div><span class='muted'>PRs</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='chip'>PR #184481</span><span class='chip'>PR #184694</span><span class='chip'>PR #185891</span></span></div></div><ul class='evidence-list'><li>Diagnosis: PR #185891 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.</li><li>Next action: Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.</li><li>Evidence: failed checks: statusCheckRollup.</li><li>Short excerpt: including static traces and AOTAutograd cache hits, so alias-sensitive synthetic-base graphs are not reused for incompatible inputs. Fixes #178680 Generated by my agent cc @voznesenskym @penguinwu @EikanWang @jgong5 @Guobing-Chen @XiaobingSuper @zhuhaozhe @blzheng @wenzhe-nrv....</li><li>Review threads: thread:issue:178680:issue:188133:issue:93617:pr:184481</li><li>Package receipt: 3d3d3ef1fb3b</li></ul></div><div class='bundle-row'><h4>Bundle BUNDLE-009: PR #185946 / PR #186375</h4><div class='meta-row'><span class='chip kind'>Existing PR blocked review</span><span class='chip bucket'>waiting on CI/check fix</span><span class='chip'>3 issues</span><span class='chip'>2 PRs</span><span class='chip'>high</span></div><div class='bundle-scope'><div><span class='muted'>Issues</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='chip'>#16706</span><span class='chip'>#185240</span><span class='chip'>#186374</span></span></div><div><span class='muted'>PRs</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='chip'>PR #185946</span><span class='chip'>PR #186375</span></span></div></div><ul class='evidence-list'><li>Diagnosis: PR #185946 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.</li><li>Next action: Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.</li><li>Evidence: failed checks: statusCheckRollup.</li><li>Short excerpt: pr #186375 declares a closing reference to issue #186374. | pr #185946 declares a closing reference to issue #185240. | ad of falling back gracefully. Similar to #185946, this PR replaces the assertion with a warning and allows control flow to continue. Fixes #186374 cc @eqy |...</li><li>Review threads: thread:issue:16706:issue:185240:issue:186374:pr:185946</li><li>Package receipt: ba5b87b237c1</li></ul></div><div class='bundle-row'><h4>Bundle BUNDLE-010: PR #185846 / PR #186358 / PR #187609</h4><div class='meta-row'><span class='chip kind'>Existing PR blocked review</span><span class='chip bucket'>waiting on CI/check fix</span><span class='chip'>2 issues</span><span class='chip'>3 PRs</span><span class='chip'>high</span></div><div class='bundle-scope'><div><span class='muted'>Issues</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='chip'>#185470</span><span class='chip'>#185484</span></span></div><div><span class='muted'>PRs</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='chip'>PR #185846</span><span class='chip'>PR #186358</span><span class='chip'>PR #187609</span></span></div></div><ul class='evidence-list'><li>Diagnosis: PR #186358 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.</li><li>Next action: Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.</li><li>Evidence: failed checks: statusCheckRollup.</li><li>Short excerpt: pr #186358 declares a closing reference to issue #185484. | so output dtype semantics are unchanged. A prior stale PR, #185846, made the same root-cause fix but has not landed on current main. Fixes #185470 Generated by my agent Test Plan: python test/inductor/test_torchinduct...</li><li>Review threads: thread:issue:185470:issue:185484:pr:185846:pr:186358</li><li>Package receipt: 221d1417621c</li></ul></div><div class='bundle-row'><h4>Bundle BUNDLE-014: PR #189294 / PR #189295</h4><div class='meta-row'><span class='chip kind'>Existing PR blocked review</span><span class='chip bucket'>waiting on CI/check fix</span><span class='chip'>2 issues</span><span class='chip'>2 PRs</span><span class='chip'>high</span></div><div class='bundle-scope'><div><span class='muted'>Issues</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='chip'>#173059</span><span class='chip'>#189034</span></span></div><div><span class='muted'>PRs</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='chip'>PR #189294</span><span class='chip'>PR #189295</span></span></div></div><ul class='evidence-list'><li>Diagnosis: PR #189294 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.</li><li>Next action: Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.</li><li>Evidence: failed checks: statusCheckRollup.</li><li>Short excerpt: o the numpy/scipy pair is consistent. Mirrors the compatible numpy==2.0.2 + scipy==1.13.1 set already used in test.sh&#x27;s numpy_2 path. Fixes #189034. Test Plan: CI: the &quot;Limited CI on H100 / ...sm90 / test (smoke)&quot; job should go green; test_foreach no longer crashes importing s...</li><li>Review threads: thread:issue:173059:issue:189034:pr:189294:pr:189295</li><li>Package receipt: ac4d167facc9</li></ul></div><div class='bundle-row'><h4>Bundle BUNDLE-015: PR #187354 / PR #188556</h4><div class='meta-row'><span class='chip kind'>Existing PR decision</span><span class='chip bucket'>waiting on maintainer review</span><span class='chip'>2 issues</span><span class='chip'>2 PRs</span><span class='chip'>medium</span></div><div class='bundle-scope'><div><span class='muted'>Issues</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='chip'>#187332</span><span class='chip'>#188545</span></span></div><div><span class='muted'>PRs</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='chip'>PR #187354</span><span class='chip'>PR #188556</span></span></div></div><ul class='evidence-list'><li>Diagnosis: PR #187354 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.</li><li>Next action: Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.</li><li>Evidence: reviewDecision=APPROVED; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=0</li><li>Short excerpt: pr #188556 declares a closing reference to issue #188545. | Fixes #188545 Summary Preserve eager-mode semantics for infinite inputs in the Triton lowering of torch.special.bessel_j0 torch.special.bessel_j1 torch.s | ile continuing to use libdevice for finite inputs. This prese...</li><li>Review threads: thread:issue:187332:issue:188545:pr:187354:pr:188556</li><li>Package receipt: 0c1a21954532</li></ul></div><div class='bundle-row'><h4>Bundle BUNDLE-016: PR #185756 / PR #187908</h4><div class='meta-row'><span class='chip kind'>Existing PR contributor wait</span><span class='chip bucket'>waiting on contributor</span><span class='chip'>2 issues</span><span class='chip'>2 PRs</span><span class='chip'>medium</span></div><div class='bundle-scope'><div><span class='muted'>Issues</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='chip'>#171356</span><span class='chip'>#187429</span></span></div><div><span class='muted'>PRs</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='chip'>PR #185756</span><span class='chip'>PR #187908</span></span></div></div><ul class='evidence-list'><li>Diagnosis: PR #187908 is contributor-owned until requested changes or review questions are answered.</li><li>Next action: Keep parked or close after maintainer review if the contributor path is no longer active; do not ask for maintainer work first.</li><li>Evidence: reviewDecision=CHANGES_REQUESTED; stale_days=0</li><li>Short excerpt: pr #187908 declares a closing reference to issue #187429. | pr #185756 declares a closing reference to issue #171356. | Fixes #187429 Root cause Commit 0eae6b68f42 (&quot;Unify torch.tensor and torch.ops.aten.scalar_tensor behavior&quot;) intentionally relaxed the cast in fill_inpla | t...</li><li>Review threads: thread:issue:171356:issue:187429:pr:185756:pr:187908</li><li>Package receipt: a8943e8c850c</li></ul></div><div class='bundle-row'><h4>Bundle BUNDLE-082: PR #183884 / PR #184161 / PR #185433 / PR #185976 / +3</h4><div class='meta-row'><span class='chip kind'>Existing PR contributor wait</span><span class='chip bucket'>waiting on CI/check fix</span><span class='chip'>10 issues</span><span class='chip'>7 PRs</span><span class='chip'>high</span></div><div class='bundle-scope'><div><span class='muted'>Issues</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='chip'>#130182</span><span class='chip'>#136216</span><span class='chip'>#137520</span><span class='chip'>#140842</span><span class='chip'>#144360</span><span class='chip'>#145093</span><span class='chip'>#145231</span><span class='chip'>#158088</span><span class='chip'>#186031</span><span class='chip'>#186136</span></span></div><div><span class='muted'>PRs</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='chip'>PR #183884</span><span class='chip'>PR #184161</span><span class='chip'>PR #185433</span><span class='chip'>PR #185976</span><span class='chip'>PR #186011</span><span class='chip'>PR #186094</span><span class='chip'>PR #186361</span></span></div></div><ul class='evidence-list'><li>Diagnosis: PR #186361 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbenc...</li><li>Next action: Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, m...</li><li>Evidence: failed checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113...</li><li>Short excerpt: g only actually used unbacked symbol definitions, instead of pinning every node that defines an unbacked symbol in DCE. Fixes #140842 Fixes #137520 Generated by my agent Benchmark Results: A small Python microbenchmark compared the previous scanner predicate (SymTypes, Expr) w...</li><li>Review threads: thread:issue:130182:issue:136216:issue:137520:issue:140842</li><li>Package receipt: afdc55cff25b</li></ul></div><div class='bundle-row'><h4>Bundle BUNDLE-083: PR #184975 / PR #184976 / PR #185953 / PR #186801 / +1</h4><div class='meta-row'><span class='chip kind'>Existing PR decision</span><span class='chip bucket'>waiting on CI/check fix</span><span class='chip'>7 issues</span><span class='chip'>5 PRs</span><span class='chip'>high</span></div><div class='bundle-scope'><div><span class='muted'>Issues</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='chip'>#145529</span><span class='chip'>#153056</span><span class='chip'>#170137</span><span class='chip'>#170770</span><span class='chip'>#170781</span><span class='chip'>#186796</span><span class='chip'>#187008</span></span></div><div><span class='muted'>PRs</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='chip'>PR #184975</span><span class='chip'>PR #184976</span><span class='chip'>PR #185953</span><span class='chip'>PR #186801</span><span class='chip'>PR #187090</span></span></div></div><ul class='evidence-list'><li>Diagnosis: PR #185953 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, lf-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2,...</li><li>Next action: Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, lf-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x8...</li><li>Evidence: failed checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, lf-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g)...</li><li>Short excerpt: n-TensorWeakRef weakrefs. Ordinary user weakrefs remain blocked because they can observe a tensor object whose contents were swapped. Fixes #186796 Generated by my agent Test Plan: python test/test_torch.py -k test_swap_allows_tensor_weakref python test/test_torch.py TestTorch...</li><li>Review threads: thread:issue:145529:issue:153056:issue:170137:issue:170770</li><li>Package receipt: 6a66b47c844f</li></ul></div><div class='bundle-row'><h4>Bundle BUNDLE-084: PR #184978 / PR #185059</h4><div class='meta-row'><span class='chip kind'>Existing PR decision</span><span class='chip bucket'>waiting on maintainer review</span><span class='chip'>3 issues</span><span class='chip'>2 PRs</span><span class='chip'>medium</span></div><div class='bundle-scope'><div><span class='muted'>Issues</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='chip'>#167007</span><span class='chip'>#170672</span><span class='chip'>#188153</span></span></div><div><span class='muted'>PRs</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='chip'>PR #184978</span><span class='chip'>PR #185059</span></span></div></div><ul class='evidence-list'><li>Diagnosis: PR #185059 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.</li><li>Next action: Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.</li><li>Evidence: reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=0</li><li>Short excerpt: xport sees a bogus lifted fake tensor constant, it used to raise an internal diagnostic ending with &quot;Please file an issue on github.&quot; Issue #170672 hits this path by reading parameters through .data before copying back into the parameter under no_grad. Direct no_grad parameter...</li><li>Review threads: thread:issue:167007:issue:170672:issue:188153:pr:184978</li><li>Package receipt: 85bf234b0f57</li></ul></div><div class='bundle-row'><h4>Bundle BUNDLE-088: PR #185170 / PR #186418</h4><div class='meta-row'><span class='chip kind'>Existing PR decision</span><span class='chip bucket'>waiting on maintainer review</span><span class='chip'>2 issues</span><span class='chip'>2 PRs</span><span class='chip'>medium</span></div><div class='bundle-scope'><div><span class='muted'>Issues</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='chip'>#128554</span><span class='chip'>#161671</span></span></div><div><span class='muted'>PRs</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='chip'>PR #185170</span><span class='chip'>PR #186418</span></span></div></div><ul class='evidence-list'><li>Diagnosis: PR #186418 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.</li><li>Next action: Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.</li><li>Evidence: reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=0</li><li>Short excerpt: izing the entire GraphModule as an opaque nested byte blob, which would hide its tensor storages from the outer torch.save machinery. Fixes #161671 Generated by my agent Test Plan: python test/export/test_serialize.py TestSaveLoad.test_torch_save_exported_program_with_call_mod...</li><li>Review threads: thread:issue:128554:issue:161671:pr:185170:pr:186418</li><li>Package receipt: 9194927cc301</li></ul></div><div class='bundle-row compact-note'><strong>260 more bundle receipt(s)</strong><p>Remaining bundles stay in the downloadable public-safe CSV artifacts to keep this action tab fast to scan.