bundle_id,bundle_key,bundle_kind,bundle_kind_label,public_label,title,primary_item_type,primary_item_number,primary_item_title,axis,would_do,maintainer_value,local_test_plan,proof_status,open_issue_numbers,active_pr_numbers,issue_count,pr_count,diagnosis_kind,diagnosis,recommended_next_step,diagnostic_confidence,diagnostic_evidence,local_only,github_action_allowed,blocked_github_actions,bundle_hash
BUNDLE-001,bundle:bundle-001,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: crash (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,188801,[MPS] Leak MetalShaderLibrary bundled singleton to avoid exit-time destructor crashes,module: crash,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,188812,188801,1,1,contributor_update_needed,PR #188801 is contributor-owned until requested changes or review questions are answered.,Keep parked or close after maintainer review if the contributor path is no longer active; do not ask for maintainer work first.,medium,reviewDecision=CHANGES_REQUESTED; stale_days=6,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",a846529043900563a1f6bd41bf9c0123c8f1ada289ecfd21b6705cc7b9041e2c
BUNDLE-002,bundle:bundle-002,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: correctness (silent) (2 issues + 1 PR),pr,189122,Fix sparse-dense mul dropping data when broadcasting a size-1 sparse dim,module: correctness (silent),"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"158861, 188900",189122,2,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #189122 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=APPROVED; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",795e74f68df038c557e585cd3efb13db755651f6dd3caa0b959d25b62466edc7
BUNDLE-003,bundle:bundle-003,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: regression (2 issues + 1 PR),pr,185730,Fix dynamic shapes for variadic kwargs,module: regression,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"150022, 150371",185730,2,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #185730 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",a677d494151485b6cb0bcc0240e4de2249b19e1de4abb000743611909eacbf46
BUNDLE-004,bundle:bundle-004,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: oncall: export (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,188948,Fix triangular_solve for sparse CPU tensors on non-MKL platforms,oncall: export,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,153410,188948,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #188948 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",5ddbe14adcf83dc3336bf0e5e739e69e02712f899859eda06abef57c661960fc
BUNDLE-005,bundle:bundle-005,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: crash (3 issues + 2 PRs),pr,189256,[BE][MPS] Factor host-buffer wrapping into buffer_with_offset_from_tensor,module: crash,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"180397, 181374, 188970","181720, 189256",3,2,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #189256 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=APPROVED; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",925dd4aed23bb62be02c51038cf75789bb22d85c81dd72ebaaa4f91cadf70d91
BUNDLE-006,bundle:bundle-006,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: binaries (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,189043,Preload full bundled cuDNN set with RTLD_GLOBAL to prevent sublibrary version mismatch,module: binaries,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,188892,189043,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #189043 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",3dacd2fcc399d1e0d143bbc8c821d1c79c208c3872de985fceff1b93ed1113bf
BUNDLE-007,bundle:bundle-007,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: advanced indexing (21 issues + 14 PRs),pr,189149,"[inductor] Emit pointwise kernel for small mm (K<8, N<8) instead of cuBLAS",module: advanced indexing,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"178040, 183988, 186348, 187988, 188477, 188675, 188704, 188706, 188707, 188708, 188709, 188710, 188711, 188712, 188713, 188714, 188715, 188716, 188717, 188721, 188891","181726, 181727, 181728, 183511, 184276, 187315, 187318, 187989, 188268, 188931, 188996, 189149, 189186, 189297",21,14,failed_ci_checks,PR #189149 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",1357f2b74327fe98a8740b67c9da5a3e33a7a8d74d6c68f5bf937b1d1935f3bc
BUNDLE-008,bundle:bundle-008,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: aotdispatch (3 issues + 3 PRs),pr,185891,[dynamo] Guard AOTAutograd input mutation overlap changes,module: aotdispatch,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"93617, 178680, 188133","184481, 184694, 185891",3,3,failed_ci_checks,PR #185891 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",e73ccc58b5ca1a244df2ba6f798ee008917041a7ef6f53de71abcfdbc736437a
BUNDLE-009,bundle:bundle-009,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: arm (3 issues + 2 PRs),pr,185946,[CUDA] Warn instead of assert in `reportProcessMemoryInfo` to prevent crash on Tegra OOM,module: arm,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"16706, 185240, 186374","185946, 186375",3,2,failed_ci_checks,PR #185946 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",b34a79bd82ead0537ff4efbf93d697c60729751160d4d3f011fe8414f9163cc9
BUNDLE-010,bundle:bundle-010,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: bfloat16 (2 issues + 3 PRs),pr,186358,Fix output mismtach for F.softshrink with bfloat16 and float scalar,module: bfloat16,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"185470, 185484","185846, 186358, 187609",2,3,failed_ci_checks,PR #186358 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",b7cc0469d8f22999be39652efdcbd5845d793cc5e0bcd75f3c9b3b47bf577921
BUNDLE-011,bundle:bundle-011,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: nans and infs (3 issues + 1 PR),pr,189045,Fix NaN gradients in nn.MultiheadAttention for fully-masked rows (#41…,module: nans and infs,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"40932, 41508, 55056",189045,3,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #189045 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",ae33edeb54cca9bcaba14d3af6d6d615ec3a1c8f519bce4d2a2f21ffeb6adf0d
BUNDLE-012,bundle:bundle-012,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: bfloat16 (3 issues + 1 PR),pr,188998,[inductor] Fix bf16 matmul accumulation precision in Triton templates (#188492),module: bfloat16,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"188492, 188841, 189287",188998,3,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #188998 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",66f87d28ffcdd38fbeed49565b079d1f3c0f24283179fee3064ee3e635dc3462
BUNDLE-013,bundle:bundle-013,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: crash (3 issues + 1 PR),pr,184621,Fix Dynamo torch.Size from tensor shape inputs,module: crash,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"182649, 182651, 182652",184621,3,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #184621 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8).","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integra...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",df3b0e8284b5105db567a486b478e0f64ec9962bd58c08814eafc3e2249372a1
BUNDLE-014,bundle:bundle-014,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: ci (2 issues + 2 PRs),pr,189294,[CI] Realign scipy after nvmath install to fix H100 smoke NumPy ABI crash,module: ci,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"173059, 189034","189294, 189295",2,2,failed_ci_checks,PR #189294 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",f6cb09610f7ca814acd523525c8e2d5dbd84a35da282cbc59d2b250ab331a4b4
BUNDLE-015,bundle:bundle-015,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: correctness (silent) (2 issues + 2 PRs),pr,187354,Match Inductor i0/i1 infinities to eager CUDA,module: correctness (silent),"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"187332, 188545","187354, 188556",2,2,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #187354 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=APPROVED; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",f8e7eae2a7664b944be1981e3d498588d1205627a614fb15552517fe7f6f2745
BUNDLE-016,bundle:bundle-016,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: correctness (silent) (2 issues + 2 PRs),pr,187908,[fix] torch.where silently overflows fp16 scalars (issue #187429),module: correctness (silent),Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"171356, 187429","185756, 187908",2,2,contributor_update_needed,PR #187908 is contributor-owned until requested changes or review questions are answered.,Keep parked or close after maintainer review if the contributor path is no longer active; do not ask for maintainer work first.,medium,reviewDecision=CHANGES_REQUESTED; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",2816ea3b823ee390ac0960375ef19d54c432b187aecb443d8bfb0db2795fcc46
BUNDLE-017,bundle:bundle-017,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: oncall: export (2 issues + 1 PR),pr,185496,Fix export autograd.grad saved tensor tracing,oncall: export,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"146719, 155044",185496,2,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #185496 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g).","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g). Review signal: My agent says I rebased this onto current main and...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",5068ddc46bbceaf596aec11b8cbf5b5603f59ee49832188e110bab2d0a0146f5
BUNDLE-018,bundle:bundle-018,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: aotdispatch (2 issues + 1 PR),pr,184632,Fix CUDA fake strides for mixed dtype pointwise ops,module: aotdispatch,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"182200, 184101",184632,2,1,contributor_update_needed,PR #184632 is contributor-owned until requested changes or review questions are answered.,Keep parked or close after maintainer review if the contributor path is no longer active; do not ask for maintainer work first.,medium,reviewDecision=CHANGES_REQUESTED; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",5aa20afd68215ad11e411afad3ea8bd82c3cd9934a81efd95f60d95e7c6133db
BUNDLE-019,bundle:bundle-019,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: crash (2 issues + 1 PR),pr,184628,Fix SingletonInt static guard evaluation,module: crash,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"182217, 183369",184628,2,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #184628 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",75280f1d082e2598b887886e01998472f2292794a8d936925c594d0784d94845
BUNDLE-020,bundle:bundle-020,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: correctness (silent) (2 issues + 1 PR),pr,184392,Fix ModularIndexing printer semantics,module: correctness (silent),"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"119883, 187027",184392,2,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #184392 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",4a1b30d2f312edc14b410c1b0d6872eb64e0c67170689c5d7cdc0ef9e74b9e8b
BUNDLE-021,bundle:bundle-021,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: aotdispatch (2 issues + 1 PR),pr,183654,Fix Inductor CPU group norm affine precision,module: aotdispatch,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"181696, 183120",183654,2,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #183654 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",fc77720549d41b5bcc7a30cb271016031f31c6bffdf2deacc6d72c616bbf6d90
BUNDLE-022,bundle:bundle-022,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: nn (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,189273,Fix nn.functional.threshold OpInfo reference for strict NumPy uint8 casting,module: nn,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,189267,189273,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #189273 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",a4246556c98b38646a23ceb54318838e79edbc79454ff6f2cfda1e7854b53681
BUNDLE-023,bundle:bundle-023,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: autograd (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,189233,[MPS] Fix avg_pool2d/adaptive_avg_pool2d backward on channels_last inputs,module: autograd,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,175190,189233,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #189233 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",9a827fab4dd9e18fb82e9c2ab3701f6d2f8a128f6880da56a205e119054dd24f
BUNDLE-024,bundle:bundle-024,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: correctness (silent) (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,189129,inductor: Fix non-deterministic gradients in slice_scatter backward fusion,module: correctness (silent),"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,188890,189129,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #189129 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",3076951f99e5ce5f404b9e257627f87069c7952337768f26f7b7aab10fcd1c91
BUNDLE-025,bundle:bundle-025,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: correctness (silent) (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,188791,Fix MKL VML first-call dispatch race producing silent low-precision results,module: correctness (silent),"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,188792,188791,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #188791 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=4,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",cbed237a0e6498d5b63c30cf38bcbfefccfe5c8fa128bbae8c8751cd188a8a24
BUNDLE-026,bundle:bundle-026,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: crash (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,188605,Fix infinite recursion with pybind11 enum conversions,module: crash,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,188547,188605,1,1,contributor_update_needed,PR #188605 is contributor-owned until requested changes or review questions are answered.,Keep parked or close after maintainer review if the contributor path is no longer active; do not ask for maintainer work first.,medium,reviewDecision=CHANGES_REQUESTED; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",478bbb0ff5bb691d23f02bba04c1091f90198ae534e073fefb91a23df81a861a
BUNDLE-027,bundle:bundle-027,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: correctness (silent) (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,188546,[Inductor] Fix log_sigmoid_forward flushing float32 subnormals to +0.0 on CUDA,module: correctness (silent),"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,188541,188546,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #188546 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",ad3101d05d852f7dd2448058aedac24a94063cab0decc998c0ff63aee6a2d12f
BUNDLE-028,bundle:bundle-028,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: crash (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,188114,Fix CK SDPA flash attention on gfx1200/gfx1201 (RDNA4),module: crash,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,188113,188114,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #188114 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=APPROVED; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",d52c4fc8353a3ac26ff86c9a9de9a10a8923b74790d61eab0fb9b9016164672e
BUNDLE-029,bundle:bundle-029,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: crash (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,188047,fix(dlpack): raise Python RuntimeError instead of aborting for negative DLPack strides,module: crash,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,188023,188047,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #188047 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",34646801082e29dea40497fa42a8c01f4e81e86a9ad3d467ad75df65744343c4
BUNDLE-030,bundle:bundle-030,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: autograd (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,188039,autograd: fix PyObject* refcount leak in setup_context path,module: autograd,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,188034,188039,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #188039 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",819a1fb125e75a75eebd7905d6972f86874e644e7402de62e0af043029f108ac
BUNDLE-031,bundle:bundle-031,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: crash (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,187955,Make expandable-segment Handle a move-only RAII owner and exception-safe,module: crash,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,188008,187955,1,1,contributor_update_needed,PR #187955 is contributor-owned until requested changes or review questions are answered.,Keep parked or close after maintainer review if the contributor path is no longer active; do not ask for maintainer work first.,medium,reviewDecision=CHANGES_REQUESTED; stale_days=10,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",bccf791837c292b39b8c3c01fc816fa6d3c9675cee633c49926cb9806c0fc518
BUNDLE-032,bundle:bundle-032,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: correctness (silent) (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,187493,Fix Inductor nextafter for low precision CUDA tensors,module: correctness (silent),"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,187340,187493,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #187493 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",bdfea31db72c712cc0987236e18ff0c1938511b3a6882ccffe2fc852b63afac0
BUNDLE-033,bundle:bundle-033,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamic shapes (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,187486,Fix unbacked memo reuse during fake replay,module: dynamic shapes,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,187415,187486,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #187486 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",8393d8a8d02457a3f019f5e632a35daeaee3aa7f96aa110fb3815e1199abcbec
BUNDLE-034,bundle:bundle-034,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: aotdispatch (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,187311,Preserve forward AD tangents for Inductor dual inputs,module: aotdispatch,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,187284,187311,1,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #187311 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_cpp_wrapper, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g).","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_cpp_wrapper, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_cpp_wrapper, 1, 2,...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",68f50e5e9b14c9cfd641c9bffd644314781b804c8ef832288155ab9b196a8280
BUNDLE-035,bundle:bundle-035,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: cpu (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,187104,Fix embedding_bag CPU segfault when offsets is empty and indices is not,module: cpu,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,175370,187104,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #187104 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",c689e65c4d195b6f0c48ba633af18ed30f1456be29a77b7582d74d20981a5592
BUNDLE-036,bundle:bundle-036,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: aotdispatch (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186622,Fix bf16 autocast precision barriers in Inductor,module: aotdispatch,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,168126,186622,1,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #186622 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g).","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (i...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",1a290c774f1361b322094469918010388638e692062b8caec36a59bc00b3102c
BUNDLE-037,bundle:bundle-037,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: bc-breaking (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186583,Propagate contextvars to Python autograd functions,module: bc-breaking,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,186537,186583,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #186583 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=APPROVED; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",92701b4a7d8fde7f9d6fdd9f1db5b5e9c7c6cb0c54393eea63c768c6a34c7d91
BUNDLE-038,bundle:bundle-038,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: custom-operators (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186454,Warn on unsupported custom op schema types,module: custom-operators,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,124863,186454,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #186454 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",5ea97548d143dc7fcdca5e9522f706e41754726a22c69fe6858b5ad883762855
BUNDLE-039,bundle:bundle-039,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: inductor (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186395,Preserve overlap deps without blocking fusion,module: inductor,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,186084,186395,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #186395 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",4e1472be51d4d159f2ce6b4d229bf4f0d9893dcf50e758499e1520eea430c24d
BUNDLE-040,bundle:bundle-040,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: inductor (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186252,[inductor] Fix truncdiv off-by-one on CUDA with _div_rn,module: inductor,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,184408,186252,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #186252 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",fd062cc6d2218b5bbfcfa916b05abf308785ac7dd62968521a38ae2fc75009ed
BUNDLE-041,bundle:bundle-041,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: crash (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185349,Fix flex decoding BLOCK_M validation for short GQA,module: crash,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,160018,185349,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #185349 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",05bc64e5f196b7481685fc38a8aa7da77040a87eec5fb0c74ed416818964c14b
BUNDLE-042,bundle:bundle-042,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: cuda graphs (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,184970,Preserve pin_memory in generated view copy kernels,module: cuda graphs,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,171894,184970,1,1,contributor_update_needed,PR #184970 is contributor-owned until requested changes or review questions are answered.,Keep parked or close after maintainer review if the contributor path is no longer active; do not ask for maintainer work first.,medium,reviewDecision=CHANGES_REQUESTED; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",07876915d14344b8a511988b3136435d560d1e29a9498542223507342ef99044
BUNDLE-043,bundle:bundle-043,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: decompositions (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,184848,Fix nearest upsample scale shortcuts in compile,module: decompositions,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,175154,184848,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #184848 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",8355bf8f0f5296e5e7ee7fbf1e685bfdbd04fffdd6adeb32b53f24c17419a8ea
BUNDLE-044,bundle:bundle-044,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: inductor (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,184153,[Inductor] Clone cudagraph-owned grads before replay,module: inductor,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,146569,184153,1,1,contributor_update_needed,PR #184153 is contributor-owned until requested changes or review questions are answered.,Keep parked or close after maintainer review if the contributor path is no longer active; do not ask for maintainer work first.,medium,reviewDecision=CHANGES_REQUESTED; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",be0438f31d9cb989092fd6ea8d6be67bbe91924fe9f26f790f0481829454f3bd
BUNDLE-045,bundle:bundle-045,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: cuda (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,183881,Fix online softmax epilogue fusion for T5,module: cuda,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,177118,183881,1,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #183881 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_models_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8).","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_models_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_models_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8).",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",268709369b045efd2af9c2ed20b559925e9e634593f7c5403d3657d379422ee4
BUNDLE-046,bundle:bundle-046,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: crash (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,183701,Fix CPU vectorized reduction tail stores,module: crash,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,181690,183701,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #183701 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",e9f111966fc5365f5677885fd20bca43e2c71dfedf242786f090d88a199336b6
BUNDLE-047,bundle:bundle-047,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: crash (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,181516,Fix heap-buffer-overflow in torch.linalg.eig on subnormal real inputs,module: crash,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,162358,181516,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #181516 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",06b4035207ae40b019b858f0d890a99736fc06e13790d38d142e19f4254ba393
BUNDLE-048,bundle:bundle-048,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: crash (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,181036,Clamp spdiags diagonal length to zero for out-of-range offsets,module: crash,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,178089,181036,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #181036 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=APPROVED; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",c8bd300fa837f53271a0ce43e16a7bb7349b4ae01b84d6bbd80e2452b9c48639
BUNDLE-049,bundle:bundle-049,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: autograd (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,176234,[autograd] Explicitly error when layer_norm computes 3rd order derivatives,module: autograd,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,186256,176234,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #176234 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",924ec72dbfea8471df483c9b86d3ccf7a4fa2d27f58cf5b6669fa345d162fe69
BUNDLE-050,bundle:bundle-050,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: crash (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,176070,[rnn] Prevent LSTMCell segfault on input/hidden shape mismatch,module: crash,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,175978,176070,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #176070 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",80046b53d950002cea5ec929165874cf93faf2194ae2d22834924c913287808f
BUNDLE-051,bundle:bundle-051,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: dynamic shapes (3 issues + 1 PR),pr,184983,Make SDPA backend checks safe for unbacked head dims,module: dynamic shapes,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"124502, 170127, 174608",184983,3,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #184983 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",25b915b8b72720d21a234da1d5b9e6aea7befe6b45b700f4a1e1161e40387f8f
BUNDLE-052,bundle:bundle-052,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dtensor (2 issues + 1 PR),pr,184508,Fix export with unused DTensor param attrs,module: dtensor,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"175467, 184229",184508,2,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #184508 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",5d92584854c8729784b964dedbca14b8c8103782bc5976c5e0219edb69e1d0fb
BUNDLE-053,bundle:bundle-053,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: compile-time (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,189124,[inductor] Cache DSR-expanded single-config reductions,module: compile-time,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,189121,189124,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #189124 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",14bc5493fcb4c22e756afcea5ba4688f985af576544276c9d0d80ca349caeb3e
BUNDLE-054,bundle:bundle-054,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: oncall: export (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,188965,Fix non-deterministic node ordering in get_source_partitions(),oncall: export,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,147170,188965,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #188965 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",94218f62825bd0496821643130b657f470687eeeaa13cc5ec431c667be0edefb
BUNDLE-055,bundle:bundle-055,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: oncall: distributed (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,188698,Make Fsspec filesystem checkpointing public and exposing cache_staged_state_dict to enable async save,oncall: distributed,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,188772,188698,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #188698 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=APPROVED; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",7fe94c9bb3584283e4c1abeb43d67188d686509fee9a43c999d7b243319f1551
BUNDLE-056,bundle:bundle-056,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: oncall: quantization (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,187481,Add overflow check to FBGEMM version of quantize_val_arm,oncall: quantization,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,187480,187481,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #187481 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=APPROVED; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",20d2699e4237b5bd4ba23bedd6280863590a12a9425a9686f69b6325e50263dd
BUNDLE-057,bundle:bundle-057,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamic shapes (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186043,Lower symbolic bool not to torch.sym_not,module: dynamic shapes,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,143157,186043,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #186043 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",ae5d33a12278f162a4e3972f932d9a5e39aa9e7993984cf20f00e1b8dae5630d
BUNDLE-058,bundle:bundle-058,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: oncall: export (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185892,Improve export device mismatch errors,oncall: export,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,184841,185892,1,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #185892 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), +1 more.","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), +1 more, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integra...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",b293bde249048a72949641d94bb0493685c4a2b21bc89574cc42d15a88582f7c
BUNDLE-059,bundle:bundle-059,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: oncall: export (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185804,Fix non-strict export tensor len handling,oncall: export,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,147326,185804,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #185804 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",d13aaf4ab1d6fe45198ff6301ae12709d491bc3e7f00c4e1b3721d0fa79f34ef
BUNDLE-060,bundle:bundle-060,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: oncall: cpu inductor (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185691,Avoid UB in float to signed integer casts,oncall: cpu inductor,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,151510,185691,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #185691 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=APPROVED; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",4b4506a350a3c2cbc2fac68bf6058a5c85057ba9f3746754016bbacd63668fdb
BUNDLE-061,bundle:bundle-061,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: oncall: cpu inductor (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185324,Reject mixed-device fake convolution inputs,oncall: cpu inductor,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,160399,185324,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #185324 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",8ac76abec3201e0b563b8de356c68d54fa8b7bd4430df865fba4f7131b5b7d80
BUNDLE-062,bundle:bundle-062,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: oncall: export (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185108,Prevent non-strict export from leaking fake buffers,oncall: export,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,163189,185108,1,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #185108 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g).","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g). Review signal: My agent says I rebased this PR onto current main t...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",f3c2e09b5e503eba4328a8766c1eeff611d3e4932512f768145290a1165dbc78
BUNDLE-063,bundle:bundle-063,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: oncall: export (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185069,Fix AOTI Windows cross-compile package loading,oncall: export,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,166093,185069,1,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #185069 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, lf-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), +1 more.","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, lf-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), +1 more, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, lf-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (i...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",84570541a56deafdd762ec3d32efd3b4c06d712acbfa73338d55b65607a0b2d3
BUNDLE-064,bundle:bundle-064,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: oncall: export (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,184967,Fix export CIA decomps with backend kernels,oncall: export,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,171897,184967,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #184967 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",b08fd01622aa795417eebc60f61e0294a83dc0cd4b4d5425952118b580dfc962
BUNDLE-065,bundle:bundle-065,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: oncall: export (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,184966,Preserve unflattened module forward signatures,oncall: export,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,171964,184966,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #184966 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",8f36fbe53db47ed53488e406c52ec8ef0ce82dbac0da26c52c1c47f5ddb081fb
BUNDLE-066,bundle:bundle-066,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: oncall: export (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,184964,Handle tensor scalar slice bounds in export setitem,oncall: export,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,171974,184964,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #184964 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",a4007b6fda64a42316ec40bd6b18408c4d10d18a79568db84b5498b9c807944a
BUNDLE-067,bundle:bundle-067,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: oncall: export (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,184963,Fix FakeTensor shallow copy state,oncall: export,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,171977,184963,1,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #184963 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), +1 more.","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), +1 more, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (i...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",00ef76a1dc711822c617165b689ea29e898fc03a714a5f3a16beb0542c330bf8
BUNDLE-068,bundle:bundle-068,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: oncall: export (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,184961,Fix packed RNN export fake metadata,oncall: export,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,171978,184961,1,1,contributor_update_needed,PR #184961 is contributor-owned until requested changes or review questions are answered.,Keep parked or close after maintainer review if the contributor path is no longer active; do not ask for maintainer work first.,medium,reviewDecision=CHANGES_REQUESTED; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",9930065c5dfc48f1808779ad35846b9c5bc1361770365d808b9e3efb2fc71bae
BUNDLE-069,bundle:bundle-069,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: correctness (silent) (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,184950,Fix mkldnn transposed conv pointwise shape inference,module: correctness (silent),"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,172711,184950,1,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #184950 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, linux-jammy-cuda13.0-py3.10-gcc11 / test (default, 2, 5, linux.g6.4xlarge.experimental.nvidia.gpu), linux-jammy-cuda13.0-py3.10-gcc11 / test-osdc (default, 1, 5, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-l4), linux-jammy-rocm-py3.10-mi355 / test (default, 1, 10, linux.rocm.gpu.gfx950.1).","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, linux-jammy-cuda13.0-py3.10-gcc11 / test (default, 2, 5, linux.g6.4xlarge.experimental.nvidia.gpu), linux-jammy-cuda13.0-py3.10-gcc11 / test-osdc (default, 1, 5, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-l4), linux-jammy-rocm-py3.10-mi355 / test (default, 1, 10, linux.rocm.gpu.gfx950.1), rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, linux-jammy-cuda13.0-py3.10-gcc11 / test (default, 2, 5, linux.g6.4xlarge.experimental.nvidia.gpu), linux-jammy-cuda13.0-py3.10-gcc11 / test-osdc (default, 1, 5, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-l4), linux-jammy-rocm-py3.10-mi355 / test (default, 1, 10, linux.rocm.gpu.gfx950.1).",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",c74f80d39bfaa9bfb75e7dd681b40c9fd1e0504562af3cbbcb21421065511ea6
BUNDLE-070,bundle:bundle-070,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: oncall: export (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,184948,Fix dynamo export for tensor closures in output pytrees,oncall: export,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,172839,184948,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #184948 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",27634fe3cac1379cf1c5a0ed5d8b55d332d40a0edb5c721fc3871d0303b2dc6e
BUNDLE-071,bundle:bundle-071,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: oncall: export (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,184787,[export] Deserialize PT2 schema in C++ during load,oncall: export,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,176428,184787,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #184787 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",546d27e7727b9a4b70df2f8af703e040ef08baccdf92c38fe515f3fdb9edb8d8
BUNDLE-072,bundle:bundle-072,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: oncall: export (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,184667,Fix cond branch tensor constants in run_decompositions,oncall: export,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,180354,184667,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #184667 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",4d55925611d3baece24ffc6c0d9580aef91f767e85985d2e04b0172e11c65138
BUNDLE-073,bundle:bundle-073,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: arm (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,182224,Enable skipped static_runtime tests on AArch64,module: arm,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,178522,182224,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #182224 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",8ca09c59378b648f03dbd68bcf446a3f1dd2a1d79a209ae84603b47578300a4e
BUNDLE-074,bundle:bundle-074,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: oncall: distributed (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,178844,[c10d] Support stacked output tensors in Gloo all_gather_into_tensor …,oncall: distributed,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,178798,178844,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #178844 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",13ca35d576116ce2fc6c60c65212efbd95f9f7c4903e746597fe304dd2d34222
BUNDLE-075,bundle:bundle-075,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: onnx (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185300,Fix AttrProxy module reuse in Dynamo,module: onnx,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,161053,185300,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #185300 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",dbf47e21c678698b69621c92331f9651a694220548b732ac632d93a3ed7244b5
BUNDLE-076,bundle:bundle-076,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: oncall: export (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185025,[export][serde] Initialize symbol ranges before constants,oncall: export,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,167872,185025,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #185025 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",8b8bd7bc8fdadb191fe84b09988fc18ef869319b12344329e6c0fbe4902a4b7e
BUNDLE-077,bundle:bundle-077,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: arm (3 issues + 1 PR),pr,166876,[ci][cpu] Update AArch64 manylinux compiler to GCC14,module: arm,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"168288, 172445, 172632",166876,3,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #166876 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",0622461bc70d7e36d62a2b94f2d892110f68cb785dc6d02004cd1feaf5b1aa3d
BUNDLE-078,bundle:bundle-078,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: crash (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186021,[Inductor][CPU] Guard compiled integer div by zero,module: crash,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,143649,186021,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #186021 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",1d6564327d3e5f879b50ab7272a03824469372aef3f3de26861e1e84b611d329
BUNDLE-079,bundle:bundle-079,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: dynamo (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185984,Fix Dynamo out= resize for internal tensors,module: dynamo,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,145220,185984,1,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #185984 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8).","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8).",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",eef4633d17c27f8d3ad095f503a385422202c80fd6a3c8901fa26c27152de5b5
BUNDLE-080,bundle:bundle-080,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: crash (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185809,Fix as_strided_copy storage bounds in Inductor,module: crash,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,147077,185809,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #185809 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",0c5add6f45ae1fbf9969b85217a1a4d93a73647bb4cb46fe53a9cb798c8fce3a
BUNDLE-081,bundle:bundle-081,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: crash (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,181062,Validate grad_output shape in multi_margin_loss_backward,module: crash,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,146790,181062,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #181062 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",2625c1fba75df50f69848c3ee6ae6fb40e17a7be9f0130798de14e2242c20cfc
BUNDLE-082,bundle:bundle-082,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: aotinductor (10 issues + 7 PRs),pr,186361,Improve autograd.Function backward graph grad names,module: aotinductor,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"130182, 136216, 137520, 140842, 144360, 145093, 145231, 158088, 186031, 186136","183884, 184161, 185433, 185976, 186011, 186094, 186361",10,7,failed_ci_checks,"PR #186361 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g).","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (i...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",4eb94d8ad262d64d1bb4abd2a24b2a876152b08ceaeb5df50612f39a0b5ece7c
BUNDLE-083,bundle:bundle-083,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: dynamo (7 issues + 5 PRs),pr,185953,Clear Dynamo weakrefs before graph-break resumes,module: dynamo,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"145529, 153056, 170137, 170770, 170781, 186796, 187008","184975, 184976, 185953, 186801, 187090",7,5,failed_ci_checks,"PR #185953 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, lf-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g).","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, lf-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, lf-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (i...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",19278b5ca2c53a46a948eb6c427c8bdf077ba915f450df29cac8930a2f4408af
BUNDLE-084,bundle:bundle-084,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: oncall: export (3 issues + 2 PRs),pr,185059,Fix non-strict export tensor subclass attr tracing,oncall: export,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"167007, 170672, 188153","184978, 185059",3,2,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #185059 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",c7f4ced5f868fc7b79fcb7a56b8bd2473b1729d3a2652fd51a2a924aa6b2e674
BUNDLE-085,bundle:bundle-085,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: error checking (3 issues + 1 PR),pr,186016,Reject invalid bitwise dtypes in Inductor lowering,module: error checking,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"139124, 144247, 144362",186016,3,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #186016 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",bbe5363975dbe8eb7c29fa6baae4b8b6fa592ff1fa91955680b7605dffbe2876
BUNDLE-086,bundle:bundle-086,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: oncall: cpu inductor (3 issues + 1 PR),pr,185939,Fix int8 WoQ GEMM residual epilogue fusion,oncall: cpu inductor,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"145687, 145709, 145711",185939,3,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #185939 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g).","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (i...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",7dbf7cb6ed82c456e1031756e663a15ea96966404caa569d7fcb2910cc55ba8f
BUNDLE-087,bundle:bundle-087,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: aotdispatch (3 issues + 1 PR),pr,185124,Fix prims.broadcast_in_dim functionalization,module: aotdispatch,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"157610, 162734, 163037",185124,3,1,contributor_update_needed,PR #185124 is contributor-owned until requested changes or review questions are answered.,Keep parked or close after maintainer review if the contributor path is no longer active; do not ask for maintainer work first.,medium,reviewDecision=CHANGES_REQUESTED; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",1cf6f713185a7bea61ec1bdd75ed96d174b50d2bb02de2cb26094e36393f3af2
BUNDLE-088,bundle:bundle-088,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: oncall: export (2 issues + 2 PRs),pr,186418,Fix AOT export GraphModule serialization,oncall: export,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"128554, 161671","185170, 186418",2,2,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #186418 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",9a3876c8b9885a9ab02c7942d975a1b0e842f4bccde7c0b29dcf42708a00352e
BUNDLE-089,bundle:bundle-089,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: aotdispatch (2 issues + 1 PR),pr,185803,Fix joint export for tied parameter aliases,module: aotdispatch,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"101192, 147380",185803,2,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #185803 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",1566bb17f9e7e1c3adc407e5351763a779987c0eb72eda2b3543a9e83ae9a74f
BUNDLE-090,bundle:bundle-090,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: oncall: export (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186900,Improve pytree missing registration error,oncall: export,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,140615,186900,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #186900 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",23e5be16d9feac92943530030baa54d14f18db9e014e68c7284578fa4292e366
BUNDLE-091,bundle:bundle-091,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: oncall: export (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186898,Add always-on AOTI input rank checks,oncall: export,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,141115,186898,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #186898 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",0c062fbaa33b4ab2dac319753fd12e0dfca311effd805a5faf9a17451427aeed
BUNDLE-092,bundle:bundle-092,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: oncall: export (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186894,Fix non-strict export of vmap tensor indexing,oncall: export,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,158540,186894,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #186894 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",98ef9512fa75afaa319e846ecb2c9adf603eb60081eb3890695ae5c85970e5fa
BUNDLE-093,bundle:bundle-093,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: oncall: export (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186879,Fix export dynamic shapes for variadic kwargs,oncall: export,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,164313,186879,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #186879 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",ca72b21a98b859c92e1ee6960f226130b2da5ef39e35414bab46f873771e680a
BUNDLE-094,bundle:bundle-094,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: ci (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186833,Remove stale export OpInfo xfails,module: ci,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,170539,186833,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #186833 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",663e5d98c96ca829ceecb118e71ad1bb5ae3f81ae1acd93321315320258b0319
BUNDLE-095,bundle:bundle-095,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: compile ux (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186119,Improve Dynamo observed exception messages,module: compile ux,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,140607,186119,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #186119 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",aec5be7d96ef0d542389f89c1144fc42afd74eb06113008e396a3a23e300e982
BUNDLE-096,bundle:bundle-096,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: oncall: cpu inductor (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186118,Preserve guard eval defaulting without callback churn,oncall: cpu inductor,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,140683,186118,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #186118 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",cfdf2e9c7f3c9639cc58c7423b2ea58ef20abff55335c8c40c10188951a34216
BUNDLE-097,bundle:bundle-097,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: oncall: export (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186058,Preserve export graph metadata during normalization,oncall: export,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,141640,186058,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #186058 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",525bccfe100be7514393d41d489f01db7231102c39e2ed44eb358b87edefb4c2
BUNDLE-098,bundle:bundle-098,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: oncall: export (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185952,Support compiled async all_reduce wait,oncall: export,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,145574,185952,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #185952 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",d7364095481678e6be25960195a6a155909f504e92a34a508e0eb02f9ae041b3
BUNDLE-099,bundle:bundle-099,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: oncall: export (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185926,Preserve tuple arguments in export serde,oncall: export,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,145785,185926,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #185926 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",dc668de0d78653808df45622ca7c4e79cdc7d0860453faa4854b764ed395e6b9
BUNDLE-100,bundle:bundle-100,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: oncall: export (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185568,Fix export of arange with data-dependent float step,oncall: export,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,153247,185568,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #185568 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",9283f24fa260e3e6c12c15c00e9a633a5fc9e5c44ec8267265b07fdbf02faafd
BUNDLE-101,bundle:bundle-101,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: oncall: export (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185564,Handle pre-dispatch export of subclass tensor constants,oncall: export,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,153387,185564,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #185564 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",b7755e118f88535f491239aa7099ad4db269ab84b8acb45d5c5887ba64a5580d
BUNDLE-102,bundle:bundle-102,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamo (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185545,Handle symbolic bounds in slice decomposition,module: dynamo,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,154137,185545,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #185545 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",6b3d12140f36cd354c49af6233f497b4d77b1f314225423070f2913a873b8f2a
BUNDLE-103,bundle:bundle-103,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: oncall: export (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185504,Support unbacked SymInt closures in cond export,oncall: export,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,154559,185504,1,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #185504 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_models_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8).","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_models_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_models_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8).",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",879f3055b37f3f7987cf29e3586858ddead44630e47d8d45cb5d4a686383f002
BUNDLE-104,bundle:bundle-104,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: oncall: export (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185499,Fix unbacked memo reuse during decomposition retrace,oncall: export,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,154647,185499,1,1,contributor_update_needed,PR #185499 is contributor-owned until requested changes or review questions are answered.,Keep parked or close after maintainer review if the contributor path is no longer active; do not ask for maintainer work first.,medium,reviewDecision=CHANGES_REQUESTED; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",be12b5ffc21ad48b7adfd13ae8e44827ec6042d5bd4c5ec7004bafa76fb4c0e5
BUNDLE-105,bundle:bundle-105,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: infra (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185460,Fix CPU perf smoketest baseline drift checks,module: infra,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,156511,185460,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #185460 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",0531278b9d44b939180dacefecbc46734103c0eaa3524b6946257228c4564038
BUNDLE-106,bundle:bundle-106,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: oncall: cpu inductor (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185450,Fix reinplace alias checks for index_put,oncall: cpu inductor,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,156786,185450,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #185450 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",42ee9ed0c030e687024862cb4af05909dc341853e0be482be139467766cc951c
BUNDLE-107,bundle:bundle-107,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: aotinductor (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185404,[inductor] Fold small-row expanded bmm to mm in post-grad,module: aotinductor,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,159346,185404,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #185404 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",08b27937388b403f16f20ecaa47c89972bc1134883e71292ae818051eb57625c
BUNDLE-108,bundle:bundle-108,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: onnx (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185371,Fix symbolic antialiased resize export shapes,module: onnx,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,159468,185371,1,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #185371 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, win-vs2022-cpu-py3 / build, win-vs2022-cuda13.0-py3 / build, unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g).","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, win-vs2022-cpu-py3 / build, win-vs2022-cuda13.0-py3 / build, unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, win-vs2022-cpu-py3 / build, win-vs2022-cuda13.0-py3 / build, unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g).",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",38aeda9371a44f8e41f68d433f670b243caceb482a13d6ecd3828775bdfc49ce
BUNDLE-109,bundle:bundle-109,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: oncall: export (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185353,Normalize export state names for subclass decomposition,oncall: export,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,159918,185353,1,1,contributor_update_needed,PR #185353 is contributor-owned until requested changes or review questions are answered.,Keep parked or close after maintainer review if the contributor path is no longer active; do not ask for maintainer work first.,medium,reviewDecision=CHANGES_REQUESTED; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",f06e829588e53188e1ea5cd1ac9d0655d1687b312352584caadf3833d62d6344
BUNDLE-110,bundle:bundle-110,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: oncall: export (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185150,Preserve OrderedDict outputs in FX tracing,oncall: export,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,161807,185150,1,1,contributor_update_needed,PR #185150 is contributor-owned until requested changes or review questions are answered.,Keep parked or close after maintainer review if the contributor path is no longer active; do not ask for maintainer work first.,medium,reviewDecision=CHANGES_REQUESTED; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",ef2d385df7f5bf58bf586325c2d3aefc72465c85d4d6afb73e820d3209378d95
BUNDLE-111,bundle:bundle-111,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: aotdispatch (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185140,Preserve reentrant checkpoint in non-strict export,module: aotdispatch,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,162386,185140,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #185140 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",a92430a922b3c97032a538ed318063874541b186e3224805c8337a127858dfe9
BUNDLE-112,bundle:bundle-112,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: oncall: export (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185106,Fix non-strict export state aliases,oncall: export,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,163303,185106,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #185106 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",aa992302d439dc1c03503ccdba499c4e0060ccd8a8469f8d94c2bb43f7a61e1a
BUNDLE-113,bundle:bundle-113,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: oncall: export (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185105,Fix export move_to_device_pass device rewrites,oncall: export,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,163323,185105,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #185105 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",13de415cf328a9fe8ce3672178d0a37435dbbb16e09fdcba0c280c16f5d0fbda
BUNDLE-114,bundle:bundle-114,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: oncall: export (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185100,Keep fake tensor cache synthesis out of proxy traces,oncall: export,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,163713,185100,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #185100 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",4f0f6bdc84d2422a03d9270a1158813e8bb3c1e6a7f17ee5052664f3abadd80e
BUNDLE-115,bundle:bundle-115,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamic shapes (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185084,Avoid contiguity guards on maybe-singleton symbolic dims,module: dynamic shapes,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,165032,185084,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #185084 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",13e39ec6effdaaa8a6ddf911b8cb5a2401b11a4181d31fa564a8d6729019c3e5
BUNDLE-116,bundle:bundle-116,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: oncall: export (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185082,Preserve lifted SymInts during strict export capture,oncall: export,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,165073,185082,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #185082 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",521c90c028e774a1bb22947cdbf45cd418e7306eb475005a185d020c21f3ce9f
BUNDLE-117,bundle:bundle-117,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: oncall: export (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185073,[export] Treat free new-tracer state as constants,oncall: export,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,165641,185073,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #185073 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",af7b415eab0ac0ee3a3d5374ea0c587c182bbbd23dd365fb0736a0cbaf87289b
BUNDLE-118,bundle:bundle-118,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: oncall: export (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,184985,Fix nested compile handling in AOT joint export,oncall: export,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,169991,184985,1,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #184985 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g).","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g).",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",8e3571090a45e1e96d1fa96551fefe8daadbba8ce069d8e968dda45f8c230730
BUNDLE-119,bundle:bundle-119,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: 64-bit (183 issues + 2 PRs),pr,188012,Add sparse triangular_solve CPU fallback,module: 64-bit,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"1359, 1369, 2129, 3877, 8853, 9222, 9674, 10043, 12308, 12498, 13246, 14945, 17902, 18904, 19149, 20433, 22402, 23159, 24041, 24185, 27312, 28090, 28307, 28308, 28318, 28319, 28320, 28329, 28341, 29137, 29758, 29973, 31837, 31945, 32097, 32288, 32293, 32570, 32998, 33041, 34279, 34651, 35529, 35641, 40471, 40568, 40570, 41128, 41793, 43116, 43949, 44634, 45833, 45897, 45996, 46164, 46225, 46544, 46829, 46999, 48088, 48628, 50010, 50342, 50343, 50344, 50345, 50382, 51450, 51509, 51720, 51962, 53441, 53704, 53900, 54766, 55279, 55299, 55366, 56356, 56485, 56586, 56697, 56764, 57610, 57947, 58489, 58734, 58736, 58741, 58742, 58743, 58745, 58770, 58828, 59058, 59099, 59101, 59104, 59545, 59786, 59787, 59868, 60858, 61417, 61453, 61474, 61486, 61490, 61523, 61582, 61653, 62352, 62784, 62812, 63293, 63870, 64023, 64208, 64254, 64359, 64897, 68105, 68291, 69491, 70906, 70910, 70914, 70915, 70916, 70919, 70920, 70921, 70924, 70925, 71209, 71386, 71403, 72824, 76644, 80553, 83818, 86055, 87085, 87358, 87366, 87448, 89255, 92141, 94779, 101699, 103352, 103581, 105465, 106584, 106614, 106667, 106991, 108565, 108977, 109017, 109108, 114951, 115819, 123082, 124505, 127622, 132559, 133676, 135704, 135724, 135826, 136264, 139792, 142358, 143588, 145624, 148077, 150612, 151912, 156308, 165612, 187389","186051, 188012",183,2,failed_ci_checks,PR #186051 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",432087367b3a66565142245df32b79d7a20ab5d7aa071899b7210d16d4bb88ff
BUNDLE-120,bundle:bundle-120,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: activation checkpointing (81 issues + 1 PR),pr,186539,[Dynamo] Limit FX node growth from loop unrolling,module: activation checkpointing,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"2628, 23756, 26288, 29697, 30291, 31557, 32021, 35666, 37410, 41081, 41243, 41353, 42959, 46168, 46184, 50122, 50688, 54389, 55135, 58997, 61686, 62448, 62530, 64730, 66073, 66707, 67586, 67760, 67761, 67958, 68332, 68648, 68978, 68979, 69972, 70173, 71683, 72146, 78917, 79197, 82464, 83159, 86590, 89116, 92884, 94652, 95408, 96136, 101082, 102839, 103444, 103588, 104849, 105255, 106624, 110761, 111003, 111441, 112303, 112901, 113287, 113914, 114206, 115626, 118758, 118966, 125531, 128046, 129889, 148819, 158371, 158968, 159765, 161302, 162591, 166208, 166209, 168044, 171302, 173559, 175891",186539,81,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #186539 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",5dbb0958b2bfb89ebced1ae19f56fea80a130fa1e1cd2eed4c4f027ae1495d29
BUNDLE-121,bundle:bundle-121,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: build (11 issues + 6 PRs),pr,189263,Remove the Miniconda base env from the CD builder images,module: build,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"108406, 119526, 157807, 160875, 163311, 164469, 169479, 179374, 180624, 183913, 188898","180247, 180248, 180250, 185208, 187633, 189263",11,6,failed_ci_checks,PR #189263 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",2ddd9977ace06bc78dd3f79e62245f184cd393867d8c3bb51fcbdc6d1c12c13e
BUNDLE-122,bundle:bundle-122,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamo (2 issues + 1 PR),pr,185085,[dynamo] Support datetime.now attrs as runtime inputs,module: dynamo,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"125171, 164922",185085,2,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #185085 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_models_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8).","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_models_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_models_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8). Review signal: My agent says I rebased the PR onto current main and resubmitted it; the prior CI failures were all SIGKILLs in test_serialization_2gb_file, and current...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",bb2f2bfa88235e2f3fba20176223d7fb1a1ec92df030f86aaba60c47cde23f3a
BUNDLE-123,bundle:bundle-123,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: dtensor (1 issue + 2 PRs),pr,182377,[DTensor] SymmetricMemory-backed DTensors,module: dtensor,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,182382,"182377, 182379",1,2,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #182377 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",2c97a13c6dc19446cea04dd2896e1134f062ccb95be2a26e7ef83cce620ed090
BUNDLE-124,bundle:bundle-124,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: oncall: profiler (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,189097,[RFC] Expose Kineto custom logger registration,oncall: profiler,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,189098,189097,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #189097 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",ab8556bd88b18627028f2696ea7cad5fb43e2fa192c50499e296afa768aa41d0
BUNDLE-125,bundle:bundle-125,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: dynamo (1 issue + 3 PRs),pr,181357,[dynamo] Add polyfill for operator.indexOf,module: dynamo,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,116396,"176830, 181357, 188966",1,3,failed_ci_checks,PR #181357 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",ada213f214e579ed67343fba3b864f742280ebb0b288b80c2880bf86b60ed25d
BUNDLE-126,bundle:bundle-126,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: compile-time (2 issues + 1 PR),pr,187952,Fix out= variant recompilations for torch.max/min/topk,module: compile-time,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"135859, 187953",187952,2,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #187952 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=APPROVED; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=8,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",41ccb98803dffc48ef7169c01fc63cb217f5ecc41436605a0052d01a4f854f28
BUNDLE-127,bundle:bundle-127,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: logging (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,188967,Update logging docs to match current API,module: logging,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,137285,188967,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #188967 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=APPROVED; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",1861cf9ff25011f9f75c412b6c85b5b12522427b88d49de2b5ea6dfb219363d3
BUNDLE-128,bundle:bundle-128,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: dynamic shapes (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186488,Improve schema errors for symbolic int list mismatches,module: dynamic shapes,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,122129,186488,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #186488 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",34f5e0cff3e07fa25f33947288c817b45824c3b7a338ac93fdd218a1cacbf5c5
BUNDLE-129,bundle:bundle-129,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: dynamo (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185782,fix: [PT2] [Hardening] Track recompiles alongside graph breaks in our actu...,module: dynamo,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,113040,185782,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #185782 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",6e258f29c09d7d9c43830534ade1603c40f56d788ea7b1f48530d8c353f1d75e
BUNDLE-130,bundle:bundle-130,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: inductor (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,184460,Remove obsolete Python wrapper symbol extraction,module: inductor,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,102870,184460,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #184460 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",e458e3abcb21315cae788d6f303f8909512be1a40f6b2bd0a0d1ef20044973c6
BUNDLE-131,bundle:bundle-131,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: optimizer (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,179273,[optim] support of dynamic coefficients and normalization in Muon,module: optimizer,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,179250,179273,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #179273 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=7,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",2b2c760c15271141a0d685744599f7d0e03b638479ce63636627ac9e87ca73df
BUNDLE-132,bundle:bundle-132,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: oncall: export (2 issues + 1 PR),pr,185786,Handle non-natural SymPy powers in value range interp,oncall: export,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"136628, 148003",185786,2,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #185786 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",c04a9f027bf18dfb35962b6a39a9fd30c435f06d5a251285223615cda7d0c21e
BUNDLE-133,bundle:bundle-133,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: cuda graphs (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,188641,Mark linalg.eigh as cudagraph-unsafe in Inductor,module: cuda graphs,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,188355,188641,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #188641 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",89b8da4618c369a1871914f647658e3c6db3b2bac557eff602184079f0e67a23
BUNDLE-134,bundle:bundle-134,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: inductor (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186849,Fix CuTeDSL grouped_mm descriptor init shape,module: inductor,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,176178,186849,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #186849 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",6c21b8d52e1199e0449765f2d945df20d926f5781797a80022873668b042044e
BUNDLE-135,bundle:bundle-135,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: proxytensor (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186261,Fix pre-dispatch tracing for saved tensor detach,module: proxytensor,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,137009,186261,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #186261 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",f881f4a6958b98a6e337a65201f5eb407ad88fd61563ed998f0939a2b96698f6
BUNDLE-136,bundle:bundle-136,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: flex attention (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185784,Fix flex attention captured vector gradient scatters,module: flex attention,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,148112,185784,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #185784 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",e68611630d4e07a4e41f11720dfdf296a3874e60d782256af5fbe91b30404567
BUNDLE-137,bundle:bundle-137,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: aotdispatch (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185742,Support None leaves in nonstrict_trace,module: aotdispatch,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,149963,185742,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #185742 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",a4b0141dcb42d0add9699128d2e8519ab6cc95735ea75e1964c9689ce16158c9
BUNDLE-138,bundle:bundle-138,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: faketensor (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185732,Fix nested compile during subclass fake tracing,module: faketensor,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,150262,185732,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #185732 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",5772ac18abd1e8ca4b6f5f0c63d21a510eccaffa001dc191d39cedb9c0c3d993
BUNDLE-139,bundle:bundle-139,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamo (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,184977,Fix Dynamo wrapper method sources for nested compile,module: dynamo,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,170696,184977,1,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #184977 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, unit-test / inductor-cpu-core-test (3.12) / test (inductor_core, 2, 2, linux.c7i.2xlarge).","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, unit-test / inductor-cpu-core-test (3.12) / test (inductor_core, 2, 2, linux.c7i.2xlarge), rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, unit-test / inductor-cpu-core-test (3.12) / test (inductor_core, 2, 2, linux.c7i.2xlarge). Review signal: My agent says I addressed the review note about the single-iteration loop by adding a short comment in the regression test explaining that it mirrors the original nested compile repro. I also rebased and resubmitted t...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",d8f26305fdc556439b5adbf8588a748ccda25c8d8c2518f1bfb3bb6044689316
BUNDLE-140,bundle:bundle-140,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: oncall: pt2 (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,184934,Validate packed RNN batch_sizes before fallback,oncall: pt2,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,173046,184934,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #184934 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",01cd0668ccc74b4533a1c24a6a223f61fc9e04873b1e1d2045cface766f34547
BUNDLE-141,bundle:bundle-141,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: 64-bit (19 issues + 4 PRs),pr,188816,"[Metal][ops] remove nonzero INT_MAX limit, widen to 64-bit (#149325)",module: 64-bit,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"77764, 83264, 83968, 84489, 97310, 98169, 102852, 111173, 113062, 130430, 136692, 140570, 140718, 141287, 149261, 149325, 154052, 157648, 178492","184779, 184780, 186540, 188816",19,4,contributor_update_needed,PR #188816 is contributor-owned until requested changes or review questions are answered.,Keep parked or close after maintainer review if the contributor path is no longer active; do not ask for maintainer work first.,medium,reviewDecision=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",46baf4849802e5828369fe2e367fdc40e4a507b1a02ca5134b4f1bb95e26c6cf
BUNDLE-142,bundle:bundle-142,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: aotdispatch (13 issues + 22 PRs),pr,186476,Fix Dynamo resume tensor lifetimes across graph breaks,module: aotdispatch,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"122512, 156075, 162151, 167729, 167732, 168393, 170487, 170496, 170834, 171158, 174929, 182842, 187806","160585, 163503, 171826, 181680, 184974, 185033, 185034, 185149, 185524, 186100, 186476, 187468, 187469, 187531, 187532, 187707, 188173, 189091, 189092, 189234, 189291, 189324",13,22,failed_ci_checks,PR #186476 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",23fd6be2f7983636d5dcd3a85c493ee8185b9dd1da9ce7953dab2bd1e5102ef8
BUNDLE-143,bundle:bundle-143,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: __torch_dispatch__ (7 issues + 1 PR),pr,186517,Detect aliased subclass inputs after desugaring,module: __torch_dispatch__,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"114397, 114403, 114411, 114412, 114413, 114414, 114415",186517,7,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #186517 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",8a9967edaf431f1adb4e16b4e2c60c68666a98ba75f674659b7b62f89efeba9f
BUNDLE-144,bundle:bundle-144,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: backend (3 issues + 3 PRs),pr,184997,Fix TVM backend scalar tensor inputs,module: backend,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"169111, 169188, 188866","184997, 189010, 189125",3,3,failed_ci_checks,PR #184997 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",b164701f5b6e7f838346c38bb994d4c49efe70f0c83695d6ef876d8a419bd3ce
BUNDLE-145,bundle:bundle-145,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: dynamic shapes (3 issues + 3 PRs),pr,185288,Support symbolic list lengths in Triton grids,module: dynamic shapes,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"161111, 161113, 161119","184051, 185280, 185288",3,3,failed_ci_checks,"PR #185288 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g).","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g). Review signal: My agent says I rebased this PR onto current main, resolved the `torch/_dynamo/variables/lists.py` conflict by preserving the symbolic-length guard with the current `InstructionTransl...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",cc8114fe481e665b156fa878850ed2cafb3422e9665e0e04b8986799d5fdbcf0
BUNDLE-146,bundle:bundle-146,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: compile-time (3 issues + 3 PRs),pr,170644,[dynamo] Support dict assignment with lazy constant keys,module: compile-time,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"174541, 187590, 187591","170092, 170644, 184858",3,3,failed_ci_checks,PR #170644 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup. Review signal: @pytorchbot rebase,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",3b6583adaf3d001671c9f7ac702c538a9b60c6650e7db681481f56aa4053f308
BUNDLE-147,bundle:bundle-147,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: flaky-tests (1 issue + 4 PRs),pr,189286,Fix DeviceContext mode leaks from checkpoint recompute and set_default_device restore,module: flaky-tests,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,189133,"188100, 188299, 188573, 189286",1,4,failed_ci_checks,PR #188573 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",f8d1d7a6fe867e94fd62d4e79739a9bfd0911cb695653f127c3457f25dd4580c
BUNDLE-148,bundle:bundle-148,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: correctness (silent) (3 issues + 1 PR),pr,187243,Reject p < 1 in triplet_margin_loss to prevent NaN from p-norm overflow,module: correctness (silent),"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"184036, 187178, 187179",187243,3,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #187243 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=22,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",bf3a2dd79b0f9a107ca367c763e1af99a9f6e6d1e39281ec5250cf38ed305b65
BUNDLE-149,bundle:bundle-149,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: compile-time (3 issues + 1 PR),pr,186614,Delay RNN graph break until module call,module: compile-time,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"141184, 158007, 185135",186614,3,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #186614 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",4642218dcababa23c2f370b4752a7d705375ea17237313604fc878fbbcbf5faf
BUNDLE-150,bundle:bundle-150,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: dynamo (3 issues + 1 PR),pr,185347,Support torch.compile under user FakeTensorMode,module: dynamo,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"136446, 136586, 160057",185347,3,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #185347 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, linux-jammy-py3.10-clang18-asan / test-osdc (default, 7, 7, mt-l-x86iavx512-16-128), linux-jammy-py3.10-clang18-asan / test-osdc (default, 5, 7, mt-l-x86iavx512-16-128), linux-jammy-py3.10-clang18-asan / test-osdc (default, 6, 7, mt-l-x86iavx512-16-128), linux-jammy-py3.10-clang18-asan / test (default, 2, 7, linux.4xlarge), linux-jammy-py3.10-clang18-asan / test-osdc (default, 3, 7, mt-l-x86iavx512-16-128), +39 more.","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, linux-jammy-py3.10-clang18-asan / test-osdc (default, 7, 7, mt-l-x86iavx512-16-128), linux-jammy-py3.10-clang18-asan / test-osdc (default, 5, 7, mt-l-x86iavx512-16-128), linux-jammy-py3.10-clang18-asan / test-osdc (default, 6, 7, mt-l-x86iavx512-16-128), linux-jammy-py3.10-clang18-asan / test (default, 2, 7, linux.4xlarge), linux-jammy-py3.10-clang18-asan / test-osdc (default, 3, 7, mt-l-x86iavx512-16-128), +39 more, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, linux-jammy-py3.10-clang18-asan / test-osdc (default, 7, 7, mt-l-x86iavx512-16-128), linux-jammy-py3.10-clang18-asan / test-osdc (default, 5, 7, mt-l-x86iavx512-16-128), linux-jammy-py3.10-clang18-asan / test-osdc (default, 6, 7, mt-l-x86iavx512-16-128), linux-jammy-py3.10-clang18-asan / test (default, 2, 7, linux.4xlarge), linux-jammy-py3.10-clang18-asan / test-osdc (default, 3,...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",9ae8cf331e2ba51c8f34d4cfca7ff98dc5aff6a343665cbce7fcc96e597ef212
BUNDLE-151,bundle:bundle-151,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamo (3 issues + 1 PR),pr,184990,[dynamo] Route fake RuntimeError through user exception handlers,module: dynamo,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"157217, 169538, 183887",184990,3,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #184990 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g).","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g). Review signal: My agent says I rebased t...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",843064c3243ddca7e0406291753b8875388183d17de367d36abe095cbceb76b6
BUNDLE-152,bundle:bundle-152,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: dynamo (2 issues + 2 PRs),pr,185050,Handle SymInt sizes in lazy module initialization,module: dynamo,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"167191, 173252","173948, 185050",2,2,failed_ci_checks,PR #173948 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",94ad9bf0b51e226b809eb30ee69a9edf99fe42dcafa90b2574844e555fc0746b
BUNDLE-153,bundle:bundle-153,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: xpu (2 issues + 1 PR),pr,189224,[xpu][skip] Skip test_combo_kernel_dynamic_scale_rblock on XPU,module: xpu,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"187810, 187811",189224,2,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #189224 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",2dc7009fccc906bc2258e76e21997c1caf07414fba1f308b60ad1c237912b701
BUNDLE-154,bundle:bundle-154,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: flaky-tests (2 issues + 1 PR),pr,189215,[MPS] Add `largeTensorTest` to `test_group_norm_backward_large_input`,module: flaky-tests,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"186605, 186867",189215,2,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #189215 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",bb25b38e0784e6b1c41f0bc8ef50901bf35463dc89f2d8f590eb1c67c87f6749
BUNDLE-155,bundle:bundle-155,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: cuda (2 issues + 1 PR),pr,189145,[Dynamo] Preserve Stream/Event subclass types in graph reconstruction,module: cuda,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"188325, 188405",189145,2,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #189145 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",8b8929da5f318cd5fe362000ec2b201a25dbee9ee9b370a166c3fe239fac5527
BUNDLE-156,bundle:bundle-156,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamic shapes (2 issues + 1 PR),pr,188636,Handle reciprocal SymPy powers in shape range eval,module: dynamic shapes,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"188422, 188423",188636,2,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #188636 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",d8f4383a9a6c6043176e7c664889f94bac54db40e6c1db128811936f9dec9a1c
BUNDLE-157,bundle:bundle-157,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: correctness (silent) (2 issues + 1 PR),pr,187353,Preserve signed zero in Triton neg lowering,module: correctness (silent),"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"187336, 187721",187353,2,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #187353 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",ad3819894f40135ea3f927adbb2974f7a288366221898dd9d5e5391c1f7e1ea7
BUNDLE-158,bundle:bundle-158,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: aotdispatch (2 issues + 1 PR),pr,186403,Avoid CUDA init during CPU torch.compile,module: aotdispatch,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"97894, 129131",186403,2,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #186403 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",454507e16c02e71e0e83310fa6c9a17ebcd8fc4895790b20be7c97b6e91048db
BUNDLE-159,bundle:bundle-159,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: custom-operators (2 issues + 1 PR),pr,185718,Fix fake functorch-wrapped tensor handling in jacfwd vmap,module: custom-operators,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"151196, 172428",185718,2,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #185718 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",4f8fa7f51571c3da4d29eaf4ae9c9a00c5510bc40028c24e0fb552519a88df19
BUNDLE-160,bundle:bundle-160,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: dynamic shapes (2 issues + 1 PR),pr,185369,Fix dynamic output sizes for adaptive avg pool lowering,module: dynamic shapes,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"159550, 185575",185369,2,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #185369 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",d601a29884d3c9178d0d65bbcd0a31a29bbea7589d4a5186e2c2f5071da79de5
BUNDLE-161,bundle:bundle-161,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: aotdispatch (2 issues + 1 PR),pr,185043,Functionalize mutations in deferred local_map,module: aotdispatch,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"167568, 182403",185043,2,1,contributor_update_needed,PR #185043 is contributor-owned until requested changes or review questions are answered.,Keep parked or close after maintainer review if the contributor path is no longer active; do not ask for maintainer work first.,medium,reviewDecision=CHANGES_REQUESTED; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",6aa0ece2976fb7c21cce8a8921d4697db864b31e35025098372416ed12366c5a
BUNDLE-162,bundle:bundle-162,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: autograd (2 issues + 1 PR),pr,184958,Prevent escaped vjp TensorWrappers from reaching AOTAutograd,module: autograd,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"172026, 179510",184958,2,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #184958 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, linux-jammy-py3.10-clang18-asan / test (default, 4, 7, linux.4xlarge), linux-jammy-py3.10-clang18-asan / test-osdc (default, 5, 7, mt-l-x86iavx512-16-128), linux-jammy-py3.10-clang18-asan / test-osdc (default, 4, 7, mt-l-x86iavx512-16-128), linux-jammy-py3.10-gcc11 / test-osdc (default, 4, 5, mt-l-x86iavx512-16-128), linux-jammy-py3.10-gcc11 / test (default, 4, 5, linux.4xlarge), +18 more.","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, linux-jammy-py3.10-clang18-asan / test (default, 4, 7, linux.4xlarge), linux-jammy-py3.10-clang18-asan / test-osdc (default, 5, 7, mt-l-x86iavx512-16-128), linux-jammy-py3.10-clang18-asan / test-osdc (default, 4, 7, mt-l-x86iavx512-16-128), linux-jammy-py3.10-gcc11 / test-osdc (default, 4, 5, mt-l-x86iavx512-16-128), linux-jammy-py3.10-gcc11 / test (default, 4, 5, linux.4xlarge), +18 more, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, linux-jammy-py3.10-clang18-asan / test (default, 4, 7, linux.4xlarge), linux-jammy-py3.10-clang18-asan / test-osdc (default, 5, 7, mt-l-x86iavx512-16-128), linux-jammy-py3.10-clang18-asan / test-osdc (default, 4, 7, mt-l-x86iavx512-16-128), linux-jammy-py3.10-gcc11 / test-osdc (default, 4, 5, mt-l-x86iavx512-16-128), linux-jammy-py3.10-gcc11 / test (default, 4, 5, linux.4xlarge),...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",823e5e6b31f466111d2ee643913f9e62390ea4849d6f3e670bd53f1c7a6c2c77
BUNDLE-163,bundle:bundle-163,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: cuda graphs (2 issues + 1 PR),pr,184639,Support None returns from torch.cond,module: cuda graphs,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"181891, 182036",184639,2,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #184639 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_huggingface, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g).","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_huggingface, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_huggingface, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g).",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",124fc772ae14d684d7f816078f3484ec8a6c18627ce56ac042501fb130f0f901
BUNDLE-164,bundle:bundle-164,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: dynamic shapes (2 issues + 1 PR),pr,183908,Fix deferred runtime assert symbol availability,module: dynamic shapes,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"154146, 176770",183908,2,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #183908 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",8eed892f0f40d0af520cc0157ba1c9b9ea884746d96cb70cbc65c7870e61ea64
BUNDLE-165,bundle:bundle-165,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: cpu (2 issues + 1 PR),pr,181895,[CUDA] Fix linspace integer dtype precision mismatch with CPU,module: cpu,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"180156, 181807",181895,2,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #181895 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",269c235eccf0c05aa85fdb1898a057fad915f095f5bdd133ce2739ad7fd6b65f
BUNDLE-166,bundle:bundle-166,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: dynamo (1 issue + 2 PRs),pr,187890,Fix Dynamo metadata sync after inplace tensor mutations,module: dynamo,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,185888,"186205, 187890",1,2,failed_ci_checks,PR #187890 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",6f201f934c156a00ce41bf182d840d551812f63d8f45ca5f5c620c7341f1fa14
BUNDLE-167,bundle:bundle-167,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: onnx (1 issue + 2 PRs),pr,186969,Bump onnx to 1.22.0 (stable) and unify typing-extensions to 4.15.0,module: onnx,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,185955,"185989, 186969",1,2,failed_ci_checks,PR #185989 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup. Review signal: @copilot can you rebase and bump to 1.22rc2?,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",d8ab0ac966b4cc41f27a3ecb359d9468a144947488717435fff4e56f2dd3c4ee
BUNDLE-168,bundle:bundle-168,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: aotinductor (1 issue + 2 PRs),pr,186920,Route overrideable SDPA AOTI calls through dispatcher,module: aotinductor,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,184195,"184308, 186920",1,2,failed_ci_checks,PR #186920 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",107f1877b9eb2619882ca657133de3041fee53370a471c2970efd25944ea77d3
BUNDLE-169,bundle:bundle-169,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: flex attention (1 issue + 2 PRs),pr,186857,Use real flex block counts for autotune inputs,module: flex attention,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,180651,"181096, 186857",1,2,failed_ci_checks,PR #186857 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",c10879b03daa2bc405b9d039c73d771f4ac81858abed2ee95a0fec7ddd2f24b4
BUNDLE-170,bundle:bundle-170,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: complex (1 issue + 2 PRs),pr,183862,[Inductor] Preserve view_as_complex input layout before fake prop,module: complex,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,179368,"179372, 183862",1,2,failed_ci_checks,PR #183862 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",752621325f500e5b855cc535490b2ab4c0f3a0080961706f56845ba87c1784c9
BUNDLE-171,bundle:bundle-171,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: flop counter (1 issue + 2 PRs),pr,187592,Support registered HOPs in FlopCounterMode,module: flop counter,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,134385,"167224, 187592",1,2,failed_ci_checks,PR #167224 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",09e08d2d21261cd429b364e31dc9ce4c246a74972db6175ad59da27f7fe010df
BUNDLE-172,bundle:bundle-172,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: docs (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,189317,[doc] Add accelerator test reuse guide (#181474),module: docs,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,181474,189317,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #189317 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=BLOCKED; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",0886f3d6115a642edabaa952c958a0b001f96bd8da6dba11e08361579d273336
BUNDLE-173,bundle:bundle-173,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: onnx (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,189313,Support aten::cumprod ONNX export via CumProd (opset 26),module: onnx,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,102948,189313,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #189313 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",99fde458ac3cd1c973070d816a30b4d307cdc92a043883fcee8a482e0a9d92ab
BUNDLE-174,bundle:bundle-174,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: custom-operators (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,189288,[inductor] Fix compute_ancestors KeyError from self-referential mutation copy,module: custom-operators,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,189271,189288,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #189288 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",23fdcc378266d7ee62a30b7b58f8bde20669639156ef9a883f4a6672b1f6d240
BUNDLE-175,bundle:bundle-175,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: ci (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,189158,Skip GHA stats artifacts from other workflow attempts,module: ci,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,189157,189158,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #189158 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",93ae1cff889a1458d17ea944fee58ec30d2da63b92618b7fee13e17628e81205
BUNDLE-176,bundle:bundle-176,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: fx (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,189142,fx: Fix incorrect return_annotation for tuple types in operator schemas,module: fx,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,189106,189142,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #189142 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=APPROVED; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",80cd40dcbcfe76baabfda69eccea1d2986793a8600c14b720efba388ae04d6d6
BUNDLE-177,bundle:bundle-177,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: tests (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,189141,"[test] Add opt-in sign-sensitive special-value parity check (copysign, atan2, reciprocal)",module: tests,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,188680,189141,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #189141 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=BLOCKED; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",d13973d2e472b22493f637ef80462c04a8e5cb613ef3b161f10ef434555a7d83
BUNDLE-178,bundle:bundle-178,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: inductor (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,189127,[inductor] Decompose broadcast-bias baddbmm before pointwise,module: inductor,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,187093,189127,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #189127 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",e3ecb752c5e01c52c32661c238eed23f5db57995c93855f24829a5f6a0900991
BUNDLE-179,bundle:bundle-179,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: ci (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,189119,Fix test-jsons artifact upload path,module: ci,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,189118,189119,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #189119 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",23b70823b00272028507ddd2c208b0ef96710ea5e467e40f5b990eae9f0fb2e4
BUNDLE-180,bundle:bundle-180,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: correctness (silent) (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,189038,[MPS] Fix uint8 casting in MPS `copy_` kernels,module: correctness (silent),Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,160744,189038,1,1,contributor_update_needed,PR #189038 is contributor-owned until requested changes or review questions are answered.,Keep parked or close after maintainer review if the contributor path is no longer active; do not ask for maintainer work first.,medium,reviewDecision=CHANGES_REQUESTED; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",f36906dafcc222cae9620bddb888d362e67bb8d14e7a20fe15a8ec80e5ff3dad
BUNDLE-181,bundle:bundle-181,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: inductor (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,189009,[xpu][fix] Enable test_fallback_kernel_with_symexpr_output on XPU with correct head_dim,module: inductor,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,188131,189009,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #189009 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",33de5f4fee7c93be5b3ef976d529ede44aa7c8c48c019d6eb47cc58e8bf2728a
BUNDLE-182,bundle:bundle-182,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: dynamic shapes (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,188994,[dynamic shapes] Preserve algebraic relationships in foreign unbacked SymInt transfer (#188723),module: dynamic shapes,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,188723,188994,1,1,contributor_update_needed,PR #188994 is contributor-owned until requested changes or review questions are answered.,Keep parked or close after maintainer review if the contributor path is no longer active; do not ask for maintainer work first.,medium,reviewDecision=CHANGES_REQUESTED; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",0b5b999677cdc45d496ebda4d9250e8129ae7c9af63692d381dffa5cc4fcd865
BUNDLE-183,bundle:bundle-183,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: fsdp (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,188990,[FSDP] Fix to_cpu when flat_param is already on CPU,module: fsdp,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,188989,188990,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #188990 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=APPROVED; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",e42025286a4742a4109b905ae36b66b05369da4f15e714b0492140f9c5666237
BUNDLE-184,bundle:bundle-184,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: oncall: distributed (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,188980,Fix inconsistent accelerator guard in checkpoint staging test,oncall: distributed,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,188790,188980,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #188980 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=APPROVED; mergeStateStatus=BLOCKED; pending=statusCheckRollup; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",a3077bfc7519f94f594487c6b57dee8fd0678b70a8b62b64bcb3aa292491b7a2
BUNDLE-185,bundle:bundle-185,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: compile ux (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,188913,[inductor] Add triton.cudagraph_max_recorded_sizes to cap dynamic shape re-recording,module: compile ux,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,188150,188913,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #188913 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",a4519311fd858daf7083865687afd29db5b7abbe4b8fe2bff86adb97876eb593
BUNDLE-186,bundle:bundle-186,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: inductor (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,188862,[inductor] Fix bool minimum/maximum crash in index propagation (#188862) (#188862),module: inductor,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,188230,188862,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #188862 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,"reviewDecision=APPROVED; mergeStateStatus=BLOCKED; pending=statusCheckRollup, macos-py3-arm64 / test (default, 1, 3, macos-m1-stable), macos-py3-arm64 / test (openreg, 1, 1, macos-m1-stable), macos-py3-arm64 / test (default, 3, 3, macos-m1-stable), macos-py3-arm64 / test (default, 2, 3, macos-m1-stable), unit-test / inductor-test / test (inductor_cpp_wrapper, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), +6 more; stale_days=0",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",592dca8b3c6f4ebfb55819e0c5f2c5f2d225dd578b7290575c70b7deffcf049f
BUNDLE-187,bundle:bundle-187,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: __torch_function__ (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,188828,Skip conv_transpose3d redispatch test on Windows CI - flaky test,module: __torch_function__,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,188757,188828,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #188828 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",8176cb166423cad62e455e44548e6f9308b109f5beb061b34f2fd3427ac23dba
BUNDLE-188,bundle:bundle-188,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: python array api (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,188795,Fix `torch.asarray` to preserve an input's device when a default device is set,module: python array api,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,150199,188795,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #188795 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",d4f70cfe88d425e17054f07a6389ea3772f18a0c61eff2a4bb802d7e28c9a216
BUNDLE-189,bundle:bundle-189,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: correctness (silent) (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,188784,Fix `torch.asarray` for buffer-protocol objects with no dtype,module: correctness (silent),"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,188128,188784,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #188784 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",5d7ef3bf1e1a467478607059cd2157d35c3a6962931e9b09f6f9140cfcb58f00
BUNDLE-190,bundle:bundle-190,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: xpu (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,188783,[xpu][fix]Fix bmm_outer_product override to support XPU tensors,module: xpu,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,188773,188783,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #188783 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",7830559724893dbffda460f83558ac2a5a63b660729ca17ee46f2a8ad4362f11
BUNDLE-191,bundle:bundle-191,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: complex (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,188719,Fix Inductor KeyError on view_as_complex of non-contiguous CUDA tensors,module: complex,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,188718,188719,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #188719 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=5,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",635a2bcfb726e79911bd7eb148caf8bea84f4aa28c2e759c99f0fb82ec04ae0f
BUNDLE-192,bundle:bundle-192,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: dynamo (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,188632,Fix Dynamo opaque object staticmethod guards,module: dynamo,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,188544,188632,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #188632 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=APPROVED; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",8c3bfa5764f50a450e6989ca84f7932af70ce757ed6497ea5633506a9eb832c9
BUNDLE-193,bundle:bundle-193,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: nn (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,188327,[test] Add error_inputs for nn.Conv2d module,module: nn,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,174183,188327,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #188327 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",6d0f5e8800ee20b28c9e9cde78447603479a371084ab0ffdede55006392b2a93
BUNDLE-194,bundle:bundle-194,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: autograd (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,188066,test: add F.normalize zero-input correctness tests (fixes #184575),module: autograd,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,184575,188066,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #188066 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=3,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",cfb26d36f93bf4c258ee1f92ce18027991918965e3fd7f6e8711297b4e16d4a7
BUNDLE-195,bundle:bundle-195,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: correctness (silent) (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,188053,test: add svdvals NaN propagation test (fixes #187759),module: correctness (silent),"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,187759,188053,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #188053 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",4bec300215dc02fc2d95b763613174e3505be11a5f834dce441898b4cd35b8bc
BUNDLE-196,bundle:bundle-196,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: correctness (silent) (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,188049,Fix Inductor div floor nonfinite CUDA results,module: correctness (silent),"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,188048,188049,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #188049 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",fe033aa039a34916fe1a1d4c00d88452e44359d69de88924c429c841cf507595
BUNDLE-197,bundle:bundle-197,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: fx (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,187956,Propagate FX subgraph replacement meta values,module: fx,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,187945,187956,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #187956 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",93f87f31ff8c3777fd6cd52c939bc89215297f4af27fa3f7a00d1ac3dbcbb9b2
BUNDLE-198,bundle:bundle-198,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamic shapes (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,187614,Use sym_numel in linalg_cond string overload,module: dynamic shapes,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,186028,187614,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #187614 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",b68d14b7f69b7a5a873e4c87c5f15d1ad5c3614a83aba726bfda8e842a73deb1
BUNDLE-199,bundle:bundle-199,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: dynamic shapes (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,187604,Fix fake slice pending unbacked replacements,module: dynamic shapes,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,185185,187604,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #187604 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",79de2e6fae10e977f356d8a967206594e7509741d7710bb638c9b4bff2b9278c
BUNDLE-200,bundle:bundle-200,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: correctness (silent) (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,187601,[functorch] Fix dynamic layers under inference_mode,module: correctness (silent),"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,177750,187601,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #187601 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",d241a7dc793adbc9a8311b0ce1fc3b8e549533cb9804f766a7cb37da8164bea8
BUNDLE-201,bundle:bundle-201,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: inductor (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,187452,Polyhedral Optimization Pass for PyTorch Inductor (Phase 1),module: inductor,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,187451,187452,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #187452 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",b2cb195815e05faafc072cfa6e01672b9e25bc3a7b7ac0cd4b6bd6728bb79e66
BUNDLE-202,bundle:bundle-202,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: error checking (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,187242,Validate LocalResponseNorm parameters to prevent silent inf output,module: error checking,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,187177,187242,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #187242 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=22,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",5bd40c60783d98c40c92be04a2e7ac876ebf9abe49e8b60585ac9be93661beec
BUNDLE-203,bundle:bundle-203,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: half (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,187171,[inductor] Fix test_comprehensive_addbmm_cpu_float16 precision mismatch (#187170),module: half,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,187170,187171,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #187171 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=APPROVED; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",e095ac92e9f3409cbd35545267008833e6800fd509d3a21482fb8c739512f537
BUNDLE-204,bundle:bundle-204,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: fsdp (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,187161,[FSDP] Cache post-forward DeviceMesh to avoid duplicate NCCL communicators per layer,module: fsdp,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,187155,187161,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #187161 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",60ded578cf9879a85f54e4ced9197eccba95171b33cbc08c14bb0a9e89d1ffeb
BUNDLE-205,bundle:bundle-205,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamo (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,187057,Fix value-opaque graph output replay,module: dynamo,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,187041,187057,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #187057 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",b081d9c8b5d6a1929fb103ffbdfefcf929fb177d9dc3b384c0ccf2a909d1d067
BUNDLE-206,bundle:bundle-206,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: custom-operators (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,187012,Support optional Tensor list schemas,module: custom-operators,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,160094,187012,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #187012 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",1be96b7610f7c494be8697353d6e268d6a7f0a84cd03e10d806ad2b9ed995562
BUNDLE-207,bundle:bundle-207,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: autograd (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186953,Fix CPU amin/amax backward rematerialization mismatch,module: autograd,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,186799,186953,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #186953 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",d36bded453b82160b5bce3963889501f368bdcc96f46d65a4fc3954795192d83
BUNDLE-208,bundle:bundle-208,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: oncall: cpu inductor (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186942,[inductor] Round fmod/remainder scalars for bf16/fp16 CPU,oncall: cpu inductor,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,186875,186942,1,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #186942 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), +1 more.","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), +1 more, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aav...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",71c860d0652137116a4d9033ce468b138824c4ac6265c12d96240f2226882bd1
BUNDLE-209,bundle:bundle-209,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamo (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186923,Graph break on custom op fake tensor failures,module: dynamo,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,185141,186923,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #186923 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",0e67c50edf078c59e623f998bb68345483e1a5f380b2afefd4a6abd794d5c27d
BUNDLE-210,bundle:bundle-210,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: correctness (silent) (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186913,Fix int64 value_expr arithmetic in Triton codegen,module: correctness (silent),"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,183901,186913,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #186913 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",1951e02864300123f0276e229282dc88e01e84eabd0dad35d9c21765d42c8fac
BUNDLE-211,bundle:bundle-211,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: aotdispatch (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186859,Recover fake/proxy views from functional tensor bases,module: aotdispatch,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,181304,186859,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #186859 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",2278ad740119c560b601115e1ec59b05b447e75d0d9a75234eb8905094fc758a
BUNDLE-212,bundle:bundle-212,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: autograd (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186845,[make_fx] Decompose detach by default for higher-order grads,module: autograd,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,175477,186845,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #186845 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",6bbce99a6ed93090266d6b96b1c4964559d5d953a7d2af7428faf3f0ad548ad2
BUNDLE-213,bundle:bundle-213,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: lint (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186764,fix: Use typing_extensions.TypeAliasType for better reexport of `__module__`,module: lint,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,171905,186764,1,1,contributor_update_needed,PR #186764 is contributor-owned until requested changes or review questions are answered.,Keep parked or close after maintainer review if the contributor path is no longer active; do not ask for maintainer work first.,medium,reviewDecision=CHANGES_REQUESTED; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",af948deae478a5805f98a65b9d4dfea7c6c8c6ebe405e69d0c01560203b52e05
BUNDLE-214,bundle:bundle-214,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: inductor (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186656,Autotune XBLOCK for mix-order reductions,module: inductor,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,185814,186656,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #186656 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",b7c5410e0814ee535cabe48e3d1f3e1fc7a6d802b1486929e5f26263648e04ff
BUNDLE-215,bundle:bundle-215,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: bootcamp (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186561,Preserve autograd metadata for functionalized inplace views,module: bootcamp,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,90507,186561,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #186561 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",2a67e9d1483569ae7fc1d319877ebbd49515f99f140f7e398450375453de9240
BUNDLE-216,bundle:bundle-216,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: aotdispatch (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186557,Resolve scalar overloads before AOT compilation,module: aotdispatch,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,90923,186557,1,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #186557 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g).","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g). Review signal: My agent says I rebased the PR, fixed the scalar-le...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",81679ca372cf645b1c09d9406b4020aa3c18520883c11967857f97f2387fabe8
BUNDLE-217,bundle:bundle-217,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: aotdispatch (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186554,Preserve hooks for dependent AOTAutograd outputs,module: aotdispatch,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,91468,186554,1,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #186554 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, lf-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8).","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, lf-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",94ee0f3718131d54a47058bedce13af5f16ace618a1c6aa6a65c837bd5bacc5c
BUNDLE-218,bundle:bundle-218,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: minifier (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186529,Preserve grad state in Dynamo minifier repros,module: minifier,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,111414,186529,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #186529 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",fa4d1be7b05f1525be9030805f7912765e85900063964fbc33318ee41680d6af
BUNDLE-219,bundle:bundle-219,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: proxytensor (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186522,Trace Tensor.requires_grad_ in pre-dispatch make_fx,module: proxytensor,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,113899,186522,1,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #186522 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g).","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aav...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",a0a4a46e71fc4a3f20e2723ad15f48240bbfc6335b0f76a653cb509af579581c
BUNDLE-220,bundle:bundle-220,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: dynamo (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186510,Fix Dynamo low-precision addc opmath,module: dynamo,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,116202,186510,1,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #186510 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, linux-jammy-py3.14t-clang18 / test-osdc (default, 2, 5, mt-l-x86iavx512-16-128), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_models_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8).","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, linux-jammy-py3.14t-clang18 / test-osdc (default, 2, 5, mt-l-x86iavx512-16-128), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_models_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, linux-jammy-py3.14t-clang18 / test-osdc (default, 2, 5, mt-l-x86iavx512-16-128), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_models_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8).",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",df9e1d9483fff7b25f3d5f8d10218cd34e96b1909209fcd2fef26200ff6455a7
BUNDLE-221,bundle:bundle-221,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: aotdispatch (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186506,Register missing CIA decomposition py_impls,module: aotdispatch,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,117555,186506,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #186506 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",0083cab3447d43d470841fd82d94e5051462dd011e463e92843ad079b781da18
BUNDLE-222,bundle:bundle-222,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: aotdispatch (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186501,Collapse foreach input mutation copies in AOTAutograd,module: aotdispatch,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,119191,186501,1,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #186501 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g).","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g).",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",57511555034d38a66265b8bea93dd616a22aada36a8a7a9fbd72f003a136fab7
BUNDLE-223,bundle:bundle-223,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: aotdispatch (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186493,Optimize AOTAutograd compiled forward wrapper,module: aotdispatch,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,122029,186493,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #186493 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",3447aafd625f9001efe6720551748851cd8c98cd6dba3822ad032a0b3edb9c02
BUNDLE-224,bundle:bundle-224,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: functionalization (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186478,Fix AOTAutograd resized out tensor mutation replay,module: functionalization,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,122386,186478,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #186478 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",846d4e887819bd5f1f742fc2840663bec3ab2a5587f757d70b7a00f6da0f192e
BUNDLE-225,bundle:bundle-225,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: functorch (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186470,Raise user error for joint parameter mutation export,module: functorch,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,122860,186470,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #186470 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",f5305ff3f815294152a142be702332c276136a10ca9451d28d8a7adbe03e980d
BUNDLE-226,bundle:bundle-226,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: pt2-dispatcher (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186459,Fix fake view strides for AOT group norm tracing,module: pt2-dispatcher,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,124181,186459,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #186459 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",2e328d7e608c9d74984c66b44bbd7a23621a6e107ea1d906095fea0f8675ee3a
BUNDLE-227,bundle:bundle-227,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamic shapes (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186457,Fix torch.ops float parsing for scalar tensor args,module: dynamic shapes,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,124344,186457,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #186457 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",d9d04b8a55ca7333ef0f9bb536f8117605d79d7d13948196e1a73d6dd3442f56
BUNDLE-228,bundle:bundle-228,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: dynamo (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186431,Fix ModuleTracker with Dynamo runtime modules,module: dynamo,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,127112,186431,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #186431 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",955f4198aa21bb693ae87b005647c547360ee4ac7292105f6c8a84d6255f06da
BUNDLE-229,bundle:bundle-229,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamo (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186425,Skip Dynamo inside non-traceable subclass dispatch hooks,module: dynamo,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,128160,186425,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #186425 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",ba49b4929125f8eafbdbeeef790c9080c289651f76bbc7a9f8a25afe80a5417e
BUNDLE-230,bundle:bundle-230,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamo (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186388,Avoid native eager router graph breaks under Dynamo,module: dynamo,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,186354,186388,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #186388 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",10aa21a1c2606c7a3cee97dfcf641543b390e4a23e7b9194644484d83023e669
BUNDLE-231,bundle:bundle-231,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamic shapes (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186248,Simplify Min/Max using ShapeEnv value ranges,module: dynamic shapes,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,137096,186248,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #186248 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",8e0d6e644c0a14476c26231de6691c640eac4057c9f639fe499897df6b825075
BUNDLE-232,bundle:bundle-232,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: correctness (silent) (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186246,Fix stale scalar value in addcdiv graph-break decomposition,module: correctness (silent),"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,185382,186246,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #186246 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",38634467736919683548a3a1c33ec3de3637e0e945295fd3a3b1013298f2c146
BUNDLE-233,bundle:bundle-233,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamic shapes (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186210,Fix cond branch-local shape assertions,module: dynamic shapes,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,138141,186210,1,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #186210 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_models_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8).","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_models_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_models_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8).",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",ef1fdce3ccdef57319d7c7fa900cbf8d1390a168c9207ce00bba1904cc08c5c6
BUNDLE-234,bundle:bundle-234,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: higher order operators (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186201,Deduplicate symbolic cond inputs after export passes,module: higher order operators,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,138229,186201,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #186201 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",8ded9150645edd02f78b79953028816ae560878100c679d47503c20e8515bbdf
BUNDLE-235,bundle:bundle-235,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: pt2-dispatcher (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186199,Fix functionalization return mapping for mixed mutable out ops,module: pt2-dispatcher,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,138264,186199,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #186199 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",a5507dec23b18d4ef95a2ded330f46643dc316b0f186a1a5df559257775795e8
BUNDLE-236,bundle:bundle-236,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: custom-operators (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186166,Respect fake/functional modes for backend autograd kernels,module: custom-operators,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,139707,186166,1,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #186166 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, linux-jammy-py3.14t-clang18 / test-osdc (default, 5, 5, mt-l-x86iavx512-16-128).","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, linux-jammy-py3.14t-clang18 / test-osdc (default, 5, 5, mt-l-x86iavx512-16-128), rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, linux-jammy-py3.14t-clang18 / test-osdc (default, 5, 5, mt-l-x86iavx512-16-128).",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",4b81444c19a9f825097ac6d7a7f198bd709cb5c38efef0c929ce099504229f69
BUNDLE-237,bundle:bundle-237,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: aotdispatch (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186111,Fix stale mutated input history in AOTAutograd,module: aotdispatch,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,140707,186111,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #186111 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",16c160142e40ed7d4203f45fc983a7bfb422d9263c6b225a86dc76304f645928
BUNDLE-238,bundle:bundle-238,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: aotdispatch (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186007,Preserve eager post accumulate hook ordering in AOTAutograd,module: aotdispatch,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,144376,186007,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #186007 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",1eca68c2b8d17c84eaab66bad6265c6fadecd55cb3659dfc5df5bf17b53339e8
BUNDLE-239,bundle:bundle-239,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: windows (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185972,Handle malformed MSVC help output,module: windows,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,145383,185972,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #185972 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",f4f98d3402338d5dcaff3c57cf00c1349d9a7f0140b58739a1b9f5255efb18ae
BUNDLE-240,bundle:bundle-240,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: benchmark (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185929,Fix Dynamo benchmark model state isolation,module: benchmark,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,145773,185929,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #185929 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",2fd6533caeda2e1c4bae1da999aa2f7edba683ac27773b6e4ce306d265f290a6
BUNDLE-241,bundle:bundle-241,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: flex attention (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185916,Fix FlexAttention nested index backward,module: flex attention,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,146896,185916,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #185916 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",bbc0131a699c25b4efed1f9e6ba23fcded4a034297069479cf9e12f23414e4c5
BUNDLE-242,bundle:bundle-242,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: aotdispatch (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185914,Log aot_export fw_metadata instead of printing it,module: aotdispatch,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,147135,185914,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #185914 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",6378324338d5740e099756347acdff2a0ff6f2e9efb44165e9b33dea5d8ee715
BUNDLE-243,bundle:bundle-243,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: custom-operators (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185897,Support concrete enum types in torch.library.define schemas,module: custom-operators,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,183957,185897,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #185897 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",64608db4bde61c9702d3973ddd6ae25444cccbc10c52707ee46690fdcf18ec31
BUNDLE-244,bundle:bundle-244,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: bfloat16 (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185878,Fix Inductor expm1 on float subnormal inputs,module: bfloat16,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,185480,185878,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #185878 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",ca4c526a2f916e01bfaaddcc46f5e685d1a822d348049c14d91ae9493fbbf6c0
BUNDLE-245,bundle:bundle-245,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: aotdispatch (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185876,Prevent saving mutated grad inputs in AOT min-cut,module: aotdispatch,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,185497,185876,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #185876 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",6fd253abe9a5e23bca5ddbbc95598c3e11b6a51d5e81a56866608bc3ca0b1c1d
BUNDLE-246,bundle:bundle-246,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: correctness (silent) (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185873,Preserve mutation renames after scheduler recompute,module: correctness (silent),"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,185509,185873,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #185873 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",af43f4077e48deb220587784ea1ba4937f49ac7c007fbaac6312cfbadf3a7b0b
BUNDLE-247,bundle:bundle-247,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamic shapes (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185871,Fix symbolic stride-order sorting without explicit ShapeEnv,module: dynamic shapes,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,185510,185871,1,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #185871 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8).","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8). Review signal: My agent says I rebased onto current main and addressed the automated review feedback by making V.graph recovery tolerate poisoned virtualized state while preserving static stride sorting on the plain argsort path.",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",33f8cbe9410aff9404701b2ea62e28564b32600164e3bd6e459e3bef55095eb5
BUNDLE-248,bundle:bundle-248,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: correctness (silent) (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185866,Fix CPU Inductor numerics for BatchNorm erf normalize,module: correctness (silent),"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,185589,185866,1,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #185866 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), +1 more.","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), +1 more, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aav...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",a3557100c319a50fb2b6e89db14268746a9633ff09e4d32e1f476d3a88f3a90d
BUNDLE-249,bundle:bundle-249,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: aotdispatch (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185861,Fix ViewMeta serialization for special views,module: aotdispatch,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,185630,185861,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #185861 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",0e6de58b6bcfe3963fa91f2d651e66af1a7f513b24b828ba72b9b518482ec9de
BUNDLE-250,bundle:bundle-250,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: aotdispatch (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185829,Fix autograd.grad graph breaks under aot_eager,module: aotdispatch,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,145899,185829,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #185829 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",0e2caf76540de0565ef1621f3d9e9747767270311887a1c2bf3642d0582bab59
BUNDLE-251,bundle:bundle-251,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: autograd (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185775,Avoid storage access for no-storage tensors in MetaConverter,module: autograd,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,148695,185775,1,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #185775 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g).","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aav...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",e706613978c61883befd4f739b315f34bac564aad63a28ef0572b204cb2c4a73
BUNDLE-252,bundle:bundle-252,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: compiled autograd (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185762,[Dynamo] Support _AutoDispatchBelowAutograd context manager,module: compiled autograd,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,149586,185762,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #185762 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",2179a05573592e8bd112718d04aa3e00cf2c8e962e8f7e7a4e93efeef4a81189
BUNDLE-253,bundle:bundle-253,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: flex attention (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185759,Improve float32 flex attention backward tiling,module: flex attention,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,149767,185759,1,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #185759 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8).","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8).",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",5183ef0915babe394bfdd1c36c7765b7ac5302b0b635b9d587b834818a4cc693
BUNDLE-254,bundle:bundle-254,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: docs (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185751,"[nn] Raise ValueError early for invalid (ndim, pad_size) in non-constant F.pad modes",module: docs,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,184845,185751,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #185751 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",270f2480889722d94aa567e224a12f147f9c2b1e3f2b5e10803390f7df67a753
BUNDLE-255,bundle:bundle-255,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamic shapes (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185734,Preserve torch._check messages in runtime asserts,module: dynamic shapes,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,150063,185734,1,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #185734 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g).","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g). Review signal: My agent says I rebased the PR onto current main and fixed the runtime-assert retrace regression behind the latest Dr. CI failures. Th...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",b372100703842bc4da5007d055eadb314ba09d267f8be175b1282d618c308a64
BUNDLE-256,bundle:bundle-256,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamic shapes (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185604,Improve infer_size unbacked broadcast error,module: dynamic shapes,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,152656,185604,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #185604 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",5dd07c045dd53765ca400a9a685f2f305549f36f2bf3983af127454d70376fb0
BUNDLE-257,bundle:bundle-257,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: compile ux (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185501,Fix Issue #185396 inductor complex64 triton signature,module: compile ux,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,185396,185501,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #185501 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",9492942d4604ca6d255f7cee99c486cba042bc23a65b3774bb46e3130a280611
BUNDLE-258,bundle:bundle-258,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: higher order operators (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185304,Fix while_loop stride metadata preservation,module: higher order operators,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,160939,185304,1,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #185304 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, lf-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g).","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, lf-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, lf-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g). Review signal: My agent says I rebased and resubmitted this stack on current main, removed the unsafe global...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",f499800d0142df52b12e6a0881205b5a12dd22943dea2c632ba15b0e00b05abb
BUNDLE-259,bundle:bundle-259,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: cpp (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185231,[C++] Ensure wrapped tensors can be printed,module: cpp,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,185200,185231,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #185231 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",725a6ec4e5e59c7f36ce0f12e0c61c999c5996aad3d32136612661b2675fdbed
BUNDLE-260,bundle:bundle-260,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: autograd (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185054,[autograd] Validate forward-mode jacobian/hessian require vectorize=T…,module: autograd,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,184842,185054,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #185054 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",203eeaa67d34fbf77f1e0b81844d263253b542ba89cd07de79c80dd3fa4b3f67
BUNDLE-261,bundle:bundle-261,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: oncall: pt2 (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185052,Fix Inductor reuse for disjoint strided slices,oncall: pt2,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,167098,185052,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #185052 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",e15144bf21e3678c9ebae19197f8d923d1497f9535493406e0406acabbe87ff0
BUNDLE-262,bundle:bundle-262,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: aotdispatch (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,184995,Fix AOT getitem replay under inference_mode,module: aotdispatch,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,169477,184995,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #184995 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",29f1243fb69a6ba7ea9b353ea998825f11af64c20f2d84133a94942764af3604
BUNDLE-263,bundle:bundle-263,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: dynamo (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,184981,Fix torch._numpy bool numeric subtract,module: dynamo,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,170509,184981,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #184981 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",c1daf38c277b6b3ecfed588fe89a036938702805e119dcf451c7b6f8001874aa
BUNDLE-264,bundle:bundle-264,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: custom-operators (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,184944,Make OpaqueBase usable as a pybind base,module: custom-operators,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,172869,184944,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #184944 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",f5eaa1f146bde2f88ca42ffbe8157f0f9dd6fefe7d19e0c3dd3ba8c7196ad94c
BUNDLE-265,bundle:bundle-265,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: pt2-dispatcher (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,184938,Fix AOTAutograd forward output overwritten by backward mutation,module: pt2-dispatcher,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,172956,184938,1,1,contributor_update_needed,PR #184938 is contributor-owned until requested changes or review questions are answered.,Keep parked or close after maintainer review if the contributor path is no longer active; do not ask for maintainer work first.,medium,reviewDecision=CHANGES_REQUESTED; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",f4d35ad213cbf215bd5c345b148adfc71ccffc0107fc758880df0287d54e4d3d
BUNDLE-266,bundle:bundle-266,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: decompositions (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,184928,Fix linalg_pinv tensor tolerance broadcasting,module: decompositions,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,173052,184928,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #184928 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",c82698a2c0ff77d10cb254ec348ef74a7ea2576967f82a220eec297cae490cd3
BUNDLE-267,bundle:bundle-267,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamo (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,184920,[dynamo] Store FunctionIdSet entries by identity weakrefs,module: dynamo,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,173578,184920,1,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #184920 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, linux-jammy-py3.10-clang18 / test-osdc (dynamo_wrapped, 3, 3, mt-l-x86iavx512-8-64), linux-jammy-py3.14t-clang18 / test-osdc (dynamo_wrapped, 3, 3, mt-l-x86iavx512-16-128), linux-jammy-py3.14-clang18 / test-osdc (dynamo_wrapped, 2, 3, mt-l-x86iavx512-8-64), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), +3 more.","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, linux-jammy-py3.10-clang18 / test-osdc (dynamo_wrapped, 3, 3, mt-l-x86iavx512-8-64), linux-jammy-py3.14t-clang18 / test-osdc (dynamo_wrapped, 3, 3, mt-l-x86iavx512-16-128), linux-jammy-py3.14-clang18 / test-osdc (dynamo_wrapped, 2, 3, mt-l-x86iavx512-8-64), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), +3 more, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, linux-jammy-py3.10-clang18 / test-osdc (dynamo_wrapped, 3, 3, mt-l-x86iavx512-8-64), linux-jammy-py3.14t-clang18 / test-osdc (dynamo_wrapped, 3, 3, mt-l-x86iavx512-16-128), linux-jammy-py3.14-clang18 / test-osdc (dynamo_wrapped, 2, 3, mt-l-x86iavx512-8-64), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, m...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",fd86c1e4c7d9abc5ec551b9472d2cecbc7db537c5a5553305af13ad0b63bba36
BUNDLE-268,bundle:bundle-268,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: dynamo (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,184917,Make FX traceback preserve state thread-local,module: dynamo,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,173816,184917,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #184917 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",cacc62e0e82241a890ac31540ce963ac3892dcebdcc6c84274be1438f270f5c0
BUNDLE-269,bundle:bundle-269,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: functionalization (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,184910,Reject direct aten.set in Dynamo,module: functionalization,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,174176,184910,1,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #184910 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), linux-jammy-py3.10-clang18 / test-osdc (crossref, 1, 2, mt-l-x86iavx512-8-64).","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), linux-jammy-py3.10-clang18 / test-osdc (crossref, 1, 2, mt-l-x86iavx512-8-64), rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), linux-jammy-py3.10-clang18 / test-osdc (crossref, 1, 2, mt-l-x86ia...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",fc25fcafc069cee7c19a11c8b5c38a57ea732084384abc305f1a8933ca4ddd89
BUNDLE-270,bundle:bundle-270,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: functionalization (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,184864,Error on overlapping as_strided mutations in compile,module: functionalization,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,174371,184864,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #184864 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",9252f16cc570f06d66be486b0d0d3bf29a9912f36eb2ed56736990514b94f755
BUNDLE-271,bundle:bundle-271,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamo (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,184838,Fix Dynamo raw descriptor building,module: dynamo,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,175264,184838,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #184838 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",0015ce7b6b81261aced8b1041503c86d2bfe26f69433d636321efc7128bc2cdb
BUNDLE-272,bundle:bundle-272,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: dynamo (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,184830,[Dynamo] Guard source-backed identity comparisons,module: dynamo,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,175267,184830,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #184830 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",226abb6faee0878395faff819f2e446813d3ecebd76759417b70296296be4fa1
BUNDLE-273,bundle:bundle-273,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamo (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,184820,[dynamo] respect custom metaclass __call__ during class construction,module: dynamo,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,175292,184820,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #184820 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",0697ae026d2555fed8c5aa2bf7bb406b6dd51942a44761de8eb8e2575a902357
BUNDLE-274,bundle:bundle-274,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: custom-operators (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,184809,Improve custom op Tensor subclass fake error,module: custom-operators,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,175408,184809,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #184809 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",35e91c8e601f134c6a132fbecb48eda0e601fd37d1bac80938483b7b00d242be
BUNDLE-275,bundle:bundle-275,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: compile ux (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,184803,[dynamo] Avoid key-set guard for dict setitem,module: compile ux,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,175858,184803,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #184803 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",595f1dd7d3bd8747df3fa661cee3c3a1a06479af4158b11c2884813346655426
BUNDLE-276,bundle:bundle-276,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamo (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,184793,Fix no-tensor-aliasing recompile reason for stale sources,module: dynamo,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,176211,184793,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #184793 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",822432104818da5aedc496f2fa9b24f44aa6a89a939454107a9ec59b9b2c6cdf
BUNDLE-277,bundle:bundle-277,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: dynamo (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,184747,Remove no-op SDPA masks before backend dispatch,module: dynamo,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,177712,184747,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #184747 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",8e6e9341989d9d4f70754b9106d939abd245aa65e7f9a6d38c5e255bfcbd507f
BUNDLE-278,bundle:bundle-278,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: convolution (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,184716,Fix conv_transpose2d meta output padding validation,module: convolution,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,178127,184716,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #184716 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=APPROVED; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",20a3fd1fc23e6fb4a632ecc0d85f0ec388a85e782db32c975fe901f98fc26388
BUNDLE-279,bundle:bundle-279,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamo (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,184713,Support Dynamo class setattr for hook handles,module: dynamo,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,178248,184713,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #184713 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",c90dab6e069724a41d8aa95a2cc8b7e097ad1b3f43f0bfcd26c7d1ed123df7e4
BUNDLE-280,bundle:bundle-280,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: dynamo (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,184709,Fix Dynamo tensor subclass constructor side effects,module: dynamo,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,178388,184709,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #184709 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",e6f5f01effb7e0e35bfa40a0cc34a66dee39aed9966a8360883c6bed7575f8b5
BUNDLE-281,bundle:bundle-281,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: correctness (silent) (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,184695,Fix all-masked TransformerEncoder compile consistency,module: correctness (silent),"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,178677,184695,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #184695 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",730e937ebcacc87698284db009564f55b68ea041cd4a52e076231c0c7c7728f8
BUNDLE-282,bundle:bundle-282,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: aotdispatch (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,184656,Fix CPU SDPA higher-order grad compile,module: aotdispatch,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,181177,184656,1,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #184656 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, linux-jammy-py3.10-clang18 / test-osdc (einops, 1, 1, mt-l-x86iavx512-8-64), linux-jammy-py3.10-clang18 / test-osdc (default, 1, 5, mt-l-x86iavx512-16-128), linux-noble-xpu-n-py3.10 / build-osdc, linux-jammy-py3.10-clang18-asan / build-osdc, linux-jammy-py3.10-gcc11 / build-osdc, +8 more.","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, linux-jammy-py3.10-clang18 / test-osdc (einops, 1, 1, mt-l-x86iavx512-8-64), linux-jammy-py3.10-clang18 / test-osdc (default, 1, 5, mt-l-x86iavx512-16-128), linux-noble-xpu-n-py3.10 / build-osdc, linux-jammy-py3.10-clang18-asan / build-osdc, linux-jammy-py3.10-gcc11 / build-osdc, +8 more, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, linux-jammy-py3.10-clang18 / test-osdc (einops, 1, 1, mt-l-x86iavx512-8-64), linux-jammy-py3.10-clang18 / test-osdc (default, 1, 5, mt-l-x86iavx512-16-128), linux-noble-xpu-n-py3.10 / build-osdc, linux-jammy-py3.10-clang18-asan / build-osdc, linux-jammy-py3.10-gcc11 / build-osdc, +8 more.",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",71246d4cd3287791e9baf27d0f772085e7eead012e306d2de9836f2ba7eb9c7a
BUNDLE-283,bundle:bundle-283,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: dynamic shapes (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,184602,Preserve frozen ShapeEnv during fake tensor guards,module: dynamic shapes,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,182940,184602,1,1,contributor_update_needed,PR #184602 is contributor-owned until requested changes or review questions are answered.,Keep parked or close after maintainer review if the contributor path is no longer active; do not ask for maintainer work first.,medium,reviewDecision=CHANGES_REQUESTED; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",40488fee09e79c0183c583eefbc3b2d49eec924394d774080641fadb18ff7d50
BUNDLE-284,bundle:bundle-284,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: functorch (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,184595,Allow functorch grad fake propagation in Dynamo,module: functorch,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,183015,184595,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #184595 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",6300fa07441d49a1bb84c41cc72b9fa87b6197345e834c46ca5225ddc44b529d
BUNDLE-285,bundle:bundle-285,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamic shapes (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,184590,Fix uncached NestedTensor seqlens under compile,module: dynamic shapes,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,183266,184590,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #184590 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",26795979a3d835e40a421e01a4461c49518d40d0e9a00aa3c657029e58a74fdb
BUNDLE-286,bundle:bundle-286,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: cudnn (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,184573,Fix compile support for CTC loss tensor lengths,module: cudnn,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,183396,184573,1,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #184573 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8).","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8).",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",2b7fcfea3bb153201ca4ba5579f5fe4049c4af6093b4cfb871764663d2da3e90
BUNDLE-287,bundle:bundle-287,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: aotdispatch (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,184367,Fix AotAutograd aliased-output replay for traceable wrapper subclasses,module: aotdispatch,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,184002,184367,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #184367 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",bb3960ea5bc53f4a73d054dfd01627c693245c3a2706fc2ca9fd758f518b7aa4
BUNDLE-288,bundle:bundle-288,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: cpp (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,184336,fix RPATH in libtorch extraction from wheel,module: cpp,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,183971,184336,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #184336 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",c49c3dba03f38e5f226f2ff2e2db31bcda0a2f8aa4e72e3da384f9a404b34979
BUNDLE-289,bundle:bundle-289,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: inductor (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,184256,[inductor] Cap reduction XBLOCK to max block,module: inductor,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,138301,184256,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #184256 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",8511e984cb67d0ff1f09a81faa4ad02e3d9c5dd7f23e44e0e89b80fbbc10d200
BUNDLE-290,bundle:bundle-290,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: inductor (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,184130,Avoid torch imports in Inductor compile sidecar,module: inductor,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,148651,184130,1,1,contributor_update_needed,PR #184130 is contributor-owned until requested changes or review questions are answered.,Keep parked or close after maintainer review if the contributor path is no longer active; do not ask for maintainer work first.,medium,reviewDecision=CHANGES_REQUESTED; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",d0fdf61e39696c641be53e2bb0a6177bb259f800959a2512690a33f5f7e926dd
BUNDLE-291,bundle:bundle-291,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: inductor (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,184124,Fix Inductor multi-output replacement insertion order,module: inductor,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,148751,184124,1,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #184124 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8).","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integra...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",be7c20df08db9b8f34558afbe782fcedd9f1cf7957353174203a93ee7bae4171
BUNDLE-292,bundle:bundle-292,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: inductor (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,184109,Fix Inductor replacement patterns across view-to-reshape,module: inductor,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,151649,184109,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #184109 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",d8a403023393f0fc4c2d3be104bc9a5a721a31b9d81b1751eed4c4ea7a417b48
BUNDLE-293,bundle:bundle-293,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: docs (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,184094,Clone aliased mm/addmm inputs on CPU to avoid in-place gemm,module: docs,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,85852,184094,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #184094 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",3fec6ff940e87f3a0659d310d8c1ebf8262a27d3322e07d4dabab9f0f75b8fe8
BUNDLE-294,bundle:bundle-294,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: inductor (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,184092,Skip tiny cudagraph partitions in max-autotune,module: inductor,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,154301,184092,1,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #184092 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8).","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8). Review signal: My agent says I rebased and resubmitted the PR onto current main to refresh CI after the ROCm failures. The failed jobs were in ROCm flash-attention/flop-counter and distributed timeout paths, not this Inductor/Dynamo... | My agent says I rebased and resubmit...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",4ba691ae0734eee167e89117a1c7bad0a443be2339bf308944253807e73bdb0d
BUNDLE-295,bundle:bundle-295,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: cuda graphs (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,184091,Handle cudagraph liveness changes during replay,module: cuda graphs,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,154306,184091,1,1,contributor_update_needed,PR #184091 is contributor-owned until requested changes or review questions are answered.,Keep parked or close after maintainer review if the contributor path is no longer active; do not ask for maintainer work first.,medium,reviewDecision=CHANGES_REQUESTED; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",3691aff4a6c346208da79cb04faedecb97778db5386e66c24c30dd25f4052780
BUNDLE-296,bundle:bundle-296,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: fx (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,184059,Fix split reduction kernel metadata,module: fx,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,160124,184059,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #184059 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",e3775f02d04713a790d3dc79517772192a333f3fdb410d72c6ce3917e2a1523f
BUNDLE-297,bundle:bundle-297,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: inductor (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,184048,Enable Inductor OpInfo CPU coverage,module: inductor,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,161132,184048,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #184048 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",8f62282c8cfeeae27cbc1b8bf1289faf78bd7aaedd9333961cfb96580ae4919a
BUNDLE-298,bundle:bundle-298,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: inductor (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,184015,[inductor] Handle scalar workaround args in pattern checks,module: inductor,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,166604,184015,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #184015 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",aead498883973b2fc79adc9eef0c964cd5d1876a3a199cd340c517a3eb925714
BUNDLE-299,bundle:bundle-299,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: dynamic shapes (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,184009,Handle SymPy boolean Inductor graph inputs,module: dynamic shapes,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,167070,184009,1,1,contributor_update_needed,PR #184009 is contributor-owned until requested changes or review questions are answered.,Keep parked or close after maintainer review if the contributor path is no longer active; do not ask for maintainer work first.,medium,reviewDecision=CHANGES_REQUESTED; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",790fe824e41c2fa7c4c774979b0eccd8e5039452e387fd18387fa9d061b866e1
BUNDLE-300,bundle:bundle-300,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: inductor (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,184007,[inductor] Clear stale subprocess cache env vars,module: inductor,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,167725,184007,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #184007 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",3b6ad22a736825d9be25c2575b902532b5c416ab198b3ba0bfb5b56afffd5836
BUNDLE-301,bundle:bundle-301,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: cuda graphs (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,183994,Specialize numpy scalar module attrs,module: cuda graphs,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,172942,183994,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #183994 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",955742c35c765a437066ab3527e5bb7a8923894080f7d7b49eca942b14cd21ad
BUNDLE-302,bundle:bundle-302,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: inductor (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,183969,Fix CSE across unrelated mutation regions,module: inductor,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,174472,183969,1,1,contributor_update_needed,PR #183969 is contributor-owned until requested changes or review questions are answered.,Keep parked or close after maintainer review if the contributor path is no longer active; do not ask for maintainer work first.,medium,reviewDecision=CHANGES_REQUESTED; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",38cb0b6aa697e7ea302455190750ff5d7df907954ca4aa5f0d617a2e1c007fdf
BUNDLE-303,bundle:bundle-303,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: inductor (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,183958,Enable SDPA constraint cache by default,module: inductor,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,175833,183958,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #183958 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",0f5b302d32e9e713d55e00dd6a6ffae3fbf2572a279167b7663ffb91245c05fc
BUNDLE-304,bundle:bundle-304,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: custom-operators (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,183954,Disallow mid-trace reference opaque creation,module: custom-operators,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,175968,183954,1,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #183954 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8).","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8). Review signal: My agent says I rebased the PR onto current main to restart CI after the prior ambient/broken-trunk and cancelled failures. Local targeted opaque-object and leaf-function tests plus lintrunner -a passed on the rebased... | My agent says I rebased the PR onto...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",f3a0f413dcae43cffb0eeddb0542d3e1fdd53942a4077f10b3bd05d8e6012df1
BUNDLE-305,bundle:bundle-305,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: inductor (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,183904,Fix CPU addcmul tensor-value decomposition numerics,module: inductor,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,176929,183904,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #183904 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",5102ef3c5843a71754c208aec9767b9c6a56f0c16869e89af3527bc6b6146138
BUNDLE-306,bundle:bundle-306,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: arm (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,183879,[inductor][cpu] Enable int8 WOQ GEMM template on Arm,module: arm,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,177327,183879,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #183879 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",a6e1d07dd2b85fc5608d3f3fbf47f805b09d223367f9d196e04f9c47d8595dd9
BUNDLE-307,bundle:bundle-307,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: inductor (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,183871,[inductor] Match eval BatchNorm CUDA numerics,module: inductor,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,178096,183871,1,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #183871 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8).","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8). Review signal: My agent says I rebased the PR onto current main and expanded the commit description to make the TF32 residual gap explicit. The issue already has the matching note: the original TF32-on script can still show a convol...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",d8503d4f47afc5eab35d5418bef82d3876034849c9953f9da81c462fafca417f
BUNDLE-308,bundle:bundle-308,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: inductor (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,183866,Preserve native matmul lowp output precision,module: inductor,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,178317,183866,1,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #183866 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, linux-jammy-cuda13.0-py3.10-gcc11-sm90 / test-osdc (smoke, 1, 1, mt-l-x86iamx-22-225-h100), linux-jammy-cuda13.0-py3.10-gcc11-sm100 / test-osdc (smoke_b200, 1, 1, mt-l-x86iamx-22-225-b200), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_models_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), linux-jammy-cuda13.0-py3.10-gcc11-sm100 / test (smoke_b200, 1, 1, linux.dgx.b200), +1 more.","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, linux-jammy-cuda13.0-py3.10-gcc11-sm90 / test-osdc (smoke, 1, 1, mt-l-x86iamx-22-225-h100), linux-jammy-cuda13.0-py3.10-gcc11-sm100 / test-osdc (smoke_b200, 1, 1, mt-l-x86iamx-22-225-b200), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_models_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), linux-jammy-cuda13.0-py3.10-gcc11-sm100 / test (smoke_b200, 1, 1, linux.dgx.b200), +1 more, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, linux-jammy-cuda13.0-py3.10-gcc11-sm90 / test-osdc (smoke, 1, 1, mt-l-x86iamx-22-225-h100), linux-jammy-cuda13.0-py3.10-gcc11-sm100 / test-osdc (smoke_b200, 1, 1, mt-l-x86iamx-22-225-b200), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_models_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",f7b6af4b248d63159b2e25ea872a6aef7d807ee8b178e3ee4e2db251aaa2c09f
BUNDLE-309,bundle:bundle-309,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: arm (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,183744,Update ACL dependencies for BF16 inner product,module: arm,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,180447,183744,1,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #183744 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, linux-jammy-py3.14t-clang18 / test (crossref, 2, 2, linux.2xlarge), linux-jammy-py3.10-clang18 / test (crossref, 2, 2, linux.2xlarge), linux-jammy-py3.10-clang18 / test (dynamo_wrapped, 3, 3, linux.2xlarge), linux-jammy-py3.10-clang18 / test (onnx, 1, 1, linux.4xlarge), linux-jammy-py3.14-clang18 / test (crossref, 2, 2, linux.2xlarge), +3 more.","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, linux-jammy-py3.14t-clang18 / test (crossref, 2, 2, linux.2xlarge), linux-jammy-py3.10-clang18 / test (crossref, 2, 2, linux.2xlarge), linux-jammy-py3.10-clang18 / test (dynamo_wrapped, 3, 3, linux.2xlarge), linux-jammy-py3.10-clang18 / test (onnx, 1, 1, linux.4xlarge), linux-jammy-py3.14-clang18 / test (crossref, 2, 2, linux.2xlarge), +3 more, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, linux-jammy-py3.14t-clang18 / test (crossref, 2, 2, linux.2xlarge), linux-jammy-py3.10-clang18 / test (crossref, 2, 2, linux.2xlarge), linux-jammy-py3.10-clang18 / test (dynamo_wrapped, 3, 3, linux.2xlarge), linux-jammy-py3.10-clang18 / test (onnx, 1, 1, linux.4xlarge), linux-jammy-py3.14-clang18 / test (crossref, 2, 2, linux.2xlarge), +3 more. Review signal: @pytorchbot rebase |...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",cd6973b5e727456710873f657d793dce699b2aa65a998265fd108b169df1e1aa
BUNDLE-310,bundle:bundle-310,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: correctness (silent) (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,183731,[inductor] Validate fallback output dtype metadata,module: correctness (silent),"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,180807,183731,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #183731 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",a5e67e8970441064b90e0c88a741610c98907d6c704e1c2333224596910bf79e
BUNDLE-311,bundle:bundle-311,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamic shapes (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,183652,Fix dynamic slice lowering for generic views,module: dynamic shapes,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,183259,183652,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #183652 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",a090604d3db5082b3683bc6df0e542658d1a1e51acc677026cf6364b15527bd1
BUNDLE-312,bundle:bundle-312,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: correctness (silent) (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,183628,Fix fractional max pool RNG in Inductor,module: correctness (silent),"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,183249,183628,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #183628 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",0d4f98d270f2e429dcbd7341080f3c17195c0caf9b401639547b5a080262fc2a
BUNDLE-313,bundle:bundle-313,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: dynamo (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,182972,added graph break on exception based on if user code would catch it,module: dynamo,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,175608,182972,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #182972 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",ff332b74d3e006690f95716866600af70c3ec6c1b8e7dcd3037c0854b10b236f
BUNDLE-314,bundle:bundle-314,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: c10d (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,182273,[c10d] Fix device_id not propagated through ProcessGroupWrapper,module: c10d,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,178977,182273,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #182273 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",fe7ef9fdb4d93e7b101b245103c7d6d5b1040e026a9fb6961139b736729adfba
BUNDLE-315,bundle:bundle-315,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: openreg (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,181860,[c10] Add InlineEventBase to unify event APIs in DeviceGuardImplInter…,module: openreg,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,163836,181860,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #181860 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",8794fec5f0e647a43677e66e42f38afd23e7b2a81dc54069e5bce2c7e1e09236
BUNDLE-316,bundle:bundle-316,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: docs (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,181823,Docs: update torch.multinomial num_samples requirement note for bette…,module: docs,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,181347,181823,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #181823 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",890f620f75401338e331a3f6ab55dfaab747fa59366761504f17b7097b0cdd3e
BUNDLE-317,bundle:bundle-317,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: mps (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,180353,[MPS] Replace isin MPSGraph implementation with native Metal kernels,module: mps,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,180833,180353,1,1,contributor_update_needed,PR #180353 is contributor-owned until requested changes or review questions are answered.,Keep parked or close after maintainer review if the contributor path is no longer active; do not ask for maintainer work first.,medium,reviewDecision=CHANGES_REQUESTED; stale_days=7,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",b165d3e1e5ff5237929155598f54f61313f1c3b3a0396c27f8d86985a725b3ec
BUNDLE-318,bundle:bundle-318,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: correctness (silent) (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,178298,torch.linalg.solve_triangular: support for eligible non-dense args,module: correctness (silent),"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,178379,178298,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #178298 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",5531b8efaccd09e34ea0803c6dffe6d47983cf9def69d225234af12aedd4ffbd
BUNDLE-319,bundle:bundle-319,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: fsdp (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,172074,Fixes grad_dtype property being lost in fsdp,module: fsdp,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,170648,172074,1,1,contributor_update_needed,PR #172074 is contributor-owned until requested changes or review questions are answered.,Keep parked or close after maintainer review if the contributor path is no longer active; do not ask for maintainer work first.,medium,reviewDecision=CHANGES_REQUESTED; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",60d18eac6a3c1de745f72b0e9f84e621883ee41a7ac99bbc1d551b5879f1c19b
BUNDLE-320,bundle:bundle-320,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: lint (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,189319,Enable flake8-bugbear B007 (unused loop control variable),module: lint,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,106571,189319,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #189319 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=BLOCKED; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",277f1abbe77ec55ae8feafd9524b11c3696d82df15eca93966cdae0f9997bb38
BUNDLE-321,bundle:bundle-321,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: oncall: pt2 (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186549,Fix fake deepcopy for custom module mappings,oncall: pt2,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,97078,186549,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #186549 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",eb0f7cfc563bfd84f202a1253f5bfe33fe71426c32aafa44cdf2cb2ef30246f1
BUNDLE-322,bundle:bundle-322,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamo (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186512,[dynamo] Graph break on shape-changing Parameter.data assignment,module: dynamo,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,115484,186512,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #186512 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",b3cd22d10f6fc8113db15948432beb34539543a12e2b4220dfa5d3d3fba446c6
BUNDLE-323,bundle:bundle-323,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: binaries (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185813,[ROCm][Windows] Audit license-files: explicit enumeration + audit test (#183434),module: binaries,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,183434,185813,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #185813 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",601fdf2e0105ac5bf029fedb0ed15b9ed4815eb695cb71247e63c3aa68c5ff18
BUNDLE-324,bundle:bundle-324,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: inductor (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,184178,Fix masked Triton conv load pointers,module: inductor,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,143412,184178,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #184178 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",0b229d82d44dd09a2b7c077f952b2136789f422643bc82775a9ca5838ef8a737
BUNDLE-325,bundle:bundle-325,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: memory usage (1 issue + 18 PRs),pr,187458,[MPS] Fuse cross_entropy into a native Metal kernel,module: memory usage,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,187455,"182109, 182731, 182736, 182749, 182791, 183688, 187456, 187457, 187458, 187553, 187556, 187557, 187559, 187787, 187976, 188156, 188333, 189146",1,18,failed_ci_checks,PR #187458 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",cd38522be27b1e2fc481e4850e0c932100bbdbb91574b8fcda21bf0b713ab066
BUNDLE-326,bundle:bundle-326,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: loss (12 issues + 1 PR),pr,119977,[NJT] Factory function support,module: loss,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"88137, 89124, 89125, 99142, 108567, 112398, 112509, 114090, 115978, 118107, 130538, 132212",119977,12,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #119977 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=65,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",5c853872b004f8bd75fadad5780866601a3caec09db0b2538f33d0da57c3d68b
BUNDLE-327,bundle:bundle-327,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: convolution (7 issues + 1 PR),pr,184193,Preserve FX graph cache guard provenance,module: convolution,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"13716, 18631, 70954, 73764, 75747, 95604, 187473",184193,7,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #184193 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, linux-jammy-rocm-py3.10-mi350 / test (distributed, 2, 3, amd-do-linux.rocm.gpu.gfx950.2), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), +2 more.","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, linux-jammy-rocm-py3.10-mi350 / test (distributed, 2, 3, amd-do-linux.rocm.gpu.gfx950.2), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), +2 more, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, linux-jammy-rocm-py3.10-mi350 / test (distributed, 2, 3, amd-do-linux.rocm.gpu.gfx950.2), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",bb49dc90bc86ec7f46ac2e5fcfe172d36003314de920834bf452bc4529510c91
BUNDLE-328,bundle:bundle-328,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: inductor (2 issues + 6 PRs),pr,185057,Support torch.cuda.use_mem_pool in compile,module: inductor,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"162859, 167026","185057, 188755, 189123, 189173, 189175, 189230",2,6,failed_ci_checks,"PR #185057 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g).","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (i...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",87f0ec6c8389fb39e4385a808b6363dbd8fdb192bfe6960c5dcea15bcf582e72
BUNDLE-329,bundle:bundle-329,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: build (5 issues + 2 PRs),pr,188999,Add RISC-V CPU pause hint to cpu_atomic_add_float spin loop,module: build,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"129553, 141550, 147513, 171659, 180975","181109, 188999",5,2,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #188999 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",67bd0d3437910263f0237f376efeaa9686908da054783e76c628cdb61e34c0df
BUNDLE-330,bundle:bundle-330,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: logging (1 issue + 5 PRs),pr,179550,Enable eager tests for inductor-unittest - Enable TestViewOps and TestDevicePrecision on Intel GPU,module: logging,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,188987,"176688, 176689, 178849, 179549, 179550",1,5,failed_ci_checks,PR #179550 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",e9d04981b1d0fdbb7b9ac2d464b31a40f16148ced1b4f355691ff332e5f3d16f
BUNDLE-331,bundle:bundle-331,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: inductor (4 issues + 1 PR),pr,184185,Use memory stats for persistent reductions,module: inductor,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"139908, 141265, 141916, 142250",184185,4,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #184185 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, linux-jammy-py3.14-clang18 / test-osdc (crossref, 2, 2, mt-l-x86iavx512-8-64).","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, linux-jammy-py3.14-clang18 / test-osdc (crossref, 2, 2, mt-l-x86iavx512-8-64), rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, linux-jammy-py3.14-clang18 / test-osdc (crossref, 2, 2, mt-l-x86iavx512-8-64). Review signal: My agent says I refreshed the PR by rebasing it onto current main after the rerun still reported an unclassified inductor_huggingface failure in eager DebertaV2 import before Inductor compilation. The rebased branch h...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",bbdaa2d965370b3a4bde5ab834025c3334eeefad180acdaf29734c8f0a3d809c
BUNDLE-332,bundle:bundle-332,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: special (4 issues + 1 PR),pr,183328,[special] Add arbitrary-order modified Bessel functions,module: special,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"76324, 78065, 80152, 80157",183328,4,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #183328 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=BLOCKED; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",d193c1276d04c1034163fa2d17b485f982c5986584edf37f314ddab667d9bebc
BUNDLE-333,bundle:bundle-333,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: aotinductor (1 issue + 4 PRs),pr,184531,[Inductor] Tolerance increase for test_bmm_large_batch_dynamic_cuda,module: aotinductor,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,188670,"169694, 183691, 184531, 187050",1,4,failed_ci_checks,PR #184531 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",593925eb1c9a71032e67621cdb7a4fa8e98131e13ae0d12d74187397d6d8f75d
BUNDLE-334,bundle:bundle-334,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: ci (3 issues + 1 PR),pr,188720,[ROCm] Enable cholesky_ex via hipSOLVER xgeev (ROCm >= 7.14),module: ci,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"181647, 181648, 181649",188720,3,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #188720 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",4160f1b7cf65c8c960ff2ad558bc1dc886a8e266a1b9916501af27ce2357f07e
BUNDLE-335,bundle:bundle-335,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamic shapes (2 issues + 2 PRs),pr,187589,Make FX symbolic tracing state thread-local,module: dynamic shapes,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"126024, 168042","168999, 187589",2,2,failed_ci_checks,PR #187589 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",09ea9b08f5b2d60dfa8eb92ba2696cef506b8a7a931734148ca6f78a1a099d3b
BUNDLE-336,bundle:bundle-336,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: tests (1 issue + 3 PRs),pr,184356,[4/N][Test] Migrate TestFwdGradients device-agnostic skips to `@skipOps`,module: tests,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,177259,"184355, 184356, 184678",1,3,failed_ci_checks,PR #184356 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",8b6bd36fac8c93a8a11b1d9d0749c3d0c001b7e0cff2369ba1746049bfd13964
BUNDLE-337,bundle:bundle-337,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: inductor (1 issue + 3 PRs),pr,183278,[Inductor][Refactor] 4/N Move reduction heuristics from triton_heuristics.py into triton_codegen/,module: inductor,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,178153,"183276, 183277, 183278",1,3,failed_ci_checks,PR #183277 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",c15e2a94e68219015513a2fd937c8ae36ee50cd44b00b99fb8de2f0954a35605
BUNDLE-338,bundle:bundle-338,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: cpp (1 issue + 3 PRs),pr,186854,Simplify endianness check using std::endian,module: cpp,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,176662,"179286, 186854, 188440",1,3,failed_ci_checks,PR #188440 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",47c8ea3579a67aa8385778701132f460f5b7dbe09e14cd3fc741036e4849a96b
BUNDLE-339,bundle:bundle-339,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: error checking (1 issue + 3 PRs),pr,174025,Add test for CosineAnnealingLR when T_max = 0,module: error checking,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,177833,"168223, 169107, 174025",1,3,failed_ci_checks,PR #174025 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",02f773003515db0fb7a446453d595156c7cf916a060a115977f041015b391c2b
BUNDLE-340,bundle:bundle-340,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: arm (2 issues + 1 PR),pr,186245,[1/N] Optimize PyTorch CUDA build with LLVM BOLT,module: arm,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"188602, 189078",186245,2,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #186245 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",aa69eebbfcb4fadf730977f98a6bdae805014bc75811c9b9d143d177172ac4cb
BUNDLE-341,bundle:bundle-341,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: edge cases (2 issues + 1 PR),pr,185790,Fix torch.nn.functional.gelu returning NaN for infinite inputs,module: edge cases,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"185770, 187293",185790,2,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #185790 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=22,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",5019511468163244d76e6a69182aff989967068909bc529f1db1d5242f40339e
BUNDLE-342,bundle:bundle-342,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: advanced indexing (2 issues + 1 PR),pr,184987,Fix index_select refs bounds semantics,module: advanced indexing,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"169779, 187463",184987,2,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #184987 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",05902a514623e251b15e56e4a74249ba9d0f0d26cb85e67737d6f6d1fd47454b
BUNDLE-343,bundle:bundle-343,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: memory format (2 issues + 1 PR),pr,182712,[MPS] Enhance Linear tensor ops to avoid unnecessary .contiguous() calls on weight tensor,module: memory format,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"181946, 183758",182712,2,1,contributor_update_needed,PR #182712 is contributor-owned until requested changes or review questions are answered.,Keep parked or close after maintainer review if the contributor path is no longer active; do not ask for maintainer work first.,medium,reviewDecision=CHANGES_REQUESTED; stale_days=29,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",c46f9a044aca032f0c397e7ee0289a7385451f9f804885b405562f19ef68b7c2
BUNDLE-344,bundle:bundle-344,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: openreg (2 issues + 1 PR),pr,165837,[OpenReg][Random] Enrich OpenReg random number generator module implementation add focused documentation,module: openreg,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"158917, 172318",165837,2,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #165837 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",8e07de6fb31e035bd301f347022bf39b992912a8a1b4a5897146b20b4d53f980
BUNDLE-345,bundle:bundle-345,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: inductor (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,189162,[inductor] Use non-NaN-propagating fmax in softmax persistent reduction,module: inductor,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,189161,189162,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #189162 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",749b2ba3b846840a302e0a0f33decf59e81277634127531f4c00e14e0c1cb00b
BUNDLE-346,bundle:bundle-346,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: binaries (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,188951,Add ROCm Docker release images,module: binaries,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,188319,188951,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #188951 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",7e6d1d4d019e8db4e88fb12072d1f964936de8798106eaa33a7dc5ea98d0bba5
BUNDLE-347,bundle:bundle-347,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: inductor (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,188681,"[Inductor] Use CUDA toolkit's libdevice by default, fallback to Triton's bundled if not found",module: inductor,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,188672,188681,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #188681 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",eb4b0d72e88b89a1dc8c7e1b7a2dccc8fde55f3ce74faef326fb508806d65763
BUNDLE-348,bundle:bundle-348,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: pipelining (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,188500,Allow pre-split pipeline microbatches,module: pipelining,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,188727,188500,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #188500 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=3,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",f22bc1dcecd27902a381a9b872908a9972d50c51bb2952aefee629bfbad4aec8
BUNDLE-349,bundle:bundle-349,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: build (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,188263,(fix) NNPACK PeachPy air gapped build,module: build,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,188652,188263,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #188263 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=12,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",b2e736000448ee6d60026b297520f7be4bc147e268f5dd05ee427310c31dfd0e
BUNDLE-350,bundle:bundle-350,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: dataloader (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,187696,Add DataLoader worker signal message affixes,module: dataloader,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,188020,187696,1,1,contributor_update_needed,PR #187696 is contributor-owned until requested changes or review questions are answered.,Keep parked or close after maintainer review if the contributor path is no longer active; do not ask for maintainer work first.,medium,reviewDecision=CHANGES_REQUESTED; stale_days=15,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",8a6b1cd07a11218e7550735516a78a37a117785fdabcc0811f7f843ef16faf11
BUNDLE-351,bundle:bundle-351,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: inductor (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,187328,Add fusion provenance to profiler timelines,module: inductor,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,189270,187328,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #187328 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",2652a7668ea6a08d5b098cce741adc5d315c81f6eb7728d9ce3119420ee24f9c
BUNDLE-352,bundle:bundle-352,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: compile ux (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186965,[RFC][dynamo] Add ContextVar.get() tracing support (Phase 1),module: compile ux,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,186449,186965,1,1,contributor_update_needed,PR #186965 is contributor-owned until requested changes or review questions are answered.,Keep parked or close after maintainer review if the contributor path is no longer active; do not ask for maintainer work first.,medium,reviewDecision=CHANGES_REQUESTED; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",7965a6b80c87f2f3079225140afc961ca17910ac93bda93c71ba1111678994d6
BUNDLE-353,bundle:bundle-353,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: ci (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186835,[RFC]: Auto-select and run Operator Performance Benchmarks from PR Diffs,module: ci,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,186837,186835,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #186835 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",2d2c2e4300e6f9987f41fe2f0d088f5d2f9c3ad9434b602e8a528e64fb2fffde
BUNDLE-354,bundle:bundle-354,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: binaries (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186209,Unify triton-xpu CD nightly build into 'triton' package with version suffix,module: binaries,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,186350,186209,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #186209 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",d590fb48066eabbfcbce4f3b90f06d5928330d6424d84528502eecd449834889
BUNDLE-355,bundle:bundle-355,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: backend (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185486,[OpenReg] Add minimal implementation for inductor integration in openreg,module: backend,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,181093,185486,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #185486 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",76dd93f4e45df6b0170132444c5dfa4ac60a18cfd22f0244ea22c5a4906a1dfd
BUNDLE-356,bundle:bundle-356,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: xnnpack (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,183487,Update XNNPACK submodule to 0b66c9f,module: xnnpack,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,183795,183487,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #183487 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",e82fb3d8ce33588ec024ab291c5ab42db68fa08c8e38182bcff02fa693016863
BUNDLE-357,bundle:bundle-357,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: correctness (silent) (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,182376,[CUDA][CPU] Unify CPU/GPU relu/max behavior,module: correctness (silent),"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,181801,182376,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #182376 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",8e261f521ccec1fa63ac33239fb16a74d781da1276b1915e77e73cafa3afa080
BUNDLE-358,bundle:bundle-358,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: ci (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,180208,Update slow tests,module: ci,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,187183,180208,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #180208 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",c5478bfb8258aa2c6bc8b23556ee60dcfb91ba037adeba69af352d3d13c92ca1
BUNDLE-359,bundle:bundle-359,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: cuda (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,180020,Add a debug tool to warn on NULL stream use,module: cuda,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,167885,180020,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #180020 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",faca667fc7a37685ac0b6324eb1e46493ae710e4bc97809467c23fbc7083fd34
BUNDLE-360,bundle:bundle-360,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: ci (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,176678,[CI][Windows] Add NVIDIA RTX workflow,module: ci,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,170753,176678,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #176678 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",7bf95ee71c50492d97348fa63bc6f10df32a6aa3cb4a5da7ef1caf28c88e0ad0
BUNDLE-361,bundle:bundle-361,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: memory usage (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,176317,[MPS] Leveraging unified memory memcpy instead of blit encoding for tensor device transfers,module: memory usage,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,172987,176317,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #176317 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=12,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",fe8d9911ffcb0620b40dbe86ec710142cb1bbf1281d940fd3f49b2da8dab135b
BUNDLE-362,bundle:bundle-362,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: functorch (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,176265,Add backward batching rules for SDPA and fix attn_bias under vmap,module: functorch,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,187266,176265,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #176265 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=4,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",d4148bac03ac8bbb58f233ea4b914d3804ee20abab4cb9f1860a399c24e83d69
BUNDLE-363,bundle:bundle-363,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: build (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,173519,Add on-demand ppc64le wheel build support,module: build,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,180362,173519,1,1,contributor_update_needed,PR #173519 is contributor-owned until requested changes or review questions are answered.,Keep parked or close after maintainer review if the contributor path is no longer active; do not ask for maintainer work first.,medium,reviewDecision=CHANGES_REQUESTED; stale_days=22,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",59d4241210a17918c18d3cd69235c44e10f20fd8890f4375b4cf4cd4a31c5b72
BUNDLE-364,bundle:bundle-364,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: fsdp (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,162706,Fix accelerator-related skip-decorators for tests,module: fsdp,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,162179,162706,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #162706 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",2ac28dd26ceb45b3682b39d3602509f4a01824df61fb69b292f8b59395210b3b
BUNDLE-365,bundle:bundle-365,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: pipelining (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,153557,"[PP] wip, allow grad to be None",module: pipelining,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,153484,153557,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #153557 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=110,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",986dabf6c73e200032c6ac23aeb814465b65f38802b923b8cde7f8f73fdf2039
BUNDLE-366,bundle:bundle-366,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: decompositions (3 issues + 2 PRs),pr,186091,Preserve CUDA LSTM in Inductor,module: decompositions,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"91439, 140845, 149909","185902, 186091",3,2,failed_ci_checks,"PR #186091 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_models_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), +1 more.","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_models_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), +1 more, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_models_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), in...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",b8f74909c2448d10f7f92bbcee17d79332658c501dc0a1c94a0eec460f2d983c
BUNDLE-367,bundle:bundle-367,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: rocm (3 issues + 1 PR),pr,188006,[ROCm] Fix torch.pdist correctness on ROCm; re-enable test_pdist_norm_large,module: rocm,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"168861, 168863, 168868",188006,3,1,contributor_update_needed,PR #188006 is contributor-owned until requested changes or review questions are answered.,Keep parked or close after maintainer review if the contributor path is no longer active; do not ask for maintainer work first.,medium,reviewDecision=CHANGES_REQUESTED; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",8807d04c755683317aa656ac841a03e7e5b7c56732b12f91cc9608ea14b9cb45
BUNDLE-368,bundle:bundle-368,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamo (2 issues + 2 PRs),pr,186069,Fix Dynamo round on NumPy scalar results,module: dynamo,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"141258, 146951","185815, 186069",2,2,failed_ci_checks,PR #186069 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",f77ca89878e119cde236f08e47f304839e43f13074a327f47a6bb3680cf09f27
BUNDLE-369,bundle:bundle-369,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: autograd (2 issues + 2 PRs),pr,186466,Fix scalar Tensor args for custom op float schemas in Dynamo,module: autograd,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"123470, 162687","185132, 186466",2,2,failed_ci_checks,PR #186466 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",8e510abb64bdca95d321a119265aa3b835ff51221cb469c6c479b2b6239e9f12
BUNDLE-370,bundle:bundle-370,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: docker (2 issues + 1 PR),pr,186538,Fix CUDA driver linking for Inductor CUTLASS builds,module: docker,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"103417, 103891",186538,2,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #186538 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",d80f569137d8a64ed21fc4f1271d52389f321063351b3e9d2242a6369fa40f60
BUNDLE-371,bundle:bundle-371,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamo (2 issues + 1 PR),pr,186406,Fix invalid source in AOT repro generation,module: dynamo,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"128830, 134885",186406,2,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #186406 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",18cb3ce0134772e599d2973b2c56bbefcdedc4d815cec331cfda03ff88fdf02f
BUNDLE-372,bundle:bundle-372,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: dynamo (2 issues + 1 PR),pr,186366,Support vmapped compiled autograd.Functions,module: dynamo,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"129845, 133493",186366,2,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #186366 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g).","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (i...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",d5bfb5afe0dbd4eb4ea5544972d06cc6eff494d61cce9cb4a7db29a30e0ef990
BUNDLE-373,bundle:bundle-373,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamo (2 issues + 1 PR),pr,186180,Fix Dynamo cProfile under active Python profilers,module: dynamo,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"137869, 139232",186180,2,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #186180 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",5e62fdfecaf71447599c1eb6683e7b01f7cce7c564d52a46fbae51455e494449
BUNDLE-374,bundle:bundle-374,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamo (2 issues + 1 PR),pr,185528,Fix Dynamo tracing of compile support checks,module: dynamo,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"120115, 154259",185528,2,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #185528 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",79560de5e835a9251173944ecdd72294bb3f5a7f8a5eff1e19308c625ca0351d
BUNDLE-375,bundle:bundle-375,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamo (2 issues + 1 PR),pr,185462,Fix NumPy ndarray operators under default device contexts,module: dynamo,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"140884, 156162",185462,2,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #185462 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",e935e257cafb3c05c237db473b0264b855e24ad4ea0c8bb433a103a8eb534778
BUNDLE-376,bundle:bundle-376,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dtensor (2 issues + 1 PR),pr,185356,Fix DTensor embedding mask state under compile,module: dtensor,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"159843, 160697",185356,2,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #185356 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",7aa996f62df8c004175c8c248025ff9bda0eccf0012e1f1c6372297447d9f410
BUNDLE-377,bundle:bundle-377,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: higher order operators (2 issues + 1 PR),pr,185116,Thread effect tokens through cond branches,module: higher order operators,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"163143, 165981",185116,2,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #185116 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",79c8f1c409d1d83de027abf3094f41e54685a3e96b3f979056c6ac569f1c62aa
BUNDLE-378,bundle:bundle-378,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: dispatch (2 issues + 1 PR),pr,184223,Run Inductor fallbacks below autograd,module: dispatch,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"139521, 139629",184223,2,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #184223 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",25845d4a838382eba845f53eb663cf53e899723a627c82087a56474de2151d11
BUNDLE-379,bundle:bundle-379,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: inductor (2 issues + 1 PR),pr,184121,Improve persistent tiled reduction defaults,module: inductor,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"148682, 149982",184121,2,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #184121 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8).","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8). Review signal: My agent says I rebased t...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",d8e29ac77bac4141e4533d61915af84a2561c3428243ba69de20868e123ab66d
BUNDLE-380,bundle:bundle-380,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: inductor (2 issues + 1 PR),pr,184016,Fix Inductor DCE for fallback alias mutations,module: inductor,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"166009, 166014",184016,2,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #184016 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g).","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (induct...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",856315e10ea723b13a6b0344d1ef247c64abf10bc16f1fa6cccd44e2ad8b44c8
BUNDLE-381,bundle:bundle-381,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamo (2 issues + 1 PR),pr,132135,"[torch.special] Adding betainc, betaincc, betaincinv, betainccinv, betaln and beta with backward operation",module: dynamo,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"132133, 145014",132135,2,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #132135 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",c6b3bb3123a0e28dacbd06bae958324438144a519c5e04e86d6b395a7dfb45c8
BUNDLE-382,bundle:bundle-382,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: privateuse1 (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,189174,Fix dcp privateuse1 stream support,module: privateuse1,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,165097,189174,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #189174 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",dc5a6f0d1e94116c286db262abb87d72d03329175cbcc76006df88f7b997fb6a
BUNDLE-383,bundle:bundle-383,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: activation checkpointing (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,188906,Add torch.utils.checkpoint.register_determinism_check,module: activation checkpointing,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,162980,188906,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #188906 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",81a6b4ee3e781adafa2f8c6266deecc0f474daebc7ecf511cefdba1fcc3567df
BUNDLE-384,bundle:bundle-384,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: dynamic shapes (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186897,Warn when custom op int schema specializes SymInts,module: dynamic shapes,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,154851,186897,1,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #186897 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g).","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g).",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",f29485dc633f17309f93fe09a818a8f347968d5130f011372aacebcb574c66a1
BUNDLE-385,bundle:bundle-385,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamic shapes (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186893,Fix dynamic size-one tensor recompiles,module: dynamic shapes,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,160271,186893,1,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #186893 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), pallas-tpu-py3.12-inductor / test (inductor-pallas-tpu, 1, 1, linux.google.tpuv7x.1).","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), pallas-tpu-py3.12-inductor / test (inductor-pallas-tpu, 1, 1, linux.google.tpuv7x.1), rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), pallas-tpu-py3.12-inductor / test (inductor-pallas-tpu, 1, 1, linux.google.tpuv7x.1). Review signal: My agent says I rebased the ghstack PR onto current main and fixed the CI failures from dy...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",4de3f04e85183ae37a8e7eeccab355ee9d8b1397270616d4417c9f66450ff689
BUNDLE-386,bundle:bundle-386,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamic shapes (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186886,Fix keyed user Triton autotune in Inductor,module: dynamic shapes,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,164124,186886,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #186886 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",130831bab2c355c553582ca35f221c3e1932fac6bcf6e97e341242a113be46ef
BUNDLE-387,bundle:bundle-387,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: minifier (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186564,Skip uninitialized outputs during accuracy minification,module: minifier,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,93437,186564,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #186564 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",3d69e1703c4bccdd58936f52c0fafd511d11e411fc87cbe14fbb97fd3d59a971
BUNDLE-388,bundle:bundle-388,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamo (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186553,[dynamo] Graph break on packed sequence lower ops,module: dynamo,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,93501,186553,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #186553 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",79dad078e2e1de3b64384dd43a11ee14c273450319ed7eae104ad116edcd7f5d
BUNDLE-389,bundle:bundle-389,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: minifier (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186551,Preserve symbolic tensor metadata in after-AOT repros,module: minifier,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,93367,186551,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #186551 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",5e716a1496c90a546812b2ac77db940fd5f5673c1834802859fbed182e2adb5b
BUNDLE-390,bundle:bundle-390,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: minifier (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186546,Preserve original Dynamo minifier backend failures,module: minifier,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,97750,186546,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #186546 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",69b2cd4a21fdfa0f5297d639b065fd9eb45318046118b4a29581c951e99afea7
BUNDLE-391,bundle:bundle-391,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: convolution (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186534,Account for fanout in Inductor reuse realization,module: convolution,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,105768,186534,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #186534 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",c360ba3f50bf71e090122249c9e267acc967e2cef7ebc5a438ab109545623c34
BUNDLE-392,bundle:bundle-392,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: custom-operators (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186533,Fix SymInt vector dispatcher signature detection,module: custom-operators,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,106135,186533,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #186533 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",b444c3c490b07adad07bddec0a5872b463cf1028c9dd6b29fe7f28b07e267d8c
BUNDLE-393,bundle:bundle-393,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: memory usage (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186531,Remove stale Dynamo skip for max_pool1d pooling test,module: memory usage,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,111320,186531,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #186531 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",cbd1f0279b090ebdf07e0625dc0c8762efefc8e806f43fada5c1334db57046e0
BUNDLE-394,bundle:bundle-394,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamo (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186530,[dynamo] Restore autocast dtype after trace-time updates,module: dynamo,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,111385,186530,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #186530 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",2cb5b7f98df748ac1e60eb2b427889923009f0a6ef4369cf765efe27078c085c
BUNDLE-395,bundle:bundle-395,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamic shapes (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186520,Preserve SymInt bindings in dynamic-shape minifier repros,module: dynamic shapes,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,114296,186520,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #186520 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",654c9d78841f4b7814bda2d353d97d8b99d98e0ffcb7ee9acbeedd324200b64e
BUNDLE-396,bundle:bundle-396,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamo (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186507,Invalidate Dynamo caches when module hooks change,module: dynamo,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,117265,186507,1,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #186507 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8).","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8).",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",01b81511fc1688278fc3e28f649623d9c3a0dbce7ccf3a063ae5d2446a4be95a
BUNDLE-397,bundle:bundle-397,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamic shapes (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186505,Simplify mod-one symbolic shape guards,module: dynamic shapes,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,118332,186505,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #186505 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",0da09841c9b34b32c4449c681dbad29c300349925d89f748aa734e8828019cbf
BUNDLE-398,bundle:bundle-398,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamo (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186504,Allow HOP speculation through torch autograd.Function skipfiles,module: dynamo,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,118334,186504,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #186504 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",f26842d69c44a368030c4a284bc24c9655fad26f086bdab67b3f9a67bf2a55e0
BUNDLE-399,bundle:bundle-399,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: aotdispatch (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186503,Preserve input aliases for multi-output view returns,module: aotdispatch,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,118739,186503,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #186503 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",be8b99d94855d4e0a05468a4d386c1d2a6fc5f8c2709977d48bbb827fefc838b
BUNDLE-400,bundle:bundle-400,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: logging (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186502,Make context decorator frames identify the context manager,module: logging,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,118747,186502,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #186502 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=APPROVED; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",7a245a40f56a157a52301ae4be933783f5b5603ac90ee20f3aecff9582ff007f
BUNDLE-401,bundle:bundle-401,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamo (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186500,Fix Dynamo resume after f-string logging graph breaks,module: dynamo,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,120375,186500,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #186500 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",a3116d3af0acb843379b39308726ee27eb4b1094ebe92a8dfed9c832b21d698a
BUNDLE-402,bundle:bundle-402,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamic shapes (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186498,Add dynamic shape test assertions for input dims,module: dynamic shapes,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,120911,186498,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #186498 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",c1ca96fd0eaf7f5d33bbb1d2050af0c968516f0b4b738b239400e5b626e063d6
BUNDLE-403,bundle:bundle-403,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: logging (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186495,Initialize compile context for non-strict export tracing,module: logging,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,121318,186495,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #186495 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",f2ce58aed4b61811d61c0e6b0904b07a29668b131a8358953bd46dd73a18cc4b
BUNDLE-404,bundle:bundle-404,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: user triton (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186494,[Dynamo] Constant-fold CUDA Tensor.is_pinned(),module: user triton,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,121526,186494,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #186494 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",9e1f384492f05b8f4f842b32c72907acfdd13fe60af885ab9ecf89403dbe1f54
BUNDLE-405,bundle:bundle-405,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamo (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186487,Run Dynamo compilation with empty functorch stack,module: dynamo,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,122200,186487,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #186487 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",e46571142b5858b4587efadbd3ff79d5a67d96d4ec07721784f94d032afa6a60
BUNDLE-406,bundle:bundle-406,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamic shapes (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186485,Fix export dynamic dims with size-one examples,module: dynamic shapes,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,122294,186485,1,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #186485 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_models_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), +1 more.","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_models_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), +1 more, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_models_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",81278e9c3d693b682c16e640245a23bc309d201c3485a2496732c7d3deae1d84
BUNDLE-407,bundle:bundle-407,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamo (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186472,Graph break on dynamic unspecialized ModuleList indexing,module: dynamo,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,122578,186472,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #186472 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",2cad64438919024aa392f2c9d068e2bc68a677a4599f2ab05b469ff87c87e95f
BUNDLE-408,bundle:bundle-408,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: dynamic shapes (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186471,Handle symbolic tensors in overlap status,module: dynamic shapes,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,122773,186471,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #186471 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",f09d12823601df9b3f69b2de00a0daadbb99b468eaac5deeec79cf6897c2b8e2
BUNDLE-409,bundle:bundle-409,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamo (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186469,Wrap Dynamo-generated bytecode runtime errors,module: dynamo,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,123374,186469,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #186469 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",ca263870874bd8461c560116686d6ea0d98dc732e40c947d3d984cc1ed8096a0
BUNDLE-410,bundle:bundle-410,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamo (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186467,Preserve non-persistent buffers in compiled modules,module: dynamo,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,123411,186467,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #186467 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",e11d2f263cc5f3024145f7b0f9fe40ee88d0582d4b7297104edc319d94e81423
BUNDLE-411,bundle:bundle-411,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: dynamic shapes (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186464,Fix singleton quotient divisibility replacement,module: dynamic shapes,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,123651,186464,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #186464 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",96383bc29d9e828b50acf99200a494c807d3d00b2757458528bd53ff22b15079
BUNDLE-412,bundle:bundle-412,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: mta (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186463,Split foreach bool inplace error samples,module: mta,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,123663,186463,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #186463 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",647b6e1ad758d637e04be82f3cee3691efa9f2c3e83c58a5a3051aa451c31d7b
BUNDLE-413,bundle:bundle-413,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: higher order operators (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186462,Allow cond branch mutation during export,module: higher order operators,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,123972,186462,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #186462 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",1369f45ed6d3ed01c98be30172e66fcb68527f811f31559a713f952ba42fc633
BUNDLE-414,bundle:bundle-414,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: dynamic shapes (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186461,Fix SymBool equality handling in symbolic shapes,module: dynamic shapes,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,124110,186461,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #186461 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=APPROVED; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",298f55e9d6124cd6af4e771b20f49d29e4bc0e96bbf3088c47ff337c813c9cfc
BUNDLE-415,bundle:bundle-415,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamo (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186460,Support dynamic mode in Dynamo explain,module: dynamo,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,124163,186460,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #186460 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",cc9297eef8ae3b8432d50543d8f7985c2d5143ddd382734d8c77c7937780f27c
BUNDLE-416,bundle:bundle-416,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: ci (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186455,Fix AOTAutograd Dynamo memory leak repro,module: ci,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,124747,186455,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #186455 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",f224812e55b249617814dac023168a220dbb1ecbe1eb4fc1321e8d4cc96a1337
BUNDLE-417,bundle:bundle-417,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: correctness (silent) (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186446,Fix fake overlap handling for Dynamo try/except,module: correctness (silent),"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,126474,186446,1,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #186446 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, lf-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_models_integration, 1, 1, lf-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g).","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, lf-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_models_integration, 1, 1, lf-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, lf-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_models_integration, 1, 1, lf-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g).",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",80d8bbb4ce08b4a9bf80462cb19c642c5816b44b5cbe2cc4a32019b819937bb8
BUNDLE-418,bundle:bundle-418,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: optimizer (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186444,Fix Adam capturable zero-lr NaNs,module: optimizer,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,126514,186444,1,1,contributor_update_needed,PR #186444 is contributor-owned until requested changes or review questions are answered.,Keep parked or close after maintainer review if the contributor path is no longer active; do not ask for maintainer work first.,medium,reviewDecision=CHANGES_REQUESTED; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",712396cf2dbbb6b9f3bbb702526d7267af29024f2bda2a1149f01fe2b455298a
BUNDLE-419,bundle:bundle-419,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: dynamo (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186443,Validate random_ and uniform_ meta arguments,module: dynamo,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,126834,186443,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #186443 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",8bea8a1f6b053080d5b568e5761cf1325441533860a0d32987645fada357a3f4
BUNDLE-420,bundle:bundle-420,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: dynamo (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186435,Fix mkldnn FakeTensor error handling,module: dynamo,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,127111,186435,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #186435 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",638bedf10c8d5dfc9a3b68eedf16f7df33bf9e7851a814cdf56b6e8b8ca09be7
BUNDLE-421,bundle:bundle-421,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: onnx (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186429,Fix ONNX export of pad_sequence with symbolic split lengths,module: onnx,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,127153,186429,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #186429 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=APPROVED; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",17fd18908c69e73d42594116a9a50d713f271b57bbff2ef708bc23fdb8f038d7
BUNDLE-422,bundle:bundle-422,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: dynamo (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186420,Run torchrec tests in Dynamo CI,module: dynamo,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,128531,186420,1,1,contributor_update_needed,PR #186420 is contributor-owned until requested changes or review questions are answered.,Keep parked or close after maintainer review if the contributor path is no longer active; do not ask for maintainer work first.,medium,reviewDecision=CHANGES_REQUESTED; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",8a94a501aaa2c315cd7a0720c1305ca7c9ab289b593e499b504ee359ca1722d8
BUNDLE-423,bundle:bundle-423,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: oncall: pt2 (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186415,Fix Dynamo Parameter construction in new modules,oncall: pt2,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,128556,186415,1,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #186415 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8).","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8).",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",577ce1a940861111270a706add9695d4293ee4b645a506d53659ad4b557e2d47
BUNDLE-424,bundle:bundle-424,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: dynamic shapes (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186409,Fix subclass view replay with dynamic metadata,module: dynamic shapes,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,128649,186409,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #186409 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",460bc338a329cb87a8d07d6cd97269683449a7ec5e5d86f5213452fb17af8538
BUNDLE-425,bundle:bundle-425,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: dynamo (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186397,Keep constant-false torch._check in compiled graph,module: dynamo,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,129327,186397,1,1,contributor_update_needed,PR #186397 is contributor-owned until requested changes or review questions are answered.,Keep parked or close after maintainer review if the contributor path is no longer active; do not ask for maintainer work first.,medium,Rebase - we recently made some fixes to torch._check handling in Dynamo | My agent says I rebased the PR onto current main as requested and adapted the constant-false torch._check path to the newer Dynamo message handling. The rebased diff is now just...,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",8a052c4d88f790d46c68d63c43a343a7a85b8a1a893e05ee2c965ecd95c72ad5
BUNDLE-426,bundle:bundle-426,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: functionalization (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186380,Run python decompositions under functionalization,module: functionalization,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,129418,186380,1,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #186380 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g).","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g). Review signal: My agent says I rebased the PR and addressed the cu...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",0b0ea73f2c02e68b01e28886f2e40d01ea9042811e9d8455d12659522eaa28c8
BUNDLE-427,bundle:bundle-427,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: dynamic shapes (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186373,Disable duck sizing by default,module: dynamic shapes,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,129456,186373,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #186373 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",7f1615bef8ae15cf6a493198711faa71036eb267467f1dda73d7e8ccf344a925
BUNDLE-428,bundle:bundle-428,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamo (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186372,Fix torch.Tensor construction from traced NumPy arrays,module: dynamo,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,129648,186372,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #186372 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",43dfcc258424ac334a94d22182da0681ea9d9bf787cf9c5c3fcc759f6ce6a403
BUNDLE-429,bundle:bundle-429,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamic shapes (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186364,Prevent guard validation from mutating ShapeEnv,module: dynamic shapes,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,129936,186364,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #186364 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",aab13c272a521e584e0ef67d27ece815ce9e0e5179cd0b901a61028878e3e355
BUNDLE-430,bundle:bundle-430,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: aotdispatch (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186355,Fix AOTAutograd unused output backward pruning,module: aotdispatch,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,131794,186355,1,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #186355 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8).","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8).",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",c15a6c032939b57d5a9a9608fa6367afc6395ae71c86770751472923ceea3803
BUNDLE-431,bundle:bundle-431,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamo (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186349,Improve Dynamo logger method graph-break guidance,module: dynamo,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,132635,186349,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #186349 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",a5410cd21fc8c2efcb2710f41ce7ebe1aac9ea3c3fe27ee8b2bb2e478f0d23a4
BUNDLE-432,bundle:bundle-432,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: compile ux (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186340,Ensure explicit compile attempts skipped code,module: compile ux,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,132923,186340,1,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #186340 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g).","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g). Review signal: My agent says I rebased this PR onto current main past the unrelated NaiveDilatedConvolution trunk build failure and addressed the review-subagent findings before resubmitting. The C++ eval-frame override now preserve...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",e6d311f3aa67cac87f5fcd8961cac352590a60407fade187211829af62647ef8
BUNDLE-433,bundle:bundle-433,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: dynamic shapes (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186291,Fix export distribution validation assertions,module: dynamic shapes,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,135061,186291,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #186291 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",91082485ee6bf92c5bfd8c5b3224583e4e6cc03fe5cc645a0da13c2eadcee731
BUNDLE-434,bundle:bundle-434,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: pt2-dispatcher (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186287,Reject non-functional export decomposition entries,module: pt2-dispatcher,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,135759,186287,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #186287 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",d4b143b1d1ab0f392fa0f9f6283076bd779d9cb09da2e22602962e528f3019b6
BUNDLE-435,bundle:bundle-435,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: dynamo (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186283,Trace data_ptr through tensor constructors,module: dynamo,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,136271,186283,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #186283 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",c3f12e21c44f2de44a782d8e51359068726351e2126407b40a45ce89bb65f560
BUNDLE-436,bundle:bundle-436,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: vllm (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186280,Disable profiler Python tracing during compile,module: vllm,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,136404,186280,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #186280 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",66e86fa4d40d4260c728fdd39ebe64904d24593a14cb210f16bb05f593741664
BUNDLE-437,bundle:bundle-437,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamic shapes (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186263,Increase small fake tensor constant limit,module: dynamic shapes,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,136642,186263,1,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #186263 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-cpu-test / test-osdc (cpu_inductor_torchbench, 1, 2, mt-l-x86iamx-8-64, unstable).","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-cpu-test / test-osdc (cpu_inductor_torchbench, 1, 2, mt-l-x86iamx-8-64, unstable), rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-cpu-test / test-osdc (cpu_induc...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",999eb2d78ee38d2d45931ee95281f63777b8c463f0cc60a6def32b52012f9723
BUNDLE-438,bundle:bundle-438,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamo (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186249,[dynamo] Support time.time as a runtime scalar input,module: dynamo,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,137068,186249,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #186249 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",0975a713da044eef57085ba222aa66af947760378d6363b651a81c8e97d781db
BUNDLE-439,bundle:bundle-439,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: nestedtensor (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186225,Preserve NJT nested ints in AOT subclass outputs,module: nestedtensor,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,137275,186225,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #186225 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",9a6c07c37b2cdf1080be019cf664816861bb0ef341581539540d3b2cc9cae7f0
BUNDLE-440,bundle:bundle-440,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamo (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186222,Include epilogue guards in Dynamo code_parts,module: dynamo,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,137388,186222,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #186222 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",b9100d90f8bb95bae626d26d545f55738ac2c161e4adcb3810a7971776a6db08
BUNDLE-441,bundle:bundle-441,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: oncall: pt2 (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186217,Move FX graph cache hash details out of debug logs,oncall: pt2,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,137875,186217,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #186217 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",b21de850c9b923c07f51208aceee1202ca0ab01d57fa76d3fca8b25a415c038d
BUNDLE-442,bundle:bundle-442,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: oncall: pt2 (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186214,Profile lazy backward compilation with cProfile,oncall: pt2,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,137996,186214,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #186214 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",bb7275e9817e7dc827173c7a729a348990e6e500db87888eaaf1fc12f81927b2
BUNDLE-443,bundle:bundle-443,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: oncall: export (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186194,Canonicalize trunc of symbolic integer division by one,oncall: export,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,138926,186194,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #186194 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",f0a57f9f736589af6b09b9ac867710b786d9e1365d0ea2d20264803480ee4aeb
BUNDLE-444,bundle:bundle-444,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: multithreading (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186192,Fix CompiledFxGraph callable state across threads,module: multithreading,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,138961,186192,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #186192 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",fbefcad73f410f575fbaeb93ab140ed0a87ec21c496c96572f240d137c37aee8
BUNDLE-445,bundle:bundle-445,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: dynamo (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186189,Report dynamo expected-failure XPASSes,module: dynamo,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,139080,186189,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #186189 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",0e4d32751fd22e7700f511678ac32c4b9330bbdaa16bf042dad070a4e986a760
BUNDLE-446,bundle:bundle-446,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: faketensor (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186188,Fix FakeTensor wrapping for meta tensor constructor,module: faketensor,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,139092,186188,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #186188 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",245ad06043cf4eb8085acfc8211eb0858d6197a6f037fc6d76b1fd0089fb7fd5
BUNDLE-447,bundle:bundle-447,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamo (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186168,Fix Dynamo tracing of torch.random.fork_rng,module: dynamo,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,139603,186168,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #186168 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",48575eed8c54e5b7d4175625b0ab1d0f5ee5ab57d314bbc16193d2b82e5cbd3d
BUNDLE-448,bundle:bundle-448,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: forward ad (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186160,Fix FakeTensor forward AD batch_norm meta rewrapping,module: forward ad,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,139756,186160,1,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #186160 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_huggingface, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), linux-jammy-py3.14t-clang18 / test-osdc (default, 3, 5, mt-l-x86iavx512-16-128), unit-test / inductor-cpu-build / build-osdc, +1 more.","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_huggingface, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), linux-jammy-py3.14t-clang18 / test-osdc (default, 3, 5, mt-l-x86iavx512-16-128), unit-test / inductor-cpu-build / build-osdc, +1 more, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_huggingface, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), linux-jammy-py3.14t-clang18 / test-osdc (default, 3, 5, mt-l-x86iavx512-16-128), unit-test / inductor-cpu-build / build-osdc, +1 more.",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",dbabb353730b61b874853e750666a9e1bd126456671a29327272a08d8c4633a7
BUNDLE-449,bundle:bundle-449,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: faketensor (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186150,Fix compile storage semantics for as_strided scatter,module: faketensor,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,140171,186150,1,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #186150 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8).","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integra...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",c7a3dbb140f5db203586d8da54785248bf54347c1f4bd397d3396c130ccaf14a
BUNDLE-450,bundle:bundle-450,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: dynamic shapes (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186082,Improve SymIntArrayRef concrete-int diagnostics,module: dynamic shapes,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,140960,186082,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #186082 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",362b8a97cee7d4336b4b66209811690ab159a1aa53e6db5120426568c7780384
BUNDLE-451,bundle:bundle-451,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamo (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186078,Fix OptimizedModule _parameters access,module: dynamo,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,141005,186078,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #186078 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",ad37705fdc564f4f49db05c5b6bec3e4b08bbea38e21398523648a08ee4cd499
BUNDLE-452,bundle:bundle-452,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: pt2 accuracy (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186074,Fix multilabel_margin_loss decomposition sentinel handling,module: pt2 accuracy,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,141017,186074,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #186074 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",9ca84e9236314ff43e865e728bf6b719dfd29d635364f6cd4e7958845198780a
BUNDLE-453,bundle:bundle-453,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamo (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186072,Make constant warnings reorderable in Dynamo by default,module: dynamo,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,141162,186072,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #186072 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",d63276d0ca0a78d7ed8b6f2e10807e26c639e1cf791a5e924a5c6ff6d5694f68
BUNDLE-454,bundle:bundle-454,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamo (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186063,[dynamo] Route OptimizedModule delegated methods through compiled call,module: dynamo,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,141473,186063,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #186063 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",729124db209e3a2a6a4b9675671cfdaf10cbd4267ee87a5ddce4ac33486a4f30
BUNDLE-455,bundle:bundle-455,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: aotdispatch (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186053,Fix AOTAutograd cache save for call-free lazy backwards,module: aotdispatch,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,141790,186053,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #186053 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",d37ca4793c54640582f16235c60bff57bb7f6f680324ca07a555acbe062d267f