</p></div></div></details><details class='move-row'><summary><div class='move-summary'><div class='move-title'><h3>park or close contributor-waiting PRs</h3><div class='muted'>Batch issue sweeps</div></div><div class='move-field wide'><span>Why</span><p>The next work is contributor-owned unless a maintainer chooses to take over or close the stale path.</p></div><div class='move-field wide'><span>Next action</span><p>Keep parked, close with context, or explicitly take over only when the evidence warrants maintainer work.</p></div><div class='move-field'><span>Impact</span><p>46 bundles | 48 issues | 46 PRs<br>Confidence: medium</p></div><div class='move-field wide'><span>Evidence</span><p><span class='chip-row'><span class='chip'>requested changes</span><span class='chip'>reviewDecision=CHANGES_REQUESTED</span><span class='chip'>stale_days=6</span><span class='chip'>stale_days=0</span><span class='chip'>46 package receipts</span></span></p></div><span class='view-bundles'>View bundles</span></div></summary><div class='move-expanded'><div class='bundle-row'><h4>Bundle BUNDLE-001: PR #188801</h4><div class='meta-row'><span class='chip kind'>Existing PR contributor wait</span><span class='chip bucket'>waiting on contributor</span><span class='chip'>1 issue</span><span class='chip'>1 PR</span><span class='chip'>medium</span></div><div class='bundle-scope'><div><span class='muted'>Issues</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='chip'>#188812</span></span></div><div><span class='muted'>PRs</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='chip'>PR #188801</span></span></div></div><ul class='evidence-list'><li>Diagnosis: PR #188801 is contributor-owned until requested changes or review questions are answered.</li><li>Next action: Keep parked or close after maintainer review if the contributor path is no longer active; do not ask for maintainer work first.</li><li>Evidence: reviewDecision=CHANGES_REQUESTED; stale_days=6</li><li>Short excerpt: MetalShaderLibrary&amp; MetalShaderLibrary::getBundledLibrary() { static BundledShaderLibrary* l = new BundledShaderLibrary(); return *l; } PR: #188801 (will be scoped down to just this leak). cc @malfet @aditvenk @kulinseth @DenisVieriu97 @jhavukainen @Isalia20 Versions PyTorch v...</li><li>Review threads: thread:issue:188812:pr:188801</li><li>Package receipt: 33311143c20a</li></ul></div><div class='bundle-row'><h4>Bundle BUNDLE-018: PR #184632</h4><div class='meta-row'><span class='chip kind'>Existing PR contributor wait</span><span class='chip bucket'>waiting on contributor</span><span class='chip'>2 issues</span><span class='chip'>1 PR</span><span class='chip'>medium</span></div><div class='bundle-scope'><div><span class='muted'>Issues</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='chip'>#182200</span><span class='chip'>#184101</span></span></div><div><span class='muted'>PRs</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='chip'>PR #184632</span></span></div></div><ul class='evidence-list'><li>Diagnosis: PR #184632 is contributor-owned until requested changes or review questions are answered.</li><li>Next action: Keep parked or close after maintainer review if the contributor path is no longer active; do not ask for maintainer work first.</li><li>Evidence: reviewDecision=CHANGES_REQUESTED; stale_days=0</li><li>Short excerpt: ch path and the fast binary path, and covers the real-valued promotion ops including copysign and transposed complex tensor variants. Fixes #182200 Fixes #184101 Generated by my agent Test Plan: lintrunner -a python test/test_meta.py -k test_cuda_mixed_dtype_binary_pointwise_f...</li><li>Review threads: thread:issue:182200:issue:184101:pr:184632</li><li>Package receipt: 45493fed498f</li></ul></div><div class='bundle-row'><h4>Bundle BUNDLE-026: PR #188605</h4><div class='meta-row'><span class='chip kind'>Existing PR contributor wait</span><span class='chip bucket'>waiting on contributor</span><span class='chip'>1 issue</span><span class='chip'>1 PR</span><span class='chip'>medium</span></div><div class='bundle-scope'><div><span class='muted'>Issues</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='chip'>#188547</span></span></div><div><span class='muted'>PRs</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='chip'>PR #188605</span></span></div></div><ul class='evidence-list'><li>Diagnosis: PR #188605 is contributor-owned until requested changes or review questions are answered.</li><li>Next action: Keep parked or close after maintainer review if the contributor path is no longer active; do not ask for maintainer work first.</li><li>Evidence: reviewDecision=CHANGES_REQUESTED; stale_days=1</li><li>Short excerpt: pr #188605 declares a closing reference to issue #188547. | Fixes #188547 Fixes infinite recursion when calling int( ), float( ), or indexing pybind11 enums in compiled functions. Basically detects GetAttrVariable | Overall looks good, I think we can simplify the test, thanks!...</li><li>Review threads: thread:issue:188547:pr:188605</li><li>Package receipt: 85d8b9894232</li></ul></div><div class='bundle-row'><h4>Bundle BUNDLE-031: PR #187955</h4><div class='meta-row'><span class='chip kind'>Existing PR contributor wait</span><span class='chip bucket'>waiting on contributor</span><span class='chip'>1 issue</span><span class='chip'>1 PR</span><span class='chip'>medium</span></div><div class='bundle-scope'><div><span class='muted'>Issues</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='chip'>#188008</span></span></div><div><span class='muted'>PRs</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='chip'>PR #187955</span></span></div></div><ul class='evidence-list'><li>Diagnosis: PR #187955 is contributor-owned until requested changes or review questions are answered.</li><li>Next action: Keep parked or close after maintainer review if the contributor path is no longer active; do not ask for maintainer work first.</li><li>Evidence: reviewDecision=CHANGES_REQUESTED; stale_days=10</li><li>Short excerpt: Being fixed in #187955: mapAndSetAccess is now strongly exception-safe — on a partial map/setAccess failure it unmaps the mapped prefix and releases the range&#x27;s h | ing unwinding → std::terminate. This is a pre-existing latent bug (the per-segment unmap loop had the same defec...</li><li>Review threads: thread:issue:188008:pr:187955</li><li>Package receipt: 8804b9ddbffb</li></ul></div><div class='bundle-row'><h4>Bundle BUNDLE-042: PR #184970</h4><div class='meta-row'><span class='chip kind'>Existing PR contributor wait</span><span class='chip bucket'>waiting on contributor</span><span class='chip'>1 issue</span><span class='chip'>1 PR</span><span class='chip'>medium</span></div><div class='bundle-scope'><div><span class='muted'>Issues</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='chip'>#171894</span></span></div><div><span class='muted'>PRs</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='chip'>PR #184970</span></span></div></div><ul class='evidence-list'><li>Diagnosis: PR #184970 is contributor-owned until requested changes or review questions are answered.</li><li>Next action: Keep parked or close after maintainer review if the contributor path is no longer active; do not ask for maintainer work first.</li><li>Evidence: reviewDecision=CHANGES_REQUESTED; stale_days=1</li><li>Short excerpt: I checked the abandoned #173517 attempt and kept the same root cause direction without adding a hard-coded lift_fresh_copy exception. Fixes #171894 Generated by my agent Test Plan: ninja -C build lib/libtorch_cpu.so python test/test_functionalization.py TestFunctionalization.t...</li><li>Review threads: thread:issue:171894:pr:184970</li><li>Package receipt: 6455c21e9526</li></ul></div><div class='bundle-row'><h4>Bundle BUNDLE-044: PR #184153</h4><div class='meta-row'><span class='chip kind'>Existing PR contributor wait</span><span class='chip bucket'>waiting on contributor</span><span class='chip'>1 issue</span><span class='chip'>1 PR</span><span class='chip'>medium</span></div><div class='bundle-scope'><div><span class='muted'>Issues</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='chip'>#146569</span></span></div><div><span class='muted'>PRs</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='chip'>PR #184153</span></span></div></div><ul class='evidence-list'><li>Diagnosis: PR #184153 is contributor-owned until requested changes or review questions are answered.</li><li>Next action: Keep parked or close after maintainer review if the contributor path is no longer active; do not ask for maintainer work first.</li><li>Evidence: reviewDecision=CHANGES_REQUESTED; stale_days=1</li><li>Short excerpt: nvalidate live .grad storage. Clone backward outputs before handing them to autograd so persistent grads have normal tensor lifetime. Fixes #146569 Generated by my agent cc @voznesenskym @penguinwu @EikanWang @jgong5 @Guobing-Chen @XiaobingSuper @zhuhaozhe @blzheng @wenzhe-nrv...</li><li>Review threads: thread:issue:146569:pr:184153</li><li>Package receipt: 062607425baa</li></ul></div><div class='bundle-row'><h4>Bundle BUNDLE-068: PR #184961</h4><div class='meta-row'><span class='chip kind'>Existing PR contributor wait</span><span class='chip bucket'>waiting on contributor</span><span class='chip'>1 issue</span><span class='chip'>1 PR</span><span class='chip'>medium</span></div><div class='bundle-scope'><div><span class='muted'>Issues</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='chip'>#171978</span></span></div><div><span class='muted'>PRs</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='chip'>PR #184961</span></span></div></div><ul class='evidence-list'><li>Diagnosis: PR #184961 is contributor-owned until requested changes or review questions are answered.</li><li>Next action: Keep parked or close after maintainer review if the contributor path is no longer active; do not ask for maintainer work first.</li><li>Evidence: reviewDecision=CHANGES_REQUESTED; stale_days=1</li><li>Short excerpt: nd would still allow wrong shapes for max(lengths) &lt; padded_length, so this patch handles the packed-sequence metadata path directly. Fixes #171978 Generated by my agent Test Plan: python test/export/test_export.py -k test_export_packed_sequence python test/export/test_export....</li><li>Review threads: thread:issue:171978:pr:184961</li><li>Package receipt: 4db135ae2adf</li></ul></div><div class='bundle-row'><h4>Bundle BUNDLE-087: PR #185124</h4><div class='meta-row'><span class='chip kind'>Existing PR contributor wait</span><span class='chip bucket'>waiting on contributor</span><span class='chip'>3 issues</span><span class='chip'>1 PR</span><span class='chip'>medium</span></div><div class='bundle-scope'><div><span class='muted'>Issues</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='chip'>#157610</span><span class='chip'>#162734</span><span class='chip'>#163037</span></span></div><div><span class='muted'>PRs</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='chip'>PR #185124</span></span></div></div><ul class='evidence-list'><li>Diagnosis: PR #185124 is contributor-owned until requested changes or review questions are answered.</li><li>Next action: Keep parked or close after maintainer review if the contributor path is no longer active; do not ask for maintainer work first.</li><li>Evidence: reviewDecision=CHANGES_REQUESTED; stale_days=1</li><li>Short excerpt: s run_decompositions during export — all of which previously failed with the same alias-annotation error. Fixes #163037 Fixes #162734 Fixes #157610 Generated by my agent Test Plan: python setup.py develop python - &lt;&lt;&#x27;PY&#x27; ... torch.compile(ReproBroadcastInDim(), backend=&quot;induct...</li><li>Review threads: thread:issue:157610:issue:162734:issue:163037:pr:185124</li><li>Package receipt: dd2feaee0bd2</li></ul></div><div class='bundle-row'><h4>Bundle BUNDLE-104: PR #185499</h4><div class='meta-row'><span class='chip kind'>Existing PR contributor wait</span><span class='chip bucket'>waiting on contributor</span><span class='chip'>1 issue</span><span class='chip'>1 PR</span><span class='chip'>medium</span></div><div class='bundle-scope'><div><span class='muted'>Issues</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='chip'>#154647</span></span></div><div><span class='muted'>PRs</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='chip'>PR #185499</span></span></div></div><ul class='evidence-list'><li>Diagnosis: PR #185499 is contributor-owned until requested changes or review questions are answered.</li><li>Next action: Keep parked or close after maintainer review if the contributor path is no longer active; do not ask for maintainer work first.</li><li>Evidence: reviewDecision=CHANGES_REQUESTED; stale_days=1</li><li>Short excerpt: d not remove nonzero_memo or skip the assertion because those would hide the missing fresh-binding invariant rather than maintain it. Fixes #154647 Generated by my agent Test Plan: Issue repro before fix: failed in ep.run_decompositions(...) with AssertionError: u2 -&gt; u0 from....</li><li>Review threads: thread:issue:154647:pr:185499</li><li>Package receipt: ad53a5e80357</li></ul></div><div class='bundle-row'><h4>Bundle BUNDLE-109: PR #185353</h4><div class='meta-row'><span class='chip kind'>Existing PR contributor wait</span><span class='chip bucket'>waiting on contributor</span><span class='chip'>1 issue</span><span class='chip'>1 PR</span><span class='chip'>medium</span></div><div class='bundle-scope'><div><span class='muted'>Issues</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='chip'>#159918</span></span></div><div><span class='muted'>PRs</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='chip'>PR #185353</span></span></div></div><ul class='evidence-list'><li>Diagnosis: PR #185353 is contributor-owned until requested changes or review questions are answered.</li><li>Next action: Keep parked or close after maintainer review if the contributor path is no longer active; do not ask for maintainer work first.</li><li>Evidence: reviewDecision=CHANGES_REQUESTED; stale_days=1</li><li>Short excerpt: original1 naming globally, since those names are part of parametrization internals and changing them would be a much broader BC risk. Fixes #159918 Generated by my agent Test Plan: python test/export/test_export.py TestExport.test_subclasses_parameterization TestExport.test_su...