BUNDLE-456,bundle:bundle-456,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: windows (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186052,Fix Inductor C++ pybinding source literal escaping,module: windows,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,142321,186052,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #186052 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",1393f81c1783689f409460b3253d9227ec9ca86bb01f4baba1d86c656a216d1b
BUNDLE-457,bundle:bundle-457,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamo (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186044,Stop Dynamo from importing optional libraries at import time,module: dynamo,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,142489,186044,1,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #186044 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), get-label-type / runner-determinator, get-cuda-version.","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), get-label-type / runner-determinator, get-cuda-version, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), get-label-type / runner-determinator, get-cuda-version. Review signal: My agent says I rebased the PR and fixed the latest related CI issues: the imp...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",47f58931eeabae5da56ca0d1921898caee48e336aba1d84056ee32ca14c558e9
BUNDLE-458,bundle:bundle-458,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: dynamo (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186039,Fix Dynamo verbose guard checks for frame locals,module: dynamo,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,143308,186039,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #186039 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",9e95ab26caf21245f61c1ceb8b35337ef92d09d0a312b914035ff2abc3036871
BUNDLE-459,bundle:bundle-459,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamic shapes (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186032,Avoid reshape metadata guards on symbolic size-one checks,module: dynamic shapes,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,143463,186032,1,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #186032 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g).","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g).",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",c99e7e32c37900b05881890219bcb074dc57918ccdc6d202e1bc08a59cfd9eda
BUNDLE-460,bundle:bundle-460,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: faketensor (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186027,Fix symbolic broadcast inference for unbacked sizes,module: faketensor,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,143495,186027,1,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #186027 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g).","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (i...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",2f6ab15f596d3adcf4e4500e11d738fdfd62ae352a7f61342991ab5119819ddd
BUNDLE-461,bundle:bundle-461,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: compile ux (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186003,Fix Dynamo condition-dependent frame skip caching,module: compile ux,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,144820,186003,1,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #186003 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8).","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8).",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",5bd40f1bf7305588d19fd8fd5bd17e4cf51ec6313701b83151e030c6cf2a72c0
BUNDLE-462,bundle:bundle-462,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamo (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185971,Fix Dynamo random.Random replay on cache hits,module: dynamo,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,145445,185971,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #185971 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",a81456d7c44c7c701ec0cf0e1465a7d75418bf5563696a9c17f83f6e6bdbba35
BUNDLE-463,bundle:bundle-463,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamic shapes (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185947,Fix Dynamo logit with tensor eps,module: dynamic shapes,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,145596,185947,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #185947 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",3b1350c4bb3cf9069112817860857bcd0c7266385d128f9000928a412cfe1575
BUNDLE-464,bundle:bundle-464,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: faketensor (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185922,Fix fake one_hot invalid class count checks,module: faketensor,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,146274,185922,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #185922 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",d77914215ab0f2ae4e7f269179c1d61105d18f90ce9b200d4900e3d429d4c5af
BUNDLE-465,bundle:bundle-465,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamo (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185920,[Dynamo] Detect tensor mutations when reconstructing generators,module: dynamo,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,146628,185920,1,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #185920 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_models_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8).","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_models_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_models_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8). Review signal: My agent says I rebased the PR onto current main, addressed the latest review hardening around Dynamo polyfill inlining, and fixed an additional generat...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",b59077efadc2d3f8049d1709765a406991b9bdffc9f22f149898be71cc72a16f
BUNDLE-466,bundle:bundle-466,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamo (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185908,[Dynamo] Preserve live dict view semantics around mappingproxy mutation,module: dynamo,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,149583,185908,1,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #185908 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), +1 more.","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), +1 more, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (i...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",8de9fc8389e52b620ff9bbb14b503aac74ba126c4f8b2785511e56c6bb2482f1
BUNDLE-467,bundle:bundle-467,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: dynamo (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185899,Fix Dynamo data mutation on functorch tensors,module: dynamo,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,149911,185899,1,1,contributor_update_needed,PR #185899 is contributor-owned until requested changes or review questions are answered.,Keep parked or close after maintainer review if the contributor path is no longer active; do not ask for maintainer work first.,medium,reviewDecision=CHANGES_REQUESTED; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",683a5c39b890c4c80ef41f5d4c55bd3631a462951de09279d526beb0f39d411e
BUNDLE-468,bundle:bundle-468,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamo (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185823,[Dynamo] Handle class method_descriptor calls generically,module: dynamo,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,146673,185823,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #185823 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",95b24351d870fd3ef26d46644b392733ea2bacbe5d7cf79daaaf5b3b2ed07f9d
BUNDLE-469,bundle:bundle-469,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: logging (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185800,Fix TORCH_LOGS stderr handling at process exit,module: logging,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,147486,185800,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #185800 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",9e2b0ec2fe44a1e9af8b29d54e88a8f31c899eec23dbae49bb658b1b73cf077d
BUNDLE-470,bundle:bundle-470,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamo (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185799,Avoid dataclass constructors in Dynamo and make_fx graphs,module: dynamo,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,147530,185799,1,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #185799 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8).","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8).",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",ad280433c20f4ef56e2d7731ec8d934be50fea5cb5ec59d1475b1a01c305213d
BUNDLE-471,bundle:bundle-471,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: oncall: pt2 (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185795,Preserve overlapping input layouts when cloning Dynamo inputs,oncall: pt2,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,147843,185795,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #185795 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",00e19eb249e083ba38543b4213ca9e10a5512bba5ba5aebf2a2caeda82bfa2d7
BUNDLE-472,bundle:bundle-472,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamic shapes (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185781,Avoid unbound symbols in insignificant output strides,module: dynamic shapes,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,148199,185781,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #185781 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",39512bcc2430803c4362eff93b5a1939f360f90e3c01dc360fa241be1f633821
BUNDLE-473,bundle:bundle-473,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamo (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185776,Propagate fake RuntimeErrors to Dynamo handlers,module: dynamo,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,148475,185776,1,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #185776 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_models_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g).","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_models_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_models_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",a3c4ca916b8124f54a4ab1e5d7cbb7bdee825df5511f1def471c7079760f57a7
BUNDLE-474,bundle:bundle-474,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: oncall: export (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185774,Fix non-strict export for Tensor.numpy,oncall: export,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,148779,185774,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #185774 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",accf09ddc3ac48b80a0b3d3f8353052629f72c6696063d652374b118dd1ad1b1
BUNDLE-475,bundle:bundle-475,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: oncall: pt2 (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185773,Use max dynamic bounds for Inductor autotuning,oncall: pt2,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,148842,185773,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #185773 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",43005f61d8a037b554fd65c8ad30817e44bddc85be07f30924be2611a02e9212
BUNDLE-476,bundle:bundle-476,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: pt2 accuracy (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185772,Fix CPU small-output bilinear upsample precision in Inductor,module: pt2 accuracy,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,148859,185772,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #185772 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",b65b2f0d05cef873122c796ce78dfdaf8c1bb187c904986f052ca906f50f129a
BUNDLE-477,bundle:bundle-477,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamo (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185771,Support Dynamo tracing through textwrap.indent string formatting,module: dynamo,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,149010,185771,1,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #185771 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8).","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8). Review signal: My agent says I updated the PR after the reported Dynamo CI failures around the textwrap/string-format tests. The update rebases onto current main, keeps the ghstack metadata intact, adds coverage for joining delayed...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",40f3891932230be60c6bd2711e3c65f4490a79abe250c535131f55320141ba5e
BUNDLE-478,bundle:bundle-478,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: oncall: pt2 (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185769,Preserve generator return values in Dynamo,oncall: pt2,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,149037,185769,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #185769 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",96f3418a3d913e6b614d7260b9cfbe6a1bce6db9e39ebc303a095350eb10dec8
BUNDLE-479,bundle:bundle-479,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamo (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185768,Improve Dynamo error for dynamic module hook registration,module: dynamo,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,149047,185768,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #185768 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",ab9893dc80d098541603ab5369f2c62cc5abdab7cc75fae56e3ca5cc517fe9f3
BUNDLE-480,bundle:bundle-480,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamo (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185766,Dynamo: support torch.jit.isinstance without graph breaks,module: dynamo,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,149556,185766,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #185766 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",a900e1648d3a379cbda4832d920bb6154c9a459a0577dc5cd75cccb02a765044
BUNDLE-481,bundle:bundle-481,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: compile ux (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185764,Recommend nonstrict_trace for skipped C extensions,module: compile ux,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,149565,185764,1,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #185764 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g).","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (i...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",07941cd746668fe3469caf38501a1d62369fed786e35e8b666b8d66fa8acc16c
BUNDLE-482,bundle:bundle-482,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamo (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185763,Improve disable API graph break messages,module: dynamo,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,149566,185763,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #185763 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",1222576cf8437592c83ca93e9d2d48f835cea48eb8213bdb6fdc1b38188b835b
BUNDLE-483,bundle:bundle-483,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: sdpa (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185755,Use gmem efficient attention kernel for long fp32 KV,module: sdpa,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,149857,185755,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #185755 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",0651d36384dcf95f48cfec1888af188d1dbfcbcbe0ddc164055b3058bebb74fd
BUNDLE-484,bundle:bundle-484,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamo (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185752,Make OptimizedModule state_dict use public keys,module: dynamo,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,149894,185752,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #185752 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",c8974b7b12a85e9a2d88b4093d68f11974948649df5a0daad0772b3e65604ee9
BUNDLE-485,bundle:bundle-485,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: dynamo (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185749,Fix Dynamo construction for classes with __getattribute__,module: dynamo,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,149895,185749,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #185749 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",7cde6cf9713e33d633119eaa88bc977636dec7a697c4bcd948eb4d2419a89a90
BUNDLE-486,bundle:bundle-486,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: dynamo (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185748,[dynamo] Model RemovableHandle hook registration side effects,module: dynamo,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,149921,185748,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #185748 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",530345375911d5fba549a564fcd94d69961d8f9952dcbb29bd87c6d5a77e3cb0
BUNDLE-487,bundle:bundle-487,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamo (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185740,Support inspect.signature on nested functions in Dynamo,module: dynamo,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,149968,185740,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #185740 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",e0efaadcd299ef2c72146b7f4c073be4df27100e2d7e1817e9751ae4ed63646e
BUNDLE-488,bundle:bundle-488,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: compile ux (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185731,Clear stale prefix exception table entries in Dynamo,module: compile ux,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,150319,185731,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #185731 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",1ebe809d8af0e15cbd16e0b3890cc6d03cff8bbe74a61ccd04c123237de6b7b1
BUNDLE-489,bundle:bundle-489,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamo (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185726,Improve Dynamo stack for nonstrict_trace input errors,module: dynamo,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,150465,185726,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #185726 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",6fe98bcaec35c6f11cffc6a63d1053957688715584029a3b81a1be2e564fd655
BUNDLE-490,bundle:bundle-490,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: decompositions (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185724,Fix scalar searchsorted decomposition for unbacked values,module: decompositions,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,150613,185724,1,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #185724 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8).","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8).",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",0f8ba085a676afc85527d416dcf5f0c281f0f325643eea6d86b0824e8dba4084
BUNDLE-491,bundle:bundle-491,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: compile ux (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185722,[dynamo] Wrap module.compile leaf module call frames,module: compile ux,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,150915,185722,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #185722 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",12830baccfd1616d4468beef51343945dc4bdcfd2607478a8dcf6e8a63056b99
BUNDLE-492,bundle:bundle-492,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: oncall: pt2 (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185690,Optimize AOT input view mutations,oncall: pt2,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,152346,185690,1,1,contributor_update_needed,PR #185690 is contributor-owned until requested changes or review questions are answered.,Keep parked or close after maintainer review if the contributor path is no longer active; do not ask for maintainer work first.,medium,reviewDecision=CHANGES_REQUESTED; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",097971873caa5fc2edcde16cc7082d3d8b43f7362fc9f7235af074cc167ba3ea
BUNDLE-493,bundle:bundle-493,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: oncall: pt2 (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185632,Make AOTAutograd metadata repr subclass-safe,oncall: pt2,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,152183,185632,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #185632 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",ee1641da3dd8ac1ac3bf0a235f60ca8a0624c484a755018ff77a9d837d81d63e
BUNDLE-494,bundle:bundle-494,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: __torch_dispatch__ (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185624,Fix subclass static input remapping for SymInt args,module: __torch_dispatch__,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,152343,185624,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #185624 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",55ad9cd459957a0943d9fad488d7dc05b2ace24951ce08d0919c3161eb1d8bfa
BUNDLE-495,bundle:bundle-495,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: docs (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185591,Canonicalize avg_pool2d singleton lists during export,module: docs,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,153149,185591,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #185591 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",9dca02b04041f44c9dd1fa43788c763b5ba19101915912c2757eb67b48b20138
BUNDLE-496,bundle:bundle-496,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamic shapes (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185588,[inductor] Codegen backed SymInt input runtime asserts,module: dynamic shapes,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,153175,185588,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #185588 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",77416c622f3233bc12bb1ebbb857cf1daafba9b691b1a3df9b9ad8af1522ec5d
BUNDLE-497,bundle:bundle-497,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: dynamic shapes (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185585,Fix mark_unbacked stride recompiles,module: dynamic shapes,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,153204,185585,1,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #185585 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g).","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g). Review signal: My agent says Dr. CI's r...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",b112b36f344cda30a2d4f4ec9ce34d938aabe66c95ebd56ac90da1f6af60b28c
BUNDLE-498,bundle:bundle-498,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: dynamic shapes (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185569,Handle symbolic bool short-circuit with unbacked terms,module: dynamic shapes,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,153227,185569,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #185569 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",2b1672eba5bff929f4dbb3c50e0b0d5efc1cb6ca689e9eb7a6582137e1e499db
BUNDLE-499,bundle:bundle-499,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamic shapes (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185536,Teach Dynamo PGO about sparse tensor strides,module: dynamic shapes,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,154161,185536,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #185536 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",ac3f6e3ea8647bbf08ba2d58f1a8cf3e37e3d5b929a759a6ee3f9241b25dc15c
BUNDLE-500,bundle:bundle-500,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: dynamo (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185526,Fix Dynamo tracing of LazyGraphModule,module: dynamo,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,154282,185526,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #185526 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",4a91ed508f765304ffd3d8a9b313f42a7e4b308c06e346146a1b423e3cc086e6
BUNDLE-501,bundle:bundle-501,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: compile ux (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185508,[dynamo] Preserve observed exception stack for reraises,module: compile ux,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,154454,185508,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #185508 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",efe19093366f09077fb7b0873078479d8c981a0c38d2be9a3bb587673c0ced16
BUNDLE-502,bundle:bundle-502,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: dynamo (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185483,Add fake support for pad_packed_sequence,module: dynamo,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,155238,185483,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #185483 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",a7ad28c76b0a07f481449e40025f6fbaa0c5ffcf5196e2018d61952716c82394
BUNDLE-503,bundle:bundle-503,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: nestedtensor (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185474,Fix nested tensor tangent metadata coercion,module: nestedtensor,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,155421,185474,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #185474 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",413bc8969768a964f15a0021833baf93c896601b6b4e1388fb706fd47b9733d7
BUNDLE-504,bundle:bundle-504,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamo (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185471,Handle Dynamo tracing of torch._C._infer_size,module: dynamo,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,155800,185471,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #185471 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",41052cb8dfefda88094262a56df8402454de40d79ef61b7c4a7ba5a84848c008
BUNDLE-505,bundle:bundle-505,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamo (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185469,Fix stable TMA descriptor reconstruction in Dynamo,module: dynamo,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,155856,185469,1,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #185469 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_models_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), linux-docs / build-docs-cpp-false, linux-docs / build-docs-python-false, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), +1 more.","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_models_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), linux-docs / build-docs-cpp-false, linux-docs / build-docs-python-false, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), +1 more, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_models_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), linux-docs / build-docs-cpp-false, linux-docs / build-docs-python-false, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-18...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",8f600232c906abf5c6d2fa6c3bf80da3cc2ed9e0b63931e96e2eab87f1ceb6c7
BUNDLE-506,bundle:bundle-506,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: correctness (silent) (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185467,Keep tensors alive for Dynamo pointer reconstruction,module: correctness (silent),"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,156059,185467,1,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #185467 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8).","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8). Review signal: My agent says I rebased the stack on current main and added data_ptr graph-break lifetime regression coverage, addressing the review-bot suggestion. The previous unclassified CI failures were SIGKILLs in unrelated lar... | My agent says I rebased the PR onto...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",3dd458d6d4b6633709bb725aba6d42c4b267829c8697a4aa781862e25e15a929
BUNDLE-507,bundle:bundle-507,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: compile ux (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185466,[dynamo] Show carets in graph break user stacks,module: compile ux,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,156127,185466,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #185466 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",efb5799a81857fea9d1fb4a09b2ad99452562948e041e039a0afd0bf0fdd553a
BUNDLE-508,bundle:bundle-508,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamo (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185461,[dynamo] Handle module-level logging ignores,module: dynamo,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,156191,185461,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #185461 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",0efa4ab179bf7e3fa1bee5303f27e3ef29712630f3f6ec423c361f7ec5fb8443
BUNDLE-509,bundle:bundle-509,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamo (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185456,Fix Dynamo tracing for Tensor.random_,module: dynamo,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,156614,185456,1,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #185456 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8).","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integra...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",3d7ab23102b86e2f600e140fc145f21bbbec4aed1a5ebdf772eaf3e8bd3aeda4
BUNDLE-510,bundle:bundle-510,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: compile ux (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185451,Wrap internal Dynamo assertion errors,module: compile ux,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,156640,185451,1,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #185451 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8).","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8). Review signal: My agent says I rebased the PR onto current main, resolved the symbolic_convert import conflict, and updated stale dynamic-shape tests after CI showed same-frame guard failures now surface as InternalTorchDynamoError....",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",c3812c658ac0f7313a7a67c145f4f7a564604073a210d0313aea146e34fa4956
BUNDLE-511,bundle:bundle-511,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: oncall: pt2 (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185438,Scope distribution validation disabling to Dynamo tracing,oncall: pt2,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,157926,185438,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #185438 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",7f58c260f8d6f78d158f308bca470021ac0f3daa0a73b3fc72f884877315fe7f
BUNDLE-512,bundle:bundle-512,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamo (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185436,Preserve eager exception assertions for eager_noexcept,module: dynamo,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,158087,185436,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #185436 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",48459c37df858de686d68752df4efa55d201be2bf9e0cbff335723ed4d8d8b3b
BUNDLE-513,bundle:bundle-513,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: compile ux (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185419,[dynamo] avoid stale verbose hint for backend failures,module: compile ux,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,158384,185419,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #185419 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",38ab65a04ae6c1f0cb0f204b0d50c03b44f4876b4b326a7a032b53dcacd032cd
BUNDLE-514,bundle:bundle-514,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: dynamo (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185408,Fix torch logging to avoid closed pytest stderr,module: dynamo,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,159160,185408,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #185408 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",76ce4b98d4575a1a9ee31cd8a2bf5e3c038e8846d7eecff62b90ddd73df5a49b
BUNDLE-515,bundle:bundle-515,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamo (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185373,Fix assume_constant_result tensor constants after graph breaks,module: dynamo,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,159457,185373,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #185373 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",fa47ef98a23af2cd317221694da59e3e51fa7282103e2d6f106c88740b147f04
BUNDLE-516,bundle:bundle-516,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: oncall: export (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185365,Fix FX subgraph rewrite of adjacent aggregate matches,oncall: export,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,159613,185365,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #185365 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",606c072975257fd969e40eb89bc477341863912826909be5d7bcd69cac37cdf5
BUNDLE-517,bundle:bundle-517,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamo (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185357,Forward container methods on OptimizedModule,module: dynamo,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,159831,185357,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #185357 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",9d9762592ed4ec0cb3ca9569d477aa4c856a162c299f81859b340592dbea2098
BUNDLE-518,bundle:bundle-518,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamo (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185336,[dynamo] Add regression test for prepended forward pre-hooks,module: dynamo,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,160083,185336,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #185336 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",81ec008ea118c9b40044606289f96a4e08a9bd41428c0bbbe2a60a3526bc44a4
BUNDLE-519,bundle:bundle-519,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamo (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185333,Graph break existing list tensor assignments in Dynamo,module: dynamo,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,160247,185333,1,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #185333 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, lf-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_models_integration, 1, 1, lf-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), +1 more.","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, lf-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_models_integration, 1, 1, lf-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), +1 more, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, lf-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_models_integration, 1, 1, lf-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",ea0109c6876aa0a332d9d61b3b2abc231720bd3a7b997b60c8c0ceaab643fd06
BUNDLE-520,bundle:bundle-520,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamo (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185320,Improve scan HOP direct call error,module: dynamo,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,160544,185320,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #185320 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",7bcf885e90174d11cd5821f557d9191b0b1cae7f8d7c83475967f24896f6b6de
BUNDLE-521,bundle:bundle-521,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: aotdispatch (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185299,Run CSE in AOT inference graphs,module: aotdispatch,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,161067,185299,1,1,contributor_update_needed,PR #185299 is contributor-owned until requested changes or review questions are answered.,Keep parked or close after maintainer review if the contributor path is no longer active; do not ask for maintainer work first.,medium,reviewDecision=CHANGES_REQUESTED; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",f134744677f5ffbf9dc4e81e7ad846e76f3e281e066adefcce42c65a77edf8ec
BUNDLE-522,bundle:bundle-522,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: oncall: export (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185293,Require bool conditions for torch.where,oncall: export,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,161088,185293,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #185293 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",fb415bd12816f640efa0fd409a4c28d98db52d23a158d2fb85ce61828e557034
BUNDLE-523,bundle:bundle-523,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: oncall: pt2 (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185274,Fix ci expected accuracy updates without ClickHouse credentials,oncall: pt2,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,161289,185274,1,1,contributor_update_needed,PR #185274 is contributor-owned until requested changes or review questions are answered.,Keep parked or close after maintainer review if the contributor path is no longer active; do not ask for maintainer work first.,medium,reviewDecision=CHANGES_REQUESTED; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",d46fae8ddfc72c631a896c82d98405a34fe21517b8de11de23909bd10a1d17ac
BUNDLE-524,bundle:bundle-524,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: dynamo (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185191,Support wrapper subclass storages in HOP alias checks,module: dynamo,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,161456,185191,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #185191 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",e5e9d0e9834a57bc9425f0ce574d48b44038c27696b5f1bad4be86ac6aa5d0ce
BUNDLE-525,bundle:bundle-525,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: functorch (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185171,Document activation memory budget config,module: functorch,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,161650,185171,1,1,contributor_update_needed,PR #185171 is contributor-owned until requested changes or review questions are answered.,Keep parked or close after maintainer review if the contributor path is no longer active; do not ask for maintainer work first.,medium,reviewDecision=CHANGES_REQUESTED; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",d290e3e4f5f940806d4a422127713b2fd65d620406143a9bc750022eb6ac59eb
BUNDLE-526,bundle:bundle-526,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: dynamic shapes (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185166,Fix export slice bounds across dynamic dim,module: dynamic shapes,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,161705,185166,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #185166 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",b3f096a72cedcd0928a24babf29ca080b5ba8dcce485e0038161537f7b27d3a8
BUNDLE-527,bundle:bundle-527,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: performance (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185159,Inductor: gate max-autotune 1x1 conv GEMM lowering,module: performance,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,161764,185159,1,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #185159 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, linux-noble-rocm-py3.12-mi300 / test (default, 1, 6, linux.rocm.gpu.gfx942.1), linux-noble-rocm-py3.12-mi300 / test (default, 4, 6, linux.rocm.gpu.gfx942.1), linux-jammy-cuda13.0-py3.10-gcc11-sm100 / test (smoke_b200, 1, 1, linux.dgx.b200), linux-jammy-cuda13.0-py3.10-gcc11-sm90 / test-osdc (smoke, 1, 1, mt-l-x86iamx-22-225-h100), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), +2 more.","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, linux-noble-rocm-py3.12-mi300 / test (default, 1, 6, linux.rocm.gpu.gfx942.1), linux-noble-rocm-py3.12-mi300 / test (default, 4, 6, linux.rocm.gpu.gfx942.1), linux-jammy-cuda13.0-py3.10-gcc11-sm100 / test (smoke_b200, 1, 1, linux.dgx.b200), linux-jammy-cuda13.0-py3.10-gcc11-sm90 / test-osdc (smoke, 1, 1, mt-l-x86iamx-22-225-h100), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), +2 more, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, linux-noble-rocm-py3.12-mi300 / test (default, 1, 6, linux.rocm.gpu.gfx942.1), linux-noble-rocm-py3.12-mi300 / test (default, 4, 6, linux.rocm.gpu.gfx942.1), linux-jammy-cuda13.0-py3.10-gcc11-sm100 / test (smoke_b200, 1, 1, linux.dgx.b200), linux-jammy-cuda13.0-py3.10-gcc11-sm90 / test-osdc (smoke, 1, 1, mt-l-x86iamx-22-225-h100), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",d0a363082592ed235a6dfc57be709e879707d7924aad03baf1a75ca638d408cb
BUNDLE-528,bundle:bundle-528,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: compile ux (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185155,Avoid warning spam for backend fallback graph breaks,module: compile ux,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,161796,185155,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #185155 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",efa32a560a21cd07b3e74606f153e9c974e3faa436d7641457533d0a1fbfc5bc
BUNDLE-529,bundle:bundle-529,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: dynamic shapes (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185147,Fix Z3 translation validation for torch.sym_not,module: dynamic shapes,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,162287,185147,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #185147 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",b2a9f43cfb615050e4a9bb556aef36ab5daceaec76893513278a43e2dba39734
BUNDLE-530,bundle:bundle-530,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: compile ux (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185138,[dynamo] Enforce one compiled frame for fullgraph skipped frames,module: compile ux,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,162415,185138,1,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #185138 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8).","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8).",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",f910083b9b0f23456e945abda92529437a1a2aea88fd0ee3f5877af381482064
BUNDLE-531,bundle:bundle-531,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: dynamo (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185126,Optimize GB_REGISTRY linter scanning,module: dynamo,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,162973,185126,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #185126 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",990e8cfb7b760c8c5b44a1b62b4c8658482c55951bfba355551f84c81ebf2380
BUNDLE-532,bundle:bundle-532,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: oncall: export (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185121,Raise TypeError for invalid torch.export.load inputs,oncall: export,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,163040,185121,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #185121 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",2f144cd333c4e5a65c94a72d9ec2e98f972b71e08cfce1b8f27aadf643d4596d
BUNDLE-533,bundle:bundle-533,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamic shapes (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185103,Fix unbacked scalar equality reasoning through div/mod,module: dynamic shapes,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,163641,185103,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #185103 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",90b29eb89de290b42d7e5fc47063d67339e2170599d9a9063d23bd4b89d66e50
BUNDLE-534,bundle:bundle-534,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: aotdispatch (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185088,Avoid graphsafe RNG inputs in descriptor compile,module: aotdispatch,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,164559,185088,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #185088 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",3f1175fd94ccd8727916ce902d13ab303ccf0cf353d86e65b7302f66e3c0ed9e
BUNDLE-535,bundle:bundle-535,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: faketensor (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185075,Improve FakeTensorMode deepcopy error for real tensors,module: faketensor,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,165547,185075,1,1,contributor_update_needed,PR #185075 is contributor-owned until requested changes or review questions are answered.,Keep parked or close after maintainer review if the contributor path is no longer active; do not ask for maintainer work first.,medium,reviewDecision=CHANGES_REQUESTED; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",74527a02100b3bb3aa050fdd32e37a3f7961fd2538c491882d6591d3dea9dbe3
BUNDLE-536,bundle:bundle-536,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: autograd (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185064,Add unroll option to scan,module: autograd,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,166516,185064,1,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #185064 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_models_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8).","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_models_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_models_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8). Review signal: My agent says I rebased the PR onto main and pushed a follow-up that fixes the docs CI failure by moving the scan docstring to Napoleon's recognized Key...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",dd1175fe344df1747d9d148df0991f1e98749e10c55892e04a173c8f70f7749b
BUNDLE-537,bundle:bundle-537,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: higher order operators (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185063,Handle scalar carries in Inductor while_loop,module: higher order operators,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,166525,185063,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #185063 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",1324a509cbfee3646a6712919f750dded70fecd13217616bdbb014fa74a6d142
BUNDLE-538,bundle:bundle-538,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: oncall: pt2 (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185051,Fix FX GraphModule serialization of string annotations,oncall: pt2,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,167117,185051,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #185051 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",a95e9da21d157ab874076445fbaf6c43246a4e228d800ead19639f68b6947223
BUNDLE-539,bundle:bundle-539,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamo (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185042,Avoid value guards for residual lazy constants,module: dynamo,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,167596,185042,1,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #185042 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_models_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8).","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_models_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_models_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8). Review signal: My agent says I rebased and resubmitted the PR, addressed the latest Claude feedback by documenting the intentional hashable traversal and adding a lazy...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",0b0af3a0f314ebc693e2eb951d6aa8c1691bfa9c3f50d9e503b58c31a0e176e5
BUNDLE-540,bundle:bundle-540,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: oncall: export (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185035,Make symbolic formatting guard data-dependent scalars,oncall: export,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,167719,185035,1,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #185035 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_models_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8).","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_models_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_models_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8).",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",f1d986e01fff5e7a4811ed9c80815ab614a3ff0f83f56aacbfbf61639fb083fd
BUNDLE-541,bundle:bundle-541,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: library (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185017,Fix OpOverloadPacket tracing during initialization,module: library,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,168136,185017,1,1,contributor_update_needed,PR #185017 is contributor-owned until requested changes or review questions are answered.,Keep parked or close after maintainer review if the contributor path is no longer active; do not ask for maintainer work first.,medium,reviewDecision=CHANGES_REQUESTED; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",ec85aad85464fc68d4b4f0bd92a10e320caeb0d02377337dfc4f48161fc8ceec
BUNDLE-542,bundle:bundle-542,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: pt2-dispatcher (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185009,Add fuzzy DebugMode hash mismatch comparison,module: pt2-dispatcher,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,168974,185009,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #185009 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",ecf60c1098ac25d64b17dedca44bd0f81f8f0cde4fd078a0842fa1a48e8804ac
BUNDLE-543,bundle:bundle-543,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: pt2-dispatcher (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185008,Add DebugMode tensor hash export,module: pt2-dispatcher,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,168975,185008,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #185008 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",f02d652d0eaab80fe1eea556c24fdb5f59e85ab50f96174fec676a14a8c8b83a
BUNDLE-544,bundle:bundle-544,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: higher order operators (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,184988,Allow HOPs to pass through unchanged input tensors,module: higher order operators,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,169769,184988,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #184988 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",94bf15329101d08011eab1921dec4050bb7820298656136cf5c0f73dc1cddf99
BUNDLE-545,bundle:bundle-545,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: inductor (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,184436,Fix Triton async compile cache keys,module: inductor,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,112788,184436,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #184436 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",be485babaf840fc300000944cae5778017de7c1dcf9bc2a8b9db6249dbb94716
BUNDLE-546,bundle:bundle-546,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: cuda graphs (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,184432,Serialize cudagraph tree runtime,module: cuda graphs,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,113809,184432,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #184432 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",34aa12a5377d3fb6800e305d1bba05752a96cb80999a4b6e387bbfce28a01493
BUNDLE-547,bundle:bundle-547,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: inductor (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,184380,Avoid fp32 materialization in checkpoint recompute,module: inductor,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,120381,184380,1,1,contributor_update_needed,PR #184380 is contributor-owned until requested changes or review questions are answered.,Keep parked or close after maintainer review if the contributor path is no longer active; do not ask for maintainer work first.,medium,reviewDecision=CHANGES_REQUESTED; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",f36862731bdf970294948651b4ae731eb796d512fb558b37cdc30fa398a269b9
BUNDLE-548,bundle:bundle-548,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: inductor (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,184347,[inductor] Add third reduction tile for strided block pointers,module: inductor,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,125077,184347,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #184347 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",6cfe6c18319a10deeb281dfbdd88fc5f8be2314ac88afb5602a17bd671cf0601
BUNDLE-549,bundle:bundle-549,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: inductor (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,184345,Use freezing compiler for traced inference graphs,module: inductor,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,125236,184345,1,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #184345 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8).","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8).",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",f3be7c9069da563a41c35784d1009f4ef71a4b2d299e9ccff5f90e498c694154
BUNDLE-550,bundle:bundle-550,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: inductor (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,184343,Prune slow Hopper WGMMA autotune configs,module: inductor,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,125277,184343,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #184343 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",16f22039483c09e37ebb93d8e8b345f64ab5cce88c772a3af450be47c996a70b
BUNDLE-551,bundle:bundle-551,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: inductor (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,184323,Share foreach combo kernel bodies,module: inductor,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,127863,184323,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #184323 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",a21dd15e2637ea283ee52c0550c8777a7e7bda9604b1c87b56582bb773218fc0
BUNDLE-552,bundle:bundle-552,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: floatx (formerly float8) (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,184319,[inductor] Align split reductions for tiled pointwise fusion,module: floatx (formerly float8),Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,128063,184319,1,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #184319 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8).","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8).",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",1bce3108be86210ec94296ce1d61efb45228f56ddf334de91c1e83f0b85f7181
BUNDLE-553,bundle:bundle-553,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: inductor (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,184294,Avoid unused storage size guards for indexing,module: inductor,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,135492,184294,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #184294 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",a37aa525d1ddab525ce911a938a07c72a01f84de4c6f7cae5696b33d7afc2d49
BUNDLE-554,bundle:bundle-554,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: inductor (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,184207,Release max autotune benchmark artifacts,module: inductor,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,140795,184207,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #184207 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",7886909602979df26cab606108ffa985e6a4b81559f87dcd1ce125aea9998f72
BUNDLE-555,bundle:bundle-555,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: inductor (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,184189,Make generated Triton code use runtime device properties,module: inductor,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,141744,184189,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #184189 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",3610ee4364b1ff43288efc2c908a82263f02a5465b8099bc927029ff45965dbe
BUNDLE-556,bundle:bundle-556,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: inductor (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,184119,Avoid fp8 bf16 prologue fusion on pre-sm90,module: inductor,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,150621,184119,1,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #184119 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, linux-jammy-cuda13.0-py3.10-gcc11-sm100 / test (smoke_b200, 1, 1, linux.dgx.b200), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), +2 more.","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, linux-jammy-cuda13.0-py3.10-gcc11-sm100 / test (smoke_b200, 1, 1, linux.dgx.b200), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), +2 more, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, linux-jammy-cuda13.0-py3.10-gcc11-sm100 / test (smoke_b200, 1, 1, linux.dgx.b200), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (induct...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",f28122bbcb0c09b04609e457292d2f501227008a08d18f2bec863a54c5f6406b
BUNDLE-557,bundle:bundle-557,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: inductor (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,184103,Fix FakeTensorUpdater HOP dtype propagation,module: inductor,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,152548,184103,1,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #184103 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), +1 more.","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), +1 more, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (i...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",0f48cbaf96156181d71e5121d93f83ed18160a5ddc47b506e6ab0a1bf51f024f
BUNDLE-558,bundle:bundle-558,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: inductor (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,184090,Preserve benchmark integer inputs for Inductor debug,module: inductor,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,154592,184090,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #184090 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",e896019fc2382871e3cc6d726390588bf445764f1d8547a2c2eab81d01a78fac
BUNDLE-559,bundle:bundle-559,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: inductor (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,184086,Fix Inductor scaled_mm scale_result lowering,module: inductor,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,154807,184086,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #184086 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",bd8be59dcf9803bd82248b09c26d330d4c1018fec6b7650ba92d41f890968308
BUNDLE-560,bundle:bundle-560,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: inductor (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,184083,Preserve user Triton allocator in Inductor,module: inductor,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,155584,184083,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #184083 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",9256603875df224c925388a261d7b9ba5208ebf1955808cbabb7fbedfb40fc8f
BUNDLE-561,bundle:bundle-561,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: inductor (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,184065,Fix static launcher 16-bit float scalars,module: inductor,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,158521,184065,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #184065 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",2f4fd97ef690b91f5f442a5959bfd72f76521298b2efc529a499878ca2a1e992
BUNDLE-562,bundle:bundle-562,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: inductor (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,184061,Fix fused moving avg observer functional meta,module: inductor,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,159192,184061,1,1,contributor_update_needed,PR #184061 is contributor-owned until requested changes or review questions are answered.,Keep parked or close after maintainer review if the contributor path is no longer active; do not ask for maintainer work first.,medium,reviewDecision=CHANGES_REQUESTED; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",719c085bfbd11ac653bb26af3bdadd3c03d933f9a424366266689a166b283e1f
BUNDLE-563,bundle:bundle-563,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: inductor (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,184052,Preserve CIA ops in AOT joint export,module: inductor,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,160388,184052,1,1,contributor_update_needed,PR #184052 is contributor-owned until requested changes or review questions are answered.,Keep parked or close after maintainer review if the contributor path is no longer active; do not ask for maintainer work first.,medium,reviewDecision=CHANGES_REQUESTED; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",a59cead8d24151d14cfad19908d12c5a429c8dd7e9f916590bee90866b4b228b
BUNDLE-564,bundle:bundle-564,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: inductor (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,184047,Enable cooperative reductions by default,module: inductor,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,161138,184047,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #184047 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",c22982a76b6fb576024b62341e7f46ba6eefeb25be00511ca05f8d399d796c51
BUNDLE-565,bundle:bundle-565,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: cpu (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,181308,[CPU] Fix std_mean/var_mean all-reduce ~4x slower than std + mean (#122191),module: cpu,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,122191,181308,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #181308 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",a170b46334dd6823f9b92f3e8272488e45638bc361ec2f7dcfe6fa5374e75e59
BUNDLE-566,bundle:bundle-566,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: build (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,148674,Set /NODEFAULTLIB:vcomp for MSVC when linking caffe2::mkl with libiomp5md.lib,module: build,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,113490,148674,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #148674 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",d4e26dad82c897e11737ae852b43c2a4b474c7933762f55020670e240ffc7fe0
BUNDLE-567,bundle:bundle-567,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: cuda (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,127702,Define PY_SSIZE_T_CLEAN before #include <Python.h>,module: cuda,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,38019,127702,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #127702 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=92,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",991fc16c23ed773a28c7ec00794cc2cb787876285efa58e30988272f6f681864
BUNDLE-568,bundle:bundle-568,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: sparse (4 issues + 1 PR),pr,84843,Support different NSE in batches of CSR and CSC tensors,module: sparse,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"104193, 105319, 105329, 109946",84843,4,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #84843 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=939,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",95a5385c406f1ce04dac68d6e46719804cda1754cb86e1be78ab71f508bb7dc0
BUNDLE-569,bundle:bundle-569,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: autograd (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,139524,Make anomaly mode asynchronous,module: autograd,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,143658,139524,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #139524 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=549,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",0da497341366ba58882f0c82c59e13045dd7e5e93b00f0e2b1a8209204594721
BUNDLE-570,bundle:bundle-570,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: nestedtensor (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,124624,[NJT] Allow construction of NJT within graph using offsets from inputs,module: nestedtensor,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,126472,124624,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #124624 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=695,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",7795bb0f3910745d907875c473e2c96f9e6713739d53818bc8f1337aab10ca27
BUNDLE-571,bundle:bundle-571,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,189307,[CI/CD] Copy newer CUPTI headers into manywheel binary-build images,general,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"178106, 182068, 184631, 184648, 184822, 185227, 186927, 187501, 188237, 189307",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #185227 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",1dc093f7b47aa8180eca25e402dcfcd30526363f31ea3cadaf073a388007f7df
BUNDLE-572,bundle:bundle-572,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,186619,[pytorch] Fix Inductor missing wait on AsyncCollectiveTensor nested inside DTensor,general,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"171617, 178805, 179205, 179882, 182414, 184334, 185579, 185727, 186061, 186619",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #186619 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",5dcb2fa416a793036d38aabc38d61cf388dbaa13bb21544582ea3ec122aaf491
BUNDLE-573,bundle:bundle-573,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,187661,Return empty result for FFT with empty batch on MKL backend,general,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"170538, 178209, 179404, 179627, 180162, 184968, 185122, 187169, 187405, 187661",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #187661 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",1572b8fa7e01e0b1749a57595b27a5b58801cca51e16c97b652f98bcdf3f2d69
BUNDLE-574,bundle:bundle-574,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,187250,Support NumPy 2 __array__ copy kwarg and __array_wrap__ context on Tensor,general,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"175526, 178584, 180315, 180557, 180782, 180783, 181252, 181481, 183525, 187250",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #187250 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",8c1761a6f7a66206cde117fb591179e09ed0e8b9dafe73262f22592e02321d4b
BUNDLE-575,bundle:bundle-575,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,187871,Fix scaled_dot_product_attention: explicitly check for both attn_mask…,general,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"175246, 179592, 180561, 181475, 181561, 183509, 184986, 185177, 186178, 187871",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #187871 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",353e2bbfbf5c069e2b85f64a4b10b4ed274b58b7e809d9c108c10dce0e1d2b4e
BUNDLE-576,bundle:bundle-576,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,188549,[AI Codemod][PerfAICT-General] Vectorize index_select bounds check via fused unsigned compare (#188549),general,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"169798, 187207, 187786, 187927, 188314, 188320, 188380, 188410, 188511, 188549",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #188549 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",25aaffd7fa0275a21d8223ec1e11decaca34ca9bc830d7c6ee92ec4ecfbedb0b
BUNDLE-577,bundle:bundle-577,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,188394,Speed up CPU quantile/nanquantile with partial selection,general,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"176084, 179619, 181571, 181582, 182092, 186127, 187653, 187714, 188291, 188394",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #188394 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",0a549c566bb119ece21e089e76b809ea639d761483ba982ef67eb0f7615278a7
BUNDLE-578,bundle:bundle-578,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,189193,[XCCL] Allow XCCL to be set as default in `_new_process_group_helper`,general,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"175081, 181559, 184133, 187664, 188328, 188401, 188853, 188859, 188902, 189193",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #189193 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",0c1acf09f086320db7a3e4728994941448b14c773f16efa0339395b850a9c1c7
BUNDLE-579,bundle:bundle-579,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,184151,[CUDA] Fix float32 std/var M2 overflow by using double accumulation,general,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"155672, 180501, 181060, 182406, 183087, 183922, 184151, 184254, 184509, 185097",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #184151 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",352a466a8603377bb3eed8493256096c5f8a383360bba55650325d2fcb22e89f
BUNDLE-580,bundle:bundle-580,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,186131,Migrate ProcessGroup method usages to the _single names,general,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"181087, 182256, 182655, 184192, 184657, 185592, 185646, 185689, 186130, 186131",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #186131 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",e4f57e80f42105271764d81151fdc3bf10a08cf9455712bc493d5b40758c2cdd
BUNDLE-581,bundle:bundle-581,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,186389,[BE][Ez]: Update string_util APIs to use std::string_view more,general,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"177263, 180081, 183847, 184315, 185956, 186048, 186218, 186253, 186334, 186389",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #186389 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",fb7b8b0af88832b74895395a42e2ff11cb6bcfff4b371cdc60ffb5909c2985f8
BUNDLE-582,bundle:bundle-582,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,186949,Fix for scan autograd issue,general,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"175468, 176600, 179257, 179400, 182013, 184825, 186139, 186634, 186636, 186949",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #186636 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",37a29da2f11c90611ba78a0cde83f4516081b160a9f28f269207820a7b2e51c0
BUNDLE-583,bundle:bundle-583,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,186848,Use C++20 concepts (1 of N),general,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"171445, 177618, 177619, 182526, 183617, 185053, 185261, 185859, 185958, 186848",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #186848 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",bb1f67e25b862010c948551214b46df0f5670210114e41cc138195d4b2d2486a
BUNDLE-584,bundle:bundle-584,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,187168,Fix accuracy degradation for baddbmm on CPU for float tensors,general,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"171219, 178014, 179642, 180167, 180183, 180274, 185875, 187069, 187142, 187168",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #187168 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",25215e3b3c526171a278a97fe623fe685a703eba2f3b7735ed86aa877250767e
BUNDLE-585,bundle:bundle-585,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,187369,[Test] Add test hardware classification for test_complex.py and test_kernel_launch_checks.py,general,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"171023, 171178, 171338, 178167, 179127, 180442, 180722, 181570, 186762, 187369",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #187369 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",c6a067959bebfb3bcf6b434dff2679e97b18f5969e6220a2e8d065bd221cbd57
BUNDLE-586,bundle:bundle-586,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,187545,[BE] Use `std::numbers` in `c10/util/MathConstants.h`,general,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"174940, 178804, 178812, 180181, 182038, 184404, 185173, 186844, 187419, 187545",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #187545 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",530023f7f28f928814d0d400fedfccee36b2937b19185401c4ea52125d599545
BUNDLE-587,bundle:bundle-587,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,186332,Improved common device test module for xpu,general,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"170679, 174395, 178800, 180665, 180947, 181023, 181221, 181905, 181907, 186332",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #186332 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",b81336e57099920809b0f25fad3c76975b5314921056996201c4d9795370eaee
BUNDLE-588,bundle:bundle-588,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,187809,Make DTensor logging and export tests accelerator-agnostic,general,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"184824, 184924, 186655, 187357, 187517, 187518, 187519, 187520, 187548, 187809",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #187809 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",c9a2dadf538061d6ca07d2d8e095978d872742e35d666715871760222e3f0876
BUNDLE-589,bundle:bundle-589,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,188188,[DTensor] local_map normalizes shard dim checking in_placements,general,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"175242, 181396, 184867, 186414, 186600, 186946, 186947, 187619, 188094, 188188",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #188188 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",67302e2b4641dd8c7375463964938e67cfc1a300f518f21608dfe1ad33bf30f5
BUNDLE-590,bundle:bundle-590,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,188298,[aot_autograd] Add PySourceBuilder for runtime-wrapper codegen,general,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"180990, 181307, 181414, 186129, 186877, 187784, 188093, 188215, 188289, 188298",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #188298 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",aca475896b016ab1ff86d98b1992ec7a200f6a6ba820a94930a6c4e125eaf5d6
BUNDLE-591,bundle:bundle-591,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,188063,Enable Blackwell FP8 grouped GEMM,general,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"174771, 178751, 181530, 181623, 181724, 181767, 182948, 187390, 187875, 188063",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #188063 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",ba6be3ecb3bf8336bb4d28822c56c810d09b2b3d3ac7690e500c55b67112d99f
BUNDLE-592,bundle:bundle-592,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,188444,[Test] Refactor tensor_creation_ops and foreach.py to be device-agnostic.,general,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"173914, 175809, 177924, 178283, 178906, 187150, 187711, 187922, 188340, 188444",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #188444 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",7b1ca157b002a0c81289ab0ff5eb4ac847a901e73b3f40eb13665772b1767ed9
BUNDLE-593,bundle:bundle-593,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,188532,Fix/threshold inplace validation,general,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"188294, 188295, 188296, 188341, 188385, 188465, 188498, 188499, 188501, 188532",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #188532 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",e58578360c45ca2f872470d1466aec5617612a13b1f92517d1c320dd0827da54
BUNDLE-594,bundle:bundle-594,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,188616,[AI Codemod][PerfAICT-General] Skip per-operand has_storage scan for non-PrivateUse1 devices in build,general,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"175011, 175472, 178710, 180907, 182051, 182920, 182986, 185115, 188535, 188616",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #188616 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",cef27409c8a1dbffbc4ebbbc7f239d0aa96e68694dfbe6b4e5b9e0a3cd464ad7
BUNDLE-595,bundle:bundle-595,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,188827,[AI Codemod][PerfAICT-General] Use SymDimVector to avoid heap allocs in select_symint,general,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"173390, 174323, 179224, 181041, 186599, 187860, 188439, 188502, 188826, 188827",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #188827 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",089c4d63b13169aa4accb3c30be2bbea7ed19860bcce8bbc60e0a3ba08a9c7cf
BUNDLE-596,bundle:bundle-596,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,188789,[xpu] Add IPC memory handle sharing support to XPUCachingAllocator,general,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"176239, 182146, 182362, 182529, 183306, 183323, 185113, 185114, 187691, 188789",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #188789 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",8b1b6450b322c647834e6096678017f400a78f0816c00b81aca73b52964f339b
BUNDLE-597,bundle:bundle-597,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,188517,Fix/180346 dtensor clip grad mixed mesh,general,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"180885, 181743, 182134, 182138, 182530, 182727, 182729, 187732, 188516, 188517",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #188517 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",b363bd9f7a37299fdc861a3c67c4da76e279de9f01daa3f2eb0717c76562482e
BUNDLE-598,bundle:bundle-598,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,189062,[profiler][cupti] Make CUPTI monitor buffer_size / flush_period_s config-only,general,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"182183, 183705, 183759, 185109, 187007, 187015, 187778, 187891, 188571, 189062",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #189062 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",832dd5b0c47cafbeeacea71f043235d71f20d076fd2cb2eec4c43aacf55f052a
BUNDLE-599,bundle:bundle-599,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,189005,fix(fx): filter internal frames in record_stack_traces to resolve broken stack traces (#130861),general,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"165766, 183620, 187009, 187131, 187132, 187133, 188276, 188766, 188979, 189005",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #189005 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",2883d83cc11f3369804a24838600d6444496c1d69efecbe9f8d70194391140d4
BUNDLE-600,bundle:bundle-600,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,189328,Add retry with backoff to download_mnist.py,general,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"179651, 187288, 187931, 188262, 189083, 189111, 189185, 189217, 189318, 189328",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #189318 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",4afe3740e1ecf966108c8d6596d6a777965aad94dd04015de7b1b3e12e888952
BUNDLE-601,bundle:bundle-601,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,189277,Skip redundant contiguity rescan in empty_tensor_restride (robust) (#189277),general,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"115316, 186055, 187465, 187699, 188621, 189088, 189153, 189192, 189220, 189277",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #189277 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",9740ca2098215e1bde1789e597befa8837df8936e54d7376ea983e06b6e9b210
BUNDLE-602,bundle:bundle-602,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,189289,[TEST] Refactor test_c10d_pypg.py with hw_classification,general,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"106149, 177757, 183910, 185251, 186056, 187307, 189131, 189246, 189247, 189289",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #189289 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",b16c51eea03095674c287ffae7444f8be9d7b480512eb6f41355e5a7876421c8
BUNDLE-603,bundle:bundle-603,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,189276,Update third_party/kineto submodule to cb6e5f7,general,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"174699, 180707, 185308, 187508, 188253, 188650, 188736, 189103, 189178, 189276",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #189276 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",fe69e0ef44c2ebee791565f58d0bb1821808f2d52c87611fed1f050acc170858
BUNDLE-604,bundle:bundle-604,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,188894,Fix HAS_XPU_AND_TRITON to require triton XPU backend,general,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"112441, 148668, 160182, 160638, 160872, 160878, 164128, 179443, 182768, 188894",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #188894 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",83426da399d63ef4458552d6592d4972e2f1e343f163b8a4a842fd2a6ced59f0
BUNDLE-605,bundle:bundle-605,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,183105,Fix formatting in extensions.json,general,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"140613, 161254, 170249, 170250, 178245, 181359, 181435, 182900, 183035, 183105",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #183105 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",a2d575e0d91573ee8f591298af665f641201df4d36ed891b5da506d627968268
BUNDLE-606,bundle:bundle-606,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,183747,Adding new test_c10d_ops_privateuse1.py variant for distributed testing,general,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"177726, 179139, 179863, 182179, 182274, 182398, 182846, 183262, 183418, 183747",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #183747 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",5d8fa6b658c9ee6816e9b808aecebb184443f77bc9398aff4b6fc3b828157bf4
BUNDLE-607,bundle:bundle-607,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,183993,"Back out ""Port D104346887/PR 182675 for index large select""",general,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"88221, 176857, 182730, 183394, 183455, 183651, 183940, 183941, 183953, 183993",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #183993 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",1a744fbdb4828cbd5f84f3e9e3383eb713d48b9ca06e179197edaadea524481c
BUNDLE-608,bundle:bundle-608,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,184674,fixup! Add CPython Dynamo agentic loop plan,general,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"178176, 179538, 184257, 184300, 184483, 184489, 184536, 184674, 185253, 185285",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #184674 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",48e6df7e0cfef3c848d87fd822bac55a0d83bbc8424867bffd75866f960efe03
BUNDLE-609,bundle:bundle-609,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,185835,[c10d] Add delegate backend to FakeProcessGroup for numerics testing,general,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"159718, 185172, 185339, 185340, 185363, 185364, 185376, 185548, 185565, 185835",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #185835 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",32a4d1e43a1d91170d051f459988893cb7c42c4010e1b0f25ddb75beaaa1a1da
BUNDLE-610,bundle:bundle-610,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,186541,[MPS] [WIP] Port all MPSGraph matmuls to Metal,general,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"177471, 178277, 185286, 185555, 185787, 185822, 185935, 185936, 186002, 186541",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #186541 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",65edae75d3768a29299c2c11a99da24784bb01a52da0c9e087207e7cf8c4b53f
BUNDLE-611,bundle:bundle-611,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,186343,Enable FA build for SDPA on Windows+CUDA,general,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"177438, 180192, 180407, 180410, 180411, 180412, 180597, 183579, 185612, 186343",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #186343 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",ed0b533b881658c5f1714524adee678cdbf908dbb4907aa8fc6def07faa51584
BUNDLE-612,bundle:bundle-612,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,187640,Support in-tree XNNPACK build on Windows ARM64,general,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"177648, 180423, 180925, 186984, 186986, 186987, 186988, 187479, 187624, 187640",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #187640 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",21a035ccd0354b8be5af1697497ebdfa593f17730b115e99d8595a4078a2a0ab
BUNDLE-613,bundle:bundle-613,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,188003,[AMD][hipBLASLt] Enable streak-K work stealing for GEMM operations,general,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"180866, 180867, 180924, 180933, 181047, 181278, 186033, 187756, 187892, 188003",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #188003 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",d9fc38c16a472d7b705e85d75c5d96ee82f59ff9cf29975e45d17e1642f2e161
BUNDLE-614,bundle:bundle-614,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,188464,[spmd_types] infer R@FSDP axes from active mesh for empty params,general,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"178862, 181199, 181269, 181664, 182271, 186271, 187981, 188189, 188463, 188464",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #188464 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",b37ffe124dbbe0be5ad42eb39a803e11bfddb3dbdfe315abe321d62a935e1361
BUNDLE-615,bundle:bundle-615,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,188629,docs: document S3-compatible object storage for distributed checkpoint,general,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"181678, 181956, 187206, 187878, 187900, 187909, 188284, 188448, 188592, 188629",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #188629 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",b588bc078f98ca339740465b17e6cbf52fdb8001132100a1a6bd196175c99b58
BUNDLE-616,bundle:bundle-616,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,188858,[DO NOT MERGE] Complex Wrapper Test,general,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"181412, 182143, 182226, 182314, 182387, 182388, 182389, 182415, 188577, 188858",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #188858 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",81642ad1ebdad6735dbdb5c46433ca3bbf339b4ffc09abcf6b72ed3921df484a
BUNDLE-617,bundle:bundle-617,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,189128,Gil acquire bool conversion,general,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"174503, 181205, 181215, 182844, 182864, 187650, 189068, 189069, 189070, 189128",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #189070 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",2caf599755c7611cbdcfa9b628871b140afb054b1174b3350cc345af5e4e69b8
BUNDLE-618,bundle:bundle-618,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,189329,[DEBUG] Profile the XPU SYCL device-link bottleneck,general,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"179094, 188016, 189071, 189072, 189073, 189074, 189237, 189275, 189299, 189329",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #189299 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",5f212a0bd87583ede92d349927f7f3e16d29676493bd7ed033203a121acb5cc5
BUNDLE-619,bundle:bundle-619,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,189250,[Test][Refactor] Decouple test_dataloader and test_comparison_utils according to the accelerator relevance.,general,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"172109, 180874, 181306, 183054, 183452, 188539, 189203, 189205, 189240, 189250",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #189205 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",72f2b3cda224aaac1de72290f9a6aa1b9d4efbdc112f8f8a28926229807b7a64
BUNDLE-620,bundle:bundle-620,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,184949,Remove allow-untyped-defs from pyi files,general,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"177605, 178412, 178628, 180904, 183479, 183612, 183797, 183925, 183966, 184949",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #184949 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",dac2d7b9438aee57ad3ff8e6fa73fd5444e41fa3c2863fd578f2b3fa4ce81dae
BUNDLE-621,bundle:bundle-621,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: accelerator (0 issues + 2 PRs),pr,185973,[Accelerator] Enable Default Stream API,module: accelerator,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"185973, 187205",0,2,failed_ci_checks,PR #185973 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",54724814d1746638363339bb3f52558766f9aff73cac0b743180ec66b89fa33c
BUNDLE-622,bundle:bundle-622,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: amp (automated mixed precision) (0 issues + 7 PRs),pr,188130,[Test] Make test_autocast device-agnostic for Out-of-Tree backends,module: amp (automated mixed precision),"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"185668, 185705, 185830, 185918, 186815, 186816, 188130",0,7,failed_ci_checks,PR #188130 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",e5fe6c60d14c49a2381eddba5c35b0e480a431525876cadd1e8e690014aa0545
BUNDLE-623,bundle:bundle-623,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: aotdispatch (0 issues + 1 PR),pr,177690,"DO NOT MERGE Default pre_grad_pass_timing to ""late"" in fbcode",module: aotdispatch,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,177690,0,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #177690 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",60a049b70c2f9b35d06a3dc9a96ba094da2fcfb6ef899bdaa8d1a92d394718d0
BUNDLE-624,bundle:bundle-624,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: aotinductor (0 issues + 1 PR),pr,186926,Remove sleef from test_aoti_abi_check linkage,module: aotinductor,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,186926,0,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #186926 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",b52a0fda3c3797ca37ddd990d8f3a431772ec006d531718fd713fff4b9c43433
BUNDLE-625,bundle:bundle-625,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: arm (0 issues + 3 PRs),pr,169937,Fix vectorized float32 to uint8 conversion on AArch64,module: arm,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"169937, 176293, 188000",0,3,failed_ci_checks,PR #169937 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",01449a4a52d88a873452a2e2117886b3b06a539a2505428bf5570bc58a2e64bb
BUNDLE-626,bundle:bundle-626,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: autograd (0 issues + 1 PR),pr,178500,[autograd] Support Mapping and OrderedDict inputs for autograd.grad and autograd.backward,module: autograd,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,178500,0,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #178500 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",090dd8d9772c4e93e17a481cd244e01a76e1b156581c84f9c301ed7036d1c126
BUNDLE-627,bundle:bundle-627,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: bc-breaking (0 issues + 3 PRs),pr,177170,[FSDP] Fix alias annotation for fsdp::all_gather_copy_in,module: bc-breaking,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"177115, 177170, 177287",0,3,failed_ci_checks,PR #177170 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",d1153546e3a79fdec85b7511ab539eea8f170221b90740c4eaa4edf58694bd46
BUNDLE-628,bundle:bundle-628,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: compiled autograd (0 issues + 7 PRs),pr,183776,C++ FakeTensor,module: compiled autograd,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"178416, 179436, 181904, 182781, 183086, 183776, 184464",0,7,failed_ci_checks,PR #183776 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",9d0d68e8dbd73767830a4b721b3b374e10aa7a240126fa6ec8f1945aae381049
BUNDLE-629,bundle:bundle-629,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: convolution (0 issues + 2 PRs),pr,188426,Fix incorrect CPU bf16 conv3d when innermost output dim is 1 and strided,module: convolution,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"176894, 188426",0,2,failed_ci_checks,PR #188426 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",ce61699fa6fea717ce5f46b8cb90384fc7100650f80ffde6be6d5f1b0e1702e7
BUNDLE-630,bundle:bundle-630,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: core aten (0 issues + 1 PR),pr,186653,Make topk deterministic under deterministic algorithms,module: core aten,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,186653,0,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #186653 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",9220634afa68b262f3f7450e11e7d5d911f98418011159eec5af0c5abf84ba98
BUNDLE-631,bundle:bundle-631,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: cpu (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,184420,"Fix pow(-0.0, +/-0.5) sign on sqrt/rsqrt shortcut",module: cpu,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"170609, 175746, 175758, 178242, 178664, 181906, 184420, 185606, 185932, 187002",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #184420 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",e1a01b5e2add43e786bc19efe345a204de0c4390ab4cd05dee39de802d82885a
BUNDLE-632,bundle:bundle-632,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: cpu (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,188563,[AI Codemod][PerfAICT-General] Enable auto-vectorization of at::vec::convert via __restrict and indexed access,module: cpu,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"180455, 182011, 185491, 187208, 187712, 187897, 188311, 188312, 188451, 188563",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #188563 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",d410c88bb9e47fcd16e9c64865d9a54d97aac507301b7034f5069567e9118a8a
BUNDLE-633,bundle:bundle-633,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: cpu (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,189044,[inductor] Handle symbolic float scalars in FX wrapper metadata hook and reference analysis (#189044),module: cpu,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"133289, 133297, 176574, 177867, 183254, 183550, 183909, 186790, 187490, 189044",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #189044 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",d80b82965203cc652a17c9f0a879811361cbae24047ab0bc55af2ce2f50dcafc
BUNDLE-634,bundle:bundle-634,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: cpu (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,184307,Update SDPA error diagnostics,module: cpu,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"177401, 178485, 179397, 181077, 182845, 183978, 184307, 185706, 186590, 187116",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #184307 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",77a1b8edf08da1941c6ca91d1e86844c2dbbe953ee7ac5e31b142077b129de2d
BUNDLE-635,bundle:bundle-635,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: cpu (0 issues + 5 PRs),pr,184892,xpu: use stride-based conv descriptors and preserve grouped layout mapping,module: cpu,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"177612, 178354, 180186, 180409, 184892",0,5,failed_ci_checks,PR #184892 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",f754df8222ea33393670966374260153185f5cf6b4151df7027ba24c505ab5a2
BUNDLE-636,bundle:bundle-636,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: cublas (0 issues + 4 PRs),pr,189312,[CUDA][cuBLAS] Change cuBLAS default workspace size for SM 11.0 to 32 MiB,module: cublas,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"170571, 180875, 181944, 189312",0,4,failed_ci_checks,PR #181944 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",042d2537964c9fdc7b6c0749339db17cfdbda3c1402a899367e4c6a19b2719d3
BUNDLE-637,bundle:bundle-637,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: cuda (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,188115,[Inductor][TEST] Align `test_main_loop_scaling` with H100 support surface,module: cuda,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"176657, 176670, 176754, 179820, 180641, 182074, 182216, 188115, 188165, 189202",0,10,failed_static_checks,"PR #188115 is blocked by failing static/type checks: statusCheckRollup, linux-jammy-aarch64-py3.10 / build-osdc, linux-jammy-cuda13.0-py3.10-gcc11-sm90 / test-osdc (smoke, 1, 1, mt-l-x86iamx-22-225-h100), linux-jammy-cuda13.0-py3.12-gcc11-sm100 / test-osdc (smoke_b200, 1, 1, mt-l-x86iamx-22-225-b200), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), +5 more.","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, linux-jammy-aarch64-py3.10 / build-osdc, linux-jammy-cuda13.0-py3.10-gcc11-sm90 / test-osdc (smoke, 1, 1, mt-l-x86iamx-22-225-h100), linux-jammy-cuda13.0-py3.12-gcc11-sm100 / test-osdc (smoke_b200, 1, 1, mt-l-x86iamx-22-225-b200), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), +5 more, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, linux-jammy-aarch64-py3.10 / build-osdc, linux-jammy-cuda13.0-py3.10-gcc11-sm90 / test-osdc (smoke, 1, 1, mt-l-x86iamx-22-225-h100), linux-jammy-cuda13.0-py3.12-gcc11-sm100 / test-osdc (smoke_b200, 1, 1, mt-l-x86iamx-22-225-b200), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",86fd202768204da74272af167d8166d7451a6c61d12d24c50f783ef0edd788d8
BUNDLE-638,bundle:bundle-638,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dataloader (0 issues + 1 PR),pr,166732,Introducing statefulness for single process dataloader,module: dataloader,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,166732,0,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #166732 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",ca96e0fb06b5ba10f22a7c2ba35ee2b0a4c098ff5e6cbd523a0ec35a89decd7f
BUNDLE-639,bundle:bundle-639,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: docs (0 issues + 1 PR),pr,170807,Adding Glossary,module: docs,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,170807,0,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #170807 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup. Review signal: @pytorchbot rebase,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",86704e7cdd0b07242d3081a07ce1e4a339f7530fbede215ce5721ceecee86a24
BUNDLE-640,bundle:bundle-640,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamo (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,135631,[scan] Autograd,module: dynamo,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"135631, 176295, 179584, 179658, 180570, 181915, 184696, 185316, 186085, 187726",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #187726 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",b557567f01bfced262632eda1eb19d90f0855cd64b8d026e7f54a6a795546875
BUNDLE-641,bundle:bundle-641,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamo (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,187032,[dynamo] Support member access on protobuf enums,module: dynamo,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"169241, 175082, 175947, 176044, 184704, 185661, 185738, 185911, 186532, 187032",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #187032 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",17196342124b5d76ec345c36fc0e433c478b088bc8fd0a2d7d9f9f2bc663fb2d
BUNDLE-642,bundle:bundle-642,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamo (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,188406,[dynamo] preserve Stream/Event subclass type across graph-break rec…,module: dynamo,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"185791, 186294, 186306, 186330, 186479, 186874, 187596, 187782, 188286, 188406",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #188406 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",92d4a3f183109dfb1cede8810f04dfdd9309d3d3b0d846d19d74db1a62d2efa8
BUNDLE-643,bundle:bundle-643,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamo (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,188978,"swap isinstance(t, FakeTensor) to is_fake",module: dynamo,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"160883, 173459, 177511, 178314, 179376, 180118, 180602, 184607, 184705, 188978",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #188978 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",b0fe48dbada4d4b6a122e25500b3469bffc9c12da9a041aa30a07e925a43c5d3
BUNDLE-644,bundle:bundle-644,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamo (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,186831,Improve cudagraph stack trace coverage and assertions,module: dynamo,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"170567, 176989, 177283, 185432, 186086, 186304, 186458, 186586, 186830, 186831",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #186831 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",c4e242f4b4435aabfbec541c71074c3f5333f3b293744d5f7e00039cebfea16d
BUNDLE-645,bundle:bundle-645,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamo (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,187430,Add Kaiser-Bessel Derived window,module: dynamo,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"113258, 178083, 179587, 180528, 184487, 185101, 185236, 186828, 187391, 187430",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #187430 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",666be1a59b991d7be3e35e6cfc5646d1a0c361da7aa01b64ae4f802773ec3529
BUNDLE-646,bundle:bundle-646,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamo (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,187823,Fix regex for extracting gist URLs from logs,module: dynamo,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"180529, 180535, 181150, 181167, 185213, 186137, 186777, 187134, 187529, 187823",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #187823 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",dd35b70886b7690441c0c69394141fa5962d8599e9411ac63301fb8a93e93f62
BUNDLE-647,bundle:bundle-647,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamo (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,188103,Enable recursive dict-tag guard optimization by default on 3.12+ non-free-threaded,module: dynamo,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"181398, 182851, 184568, 186243, 186771, 186899, 187692, 187832, 188101, 188103",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #188103 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",027a80dde6dcfbbc0d51c3ed1230c0d133c0dd0a1a3fe3c2a556153b73829f9a
BUNDLE-648,bundle:bundle-648,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamo (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,188745,"[dynamo, nested graph breaks] fix empty nn.Module hook dict reconstruction",module: dynamo,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"170396, 186902, 186906, 186968, 187061, 187876, 187938, 188581, 188744, 188745",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #188745 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",7f25182a2f999791e75e7323890d271aca8dc666c4922e7d7f39b59369320952
BUNDLE-649,bundle:bundle-649,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamo (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,189325,[Dynamo] Fix self-referential bw_compiler on backend re-entry,module: dynamo,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"180283, 181780, 181781, 184218, 189024, 189027, 189051, 189249, 189311, 189325",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #189311 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",40197d88bb9e23ddc73ec07239ac280bf110723b35ba3315668008fbced758fc
BUNDLE-650,bundle:bundle-650,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamo (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,189206,[Inductor] register `target_code` in `input_codes` tracker,module: dynamo,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"157149, 184365, 185220, 186915, 187690, 187744, 188181, 188824, 189042, 189206",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #189206 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",695d00130d2553a59f7ee97e6821900f0b2f430c48baee7a42c33528b8d9e403
BUNDLE-651,bundle:bundle-651,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamo (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,188995,[dynamo] Allow raw unbacked SymInts in strict mode (FlexAttention BlockMask) (#187547),module: dynamo,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"160888, 177205, 179625, 180379, 183404, 187883, 188037, 188350, 188993, 188995",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #188350 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",2ff8acfc643a6a7204d26442affadfad82808039362fd6cbd963a16a9c906b5b
BUNDLE-652,bundle:bundle-652,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamo (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,184801,Gate baddbmm expectedFailureDynamic on TEST_Z3,module: dynamo,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"179096, 181281, 181337, 181338, 182196, 182598, 184401, 184617, 184755, 184801",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #184801 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",8b2cce39fe46097db88adec166a013936f61881de37a9eb5ff21fd7759d65fd8
BUNDLE-653,bundle:bundle-653,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamo (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,184766,Fix Dynamo set discard and remove semantics,module: dynamo,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"184616, 184635, 184754, 184757, 184759, 184761, 184762, 184763, 184765, 184766",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #184766 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",d4f1b48d81d373c189de16724305c29928abde6d3ae60cbc1d26845ab846188b
BUNDLE-654,bundle:bundle-654,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamo (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,184764,Fix Dynamo iterator reduce semantics,module: dynamo,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"184622, 184627, 184645, 184669, 184670, 184671, 184672, 184673, 184760, 184764",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #184764 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",ba32b13f7a47462606fde5e692c79e8b32d10b17d03fe3a483a7ac7140a6fc53
BUNDLE-655,bundle:bundle-655,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamo (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,184758,Fix Dynamo defaultdict shallow copy semantics,module: dynamo,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"181578, 183029, 184756, 184758, 185218, 185284, 185287, 185712, 185713, 186378",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #184758 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",8bd336a81aa8c96c7bf0c5c56737746d9bd8c83c3e3c13085c00cdf4ec13668e
BUNDLE-656,bundle:bundle-656,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamo (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,187674,Preserve boxed lifetimes for regional compiled calls,module: dynamo,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"179675, 180207, 186277, 186382, 186753, 187004, 187249, 187435, 187472, 187674",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #187674 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",48fa271ac2a1c7de1c253670ca5ce9b5f06b988fe031d7ef19acf447fe430b1a
BUNDLE-657,bundle:bundle-657,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamo (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,188326,feat(dynamo): backport recursive dict tags,module: dynamo,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"177038, 180986, 181189, 181392, 181443, 181444, 186945, 187882, 188259, 188326",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #187882 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",3d2e5956a6d41d01651622b895aea1c2fd0f1fcc5ab504f2dd8d995f1f5044bb
BUNDLE-658,bundle:bundle-658,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamo (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,189320,[inductor] Enable nested Inductor configs for invoke_subgraph regions,module: dynamo,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"178393, 181324, 183264, 188435, 188963, 189198, 189216, 189218, 189229, 189320",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #189229 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",1051e93f84b7dfc4f4d0e779d0f07cff8607f12aedabfc6ee7db5b32c83034f2
BUNDLE-659,bundle:bundle-659,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamo (0 issues + 4 PRs),pr,184440,[dynamic_spec]Add optimizer to ease user's dynamic_spec adoption,module: dynamo,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"166063, 182779, 183361, 184440",0,4,failed_ci_checks,PR #184440 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",05ab9c9e4f0ad43d69c148025d2401696f2636c2621ac6154e255647dabfde18
BUNDLE-660,bundle:bundle-660,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: flex attention (0 issues + 2 PRs),pr,186880,Add FlexAttention shared memory compile hints,module: flex attention,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"186880, 188178",0,2,failed_ci_checks,PR #186880 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",c2aed1929cf4fde6ea810d7e9399122113792c7c3b4583aec0d12b01a7ebb7a0
BUNDLE-661,bundle:bundle-661,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: functionalization (0 issues + 1 PR),pr,184409,Fix local_map deferred inlining to functionalize mutable operations,module: functionalization,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,184409,0,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #184409 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",071d100fe9289ada90eea0b725ce7abc9612ce38f2bbfc65da6e72809357c822
BUNDLE-662,bundle:bundle-662,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: inductor (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,188301,[inductor] Fix inductor dropping ordering dep between effectful ops with different kernel types,module: inductor,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"174241, 177546, 184164, 184459, 185518, 185834, 185838, 185842, 185851, 188301",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #185851 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",3f14d59d7b01740e725dd17787e21eb92d01dce8543f55466e6680b6ba3b6e21
BUNDLE-663,bundle:bundle-663,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: inductor (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,186573,[Inductor] Stabilize checkpointed reduction autotuning,module: inductor,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"179526, 180737, 180810, 180971, 182431, 184114, 184143, 184155, 185578, 186573",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #186573 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",12d5aa42e336341d8f4d77501fbb1d038a91c94651c69815993397a01e309aac
BUNDLE-664,bundle:bundle-664,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: inductor (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,188368,[Inductor] Fix ValueRangeError in Inductor for zero-iteration loops,module: inductor,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"179235, 180319, 181546, 182342, 185077, 185988, 186049, 186779, 187368, 188368",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #188368 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",75bdc5be5f28505fbefad5a955411e01743a12531f6faafbd80c278cb580a076
BUNDLE-665,bundle:bundle-665,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: inductor (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,189191,Cuda Graph Default Enable (#189191),module: inductor,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"175566, 183681, 184305, 186319, 186336, 188337, 188357, 188466, 188521, 189191",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #189191 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",814c6001d32d847421e5232c693b854321aaf15afa3ea5ae4c3d9330d439249c
BUNDLE-666,bundle:bundle-666,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: inductor (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,184279,Avoid MultiOutput for single-output fallback kernels,module: inductor,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"177568, 179547, 181074, 182055, 183854, 184279, 184587, 185091, 185570, 185844",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #184279 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",19f3bad9cce04669c967ba9936cf4bce3ed24742c6ad3575d448d2d542341a40
BUNDLE-667,bundle:bundle-667,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: inductor (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,186829,Auto-promote CUDA graph static input copies,module: inductor,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"181188, 184226, 184965, 185183, 186020, 186095, 186106, 186608, 186609, 186829",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #186829 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",baf81cf31515f7b089f2c577444fefc8708f1a6eaf35b7a53ff779f482d29218
BUNDLE-668,bundle:bundle-668,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: inductor (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,186882,RFC Change error order,module: inductor,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"175450, 177854, 178300, 179142, 179548, 181007, 181748, 182963, 182964, 186882",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #186882 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",ffe54b02363623f5c24d0669473347e8fd1721cf3879c6b0b32ee649a54aa50b
BUNDLE-669,bundle:bundle-669,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: inductor (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,186190,[spmd_types] typecheck FlexAttention,module: inductor,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"174409, 175584, 178922, 179699, 183638, 186096, 186097, 186101, 186102, 186190",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #186190 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",6d6fa7fd0b1569534e12659408aa00a237a46d0f8369165b8ea8b56db72bdee6
BUNDLE-670,bundle:bundle-670,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: inductor (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,187062,[inductor] Expose compile_worker_malloc_conf to tune the compile-worker allocator (#187062),module: inductor,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"175914, 177087, 178150, 178338, 179702, 180858, 180930, 181009, 181010, 187062",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #187062 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",3066c3bcdd933908a200dc3b47508d87a9ffa0096d2176b645674457fa28a5b9
BUNDLE-671,bundle:bundle-671,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: inductor (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,187965,[inductor] Avoid disjoint horizontal fusion when allow_peak_memory_increasing_fusion is off,module: inductor,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"181008, 181178, 181265, 181518, 182193, 183468, 187367, 187962, 187964, 187965",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #187965 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",c72eacc0681d30224017a3295b70add848a367f63a44362408a8d4f2e7ec77ae
BUNDLE-672,bundle:bundle-672,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: inductor (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,188059,[inductor] Block only peak-crossing fusions in the peak-memory guards,module: inductor,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"176920, 180644, 186211, 187471, 187842, 188055, 188056, 188057, 188058, 188059",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #188059 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",2870bafb2cd27c6cd5852383b1a37f8a9f0852a736d9ddb0c8a9f7aaf6c26878
BUNDLE-673,bundle:bundle-673,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: inductor (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,188771,[inductor] Rewind block_ptr across outer loop in nested reductions (#188771),module: inductor,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"178318, 182310, 187224, 187550, 188161, 188179, 188180, 188339, 188646, 188771",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #188771 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",0abf8408a4149429e22f1cd2f792838d8cbd8b3e1b491b04ee7d5c681c061ba7
BUNDLE-674,bundle:bundle-674,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: inductor (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,189107,Introduce Inductor lowering for _philox_uniform,module: inductor,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"152806, 180608, 182577, 184955, 186370, 187675, 187961, 188050, 188822, 189107",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #189107 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",0f68ea5c6079c1e8ddc20916aa43c6b95bf6a001a842c0ecbd5772306eb5645b
BUNDLE-675,bundle:bundle-675,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: inductor (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,189316,flex_gemm: support mx block-scale stores,module: inductor,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"176876, 184946, 188597, 188643, 189095, 189195, 189305, 189314, 189315, 189316",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #189316 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",46eaf638d77db5eecda22807a4d2da2cc7686b69e116ba0859ce09d67c9ab092
BUNDLE-676,bundle:bundle-676,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: inductor (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,189257,[rocm] Re-enable conv2d backward parametrized test on ROCm by using fp16 on NAVI,module: inductor,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"175900, 183682, 183683, 183684, 184447, 185359, 188137, 189080, 189190, 189257",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #189257 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",6b431dc55758d1fbb7eeab7524652f0617eddd41e9d557eb13bbfde64af6f7a8
BUNDLE-677,bundle:bundle-677,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: inductor (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,189197,make post-processing in codegen mandatory,module: inductor,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"165800, 180716, 181000, 181826, 186797, 187461, 188992, 189076, 189147, 189197",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #189197 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",8d7854afb4d9932d0aa1ebbf490f249c17f33713b4ee053c80fb7e62a438a403
BUNDLE-678,bundle:bundle-678,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: inductor (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,184389,[ROCm] Fix test_origami autotune comparison after PR #181617 cap,module: inductor,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"167894, 174893, 180545, 181617, 181909, 183384, 183611, 184194, 184236, 184389",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #184389 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",9d1cc8c050d8be0e4dff98cca3d51aa99fd69fa5bcc8e82e3b8ca20aab76c21d
BUNDLE-679,bundle:bundle-679,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: inductor (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,185044,[AI SLOP] Support SymInt list custom op returns,module: inductor,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"175969, 177445, 184302, 184812, 184813, 184909, 184991, 185044, 185219, 185457",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #185044 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",bd342c0e44fbd7384ca5e4d178801227d05a2e6ebaecacf8d29810e8fcb926c8
BUNDLE-680,bundle:bundle-680,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: inductor (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,186798,[TESTING ONLY] [ROCm] testing heuristic config approach,module: inductor,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"179769, 180682, 180683, 180684, 182631, 183270, 183626, 186752, 186756, 186798",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #186798 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",f62db8fd997e9ca5405f574d0a8eea279bf65675f27d578c85a78014d854209f
BUNDLE-681,bundle:bundle-681,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: inductor (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,187846,[inductor] Pick low-pressure buffer reuse when allow_peak_memory_increasing_fusion is off,module: inductor,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"179149, 184886, 187258, 187636, 187815, 187839, 187840, 187841, 187843, 187846",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #187846 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",5d9c9783d6f0d72376471078beb9d6e53b3237c06500fe1163b4839c8d01997e
BUNDLE-682,bundle:bundle-682,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: inductor (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,187971,[inductor] Add strict_numerics config to emit INNER_TREE reduction ordering for sum,module: inductor,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"172682, 175486, 180754, 181449, 185258, 187606, 187818, 187844, 187845, 187971",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #187971 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",a43435ff00431fe14064bb42c7934968a51dd2bdc04e2af1b6c45feb4744c984
BUNDLE-683,bundle:bundle-683,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: inductor (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,189003,[inductor] Coordinate-descent tune compile-time combo kernel blocks,module: inductor,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"181611, 182691, 187870, 188119, 188203, 188404, 188734, 188887, 189002, 189003",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #189003 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",2771d961b1592fb8888ec09234b509751a0d6a56e809c447c33cec0e3be68740
BUNDLE-684,bundle:bundle-684,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: inductor (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,189321,[inductor] Enable per-region cudagraphs for invoke_subgraph via auto graph partition,module: inductor,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"177705, 181089, 182334, 188236, 188469, 188886, 189001, 189165, 189209, 189321",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #189209 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",bffe886953cf38263efc9cbc8aa1e4e34682c3244bbd2e5c47af93bbebf413ff
BUNDLE-685,bundle:bundle-685,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: inductor (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,179175,[Inductor][NVGEMM] Fix FP4 autotuning tensor creation,module: inductor,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"178840, 179011, 179012, 179013, 179014, 179015, 179016, 179049, 179167, 179175",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #179175 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",7a298cf6048836d535a40990d22ca126a24dabe1f8955c2b4b165459e4ec0ebd
BUNDLE-686,bundle:bundle-686,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: inductor (0 issues + 6 PRs),pr,185012,[inductor] Add FP64-heavy pointwise autotune candidate,module: inductor,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"184930, 184933, 184937, 184999, 185011, 185012",0,6,failed_ci_checks,PR #185012 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",36fce20376099546a60b8bae2b169a187f4f84cadeb671da665cc7184d225ad5
BUNDLE-687,bundle:bundle-687,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: linear algebra (0 issues + 1 PR),pr,57772,Deprecate torch.svd and change svd -> linalg_svd,module: linear algebra,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,57772,0,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #57772 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",4eb4dd1e9bd3010fa2e855c8fdd418c521ef925c6c66a6c96e0dba599656f719
BUNDLE-688,bundle:bundle-688,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: mkldnn (0 issues + 3 PRs),pr,188787,OneDNN 3.12.2 acceptance test,module: mkldnn,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"184873, 188136, 188787",0,3,failed_ci_checks,PR #188787 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",69121d0f2a9bc3c24285ebe9a904c196575cd2efab23a7b09db891b7abc5cb5c
BUNDLE-689,bundle:bundle-689,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: mps (0 issues + 1 PR),pr,187797,Add linalg SVD operator benchmarks,module: mps,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,187797,0,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #187797 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",f740927a9e13b97658321035fe600cf6469f71f60b0b9c1653dcf803e0c0f7c7
BUNDLE-690,bundle:bundle-690,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: openreg (0 issues + 1 PR),pr,185700,[OpenReg] Add compiler integration doc for OOT accelerators,module: openreg,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,185700,0,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #185700 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",cb73872a8512a9260392d2cecbf0c6b08c69474e83a3c6309df16d63fc6ebdd7
BUNDLE-691,bundle:bundle-691,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: privateuse1 (0 issues + 6 PRs),pr,185882,[PrivateUse1] Return `False` instead of `None` when PU1 backend is not available,module: privateuse1,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"178336, 178360, 180050, 180083, 185358, 185882",0,6,failed_ci_checks,PR #185358 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",40d6e43a650c4830fa239159c8c26b2cb8bff8da98503463ba577f0d8c4ca6b6
BUNDLE-692,bundle:bundle-692,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: rocm (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,185415,[ROCm] Fix LayerNorm backward kernel for AMD Strix Halo GPUs,module: rocm,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"178004, 183668, 184253, 185366, 185415, 185666, 186010, 186122, 187189, 188316",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #183668 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",340ab3d8d620e18e81d10371df397c35dda8a90ae1fcf234d154301ece1696c0