</li><li>Review threads: thread:issue:159918:pr:185353</li><li>Package receipt: 6d0331b30ff8</li></ul></div><div class='bundle-row'><h4>Bundle BUNDLE-110: PR #185150</h4><div class='meta-row'><span class='chip kind'>Existing PR contributor wait</span><span class='chip bucket'>waiting on contributor</span><span class='chip'>1 issue</span><span class='chip'>1 PR</span><span class='chip'>medium</span></div><div class='bundle-scope'><div><span class='muted'>Issues</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='chip'>#161807</span></span></div><div><span class='muted'>PRs</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='chip'>PR #185150</span></span></div></div><ul class='evidence-list'><li>Diagnosis: PR #185150 is contributor-owned until requested changes or review questions are answered.</li><li>Next action: Keep parked or close after maintainer review if the contributor path is no longer active; do not ask for maintainer work first.</li><li>Evidence: reviewDecision=CHANGES_REQUESTED; stale_days=0</li><li>Short excerpt: ules, but that would only hide the source bug: the GraphModule produced by FX tracing was already returning the wrong container type. Fixes #161807 Generated by my agent Test Plan: python test/test_fx.py TestFX.test_symbolic_trace_preserves_ordered_dict_output (blocked before....</li><li>Review threads: thread:issue:161807:pr:185150</li><li>Package receipt: 3512fb8924db</li></ul></div><div class='bundle-row'><h4>Bundle BUNDLE-161: PR #185043</h4><div class='meta-row'><span class='chip kind'>Existing PR contributor wait</span><span class='chip bucket'>waiting on contributor</span><span class='chip'>2 issues</span><span class='chip'>1 PR</span><span class='chip'>medium</span></div><div class='bundle-scope'><div><span class='muted'>Issues</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='chip'>#167568</span><span class='chip'>#182403</span></span></div><div><span class='muted'>PRs</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='chip'>PR #185043</span></span></div></div><ul class='evidence-list'><li>Diagnosis: PR #185043 is contributor-owned until requested changes or review questions are answered.</li><li>Next action: Keep parked or close after maintainer review if the contributor path is no longer active; do not ask for maintainer work first.</li><li>Evidence: reviewDecision=CHANGES_REQUESTED; stale_days=1</li><li>Short excerpt: ntains triton_kernel_wrapper_functional, no longer contains the mutating wrapper, and returns the functional wrapper&#x27;s cloned output. Fixes #167568 Generated by my agent Test Plan: python test/higher_order_ops/test_local_map.py TestLocalMap.test_mutations_triton_deferred_inlin...</li><li>Review threads: thread:issue:167568:issue:182403:pr:185043</li><li>Package receipt: 73e26b1c2975</li></ul></div><div class='bundle-row compact-note'><strong>34 more bundle receipt(s)</strong><p>Remaining bundles stay in the downloadable public-safe CSV artifacts to keep this action tab fast to scan.</p></div></div></details><details class='move-row'><summary><div class='move-summary'><div class='move-title'><h3>consolidate duplicate candidates</h3><div class='muted'>Batch issue sweeps</div></div><div class='move-field wide'><span>Why</span><p>Related reports can share one canonical answer, close path, or implementation direction.</p></div><div class='move-field wide'><span>Next action</span><p>Pick the canonical issue, preserve the strongest reproduction, and close or link duplicates in one pass.</p></div><div class='move-field'><span>Impact</span><p>22 bundles | 184 issues | 0 PRs<br>Confidence: medium</p></div><div class='move-field wide'><span>Evidence</span><p><span class='chip-row'><span class='chip'>issues #167693 and #119536 share title/component terms:...</span><span class='chip'>issues #167693 and #119346 share title/component terms:...</span><span class='chip'>issues #167693 and #119364 share title/component terms:...</span><span class='chip'>issues #167693 and #119357 share title/component terms:...</span><span class='chip'>22 package receipts</span></span></p></div><span class='view-bundles'>View bundles</span></div></summary><div class='move-expanded'><div class='bundle-row'><h4>Bundle BUNDLE-864: module: __torch_function__ needs triage queue (24 issues)</h4><div class='meta-row'><span class='chip kind'>Duplicate/related issue sweep</span><span class='chip bucket'>needs design decision</span><span class='chip'>24 issues</span><span class='chip'>0 PRs</span><span class='chip'>medium</span></div><div class='bundle-scope'><div><span class='muted'>Issues</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='chip'>#119346</span><span class='chip'>#119357</span><span class='chip'>#119364</span><span class='chip'>#119490</span><span class='chip'>#119514</span><span class='chip'>#119536</span><span class='chip'>#119537</span><span class='chip'>#119576</span><span class='chip'>#167693</span><span class='chip'>#185267</span><span class='chip'>#185268</span><span class='chip'>#186344</span><span class='chip muted'>+12</span></span></div><div><span class='muted'>PRs</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='muted'>none</span></span></div></div><ul class='evidence-list'><li>Diagnosis: The local evidence indicates likely related reports that should share one canonical answer or implementation path.</li><li>Next action: Pick the canonical issue, preserve the strongest reproduction, and close/link duplicates in one maintainer pass.</li><li>Evidence: issues #167693 and #119536 share title/component terms: __main__, disabled | issues #167693 and #119346 share title/component terms: __main__, disabled | issues #167693 and #119364 share title/component terms: __main_...</li><li>Short excerpt: issues #167693 and #119536 share title/component terms: __main__, disabled | issues #167693 and #119346 share title/component terms: __main__, disabled | issues #167693 and #119364 share title/component terms: __main__, disabled | issues #167693 and #119357 share title/compone...</li><li>Package receipt: 4c678752690c</li></ul></div><div class='bundle-row'><h4>Bundle BUNDLE-865: module: abi high-priority/blocker queue (2 issues)</h4><div class='meta-row'><span class='chip kind'>Duplicate/related issue sweep</span><span class='chip bucket'>high-priority/blocker</span><span class='chip'>2 issues</span><span class='chip'>0 PRs</span><span class='chip'>medium</span></div><div class='bundle-scope'><div><span class='muted'>Issues</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='chip'>#149658</span><span class='chip'>#187320</span></span></div><div><span class='muted'>PRs</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='muted'>none</span></span></div></div><ul class='evidence-list'><li>Diagnosis: The local evidence indicates likely related reports that should share one canonical answer or implementation path.</li><li>Next action: Pick the canonical issue, preserve the strongest reproduction, and close/link duplicates in one maintainer pass.</li><li>Evidence: issues #187320 and #149658 share title/component terms: pytorch, stable, version</li><li>Short excerpt: issues #187320 and #149658 share title/component terms: pytorch, stable, version</li><li>Package receipt: 1971cae443f5</li></ul></div><div class='bundle-row'><h4>Bundle BUNDLE-866: module: activation checkpointing needs triage queue (2 issues)</h4><div class='meta-row'><span class='chip kind'>Duplicate/related issue sweep</span><span class='chip bucket'>needs design decision</span><span class='chip'>2 issues</span><span class='chip'>0 PRs</span><span class='chip'>medium</span></div><div class='bundle-scope'><div><span class='muted'>Issues</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='chip'>#85088</span><span class='chip'>#183207</span></span></div><div><span class='muted'>PRs</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='muted'>none</span></span></div></div><ul class='evidence-list'><li>Diagnosis: The local evidence indicates likely related reports that should share one canonical answer or implementation path.</li><li>Next action: Pick the canonical issue, preserve the strongest reproduction, and close/link duplicates in one maintainer pass.</li><li>Evidence: issues #85088 and #183207 share title/component terms: does, not, work</li><li>Short excerpt: issues #85088 and #183207 share title/component terms: does, not, work</li><li>Package receipt: 07b9787d7c5d</li></ul></div><div class='bundle-row'><h4>Bundle BUNDLE-867: module: amp (automated mixed precision) high-priority/blocker queue (49 issues)</h4><div class='meta-row'><span class='chip kind'>Duplicate/related issue sweep</span><span class='chip bucket'>high-priority/blocker</span><span class='chip'>52 issues</span><span class='chip'>0 PRs</span><span class='chip'>medium</span></div><div class='bundle-scope'><div><span class='muted'>Issues</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='chip'>#30651</span><span class='chip'>#55669</span><span class='chip'>#66782</span><span class='chip'>#78829</span><span class='chip'>#91633</span><span class='chip'>#96779</span><span class='chip'>#97086</span><span class='chip'>#111901</span><span class='chip'>#116423</span><span class='chip'>#117494</span><span class='chip'>#118088</span><span class='chip'>#119845</span><span class='chip muted'>+40</span></span></div><div><span class='muted'>PRs</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='muted'>none</span></span></div></div><ul class='evidence-list'><li>Diagnosis: The local evidence indicates likely related reports that should share one canonical answer or implementation path.</li><li>Next action: Pick the canonical issue, preserve the strongest reproduction, and close/link duplicates in one maintainer pass.</li><li>Evidence: issues #116423 and #155146 share title/component terms: fault, segmentation | issues #116423 and #183251 share title/component terms: fault, pytorch, segmentation | issues #119845 and #155146 share title/component ter...</li><li>Short excerpt: issues #116423 and #155146 share title/component terms: fault, segmentation | issues #116423 and #183251 share title/component terms: fault, pytorch, segmentation | issues #119845 and #155146 share title/component terms: fault, segmentation | issues #119845 and #181853 share t...</li><li>Package receipt: 46341333cbf5</li></ul></div><div class='bundle-row'><h4>Bundle BUNDLE-868: module: aotdispatch high-priority/blocker queue (6 issues)</h4><div class='meta-row'><span class='chip kind'>Duplicate/related issue sweep</span><span class='chip bucket'>high-priority/blocker</span><span class='chip'>6 issues</span><span class='chip'>0 PRs</span><span class='chip'>medium</span></div><div class='bundle-scope'><div><span class='muted'>Issues</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='chip'>#38910</span><span class='chip'>#173313</span><span class='chip'>#174468</span><span class='chip'>#174704</span><span class='chip'>#183890</span><span class='chip'>#187781</span></span></div><div><span class='muted'>PRs</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='muted'>none</span></span></div></div><ul class='evidence-list'><li>Diagnosis: The local evidence indicates likely related reports that should share one canonical answer or implementation path.</li><li>Next action: Pick the canonical issue, preserve the strongest reproduction, and close/link duplicates in one maintainer pass.</li><li>Evidence: issues #174468 and #174704 share title/component terms: compile, torch | issues #174468 and #173313 share title/component terms: compile, torch | issues #174468 and #183890 share title/component terms: compile, torch...</li><li>Short excerpt: issues #174468 and #174704 share title/component terms: compile, torch | issues #174468 and #173313 share title/component terms: compile, torch | issues #174468 and #183890 share title/component terms: compile, torch | issues #174468 and #187781 share title/component terms: co...</li><li>Package receipt: 85fe06db2c61</li></ul></div><div class='bundle-row'><h4>Bundle BUNDLE-869: module: arm has linked PR queue (2 issues)</h4><div class='meta-row'><span class='chip kind'>Duplicate/related issue sweep</span><span class='chip bucket'>has linked PR</span><span class='chip'>9 issues</span><span class='chip'>0 PRs</span><span class='chip'>medium</span></div><div class='bundle-scope'><div><span class='muted'>Issues</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='chip'>#40425</span><span class='chip'>#149201</span><span class='chip'>#161783</span><span class='chip'>#162422</span><span class='chip'>#170877</span><span class='chip'>#177247</span><span class='chip'>#177249</span><span class='chip'>#178538</span><span class='chip'>#188255</span></span></div><div><span class='muted'>PRs</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='muted'>none</span></span></div></div><ul class='evidence-list'><li>Diagnosis: The local evidence indicates likely related reports that should share one canonical answer or implementation path.</li><li>Next action: Pick the canonical issue, preserve the strongest reproduction, and close/link duplicates in one maintainer pass.</li><li>Evidence: issues #162422 and #161783 share title/component terms: compile, runtime, torch | issues #188255 and #178538 share title/component terms: crash, import, torch | issues #170877 and #177249 share title/component terms:...</li><li>Short excerpt: issues #162422 and #161783 share title/component terms: compile, runtime, torch | issues #188255 and #178538 share title/component terms: crash, import, torch | issues #170877 and #177249 share title/component terms: aarch64, failure, test, unit | issues #170877 and #177247 sh...</li><li>Package receipt: 87c1606ebbd1</li></ul></div><div class='bundle-row'><h4>Bundle BUNDLE-870: module: autograd needs triage queue (4 issues)</h4><div class='meta-row'><span class='chip kind'>Duplicate/related issue sweep</span><span class='chip bucket'>needs design decision</span><span class='chip'>16 issues</span><span class='chip'>0 PRs</span><span class='chip'>medium</span></div><div class='bundle-scope'><div><span class='muted'>Issues</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='chip'>#73294</span><span class='chip'>#80946</span><span class='chip'>#143580</span><span class='chip'>#146907</span><span class='chip'>#153937</span><span class='chip'>#155693</span><span class='chip'>#158701</span><span class='chip'>#172798</span><span class='chip'>#181024</span><span class='chip'>#182283</span><span class='chip'>#185715</span><span class='chip'>#186453</span><span class='chip muted'>+4</span></span></div><div><span class='muted'>PRs</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='muted'>none</span></span></div></div><ul class='evidence-list'><li>Diagnosis: The local evidence indicates likely related reports that should share one canonical answer or implementation path.</li><li>Next action: Pick the canonical issue, preserve the strongest reproduction, and close/link duplicates in one maintainer pass.</li><li>Evidence: issues #189282 and #189281 share title/component terms: 2025, aarch64, cpu, measurement, nov, operator_benchmark, possible, since | issues #189281 and #189283 share title/component terms: 2025, cpu, nov, operator_benc...</li><li>Short excerpt: issues #189282 and #189281 share title/component terms: 2025, aarch64, cpu, measurement, nov, operator_benchmark, possible, since | issues #189281 and #189283 share title/component terms: 2025, cpu, nov, operator_benchmark, since | issues #189281 and #189280 share title/compon...</li><li>Package receipt: 837d247a835c</li></ul></div><div class='bundle-row'><h4>Bundle BUNDLE-871: module: bfloat16 needs triage queue (14 issues)</h4><div class='meta-row'><span class='chip kind'>Duplicate/related issue sweep</span><span class='chip bucket'>needs design decision</span><span class='chip'>14 issues</span><span class='chip'>0 PRs</span><span class='chip'>medium</span></div><div class='bundle-scope'><div><span class='muted'>Issues</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='chip'>#19106</span><span class='chip'>#48251</span><span class='chip'>#52741</span><span class='chip'>#67797</span><span class='chip'>#75171</span><span class='chip'>#86532</span><span class='chip'>#86594</span><span class='chip'>#86595</span><span class='chip'>#97876</span><span class='chip'>#159238</span><span class='chip'>#173492</span><span class='chip'>#183812</span><span class='chip muted'>+2</span></span></div><div><span class='muted'>PRs</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='muted'>none</span></span></div></div><ul class='evidence-list'><li>Diagnosis: The local evidence indicates likely related reports that should share one canonical answer or implementation path.</li><li>Next action: Pick the canonical issue, preserve the strongest reproduction, and close/link duplicates in one maintainer pass.</li><li>Evidence: issues #159238 and #19106 share title/component terms: jit, performance, torch, trace | issues #86595 and #86594 share title/component terms: computing, crash, jit, model, will | issues #86595 and #86532 share title/c...</li><li>Short excerpt: issues #159238 and #19106 share title/component terms: jit, performance, torch, trace | issues #86595 and #86594 share title/component terms: computing, crash, jit, model, will | issues #86595 and #86532 share title/component terms: crash, jit, will | issues #86594 and #86532...</li><li>Package receipt: 65c075d77ef5</li></ul></div><div class='bundle-row'><h4>Bundle BUNDLE-872: module: binaries high-priority/blocker queue (2 issues)</h4><div class='meta-row'><span class='chip kind'>Duplicate/related issue sweep</span><span class='chip bucket'>high-priority/blocker</span><span class='chip'>8 issues</span><span class='chip'>0 PRs</span><span class='chip'>medium</span></div><div class='bundle-scope'><div><span class='muted'>Issues</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='chip'>#37449</span><span class='chip'>#66033</span><span class='chip'>#87209</span><span class='chip'>#119547</span><span class='chip'>#170039</span><span class='chip'>#178085</span><span class='chip'>#188958</span><span class='chip'>#188959</span></span></div><div><span class='muted'>PRs</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='muted'>none</span></span></div></div><ul class='evidence-list'><li>Diagnosis: The local evidence indicates likely related reports that should share one canonical answer or implementation path.</li><li>Next action: Pick the canonical issue, preserve the strongest reproduction, and close/link duplicates in one maintainer pass.</li><li>Evidence: issues #170039 and #66033 share title/component terms: __1, argument, failed, invalid, std, system_error | issues #178085 and #87209 share title/component terms: access, cuda, encountered, error, illegal, memory, was...</li><li>Short excerpt: issues #170039 and #66033 share title/component terms: __1, argument, failed, invalid, std, system_error | issues #178085 and #87209 share title/component terms: access, cuda, encountered, error, illegal, memory, was | issues #178085 and #37449 share title/component terms: acc...</li><li>Package receipt: 1cc78b9d40ca</li></ul></div><div class='bundle-row'><h4>Bundle BUNDLE-873: module: c10d needs triage queue (3 issues)</h4><div class='meta-row'><span class='chip kind'>Duplicate/related issue sweep</span><span class='chip bucket'>needs design decision</span><span class='chip'>3 issues</span><span class='chip'>0 PRs</span><span class='chip'>medium</span></div><div class='bundle-scope'><div><span class='muted'>Issues</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='chip'>#74809</span><span class='chip'>#144359</span><span class='chip'>#163193</span></span></div><div><span class='muted'>PRs</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='muted'>none</span></span></div></div><ul class='evidence-list'><li>Diagnosis: The local evidence indicates likely related reports that should share one canonical answer or implementation path.</li><li>Next action: Pick the canonical issue, preserve the strongest reproduction, and close/link duplicates in one maintainer pass.</li><li>Evidence: issues #163193 and #144359 share title/component terms: incorrect, results | issues #144359 and #74809 share title/component terms: incorrect, results, tensor</li><li>Short excerpt: issues #163193 and #144359 share title/component terms: incorrect, results | issues #144359 and #74809 share title/component terms: incorrect, results, tensor</li><li>Package receipt: ef65832281c6</li></ul></div><div class='bundle-row'><h4>Bundle BUNDLE-874: module: complex high-priority/blocker queue (2 issues)</h4><div class='meta-row'><span class='chip kind'>Duplicate/related issue sweep</span><span class='chip bucket'>high-priority/blocker</span><span class='chip'>2 issues</span><span class='chip'>0 PRs</span><span class='chip'>medium</span></div><div class='bundle-scope'><div><span class='muted'>Issues</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='chip'>#185405</span><span class='chip'>#188069</span></span></div><div><span class='muted'>PRs</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='muted'>none</span></span></div></div><ul class='evidence-list'><li>Diagnosis: The local evidence indicates likely related reports that should share one canonical answer or implementation path.</li><li>Next action: Pick the canonical issue, preserve the strongest reproduction, and close/link duplicates in one maintainer pass.</li><li>Evidence: issues #188069 and #185405 share title/component terms: autotune, bmm, compile, max, mode, torch</li><li>Short excerpt: issues #188069 and #185405 share title/component terms: autotune, bmm, compile, max, mode, torch</li><li>Package receipt: f29ebe5995bb</li></ul></div><div class='bundle-row'><h4>Bundle BUNDLE-875: module: correctness (silent) high-priority/blocker queue (6 issues)</h4><div class='meta-row'><span class='chip kind'>Duplicate/related issue sweep</span><span class='chip bucket'>high-priority/blocker</span><span class='chip'>6 issues</span><span class='chip'>0 PRs</span><span class='chip'>medium</span></div><div class='bundle-scope'><div><span class='muted'>Issues</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='chip'>#187444</span><span class='chip'>#187445</span><span class='chip'>#187446</span><span class='chip'>#187447</span><span class='chip'>#187448</span><span class='chip'>#187449</span></span></div><div><span class='muted'>PRs</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='muted'>none</span></span></div></div><ul class='evidence-list'><li>Diagnosis: The local evidence indicates likely related reports that should share one canonical answer or implementation path.</li><li>Next action: Pick the canonical issue, preserve the strongest reproduction, and close/link duplicates in one maintainer pass.</li><li>Evidence: issues #187444 and #187449 share title/component terms: adamw, compile, ddp, divergence, eager, nccl, node, resnet50 | issues #187444 and #187448 share title/component terms: adamw, compile, ddp, divergence, eager, re...</li><li>Short excerpt: issues #187444 and #187449 share title/component terms: adamw, compile, ddp, divergence, eager, nccl, node, resnet50 | issues #187444 and #187448 share title/component terms: adamw, compile, ddp, divergence, eager, resnet50, torch | issues #187444 and #187447 share title/compo...</li><li>Package receipt: 160852e585ce</li></ul></div><div class='bundle-row compact-note'><strong>10 more bundle receipt(s)</strong><p>Remaining bundles stay in the downloadable public-safe CSV artifacts to keep this action tab fast to scan.</p></div></div></details><details class='move-row'><summary><div class='move-summary'><div class='move-title'><h3>apply stale sweep policy</h3><div class='muted'>Batch issue sweeps</div></div><div class='move-field wide'><span>Why</span><p>Old low-urgency rows can be handled as a policy batch instead of reopened one at a time.</p></div><div class='move-field wide'><span>Next action</span><p>Close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local draft.</p></div><div class='move-field'><span>Impact</span><p>281 bundles | 9771 issues | 0 PRs<br>Confidence: medium</p></div><div class='move-field wide'><span>Evidence</span><p><span class='chip-row'><span class='chip'>issue #103382: stale/low urgency</span><span class='chip'>labels: triaged</span><span class='chip'>title: NotImplementedError Could not run &#x27;c10d::alltoal...</span><span class='chip'>issue #102921: stale/low urgency</span><span class='chip'>281 package receipts</span></span></p></div><span class='view-bundles'>View bundles</span></div></summary><div class='move-expanded'><div class='bundle-row'><h4>Bundle BUNDLE-1177: general stale/low urgency batch 9</h4><div class='meta-row'><span class='chip kind'>Stale issue resolution sweep</span><span class='chip bucket'>stale/low urgency</span><span class='chip'>140 issues</span><span class='chip'>0 PRs</span><span class='chip'>medium</span></div><div class='bundle-scope'><div><span class='muted'>Issues</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='chip'>#4073</span><span class='chip'>#6552</span><span class='chip'>#6846</span><span class='chip'>#6901</span><span class='chip'>#7047</span><span class='chip'>#7227</span><span class='chip'>#7480</span><span class='chip'>#7493</span><span class='chip'>#7571</span><span class='chip'>#7729</span><span class='chip'>#7781</span><span class='chip'>#7789</span><span class='chip muted'>+128</span></span></div><div><span class='muted'>PRs</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='muted'>none</span></span></div></div><ul class='evidence-list'><li>Diagnosis: This is a general stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.</li><li>Next action: Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.</li><li>Evidence: issue #103382: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged; title: NotImplementedError Could not run &#x27;c10d::alltoall_&#x27; with arguments from the &#x27;Meta&#x27; backend. | issue #102921: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged; title: Unbox e...</li><li>Short excerpt: issue #103382: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged; title: NotImplementedError Could not run &#x27;c10d::alltoall_&#x27; with arguments from the &#x27;Meta&#x27; backend. | issue #102921: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged; title: Unbox expectedml | issue #102741: stale/low urgency; labels: triage...</li><li>Package receipt: 9a1679f2227a</li></ul></div><div class='bundle-row'><h4>Bundle BUNDLE-1178: general stale/low urgency batch 41</h4><div class='meta-row'><span class='chip kind'>Stale issue resolution sweep</span><span class='chip bucket'>stale/low urgency</span><span class='chip'>140 issues</span><span class='chip'>0 PRs</span><span class='chip'>medium</span></div><div class='bundle-scope'><div><span class='muted'>Issues</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='chip'>#6618</span><span class='chip'>#6660</span><span class='chip'>#6868</span><span class='chip'>#7078</span><span class='chip'>#7912</span><span class='chip'>#8471</span><span class='chip'>#8937</span><span class='chip'>#8944</span><span class='chip'>#9407</span><span class='chip'>#9531</span><span class='chip'>#9676</span><span class='chip'>#9704</span><span class='chip muted'>+128</span></span></div><div><span class='muted'>PRs</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='muted'>none</span></span></div></div><ul class='evidence-list'><li>Diagnosis: This is a general stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.</li><li>Next action: Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.</li><li>Evidence: issue #11890: stale/low urgency; labels: caffe2; title: caffe2 argmax and argmin documentation incorrect for output type | issue #11885: stale/low urgency; labels: caffe2; title: [caffe2] Bug for softmaxwithloss opera...</li><li>Short excerpt: issue #11890: stale/low urgency; labels: caffe2; title: caffe2 argmax and argmin documentation incorrect for output type | issue #11885: stale/low urgency; labels: caffe2; title: [caffe2] Bug for softmaxwithloss operator | issue #9975: stale/low urgency; labels: caffe2; title:...</li><li>Package receipt: 223418e87611</li></ul></div><div class='bundle-row'><h4>Bundle BUNDLE-1179: general stale/low urgency batch 32</h4><div class='meta-row'><span class='chip kind'>Stale issue resolution sweep</span><span class='chip bucket'>stale/low urgency</span><span class='chip'>140 issues</span><span class='chip'>0 PRs</span><span class='chip'>medium</span></div><div class='bundle-scope'><div><span class='muted'>Issues</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='chip'>#2739</span><span class='chip'>#3176</span><span class='chip'>#5266</span><span class='chip'>#6402</span><span class='chip'>#6408</span><span class='chip'>#6613</span><span class='chip'>#6760</span><span class='chip'>#6794</span><span class='chip'>#8028</span><span class='chip'>#8550</span><span class='chip'>#8886</span><span class='chip'>#9029</span><span class='chip muted'>+128</span></span></div><div><span class='muted'>PRs</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='muted'>none</span></span></div></div><ul class='evidence-list'><li>Diagnosis: This is a general stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.