BUNDLE-693,bundle:bundle-693,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: rocm (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,189302,[ROCm][CI] Make ROCM_SO_FILES a single shared source of truth for wheel bundling + preload,module: rocm,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"180955, 181875, 182145, 183592, 187056, 187164, 188067, 189264, 189266, 189302",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #189302 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",ae855e2c5b48cd14ec91e2cbed6fedc69628e9eb9f7675ca5cf611255b00445a
BUNDLE-694,bundle:bundle-694,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: rocm (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,188662,[ROCm] Updated mi300 runners to have 8 shards,module: rocm,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"181218, 181615, 181627, 181628, 187464, 187739, 188168, 188184, 188429, 188662",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #188662 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",17d0f9eada71d580749bff3b80b20725bf3bd696e722b1cefcb7d8ce52f8a2c5
BUNDLE-695,bundle:bundle-695,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: rocm (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,189301,[ROCm] Bump AOTriton to 0.13b,module: rocm,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"180891, 182810, 182921, 183374, 183456, 183613, 183798, 184962, 189084, 189301",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #189084 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",69d74b1276a67b1f53f3472abad5dafc55b586e78d835eaee1f08684acbd96d6
BUNDLE-696,bundle:bundle-696,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: symm_mem (0 issues + 5 PRs),pr,187785,[TokenSwitch] Add symmetric-memory zero-copy dispatch/combine,module: symm_mem,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"183390, 187642, 187750, 187776, 187785",0,5,failed_ci_checks,PR #187785 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",22b27216ba959e34e95fe98de41303d7cd34b51116a04d5564b281b23461db3b
BUNDLE-697,bundle:bundle-697,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: testing (0 issues + 1 PR),pr,186918,[Test] Add test hardware classification for test classes,module: testing,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,186918,0,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #186918 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",088b82afe88765c9206ac808c2407cb0c50c0ee4f97aa8d3ca461996cc8ac455
BUNDLE-698,bundle:bundle-698,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: tests (0 issues + 1 PR),pr,185797,[Test] Refactor test/test_bmm_outer_product.py,module: tests,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,185797,0,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #185797 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",4af9ae616808e0955acf33787e30eae207767433ad1b2b43935975c6d6b39bb7
BUNDLE-699,bundle:bundle-699,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: tests/core (0 issues + 2 PRs),pr,188043,[Test] Make test/test_sort_and_select.py device-agnostic for out-of-tree backends,module: tests/core,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"185649, 188043",0,2,failed_ci_checks,PR #188043 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",564fc49648bd979055c5c204e311cc39f470e16c0e9d2938241bdb23cb5695be
BUNDLE-700,bundle:bundle-700,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: xpu (0 issues + 3 PRs),pr,187549,[xpu][test]testing: enable tf32_on_and_off() for XPU devices,module: xpu,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"182199, 187549, 189227",0,3,failed_ci_checks,PR #187549 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",901b05eca7ca7cd5152d5837327b0f4b7eb3b7536a92ddeefb0083ef2245e778
BUNDLE-701,bundle:bundle-701,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: oncall: distributed (0 issues + 5 PRs),pr,162033,[RFC] Switch all of c10d to use .h instead of .hpp,oncall: distributed,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"130556, 130856, 148900, 157193, 162033",0,5,failed_ci_checks,PR #162033 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",566808d4949d2106fdfe7f55da266f9d8e29f487d5fcb5e5df5f391bc48adb03
BUNDLE-702,bundle:bundle-702,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,186776,Fix __qualname__ for OpOverload and OpOverloadPacket,general,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"175964, 181465, 181526, 182618, 183535, 185048, 185645, 185927, 186079, 186776",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #183535 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",ca5e31db54e1f2ea9ff0a47cc139c1aabbbd36fd8782f297f56849bc92454784
BUNDLE-703,bundle:bundle-703,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,188297,"Validate target range [0, 1] in binary_cross_entropy_with_logits",general,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"183508, 185831, 186542, 186579, 187247, 187260, 187323, 187572, 187663, 188297",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #188297 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",6ffed7143dcd9b625f95a8b997f1bc0124a21386b29213b4e6d1a1771cf76473
BUNDLE-704,bundle:bundle-704,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,189132,Register sspaddmm.out for XPU backend,general,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"172003, 177457, 178082, 178493, 182576, 187477, 188473, 188748, 189019, 189132",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #189019 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",d839fb62629e45ca0e0d13be65b742e9dd236419750ecc6300b43bbadb3086d4
BUNDLE-705,bundle:bundle-705,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,187492,Avoid std::views::reverse in CUDACachingAllocator,general,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"180129, 181730, 182025, 184141, 184335, 185475, 185741, 186138, 186251, 187492",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #187492 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",fcf7c90d7ec7732222fdfc0ea648fc03c3ec14dd2b5d09c20e48171cbe367dab
BUNDLE-706,bundle:bundle-706,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,188608,[ci] Re-enable cuDSS installation in CI Docker images so CUDA CI can actually build and run cuDSS tests,general,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"166396, 170752, 172603, 173258, 174491, 176747, 178550, 187223, 187754, 188608",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #188608 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",1d0c6dc8b33ed1d59e86120ba534cb48b6eb7d7851cf721bc35153a36249ee9d
BUNDLE-707,bundle:bundle-707,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,189284,Add torch.autograd.graph.node_creation_hook,general,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"182725, 187434, 187755, 188042, 188331, 188747, 188954, 189109, 189207, 189284",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #188747 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",17986e101ad9f3e8d90ddaa71f84f11a0dd5287a776e0b535205e62810691a5a
BUNDLE-708,bundle:bundle-708,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: general (0 issues + 7 PRs),pr,182612,Ignore decoding errors when reading CMake cache files (errors='ignore'),general,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"176726, 181110, 181501, 181520, 181926, 182612, 183875",0,7,failed_ci_checks,PR #181110 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",fc463ef77f9a1d4d1fd2dc0ab1bbbb40b18d6fccb56bdadeacb45400bc115472
BUNDLE-709,bundle:bundle-709,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: activation checkpointing (0 issues + 1 PR),pr,174862,[FSDP2] Fix to differing gradient computation graphs in different ranks,module: activation checkpointing,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,174862,0,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #174862 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",5a7e1a012eb619e8d4fb7c86350addaed2cabfb713ca55eb07824fe7ee4d4894
BUNDLE-710,bundle:bundle-710,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: amp (automated mixed precision) (0 issues + 6 PRs),pr,133419,"Keep is_mkldnn, add is_onednn",module: amp (automated mixed precision),Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"133315, 133392, 133419, 133423, 133667, 133753",0,6,failed_ci_checks,PR #133419 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup. Review signal: fix merge conflicts,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",8df2ece7cc724ac30fda541899fffdf4c93cac115fad925fc49d904678eb9e50
BUNDLE-711,bundle:bundle-711,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: arm (0 issues + 2 PRs),pr,138388,Extending SVE VEC Backend Support in PyTorch to SVE128 and SVE512.,module: arm,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"134942, 138388",0,2,contributor_update_needed,PR #138388 is contributor-owned until requested changes or review questions are answered.,Keep parked or close after maintainer review if the contributor path is no longer active; do not ask for maintainer work first.,medium,reviewDecision=CHANGES_REQUESTED; stale_days=331,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",4f4f4335bf817a3d0990219d3e1330eca09e35a1561eabe1c601c9853e162631
BUNDLE-712,bundle:bundle-712,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: autograd (0 issues + 1 PR),pr,97825,Support sparse COO/CSR/CSC/BSR/BSC return values in gradcheck input function,module: autograd,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,97825,0,1,contributor_update_needed,PR #97825 is contributor-owned until requested changes or review questions are answered.,Keep parked or close after maintainer review if the contributor path is no longer active; do not ask for maintainer work first.,medium,reviewDecision=CHANGES_REQUESTED; stale_days=384,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",6c19d02562da6786d0c581373bb416c698b21bff40ce479ab773312161528034
BUNDLE-713,bundle:bundle-713,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: bc-breaking (0 issues + 2 PRs),pr,188092,Fix cartesian_prod returning inconsistent shape for single tensor input,module: bc-breaking,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"187558, 188092",0,2,failed_ci_checks,PR #187558 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",e3a19a930f6531620df583815a8649dcebd310038701269d2b18f4fb77c0993a
BUNDLE-714,bundle:bundle-714,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: build (0 issues + 1 PR),pr,188952,Fix C2872 'std' ambiguous symbol when nvcc compiles compiled_autograd.h on Windows extension builds,module: build,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,188952,0,1,contributor_update_needed,PR #188952 is contributor-owned until requested changes or review questions are answered.,Keep parked or close after maintainer review if the contributor path is no longer active; do not ask for maintainer work first.,medium,reviewDecision=CHANGES_REQUESTED; stale_days=4,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",fe4686aaadff93ed1b1061db2a59462fd74d9f9d2835dede6ba64e03c0a806e0
BUNDLE-715,bundle:bundle-715,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: compiled autograd (0 issues + 1 PR),pr,183944,Fix compiled autograd clear saved tensors semantics,module: compiled autograd,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,183944,0,1,contributor_update_needed,PR #183944 is contributor-owned until requested changes or review questions are answered.,Keep parked or close after maintainer review if the contributor path is no longer active; do not ask for maintainer work first.,medium,reviewDecision=CHANGES_REQUESTED; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",611d5f0d1cb578832b6beb2279a36573c2b63b3e10fe1c544e3ddc8c4eefa1ba
BUNDLE-716,bundle:bundle-716,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: cpu (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,188249,[inductor] Fix bool equality value range analysis,module: cpu,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"172945, 173072, 175490, 180080, 181665, 183980, 185163, 185256, 185361, 188249",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #188249 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",6bb93ebb19b7582168a4efbcbcf9196be584585e53758257f05c7ca59e3dbd5d
BUNDLE-717,bundle:bundle-717,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: cpu (0 issues + 9 PRs),pr,185910,[AARCH64] Optimize AArch64 qlinear performance by triggering blocked layout in prepacked weight,module: cpu,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"133296, 140372, 169916, 174864, 176420, 179565, 182809, 184372, 185910",0,9,failed_ci_checks,PR #185910 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",530bc1901c6af4d06d2dc8ee4d91d009b8102e54ad54fea6422a706060960bb7
BUNDLE-718,bundle:bundle-718,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: determinism (0 issues + 1 PR),pr,174718,[inductor] fix allocation with deterministic guard,module: determinism,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,174718,0,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #174718 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",661dc26a5ce13416f48c26b10442120ff1c1193d0af06ca2577f6dad64cb8a9b
BUNDLE-719,bundle:bundle-719,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: dynamo (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,187316,Support save_on_cpu offloading under first-order torch.func transforms,module: dynamo,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"172727, 172991, 176072, 178204, 180675, 181106, 182980, 185519, 186543, 187316",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #186543 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",7b49516698b37135f47168ddf279a3bd73b3202c051a6b7e89f898dfd5fcb73c
BUNDLE-720,bundle:bundle-720,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: dynamo (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,187603,[executorch][dynamo] Import torch._utils before Dynamo variable registration,module: dynamo,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"179546, 182208, 184533, 184895, 185015, 185407, 185418, 186104, 187414, 187603",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #187603 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",10f148eda60eb94705e5b7a4169808a71d4c06e108e2a73f10be2ec9bcb490f7
BUNDLE-721,bundle:bundle-721,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: dynamo (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,188395,Refactor Dynamo side effect replay into registry dispatcher,module: dynamo,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"171035, 179284, 179425, 184739, 186324, 187654, 187772, 188105, 188374, 188395",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #188395 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",1e56a1c69990679bdae3e7889f58bc57d935a898be058200efa63f7a43954012
BUNDLE-722,bundle:bundle-722,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: dynamo (0 issues + 2 PRs),pr,188004,rewrite exception handling to be more closer to CPython,module: dynamo,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"181352, 188004",0,2,failed_ci_checks,PR #181352 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup. Review signal: LGTM! Please help resolve the merge conflicts | fix merge conflicts,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",b0c4749e5cb4df1695b03def55c32f0e26b36088a14e50b13634cc3c8584942a
BUNDLE-723,bundle:bundle-723,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: inductor (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,187106,[inductor] decompose broadcast-bias baddbmm into bmm + pointwise add,module: inductor,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"177823, 179830, 182794, 183023, 184249, 185157, 185263, 185765, 185977, 187106",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #187106 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",5cf8b283a4f26b07a5e841cc91c84b99d6bd3538ac20e4eb5a4b7ff25ef50c40
BUNDLE-724,bundle:bundle-724,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: inductor (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,187154,Use TORCH_INSTALL_LIB_DIR instead of hardcoded path 'lib',module: inductor,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"178591, 180689, 182276, 184303, 184310, 184312, 184680, 186445, 186766, 187154",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #186766 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",8ff685f7bea1348290b1f8d65b4448602859ae78627d4a7c35bdff151746ecf0
BUNDLE-725,bundle:bundle-725,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: inductor (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,179719,Skip div-to-mul-reciprocal when division_rounding is enabled,module: inductor,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"178048, 179422, 179719, 182233, 183556, 183669, 184654, 186642, 186808, 186950",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #179719 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup. Review signal: fix merge conflicts,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",d5630ed465720d6eb4145a28417e6f37c5c9f7a0e55b6d6c69cf50f89a58f22f
BUNDLE-726,bundle:bundle-726,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: inductor (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,188365,[MPS] Remove support for macOS 14,module: inductor,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"176619, 177540, 181138, 182984, 185505, 187573, 187747, 188086, 188095, 188365",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #188365 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",60cb5c73646765d9cb73853001bcbaebb68b8ea122b1a6747c4f648afd889751
BUNDLE-727,bundle:bundle-727,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: inductor (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,189183,[inductor][mtia] Fix fp16 reduction accumulator dtype mismatch,module: inductor,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"178390, 180826, 183433, 183663, 187600, 187940, 188600, 188742, 189096, 189183",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #189096 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",4c4787ad2474022661eb0d60b4b6786667884a55d57026db30e30f47fc996bca
BUNDLE-728,bundle:bundle-728,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: inductor (0 issues + 3 PRs),pr,183749,Support auto_functionalized_v2 in can_fuse_into_auto_functionalized,module: inductor,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"180225, 183749, 187165",0,3,failed_ci_checks,PR #187165 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",2aa999943fca8453f48f3e2241be064da6ab7e64279c9d5ae74d2436693ab6ce
BUNDLE-729,bundle:bundle-729,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: pipelining (0 issues + 1 PR),pr,185355,[pipelining] Fix backward hook accumulation on recv buffer activations,module: pipelining,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,185355,0,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #185355 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",927af5a45742888f72aabfb5ee2302d24aa7b922f32e699735c7c5cd4222872a
BUNDLE-730,bundle:bundle-730,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: privateuse1 (0 issues + 3 PRs),pr,187828,Add privateuse1 backend support to has_triton(),module: privateuse1,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"178463, 186047, 187828",0,3,failed_ci_checks,PR #178463 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",d59e131387a3bf9fa8ced1c098677eb4cf69b5139f5ff43d4cfb4b7abdbc7362
BUNDLE-731,bundle:bundle-731,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: risc-v (0 issues + 1 PR),pr,182278,[CI] Add native build image for linux-riscv64,module: risc-v,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,182278,0,1,contributor_update_needed,PR #182278 is contributor-owned until requested changes or review questions are answered.,Keep parked or close after maintainer review if the contributor path is no longer active; do not ask for maintainer work first.,medium,reviewDecision=CHANGES_REQUESTED; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",14d989a9eab0000e07cf833f3a96d2b47e97aa309f0343255733ada05ae65c32
BUNDLE-732,bundle:bundle-732,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: rocm (0 issues + 6 PRs),pr,187450,[ROCm] periodic-rocm-mi350: run only the 4-GPU distributed tests,module: rocm,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"177961, 178737, 183673, 186652, 187450, 188242",0,6,failed_ci_checks,PR #187450 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",f9105baa1b8df3c04236df46def6ca05060d5b21d64e18470b9a3c60a2d7a89e
BUNDLE-733,bundle:bundle-733,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: sdpa (0 issues + 1 PR),pr,188015,[SDPA] Fix 32-bit dropout RNG offset overflow in mem-efficient attention,module: sdpa,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,188015,0,1,contributor_update_needed,PR #188015 is contributor-owned until requested changes or review questions are answered.,Keep parked or close after maintainer review if the contributor path is no longer active; do not ask for maintainer work first.,medium,reviewDecision=CHANGES_REQUESTED; stale_days=10,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",18d1f13e46eb149ba8f623453be206ec92a0caf380e0b42c77d84da449d0ac8f
BUNDLE-734,bundle:bundle-734,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: tests/core (0 issues + 2 PRs),pr,185701,[Test] Make test_packed_sequence.py device agnostic for out-of-tree backends,module: tests/core,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"185617, 185701",0,2,failed_ci_checks,PR #185701 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",ba41f92dc3fbd204068c57dc01d3b87a245ae81c3f948121a24c50890d8fd4c1
BUNDLE-735,bundle:bundle-735,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,185454,"fix clamp and clamp_{min,max} gradient at scalar bound to be 0",general,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"148023, 178031, 181993, 182384, 184064, 184857, 184885, 185026, 185193, 185454",0,10,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #185454 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=40,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",43aff640453171988d6cd46c8b2bc94a33d51296d6e739cbc269aa00114c03ba
BUNDLE-736,bundle:bundle-736,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,185868,"Update clamp, clamp_min, clamp_max to use the minimum norm subgradient",general,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"175542, 180444, 180496, 183269, 184698, 184898, 185117, 185747, 185792, 185868",0,10,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #185868 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=35,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",e0578f4caddf3df176c36ccbef10a5f16119ae31a7d9ae2eb48d8aed05d108fe
BUNDLE-737,bundle:bundle-737,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,186607,Raise a clear error for malformed allocator config instead of INTERNAL_ASSERT,general,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"172829, 174196, 184577, 185187, 185864, 186073, 186128, 186159, 186207, 186607",0,10,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #186607 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=30,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",dcfdfb29f0db5f9cc6b231499bb1a90798947e1d9072155f515d6709d853d4d0
BUNDLE-738,bundle:bundle-738,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,187187,[typing] Replace TypeAlias with TypeAliasType in torch/types.py,general,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"176746, 177866, 178371, 178797, 179160, 179379, 186863, 186940, 187101, 187187",0,10,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #187187 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=25,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",d2b15d97f556b9ed82c63f28d54e80aa21309d50742b3fc3adb0b2261535f1ac
BUNDLE-739,bundle:bundle-739,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,187662,Reject aliased Q/R out tensors in torch.linalg.qr,general,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"172539, 180188, 185807, 186589, 187238, 187253, 187286, 187329, 187595, 187662",0,10,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #187662 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=20,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",3e5a8ed4152c713623b9b45918f1e89272a205465ef238bc676da7cadcdba936
BUNDLE-740,bundle:bundle-740,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,187771,Warn when convert_sync_batchnorm drops _BatchNorm subclass behavior,general,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"177455, 177985, 178099, 179827, 180601, 180764, 185319, 187597, 187656, 187771",0,10,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #187771 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=16,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",822de1bf459948b36d5df94af85dcb5da16f4b415de091c30b901d8e47af0808
BUNDLE-741,bundle:bundle-741,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,187814,Reject factor=0 in ConstantLR to avoid later ZeroDivisionError,general,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"175525, 184641, 186929, 187198, 187748, 187757, 187764, 187783, 187790, 187814",0,10,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #187814 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=15,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",fa0511e44616f497971addf61c2c9546a9339e88766d80e6969793c874a3db89
BUNDLE-742,bundle:bundle-742,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,188270,Fix inplace modification error with softmax when combining forward and backward AD,general,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"182601, 183743, 187153, 187246, 187630, 188099, 188138, 188149, 188258, 188270",0,10,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #188270 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=12,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",83ce0479447ba4d119f57c582ecfa4de16df84153ae0b548ec10f53ff7737553
BUNDLE-743,bundle:bundle-743,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,188271,Allow PrivateUse1 backends to opt out of CEA decomposition,general,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"182602, 182603, 182604, 182605, 183316, 185398, 185744, 185745, 188183, 188271",0,10,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #188271 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=11,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",94b55426a7d39f947a4c4e4ac2e55e2487cf8e362ed55457c5aea1e85292a1f9
BUNDLE-744,bundle:bundle-744,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,188543,Remove deprecated torch.utils.mobile_optimizer from API index,general,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"179377, 185056, 187795, 188347, 188363, 188373, 188381, 188399, 188526, 188543",0,10,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #188543 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=8,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",ae133dc73bb66399965b3df20b4ed7378314370189a8b67a656892f1f86fca74
BUNDLE-745,bundle:bundle-745,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,188732,[MPS] Enable ConvTranspose3d for fp16/bf16 via internal fp32 upcast,general,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"176434, 182627, 187257, 187309, 188369, 188524, 188525, 188528, 188531, 188732",0,10,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #188732 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=7,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",0c33696131c0baa657279c6093435c7507215e9a9d402f34997e2899dd55cddf
BUNDLE-746,bundle:bundle-746,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,188762,Fix multinomial without replacement silently sampling zero-probability categories,general,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"172219, 182291, 182296, 187327, 187330, 188200, 188349, 188560, 188647, 188762",0,10,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #188762 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=6,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",07c9d4a8adb3271a1aeddc67ee8ab0377d91caff5ec16ea5c44445a14c4a8ada
BUNDLE-747,bundle:bundle-747,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,188642,Fix __qualname__ for OpOverloadPacket,general,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"180408, 181756, 182076, 182133, 182204, 182262, 182268, 187325, 187453, 188642",0,10,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #188642 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=3,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",2e592de2d2864ac57ec04d64d7aae61e149fa3019fafe3e2b26ae466c5fa3b0d
BUNDLE-748,bundle:bundle-748,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,189285,Fix MIOpen RNN dropout: gradient stall and missing per-step mask variation,general,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"181027, 185794, 188831, 188843, 188857, 188883, 188893, 188968, 188969, 189285",0,10,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #189285 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",7a96ba73a8651cbf89b0c97c2ead0d2fd63b2af37673707e9e92dcf185e20f9d
BUNDLE-749,bundle:bundle-749,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,189006,Ensure correct sign of input for test_laplace in test_distributions.py,general,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"183366, 185178, 186068, 186089, 186852, 187409, 187554, 187896, 188143, 189006",0,10,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #189006 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=2,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",c3fb6b0076bb2230be51f76aba4f735f74791cd6f0e69dd352d0167ce15cf253
BUNDLE-750,bundle:bundle-750,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,187620,[FSDP2] Add PartialOffloadPolicy for fractional CPU parameter offload,general,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"177649, 180087, 186851, 186981, 186982, 186983, 186985, 187213, 187612, 187620",0,10,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #187620 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=21,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",2830deb82e4296de51c940aa197219456d94d171261f6bece3ee2ab6466c0185
BUNDLE-751,bundle:bundle-751,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,188257,[RFC] S3-over-RDMA checkpoint storage backends via NVIDIA cuObject,general,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"180573, 181145, 181187, 181528, 187564, 187685, 187835, 188065, 188120, 188257",0,10,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #188257 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=12,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",6937634119bc81d6826fdb1cf9fe59610a39afa31028b052b8e8f6fcb04ae98d
BUNDLE-752,bundle:bundle-752,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,189099,[Profiler][NOT FOR LAND] CI test debugging,general,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"182838, 182841, 186282, 186980, 187540, 188447, 188781, 188782, 188888, 189099",0,10,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #189099 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=2,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",0df0c08e44db2bedad70e0f2dc47a821b787f5644c48721888bb59214a7d72b6
BUNDLE-753,bundle:bundle-753,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,189304,Use freeze_rng_state in distribution rsample gradient tests,general,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"181659, 185424, 186302, 187859, 188195, 188388, 188653, 189020, 189253, 189304",0,10,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #189304 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",442b152ac903b7543df4302c2fb6bbbb0aacd1959ac8c830837a00e1553530db
BUNDLE-754,bundle:bundle-754,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: general (0 issues + 2 PRs),pr,189238,[XPU] Register linalg._powsum and _foreach_powsum.Scalar for XPU,general,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"183041, 189238",0,2,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #189238 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",c0da32a454f3c015aa3279eb4dad688b812a92c5f143113bbbd3a889f5a9c97b
BUNDLE-755,bundle:bundle-755,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: autograd (0 issues + 2 PRs),pr,187803,fix(autograd): sinc_backward NaN for second derivative at x=0,module: autograd,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"186177, 187803",0,2,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #187803 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=14,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",154578e2a579ab44a5f37f0ee7545e798a4d67b56ca0af51eebdce7de750ad3f
BUNDLE-756,bundle:bundle-756,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: cpu (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,188334,Handle negative integer exponents in SymPy utilities,module: cpu,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"173894, 175509, 181051, 181681, 185959, 186050, 186524, 186930, 187570, 188334",0,10,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #188334 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=9,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",31e5f7669c34b8b31bec901105fb1908c6d7f3b039ec7332c0c8f5d8452faa05
BUNDLE-757,bundle:bundle-757,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: cpu (0 issues + 6 PRs),pr,186778,Reduce fp16 batch-1 Conv2d forward divergence on XPU,module: cpu,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"176393, 178305, 180317, 180857, 181557, 186778",0,6,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #186778 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=2,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",94cad2660bb76e34caaacb8424fad4a9f699e9ab62f975c6439d72864677b7b7
BUNDLE-758,bundle:bundle-758,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: crash (0 issues + 1 PR),pr,184545,Fix UntypedStorage.new null allocator crash,module: crash,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,184545,0,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #184545 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=9,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",e830e2a921ace36491551cc6308e4ddce0cf44f98f84bb17c275570244bcb562
BUNDLE-759,bundle:bundle-759,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: cuda (0 issues + 1 PR),pr,180781,Fix integer divide-by-zero UB in CUDA binary kernels,module: cuda,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,180781,0,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #180781 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=17,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",1bb49511b164f8aef61e95fae5a0cfd65bac4ffb44d27cb9eea850415fab2d47
BUNDLE-760,bundle:bundle-760,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: dynamo (0 issues + 7 PRs),pr,174559,[lint] Enable Ruff PYI056 by replacing __all__.append/extend usage,module: dynamo,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"174559, 179223, 182147, 187647, 188593, 188918, 189081",0,7,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #174559 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=29,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",8170250074ecae6bfe58b6f961c0afbb85401e3393a16c3cfe665de0c5a2f14d
BUNDLE-761,bundle:bundle-761,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: inductor (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,189310,Generalize GeneratorState input device type,module: inductor,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"179941, 180460, 182945, 183530, 187930, 188260, 188579, 188633, 188637, 189310",0,10,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #189310 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",2a9d7780946c6c7c8d5b50e17bc81487d7b9f07760e84c33aee428ee01a0b7da
BUNDLE-762,bundle:bundle-762,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: inductor (0 issues + 7 PRs),pr,189290,Harden Inductor SubprocPool against compile-worker death and teardown hangs,module: inductor,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"185816, 188112, 188470, 188565, 188739, 189258, 189290",0,7,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #189290 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",d8133710e5922a0aa9f31d22e5546799adc6273984913afff8e660348d05f1bd
BUNDLE-763,bundle:bundle-763,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: intel (0 issues + 1 PR),pr,186571,Fix #176298: support unsigned add and sub on CPU,module: intel,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,186571,0,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #186571 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=18,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",31887e6b45e2ab44192ef0a78775a0007a9ba77026a6b48adff6a18d10d05fbb
BUNDLE-764,bundle:bundle-764,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: mkldnn (0 issues + 1 PR),pr,185217,Fix Debug/RelWithDebInfo PyTorch+XPU on Windows,module: mkldnn,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,185217,0,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #185217 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=37,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",a245f437d22fd84e9b7c8e2fb9a73c3248e8d9243985f8497d4f776ade27ca47
BUNDLE-765,bundle:bundle-765,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: mps (0 issues + 1 PR),pr,188923,test: add gradient health validation tests (fixes #177116),module: mps,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,188923,0,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #188923 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=2,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",c1c340414e6f52659380657021bfc116c3d55db92eb469e3f5764a7847004ee2
BUNDLE-766,bundle:bundle-766,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: nn (0 issues + 2 PRs),pr,184840,Add Module.to overload for memory_format,module: nn,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"182541, 184840",0,2,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #184840 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=43,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",1eedebb96ece07ae61b1a6c38a24ddcd8cbe681a67f91460413e0ff4f3d087a5
BUNDLE-767,bundle:bundle-767,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: numpy (0 issues + 1 PR),pr,188945,Fix assert_close to support comparisons involving Python and NumPy scalars,module: numpy,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,188945,0,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #188945 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=2,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",b5fa8bc464a14d2495501856fd9f83189d0217d51abda9ebcdee6cbdef204439
BUNDLE-768,bundle:bundle-768,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: openreg (0 issues + 1 PR),pr,173239,Test openreg inference hooks,module: openreg,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,173239,0,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #173239 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=27,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",ca48518386b4389ddbeb0150137254f7edf047397f8ef8a13cb372a6c0a7001f
BUNDLE-769,bundle:bundle-769,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: privateuse1 (0 issues + 1 PR),pr,180184,Export auto-generated unstructured inplace meta dispatch symbols,module: privateuse1,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,180184,0,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #180184 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=16,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",d587371cd038814dd0576eb4b8544044dab583f71b0e8dd604d5fe802df2c780
BUNDLE-770,bundle:bundle-770,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: python frontend (0 issues + 1 PR),pr,187544,Fix torch.gcd returning negative results for INT_MIN inputs,module: python frontend,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,187544,0,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #187544 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=7,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",fc57105476b2435e366ce1bfae583e0c7f35095cc79420f5d38d380413b32730
BUNDLE-771,bundle:bundle-771,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: rocm (0 issues + 2 PRs),pr,189154,Bundle unversioned libnuma for ROCm wheels,module: rocm,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"188682, 189154",0,2,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #189154 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",b9b76090750234daa48a718be41320e0bfdf2462875fb3318ed148f9a64cd67e
BUNDLE-772,bundle:bundle-772,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: oncall: distributed (0 issues + 1 PR),pr,166388,Fixing assertion fail by checking if no_sync is true before DDPsink,oncall: distributed,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,166388,0,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #166388 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=6,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",34513374b3aadce7232167b2b70c811d329cc25b3750c705070c4f40287a3de2
BUNDLE-773,bundle:bundle-773,existing_pr_final_review,Existing PR final review,evidence bundle,Existing PR final review: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,184939,Support SymInt steps for linspace/logspace export,general,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"174198, 178100, 179528, 179732, 180742, 182034, 182546, 184939, 185190, 187326",0,10,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #184939 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=APPROVED; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=20,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",9ed363503d6ed25b913ef0c34491f9db7d216dd3438a54bb48a259319219a25a
BUNDLE-774,bundle:bundle-774,existing_pr_final_review,Existing PR final review,evidence bundle,Existing PR final review: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,187396,Fix integer linspace decomposition to match eager,general,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"169249, 177069, 178781, 182323, 184881, 186346, 186566, 186570, 186836, 187396",0,10,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #187396 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=APPROVED; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=19,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",c3bf57fce2fa8db782443b221bb45f75b1a06f5120f99b2e8cca596edc752f04
BUNDLE-775,bundle:bundle-775,existing_pr_final_review,Existing PR final review,evidence bundle,Existing PR final review: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,188378,"Fix linspace/logspace docstrings: start/end are Number, not float",general,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"182937, 184745, 185812, 186489, 187928, 187969, 188036, 188287, 188321, 188378",0,10,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #188378 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=APPROVED; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=4,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",24546f433c8ededc329ead26a6c94b4a2af955ed3392660d416088eaf83b13e1
BUNDLE-776,bundle:bundle-776,existing_pr_final_review,Existing PR final review,evidence bundle,Existing PR final review: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,178768,Pass tensor data pointer to dlDeviceToTorchDevice from maybeCopyTensor in DLConvertor.cpp,general,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"171780, 178768, 182924, 183389, 184163, 185189, 185934, 186038, 186519, 186635",0,10,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #178768 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=APPROVED; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",f86ddede593643a205fb45632e5949b7f5be182a87e007c8a26ee6c335d19cc2
BUNDLE-777,bundle:bundle-777,existing_pr_final_review,Existing PR final review,evidence bundle,Existing PR final review: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,187779,Fix MPS fused RMSNorm: do the weight multiply in fp32 to match CPU/CUDA,general,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"174667, 174826, 176321, 186012, 187068, 187130, 187625, 187720, 187731, 187779",0,10,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #187779 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=APPROVED; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=15,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",96c6d6ea6ffd1f09600e5ebf82102e1cf8e96e443723b15018c14a7e927efac5
BUNDLE-778,bundle:bundle-778,existing_pr_final_review,Existing PR final review,evidence bundle,Existing PR final review: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,189016,[Test] Improve test reuse in test_torch.py for out-of-tree backends,general,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"181431, 182033, 182784, 183272, 185123, 186468, 186639, 188229, 188666, 189016",0,10,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #189016 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=APPROVED; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=2,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",8776ad3f3ff0f72780380274c401fd2b36f91799eef4f7eb9953c28e4cc1b42f
BUNDLE-779,bundle:bundle-779,existing_pr_final_review,Existing PR final review,evidence bundle,Existing PR final review: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,189181,[CI] Advisor: split garbage verdict into infra_issue + garbage (minimal),general,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"176404, 185586, 188044, 188396, 188656, 188832, 189004, 189017, 189033, 189181",0,10,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #189181 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=APPROVED; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",4b9bd908a2611c8187b39c6eac8ba2f63ee45e926ac9e0fb96de62cce98244c3
BUNDLE-780,bundle:bundle-780,existing_pr_final_review,Existing PR final review,evidence bundle,Existing PR final review: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,189292,Fix dead ExecuTorch XNNPACK doc link in mobile_optimizer,general,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"182906, 184261, 185000, 185309, 186527, 187509, 188330, 188901, 189172, 189292",0,10,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #189292 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=APPROVED; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",ebc94921f412ba93a7caf2fa1e98b7f947b0d6ebff1b005f9463c67fb8af52ee
BUNDLE-781,bundle:bundle-781,existing_pr_final_review,Existing PR final review,evidence bundle,Existing PR final review: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,186342,Preserve nested fake subclass inputs in AOTAutograd,general,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"111673, 138436, 138471, 138626, 176001, 185793, 186315, 186322, 186328, 186342",0,10,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #186342 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=2,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",27e8fc04563542c1e012c729fad48f9e99b8e3cd17a544b840e87bc226ce1444
BUNDLE-782,bundle:bundle-782,existing_pr_final_review,Existing PR final review,evidence bundle,Existing PR final review: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,183335,Internal,general,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"183335, 183501, 183738, 183739, 183752, 184426, 184859, 184866, 185125, 185137",0,10,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #183335 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=APPROVED; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=51,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",6961a282660f1c547dd064f198178f9d2f8c0cd9e411e6659b29740a54d85390
BUNDLE-783,bundle:bundle-783,existing_pr_final_review,Existing PR final review,evidence bundle,Existing PR final review: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,185993,Fix SM121 compute capability corruption in CMake GPU arch detection,general,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"180954, 181833, 182289, 183870, 184142, 185743, 185758, 185883, 185906, 185993",0,10,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #185993 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=35,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",6aeaf0322dca51ca745ff81a6ceb10dfc4d4c74849396cefcc5423f91c7182ca
BUNDLE-784,bundle:bundle-784,existing_pr_final_review,Existing PR final review,evidence bundle,Existing PR final review: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,186568,Add expected-failure test for ConstantLR factor=0,general,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"178545, 183855, 184548, 184559, 186045, 186110, 186307, 186559, 186565, 186568",0,10,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #186568 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=30,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",cb003659087bec6ea1582475b75da94543e6d37263e5875196597a190e191a53
BUNDLE-785,bundle:bundle-785,existing_pr_final_review,Existing PR final review,evidence bundle,Existing PR final review: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,187146,test all named dims test with dynamic sepcs using automatic conversion,general,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"178960, 183852, 184190, 186046, 186232, 187006, 187097, 187126, 187135, 187146",0,10,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #187146 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=26,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",bcb95b33d0e5eb65e6ec74c34457c9fb0fedb0e3ec530a122960e1e927aa74ab
BUNDLE-786,bundle:bundle-786,existing_pr_final_review,Existing PR final review,evidence bundle,Existing PR final review: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,187410,[distributed] Use node.target instead of node.name in apply_manual_re…,general,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"173182, 174605, 176936, 177147, 179000, 179399, 179594, 187192, 187245, 187410",0,10,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #187410 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=22,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",3fd972306a4117761502e97fa16d9bf83cd33416e8f776bdf95be7dc6f5f9260
BUNDLE-787,bundle:bundle-787,existing_pr_final_review,Existing PR final review,evidence bundle,Existing PR final review: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,187566,[docs] Improve autograd anomaly mode documentation,general,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"175706, 179747, 180171, 180187, 180686, 180988, 183811, 185930, 187333, 187566",0,10,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #187566 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=21,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",5f8076bd0977a4fdafc99cd7270139c75205c83070c5874af1832df34aa6313e
BUNDLE-788,bundle:bundle-788,existing_pr_final_review,Existing PR final review,evidence bundle,Existing PR final review: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,187881,Fix margin docstring rendering in HingeEmbeddingLoss,general,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"175425, 175512, 178068, 178069, 178373, 180788, 184398, 187687, 187816, 187881",0,10,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #187881 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=15,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",313a52d4a84ce6fa6fe4086bf479d86a8649bea0d1f85ff47085c2dcdc260e62
BUNDLE-789,bundle:bundle-789,existing_pr_final_review,Existing PR final review,evidence bundle,Existing PR final review: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,187921,Support freeing blocks with stream uses during graph capture,general,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"186624, 187694, 187713, 187717, 187742, 187769, 187796, 187800, 187847, 187921",0,10,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #187921 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=15,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",acb0c220edbdf26a46ef1630b59046202783dfd56346a34f35921fd1149d1118
BUNDLE-790,bundle:bundle-790,existing_pr_final_review,Existing PR final review,evidence bundle,Existing PR final review: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,188407,[Windows] Add triton_windows commit pin for Windows nightly builds,general,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"181030, 181330, 186145, 186881, 187999, 188045, 188125, 188164, 188364, 188407",0,10,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #188407 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=9,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",bc9f605888aeae877ae008a4baa39c6431c9a36b90006c36fe03f6ff3a291f99
BUNDLE-791,bundle:bundle-791,existing_pr_final_review,Existing PR final review,evidence bundle,Existing PR final review: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,188626,build-almalinux-images: migrate to OSDC via remote BuildKit,general,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"181996, 182040, 186617, 188293, 188402, 188433, 188530, 188606, 188625, 188626",0,10,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #188626 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=8,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",5210c877b3eec846bcd0825c7d48e63ba71b9b488e888214ae7c025d553db777
BUNDLE-792,bundle:bundle-792,existing_pr_final_review,Existing PR final review,evidence bundle,Existing PR final review: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,188613,[MPS] copy for contiguous same-dtype using a compute kernel,general,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"179212, 181862, 182053, 182340, 182582, 182919, 183716, 188315, 188329, 188613",0,10,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #188613 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=6,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",1687daa32e0129e9fd7e99483b410e0b16ae9550224732ee38bb3c7f2477f7dc
BUNDLE-793,bundle:bundle-793,existing_pr_final_review,Existing PR final review,evidence bundle,Existing PR final review: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,188947,[Bugfix][DTensor] Fix wrong shard offsets for uneven DTensor shards in TP-FSDP metadata,general,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"126348, 138068, 179485, 182159, 185788, 188761, 188804, 188885, 188944, 188947",0,10,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #188947 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=2,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",c9d62a57dddec5cb1b54b00333f0e74e7b18d79b0897c88dc511a48e0a2358f4
BUNDLE-794,bundle:bundle-794,existing_pr_final_review,Existing PR final review,evidence bundle,Existing PR final review: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,189028,[HOP] Moved branch clamping to user surface for switch,general,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"182747, 183755, 187317, 188434, 188846, 188939, 188946, 188977, 189011, 189028",0,10,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #189028 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",25ae4268adb379c9a3bf5311b3f364db56f12d075ce6f86578f31c9d0666fc55
BUNDLE-795,bundle:bundle-795,existing_pr_final_review,Existing PR final review,evidence bundle,Existing PR final review: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,189303,"Reapply ""Dispatch index_put_ to fill_ for scalar values (#188267 / #189105)""",general,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"187898, 188814, 188867, 188973, 189148, 189160, 189163, 189182, 189199, 189303",0,10,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #189303 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",1ba27ad086b824833ea6e748aac874a70f13a5098cf5fe97a908f281d2674dc2
BUNDLE-796,bundle:bundle-796,existing_pr_final_review,Existing PR final review,evidence bundle,Existing PR final review: general (0 issues + 6 PRs),pr,189260,PERF: improve cuda/xpu Stream.__hash__,general,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"182024, 186345, 188366, 188367, 188376, 189260",0,6,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #189260 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",c93e6e4a6c0f5b885c4adca243e3b2bc2c88e8cd95266d74c0e0c99046ef77ca
BUNDLE-797,bundle:bundle-797,existing_pr_final_review,Existing PR final review,evidence bundle,Existing PR final review: module: 64-bit (0 issues + 1 PR),pr,188031,Fix 64-bit indexing in spatial softmax backward,module: 64-bit,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,188031,0,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #188031 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=10,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",0a88a9d717e71b621268fc1641ddd3a561837e9ab76c0928d3a6d33e4d2cea86
BUNDLE-798,bundle:bundle-798,existing_pr_final_review,Existing PR final review,evidence bundle,Existing PR final review: module: accelerator (0 issues + 2 PRs),pr,187813,Generalize memory viz and cycle detection,module: accelerator,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"171313, 187813",0,2,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #187813 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=14,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",aa67bca70158b059a99f586a47a393f4929391b9464e89a9dfd7f555bc413185
BUNDLE-799,bundle:bundle-799,existing_pr_final_review,Existing PR final review,evidence bundle,Existing PR final review: module: activation checkpointing (0 issues + 1 PR),pr,178568,Add support for activation checkpointing with nested data structures,module: activation checkpointing,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,178568,0,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #178568 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=16,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",3e86d6d87d04db53e85769389fff87c190f9b3177b38a4b76e5115a9c3baa25d
BUNDLE-800,bundle:bundle-800,existing_pr_final_review,Existing PR final review,evidence bundle,Existing PR final review: module: amp (automated mixed precision) (0 issues + 4 PRs),pr,183056,[lint] Fix PYI036 violations and re-enable the rule,module: amp (automated mixed precision),"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"170051, 183056, 185917, 186473",0,4,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #183056 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=APPROVED; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=37,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",c35262b91ad2e73df13f02987501e1dbbc343db7fe70315977d1068e2ab85fed
BUNDLE-801,bundle:bundle-801,existing_pr_final_review,Existing PR final review,evidence bundle,Existing PR final review: module: arm (0 issues + 1 PR),pr,181285,"[TEST][ARM] Remove Pointer Authentication Code from address, fall back to `dladdr_lookup` where possible",module: arm,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,181285,0,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #181285 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=12,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",d868149192d5ea6432478105873f95d0bcc177697d77e53cd06f8ce876b4e33e
BUNDLE-802,bundle:bundle-802,existing_pr_final_review,Existing PR final review,evidence bundle,Existing PR final review: module: autograd (0 issues + 1 PR),pr,188089,[forward AD] Remove obsolete __debug__ guard when loading JVP decompositions,module: autograd,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,188089,0,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #188089 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=14,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",fd7942576e1cac2c2b12ecdebe9cb1c022aee3919140d1f1b80ca29410623517
BUNDLE-803,bundle:bundle-803,existing_pr_final_review,Existing PR final review,evidence bundle,Existing PR final review: module: bazel (0 issues + 1 PR),pr,178258,[submodule] Upgrade to protobuf v33.6,module: bazel,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,178258,0,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #178258 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=APPROVED; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=27,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",f53b91d37b072d89a2a4cc78b6349eb75b84f5e8fd7a78055897012ad89e0c3c
BUNDLE-804,bundle:bundle-804,existing_pr_final_review,Existing PR final review,evidence bundle,Existing PR final review: module: bc-breaking (0 issues + 1 PR),pr,176584,[RNG] Decouple Philox subsequence from hardware topology for cross-platform consistency,module: bc-breaking,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,176584,0,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #176584 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=11,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",861ce8d75c0845f20a75cd9b53e36cd030ffc3e712d86183eea0e019d5cf22c2
BUNDLE-805,bundle:bundle-805,existing_pr_final_review,Existing PR final review,evidence bundle,Existing PR final review: module: build (0 issues + 1 PR),pr,188191,Add sm_121a (NVIDIA GB10/DGX Spark) to default CUDA arch list,module: build,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,188191,0,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #188191 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=11,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",75c1b7e516f67df90c81ed54e696867528f8ddfed1e6a6b48882d447af33e0f3
BUNDLE-806,bundle:bundle-806,existing_pr_final_review,Existing PR final review,evidence bundle,Existing PR final review: module: cpu (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,183697,Fix SVE blendv mask handling after bool fill,module: cpu,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"120076, 154279, 166813, 171101, 174275, 183697, 183857, 185507, 185821, 186924",0,10,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #183697 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=APPROVED; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=16,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",dc394587f4a67ad62e3fc1f59875772a37966f835813531d9abe56668b415a6b
BUNDLE-807,bundle:bundle-807,existing_pr_final_review,Existing PR final review,evidence bundle,Existing PR final review: module: cpu (0 issues + 7 PRs),pr,189155,Add CUDA Support for Fused `_add_relu` With Half and BFloat16,module: cpu,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"151218, 162454, 178088, 180209, 182785, 188802, 189155",0,7,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #189155 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",807b5a4277a62df699f07bb35520f2ea1050c0ba63d9b804380a88d7fbff49e6
BUNDLE-808,bundle:bundle-808,existing_pr_final_review,Existing PR final review,evidence bundle,Existing PR final review: module: cuda (0 issues + 6 PRs),pr,189201,[TEST][Inductor] Fix some `test_buffer_mutation*` tests,module: cuda,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"180230, 182062, 186268, 186273, 189102, 189201",0,6,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #189201 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=APPROVED; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",b9eccd8fee319626c3682709ed3cae49aab97eff749af9f2a0a2efffee1ea86f
BUNDLE-809,bundle:bundle-809,existing_pr_final_review,Existing PR final review,evidence bundle,Existing PR final review: module: cudacachingallocator (0 issues + 1 PR),pr,186809,[cudaMallocAsync] Count graph-mem pool in memory_reserved(),module: cudacachingallocator,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,186809,0,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #186809 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=APPROVED; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",470e7b5c35b2d69315e5750d58a396f79e55d53ff13be63ae5b9f669c989113d
BUNDLE-810,bundle:bundle-810,existing_pr_final_review,Existing PR final review,evidence bundle,Existing PR final review: module: data (0 issues + 1 PR),pr,161044,Thread based dataloading workers,module: data,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,161044,0,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #161044 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=APPROVED; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=48,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",192cab71f6e92f8bef8c72a4c9dcd29e684488af4037475a0311fa4cb4ac6b61
BUNDLE-811,bundle:bundle-811,existing_pr_final_review,Existing PR final review,evidence bundle,Existing PR final review: module: distributions (0 issues + 1 PR),pr,182687,Support generator arg in dirichlet and beta torch.distributions API,module: distributions,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,182687,0,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #182687 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=2,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",61e4e51fbf2dfeca9ca32858601994114056beaad69c9b23e04c6c9849e96934
BUNDLE-812,bundle:bundle-812,existing_pr_final_review,Existing PR final review,evidence bundle,Existing PR final review: module: dynamo (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,188799,Fix callable value-opaque objects causing graph break on method access,module: dynamo,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"121445, 178051, 180828, 184947, 185207, 187631, 188175, 188799, 188825, 189021",0,10,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #188799 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=APPROVED; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=3,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",8a8c866dfd2c1962b8c15bcb292dfd8c8d30d061663b36d0dfb23078817d521a
BUNDLE-813,bundle:bundle-813,existing_pr_final_review,Existing PR final review,evidence bundle,Existing PR final review: module: dynamo (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,188834,[Dynamo] Track generator attribute mutations for proper closure handling,module: dynamo,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"124490, 132814, 184079, 185079, 186321, 186339, 188480, 188638, 188639, 188834",0,10,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #188834 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=APPROVED; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",88c32d7a6df4fb485cdeab346b2cf5090a73e403cf3497140e5b9cbdda134fd7
BUNDLE-814,bundle:bundle-814,existing_pr_final_review,Existing PR final review,evidence bundle,Existing PR final review: module: dynamo (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,146172,Factory function support for NestedTensor,module: dynamo,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"146172, 152159, 180527, 183343, 188029, 188348, 188379, 188903, 189022, 189306",0,10,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #146172 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=APPROVED; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=456,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",74a5276a1fb3877568433be9d874e740da3c1e8daa1152cda797de824623a0c2
BUNDLE-815,bundle:bundle-815,existing_pr_final_review,Existing PR final review,evidence bundle,Existing PR final review: module: dynamo (0 issues + 5 PRs),pr,189274,[dynamo] Route set/dict-view/list dunder methods through tp_slots,module: dynamo,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"185206, 189052, 189053, 189251, 189274",0,5,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #189274 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",ff5ae5ffa92764d4e7f5355b50b33f74c5e2ca3bd7506c76b3d2ebe4a2a1e546
BUNDLE-816,bundle:bundle-816,existing_pr_final_review,Existing PR final review,evidence bundle,Existing PR final review: module: flex attention (0 issues + 1 PR),pr,189187,Retune against triton 3.8,module: flex attention,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,189187,0,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #189187 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=APPROVED; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",c07a095962b1e2b7920089b3b2fddc244d12128607b8c062246b1d008854ef2d
BUNDLE-817,bundle:bundle-817,existing_pr_final_review,Existing PR final review,evidence bundle,Existing PR final review: module: inductor (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,189265,test/inductor: relax FlexAttention invalid-block-size regex,module: inductor,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"181292, 182014, 182344, 184585, 185995, 186492, 187236, 187887, 188472, 189265",0,10,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #189265 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=APPROVED; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",0e30aa52f55a97806dfa399d59196cb2eac3dad1363f24a210c859b2b064dee2
BUNDLE-818,bundle:bundle-818,existing_pr_final_review,Existing PR final review,evidence bundle,Existing PR final review: module: inductor (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,188760,Guard user stream compile tests with xfailIfNoAcceleratorTriton,module: inductor,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"175476, 178924, 179698, 179700, 180584, 181622, 185446, 188126, 188660, 188760",0,10,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #188760 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=5,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",9c983916f4fe9e5c7c5988d43de128dfd1afeb180ae47a947cb380aa3630149a
BUNDLE-819,bundle:bundle-819,existing_pr_final_review,Existing PR final review,evidence bundle,Existing PR final review: module: inductor (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,189184,[inductor][fb] Whole-graph batch_addmm->bmm fusion for independent same-shape addmm (#189184),module: inductor,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"181902, 181903, 181910, 187404, 188823, 188976, 189101, 189108, 189177, 189184",0,10,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #189184 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",808e1a90e97efb61a6e5eaa3c35ba70769cba1813ba39a270d4df6b4526b0465
BUNDLE-820,bundle:bundle-820,existing_pr_final_review,Existing PR final review,evidence bundle,Existing PR final review: module: inductor (0 issues + 7 PRs),pr,189188,flex_gemm: support scalar captured epilogue args,module: inductor,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"182987, 188176, 188468, 188870, 188991, 189037, 189188",0,7,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #189188 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",0bbccd94a2e4e45baefff37d779ae58d045438d8dc149a5808aa54f8507979d2
BUNDLE-821,bundle:bundle-821,existing_pr_final_review,Existing PR final review,evidence bundle,Existing PR final review: module: intel (0 issues + 1 PR),pr,186603,Exposing MiMalloc options and stats,module: intel,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,186603,0,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #186603 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=7,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",b5bd30fe64ca17654d0b65627f58a20998b3ced7862627eb2f686ab5dd4cae1a
BUNDLE-822,bundle:bundle-822,existing_pr_final_review,Existing PR final review,evidence bundle,Existing PR final review: module: linear algebra (0 issues + 3 PRs),pr,185913,[BugFix] Fix torch.kron crash on non-contiguous input (Issue #185650),module: linear algebra,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"181849, 182426, 185913",0,3,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #185913 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=APPROVED; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=9,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",878de6af0f78b1b8d82b15a069bbe7da6f7312ebd6745b5c1636f89355f18b2e
BUNDLE-823,bundle:bundle-823,existing_pr_final_review,Existing PR final review,evidence bundle,Existing PR final review: module: mkldnn (0 issues + 3 PRs),pr,188785,Upgrade submodule oneDNN to v3.12.2,module: mkldnn,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"184795, 186575, 188785",0,3,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #188785 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=APPROVED; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=6,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",8c7c2b77b5343c83962e703aae1fc14b8ca4a037fbf60e5881312695865d2f49
BUNDLE-824,bundle:bundle-824,existing_pr_final_review,Existing PR final review,evidence bundle,Existing PR final review: module: mps (0 issues + 1 PR),pr,178037,[MPS] Raise clear error when MPS is used in forked subprocess,module: mps,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,178037,0,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #178037 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=13,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",1077dea5b2486e5fe8ad973fbbc7264b2b19121a3ecc8a07ff97024463053e4a
BUNDLE-825,bundle:bundle-825,existing_pr_final_review,Existing PR final review,evidence bundle,Existing PR final review: module: nn (0 issues + 1 PR),pr,178590,Correct type hints for ConvNd subclasses,module: nn,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,178590,0,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #178590 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=36,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",bbb4e101023e190e238eb405d7cbfc047f01342455f84d42fe4c86004a430bf0
BUNDLE-826,bundle:bundle-826,existing_pr_final_review,Existing PR final review,evidence bundle,Existing PR final review: module: privateuse1 (0 issues + 1 PR),pr,187901,[TEST] Prevent PLATFORM_SUPPORTS_* from skipping tests on privateuse1 backends,module: privateuse1,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,187901,0,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #187901 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",3e91690a49ec881d889a3034546025f1274bbca9b510ed31d0bc41f17ef318ab
BUNDLE-827,bundle:bundle-827,existing_pr_final_review,Existing PR final review,evidence bundle,Existing PR final review: module: pytree (0 issues + 1 PR),pr,175083,[pytree] add another simplified pytree module `torch.pytree`,module: pytree,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,175083,0,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #175083 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=4,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",9119ce538b89bce375a0dd38618266057510b43967fe212984570036edaf0f3f
BUNDLE-828,bundle:bundle-828,existing_pr_final_review,Existing PR final review,evidence bundle,Existing PR final review: module: rocm (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,186133,[ROCm] remove redundant @skipIfRocm from test_cudnn_attention_broken_166211,module: rocm,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"179020, 180758, 182030, 186133, 186239, 187799, 188250, 188252, 188555, 189089",0,10,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #186133 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=APPROVED; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=35,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",0ed358d078d30e15eef418b5ca976f72f85202495b52cfac2fd0de546c63328f
BUNDLE-829,bundle:bundle-829,existing_pr_final_review,Existing PR final review,evidence bundle,Existing PR final review: module: rocm (0 issues + 1 PR),pr,189100,[ROCm] Fix test_is_pinned_no_context for Python 3.14 forkserver default,module: rocm,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,189100,0,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #189100 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",ae53ddea4a2ea25b600733fee078764b778cb8f878101828095804c5c6b9466e
BUNDLE-830,bundle:bundle-830,existing_pr_final_review,Existing PR final review,evidence bundle,Existing PR final review: module: serialization (0 issues + 1 PR),pr,182061,Document low-memory state_dict loading with meta device,module: serialization,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,182061,0,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #182061 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=4,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",bf3a219c861725f32f143c6eac8aa53c27ee8697fe0dc887070681c0cbde14ea
BUNDLE-831,bundle:bundle-831,existing_pr_final_review,Existing PR final review,evidence bundle,Existing PR final review: module: sparse (0 issues + 1 PR),pr,186887,Update test_mm_sparse_first_NT/NN input generation,module: sparse,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,186887,0,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #186887 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=28,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",30cc88bb9660029818d40c9bb454a2fccf3662de7511c75808cc4fb59ff1f337
BUNDLE-832,bundle:bundle-832,existing_pr_final_review,Existing PR final review,evidence bundle,Existing PR final review: module: testing (0 issues + 1 PR),pr,185184,[Test][distributed] Refactor some distributed test helpers to be device-agnostic,module: testing,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,185184,0,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #185184 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=34,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",3332c0e8dd9ac9bf39ff4dc854c7f8a6727999b1b0524fd0bd7d32d68e7b4a8e
BUNDLE-833,bundle:bundle-833,existing_pr_final_review,Existing PR final review,evidence bundle,Existing PR final review: module: tests (0 issues + 4 PRs),pr,185802,[Test] Refactor test/test_out_dtype_op.py,module: tests,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"181614, 185798, 185802, 185881",0,4,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #185802 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=APPROVED; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=2,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",36f781311d42e0c6def827a0c74bf764fc0975ff3e7d953c887d8390018b13a5
BUNDLE-834,bundle:bundle-834,existing_pr_final_review,Existing PR final review,evidence bundle,Existing PR final review: module: tests/core (0 issues + 8 PRs),pr,187926,[Test] Refactor test/test_shape_ops.py,module: tests/core,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"184593, 184742, 185901, 186351, 186352, 187926, 189140, 189143",0,8,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #187926 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=APPROVED; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=2,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",42e0fc5a686d12d56edd121543fa2c73b05ae556293555d506f43be22a885f42
BUNDLE-835,bundle:bundle-835,existing_pr_final_review,Existing PR final review,evidence bundle,Existing PR final review: module: tests/graph (0 issues + 1 PR),pr,185648,[Test] Make sigmoid_add extension test device-agnostic in test_cpp_extensions_aot.py,module: tests/graph,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,185648,0,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #185648 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=33,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",6a2b7ccc85f618b43a23db85f2517949a33264b0d6a53c7eba3e8e3da68067f9
BUNDLE-836,bundle:bundle-836,existing_pr_final_review,Existing PR final review,evidence bundle,Existing PR final review: module: tests/others (0 issues + 1 PR),pr,184718,[Test] Make test_testing.py device-agnostic for out-of-tree accelerators,module: tests/others,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,184718,0,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #184718 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",248a6b854b7d562c8e0624e4933ecb1ecd796347d3a23ab6dc92f7a07a9f2d3f
BUNDLE-837,bundle:bundle-837,existing_pr_final_review,Existing PR final review,evidence bundle,Existing PR final review: module: xpu (0 issues + 1 PR),pr,188874,Enable XPUGraph native recording mode,module: xpu,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,188874,0,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #188874 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=2,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",cee4687b085427e0fd9c28b93968a66e513d4475a986f642c09f5a6bee669ba5
BUNDLE-838,bundle:bundle-838,existing_pr_final_review,Existing PR final review,evidence bundle,Existing PR final review: oncall: distributed (0 issues + 1 PR),pr,141912,Add stdlib includes to c10d debug handlers,oncall: distributed,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,141912,0,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #141912 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=APPROVED; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=485,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",f31199fb31053681be5b9bb47d2f77806eb90636cc28e76b041ddaee8c5928a4
BUNDLE-839,bundle:bundle-839,existing_pr_stale_sweep,Existing stale PR sweep,evidence bundle,Existing stale PR sweep: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,183052,Fix OOM error suggesting expandable_segments when already enabled,general,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"102148, 147365, 152104, 154395, 159862, 173644, 181052, 181367, 183039, 183052",0,10,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #183052 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=57,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",8da2b38dd783888b785d4e4a145956f639dc61bd60607ee6841895b2f028c900
BUNDLE-840,bundle:bundle-840,existing_pr_stale_sweep,Existing stale PR sweep,evidence bundle,Existing stale PR sweep: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,184349,Improve complex input error for BatchNorm,general,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"180420, 180748, 181073, 182348, 182609, 182803, 183367, 183522, 184058, 184349",0,10,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #184349 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=50,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",df70cac3f95dbf3020599b8af2cecc85be6287811f8ba2370134c538b53ca367
BUNDLE-841,bundle:bundle-841,existing_pr_stale_sweep,Existing stale PR sweep,evidence bundle,Existing stale PR sweep: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,179936,[MPS] Fix avg_pool2d precision by using Metal kernel instead of MPSGraph,general,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"108303, 117905, 130462, 140321, 142114, 146318, 175537, 176893, 178513, 179936",0,10,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #179936 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=49,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",b210060d6b22f8a53452b9957731e2e658997dbf7934f7640b8a4e33d0a0918e
BUNDLE-842,bundle:bundle-842,existing_pr_stale_sweep,Existing stale PR sweep,evidence bundle,Existing stale PR sweep: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,182975,Document 5 public APIs in docs/source/utils.md,general,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"132414, 152158, 165986, 167541, 174768, 174959, 176430, 177126, 182934, 182975",0,10,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #182975 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=58,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",fc53844a990947b286dd11843aa7dbd9c6160b5fa2ec273a3626444a18bda544
BUNDLE-843,bundle:bundle-843,existing_pr_stale_sweep,Existing stale PR sweep,evidence bundle,Existing stale PR sweep: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,183787,[PyTorch] Support selective TorchScript tensor data elision (#183787),general,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"166625, 169936, 171686, 175320, 176709, 177450, 181262, 182114, 183405, 183787",0,10,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #183787 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=55,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",09508234996d47d394cccf9db03ca503f506f0490ed03722b2aef98932a2f5ae
BUNDLE-844,bundle:bundle-844,existing_pr_stale_sweep,Existing stale PR sweep,evidence bundle,Existing stale PR sweep: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,183726,[poc] yet another nonstrict api,general,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"182424, 182746, 182788, 182873, 183037, 183203, 183386, 183502, 183568, 183726",0,10,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #183726 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=54,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",1c507c8d32658eea3afdc136b4e861c4a3d87d803a608213d5e313cd01a78f2a
BUNDLE-845,bundle:bundle-845,existing_pr_stale_sweep,Existing stale PR sweep,evidence bundle,Existing stale PR sweep: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,184605,Add CPython Dynamo agentic loop plan,general,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"126199, 147653, 178850, 182269, 183507, 183976, 184042, 184116, 184358, 184605",0,10,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #184605 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=48,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",3da77f42f1de899b1e87a9450548868ad591d21ff166c996f78ab9b6b23606e0
BUNDLE-846,bundle:bundle-846,existing_pr_stale_sweep,Existing stale PR sweep,evidence bundle,Existing stale PR sweep: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,184777,Refactor test_dlpack for out of tree backend,general,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"180888, 182811, 183211, 183253, 183594, 183903, 184318, 184498, 184724, 184777",0,10,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #184777 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=46,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",9d70fe4f9127e8b81720523d49f09a8357e8318e26e02c33792a30532b33767c
BUNDLE-847,bundle:bundle-847,existing_pr_stale_sweep,Existing stale PR sweep,evidence bundle,Existing stale PR sweep: module: build (0 issues + 1 PR),pr,152828,[MSVC] Remove redundant MEM_EFF_ATTENTION_CUDA_SOURCES definition as /Zc:lambda is set globally for C++20 by default,module: build,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,152828,0,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #152828 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=59,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",869619aa86380e20b89a965a161606d6aa2f72d9880e780b78ef0fce1f83f72d
BUNDLE-848,bundle:bundle-848,existing_pr_stale_sweep,Existing stale PR sweep,evidence bundle,Existing stale PR sweep: module: cpu (0 issues + 7 PRs),pr,174882,Fix torch.histc float16 precision inconsistency,module: cpu,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"102613, 119496, 142160, 145922, 167306, 174882, 184067",0,7,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #174882 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=49,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",d59651b255046f5c493d16b980603429633d90184737146b67ea5d6b60a1d338
BUNDLE-849,bundle:bundle-849,existing_pr_stale_sweep,Existing stale PR sweep,evidence bundle,Existing stale PR sweep: module: docs (0 issues + 1 PR),pr,182583,Skip RST<->MD source conversions in doc-redirects-check,module: docs,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,182583,0,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #182583 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=55,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",98aad7f759119e5887c243f307ee36e97df28ae7e5fe2415591c2df15ebdd49d
BUNDLE-850,bundle:bundle-850,existing_pr_stale_sweep,Existing stale PR sweep,evidence bundle,Existing stale PR sweep: module: dynamo (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,184753,Fix Dynamo frozenset copy identity semantics,module: dynamo,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"110155, 125270, 125326, 125428, 141842, 143812, 146101, 147927, 153317, 184753",0,10,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #184753 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=48,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",99dc1e0871f6bc7a8b5cf9bdf40da85f2c21d74ddd9fb198705ca5197ff96669
BUNDLE-851,bundle:bundle-851,existing_pr_stale_sweep,Existing stale PR sweep,evidence bundle,Existing stale PR sweep: module: dynamo (0 issues + 3 PRs),pr,183360,Prototype lazy activation checkpoint compile,module: dynamo,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"177636, 183359, 183360",0,3,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #183360 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=57,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",7887a1ec1a82d6424d93c9f1b3ea8b5e6f98c0f2d21c4b8bd1fd3edefe83486b
BUNDLE-852,bundle:bundle-852,existing_pr_stale_sweep,Existing stale PR sweep,evidence bundle,Existing stale PR sweep: module: inductor (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,182857,[inductor][mtia] Skip matvec bmm/addmm decomposition on MTIA; add MTIA matvec bmm lowering (#182857),module: inductor,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"138519, 142295, 182850, 182857, 183009, 183028, 184929, 184932, 184936, 184940",0,10,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #182857 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=57,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",17f753d63a88ab04622c6f32a2c6ce461ceb35b1b2450a11eead3072fd58e17d
BUNDLE-853,bundle:bundle-853,existing_pr_stale_sweep,Existing stale PR sweep,evidence bundle,Existing stale PR sweep: module: inductor (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,185037,[inductor] Use persistent path for small fused online softmax,module: inductor,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"184931, 184935, 184941, 184998, 185003, 185027, 185028, 185030, 185036, 185037",0,10,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #185037 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=45,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",99669ffcd11509aa76439f7258b0efc2f7eb8abdfff4e968721a744e52d9ff3f
BUNDLE-854,bundle:bundle-854,existing_pr_stale_sweep,Existing stale PR sweep,evidence bundle,Existing stale PR sweep: module: inductor (0 issues + 1 PR),pr,185032,[inductor] Reuse expensive broadcast factors in pointwise tiling,module: inductor,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,185032,0,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #185032 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=45,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",2a08a7f984b200b34713d5bb4f6163bb84bab54428c39048898799d903575539
BUNDLE-855,bundle:bundle-855,existing_pr_stale_sweep,Existing stale PR sweep,evidence bundle,Existing stale PR sweep: module: linear algebra (0 issues + 1 PR),pr,162079,Tune linalg_eigh_cusolver: better heuristic for syevj_batched selection on cuda,module: linear algebra,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,162079,0,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #162079 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=235,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",39883c04cba92aacec050989cd8026db2ff888986ca7355cf6b67ceca4ea95bd
BUNDLE-856,bundle:bundle-856,existing_pr_stale_sweep,Existing stale PR sweep,evidence bundle,Existing stale PR sweep: module: mkldnn (0 issues + 1 PR),pr,88106,WIP: feat: LARS optimizer,module: mkldnn,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,88106,0,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #88106 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=890,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",3649920a02f3164b414381482d914f6878bbdb165912560fd67088a3594d33c8
BUNDLE-857,bundle:bundle-857,existing_pr_stale_sweep,Existing stale PR sweep,evidence bundle,Existing stale PR sweep: module: nn (0 issues + 1 PR),pr,168895,Add `pad_to_multiple_of` to `pad_sequence` (C++ only),module: nn,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,168895,0,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #168895 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=155,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",0c4acb000a1c3f1da1bf302cf111938e430b327c1b2d334e48488595e2b4f817
BUNDLE-858,bundle:bundle-858,existing_pr_stale_sweep,Existing stale PR sweep,evidence bundle,Existing stale PR sweep: module: nvfuser (0 issues + 3 PRs),pr,88998,Fix fake tensor propagation for nvprims,module: nvfuser,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"84545, 85699, 88998",0,3,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #88998 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=1179,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",d8f53f75d1962c4b627815db199c2598119af80daad02d730aa43f99715ee3d0
BUNDLE-859,bundle:bundle-859,existing_pr_stale_sweep,Existing stale PR sweep,evidence bundle,Existing stale PR sweep: module: pipelining (0 issues + 1 PR),pr,153893,[PP] Fix double backward error in stage_backward,module: pipelining,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,153893,0,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #153893 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=110,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",6bfe21461c350d16d90ef9b9de0fb7225333e2b45e8bcc6659d372b6f2957b8f
BUNDLE-860,bundle:bundle-860,existing_pr_stale_sweep,Existing stale PR sweep,evidence bundle,Existing stale PR sweep: module: primtorch (0 issues + 1 PR),pr,82997,Implement refs.var as a real reference,module: primtorch,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,82997,0,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #82997 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=1179,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",2361a6df499c8bb340fb63b00fc8e3b3c2e8d6eaef360c8a19abd3a36ffa777f
BUNDLE-861,bundle:bundle-861,existing_pr_stale_sweep,Existing stale PR sweep,evidence bundle,Existing stale PR sweep: module: rocm (0 issues + 2 PRs),pr,182836,[ROCm][CI] Update mi200 workflows to use arc label,module: rocm,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"182836, 183354",0,2,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #182836 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=55,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",f05ad84f4301b3fa9a55db22441795c0551ac5ce010bbe215cc93c8cc87ca70d
BUNDLE-862,bundle:bundle-862,existing_pr_stale_sweep,Existing stale PR sweep,evidence bundle,Existing stale PR sweep: oncall: distributed (0 issues + 3 PRs),pr,136835,Add back DistributedDataParallel types that were lost when pyi was removed,oncall: distributed,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"130752, 136835, 146593",0,3,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #136835 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=428,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",3b838c7aa9a1c2f8064fac55d485e48c7752b02a48d99840a387953324e625f5
BUNDLE-863,bundle:bundle-863,existing_pr_stale_sweep,Existing stale PR sweep,evidence bundle,Existing stale PR sweep: oncall: jit (0 issues + 1 PR),pr,162130,Raise error when no record on `extra_files`,oncall: jit,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,162130,0,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #162130 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=233,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",ee339b8d63abf7f75b505f484af42c7ffe020c52d7ed96e7916ab4ac2ec0bc98
BUNDLE-864,bundle:bundle-864,duplicate_resolution_sweep,Duplicate/related issue sweep,evidence bundle,Duplicate/related issue sweep: module: __torch_function__ (24 issues),issue_group,,module: __torch_function__ needs triage queue (24 issues),module: __torch_function__,"Compare 24 related reports, select a canonical thread, and close or link duplicates in one pass.","Reduces separate answers for issues that likely share a fix, answer, or reproduction.","No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"119346, 119357, 119364, 119490, 119514, 119536, 119537, 119576, 167693, 185267, 185268, 186344, 186400, 186587, 186637, 186773, 186823, 188674, 188678, 188691, 188836, 188896, 189322, 189323",,24,0,duplicate_consolidation,The local evidence indicates likely related reports that should share one canonical answer or implementation path.,"Pick the canonical issue, preserve the strongest reproduction, and close/link duplicates in one maintainer pass.",medium,"issues #167693 and #119536 share title/component terms: __main__, disabled | issues #167693 and #119346 share title/component terms: __main__, disabled | issues #167693 and #119364 share title/component terms: __main__, disabled | issues #167693 and #119357 share title/component terms: __main__, disabled | issues #167693 and #119576 share title/component terms: __main__, disabled | issues #167693 and #119514 share...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",1caad2bfec1fbb3ae59e12fb441b7be9cd4cdc899a1fc27ebc4f566b5d97267b
BUNDLE-865,bundle:bundle-865,duplicate_resolution_sweep,Duplicate/related issue sweep,evidence bundle,Duplicate/related issue sweep: module: abi (2 issues),issue_group,,module: abi high-priority/blocker queue (2 issues),module: abi,"Compare 2 related reports, select a canonical thread, and close or link duplicates in one pass.","Reduces separate answers for issues that likely share a fix, answer, or reproduction.","No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"149658, 187320",,2,0,duplicate_consolidation,The local evidence indicates likely related reports that should share one canonical answer or implementation path.,"Pick the canonical issue, preserve the strongest reproduction, and close/link duplicates in one maintainer pass.",medium,"issues #187320 and #149658 share title/component terms: pytorch, stable, version",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",be10eec22506817dd75b8d6bb8abef7b524099aa14fe4f97078280181b03895d
BUNDLE-866,bundle:bundle-866,duplicate_resolution_sweep,Duplicate/related issue sweep,evidence bundle,Duplicate/related issue sweep: module: activation checkpointing (2 issues),issue_group,,module: activation checkpointing needs triage queue (2 issues),module: activation checkpointing,"Compare 2 related reports, select a canonical thread, and close or link duplicates in one pass.","Reduces separate answers for issues that likely share a fix, answer, or reproduction.","No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"85088, 183207",,2,0,duplicate_consolidation,The local evidence indicates likely related reports that should share one canonical answer or implementation path.,"Pick the canonical issue, preserve the strongest reproduction, and close/link duplicates in one maintainer pass.",medium,"issues #85088 and #183207 share title/component terms: does, not, work",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",68e9f141fd5f8bd184eb1b24c5cb6c84352f026aee94b72245057d467047173f
BUNDLE-867,bundle:bundle-867,duplicate_resolution_sweep,Duplicate/related issue sweep,evidence bundle,Duplicate/related issue sweep: module: amp (automated mixed precision) (52 issues),issue_group,,module: amp (automated mixed precision) high-priority/blocker queue (49 issues),module: amp (automated mixed precision),"Compare 52 related reports, select a canonical thread, and close or link duplicates in one pass.","Reduces separate answers for issues that likely share a fix, answer, or reproduction.","No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"30651, 55669, 66782, 78829, 91633, 96779, 97086, 111901, 116423, 117494, 118088, 119845, 121101, 122308, 122478, 124644, 124656, 125664, 135835, 136712, 136728, 136819, 142454, 142457, 142459, 142834, 143484, 143487, 146788, 150098, 152102, 154014, 155146, 155147, 156563, 162343, 162797, 169210, 169741, 171838, 173495, 173574, 177227, 179030, 180740, 181853, 182279, 183251, 185247, 187659, 188261, 188912",,52,0,duplicate_consolidation,The local evidence indicates likely related reports that should share one canonical answer or implementation path.,"Pick the canonical issue, preserve the strongest reproduction, and close/link duplicates in one maintainer pass.",medium,"issues #116423 and #155146 share title/component terms: fault, segmentation | issues #116423 and #183251 share title/component terms: fault, pytorch, segmentation | issues #119845 and #155146 share title/component terms: fault, segmentation | issues #119845 and #181853 share title/component terms: dataloader, fault, segmentation, worker | issues #119845 and #142834 share title/component terms: fault, segmentation...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",fc3a3cddad07d704f234459481db2cc9b27665cdc05c631eede2f8afdb29b426
BUNDLE-868,bundle:bundle-868,duplicate_resolution_sweep,Duplicate/related issue sweep,evidence bundle,Duplicate/related issue sweep: module: aotdispatch (6 issues),issue_group,,module: aotdispatch high-priority/blocker queue (6 issues),module: aotdispatch,"Compare 6 related reports, select a canonical thread, and close or link duplicates in one pass.","Reduces separate answers for issues that likely share a fix, answer, or reproduction.","No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"38910, 173313, 174468, 174704, 183890, 187781",,6,0,duplicate_consolidation,The local evidence indicates likely related reports that should share one canonical answer or implementation path.,"Pick the canonical issue, preserve the strongest reproduction, and close/link duplicates in one maintainer pass.",medium,"issues #174468 and #174704 share title/component terms: compile, torch | issues #174468 and #173313 share title/component terms: compile, torch | issues #174468 and #183890 share title/component terms: compile, torch | issues #174468 and #187781 share title/component terms: compile, memory, torch | issues #174468 and #38910 share title/component terms: leak, memory | issues #174704 and #173313 share title/componen...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",8bb10d37e700430e360f43802c4396845547ec4e2c9b65ae996998f6e29af5fd
BUNDLE-869,bundle:bundle-869,duplicate_resolution_sweep,Duplicate/related issue sweep,evidence bundle,Duplicate/related issue sweep: module: arm (9 issues),issue_group,,module: arm has linked PR queue (2 issues),module: arm,"Compare 9 related reports, select a canonical thread, and close or link duplicates in one pass.","Reduces separate answers for issues that likely share a fix, answer, or reproduction.","No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"40425, 149201, 161783, 162422, 170877, 177247, 177249, 178538, 188255",,9,0,duplicate_consolidation,The local evidence indicates likely related reports that should share one canonical answer or implementation path.,"Pick the canonical issue, preserve the strongest reproduction, and close/link duplicates in one maintainer pass.",medium,"issues #162422 and #161783 share title/component terms: compile, runtime, torch | issues #188255 and #178538 share title/component terms: crash, import, torch | issues #170877 and #177249 share title/component terms: aarch64, failure, test, unit | issues #170877 and #177247 share title/component terms: aarch64, failure, test, unit | issues #177249 and #177247 share title/component terms: aarch64, failure, test, un...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",341d6141b10d94a45ee14319a30490ea76b18783c39411387362cebaf5f0caf4
BUNDLE-870,bundle:bundle-870,duplicate_resolution_sweep,Duplicate/related issue sweep,evidence bundle,Duplicate/related issue sweep: module: autograd (16 issues),issue_group,,module: autograd needs triage queue (4 issues),module: autograd,"Compare 16 related reports, select a canonical thread, and close or link duplicates in one pass.","Reduces separate answers for issues that likely share a fix, answer, or reproduction.","No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"73294, 80946, 143580, 146907, 153937, 155693, 158701, 172798, 181024, 182283, 185715, 186453, 189280, 189281, 189282, 189283",,16,0,duplicate_consolidation,The local evidence indicates likely related reports that should share one canonical answer or implementation path.,"Pick the canonical issue, preserve the strongest reproduction, and close/link duplicates in one maintainer pass.",medium,"issues #189282 and #189281 share title/component terms: 2025, aarch64, cpu, measurement, nov, operator_benchmark, possible, since | issues #189281 and #189283 share title/component terms: 2025, cpu, nov, operator_benchmark, since | issues #189281 and #189280 share title/component terms: 2025, cpu, nov, operator_benchmark, possible, since, slower | issues #186453 and #185715 share title/component terms: assert, c10...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",b8999ee0d4872e7cabaea574577e6e5479de8df72034cb430a996c6081b2e555
BUNDLE-871,bundle:bundle-871,duplicate_resolution_sweep,Duplicate/related issue sweep,evidence bundle,Duplicate/related issue sweep: module: bfloat16 (14 issues),issue_group,,module: bfloat16 needs triage queue (14 issues),module: bfloat16,"Compare 14 related reports, select a canonical thread, and close or link duplicates in one pass.","Reduces separate answers for issues that likely share a fix, answer, or reproduction.","No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"19106, 48251, 52741, 67797, 75171, 86532, 86594, 86595, 97876, 159238, 173492, 183812, 183815, 189298",,14,0,duplicate_consolidation,The local evidence indicates likely related reports that should share one canonical answer or implementation path.,"Pick the canonical issue, preserve the strongest reproduction, and close/link duplicates in one maintainer pass.",medium,"issues #159238 and #19106 share title/component terms: jit, performance, torch, trace | issues #86595 and #86594 share title/component terms: computing, crash, jit, model, will | issues #86595 and #86532 share title/component terms: crash, jit, will | issues #86594 and #86532 share title/component terms: crash, jit, will | issues #86532 and #189298 share title/component terms: jit, trace | issues #183812 and #1838...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",390d3e49fddec964256938591487c14cd1b917debcd4b54f77b6fb80ea73c2c5
BUNDLE-872,bundle:bundle-872,duplicate_resolution_sweep,Duplicate/related issue sweep,evidence bundle,Duplicate/related issue sweep: module: binaries (8 issues),issue_group,,module: binaries high-priority/blocker queue (2 issues),module: binaries,"Compare 8 related reports, select a canonical thread, and close or link duplicates in one pass.","Reduces separate answers for issues that likely share a fix, answer, or reproduction.","No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"37449, 66033, 87209, 119547, 170039, 178085, 188958, 188959",,8,0,duplicate_consolidation,The local evidence indicates likely related reports that should share one canonical answer or implementation path.,"Pick the canonical issue, preserve the strongest reproduction, and close/link duplicates in one maintainer pass.",medium,"issues #170039 and #66033 share title/component terms: __1, argument, failed, invalid, std, system_error | issues #178085 and #87209 share title/component terms: access, cuda, encountered, error, illegal, memory, was | issues #178085 and #37449 share title/component terms: access, cuda, encountered, error, illegal, memory, was | issues #188958 and #188959 share title/component terms: cuda, illegal, memory, read |...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",b4906d55e8c8fdc3711c15b2010db0ac18aa68d71823924f33de68d82c519f53
BUNDLE-873,bundle:bundle-873,duplicate_resolution_sweep,Duplicate/related issue sweep,evidence bundle,Duplicate/related issue sweep: module: c10d (3 issues),issue_group,,module: c10d needs triage queue (3 issues),module: c10d,"Compare 3 related reports, select a canonical thread, and close or link duplicates in one pass.","Reduces separate answers for issues that likely share a fix, answer, or reproduction.","No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"74809, 144359, 163193",,3,0,duplicate_consolidation,The local evidence indicates likely related reports that should share one canonical answer or implementation path.,"Pick the canonical issue, preserve the strongest reproduction, and close/link duplicates in one maintainer pass.",medium,"issues #163193 and #144359 share title/component terms: incorrect, results | issues #144359 and #74809 share title/component terms: incorrect, results, tensor",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",6c9ff1d633a281a8381cb3bc102a204b88a90ca824f90fb1750b00861e5bd81d
BUNDLE-874,bundle:bundle-874,duplicate_resolution_sweep,Duplicate/related issue sweep,evidence bundle,Duplicate/related issue sweep: module: complex (2 issues),issue_group,,module: complex high-priority/blocker queue (2 issues),module: complex,"Compare 2 related reports, select a canonical thread, and close or link duplicates in one pass.","Reduces separate answers for issues that likely share a fix, answer, or reproduction.","No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"185405, 188069",,2,0,duplicate_consolidation,The local evidence indicates likely related reports that should share one canonical answer or implementation path.,"Pick the canonical issue, preserve the strongest reproduction, and close/link duplicates in one maintainer pass.",medium,"issues #188069 and #185405 share title/component terms: autotune, bmm, compile, max, mode, torch",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",47542788130d71d97410b8a674c7bb2cf67e559e7197159f63026e512e2c34cc
BUNDLE-875,bundle:bundle-875,duplicate_resolution_sweep,Duplicate/related issue sweep,evidence bundle,Duplicate/related issue sweep: module: correctness (silent) (6 issues),issue_group,,module: correctness (silent) high-priority/blocker queue (6 issues),module: correctness (silent),"Compare 6 related reports, select a canonical thread, and close or link duplicates in one pass.","Reduces separate answers for issues that likely share a fix, answer, or reproduction.","No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"187444, 187445, 187446, 187447, 187448, 187449",,6,0,duplicate_consolidation,The local evidence indicates likely related reports that should share one canonical answer or implementation path.,"Pick the canonical issue, preserve the strongest reproduction, and close/link duplicates in one maintainer pass.",medium,"issues #187444 and #187449 share title/component terms: adamw, compile, ddp, divergence, eager, nccl, node, resnet50 | issues #187444 and #187448 share title/component terms: adamw, compile, ddp, divergence, eager, resnet50, torch | issues #187444 and #187447 share title/component terms: compile, ddp, divergence, eager, resnet50, torch | issues #187444 and #187446 share title/component terms: compile, ddp, diverge...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",9646ba8c0567e6ecaaed051b02c1f328552760ac8b16aabe6bf743596b1b2d71
BUNDLE-876,bundle:bundle-876,duplicate_resolution_sweep,Duplicate/related issue sweep,evidence bundle,Duplicate/related issue sweep: module: cpu (7 issues),issue_group,,module: cpu needs triage queue (5 issues),module: cpu,"Compare 7 related reports, select a canonical thread, and close or link duplicates in one pass.","Reduces separate answers for issues that likely share a fix, answer, or reproduction.","No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"99509, 115640, 141668, 150011, 152108, 177508, 183401",,7,0,duplicate_consolidation,The local evidence indicates likely related reports that should share one canonical answer or implementation path.,"Pick the canonical issue, preserve the strongest reproduction, and close/link duplicates in one maintainer pass.",medium,"issues #152108 and #177508 share title/component terms: amp, cpu, inductor, nightly, performance, regression, release | issues #152108 and #141668 share title/component terms: amp, cpu, inductor, nightly, performance, regression, release, wrapper | issues #150011 and #141668 share title/component terms: cpp, cpu, inductor, wrapper | issues #183401 and #141668 share title/component terms: cpp, cpu, inductor, nightl...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",004c6e3196d849ab5a71b4427dc9aaab83754d36e305e4c8ce479893ef1b57d3
BUNDLE-877,bundle:bundle-877,duplicate_resolution_sweep,Duplicate/related issue sweep,evidence bundle,Duplicate/related issue sweep: module: crash (8 issues),issue_group,,module: crash needs triage queue (4 issues),module: crash,"Compare 8 related reports, select a canonical thread, and close or link duplicates in one pass.","Reduces separate answers for issues that likely share a fix, answer, or reproduction.","No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"39388, 116351, 130708, 143574, 145064, 177476, 177825, 182653",,8,0,duplicate_consolidation,The local evidence indicates likely related reports that should share one canonical answer or implementation path.,"Pick the canonical issue, preserve the strongest reproduction, and close/link duplicates in one maintainer pass.",medium,"issues #116351 and #182653 share title/component terms: fpe, torch | issues #177476 and #182653 share title/component terms: crash, functional, quantized, torch | issues #177476 and #177825 share title/component terms: quantized, sized, tensor, torch | issues #145064 and #130708 share title/component terms: causes, fault, segmentation, size, tensor | issues #143574 and #39388 share title/component terms: error, nc...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",98ba26cefbbc6302fc2a029bef509cb0679a0079c1575839b7107ca86569a261
BUNDLE-878,bundle:bundle-878,duplicate_resolution_sweep,Duplicate/related issue sweep,evidence bundle,Duplicate/related issue sweep: module: dataloader (2 issues),issue_group,,module: dataloader needs triage queue (2 issues),module: dataloader,"Compare 2 related reports, select a canonical thread, and close or link duplicates in one pass.","Reduces separate answers for issues that likely share a fix, answer, or reproduction.","No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"87995, 167975",,2,0,duplicate_consolidation,The local evidence indicates likely related reports that should share one canonical answer or implementation path.,"Pick the canonical issue, preserve the strongest reproduction, and close/link duplicates in one maintainer pass.",medium,"issues #87995 and #167975 share title/component terms: after, distributed, multi, node, training",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",af6089b2b3ed31747815c7bac2c940e2667a2bbbf74e9b97d1f240834d084d2e
BUNDLE-879,bundle:bundle-879,duplicate_resolution_sweep,Duplicate/related issue sweep,evidence bundle,Duplicate/related issue sweep: module: ddp (9 issues),issue_group,,module: ddp needs triage queue (7 issues),module: ddp,"Compare 9 related reports, select a canonical thread, and close or link duplicates in one pass.","Reduces separate answers for issues that likely share a fix, answer, or reproduction.","No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"67389, 82308, 91173, 102596, 130113, 153779, 170045, 178766, 183459",,9,0,duplicate_consolidation,The local evidence indicates likely related reports that should share one canonical answer or implementation path.,"Pick the canonical issue, preserve the strongest reproduction, and close/link duplicates in one maintainer pass.",medium,"issues #183459 and #67389 share title/component terms: distributed, torch | issues #183459 and #178766 share title/component terms: _functional_collectives, distributed, torch | issues #67389 and #91173 share title/component terms: distributed, missing, torch | issues #178766 and #82308 share title/component terms: gets, torch, wrong | issues #102596 and #91173 share title/component terms: distributed, import, tor...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",6c877cfa7c1454b537269f4a61a451484730855e2980b79e7a1542b7d8caed31
BUNDLE-880,bundle:bundle-880,duplicate_resolution_sweep,Duplicate/related issue sweep,evidence bundle,Duplicate/related issue sweep: module: dynamo (4 issues),issue_group,,module: dynamo needs triage queue (4 issues),module: dynamo,"Compare 4 related reports, select a canonical thread, and close or link duplicates in one pass.","Reduces separate answers for issues that likely share a fix, answer, or reproduction.","No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"144663, 166572, 167623, 175520",,4,0,duplicate_consolidation,The local evidence indicates likely related reports that should share one canonical answer or implementation path.,"Pick the canonical issue, preserve the strongest reproduction, and close/link duplicates in one maintainer pass.",medium,"issues #144663 and #175520 share title/component terms: export, support, torch | issues #144663 and #167623 share title/component terms: export, support, torch | issues #144663 and #166572 share title/component terms: export, exportedprogram, torch | issues #175520 and #167623 share title/component terms: export, support, torch",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",0059878816eb662ab945671a1f8bd02b9db9f86c38c40a98aeb25e3fc2a517a0
BUNDLE-881,bundle:bundle-881,duplicate_resolution_sweep,Duplicate/related issue sweep,evidence bundle,Duplicate/related issue sweep: module: nn (2 issues),issue_group,,module: nn high-priority/blocker queue (2 issues),module: nn,"Compare 2 related reports, select a canonical thread, and close or link duplicates in one pass.","Reduces separate answers for issues that likely share a fix, answer, or reproduction.","No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"86120, 175293",,2,0,duplicate_consolidation,The local evidence indicates likely related reports that should share one canonical answer or implementation path.,"Pick the canonical issue, preserve the strongest reproduction, and close/link duplicates in one maintainer pass.",medium,"issues #175293 and #86120 share title/component terms: does, not, work",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",27c46368ebd1c9df9cf75b1c8753c0677eb93fbc138db6677afb7d27dbb2ed10
BUNDLE-882,bundle:bundle-882,duplicate_resolution_sweep,Duplicate/related issue sweep,evidence bundle,Duplicate/related issue sweep: module: power (2 issues),issue_group,,module: power needs triage queue (2 issues),module: power,"Compare 2 related reports, select a canonical thread, and close or link duplicates in one pass.","Reduces separate answers for issues that likely share a fix, answer, or reproduction.","No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"171870, 181638",,2,0,duplicate_consolidation,The local evidence indicates likely related reports that should share one canonical answer or implementation path.,"Pick the canonical issue, preserve the strongest reproduction, and close/link duplicates in one maintainer pass.",medium,"issues #171870 and #181638 share title/component terms: backend, compile, inductor, torch",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",3373ad4febb5c02ecc1eeb53faba3a23ffadb4b5dfe831ecb0d02e07908a8edc
BUNDLE-883,bundle:bundle-883,duplicate_resolution_sweep,Duplicate/related issue sweep,evidence bundle,Duplicate/related issue sweep: module: serialization (2 issues),issue_group,,module: serialization needs triage queue (2 issues),module: serialization,"Compare 2 related reports, select a canonical thread, and close or link duplicates in one pass.","Reduces separate answers for issues that likely share a fix, answer, or reproduction.","No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"46166, 82306",,2,0,duplicate_consolidation,The local evidence indicates likely related reports that should share one canonical answer or implementation path.,"Pick the canonical issue, preserve the strongest reproduction, and close/link duplicates in one maintainer pass.",medium,"issues #46166 and #82306 share title/component terms: error, model",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",1ff1a58f232f38f88044f98e7691c436fa2ce1fcc6a087633d26c00fd8a05495
BUNDLE-884,bundle:bundle-884,duplicate_resolution_sweep,Duplicate/related issue sweep,evidence bundle,Duplicate/related issue sweep: oncall: distributed (2 issues),issue_group,,oncall: distributed needs triage queue (2 issues),oncall: distributed,"Compare 2 related reports, select a canonical thread, and close or link duplicates in one pass.","Reduces separate answers for issues that likely share a fix, answer, or reproduction.","No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"130345, 179238",,2,0,duplicate_consolidation,The local evidence indicates likely related reports that should share one canonical answer or implementation path.,"Pick the canonical issue, preserve the strongest reproduction, and close/link duplicates in one maintainer pass.",medium,"issues #179238 and #130345 share title/component terms: backend, shutdown",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",8ec18be6fece39d9b96387bd1cdd15aeecfbf9433c5de6edc038fcba6f9e5136
BUNDLE-885,bundle:bundle-885,duplicate_resolution_sweep,Duplicate/related issue sweep,evidence bundle,Duplicate/related issue sweep: oncall: jit (2 issues),issue_group,,oncall: jit needs triage queue (2 issues),oncall: jit,"Compare 2 related reports, select a canonical thread, and close or link duplicates in one pass.","Reduces separate answers for issues that likely share a fix, answer, or reproduction.","No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"34116, 37015",,2,0,duplicate_consolidation,The local evidence indicates likely related reports that should share one canonical answer or implementation path.,"Pick the canonical issue, preserve the strongest reproduction, and close/link duplicates in one maintainer pass.",medium,"issues #37015 and #34116 share title/component terms: does, match, not",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",08f85a67dbca25e91e1c272bf73ca3c768109f54818e8f65d9d42930c39ed20e
BUNDLE-886,bundle:bundle-886,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: general (34 issues),issue_group,,general has linked PR,general,Create one general fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for general paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"7887, 42652, 45808, 48972, 57724, 97635, 108784, 110944, 116882, 117032, 117962, 118263, 121791, 125388, 127882, 128283, 128380, 130641, 135693, 137260, 145827, 153564, 157709, 159224, 163650, 164478, 170944, 177021, 178049, 178145, 185295, 185581, 187974, 189279",,34,0,patch_plan_candidate,This general bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against src/, test/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #185581: has linked PR; labels: triaged; title: `torch.compile` fails at FakeTensor validation for ConvTranspose2d | issue #164478: has linked PR; labels: triaged, actionable; title: Out of date references in CONTRIBUTING.md and Wiki | issue #130641: has linked PR; labels: triaged, topic: docs; title: `dims` of `flip()` without `list` or `tuple` works with a tensor agaist the doc | issue #125388: has linked...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",5bfd8702584641a4545d42b6bc3f2e65f1ed6863651f81ecfe3a0f4e346bb887
BUNDLE-887,bundle:bundle-887,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: general (36 issues),issue_group,,feature needs design decision,general,Create one general fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for general paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"32584, 32662, 37067, 38155, 39780, 42581, 44024, 46153, 49338, 49870, 51275, 53464, 54827, 60936, 62152, 62644, 67835, 68864, 69448, 72105, 75265, 76954, 76955, 76956, 76959, 76960, 90138, 91970, 92794, 93900, 95677, 96555, 98142, 101880, 113730, 116354",,36,0,patch_plan_candidate,This general bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against src/, test/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #116354: needs design decision; labels: feature, triaged, needs research, needs design; title: Abstract torch.device for GPU/NE/TPU computations in the cloud-based agent | issue #113730: needs design decision; labels: feature, triaged, needs design; title: Can the official provide cpu offload method for large model inference? | issue #96555: needs design decision; labels: feature, triaged, needs design; titl...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",148e99e7f02b5398997175c6911ae822b4fa5e67da587830d77e66b95e2f85b7
BUNDLE-888,bundle:bundle-888,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: 64-bit (4 issues),issue_group,,module: 64-bit has linked PR,module: 64-bit,Create one module: 64-bit fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: 64-bit paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"119147, 131185, 167086, 170798",,4,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: 64-bit bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #167086: has linked PR; labels: high priority, module: cuda, triaged, module: 64-bit; title: Unchecked uint32 overflow in CUDA scan (cumsum/cumprod/cummin/etc) | issue #170798: has linked PR; labels: module: nn, triaged, module: 64-bit, actionable, module: correctness (silent), module: edge cases; title: nn.functional.pad silently changes the padding value if input dtype is int64 and padding value is larger...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",0969b5d2c4e59da5de0f393714c49386908ba77e0b35c4f25ee058d31936d148
BUNDLE-889,bundle:bundle-889,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: __torch_dispatch__ (10 issues),issue_group,,module: __torch_dispatch__ needs design decision,module: __torch_dispatch__,Create one module: __torch_dispatch__ fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: __torch_dispatch__ paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"62982, 73513, 73537, 79205, 96319, 97500, 113089, 117115, 132651, 140909",,10,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: __torch_dispatch__ bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #132651: needs design decision; labels: triaged, needs design, module: __torch_dispatch__, tensor subclass, oncall: pt2, module: aotdispatch, module: compile-time, module: pt2-dispatcher; title: fix unnecessary re-trace in AOTDispatcher in subclass code path | issue #79205: needs design decision; labels: module: optimizer, triaged, needs research, module: __torch_dispatch__, tensor subclass; title: out-of-pl...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",34e98941599e6b8112b5a01b2393fcbf224a93b4582d991546d18d140bc39456