</li><li>Next action: Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.</li><li>Evidence: issue #6408: stale/low urgency; labels: caffe2; title: [caffe2] Prefetching blobs for memory optimization | issue #18944: stale/low urgency; labels: caffe2; title: Caffe2 on google colab: | issue #15120: stale/low urg...</li><li>Short excerpt: issue #6408: stale/low urgency; labels: caffe2; title: [caffe2] Prefetching blobs for memory optimization | issue #18944: stale/low urgency; labels: caffe2; title: Caffe2 on google colab: | issue #15120: stale/low urgency; labels: caffe2; title: Different implementations of up...</li><li>Package receipt: 243640805cd4</li></ul></div><div class='bundle-row'><h4>Bundle BUNDLE-1180: general stale/low urgency batch 23</h4><div class='meta-row'><span class='chip kind'>Stale issue resolution sweep</span><span class='chip bucket'>stale/low urgency</span><span class='chip'>140 issues</span><span class='chip'>0 PRs</span><span class='chip'>medium</span></div><div class='bundle-scope'><div><span class='muted'>Issues</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='chip'>#3823</span><span class='chip'>#6505</span><span class='chip'>#7020</span><span class='chip'>#7546</span><span class='chip'>#7745</span><span class='chip'>#9133</span><span class='chip'>#9375</span><span class='chip'>#10913</span><span class='chip'>#11516</span><span class='chip'>#11537</span><span class='chip'>#12690</span><span class='chip'>#13034</span><span class='chip muted'>+128</span></span></div><div><span class='muted'>PRs</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='muted'>none</span></span></div></div><ul class='evidence-list'><li>Diagnosis: This is a general stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.</li><li>Next action: Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.</li><li>Evidence: issue #42173: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, function request; title: Exclusive flag in torch.cumsum | issue #7546: stale/low urgency; labels: caffe2; title: [Caffe2] Build broken on macOS High Sierra: can&#x27;t find...</li><li>Short excerpt: issue #42173: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, function request; title: Exclusive flag in torch.cumsum | issue #7546: stale/low urgency; labels: caffe2; title: [Caffe2] Build broken on macOS High Sierra: can&#x27;t find sys headers in /usr/local/include. | issue #3823: stale/low...</li><li>Package receipt: 3bb849d9ca0b</li></ul></div><div class='bundle-row'><h4>Bundle BUNDLE-1181: general stale/low urgency batch 14</h4><div class='meta-row'><span class='chip kind'>Stale issue resolution sweep</span><span class='chip bucket'>stale/low urgency</span><span class='chip'>140 issues</span><span class='chip'>0 PRs</span><span class='chip'>medium</span></div><div class='bundle-scope'><div><span class='muted'>Issues</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='chip'>#630</span><span class='chip'>#711</span><span class='chip'>#1442</span><span class='chip'>#1641</span><span class='chip'>#1642</span><span class='chip'>#1861</span><span class='chip'>#2569</span><span class='chip'>#5385</span><span class='chip'>#7250</span><span class='chip'>#9417</span><span class='chip'>#9624</span><span class='chip'>#9898</span><span class='chip muted'>+128</span></span></div><div><span class='muted'>PRs</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='muted'>none</span></span></div></div><ul class='evidence-list'><li>Diagnosis: This is a general stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.</li><li>Next action: Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.</li><li>Evidence: issue #79050: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, lazy; title: [MetaIssue] Investigate if we should be reusing primtorch formulas for `is_dynamic` | issue #79031: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, lazy; title: Imple...</li><li>Short excerpt: issue #79050: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, lazy; title: [MetaIssue] Investigate if we should be reusing primtorch formulas for `is_dynamic` | issue #79031: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, lazy; title: Implement SymbolicIntNode interface for lazy (i.e. lazy::Symbolic...</li><li>Package receipt: fbd2cf4ac40e</li></ul></div><div class='bundle-row'><h4>Bundle BUNDLE-1182: general stale/low urgency batch 47</h4><div class='meta-row'><span class='chip kind'>Stale issue resolution sweep</span><span class='chip bucket'>stale/low urgency</span><span class='chip'>33 issues</span><span class='chip'>0 PRs</span><span class='chip'>medium</span></div><div class='bundle-scope'><div><span class='muted'>Issues</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='chip'>#1487</span><span class='chip'>#6273</span><span class='chip'>#6357</span><span class='chip'>#6542</span><span class='chip'>#6783</span><span class='chip'>#6845</span><span class='chip'>#6857</span><span class='chip'>#6875</span><span class='chip'>#6902</span><span class='chip'>#7127</span><span class='chip'>#7133</span><span class='chip'>#7179</span><span class='chip muted'>+21</span></span></div><div><span class='muted'>PRs</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='muted'>none</span></span></div></div><ul class='evidence-list'><li>Diagnosis: This is a general stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.</li><li>Next action: Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.</li><li>Evidence: issue #7133: stale/low urgency; labels: caffe2; title: [Caffe2 warpctc] How to use the offered warpctc? | issue #7179: stale/low urgency; labels: caffe2; title: [caffe2]when i do CMAKE | issue #6902: stale/low urgency...</li><li>Short excerpt: issue #7133: stale/low urgency; labels: caffe2; title: [Caffe2 warpctc] How to use the offered warpctc? | issue #7179: stale/low urgency; labels: caffe2; title: [caffe2]when i do CMAKE | issue #6902: stale/low urgency; labels: caffe2; title: [Caffe2] Flatten Layer in caffe2 |...</li><li>Review threads: thread:issue:10007:issue:10254:issue:9853:issue:9854, thread:issue:68287:issue:68288:issue:68298, thread:issue:12983:issue:9484:issue:9604, +5</li><li>Package receipt: 2c3c5c892d41</li></ul></div><div class='bundle-row'><h4>Bundle BUNDLE-1183: Review thread: 2 issues - Issue #10119 - [Caffe2] MNIST Tutorial LMDB Error &quot;Cannot open db&quot;</h4><div class='meta-row'><span class='chip kind'>Stale issue resolution sweep</span><span class='chip bucket'>stale/low urgency</span><span class='chip'>2 issues</span><span class='chip'>0 PRs</span><span class='chip'>medium</span></div><div class='bundle-scope'><div><span class='muted'>Issues</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='chip'>#7807</span><span class='chip'>#10119</span></span></div><div><span class='muted'>PRs</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='muted'>none</span></span></div></div><ul class='evidence-list'><li>Diagnosis: This is a general stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.</li><li>Next action: Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.</li><li>Evidence: put - none of these combos work. I&#x27;ve seen other posts on this issue such as: facebookarchive/caffe2#1074 facebookarchive/caffe2#2282 #9736 #7807 facebookarchive/tutorials#7 But most of these issues were either older,...</li><li>Short excerpt: put - none of these combos work. I&#x27;ve seen other posts on this issue such as: facebookarchive/caffe2#1074 facebookarchive/caffe2#2282 #9736 #7807 facebookarchive/tutorials#7 But most of these issues were either older, posted by those who built from source or had different envi...</li><li>Review threads: thread:issue:10119:issue:7807</li><li>Package receipt: b105b63cb955</li></ul></div><div class='bundle-row'><h4>Bundle BUNDLE-1184: Review thread: 2 issues - Issue #129118 - interpolate nearest get values zero when outputs over 4G elements</h4><div class='meta-row'><span class='chip kind'>Stale issue resolution sweep</span><span class='chip bucket'>stale/low urgency</span><span class='chip'>18 issues</span><span class='chip'>0 PRs</span><span class='chip'>medium</span></div><div class='bundle-scope'><div><span class='muted'>Issues</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='chip'>#17897</span><span class='chip'>#25747</span><span class='chip'>#31708</span><span class='chip'>#84520</span><span class='chip'>#95024</span><span class='chip'>#117736</span><span class='chip'>#129118</span><span class='chip'>#133751</span><span class='chip'>#137368</span><span class='chip'>#141831</span><span class='chip'>#144824</span><span class='chip'>#147118</span><span class='chip muted'>+6</span></span></div><div><span class='muted'>PRs</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='muted'>none</span></span></div></div><ul class='evidence-list'><li>Diagnosis: This is a module: 64-bit stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.</li><li>Next action: Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.</li><li>Evidence: 1].abs().sum()) tensor(0., device=&#x27;cuda:0&#x27;, dtype=torch.bfloat16) Workaround Make the input tensor contiguous, as in #81665. Related issues #129118 #81665 Additional considerations The fact that the failure is silent...</li><li>Short excerpt: 1].abs().sum()) tensor(0., device=&#x27;cuda:0&#x27;, dtype=torch.bfloat16) Workaround Make the input tensor contiguous, as in #81665. Related issues #129118 #81665 Additional considerations The fact that the failure is silent makes this hard to identify, track and debug. The CPU implem...</li><li>Review threads: thread:issue:129118:issue:141831, thread:issue:144824:issue:188756:issue:84520, thread:issue:117736:issue:155218:issue:95024, +1</li><li>Package receipt: ed335031f944</li></ul></div><div class='bundle-row'><h4>Bundle BUNDLE-1185: module: __torch_dispatch__ stale/low urgency batch 2</h4><div class='meta-row'><span class='chip kind'>Stale issue resolution sweep</span><span class='chip bucket'>stale/low urgency</span><span class='chip'>41 issues</span><span class='chip'>0 PRs</span><span class='chip'>medium</span></div><div class='bundle-scope'><div><span class='muted'>Issues</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='chip'>#62888</span><span class='chip'>#64548</span><span class='chip'>#64874</span><span class='chip'>#65339</span><span class='chip'>#65423</span><span class='chip'>#65619</span><span class='chip'>#66026</span><span class='chip'>#68622</span><span class='chip'>#69530</span><span class='chip'>#69991</span><span class='chip'>#72179</span><span class='chip'>#72911</span><span class='chip muted'>+29</span></span></div><div><span class='muted'>PRs</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='muted'>none</span></span></div></div><ul class='evidence-list'><li>Diagnosis: This is a module: __torch_dispatch__ stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.</li><li>Next action: Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.</li><li>Evidence: issue #81240: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: __torch_dispatch__, module: functionalization; title: Functionalization and fake tensors failure in torture test | issue #74991: stale/low urgency; labels: tri...</li><li>Short excerpt: issue #81240: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: __torch_dispatch__, module: functionalization; title: Functionalization and fake tensors failure in torture test | issue #74991: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, better-engineering, module: __torch_dispatch__, tensor...</li><li>Review threads: thread:issue:69991:issue:72911:issue:84565, thread:issue:77223:issue:77332, thread:issue:124788:issue:84864</li><li>Package receipt: 90225f4c4ae4</li></ul></div><div class='bundle-row'><h4>Bundle BUNDLE-1186: module: __torch_function__ stale/low urgency batch 2</h4><div class='meta-row'><span class='chip kind'>Stale issue resolution sweep</span><span class='chip bucket'>stale/low urgency</span><span class='chip'>34 issues</span><span class='chip'>0 PRs</span><span class='chip'>medium</span></div><div class='bundle-scope'><div><span class='muted'>Issues</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='chip'>#44316</span><span class='chip'>#45565</span><span class='chip'>#53678</span><span class='chip'>#53937</span><span class='chip'>#55095</span><span class='chip'>#55104</span><span class='chip'>#55440</span><span class='chip'>#61544</span><span class='chip'>#63911</span><span class='chip'>#64187</span><span class='chip'>#64690</span><span class='chip'>#65215</span><span class='chip muted'>+22</span></span></div><div><span class='muted'>PRs</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='muted'>none</span></span></div></div><ul class='evidence-list'><li>Diagnosis: This is a module: __torch_function__ stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.</li><li>Next action: Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.</li><li>Evidence: issue #76734: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: __torch_function__; title: __torch_function__ callers should always pass kwargs | issue #76294: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: vmap, module: __tor...</li><li>Short excerpt: issue #76734: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: __torch_function__; title: __torch_function__ callers should always pass kwargs | issue #76294: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: vmap, module: __torch_function__; title: torch._remove_batch_dim is interceptab...</li><li>Review threads: thread:issue:44316:issue:45565:issue:53678:issue:53937</li><li>Package receipt: ef97ef3f503d</li></ul></div><div class='bundle-row'><h4>Bundle BUNDLE-1187: Review thread: 2 issues - Issue #47993 - build pytorch from source on ubuntu, building error from fbgemm::SparseAdaGradSignature</h4><div class='meta-row'><span class='chip kind'>Stale issue resolution sweep</span><span class='chip bucket'>stale/low urgency</span><span class='chip'>23 issues</span><span class='chip'>0 PRs</span><span class='chip'>medium</span></div><div class='bundle-scope'><div><span class='muted'>Issues</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='chip'>#2575</span><span class='chip'>#17658</span><span class='chip'>#28754</span><span class='chip'>#41797</span><span class='chip'>#47993</span><span class='chip'>#51039</span><span class='chip'>#51781</span><span class='chip'>#55267</span><span class='chip'>#60341</span><span class='chip'>#61260</span><span class='chip'>#62650</span><span class='chip'>#64645</span><span class='chip muted'>+11</span></span></div><div><span class='muted'>PRs</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='muted'>none</span></span></div></div><ul class='evidence-list'><li>Diagnosis: This is a module: abi stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.