BUNDLE-890,bundle:bundle-890,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: __torch_function__ (14 issues),issue_group,,module: __torch_function__ has linked PR,module: __torch_function__,Create one module: __torch_function__ fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: __torch_function__ paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"47117, 54881, 58212, 63485, 96579, 103752, 115741, 147995, 167223, 182318, 186203, 186259, 188684, 188686",,14,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: __torch_function__ bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #167223: has linked PR; labels: module: docs, module: autograd, triaged, actionable, module: __torch_function__; title: [feature request] Re-enable `__torch_function__` dispatch when invoking autograd hooks for Tensor subclasses | issue #182318: has linked PR; labels: triaged, has workaround, module: correctness (silent), module: __torch_function__, oncall: pt2, module: dynamo, module: graph breaks, bot-tria...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",81cbaa7abafc7ec2225f8a650b6f9f31a6f0d8e160760997c469507b250a3548
BUNDLE-891,bundle:bundle-891,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: abi (4 issues),issue_group,,module: abi needs maintainer decision,module: abi,Create one module: abi fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: abi paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"103359, 121837, 124197, 174507",,4,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: abi bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #174507: needs maintainer decision; labels: feature, module: abi, triaged, bot-triaged; title: PyTorch Stable ABI support | issue #121837: needs maintainer decision; labels: module: binaries, module: cpp, module: abi, triaged; title: Revive libtorch-shared-without-deps flavor | issue #103359: needs maintainer decision; labels: module: build, module: abi, triaged; title: Libtorch compile error when defining D...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",dbe318e0963fb3546eef75da65e2931720ba29a7cea1e1f1359350d4a9f38758
BUNDLE-892,bundle:bundle-892,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: accelerator (12 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #175211: CUDA/ROCm/Accelerator testing should replace get_device_capability() with feature queries,module: accelerator,Create one module: accelerator fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: accelerator paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"143887, 156805, 158827, 164302, 175211, 177010, 177771, 177935, 177969, 185975, 186260, 189014",,12,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: accelerator bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"I agreed, and a similar idea from #175211 | issue #185975: has linked PR; labels: feature, triaged, module: PrivateUse1, module: accelerator, bot-triaged; title: torch.accelerator.default_stream API is missing | our categories in a backend-agnostic way. And generalize the advanced runtime functionality, Graph capturing and replay, for accelerator on #158827. Today, generator APIs are still mostly backend-specific...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",1312b5aa36ca41e1c62e72011a50a08d92e33affea195b03c0920958e8ea7413
BUNDLE-893,bundle:bundle-893,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: accelerator (6 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 3 issues - issue #180343: Accelerator-independent API to determine if a specific backend is available?,module: accelerator,Create one module: accelerator fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: accelerator paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"166563, 167283, 167881, 180343, 180345, 180712",,6,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: accelerator bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"🚀 The feature, motivation and pitch This probably lands somewhere between #180343 and #180345, not sure if it is justified in having its own issue, but in TorchTPU we have set up autoloading of our tpu module, but we only | 🚀 The feature, motivation and pitch This probably lands somewhere between #180343 and #180345, not sure if it is justified in having its own issue, but in TorchTPU we have set up autoloading of...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",3a9ae020aabd391ca714053636d1cc5241da99b3c6f457cde831fd71b36ebbfc
BUNDLE-894,bundle:bundle-894,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: activation checkpointing (17 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 7 issues - issue #113045: [Feature][DTensor] Manage additional `_padded_local_tensor` attribute,module: activation checkpointing,Create one module: activation checkpointing fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: activation checkpointing paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"113045, 113737, 114299, 120003, 120945, 121594, 129867, 136433, 147662, 155547, 158657, 163923, 171355, 174960, 175306, 186572, 187615",,17,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: activation checkpointing bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"willing to work on this one here is one related issue #158657 | more. This is the natural continuation of the per-parameter FSDP direction (RFC #114299) and is adjacent to the activation-offload work in #174960, on the parameter axis rather than the activation axis. Proposed API @dataclass(frozen=True) class PartialOffloadPolicy(OffloadPol... | i OffloadManager: Batch-level offload/onload with ping-pong GPU buffer...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",8f9f7b9e2e83079a780e856576660d2667c4b80f7ae6cfbab98e91e3d9de1d6d
BUNDLE-895,bundle:bundle-895,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: advanced indexing (4 issues),issue_group,,"#180855 `""index_copy_cpu""` not implemented for `'Float8_e5m2'`",module: advanced indexing,Create one module: advanced indexing fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: advanced indexing paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"110946, 116555, 180855, 189046",,4,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: advanced indexing bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #180855: has linked PR; labels: module: cpu, triaged, enhancement, module: advanced indexing, module: floatx (formerly float8), bot-triaged; title: `""index_copy_cpu""` not implemented for `'Float8_e5m2'` | issue #189046: needs maintainer decision; labels: feature, module: autograd, triaged, module: advanced indexing, module: dispatch, module: backend, module: reductions, module: PrivateUse1, bot-triaged; titl...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",ad6c2f2d6e7bbe1385cc0ce1e907ec41811a662d2498f0f51412f96b27aec1d8
BUNDLE-896,bundle:bundle-896,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: amp (automated mixed precision) (26 issues),issue_group,,"Review thread: 15 issues - issue #104247: [proposal] ""Name"" string attribute for modules, parameters, buffers, tensors for more pleasant debugging (including distributed FSDP2 logging)",module: amp (automated mixed precision),Create one module: amp (automated mixed precision) fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: amp (automated mixed precision) paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"1529, 16668, 25267, 27479, 30049, 31252, 31353, 35633, 45273, 47128, 58228, 58392, 84321, 85652, 85698, 91692, 104247, 127176, 133924, 163688, 164455, 167656, 168976, 172383, 174763, 184890",,26,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: amp (automated mixed precision) bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"This is a very close duplicate of #31252, and there is a discussion going on already there. TL;DR it's complicated. | Related #31252 | @eellison My impression is that this is unrelated to #25267 given that I am not using MKL and I only encounter the CPU memory leak when the model is on GPU. Is there anything I can do to help you dia | @yushangdi seems similar to #168976? I think there's settings we should flip as...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",c6b9a337fb28f67aab636d706f0da70818448967fe3e3a13e0ffb9521fb214c5
BUNDLE-897,bundle:bundle-897,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: android (16 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 15 issues - issue #102078: AddressSanitizer: heap-buffer-overflow in test_comprehensive_nn_functional_embedding_bag_cpu_bfloat16,module: android,Create one module: android fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: android paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"88, 13993, 14436, 19668, 23240, 48491, 66247, 70245, 89817, 95944, 99561, 102078, 123421, 126963, 147141, 154449",,16,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: android bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,I have also seen the same issue in #66247 and had to resort to building my own PyTorch container with `USE_MKL=OFF` in order to resolve this issue. My stack trace was also similar t | 000004ea137 in PyCFunction_Call () at ../Objects/methodobject.c:98 #87 0x00000000005c20e7 in PyObject_Call () at ../Objects/abstract.c:2165 #88 0x0000000000534870 in PyEval_CallObjectWithKeywords () at ../Python/ceval.c:4580 #89 0x00...,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",fe7b30b29fcb9949227bfad86d7fc03a4ca32d267481cf7dda6498f69a749165
BUNDLE-898,bundle:bundle-898,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: aotdispatch (27 issues),issue_group,,module: aotdispatch has linked PR,module: aotdispatch,Create one module: aotdispatch fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: aotdispatch paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"91469, 103650, 104053, 104146, 109237, 110485, 110700, 125977, 129964, 130028, 131974, 132896, 136092, 136272, 139152, 141349, 146994, 148811, 151142, 163716, 172213, 174970, 178883, 185296, 188222, 188232, 188390",,27,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: aotdispatch bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #188390: has linked PR; labels: oncall: distributed, triaged, oncall: pt2, module: aotdispatch, module: dtensor, module: pt2-dispatcher, bot-triaged, oncall: distributed parallelisms; title: [DTensor][Compile][AOTAutograd cache] DTensor stable hashing generates identical AOTAutograd hash keys across ranks, causing false cache hits. | issue #185296: has linked PR; labels: oncall: distributed, triaged, tensor...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",a1818f8b70d52d5649b4b0d68a79aebc6693e7bc9e6738c94a00b049d822a6f5
BUNDLE-899,bundle:bundle-899,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: aotdispatch (2 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #122540: [RFC] Solving Warm Start in torch.compile,module: aotdispatch,Create one module: aotdispatch fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: aotdispatch paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"122540, 125958",,2,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: aotdispatch bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,Just as a reference in the case we have some fresh news to comment about point 2 #125958,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",9c3c1df8857844d15e343654a34bf19898ae48c76a9ffc403c54bf799e947485
BUNDLE-900,bundle:bundle-900,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: aotinductor (13 issues),issue_group,,module: aotinductor has linked PR,module: aotinductor,Create one module: aotinductor fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: aotinductor paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"144459, 151027, 169182, 180107, 180811, 186143, 186176, 187907, 189135, 189136, 189137, 189138, 189189",,13,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: aotinductor bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #151027: has linked PR; labels: triaged, oncall: pt2, module: inductor, oncall: export, module: aotinductor; title: Add size/strides/alignment assertions for cpp_wrapper | issue #186176: has linked PR; labels: module: serialization, triaged, has workaround, oncall: pt2, oncall: export, module: aotinductor, bot-triaged; title: AOTInductor serializes entire underlying storage for each constant tensor, causing...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",df4a4b080bd7e8602822ea10e5480f050a67cd9eab1b25824500585fbae9d909
BUNDLE-901,bundle:bundle-901,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: arm (28 issues),issue_group,,module: arm has linked PR,module: arm,Create one module: arm fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: arm paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"55663, 64156, 71704, 72591, 78831, 104284, 104587, 125438, 125754, 125767, 133006, 137078, 154260, 154444, 157237, 162780, 168168, 168972, 169926, 170038, 170117, 171501, 173389, 174088, 174373, 177250, 179710, 186521",,28,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: arm bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #177250: has linked PR; labels: module: autograd, module: nn, triaged, module: arm, bot-triaged; title: AArch64 Unit Test Failure - TestNN test_upsampling_bfloat16 | issue #168972: has linked PR; labels: triaged, module: arm, oncall: pt2, module: inductor; title: Aarch64 unit test failures - test/test_cpu_repro.py CPUReproTests.test_float32_to_uint8 | issue #125438: has linked PR; labels: module: tests, tria...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",941ccab3427b7ed4253b893a3e9d8ae7faaed231c6dfa5415f21488a39a46c36
BUNDLE-902,bundle:bundle-902,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: autograd (46 issues),issue_group,,module: autograd has linked PR,module: autograd,Create one module: autograd fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: autograd paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"4132, 67887, 76185, 80025, 86735, 91898, 94336, 106360, 117662, 126654, 138118, 138649, 140378, 144159, 144228, 144580, 149133, 150698, 153016, 154767, 155322, 155983, 158709, 160016, 160230, 161129, 162350, 162638, 174017, 175324, 177623, 178251, 179652, 181723, 182381, 184466, 184572, 184783, 185331, 185639, 186556, 187698, 188205, 188375, 188693, 189093",,46,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: autograd bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #144580: has linked PR; labels: module: autograd, triaged, actionable, module: mta; title: `torch._foreach_mul` does not support autograd | issue #186556: has linked PR; labels: module: windows, module: autograd, triaged, module: derivatives, module: correctness (silent), bot-triaged; title: torch.ldexp returns incorrect gradient w.r.t. mantissa for negative exponents | issue #184783: has linked PR; labels:...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",418cfd0bd717203ea6ee0c46847754b0dde550bf06b24a4122a4738035ae8948
BUNDLE-903,bundle:bundle-903,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: autograd (28 issues),issue_group,,module: autograd needs maintainer decision batch 2,module: autograd,Create one module: autograd fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: autograd paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"52241, 68879, 71117, 89757, 92330, 95916, 96764, 96766, 100628, 102337, 102417, 109948, 110780, 111563, 114650, 119475, 120107, 127996, 128793, 131972, 134784, 152877, 158610, 171620, 172797, 174165, 174355, 177386",,28,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: autograd bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #52241: needs maintainer decision; labels: module: docs, module: autograd, module: loss, triaged; title: CTCLoss gradient is incorrect | issue #131972: needs maintainer decision; labels: module: autograd, triaged, module: determinism, actionable; title: backward of adaptive max pool (adaptive_max_pool2d_backward_cuda) doesn't have a deterministic implementation | issue #177386: needs maintainer decision; lab...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",7865b385b527a3c4e94de73cc6d967f03da033b1c6c9d34339883cf8b454e488
BUNDLE-904,bundle:bundle-904,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: autograd (20 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #133566: Performance: Autodiff stores inputs of convolution layers with non-trainable weight,module: autograd,Create one module: autograd fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: autograd paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"22597, 24397, 57796, 60923, 68699, 70702, 76798, 79877, 82217, 82218, 97135, 97575, 116490, 116589, 126141, 132378, 133566, 141832, 143259, 156616",,20,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: autograd bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"Related #97575 | re) but no one seems to have found a satisfying solution. I also looked at existing issues about this, and I found this very related issue: #132378. In this issue's case, a is_outputs_batched parameter would have elegantly solved the person's problem (although in their case th... | rue) x = torch.full((1, 1), 1.0) y = 2 * x y_pred = model(x) loss = criterion(y_pred, y) loss.backward() optimizer.st...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",a07645ecdef8ffd1478ad0bfd0176dbbc1251aaa871f9421d260ee4b47c9c921
BUNDLE-905,bundle:bundle-905,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: autograd (2 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #30900: CUDA error: initialization error (multiprocessing) with Python 3.7,module: autograd,Create one module: autograd fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: autograd paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"30900, 33248",,2,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: autograd bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"either lack reproducibility or are classified as user error since the programmer attempts to use CUDA on multiple processes in a tree. See #30900, #2517 and #3491. In our environment, using spawn instead of fork to create the child processes does not resolve the issue. cc @ezy...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",f0b6b045a90a8aaa2d822931b467872afac3dd43f4123f25cd78bcfe6a8c17cc
BUNDLE-906,bundle:bundle-906,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: backend (12 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 4 issues - issue #174469: [RFC] Overview of Test Case Refactoring in PyTorch,module: backend,Create one module: backend fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: backend paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"77170, 77176, 133288, 174469, 176877, 177968, 178930, 185142, 185590, 187148, 188370, 188882",,12,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: backend bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"act same goal as this refactoring initiative and provide crucial underlying technical context, serving as perfect complements to this plan: #174469 #185142 Looking forward to great discussions and contributions in the Slack channel and PR reviews! cc @mruberry | es Decorator bypass extending DistTestCases.backend_feature so PrivateUse1 devices count as accelerators for GPU-count checks. Related RFC: #174469 5. Doc...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",e5fcfa38254f1c41f5222c977b666ab544e2d102741f423125a5bd7cb3609c91
BUNDLE-907,bundle:bundle-907,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: batching (1 issue),issue_group,,#173802 Batching rule of aten::_weight_norm,module: batching,Create one module: batching fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: batching paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,173802,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: batching bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #173802: needs maintainer decision; labels: feature, triaged, module: batching; title: Batching rule of aten::_weight_norm",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",7f16b736bb42860c81ddeba09caf9f847a48476b19b17696fca36bf5c8113ecf
BUNDLE-908,bundle:bundle-908,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: bazel (1 issue),issue_group,,#112903 Support for Bazel workspace function or Bazel module,module: bazel,Create one module: bazel fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: bazel paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,112903,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: bazel bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #112903: needs maintainer decision; labels: module: build, triaged, module: bazel; title: Support for Bazel workspace function or Bazel module",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",9ab4d1741130f82859b66eefe924d1568b6b0c72f7930fe8a78379eb1a4e0800
BUNDLE-909,bundle:bundle-909,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: bc-breaking (5 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 4 issues - issue #102730: Best practices clarification for initialization strategies,module: bc-breaking,Create one module: bc-breaking fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: bc-breaking paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"18182, 20102, 49227, 102730, 125861",,5,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: bc-breaking bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"Related to #18182 | Related long-standing issue: #18182 | There were also some related discussions on passing in keras-like weight init options to non-lazy modules as well: #18182 | issue #49227: needs design decision; labels: module: bc-breaking, triaged, module: numpy, needs design, topic: bc breaking; title: Looking for a more convenient way to getter value of the upper/lower triangular matrix into 1D",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",f0c6a5934fb699852d6082eab47a81d3908aeffde132c733fd774672bf66bc07
BUNDLE-910,bundle:bundle-910,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: benchmark (4 issues),issue_group,,module: benchmark needs maintainer decision,module: benchmark,Create one module: benchmark fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: benchmark paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"164593, 171376, 172495, 188851",,4,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: benchmark bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #188851: needs maintainer decision; labels: module: dependency bug, module: rocm, module: ci, triaged, module: benchmark, bot-triaged; title: [CI][ROCm] DebertaV2ForMaskedLM fails to import from transformers on gfx950 (dynamic_inductor_huggingface eager_fail_to_run) | issue #164593: needs maintainer decision; labels: module: ci, triaged, module: benchmark; title: [CI] Make sure B200 benchmark testing covers...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",ee81313d967a443e6c363d9216a3ce79bfad545b013688a00b36d57e9ce6fa79
BUNDLE-911,bundle:bundle-911,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: bfloat16 (13 issues),issue_group,,module: bfloat16 has linked PR,module: bfloat16,Create one module: bfloat16 fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: bfloat16 paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"75458, 90574, 95100, 117844, 120376, 121190, 153033, 163347, 170758, 175489, 177859, 181718, 187089",,13,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: bfloat16 bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #187089: has linked PR; labels: module: cpu, triaged, enhancement, module: bfloat16, module: tensor creation, bot-triaged; title: Support BFloat16 in ATen CPU tensor creation (tensor_cpu) | issue #175489: has linked PR; labels: module: nn, module: cpu, triaged, module: bfloat16, module: half, bot-triaged; title: CPU `F.interpolate(..., antialias=True)` raises NotImplementedError for bfloat16/float16 (bilinea...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",0b3255fb026618fe7254ec891ebeb1986f1c1fa3ad9392bba11e09454b136510
BUNDLE-912,bundle:bundle-912,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: binaries (39 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 4 issues - issue #44282: PyTorch wheel's own OpenMP library clashing with system-wide OpenMP library at runtime,module: binaries,Create one module: binaries fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: binaries paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"44282, 71381, 71545, 72712, 91989, 98836, 99625, 104259, 135508, 144071, 148169, 148345, 150655, 150742, 152355, 152783, 154299, 159207, 160261, 164883, 165798, 167411, 167818, 167833, 168362, 168897, 171092, 172628, 177050, 178196, 178368, 180215, 181565, 182008, 182272, 185746, 186905, 187824, 187834",,39,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: binaries bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"brary. As this is a cross project issue, I'm not sure what the best way is to coordinate with the other projects. This issue is related to: #44282, #19764 Versions Collecting environment information... PyTorch version: 2.0.0+cu117 Is debug build: False CUDA used to build PyTor... | 🐛 Describe the bug This issue may be related to #98836 and #91989. Background The issue arise when using PyTorch with Ray. The raylet...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",d4562a00cc9d226322c71184722f7e50228fec3b4f36e017d180305badac0930
BUNDLE-913,bundle:bundle-913,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: binaries (24 issues),issue_group,,module: binaries needs maintainer decision batch 2,module: binaries,Create one module: binaries fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: binaries paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"74282, 85211, 104598, 111896, 116931, 117469, 118172, 119461, 120606, 121222, 121287, 121646, 127560, 128939, 134993, 138821, 149953, 153996, 166628, 169429, 171194, 172351, 184352, 186099",,24,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: binaries bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #119461: needs maintainer decision; labels: module: binaries, triaged, module: docker; title: Promote pytorch nightly docker image | issue #74282: needs maintainer decision; labels: module: binaries, module: cudnn, triaged, module: vision; title: RuntimeError: cuDNN error: CUDNN_STATUS_VERSION_MISMATCH for torchvision models | issue #172351: needs maintainer decision; labels: module: binaries, module: cudnn,...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",ae879fb72d9ceb950b6e72769403ef2204c545418bd449fc74dd62d109c156de
BUNDLE-914,bundle:bundle-914,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: binaries (10 issues),issue_group,,module: binaries needs reproduction batch 3,module: binaries,Create one module: binaries fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: binaries paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"31004, 56928, 60094, 86919, 90115, 97865, 101331, 106126, 152790, 155066",,10,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: binaries bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #106126: needs reproduction; labels: needs reproduction, module: binaries, module: cpp, triaged; title: Libtorch report C10 error when compiling on my own project | issue #101331: needs reproduction; labels: needs reproduction, module: binaries, module: cuda, triaged; title: Pytorch 2.1.0.dev20230512 cuda not available | issue #97865: needs reproduction; labels: needs reproduction, module: binaries, triaged;...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",e9fe5ccd5836f50d0a113a32e8ef4c9e8629ff28ee87a8b032cf8098056ca96f
BUNDLE-915,bundle:bundle-915,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: bootcamp (1 issue),issue_group,,#78842 Add TORCH_SHOW_CPP_STACKTRACES when TORCH_DISTRIBUTED_DEBUG = detail,module: bootcamp,Create one module: bootcamp fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: bootcamp paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,78842,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: bootcamp bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #78842: needs maintainer decision; labels: oncall: distributed, module: bootcamp, triaged, enhancement, pt_distributed_rampup, module: c10d, module: distributed_tool, bot-triaged, oncall: distributed infra, ptd-bot-triaged; title: Add TORCH_SHOW_CPP_STACKTRACES when TORCH_DISTRIBUTED_DEBUG = detail",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",f59c63680be91306ecbfeb5535104b789fe2528425f44d12447d246526d0959e
BUNDLE-916,bundle:bundle-916,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: build (24 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #125678: Unnecessary warning when numpy not installed,module: build,Create one module: build fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: build paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"50779, 60252, 89489, 110883, 111419, 113150, 115937, 120081, 125678, 127078, 128290, 133808, 134331, 143338, 151201, 152592, 153574, 158346, 158986, 173881, 174682, 177265, 182760, 186544",,24,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: build bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,".) cpu = _conversion_method_template(device=torch.device(""cpu"")) Apart from #115638 that already mentioned by OP, I also found an abandoned #60252 as well. I'm not installing Numpy since I don't use it. But the amount of warning from PyTorch is concerning. If PyTorch without N... | issue #186544: has linked PR; labels: module: build, module: windows, triaged, module: pybind, module: debug-build, bot-triaged; title...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",005d412c1ec408cb86de9a7cb70f69a816d1ba112980f418b9c94d57bfa92c11
BUNDLE-917,bundle:bundle-917,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: build (67 issues),issue_group,,"Review thread: 22 issues - issue #10440: [caffe2] enforce fail at context_gpu.cu:285, cannot get GPU memory usage statistics",module: build,Create one module: build fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: build paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"6549, 6785, 6979, 7060, 7362, 7374, 7490, 7491, 7569, 7614, 7835, 8442, 8533, 8595, 9349, 9707, 9867, 10440, 10464, 10818, 11869, 12641, 14152, 28648, 56019, 61341, 65462, 65464, 65465, 70038, 74670, 75963, 84370, 86877, 87597, 89041, 94792, 101321, 101404, 103222, 108013, 110588, 113149, 126804, 128959, 144608, 149809, 153546, 155512, 155720, 159444, 165070, 167365, 167822, 172807, 172886, 175193, 177014, 178988, 181499, 181939, 184397, 185215, 185698, 186004, 186405, 188935",,67,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: build bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"removed from this repository. Evidence: The ""Remove Caffe2"" tracking issue (#72536) was closed in Oct 2024, and the umbrella removal issue (#128959) tracks the cleanup work. The caffe2/python/, caffe2/operators/, and caffe2/proto/ directories no longer exist in main — only caf... | issue #167822: needs maintainer decision; labels: module: build, triaged; title: [RFD] Composable Kernel (CK) moving to C++20 — reques...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",c78f89f06818a1e7d75bb5e7de1bf30558fc2734a485e6b1609fa174671d4e64
BUNDLE-918,bundle:bundle-918,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: build (8 issues),issue_group,,module: build needs reproduction batch 3,module: build,Create one module: build fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: build paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"14352, 19128, 20134, 21179, 30896, 36721, 46806, 114465",,8,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: build bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #46806: needs reproduction; labels: needs reproduction, module: build, triaged; title: Compile Pytorch with MAGMA Issue | issue #36721: needs reproduction; labels: needs reproduction, module: build, triaged; title: [1.4.1] Cuda build fails | issue #14352: needs reproduction; labels: needs reproduction, module: build, triaged, has workaround; title: [libtorch] Catkin_make compilation error | issue #20134: nee...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",8c6a7164bc014cad00c76677c02a85244e9691ad025b1147eae77f414d8052b3
BUNDLE-919,bundle:bundle-919,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: c10d (42 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 11 issues - issue #103625: DISABLED test_backward_ddp_outside (__main__.TensorPipeDdpUnderDistAutogradTest),module: c10d,Create one module: c10d fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: c10d paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"15963, 16295, 51062, 58856, 64093, 69178, 69179, 72025, 72099, 72346, 72366, 72435, 72835, 74323, 74528, 74602, 74734, 76913, 76927, 77523, 92694, 94003, 103625, 104011, 113281, 115861, 119455, 120741, 124380, 124468, 132845, 137010, 139129, 142356, 151204, 162668, 166291, 177427, 178600, 178820, 186601, 187239",,42,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: c10d bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"14 #132447 #131446 #127373 #126868 #126852 #126493 #123294 DDP, FSDP, PiPPy FSDP1 #123726 #105024 FSDP2 #120961 DDP #106361 #104328 #104011 #103625 #77342 #77317 pipeline #121234 Other DCP #113937 #113936 Functional Collectives #107278 ShardedTensor #78068 cc @XilunWu @H-Huang... | Tcpstore #61671 #50701 MultiProcessing #65559 MultiThreadedTestCase #107425 #107424 #100459 #100448 RPC #125365 #74180 #70753 #70546 #...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",bf6a18ab7b6b9ab7004479f08096dec1bcad9964feb8d5fccf523e9f73f0ff2b
BUNDLE-920,bundle:bundle-920,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: ci (41 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 14 issues - issue #154297: Hangs and timeouts on dist.reduce_scatter on B200 GPU,module: ci,Create one module: ci fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: ci paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"146094, 150779, 154297, 159520, 162178, 162745, 162748, 162820, 162871, 162897, 162917, 162940, 163429, 165170, 165685, 167616, 167994, 170278, 172217, 172321, 172427, 173950, 174220, 174930, 175022, 175829, 175899, 175994, 176687, 177135, 177425, 177896, 177970, 178345, 182336, 187158, 189032, 189065, 189164, 189261, 189262",,41,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: ci bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"Failure 2 will be fixed by #187371 which supersedes the previously flagged #187158 | Failures 1 and 3 are now passing, however failure 2 is still happening and it is reported as #187158 with open PR | cc @Aidyn-A I just saw your comment : #159323 (comment) and see you raised a similar issue recently #165170. The issue is not B200 specific as you've noted - I can reproduce this on a 8xH100. Also, I think it is rela...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",b534db62accc81959dbc3a42852c0a8b27f08a66d957109d55d81a4f24f0d495
BUNDLE-921,bundle:bundle-921,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: ci (8 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #140556: DISABLED test_backward_prod_cuda_float32 (__main__.TestNestedTensorOpInfoCUDA),module: ci,Create one module: ci fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: ci paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"83854, 110295, 125239, 140556, 142381, 160489, 165577, 189075",,8,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: ci bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"never completes. Genuine per-test failures in the same job (e.g. the test_backward_prod_cuda_float32 mem-leak-check, tracked separately in #140556) are a distinct problem from this timeout. Fix levers (CI-side) Increase the shard count (currently 8) so each shard's slice fits... | issue #165577: needs design decision; labels: module: ci, triaged, needs research; title: CI: What is the purpose of `slow.yml` | issue...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",264ac36a0789c6d3910a73d537857846a962aaf58a17d4dac9822eead5a6aa39
BUNDLE-922,bundle:bundle-922,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: codegen (2 issues),issue_group,,#182450 Spin codegen run doesn't use self-contained environement,module: codegen,Create one module: codegen fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: codegen paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"61664, 182450",,2,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: codegen bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #182450: needs maintainer decision; labels: module: lint, triaged, enhancement, module: codegen, bot-triaged, bot-mislabeled, module: spin; title: Spin codegen run doesn't use self-contained environement | issue #61664: needs design decision; labels: module: internals, triaged, module: codegen, needs design; title: Support adding new keyword-only parameters without breaking FC",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",e75ad38b38c406f92864c3e2784da18dd51035ba3e90a9d3a048b612377dca1b
BUNDLE-923,bundle:bundle-923,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: collect_env.py (2 issues),issue_group,,"#177819 MPS unavailable on macOS 26.3.1 arm64, and `device=""mps""` reports incorrect macOS requirement",module: collect_env.py,Create one module: collect_env.py fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: collect_env.py paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"144536, 177819",,2,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: collect_env.py bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #177819: needs reproduction; labels: needs reproduction, module: collect_env.py, triaged, module: macos, bot-triaged, bot-mislabeled; title: MPS unavailable on macOS 26.3.1 arm64, and `device=""mps""` reports incorrect macOS requirement | issue #144536: needs design decision; labels: module: collect_env.py, triaged, needs design; title: [bug report template format] Simplify version information with HTML tags",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",0b59a87d04f36396ffa4c2da76ec812f7634b1efd8ad74269709057b435ea77f
BUNDLE-924,bundle:bundle-924,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: compile ux (12 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 3 issues - issue #180284: Unused jvp function on autograd function causes inscrutable shape error,module: compile ux,Create one module: compile ux fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: compile ux paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"113800, 173621, 173642, 175229, 175484, 177830, 180284, 180824, 180845, 181851, 182641, 182661",,12,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: compile ux bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"ils, please see https://pytorch.org/docs/main/notes/extending.func.html so _DDPSink doesn't use the setup_context idiom. this is similar to #180284. | oducer for setting up a DDP model and jvp'ing through it. I also cannot try the same via FSDP2's replicate mode, because that's broken too (#182641). the consequence of these two errors is that there is no distributed way to train MeanFlow models. which is a shame b...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",4a638609594207b4bc04409a13a8a773c1c8827051b04b0aac4eb85edc92cb49
BUNDLE-925,bundle:bundle-925,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: compile-time (5 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #118492: `torch.compile(dynamic=True)` compiles forever,module: compile-time,Create one module: compile-time fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: compile-time paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"108971, 118492, 118798, 133734, 181428",,5,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: compile-time bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"🐛 Describe the bug Looking at #118492 and #118213 it occurs to me that if we are generating hundreds of guards involving a single symbolic variable, we probably should just give | issue #181428: needs maintainer decision; labels: triaged, oncall: pt2, module: functorch, module: dynamic shapes, module: inductor, module: compile-time, dynamo-functorch, bot-triaged; title: torch.compile + torch.func.grad: superlinear...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",da332912659096a88b79fb9606cb6699ef5ef586ebe531b8d130a2f3418241db
BUNDLE-926,bundle:bundle-926,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: compiled autograd (1 issue),issue_group,,#173232 error C2872: 'std': ambiguous symbol when compiling `csrc/dynamo/compiled_autograd.h`,module: compiled autograd,Create one module: compiled autograd fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: compiled autograd paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,173232,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: compiled autograd bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #173232: has linked PR; labels: module: windows, triaged, oncall: pt2, module: compiled autograd; title: error C2872: 'std': ambiguous symbol when compiling `csrc/dynamo/compiled_autograd.h`",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",845a0294c6a6ea8d0d9c384edf0bd2857e2154c4cfa7c0d411494c78a05cfe3e
BUNDLE-927,bundle:bundle-927,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: compiled streams (1 issue),issue_group,,#178132 torch.compile streams support in AOTI,module: compiled streams,Create one module: compiled streams fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: compiled streams paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,178132,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: compiled streams bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #178132: needs maintainer decision; labels: feature, triaged, oncall: pt2, module: inductor, bot-triaged, module: compiled streams; title: torch.compile streams support in AOTI",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",a3098997453799468f7ef9b62ea1366aa9ad2c753219a87acf929337d2b71b62
BUNDLE-928,bundle:bundle-928,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: complex (11 issues),issue_group,,module: complex has linked PR,module: complex,Create one module: complex fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: complex paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"67634, 95337, 99652, 127978, 138906, 139313, 146691, 184282, 184769, 187107, 187233",,11,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: complex bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #187107: has linked PR; labels: triaged, module: complex, enhancement, module: linear algebra, module: mps, bot-triaged; title: [MPS] linalg.lu_factor not implemented, causing RunTimeErrors on torch.linalg.det and torch.linalg.solve | issue #187233: has linked PR; labels: module: error checking, triaged, module: complex, module: pooling, module: mps, topic: fuzzer, bot-triaged; title: torch.nn.functional.max...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",5cb5173700db9dc384f6c446a31d13d2bfa0b8d99b5687af1849f22db3e2c485
BUNDLE-929,bundle:bundle-929,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: convolution (23 issues),issue_group,,module: convolution has linked PR,module: convolution,Create one module: convolution fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: convolution paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"3867, 47990, 74363, 80301, 99149, 120905, 130614, 133093, 143651, 169342, 169688, 170016, 170138, 175637, 177237, 177245, 177277, 178125, 178128, 178134, 178472, 178839, 188338",,23,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: convolution bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #169688: has linked PR; labels: needs reproduction, module: cuda, module: convolution, triaged; title: [CPU] Stride 3 bfloat16 convolutions appear incorrect | issue #188338: has linked PR; labels: module: rocm, module: convolution, triaged, enhancement, module: cuda graphs, bot-triaged; title: [ROCm]: CUDAGraph safe Convolutional Kernel e.g. `F.conv_transpose1d` | issue #178128: has linked PR; labels: module...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",dc3bf45b53d03a8d72edf27b385fa6eec198fe63fc00afda93b4fdd8daa16eff
BUNDLE-930,bundle:bundle-930,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: convolution (10 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 7 issues - issue #153854: Better padding API,module: convolution,Create one module: convolution fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: convolution paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"28214, 29863, 46240, 52205, 57911, 60294, 115852, 116506, 144012, 153854",,10,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: convolution bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"ore last -> first) Convenient / consistent padding for a single dim or subset of dims Complete set of padding modes matching real use cases #57911 points out that PyTorch's circular padding mode only allows wrapping once, whereas numpy's wrap mode will wrap any number of times... | the last dimension and working back. Padding does not have to be specified for all dimensions. Proposed APIs: Match numpy's pad() API...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",be301fcb613fda85e731c6b86818b260067f161139a74eddf7c0eb1178d741c9
BUNDLE-931,bundle:bundle-931,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: core aten (1 issue),issue_group,,"#137440 `torch.pow` throws with `RuntimeError: ""reciprocal_cuda"" not implemented for 'Char'`",module: core aten,Create one module: core aten fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: core aten paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,137440,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: core aten bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #137440: has linked PR; labels: module: cuda, low priority, triaged, actionable, module: core aten; title: `torch.pow` throws with `RuntimeError: ""reciprocal_cuda"" not implemented for 'Char'`",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",f4ea43faa17f32037b7872eecd43d0e93715ad0afcf850999f54a46bca32fd6c
BUNDLE-932,bundle:bundle-932,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: correctness (silent) (19 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #186241: TMA descriptor loads use stale `xoffset` in mix-order reduction loop,module: correctness (silent),Create one module: correctness (silent) fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: correctness (silent) paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"178593, 179608, 181806, 184031, 185246, 185248, 185464, 185696, 186241, 186824, 186826, 187175, 187295, 187296, 187338, 188420, 188425, 188430, 188432",,19,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: correctness (silent) bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"to it unconditionally. There are several recently filed issues that highlight the TMA path for pointwise/reduction is not yet fully mature: #186241 #185513 #185222 #184714 #184563 Phase 2 — Once we are confident the TMA path is correct and mature: Enabling autotuning alone (wi... | @Blooming-Tree I noticed that #188420, #188430, and #188432 appear to have the same methodology issue. They compare eager FP64 against...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",42394053c9c03a6a08783e7d0d6aac11cd3ba1509f84004d56f34540bec2cc7f
BUNDLE-933,bundle:bundle-933,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: correctness (silent) (17 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #176296: [MPS] Binary ops on uint16/uint32/uint64 produce garbage values,module: correctness (silent),Create one module: correctness (silent) fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: correctness (silent) paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"65392, 126862, 137001, 137635, 137964, 151667, 154302, 154356, 157398, 163510, 169082, 170168, 176296, 176298, 178586, 180377, 181901",,17,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: correctness (silent) bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"ted for 'UInt16' print(a * b) # NotImplementedError: ""mul_stub"" not implemented for 'UInt16' Same for uint32 and uint64. Context Related to #176296 (same gap on MPS). PR #159094 added foundational support for these types but binary op kernels were not registered on either back... | ) or torch could throw an error here too. If anyone has any thoughts on this, please let me know and I can add a this check. (related...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",5dec2d7a590b3fc533d34912101fb909c55fa1ac1205395f656953bddc50efc5
BUNDLE-934,bundle:bundle-934,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: correctness (silent) (21 issues),issue_group,,module: correctness (silent) needs maintainer decision batch 1,module: correctness (silent),Create one module: correctness (silent) fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: correctness (silent) paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"152028, 159155, 160740, 163327, 164563, 165987, 170837, 173638, 176091, 176625, 177654, 178482, 178614, 182960, 183607, 183768, 185587, 187180, 187227, 187715, 188074",,21,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: correctness (silent) bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #160740: needs maintainer decision; labels: triaged, module: correctness (silent), module: mps; title: MPS torch.argmax/torch.argmin fail for non-contiguous input | issue #188074: needs maintainer decision; labels: module: nn, triaged, module: determinism, module: correctness (silent), oncall: pt2, module: dynamo, bot-triaged; title: torch.compile produces inconsistent outputs for stateful SNN model with cus...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",20f35a70bc1a2058cc2195f42b7f780649ff7978f24bb9e9edbc019ef99775e9
BUNDLE-935,bundle:bundle-935,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: cpp (18 issues),issue_group,,module: cpp has linked PR,module: cpp,Create one module: cpp fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: cpp paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"19029, 27694, 30507, 59628, 82546, 100990, 107224, 108794, 114572, 122707, 133860, 150857, 157776, 163974, 176153, 177520, 177738, 186233",,18,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: cpp bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #186233: has linked PR; labels: module: crash, module: cpp, triaged, module: tensor creation, module: edge cases, bot-triaged; title: C++ API: at::range crashes due to division-by-zero in RangeFactories.cpp | issue #157776: has linked PR; labels: module: cpp, triaged, enhancement, actionable; title: Support for _Float16/C++23 std::float16_t | issue #150857: has linked PR; labels: module: cpp, module: seriali...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",ff1bb3c119ca489317cea4c8dce1a5415a0478495298c21a09f9d7bb5c45ba14
BUNDLE-936,bundle:bundle-936,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: cpp-extensions (9 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #180762: torch.utils.cpp_extension.load should support CUDA device linking (-dlink) similar to CUDAExtension,module: cpp-extensions,Create one module: cpp-extensions fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: cpp-extensions paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"44279, 84782, 127445, 151310, 155344, 158032, 166123, 166633, 180762",,9,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: cpp-extensions bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"allelism / device linking support for custom PyTorch CUDA extensions #78225 added relocatable device code linking support for CUDAExtension #44279 shows user confusion around how to achieve this in cpp extensions, especially for JIT-like workflows Expected outcome: JIT cpp ext... | issue #166633: needs reproduction; labels: needs reproduction, module: cpp-extensions, module: cuda, triaged; title: Command '['ninja'...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",fea4edf77075838c773d9d01402c79ecce2cbb917283253f0a84987e53bac941
BUNDLE-937,bundle:bundle-937,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: cpu (22 issues),issue_group,,module: cpu has linked PR,module: cpu,Create one module: cpu fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: cpu paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"41556, 75949, 125223, 127163, 132446, 136748, 140000, 140970, 143800, 146508, 170370, 170743, 173922, 173946, 174266, 176274, 177599, 180650, 181510, 183686, 186618, 188926",,22,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: cpu bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #181510: has linked PR; labels: module: crash, module: nn, module: cpu, triaged, module: vectorization, module: sanitizers, module: edge cases, module: empty tensor, topic: fuzzer, bot-triaged; title: torch.nn.utils.weight_norm triggers a UBSan null pointer error for nn.Linear(0, 1) on CPU | issue #173946: has linked PR; labels: module: crash, module: rnn, module: cpu, module: error checking, triaged, bot-tr...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",8f01459ce01b9d0843729fdc472167e3c4c9074a39e357652197cb902e3275f6
BUNDLE-938,bundle:bundle-938,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: crash (10 issues),issue_group,,module: crash has linked PR,module: crash,Create one module: crash fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: crash paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"21018, 27614, 50804, 75912, 184032, 184876, 185482, 187399, 188033, 188231",,10,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: crash bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #188033: has linked PR; labels: high priority, module: crash, module: cuda, module: error checking, triaged, module: pybind, actionable, security, bot-triaged; title: [BUG] THPStream_richcompare casts arbitrary objects to THPStream* without type check | issue #188231: has linked PR; labels: module: crash, triaged, oncall: pt2, module: inductor, bot-triaged; title: [inductor] `TypeError: A Boolean argument ca...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",4600781d7cd3e8f755585843d6d1d96307f478c9d515095f40fadfcb859881c6
BUNDLE-939,bundle:bundle-939,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: cublas (9 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #173382: Make torch.cuda.empty_cache() actually empty the GPU cache,module: cublas,Create one module: cublas fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: cublas paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"52515, 70519, 107276, 130253, 172231, 173382, 174949, 181737, 184084",,9,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: cublas bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"ction is documented in docs/source/notes/cuda.rst but only as a private API Related issues about incomplete memory release: #17157, #46602, #173382, #20837 cc @ptrblck @msaroufim @eqy @jerryzh168 @tinglvv @nWEIdia @csarofeen | issue #130253: needs reproduction; labels: needs reproduction, module: cuda, triaged, module: cublas; title: RuntimeError: CUDA error: CUBLAS_STATUS_EXECUTION_FAILED when calling `cublasGemm...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",24918819f6a31db4a8d90d0768b2ad6338fa5ae77d2a9c2ab007b3d1ff356913
BUNDLE-940,bundle:bundle-940,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: cuda (39 issues),issue_group,,module: cuda has linked PR,module: cuda,Create one module: cuda fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: cuda paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"44777, 45295, 81333, 85960, 103584, 109052, 115993, 124296, 131881, 133548, 137680, 141678, 152875, 153172, 153825, 156010, 156424, 159594, 161104, 162957, 164342, 165650, 170676, 170955, 171499, 171804, 172500, 173049, 173315, 173476, 174010, 174625, 177020, 177028, 177827, 181805, 182277, 183806, 188411",,39,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: cuda bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #183806: has linked PR; labels: high priority, module: performance, module: cuda, triaged, module: regression, module: linear algebra, module: magma, bot-triaged; title: `torch.linalg.eig` and `torch.linalg.eigh` 30-130x slower on 2.11.0+cu130 vs 2.5.1+cu124 | issue #181805: has linked PR; labels: module: cuda, triaged, module: python frontend; title: torch.fmax with uint8 out produces inconsistent overflow...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",96f5fe59463f80516dd5f1237ff6ec451aa1be3458af605a34275acae5dc11b8
BUNDLE-941,bundle:bundle-941,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: cuda (58 issues),issue_group,,module: cuda needs maintainer decision batch 4,module: cuda,Create one module: cuda fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: cuda paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"28224, 34242, 53721, 60541, 68506, 76632, 104695, 104701, 111824, 120902, 127605, 130330, 131754, 136187, 136567, 143281, 147478, 147971, 150725, 153122, 153460, 153555, 154077, 157456, 159113, 159547, 164015, 167353, 169015, 170535, 171398, 173290, 173516, 173729, 173904, 174227, 174983, 175311, 175409, 175636, 175737, 177477, 177578, 177910, 178052, 178864, 179124, 179152, 179745, 179798, 181094, 181379, 182001, 182286, 183391, 186213, 187045, 188705",,58,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: cuda bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #53721: needs maintainer decision; labels: module: cuda, triaged; title: PyTorch on Embedded Hardware | issue #170535: needs maintainer decision; labels: module: cuda, triaged, module: cuda graphs, PT2-Bug-Bash; title: Graphsafe RNG clone_state | issue #175311: needs maintainer decision; labels: feature, module: cuda, triaged, oncall: pt2, module: inductor, module: helion, bot-triaged; title: [RFC][Inductor]...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",e3da39ec4f8e98ac6e3a72f16a1b4ebe1ea052285a1d1a5abd7c946fa5259893
BUNDLE-942,bundle:bundle-942,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: cuda (48 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #174496: Improve performance of torch._foreach_copy_ on CUDA tensors,module: cuda,Create one module: cuda fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: cuda paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"24398, 25190, 35754, 49832, 51156, 54138, 54139, 54487, 54799, 54975, 56771, 57794, 58036, 58135, 59883, 63847, 64560, 64889, 65027, 70048, 73568, 81257, 86547, 90521, 90752, 91072, 97847, 109193, 110701, 112569, 113035, 114534, 121067, 125911, 126775, 128131, 130486, 130728, 138208, 139884, 140096, 141465, 143905, 149279, 152135, 159309, 174496, 175695",,48,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: cuda bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"I first noticed this here #174496 (comment) I am making a separate issue becuase I plan to solve #174496 in a stacked PR on top of a PR to solve this specific issue. Essenti | .asarray(a_tensor) will prefer the new __array_interface__ attribute over Tensor.__array__. It's not clear to me that what I pointed out in #51156 (comment), // TODO: This attempts to keep the underlying memory alive by setting the base // o...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",c71e73138252cead68e29b8a879af7f88c5500bf2cdfb7ae97d5da0d4d574074
BUNDLE-943,bundle:bundle-943,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: cuda (10 issues),issue_group,,module: cuda needs reproduction batch 5,module: cuda,Create one module: cuda fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: cuda paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"4334, 26400, 28956, 30830, 31660, 32443, 35870, 37057, 49669, 52307",,10,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: cuda bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #52307: needs reproduction; labels: needs reproduction, module: cuda, triaged; title: Model produces same outputs for different inputs when using GPU | issue #49669: needs reproduction; labels: needs reproduction, module: cuda, triaged, module: deadlock; title: While training the model, GPU util reaches 100% but no progress happends. | issue #35870: needs reproduction; labels: needs reproduction, module: cud...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",1921e8aea03d5500209585726c8f8d2359035f9f05ca2cc224e95c1dcdb60e25
BUNDLE-944,bundle:bundle-944,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: cuda graphs (13 issues),issue_group,,#175001 torch.cond() and cuda graph mega issue,module: cuda graphs,Create one module: cuda graphs fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: cuda graphs paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"122192, 131009, 155679, 158551, 167766, 170241, 171672, 175001, 176611, 177719, 180960, 188677, 188837",,13,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: cuda graphs bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #175001: has linked PR; labels: triaged, module: cuda graphs, oncall: pt2, module: higher order operators, module: pt2-dispatcher, bot-triaged, PT2-Bug-Bash; title: torch.cond() and cuda graph mega issue | issue #122192: needs design decision; labels: triaged, needs design, module: cuda graphs, oncall: pt2, module: inductor, repro:agent:h100:repro_success:reproduced, agents-banned; title: extra checks for re...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",310401b10bd012d2244309d3872c8713fa1fc2c13938e852f6c1a1f93df5acbf
BUNDLE-945,bundle:bundle-945,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: cudacachingallocator (1 issue),issue_group,,#173104 Crash with `CUDACachingAllocator.cpp` when running Nvidia `nemotron-parse` at load,module: cudacachingallocator,Create one module: cudacachingallocator fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: cudacachingallocator paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,173104,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: cudacachingallocator bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #173104: needs maintainer decision; labels: triaged, module: CUDACachingAllocator; title: Crash with `CUDACachingAllocator.cpp` when running Nvidia `nemotron-parse` at load",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",5199b1f4c9d2cd4dc9592ffcb2541665bd899f99acff92450707166e81e8251e
BUNDLE-946,bundle:bundle-946,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: cudnn (3 issues),issue_group,,#170762 [BUG][Inconsistency] aten.cudnn_batch_norm_backward produces numerical mismatch between eager and inductor,module: cudnn,Create one module: cudnn fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: cudnn paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"105941, 170524, 170762",,3,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: cudnn bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #170762: needs maintainer decision; labels: module: cudnn, triaged, oncall: pt2, module: inductor, repro:agent:h100:repro_fail:not_reproduced; title: [BUG][Inconsistency] aten.cudnn_batch_norm_backward produces numerical mismatch between eager and inductor | issue #170524: needs reproduction; labels: needs reproduction, module: cudnn, triaged, module: third_party; title: RuntimeError occurred when I train “R...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",a5e1803bd878434a62983bb30acdc61dd2218ab5a7786ba7a40d39d8031685a2
BUNDLE-947,bundle:bundle-947,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: custom-operators (24 issues),issue_group,,"Review thread: 3 issues - issue #139500: Custom operators registered via decorator slower than ops registered via `torch.Library.{define, impl}`",module: custom-operators,Create one module: custom-operators fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: custom-operators paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"113022, 127621, 129395, 139257, 139444, 139500, 139518, 142388, 143579, 146936, 149559, 152270, 155240, 158186, 160472, 176592, 177109, 180206, 180620, 185046, 186140, 187470, 187505, 187862",,24,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: custom-operators bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"known issue, duplicate of #139500 | Function | custom op 1 threads: ----------------------------------- f(x) | 25.0 | 88.3 Times are in microseconds (us). Potential related to #139500 (but #139500 seems tailored more towards inference setting). cc: @riccardofelluga Versions main cc @jerryzh168 @chauhang @penguin... | This came up when I was investigating #139500 (and in parallel @ezyang hypothesized about boxing v...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",d4bac5b9f63c6369d96ecad3845c188a5424f6fa46dc78f1ac992c19f45c70fc
BUNDLE-948,bundle:bundle-948,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: custom-operators (3 issues),issue_group,,module: custom-operators needs maintainer decision batch 2,module: custom-operators,Create one module: custom-operators fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: custom-operators paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"125030, 138355, 164696",,3,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: custom-operators bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #164696: needs maintainer decision; labels: triaged, module: custom-operators, function request, oncall: pt2, module: inductor, module: pt2-dispatcher; title: Support torch._inductor.config.inplace_buffers for custom_op whenever possible | issue #138355: needs maintainer decision; labels: feature, triaged, module: custom-operators, oncall: pt2, oncall: fx, module: pt2-dispatcher; title: tlparse's fx_graph_ru...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",e72d833757ac04655731f6e5b56c4c1a97cd24fd7c1d3c5f76bb43ad432794f9
BUNDLE-949,bundle:bundle-949,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: data (5 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #106704: Dataloader extremely slow on in-memory datasets,module: data,Create one module: data fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: data paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"67740, 106704, 143471, 154318, 158714",,5,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: data bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"ass Time: 4.772 seconds I have to reduce to batch size since DataLoader fails to complete due to unexpected bus error Versions 2.7 Relevant #106704 cc @msaroufim @jerryzh168 @andrewkho @divyanshk @ssnl @VitalyFedyunin @dzhulgakov | issue #158714: needs maintainer decision; labels: module: dataloader, triaged, module: multithreading, module: data; title: Feature request: `DataLoader` using multithreading instead of...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",880b83b41c3ab4ad6226de58c98cfabdd3f1c6e3cac043c91574a6aac730f0f2
BUNDLE-950,bundle:bundle-950,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: data parallel (10 issues),issue_group,,module: data parallel needs maintainer decision,module: data parallel,Create one module: data parallel fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: data parallel paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"36649, 44855, 69966, 90052, 91629, 101402, 107133, 114437, 141482, 156392",,10,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: data parallel bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #114437: needs maintainer decision; labels: oncall: distributed, module: dataloader, triaged, module: data parallel, bot-triaged, oncall: distributed parallelisms, ptd-bot-triaged; title: [Help Needed] [DataParallel/DataLoader/AMP] Severe slowdown on large dataset with fp16 precision and DataParallel wrapper | issue #90052: needs maintainer decision; labels: module: performance, oncall: distributed, triaged,...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",e3ed2fbdbf81134b999790e9517762815787dd812b7d735e9d4d70716342192d
BUNDLE-951,bundle:bundle-951,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: dataloader (22 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #124275: Performance Impact of `torch.autograd.profiler.record_function` in DataLoader's `_BaseDataLoaderIter` Iteration,module: dataloader,Create one module: dataloader fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: dataloader paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"2539, 20822, 23430, 28950, 34130, 45728, 47037, 54716, 55035, 61660, 72107, 76410, 77154, 91245, 124275, 158704, 165532, 173661, 176166, 179707, 179979, 186908",,22,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: dataloader bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"This seems to be caused by the call to torch.ops.profiler._record_function_enter_new. Might be related to #76410. | issue #165532: needs reproduction; labels: needs reproduction, module: dataloader, triaged; title: PyTorch CPU / DataLoader: “Too many open files” (`EMFILE`) | issue #2539: needs reproduction; labels: needs reproduction, module: dataloader, triaged; title: DataLoader converts cuda FloatTensor into cp...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",d945e9dc3859bcf5b3da7994ac7b3d5ad6ea1447a13a02d5db63bb65ed283238
BUNDLE-952,bundle:bundle-952,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: ddp (38 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 5 issues - issue #158698: [fsdp2] Possible to fuse reduce-scatter (in fp32) + div + dtype conversion (to bf16) in post-backward?,module: ddp,Create one module: ddp fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: ddp paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"50803, 69431, 86456, 88006, 88251, 89546, 89716, 90171, 90688, 91408, 92801, 95724, 98542, 99908, 99978, 100582, 102197, 102438, 103622, 104164, 105723, 109103, 111834, 112029, 112277, 114765, 114857, 114861, 121181, 124680, 135511, 140107, 152042, 155993, 158698, 158710, 179128, 187298",,38,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: ddp bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"Maybe related: #69431 #88540 | Could this be related? #158698 Maybe not related to HSDP, but this also increases peak memory (as reduction is first done in fp32 buffer, and then a separate bf16 buffer | itemsize, a.nbytes) b = to_(a, torch.bfloat16) print(b, b.dtype, b.dtype.itemsize, b.nbytes) Or might be better to model this as torch.to_: #69431 | 🚀 The feature, motivation and pitch Motivated by: #158698 It's so...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",4f629f79d8c75dde1801e317d159a0f827bda3c89f431f72de7c043ccb85507d
BUNDLE-953,bundle:bundle-953,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: ddp (18 issues),issue_group,,module: ddp needs maintainer decision batch 1,module: ddp,Create one module: ddp fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: ddp paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"73081, 74162, 75031, 76389, 80496, 80595, 81383, 82153, 135358, 143647, 143721, 156130, 157862, 159836, 163722, 166523, 187276, 187279",,18,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: ddp bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #187279: needs maintainer decision; labels: oncall: distributed, triaged, module: ddp, bot-triaged, oncall: distributed parallelisms; title: Two-node DDP shows reproducible FP32 loss divergence between CPU/Gloo and CUDA/NCCL with large lr and resnet18 | issue #187276: needs maintainer decision; labels: oncall: distributed, triaged, module: ddp, bot-triaged, oncall: distributed parallelisms; title: Two-node D...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",9b6d27c629cdddfd0db61758fd8666dabf925c893fa15754d027567a75e05134
BUNDLE-954,bundle:bundle-954,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: deadlock (5 issues),issue_group,,module: deadlock needs maintainer decision,module: deadlock,Create one module: deadlock fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: deadlock paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"25904, 113228, 144634, 162872, 174359",,5,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: deadlock bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #113228: needs maintainer decision; labels: triaged, module: deadlock, release notes: dataloader; title: dataloader use lmdb stuck | issue #162872: needs maintainer decision; labels: triaged, module: deadlock, module: mps; title: [MPS] dead lock when calling `Event.synchronize()` before `Event.elapsed_time()` | issue #174359: needs maintainer decision; labels: triaged, module: deadlock, module: multithreadin...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",4caeb00261edadb9faa1b831df6af7a7d3014cb9d690a0a262e298136dbbfe4b
BUNDLE-955,bundle:bundle-955,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: decompositions (2 issues),issue_group,,module: decompositions has linked PR,module: decompositions,Create one module: decompositions fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: decompositions paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"137546, 185543",,2,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: decompositions bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #185543: has linked PR; labels: triaged, module: derivatives, oncall: pt2, module: decompositions, module: inductor, bot-triaged; title: [inductor] Gradient mismatch between eager and inductor for torch.quantile on tied values | issue #137546: has linked PR; labels: triaged, module: linear algebra, module: decompositions; title: `torch.linspace` doesn't agree with decomposition.",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",487284116635f9f3dca2a74748f4c943bb74649f1170efb21f030c28a5ced846
BUNDLE-956,bundle:bundle-956,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: dependency bug (3 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #101850: Unexpected modification to CPU affinity of Dataloader workers,module: dependency bug,Create one module: dependency bug fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: dependency bug paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"17023, 101850, 102269",,3,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: dependency bug bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"trying to find what difference in setup/architecture is causing this weird behavior. Thanks in advance for any help Possible duplicate of: #101850, but also breaks normal multiprocessing Versions $ python collect_env.py Collecting environment information... PyTorch version: 2.... | issue #17023: needs maintainer decision; labels: module: dependency bug, triaged; title: Download speed issues with the pytorch conda...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",c25d2348762e92444872e37d6b2f70d24935606b852a34ec7bb7fe10d11e4799
BUNDLE-957,bundle:bundle-957,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: derivatives (1 issue),issue_group,,#89459 Higher order derivatives of sinc explode,module: derivatives,Create one module: derivatives fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: derivatives paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,89459,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: derivatives bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #89459: has linked PR; labels: triaged, module: derivatives, actionable; title: Higher order derivatives of sinc explode",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",5ca123ddcdd1c898fa23a0f88b703ea77c8f896387adf534a214a2d93f9aaab2
BUNDLE-958,bundle:bundle-958,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: determinism (8 issues),issue_group,,module: determinism needs maintainer decision,module: determinism,Create one module: determinism fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: determinism paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"57491, 71222, 88096, 94855, 166856, 172475, 174711, 175478",,8,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: determinism bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #88096: needs maintainer decision; labels: triaged, module: determinism; title: Add nondeterministic alert to `torch.Tensor.scatter()` | issue #174711: needs maintainer decision; labels: feature, triaged, module: determinism, oncall: pt2, module: inductor; title: add an alternative to compile time benchmarking in inductor for determinism that is reasonably performant | issue #175478: needs maintainer decisio...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",aa0738ed0178c6b3b78136103f10e14fe789476c8cbd77e66f4113efe320466d
BUNDLE-959,bundle:bundle-959,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: devicemesh (2 issues),issue_group,,module: devicemesh needs maintainer decision,module: devicemesh,Create one module: devicemesh fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: devicemesh paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"154787, 161776",,2,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: devicemesh bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #161776: needs maintainer decision; labels: oncall: distributed, triaged, module: fsdp, module: DeviceMesh, bot-triaged, oncall: distributed parallelisms, ptd-bot-triaged; title: FSDP&device_mesh Mesh_dim_names in init_device_mesh not work | issue #154787: needs maintainer decision; labels: oncall: distributed, triaged, module: dtensor, module: DeviceMesh, oncall: distributed checkpointing, bot-triaged, ptd-...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",f8dd1be2bb5f05c0b5c8905f05cc1894e4c2775bf52458932c496a4834086b3b
BUNDLE-960,bundle:bundle-960,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: devx (6 issues),issue_group,,module: devx needs maintainer decision,module: devx,Create one module: devx fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: devx paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"115273, 118133, 167775, 177322, 186939, 188446",,6,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: devx bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #188446: needs maintainer decision; labels: feature, triaged, module: devx, bot-triaged; title: Add issue de-duplication system | issue #186939: needs maintainer decision; labels: triaged, module: devx; title: pitch: fast development mode where we use pre-build nightly .so files | issue #167775: needs maintainer decision; labels: oncall: distributed, triaged, enhancement, module: devx, bot-triaged, oncall: d...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",a681a33dcfeced12e15df593718e8c5959ee032b96d10611d098974ff7a4d8bb
BUNDLE-961,bundle:bundle-961,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: dispatch (4 issues),issue_group,,#188052 Allow PrivateUse1 backends to opt out of CompositeExplicitAutograd decomposition,module: dispatch,Create one module: dispatch fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: dispatch paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"26207, 88109, 172944, 188052",,4,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: dispatch bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #188052: has linked PR; labels: feature, triaged, module: dispatch, module: PrivateUse1, bot-triaged; title: Allow PrivateUse1 backends to opt out of CompositeExplicitAutograd decomposition | issue #172944: needs reproduction; labels: needs reproduction, triaged, module: dispatch; title: Tried to access the schema for which doesn't have a schema registered yet | issue #88109: needs maintainer decision; label...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",3549888b0cd2304b55c00d70d98b387ff6f0ed9d6e40cb9fbfbb3aee77163ed7
BUNDLE-962,bundle:bundle-962,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: distance functions (1 issue),issue_group,,#59194 Add numerically-stable function for angle between vectors,module: distance functions,Create one module: distance functions fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: distance functions paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,59194,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: distance functions bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #59194: needs maintainer decision; labels: module: numerical-stability, triaged, enhancement, module: distance functions; title: Add numerically-stable function for angle between vectors",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",38aff600a820cbdad1f6fd9e7a9737c7f6954c775e866ac8024ceafd8321c37b
BUNDLE-963,bundle:bundle-963,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: distributed_tool (3 issues),issue_group,,module: distributed_tool needs maintainer decision,module: distributed_tool,Create one module: distributed_tool fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: distributed_tool paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"108212, 126302, 162755",,3,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: distributed_tool bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #162755: needs maintainer decision; labels: oncall: distributed, module: tests, triaged, enhancement, module: distributed_tool, bot-triaged, oncall: distributed infra, ptd-bot-triaged; title: Ideally, we should not use `require_exact_world_size(4)` if we only have 8-GPU runners | issue #126302: needs maintainer decision; labels: oncall: distributed, triaged, enhancement, module: distributed_tool, bot-triaged...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",5fbb9d6bfd3b9ed697aafe810f262853cfe50e874f0aa5c69e9fd22c35c16387
BUNDLE-964,bundle:bundle-964,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: distributions (14 issues),issue_group,,module: distributions needs maintainer decision,module: distributions,Create one module: distributions fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: distributions paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"31779, 35527, 45133, 72525, 102938, 133702, 136532, 145679, 152095, 157547, 171283, 172059, 179430, 186825",,14,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: distributions bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #145679: needs maintainer decision; labels: module: distributions, triaged; title: Gamma cdf function | issue #179430: needs maintainer decision; labels: module: distributions, feature, triaged, function request, bot-triaged; title: Add Frechet/Inverse Weibull distribution | issue #133702: needs maintainer decision; labels: module: distributions, triaged; title: Add `beta`, `betainc`, etc. to `torch.special`...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",f99ce20adfb9ef8aafeeda74827f2f90c84663416207c77b081af5fe45225ba0
BUNDLE-965,bundle:bundle-965,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: docs (38 issues),issue_group,,module: docs has linked PR batch 1,module: docs,Create one module: docs fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: docs paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"32864, 41226, 62027, 83494, 86558, 103841, 112586, 113669, 121587, 123800, 129319, 129970, 131280, 132020, 133511, 134964, 144779, 145555, 152213, 157395, 158775, 161847, 170869, 171866, 172324, 173318, 175479, 176065, 177957, 180119, 180467, 180649, 182490, 183036, 186496, 188245, 188389, 188398",,38,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: docs bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #173318: has linked PR; labels: high priority, module: docs, triaged, module: regression; title: [docs] `torch.cuda.Stream` link broken on 2.10+ | issue #188398: has linked PR; labels: module: docs, triaged, actionable, bot-triaged; title: [Docs] torch.utils.mobile_optimizer link broken in 2.7 API documentation | issue #188245: has linked PR; labels: module: docs, triaged, actionable; title: Broken tutorial...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",37d553cef5e29bc09123bd3c2513b0cebeee432d6590dacd110aec53eee3b75f
BUNDLE-966,bundle:bundle-966,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: docs (15 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #164281: Document Symmetric Memory,module: docs,Create one module: docs fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: docs paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"41559, 62155, 67969, 68798, 71392, 99421, 105318, 106664, 129338, 150432, 151558, 151559, 151561, 164281, 173514",,15,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: docs bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"nsistency Would this address the concerns raised in the issue? I'd be happy to open a draft PR if this approach looks good! Also, regarding #164281 - should that be closed as part of this work, or handled separately? Thanks! | a memory pool is used : it would be good to add this to that section as well (maybe through a link). While looking for this, I noticed that #164281 is still open but I believe it can be clos...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",68df02a278c8ab0eeaa0b50d1eb3120a44e59458bc2d6e5d3c733e027fc06c01
BUNDLE-967,bundle:bundle-967,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: docs (4 issues),issue_group,,module: docs needs reproduction,module: docs,Create one module: docs fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: docs paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"39832, 103423, 103424, 166303",,4,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: docs bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #166303: needs reproduction; labels: needs reproduction, module: docs, triaged; title: Pytorch Operators on older pytorch version | issue #103424: needs reproduction; labels: needs reproduction, module: docs, triaged; title: The document does not emphasize hidden range in nn.Embedding | issue #103423: needs reproduction; labels: needs reproduction, module: docs, triaged; title: The document does not emphasiz...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",679e58dd1037590b7b545d8cbe0284fa440b13a6a3938488ee372c2bdb83b604
BUNDLE-968,bundle:bundle-968,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: double backwards (1 issue),issue_group,,#183603 torch.compile fails on second-order gradient after autograd.grad(create_graph=True),module: double backwards,Create one module: double backwards fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: double backwards paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,183603,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: double backwards bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #183603: needs maintainer decision; labels: module: double backwards, triaged, oncall: pt2, bot-triaged; title: torch.compile fails on second-order gradient after autograd.grad(create_graph=True)",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",10e3a98cd8344135d22054eac5071cbf619a77b5d7ab95ced4a3dd8f4ec3a84a
BUNDLE-969,bundle:bundle-969,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: dtensor (60 issues),issue_group,,module: dtensor has linked PR,module: dtensor,Create one module: dtensor fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: dtensor paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"108744, 109477, 116683, 118094, 119930, 120158, 120787, 124019, 127772, 135178, 139681, 140227, 143748, 143985, 145218, 146045, 146601, 146884, 153615, 155562, 155657, 156523, 156533, 156842, 159959, 160911, 160968, 161091, 161218, 161368, 161974, 162215, 162290, 163043, 163692, 166930, 167074, 167090, 167106, 167219, 167540, 167657, 167917, 168099, 169320, 169814, 170367, 172485, 172491, 173123, 177663, 178091, 178616, 179448, 179858, 180346, 186030, 187020, 187561, 188182",,60,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: dtensor bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #108744: has linked PR; labels: good first issue, triaged, module: dtensor; title: switch more test cases to use MultithreadTestCase | issue #188182: has linked PR; labels: oncall: distributed, triaged, actionable, module: dtensor, oncall: distributed parallelisms; title: torch.fft has no sharding strategy | issue #170367: has linked PR; labels: module: performance, oncall: distributed, triaged, enhancement,...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",32e69fe0262fa00ab1ca7267bf4e1305c315ae319c1650b5154b958d12a11a68
BUNDLE-970,bundle:bundle-970,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: dtensor (3 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #156217: [Tracker] AutoParallel's feature request to DTensor,module: dtensor,Create one module: dtensor fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: dtensor paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"154266, 156217, 157495",,3,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: dtensor bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"ops only included that for a certain target shardings. To achieve this, we require OpSpec always include tensor_meta for input and output. #157495 OpStrategy should return all valid OpSpec's. OpStrategy should never raise error when finding unsupported input strategy in OpStra... | issue #154266: needs reproduction; labels: needs reproduction, oncall: distributed, triaged, oncall: pt2, module: dtensor; title: torc...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",08f4809ee510d402e6a4614c94fed5c29982aa78f1ba3c8502b0f5b7b87fac8b
BUNDLE-971,bundle:bundle-971,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: dynamic shapes (23 issues),issue_group,,module: dynamic shapes has linked PR,module: dynamic shapes,Create one module: dynamic shapes fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: dynamic shapes paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"90900, 112044, 118521, 121818, 125604, 133655, 137093, 137560, 140463, 143494, 151997, 152944, 165506, 168279, 175057, 180595, 180596, 181108, 181525, 181653, 187547, 188151, 188871",,23,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: dynamic shapes bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #187547: has linked PR; labels: triaged, enhancement, oncall: pt2, module: dynamic shapes, module: dynamo, bot-triaged; title: Dynamo graph-breaks on raw unbacked SymInt BlockMask lengths in FlexAttention | issue #112044: has linked PR; labels: module: rnn, triaged, module: fx, oncall: pt2, module: dynamic shapes; title: DDE in pack_padded_sequence/pad_packed_sequence decomposition. | issue #133655: has link...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",f08906ad2ba318c18fe57a49564ea61b71792c9a4525f1155aea2ff084d20286
BUNDLE-972,bundle:bundle-972,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: dynamic shapes (1 issue),issue_group,,"#93419 torchdynamo is not properly setting up input tracking (e.g., for symbolic shape guards) for view bases",module: dynamic shapes,Create one module: dynamic shapes fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: dynamic shapes paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,93419,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: dynamic shapes bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #93419: needs design decision; labels: low priority, triaged, needs design, oncall: pt2, module: dynamic shapes; title: torchdynamo is not properly setting up input tracking (e.g., for symbolic shape guards) for view bases",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",9f079ae9b0459e9f6c0a7fc336cb40e0cfc677345b48a6d279e4295b5b34a883
BUNDLE-973,bundle:bundle-973,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: dynamo (48 issues),issue_group,,module: dynamo has linked PR,module: dynamo,Create one module: dynamo fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: dynamo paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"99873, 107631, 112344, 113643, 117584, 118211, 123252, 128121, 134950, 135011, 135816, 136149, 136495, 137749, 141452, 144805, 146129, 147212, 149989, 155632, 158519, 160757, 161765, 165385, 168307, 170224, 170361, 170556, 170558, 173255, 173452, 175269, 175869, 176692, 178511, 179643, 180839, 182684, 182706, 185886, 186864, 186865, 187073, 187593, 188077, 188234, 188536, 188796",,48,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: dynamo bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #185886: has linked PR; labels: high priority, module: performance, triaged, module: regression, oncall: pt2, module: dynamo, module: guards, bot-triaged; title: [torch.compile] Clarification/regression: Dynamo cache lookup guard eval is much slower in 2.12 vs 2.7 after `inline_inbuilt_nn_modules` became always True | issue #188536: has linked PR; labels: triaged, oncall: pt2, module: dynamo; title: Graph-br...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",461f46c5d337e725c95de6845e0312466ce99b5e7766b9803456ce14efe2c445
BUNDLE-974,bundle:bundle-974,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: dynamo (5 issues),issue_group,,module: dynamo needs reproduction,module: dynamo,Create one module: dynamo fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: dynamo paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"105700, 116766, 129658, 129668, 150912",,5,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: dynamo bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #105700: needs reproduction; labels: needs reproduction, triaged, enhancement, oncall: pt2, module: dynamo; title: Don't use weak ref finalization for freeing resources when code objects die | issue #150912: needs reproduction; labels: needs reproduction, triaged, oncall: pt2, module: dynamo; title: using torch.compile with torchao at the same time cause stack overflow error | issue #116766: needs reproducti...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",19579875e352d4af106c4e06979abbf3f918160f2abec44d8ba4ba5aaf9cba7d
BUNDLE-975,bundle:bundle-975,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: edge cases (23 issues),issue_group,,module: edge cases has linked PR,module: edge cases,Create one module: edge cases fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: edge cases paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"87131, 87172, 87556, 89431, 106665, 138464, 154262, 171249, 171676, 173525, 173885, 174668, 174984, 176384, 176385, 176412, 176415, 182560, 184030, 186901, 187294, 187299, 188382",,23,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: edge cases bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #187299: has linked PR; labels: module: nn, module: error checking, triaged, enhancement, module: edge cases, topic: fuzzer, bot-triaged; title: torch.nn.functional.unfold — RuntimeError instead of ValueError for zero stride | issue #187294: has linked PR; labels: triaged, module: NaNs and Infs, module: special, module: edge cases, bot-triaged; title: torch.special.zeta returns NaN for q=+Inf instead of 0 |...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",ab6e09de5fe4de9f250986f438433a17ae1624eb1557992b7be1f1031d328a80
BUNDLE-976,bundle:bundle-976,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: elastic (7 issues),issue_group,,module: elastic needs maintainer decision,module: elastic,Create one module: elastic fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: elastic paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"75087, 76287, 80824, 121486, 124058, 143823, 160130",,7,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: elastic bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #143823: needs maintainer decision; labels: oncall: distributed, module: tests, triaged, module: elastic, bot-triaged, oncall: distributed infra, ptd-bot-triaged; title: Possible race condition found in TailLogTest.test_tail | issue #124058: needs maintainer decision; labels: oncall: distributed, triaged, module: elastic, bot-triaged, oncall: distributed infra, ptd-bot-triaged; title: [RFC] Support Torchrun...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",a729a68eac16c5d41b95ec8150203082c2c3d008cc12bfd9213db0298e3a679e
BUNDLE-977,bundle:bundle-977,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: embedding (1 issue),issue_group,,#99268 Embedding layer tensor shape,module: embedding,Create one module: embedding fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: embedding paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,99268,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: embedding bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #99268: needs reproduction; labels: needs reproduction, triaged, module: embedding; title: Embedding layer tensor shape",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",7509cd13a7213b0356e608f887a1b76738b90032b000bb7604daffdddc56c87c
BUNDLE-978,bundle:bundle-978,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: empty tensor (1 issue),issue_group,,#169208 Segmentation fault in torch.native_batch_norm with empty running_var tensor,module: empty tensor,Create one module: empty tensor fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: empty tensor paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,169208,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: empty tensor bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #169208: has linked PR; labels: module: error checking, triaged, actionable, module: norms and normalization, module: empty tensor; title: Segmentation fault in torch.native_batch_norm with empty running_var tensor",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",1471bfa97dfd5e67e34e7f2208fc33333e55edef1b9c8993254ae3b9a9b10e49
BUNDLE-979,bundle:bundle-979,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: error checking (19 issues),issue_group,,module: error checking has linked PR,module: error checking,Create one module: error checking fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: error checking paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"111158, 126673, 134841, 137468, 152178, 153378, 160553, 163504, 167414, 169236, 174602, 175368, 176244, 181576, 184280, 185006, 185481, 188087, 188360",,19,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: error checking bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #185481: has linked PR; labels: module: error checking, triaged, oncall: pt2, module: inductor; title: [inductor] argmax over comparison mask is accepted and used for indexing while eager raises | issue #185006: has linked PR; labels: module: optimizer, module: error checking, triaged, module: LrScheduler, bot-triaged; title: ConstantLR accepts factor=0 and crashes with ZeroDivisionError after total_iters st...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",453cbe005277b6ad5d8322e98635431c467bcd8de9f3d8a0f28fa9bb3d12acfe
BUNDLE-980,bundle:bundle-980,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: faketensor (17 issues),issue_group,,#115516 [FakeTensor] FakeTensorMode dispatch won't change generator state,module: faketensor,Create one module: faketensor fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: faketensor paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"82616, 84925, 91655, 100985, 102187, 104194, 106732, 107582, 113589, 115516, 119407, 119589, 120105, 122806, 141545, 159150, 185684",,17,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: faketensor bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #115516: needs design decision; labels: triaged, module: random, needs design, oncall: pt2, module: fakeTensor, module: pt2-dispatcher; title: [FakeTensor] FakeTensorMode dispatch won't change generator state | issue #141545: needs reproduction; labels: needs reproduction, triaged, oncall: pt2, module: fakeTensor, module: pt2-dispatcher; title: Missing Fake/Meta/Abstract Kernels for Operators | issue #185684...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",45bb03eec423611fe72744d3a8049705824ef16be785509d7857eb42611441af
BUNDLE-981,bundle:bundle-981,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: fft (2 issues),issue_group,,module: fft needs maintainer decision,module: fft,Create one module: fft fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: fft paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"171022, 188496",,2,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: fft bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #188496: needs maintainer decision; labels: module: onnx, triaged, has workaround, module: fft, bot-triaged; title: torch.fft.irfft2 ONNX export produces graph that onnxruntime cannot execute. | issue #171022: needs maintainer decision; labels: triaged, module: fft; title: In-place real-domain FFT operators for memory-efficient training (bf16 support)",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",f8e7e6b4b3f1803ceddf97a84016e8b42065cdbfa7d56c6a3afbbe8dca823426
BUNDLE-982,bundle:bundle-982,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: first class dims (1 issue),issue_group,,#133559 Support for variable number of dimensions in functorch.dim dims() and autonaming induced inconsistencies,module: first class dims,Create one module: first class dims fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: first class dims paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,133559,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: first class dims bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #133559: needs maintainer decision; labels: triaged, module: functorch, module: first class dims; title: Support for variable number of dimensions in functorch.dim dims() and autonaming induced inconsistencies",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",f7d23b6084b753c705d3d67868486361b42c860b526e07d3384c22e16aee7922
BUNDLE-983,bundle:bundle-983,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: flaky-tests (70 issues),issue_group,,module: flaky-tests needs maintainer decision batch 6,module: flaky-tests,Create one module: flaky-tests fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: flaky-tests paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"100074, 124152, 145189, 145344, 149080, 153236, 158443, 159151, 176966, 179811, 179853, 179874, 179897, 179990, 180204, 180322, 180324, 180337, 180366, 180414, 180437, 180439, 180490, 180542, 181224, 181318, 181322, 181629, 182174, 182259, 182260, 185452, 186868, 186871, 186872, 186873, 186909, 186910, 186911, 186912, 186999, 187000, 187046, 187156, 187176, 187202, 187203, 187290, 187378, 187424, 187425, 187645, 187658, 187718, 187738, 188041, 188123, 188144, 188627, 188628, 188668, 188767, 188895, 188897, 188899, 188983, 188985, 189015, 189066, 189067",,70,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: flaky-tests bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #186912: needs maintainer decision; labels: module: rocm, triaged, module: flaky-tests, skipped, oncall: distributed checkpointing; title: DISABLED test_checkpoint_write_future_state_dict (__main__.TestCheckpointProcess) | issue #186911: needs maintainer decision; labels: triaged, module: flaky-tests, skipped, oncall: r2p; title: DISABLED test_launch_elastic_multiple_agents (__main__.ElasticLaunchTest) | iss...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",48679d70f17f6deb7fb2436bd9929b62711582a89320119818a33672ba5f2d45
BUNDLE-984,bundle:bundle-984,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: flaky-tests (18 issues),issue_group,,module: flaky-tests needs maintainer decision batch 1,module: flaky-tests,Create one module: flaky-tests fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: flaky-tests paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"62902, 150877, 152632, 167272, 167297, 179742, 179799, 179879, 180194, 180195, 180213, 187289, 188798, 189151, 189221, 189223, 189244, 189255",,18,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: flaky-tests bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #189255: needs maintainer decision; labels: oncall: distributed, module: rocm, triaged, module: flaky-tests, skipped; title: DISABLED test_delayed_optim_step_offload_true_no_shard_cuda (__main__.TestParityWithDDPCUDA) | issue #189244: needs maintainer decision; labels: module: rocm, triaged, module: flaky-tests, skipped, oncall: pt2, module: inductor; title: DISABLED test_cat_pointwise (__main__.NumBytesMetr...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",1e553fc2471bfea296d207eb3bdfeff1aaffad20b88c192007091aa473828c3e
BUNDLE-985,bundle:bundle-985,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: flex attention (13 issues),issue_group,,module: flex attention has linked PR,module: flex attention,Create one module: flex attention fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: flex attention paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"133254, 137574, 141627, 141784, 145208, 145782, 150321, 153221, 159770, 170839, 173071, 176837, 188212",,13,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: flex attention bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #145208: has linked PR; labels: triaged, oncall: pt2, module: higher order operators, module: pt2-dispatcher, module: flex attention; title: Some FlexAttention learned bias bugs/limitations | issue #133254: has linked PR; labels: triaged, oncall: pt2, module: inductor, module: flex attention, repro:agent:h100:repro_fail:not_reproduced; title: Shared memory out of resource when using flex attention | issue #1...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",1e0e80099c3870c0527b158ab903003fb7fddb0449ec48d8c4c76719697f1648
BUNDLE-986,bundle:bundle-986,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: floatx (formerly float8) (15 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 8 issues - issue #146326: Tracking issue for Improvements for DeepSeek,module: floatx (formerly float8),Create one module: floatx (formerly float8) fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: floatx (formerly float8) paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"130015, 146326, 146328, 146329, 146330, 146331, 146332, 146368, 146542, 148420, 153809, 156771, 174417, 187807, 188676",,15,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: floatx (formerly float8) bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"@eqy let's take this discussion to #146328, the API you linked is for fp32/fp64 only, and has sizes/pointers on the CPU, not GPU. | sign options here. #146332 More flexibility for mixed precision optimizers (e.g. DeepSeek mentions that they keep optimizer states in bf16) #146542 cc @awgu @wanchaol @fegin @fduwjj @wz337 @wconstab @d4l3k @pragupta @msaroufim @dcci @aditvenk @weifengpy @drisspg @liangel-02 @h... | or...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",6beec48a13eccfea655c73056f5a014e0efe2cb519b543fdae10d28e8afe703f
BUNDLE-987,bundle:bundle-987,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: fsdp (23 issues),issue_group,,#120383 Numeric stability issue with full parameter fine tuning of Llama 2 7B model with FSDP,module: fsdp,Create one module: fsdp fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: fsdp paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"102402, 108381, 120383, 124260, 136408, 136950, 141237, 154657, 156784, 156966, 157027, 157832, 160068, 160169, 160272, 160340, 161153, 162160, 162257, 165933, 167036, 168143, 178749",,23,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: fsdp bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #120383: needs reproduction; labels: needs reproduction, oncall: distributed, triaged, module: fsdp, bot-triaged, oncall: distributed parallelisms, ptd-bot-triaged; title: Numeric stability issue with full parameter fine tuning of Llama 2 7B model with FSDP | issue #162257: needs maintainer decision; labels: oncall: distributed, triaged, module: fsdp, oncall: distributed checkpointing, bot-triaged, ptd-bot-t...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",c34e15d9b9aafd59d439e5adb287aa81d1405aa27b61e94b95fc550e25d447cc
BUNDLE-988,bundle:bundle-988,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: functionalization (7 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #138220: Update auto_functionalized_v2 to pass view subgraphs,module: functionalization,Create one module: functionalization fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: functionalization paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"133512, 138220, 138221, 140835, 152323, 171375, 177372",,7,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: functionalization bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"lacing. The main thing to do to get auto_functionalized_v2 to work with export is to develop a BC serialization scheme for it. We should do #138220 as a part of that work so that we don't need to break BC in the future when we implement that. cc @ezyang @chauhang @penguinwu @a... | issue #133512: has linked PR; labels: triaged, module: functionalization, oncall: pt2, module: pt2-dispatcher; title: functionalizatio...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",3b5853f5259939179b85f62d246c4421bfebcf0eb4e6326dea5e1b6c7bc5702b
BUNDLE-989,bundle:bundle-989,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: functorch (12 issues),issue_group,,module: functorch has linked PR,module: functorch,Create one module: functorch fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: functorch paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"86641, 91942, 97248, 99573, 130451, 138422, 151782, 154284, 171604, 175521, 175522, 175850",,12,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: functorch bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #175521: has linked PR; labels: feature, triaged, module: vmap, module: pytree, module: functorch, bot-triaged; title: torch.vmap working with non-tensor leaves in output pytrees | issue #175522: has linked PR; labels: feature, triaged, module: vmap, oncall: pt2, module: functorch, module: higher order operators, module: pt2-dispatcher, bot-triaged; title: while_loop vmap compatibility | issue #154284: has l...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",79aec20c64923881f22efb531a7c7b9bbae2abcab8d6d9dbfbe6e9f3a78f0e55
BUNDLE-990,bundle:bundle-990,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: fx (5 issues),issue_group,,module: fx has linked PR,module: fx,Create one module: fx fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: fx paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"135196, 171981, 185640, 187649, 188538",,5,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: fx bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #188538: has linked PR; labels: triaged, module: fx, oncall: pt2, bot-triaged, bot-mislabeled; title: torch.fx _format_target emits invalid or semantically incorrect Python for valid module names | issue #185640: has linked PR; labels: triaged, module: fx, oncall: pt2, module: ProxyTensor, module: pt2-dispatcher, bot-triaged; title: `make_fx` generates broken input codegen for a function with a `(tuple, dict...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",4e69202a172f7394c7573642d14b639cc5cc7e8bb4f2df6d89b9c86c8cd9e58b
BUNDLE-991,bundle:bundle-991,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: fx.passes (1 issue),issue_group,,#188669 fx_graph_cse skipping duplicate element-wise CUDA optimization.,module: fx.passes,Create one module: fx.passes fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: fx.passes paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,188669,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: fx.passes bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #188669: needs maintainer decision; labels: triaged, oncall: pt2, module: fx.passes, bot-triaged; title: fx_graph_cse skipping duplicate element-wise CUDA optimization.",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",d45b8cfb97ea16e952d2bc9e0724cd902ed4a92a25b464e844f9053d952c87dc
BUNDLE-992,bundle:bundle-992,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: guards (1 issue),issue_group,,"#139789 compiling ""input mutation"" followed by ""input mutation + aliasing"" does not properly recompile",module: guards,Create one module: guards fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: guards paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,139789,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: guards bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #139789: has linked PR; labels: high priority, triaged, oncall: pt2, module: guards; title: compiling ""input mutation"" followed by ""input mutation + aliasing"" does not properly recompile",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",ac401b283722e148bdf6092b244301370501897f58b1642aeea6d60cdb1bcce5
BUNDLE-993,bundle:bundle-993,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: half (2 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #182817: [MPS] Switch test_output_match / test_output_grad_match to magnitude-floored relative tolerance,module: half,Create one module: half fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: half paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"182817, 183621",,2,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: half bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,🐛 Describe the bug Context Related to the discussion at issue #182817 this is an orthogonal issue with the current testing approach and a suggestion on how we could address it: When testing op correctness for,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",8b86baabe9ab8197dcf33db43f50e458f3c4eab4fd9d496a06d1a49bbd387e4b
BUNDLE-994,bundle:bundle-994,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: higher order operators (14 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #146941: Make HOPs more debuggable,module: higher order operators,Create one module: higher order operators fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: higher order operators paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"120189, 122588, 133721, 141259, 144803, 145451, 146860, 146861, 146941, 147115, 147210, 150062, 158975, 169672",,14,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: higher order operators bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"another example: #147115 | issue #145451: needs reproduction; labels: needs reproduction, triaged, oncall: pt2, module: higher order operators, module: pt2-dispatcher; title: [Dynamo]while_loop raise an exception | issue #144803: needs reproduction; labels: needs reproduction, triaged, oncall: pt2, module: higher order operators, module: pt2-dispatcher; title: Something is fishy with discard_graph_changes | issue...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",223f0b2b291e7c4aa4fce6c15695b098eaf3dc866938c3429154106fbead1358
BUNDLE-995,bundle:bundle-995,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: inductor (49 issues),issue_group,,module: inductor has linked PR batch 1,module: inductor,Create one module: inductor fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: inductor paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"105560, 106006, 111182, 121122, 121135, 130039, 132865, 133462, 138980, 139077, 141595, 145401, 146306, 147075, 150296, 159413, 161609, 161842, 163932, 165280, 165501, 165785, 170562, 173793, 174066, 174792, 175538, 176507, 179272, 179520, 180168, 180823, 180957, 181006, 181076, 182430, 182928, 183899, 184394, 184903, 185533, 185885, 187241, 188213, 188217, 188225, 188226, 188578, 188635",,49,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: inductor bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #188578: has linked PR; labels: module: performance, triaged, enhancement, module: regression, oncall: pt2, module: inductor, bot-triaged; title: [Inductor] Optimize split reduction heuristics on GB200 | issue #188635: has linked PR; labels: module: performance, triaged, enhancement, oncall: pt2, module: inductor, bot-triaged; title: torch.compile misses fusion for producer -> view/transpose/contiguous layou...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",d949bd84a8cff666db39d2aa339c79faa766f3a89e1384ffd9ce18f529f1b030
BUNDLE-996,bundle:bundle-996,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: inductor (21 issues),issue_group,,module: inductor needs maintainer decision batch 1,module: inductor,Create one module: inductor fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: inductor paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"122840, 125254, 146780, 148402, 156818, 165398, 168573, 168995, 174313, 180948, 180974, 182868, 185534, 187019, 188238, 188239, 188392, 188393, 188687, 188740, 188840",,21,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: inductor bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #180948: needs maintainer decision; labels: module: tests, triaged, skipped, oncall: pt2, module: inductor, module: xpu, bot-triaged; title: DISABLED test_emulate_precision_casts_preserves_explicit_precision_cast_float16 (__main__.CudaReproTests) | issue #168995: needs maintainer decision; labels: triaged, oncall: pt2, module: inductor; title: MXFP8 + torch.compile error: NotImplementedError: make_reindexer...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",e29cd6818858eef81ae5bdfa9c75b7a7e2dd4643ebe0ca1b86cb8c1cb9fbac8f
BUNDLE-997,bundle:bundle-997,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: infra (4 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 3 issues - issue #160322: `torch.Tensor` methods return type annotation too broad for `torch.Tensor` subclasses,module: infra,Create one module: infra fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: infra paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"63038, 160322, 161713, 163990",,4,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: infra bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"🚀 The feature, motivation and pitch This is a subtask of #161713 In order to understand the impact of changes made to type signatures and help improve type coverage from downstream users of PyTorch, we sh | mprove types exported by PyTorch so people who install torch can better navigate and enable type checking in their code. This follows up on #160322 to help define how we'll track external type coverage improvem...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",c7aa35e39ce5240d9fe020fc623320ab0001b67d2f336a713f129e15f68663bd
BUNDLE-998,bundle:bundle-998,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: initialization (1 issue),issue_group,,#180968 Initializing weights after parametrization silently fails,module: initialization,Create one module: initialization fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: initialization paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,180968,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: initialization bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #180968: needs maintainer decision; labels: module: nn, triaged, module: initialization, has workaround, module: nn.utils.parametrize, bot-triaged; title: Initializing weights after parametrization silently fails",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",60d6b6d56701c9656a601aaa628a8d1c8a63a9239c64ba6f61c28000638c389f
BUNDLE-999,bundle:bundle-999,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: intel (3 issues),issue_group,,#125954 Error: command buffer exited with error status.,module: intel,Create one module: intel fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: intel paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"125954, 132368, 169670",,3,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: intel bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #125954: needs reproduction; labels: needs reproduction, triaged, module: macos, module: intel, module: mps; title: Error: command buffer exited with error status. | issue #169670: needs maintainer decision; labels: triaged, module: mkl, module: linear algebra, module: intel; title: Energy normalization error on torch.fft.fft2 and torch.fft.ifft2 when the matrix size = [2048, 2048] | issue #132368: has linke...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",72d89eb4e8af1df032efa9f05d02f1aa073016002b39e2cc90aaed81e9900963
BUNDLE-1000,bundle:bundle-1000,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: internals (6 issues),issue_group,,#129020 Expand Tag Set: views & reductions,module: internals,Create one module: internals fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: internals paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"30955, 129020, 129992, 146414, 146647, 146980",,6,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: internals bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #129020: has linked PR; labels: module: internals, good first issue, triaged; title: Expand Tag Set: views & reductions | e in core rather than extension that implements this one via TensorSubclassing. If it must be part of PyTorch, will it be a shell type (see #146414 that outlines what shell types are) or a fully functional one. If later, then it would be nice to better. understand what hardwar... | Contex...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",fcd17fe2b700ca52d396892e55eda9313b0d035d82a637c14cf063fd8a63a0c8
BUNDLE-1001,bundle:bundle-1001,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: jiterator (2 issues),issue_group,,#132756 JITerator: Torch.prod produces RuntimeError: CUDA driver error: invalid argument,module: jiterator,Create one module: jiterator fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: jiterator paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"74415, 132756",,2,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: jiterator bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #132756: has linked PR; labels: needs reproduction, triaged, module: jiterator, oncall: pt2; title: JITerator: Torch.prod produces RuntimeError: CUDA driver error: invalid argument | issue #74415: needs maintainer decision; labels: triaged, module: jiterator; title: Warning: ""Specified kernel cache directory could not be created""",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",ed14c2e2656a6152ce6101ce50d319661fdf0ea5951c21cf88fda82178d92657
BUNDLE-1002,bundle:bundle-1002,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: library (1 issue),issue_group,,"#146804 `torch.library.register_fake` respects only positional order, but not kwargs order",module: library,Create one module: library fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: library paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,146804,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: library bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #146804: needs design decision; labels: triaged, needs design, module: library, oncall: pt2, module: pt2-dispatcher; title: `torch.library.register_fake` respects only positional order, but not kwargs order",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",9a030851d597c7c44b91f91101ec8312093c1d564d34c64b588110cfab80cc71
BUNDLE-1003,bundle:bundle-1003,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: linear algebra (23 issues),issue_group,,module: linear algebra has linked PR,module: linear algebra,Create one module: linear algebra fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: linear algebra paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"9983, 44591, 49890, 50204, 69203, 70008, 73143, 75225, 76528, 88948, 101249, 118225, 128564, 128778, 140282, 151761, 157360, 176413, 185650, 186148, 187567, 188135, 188391",,23,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: linear algebra bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #187567: has linked PR; labels: high priority, module: performance, triaged, module: macos, has workaround, module: linear algebra, module: mps, bot-triaged; title: [MPS] torch.linalg.qr is 25-250× slower than CPU on tall-skinny matrices | issue #186148: has linked PR; labels: module: performance, triaged, enhancement, has workaround, module: linear algebra, bot-triaged; title: `torch.matmul` misses `mm` fol...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",10dcf906dbc807a382161ab3bd9dfa4f74e8dbb785ba87f8d4bc9aa450c49244
BUNDLE-1004,bundle:bundle-1004,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: lint (3 issues),issue_group,,#115016 Enable ruff rule PLW1510 codebase wide,module: lint,Create one module: lint fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: lint paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"115016, 149639, 158906",,3,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: lint bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #115016: has linked PR; labels: good first issue, module: lint, triaged; title: Enable ruff rule PLW1510 codebase wide | issue #149639: needs maintainer decision; labels: module: typing, module: lint, triaged, actionable; title: Pylint error: ` torch.linalg.vector_norm is not callable` | issue #158906: needs reproduction; labels: needs reproduction, module: lint, triaged; title: The make lint command got stuck.",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",4d88581488651ad60363015c27d794aa5e3aadfe3a877f67c1c39ec7487742b8
BUNDLE-1005,bundle:bundle-1005,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: logging (1 issue),issue_group,,#150974 feature: tlparse summary,module: logging,Create one module: logging fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: logging paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,150974,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: logging bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #150974: needs maintainer decision; labels: module: logging, triaged, oncall: pt2; title: feature: tlparse summary",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",9df7becdc54c004d4f31395fe62a272a642b71f0def82dc87aba102299fede16
BUNDLE-1006,bundle:bundle-1006,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: loss (11 issues),issue_group,,module: loss has linked PR,module: loss,Create one module: loss fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: loss paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"25174, 50712, 88325, 95374, 97788, 123339, 126642, 129643, 134767, 185647, 188216",,11,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: loss bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #123339: has linked PR; labels: module: loss, triaged; title: Inconsistency: BCELoss asserts target in [0, 1], BCEWithLogitsLoss does not | issue #185647: has linked PR; labels: module: loss, module: memory usage, triaged, actionable; title: Unexpected storage from MSE loss output | issue #126642: has linked PR; labels: module: loss, module: optimizer, triaged, actionable; title: [optim] add missing 'maximiz...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",d85b7580108081db50537e4b30a676059fe482b7c77db5dcfd1f069061256c3e
BUNDLE-1007,bundle:bundle-1007,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: lrscheduler (3 issues),issue_group,,#184517 LRScheduler doesn't use _get_closed_form_lr when initalizing scheduler,module: lrscheduler,Create one module: lrscheduler fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: lrscheduler paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"66781, 71272, 184517",,3,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: lrscheduler bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #184517: needs design decision; labels: triaged, needs research, module: LrScheduler, bot-triaged, bot-mislabeled; title: LRScheduler doesn't use _get_closed_form_lr when initalizing scheduler | issue #71272: needs reproduction; labels: needs reproduction, module: optimizer, triaged, module: LrScheduler; title: UserWarning: Seems like `optimizer.step()` has been overridden after learning rate scheduler initi...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",7583f1c9ed688e4f47b53d41acec34bee4627a898369e0e99683fe151bc3752c
BUNDLE-1008,bundle:bundle-1008,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: memory format (2 issues),issue_group,,#184642 `Module.to()` has no overload for `.to(memory_format=torch.channels_last)`,module: memory format,Create one module: memory format fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: memory format paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"184642, 187963",,2,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: memory format bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #184642: has linked PR; labels: module: nn, module: typing, triaged, enhancement, module: memory format, bot-triaged; title: `Module.to()` has no overload for `.to(memory_format=torch.channels_last)` | issue #187963: needs maintainer decision; labels: triaged, module: memory format, module: pooling, oncall: pt2, module: pallas, bot-triaged; title: Pallas CPU max_unpool2d does not preserve channels-last outpu...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",55917a72840f630a4523129b44856e0d126c391f03f0987f96640efd91c9b5f3
BUNDLE-1009,bundle:bundle-1009,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: memory usage (15 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 4 issues - issue #145374: Memory Leak in MPS Backend During LSTM Iterations (Out of Memory Error),module: memory usage,Create one module: memory usage fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: memory usage paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"28943, 40133, 43450, 52036, 105839, 120167, 126388, 137393, 139709, 145374, 154329, 154363, 155060, 164299, 167906",,15,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: memory usage bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"🐛 Describe the bug 🐛 Describe the bug The MPS backend leaks memory. This has been a long-standing issue as mentioned in Issue #155060, Issue #154329, and issue #145374. I've observed it on my machines for the past 2 years and decided to do some RCA work over the past week. | is a few seconds into the script: On CPU, I don't get any memory pressure at all. I initially documented these observations as comments to #1...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",84ebfcb8a549fbf4744fd6f32653d44d31002400af8f1b6a8e006207c7a137a8
BUNDLE-1010,bundle:bundle-1010,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: memory usage (2 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #114455: Torch Cpu Memory Leak with FastApi uvicorn.,module: memory usage,Create one module: memory usage fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: memory usage paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"68114, 114455",,2,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: memory usage bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"contains torch.no_grad() , gc, and del model. But still during embeddings generation 250-300 mb memory getting stuck in ram. Similar issue: #68114 Is there any way to release cpu memory after every api call ? Versions 2.1.0+cu121'",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",3eee8ba6164206abc0f2ef8c7bc9e2018390c1c1b9694230129ed656ea87969d
BUNDLE-1011,bundle:bundle-1011,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: meta tensors (2 issues),issue_group,,"#96409 Initialization on `meta` device failing for models containing `nn.utils.weight_norm`, with `NotImplementedError: Could not run 'aten::_weight_norm_interface' with arguments from the 'Meta' backend.`",module: meta tensors,Create one module: meta tensors fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: meta tensors paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"96409, 188692",,2,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: meta tensors bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #96409: has linked PR; labels: triaged, actionable, module: meta tensors; title: Initialization on `meta` device failing for models containing `nn.utils.weight_norm`, with `NotImplementedError: Could not run 'aten::_weight_norm_interface' with arguments from the 'Meta' backend.` | issue #188692: needs maintainer decision; labels: module: rnn, module: tests, triaged, module: mkldnn, skipped, module: meta tens...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",b236f057e0f4ac127d26545419cdc0a7ee51cfea75b367399088e302df6e8936
BUNDLE-1012,bundle:bundle-1012,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: molly-guard (1 issue),issue_group,,#182105 Adding a UserWarning when pickling / deepcopying tensor views,module: molly-guard,Create one module: molly-guard fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: molly-guard paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,182105,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: molly-guard bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #182105: needs maintainer decision; labels: feature, module: molly-guard, module: pickle, module: serialization, triaged, module: ux, bot-triaged; title: Adding a UserWarning when pickling / deepcopying tensor views",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",351a848beaea2c4f71eda278b759f2e7ed2ce13645ac23c1ff6a1f7f76efeab2
BUNDLE-1013,bundle:bundle-1013,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: mpi (1 issue),issue_group,,#142095 torch.distributed.new_group got stuck when use backend=mpi,module: mpi,Create one module: mpi fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: mpi paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,142095,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: mpi bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #142095: needs maintainer decision; labels: oncall: distributed, triaged, module: mpi, bot-triaged, oncall: distributed infra, ptd-bot-triaged; title: torch.distributed.new_group got stuck when use backend=mpi",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",c016cb133c3aff95de7d330ae7fc33d1c992c23021c56817e71d4eea89ea6584
BUNDLE-1014,bundle:bundle-1014,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: mps (21 issues),issue_group,,module: mps has linked PR,module: mps,Create one module: mps fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: mps paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"96602, 99037, 111547, 117210, 123148, 132226, 136003, 140706, 146769, 150121, 160732, 160739, 175873, 176730, 177225, 179259, 179294, 181650, 187827, 188198, 188728",,21,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: mps bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #188198: has linked PR; labels: module: performance, triaged, module: regression, module: mps, bot-triaged; title: [MPS] cat op dropped performance in torch==2.10 release | issue #181650: has linked PR; labels: needs reproduction, triaged, module: mps, bot-triaged; title: MPS: `add_dense_scalar_cast_float` shader fails with ""Read-only bytes bound to shader argument with write access enabled"" assertion during...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",9a3e905f525420b890a5e10c4f6a0c815bbc637f45668a0dd0235aa3deb9d313
BUNDLE-1015,bundle:bundle-1015,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: mta (2 issues),issue_group,,module: mta needs maintainer decision,module: mta,Create one module: mta fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: mta paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"133367, 172273",,2,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: mta bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #133367: needs maintainer decision; labels: module: performance, module: optimizer, triaged, actionable, module: mta; title: Adafactor foreach impl performance tracker | issue #172273: needs maintainer decision; labels: triaged, module: mta; title: Numeric difference between div and foreach_div",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",94b0d405f6a0a393ee66146ee013d3d72123247b8831988ab76701655a77dfb4
BUNDLE-1016,bundle:bundle-1016,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: multi-gpu (1 issue),issue_group,,#59626 multi scripted model on the same gpu on multi gpu machine,module: multi-gpu,Create one module: multi-gpu fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: multi-gpu paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,59626,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: multi-gpu bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #59626: needs reproduction; labels: needs reproduction, module: multi-gpu, triaged; title: multi scripted model on the same gpu on multi gpu machine",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",db341166f2ed2500594f510023f13a1827ce48ed3bad5974745dbc38da1b95de
BUNDLE-1017,bundle:bundle-1017,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: multiprocessing (9 issues),issue_group,,#171796 Exception in subprocess causes infinite hang and zombie processes,module: multiprocessing,Create one module: multiprocessing fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: multiprocessing paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"2482, 48579, 50261, 110594, 113840, 119546, 124902, 150921, 171796",,9,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: multiprocessing bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #171796: needs maintainer decision; labels: oncall: distributed, module: multiprocessing, triaged; title: Exception in subprocess causes infinite hang and zombie processes | issue #124902: needs design decision; labels: module: multiprocessing, feature, triaged, needs design, module: PrivateUse1; title: Add support for IPC features for PrivateUse devices | issue #119546: needs reproduction; labels: needs rep...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",b09fd97c4846f1f48dd7ff0c3197e7c8e43d44022eea80f95a605d7a266e9ff2
BUNDLE-1018,bundle:bundle-1018,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: nans and infs (7 issues),issue_group,,module: nans and infs needs maintainer decision,module: nans and infs,Create one module: nans and infs fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: nans and infs paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"63322, 80588, 98204, 126760, 163997, 173796, 182156",,7,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: nans and infs bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #182156: needs maintainer decision; labels: feature, module: nn, triaged, module: NaNs and Infs, bot-triaged; title: Add torch.utils.nan_guard for forward-pass NaN/Inf debugging | issue #163997: needs maintainer decision; labels: triaged, module: NaNs and Infs, module: sdpa; title: `F.scaled_dot_product_attention` returns all-`NaN` rows during evaluation but not training | issue #173796: needs maintainer dec...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",b453c3819a5dd12f90004c4af4a6045cadd5f8a122281140eb5596e132787c8f
BUNDLE-1019,bundle:bundle-1019,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: nccl (7 issues),issue_group,,module: nccl needs maintainer decision,module: nccl,Create one module: nccl fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: nccl paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"75334, 107174, 114884, 119196, 129862, 136390, 139581",,7,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: nccl bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #136390: needs maintainer decision; labels: oncall: distributed, triaged, module: nccl, bot-triaged, oncall: distributed infra, ptd-bot-triaged; title: [c10d][nccl][cuda] Regression (unspecific cuda launch error) with test_c10d_nncl | issue #129862: needs maintainer decision; labels: module: performance, oncall: distributed, triaged, enhancement, module: nccl, bot-triaged, oncall: distributed infra, ptd-bot-...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",ae8d70c6b69a3b76f8c932cc09c8a311efb87641b7bb7f52017fddb54948a599
BUNDLE-1020,bundle:bundle-1020,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: nestedtensor (2 issues),issue_group,,module: nestedtensor needs maintainer decision,module: nestedtensor,Create one module: nestedtensor fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: nestedtensor paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"172623, 187582",,2,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: nestedtensor bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #187582: needs maintainer decision; labels: triaged, module: nestedtensor, bot-triaged; title: torch.nested NJTs with identical layout fail on binary operation | issue #172623: needs maintainer decision; labels: module: typing, triaged, module: nestedtensor; title: Nested Tensors should have their own type",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",6de1d56bd67360751f4d263aa1b99d840e9a682315f4a102b260dd6499731b9b
BUNDLE-1021,bundle:bundle-1021,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: nn (47 issues),issue_group,,module: nn has linked PR,module: nn,Create one module: nn fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: nn paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"38035, 44945, 73009, 74746, 80168, 80821, 104860, 105632, 109652, 109691, 109706, 110865, 112827, 113708, 122680, 128712, 133168, 140458, 141288, 141827, 142320, 146938, 148843, 153035, 154906, 155368, 155878, 157345, 158043, 166166, 166826, 172338, 173160, 174045, 175032, 175372, 175862, 176381, 176628, 177537, 178072, 181663, 184037, 185022, 185023, 188166, 189236",,47,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: nn bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #188166: has linked PR; labels: module: nn, triaged, bot-triaged; title: load_state_dict(assign=True) mutates the caller's state_dict._metadata | issue #73009: has linked PR; labels: module: nn, triaged, actionable; title: Improve loading for nn.modules.lazy.LazyModuleMixin | issue #185023: has linked PR; labels: module: nn, module: typing, triaged, bot-triaged; title: register_buffer-created attributes and...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",e44d73c6cfcca8ea49358869473f36e91bca6e54dd32679f0e71b3a74fb27784
BUNDLE-1022,bundle:bundle-1022,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: nn (51 issues),issue_group,,module: nn needs design decision batch 3,module: nn,Create one module: nn fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: nn paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"8837, 14844, 35458, 37155, 43101, 48494, 50566, 52207, 64804, 67087, 68514, 68516, 69757, 73172, 76024, 80302, 80380, 83492, 83800, 84751, 89724, 91073, 98089, 102201, 102447, 102905, 104857, 105365, 108676, 108692, 109453, 109582, 110885, 111538, 114462, 115585, 115588, 117217, 120072, 120700, 122551, 126762, 127932, 130480, 133466, 134325, 138952, 139977, 142302, 143852, 165590",,51,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: nn bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #102447: needs design decision; labels: module: nn, triaged, enhancement, needs research; title: Add additional ""sigmoid"" approximation to GeLu activation? | issue #117217: needs design decision; labels: module: nn, triaged, needs research; title: BatchNorm1d, running_mean and running_var | issue #115588: needs design decision; labels: module: nn, triaged, needs research; title: `torch.nn.KLDivLoss` fails `t...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",b76e6be1a025a72c4fc99bc0b5de282212717cf1bf82f8d7b57da1835ac6c3bd
BUNDLE-1023,bundle:bundle-1023,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: nnpack (1 issue),issue_group,,"#143646 Getting ""Could not initialize NNPACK! Reason: Unsupported hardware."" warning even though NNPACK is enabled",module: nnpack,Create one module: nnpack fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: nnpack paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,143646,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: nnpack bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #143646: needs reproduction; labels: needs reproduction, triaged, module: nnpack; title: Getting ""Could not initialize NNPACK! Reason: Unsupported hardware."" warning even though NNPACK is enabled",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",7018188991a82924185cc02013eafec8902705dc26d2bbf153cda3660a19f6b2
BUNDLE-1024,bundle:bundle-1024,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: norms and normalization (1 issue),issue_group,,#46516 Batchnorm support for tracking buffer statistics when using gradient accumulation,module: norms and normalization,Create one module: norms and normalization fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: norms and normalization paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,46516,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: norms and normalization bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #46516: needs design decision; labels: triaged, enhancement, needs research, module: norms and normalization; title: Batchnorm support for tracking buffer statistics when using gradient accumulation",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",bea84851964737cd1464d4b069cffe7a301f9406cfe00046f13c8012f2371305
BUNDLE-1025,bundle:bundle-1025,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: numerical-reproducibility (1 issue),issue_group,,#107115 H100 works differently than rtx4090 on same model,module: numerical-reproducibility,Create one module: numerical-reproducibility fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: numerical-reproducibility paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,107115,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: numerical-reproducibility bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #107115: needs reproduction; labels: needs reproduction, triaged, module: numerical-reproducibility; title: H100 works differently than rtx4090 on same model",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",bdae56375c72fcb9a45c9cf4f9e1f4cb1d8d2ae944a479cc544d6a41df38bf50
BUNDLE-1026,bundle:bundle-1026,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: numerical-stability (8 issues),issue_group,,module: numerical-stability needs maintainer decision,module: numerical-stability,Create one module: numerical-stability fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: numerical-stability paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"5953, 39242, 56340, 72759, 108521, 126158, 132989, 139964",,8,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: numerical-stability bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #56340: needs maintainer decision; labels: module: numerical-stability, triaged; title: log_softmax(x) != x - logsumexp(x) | issue #132989: needs maintainer decision; labels: module: numerical-stability, triaged; title: Different random seeds can cause differences in arithmetic precision | issue #139964: needs maintainer decision; labels: module: numerical-stability, triaged; title: Report issue for torch.nn...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",7e8496d38ecd8deec95d7bb8692dddb8c269552d2aa14531ac0b605f68ae0254
BUNDLE-1027,bundle:bundle-1027,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: numpy (11 issues),issue_group,,module: numpy has linked PR,module: numpy,Create one module: numpy fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: numpy paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"41245, 41803, 45051, 48830, 61901, 71479, 84705, 105053, 106692, 116465, 125422",,11,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: numpy bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #116465: has linked PR; labels: triaged, module: numpy, actionable; title: torch.cartesian_prod inconsitent return shape for one input tensor | issue #41245: has linked PR; labels: triaged, module: numpy; title: torch.sign is divergent from numpy.sign on NaN | issue #105053: needs design decision; labels: feature, triaged, module: numpy, needs design, module: python frontend; title: Multiple dimensions suppo...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",996ff85cdbdc994f0ab1bdcc654bbc5c757a5983228c0d6e236dc17f53ebd53b
BUNDLE-1028,bundle:bundle-1028,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: onnx (12 issues),issue_group,,module: onnx needs reproduction,module: onnx,Create one module: onnx fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: onnx paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"76344, 86684, 87550, 129279, 143954, 149605, 149937, 171759, 173369, 175738, 177952, 179709",,12,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: onnx bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #177952: needs reproduction; labels: needs reproduction, module: onnx, triaged, OSS contribution wanted, bot-triaged; title: Fix onnx tests running on GPU/CUDA | issue #149937: needs reproduction; labels: needs reproduction, module: onnx, triaged; title: torch.inverse can't export onnx opset16 | issue #87550: needs reproduction; labels: needs reproduction, module: onnx, triaged, onnx-triaged; title: [onnx] e...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",91a6c874e0e460a744a638f66078b22adad2a5b890320aae9dc7b18785d1704b
BUNDLE-1029,bundle:bundle-1029,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: openreg (6 issues),issue_group,,module: openreg needs maintainer decision,module: openreg,Create one module: openreg fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: openreg paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"169597, 172319, 172320, 172322, 172803, 177268",,6,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: openreg bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #177268: needs maintainer decision; labels: module: tests, triaged, enhancement, module: openreg, bot-triaged; title: [OpenReg] Add testing operator framework usage examples | issue #172320: needs maintainer decision; labels: triaged, module: openreg; title: [OpenReg] Extend device infrastructure tests (device, event, streams) | issue #172803: needs maintainer decision; labels: oncall: distributed, triaged,...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",5cbdd81e8e18848923e8a9854566c0025125a22298c4c9fde51c01a20c657c78
BUNDLE-1030,bundle:bundle-1030,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: optimizer (35 issues),issue_group,,module: optimizer has linked PR,module: optimizer,Create one module: optimizer fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: optimizer paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"3863, 3904, 4660, 6657, 35801, 44954, 50282, 52989, 61343, 67587, 68144, 74904, 80308, 83529, 83901, 84347, 87734, 93154, 94904, 103449, 108090, 108491, 108493, 111508, 116203, 119300, 127284, 127699, 131765, 142378, 147437, 149508, 160637, 173066, 179143",,35,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: optimizer bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #116203: has linked PR; labels: module: optimizer, triaged, better-engineering, actionable; title: Refactor precision handling in test/test_optim.py | issue #131765: has linked PR; labels: module: optimizer, module: typing, triaged, actionable; title: [typing] Add missing `__all__` to modules. | issue #142378: has linked PR; labels: module: optimizer, low priority, triaged, actionable; title: Support int ste...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",e2b99c1554f5236ca0417b708c70456d50f3a6595cae280b24a6e2d35b2139a6
BUNDLE-1031,bundle:bundle-1031,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: performance (11 issues),issue_group,,#177127 torch.multinomial: add flag to skip input validation (66% of GPU time),module: performance,Create one module: performance fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: performance paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"61243, 110281, 120308, 131739, 136226, 136380, 151722, 175252, 177127, 180915, 181488",,11,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: performance bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #177127: has linked PR; labels: module: performance, triaged, has workaround, function request, bot-triaged; title: torch.multinomial: add flag to skip input validation (66% of GPU time) | issue #120308: needs maintainer decision; labels: module: performance, module: rocm, triaged; title: ROCm: foreach is substantially slower than for loop MI250x | issue #136380: needs maintainer decision; labels: module: pe...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",6d76a9e60098590684626bb6e9b0582992d5e1cf01f9fbe910ba43936a758026
BUNDLE-1032,bundle:bundle-1032,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: pickle (1 issue),issue_group,,#39383 Pickling a Tensor or a Storage is not deterministic,module: pickle,Create one module: pickle fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: pickle paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,39383,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: pickle bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #39383: has linked PR; labels: module: pickle, triaged; title: Pickling a Tensor or a Storage is not deterministic",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",944c4f9c2254db430967b5f67636f0c014c4c0b0a8e4e797cb30291d2aa370a6
BUNDLE-1033,bundle:bundle-1033,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: pipelining (14 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #184361: [pipelining] PP fails when trying to pipeline any HF transformers model that uses RoPE,module: pipelining,Create one module: pipelining fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: pipelining paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"110775, 116183, 124372, 136363, 153485, 155589, 159711, 160648, 162741, 167425, 167897, 171656, 184361, 185780",,14,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: pipelining bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"dering if something like that at a smaller scale could be implemented for the pipelining module Alternatives No response Additional context #184361 (comment) cc @awgu @wanchaol @fegin @fduwjj @wz337 @wconstab @d4l3k @pragupta @msaroufim @dcci @aditvenk @weifengpy | issue #153485: has linked PR; labels: oncall: distributed, triaged, module: pipelining, bot-triaged, oncall: distributed parallelisms, ptd-bot-triaged;...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",95e214a0b0611decd794521f83d4cba87fa2e8e40ae207cd9ada2a117de04c43
BUNDLE-1034,bundle:bundle-1034,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: power (1 issue),issue_group,,#109592 test_memory_timeline fails on PPC due to extra temopraries,module: power,Create one module: power fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: power paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,109592,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: power bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #109592: needs maintainer decision; labels: triaged, module: POWER, OSS contribution wanted, oncall: profiler; title: test_memory_timeline fails on PPC due to extra temopraries",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",254060486273524ac4c7742068cc5743ed40f1239a12c8be0f902afe2432bc50
BUNDLE-1035,bundle:bundle-1035,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: printing (2 issues),issue_group,,#51002 Consider adding context manager support for torch.set_printoptions,module: printing,Create one module: printing fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: printing paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"51002, 76532",,2,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: printing bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #51002: needs maintainer decision; labels: module: printing, triaged, enhancement; title: Consider adding context manager support for torch.set_printoptions | issue #76532: needs design decision; labels: module: printing, triaged, enhancement, needs design, tensor subclass, module: python frontend; title: Add ability to add custom suffixes to tensor repr",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",7013ace39f4709af2596106c8fc194328eaac12bded2bd19b1ebc53ddfdacd29
BUNDLE-1036,bundle:bundle-1036,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: privateuse1 (7 issues),issue_group,,module: privateuse1 has linked PR,module: privateuse1,Create one module: privateuse1 fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: privateuse1 paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"136344, 158911, 170737, 172538, 179008, 179010, 188688",,7,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: privateuse1 bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #170737: has linked PR; labels: triaged, module: PrivateUse1; title: Expect to open the is_privateuseone branch in the LSTM interface of PyTorch's RNN.cpp to develop corresponding LSTM functionality on NPU. | issue #172538: has linked PR; labels: triaged, module: PrivateUse1; title: Support native structured kernel and out_as_primary: true for PrivateUse1 | issue #136344: needs reproduction; labels: needs re...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",aa67b61b3e348b11f1bef45758ef9b13d46db23c11a044c54c449a63ecca7890
BUNDLE-1037,bundle:bundle-1037,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: pruning (1 issue),issue_group,,#39765 Support mainstream pruning techniques,module: pruning,Create one module: pruning fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: pruning paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,39765,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: pruning bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #39765: needs design decision; labels: feature, triaged, needs research, module: pruning; title: Support mainstream pruning techniques",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",ddaf0246a121ddb494c6dd3254c97ba6f1b063386b13f2cd4b4a239e9155eb2b
BUNDLE-1038,bundle:bundle-1038,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: pt2-dispatcher (13 issues),issue_group,,module: pt2-dispatcher has linked PR,module: pt2-dispatcher,Create one module: pt2-dispatcher fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: pt2-dispatcher paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"129430, 133443, 133592, 145522, 149258, 153044, 158561, 160333, 161494, 169150, 172549, 174131, 188358",,13,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: pt2-dispatcher bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #188358: has linked PR; labels: high priority, triaged, oncall: pt2, module: pt2-dispatcher; title: [Dynamo] Eager and torch.compile behavior mismatch in F.batch_norm with multidimensional bias | issue #153044: has linked PR; labels: high priority, triaged, months, oncall: pt2, module: pt2-dispatcher, PT2-Bug-Bash; title: Unexpected float32 overflow for amp training with torch.compile | issue #133443: has li...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",74350128bf679baa281bbff11cbc69f67286977b742c64867393838f7c8bd81a
BUNDLE-1039,bundle:bundle-1039,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: pybind (1 issue),issue_group,,"#108041 Undefined Symobl: pybind11::detail::type_caster<at::Tensor, void>::load(pybind11::handle, bool)",module: pybind,Create one module: pybind fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: pybind paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,108041,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: pybind bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #108041: needs reproduction; labels: needs reproduction, triaged, module: pybind; title: Undefined Symobl: pybind11::detail::type_caster<at::Tensor, void>::load(pybind11::handle, bool)",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",3dbc054269f2c3e4a6f3134926a758078d7d0980d2ba9adb329f153678032b78
BUNDLE-1040,bundle:bundle-1040,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: python frontend (18 issues),issue_group,,module: python frontend has linked PR,module: python frontend,Create one module: python frontend fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: python frontend paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"77171, 79842, 106784, 120791, 120819, 122548, 130428, 141994, 144673, 145739, 149097, 149118, 152750, 161863, 170298, 170419, 176078, 188088",,18,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: python frontend bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #188088: has linked PR; labels: triaged, has workaround, function request, module: python frontend, bot-triaged; title: torch.clamp rejects mixed Tensor and Number min/max bounds although Tensor+Tensor and Number+Number both work | issue #161863: has linked PR; labels: triaged, enhancement, module: testing, module: python frontend; title: torch.testing.assert_close doesn't accept tensor-likes | issue #170298...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",9d7a969e0db9c90957a7352dd16ed7414be493b9c3ab7784b22447e480c68e0d
BUNDLE-1041,bundle:bundle-1041,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: pytree (3 issues),issue_group,,#65761 torch.utils._pytree -> stable,module: pytree,Create one module: pytree fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: pytree paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"65761, 119328, 188648",,3,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: pytree bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #65761: has linked PR; labels: high priority, feature, triaged, better-engineering, needs design, module: pytree; title: torch.utils._pytree -> stable | issue #188648: needs maintainer decision; labels: module: serialization, triaged, module: pytree, bot-triaged; title: treespec_dumps does not preserve tuple keys in dict/OrderedDict/defaultdict pytrees, so the round-trip fails with `unhashable type: 'list'`...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",8413c740ecd3389219536f7bf14ef93562318e7022f38464340438b324b5a89c
BUNDLE-1042,bundle:bundle-1042,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: random (2 issues),issue_group,,#169803 [RFC] Add RGE256ctr: A Fast Counter-Mode ARX RNG for PyTorch GeneratorImpl,module: random,Create one module: random fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: random paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"63726, 169803",,2,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: random bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #169803: needs design decision; labels: triaged, enhancement, module: random, needs research; title: [RFC] Add RGE256ctr: A Fast Counter-Mode ARX RNG for PyTorch GeneratorImpl | issue #63726: needs reproduction; labels: needs reproduction, triaged, module: random; title: a problem happened in torch.randperm",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",719825e8a45615d7bda94801b5853ba9a1bd359bb54092372f319e8fb80e15c2
BUNDLE-1043,bundle:bundle-1043,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: reductions (3 issues),issue_group,,#172854 [test] Add unittest for nanmean output dtype validation (follow-up to #131043),module: reductions,Create one module: reductions fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: reductions paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"129303, 131927, 172854",,3,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: reductions bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #172854: needs maintainer decision; labels: module: tests, triaged, module: reductions; title: [test] Add unittest for nanmean output dtype validation (follow-up to #131043) | issue #131927: needs design decision; labels: feature, triaged, needs research, module: reductions; title: exclude_dim=[...] as a keyword argument to reduce type operations | issue #129303: needs reproduction; labels: needs reproductio...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",bc79d845cddbd58d12c70cdc054cb2906088a38ddc87e9fd5e0ccd1b4138ac42
BUNDLE-1044,bundle:bundle-1044,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: regression (1 issue),issue_group,,#148317 compile SageAttention faing error C2872: “std” for latest torch nightly,module: regression,Create one module: regression fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: regression paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,148317,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: regression bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #148317: has linked PR; labels: module: windows, triaged, module: regression, oncall: pt2; title: compile SageAttention faing error C2872: “std” for latest torch nightly",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",61efe77561e3aef661753c43ac55a12017686db5c38a61367de488cfd4389917
BUNDLE-1045,bundle:bundle-1045,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: rocm (15 issues),issue_group,,module: rocm needs maintainer decision,module: rocm,Create one module: rocm fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: rocm paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"55937, 60477, 109204, 141958, 150168, 153566, 168871, 168872, 168875, 168876, 168877, 171568, 176188, 177548, 179951",,15,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: rocm bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #179951: needs maintainer decision; labels: oncall: distributed, module: rocm, triaged, skipped, bot-triaged; title: DISABLED test_scaled_mm (__main__.DistMatrixOpsTestWithLocalTensor) | issue #150168: needs maintainer decision; labels: module: rocm, triaged, topic: performance; title: [ROCm] PyTorch slow on TTS | issue #55937: needs maintainer decision; labels: in progress, module: rocm, module: tests, tria...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",4c883cb8422816839bcb2eebc1e2b4a32a353bbcee13921dd37fb51929e463e0
BUNDLE-1046,bundle:bundle-1046,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: rpc (6 issues),issue_group,,#158724 Problem with RPC on dual stack networks,module: rpc,Create one module: rpc fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: rpc paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"44827, 80774, 81622, 95487, 106851, 158724",,6,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: rpc bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #158724: needs reproduction; labels: needs reproduction, oncall: distributed, triaged, module: rpc, bot-triaged, oncall: distributed infra, ptd-bot-triaged; title: Problem with RPC on dual stack networks | issue #106851: needs maintainer decision; labels: oncall: distributed, triaged, module: rpc, bot-triaged, oncall: distributed infra, ptd-bot-triaged; title: RPC all_gather doesn't work with dynamic world s...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",7be1926056827d99095b6c4bc0b7ca3d99755f600bd805dfcd3241e83357c95b
BUNDLE-1047,bundle:bundle-1047,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: scatter & gather ops (1 issue),issue_group,,#138502 Contribution Proposal: ScatterND Implementation for PyTorch,module: scatter & gather ops,Create one module: scatter & gather ops fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: scatter & gather ops paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,138502,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: scatter & gather ops bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #138502: needs design decision; labels: feature, triaged, needs design, module: scatter & gather ops; title: Contribution Proposal: ScatterND Implementation for PyTorch",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",b736ce21206763fce96b3737d82d31eaa91ffa545b7eb5aa854bc921de97c11e
BUNDLE-1048,bundle:bundle-1048,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: scientific computing (1 issue),issue_group,,#74839 Feature request: Root-finding functionality (like scipy.optimize.root_scalar),module: scientific computing,Create one module: scientific computing fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: scientific computing paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,74839,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: scientific computing bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #74839: needs maintainer decision; labels: feature, triaged, module: scientific computing; title: Feature request: Root-finding functionality (like scipy.optimize.root_scalar)",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",fefa7f21b8d17f2993a7b6e9ac67c2d6e944947d78465c933ff5de580b0cff25
BUNDLE-1049,bundle:bundle-1049,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: scipy compatibility (2 issues),issue_group,,module: scipy compatibility needs maintainer decision,module: scipy compatibility,Create one module: scipy compatibility fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: scipy compatibility paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"85366, 179784",,2,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: scipy compatibility bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #179784: needs maintainer decision; labels: triaged, enhancement, module: special, module: scipy compatibility, bot-triaged; title: torch.xlogy(0, 0) returns NaN, while in many numerical computing libraries (e.g., SciPy) and common machine learning practice, it is defined as 0. | issue #85366: needs maintainer decision; labels: triaged, module: scipy compatibility; title: More windows for filtering and spect...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",24a110e4b79c15696ae03f27425ac58deacca6dfe410cd3e7daea166bcd9328f
BUNDLE-1050,bundle:bundle-1050,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: sdpa (8 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #142228: Scaled Dot-Product Attention Invalid Configuration Error on Large batch size,module: sdpa,Create one module: sdpa fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: sdpa paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"117016, 117974, 120589, 142228, 161757, 162588, 179382, 187770",,8,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: sdpa bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"ient-attention (cutlass FMHA) kernel that wraps when the sequence index crosses 2**16. Note a separate failure mode exists for large batch (#142228) that DOES raise (grid-dim launch error); the seq-length case here is silent, consistent with an index wrap rather than a launch-... | issue #117974: needs maintainer decision; labels: triaged, module: sdpa; title: RuntimeError: derivative for aten::_scaled_dot_product...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",73213ad5da541ad0a8166391844f6cbec7ddd4144656e21281efb84ce1a2d7f0
BUNDLE-1051,bundle:bundle-1051,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: serialization (17 issues),issue_group,,#184219 serialization_id is not deterministic across machines,module: serialization,Create one module: serialization fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: serialization paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"37066, 48580, 48747, 55777, 64143, 71389, 76643, 97772, 113530, 118092, 122099, 128934, 146579, 150998, 160846, 179904, 184219",,17,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: serialization bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #184219: has linked PR; labels: module: serialization, triaged, actionable; title: serialization_id is not deterministic across machines | issue #179904: needs reproduction; labels: needs reproduction, module: serialization, triaged, has workaround, bot-triaged; title: PyTorch 2.6 weights_only=True breaks loading of existing checkpoints | issue #160846: needs reproduction; labels: needs reproduction, module:...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",61cf62f89c62e966b77141f70ed1261f776dd77f9d97e7391c9f4b08de803db7
BUNDLE-1052,bundle:bundle-1052,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: sparse (5 issues),issue_group,,module: sparse needs maintainer decision,module: sparse,Create one module: sparse fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: sparse paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"97668, 111359, 136258, 171558, 181494",,5,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: sparse bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #181494: needs maintainer decision; labels: module: sparse, feature, triaged, bot-triaged; title: Add support for sparse block-diagonal matrices | issue #97668: needs maintainer decision; labels: module: sparse, triaged; title: sparse_csr_tensor matmul wrong output in bfloat16 | issue #171558: needs maintainer decision; labels: module: sparse, triaged; title: `torch.sparse.spdiags` produces incorrect results...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",cc3a0ed5ecf07bbe96c10312b108fb96bb2b5c806b9b1e0a3c0c2f48088ac837
BUNDLE-1053,bundle:bundle-1053,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: special (2 issues),issue_group,,#68110 zeta(1/2) returns nan,module: special,Create one module: special fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: special paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"68110, 94542",,2,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: special bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #68110: needs maintainer decision; labels: triaged, module: special; title: zeta(1/2) returns nan | issue #94542: needs reproduction; labels: needs reproduction, triaged, module: special; title: torch.lgamma CUDA driver error",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",22fef1c2c7643fc5175e980cf67cbb4e472e4e1538b12f932f4e712dd68483b9
BUNDLE-1054,bundle:bundle-1054,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: symm_mem (8 issues),issue_group,,module: symm_mem has linked PR,module: symm_mem,Create one module: symm_mem fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: symm_mem paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"167684, 169035, 169099, 170479, 171495, 185216, 188001, 188005",,8,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: symm_mem bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #185216: has linked PR; labels: oncall: distributed, triaged, module: symm_mem; title: `torch.ops.symm_mem.one_shot_all_reduce` causes `CUDA_ERROR_ILLEGAL_ADDRESS` | issue #169099: has linked PR; labels: oncall: distributed, triaged, module: symm_mem; title: [RFC] Implement StoreExchange.broadcast | issue #188005: needs maintainer decision; labels: oncall: distributed, triaged, enhancement, module: symm_mem,...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",071eb228404a44edd5e4196d17bd5bf87393f6c309317505bf4a2edc1fe7301b
BUNDLE-1055,bundle:bundle-1055,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: tensor creation (1 issue),issue_group,,#121933 Please provide `total_repeat_length` field to PyTorch `repeat` / `repeat_interleave` API,module: tensor creation,Create one module: tensor creation fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: tensor creation paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,121933,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: tensor creation bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #121933: needs design decision; labels: feature, triaged, needs research, module: tensor creation; title: Please provide `total_repeat_length` field to PyTorch `repeat` / `repeat_interleave` API",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",8eddabb5747ac39ed5e66bf3c4a1e85825a78875e0a8f7d1f3d2e3a848577e41
BUNDLE-1056,bundle:bundle-1056,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: tensorpipe (2 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #130513: RuntimeError Occurred In getBar1SizeOfGpu when initializing torch RPC,module: tensorpipe,Create one module: tensorpipe fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: tensorpipe paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"130513, 159354",,2,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: tensorpipe bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"ally clause of TestRPCPickler.test_case to timeout, likely because the RPC init call already failed. The reason is the same as described in #130513 and can be fixed by patching tensorpipe, which unfortunately is archived. Versions PyTorch version: 2.7.1 Is debug build: False C...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",3622136cedfa3455b25fa31b1a744491128d10097db162adf616d8ee9a2256f5
BUNDLE-1057,bundle:bundle-1057,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: testing (1 issue),issue_group,,#138455 Tried to instantiate dummy base class,module: testing,Create one module: testing fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: testing paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,138455,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: testing bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #138455: needs reproduction; labels: needs reproduction, triaged, module: testing; title: Tried to instantiate dummy base class",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",3d00fcab5647c63783b6d2f1654b9ca7f0245b80cbf2edbe538fae0517112688
BUNDLE-1058,bundle:bundle-1058,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: tests (10 issues),issue_group,,#174177 [test] Add error_inputs for nn.Linear module,module: tests,Create one module: tests fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: tests paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"55152, 55159, 60223, 78885, 99082, 160514, 169752, 174177, 177260, 177393",,10,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: tests bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #174177: has linked PR; labels: module: tests, triaged, better-engineering, actionable, function request, bot-triaged; title: [test] Add error_inputs for nn.Linear module | issue #169752: needs maintainer decision; labels: oncall: distributed, module: tests, triaged, bot-triaged, oncall: distributed infra, ptd-bot-triaged; title: if __name__ == ""__main__"": run_tests() cannot be found in the test files under...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",023030b2f3f27143f7a4c180ed601eeaffa171c5d6fcd77a5cf61a76833bfbb1
BUNDLE-1059,bundle:bundle-1059,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: third_party (1 issue),issue_group,,#143288 EXCEPTION : /python3.11/distutils/core.py,module: third_party,Create one module: third_party fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: third_party paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,143288,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: third_party bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #143288: needs reproduction; labels: needs reproduction, triaged, module: third_party, oncall: pt2; title: EXCEPTION : /python3.11/distutils/core.py",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",1b92fae44083c6eff1f186429bc7fe87d6dc3ac13362615b50a4aa68ae58ee4c
BUNDLE-1060,bundle:bundle-1060,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: typing (7 issues),issue_group,,module: typing has linked PR,module: typing,Create one module: typing fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: typing paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"103109, 146249, 159259, 162373, 165628, 166905, 181861",,7,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: typing bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #146249: has linked PR; labels: module: typing, triaged; title: Replace `*args : Any` with `typing_extensions.TypeVarTuple` | issue #166905: has linked PR; labels: module: typing, triaged; title: Type Annotation for `named_modules()` | issue #162373: has linked PR; labels: module: typing, triaged, actionable; title: Pylint E1102: torch.fft.rfft/istft/irfft and more is not callable | issue #159259: has linked...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",89a3436c44d2af12a5748d71145db7e8f42adb7f9dee62059aacd33c56e83047
BUNDLE-1061,bundle:bundle-1061,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: viewing and reshaping (1 issue),issue_group,,#97892 A parameterized fill value for triu and tril functions,module: viewing and reshaping,Create one module: viewing and reshaping fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: viewing and reshaping paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,97892,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: viewing and reshaping bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #97892: needs maintainer decision; labels: triaged, enhancement, module: viewing and reshaping; title: A parameterized fill value for triu and tril functions",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",f8f3e45f46d2b745e0eceb90dc05d91712d2e81bfb4381b894594ffb5b874625
BUNDLE-1062,bundle:bundle-1062,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: vllm (2 issues),issue_group,,#138795 compile + allgather with group will fail for stack-style allgather,module: vllm,Create one module: vllm fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: vllm paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"138795, 167820",,2,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: vllm bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #138795: has linked PR; labels: oncall: distributed, triaged, oncall: pt2, vllm-compile, pt2d-triage-nov2024, module: vllm, PT2-Bug-Bash; title: compile + allgather with group will fail for stack-style allgather | issue #167820: needs reproduction; labels: needs reproduction, triaged, oncall: pt2, vllm-compile, module: vllm; title: Why torch==2.9 compile qwen3 model with block ptr will crash?",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",e46e464be7f701effc3a5f8e9c5c9b65186fe13d019db6e3559b11dae773d703
BUNDLE-1063,bundle:bundle-1063,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: vmap (3 issues),issue_group,,#116697 Tracing GPU usage of `torch.vmap` vectorized operation using `torch.profiler` cause CUDA OOM,module: vmap,Create one module: vmap fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: vmap paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"77893, 116697, 122729",,3,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: vmap bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #116697: needs maintainer decision; labels: triaged, oncall: profiler, module: vmap; title: Tracing GPU usage of `torch.vmap` vectorized operation using `torch.profiler` cause CUDA OOM | issue #122729: has linked PR; labels: triaged, module: vmap; title: torch.func transforms don't yet support saved tensor hooks. | issue #77893: needs reproduction; labels: needs reproduction, triaged, module: vmap; title: Se...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",c1568279467aeb1a0c7a81baf607eb69e5cec10c9acffa8529b4f97d14ee7667
BUNDLE-1064,bundle:bundle-1064,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: vulkan (1 issue),issue_group,,#155986 Vulkan interoperability,module: vulkan,Create one module: vulkan fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: vulkan paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,155986,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: vulkan bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #155986: needs design decision; labels: triaged, enhancement, needs research, module: vulkan; title: Vulkan interoperability",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",ec4272a588213ad45887c7d17ce1911401fa6b57650406e43f7c7e40cf11853f
BUNDLE-1065,bundle:bundle-1065,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: windows (3 issues),issue_group,,module: windows needs maintainer decision,module: windows,Create one module: windows fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: windows paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"92600, 157989, 167062",,3,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: windows bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #157989: needs maintainer decision; labels: module: windows, triaged, module: xpu; title: [XPU] torch.xpu.mem_get_info() query failed or reports Out-Of-Memory even when there are enough free memory | issue #167062: needs maintainer decision; labels: module: windows, triaged, oncall: pt2; title: How to use torch.compile on Windows GPU? | issue #92600: has linked PR; labels: module: windows, oncall: quantizati...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",112a2a8c85977d45dee73002ac2a31e99ab468514aeac527bd3fa24d73b2ea88
BUNDLE-1066,bundle:bundle-1066,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: xnnpack (1 issue),issue_group,,#158343 Upgrade to latest XNNPACK,module: xnnpack,Create one module: xnnpack fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: xnnpack paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,158343,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: xnnpack bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #158343: needs maintainer decision; labels: triaged, module: xnnpack; title: Upgrade to latest XNNPACK",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",ac182c323f8fe349965c3e2507d445e8032ba608f79d23237f680f3c0f2d56f1
BUNDLE-1067,bundle:bundle-1067,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: xpu (9 issues),issue_group,,module: xpu needs maintainer decision,module: xpu,Create one module: xpu fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: xpu paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"134956, 142135, 143239, 164057, 164429, 171938, 173897, 185198, 186548",,9,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: xpu bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #185198: needs maintainer decision; labels: triaged, has workaround, module: xpu, bot-triaged; title: [xpu] Intel GPU telemetry management APIs may not work on Arc A-Series and data center GPUs | issue #142135: needs maintainer decision; labels: triaged, module: xpu; title: Device assert throws a runtime error in cuda backend and results in a crash in xpu backend | issue #143239: needs maintainer decision; l...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",3acce8a91b23967b1a6396d904399d54e2a9980657418508d9c7869d8e298b7f
BUNDLE-1068,bundle:bundle-1068,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: oncall: cpu inductor (1 issue),issue_group,,#93531 TorchInductor CPU Performance Dashboard,oncall: cpu inductor,Create one oncall: cpu inductor fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for oncall: cpu inductor paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,93531,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This oncall: cpu inductor bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #93531: needs maintainer decision; labels: triaged, oncall: pt2, oncall: cpu inductor; title: TorchInductor CPU Performance Dashboard",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",941668aa8c7a26bb352a68683d2a27176bb76955ca6b810e1f0fd011b61b7553
BUNDLE-1069,bundle:bundle-1069,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: oncall: distributed (55 issues),issue_group,,#140497 C++ standard library functions not found when compiling c10d debug handlers,oncall: distributed,Create one oncall: distributed fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for oncall: distributed paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"16654, 29891, 43859, 47832, 76760, 78638, 79388, 85949, 88626, 89197, 90245, 90509, 97872, 99614, 103626, 107177, 111131, 111646, 111943, 113114, 113376, 117159, 117755, 119758, 119856, 119890, 120516, 121543, 121605, 121606, 121944, 123815, 124101, 124204, 124317, 130530, 131737, 136122, 136248, 136425, 136866, 137505, 137524, 139280, 139579, 139739, 140497, 143906, 144239, 144851, 145726, 152442, 152710, 159635, 165959",,55,0,patch_plan_candidate,This oncall: distributed bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #140497: has linked PR; labels: oncall: distributed, triaged, bot-triaged, oncall: distributed infra, ptd-bot-triaged; title: C++ standard library functions not found when compiling c10d debug handlers | issue #165959: needs reproduction; labels: needs reproduction, oncall: distributed, triaged, bot-triaged, oncall: distributed infra, ptd-bot-triaged; title: torch.distributed.DistStoreError: use_libuv was re...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",6b5625f05358ece9d521d3fdcb1799c0cfa32b43a81389e52d2527ad9fe8e017
BUNDLE-1070,bundle:bundle-1070,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: oncall: distributed (58 issues),issue_group,,oncall: distributed needs maintainer decision batch 4,oncall: distributed,Create one oncall: distributed fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for oncall: distributed paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"72034, 74666, 74824, 75657, 75936, 76387, 76395, 76527, 144856, 145170, 145376, 146565, 146813, 152427, 153350, 153369, 153822, 154102, 154116, 154327, 154345, 154370, 154563, 154621, 155467, 155664, 155892, 155916, 156002, 156627, 156942, 157318, 157781, 158016, 159563, 159686, 160006, 160731, 160950, 162032, 162237, 163546, 163678, 163913, 165653, 167288, 167305, 167832, 169275, 169841, 170290, 173164, 173362, 173608, 173789, 187996, 188317, 188542",,58,0,patch_plan_candidate,This oncall: distributed bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #154370: needs maintainer decision; labels: oncall: distributed, triaged, bot-triaged, oncall: distributed infra, ptd-bot-triaged; title: [C10D] Blackwell B200: NotImplementedError: Could not run '_c10d_functional_autograd::all_to_all_single' with arguments from the 'CUDA' backend. | issue #154345: needs maintainer decision; labels: oncall: distributed, triaged, bot-triaged, oncall: distributed infra, ptd-bo...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",f15a514ab9e78881237dbb0bad7c8ed0aefdb4658ae48200518442fc1241bb61
BUNDLE-1071,bundle:bundle-1071,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: oncall: export (6 issues),issue_group,,"Review thread: 2 issues - issue #111693: [export] 14k models: AssertionError: graph-captured input # 2, of type <class 'torch.nn.parameter.Parameter'>, is not among original inputs of types",oncall: export,Create one oncall: export fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for oncall: export paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"111693, 112043, 134533, 147991, 186381, 186594",,6,0,patch_plan_candidate,This oncall: export bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"Similar issue as: #112043 | issue #186594: needs maintainer decision; labels: triaged, oncall: pt2, oncall: export, bot-triaged; title: torch.ops.higher_order.associative_scan cannot be torch.export'ed | issue #186381: needs maintainer decision; labels: triaged, oncall: pt2, oncall: export; title: [export] No-op contiguous() elided during tracing bakes trace-time layout into the graph; downstream view becomes layo...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",98e8a04d1f4d43170ffb01c1f926dc6053fd8d65e0539132a737144a98415a5b
BUNDLE-1072,bundle:bundle-1072,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: oncall: jit (4 issues),issue_group,,oncall: jit needs reproduction,oncall: jit,Create one oncall: jit fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for oncall: jit paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"20805, 34937, 34948, 35990",,4,0,patch_plan_candidate,This oncall: jit bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #34948: needs reproduction; labels: needs reproduction, oncall: jit, triaged; title: TracerWarning: Output nr 1. of the traced function does not match the corresponding output of the Python function | issue #35990: needs reproduction; labels: needs reproduction, oncall: jit, triaged; title: [JIT] Tensor method API behavior discrepancy, Tensor.detach(..) | issue #34937: needs reproduction; labels: needs repro...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",7ff096b3324edf39925eb4e9ca9c523c26f73cf1b26c96e76651db6fbf92f7ee
BUNDLE-1073,bundle:bundle-1073,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: oncall: mobile (1 issue),issue_group,,#54577 Question when I use Pytorch Mobile,oncall: mobile,Create one oncall: mobile fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for oncall: mobile paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,54577,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This oncall: mobile bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #54577: needs reproduction; labels: needs reproduction, triaged, oncall: mobile; title: Question when I use Pytorch Mobile",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",c12b3481b613443743d0fbbffd493adb38a660ab5b8880f3ba10e12480286377
BUNDLE-1074,bundle:bundle-1074,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: oncall: pt2 (10 issues),issue_group,,oncall: pt2 needs reproduction,oncall: pt2,Create one oncall: pt2 fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for oncall: pt2 paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"125557, 132929, 133078, 143337, 159196, 159669, 162728, 172522, 172547, 177053",,10,0,patch_plan_candidate,This oncall: pt2 bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #172547: needs reproduction; labels: needs reproduction, triaged, oncall: pt2; title: Cold start models with compile-cache have significant overhead | issue #159669: needs reproduction; labels: needs reproduction, triaged, oncall: pt2; title: Torch Compile. CudaGraphs Memory leak | issue #159196: needs reproduction; labels: needs reproduction, triaged, oncall: pt2; title: torch.compile: device of tensor swit...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",2b2b847e6370d48e181a7d313cf760118efa2ae3caa3e45b7205c6487ccf6995
BUNDLE-1075,bundle:bundle-1075,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: oncall: quantization (1 issue),issue_group,,#111471 test_learnable_forward_per_channel fails due to integer overflow,oncall: quantization,Create one oncall: quantization fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for oncall: quantization paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,111471,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This oncall: quantization bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #111471: has linked PR; labels: oncall: quantization, triaged; title: test_learnable_forward_per_channel fails due to integer overflow",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",099682e4d4a17e76e7d118aa43df40512f7a9ffed2cf1865b639cb2c9da9c693
BUNDLE-1076,bundle:bundle-1076,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: oncall: releng (2 issues),issue_group,,oncall: releng needs maintainer decision,oncall: releng,Create one oncall: releng fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for oncall: releng paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"136275, 159516",,2,0,patch_plan_candidate,This oncall: releng bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #136275: needs maintainer decision; labels: oncall: releng, triaged; title: Please offer `<version>+cpu`-versioned packages for MacOS and linux ARM CPU-only builds | issue #159516: needs maintainer decision; labels: oncall: releng, triaged, better-engineering; title: Validate PyPI Wheel Binary Size failing for >3months",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",aba795a482c6b22eea014b960038fae8d25a2bd46d9670cb7946e9f39ef649a2
BUNDLE-1077,bundle:bundle-1077,new_code_pr,New maintainer code PR,patch-plan bundle,New maintainer code PR: general (1 issue),issue_group,,#48365 Custom exception for out of memory,general,Open one maintainer code PR for the general blocker/regression cluster with regression tests.,Puts the highest-risk issues into the shortest review path.,Run focused tests for general paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,48365,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This general bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against src/, test/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #48365: high-priority/blocker; labels: high priority, feature, triaged, better-engineering; title: Custom exception for out of memory",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",29ba138e34c5a2669526c2a4fd64f547f604f7067e67fc97f3877ec28f7f46b5
BUNDLE-1078,bundle:bundle-1078,new_code_pr,New maintainer code PR,patch-plan bundle,New maintainer code PR: module: 64-bit (4 issues),issue_group,,module: 64-bit high-priority/blocker,module: 64-bit,Open one maintainer code PR for the module: 64-bit blocker/regression cluster with regression tests.,Puts the highest-risk issues into the shortest review path.,Run focused tests for module: 64-bit paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"2576, 43115, 155293, 176784",,4,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: 64-bit bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #176784: high-priority/blocker; labels: module: crash, module: nn, module: cuda, triaged, module: 64-bit, module: edge cases, bot-triaged; title: [CUDA] AdaptiveAvgPool2d: START_IND macro causes int32 overflow → OOB read | issue #155293: high-priority/blocker; labels: module: crash, triaged, module: 64-bit, module: random, module: mps; title: [MPS] 5D 4Mln rng attempts fail with internal error | llapse to be...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",c277f8fb5376f192789a1a9cbfe38bdb1f5588a8363f7ca2724546bcd0f117f6
BUNDLE-1079,bundle:bundle-1079,new_code_pr,New maintainer code PR,patch-plan bundle,New maintainer code PR: module: abi (1 issue),issue_group,,#20748 Segmentation fault when use torch::from_blob,module: abi,Open one maintainer code PR for the module: abi blocker/regression cluster with regression tests.,Puts the highest-risk issues into the shortest review path.,Run focused tests for module: abi paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,20748,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: abi bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #20748: high-priority/blocker; labels: module: crash, module: cpp, module: abi, triaged; title: Segmentation fault when use torch::from_blob",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",f851ef53624dfbe8888046f78c57806943e5ccf0c3b6cf86dfc01b4d6022860f
BUNDLE-1080,bundle:bundle-1080,new_code_pr,New maintainer code PR,patch-plan bundle,New maintainer code PR: module: activation checkpointing (7 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 4 issues - issue #112583: Nesting no_grad in autocast causes backwards graph to be (partially) lost outside of no_grad,module: activation checkpointing,Open one maintainer code PR for the module: activation checkpointing blocker/regression cluster with regression tests.,Puts the highest-risk issues into the shortest review path.,Run focused tests for module: activation checkpointing paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"65766, 77284, 82293, 112583, 139989, 141896, 169934",,7,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: activation checkpointing bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"e the same issue with Pytorch 2.0. Some related issues: https://discuss.pytorch.org/t/autocast-and-torch-no-grad-unexpected-behaviour/93475 #65766 | The root cause should be that autocast cache does not key on requires grad. #112583 What happens is that when checkpoint recomputes, we are in a fresh autocast context that did not first run the same module under no-grad, e | This is a duplicate of #112583 There was a...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",29c52b2653938a353d174e9ccf5dc7f10fe174220c951cd5078a57e2074e1d4f
BUNDLE-1081,bundle:bundle-1081,new_code_pr,New maintainer code PR,patch-plan bundle,New maintainer code PR: module: advanced indexing (2 issues),issue_group,,module: advanced indexing high-priority/blocker,module: advanced indexing,Open one maintainer code PR for the module: advanced indexing blocker/regression cluster with regression tests.,Puts the highest-risk issues into the shortest review path.,Run focused tests for module: advanced indexing paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"107699, 139242",,2,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: advanced indexing bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #107699: high-priority/blocker; labels: high priority, triaged, module: advanced indexing, actionable; title: index.Tensor_out & index_put.out errors or segfaults with indices list containing only null tensors | issue #139242: high-priority/blocker; labels: high priority, triaged, module: advanced indexing; title: Tensor.index_reduce produces incorrect result",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",b6ba696da4b1309a698bc3ea4af2a26451845a85a4fe3416b3658ac55ebb06a1
BUNDLE-1082,bundle:bundle-1082,new_code_pr,New maintainer code PR,patch-plan bundle,New maintainer code PR: module: amp (automated mixed precision) (5 issues),issue_group,,"Review thread: 3 issues - issue #93880: `PYTORCH_DEBUG_MODE`, better invalid index embedding lookup error message on cuda",module: amp (automated mixed precision),Open one maintainer code PR for the module: amp (automated mixed precision) blocker/regression cluster with regression tests.,Puts the highest-risk issues into the shortest review path.,Run focused tests for module: amp (automated mixed precision) paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"47056, 93880, 99640, 99918, 188955",,5,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: amp (automated mixed precision) bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"s that are not at native op boundary. For example pre-condition checking in some autograd formulas here EDIT: and also at higher level like #99640. I think it would be good to: Make sure the API works well with a non-Mode API. I guess global flag-based. This kind of C++ API fe... | 🚀 The feature, motivation and pitch RFC: Debug Mode Inspired by issue #93880, this RFC proposes to design a DEBUG mode for PyTorch eag...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",135dfdc9ef62399b512dd25ad8738a6152c6b6ad12dea895dd912fb8a4d17218
BUNDLE-1083,bundle:bundle-1083,new_code_pr,New maintainer code PR,patch-plan bundle,New maintainer code PR: module: aotdispatch (2 issues),issue_group,,module: aotdispatch high-priority/blocker,module: aotdispatch,Open one maintainer code PR for the module: aotdispatch blocker/regression cluster with regression tests.,Puts the highest-risk issues into the shortest review path.,Run focused tests for module: aotdispatch paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"179804, 181869",,2,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: aotdispatch bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #181869: high-priority/blocker; labels: module: pickle, triaged, module: regression, oncall: pt2, module: aotdispatch, module: inductor, module: pt2-dispatcher, module: vllm, bot-triaged; title: [vllm] [torch nightly] AOTAutogradCache.save: _pickle.PicklingError on triton launcher (DFlashDraftModel speculative-decode path) | issue #179804: high-priority/blocker; labels: high priority, module: autograd, triag...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",a5955b9184d6d66f34174a07b873b91689ca663526dd15eaaeb25e4a45b31c6b
BUNDLE-1084,bundle:bundle-1084,new_code_pr,New maintainer code PR,patch-plan bundle,New maintainer code PR: module: aotinductor (1 issue),issue_group,,"#157128 Windows Source Build Fails with OSError: [WinError 126] on aoti_custom_ops.dll for RTX 5080 (sm_120), Pre-built PyTorch Works",module: aotinductor,Open one maintainer code PR for the module: aotinductor blocker/regression cluster with regression tests.,Puts the highest-risk issues into the shortest review path.,Run focused tests for module: aotinductor paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,157128,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: aotinductor bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #157128: high-priority/blocker; labels: module: build, module: windows, triaged, module: regression, module: aotinductor, PT2-Bug-Bash; title: Windows Source Build Fails with OSError: [WinError 126] on aoti_custom_ops.dll for RTX 5080 (sm_120), Pre-built PyTorch Works",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",50b633bf1dd4f5e0eab9433d9bf304fde806dc318ecdd43e2bdbdd4377b26b6d
BUNDLE-1085,bundle:bundle-1085,new_code_pr,New maintainer code PR,patch-plan bundle,New maintainer code PR: module: arm (10 issues),issue_group,,module: arm high-priority/blocker,module: arm,Open one maintainer code PR for the module: arm blocker/regression cluster with regression tests.,Puts the highest-risk issues into the shortest review path.,Run focused tests for module: arm paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"78924, 136299, 141083, 146857, 151680, 170787, 176285, 178726, 186952, 188336",,10,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: arm bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #188336: high-priority/blocker; labels: module: performance, module: ci, triaged, module: regression, module: arm, oncall: pt2, oncall: cpu inductor, arm priority; title: AArch64 CPU - Inductor benchmark Regressions | issue #186952: high-priority/blocker; labels: high priority, module: ci, triaged, module: macos, module: arm, bot-triaged; title: GPU is not accessible on some MacOS-15 runners | issue #178726:...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",8aebf16242c2830fe7224212776c121689c83133fa6edc3374d0740f15e33e79
BUNDLE-1086,bundle:bundle-1086,new_code_pr,New maintainer code PR,patch-plan bundle,New maintainer code PR: module: assert failure (1 issue),issue_group,,#51083 apex internal assert failed,module: assert failure,Open one maintainer code PR for the module: assert failure blocker/regression cluster with regression tests.,Puts the highest-risk issues into the shortest review path.,Run focused tests for module: assert failure paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,51083,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: assert failure bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #51083: high-priority/blocker; labels: module: dependency bug, triaged, module: assert failure, module: regression; title: apex internal assert failed",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",a451ef9af4c500a3a921d7a179571cad696ea31089e9cf53bc80657bf2b092d5
BUNDLE-1087,bundle:bundle-1087,new_code_pr,New maintainer code PR,patch-plan bundle,New maintainer code PR: module: autograd (14 issues),issue_group,,module: autograd high-priority/blocker,module: autograd,Open one maintainer code PR for the module: autograd blocker/regression cluster with regression tests.,Puts the highest-risk issues into the shortest review path.,Run focused tests for module: autograd paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"13402, 28980, 33867, 38231, 53796, 60835, 65366, 70108, 73349, 76543, 81532, 120622, 177561, 181534",,14,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: autograd bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #181534: high-priority/blocker; labels: high priority, needs reproduction, module: autograd, module: nn, module: loss, triaged, module: correctness (silent), bot-triaged; title: CTCLoss backward is inconsistent with its forward derivative with respect to the documented log_probs input. | issue #177561: high-priority/blocker; labels: high priority, needs reproduction, module: autograd, module: cuda, triaged,...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",8ab955922f533dc85177cabb9da5f99c5eddae894496ecc0b47b0e209f0b0f0e
BUNDLE-1088,bundle:bundle-1088,new_code_pr,New maintainer code PR,patch-plan bundle,New maintainer code PR: module: batching (2 issues),issue_group,,"Review thread: 2 issues - issue #69801: Dropout2d doesn't drop channels for (C, H, W)",module: batching,Open one maintainer code PR for the module: batching blocker/regression cluster with regression tests.,Puts the highest-risk issues into the shortest review path.,Run focused tests for module: batching paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"69801, 69960",,2,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: batching bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,🐛 Describe the bug Related #69801 FeatureAlphaDropout also has similar problem. import torch import torch.nn as nn from torch.testing._internal.common_utils import freeze_rn,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",ada304059bf1afbcb503a4362b6084954837e4329bea748b064366d9d90be121
BUNDLE-1089,bundle:bundle-1089,new_code_pr,New maintainer code PR,patch-plan bundle,New maintainer code PR: module: bc-breaking (1 issue),issue_group,,#157461 vLLM tests failing in torch 2.8rc but passing with torch 2.7,module: bc-breaking,Open one maintainer code PR for the module: bc-breaking blocker/regression cluster with regression tests.,Puts the highest-risk issues into the shortest review path.,Run focused tests for module: bc-breaking paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,157461,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: bc-breaking bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #157461: high-priority/blocker; labels: module: bc-breaking, triaged, module: regression, module: vllm; title: vLLM tests failing in torch 2.8rc but passing with torch 2.7",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",6c079c739b42933e406bd86de5499d423f8b23e0c70056a5240a61b2bb7fbdbb
BUNDLE-1090,bundle:bundle-1090,new_code_pr,New maintainer code PR,patch-plan bundle,New maintainer code PR: module: benchmark (2 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #188557: operator_microbenchmark ROCm gfx950 job never completes -- runs 8h+ and is cancelled at the workflow timeout,module: benchmark,Open one maintainer code PR for the module: benchmark blocker/regression cluster with regression tests.,Puts the highest-risk issues into the shortest review path.,Run focused tests for module: benchmark paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"188557, 189077",,2,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: benchmark bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"d-environment linux-jammy-cuda13.0-py3.12-gcc11-sm100, single unsharded (1, 1) job on one Blackwell GPU. This is the NVIDIA/b200 sibling of #188557 (which tracks the same failure mode on ROCm gfx950). Same root cause and fix levers; different infra/owners, so filing separately...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",73e3d2a6d2535596e70900397e93ee6a9828bb7dbe548f3961653a9bb5fa2766
BUNDLE-1091,bundle:bundle-1091,new_code_pr,New maintainer code PR,patch-plan bundle,New maintainer code PR: module: bfloat16 (2 issues),issue_group,,module: bfloat16 high-priority/blocker,module: bfloat16,Open one maintainer code PR for the module: bfloat16 blocker/regression cluster with regression tests.,Puts the highest-risk issues into the shortest review path.,Run focused tests for module: bfloat16 paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"155393, 184431",,2,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: bfloat16 bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #184431: high-priority/blocker; labels: high priority, module: numerical-stability, triaged, module: regression, module: bfloat16, module: correctness (silent), module: sdpa, module: vllm, bot-triaged; title: [vllm] [2.12 regression][multimodal] Qwen2-Audio text-then-audio_embeds: prompt_embeds vs raw-text outputs diverge under --enforce-eager | issue #155393: high-priority/blocker; labels: module: crash, tr...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",e9f742bd2a91ab65d960f8401fc3aa9dfadfc5aadda18a4b68689ef830c083b5
BUNDLE-1092,bundle:bundle-1092,new_code_pr,New maintainer code PR,patch-plan bundle,New maintainer code PR: module: binaries (28 issues),issue_group,,module: binaries high-priority/blocker batch 1,module: binaries,Open one maintainer code PR for the module: binaries blocker/regression cluster with regression tests.,Puts the highest-risk issues into the shortest review path.,Run focused tests for module: binaries paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"34058, 35418, 36152, 41661, 47116, 60628, 78475, 78489, 82098, 88882, 90608, 91570, 92226, 93081, 93955, 108532, 109014, 120995, 159454, 161358, 161865, 163675, 165448, 168997, 178841, 182263, 182949, 186516",,28,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: binaries bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #178841: high-priority/blocker; labels: needs reproduction, module: binaries, module: crash, triaged, module: macos, has workaround, bot-triaged, bot-mislabeled; title: Importing torch before QApplication on macOS prevents Qt from discovering cocoa platform plugin (inverse of #11326) | issue #186516: high-priority/blocker; labels: high priority, module: binaries, module: rocm, triaged, has workaround, bot-tr...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",3fb124be4e2c8a8d70617263604cafe109653014378bc9e363ea72be271bffbb
BUNDLE-1093,bundle:bundle-1093,new_code_pr,New maintainer code PR,patch-plan bundle,New maintainer code PR: module: bootcamp (2 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #16897: Implement `numpy.random.choice` equivalent,module: bootcamp,Open one maintainer code PR for the module: bootcamp blocker/regression cluster with regression tests.,Puts the highest-risk issues into the shortest review path.,Run focused tests for module: bootcamp paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"16897, 82761",,2,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: bootcamp bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"yTorch could also implement the equivalent of numpy's np.random.choice(), which has an outstanding pull request as described in this issue: #16897 Additional context No response",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",765e501244582d06ffb75de8e654c2f160765e71cf431d9adc69b3132d31874e
BUNDLE-1094,bundle:bundle-1094,new_code_pr,New maintainer code PR,patch-plan bundle,New maintainer code PR: module: build (18 issues),issue_group,,module: build high-priority/blocker,module: build,Open one maintainer code PR for the module: build blocker/regression cluster with regression tests.,Puts the highest-risk issues into the shortest review path.,Run focused tests for module: build paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"35597, 38122, 51332, 80012, 94544, 98503, 129304, 135637, 145702, 146551, 153733, 153961, 156613, 162884, 164402, 164787, 164957, 178939",,18,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: build bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #178939: high-priority/blocker; labels: module: build, triaged, module: regression, bot-triaged, bot-mislabeled; title: Pytorch needs Kineto even when using USE_KINETO=OFF | issue #156613: high-priority/blocker; labels: needs reproduction, module: crash, module: build, module: cuda, triaged, module: third_party; title: [CUDA 12.9 | sm_120] Build fails on RowwiseScaledMM.cu with PTXAS error (PyTorch 2.8.0a0)...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",2528952f0358dc3b7c86e4d2df5a7a3a01c1ad55fba3885810715e1fc779980f
BUNDLE-1095,bundle:bundle-1095,new_code_pr,New maintainer code PR,patch-plan bundle,New maintainer code PR: module: c10d (3 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #76865: Object-base collectives create tensors at unexpected devices,module: c10d,Open one maintainer code PR for the module: c10d blocker/regression cluster with regression tests.,Puts the highest-risk issues into the shortest review path.,Run focused tests for module: c10d paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"59745, 76865, 77200",,3,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: c10d bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"ow object collectives / rpc to send tensors around without copying them to the CPU first. Additional context This is a known issue for PTD: #76865 cc @mruberry | issue #59745: high-priority/blocker; labels: high priority, oncall: distributed, triaged, better-engineering, pt_distributed_rampup, module: c10d; title: [c10d] Work objects should have a general operator<<",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",32aa9ec5dd081506fbb28ad28ab4867e1855ae2fcef4179aa57eb6ace1a9fe53
BUNDLE-1096,bundle:bundle-1096,new_code_pr,New maintainer code PR,patch-plan bundle,New maintainer code PR: module: ci (19 issues),issue_group,,module: ci high-priority/blocker batch 1,module: ci,Open one maintainer code PR for the module: ci blocker/regression cluster with regression tests.,Puts the highest-risk issues into the shortest review path.,Run focused tests for module: ci paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"49392, 51863, 54418, 64794, 67448, 67712, 72189, 81127, 82894, 83393, 88842, 123219, 137098, 148699, 158728, 161295, 164562, 172907, 187951",,19,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: ci bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #187951: high-priority/blocker; labels: high priority, module: ci, module: tests, triaged, module: regression, oncall: pt2, module: inductor, bot-triaged; title: inductor_timm tests has been broken since 6/12 | issue #161295: high-priority/blocker; labels: high priority, module: ci, triaged, actionable, oncall: pt2, module: inductor, unstable, PT2-Bug-Bash; title: UNSTABLE inductor-periodic / cuda12.8-py3.10...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",22c8c7d3844ecfe9f22f4c5784e20531816e1ed614b0558aa507e68094325ac4
BUNDLE-1097,bundle:bundle-1097,new_code_pr,New maintainer code PR,patch-plan bundle,New maintainer code PR: module: compile ux (1 issue),issue_group,,#146798 Torch 2.6 Unexpected Graph Break with SubConfigProxy,module: compile ux,Open one maintainer code PR for the module: compile ux blocker/regression cluster with regression tests.,Puts the highest-risk issues into the shortest review path.,Run focused tests for module: compile ux paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,146798,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: compile ux bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #146798: high-priority/blocker; labels: triaged, module: regression, oncall: pt2, module: graph breaks, module: compile ux; title: Torch 2.6 Unexpected Graph Break with SubConfigProxy",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",22aa3e29acd81077d129f1aea560d17d076b6c4bf783a43626e5befb97ed679f
BUNDLE-1098,bundle:bundle-1098,new_code_pr,New maintainer code PR,patch-plan bundle,New maintainer code PR: module: complex (5 issues),issue_group,,module: complex high-priority/blocker,module: complex,Open one maintainer code PR for the module: complex blocker/regression cluster with regression tests.,Puts the highest-risk issues into the shortest review path.,Run focused tests for module: complex paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"46155, 55375, 57534, 146286, 188864",,5,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: complex bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #188864: high-priority/blocker; labels: module: crash, module: error checking, triaged, module: complex, module: fft, module: mps, topic: fuzzer, bot-triaged; title: [MPS] torch.fft.hfft aborts on 5D complex64 input with dim=0 | issue #146286: high-priority/blocker; labels: high priority, triaged, module: complex, module: correctness (silent); title: Non-blocking GPU to CPU copy of complex numbers with the d...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",7d80aba12b98129a84e013b222ca61cc1f0ec3a59ef0a6e764acf0f910f426a2
BUNDLE-1099,bundle:bundle-1099,new_code_pr,New maintainer code PR,patch-plan bundle,New maintainer code PR: module: convolution (5 issues),issue_group,,module: convolution high-priority/blocker,module: convolution,Open one maintainer code PR for the module: convolution blocker/regression cluster with regression tests.,Puts the highest-risk issues into the shortest review path.,Run focused tests for module: convolution paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"48400, 73179, 142209, 143481, 184027",,5,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: convolution bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #184027: high-priority/blocker; labels: module: crash, module: convolution, triaged, oncall: pt2, module: inductor, bot-triaged, repro:agent:h100:repro_fail:not_reproduced; title: [inductor] `torch.compile` crashes on convolutions when weight is a plain tensor — stride prediction mismatch | issue #143481: high-priority/blocker; labels: module: crash, module: nn, module: error checking, module: convolution, t...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",9956003e3fd07458e0487e127d0bc484adc75ef8f5132a2479707664de1b9712
BUNDLE-1100,bundle:bundle-1100,new_code_pr,New maintainer code PR,patch-plan bundle,New maintainer code PR: module: correctness (silent) (13 issues),issue_group,,module: correctness (silent) high-priority/blocker,module: correctness (silent),Open one maintainer code PR for the module: correctness (silent) blocker/regression cluster with regression tests.,Puts the highest-risk issues into the shortest review path.,Run focused tests for module: correctness (silent) paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"58005, 65815, 73792, 94691, 102911, 102971, 107668, 132086, 154312, 163539, 165123, 178880, 187319",,13,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: correctness (silent) bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #187319: high-priority/blocker; labels: high priority, triaged, has workaround, module: custom-operators, module: correctness (silent), module: fx, oncall: pt2, module: inductor, module: pt2-dispatcher, bot-triaged; title: torch.compile FX graph does not distinguish custom ops with the same name but different mutates_args | issue #178880: high-priority/blocker; labels: high priority, triaged, module: correct...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",f801f166f95916ca63280967125940b481b3a9ae21664a5faf8f9c5cf1e91d0a
BUNDLE-1101,bundle:bundle-1101,new_code_pr,New maintainer code PR,patch-plan bundle,New maintainer code PR: module: cpp (7 issues),issue_group,,module: cpp high-priority/blocker,module: cpp,Open one maintainer code PR for the module: cpp blocker/regression cluster with regression tests.,Puts the highest-risk issues into the shortest review path.,Run focused tests for module: cpp paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"52663, 53895, 71391, 83577, 106700, 140272, 186212",,7,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: cpp bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #186212: high-priority/blocker; labels: module: crash, module: cpp, module: cpu, triaged, module: norms and normalization, bot-triaged; title: C++ API: at::batch_norm crashes with an internal assertion on invalid inputs | issue #53895: high-priority/blocker; labels: needs reproduction, module: crash, module: cpp, triaged; title: terminate called after throwing an instance of 'c10::Error' what(): isTuple() IN...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",4991abf11db5e716a75584cf8952bbccb7f44c4efaa1253d044210357d952bca
BUNDLE-1102,bundle:bundle-1102,new_code_pr,New maintainer code PR,patch-plan bundle,New maintainer code PR: module: cpp-extensions (4 issues),issue_group,,module: cpp-extensions high-priority/blocker,module: cpp-extensions,Open one maintainer code PR for the module: cpp-extensions blocker/regression cluster with regression tests.,Puts the highest-risk issues into the shortest review path.,Run focused tests for module: cpp-extensions paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"63749, 89006, 143780, 163501",,4,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: cpp-extensions bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #163501: high-priority/blocker; labels: module: cpp-extensions, triaged, module: regression, module: dispatch, module: dynamic shapes, llm-amenable, PT2-Bug-Bash; title: Improve Registration Error message with const SymIntArrayRef&in PyTorch 2.5+ | issue #143780: high-priority/blocker; labels: high priority, needs reproduction, module: crash, module: cpp-extensions, triaged, has workaround; title: Looking fo...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",9dc3e27d79d298ad23ee59c92ea8e1259b47f443df264a8333e0ce4d76a8c390
BUNDLE-1103,bundle:bundle-1103,new_code_pr,New maintainer code PR,patch-plan bundle,New maintainer code PR: module: cpu (16 issues),issue_group,,module: cpu high-priority/blocker,module: cpu,Open one maintainer code PR for the module: cpu blocker/regression cluster with regression tests.,Puts the highest-risk issues into the shortest review path.,Run focused tests for module: cpu paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"26165, 41486, 42784, 42815, 64412, 64535, 73174, 73185, 73186, 113037, 125247, 134198, 152979, 171606, 175436, 177906",,16,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: cpu bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #177906: high-priority/blocker; labels: needs reproduction, module: performance, module: windows, module: cpu, triaged, module: openmp, module: multithreading, module: regression, bot-triaged; title: CPU: 2x CPU utilization regression in 2.9+ with no proportional wall-clock improvement | issue #171606: high-priority/blocker; labels: high priority, needs reproduction, module: cpu, triaged, module: determinism...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",0ebf37349b14e18d0a2399664d624261f7b2b5fd6ee3660e42cebd530eb91c67
BUNDLE-1104,bundle:bundle-1104,new_code_pr,New maintainer code PR,patch-plan bundle,New maintainer code PR: module: crash (25 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #120597: floating point exception on `torch.fmod` when x is large negative integer and y is `-1`,module: crash,Open one maintainer code PR for the module: crash blocker/regression cluster with regression tests.,Puts the highest-risk issues into the shortest review path.,Run focused tests for module: crash paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"45111, 85329, 87960, 87961, 88148, 94594, 94765, 113586, 120597, 121343, 142048, 157704, 175614, 176426, 177714, 178038, 178892, 179891, 184880, 185494, 185839, 187343, 188218, 188733, 188953",,25,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: crash bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"You're correct, torch.lcm internally calls a % b at some point, which is pretty much the same issue as #120597. | issue #176426: high-priority/blocker; labels: needs reproduction, module: crash, module: cuda, triaged, oncall: pt2, module: inductor, upstream triton, bot-triaged, PT2-Bug-Bash; title: Triton kernels with 2 or more tl.load() calls segfault at runtime on sm_120 (NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell). The kern...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",5d5292d9d3dbf9fc0c5286d831f032a10b166b69ec05f56ed43ccddbf0e957bb
BUNDLE-1105,bundle:bundle-1105,new_code_pr,New maintainer code PR,patch-plan bundle,New maintainer code PR: module: crash (70 issues),issue_group,,module: crash high-priority/blocker batch 3,module: crash,Open one maintainer code PR for the module: crash blocker/regression cluster with regression tests.,Puts the highest-risk issues into the shortest review path.,Run focused tests for module: crash paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"26120, 29498, 31362, 35792, 48555, 50037, 54578, 62308, 62331, 74547, 79014, 81180, 82813, 83070, 84181, 84990, 85214, 85215, 85217, 87446, 88036, 89714, 89718, 90535, 90676, 91533, 91590, 94125, 94669, 94696, 94698, 96277, 98136, 99200, 106362, 107429, 115416, 117254, 117431, 121235, 126385, 127102, 127275, 128503, 128690, 128691, 128692, 128695, 133334, 136217, 136704, 136709, 136714, 136719, 138425, 139987, 140945, 141358, 141481, 149941, 153203, 154424, 154887, 156723, 157097, 158154, 161760, 171284, 172011, 184878",,70,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: crash bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #31362: high-priority/blocker; labels: needs reproduction, module: crash, triaged; title: sklearn and pytorch incompatibility issue | issue #29498: high-priority/blocker; labels: needs reproduction, module: crash, triaged; title: ""malloc(): memory corruption (fast)"", action=3) at malloc.c | issue #184878: high-priority/blocker; labels: module: crash, low priority, module: error checking, triaged, module: edg...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",2a2d2435db18726d943aa1fbe29cf2f944988ca8ecce8540a4ce682895ca670e
BUNDLE-1106,bundle:bundle-1106,new_code_pr,New maintainer code PR,patch-plan bundle,New maintainer code PR: module: crash (59 issues),issue_group,,module: crash high-priority/blocker batch 6,module: crash,Open one maintainer code PR for the module: crash blocker/regression cluster with regression tests.,Puts the highest-risk issues into the shortest review path.,Run focused tests for module: crash paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"5353, 6998, 16953, 19739, 25518, 35151, 38623, 42452, 43005, 43484, 47161, 49520, 50038, 51134, 51732, 59645, 72182, 74422, 92776, 96056, 97109, 103966, 104342, 119367, 133625, 141229, 141847, 142221, 142837, 142838, 143480, 143482, 143483, 143485, 143490, 145065, 145071, 145259, 145267, 145604, 146787, 146789, 146791, 146793, 146794, 147362, 149820, 150388, 152777, 152824, 152913, 153231, 154422, 154882, 155201, 155981, 157098, 159713, 161874",,59,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: crash bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #133625: high-priority/blocker; labels: module: crash, triaged, module: mps; title: Binary Cross Entropy crashes kernel on apple silicon with singleton dimensions | issue #119367: high-priority/blocker; labels: module: crash, triaged, module: mps; title: Updating a slice on CPU with a slice from MPS results in an error | issue #104342: high-priority/blocker; labels: module: crash, triaged, module: mps; title...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",6495b61c83156debe7358bcc75e256b71775d1bd331854698407f3a74f8adc70
BUNDLE-1107,bundle:bundle-1107,new_code_pr,New maintainer code PR,patch-plan bundle,New maintainer code PR: module: crash (8 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #98537: Segfault when using torch.ops.* to access de-registered op,module: crash,Open one maintainer code PR for the module: crash blocker/regression cluster with regression tests.,Puts the highest-risk issues into the shortest review path.,Run focused tests for module: crash paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"94668, 94808, 96275, 96276, 98537, 98541, 141218, 141219",,8,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: crash bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"m"", ""CPU"") def my_sum(*args, **kwargs): return args[0] x = torch.tensor([1, 2]) self.assertEqual(torch.ops.foo.sum(x), x) Likely related to #98537, unsure if same exact issue. Versions master cc @ezyang @bhosmer @smessmer @ljk53 @bdhirsh | e output is: Segmentation fault (core dumped) The large value and zero in input's shape might be the cause of this bug, which is similar to #96275. Versions Collecting environme...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",5528e9d1723ec4008bbcb8c595e3fc88f8bf847e11d031b01d32bb7e70063f47
BUNDLE-1108,bundle:bundle-1108,new_code_pr,New maintainer code PR,patch-plan bundle,New maintainer code PR: module: cublas (1 issue),issue_group,,#44428 Support for CUDA matrix multiplication on long (and other integer) tensors,module: cublas,Open one maintainer code PR for the module: cublas blocker/regression cluster with regression tests.,Puts the highest-risk issues into the shortest review path.,Run focused tests for module: cublas paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,44428,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: cublas bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #44428: high-priority/blocker; labels: high priority, module: cuda, triaged, module: cublas, module: linear algebra, needs design, function request; title: Support for CUDA matrix multiplication on long (and other integer) tensors",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",9dfdbb31e286357710936a12393a3f47fec8080d2fca9023183f58ae236d18ad
BUNDLE-1109,bundle:bundle-1109,new_code_pr,New maintainer code PR,patch-plan bundle,New maintainer code PR: module: cuda (19 issues),issue_group,,module: cuda high-priority/blocker batch 1,module: cuda,Open one maintainer code PR for the module: cuda blocker/regression cluster with regression tests.,Puts the highest-risk issues into the shortest review path.,Run focused tests for module: cuda paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"22259, 47844, 49473, 49758, 49877, 49909, 76191, 91754, 101529, 105872, 107363, 116928, 119000, 119261, 128819, 139298, 141133, 155607, 179214",,19,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: cuda bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #179214: high-priority/blocker; labels: high priority, needs reproduction, module: cuda, triaged, bot-mislabeled; title: cudaErrorLaunchOutOfResources in CTC loss backward on RTX 5090 (sm_120, Blackwell) with CUDA 13.0 | issue #22259: high-priority/blocker; labels: high priority, needs reproduction, module: cuda, triaged, quansight-nack; title: using multi thread lead to gpu stuck with GPU-util 100% | issue...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",d269ab9391ac06b1e60b4201cda23cdf84ada6c0e52c46e9b5674690ef023c80
BUNDLE-1110,bundle:bundle-1110,new_code_pr,New maintainer code PR,patch-plan bundle,New maintainer code PR: module: cuda graphs (1 issue),issue_group,,#167373 Torch Tensor -> Nanobind ndarray breaks cuda graphs on torch 2.9,module: cuda graphs,Open one maintainer code PR for the module: cuda graphs blocker/regression cluster with regression tests.,Puts the highest-risk issues into the shortest review path.,Run focused tests for module: cuda graphs paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,167373,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: cuda graphs bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #167373: high-priority/blocker; labels: triaged, module: regression, module: cuda graphs, module: dlpack, PT2-Bug-Bash; title: Torch Tensor -> Nanobind ndarray breaks cuda graphs on torch 2.9",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",908b496c054c75469655b4866157022b1c7373e5ffc97bb35f3fb3887fe798ae
BUNDLE-1111,bundle:bundle-1111,new_code_pr,New maintainer code PR,patch-plan bundle,New maintainer code PR: module: cudnn (2 issues),issue_group,,module: cudnn high-priority/blocker,module: cudnn,Open one maintainer code PR for the module: cudnn blocker/regression cluster with regression tests.,Puts the highest-risk issues into the shortest review path.,Run focused tests for module: cudnn paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"50879, 137347",,2,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: cudnn bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #137347: high-priority/blocker; labels: high priority, module: cudnn, triaged, module: regression, module: sdpa; title: cuDNN dBias error starting on 10/2 nightly | issue #50879: high-priority/blocker; labels: high priority, module: cudnn, module: rnn, triaged; title: Unexpected slow dropout in stacked RNN/LSTM/GRU",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",51ba3789ea169c973ea3054226c6ef2a7553cdfd251b56f80be142fa61a635bd
BUNDLE-1112,bundle:bundle-1112,new_code_pr,New maintainer code PR,patch-plan bundle,New maintainer code PR: module: custom-operators (1 issue),issue_group,,#184549 [vllm] [2.12 regression][Inductor] assert_size_stride (8192 vs 512) in BERT-with-rope AOT-compiled path for Nomic v2 MoE pooling model,module: custom-operators,Open one maintainer code PR for the module: custom-operators blocker/regression cluster with regression tests.,Puts the highest-risk issues into the shortest review path.,Run focused tests for module: custom-operators paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,184549,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: custom-operators bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #184549: high-priority/blocker; labels: triaged, module: regression, module: custom-operators, oncall: pt2, module: inductor, module: pt2-dispatcher, module: vllm, bot-triaged; title: [vllm] [2.12 regression][Inductor] assert_size_stride (8192 vs 512) in BERT-with-rope AOT-compiled path for Nomic v2 MoE pooling model",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",5820be49e896a64bd298b6822043b48f7f34c7ca09adee5d9520899846bd8970
BUNDLE-1113,bundle:bundle-1113,new_code_pr,New maintainer code PR,patch-plan bundle,New maintainer code PR: module: data (1 issue),issue_group,,#103117 Observed regress in DataLoader spawn from PyTorch1.13 to PyTorch2.0,module: data,Open one maintainer code PR for the module: data blocker/regression cluster with regression tests.,Puts the highest-risk issues into the shortest review path.,Run focused tests for module: data paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,103117,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: data bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #103117: high-priority/blocker; labels: high priority, module: performance, triaged, module: regression, module: data; title: Observed regress in DataLoader spawn from PyTorch1.13 to PyTorch2.0",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",433910c6416d2071c0c7808e4cc12fdc91ec722d2e1643f6e21ed61a3ed362b6
BUNDLE-1114,bundle:bundle-1114,new_code_pr,New maintainer code PR,patch-plan bundle,New maintainer code PR: module: data parallel (2 issues),issue_group,,module: data parallel high-priority/blocker,module: data parallel,Open one maintainer code PR for the module: data parallel blocker/regression cluster with regression tests.,Puts the highest-risk issues into the shortest review path.,Run focused tests for module: data parallel paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"36871, 40457",,2,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: data parallel bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #36871: high-priority/blocker; labels: high priority, needs reproduction, oncall: distributed, triaged, module: determinism, module: data parallel; title: Stochasticity for DistributedDataParallel on CPU but not on GPU | issue #40457: high-priority/blocker; labels: high priority, triaged, module: regression, module: data parallel; title: DataParallel with Torch 1.5",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",b6ad6dde46a1599c7108b0596cc3ef5250cabb38367f373564cf8d712de04864
BUNDLE-1115,bundle:bundle-1115,new_code_pr,New maintainer code PR,patch-plan bundle,New maintainer code PR: module: dataloader (5 issues),issue_group,,module: dataloader high-priority/blocker,module: dataloader,Open one maintainer code PR for the module: dataloader blocker/regression cluster with regression tests.,Puts the highest-risk issues into the shortest review path.,Run focused tests for module: dataloader paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"15849, 39443, 45198, 93846, 122935",,5,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: dataloader bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #45198: high-priority/blocker; labels: needs reproduction, module: dataloader, triaged, module: multithreading, module: regression; title: DataLoader with cv2 and some numpy/cv2 import order causes workers to not work | issue #122935: high-priority/blocker; labels: needs reproduction, module: dataloader, module: memory usage, triaged, module: regression; title: Pytorch 2.1 / 2.2 uses 4x more memory during da...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",b2ba10aa0ff845f40c8da16ced0aa10025aebd4add066dc607c451b08578487d
BUNDLE-1116,bundle:bundle-1116,new_code_pr,New maintainer code PR,patch-plan bundle,New maintainer code PR: module: deadlock (3 issues),issue_group,,module: deadlock high-priority/blocker,module: deadlock,Open one maintainer code PR for the module: deadlock blocker/regression cluster with regression tests.,Puts the highest-risk issues into the shortest review path.,Run focused tests for module: deadlock paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"48382, 153050, 186174",,3,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: deadlock bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #186174: high-priority/blocker; labels: module: rocm, triaged, module: deadlock, module: regression, has workaround, module: sdpa, bot-triaged; title: ROCm: Flash/mem-efficient SDPA hangs during batched autoregressive generation with left-padded sequences | issue #153050: high-priority/blocker; labels: high priority, module: multiprocessing, triaged, module: macos, module: deadlock, module: regression; title...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",e1dffa92e9706833c072250e7c59c02c439787aa08af1439739715522b74d986
BUNDLE-1117,bundle:bundle-1117,new_code_pr,New maintainer code PR,patch-plan bundle,New maintainer code PR: module: deploy (1 issue),issue_group,,#71227 Move torch::deploy tests to their own workflow job,module: deploy,Open one maintainer code PR for the module: deploy blocker/regression cluster with regression tests.,Puts the highest-risk issues into the shortest review path.,Run focused tests for module: deploy paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,71227,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: deploy bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #71227: high-priority/blocker; labels: high priority, triaged, module: deploy; title: Move torch::deploy tests to their own workflow job",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",7e83012ebc4011ad8939cb415adb09bee79b780c3e3468eebe4b0ff583ae6219
BUNDLE-1118,bundle:bundle-1118,new_code_pr,New maintainer code PR,patch-plan bundle,New maintainer code PR: module: deprecation (4 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 3 issues - issue #50012: torch.split is divergent from np.split,module: deprecation,Open one maintainer code PR for the module: deprecation blocker/regression cluster with regression tests.,Puts the highest-risk issues into the shortest review path.,Run focused tests for module: deprecation paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"5212, 50012, 50013, 68174",,4,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: deprecation bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"Note this issue was previously discussed in #5212, too. Despite having the same name, torch.split and np.split are different functions. The distinction is a little subtle when just reading | different from NumPy’s split because it asks what size the resulting chunks should be, instead of how many there should be (see this issue (#50012) for details) nonzero → argwhere PyTorch’s nonzero is different from NumPy’s no...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",57d93371bedb42bffdce4551a2736913e048382713a08c72597ca5c663848363
BUNDLE-1119,bundle:bundle-1119,new_code_pr,New maintainer code PR,patch-plan bundle,New maintainer code PR: module: dispatch (3 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #30774: Natively Declarable Fast-path Functions,module: dispatch,Open one maintainer code PR for the module: dispatch blocker/regression cluster with regression tests.,Puts the highest-risk issues into the shortest review path.,Run focused tests for module: dispatch paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"30774, 49372, 189018",,3,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: dispatch bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"see #30774. Now that we have manual_cpp_binding, that should be doable through native_functions.yaml | issue #189018: high-priority/blocker; labels: triaged, module: regression, module: dispatch, module: meta tensors, matrix multiplication, bot-triaged; title: `_scaled_mm_v2` meta implementation checks for device-specific constraints",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",6cb1a01de7f4352ff0f3e065051129c1f6e2a1bb139906f9a07c4bb31b8929f8
BUNDLE-1120,bundle:bundle-1120,new_code_pr,New maintainer code PR,patch-plan bundle,New maintainer code PR: module: distance functions (1 issue),issue_group,,#69512 Inconsistent behavior of cosine_similarity between fp16 and fp32 inputs,module: distance functions,Open one maintainer code PR for the module: distance functions blocker/regression cluster with regression tests.,Puts the highest-risk issues into the shortest review path.,Run focused tests for module: distance functions paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,69512,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: distance functions bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #69512: high-priority/blocker; labels: high priority, module: numerical-stability, triaged, module: half, module: distance functions; title: Inconsistent behavior of cosine_similarity between fp16 and fp32 inputs",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",510c2dbb8c809791b494b4d14cbd57acdf3fc6c72e4feeb307e991de247aab36
BUNDLE-1121,bundle:bundle-1121,new_code_pr,New maintainer code PR,patch-plan bundle,New maintainer code PR: module: distributions (2 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #71149: Memory leak in distributions.multivariate_normal.MultivariateNormal,module: distributions,Open one maintainer code PR for the module: distributions blocker/regression cluster with regression tests.,Puts the highest-risk issues into the shortest review path.,Run focused tests for module: distributions paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"71149, 99042",,2,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: distributions bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"ftplus(sig)) The calculation of eps is copied from the actual implementation of MultivariateNormal. I thought that maybe this is related to #71149, but I don't know. Unfortunately, I can't easily test this on cpu since the framework I'm working with (fastreid) isn't exactly bu...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",f4c17c43d582086d06d9eb0c8346163b26c1a00f712b72bd3921fd7e329eb0ae
BUNDLE-1122,bundle:bundle-1122,new_code_pr,New maintainer code PR,patch-plan bundle,New maintainer code PR: module: docker (1 issue),issue_group,,#80431 CMake Error: File /opt/pytorch/build_variables.bzl does not exist.,module: docker,Open one maintainer code PR for the module: docker blocker/regression cluster with regression tests.,Puts the highest-risk issues into the shortest review path.,Run focused tests for module: docker paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,80431,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: docker bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #80431: high-priority/blocker; labels: triaged, module: regression, module: docker; title: CMake Error: File /opt/pytorch/build_variables.bzl does not exist.",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",54048f1dc7e8a5ff7ad0d844cda05d5cab7adcab4f17aa962f8612bbfc3138af
BUNDLE-1123,bundle:bundle-1123,new_code_pr,New maintainer code PR,patch-plan bundle,New maintainer code PR: module: docs (4 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #17199: Deadlock with multiprocessing (using fork) and OpenMP / PyTorch should warn after OMP and fork that multithreading may be broken,module: docs,Open one maintainer code PR for the module: docs blocker/regression cluster with regression tests.,Puts the highest-risk issues into the shortest review path.,Run focused tests for module: docs paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"17199, 57178, 58962, 67237",,4,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: docs bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"ain with the desired number of threads after creating the subprocess. BTW, had you tested it on v1.4 today? A similar issue was reported in #17199 but on v1.0.1. | issue #67237: high-priority/blocker; labels: high priority, module: docs, triaged; title: [docs] Google finds docs pages that give 404 | issue #57178: high-priority/blocker; labels: high priority, module: docs, triaged, module: pooling; title: MaxPool2D...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",bbda5d5e522268379698f9e250df0df9ae60d9961d125921337052c9721e4067
BUNDLE-1124,bundle:bundle-1124,new_code_pr,New maintainer code PR,patch-plan bundle,New maintainer code PR: module: dtensor (1 issue),issue_group,,#168058 [DTensor] inconsistency of distributed RNG (Shard(0) != Shard(1) or 8 GPU != 4 GPU != 1 GPU),module: dtensor,Open one maintainer code PR for the module: dtensor blocker/regression cluster with regression tests.,Puts the highest-risk issues into the shortest review path.,Run focused tests for module: dtensor paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,168058,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: dtensor bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #168058: high-priority/blocker; labels: high priority, oncall: distributed, triaged, module: dtensor; title: [DTensor] inconsistency of distributed RNG (Shard(0) != Shard(1) or 8 GPU != 4 GPU != 1 GPU)",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",301f7f2ff0d782ffc2d492e5a5d8e9d3d44d7362fbabfaee12cb29b7792d0887
BUNDLE-1125,bundle:bundle-1125,new_code_pr,New maintainer code PR,patch-plan bundle,New maintainer code PR: module: error checking (3 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #109819: ValueError: only one element tensors can be converted to Python scalars,module: error checking,Open one maintainer code PR for the module: error checking blocker/regression cluster with regression tests.,Puts the highest-risk issues into the shortest review path.,Run focused tests for module: error checking paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"81195, 109819, 110605",,3,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: error checking bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"🐛 Describe the bug When using math.isfinite with a tensor a wrong ValueError is issued instead of a TypeError. This creates bugs (see #109819). Fixing this issue will fix the other one as well. >>> import math, torch >>> a = torch.randn(5) >>> math.isfinite(a) ----------------... | issue #81195: high-priority/blocker; labels: module: nn, module: error checking, triaged, module: regression, module: norms and normal...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",4e93c20a3802f60fba18732a63233cecc2ae19017a6467b90c549c6450b2ac93
BUNDLE-1126,bundle:bundle-1126,new_code_pr,New maintainer code PR,patch-plan bundle,New maintainer code PR: module: faketensor (1 issue),issue_group,,#156819 FakeTensorUpdater doesn't support HOPs,module: faketensor,Open one maintainer code PR for the module: faketensor blocker/regression cluster with regression tests.,Puts the highest-risk issues into the shortest review path.,Run focused tests for module: faketensor paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,156819,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: faketensor bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #156819: high-priority/blocker; labels: high priority, triaged, oncall: pt2, module: fakeTensor, module: inductor, module: pt2-dispatcher, PT2-Bug-Bash; title: FakeTensorUpdater doesn't support HOPs",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",99815c5d5d558fc696874773edc0262ea0329131b6309b426298701fcb13aea7
BUNDLE-1127,bundle:bundle-1127,new_code_pr,New maintainer code PR,patch-plan bundle,New maintainer code PR: module: floatx (formerly float8) (1 issue),issue_group,,#113663 FP8 types should not participate in type promotion and should have no math ops defined on them,module: floatx (formerly float8),Open one maintainer code PR for the module: floatx (formerly float8) blocker/regression cluster with regression tests.,Puts the highest-risk issues into the shortest review path.,Run focused tests for module: floatx (formerly float8) paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,113663,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: floatx (formerly float8) bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #113663: high-priority/blocker; labels: high priority, triaged, module: floatx (formerly float8); title: FP8 types should not participate in type promotion and should have no math ops defined on them",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",3c2afd87d6960a5176d68c61fa44c6ceeb3b4a4147738cdfa9c40bbfbd6405f5