</li><li>Next action: Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.</li><li>Evidence: port torch; print(torch._C._GLIBCXX_USE_CXX11_ABI)&quot;` with the conda version also yields `False` I tried compiling from source but am facing #47993. Any feedback or tips would be appreciated. | ssages sent to stderr or...</li><li>Short excerpt: port torch; print(torch._C._GLIBCXX_USE_CXX11_ABI)&quot;` with the conda version also yields `False` I tried compiling from source but am facing #47993. Any feedback or tips would be appreciated. | ssages sent to stderr or stdout. Yet, I&#x27;m speculating if this crash might be hiding...</li><li>Review threads: thread:issue:47993:issue:51039, thread:issue:109923:issue:2575, thread:issue:55267:issue:60341:issue:61260:issue:68905</li><li>Package receipt: 9b40fb8109d2</li></ul></div><div class='bundle-row'><h4>Bundle BUNDLE-1188: Review thread: 3 issues - Issue #143112 - FFT half precision only let CUDA pass the check</h4><div class='meta-row'><span class='chip kind'>Stale issue resolution sweep</span><span class='chip bucket'>stale/low urgency</span><span class='chip'>9 issues</span><span class='chip'>0 PRs</span><span class='chip'>medium</span></div><div class='bundle-scope'><div><span class='muted'>Issues</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='chip'>#143112</span><span class='chip'>#150663</span><span class='chip'>#165038</span><span class='chip'>#166054</span><span class='chip'>#166696</span><span class='chip'>#167210</span><span class='chip'>#167447</span><span class='chip'>#169277</span><span class='chip'>#169371</span></span></div><div><span class='muted'>PRs</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='muted'>none</span></span></div></div><ul class='evidence-list'><li>Diagnosis: This is a module: accelerator stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.</li><li>Next action: Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.</li><li>Evidence: torch.accelerator.get_device_capability for users to get some device capabilities (currently focus on data types) to solve some issues like #165038 and #143112. The supported data types in PyTorch are: float32, float6...</li><li>Short excerpt: torch.accelerator.get_device_capability for users to get some device capabilities (currently focus on data types) to solve some issues like #165038 and #143112. The supported data types in PyTorch are: float32, float64, float16, bfloat16, float8_e5m2, float8_e4m3fn, float8_e5m...</li><li>Review threads: thread:issue:143112:issue:165038:issue:169277</li><li>Package receipt: 459f88686ca5</li></ul></div><div class='bundle-row compact-note'><strong>269 more bundle receipt(s)</strong><p>Remaining bundles stay in the downloadable public-safe CSV artifacts to keep this action tab fast to scan.</p></div></div></details><details class='move-row'><summary><div class='move-summary'><div class='move-title'><h3>prepare patch-plan bundle</h3><div class='muted'>Volunteer bundles</div></div><div class='move-field wide'><span>Why</span><p>The local evidence is concrete enough to plan a patch or design branch without writing to GitHub.</p></div><div class='move-field wide'><span>Next action</span><p>Draft locally, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.</p></div><div class='move-field'><span>Impact</span><p>398 bundles | 4421 issues | 0 PRs<br>Confidence: medium</p></div><div class='move-field wide'><span>Evidence</span><p><span class='chip-row'><span class='chip'>patch-plan ready</span><span class='chip'>issue #185581: has linked PR</span><span class='chip'>labels: triaged</span><span class='chip'>title: `torch.compile` fails at FakeTensor validation f...</span><span class='chip'>398 package receipts</span></span></p></div><span class='view-bundles'>View bundles</span></div></summary><div class='move-expanded'><div class='bundle-row'><h4>Bundle BUNDLE-886: general has linked PR</h4><div class='meta-row'><span class='chip kind'>New code/decision package</span><span class='chip bucket'>has linked PR</span><span class='chip'>34 issues</span><span class='chip'>0 PRs</span><span class='chip'>medium</span></div><div class='bundle-scope'><div><span class='muted'>Issues</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='chip'>#7887</span><span class='chip'>#42652</span><span class='chip'>#45808</span><span class='chip'>#48972</span><span class='chip'>#57724</span><span class='chip'>#97635</span><span class='chip'>#108784</span><span class='chip'>#110944</span><span class='chip'>#116882</span><span class='chip'>#117032</span><span class='chip'>#117962</span><span class='chip'>#118263</span><span class='chip muted'>+22</span></span></div><div><span class='muted'>PRs</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='muted'>none</span></span></div></div><ul class='evidence-list'><li>Diagnosis: This general bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.</li><li>Next action: Draft locally against src/, test/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.</li><li>Evidence: issue #185581: has linked PR; labels: triaged; title: `torch.compile` fails at FakeTensor validation for ConvTranspose2d | issue #164478: has linked PR; labels: triaged, actionable; title: Out of date references in CO...</li><li>Short excerpt: issue #185581: has linked PR; labels: triaged; title: `torch.compile` fails at FakeTensor validation for ConvTranspose2d | issue #164478: has linked PR; labels: triaged, actionable; title: Out of date references in CONTRIBUTING.md and Wiki | issue #130641: has linked PR; label...</li><li>Package receipt: dbad2d7ed291</li></ul></div><div class='bundle-row'><h4>Bundle BUNDLE-887: feature needs design decision</h4><div class='meta-row'><span class='chip kind'>New code/decision package</span><span class='chip bucket'>needs design decision</span><span class='chip'>36 issues</span><span class='chip'>0 PRs</span><span class='chip'>medium</span></div><div class='bundle-scope'><div><span class='muted'>Issues</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='chip'>#32584</span><span class='chip'>#32662</span><span class='chip'>#37067</span><span class='chip'>#38155</span><span class='chip'>#39780</span><span class='chip'>#42581</span><span class='chip'>#44024</span><span class='chip'>#46153</span><span class='chip'>#49338</span><span class='chip'>#49870</span><span class='chip'>#51275</span><span class='chip'>#53464</span><span class='chip muted'>+24</span></span></div><div><span class='muted'>PRs</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='muted'>none</span></span></div></div><ul class='evidence-list'><li>Diagnosis: This general bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.</li><li>Next action: Draft locally against src/, test/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.</li><li>Evidence: issue #116354: needs design decision; labels: feature, triaged, needs research, needs design; title: Abstract torch.device for GPU/NE/TPU computations in the cloud-based agent | issue #113730: needs design decision; l...</li><li>Short excerpt: issue #116354: needs design decision; labels: feature, triaged, needs research, needs design; title: Abstract torch.device for GPU/NE/TPU computations in the cloud-based agent | issue #113730: needs design decision; labels: feature, triaged, needs design; title: Can the offici...</li><li>Package receipt: fd9cd814d7fe</li></ul></div><div class='bundle-row'><h4>Bundle BUNDLE-888: module: 64-bit has linked PR</h4><div class='meta-row'><span class='chip kind'>New code/decision package</span><span class='chip bucket'>has linked PR</span><span class='chip'>4 issues</span><span class='chip'>0 PRs</span><span class='chip'>medium</span></div><div class='bundle-scope'><div><span class='muted'>Issues</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='chip'>#119147</span><span class='chip'>#131185</span><span class='chip'>#167086</span><span class='chip'>#170798</span></span></div><div><span class='muted'>PRs</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='muted'>none</span></span></div></div><ul class='evidence-list'><li>Diagnosis: This module: 64-bit bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.</li><li>Next action: Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.</li><li>Evidence: issue #167086: has linked PR; labels: high priority, module: cuda, triaged, module: 64-bit; title: Unchecked uint32 overflow in CUDA scan (cumsum/cumprod/cummin/etc) | issue #170798: has linked PR; labels: module: nn,...</li><li>Short excerpt: issue #167086: has linked PR; labels: high priority, module: cuda, triaged, module: 64-bit; title: Unchecked uint32 overflow in CUDA scan (cumsum/cumprod/cummin/etc) | issue #170798: has linked PR; labels: module: nn, triaged, module: 64-bit, actionable, module: correctness (s...</li><li>Package receipt: b287dbb3e360</li></ul></div><div class='bundle-row'><h4>Bundle BUNDLE-889: module: __torch_dispatch__ needs design decision</h4><div class='meta-row'><span class='chip kind'>New code/decision package</span><span class='chip bucket'>needs design decision</span><span class='chip'>10 issues</span><span class='chip'>0 PRs</span><span class='chip'>medium</span></div><div class='bundle-scope'><div><span class='muted'>Issues</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='chip'>#62982</span><span class='chip'>#73513</span><span class='chip'>#73537</span><span class='chip'>#79205</span><span class='chip'>#96319</span><span class='chip'>#97500</span><span class='chip'>#113089</span><span class='chip'>#117115</span><span class='chip'>#132651</span><span class='chip'>#140909</span></span></div><div><span class='muted'>PRs</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='muted'>none</span></span></div></div><ul class='evidence-list'><li>Diagnosis: This module: __torch_dispatch__ bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.</li><li>Next action: Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.</li><li>Evidence: issue #132651: needs design decision; labels: triaged, needs design, module: __torch_dispatch__, tensor subclass, oncall: pt2, module: aotdispatch, module: compile-time, module: pt2-dispatcher; title: fix unnecessary...</li><li>Short excerpt: issue #132651: needs design decision; labels: triaged, needs design, module: __torch_dispatch__, tensor subclass, oncall: pt2, module: aotdispatch, module: compile-time, module: pt2-dispatcher; title: fix unnecessary re-trace in AOTDispatcher in subclass code path | issue #792...</li><li>Review threads: thread:issue:96319:issue:97500, thread:issue:73513:issue:73537</li><li>Package receipt: 95b25f401b1e</li></ul></div><div class='bundle-row'><h4>Bundle BUNDLE-890: module: __torch_function__ has linked PR</h4><div class='meta-row'><span class='chip kind'>New code/decision package</span><span class='chip bucket'>has linked PR</span><span class='chip'>14 issues</span><span class='chip'>0 PRs</span><span class='chip'>medium</span></div><div class='bundle-scope'><div><span class='muted'>Issues</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='chip'>#47117</span><span class='chip'>#54881</span><span class='chip'>#58212</span><span class='chip'>#63485</span><span class='chip'>#96579</span><span class='chip'>#103752</span><span class='chip'>#115741</span><span class='chip'>#147995</span><span class='chip'>#167223</span><span class='chip'>#182318</span><span class='chip'>#186203</span><span class='chip'>#186259</span><span class='chip muted'>+2</span></span></div><div><span class='muted'>PRs</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='muted'>none</span></span></div></div><ul class='evidence-list'><li>Diagnosis: This module: __torch_function__ bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.</li><li>Next action: Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.</li><li>Evidence: issue #167223: has linked PR; labels: module: docs, module: autograd, triaged, actionable, module: __torch_function__; title: [feature request] Re-enable `__torch_function__` dispatch when invoking autograd hooks for...</li><li>Short excerpt: issue #167223: has linked PR; labels: module: docs, module: autograd, triaged, actionable, module: __torch_function__; title: [feature request] Re-enable `__torch_function__` dispatch when invoking autograd hooks for Tensor subclasses | issue #182318: has linked PR; labels: tr...</li><li>Review threads: thread:issue:47117:issue:58212:issue:63485</li><li>Package receipt: 505c70e927db</li></ul></div><div class='bundle-row'><h4>Bundle BUNDLE-891: module: abi needs maintainer decision</h4><div class='meta-row'><span class='chip kind'>New code/decision package</span><span class='chip bucket'>needs maintainer decision</span><span class='chip'>4 issues</span><span class='chip'>0 PRs</span><span class='chip'>medium</span></div><div class='bundle-scope'><div><span class='muted'>Issues</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='chip'>#103359</span><span class='chip'>#121837</span><span class='chip'>#124197</span><span class='chip'>#174507</span></span></div><div><span class='muted'>PRs</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='muted'>none</span></span></div></div><ul class='evidence-list'><li>Diagnosis: This module: abi bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.</li><li>Next action: Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.</li><li>Evidence: issue #174507: needs maintainer decision; labels: feature, module: abi, triaged, bot-triaged; title: PyTorch Stable ABI support | issue #121837: needs maintainer decision; labels: module: binaries, module: cpp, module...</li><li>Short excerpt: issue #174507: needs maintainer decision; labels: feature, module: abi, triaged, bot-triaged; title: PyTorch Stable ABI support | issue #121837: needs maintainer decision; labels: module: binaries, module: cpp, module: abi, triaged; title: Revive libtorch-shared-without-deps f...