BUNDLE-1128,bundle:bundle-1128,new_code_pr,New maintainer code PR,patch-plan bundle,New maintainer code PR: module: flop counter (1 issue),issue_group,,#134804 FlopsProfiler double counts sdpa flops,module: flop counter,Open one maintainer code PR for the module: flop counter blocker/regression cluster with regression tests.,Puts the highest-risk issues into the shortest review path.,Run focused tests for module: flop counter paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,134804,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: flop counter bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #134804: high-priority/blocker; labels: high priority, triaged, module: regression, module: flop counter, module: sdpa; title: FlopsProfiler double counts sdpa flops",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",a98795c12daf606b6b0e82906062e8e2017d6471dab97de4d45167708687467b
BUNDLE-1129,bundle:bundle-1129,new_code_pr,New maintainer code PR,patch-plan bundle,New maintainer code PR: module: fsdp (1 issue),issue_group,,#102904 Unable to checkpoint model and optimizer state when using Hybrid Sharding Strategy,module: fsdp,Open one maintainer code PR for the module: fsdp blocker/regression cluster with regression tests.,Puts the highest-risk issues into the shortest review path.,Run focused tests for module: fsdp paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,102904,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: fsdp bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #102904: high-priority/blocker; labels: high priority, oncall: distributed, triaged, module: fsdp, oncall: distributed checkpointing; title: Unable to checkpoint model and optimizer state when using Hybrid Sharding Strategy",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",d5238e95221d7e8a666b16d400f27d694ef8e038a7c5a2b2c216b9098c3a80e3
BUNDLE-1130,bundle:bundle-1130,new_code_pr,New maintainer code PR,patch-plan bundle,New maintainer code PR: module: functorch (5 issues),issue_group,,module: functorch high-priority/blocker,module: functorch,Open one maintainer code PR for the module: functorch blocker/regression cluster with regression tests.,Puts the highest-risk issues into the shortest review path.,Run focused tests for module: functorch paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"92033, 115347, 121711, 124291, 142032",,5,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: functorch bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #121711: high-priority/blocker; labels: high priority, triaged, module: functorch; title: torch.func.grad hangs on nested differentiation | issue #142032: high-priority/blocker; labels: triaged, module: regression, module: functorch; title: Python 3.12 ""from functorch.einops import rearrange"" fails with ""RuntimeError: First class dim doesn't work with python 3.12"" | issue #92033: high-priority/blocker; label...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",b4beec6e6333aa9829981c21e048426091c11cd01cf222d89d8ea835d25f3b4c
BUNDLE-1131,bundle:bundle-1131,new_code_pr,New maintainer code PR,patch-plan bundle,New maintainer code PR: module: inductor (4 issues),issue_group,,module: inductor high-priority/blocker,module: inductor,Open one maintainer code PR for the module: inductor blocker/regression cluster with regression tests.,Puts the highest-risk issues into the shortest review path.,Run focused tests for module: inductor paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"181362, 185346, 188127, 188835",,4,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: inductor bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #188835: high-priority/blocker; labels: high priority, module: numerical-stability, triaged, module: regression, oncall: pt2, module: inductor, upstream triton, bot-triaged; title: DistillGPT2 fails accuracy on A100 in inductor smoke test | issue #188127: high-priority/blocker; labels: module: performance, module: rocm, module: memory usage, triaged, module: regression, oncall: pt2, module: inductor, bot-tri...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",a8f2feae414711fc8a860e081a015e65ab66aa8881efc181a0df0dd89f478b09
BUNDLE-1132,bundle:bundle-1132,new_code_pr,New maintainer code PR,patch-plan bundle,New maintainer code PR: module: infra (2 issues),issue_group,,module: infra high-priority/blocker,module: infra,Open one maintainer code PR for the module: infra blocker/regression cluster with regression tests.,Puts the highest-risk issues into the shortest review path.,Run focused tests for module: infra paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"135885, 136374",,2,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: infra bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #135885: high-priority/blocker; labels: high priority, triaged, module: macos, module: infra; title: ☂️ 150+ MacOS tests were marked flaky recently | issue #136374: high-priority/blocker; labels: high priority, triaged, module: infra; title: Runbook for GCP A100 runners should be updated",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",7253ac3e017a3178c555af3534af76da5827db5206500a77996594ba14053663
BUNDLE-1133,bundle:bundle-1133,new_code_pr,New maintainer code PR,patch-plan bundle,New maintainer code PR: module: intel (1 issue),issue_group,,#120601 Torchrun arguments shadowing script arguments,module: intel,Open one maintainer code PR for the module: intel blocker/regression cluster with regression tests.,Puts the highest-risk issues into the shortest review path.,Run focused tests for module: intel paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,120601,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: intel bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #120601: high-priority/blocker; labels: triaged, module: regression, module: intel; title: Torchrun arguments shadowing script arguments",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",a124503219c980f0864633297af0a7183eaa2eddd56781a5fbee817e20849e4c
BUNDLE-1134,bundle:bundle-1134,new_code_pr,New maintainer code PR,patch-plan bundle,New maintainer code PR: module: memory usage (6 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 3 issues - issue #35600: Increased memory usage in repetitive torch.jit.trace calls,module: memory usage,Open one maintainer code PR for the module: memory usage blocker/regression cluster with regression tests.,Puts the highest-risk issues into the shortest review path.,Run focused tests for module: memory usage paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"35600, 59196, 84051, 86537, 95432, 96726",,6,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: memory usage bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"riments again, and found that just calling jit trace for a same model could trigger this issue. I've corrected the statement above. I think #35600 is a simpler case of mine because it just compiles the same model each time. It's worth to note that after the simpler one being f... | Probably a duplicate of #35600. | Originally reported in #35600, but this issue's description supplements the debugging info present i...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",9ae3f71d67fab817c9caf34cd732f17befa7209dc7b11064d5f99ab0f8df2617
BUNDLE-1135,bundle:bundle-1135,new_code_pr,New maintainer code PR,patch-plan bundle,New maintainer code PR: module: mkldnn (1 issue),issue_group,,#121150 ☂️ oneDNN update functional/regression,module: mkldnn,Open one maintainer code PR for the module: mkldnn blocker/regression cluster with regression tests.,Puts the highest-risk issues into the shortest review path.,Run focused tests for module: mkldnn paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,121150,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: mkldnn bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #121150: high-priority/blocker; labels: high priority, triaged, module: mkldnn; title: ☂️ oneDNN update functional/regression",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",37e7cf52d62d8c808d0083bfad0bc0d55cb2761b26c1dabcf0d5861057e839d0
BUNDLE-1136,bundle:bundle-1136,new_code_pr,New maintainer code PR,patch-plan bundle,New maintainer code PR: module: mps (3 issues),issue_group,,module: mps high-priority/blocker,module: mps,Open one maintainer code PR for the module: mps blocker/regression cluster with regression tests.,Puts the highest-risk issues into the shortest review path.,Run focused tests for module: mps paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"122394, 141836, 143123",,3,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: mps bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #141836: high-priority/blocker; labels: triaged, module: regression, module: mps; title: StrideAPI caused regression in channels-last logic | issue #143123: high-priority/blocker; labels: triaged, module: regression, module: mps; title: MPS incompatibility: Calls into the C++ engine to run the backward pass | issue #122394: high-priority/blocker; labels: module: performance, triaged, module: regression, modu...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",884cada82b97a6229cfc42271daf625107e28c278e05b2264363ee9789e70bd1
BUNDLE-1137,bundle:bundle-1137,new_code_pr,New maintainer code PR,patch-plan bundle,New maintainer code PR: module: multiprocessing (6 issues),issue_group,,module: multiprocessing high-priority/blocker,module: multiprocessing,Open one maintainer code PR for the module: multiprocessing blocker/regression cluster with regression tests.,Puts the highest-risk issues into the shortest review path.,Run focused tests for module: multiprocessing paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"32351, 53625, 60626, 67247, 146828, 180458",,6,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: multiprocessing bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #180458: high-priority/blocker; labels: needs reproduction, module: windows, module: multiprocessing, module: serialization, triaged, module: regression, bot-triaged; title: [Bug] ValueError: I/O operation on closed file during torch.save() on Windows (PyTorch Nightly + CUDA 13.2) | issue #53625: high-priority/blocker; labels: oncall: distributed, module: multiprocessing, triaged, module: regression; title:...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",45fbfda63b970da98d21cd78d9b595d19087ad0e04a5bbbf9827a7accdc20707
BUNDLE-1138,bundle:bundle-1138,new_code_pr,New maintainer code PR,patch-plan bundle,New maintainer code PR: module: nans and infs (1 issue),issue_group,,#160876 F.silu(torch.tensor(float('-inf'))) returns nan instead of 0 in PyTorch 2.7.0+cu128,module: nans and infs,Open one maintainer code PR for the module: nans and infs blocker/regression cluster with regression tests.,Puts the highest-risk issues into the shortest review path.,Run focused tests for module: nans and infs paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,160876,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: nans and infs bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #160876: high-priority/blocker; labels: needs reproduction, triaged, module: NaNs and Infs, module: regression; title: F.silu(torch.tensor(float('-inf'))) returns nan instead of 0 in PyTorch 2.7.0+cu128",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",52ba390872eab04fe612cbaf49d7c739c54884d35f7d105c7af81ebe9eb1a93d
BUNDLE-1139,bundle:bundle-1139,new_code_pr,New maintainer code PR,patch-plan bundle,New maintainer code PR: module: nccl (2 issues),issue_group,,module: nccl high-priority/blocker,module: nccl,Open one maintainer code PR for the module: nccl blocker/regression cluster with regression tests.,Puts the highest-risk issues into the shortest review path.,Run focused tests for module: nccl paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"18300, 152302",,2,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: nccl bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #152302: high-priority/blocker; labels: oncall: distributed, triaged, module: nccl, module: regression; title: NCCL out of memory error after updating to PyTorch 2.7 | issue #18300: high-priority/blocker; labels: high priority, oncall: distributed, triaged, module: nccl; title: NCCL backend fails when calling broadcast from different threads",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",c9bdd8f40f24599e3a1ab0816b5d2845ec9d4cd46513e6073b3c25415180b6ab
BUNDLE-1140,bundle:bundle-1140,new_code_pr,New maintainer code PR,patch-plan bundle,New maintainer code PR: module: nestedtensor (1 issue),issue_group,,#122617 [Regression PyTorch 2.1 & 2.2] `torch._transformer_encoder_layer_fwd` outputs on CUDA/NestedTensorCUDA backends significantly diverge from truth for torch>=2.1 (SDP math)),module: nestedtensor,Open one maintainer code PR for the module: nestedtensor blocker/regression cluster with regression tests.,Puts the highest-risk issues into the shortest review path.,Run focused tests for module: nestedtensor paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,122617,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: nestedtensor bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #122617: high-priority/blocker; labels: high priority, module: nn, triaged, module: nestedtensor; title: [Regression PyTorch 2.1 & 2.2] `torch._transformer_encoder_layer_fwd` outputs on CUDA/NestedTensorCUDA backends significantly diverge from truth for torch>=2.1 (SDP math))",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",3092a5578198f0612e09ea47f31946410cd2daa3ad5f2dbee4e1ff2ab9f9e160
BUNDLE-1141,bundle:bundle-1141,new_code_pr,New maintainer code PR,patch-plan bundle,New maintainer code PR: module: nn (4 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #32918: Interpolate in the “bicubic” mode with the same shape outputs zeros from second sample onwards,module: nn,Open one maintainer code PR for the module: nn blocker/regression cluster with regression tests.,Puts the highest-risk issues into the shortest review path.,Run focused tests for module: nn paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"32918, 34544, 80488, 82068",,4,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: nn bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"Maybe related to #32918. To make sure though: is content.png a 256x256 image? | issue #82068: high-priority/blocker; labels: module: nn, triaged, module: regression; title: upsample_bilinear2d() received an invalid combination of arguments | issue #80488: high-priority/blocker; labels: high priority, module: nn, triaged; title: Negative values still produced by torch.nn.functional.kl_div",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",a7100b7ac217284ed5e4470edb47105677c49d94ac98a91baf02c936d247402b
BUNDLE-1142,bundle:bundle-1142,new_code_pr,New maintainer code PR,patch-plan bundle,New maintainer code PR: module: norms and normalization (1 issue),issue_group,,#100085 [regression] torch.norm with out dtype bfloat16 cause runtime error,module: norms and normalization,Open one maintainer code PR for the module: norms and normalization blocker/regression cluster with regression tests.,Puts the highest-risk issues into the shortest review path.,Run focused tests for module: norms and normalization paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,100085,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: norms and normalization bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #100085: high-priority/blocker; labels: triaged, module: regression, module: norms and normalization; title: [regression] torch.norm with out dtype bfloat16 cause runtime error",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",92574a934de47abbbdd3bd94241386ec339a235590dada345251fee08692d0e8
BUNDLE-1143,bundle:bundle-1143,new_code_pr,New maintainer code PR,patch-plan bundle,New maintainer code PR: module: numpy (4 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #13918: Pytorch very slow to convert list of numpy arrays into tensors,module: numpy,Open one maintainer code PR for the module: numpy blocker/regression cluster with regression tests.,Puts the highest-risk issues into the shortest review path.,Run focused tests for module: numpy paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"13918, 38703, 59237, 60081",,4,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: numpy bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"Per title. Reported internally. See related (but distinct) #13918, which discusses conversion from lists of arrays. cc @mruberry @VitalyFedyunin @ngimel | issue #60081: high-priority/blocker; labels: high priority, triaged, module: numpy; title: [Bug] numpy is no longer a required dependency | issue #59237: high-priority/blocker; labels: high priority, triaged, module: numpy; title: Multiplication of `torch.tensor...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",40ad73d121ea4ab0f45bc2be50d4a067f157658632e69ee669e690bba7f2b753
BUNDLE-1144,bundle:bundle-1144,new_code_pr,New maintainer code PR,patch-plan bundle,New maintainer code PR: module: optimizer (1 issue),issue_group,,#110205 RuntimeError: Expected packed scalar Tensor to be of dimension 1. Got 0 instead.,module: optimizer,Open one maintainer code PR for the module: optimizer blocker/regression cluster with regression tests.,Puts the highest-risk issues into the shortest review path.,Run focused tests for module: optimizer paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,110205,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: optimizer bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #110205: high-priority/blocker; labels: module: optimizer, triaged, module: regression, actionable; title: RuntimeError: Expected packed scalar Tensor to be of dimension 1. Got 0 instead.",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",d66ed9ee7c9c384badd76aeac5fbe12eecf9f8ddd6a2c842356bf0c7611213f2
BUNDLE-1145,bundle:bundle-1145,new_code_pr,New maintainer code PR,patch-plan bundle,New maintainer code PR: module: performance (3 issues),issue_group,,module: performance high-priority/blocker,module: performance,Open one maintainer code PR for the module: performance blocker/regression cluster with regression tests.,Puts the highest-risk issues into the shortest review path.,Run focused tests for module: performance paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"160296, 169823, 172537",,3,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: performance bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #169823: high-priority/blocker; labels: needs reproduction, module: performance, triaged, module: regression; title: Abnormal CPU usage with ComfyUI | issue #172537: high-priority/blocker; labels: high priority, module: performance, triaged; title: [Regression] 20x slower vision model forward pass in PyTorch 2.9.1 vs 2.8.0 | issue #160296: high-priority/blocker; labels: module: performance, triaged, module:...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",b1995c85a633e25b1bc4d9b679c3c2806a4453d7ea8fe4dbe64a1b1a79d7cae6
BUNDLE-1146,bundle:bundle-1146,new_code_pr,New maintainer code PR,patch-plan bundle,New maintainer code PR: module: pt2 accuracy (1 issue),issue_group,,#113180 Higher train loss and worse evaluation metrics when using `torch.compile()`,module: pt2 accuracy,Open one maintainer code PR for the module: pt2 accuracy blocker/regression cluster with regression tests.,Puts the highest-risk issues into the shortest review path.,Run focused tests for module: pt2 accuracy paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,113180,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: pt2 accuracy bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #113180: high-priority/blocker; labels: high priority, needs reproduction, triaged, oncall: pt2, module: pt2 accuracy; title: Higher train loss and worse evaluation metrics when using `torch.compile()`",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",4407f9dd30fc3fc642de205cd52e0c5dfb7e3e26674d7257d16efd8c33ad4227
BUNDLE-1147,bundle:bundle-1147,new_code_pr,New maintainer code PR,patch-plan bundle,New maintainer code PR: module: pt2-dispatcher (3 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #152954: DTensor placement propagation for `as_strided` missing,module: pt2-dispatcher,Open one maintainer code PR for the module: pt2-dispatcher blocker/regression cluster with regression tests.,Puts the highest-risk issues into the shortest review path.,Run focused tests for module: pt2-dispatcher paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"124484, 152954, 152963",,3,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: pt2-dispatcher bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"This is a child issue of #152963 cc @IvanKobzarev | issue #124484: high-priority/blocker; labels: high priority, triaged, better-engineering, months, oncall: pt2, module: pt2-dispatcher, PT2-Bug-Bash; title: HOP dispatch isn't faithful",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",db785f1cd26febc977c0ed6f585901f01c9c69bb59ddc09f456245d6bd380cac
BUNDLE-1148,bundle:bundle-1148,new_code_pr,New maintainer code PR,patch-plan bundle,New maintainer code PR: module: pybind (3 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #40137: Improve RPC test debugability,module: pybind,Open one maintainer code PR for the module: pybind blocker/regression cluster with regression tests.,Puts the highest-risk issues into the shortest review path.,Run focused tests for module: pybind paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"40137, 56297, 87283",,3,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: pybind bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"Also relatedly #40137; it would also be nice if the traces reported what locks they held (esp the GIL) so I don't have to sleuth it manually, but that might be d | issue #87283: high-priority/blocker; labels: high priority, triaged, module: pybind; title: Missing string parsing for some parameter types in python arg parsing logic",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",0e3e2ce47388dc08450aa62d7c50350a41edddb11cb0cd53be69dc034dc39e4c
BUNDLE-1149,bundle:bundle-1149,new_code_pr,New maintainer code PR,patch-plan bundle,New maintainer code PR: module: pytree (1 issue),issue_group,,#152535 optree package status in PyTorch,module: pytree,Open one maintainer code PR for the module: pytree blocker/regression cluster with regression tests.,Puts the highest-risk issues into the shortest review path.,Run focused tests for module: pytree paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,152535,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: pytree bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #152535: high-priority/blocker; labels: high priority, triaged, dependency issue, module: pytree; title: optree package status in PyTorch",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",aca2a86f1cea5b313c95c591c1007ea5e700f0435c9ac11f3c7984857c8e4dc0
BUNDLE-1150,bundle:bundle-1150,new_code_pr,New maintainer code PR,patch-plan bundle,New maintainer code PR: module: regression (9 issues),issue_group,,module: regression high-priority/blocker,module: regression,Open one maintainer code PR for the module: regression blocker/regression cluster with regression tests.,Puts the highest-risk issues into the shortest review path.,Run focused tests for module: regression paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"45136, 68920, 73488, 86704, 114529, 150187, 152292, 152747, 175928",,9,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: regression bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #175928: high-priority/blocker; labels: high priority, oncall: releng, module: tests, triaged, module: regression, module: vllm, bot-triaged; title: [release 2.11][vllm] Language Models Tests (Extra Standard) 1 test_models[float-jason9693/Qwen2.5-1.5B-apeach] | issue #68920: high-priority/blocker; labels: needs reproduction, triaged, module: regression; title: Breakes with -OO flag in script | issue #150187:...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",706b076d5a430b3f629058b609b7af17885ce533284fdeae422a538a81880121
BUNDLE-1151,bundle:bundle-1151,new_code_pr,New maintainer code PR,patch-plan bundle,New maintainer code PR: module: rocm (1 issue),issue_group,,#85909 Steam Deck Core Dump,module: rocm,Open one maintainer code PR for the module: rocm blocker/regression cluster with regression tests.,Puts the highest-risk issues into the shortest review path.,Run focused tests for module: rocm paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,85909,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: rocm bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #85909: high-priority/blocker; labels: high priority, module: rocm, triaged; title: Steam Deck Core Dump",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",734de9b895409879ce2a17e56cdccdbdcede79521aee0df839e81f8c1e77d9d3
BUNDLE-1152,bundle:bundle-1152,new_code_pr,New maintainer code PR,patch-plan bundle,New maintainer code PR: module: rpc (2 issues),issue_group,,module: rpc high-priority/blocker,module: rpc,Open one maintainer code PR for the module: rpc blocker/regression cluster with regression tests.,Puts the highest-risk issues into the shortest review path.,Run focused tests for module: rpc paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"46491, 83243",,2,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: rpc bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #83243: high-priority/blocker; labels: high priority, oncall: distributed, triaged, module: rpc; title: RPC: wait method of Future object return 0 sometimes in rpc framework | issue #46491: high-priority/blocker; labels: high priority, oncall: distributed, triaged, module: rpc; title: cannot call rpc.init_rpc twice within a single process",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",91a53965412725c8e097ad13bad4b0c4458211e8aeda7a236a45062641fa56e8
BUNDLE-1153,bundle:bundle-1153,new_code_pr,New maintainer code PR,patch-plan bundle,New maintainer code PR: module: serialization (2 issues),issue_group,,module: serialization high-priority/blocker,module: serialization,Open one maintainer code PR for the module: serialization blocker/regression cluster with regression tests.,Puts the highest-risk issues into the shortest review path.,Run focused tests for module: serialization paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"20497, 140230",,2,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: serialization bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #140230: high-priority/blocker; labels: high priority, needs reproduction, module: serialization, triaged; title: Inconsistent Model Loading with `weights_only=True` for Custom Models | issue #20497: high-priority/blocker; labels: high priority, module: serialization, triaged; title: Statically make `__setstate__` set all attributes/parameters",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",411a01f90479162befd3f2ec12de65dc8d57db473538f34db302f98e7ffda763
BUNDLE-1154,bundle:bundle-1154,new_code_pr,New maintainer code PR,patch-plan bundle,New maintainer code PR: module: tensor creation (1 issue),issue_group,,#48558 [FR] tensor ctors should support directly creating in shared memory,module: tensor creation,Open one maintainer code PR for the module: tensor creation blocker/regression cluster with regression tests.,Puts the highest-risk issues into the shortest review path.,Run focused tests for module: tensor creation paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,48558,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: tensor creation bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #48558: high-priority/blocker; labels: high priority, feature, triaged, module: tensor creation; title: [FR] tensor ctors should support directly creating in shared memory",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",3b2be6d430e790827bfe86b03106a0260b970d21943f0ac134eebc75d075ea80
BUNDLE-1155,bundle:bundle-1155,new_code_pr,New maintainer code PR,patch-plan bundle,New maintainer code PR: module: tests (1 issue),issue_group,,#39061 Some @slowtests are never run in CI,module: tests,Open one maintainer code PR for the module: tests blocker/regression cluster with regression tests.,Puts the highest-risk issues into the shortest review path.,Run focused tests for module: tests paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,39061,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: tests bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #39061: high-priority/blocker; labels: high priority, module: tests, triaged, quansight-nack; title: Some @slowtests are never run in CI",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",dee19e2e10f652fe04566918c9d971f4cbeb8081270f4ae29a7f1b519c096075
BUNDLE-1156,bundle:bundle-1156,new_code_pr,New maintainer code PR,patch-plan bundle,New maintainer code PR: module: typing (1 issue),issue_group,,#58370 Add better python operators annotations for IDE type checking,module: typing,Open one maintainer code PR for the module: typing blocker/regression cluster with regression tests.,Puts the highest-risk issues into the shortest review path.,Run focused tests for module: typing paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,58370,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: typing bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #58370: high-priority/blocker; labels: high priority, feature, module: typing, triaged; title: Add better python operators annotations for IDE type checking",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",7271dae20f534f1c8f40fd72882b664ec2c5f02c7d3c27cb3f0aa689d2bd8cf8
BUNDLE-1157,bundle:bundle-1157,new_code_pr,New maintainer code PR,patch-plan bundle,New maintainer code PR: module: ux (1 issue),issue_group,,#31558 More dynamic PyTorch APIs,module: ux,Open one maintainer code PR for the module: ux blocker/regression cluster with regression tests.,Puts the highest-risk issues into the shortest review path.,Run focused tests for module: ux paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,31558,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: ux bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #31558: high-priority/blocker; labels: high priority, triaged, module: ux; title: More dynamic PyTorch APIs",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",e15af8561fa7dce70f7ceab3f6cee7c653c85f532ff7eda7819edeae6b5ede33
BUNDLE-1158,bundle:bundle-1158,new_code_pr,New maintainer code PR,patch-plan bundle,New maintainer code PR: oncall: distributed (1 issue),issue_group,,#42793 distributed training with c10d does not work with layerdrop in pytorch > 1.4,oncall: distributed,Open one maintainer code PR for the oncall: distributed blocker/regression cluster with regression tests.,Puts the highest-risk issues into the shortest review path.,Run focused tests for oncall: distributed paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,42793,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This oncall: distributed bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #42793: high-priority/blocker; labels: high priority, oncall: distributed, triaged; title: distributed training with c10d does not work with layerdrop in pytorch > 1.4",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",45ec1d66ddeb8d37ce0c38e16c393e218b4abadeb8387d64e7cc66c80500a4b5
BUNDLE-1159,bundle:bundle-1159,new_code_pr,New maintainer code PR,patch-plan bundle,New maintainer code PR: oncall: jit (3 issues),issue_group,,oncall: jit high-priority/blocker,oncall: jit,Open one maintainer code PR for the oncall: jit blocker/regression cluster with regression tests.,Puts the highest-risk issues into the shortest review path.,Run focused tests for oncall: jit paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"36040, 42487, 61223",,3,0,patch_plan_candidate,This oncall: jit bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #61223: high-priority/blocker; labels: high priority, oncall: jit, triaged; title: optimize_for_inference does not handle MKLDNN for BatchNorm1d | issue #42487: high-priority/blocker; labels: high priority, oncall: jit, triaged, weeks; title: Support recursive data type in TorchScript | issue #36040: high-priority/blocker; labels: high priority, oncall: jit, triaged; title: [JIT] Huge delay (1274s vs 0.031s)...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",a73481272dfcc58ad907eef4a0e7558dde6cb60cbe219ea2b97aaedffb00d2ab
BUNDLE-1160,bundle:bundle-1160,new_code_pr,New maintainer code PR,patch-plan bundle,New maintainer code PR: oncall: pt2 (2 issues),issue_group,,oncall: pt2 high-priority/blocker,oncall: pt2,Open one maintainer code PR for the oncall: pt2 blocker/regression cluster with regression tests.,Puts the highest-risk issues into the shortest review path.,Run focused tests for oncall: pt2 paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"161419, 188332",,2,0,patch_plan_candidate,This oncall: pt2 bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #188332: high-priority/blocker; labels: high priority, triaged, oncall: pt2; title: Inductor: allgather fusion creates rank-specific cache that crashes when loaded by other ranks | issue #161419: high-priority/blocker; labels: high priority, triaged, oncall: pt2; title: mobilenetv3_large_100 aot_eager accuracy failure",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",2b546f844d1c3a739993f4cf40b65327da8c6b386b33a14a6a95612f80d15a43
BUNDLE-1161,bundle:bundle-1161,new_code_pr,New maintainer code PR,patch-plan bundle,New maintainer code PR: oncall: quantization (1 issue),issue_group,,#106432 inconsistent dtype of scale and zero_point in observers,oncall: quantization,Open one maintainer code PR for the oncall: quantization blocker/regression cluster with regression tests.,Puts the highest-risk issues into the shortest review path.,Run focused tests for oncall: quantization paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,106432,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This oncall: quantization bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #106432: high-priority/blocker; labels: high priority, oncall: quantization, triaged; title: inconsistent dtype of scale and zero_point in observers",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",6025843edcb25d446c2dd2ee3b0c254d43309e9e3755bb95679b15bf4b300394
BUNDLE-1162,bundle:bundle-1162,new_volunteer_pr,New volunteer-ready PR,patch-plan bundle,New volunteer-ready PR: module: __torch_function__ (1 issue),issue_group,,#117806 Supporting custom attributes with `__torch_function__` tensor subclasses,module: __torch_function__,Open one scoped PR or contributor-ready branch for the module: __torch_function__ volunteer slice.,Turns easy/PR-welcome items into one patchable scope with tests instead of scattered asks.,Run focused tests for module: __torch_function__ paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,117806,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: __torch_function__ bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #117806: good volunteer slice; labels: good first issue, triaged, enhancement, module: __torch_function__, module: dynamo; title: Supporting custom attributes with `__torch_function__` tensor subclasses",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",259ebfcc186d685bb50500849bbf5b3cc5158b3853a180c71291003803bf22ac
BUNDLE-1163,bundle:bundle-1163,new_volunteer_pr,New volunteer-ready PR,patch-plan bundle,New volunteer-ready PR: module: bootcamp (2 issues),issue_group,,module: bootcamp good volunteer slice,module: bootcamp,Open one scoped PR or contributor-ready branch for the module: bootcamp volunteer slice.,Turns easy/PR-welcome items into one patchable scope with tests instead of scattered asks.,Run focused tests for module: bootcamp paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"58122, 79452",,2,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: bootcamp bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #58122: good volunteer slice; labels: module: bootcamp, good first issue, triaged, OSS contribution wanted; title: Generate special clear error messages for known common misuses in TorchScript | issue #79452: good volunteer slice; labels: oncall: distributed, module: bootcamp, good first issue, triaged, better-engineering, pt_distributed_rampup; title: Use c10d broadcast_object in Zero",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",869e0ef701f0ff78c6068f6fc8670cb2e0a7f37a7f14ffee03748594ba2d91fe
BUNDLE-1164,bundle:bundle-1164,new_volunteer_pr,New volunteer-ready PR,patch-plan bundle,New volunteer-ready PR: module: build (1 issue),issue_group,,#99278 Build error on libstc++ header stl_alogbase.h on riscv,module: build,Open one scoped PR or contributor-ready branch for the module: build volunteer slice.,Turns easy/PR-welcome items into one patchable scope with tests instead of scattered asks.,Run focused tests for module: build paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,99278,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: build bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #99278: good volunteer slice; labels: module: build, good first issue, triaged; title: Build error on libstc++ header stl_alogbase.h on riscv",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",1ffbec86be446d749a0d63946bcff0ef023cd959befec8bf1c95abca26a583cd
BUNDLE-1165,bundle:bundle-1165,new_volunteer_pr,New volunteer-ready PR,patch-plan bundle,New volunteer-ready PR: module: c10d (2 issues),issue_group,,module: c10d good volunteer slice,module: c10d,Open one scoped PR or contributor-ready branch for the module: c10d volunteer slice.,Turns easy/PR-welcome items into one patchable scope with tests instead of scattered asks.,Run focused tests for module: c10d paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"84593, 97469",,2,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: c10d bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #97469: good volunteer slice; labels: good first issue, triaged, module: c10d; title: Improve collectives fingerprinting | issue #84593: good volunteer slice; labels: good first issue, triaged, module: c10d; title: Uneven and/or Dynamically sized collectives",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",fc7dff3a7840c13b8aaf3f092ad073b4eff0cdfe6408531a8212448e3083db3e
BUNDLE-1166,bundle:bundle-1166,new_volunteer_pr,New volunteer-ready PR,patch-plan bundle,New volunteer-ready PR: module: ci (2 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #64067: Execute C++ based GTest unit tests from a python wrapper,module: ci,Open one scoped PR or contributor-ready branch for the module: ci volunteer slice.,Turns easy/PR-welcome items into one patchable scope with tests instead of scattered asks.,Run focused tests for module: ci paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"64067, 66824",,2,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: ci bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"#65514 introduced a Python framework for running C++ tests(the benefits and reasoning are described in #64067). While that PR added a framework for running tests, we still have many manual calls to C++ test binaries in the scripts used in CI. This i",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",504c386963a86452d9b5274bcf6e9188c48ab9076d834c78e431f54211260b76
BUNDLE-1167,bundle:bundle-1167,new_volunteer_pr,New volunteer-ready PR,patch-plan bundle,New volunteer-ready PR: module: compile ux (1 issue),issue_group,,#153669 Make tlparse able to show a summary of distinct graph breaks,module: compile ux,Open one scoped PR or contributor-ready branch for the module: compile ux volunteer slice.,Turns easy/PR-welcome items into one patchable scope with tests instead of scattered asks.,Run focused tests for module: compile ux paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,153669,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: compile ux bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #153669: good volunteer slice; labels: good first issue, triaged, oncall: pt2, module: dynamo, dynamo-triage-jan2025, module: compile ux; title: Make tlparse able to show a summary of distinct graph breaks",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",3917da7b8c8230e3ef4ea8c34e88d606547b14470052275e2e634cf8f5be7362
BUNDLE-1168,bundle:bundle-1168,new_volunteer_pr,New volunteer-ready PR,patch-plan bundle,New volunteer-ready PR: module: docs (1 issue),issue_group,,#9886 [doc] functionalities not documented,module: docs,Open one scoped PR or contributor-ready branch for the module: docs volunteer slice.,Turns easy/PR-welcome items into one patchable scope with tests instead of scattered asks.,Run focused tests for module: docs paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,9886,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: docs bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #9886: good volunteer slice; labels: module: docs, good first issue, triaged; title: [doc] functionalities not documented",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",9454a146c225ba06ad0bddd0271ca97183109952b7ac4b05927e314b0f3bc55b
BUNDLE-1169,bundle:bundle-1169,new_volunteer_pr,New volunteer-ready PR,patch-plan bundle,New volunteer-ready PR: module: dynamo (2 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #102207: skipIfTorchInductor Tracking Issue,module: dynamo,Open one scoped PR or contributor-ready branch for the module: dynamo volunteer slice.,Turns easy/PR-welcome items into one patchable scope with tests instead of scattered asks.,Run focused tests for module: dynamo paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"102207, 108798",,2,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: dynamo bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"_.from needs to be renamed"" 'test_advancedindex_mixed_cpu_devices' - ""FIXME"" 'test_advancedindex_mixed_devices_error' - ""FIXME"" #108181 and #108798 'test_typed_storage_deprecation_warning' - ""FIXME"" 'test_pin_memory' - ""pin_memory isn't yet supported in TorchInductor"" 'test_me...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",4d8203cbc6dadd1c24c405a9056f835d27a326cecdf1a9aae05be2fc414a3d07
BUNDLE-1170,bundle:bundle-1170,new_volunteer_pr,New volunteer-ready PR,patch-plan bundle,New volunteer-ready PR: module: internals (3 issues),issue_group,,module: internals good volunteer slice,module: internals,Open one scoped PR or contributor-ready branch for the module: internals volunteer slice.,Turns easy/PR-welcome items into one patchable scope with tests instead of scattered asks.,Run focused tests for module: internals paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"10756, 20704, 61654",,3,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: internals bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #61654: good volunteer slice; labels: module: internals, good first issue, triaged; title: Allow creation of pseudo devices for testing purposes | issue #10756: good volunteer slice; labels: module: internals, good first issue, triaged, module: partial aliasing; title: Unexpected Behavior when Pointwise Operations Write to Expanded Tensors | issue #20704: good volunteer slice; labels: module: internals, modu...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",2427912bbdccbfdd670c399b623a2d3a18fccb2ee4d8d97719537020f03c3faa
BUNDLE-1171,bundle:bundle-1171,new_volunteer_pr,New volunteer-ready PR,patch-plan bundle,New volunteer-ready PR: module: memory format (2 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #40316: Refactor the adaptive avg pool code,module: memory format,Open one scoped PR or contributor-ready branch for the module: memory format volunteer slice.,Turns easy/PR-welcome items into one patchable scope with tests instead of scattered asks.,Run focused tests for module: memory format paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"40316, 42779",,2,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: memory format bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"ng5 @Xia-Weiwen @leslie-fang-intel @dzhulgakov @VitalyFedyunin @ppwwyyxx @ngimel @z-a-f, @vkuzo. 🐛 Bug As part of the refactoring effort in #40316, I ran some benchmarks on adaptive_avg_pool(2/3)d to see what is the difference in execution time for MemoryFormat::Contiguous vs...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",40eea0de8f490a3315d4a897b633c13c5416b2d0545376037f7951fdb417d1e2
BUNDLE-1172,bundle:bundle-1172,new_volunteer_pr,New volunteer-ready PR,patch-plan bundle,New volunteer-ready PR: module: nn (1 issue),issue_group,,#66813 Use `__slots__` for the `nn.Module` class,module: nn,Open one scoped PR or contributor-ready branch for the module: nn volunteer slice.,Turns easy/PR-welcome items into one patchable scope with tests instead of scattered asks.,Run focused tests for module: nn paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,66813,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: nn bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #66813: good volunteer slice; labels: module: performance, module: nn, good first issue, triaged, better-engineering, actionable; title: Use `__slots__` for the `nn.Module` class",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",74afc6b2a8d1249fcff10dd1966f709815c151a6d00d58eb62d9fd51cd249994
BUNDLE-1173,bundle:bundle-1173,new_volunteer_pr,New volunteer-ready PR,patch-plan bundle,New volunteer-ready PR: module: numpy (1 issue),issue_group,,#93684 Can we rewrite numpy operators to pytorch operators?,module: numpy,Open one scoped PR or contributor-ready branch for the module: numpy volunteer slice.,Turns easy/PR-welcome items into one patchable scope with tests instead of scattered asks.,Run focused tests for module: numpy paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,93684,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: numpy bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #93684: good volunteer slice; labels: good first issue, triaged, module: numpy; title: Can we rewrite numpy operators to pytorch operators?",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",da9075cd9722a0b875cff11286033496071de45bb28ec677e450fe0d773baa6e
BUNDLE-1174,bundle:bundle-1174,new_volunteer_pr,New volunteer-ready PR,patch-plan bundle,New volunteer-ready PR: module: random (1 issue),issue_group,,#67321 alias to generate tensor with random uniform distribution.,module: random,Open one scoped PR or contributor-ready branch for the module: random volunteer slice.,Turns easy/PR-welcome items into one patchable scope with tests instead of scattered asks.,Run focused tests for module: random paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,67321,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: random bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #67321: good volunteer slice; labels: feature, good first issue, triaged, module: random; title: alias to generate tensor with random uniform distribution.",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",a1691c6d6e09680e10ed6b2d6f68d30adadf5137da6d8a96ea3b78c65d47dbcf
BUNDLE-1175,bundle:bundle-1175,new_volunteer_pr,New volunteer-ready PR,patch-plan bundle,New volunteer-ready PR: module: scatter & gather ops (1 issue),issue_group,,#63265 torch.scatter_: support index.size(d) > src.size(d),module: scatter & gather ops,Open one scoped PR or contributor-ready branch for the module: scatter & gather ops volunteer slice.,Turns easy/PR-welcome items into one patchable scope with tests instead of scattered asks.,Run focused tests for module: scatter & gather ops paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,63265,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: scatter & gather ops bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #63265: good volunteer slice; labels: good first issue, triaged, enhancement, module: scatter & gather ops; title: torch.scatter_: support index.size(d) > src.size(d)",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",6e7fd8e663ac496d48621790fc6d6f75b2ab1a935919f7b181e81021481c71cb
BUNDLE-1176,bundle:bundle-1176,new_volunteer_pr,New volunteer-ready PR,patch-plan bundle,New volunteer-ready PR: oncall: jit (1 issue),issue_group,,#16663 new_zeros is not traced correctly,oncall: jit,Open one scoped PR or contributor-ready branch for the oncall: jit volunteer slice.,Turns easy/PR-welcome items into one patchable scope with tests instead of scattered asks.,Run focused tests for oncall: jit paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,16663,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This oncall: jit bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #16663: good volunteer slice; labels: oncall: jit, good first issue, triaged; title: new_zeros is not traced correctly",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",6231ad1e7488c7142605578c0f579291d8fc60193a8e6cb32ebf6d94c58c3f93
BUNDLE-1177,bundle:bundle-1177,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: general (140 issues),issue_group,,general stale/low urgency batch 9,general,"Run one general stale-resolution sweep covering 140 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"4073, 6552, 6846, 6901, 7047, 7227, 7480, 7493, 7571, 7729, 7781, 7789, 7897, 7945, 7946, 7986, 8012, 8128, 8186, 8328, 8479, 8546, 8548, 8607, 8648, 8650, 8730, 8902, 8979, 8982, 8984, 9003, 9016, 9024, 9028, 9068, 9098, 9150, 9166, 9174, 9207, 9218, 9449, 9761, 9881, 9883, 9921, 9945, 10070, 10088, 10161, 10170, 10176, 10215, 10256, 10314, 10341, 10342, 10396, 10460, 10461, 10515, 10582, 10714, 10738, 10808, 10902, 10984, 10985, 10991, 11119, 11197, 27815, 33298, 33520, 40087, 65140, 68258, 70540, 73665, 77537, 77880, 84193, 92838, 97408, 97504, 97653, 97961, 99025, 99790, 100419, 100617, 100785, 100807, 101191, 101319, 101536, 102360, 102741, 102921, 103241, 103382, 103530, 103802, 104045, 104282, 108888, 110786, 111210, 111806, 112318, 112608, 114044, 117967, 118970, 119377, 119387, 119417, 119418, 120002, 120037, 120104, 120534, 120541, 121737, 122552, 122756, 123120, 123466, 124998, 127555, 128960, 129447, 129625, 130238, 130636, 130792, 131274, 131962, 134201",,140,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a general stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #103382: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged; title: NotImplementedError Could not run 'c10d::alltoall_' with arguments from the 'Meta' backend. | issue #102921: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged; title: Unbox expectedml | issue #102741: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, topic: new features, topic: docs; title: Unlocking PyTorch's Power: README.md in Multiple Languages! | issue #100785: stale/low urgency;...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",2e49a98a72ff8bb4bbfc10ee9b250d6be9c92ca4f1ef0e5ba629c52e20d408d9
BUNDLE-1178,bundle:bundle-1178,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: general (140 issues),issue_group,,general stale/low urgency batch 41,general,"Run one general stale-resolution sweep covering 140 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"6618, 6660, 6868, 7078, 7912, 8471, 8937, 8944, 9407, 9531, 9676, 9704, 9708, 9975, 10675, 10875, 10940, 10990, 11058, 11180, 11267, 11268, 11354, 11363, 11433, 11636, 11678, 11735, 11791, 11850, 11861, 11865, 11885, 11890, 11976, 11996, 12007, 12010, 12045, 12086, 12134, 12136, 12181, 12257, 12280, 12297, 12322, 12501, 12515, 12530, 12576, 12640, 12642, 12646, 12658, 12755, 12763, 12808, 12879, 12913, 12931, 13041, 13120, 13208, 13226, 13297, 13373, 13405, 13493, 13498, 13598, 13655, 13667, 13671, 13684, 13715, 13772, 14030, 14185, 14222, 14262, 14312, 14320, 14328, 14337, 14348, 14366, 14380, 14408, 14431, 14459, 14508, 14538, 14652, 14685, 14726, 14788, 14796, 14799, 14925, 14939, 14940, 14963, 14970, 14989, 15009, 15249, 15290, 15313, 15431, 15432, 15465, 15608, 15771, 15869, 16138, 16195, 16254, 16280, 16385, 16436, 16494, 16590, 16666, 17437, 17632, 17634, 17712, 37443, 50258, 55228, 57117, 57230, 78954, 96265, 129228, 138197, 139520, 140640, 140711",,140,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a general stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,issue #11890: stale/low urgency; labels: caffe2; title: caffe2 argmax and argmin documentation incorrect for output type | issue #11885: stale/low urgency; labels: caffe2; title: [caffe2] Bug for softmaxwithloss operator | issue #9975: stale/low urgency; labels: caffe2; title: python caffe2/python/operator_test/activation_ops_test.py Segmentation fault (core dumped) | issue #11976: stale/low urgency; labels: caffe...,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",affd147e1e10e6fe82b6ccb1201a3794f4280294475f15ab1db16978468c3a35
BUNDLE-1179,bundle:bundle-1179,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: general (140 issues),issue_group,,general stale/low urgency batch 32,general,"Run one general stale-resolution sweep covering 140 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"2739, 3176, 5266, 6402, 6408, 6613, 6760, 6794, 8028, 8550, 8886, 9029, 9208, 9699, 10232, 11451, 11978, 12401, 12509, 12855, 12869, 13224, 13304, 13664, 13746, 13836, 14131, 14370, 14486, 14487, 14731, 15120, 16299, 16322, 17458, 17495, 17796, 17800, 17850, 17872, 17887, 17907, 17936, 18000, 18011, 18101, 18273, 18677, 18944, 19107, 19244, 19416, 19708, 19930, 19960, 20268, 20273, 20776, 20777, 20975, 21012, 21277, 21684, 21766, 22040, 22358, 22375, 22609, 22859, 23364, 23429, 24079, 24353, 24835, 25112, 25880, 26802, 27034, 27840, 28093, 28249, 28859, 30155, 30405, 30418, 31548, 31606, 32033, 32105, 32783, 32916, 33085, 33180, 33341, 33611, 33653, 33787, 34207, 34715, 35609, 35681, 35755, 35944, 35964, 36436, 36733, 36753, 36754, 37065, 37204, 37434, 37684, 38170, 38640, 39298, 39603, 39665, 39972, 40030, 40269, 41660, 41801, 41823, 41904, 43040, 43486, 93454, 93455, 93456, 93463, 146889, 148044, 148113, 150531, 150861, 153041, 153967, 155703, 157721, 159228",,140,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a general stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,issue #6408: stale/low urgency; labels: caffe2; title: [caffe2] Prefetching blobs for memory optimization | issue #18944: stale/low urgency; labels: caffe2; title: Caffe2 on google colab: | issue #15120: stale/low urgency; labels: caffe2; title: Different implementations of upsampleBilinear between pytorch and caffe2 | issue #16299: stale/low urgency; labels: caffe2; title: caffe2::CudnnConvOp::RunOnDevice() fails...,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",a1eb7ddcd54e7f083655af150205c2b2deb69e9b5681f4f2f6d657dc1aa18595
BUNDLE-1180,bundle:bundle-1180,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: general (140 issues),issue_group,,general stale/low urgency batch 23,general,"Run one general stale-resolution sweep covering 140 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"3823, 6505, 7020, 7546, 7745, 9133, 9375, 10913, 11516, 11537, 12690, 13034, 13508, 14702, 14864, 15378, 16402, 16556, 17538, 22447, 24313, 27336, 28218, 31679, 40034, 41232, 42173, 42597, 42919, 43815, 43964, 44185, 44489, 46400, 46787, 46869, 47954, 48929, 48998, 49166, 51282, 51410, 51451, 52694, 52745, 52767, 53072, 53193, 53386, 53442, 53462, 53463, 53952, 54192, 54340, 54362, 54364, 54366, 54566, 54630, 54757, 54800, 54802, 54897, 55696, 55933, 55941, 56100, 56285, 56357, 56634, 56707, 56809, 57005, 57359, 57380, 57404, 57415, 57495, 57691, 57742, 57987, 58016, 58091, 58167, 58617, 58791, 58930, 59575, 60083, 60102, 60802, 60924, 60991, 60999, 61384, 61843, 62011, 62673, 62699, 62742, 62973, 64124, 64845, 65494, 67377, 67751, 68474, 68475, 68498, 69676, 69893, 69932, 70413, 72448, 74248, 74300, 74485, 74514, 75798, 75925, 75986, 76040, 76047, 76323, 76326, 93464, 93465, 93486, 93488, 93580, 93592, 93596, 93602, 93604, 93609, 99999, 106885, 146945, 153745",,140,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a general stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #42173: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, function request; title: Exclusive flag in torch.cumsum | issue #7546: stale/low urgency; labels: caffe2; title: [Caffe2] Build broken on macOS High Sierra: can't find sys headers in /usr/local/include. | issue #3823: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, enhancement; title: Fuse bias to CuDNN convolution | issue #46869: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, open sourc...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",c9ba0dee5efb464242ce173a64cc7e1f8dbb381be0eecb287e85b3e277b8a4b8
BUNDLE-1181,bundle:bundle-1181,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: general (140 issues),issue_group,,general stale/low urgency batch 14,general,"Run one general stale-resolution sweep covering 140 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"630, 711, 1442, 1641, 1642, 1861, 2569, 5385, 7250, 9417, 9624, 9898, 11612, 12764, 15829, 17268, 20613, 25091, 26109, 32088, 32219, 32452, 33390, 33859, 34086, 37300, 38550, 38684, 38737, 39395, 39820, 41164, 42440, 44255, 45540, 48366, 49076, 49110, 51440, 51456, 52553, 52668, 52673, 53438, 55274, 59386, 64932, 65002, 65950, 68967, 69654, 70529, 72737, 73646, 74539, 74669, 76327, 76331, 76441, 76451, 76656, 77736, 77894, 77899, 77946, 77967, 77981, 78507, 79013, 79030, 79031, 79032, 79050, 79052, 79053, 79118, 79137, 79138, 79336, 79349, 79395, 79407, 79425, 79453, 79469, 79592, 80985, 81932, 81935, 81937, 81938, 81943, 82197, 82357, 82751, 82764, 83024, 83764, 83817, 83851, 84346, 84597, 84691, 84721, 85058, 85082, 85625, 87350, 88880, 90905, 90998, 91624, 91678, 91716, 91759, 92075, 92781, 92811, 92828, 92967, 93444, 93446, 93458, 93579, 93719, 95779, 95917, 109098, 129330, 152134, 156745, 159932, 160122, 164089, 165042, 165992, 169318, 169955, 170674, 171100",,140,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a general stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #79050: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, lazy; title: [MetaIssue] Investigate if we should be reusing primtorch formulas for `is_dynamic` | issue #79031: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, lazy; title: Implement SymbolicIntNode interface for lazy (i.e. lazy::SymbolicIntNode) | issue #79030: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, lazy; title: Devirtualize `sym_sizes`. It still has to work for python tensor s...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",1319789ccd61d8e45475098d3b01c191a1b982532be3d3a9803f15f0ae7739b2
BUNDLE-1182,bundle:bundle-1182,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: general (33 issues),issue_group,,general stale/low urgency batch 47,general,"Run one general stale-resolution sweep covering 33 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"1487, 6273, 6357, 6542, 6783, 6845, 6857, 6875, 6902, 7127, 7133, 7179, 9484, 9604, 9853, 9854, 10007, 10254, 12983, 25381, 31085, 49480, 59682, 61079, 64185, 68287, 68288, 68298, 106713, 106717, 106718, 159229, 159230",,33,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a general stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,issue #7133: stale/low urgency; labels: caffe2; title: [Caffe2 warpctc] How to use the offered warpctc? | issue #7179: stale/low urgency; labels: caffe2; title: [caffe2]when i do CMAKE | issue #6902: stale/low urgency; labels: caffe2; title: [Caffe2] Flatten Layer in caffe2 | issue #6875: stale/low urgency; labels: caffe2; title: [Bug] VS reports unresolved external symbol from caffe2 observer | issue #6845: stale...,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",db2c94af1e14561c5449086e83fa5dd44df27692a0978d57b2b7b1bf12dd5b64
BUNDLE-1183,bundle:bundle-1183,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: general (2 issues),issue_group,,"Review thread: 2 issues - issue #10119: [Caffe2] MNIST Tutorial LMDB Error ""Cannot open db""",general,"Run one general stale-resolution sweep covering 2 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"7807, 10119",,2,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a general stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"put - none of these combos work. I've seen other posts on this issue such as: facebookarchive/caffe2#1074 facebookarchive/caffe2#2282 #9736 #7807 facebookarchive/tutorials#7 But most of these issues were either older, posted by those who built from source or had different envi...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",62cbe92b789f7f28cab0912eb70d210cb9ba1a3b324c8634345dd192e1489533
BUNDLE-1184,bundle:bundle-1184,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: 64-bit (18 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #129118: interpolate nearest get values zero when outputs over 4G elements,module: 64-bit,"Run one module: 64-bit stale-resolution sweep covering 18 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"17897, 25747, 31708, 84520, 95024, 117736, 129118, 133751, 137368, 141831, 144824, 147118, 147613, 149301, 154322, 155218, 169163, 188756",,18,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: 64-bit stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"1].abs().sum()) tensor(0., device='cuda:0', dtype=torch.bfloat16) Workaround Make the input tensor contiguous, as in #81665. Related issues #129118 #81665 Additional considerations The fact that the failure is silent makes this hard to identify, track and debug. The CPU implem... | slicing — the device copy is intact; only the gather is broken. All indices involved are valid; this is not the OOB-index case of #154...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",d660ddade16561d93add49d96711f516f0757431948fb4a0eb320d2be3ff2725
BUNDLE-1185,bundle:bundle-1185,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: __torch_dispatch__ (41 issues),issue_group,,module: __torch_dispatch__ stale/low urgency batch 2,module: __torch_dispatch__,"Run one module: __torch_dispatch__ stale-resolution sweep covering 41 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"62888, 64548, 64874, 65339, 65423, 65619, 66026, 68622, 69530, 69991, 72179, 72911, 73150, 73930, 74991, 75166, 76844, 77118, 77223, 77265, 77332, 77544, 78845, 79563, 81240, 81565, 81682, 82239, 82479, 84565, 84864, 85105, 86128, 91437, 108983, 114652, 121917, 124788, 131753, 131772, 163013",,41,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: __torch_dispatch__ stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #81240: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: __torch_dispatch__, module: functionalization; title: Functionalization and fake tensors failure in torture test | issue #74991: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, better-engineering, module: __torch_dispatch__, tensor subclass; title: Tensor Subclass not preserved for Tensor subclasses created via inheritance of a TensorImpl subclass | issue #79563: stale...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",77479a1fc177bd3f3add6f2bdb348c65721efa234b1e21f02184a1cb131db2c1
BUNDLE-1186,bundle:bundle-1186,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: __torch_function__ (34 issues),issue_group,,module: __torch_function__ stale/low urgency batch 2,module: __torch_function__,"Run one module: __torch_function__ stale-resolution sweep covering 34 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"44316, 45565, 53678, 53937, 55095, 55104, 55440, 61544, 63911, 64187, 64690, 65215, 65753, 73860, 74491, 75462, 75554, 75568, 76037, 76294, 76734, 76751, 77668, 81323, 92701, 93362, 105644, 106302, 110249, 119194, 122814, 123245, 131947, 135660",,34,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: __torch_function__ stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #76734: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: __torch_function__; title: __torch_function__ callers should always pass kwargs | issue #76294: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: vmap, module: __torch_function__; title: torch._remove_batch_dim is interceptable by __torch_function__ / batch tensors don't print correctly | issue #76037: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: __torch_function_...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",2bd8566516cf4b431ba94bd83862feb1d2fa5a3752677456530a7d16ebbc5622
BUNDLE-1187,bundle:bundle-1187,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: abi (23 issues),issue_group,,"Review thread: 2 issues - issue #47993: build pytorch from source on ubuntu, building error from fbgemm::SparseAdaGradSignature",module: abi,"Run one module: abi stale-resolution sweep covering 23 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"2575, 17658, 28754, 41797, 47993, 51039, 51781, 55267, 60341, 61260, 62650, 64645, 68905, 69013, 70191, 73829, 77184, 81680, 102142, 102272, 109923, 163290, 166101",,23,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: abi stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"port torch; print(torch._C._GLIBCXX_USE_CXX11_ABI)""` with the conda version also yields `False` I tried compiling from source but am facing #47993. Any feedback or tips would be appreciated. | ssages sent to stderr or stdout. Yet, I'm speculating if this crash might be hiding a Thread-Local Storage (TLS) issue, as documented here: #2575. SEGFAULT BT: Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. 0x00007fffc...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",15b5bedf4bcf10b8a43b2f3159bd46422c463e1cd570c9383f425e371de62232
BUNDLE-1188,bundle:bundle-1188,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: accelerator (9 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 3 issues - issue #143112: FFT half precision only let CUDA pass the check,module: accelerator,"Run one module: accelerator stale-resolution sweep covering 9 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"143112, 150663, 165038, 166054, 166696, 167210, 167447, 169277, 169371",,9,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: accelerator stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"torch.accelerator.get_device_capability for users to get some device capabilities (currently focus on data types) to solve some issues like #165038 and #143112. The supported data types in PyTorch are: float32, float64, float16, bfloat16, float8_e5m2, float8_e4m3fn, float8_e5m... | rator.get_device_capability for users to get some device capabilities (currently focus on data types) to solve some issues like #16503...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",9aa594a9953ee042c37c256262eec25e6a6d1f1f25b723e68a44cf049a0dea0b
BUNDLE-1189,bundle:bundle-1189,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: activation checkpointing (42 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 7 issues - issue #12659: Differentiation through Module parameters updates,module: activation checkpointing,"Run one module: activation checkpointing stale-resolution sweep covering 42 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"7313, 7617, 7801, 12659, 13234, 23732, 24005, 32005, 39279, 42812, 45242, 46886, 65913, 68423, 71322, 79016, 82156, 82465, 86097, 90481, 98668, 102600, 125591, 129293, 130096, 131062, 143176, 143774, 144470, 144928, 145511, 146707, 147449, 151936, 152752, 153334, 154984, 155171, 155490, 165880, 166646, 170284",,42,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: activation checkpointing stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"Hi, Thanks for sharing these details. We are indeed looking into providing these functionalities (via different APIs). You can see #39279 and #49171 for example. These two would provide similar functionality as what you're looking for right? | Yup, #7313 :) But maybe even regardless, having supported convenience methods for removing buffers / parameters / etc can be useful. | I don't think this fits well with how...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",f3fa8669910012f84144d7630c152ac8186d7ae3d2d46cbc0c46ff9153ee0909
BUNDLE-1190,bundle:bundle-1190,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: advanced indexing (44 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 5 issues - issue #105641: Turn indexing with a scalar tensor into an copy into a view and avoid a D2H synchronization.,module: advanced indexing,"Run one module: advanced indexing stale-resolution sweep covering 44 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"11635, 15284, 30574, 31913, 45125, 50737, 52743, 53257, 54062, 55143, 56896, 58181, 59140, 61819, 63921, 63935, 71331, 73175, 73501, 74952, 76347, 79997, 81413, 82926, 86890, 96111, 99297, 103580, 105641, 107700, 108968, 111159, 119548, 121719, 128396, 130525, 135487, 136736, 147628, 150017, 161970, 162918, 167825, 170350",,44,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: advanced indexing stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"@Chillee maybe also that's why part of why repeat_interleave is slow: #31980, also a bit related: #73175 | tensor([2, 3, 5]) out = torch.repeat_interleave(A, num_repeats.cuda(), dim=0) Indexing with a scalar tensor performs a synchronization. See #105641 for more details. torch.normal also incurs a sync on std: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/blob/main/aten/src/ATen/native/Distr... | ates.h#L222 nanmedian incur...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",a0ccbce54899fa6ce1af80729acc0eb2073ccf78423167e88162697e9abc71e8
BUNDLE-1191,bundle:bundle-1191,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: amp (automated mixed precision) (86 issues),issue_group,,"Review thread: 5 issues - issue #44511: LR scheduler throws warning when using scaler.step instead of optimizer.step, and when saving optimizer state",module: amp (automated mixed precision),"Run one module: amp (automated mixed precision) stale-resolution sweep covering 86 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"38487, 38788, 40427, 40497, 42311, 42460, 42838, 43544, 43556, 44511, 44710, 44724, 45412, 45910, 46178, 47906, 49038, 49282, 49653, 52279, 53094, 53345, 55374, 55585, 56979, 60164, 60724, 61173, 63078, 63313, 65760, 65788, 67589, 67590, 67598, 67879, 68315, 70166, 70346, 71631, 72295, 72421, 72897, 73050, 73924, 74739, 76282, 80167, 81876, 82076, 82212, 83733, 86270, 86548, 87979, 88474, 89241, 90057, 92542, 93227, 98814, 98860, 99710, 100705, 100932, 105682, 107663, 108627, 110966, 111739, 115500, 117832, 119473, 120930, 120994, 129027, 130067, 130847, 132388, 132602, 137080, 160415, 160438, 161621, 165324, 165730",,86,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: amp (automated mixed precision) stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,error-using-gradscaler/92930/8. IMO this is an ugly solution that relies on the details of the scaler values. Additional context Also fixes #55585 The warning UserWarning: Detected call of lr_scheduler.step() before optimizer.step() is impacting Lightning (Lightning-AI/pytorch... | sure if any other optimizer wrapper may need to run certain communications even if no local optimizer step. One relevant feature reque...,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",aae0d85edf95e97ad5e0540defbf5b1beba454eacfde0546bf94c6915113f04e
BUNDLE-1192,bundle:bundle-1192,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: android (23 issues),issue_group,,module: android stale/low urgency batch 1,module: android,"Run one module: android stale-resolution sweep covering 23 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"32919, 34799, 45560, 50723, 51020, 52495, 55296, 55297, 58171, 58172, 58393, 58548, 63082, 63305, 64311, 66284, 74155, 78261, 83947, 101972, 107627, 125837, 140090",,23,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: android stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #63305: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, enhancement, module: android, oncall: mobile; title: Alternate Model Loading - Android | issue #58393: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: android, oncall: mobile; title: In Android, the memory used by the tensor or model cannot be recycled. Is there any way to solve it? | issue #51020: stale/low urgency; labels: module: build, triaged, module: android, mod...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",78879628b31d631399b6492d60e5e2c7056c1e39df19070f182b49ecb71b5966
BUNDLE-1193,bundle:bundle-1193,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: aotdispatch (21 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 10 issues - issue #103475: [Inductor] Optimize More Cases of Int32 -> Int64,module: aotdispatch,"Run one module: aotdispatch stale-resolution sweep covering 21 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"25104, 26889, 40373, 43501, 44026, 46948, 54982, 68204, 76580, 92927, 103475, 106596, 110175, 111950, 146693, 148146, 151884, 154083, 158643, 158970, 163048",,21,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: aotdispatch stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,Related RFC: #54982 (comment) | less_than(torch.uint32) (this latter can be even more expressive for shorter dtypes assert tensor.is_numel_less_than(torch.uint8)) Related: #46948 | I think it might be best to merge this and your comments into #26889. Part of the problem could be that you get funny things with dynamic patterns (eg padding in conv). | The related issue is #46948 on using assert statements to give sh...,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",f07c3f14e87c4603a7b5d56fc2def8c956b238125f1966e3790b81816a0db08c
BUNDLE-1194,bundle:bundle-1194,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: aotinductor (17 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #159124: AOTInductor preallocate output tensors,module: aotinductor,"Run one module: aotinductor stale-resolution sweep covering 17 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"127928, 147475, 150364, 159124, 161108, 163624, 165444, 168563, 168566, 168567, 168568, 168706, 168707, 168708, 168709, 169154, 169469",,17,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: aotinductor stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"all, I'd like to double check whether updating buffers inplace is currently supported with AOTInductor? Based on the answers on this issue #159124 I think it should be, but it does not seem to work when I load the module from file. If not, is there any workaround we can use at... | uctor.py Test class: AOTInductorTestsTemplate Test name: test_autotune_int64_user_defined_triton_kernel Defined at line: 5861 Parent i...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",5ce62525c8014f5e77af7c7776b8c37ff9a71cd2b43870a81f2943878d15d579
BUNDLE-1195,bundle:bundle-1195,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: arm (68 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 3 issues - issue #64812: PyTorch inference on tensors of a particular size cause Illegal Instruction (core dumped) on Jetson Nano,module: arm,"Run one module: arm stale-resolution sweep covering 68 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"13130, 22550, 39680, 42439, 46522, 47476, 50471, 50650, 51535, 52206, 52478, 54104, 56333, 59243, 59262, 59356, 59437, 59439, 59936, 60834, 61110, 63558, 64812, 65673, 66410, 68349, 68701, 70350, 73051, 74503, 76689, 79421, 81317, 86076, 86676, 86989, 87159, 88968, 89336, 90536, 91182, 91368, 93197, 97188, 99544, 104502, 105335, 107693, 110737, 120897, 123835, 126980, 128414, 130524, 132132, 132412, 134117, 139210, 143571, 144633, 145716, 148078, 153471, 157139, 158041, 166512, 169294, 173225",,68,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: arm stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"python3 -c ""import torch;print(torch.mm(torch.zeros((1,1024)), torch.zeros((1024,1024))))"" ... run ... bt ... disasm Likely a duplicate of #64812 a should be fixable by building OpenBLAS with a dynamic backend | ing the pytorch api at runtime using https://github.com/xloem/mempickle/blob/master/patch_pytorch.py . This approach may work to workaround #64812 and #68349 which are likely the same issue. | orch api at...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",b53497ecf57e4d13034da8d37180b9e1f812d4b2bcaf8ac75ac532de2c082068
BUNDLE-1196,bundle:bundle-1196,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: assert failure (18 issues),issue_group,,module: assert failure stale/low urgency batch 1,module: assert failure,"Run one module: assert failure stale-resolution sweep covering 18 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"5857, 16589, 16695, 22122, 29026, 32036, 32227, 51855, 59743, 70388, 84510, 86644, 89275, 92594, 94304, 96789, 122467, 130073",,18,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: assert failure stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #130073: stale/low urgency; labels: module: ci, triaged, module: assert failure, module: dynamic shapes; title: ☂️ TORCH_INTERNAL_ASSERT failures while running CI | issue #22122: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: assert failure; title: ASSERT FAILED at /pytorch/torch/csrc/autograd/generated/VariableType_0.cpp:12721 | issue #122467: stale/low urgency; labels: module: sparse, module: multiprocessing,...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",df0865549b05e7feee4cb7703553acbaf21c03c31ba24cedcdfc3607c84b3931
BUNDLE-1197,bundle:bundle-1197,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: autograd (82 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #25888: Forward/backward hooks for C++ torch::nn modules,module: autograd,"Run one module: autograd stale-resolution sweep covering 82 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"3625, 18173, 25883, 25888, 28440, 30458, 33227, 34329, 44027, 49825, 56500, 63623, 66357, 67463, 68208, 68331, 69714, 70870, 71698, 72041, 72055, 72061, 72831, 73137, 74222, 74299, 74604, 74677, 76522, 76585, 76780, 76783, 76786, 77515, 77552, 77963, 78151, 78346, 78482, 78624, 79705, 80061, 80204, 80206, 80762, 80803, 80804, 81417, 81448, 82145, 82545, 83537, 85485, 86271, 86444, 87755, 87956, 88691, 89574, 90065, 91996, 94111, 94451, 94990, 95132, 96187, 96305, 96769, 96908, 97827, 98004, 98498, 99147, 99806, 101069, 102556, 103518, 104040, 105220, 117826, 126164, 177116",,82,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: autograd stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,") tensor(12) Eager result tensor(42) Script result tensor(2) Hooks are also currently not supported in the PyTorch C++ API for nn::Modules (#25888). The the TorchScript C++ API script::Module methods can only be run by fetching them explicitly, e.g. my_module.forward(the_input... | shaders, fixed for torch.mm/torch.bmm via tiling in PR #117549 but not all code paths), #122045 (F.linear wrong results for large inpu...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",02006ccb7e5139a7b6d31e81a76ca72c8c4124636dcbc8eaffbe05297adede5f
BUNDLE-1198,bundle:bundle-1198,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: autograd (140 issues),issue_group,,module: autograd stale/low urgency batch 4,module: autograd,"Run one module: autograd stale-resolution sweep covering 140 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"2512, 2691, 3818, 4501, 4564, 4731, 4952, 5159, 7343, 7786, 8874, 9282, 9701, 12248, 13818, 18643, 22035, 22778, 23032, 25814, 25941, 26379, 27579, 27641, 27642, 28549, 28925, 29378, 29734, 31185, 31579, 32531, 32576, 32884, 33373, 33628, 33855, 34082, 34367, 34998, 35128, 35797, 37354, 37751, 37860, 38057, 40480, 40736, 41926, 42156, 43347, 45308, 45459, 46643, 46820, 46918, 47028, 47502, 47824, 47901, 48227, 49409, 49673, 49724, 50219, 50613, 51117, 52390, 52762, 53407, 53649, 53666, 54216, 54375, 54591, 55557, 55609, 56177, 56370, 57157, 57502, 57503, 57507, 58037, 58442, 58479, 59493, 59896, 60159, 60426, 60796, 61222, 61410, 61485, 61513, 61619, 61645, 62934, 63205, 63624, 63644, 67240, 68429, 80411, 80827, 83510, 87559, 92331, 94397, 95711, 99556, 101407, 104933, 105846, 106265, 115785, 116320, 118883, 121842, 123996, 127541, 128020, 128064, 128600, 128703, 128971, 134069, 134612, 134901, 135229, 135447, 140516, 141845, 144639, 145356, 146036, 149315, 154332, 159667, 162907",,140,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: autograd stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #123996: stale/low urgency; labels: module: autograd, triaged, module: functorch; title: MSE loss triggers ZeroTensor immutable error inside `torch.func` | issue #121842: stale/low urgency; labels: module: autograd, triaged, actionable; title: gradcheck fails when inputs are dependent on each other | issue #87559: stale/low urgency; labels: module: autograd, triaged, enhancement; title: diagonal of Jacobian...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",604b0d147e320a6f53af2f688c87caf80974b324c8f2a803cda1d9525af6fe15
BUNDLE-1199,bundle:bundle-1199,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: autograd (67 issues),issue_group,,module: autograd stale/low urgency batch 11,module: autograd,"Run one module: autograd stale-resolution sweep covering 67 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"11390, 23938, 30987, 35041, 35736, 41186, 41400, 52052, 54346, 56202, 56235, 56275, 57447, 57617, 59137, 62032, 62473, 62654, 62849, 64306, 64407, 64931, 65151, 65536, 65683, 66066, 66199, 66875, 67187, 67387, 67493, 67594, 67653, 67772, 68046, 68966, 69531, 69532, 69610, 69687, 70342, 72345, 72347, 72358, 72359, 72361, 72362, 75432, 75586, 76785, 77230, 79039, 83773, 95434, 117394, 117582, 120814, 125984, 133230, 138217, 140520, 154226, 164331, 164759, 166131, 167254, 169055",,67,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: autograd stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #65683: stale/low urgency; labels: module: autograd, module: nn, triaged, module: complex; title: `torch.nn.functional.l1_loss` fails gradgradcheck for complex inputs | issue #65536: stale/low urgency; labels: module: autograd, triaged; title: Pass backward flags such as retain_graph to context of custom torch.autograd.Function | issue #35736: stale/low urgency; labels: module: cpp, module: autograd, triaged...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",29f7ea06f93255e40d93347e92107e2bd8ae844da695ac2868c954a949b55a99
BUNDLE-1200,bundle:bundle-1200,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: autograd (15 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #59855: pytorch test failed,module: autograd,"Run one module: autograd stale-resolution sweep covering 15 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"20272, 35749, 40208, 41530, 52648, 52717, 53903, 59855, 63295, 100626, 106455, 106951, 110758, 128641, 129272",,15,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: autograd stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"() File ""test/run_test.py"", line 905, in main raise RuntimeError(err_message) RuntimeError: test_autograd failed! Some of it is the same as #59855, but there seem to be more failures this time. cc @malfet @seemethere @walterddr @ezyang @albanD @zou3519 @gqchen @pearu @nikitave... | This is much like issue #52648, but for torch.norm, not torch.linalg.vector_norm. However, torch.norm does not have the workaround tha...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",83dd8912fcdd91e22de753dd8223739a97ff1a4a8de17eb2ad2b90cd2a0901f2
BUNDLE-1201,bundle:bundle-1201,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: backend (23 issues),issue_group,,module: backend stale/low urgency batch 1,module: backend,"Run one module: backend stale-resolution sweep covering 23 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"7944, 26691, 47546, 54546, 54646, 55879, 55884, 63477, 83657, 91737, 93347, 95207, 98070, 98073, 98406, 98924, 100914, 112691, 113369, 116255, 123072, 151303, 165811",,23,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: backend stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #165811: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: backend, module: python frontend; title: [RFC] A Python backend registration API | issue #151303: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: backend, module: PrivateUse1; title: [Feature Request] Experimental support to Moore Threads GPU MUSA | issue #55879: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: backend, module: vulkan; title: Vulkan backend on desk...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",508de4296834bdc1927b956e98801ac907b66d194953853ed719b4f9c5dbd569
BUNDLE-1202,bundle:bundle-1202,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: batching (19 issues),issue_group,,module: batching stale/low urgency,module: batching,"Run one module: batching stale-resolution sweep covering 19 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"10172, 15253, 16432, 17774, 21688, 21856, 22169, 33035, 40375, 40441, 47149, 54147, 54743, 58128, 60234, 62171, 75909, 101564, 146697",,19,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: batching stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #40375: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, enhancement, module: batching, function request; title: Add batched torch.combinations | issue #146697: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: batching, module: vmap, module: functorch; title: There is a performance drop because we have not yet implemented the batching rule for aten::mse_loss_backward. | issue #54147: stale/low urgency; labels: feature, module...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",5ce6fff1a20954ff2996d2dbef4875dfdc2e399a164567613c135627b59fca0c
BUNDLE-1203,bundle:bundle-1203,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: bazel (16 issues),issue_group,,module: bazel stale/low urgency,module: bazel,"Run one module: bazel stale-resolution sweep covering 16 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"46631, 63972, 66565, 72880, 79351, 79355, 79851, 79853, 81167, 86194, 91751, 101314, 101470, 117350, 119279, 121207",,16,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: bazel stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #119279: stale/low urgency; labels: module: build, triaged, module: bazel; title: MODULE.bazel support | issue #101470: stale/low urgency; labels: module: build, triaged, module: bazel; title: [bazel] add inductor to bazel build | issue #79851: stale/low urgency; labels: module: cuda, triaged, module: bazel; title: [bazel] [ci] `//:module_test` CUDA error: CUDA driver version is insufficient for CUDA runtime...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",ea2cddc7e262fa445ee4302ab436bb5c8f6ba28d9b01baaac4576147c59ba97d
BUNDLE-1204,bundle:bundle-1204,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: bc-breaking (31 issues),issue_group,,module: bc-breaking stale/low urgency batch 1,module: bc-breaking,"Run one module: bc-breaking stale-resolution sweep covering 31 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"3697, 8104, 10683, 12962, 22707, 30263, 31776, 33122, 38205, 39310, 41027, 46291, 49726, 50292, 50530, 61574, 68464, 72317, 79195, 88144, 88464, 95116, 108108, 109781, 110681, 110702, 129657, 135359, 141139, 151110, 157764",,31,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: bc-breaking stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #151110: stale/low urgency; labels: module: numerical-stability, module: bc-breaking, triaged; title: Update epsilon logic to improve numerical stability | issue #157764: stale/low urgency; labels: module: bc-breaking, triaged, module: mkldnn, module: intel; title: Drop SSE4 support in oneDNN | issue #141139: stale/low urgency; labels: module: bc-breaking, triaged, topic: improvements; title: Consider noting...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",74ef6b25975cf490f93bf5b42973f8b4a52706bf8f4bf3230ea07c72744e2227
BUNDLE-1205,bundle:bundle-1205,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: benchmark (12 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #112883: Torchbench inference failures,module: benchmark,"Run one module: benchmark stale-resolution sweep covering 12 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"63971, 66992, 77801, 106801, 112883, 113063, 113854, 134079, 149209, 153826, 159676, 159680",,12,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: benchmark stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"s timm_efficientdet - at least locally, OOMs, needs to lower batch size - @eellison cudagraphs dynamic Deferring the dynamic failures until #113063 hf_BigBird Not all values of RelaxedUnspecConstraint(L['inputs'][0].size()[0]) are valid because L['inputs'][0].size()[0] was inf... | issue #159680: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: benchmark; title: [Benchmark Dashboard] Kernel-level benchmark | issue #159...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",7a8bcad18c6fca5e5ff3bbb7e3f2a272ba6e1930d53a7b9b3f79fced981fb24a
BUNDLE-1206,bundle:bundle-1206,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: bfloat16 (42 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #144040: Torch.sparse.mm failing gradient computation at half precision.,module: bfloat16,"Run one module: bfloat16 stale-resolution sweep covering 42 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"15607, 22669, 26136, 28845, 49666, 52310, 54622, 54841, 57773, 62016, 67682, 67979, 75427, 75667, 80574, 88136, 94333, 101781, 106469, 106485, 112575, 116120, 117961, 120463, 121389, 136186, 140222, 140252, 140348, 140892, 144040, 146817, 147134, 151934, 154086, 154351, 157808, 163425, 163574, 164666, 166853, 172085",,42,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: bfloat16 stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"ed"" kernel, resulting in NotImplementedError: ""sampled_addmm_out_sparse_csr"" not implemented for 'BFloat16'. Here's a related issue I found #144040. I could try my hand at fixing this issue, but I need guidance on which approach to take. import torch # @ device = torch.device(... | issue #116120: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: bfloat16; title: bfloat16 on 'grid_sampler_3d_cuda' not implemented | issue...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",ff2f39a0314a529412b4a594013e5c3862421a98a6a25cf0b435dd5a1c7f6454
BUNDLE-1207,bundle:bundle-1207,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: binaries (129 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 3 issues - issue #145949: [CUDA][Blackwell] Blackwell Tracking Issue,module: binaries,"Run one module: binaries stale-resolution sweep covering 129 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"8276, 17835, 20963, 24205, 27752, 28863, 31697, 32419, 32972, 34064, 36062, 37332, 37588, 38412, 38624, 43140, 43758, 43760, 47109, 47291, 47739, 47751, 47916, 48485, 49405, 49406, 49445, 52134, 54332, 55120, 55454, 55611, 56901, 56926, 59263, 60288, 61516, 63555, 63849, 66359, 68055, 69072, 69202, 69505, 70199, 70394, 70513, 71022, 71364, 71473, 73034, 75158, 77052, 79359, 79606, 80857, 80874, 81172, 83064, 85098, 85390, 86965, 87267, 89417, 91334, 92273, 92292, 92907, 93884, 95225, 96595, 96608, 98115, 98361, 98863, 99637, 99781, 100366, 103578, 103959, 106382, 108244, 109112, 110074, 110250, 110819, 112872, 113621, 113941, 114948, 114949, 115077, 115138, 116576, 118173, 119072, 119447, 120291, 120319, 121090, 121308, 121668, 122571, 123075, 124047, 124566, 125502, 125862, 126005, 126286, 128033, 129336, 129555, 130128, 132617, 134236, 137412, 139005, 141094, 141337, 141467, 141977, 143434, 145949, 147692, 152426, 155203, 156024, 165727",,129,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: binaries stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"#145949 | may be related to how DDP handles tied/shared parameters on Blackwell architecture Novel bug - No documented cases found in PyTorch issues #145949 (Blackwell tracking) or #157549 (Blackwell compatibility) Frameworks tested (ALL exhibit same hang): torchrun with native DDP Hugg... | issue #66359: stale/low urgency; labels: module: binaries, module: cuda, triaged, module: lts; title: question on installing...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",16dc040dfadeed3796200dc581c17ea03c7ab3089ca7449124426002d23e8c55
BUNDLE-1208,bundle:bundle-1208,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: binaries (38 issues),issue_group,,module: binaries stale/low urgency batch 1,module: binaries,"Run one module: binaries stale-resolution sweep covering 38 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"3990, 8098, 23094, 25548, 29057, 29722, 30532, 30903, 31007, 31907, 38310, 50503, 61411, 73008, 76557, 78681, 79337, 97990, 131312, 133823, 138460, 139761, 141014, 142703, 143913, 147274, 150399, 155325, 156694, 156810, 157548, 159947, 162971, 164122, 165902, 166233, 167979, 177082",,38,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: binaries stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #177082: stale/low urgency; labels: module: binaries, module: build, low priority, triaged, actionable, bot-triaged; title: Stable Linux binaries of LibTorch have broken soname and versioning in libgomp | issue #147274: stale/low urgency; labels: module: binaries, module: windows, triaged; title: PaddleOCR PyTorch conflicts | issue #76557: stale/low urgency; labels: module: binaries, triaged; title: Pip pack...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",4a8d24fa414685b13301967c3bcd51c0ba03b8e6657deeb0c7c40a3ae55b2b31
BUNDLE-1209,bundle:bundle-1209,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: binaries (2 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #11982: [feature request] Publish wheels with debug symbols,module: binaries,"Run one module: binaries stale-resolution sweep covering 2 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"11982, 56397",,2,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: binaries stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"ches the correct debug information from pytorch.org, then installs it so gdb will transparently symbolicate crashes. This will also address #11982 Alternatives Do nothing, keep repro-ing issues manually and being sad.",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",fd260c783702acd716268a0d6e6ade9af4513ea96e88f69e52b101228b5b9ca9
BUNDLE-1210,bundle:bundle-1210,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: boolean tensor (19 issues),issue_group,,module: boolean tensor stale/low urgency batch 1,module: boolean tensor,"Run one module: boolean tensor stale-resolution sweep covering 19 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"25480, 32210, 41323, 44969, 48353, 52265, 62147, 63023, 64041, 67684, 77962, 106579, 106662, 107041, 111925, 117246, 117249, 136578, 139609",,19,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: boolean tensor stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #77962: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: numpy, module: type promotion, module: boolean tensor; title: Operating on boolean torch tensor and numpy array casts to `unit8` | issue #107041: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: boolean tensor; title: I want to calculate the matrix multiplication of two Boolean matrices, but torch.mm will report an error. Is there any more efficient alternative?...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",3b29b572891f128c969f7f71965d26cb5c67a26cfef20cc1fa010069f17256eb
BUNDLE-1211,bundle:bundle-1211,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: bootcamp (145 issues),issue_group,,"Review thread: 39 issues - issue #100249: [discussion] ""TensorList"" as first-class python-world abstraction (to mirror existing dispatcher's `TensorList` and `torch::autograd::tensor_list`) and as key for dispatch for merging `torch._foreach_*` into regular `torch.*` functions",module: bootcamp,"Run one module: bootcamp stale-resolution sweep covering 145 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"1512, 1736, 4959, 8374, 10375, 11936, 12672, 14095, 15821, 15822, 18229, 22924, 23299, 24273, 24422, 24836, 24915, 24985, 25162, 25522, 25641, 25691, 25743, 26957, 27522, 27617, 28743, 30443, 31107, 31422, 31467, 31758, 32497, 32851, 33181, 33296, 35642, 35759, 36650, 37010, 37782, 38228, 38233, 38419, 38437, 38548, 39570, 40456, 40550, 40790, 41292, 42405, 43012, 43253, 43502, 44341, 44898, 45760, 46076, 46176, 46321, 48605, 48845, 49178, 49539, 52583, 52940, 54899, 54941, 54942, 54943, 55005, 55191, 55198, 56191, 56482, 58015, 58139, 60431, 61122, 61835, 62141, 62540, 62554, 62655, 62790, 62917, 63291, 64492, 64744, 64745, 65156, 69519, 70533, 71806, 71810, 71812, 71813, 71814, 71815, 71816, 71817, 71818, 71819, 71820, 71821, 71822, 71823, 71824, 71825, 71826, 71828, 71830, 71831, 71832, 71833, 71834, 71835, 71836, 71837, 71838, 71839, 71840, 71841, 71842, 71843, 72257, 72556, 72558, 73517, 75926, 83775, 85157, 87514, 91471, 91508, 96085, 99719, 100249, 105325, 126714, 134570, 140596, 150989, 151579",,145,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: bootcamp stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,Related #33296 | A bit related (on fusing stack and padding - potentially with multiple): #65156 (comment) #27617 | @cpuhrsch some more nested tensor discussions (also of tensorlist): #65156 #27522 | regular sum also seems not very nice in terms of computational complexity (unless JIT can optimize it). A related feature request: #27522 | for an image. I tried a few approaches which each had some limitations: suppo...,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",f734eae768a5fd4005417b60006813eeed200398eac211ee3206e6f458c3ee7a
BUNDLE-1212,bundle:bundle-1212,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: bootcamp (10 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #46559: Exception raised in rpc_async context is silently handled,module: bootcamp,"Run one module: bootcamp stale-resolution sweep covering 10 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"3667, 4392, 17425, 19120, 27647, 28733, 34675, 40107, 46559, 46653",,10,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: bootcamp stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"#46559 mentioned that it's hard to debug async RPC, as the error is only thrown when users call Future.wait() but users might miss that. @lw sugge | it's very important to not accidentally state-dependence (which will lead to hard to debug performance regressions and problems.) Related: #3667 cc @csarofeen @ptrblck | Issue description @soumith, @VitalyFedyunin, @karimhasebou, I was investigating slow maxpool2d on...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",5e8b8c803f98806475bd2ca581416421b6e749ce3491ed8f656d4ef35a1e4745
BUNDLE-1213,bundle:bundle-1213,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: build (116 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #81541: [vulkan]compiling VulkanOpContext.cpp with some errors,module: build,"Run one module: build stale-resolution sweep covering 116 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"10684, 14277, 15167, 16710, 21318, 21738, 21818, 22495, 22682, 22868, 23512, 23676, 23768, 23896, 24167, 24417, 24419, 24456, 24500, 24798, 24831, 25460, 26058, 26258, 26340, 26409, 26796, 26863, 26964, 26967, 27015, 36437, 41119, 42791, 51151, 55865, 58267, 61244, 65313, 68923, 72582, 75184, 76082, 77939, 81541, 81856, 82072, 82627, 91566, 102936, 103150, 103805, 105728, 106971, 112089, 112942, 113948, 114175, 114388, 115020, 115257, 115672, 116012, 116416, 116478, 117099, 119557, 119740, 120000, 121215, 122027, 122187, 122592, 123091, 124270, 124383, 125134, 125243, 125539, 126211, 126394, 127388, 128314, 129310, 130863, 132013, 132599, 132600, 134399, 134439, 134576, 134682, 135437, 135604, 136201, 137261, 139170, 139290, 139874, 139958, 139962, 140088, 143109, 144328, 144495, 146982, 148518, 148546, 149796, 149803, 149845, 150571, 150718, 150873, 151592, 153361",,116,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: build stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"Identified a possible fix in #82072 | This relates to #82627 (comment) | issue #116478: stale/low urgency; labels: module: build, module: cpp, triaged; title: The Python module installs cmake files and headers under the Python's site-packages directory that can't be used | issue #122027: stale/low urgency; labels: module: build, module: cuda, triaged, module: mkl; title: PyTorch fails to build with mkl if cmake is...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",15d0e65acf8013bb574d4e6595c8d7e8e3d4031ec5c0bdefa4ec7ffcb51b085f
BUNDLE-1214,bundle:bundle-1214,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: build (140 issues),issue_group,,module: build stale/low urgency batch 35,module: build,"Run one module: build stale-resolution sweep covering 140 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"4758, 5900, 5924, 6071, 6328, 7214, 7352, 7353, 8097, 8107, 8561, 8871, 12535, 14200, 14699, 15291, 15294, 16405, 17666, 17920, 21794, 23730, 25004, 25714, 27409, 28515, 28655, 28745, 28756, 28780, 29235, 30463, 30744, 31264, 31300, 31487, 31598, 31883, 31916, 32113, 32214, 32403, 32416, 32687, 33049, 33129, 33668, 33890, 34409, 34451, 34621, 35035, 35097, 35234, 35414, 35832, 35942, 36125, 36356, 36378, 36407, 36570, 36572, 36713, 36792, 36804, 37282, 37510, 37629, 38204, 38212, 38239, 38354, 38719, 38765, 38854, 38855, 39064, 39101, 39305, 39990, 40563, 40854, 40968, 41135, 41178, 41673, 41816, 41915, 41916, 41918, 41920, 41921, 41938, 41999, 42362, 42526, 42807, 42916, 43030, 43113, 43604, 44362, 44948, 45129, 45444, 45493, 45573, 46035, 46139, 46241, 46367, 46644, 46659, 46766, 46807, 47557, 47681, 48033, 48064, 48291, 48457, 49677, 49784, 49865, 50136, 50830, 51511, 88802, 135126, 139108, 144767, 146221, 150328, 153606, 154096, 155350, 156725, 157465, 159156",,140,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: build stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #31300: stale/low urgency; labels: module: build, triaged, module: mkldnn; title: torch runtime error when manual link libmkldnn.so | issue #27409: stale/low urgency; labels: module: build, module: cuda, triaged, module: macos; title: Installer not setting rpath for MAGMA (OS X w/ GPU) | issue #17666: stale/low urgency; labels: module: build, triaged; title: Building pytorch on ARM failed | issue #30744: sta...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",6eba40ac70483284038c060b9ca4e9e124250d9094cd8decde9f022290954eda
BUNDLE-1215,bundle:bundle-1215,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: build (140 issues),issue_group,,module: build stale/low urgency batch 26,module: build,"Run one module: build stale-resolution sweep covering 140 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"1505, 4906, 9433, 9893, 10691, 11113, 11213, 11854, 12609, 12828, 12830, 14477, 15303, 15812, 16090, 16499, 17525, 17644, 20206, 23482, 24810, 31943, 31994, 32083, 37113, 38193, 39634, 42353, 42689, 44172, 44726, 44814, 45073, 45448, 46157, 47281, 48483, 49795, 49810, 50206, 50888, 50944, 51015, 51074, 51084, 51231, 51302, 51868, 52096, 52168, 52208, 52318, 52598, 52605, 53710, 54279, 54829, 54905, 55329, 55461, 56038, 56110, 56161, 56465, 56710, 56777, 57108, 57123, 57370, 57440, 58054, 58596, 58672, 58944, 59457, 59531, 59542, 59935, 60448, 60674, 60848, 60950, 61468, 61510, 61695, 61718, 61730, 61827, 61930, 62656, 63574, 64308, 64527, 65062, 65446, 65475, 65572, 66196, 66271, 67284, 67642, 67758, 67968, 68163, 69086, 69286, 69360, 70138, 70521, 71228, 71396, 71471, 71518, 71660, 71682, 73062, 73355, 73394, 74398, 74421, 74896, 75180, 75565, 75895, 75911, 77411, 77546, 129358, 141235, 144931, 147001, 153933, 159838, 160167, 160225, 162280, 162283, 162352, 163950, 164786",,140,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: build stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #39634: stale/low urgency; labels: module: build, module: cuda, triaged, module: macos; title: Installation from source fails on macOS (No CUDA) | issue #10691: stale/low urgency; labels: module: build, triaged; title: Build system doesn't prevent ATen/core from including non-core files | issue #50206: stale/low urgency; labels: module: build, triaged; title: Build Fail with vulkan on ARM64 and wayland drive...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",422802a3f5a6f69073e26e2708f19a9781f3936d98eef860d47bf219cb456e0f
BUNDLE-1216,bundle:bundle-1216,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: build (138 issues),issue_group,,module: build stale/low urgency batch 17,module: build,"Run one module: build stale-resolution sweep covering 138 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"7035, 13118, 14367, 15309, 16843, 18993, 20576, 20686, 20753, 21135, 21399, 21777, 22370, 22406, 22541, 22580, 23233, 32694, 33385, 34611, 36041, 38090, 38536, 39917, 46803, 47568, 50718, 55437, 57423, 59592, 62168, 62630, 63188, 64692, 65161, 66573, 69063, 70243, 72393, 73554, 73563, 76105, 76206, 77614, 77738, 78248, 78530, 78882, 79021, 79202, 79387, 80742, 81065, 81543, 81544, 82276, 82710, 82871, 83157, 83509, 83714, 83977, 83979, 84050, 84805, 85590, 85618, 86192, 86544, 86660, 87080, 87352, 87389, 87449, 87589, 87642, 87957, 88004, 88265, 88389, 88616, 89293, 89490, 90256, 90395, 90895, 91406, 91417, 91697, 93206, 93240, 93944, 94739, 94801, 94804, 94912, 95135, 95369, 97397, 97421, 98459, 98587, 98917, 99035, 100054, 100123, 100957, 102732, 102753, 102761, 102966, 103131, 103212, 105060, 105904, 107389, 108851, 110238, 110795, 111410, 111566, 111654, 111907, 112330, 112857, 124018, 139065, 153863, 156434, 159232, 160248, 165100, 166064, 166167, 167970, 169072, 169675, 169816",,138,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: build stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #76206: stale/low urgency; labels: oncall: distributed, module: build, triaged; title: Update NCCL to 2.12 | issue #81543: stale/low urgency; labels: module: build, triaged; title: Linking pytorch libraries causes sstream behavior to be overridden globally | issue #81544: stale/low urgency; labels: module: build, triaged; title: Torch does not build with Lazy TS disabled | issue #79202: stale/low urgency; la...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",76f37ea235499f7386ae476cb3bfcd0c818fc4c79aa0d3f401806b36be2ef793
BUNDLE-1217,bundle:bundle-1217,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: build (25 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 3 issues - issue #30929: How to set not to build libtorch_cpu.so and libmkl_*.so dependencies?,module: build,"Run one module: build stale-resolution sweep covering 25 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"4716, 9204, 9310, 11071, 13207, 15004, 17966, 29093, 29739, 30929, 32407, 35363, 39947, 59218, 70608, 73113, 73412, 73487, 81692, 85773, 89491, 90547, 91524, 104113, 144206",,25,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: build stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"to the somewhat different list in cmake/Modules/FindBLAS.cmake (from which you can choose with a different variable). Note that because of #32407, it is not currently possible to specify Eigen and keep another BLAS out of the build. It accepts the Eigan preference, adds the he... | nclear what the benefit of choosing Eigen + *BLAS is over just choosing a BLAS lib It would be great, if this was clarified. Maybe rel...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",5024149aa675e2ee359d07a5604638b6c8b485c2ff00b785b63e7ca4a41e2ad1
BUNDLE-1218,bundle:bundle-1218,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: build (20 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #67153: Build not working with cuda 11.5,module: build,"Run one module: build stale-resolution sweep covering 20 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"17901, 21700, 24834, 25150, 28417, 29042, 31822, 34606, 37488, 40988, 43127, 43459, 46724, 46902, 47649, 56126, 66640, 67153, 70931, 88980",,20,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: build stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"Pytorch 1.10 doesn't support cuda 11.5, that support was added later. Duplicate of #67153 | duplicate of #46902? | Same Issue: #66640 | ome/cloudhan/workspaces/pytorch/build/lib/libtorch_cpu.so: undefined reference to `pthreadpool_compute_4d_tiled' similar issue mentioned in #34606 (comment) To Reproduce Steps to reproduce the behavior: build the code Expected behavior Environment PyTorch version: N/A Is debug......",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",2e42a4337a3c31647b7c52471a6f8fb11ba21c2b311d8a9524caf544b028690b
BUNDLE-1219,bundle:bundle-1219,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: build (14 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #17234: [feature request] build and move distributions w/ device and/or dtype,module: build,"Run one module: build stale-resolution sweep covering 14 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"7795, 12117, 13188, 15630, 16708, 17234, 71379, 106206, 106297, 108934, 108984, 147044, 152285, 172034",,14,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: build stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"#7795 is probably related to this. | rom a commit (c373387) more than 4 years ago. I strongly suspect that the situation has changed in the meantime. There's an existing issue (#71379) in the same vein, but IMO broader in scope than what the aim is for this issue: respecting (or at least not overriding) CMAKE_CUD... | Solved via #152285 (comment) that is pip install transformers -U if e.g. on Termux, where apt ins...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",22c3b3986f747658d8d3b00aa626f7602750787f1a05abe82d33b27eb96493e6
BUNDLE-1220,bundle:bundle-1220,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: build warnings (10 issues),issue_group,,module: build warnings stale/low urgency,module: build warnings,"Run one module: build warnings stale-resolution sweep covering 10 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"22252, 27021, 35678, 36999, 39682, 54149, 55952, 62588, 69290, 81140",,10,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: build warnings stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #81140: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: build warnings; title: libprotobuf version compatibility | issue #69290: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: build warnings, Stale; title: Deprecation warnings generated when including header files in C++17 code | issue #55952: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: build warnings; title: Compiler warnings tracking | issue #62588: stale/low urg...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",00fdadd80e20ab6daf98fe26344e7a8577b469d092ff4330626c43446193f82f
BUNDLE-1221,bundle:bundle-1221,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: c10d (76 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 3 issues - issue #104506: TImeout in NCCL doesn't work,module: c10d,"Run one module: c10d stale-resolution sweep covering 76 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"53658, 54021, 56836, 57547, 59256, 63802, 67312, 68803, 71134, 73121, 73683, 73825, 75097, 75773, 76288, 80022, 80372, 80417, 82091, 85604, 85621, 86225, 88103, 90544, 90848, 95572, 95895, 97268, 104506, 107298, 108158, 108900, 113543, 113546, 115388, 119215, 122931, 123447, 124950, 126008, 126032, 126381, 126544, 131755, 133877, 136312, 137014, 137268, 140301, 146956, 147179, 147502, 147631, 147677, 148048, 149177, 151965, 152527, 153302, 154847, 158793, 159013, 159014, 159015, 159017, 159018, 159019, 168453, 168454, 168455, 168456, 168457, 168458, 168459, 168460, 177815",,76,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: c10d stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,A related issue here: #104506 | Seems relevant to #88103 | ts and Proposals We want to use RFC to track all RFCs since each topic is an orthogonal one so discussions will be more focused. Topic one: #159013 (Mostly wanted and asked) Topic two: #159014 Topic three: #159015. Topic four: #159017 Topic five: #159018 Topic six: #159019 Alt... | bmit a PR. This benefits any torch.compile backend that lowers collectives...,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",8d1a5d54c650a03dd58ba437fcbbf62127dd3333ca89d5736faea0b9f504a1ee
BUNDLE-1222,bundle:bundle-1222,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: c10d (10 issues),issue_group,,module: c10d stale/low urgency batch 4,module: c10d,"Run one module: c10d stale-resolution sweep covering 10 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"10800, 16318, 46428, 48305, 49217, 53866, 73656, 108739, 150943, 151960",,10,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: c10d stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #53866: stale/low urgency; labels: oncall: distributed, triaged, module: c10d, module: ddp; title: Add comprehensive subgroup testing to torch.distributed | issue #49217: stale/low urgency; labels: oncall: distributed, triaged, module: c10d; title: Bug in profiler on CI machines when profiling NCCL distributed calls | issue #48305: stale/low urgency; labels: oncall: distributed, triaged, module: rpc, module:...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",a1a68f1b33ebc11d18bf4f0d3f59f31a77d592a789bc6d84d054ae822870fbcc
BUNDLE-1223,bundle:bundle-1223,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: capabilitybasedpartitioner (2 issues),issue_group,,module: capabilitybasedpartitioner stale/low urgency,module: capabilitybasedpartitioner,"Run one module: capabilitybasedpartitioner stale-resolution sweep covering 2 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"81244, 81539",,2,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: capabilitybasedpartitioner stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #81539: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: fx, module: CapabilityBasedPartitioner, module: fx.passes; title: CapabilityBasedPartitioner treats non-compute ops inconsistently | issue #81244: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: fx, module: CapabilityBasedPartitioner; title: CapabilityBasedPartitioner does not work correctly with mutating operations",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",81280b7769ecdaf9fd5704abb08806344bd0eabedbe82fc9a08ac6be77dca37f
BUNDLE-1224,bundle:bundle-1224,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: ci (111 issues),issue_group,,"Review thread: 6 issues - issue #152595: ROCm, 7900 XTX (gfx1100): Pytorch FLASH_ATTENTION SDPA is 2.5x slower than MATH (fp16, head_dim 256, seqlen 4360, 12 heads)",module: ci,"Run one module: ci stale-resolution sweep covering 111 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"14701, 43567, 52633, 65718, 71911, 72106, 72555, 72749, 72814, 72933, 73083, 73531, 73755, 74256, 74281, 75703, 76028, 76838, 76972, 77340, 78260, 78634, 79083, 79787, 79893, 79895, 79977, 80118, 80238, 81110, 81768, 81945, 81955, 81983, 82033, 82259, 83081, 83082, 84259, 85499, 86131, 86717, 87501, 87782, 88309, 88408, 92173, 95645, 96637, 103860, 104808, 106073, 106237, 106544, 107253, 107780, 115659, 117357, 117424, 117576, 117705, 123169, 123506, 123532, 124417, 125146, 126323, 126523, 127950, 129386, 129784, 130396, 131213, 131695, 136647, 137931, 137941, 138042, 138564, 139188, 139201, 140017, 140018, 140345, 141204, 141558, 143041, 143079, 143215, 144563, 144875, 145388, 148762, 149110, 149169, 150078, 151322, 152212, 152489, 152566, 152595, 152699, 152884, 153938, 154560, 156607, 165040, 165141, 169857, 177834, 188564",,111,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: ci stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"s confirmed for the current runs but not individually proven as the culprit for all 388 red runs. This is NOT covered by the existing issue #165040 ""DISABLED rocm / linux-jammy-rocm-py3_10-gfx1100 / test (default)"" (OPEN; module: rocm, module: ci) is adjacent but distinct: it'... | U is found, tests run and pass, and the job is killed purely by the 270-min wall-clock. (Other gfx1100 issues #152595 / #165141 / #169...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",f944e73c38500c19387cd4c6cd69f6800098f68c7d5f02e67d40003dee16e533
BUNDLE-1225,bundle:bundle-1225,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: ci (67 issues),issue_group,,module: ci stale/low urgency batch 2,module: ci,"Run one module: ci stale-resolution sweep covering 67 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"11578, 14839, 18692, 20111, 33477, 37512, 37847, 37880, 42655, 46065, 46066, 47208, 47669, 48878, 49642, 52984, 53910, 54006, 54938, 55330, 64868, 64939, 66775, 66902, 68193, 71152, 71407, 75419, 82139, 82443, 108174, 108175, 109770, 120710, 138696, 141764, 141984, 148335, 148336, 148338, 148339, 154074, 157379, 158127, 158782, 158876, 159866, 160240, 161281, 162182, 163302, 163577, 163657, 163902, 164493, 164860, 164951, 165173, 165684, 166011, 166072, 167351, 167670, 167746, 169184, 170266, 170365",,67,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: ci stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #164951: stale/low urgency; labels: module: ci, triaged; title: Docker checkouts take 30+ min on H100 runners | issue #158782: stale/low urgency; labels: module: ci, module: lint, triaged, enhancement, module: docker, better-engineering; title: [BE] linter for base docker image configurations with docker_builds.yml | issue #158127: stale/low urgency; labels: module: ci, triaged; title: A ""Merge-when-ready"" l...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",5d7ac35dc19e70e88b46c883a26ca299651a3c63c61ded3794de3b4aa38aa97e
BUNDLE-1226,bundle:bundle-1226,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: ci (2 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #116626: `test_modules.py` does not test for half precision or complex types,module: ci,"Run one module: ci stale-resolution sweep covering 2 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"116626, 122287",,2,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: ci stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"his thus far is that most modules tested in test_modules.py are only tested for torch.float32 and torch.float64, which is on my list to fix #116626 (comment) So far I have only enabled float16 testing for MPS. Let me know if you are keen to help with this :)",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",63a18bf495aa90b9dce19d12772142c85415fb3fcec694acb0ddd4fc9c3c7fe2
BUNDLE-1227,bundle:bundle-1227,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: codegen (34 issues),issue_group,,module: codegen stale/low urgency batch 2,module: codegen,"Run one module: codegen stale-resolution sweep covering 34 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"4102, 17257, 40250, 42863, 43114, 44738, 46061, 49416, 50987, 53023, 54001, 58087, 58124, 58765, 60149, 60153, 62591, 63356, 66341, 69471, 73425, 73505, 75904, 77251, 83214, 84265, 84616, 87178, 88598, 100062, 103160, 103370, 111157, 162398",,34,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: codegen stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #73425: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: codegen; title: ufunc codegen support for dtypes that are supported on CUDA but not CPU | issue #43114: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: codegen; title: out kwargs are sometimes inconsistent with returned named tuple field name (and in some cases, cannot be made consistent) | issue #66341: stale/low urgency; labels: module: internals, triaged, mo...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",78934821eeafdda5cad21a64f76e5155e64405d5cbdb271ebaf4292cad494702
BUNDLE-1228,bundle:bundle-1228,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: collect_env.py (5 issues),issue_group,,module: collect_env.py stale/low urgency,module: collect_env.py,"Run one module: collect_env.py stale-resolution sweep covering 5 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"18658, 72768, 96447, 124025, 144615",,5,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: collect_env.py stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #144615: stale/low urgency; labels: module: collect_env.py, triaged, module: devx; title: `collect_env.py` fails with `'NoneType' object has no attribute 'splitlines'` if pytorch is installed without pip | issue #124025: stale/low urgency; labels: module: numerical-stability, module: docs, module: collect_env.py, triaged; title: Different results for single sample vs. batched | issue #96447: stale/low urgenc...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",49aed29d6ba6046c08670dca42e9a0afec5ae252123203e51bfce19e921a75ce
BUNDLE-1229,bundle:bundle-1229,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: compile ux (5 issues),issue_group,,module: compile ux stale/low urgency,module: compile ux,"Run one module: compile ux stale-resolution sweep covering 5 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"131263, 133944, 147428, 150021, 158873",,5,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: compile ux stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #150021: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, oncall: pt2, module: dynamo, empathy-day, module: compile ux; title: [ued] I want to see the full sizes/strides in TORCH_LOGS=recompiles | issue #133944: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, oncall: pt2, module: dynamo, module: compile ux; title: torch.compile ""run at compile time"" decorator. | issue #131263: stale/low urgency; labels: feature, triaged, oncall: pt2...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",981d14224c33b2d1bfd91706481f6b4f3723f2fcf99413c346dfb42b562edbbf
BUNDLE-1230,bundle:bundle-1230,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: compile-time (12 issues),issue_group,,module: compile-time stale/low urgency,module: compile-time,"Run one module: compile-time stale-resolution sweep covering 12 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"93716, 97155, 109074, 119128, 128071, 128153, 130119, 135489, 143670, 149957, 154456, 156520",,12,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: compile-time stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #119128: stale/low urgency; labels: low priority, triaged, oncall: pt2, module: dynamo, module: compile-time, no-scrub; title: [dynamo] Refactor switch statements to improve compile times | issue #109074: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, oncall: pt2, module: inductor, upstream triton, module: compile-time; title: torch.compile/triton holding GIL during compilation and CompiledKernel call results in deadlo...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",8af7c89a6254d9ea4131bda445003a011a5c45fc640144fb94a75fd973065119
BUNDLE-1231,bundle:bundle-1231,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: compiled autograd (7 issues),issue_group,,module: compiled autograd stale/low urgency,module: compiled autograd,"Run one module: compiled autograd stale-resolution sweep covering 7 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"124866, 138215, 138901, 142104, 143759, 144982, 155105",,7,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: compiled autograd stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #138215: stale/low urgency; labels: feature, triaged, actionable, oncall: pt2, module: compiled autograd, dynamo-autograd-function; title: Dynamo x autograd.Function: leverage compiled autograd on graph break in backwards | issue #124866: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, enhancement, oncall: pt2, module: higher order operators, module: compiled autograd, module: pt2-dispatcher; title: support side effects...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",186c639582b9f730190b9e99d35f49c0602c4b7ec73b3bbd6114734017d9ae6e
BUNDLE-1232,bundle:bundle-1232,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: complex (102 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 7 issues - issue #118507: RuntimeError in torch.istft with center=False: Window Overlap Add Issue,module: complex,"Run one module: complex stale-resolution sweep covering 102 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"35312, 36175, 36469, 37314, 38650, 39123, 39128, 39270, 40590, 41244, 41246, 43579, 44611, 44741, 44817, 45690, 46374, 46642, 47052, 48000, 48486, 49133, 50097, 50098, 51210, 51455, 51714, 52457, 53440, 54753, 56012, 57358, 60941, 61909, 62884, 63138, 64186, 65306, 67324, 67333, 69287, 70073, 71465, 71472, 71635, 71671, 72134, 72341, 74537, 74748, 75862, 76012, 76166, 77046, 77731, 78050, 78170, 80256, 81428, 81749, 81982, 83376, 86340, 90447, 91309, 92398, 92683, 92818, 94395, 94718, 96704, 104466, 104516, 108882, 113750, 115164, 116018, 116414, 117232, 117236, 117245, 118507, 121588, 125198, 125718, 125746, 131283, 134323, 135210, 136568, 136621, 139349, 142392, 148670, 151182, 154496, 154501, 154606, 157272, 159870, 160629, 163984",,102,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: complex stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"Is this potentially the same as #134323 ? | t-device synchronization. This has been discussed in other issues regarding reconstruction with certain windows when center=False ( #62323, #91309), but my proposal is from a performance standpoint (https://discuss.pytorch.org/t/torch-istft-nola-check-causes-synchronization-an... | o signal processing. This is a non-exhaustive compilation of issues: pytorch/audio/issues/...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",1b9928d980c243c95826dc1d77da1c8fbecbedf86adc61199fcdac8360f23ed7