</li><li>Package receipt: e1c23fc4dc50</li></ul></div><div class='bundle-row'><h4>Bundle BUNDLE-892: Review thread: 2 issues - Issue #175211 - CUDA/ROCm/Accelerator testing should replace get_device_capability() with feature queries</h4><div class='meta-row'><span class='chip kind'>New code/decision package</span><span class='chip bucket'>has linked PR</span><span class='chip'>12 issues</span><span class='chip'>0 PRs</span><span class='chip'>medium</span></div><div class='bundle-scope'><div><span class='muted'>Issues</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='chip'>#143887</span><span class='chip'>#156805</span><span class='chip'>#158827</span><span class='chip'>#164302</span><span class='chip'>#175211</span><span class='chip'>#177010</span><span class='chip'>#177771</span><span class='chip'>#177935</span><span class='chip'>#177969</span><span class='chip'>#185975</span><span class='chip'>#186260</span><span class='chip'>#189014</span></span></div><div><span class='muted'>PRs</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='muted'>none</span></span></div></div><ul class='evidence-list'><li>Diagnosis: This module: accelerator bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.</li><li>Next action: Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.</li><li>Evidence: I agreed, and a similar idea from #175211 | issue #185975: has linked PR; labels: feature, triaged, module: PrivateUse1, module: accelerator, bot-triaged; title: torch.accelerator.default_stream API is missing | our c...</li><li>Short excerpt: I agreed, and a similar idea from #175211 | issue #185975: has linked PR; labels: feature, triaged, module: PrivateUse1, module: accelerator, bot-triaged; title: torch.accelerator.default_stream API is missing | our categories in a backend-agnostic way. And generalize the adva...</li><li>Review threads: thread:issue:175211:issue:177969, thread:issue:158827:issue:164302:issue:177010</li><li>Package receipt: 580e6eecb1da</li></ul></div><div class='bundle-row'><h4>Bundle BUNDLE-893: Review thread: 3 issues - Issue #180343 - Accelerator-independent API to determine if a specific backend is available?</h4><div class='meta-row'><span class='chip kind'>New code/decision package</span><span class='chip bucket'>needs maintainer decision</span><span class='chip'>6 issues</span><span class='chip'>0 PRs</span><span class='chip'>medium</span></div><div class='bundle-scope'><div><span class='muted'>Issues</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='chip'>#166563</span><span class='chip'>#167283</span><span class='chip'>#167881</span><span class='chip'>#180343</span><span class='chip'>#180345</span><span class='chip'>#180712</span></span></div><div><span class='muted'>PRs</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='muted'>none</span></span></div></div><ul class='evidence-list'><li>Diagnosis: This module: accelerator bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.</li><li>Next action: Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.</li><li>Evidence: 🚀 The feature, motivation and pitch This probably lands somewhere between #180343 and #180345, not sure if it is justified in having its own issue, but in TorchTPU we have set up autoloading of our tpu module, but we...</li><li>Short excerpt: 🚀 The feature, motivation and pitch This probably lands somewhere between #180343 and #180345, not sure if it is justified in having its own issue, but in TorchTPU we have set up autoloading of our tpu module, but we only | 🚀 The feature, motivation and pitch This probably lan...</li><li>Review threads: thread:issue:180343:issue:180345:issue:180712, thread:issue:166563:issue:167283:issue:167881</li><li>Package receipt: 731017ff4f38</li></ul></div><div class='bundle-row'><h4>Bundle BUNDLE-894: Review thread: 7 issues - Issue #113045 - [Feature][DTensor] Manage additional `_padded_local_tensor` attribute</h4><div class='meta-row'><span class='chip kind'>New code/decision package</span><span class='chip bucket'>needs maintainer decision</span><span class='chip'>17 issues</span><span class='chip'>0 PRs</span><span class='chip'>medium</span></div><div class='bundle-scope'><div><span class='muted'>Issues</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='chip'>#113045</span><span class='chip'>#113737</span><span class='chip'>#114299</span><span class='chip'>#120003</span><span class='chip'>#120945</span><span class='chip'>#121594</span><span class='chip'>#129867</span><span class='chip'>#136433</span><span class='chip'>#147662</span><span class='chip'>#155547</span><span class='chip'>#158657</span><span class='chip'>#163923</span><span class='chip muted'>+5</span></span></div><div><span class='muted'>PRs</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='muted'>none</span></span></div></div><ul class='evidence-list'><li>Diagnosis: This module: activation checkpointing bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.</li><li>Next action: Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.</li><li>Evidence: willing to work on this one here is one related issue #158657 | more. This is the natural continuation of the per-parameter FSDP direction (RFC #114299) and is adjacent to the activation-offload work in #174960, on th...</li><li>Short excerpt: willing to work on this one here is one related issue #158657 | more. This is the natural continuation of the per-parameter FSDP direction (RFC #114299) and is adjacent to the activation-offload work in #174960, on the parameter axis rather than the activation axis. Proposed A...</li><li>Review threads: thread:issue:113045:issue:114299:issue:120003:issue:147662</li><li>Package receipt: 75aeea97036e</li></ul></div><div class='bundle-row'><h4>Bundle BUNDLE-895: #180855 `&quot;index_copy_cpu&quot;` not implemented for `&#x27;Float8_e5m2&#x27;`</h4><div class='meta-row'><span class='chip kind'>New code/decision package</span><span class='chip bucket'>has linked PR</span><span class='chip'>4 issues</span><span class='chip'>0 PRs</span><span class='chip'>medium</span></div><div class='bundle-scope'><div><span class='muted'>Issues</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='chip'>#110946</span><span class='chip'>#116555</span><span class='chip'>#180855</span><span class='chip'>#189046</span></span></div><div><span class='muted'>PRs</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='muted'>none</span></span></div></div><ul class='evidence-list'><li>Diagnosis: This module: advanced indexing bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.</li><li>Next action: Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.</li><li>Evidence: issue #180855: has linked PR; labels: module: cpu, triaged, enhancement, module: advanced indexing, module: floatx (formerly float8), bot-triaged; title: `&quot;index_copy_cpu&quot;` not implemented for `&#x27;Float8_e5m2&#x27;` | issue...</li><li>Short excerpt: issue #180855: has linked PR; labels: module: cpu, triaged, enhancement, module: advanced indexing, module: floatx (formerly float8), bot-triaged; title: `&quot;index_copy_cpu&quot;` not implemented for `&#x27;Float8_e5m2&#x27;` | issue #189046: needs maintainer decision; labels: feature, module:...</li><li>Package receipt: 5158149500a8</li></ul></div><div class='bundle-row'><h4>Bundle BUNDLE-896: Review thread: 15 issues - Issue #104247 - [proposal] &quot;Name&quot; string attribute for modules, parameters, buffers, tensors for more pleasant debugging (including distributed FSDP2 logging)</h4><div class='meta-row'><span class='chip kind'>New code/decision package</span><span class='chip bucket'>needs design decision</span><span class='chip'>26 issues</span><span class='chip'>0 PRs</span><span class='chip'>medium</span></div><div class='bundle-scope'><div><span class='muted'>Issues</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='chip'>#1529</span><span class='chip'>#16668</span><span class='chip'>#25267</span><span class='chip'>#27479</span><span class='chip'>#30049</span><span class='chip'>#31252</span><span class='chip'>#31353</span><span class='chip'>#35633</span><span class='chip'>#45273</span><span class='chip'>#47128</span><span class='chip'>#58228</span><span class='chip'>#58392</span><span class='chip muted'>+14</span></span></div><div><span class='muted'>PRs</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='muted'>none</span></span></div></div><ul class='evidence-list'><li>Diagnosis: This module: amp (automated mixed precision) bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.</li><li>Next action: Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.</li><li>Evidence: This is a very close duplicate of #31252, and there is a discussion going on already there. TL;DR it&#x27;s complicated. | Related #31252 | @eellison My impression is that this is unrelated to #25267 given that I am not us...</li><li>Short excerpt: This is a very close duplicate of #31252, and there is a discussion going on already there. TL;DR it&#x27;s complicated. | Related #31252 | @eellison My impression is that this is unrelated to #25267 given that I am not using MKL and I only encounter the CPU memory leak when the mo...</li><li>Review threads: thread:issue:104247:issue:1529:issue:16668:issue:167656</li><li>Package receipt: 9069be9c0a49</li></ul></div><div class='bundle-row'><h4>Bundle BUNDLE-897: Review thread: 15 issues - Issue #102078 - AddressSanitizer: heap-buffer-overflow in test_comprehensive_nn_functional_embedding_bag_cpu_bfloat16</h4><div class='meta-row'><span class='chip kind'>New code/decision package</span><span class='chip bucket'>needs reproduction</span><span class='chip'>16 issues</span><span class='chip'>0 PRs</span><span class='chip'>medium</span></div><div class='bundle-scope'><div><span class='muted'>Issues</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='chip'>#88</span><span class='chip'>#13993</span><span class='chip'>#14436</span><span class='chip'>#19668</span><span class='chip'>#23240</span><span class='chip'>#48491</span><span class='chip'>#66247</span><span class='chip'>#70245</span><span class='chip'>#89817</span><span class='chip'>#95944</span><span class='chip'>#99561</span><span class='chip'>#102078</span><span class='chip muted'>+4</span></span></div><div><span class='muted'>PRs</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='muted'>none</span></span></div></div><ul class='evidence-list'><li>Diagnosis: This module: android bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.</li><li>Next action: Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.</li><li>Evidence: I have also seen the same issue in #66247 and had to resort to building my own PyTorch container with `USE_MKL=OFF` in order to resolve this issue. My stack trace was also similar t | 000004ea137 in PyCFunction_Call (...</li><li>Short excerpt: I have also seen the same issue in #66247 and had to resort to building my own PyTorch container with `USE_MKL=OFF` in order to resolve this issue. My stack trace was also similar t | 000004ea137 in PyCFunction_Call () at ../Objects/methodobject.c:98 #87 0x00000000005c20e7 in...</li><li>Review threads: thread:issue:102078:issue:123421:issue:126963:issue:13993</li><li>Package receipt: 11f6973c70da</li></ul></div><div class='bundle-row compact-note'><strong>386 more bundle receipt(s)</strong><p>Remaining bundles stay in the downloadable public-safe CSV artifacts to keep this action tab fast to scan.</p></div></div></details><details class='move-row'><summary><div class='move-summary'><div class='move-title'><h3>prepare volunteer-ready bundle</h3><div class='muted'>Volunteer bundles</div></div><div class='move-field wide'><span>Why</span><p>The grouped issues share low-risk scope, labels, or documentation/test expectations suitable for contributors.</p></div><div class='move-field wide'><span>Next action</span><p>Publish or keep a local contributor-ready bundle with scope, expected files, tests, and linked issue context.</p></div><div class='move-field'><span>Impact</span><p>15 bundles | 22 issues | 0 PRs<br>Confidence: medium</p></div><div class='move-field wide'><span>Evidence</span><p><span class='chip-row'><span class='chip'>patch-plan ready</span><span class='chip'>issue #117806: good volunteer slice</span><span class='chip'>labels: good first issue, triaged, enhancement, module:...</span><span class='chip'>title: Supporting custom attributes with `__torch_funct...</span><span class='chip'>15 package receipts</span></span></p></div><span class='view-bundles'>View bundles</span></div></summary><div class='move-expanded'><div class='bundle-row'><h4>Bundle BUNDLE-1162: #117806 Supporting custom attributes with `__torch_function__` tensor subclasses</h4><div class='meta-row'><span class='chip kind'>New volunteer-ready PR</span><span class='chip bucket'>good volunteer slice</span><span class='chip'>1 issue</span><span class='chip'>0 PRs</span><span class='chip'>medium</span></div><div class='bundle-scope'><div><span class='muted'>Issues</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='chip'>#117806</span></span></div><div><span class='muted'>PRs</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='muted'>none</span></span></div></div><ul class='evidence-list'><li>Diagnosis: This module: __torch_function__ bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.</li><li>Next action: Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.</li><li>Evidence: issue #117806: good volunteer slice; labels: good first issue, triaged, enhancement, module: __torch_function__, module: dynamo; title: Supporting custom attributes with `__torch_function__` tensor subclasses</li><li>Short excerpt: issue #117806: good volunteer slice; labels: good first issue, triaged, enhancement, module: __torch_function__, module: dynamo; title: Supporting custom attributes with `__torch_function__` tensor subclasses</li><li>Package receipt: d846dd808be3</li></ul></div><div class='bundle-row'><h4>Bundle BUNDLE-1163: module: bootcamp good volunteer slice</h4><div class='meta-row'><span class='chip kind'>New volunteer-ready PR</span><span class='chip bucket'>good volunteer slice</span><span class='chip'>2 issues</span><span class='chip'>0 PRs</span><span class='chip'>medium</span></div><div class='bundle-scope'><div><span class='muted'>Issues</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='chip'>#58122</span><span class='chip'>#79452</span></span></div><div><span class='muted'>PRs</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='muted'>none</span></span></div></div><ul class='evidence-list'><li>Diagnosis: This module: bootcamp bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.</li><li>Next action: Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.</li><li>Evidence: issue #58122: good volunteer slice; labels: module: bootcamp, good first issue, triaged, OSS contribution wanted; title: Generate special clear error messages for known common misuses in TorchScript | issue #79452: go...</li><li>Short excerpt: issue #58122: good volunteer slice; labels: module: bootcamp, good first issue, triaged, OSS contribution wanted; title: Generate special clear error messages for known common misuses in TorchScript | issue #79452: good volunteer slice; labels: oncall: distributed, module: boo...</li><li>Package receipt: da0fb0d4012d</li></ul></div><div class='bundle-row'><h4>Bundle BUNDLE-1164: #99278 Build error on libstc++ header stl_alogbase.h on riscv</h4><div class='meta-row'><span class='chip kind'>New volunteer-ready PR</span><span class='chip bucket'>good volunteer slice</span><span class='chip'>1 issue</span><span class='chip'>0 PRs</span><span class='chip'>medium</span></div><div class='bundle-scope'><div><span class='muted'>Issues</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='chip'>#99278</span></span></div><div><span class='muted'>PRs</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='muted'>none</span></span></div></div><ul class='evidence-list'><li>Diagnosis: This module: build bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.</li><li>Next action: Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.</li><li>Evidence: issue #99278: good volunteer slice; labels: module: build, good first issue, triaged; title: Build error on libstc++ header stl_alogbase.h on riscv</li><li>Short excerpt: issue #99278: good volunteer slice; labels: module: build, good first issue, triaged; title: Build error on libstc++ header stl_alogbase.h on riscv</li><li>Package receipt: e59d59de9091</li></ul></div><div class='bundle-row'><h4>Bundle BUNDLE-1165: module: c10d good volunteer slice</h4><div class='meta-row'><span class='chip kind'>New volunteer-ready PR</span><span class='chip bucket'>good volunteer slice</span><span class='chip'>2 issues</span><span class='chip'>0 PRs</span><span class='chip'>medium</span></div><div class='bundle-scope'><div><span class='muted'>Issues</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='chip'>#84593</span><span class='chip'>#97469</span></span></div><div><span class='muted'>PRs</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='muted'>none</span></span></div></div><ul class='evidence-list'><li>Diagnosis: This module: c10d bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.</li><li>Next action: Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.</li><li>Evidence: issue #97469: good volunteer slice; labels: good first issue, triaged, module: c10d; title: Improve collectives fingerprinting | issue #84593: good volunteer slice; labels: good first issue, triaged, module: c10d; tit...</li><li>Short excerpt: issue #97469: good volunteer slice; labels: good first issue, triaged, module: c10d; title: Improve collectives fingerprinting | issue #84593: good volunteer slice; labels: good first issue, triaged, module: c10d; title: Uneven and/or Dynamically sized collectives</li><li>Package receipt: 7b39e91240ea</li></ul></div><div class='bundle-row'><h4>Bundle BUNDLE-1166: Review thread: 2 issues - Issue #64067 - Execute C++ based GTest unit tests from a python wrapper</h4><div class='meta-row'><span class='chip kind'>New volunteer-ready PR</span><span class='chip bucket'>good volunteer slice</span><span class='chip'>2 issues</span><span class='chip'>0 PRs</span><span class='chip'>medium</span></div><div class='bundle-scope'><div><span class='muted'>Issues</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='chip'>#64067</span><span class='chip'>#66824</span></span></div><div><span class='muted'>PRs</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='muted'>none</span></span></div></div><ul class='evidence-list'><li>Diagnosis: This module: ci bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.</li><li>Next action: Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.</li><li>Evidence: #65514 introduced a Python framework for running C++ tests(the benefits and reasoning are described in #64067). While that PR added a framework for running tests, we still have many manual calls to C++ test binaries i...</li><li>Short excerpt: #65514 introduced a Python framework for running C++ tests(the benefits and reasoning are described in #64067). While that PR added a framework for running tests, we still have many manual calls to C++ test binaries in the scripts used in CI. This i</li><li>Review threads: thread:issue:64067:issue:66824</li><li>Package receipt: dd1bc8ca2b8f</li></ul></div><div class='bundle-row'><h4>Bundle BUNDLE-1167: #153669 Make tlparse able to show a summary of distinct graph breaks</h4><div class='meta-row'><span class='chip kind'>New volunteer-ready PR</span><span class='chip bucket'>good volunteer slice</span><span class='chip'>1 issue</span><span class='chip'>0 PRs</span><span class='chip'>medium</span></div><div class='bundle-scope'><div><span class='muted'>Issues</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='chip'>#153669</span></span></div><div><span class='muted'>PRs</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='muted'>none</span></span></div></div><ul class='evidence-list'><li>Diagnosis: This module: compile ux bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.</li><li>Next action: Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.</li><li>Evidence: issue #153669: good volunteer slice; labels: good first issue, triaged, oncall: pt2, module: dynamo, dynamo-triage-jan2025, module: compile ux; title: Make tlparse able to show a summary of distinct graph breaks</li><li>Short excerpt: issue #153669: good volunteer slice; labels: good first issue, triaged, oncall: pt2, module: dynamo, dynamo-triage-jan2025, module: compile ux; title: Make tlparse able to show a summary of distinct graph breaks</li><li>Package receipt: b998105f7b5b</li></ul></div><div class='bundle-row'><h4>Bundle BUNDLE-1168: #9886 [doc] functionalities not documented</h4><div class='meta-row'><span class='chip kind'>New volunteer-ready PR</span><span class='chip bucket'>good volunteer slice</span><span class='chip'>1 issue</span><span class='chip'>0 PRs</span><span class='chip'>medium</span></div><div class='bundle-scope'><div><span class='muted'>Issues</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='chip'>#9886</span></span></div><div><span class='muted'>PRs</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='muted'>none</span></span></div></div><ul class='evidence-list'><li>Diagnosis: This module: docs bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.</li><li>Next action: Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.</li><li>Evidence: issue #9886: good volunteer slice; labels: module: docs, good first issue, triaged; title: [doc] functionalities not documented</li><li>Short excerpt: issue #9886: good volunteer slice; labels: module: docs, good first issue, triaged; title: [doc] functionalities not documented</li><li>Package receipt: 3b48f90fa778</li></ul></div><div class='bundle-row'><h4>Bundle BUNDLE-1169: Review thread: 2 issues - Issue #102207 - skipIfTorchInductor Tracking Issue</h4><div class='meta-row'><span class='chip kind'>New volunteer-ready PR</span><span class='chip bucket'>good volunteer slice</span><span class='chip'>2 issues</span><span class='chip'>0 PRs</span><span class='chip'>medium</span></div><div class='bundle-scope'><div><span class='muted'>Issues</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='chip'>#102207</span><span class='chip'>#108798</span></span></div><div><span class='muted'>PRs</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='muted'>none</span></span></div></div><ul class='evidence-list'><li>Diagnosis: This module: dynamo bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.</li><li>Next action: Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.</li><li>Evidence: _.from needs to be renamed&quot; &#x27;test_advancedindex_mixed_cpu_devices&#x27; - &quot;FIXME&quot; &#x27;test_advancedindex_mixed_devices_error&#x27; - &quot;FIXME&quot; #108181 and #108798 &#x27;test_typed_storage_deprecation_warning&#x27; - &quot;FIXME&quot; &#x27;test_pin_memory&#x27;...</li><li>Short excerpt: _.from needs to be renamed&quot; &#x27;test_advancedindex_mixed_cpu_devices&#x27; - &quot;FIXME&quot; &#x27;test_advancedindex_mixed_devices_error&#x27; - &quot;FIXME&quot; #108181 and #108798 &#x27;test_typed_storage_deprecation_warning&#x27; - &quot;FIXME&quot; &#x27;test_pin_memory&#x27; - &quot;pin_memory isn&#x27;t yet supported in TorchInductor&quot; &#x27;test_me...</li><li>Review threads: thread:issue:102207:issue:108798</li><li>Package receipt: e8ae53853c07</li></ul></div><div class='bundle-row'><h4>Bundle BUNDLE-1170: module: internals good volunteer slice</h4><div class='meta-row'><span class='chip kind'>New volunteer-ready PR</span><span class='chip bucket'>good volunteer slice</span><span class='chip'>3 issues</span><span class='chip'>0 PRs</span><span class='chip'>medium</span></div><div class='bundle-scope'><div><span class='muted'>Issues</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='chip'>#10756</span><span class='chip'>#20704</span><span class='chip'>#61654</span></span></div><div><span class='muted'>PRs</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='muted'>none</span></span></div></div><ul class='evidence-list'><li>Diagnosis: This module: internals bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.</li><li>Next action: Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.</li><li>Evidence: issue #61654: good volunteer slice; labels: module: internals, good first issue, triaged; title: Allow creation of pseudo devices for testing purposes | issue #10756: good volunteer slice; labels: module: internals, g...</li><li>Short excerpt: issue #61654: good volunteer slice; labels: module: internals, good first issue, triaged; title: Allow creation of pseudo devices for testing purposes | issue #10756: good volunteer slice; labels: module: internals, good first issue, triaged, module: partial aliasing; title: U...</li><li>Package receipt: b99cd5d3da96</li></ul></div><div class='bundle-row'><h4>Bundle BUNDLE-1171: Review thread: 2 issues - Issue #40316 - Refactor the adaptive avg pool code</h4><div class='meta-row'><span class='chip kind'>New volunteer-ready PR</span><span class='chip bucket'>good volunteer slice</span><span class='chip'>2 issues</span><span class='chip'>0 PRs</span><span class='chip'>medium</span></div><div class='bundle-scope'><div><span class='muted'>Issues</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='chip'>#40316</span><span class='chip'>#42779</span></span></div><div><span class='muted'>PRs</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='muted'>none</span></span></div></div><ul class='evidence-list'><li>Diagnosis: This module: memory format bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.</li><li>Next action: Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.</li><li>Evidence: ng5 @Xia-Weiwen @leslie-fang-intel @dzhulgakov @VitalyFedyunin @ppwwyyxx @ngimel @z-a-f, @vkuzo. 🐛 Bug As part of the refactoring effort in #40316, I ran some benchmarks on adaptive_avg_pool(2/3)d to see what is the d...</li><li>Short excerpt: ng5 @Xia-Weiwen @leslie-fang-intel @dzhulgakov @VitalyFedyunin @ppwwyyxx @ngimel @z-a-f, @vkuzo. 🐛 Bug As part of the refactoring effort in #40316, I ran some benchmarks on adaptive_avg_pool(2/3)d to see what is the difference in execution time for MemoryFormat::Contiguous vs...</li><li>Review threads: thread:issue:40316:issue:42779</li><li>Package receipt: c8c38eba8b96</li></ul></div><div class='bundle-row'><h4>Bundle BUNDLE-1172: #66813 Use `__slots__` for the `nn.Module` class</h4><div class='meta-row'><span class='chip kind'>New volunteer-ready PR</span><span class='chip bucket'>good volunteer slice</span><span class='chip'>1 issue</span><span class='chip'>0 PRs</span><span class='chip'>medium</span></div><div class='bundle-scope'><div><span class='muted'>Issues</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='chip'>#66813</span></span></div><div><span class='muted'>PRs</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='muted'>none</span></span></div></div><ul class='evidence-list'><li>Diagnosis: This module: nn bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.</li><li>Next action: Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.</li><li>Evidence: issue #66813: good volunteer slice; labels: module: performance, module: nn, good first issue, triaged, better-engineering, actionable; title: Use `__slots__` for the `nn.Module` class</li><li>Short excerpt: issue #66813: good volunteer slice; labels: module: performance, module: nn, good first issue, triaged, better-engineering, actionable; title: Use `__slots__` for the `nn.Module` class</li><li>Package receipt: 871dc27de148</li></ul></div><div class='bundle-row'><h4>Bundle BUNDLE-1173: #93684 Can we rewrite numpy operators to pytorch operators?</h4><div class='meta-row'><span class='chip kind'>New volunteer-ready PR</span><span class='chip bucket'>good volunteer slice</span><span class='chip'>1 issue</span><span class='chip'>0 PRs</span><span class='chip'>medium</span></div><div class='bundle-scope'><div><span class='muted'>Issues</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='chip'>#93684</span></span></div><div><span class='muted'>PRs</span> <span class='chip-row'><span class='muted'>none</span></span></div></div><ul class='evidence-list'><li>Diagnosis: This module: numpy bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.</li><li>Next action: Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.</li><li>Evidence: issue #93684: good volunteer slice; labels: good first issue, triaged, module: numpy; title: Can we rewrite numpy operators to pytorch operators?</li><li>Short excerpt: issue #93684: good volunteer slice; labels: good first issue, triaged, module: numpy; title: Can we rewrite numpy operators to pytorch operators?</li><li>Package receipt: 06df091b836c</li></ul></div><div class='bundle-row compact-note'><strong>3 more bundle receipt(s)</strong><p>Remaining bundles stay in the downloadable public-safe CSV artifacts to keep this action tab fast to scan.</p></div></div></details></div></section></div>