BUNDLE-1233,bundle:bundle-1233,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: complex (13 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 3 issues - issue #135860: Lobpcg for complex gives wrong results.,module: complex,"Run one module: complex stale-resolution sweep covering 13 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"36444, 52332, 55661, 71446, 76483, 76558, 76853, 82510, 82565, 127075, 135860, 137767, 156152",,13,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: complex stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,#134487 torch.nn.functional.normalize: #135428 torch.sigmoid: #135777 torch.lobpcg: #135860 torch.exp: #136063 torch.asin: #138327 #141487 #156152 cc @jgong5 @mingfeima @XiaobingSuper @sanchitintel @ashokei @jingxu10 @ezyang @anjali411 @dylanbespalko @mruberry @nikitaved @amjames | es: torch.linalg.norm & torch.norm: #132634 torch.acos: #134487 torch.nn.functional.normalize: #135428 torch.sigmoid: #135777 torch.lo...,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",69e1ed6467466a9911e6cdafd0fc0d0e2de5f4f5a46a4d4bc95b4abf5578187c
BUNDLE-1234,bundle:bundle-1234,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: context parallel (2 issues),issue_group,,module: context parallel stale/low urgency,module: context parallel,"Run one module: context parallel stale-resolution sweep covering 2 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"147793, 151878",,2,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: context parallel stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #151878: stale/low urgency; labels: oncall: distributed, triaged, module: dtensor, module: context parallel; title: Potential error in calling scaled_dot_product_attention in pytorch/torch/testing/_internal/distributed/_tensor /common_dtensor.py ? | issue #147793: stale/low urgency; labels: oncall: distributed, triaged, module: sdpa, module: context parallel; title: context_parallel fails with plain sdpa ker...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",82446813f42b8916f71fff06e6a52ab58b40213252ac90bfb5bfc2a578bd3109
BUNDLE-1235,bundle:bundle-1235,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: convolution (108 issues),issue_group,,"Review thread: 12 issues - issue #124931: Missing description of Transformer argument ""memory_mask"" shape in 3D (including the batch dimension) case",module: convolution,"Run one module: convolution stale-resolution sweep covering 108 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"7740, 7806, 10685, 11974, 13268, 13505, 17150, 21462, 21876, 22330, 22577, 22919, 23547, 23854, 24826, 24930, 25132, 28657, 29369, 29713, 30399, 30934, 32529, 32590, 34573, 35603, 35655, 40275, 40761, 41311, 42663, 46027, 47341, 47915, 48439, 48945, 49207, 49459, 50190, 51711, 53178, 53191, 54906, 55045, 56224, 56246, 56263, 58343, 58414, 58858, 58859, 58860, 58862, 59730, 61772, 62672, 64145, 64544, 65510, 65661, 66963, 67071, 70184, 72850, 73413, 74092, 75495, 75500, 76244, 77821, 77838, 77900, 77901, 78262, 79222, 82093, 83579, 88147, 101871, 106450, 112376, 113713, 115610, 117963, 119677, 121261, 121715, 123533, 124931, 127221, 127375, 128936, 133114, 134641, 136086, 136479, 139066, 142467, 144445, 149534, 150614, 152992, 153139, 157334, 161778, 163408, 165744, 165976",,108,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: convolution stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"Related: #163774 #149534 (comment) | Is this a duplicate of #24930? | Relevant older issue: #24826 Note that we generally maintain a high bar for inclusion of new modules into torch.nn, as each addition comes with a steep maintenance cost | e transformer module #25538 Doc update #28719, #28657 Additional attention layers (e.g. AugmentedConv, StandAloneAttention) - need research #32529 Add embedding layer and posit...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",282ca4b50bd31b694f7d91c536d24e8010fa6facb72fe81ff0990facbfc6fff1
BUNDLE-1236,bundle:bundle-1236,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: convolution (15 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 5 issues - issue #121596: Memory Usage of Conv2d Rapidly Increases when Params >1G,module: convolution,"Run one module: convolution stale-resolution sweep covering 15 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"4632, 22532, 23068, 25821, 26396, 26950, 52211, 52439, 75363, 76354, 94869, 121596, 123157, 168692, 168696",,15,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: convolution stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"y of setting these options for a given gemm call - either with with statement, or maybe even better also allowing some explicit hints= arg: #52439 | Might be related: #52439 | And unfortunately no easy way of logging / forcing the algo choice for a given op call :( #52439 | m2col, as 512 * 2048^2 * 3^2 * 2 = 36G and very close the increased memory usage. Similiar thoughts are also mentioned in pytorch forum and #2...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",9937b657d68b2e979c5cc002ca1df31bbf15287677f68837723a9e82d238069c
BUNDLE-1237,bundle:bundle-1237,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: copy on write (3 issues),issue_group,,module: copy on write stale/low urgency,module: copy on write,"Run one module: copy on write stale-resolution sweep covering 3 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"97856, 109833, 132485",,3,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: copy on write stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #132485: stale/low urgency; labels: module: cuda, triaged, module: copy on write; title: lazy_clone does not work for pinned memory | issue #109833: stale/low urgency; labels: module: internals, triaged, module: viewing and reshaping, module: copy on write; title: Implement Copy-on-write (COW) tensors | issue #97856: stale/low urgency; labels: module: internals, triaged, module: copy on write; title: make te...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",e033c75f5d51e73413ac5afa3c7728c94baaf36b6fd57c83cddda742418220f5
BUNDLE-1238,bundle:bundle-1238,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: core aten (3 issues),issue_group,,"Review thread: 2 issues - issue #137482: `torch.ops.aten.divide_` leads to ""RuntimeError: result type Float can't be cast to the desired output type Int""",module: core aten,"Run one module: core aten stale-resolution sweep covering 3 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"42246, 133941, 137482",,3,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: core aten stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"I don't think #42246 was fixed, but sure, if you have a fix in mind, please do not hesitate to propose a PR. | issue #133941: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: core aten; title: Why core aten IR doesn’t contain scalar_tensor overload version of some ops, like bitwise-like ops, remainder and so on?",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",016d017212a8ad4844dab9db360e47d575565340c7457c93510af08737ec8e0c
BUNDLE-1239,bundle:bundle-1239,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: correctness (silent) (71 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #142515: [MPS] `out_channels` <= 2**16 guard for convolution is too broad,module: correctness (silent),"Run one module: correctness (silent) stale-resolution sweep covering 71 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"5272, 24168, 25478, 48281, 48900, 55355, 57721, 59515, 61538, 65083, 67470, 68070, 70397, 70398, 71774, 73190, 73870, 76232, 78064, 79788, 80494, 80776, 81996, 83015, 84202, 86074, 86465, 89320, 94183, 94186, 96225, 96982, 97631, 100334, 101167, 101878, 101934, 103023, 104106, 104832, 107214, 107381, 107455, 107478, 107694, 111479, 113956, 114350, 120237, 121439, 121961, 122030, 124029, 125051, 131736, 132605, 133100, 134430, 134534, 136031, 136623, 137951, 137968, 142515, 142836, 147510, 151740, 153957, 158199, 162362, 169738",,71,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: correctness (silent) stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"oduce support for convolutions with out_channels > 2**16. While this appeared to work for Conv1d, it introduced a regression in Conv2d (see #142515 (comment)). It remains unclear whether Conv3d is affected. The issue results in a silent correctness bug. A guard was previously... | Could be related to this #120237 | issue #125051: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: correctness (silent), module: mps; title:...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",94cc1780b2458c0b53325d2ab58be6a991ca4fa0d1344048f1909bbc90960965
BUNDLE-1240,bundle:bundle-1240,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: cpp (95 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 4 issues - issue #102517: [feature request] PyTorch support for sub-interpreters with PEP 684 accepted and release in Python 3.12,module: cpp,"Run one module: cpp stale-resolution sweep covering 95 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"9912, 9950, 10950, 12868, 14959, 17554, 17614, 17879, 18630, 23490, 25646, 25979, 26456, 28929, 31178, 32166, 32614, 35723, 35872, 36577, 36914, 39522, 40729, 40959, 41177, 41525, 41903, 41955, 42848, 43490, 45855, 46712, 47591, 49320, 50375, 52575, 52744, 53157, 53584, 53622, 53983, 54058, 54201, 54815, 54874, 56522, 56781, 59074, 59418, 62566, 63479, 63897, 64206, 65984, 66755, 67902, 70160, 70416, 71069, 73171, 74101, 74942, 75562, 76103, 77161, 77241, 78876, 78880, 79004, 80580, 81625, 82542, 84473, 85078, 87706, 90424, 90751, 94827, 97802, 97849, 98907, 99225, 100741, 101210, 102517, 102533, 103570, 103671, 103756, 103837, 105943, 106533, 108651, 115034, 117938",,95,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: cpp stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,Maybe related #102517 | estion would be of zero-copy in-RAM IPC data exchange: maybe via named pipes? Some mmaps? shm? I found older issues asking the same: #23490 #10950 This might be important for working in hosted multi-threaded environments where every thread runs its own Python / PyTorch code. T... | 🚀 Feature support python sub-interpreters and maintains all status of the torch library. Motivation as #10950...,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",34ddf30e59a446ca7d88187f50b046bd9b0d87df0705b2a5d48f1642a081eff6
BUNDLE-1241,bundle:bundle-1241,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: cpp (86 issues),issue_group,,module: cpp stale/low urgency batch 3,module: cpp,"Run one module: cpp stale-resolution sweep covering 86 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"12795, 15149, 15491, 16375, 17797, 17984, 18283, 19125, 19453, 19499, 20315, 20531, 21050, 21405, 21828, 21899, 21902, 22022, 22536, 23301, 23859, 25520, 25635, 26086, 26659, 27055, 27958, 28930, 31688, 32237, 32415, 32421, 33301, 33303, 33514, 33811, 34052, 34068, 34881, 35078, 35441, 35640, 35713, 35770, 36004, 36099, 36891, 40098, 40581, 41213, 42665, 44533, 45139, 48548, 48959, 73016, 79272, 89051, 111704, 117930, 118478, 118723, 119486, 120085, 121485, 125471, 128509, 130514, 134098, 134637, 138387, 138940, 138981, 143564, 144955, 145337, 145493, 145656, 147581, 150548, 153463, 155011, 163502, 167762, 168376, 169893",,86,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: cpp stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #19453: stale/low urgency; labels: module: cpp, triaged; title: How to load PyTorch model with LSTM using C++ api | issue #17984: stale/low urgency; labels: module: cpp, triaged; title: ""unknown builtin op"" error with static library | issue #130514: stale/low urgency; labels: module: cpp, module: cuda, triaged; title: C++ API Does Not Expose Lazy NVRTC | issue #128509: stale/low urgency; labels: module: cpp-...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",f74357cbe8e7c054a07235d3ceab8be582da58da221e9c8b8f69c9416b10e57b
BUNDLE-1242,bundle:bundle-1242,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: cpp-extensions (44 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 5 issues - issue #55655: Performance debugging / warning mode,module: cpp-extensions,"Run one module: cpp-extensions stale-resolution sweep covering 44 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"12449, 16873, 17849, 18805, 37766, 54077, 55363, 55655, 57118, 58779, 59251, 68768, 72948, 75725, 78708, 81899, 82132, 90775, 95786, 99143, 113550, 114935, 114962, 118842, 119190, 119206, 119633, 121131, 124454, 132130, 136664, 140015, 142145, 144690, 148920, 149798, 152032, 154187, 155378, 161068, 163142, 163659, 166219, 170542",,44,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: cpp-extensions stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"t new types of messaging and control it (see #55655)? There are also issues with our current messages and other logging systems, like VLOG (#57118) and GLOG (#14724). This issue proposes we add a messaging system to PyTorch that address these issues. It should have the followi... | rograms for nondeterminism or using deprecated operations? How do we make it easier to implement new types of messaging and control it...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",928505c1998d3722e5d200995e1a99be813a7084342f13e464d47a2519152d28
BUNDLE-1243,bundle:bundle-1243,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: cpu (109 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 25 issues - issue #15386: F.grid_sample doesn't respect padding_mode when height of inputs is 1,module: cpu,"Run one module: cpu stale-resolution sweep covering 109 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"2180, 2732, 3468, 4085, 4703, 4825, 5388, 5565, 9873, 13018, 15386, 16717, 18987, 19163, 19437, 19825, 19826, 20367, 21457, 21602, 22331, 22687, 22803, 23509, 24303, 24470, 24823, 24870, 25014, 25039, 26534, 28390, 30388, 30565, 32023, 33725, 34728, 35937, 36107, 36108, 41399, 44343, 47447, 48245, 48389, 48641, 50334, 50335, 50336, 50337, 50338, 50339, 50340, 50341, 52291, 61528, 68394, 70239, 72408, 74876, 81868, 88565, 88658, 88805, 90695, 91156, 91374, 91936, 93188, 94322, 94457, 95108, 95945, 99690, 104602, 105778, 107433, 108496, 110858, 112714, 114080, 117429, 118499, 123047, 124934, 125547, 125744, 126115, 131011, 132386, 132395, 132579, 133304, 134459, 134996, 135542, 138337, 139472, 140112, 149304, 151037, 151463, 152294, 153919, 154017, 155671, 156959, 162719, 163052",,109,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: cpu stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"As detailed in #81868, I am encountering precision issues with grid_sample in bilinear mode at discrete pixel locations. Simple experimentation seems to point to | If I understand correctly, @andreaskoepf is suggesting at #24870 (comment) that a better downsampling grid_sample result could be achieved by filtering the image in different ways before sampling. This co | gn_corners=False: 1.2069940567016602e-06 Basel...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",cd26b3fb8c34599187464058be5072ce5637b25ad7f78045db0e48c2119c50ee
BUNDLE-1244,bundle:bundle-1244,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: cpu (12 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #76654: `torch.sort` does not exploit parallelization when invoked without the `dim` parameter.,module: cpu,"Run one module: cpu stale-resolution sweep covering 12 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"18634, 21731, 22414, 30803, 31356, 31474, 76654, 76655, 90760, 97068, 101359, 145233",,12,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: cpu stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"and the remaining dimensions will have more than >33k elements, you will see a nice speed-up on a multi-core machine. Sure! I opened here. #76655 | try to sort 1 dimention tensors. Alternatives Maybe you could implement merge sort or other parallel sorting algorithms Additional context #76654 I have a report and code here import torch import torch.nn as nn import torch.multiprocessing as mp import torch.distribute...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",7ba8eac2abe500791eb77c5c9b6fe6e8173a61eb16e59a6b67b638dfdadcac9b
BUNDLE-1245,bundle:bundle-1245,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: cpu_tensor_apply (2 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #24478: Port CPU_tensor_apply functions to TensorIterator (umbrella issue),module: cpu_tensor_apply,"Run one module: cpu_tensor_apply stale-resolution sweep covering 2 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"24478, 24498",,2,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: cpu_tensor_apply stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"pare.cpp:18 pytorch/aten/src/ATen/native/TensorCompare.cpp Line 18 in eabfca3 at::CPU_tensor_apply4<scalar_t, uint8_t, scalar_t, scalar_t>( #24498 Migrate CPU_tensor_apply to TensorIterator in aten/src/ATen/native/TensorCompare.cpp:30 pytorch/aten/src/ATen/native/TensorCompare... | , scalar_t, scalar_t>( How to use TensorIterator: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/wiki/How-to-use-TensorIterator Additional Instruc...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",6d2b1e3ed9f42227bc8e8e01ac8fda37d0f91261d40295e7ffbf05e5a086fa63
BUNDLE-1246,bundle:bundle-1246,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: crash (7 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 5 issues - issue #41950: [docs] Clarify behavior of torch.cuda.device_count() when torch compiled without CUDA (cpu-only) or when CUDA is not available,module: crash,"Run one module: crash stale-resolution sweep covering 7 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"41950, 51872, 52675, 62931, 80337, 92250, 99982",,7,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: crash stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,n try to run the two setups under strace (or maybe ltrace?) to find any such differences Some related issues / discussions are linked at in #52675. Please chime in and add your usecase there too :) My main suggestion there is that torch.cuda.is_available() and related function... | Related: #41950 #52675 #62931 | Related in the sense of theme of avoiding CUDA initialization for functioning: #52675 | s the indices...,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",e38e805181a727507eee3b52864429aa79c6e22f70e29b7376003bdf1c672ea6
BUNDLE-1247,bundle:bundle-1247,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: cublas (31 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #102963: torch.svd fails on large matrices,module: cublas,"Run one module: cublas stale-resolution sweep covering 31 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"21459, 21587, 30596, 34576, 38553, 42800, 43325, 51351, 53473, 58670, 75549, 83272, 91653, 91958, 94294, 100850, 101428, 102459, 102963, 103499, 107800, 116184, 118774, 120240, 124262, 132300, 137389, 141210, 154248, 157054, 166004",,31,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: cublas stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"m the function's parameter check (possibly n*lda*batchSize>INT32_MAX, or lda<max(1,n), see the cusolverDnXsyevBatched documentation). Maybe #102963 hits a similar check. Meanwhile, because we use symmetric real 3x3 matrices, we ware able to work around the issue by using a clo... | issue #107800: stale/low urgency; labels: feature, module: cuda, triaged, module: cublas; title: [feature request] [discussion] Includ...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",228036d3145c2706e6ba41cb9df3ccab52726ed54bda1a62e49de4fc11e4e497
BUNDLE-1248,bundle:bundle-1248,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: cuda (67 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 4 issues - issue #23940: Improve the performance of linear algebra operations in CUDA for small problem sizes,module: cuda,"Run one module: cuda stale-resolution sweep covering 67 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"10454, 10615, 23940, 28829, 37406, 37664, 40770, 44380, 47953, 48559, 53879, 55122, 55207, 59692, 67978, 68272, 69364, 72138, 74235, 88838, 89160, 89884, 98925, 104152, 104591, 104702, 108858, 113560, 115618, 117122, 118991, 119131, 121857, 126344, 127062, 127225, 127521, 129523, 129627, 132218, 137564, 137581, 140069, 140214, 140687, 140930, 141915, 142127, 144025, 144611, 144612, 145145, 145349, 145350, 145453, 146040, 146056, 147284, 147682, 147874, 148885, 149802, 150574, 150700, 152335, 153210, 159447",,67,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: cuda stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"Cross-posting an issue I created a year ago: #23940 and an issue I created two years ago: #13546. | ch 1.9 linear algebra development plan See #47953 (comment) For detailed MAGMA mechanism See #47953 (comment) See also #42666 #26996 #42403 #53879 cc @ezyang @gchanan @zou3519 @bdhirsh @ngimel @vishwakftw @jianyuh @nikitaved @pearu @mruberry @heitorschueroff @walterddr @Vitaly... | * N]); } printf(""\n""); } } See als...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",bea615aa40803a8ade7fb4f7a0ba38343b7ea69be58a9a4fd48ba17a898a3736
BUNDLE-1249,bundle:bundle-1249,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: cuda (140 issues),issue_group,,module: cuda stale/low urgency batch 6,module: cuda,"Run one module: cuda stale-resolution sweep covering 140 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"1328, 1750, 3390, 3396, 3600, 4987, 13786, 14996, 16542, 18849, 20864, 21061, 21780, 22383, 22785, 22961, 23026, 23061, 24016, 24176, 24963, 25045, 25297, 25752, 25820, 27024, 27138, 27297, 27540, 27780, 27926, 27975, 28791, 29198, 29516, 29528, 29545, 29553, 29710, 29961, 30404, 30528, 30569, 31038, 31261, 31425, 31570, 32370, 32504, 32510, 32868, 33051, 33979, 34323, 34878, 36160, 36638, 37048, 37153, 37549, 37585, 37682, 38671, 38911, 38996, 38997, 39317, 39632, 40020, 40548, 40667, 42074, 42301, 43281, 43685, 44248, 44547, 44624, 44943, 45447, 45578, 46379, 46899, 47111, 48202, 48706, 49332, 64491, 68959, 76071, 77049, 81717, 119420, 122274, 123548, 123834, 129649, 140696, 142232, 145471, 147011, 149155, 149196, 151433, 152150, 152756, 152922, 153502, 153534, 153649, 154428, 154602, 155798, 156238, 156618, 157502, 157950, 158172, 158444, 158641, 158831, 159301, 159564, 159674, 159914, 160308, 160816, 160838, 160891, 162127, 162402, 162582, 163062, 163709, 163982, 164249, 164799, 165715, 165741, 165826",,140,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: cuda stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #123548: stale/low urgency; labels: module: docs, module: cuda, module: memory usage, triaged, module: CUDACachingAllocator; title: An error occurs when ‘max_split_size_mb ’and ‘expandable_segments ’ are enabled at the same time. | issue #157502: stale/low urgency; labels: module: cuda, triaged; title: Failure with cub::TransformInputIterator in 12.9 periodic CI test | issue #147011: stale/low urgency; label...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",64f50cd7008cf61d0e27c1bbda0cb8c8a100b30acf7e54f86b0a027007c3338e
BUNDLE-1250,bundle:bundle-1250,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: cuda (140 issues),issue_group,,module: cuda stale/low urgency batch 29,module: cuda,"Run one module: cuda stale-resolution sweep covering 140 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"12060, 23780, 24081, 24401, 27588, 30246, 32524, 32881, 36066, 36560, 36706, 37713, 41852, 43546, 45428, 46024, 46386, 48832, 49023, 49095, 50036, 50185, 50268, 50354, 50829, 50925, 51224, 51644, 52041, 52145, 52266, 52570, 52644, 53130, 53957, 54047, 54307, 54564, 55277, 55643, 55736, 55756, 56350, 56694, 58385, 58474, 58626, 59071, 59309, 59778, 60306, 61525, 61890, 62031, 62265, 62648, 62661, 62695, 63069, 63226, 63837, 63992, 63998, 65100, 65301, 66076, 66473, 66482, 66936, 67208, 67388, 68165, 68323, 68909, 69772, 70490, 70669, 70901, 71301, 71414, 71495, 71697, 72709, 73003, 73196, 73461, 74146, 74391, 74679, 75025, 75198, 75494, 76043, 76743, 77397, 77951, 78018, 78518, 78581, 78884, 81620, 81988, 82061, 82200, 83148, 83392, 84194, 84309, 84336, 84445, 85227, 85377, 85387, 85841, 85889, 86449, 86493, 86551, 86782, 86798, 87539, 87841, 87992, 88027, 88081, 88189, 88191, 88410, 88563, 88639, 89245, 90793, 90999, 91375, 91536, 91582, 95058, 95077, 95169, 95237",,140,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: cuda stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #53130: stale/low urgency; labels: module: cuda, module: lint, triaged; title: Lint rule to forbid bare assert() in cuda | issue #52644: stale/low urgency; labels: module: cuda, triaged, enhancement; title: [FR] torch.load's map_location supports int | issue #52570: stale/low urgency; labels: module: performance, module: cuda, triaged; title: RTX 2080s performs better than RTX 3080 in Semantic Segmentation i...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",8de0ffea1eaf3f9064d898dedb80858f082a67441be8ebdd10aa19546c6017da
BUNDLE-1251,bundle:bundle-1251,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: cuda (140 issues),issue_group,,module: cuda stale/low urgency batch 2,module: cuda,"Run one module: cuda stale-resolution sweep covering 140 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"11340, 13058, 16266, 20655, 22573, 30401, 30711, 32575, 37324, 41970, 42080, 43623, 44156, 44551, 48163, 50198, 52718, 58155, 58812, 62350, 65528, 67680, 68961, 70701, 72117, 72791, 74393, 75391, 81883, 82073, 87696, 89342, 89730, 90261, 94966, 95121, 95648, 95696, 95768, 98193, 98481, 99138, 99372, 99812, 100145, 100425, 101890, 103495, 103589, 104107, 104322, 104867, 104925, 104981, 105726, 106520, 106606, 107201, 107374, 107528, 107864, 108277, 108407, 108494, 108645, 109383, 109494, 109863, 110014, 110116, 110194, 110252, 111024, 111349, 111363, 111466, 112847, 113053, 113326, 113408, 113449, 113743, 113847, 114040, 114943, 115331, 115340, 115418, 115735, 116543, 116870, 117130, 117910, 118373, 118859, 118863, 119624, 120996, 121203, 121641, 122068, 122092, 122170, 123505, 123604, 124351, 124456, 124838, 126748, 127196, 128296, 128601, 128791, 128988, 129670, 129954, 130078, 130124, 130193, 131491, 131655, 131656, 133280, 133281, 133629, 134403, 134441, 134607, 134851, 148681, 150517, 152731, 166234, 166409, 166611, 166651, 167409, 167420, 167724, 168158",,140,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: cuda stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #133629: stale/low urgency; labels: module: cuda, triaged, module: CUDACachingAllocator; title: RuntimeError: free_upper_bound + pytorch_used_bytes[device] | issue #152731: stale/low urgency; labels: module: cuda, low priority, triaged, module: half, actionable, module: edge cases; title: Inconsistent float16 overflow behavior between CPU and CUDA devices | issue #168158: stale/low urgency; labels: module: c...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",067772096da6340c01a610878310bd6696687ee557a33c2c872d959b4fc7cb85
BUNDLE-1252,bundle:bundle-1252,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: cuda (52 issues),issue_group,,module: cuda stale/low urgency batch 10,module: cuda,"Run one module: cuda stale-resolution sweep covering 52 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"12819, 17350, 19229, 19335, 19599, 20562, 29554, 36990, 40989, 43947, 44103, 47996, 51075, 58466, 63079, 63618, 69688, 73176, 82886, 88380, 97210, 98414, 99410, 114153, 116242, 132041, 132045, 132047, 135837, 136812, 136815, 137174, 138453, 138829, 139115, 139333, 139342, 139382, 139648, 149187, 149821, 167526, 169237, 169266, 169390, 169909, 169956, 170694, 171039, 171286, 171697, 171771",,52,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: cuda stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #139648: stale/low urgency; labels: module: cuda, module: tests, triaged, module: mta; title: [Tracker] complex128 tests are disabled for all foreach internally | issue #139342: stale/low urgency; labels: module: cuda, triaged, module: python frontend; title: torch.logcumsumexp runtime error inconsistency on CPU and CUDA (also documentation missing constraint) | issue #139333: stale/low urgency; labels: modu...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",341de58d96231ec4bfc4a3152d41bdf6e3334a1405c0e20cbfc1eed607fd8a46
BUNDLE-1253,bundle:bundle-1253,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: cuda (18 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #47908: The speed of pytorch with cudatoolkit 11.0 is slower than cudatoolkit 10.2,module: cuda,"Run one module: cuda stale-resolution sweep covering 18 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"28619, 31528, 37250, 42109, 43453, 47908, 54408, 58136, 59168, 101159, 103820, 114569, 121894, 121969, 131650, 131667, 150285, 162235",,18,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: cuda stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"I tested the time on each GPU for 1000 rounds. I don't think it is measuring error. I do not mean RTX 3090 itself is low. Since I also read #47908 , I guess it is because PyTorch with CUDA 11 has the problem in efficiency, and RTX 3090 has not choice but to use it. If you are... | ch 1.8.0 + CUDA 10.2 = 0.6 ms RTX 3090 + PyTorch 1.8.0 + CUDA 11.1 = 0.94 ms RTX 3090 + PyTorch 1.7.0 + CUDA 11.0 = 1.12 ms I also foun...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",01c8e07430fa8670157b265b25363bcba3997855db8e8d2a155e41d765a18fee
BUNDLE-1254,bundle:bundle-1254,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: cuda graphs (26 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #154824: torch inductor cudagraph tree could incorrectly release some input nodes during replay,module: cuda graphs,"Run one module: cuda graphs stale-resolution sweep covering 26 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"66858, 71896, 85201, 87163, 91950, 92217, 102830, 115339, 118018, 118715, 119873, 126753, 132856, 133984, 148927, 149944, 150482, 150484, 150488, 153025, 154824, 156820, 159384, 160281, 171263, 175557",,26,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: cuda graphs stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"_weakrefs() in cudagraph_trees.py — it frees storages that are still needed as inputs to subsequent warmup nodes. This is the same issue as #154824. Crashes at step 1 with mode=""reduce-overhead"", reproduces on PyTorch 2.8 and 2.10. I also found a secondary issue on the same co... | issue #171263: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: cuda graphs; title: [CUDA Graphs] Capture failure leaves generator state co...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",696f502224b07f6d4852dd255f334dfbc6ba9e0a0fbe73e64682b1ae45818d01
BUNDLE-1255,bundle:bundle-1255,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: cudacachingallocator (11 issues),issue_group,,module: cudacachingallocator stale/low urgency,module: cudacachingallocator,"Run one module: cudacachingallocator stale-resolution sweep covering 11 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"111366, 112377, 119452, 130162, 154603, 159149, 159164, 159906, 160405, 160420, 166116",,11,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: cudacachingallocator stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #112377: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: CUDACachingAllocator; title: RuntimeError: NVML_SUCCESS == r INTERNAL ASSERT FAILED at ""/opt/conda/conda-bld/pytorch_1695392020201/work/c10/cuda/CUDACachingAllocator.cpp"":1154, please report a bug to PyTorch. | issue #166116: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: CUDACachingAllocator; title: [CCA] CUDACachingAllocator always release physical memory h...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",47e160b0755c2c4a80ed35d10fb3bdb8d2df09fd3f27b0f5f36739acc66a8a72
BUNDLE-1256,bundle:bundle-1256,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: cudnn (40 issues),issue_group,,module: cudnn stale/low urgency batch 2,module: cudnn,"Run one module: cudnn stale-resolution sweep covering 40 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"4145, 4181, 4241, 4542, 4551, 4930, 5280, 12484, 16655, 18536, 19911, 28777, 34977, 36333, 40134, 42545, 45053, 45769, 51044, 51776, 51933, 57921, 62034, 62926, 64025, 70487, 77844, 77955, 80259, 104697, 107751, 109010, 113590, 133780, 134977, 144913, 146096, 149090, 166557, 169146",,40,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: cudnn stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #107751: stale/low urgency; labels: module: cudnn, triaged; title: conv cudnn support integers | issue #34977: stale/low urgency; labels: module: performance, module: cudnn, triaged, module: memory format; title: `conv2d` is slow with specific shapes of channels_last tensors | issue #77844: stale/low urgency; labels: module: cudnn, triaged; title: Conv2D with large different number of input and output channe...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",8ed2f9d774a65bba7346cb65132c8429569a14ba403b8182b2b2d169df9d9d69
BUNDLE-1257,bundle:bundle-1257,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: custom-operators (19 issues),issue_group,,module: custom-operators stale/low urgency batch 1,module: custom-operators,"Run one module: custom-operators stale-resolution sweep covering 19 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"46409, 57392, 97329, 110461, 124645, 127337, 130282, 132534, 139494, 142353, 143466, 144344, 150972, 152720, 155386, 155616, 156622, 161001, 162870",,19,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: custom-operators stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #130282: stale/low urgency; labels: feature, triaged, module: custom-operators, oncall: pt2, module: pt2-dispatcher; title: [custom_ops] We should be able to mark an operator as non-differentiable. | issue #139494: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: custom-operators, actionable, oncall: pt2, module: pt2-dispatcher, vllm-compile, dynamo-triage-jan2025, module: vllm; title: Mutating custom ops slower...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",4f827904cf3e4194128113c861d4b85a0fce69d6c0dcb14de676a4efe305499a
BUNDLE-1258,bundle:bundle-1258,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: data (43 issues),issue_group,,"Review thread: 3 issues - issue #120139: On `Dataset`, `IterableDataset` inheritance",module: data,"Run one module: data stale-resolution sweep covering 43 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"11980, 13053, 46711, 47055, 49180, 49398, 51777, 56360, 64766, 65067, 66116, 68925, 71543, 73141, 74014, 75582, 80134, 88062, 91252, 102368, 106540, 107217, 107854, 108861, 109968, 110156, 113748, 116403, 120139, 122410, 123172, 128015, 128497, 129224, 129225, 131113, 132492, 138957, 148807, 153536, 160849, 164862, 169080",,43,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: data stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"Didn't see but #47055 is related. | n this could solve the nasty https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/blob/v2.2.1/torch/utils/data/sampler.py#L70-L95. On that, see also #122410, #47055. Related Discussions, Issues and Commits #19228, #47055, #23587. Thoughts Thoughts? :) cc @VitalyFedyunin @ejguan @dzhulgakov @ssnl | hinking on this could solve the nasty https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/blob/v2.2.1/torch/utils/dat...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",bee206543c37eca9bda1b0a36c4dafb5dd9ec3eaba51f11171fc65fa50a41ec6
BUNDLE-1259,bundle:bundle-1259,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: data parallel (67 issues),issue_group,,module: data parallel stale/low urgency batch 4,module: data parallel,"Run one module: data parallel stale-resolution sweep covering 67 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"2312, 7358, 7365, 7457, 7890, 11645, 13447, 14461, 15161, 15260, 16700, 24155, 25514, 27046, 27218, 28275, 31360, 31460, 31478, 31553, 32444, 33081, 33342, 33785, 33800, 34001, 34516, 34941, 35118, 35208, 37246, 37444, 37484, 37814, 38543, 38936, 38940, 40978, 41327, 41681, 42183, 42478, 43120, 43259, 43754, 44938, 45840, 46381, 48714, 50170, 50210, 51385, 52260, 52289, 52597, 53405, 55304, 58218, 62130, 62466, 68931, 70447, 73218, 77576, 83315, 122080, 122568",,67,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: data parallel stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #38543: stale/low urgency; labels: oncall: distributed, triaged, module: data parallel; title: Make rebuildBucket() to be async in c10d reducer | issue #7890: stale/low urgency; labels: module: nn, triaged, enhancement, module: data parallel; title: [feature request] batch_first of RNN hidden weight for Multi GPU training | issue #37814: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: data parallel; title: Distr...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",98f7140bc5364c44ea16ca401c18c809010f09da1ee6ff0047ffea888aef47f5
BUNDLE-1260,bundle:bundle-1260,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: dataloader (138 issues),issue_group,,module: dataloader stale/low urgency batch 9,module: dataloader,"Run one module: dataloader stale-resolution sweep covering 138 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"934, 2407, 2724, 3281, 3356, 5231, 6350, 7423, 9171, 9559, 9753, 10165, 11062, 11372, 11633, 11727, 11790, 16901, 18317, 20416, 21016, 21554, 21645, 22136, 22585, 23048, 23720, 24984, 27421, 29804, 30225, 31232, 31657, 31689, 31867, 32034, 32150, 33413, 37409, 40972, 41329, 42402, 42654, 43467, 44528, 44631, 46530, 46802, 47563, 48702, 49727, 49849, 50201, 50831, 50939, 51011, 51418, 51663, 52850, 53337, 54871, 58847, 59438, 61281, 61457, 61503, 61665, 62066, 65198, 65216, 65665, 66223, 66251, 67439, 67602, 68519, 70158, 70386, 71872, 73417, 74337, 75147, 76750, 76887, 77159, 77646, 78921, 78987, 80594, 81412, 82185, 82219, 82583, 85775, 87003, 87955, 91353, 92134, 94131, 96629, 97432, 97498, 98002, 98792, 99584, 100012, 102511, 105799, 106634, 107392, 107443, 110029, 110820, 113600, 116117, 116479, 116558, 117586, 119123, 119281, 123262, 125844, 126620, 127072, 130610, 131631, 131883, 131931, 132919, 135409, 136588, 137882, 142884, 149837, 153594, 154810, 155157, 169078",,138,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: dataloader stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #37409: stale/low urgency; labels: module: dataloader, triaged; title: Compatibility of subset dataset with disabled batch sampling | issue #43467: stale/low urgency; labels: module: multiprocessing, module: dataloader, triaged; title: Data loader struct pack issue(overflow)? | issue #6350: stale/low urgency; labels: module: dataloader, triaged; title: worker assignments in torch.utils.dataloader.py | issue...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",52b3506ad4210ac0252554bcf4a1a5a43d507b89840da9fbc7e4d3c80b5bfa30
BUNDLE-1261,bundle:bundle-1261,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: dataloader (8 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 4 issues - issue #10386: [feature request] batch_first option in torch.utils.data,module: dataloader,"Run one module: dataloader stale-resolution sweep covering 8 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"7359, 10386, 13023, 49440, 50689, 50940, 53982, 64881",,8,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: dataloader stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,e system to support more flexible data-loading process. Then you should be able to load data directly into GPU. Please checkout out our RFC #49440 | Would be possible after migrating to DataPipes #49440 | _dim = batch_dim) else: self.collate_fn = collate_fn ### OTHER STUFF HERE ### A similar (but more limited in scope) request was advanced in #10386 cc @ssnl @VitalyFedyunin @ejguan | d Simpletransformers. Replacin...,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",5ff041fbcecefc3cc235894545707e735ab0d0cc9fd2ede4a4ea08a843025cc2
BUNDLE-1262,bundle:bundle-1262,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: ddp (81 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 3 issues - issue #64636: [docs or feature request] torchelastic: OOM recovery / skipping batches (e.g. if inf loss or nan gradients),module: ddp,"Run one module: ddp stale-resolution sweep covering 81 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"45943, 46248, 49477, 49716, 49891, 54232, 54351, 54445, 55156, 55876, 56460, 57593, 58522, 58813, 60343, 62862, 63041, 63211, 63290, 64636, 64637, 64905, 65357, 65436, 65637, 68781, 70222, 71330, 71377, 73600, 74148, 74185, 74907, 78157, 78159, 79164, 79171, 79299, 79464, 79542, 79629, 80080, 80420, 83074, 83245, 83320, 84414, 89942, 90742, 95872, 97030, 105499, 109774, 111317, 111552, 112164, 127873, 130932, 149762, 150734, 156680, 158936, 168411, 168412, 168413, 168414, 168415, 168416, 168417, 168418, 168419, 168420, 168421, 168424, 168425, 168426, 168427, 168428, 168429, 168430, 168431",,81,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: ddp stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"Also, OOM recovery and skipping batches: #64636 (per replica or globally) And error / exception / stack trace marshaling Correct implementation of training log logging (both into text jso | sion, static graph, etc Show how to do performance analysis/tuning Show how to do inference in distributed setting and aggregate results as #64905 requests. Recover from batches that cause OOM/inf/nan grads. Overall this will m...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",ebfc4affaed82299e322717ec44cf713238626157f7b3cdec86eaefba7449cd1
BUNDLE-1263,bundle:bundle-1263,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: ddp (17 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 3 issues - issue #168475: TestModule: test/distributed/test_composability.py::ComposabilityTest,module: ddp,"Run one module: ddp stale-resolution sweep covering 17 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"23425, 49321, 168422, 168423, 168434, 168435, 168445, 168446, 168447, 168448, 168449, 168450, 168451, 168452, 168475, 168476, 168477",,17,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: ddp stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,uted/test_composability.py Test class: ComposabilityTest Test name: test_pp_fsdp_unshard_reshard_runtime Defined at line: 389 Parent issue: #168475 Code reference: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/blob/main/test/distributed/test_composability.py cc @sunway513 @jithunnair-amd... | ource file: test/distributed/test_composability.py Test class: ComposabilityTest Test name: test_pp_fsdp Defined at line: 288 Parent i...,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",4932e40fcc3384f77678a41d1d4723e1cfbaed35105cb6c651ada161be5a34bd
BUNDLE-1264,bundle:bundle-1264,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: deadlock (7 issues),issue_group,,module: deadlock stale/low urgency,module: deadlock,"Run one module: deadlock stale-resolution sweep covering 7 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"17745, 26447, 39706, 63441, 68507, 134067, 162154",,7,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: deadlock stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #162154: stale/low urgency; labels: module: multiprocessing, triaged, module: deadlock, module: linear algebra; title: Linear algebra operations hang indefinitely doing nothing when run in subprocesses | issue #134067: stale/low urgency; labels: module: multiprocessing, triaged, module: deadlock; title: subprocess tensor creation gets stuck | issue #17745: stale/low urgency; labels: oncall: distributed, tria...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",b5e334ab17cb2502cad8f252713ddf0439b5949dea3f4012f26c461f67a0dca9
BUNDLE-1265,bundle:bundle-1265,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: decompositions (12 issues),issue_group,,module: decompositions stale/low urgency,module: decompositions,"Run one module: decompositions stale-resolution sweep covering 12 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"94591, 106375, 113007, 113024, 113329, 117348, 118227, 118642, 134821, 137128, 145094, 147287",,12,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: decompositions stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #137128: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, better-engineering, oncall: pt2, module: dynamic shapes, module: decompositions, module: dynamo; title: Context manager to skip checks inside decompositions | issue #145094: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, oncall: pt2, module: fakeTensor, module: decompositions, module: pt2-dispatcher; title: Tracking issue: Incorrect Meta Strides / Turn On PyDispatcher in Fak...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",8c3e8e882444167990a51daede67f16a54f2942be99f82fb2979dd200d4285e9
BUNDLE-1266,bundle:bundle-1266,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: dependency bug (9 issues),issue_group,,module: dependency bug stale/low urgency,module: dependency bug,"Run one module: dependency bug stale-resolution sweep covering 9 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"21956, 22815, 23721, 26344, 31289, 37004, 53891, 70170, 113905",,9,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: dependency bug stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #22815: stale/low urgency; labels: module: dependency bug, module: internals, triaged, quansight-nack; title: TensorImpl de-virtualization | issue #113905: stale/low urgency; labels: module: dependency bug, triaged; title: Sympy reasoning with true division is broken | issue #21956: stale/low urgency; labels: module: dependency bug, module: multiprocessing, module: nn, triaged, module: initialization; title:...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",fe2d7808692956e55e7a4b5d07d8e515ef1f6c2277ad33124c564b3d6e1123ae
BUNDLE-1267,bundle:bundle-1267,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: deploy (8 issues),issue_group,,module: deploy stale/low urgency,module: deploy,"Run one module: deploy stale-resolution sweep covering 8 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"56489, 58238, 58876, 73268, 74384, 81568, 82382, 82419",,8,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: deploy stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #56489: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: deploy; title: [torchdeploy] ar: _bz2module.o: No such file or directory | issue #82382: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: deploy; title: Problems in built-from-source pytorch with USE_DEPLOY=1 in Ubuntu | issue #82419: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: deploy; title: The torch::deploy document is not updated | issue #81568: stale/low ur...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",4bf9ce64a91e5276ca7cbcaeea3dc90625a114e1ca7cbbdcbb35fd305b1cf3f7
BUNDLE-1268,bundle:bundle-1268,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: deprecation (32 issues),issue_group,,"Review thread: 6 issues - issue #36524: Drop _stacklevel from argspecs of F.softmax, F.softmin, F.log_softmax (for implicit dim has been long deprecated)",module: deprecation,"Run one module: deprecation stale-resolution sweep covering 32 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"7834, 7900, 9381, 32580, 36524, 37863, 46187, 50273, 50274, 50275, 50276, 50332, 50352, 53124, 54588, 55948, 55951, 55964, 60548, 64038, 65752, 65910, 65936, 71357, 83163, 84290, 84524, 86968, 97014, 117540, 120584, 162782",,32,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: deprecation stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"Related: #36524. As discussed there, this _stacklevel is a remnant of migrating to explicit-only dim and to control warnings about not setting dim and the | Related: #36524 #64038 As discussed there, this _stacklevel is a remnant of migrating to explicit-only dim and to control warnings about not setting dim an | Related: #36524 #64038 As discussed there, this _stacklevel is a remnant of migrating to explicit-only...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",5b8b95ae4fa940dde9b23e194677139a87730fb53c36801ec100ce0e19f0c703
BUNDLE-1269,bundle:bundle-1269,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: derivatives (2 issues),issue_group,,module: derivatives stale/low urgency,module: derivatives,"Run one module: derivatives stale-resolution sweep covering 2 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"22274, 77973",,2,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: derivatives stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #77973: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: derivatives, module: forward ad; title: forward-mode support for ""logically composite"" operators | issue #22274: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, enhancement, module: derivatives; title: second derivatives of unfold",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",92071425790cae75df6a24cc588ff0f734641a8c62dd3dad7f74a97a3ba66f1f
BUNDLE-1270,bundle:bundle-1270,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: determinism (35 issues),issue_group,,module: determinism stale/low urgency batch 2,module: determinism,"Run one module: determinism stale-resolution sweep covering 35 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"17798, 23151, 27542, 38541, 39134, 51493, 53352, 58471, 59783, 62451, 65049, 72766, 73640, 78249, 82843, 84234, 85096, 88591, 94388, 97236, 98200, 98208, 101246, 107011, 107999, 108341, 110698, 120689, 130968, 140513, 143655, 147595, 155552, 161029, 166114",,35,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: determinism stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #107011: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: determinism, module: pooling; title: max_pool3d_with_indices_backward_cuda does not have a deterministic implementation | issue #101246: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: determinism; title: Tool for identifying where in eager model an operation is nondeterministic | issue #97236: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: determinism, module: m...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",7c307daa0307b9f39847ec8eed3315b4917dcd3eafc8a77c4ecbb23dc2536e4f
BUNDLE-1271,bundle:bundle-1271,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: devicemesh (7 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #119574: Cannot configure dist_timeout when using device_mesh,module: devicemesh,"Run one module: devicemesh stale-resolution sweep covering 7 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"114629, 114632, 119574, 119613, 125358, 142469, 160337",,7,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: devicemesh stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"Is this similar to #119574 | issue #114629: stale/low urgency; labels: oncall: distributed, triaged, module: DeviceMesh; title: [DeviceMesh] `init_device_mesh` does not support CPU-only | issue #160337: stale/low urgency; labels: oncall: distributed, triaged, module: DeviceMesh; title: [RFC] Simplify bookkeeping of DeviceMesh slicing, (un)flattening, ... | issue #125358: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module:...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",d046b50cfaaaf95acba0e300125b7f7e189b9d48c87238c46a882b3fde4c70d2
BUNDLE-1272,bundle:bundle-1272,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: devx (27 issues),issue_group,,module: devx stale/low urgency batch 1,module: devx,"Run one module: devx stale-resolution sweep covering 27 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"96585, 99176, 102227, 102559, 102673, 103354, 103482, 105954, 110130, 116539, 116775, 116896, 117647, 118015, 124016, 124222, 125297, 125467, 125626, 127788, 131357, 141299, 144890, 147387, 152190, 153273, 167558",,27,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: devx stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #167558: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: devx; title: per_page=1000 doesn't work in hud.pytorch.org | issue #152190: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: devx; title: HUD Dashboard sort by perf speedup doesn't do anything | issue #153273: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: devx; title: Auto format lint not making suggestions | issue #102559: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, enh...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",153b4646f803109228cbb0fa08b0fdf803a48e1322ca7d7f28491dcea5407495
BUNDLE-1273,bundle:bundle-1273,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: dispatch (42 issues),issue_group,,module: dispatch stale/low urgency batch 3,module: dispatch,"Run one module: dispatch stale-resolution sweep covering 42 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"28532, 29844, 32549, 32937, 35038, 35040, 42818, 42858, 42902, 43429, 44657, 44809, 45203, 54082, 54096, 54283, 54356, 54614, 57326, 57369, 57957, 60997, 65426, 65825, 66563, 67279, 76175, 78519, 78743, 81722, 85122, 85815, 102423, 109724, 112666, 114440, 119971, 124083, 124630, 140322, 148029, 164872",,42,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: dispatch stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #54356: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: dispatch; title: Generate delegates for all non-structured kernels | issue #54283: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: dispatch; title: Split VariableTypeManual.cpp | issue #54096: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: dispatch, better-engineering, module: distance functions; title: cdist skip for manual backward is kind of janky | issue #4480...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",afb57fa4f1899cefd998a80d7df883515e45ece52f1d865f60c9d11b0bd6497a
BUNDLE-1274,bundle:bundle-1274,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: distance functions (14 issues),issue_group,,module: distance functions stale/low urgency,module: distance functions,"Run one module: distance functions stale-resolution sweep covering 14 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"11202, 15918, 25156, 28119, 37363, 37408, 37734, 46169, 48306, 49426, 52005, 61509, 69524, 70040",,14,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: distance functions stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #61509: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, function request, module: distance functions; title: [feature request] Exact euclidean distance transform | issue #69524: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: distance functions; title: [feature request] Accepting python scalar inputs for torch.minimum/torch.maximum and friends | issue #70040: stale/low urgency; labels: module: docs, triaged, module: distanc...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",60bf98f5e3c0c45aaedb8be97c5bd22d9e034aeed84c798d6b5cef22e4fca214
BUNDLE-1275,bundle:bundle-1275,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: distributed_tool (2 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #115305: torchrun to support NUMA affiinity,module: distributed_tool,"Run one module: distributed_tool stale-resolution sweep covering 2 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"115305, 152822",,2,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: distributed_tool stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,Is it possible to consider this option in conjunction with #115305,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",2d8caff8f70e106354b294490e49d8d59402920200029d7feb64238d9d639a3a
BUNDLE-1276,bundle:bundle-1276,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: distributions (105 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #139019: Stabilizing the Kumaraswamy Distribution,module: distributions,"Run one module: distributions stale-resolution sweep covering 105 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"1747, 3364, 4159, 4574, 7857, 11937, 12716, 12895, 13811, 15288, 15738, 16291, 18730, 20343, 20682, 21553, 21673, 25783, 26334, 28441, 29044, 32406, 32552, 33898, 34949, 36036, 37162, 38474, 38611, 38612, 38613, 39178, 41284, 42407, 43250, 45115, 46350, 48273, 49291, 50616, 52298, 52625, 52973, 54394, 56030, 56881, 59822, 60916, 61727, 62178, 65811, 67390, 68746, 69281, 69467, 69469, 71689, 71951, 72545, 73070, 73585, 73826, 73848, 73916, 75173, 76030, 76160, 76709, 83564, 85375, 87468, 89684, 91574, 91863, 92260, 95129, 95548, 96494, 97156, 97656, 98939, 99630, 102811, 107821, 108152, 110366, 113579, 119524, 121220, 122021, 122185, 127387, 130950, 133754, 136750, 139019, 142825, 144660, 145729, 147048, 148247, 149718, 164061, 166243, 173912",,105,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: distributions stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"enjoy the benefit of yielding nan's in the exact spots without having to manually mask for entries in which $a&lt;1, b&lt;1, a=b=1$. Issue #139019 might be related. Versions Collecting environment information... PyTorch version: 2.10.0+cpu Is debug build: False CUDA used to bu... | hat exposes an .rsample() method is available in this repo. Moreover I can see that in the original Von Mises distribution feature req...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",289c3eebd5245a7027b4adaa81b244ed373db255b314849983ca78e7c631edec
BUNDLE-1277,bundle:bundle-1277,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: distributions (11 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 3 issues - issue #11389: [distributions] Torch distribution samplers slow on expanded parameters,module: distributions,"Run one module: distributions stale-resolution sweep covering 11 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"11389, 18906, 19248, 29981, 30968, 50034, 72258, 74771, 84625, 90663, 91300",,11,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: distributions stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"This appears to be an especially important instance of #11389. This refactoring will also be necessary for #18906 | orch and to use it to increase precision in the sampling of Dirichlet/Beta distributions. This feature proposal is in part related to issue #84625. This issue reveals that for small parameter values, the beta distribution behaves incorrectly. More generally, the Dirichlet dist... | related #50034, fi...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",17530bb9ff7d169b36f050fed6cc30a0ff9de5d14fd0640a81542986a6ef4462
BUNDLE-1278,bundle:bundle-1278,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: dlpack (5 issues),issue_group,,module: dlpack stale/low urgency,module: dlpack,"Run one module: dlpack stale-resolution sweep covering 5 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"82610, 82823, 96318, 136250, 148306",,5,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: dlpack stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #148306: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: vmap, module: dlpack, module: functorch; title: torch.vmap incompatibility with DLPack functions | issue #136250: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: dlpack; title: A question about `getDLDevice` | issue #96318: stale/low urgency; labels: feature, triaged, module: dlpack; title: Support managed memory backed dlpack with torch.from_dlpack | issue #8...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",a332cfc44b6f8a1cf72114cc4f9562cf159df41ba33bb0409924f254be591bca
BUNDLE-1279,bundle:bundle-1279,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: doc infra (39 issues),issue_group,,"Review thread: 8 issues - issue #106959: `tensor.repeat` quirks: has no `torch.` variant, no `out=` variant, no inplace variant | `torch.tile` also does not have `out=` variant and uses `dims=` instead of `dim=`",module: doc infra,"Run one module: doc infra stale-resolution sweep covering 39 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"4954, 6662, 18095, 19263, 20183, 27708, 27843, 31458, 38010, 38012, 39007, 39836, 41499, 44593, 44719, 48287, 48465, 49873, 49874, 51575, 52256, 52747, 54677, 55751, 57759, 61585, 62446, 64541, 64711, 68616, 71210, 71760, 74152, 84932, 85351, 101369, 106959, 127530, 154613",,39,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: doc infra stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"We should solve this while/by fixing #61585. | Related to #61585. In addition to norm, split and unique in torch/functional.py also do not support axis alias. | Related: #68616 , #18095 | tensor.repeat. torch.tile also does not have inplace/out-variants and uses inconsistent arg name dims instead of dim, same as flip/roll :( #68616 | Originally in #18095 (comment): @vadimkantorov: Works: https://pytorch.org/docs/s...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",24227cf8df4234b0d2b49825b058eb59f6062b531fa8962ca2b15a514f6a8891
BUNDLE-1280,bundle:bundle-1280,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: docker (22 issues),issue_group,,module: docker stale/low urgency batch 1,module: docker,"Run one module: docker stale-resolution sweep covering 22 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"5070, 12773, 17286, 32030, 39444, 48083, 58386, 60932, 61030, 69685, 72784, 73920, 79604, 87196, 87701, 103832, 112876, 115421, 118508, 119843, 146701, 150049",,22,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: docker stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #150049: stale/low urgency; labels: oncall: distributed, oncall: releng, triaged, module: docker; title: 2.7 test docker image has NCCL with older CUDA | issue #146701: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: docker; title: Unable to Import PyTorch After Upgrade in Docker Environment | issue #73920: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: docker; title: pytorch/pytorch:1.8.1-cuda10.2-cudnn7-devel doc...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",17f9e5ba141a8deda26f78d116fd40028bddac4ce0cdcfd90cbd2bbe73e87717
BUNDLE-1281,bundle:bundle-1281,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: docs (116 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #69033: Lazy Tensor Core Documentation Out-of-Date,module: docs,"Run one module: docs stale-resolution sweep covering 116 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"4474, 8069, 14318, 16257, 16268, 21290, 21518, 21682, 22220, 22232, 22494, 23054, 23072, 23079, 23787, 25991, 26338, 28906, 36091, 36217, 40967, 41571, 46253, 47917, 51623, 52262, 54209, 54393, 56136, 56262, 64006, 66806, 68009, 68352, 69033, 71552, 72112, 76510, 77053, 82430, 83244, 90633, 96073, 97118, 97597, 97966, 98409, 98499, 98566, 98600, 98805, 98871, 99310, 99316, 100347, 100584, 102437, 102515, 103640, 103846, 103847, 103960, 104033, 104154, 104872, 104962, 105460, 107130, 107703, 108197, 108522, 110084, 111621, 112585, 112587, 112588, 112600, 112638, 112641, 112644, 112646, 112715, 113186, 113187, 113188, 113190, 113192, 114364, 116569, 120255, 120407, 120735, 123113, 123344, 124395, 126518, 127031, 127497, 128495, 129050, 129122, 130254, 130448, 134691, 138017, 140296, 141277, 141417, 141616, 145357, 145907, 146086, 149284, 150252, 152381, 181725",,116,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: docs stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"ith 1 in the graph before parsing. Is there a way around this issue, or another way to parse the generated IR? Note: @wconstab mentioned in #69033 (comment) that ""manually extracting the IR from lazy tracing and feeding it to a compiler isn't really the envisioned use case for... | in the wrapper / functional layer, not a difference in the math. The same comparison on CPU shows ~1× (no gap). This is not a duplicat...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",c7345a1d9c54a5e27f2fda3dac200828e182315d625747131d8531a3dcbe3785
BUNDLE-1282,bundle:bundle-1282,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: docs (140 issues),issue_group,,module: docs stale/low urgency batch 26,module: docs,"Run one module: docs stale-resolution sweep covering 140 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"3920, 4400, 4530, 5524, 6165, 9882, 10735, 11551, 12532, 14790, 15259, 15298, 19160, 20151, 20935, 21779, 22755, 23305, 26990, 27687, 28110, 28558, 28721, 28757, 28938, 29021, 29202, 29510, 29800, 29860, 30162, 30380, 30384, 30403, 30533, 30762, 31048, 31321, 32087, 32141, 32767, 32872, 33055, 34063, 34210, 34300, 34412, 34833, 35766, 36059, 36307, 36386, 37416, 37440, 37441, 38595, 38639, 38720, 39130, 39399, 39426, 39619, 39705, 39799, 40417, 40969, 40971, 41106, 41148, 41282, 41392, 42112, 42159, 42177, 42188, 42228, 42447, 42529, 42539, 42729, 42774, 42829, 42830, 43109, 43245, 43352, 43503, 44179, 44415, 44552, 44917, 45483, 45717, 45767, 46597, 46819, 47357, 48466, 48648, 48649, 49475, 50076, 50094, 50118, 50890, 51008, 51197, 51256, 52688, 53360, 53477, 53642, 54213, 54368, 54387, 55450, 56328, 56329, 57112, 57712, 58395, 58585, 59627, 60096, 60400, 60561, 88327, 127886, 127915, 127917, 142290, 149393, 153531, 156072, 156258, 157101, 158895, 159234, 159536, 159886",,140,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: docs stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #30384: stale/low urgency; labels: module: docs, triaged; title: Docs missing link to torch.__config__ | issue #30162: stale/low urgency; labels: module: docs, triaged; title: [docs] Newline / whitespace / comma missing in formula for PoissonNLLLoss | issue #29860: stale/low urgency; labels: module: docs, module: serialization, triaged; title: torch.save/load shows raw path on the pickle_module arg | issue #...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",9885f68319831a3c29abb3a564a8b7abd947504edc978ce004c71c3da44db75e
BUNDLE-1283,bundle:bundle-1283,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: docs (132 issues),issue_group,,module: docs stale/low urgency batch 17,module: docs,"Run one module: docs stale-resolution sweep covering 132 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"8153, 10377, 16014, 16523, 16737, 16804, 16896, 16899, 17612, 18434, 19652, 20359, 20375, 20481, 20641, 21567, 28794, 36426, 37063, 39716, 42303, 47201, 47351, 53261, 55752, 56396, 57272, 60372, 60381, 60520, 60843, 61515, 62162, 62343, 62399, 62606, 62989, 63140, 63207, 63257, 63559, 64133, 64138, 64292, 64384, 64539, 65069, 65166, 65526, 65702, 65739, 65949, 66364, 66907, 66921, 67482, 68017, 68058, 68169, 69363, 69408, 69442, 69984, 70265, 70419, 70454, 70498, 70970, 71076, 71366, 71633, 72240, 72788, 73007, 73699, 74022, 74937, 75510, 75659, 75737, 76138, 76338, 76627, 77454, 78742, 79518, 80771, 80940, 82041, 82081, 82377, 82802, 82960, 83060, 83135, 83234, 84140, 84537, 85558, 86020, 86563, 87388, 87494, 87902, 88192, 88423, 88992, 90114, 90485, 90832, 91210, 91618, 91842, 94654, 95462, 95953, 96523, 97026, 98456, 142840, 161509, 162711, 163789, 165578, 165621, 165626, 166823, 167229, 167721, 167950, 168128, 171401",,132,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: docs stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #63207: stale/low urgency; labels: module: docs, triaged; title: document our compatibility with upstream packages (e.g. languages, compilers, tools) | issue #62989: stale/low urgency; labels: module: docs, triaged; title: Doc page for functions with overload is not properly indented | issue #62606: stale/low urgency; labels: module: docs, triaged; title: Guidance on where to add documentation | issue #20359...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",bf9fa5582e22b1ab5e09d2706055d16562e2c09fe927e44d65fe7427627042b1
BUNDLE-1284,bundle:bundle-1284,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: docs (28 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 5 issues - issue #107112: from_blob python api,module: docs,"Run one module: docs stale-resolution sweep covering 28 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"5405, 5740, 20117, 25032, 25310, 30387, 34646, 34649, 38767, 42843, 45901, 49949, 49992, 50802, 56440, 56975, 59526, 59566, 59629, 71249, 71329, 78878, 80208, 100904, 104623, 105457, 107112, 115821",,28,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: docs stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"My usecase is this: #34646 I tried a few things to simplify the code. One of them was creating a typed storage, and then trying some generic method to create a tensor | Can Storage.from_buffer be used now for this purpose? #30387 and I wonder what happens about freeing the memory. pytorch/torch/csrc/generic/StorageMethods.cpp Line 87 in 74ce3a0 static PyObject * THPS | Related: #30387, I used this to convert a byt...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",846d9b657ad68eb08e8c03e853dcab6ddfe8ba8602d8239251df0465d789b467
BUNDLE-1285,bundle:bundle-1285,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: docs (6 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #38622: Clarification for usage of negative loss with optim.lr_scheduler.ReduceLROnPlateau,module: docs,"Run one module: docs stale-resolution sweep covering 6 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"29028, 29116, 34306, 38622, 47513, 50962",,6,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: docs stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"ogous for the case mode='max' and threshold_mode == 'rel' return a - best > self.threshold * abs(best) This behavior was already noticed in #38622 which believes this to be an error in the documentation rather than the code. cc @jlin27 @mruberry @vincentqb | Related about 1d conv_tbc: #34306 | Following up on #29028 (comment), there exists torch.masked_fill_ but cannot be accessed through out argument, which makes...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",313c3b8129e9d906be7f84d13270b74e238995c3e39bff9cb3366dca8a5e2016
BUNDLE-1286,bundle:bundle-1286,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: dtensor (33 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #152406: [DTensor] Calling .item() on DTensor with Partial placement results in local value,module: dtensor,"Run one module: dtensor stale-resolution sweep covering 33 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"90585, 105213, 106566, 113761, 115058, 116101, 117728, 118461, 119343, 119714, 122485, 124989, 124990, 126795, 133221, 134462, 136946, 137392, 144109, 147570, 147814, 147980, 148269, 150336, 151858, 152406, 152717, 157545, 157976, 164891, 166638, 168304, 170936",,33,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: dtensor stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"Seems duplicate to #152406. | issue #150336: stale/low urgency; labels: oncall: distributed, triaged, module: dtensor; title: [parallelize_module] uneven sharding + use_local_output breaks | issue #148269: stale/low urgency; labels: oncall: distributed, triaged, module: dtensor; title: Should DTensor support `Shard()` placement without dim requirement? | issue #147980: stale/low urgency; labels: oncall: distribute...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",1c6f01f52b507c4e3d365d8b18f837a961bcc5b7db128443f9541fa4d7c5c0ff
BUNDLE-1287,bundle:bundle-1287,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: dynamic shapes (37 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 3 issues - issue #124572: Variant of slice that doesn't perform clamp behavior,module: dynamic shapes,"Run one module: dynamic shapes stale-resolution sweep covering 37 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"41625, 43125, 107873, 113232, 117681, 119549, 121286, 123765, 124572, 124686, 126738, 126846, 128053, 128150, 128548, 130432, 130534, 135255, 136119, 136605, 136681, 137217, 138813, 141594, 141675, 141934, 144068, 144969, 147264, 148564, 149743, 154489, 159942, 163785, 165421, 165912, 166186",,37,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: dynamic shapes stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"If you do this, might also be good to make public the classical slice method in general (narrow does not support the step argument) :) #41625 | UPD: Original title: ""slice(None) and maybe slice in general is not supported in JIT"" Originally reported in #41625 (comment) def tensor_dim_slice(tensor, dim, dim_slice): return tensor[(dim if dim >= 0 else dim + tensor.dim()) * (slice(None), ) + (dim_sl | issue #149743:...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",bcbfb1ae7720c9d87bbce8f6eaa15df6cb040f74b72bde2117b33b7bc909ff13
BUNDLE-1288,bundle:bundle-1288,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: dynamo (85 issues),issue_group,,module: dynamo stale/low urgency batch 5,module: dynamo,"Run one module: dynamo stale-resolution sweep covering 85 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"89158, 93480, 93511, 93737, 93743, 93923, 96396, 101107, 101117, 102063, 102878, 102898, 109309, 111674, 112727, 114353, 115122, 115526, 116013, 116575, 117321, 118058, 118390, 118884, 121333, 124749, 126360, 126566, 128095, 128149, 129482, 129937, 129942, 130464, 133040, 133117, 134249, 136833, 137811, 138226, 138786, 138800, 140416, 140437, 141125, 141422, 141589, 141690, 141964, 142171, 142395, 142414, 144478, 146930, 146964, 147597, 148103, 148106, 148144, 148289, 148828, 149062, 149872, 149906, 149908, 149956, 149962, 149970, 150864, 151015, 151251, 151776, 152829, 152869, 152994, 155266, 155825, 157075, 160071, 160508, 161105, 161330, 162375, 164062, 167257",,85,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: dynamo stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #93737: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, enhancement, oncall: pt2, module: dynamo; title: Improve handling of generators | issue #144478: stale/low urgency; labels: feature, triaged, oncall: pt2, module: dynamo; title: [dynamo] Support using UserDefinedFunction as argument (as_proxy). | issue #142414: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, oncall: pt2, module: dynamo; title: [dynamo] Tracking issue for multi...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",482fad90d1b71cf3c5207da6fc687f8393ba036e65d1fdce11f787d4328f428e
BUNDLE-1289,bundle:bundle-1289,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: edge cases (80 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #157431: ``torch.quantile`` edge case,module: edge cases,"Run one module: edge cases stale-resolution sweep covering 80 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"64947, 73180, 73181, 73182, 73504, 73840, 77514, 78122, 78125, 78126, 78127, 78128, 78129, 78130, 78131, 78153, 78255, 83175, 83624, 84560, 85791, 86918, 87551, 88941, 88943, 89393, 89420, 91552, 91553, 91556, 91557, 91593, 92835, 94115, 94590, 96236, 96613, 97087, 97088, 101653, 102894, 113370, 114216, 120986, 126658, 126659, 126776, 126777, 131273, 134183, 134244, 135048, 135050, 135330, 136699, 136717, 137484, 141203, 141449, 141450, 144643, 146570, 149013, 153187, 153234, 153329, 153337, 154311, 154474, 156020, 157431, 158412, 158419, 159333, 159363, 160856, 161524, 161853, 162489, 169058",,80,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: edge cases stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"🐛 Describe the bug It seems anyway that this function would benefit from rewriting (#64947), but here's a small edge case problem. >>> tensor = torch.tensor([0.0, 1.0, 2.0]) >>> torch.quantile(tensor, 0.5000001, interpolation=""mid | issue #88941: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: linear algebra, actionable, module: sanitizers, module: edge cases; title: `torch.linalg.lstsq` Trigger RuntimeError under Und...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",8788a2935e132f3006535815c39967931d8af46e492826bf396bef37a855f0cc
BUNDLE-1290,bundle:bundle-1290,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: elastic (15 issues),issue_group,,module: elastic stale/low urgency batch 1,module: elastic,"Run one module: elastic stale-resolution sweep covering 15 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"60911, 63223, 63846, 73380, 85300, 99684, 109747, 113515, 114097, 122694, 124906, 130656, 132951, 147563, 158326",,15,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: elastic stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #158326: stale/low urgency; labels: oncall: distributed, triaged, module: elastic; title: Support for etcd v3 api as rendezvous backend | issue #147563: stale/low urgency; labels: oncall: distributed, triaged, module: elastic; title: torch.distributed.elastic.multiprocessing.start_process description does not reflect API | issue #114097: stale/low urgency; labels: oncall: distributed, triaged, module: elasti...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",a635b28b73cde960daff17f62fc635b8b2744fe1cfd66d81bdccad974a09ca87
BUNDLE-1291,bundle:bundle-1291,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: embedding (10 issues),issue_group,,module: embedding stale/low urgency,module: embedding,"Run one module: embedding stale-resolution sweep covering 10 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"51003, 52851, 54861, 55549, 55981, 56064, 66750, 66751, 123119, 127422",,10,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: embedding stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #123119: stale/low urgency; labels: module: nn, triaged, module: embedding, module: mps; title: `nn.Embedding` behaves differently on CPU (fails) and MPS (fails not) | issue #127422: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: embedding, module: vulkan; title: index_select op not implemented on Vulkan backend | issue #55549: stale/low urgency; labels: module: nn, triaged, module: embedding; title: `embedding...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",b16b66f6e6aea642ea6b8eea85096e8c1bfa14ccbe6f8626c1375e89c841d274
BUNDLE-1292,bundle:bundle-1292,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: empty tensor (2 issues),issue_group,,module: empty tensor stale/low urgency,module: empty tensor,"Run one module: empty tensor stale-resolution sweep covering 2 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"131148, 153327",,2,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: empty tensor stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #153327: stale/low urgency; labels: module: error checking, triaged, actionable, module: empty tensor; title: FPE when calling `torch.pixel_shuffle()` with empty tensors and large upscale_factor | issue #131148: stale/low urgency; labels: module: error checking, triaged, actionable, module: empty tensor; title: The empty 1D or more D tensor for `median()/nanmedian()` with the deepest `dim` gets errors, not g...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",4afe82a1fdd95a27486e9aafca263141f17dab426b7254a3ce3164de5b87c42e
BUNDLE-1293,bundle:bundle-1293,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: error checking (75 issues),issue_group,,module: error checking stale/low urgency batch 4,module: error checking,"Run one module: error checking stale-resolution sweep covering 75 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"4622, 10298, 11426, 13782, 18933, 20056, 22513, 24031, 24354, 24463, 26354, 27936, 34880, 37457, 38202, 39224, 40237, 44704, 47610, 49224, 53391, 54135, 55161, 56330, 58380, 58657, 60277, 62865, 63282, 65375, 66868, 69800, 69912, 71059, 71078, 71084, 71541, 71636, 72332, 73638, 74295, 75733, 76362, 77415, 78929, 81459, 87031, 89218, 89254, 89381, 89394, 89418, 94704, 95590, 95756, 99265, 99351, 105629, 105860, 106124, 120973, 121226, 126758, 130608, 135640, 135648, 138192, 138418, 149724, 152437, 159740, 162712, 164878, 171536, 174986",,75,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: error checking stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #65375: stale/low urgency; labels: module: error checking, triaged, better-engineering; title: Make python_error use c10/util/Exception.h C++ backtrace machinery | issue #58380: stale/low urgency; labels: module: error checking, triaged, module: linear algebra; title: Clarity of error message in einsum regressed in performance improvements | issue #63282: stale/low urgency; labels: module: error checking, mo...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",15c46a710b5a53e46b3a0cb6134ec25f887384fad63b741e953d02a41bd4b026
BUNDLE-1294,bundle:bundle-1294,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: faketensor (4 issues),issue_group,,module: faketensor stale/low urgency,module: faketensor,"Run one module: faketensor stale-resolution sweep covering 4 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"106130, 113456, 115362, 164732",,4,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: faketensor stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #106130: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: fakeTensor; title: torch._subclasses.fake_tensor.DynamicOutputShapeException: aten.nonzero.default | issue #164732: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, oncall: pt2, module: fakeTensor, module: functorch, module: pt2-dispatcher; title: Fake tensor leakage in aot_autograd by itself | issue #115362: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: fakeTensor, modu...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",0d9295e1ae811c9e44a834230ced0a41a9824e9045cfafa0cee4415f146c9aaf
BUNDLE-1295,bundle:bundle-1295,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: fft (18 issues),issue_group,,module: fft stale/low urgency batch 1,module: fft,"Run one module: fft stale-resolution sweep covering 18 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"50552, 51965, 61211, 61213, 66305, 69627, 87353, 96518, 99515, 106622, 113525, 114581, 114672, 128044, 145943, 145944, 165425, 165739",,18,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: fft stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #165739: stale/low urgency; labels: low priority, triaged, module: NaNs and Infs, module: fft; title: Inconsistent in `torch.fft.irfft` and `torch.fft.ifftn` for complex64 inputs containing `Inf` | issue #165425: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: fft, module: flop counter; title: Support FFT operations in FLOP counter | issue #145944: stale/low urgency; labels: module: onnx, triaged, module: fft; t...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",a3592c8691958acc029c53b890ace1dbcd0229d8b2c7faeb480bd47d384d579f
BUNDLE-1296,bundle:bundle-1296,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: first class dims (2 issues),issue_group,,module: first class dims stale/low urgency,module: first class dims,"Run one module: first class dims stale-resolution sweep covering 2 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"111525, 120572",,2,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: first class dims stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #120572: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, tensor subclass, module: functorch, module: first class dims; title: FCD and tensor subclasses | issue #111525: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: functorch, module: first class dims; title: Functorch FCD breaks with tensor subclasses",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",946d278c83cb1502f9bab00cf1c5620d96992d2800ae9554596caf82f51372be
BUNDLE-1297,bundle:bundle-1297,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: flaky-tests (15 issues),issue_group,,module: flaky-tests stale/low urgency batch 1,module: flaky-tests,"Run one module: flaky-tests stale-resolution sweep covering 15 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"8044, 9563, 14478, 16458, 17354, 20488, 59875, 61614, 62602, 87087, 88883, 88902, 146307, 149016, 160387",,15,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: flaky-tests stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #149016: stale/low urgency; labels: module: rocm, triaged, module: flaky-tests, skipped, oncall: pt2, module: inductor, rocm-skipped-tests; title: DISABLED test_var_mean_tile_reduction_True_dynamic_shapes_cuda (__main__.DynamicShapesGPUTests) | issue #160387: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: flaky-tests, skipped, module: unknown; title: DISABLED RecordDebugHandles.Basic (__main__.test_jit) | issue...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",fccd55055f6457d415015736425fd82778fa6e6ddabdca0ffb24d7dadf805497
BUNDLE-1298,bundle:bundle-1298,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: flex attention (5 issues),issue_group,,module: flex attention stale/low urgency,module: flex attention,"Run one module: flex attention stale-resolution sweep covering 5 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"139131, 144810, 151695, 157015, 163428",,5,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: flex attention stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #144810: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, oncall: pt2, module: functorch, module: higher order operators, module: pt2-dispatcher, module: flex attention; title: Support torch.func.grad for Flex Attention | issue #157015: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, oncall: pt2, module: higher order operators, module: pt2-dispatcher, module: flex attention; title: [WIP][RFC] Compilable flex_attention + Context Para...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",5ad492ff2dca2f4c879ec2297bf2995f770739257e0b3a5b2daa605117209927
BUNDLE-1299,bundle:bundle-1299,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: floatx (formerly float8) (15 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 3 issues - issue #168819: TestModule: test/test_scaled_matmul_cuda.py::TestFP8Matmul,module: floatx (formerly float8),"Run one module: floatx (formerly float8) stale-resolution sweep covering 15 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"107087, 113831, 123761, 128257, 129803, 130359, 131196, 132624, 141749, 154028, 160651, 162458, 168819, 168820, 168823",,15,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: floatx (formerly float8) stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,est/test_scaled_matmul_cuda.py Test class: TestFP8Matmul Test name: test_scaled_mm_vs_emulated_row_wise Defined at line: 1267 Parent issue: #168819 Code reference: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/blob/main/test/test_scaled_matmul_cuda.py cc @sunway513 @jithunnair-amd @pruth... | st_scaled_matmul_cuda.py Test class: TestFP8Matmul Test name: test_blockwise_mxfp8_nvfp4_mxfp4_numerics Defined at line: 1894 Parent i...,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",0f86e18af467dc1ab79f28e2c53e2ddb8204c6df066651d2cad6c44147be9e78
BUNDLE-1300,bundle:bundle-1300,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: flop counter (4 issues),issue_group,,module: flop counter stale/low urgency,module: flop counter,"Run one module: flop counter stale-resolution sweep covering 4 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"144001, 144564, 145947, 165570",,4,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: flop counter stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #144564: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, dependency issue, module: flop counter; title: Tabulate not official dependency of PyTorch but needed by features like FlopCounterMode | issue #165570: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: flop counter; title: Add support for element-wise operations to flop counter | issue #145947: stale/low urgency; labels: oncall: distributed, triaged, module: flop counte...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",c6dc5a06541be497a92184f3ba3b90314eac642180f92fc69657f8986a72f39a
BUNDLE-1301,bundle:bundle-1301,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: forward ad (15 issues),issue_group,,module: forward ad stale/low urgency,module: forward ad,"Run one module: forward ad stale-resolution sweep covering 15 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"58833, 68041, 75503, 75652, 78961, 91280, 92072, 93982, 94085, 94208, 98164, 104472, 113368, 129176, 146901",,15,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: forward ad stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #93982: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: forward ad; title: `linalg.lstsq` fails the gradient computation in forward mode | issue #146901: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: forward ad, module: sdpa; title: Trying to use forward AD with _scaled_dot_product_efficient_attention | issue #129176: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: forward ad; title: extending forward-mode AD docs sho...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",f72b21f56f0d14f7e07268e0c7238b317fa70eb7b3e1189084cb34c6bdfa5ae1
BUNDLE-1302,bundle:bundle-1302,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: fsdp (45 issues),issue_group,,"Review thread: 2 issues - issue #134191: AdamW is CPU-bottlenecked with FSDP2, with slow foreach kernels",module: fsdp,"Run one module: fsdp stale-resolution sweep covering 45 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"66335, 71404, 77724, 98484, 98808, 101335, 101999, 103962, 104252, 104479, 107909, 108023, 108190, 109002, 109440, 117601, 118095, 118245, 119431, 120879, 125738, 133849, 134191, 140514, 148257, 148504, 148756, 148831, 149100, 150096, 150140, 150799, 151030, 154272, 154836, 154960, 158819, 159169, 159498, 168402, 168403, 168404, 168405, 168406, 168407",,45,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: fsdp stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"Some prior discussion #134191 | issue #148504: stale/low urgency; labels: oncall: distributed, triaged, module: fsdp; title: [FSDP2] improve error msg for duplicate wraps | issue #148257: stale/low urgency; labels: oncall: distributed, triaged, module: fsdp; title: [FSDP2] HSDP with globally sharded fp32 weights and optimizer states | issue #109002: stale/low urgency; labels: oncall: distributed, triaged, module:...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",eb00e4a5ae2c9db2fd1713475934e7eade77da3b420ad8169561c5100a8f973c
BUNDLE-1303,bundle:bundle-1303,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: functional ux (1 issue),issue_group,,#104768 Support for `eval` in functional_call,module: functional ux,"Run one module: functional ux stale-resolution sweep covering 1 issue: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,104768,,1,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: functional ux stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #104768: stale/low urgency; labels: module: nn, triaged, module: functional UX; title: Support for `eval` in functional_call",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",d8ff121470d71cff38e806b7a24a3ea3170ac1457bc6ed55631ec6c5eb29231f
BUNDLE-1304,bundle:bundle-1304,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: functionalization (17 issues),issue_group,,module: functionalization stale/low urgency batch 1,module: functionalization,"Run one module: functionalization stale-resolution sweep covering 17 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"79867, 81385, 83923, 87019, 87571, 89068, 90992, 92912, 94471, 97852, 107961, 115706, 120585, 130021, 135382, 159784, 165409",,17,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: functionalization stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #165409: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, has workaround, module: functionalization, oncall: pt2, module: pt2-dispatcher; title: [torch.compile][fullgraph][functionalization] In-place op on overlapped view from unfold fails: “tensor being mutated has internal overlap” (eager OK) | issue #159784: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: functionalization, oncall: pt2, module: functorch, module: pt2-disp...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",ef176ba20ca2dac21cc6d5d3a1637976d2eb616c29b3b37dfce59507c95cfd3e
BUNDLE-1305,bundle:bundle-1305,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: functorch (76 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #105494: workaround for using vmap when .item() is being used internally,module: functorch,"Run one module: functorch stale-resolution sweep covering 76 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"85533, 85656, 86298, 86819, 87222, 91199, 91244, 91509, 91810, 93231, 93317, 93319, 93523, 95718, 96337, 96855, 97283, 97286, 97395, 98338, 98515, 98557, 98724, 99287, 99311, 99558, 99836, 100801, 101073, 101241, 101415, 102085, 102109, 103161, 103329, 103879, 104704, 105326, 105494, 105912, 105982, 107125, 109938, 111311, 112013, 112459, 114604, 114605, 115342, 116102, 118861, 124423, 127750, 129459, 132052, 134038, 134606, 136357, 139241, 140704, 144850, 145262, 149250, 149609, 149620, 149694, 149788, 149804, 151113, 151591, 152295, 153861, 158169, 161296, 162346, 166511",,76,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: functorch stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"loop. Apparently, torch.arange() internally uses .item() and vmap cannot handle that. Is there any workaround? This issue seems similar to #124423, but it is not exactly the same. cc @zou3519 @Chillee @samdow @kshitij12345 @janeyx99 | Hello! I'm facing a similar issue and reported in #134606. Are there any updates on this? | wargs) RuntimeError: Cannot access data pointer of Tensor that doesn't have storage The ab...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",31228993964cd606002605f1441b8461176fd7a94216f3cd8640acbd5336cfc1
BUNDLE-1306,bundle:bundle-1306,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: fx (127 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #79715: [FX] TypeError when tracing cat taking split's output as input,module: fx,"Run one module: fx stale-resolution sweep covering 127 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"43659, 43679, 44049, 44851, 45220, 45534, 45683, 46210, 47481, 48209, 48813, 49265, 49618, 50143, 50177, 52022, 52538, 52564, 53026, 53121, 53732, 53794, 53935, 54071, 54503, 54574, 54785, 54913, 54979, 55394, 55395, 55397, 55399, 55400, 55401, 55544, 55668, 55694, 56688, 56778, 56862, 56938, 57124, 58051, 58402, 60069, 61246, 62395, 63076, 63490, 63815, 64497, 64997, 65096, 66197, 67030, 67350, 67364, 67402, 67543, 67662, 68190, 68301, 68513, 69025, 69095, 69577, 69804, 70449, 70892, 71715, 71919, 73304, 73469, 73992, 74058, 74218, 74842, 74901, 75090, 75342, 76186, 77016, 78201, 78435, 79307, 79715, 80172, 80427, 80903, 81229, 82727, 83292, 84316, 84415, 84515, 84840, 87777, 89421, 91293, 94374, 95276, 98942, 99023, 99407, 103060, 104593, 105445, 107538, 107678, 109386, 109539, 112775, 113034, 125581, 127282, 130701, 139163, 139185, 139876, 147884, 150922, 153930, 156733, 165277, 165634, 169797",,127,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: fx stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"behavior should be that the tracing for both of the following modules should complete without emitting any error messages. Related issues: #79715 #34294 (Seems to contain an (incomplete) fix?) #43248 Code for reproducing the issue: The graph = tracer.trace(nested_cat) line com... | issue #54913: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: fx; title: FX tracer doesn't support returning a new instance of `object` su...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",973ce65977e996b07e1cb864ebe5523779f76bd828f288196f77dde73333fc0f
BUNDLE-1307,bundle:bundle-1307,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: fx (12 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 4 issues - issue #44901: for loop can't be symbolically traced,module: fx,"Run one module: fx stale-resolution sweep covering 12 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"37334, 44901, 45682, 45685, 51803, 53534, 54602, 62021, 67970, 70485, 78487, 101110",,12,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: fx stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"Hi @jamesr66a With custom Tracer, the control flow can be used by Trace，Please see #51803 (comment) | Tensor out, torch.dtype dtype, torch.layout layout, torch.device device, bool pin_memory, bool requires_grad) I suspect this is related to #51803 with a potential solution provided by ModelTC/MQBench#82. | 🐛 Bug if conditional cannot be symbolically traced. Related to #44901 To Reproduce Steps to reproduce the beh...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",eaf0e9f4a0fbb5fe6c0db232031130725688770d06787f0024633be2903bb6d4
BUNDLE-1308,bundle:bundle-1308,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: graph breaks (3 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #111676: [export] self.buffer += 1 raises error,module: graph breaks,"Run one module: graph breaks stale-resolution sweep covering 3 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"111676, 114805, 114967",,3,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: graph breaks stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"duplicate of #111676 | issue #114805: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: graph breaks; title: Unsupported: call_method UserDefinedObjectVariable(_profiler_enabled) __call__ [] {}",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",442bbbf7f2acc7da7bdafc5aa45021414ea4670a67d90cc41f1c059a8ba4d277
BUNDLE-1309,bundle:bundle-1309,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: half (21 issues),issue_group,,module: half stale/low urgency batch 1,module: half,"Run one module: half stale-resolution sweep covering 21 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"26218, 32137, 54774, 54983, 55442, 55629, 55755, 56231, 58841, 65447, 74634, 83281, 84348, 107514, 109753, 111454, 121960, 123911, 135969, 136680, 162674",,21,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: half stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #162674: stale/low urgency; labels: module: sparse, triaged, module: half; title: NotImplementedError: ""addmm_sparse_cuda"" not implemented for 'Half' | issue #32137: stale/low urgency; labels: module: numerical-stability, module: nn, triaged, module: half, actionable, module: norms and normalization; title: torch.nn.functional.normalize epsilon too small for half precision | issue #123911: stale/low urgency;...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",a5daa4acb9095a7255309c838689ad15c6e077085d4b687c35ddd54238f6f30d
BUNDLE-1310,bundle:bundle-1310,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: higher order operators (9 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #146108: [associative_scan] Support lifted arguments for inductor,module: higher order operators,"Run one module: higher order operators stale-resolution sweep covering 9 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"146108, 146111, 152870, 155230, 157919, 158566, 159353, 159852, 165999",,9,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: higher order operators stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"@ydwu4 assigned to you because of similar #146108 Feel free to unassign. | issue #165999: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, oncall: pt2, module: higher order operators, module: pt2-dispatcher, dependencies; title: [RFC] Improve the performance of `associative_scan()` with `cuda.compute` | issue #157919: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, oncall: pt2, module: higher order operators, module: pt2-dispatcher; title...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",7d30c3b91e33f944f53a37240361d2357cb89a80ce6113c5d5684d86dd11ea60
BUNDLE-1311,bundle:bundle-1311,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: hub (24 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 5 issues - issue #155992: [feature request] Native checkpointing to/from `s3://` (DCP / `torch.load` / `torch.save`),module: hub,"Run one module: hub stale-resolution sweep covering 24 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"27610, 30373, 33354, 43638, 45569, 52596, 56067, 65881, 68320, 68916, 71205, 73466, 74368, 75577, 81297, 84620, 90126, 90147, 91608, 91965, 96412, 134947, 155992, 171412",,24,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: hub stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"ode should also be more practical for loading from S3: [feature request] Native checkpointing to/from s3:// (DCP / torch.load / torch.save) #155992 And I also wonder, if HF model AutoLoader can do the same - to avoid hitting the HF servers more times than needed, before the we... | A bit related: #91965 | This new mode should also be more practical for loading from S3: #155992 And I also wonder, if HF model AutoLo...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",081a3013f43fbb281f502f91e88c29d109bc09854d214433ad1b7f2aae0f8c14
BUNDLE-1312,bundle:bundle-1312,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: inductor (90 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #105582: RFC: Integrating oneDNN Graph Compiler into Inductor C++/OpenMP Backend for Enhanced Graph Fusion and Performance,module: inductor,"Run one module: inductor stale-resolution sweep covering 90 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"49444, 92259, 93482, 93639, 94167, 95021, 95423, 99807, 102319, 103652, 103990, 105582, 109213, 110448, 115966, 117251, 117976, 118175, 118570, 118573, 120057, 120116, 121311, 121371, 121631, 121968, 124145, 125672, 125683, 126708, 126913, 127271, 127500, 128012, 130769, 133250, 133383, 134363, 135305, 136118, 136733, 137012, 138280, 138743, 139268, 139602, 140592, 141507, 142315, 143453, 143931, 144375, 145242, 145326, 146629, 147062, 147999, 148052, 148073, 148116, 148196, 148960, 149319, 149440, 149603, 149879, 150476, 150871, 151555, 151705, 153103, 153241, 153532, 153737, 155838, 158240, 158699, 159769, 160142, 160359, 162198, 164041, 164813, 167027, 167520, 168651, 168652, 170345, 171184, 171534",,90,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: inductor stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"her features include low precision. Since PyTorch 1.12, this API has been added in TorchScript JIT fuser path showing promising performance #49444. Integrating the oneDNN Graph Compiler with Inductor C++ backend offers further performance enhancements. Additionally, adopting t... | file: test/inductor/test_select_algorithm.py Test class: TestSelectAlgorithm Test name: test_mm_dropout Defined at line: 329 Parent is...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",c226180d756184fd7f279a84de20a586ab3a741caa13874fad77d597a8ba30e6
BUNDLE-1313,bundle:bundle-1313,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: inductor (14 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 3 issues - issue #168644: TestModule: test/inductor/test_multi_kernel.py::MultiKernelTest,module: inductor,"Run one module: inductor stale-resolution sweep covering 14 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"114723, 114835, 122094, 124245, 135927, 139643, 141079, 146898, 149734, 168623, 168624, 168644, 168645, 168646",,14,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: inductor stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,Source file: test/inductor/test_multi_kernel.py Test class: MultiKernelTest Test name: test_triton_gemm Defined at line: 115 Parent issue: #168644 Code reference: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/blob/main/test/inductor/test_multi_kernel.py cc @sunway513 @jithunnair-amd @pru... | e: test/inductor/test_multi_kernel.py Test class: MultiKernelTest Test name: test_triton_relu_fused_gemm Defined at line: 144 Parent i...,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",81e2ed1958456d8006170a1886f2898512fb7ae92c2c556801a5747b08e0d8cb
BUNDLE-1314,bundle:bundle-1314,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: infra (8 issues),issue_group,,module: infra stale/low urgency,module: infra,"Run one module: infra stale-resolution sweep covering 8 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"40319, 83932, 95244, 108862, 124953, 128735, 135362, 169458",,8,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: infra stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #169458: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: infra; title: [download.pytorch.org] obselete dangling `xformers` index on CPU only branch | issue #40319: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: infra; title: Too many labels in the repo | issue #135362: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: infra; title: MacOS runner fails at `Complete runner step` | issue #128735: stale/low urgency; labels: t...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",86fa3a486275c9ab46f0bcaf8a9d607b3a6845eb797688193a54d5d1a995e361
BUNDLE-1315,bundle:bundle-1315,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: initialization (6 issues),issue_group,,module: initialization stale/low urgency,module: initialization,"Run one module: initialization stale-resolution sweep covering 6 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"43411, 54030, 54055, 65153, 124719, 136410",,6,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: initialization stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #136410: stale/low urgency; labels: module: sparse, module: nn, triaged, module: initialization; title: Implement kaiming_uniform_ for sparse tensors. | issue #124719: stale/low urgency; labels: module: nn, triaged, module: initialization; title: Questions about parameter initialization, especially with torch.bfloat16 precision | issue #65153: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, enhancement, module: initiali...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",e4124f33e73912831a81ebf1cb99b2c86a97eaac323ba9ef8f3bc06948af594a
BUNDLE-1316,bundle:bundle-1316,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: int overflow (13 issues),issue_group,,module: int overflow stale/low urgency,module: int overflow,"Run one module: int overflow stale-resolution sweep covering 13 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"107539, 107541, 107543, 107544, 107545, 107546, 107548, 107550, 107552, 107554, 107555, 107556, 107702",,13,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: int overflow stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #107702: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: int overflow; title: Inconsistencies when handling scalars that are out of the range relative to the input tensor's dtype | issue #107556: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: int overflow; title: Integer multiplication overflow when running torch.nn.AdaptiveAvgPool2d | issue #107555: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: int overflow; title:...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",498d19e078a2b4674b683bbebe5605867a2f1c2913ea95c5bea96a1f64ff6afc
BUNDLE-1317,bundle:bundle-1317,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: intel (12 issues),issue_group,,module: intel stale/low urgency,module: intel,"Run one module: intel stale-resolution sweep covering 12 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"48246, 53707, 65448, 94021, 95146, 96738, 97757, 106602, 107294, 116322, 142484, 161163",,12,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: intel stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #161163: stale/low urgency; labels: module: performance, triaged, module: random, module: intel; title: Dropout performance degradation after version 2.6.0 | issue #106602: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, medium, module: intel; title: onednn ops supported in pytorch | issue #107294: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: intel, module: mps; title: 'MPS' training Issue(s) with NanoGPT: -Inf, NaN's |...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",c0a3080604722e23a761ed25ce98cceb37123f33e892a41aed35fb6c38bb80c5
BUNDLE-1318,bundle:bundle-1318,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: internals (86 issues),issue_group,,module: internals stale/low urgency batch 5,module: internals,"Run one module: internals stale-resolution sweep covering 86 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"4123, 4148, 4636, 8602, 12069, 14797, 17249, 19092, 19408, 20005, 20006, 20342, 20363, 20412, 21824, 21847, 22024, 22766, 24090, 24193, 24261, 24264, 24956, 26139, 26428, 27608, 28577, 29548, 30780, 30953, 32078, 32427, 33476, 34939, 37142, 37837, 38973, 38974, 38975, 40215, 40355, 40564, 41478, 42155, 43385, 44421, 44721, 46311, 46319, 46382, 46760, 48650, 48667, 48684, 49298, 50953, 51054, 51229, 52569, 52680, 56399, 57059, 62500, 62845, 62876, 63645, 73134, 73506, 75172, 76433, 76514, 76936, 77047, 77165, 78737, 81750, 81801, 90398, 91395, 99359, 102081, 105281, 117645, 123284, 126519, 147867",,86,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: internals stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #38974: stale/low urgency; labels: module: internals, triaged; title: ATen registrable operator list | issue #38973: stale/low urgency; labels: module: internals, triaged; title: ATen operator API versioning | issue #26139: stale/low urgency; labels: module: internals, triaged; title: c10 List API hard to use | issue #34939: stale/low urgency; labels: module: internals, triaged, module: mkldnn; title: Enable...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",a002fd2f94befcd0ec9fa203e00cd704d28695d2bc8d9200665ff6fda4dc2e27
BUNDLE-1319,bundle:bundle-1319,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: interpolation (14 issues),issue_group,,module: interpolation stale/low urgency,module: interpolation,"Run one module: interpolation stale-resolution sweep covering 14 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"10482, 10604, 52845, 61182, 62396, 63016, 63217, 66366, 70559, 76487, 80929, 84630, 86204, 94816",,14,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: interpolation stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #94816: stale/low urgency; labels: feature, module: nn, triaged, actionable, module: interpolation; title: grid_sample with relative grid | issue #10604: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: interpolation; title: Bilinear interpolation behavior inconsistent with TF, CoreML and Caffe | issue #86204: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: interpolation; title: How to perform unstructured interpolat...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",755c65c043c82f3d462cd246693b617e8cb02270a219598b828ab0a0a6b77b3e
BUNDLE-1320,bundle:bundle-1320,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: ios (10 issues),issue_group,,module: ios stale/low urgency,module: ios,"Run one module: ios stale-resolution sweep covering 10 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"35535, 44313, 47904, 49456, 77538, 90551, 95946, 102833, 107394, 107581",,10,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: ios stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #102833: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: ios; title: LibTorch-Lite 1.13.0.1 Crash on iOS 12 on app startup | issue #107394: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, oncall: mobile, module: ios; title: [LibTorch/iOS] Unknown custom class type quantized.Conv2dPackedParamsBase. Please ensure it is registered | issue #107581: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, oncall: mobile, module: ios; title: [LibTorc...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",1b6b1d8c95779d78919500b8ff9e94b9e74268c3bda890ce07b93519e05b57ae
BUNDLE-1321,bundle:bundle-1321,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: jetson (4 issues),issue_group,,module: jetson stale/low urgency,module: jetson,"Run one module: jetson stale-resolution sweep covering 4 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"72581, 78067, 94614, 144033",,4,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: jetson stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #72581: stale/low urgency; labels: feature, triaged, module: jetson; title: Zero-copy on shared memory of NVIDIA Jetson devices | issue #144033: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: jetson; title: Training fails with Torch 2.1.0 on Nvidia Jetpack 5.1.2 | issue #78067: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: jetson; title: Installation on Jetson target board | issue #94614: stale/low urgency; label...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",e6c0801148ca878d15aba198d038acab6e6acef475ae558b26cb04ec3cddf50a
BUNDLE-1322,bundle:bundle-1322,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: jiterator (1 issue),issue_group,,#94443 A better error msg for `cuda.jiterator` when input is on `cpu`,module: jiterator,"Run one module: jiterator stale-resolution sweep covering 1 issue: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,94443,,1,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: jiterator stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #94443: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: jiterator; title: A better error msg for `cuda.jiterator` when input is on `cpu`",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",442cbaaba1e593e76f82d3a3ba70d03ef348f386654acf8e29fc59a567a47579
BUNDLE-1323,bundle:bundle-1323,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: language binding (3 issues),issue_group,,module: language binding stale/low urgency,module: language binding,"Run one module: language binding stale-resolution sweep covering 3 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"28233, 32698, 54035",,3,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: language binding stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #28233: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: pybind, module: language binding; title: torch native functions cannot be used with inspect.signature | issue #54035: stale/low urgency; labels: feature, triaged, module: language binding; title: Web support? | issue #32698: stale/low urgency; labels: feature, low priority, triaged, module: language binding; title: Add Julia Bindings to Torch backend",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",88b450298d661dd4c478b2d07afaa575e6f866a885259ee027a329419326c27b
BUNDLE-1324,bundle:bundle-1324,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: lazy (34 issues),issue_group,,module: lazy stale/low urgency batch 1,module: lazy,"Run one module: lazy stale-resolution sweep covering 34 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"62614, 62616, 62619, 62675, 63113, 63970, 64327, 65386, 65576, 65640, 65646, 65837, 66208, 67535, 67540, 67937, 70505, 72960, 73710, 73711, 73989, 73994, 74134, 75242, 79020, 79967, 80226, 80942, 83826, 87033, 94132, 97196, 99299, 147661",,34,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: lazy stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #147661: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: xla, module: linear algebra, module: lazy; title: Add shape fn for einsum | issue #99299: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, lazy, module: lazy; title: There has implmenet bug in LTC IrBuilder's MakeSizeMul method. | issue #94132: stale/low urgency; labels: module: nn, module: molly-guard, triaged, module: lazy; title: Asking for a LAZYMODULEMIXIN warning...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",6344c56a80244f502261e03e19cfadab8b81d35973c61e2fe9665f1b9f0320c5
BUNDLE-1325,bundle:bundle-1325,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: library (7 issues),issue_group,,module: library stale/low urgency,module: library,"Run one module: library stale-resolution sweep covering 7 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"83583, 99681, 107387, 107695, 125183, 125234, 127615",,7,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: library stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #127615: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: library; title: TORCH_LIBRARY breaks when passing (unexpanded) macro as namespace argument | issue #125234: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: library; title: torch.Library can easily cause segfault on loading/unloading | issue #125183: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: library; title: torch/_refs/__init__.py is not autoreloadable in ben...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",b0191ee18e18bece7b18e1ce4d4a711a030cee4404f60ebe3a0c59ad917a6dde
BUNDLE-1326,bundle:bundle-1326,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: linear algebra (99 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 7 issues - issue #168756: TestModule: test/test_linalg.py::TestLinalg,module: linear algebra,"Run one module: linear algebra stale-resolution sweep covering 99 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"1178, 12435, 13222, 21760, 22848, 23434, 25785, 25978, 31546, 36314, 37556, 41622, 47918, 48587, 49177, 50068, 52712, 55261, 55907, 56483, 56891, 57121, 60264, 60295, 61649, 61650, 62955, 64818, 68696, 69080, 70391, 72537, 72711, 72909, 74389, 75701, 76300, 76612, 76649, 76705, 76779, 78808, 78809, 80132, 82088, 83493, 84530, 84835, 86814, 87170, 88002, 88942, 90613, 95304, 101106, 102772, 103313, 105068, 105697, 109497, 111908, 121482, 121683, 122454, 122699, 125182, 127223, 128952, 131774, 132693, 132940, 134326, 135514, 136452, 136913, 137464, 138353, 138452, 142815, 143189, 146732, 148775, 148954, 154791, 154842, 158428, 165251, 168756, 168766, 168767, 168768, 168771, 168772, 168773, 168774, 168776, 168777, 168778, 174913",,99,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: linear algebra stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,Context Source file: test/test_linalg.py Test class: TestLinalg Test name: test_tensorinv Defined at line: 3771 Parent issue: #168756 Code reference: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/blob/main/test/test_linalg.py cc @sunway513 @jithunnair-amd @pruthvistony @ROCmSupport @ | ext Source file: test/test_linalg.py Test class: TestLinalg Test name: test__dyn_quant_pack_4bit_weight Defined at line: 7844 Parent issue: #...,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",1da73883d630db4b9aac033bbe9b3a1f9e47b4dbc980517bd968b97a89046de8
BUNDLE-1327,bundle:bundle-1327,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: linear algebra (8 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #61658: Move `torch.cholesky_solve` into `torch.linalg`.,module: linear algebra,"Run one module: linear algebra stale-resolution sweep covering 8 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"3619, 4358, 49252, 52915, 61658, 77166, 168780, 168781",,8,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: linear algebra stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"ve cholesky_solve, and expect that the user uses the construction above if they want to materialise the inverse. This is already tracked in #61658 | oesn't work # both cases work with torch.linalg.solve Additional context Memory inefficiency of the actual implementation is discussed here #49252. cc @jianyuh @nikitaved @pearu @mruberry @heitorschueroff @walterddr @IvanYashchuk | something similar was reported befor...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",d9a7a2159f615272240d90ca4b398a97d037ad4a0cc8bf228996fa92f64f4b0d
BUNDLE-1328,bundle:bundle-1328,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: lint (29 issues),issue_group,,module: lint stale/low urgency batch 2,module: lint,"Run one module: lint stale-resolution sweep covering 29 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"9032, 20466, 55764, 59854, 63919, 63920, 76618, 76827, 77253, 77548, 81259, 90827, 94504, 114155, 123062, 123465, 124857, 126386, 127352, 129410, 144217, 146699, 148451, 153638, 156073, 158783, 158785, 159122, 168907",,29,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: lint stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #124857: stale/low urgency; labels: module: lint, triaged; title: Use lintrunner-adapters for our adapters when possible | issue #114155: stale/low urgency; labels: module: lint, triaged; title: Lintrunner on all files fails locally even though it passes in CI | issue #77253: stale/low urgency; labels: module: lint, triaged; title: lintrunner not working | issue #90827: stale/low urgency; labels: module: lin...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",ff250ae7cdae63471b41432bd0877ea95be8f5532dfc96efc95b679ca884c905
BUNDLE-1329,bundle:bundle-1329,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: logging (13 issues),issue_group,,module: logging stale/low urgency,module: logging,"Run one module: logging stale-resolution sweep covering 13 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"39503, 40687, 52913, 82789, 86265, 98872, 103173, 109850, 120079, 135135, 142493, 143274, 146913",,13,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: logging stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #120079: stale/low urgency; labels: feature, low priority, module: logging, triaged, oncall: pt2; title: Use sys.settrace or torch function mode to compute how much of a model was not covered by Dynamo | issue #103173: stale/low urgency; labels: feature, module: logging, triaged, oncall: pt2, no-scrub; title: [RFC] Emit better Telemetry in PyTorch | issue #146913: stale/low urgency; labels: module: logging,...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",7fd217598112138574fe52262ddc701f0b65ebfec8cb1e59305417d6ce60903d
BUNDLE-1330,bundle:bundle-1330,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: loss (55 issues),issue_group,,module: loss stale/low urgency batch 3,module: loss,"Run one module: loss stale-resolution sweep covering 55 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"634, 842, 1249, 2629, 5157, 8062, 9250, 9286, 16148, 16599, 22604, 25057, 26228, 29754, 34879, 36553, 38185, 39435, 41142, 48621, 49844, 49851, 54137, 54843, 55902, 58351, 59216, 61309, 65329, 66083, 67136, 69858, 69900, 71367, 76646, 76732, 77256, 77529, 89369, 89408, 89907, 97539, 104711, 104776, 105304, 106467, 107680, 118918, 129222, 133084, 136145, 139916, 141177, 141822, 142146",,55,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: loss stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #67136: stale/low urgency; labels: feature, module: nn, module: loss, triaged, actionable; title: addition of loss function RMSE in the torch.nn | issue #66083: stale/low urgency; labels: feature, module: loss, triaged, module: shape checking; title: [feature request] Allow broadcasting for F.huber_loss and potentially other losses | issue #65329: stale/low urgency; labels: module: loss, triaged, enhancement...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",c7b983e69586afdf03d4a07467a1c3c19e3466672c25dbb49f1215e400ad0706
BUNDLE-1331,bundle:bundle-1331,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: lrscheduler (17 issues),issue_group,,module: lrscheduler stale/low urgency,module: lrscheduler,"Run one module: lrscheduler stale-resolution sweep covering 17 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"53712, 62475, 62640, 63488, 69753, 72714, 74884, 78253, 79888, 95122, 106339, 106359, 113222, 121271, 129565, 153842, 156846",,17,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: lrscheduler stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #156846: stale/low urgency; labels: module: optimizer, triaged, has workaround, module: LrScheduler; title: Can't alter the learning rate though loading optimizer states | issue #113222: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: LrScheduler, topic: deprecation; title: EPOCH_DEPRECATION_WARNING in ChainedScheduler.step | issue #153842: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: LrScheduler, oncall: distrib...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",20c6f596af4f8af80c068828ed60dd668eb62c8b7a26e61253cc8c265393b72a
BUNDLE-1332,bundle:bundle-1332,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: lts (3 issues),issue_group,,module: lts stale/low urgency,module: lts,"Run one module: lts stale-resolution sweep covering 3 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"71340, 73424, 77463",,3,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: lts stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #77463: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: lts; title: conda CPU installation for LTS fails with UnsatisfiableError | issue #73424: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: lts; title: ""munmap_chunk(): invalid pointer"" interaction error with pytorch (< 1.10), pybind, and cv_bridge | issue #71340: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: lts; title: locally installed PyTorch upgraded or superse...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",ac20c61d3ff4646723f960390656b2c49226fc0e37165ae9c5332836c5e79ef3
BUNDLE-1333,bundle:bundle-1333,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: m1 (1 issue),issue_group,,#88614 The libtorch test TestScalarTensor.TestScalarTensorMPS fails on Apple Silicon,module: m1,"Run one module: m1 stale-resolution sweep covering 1 issue: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,88614,,1,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: m1 stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #88614: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, actionable, module: mps, module: m1; title: The libtorch test TestScalarTensor.TestScalarTensorMPS fails on Apple Silicon",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",27bd0d5aaf462cc95e5217a31fc02f9ac8e9618b98171ceddc6b8193b480e567
BUNDLE-1334,bundle:bundle-1334,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: macos (16 issues),issue_group,,module: macos stale/low urgency batch 1,module: macos,"Run one module: macos stale-resolution sweep covering 16 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"7686, 19672, 31308, 54655, 57185, 79382, 83540, 87041, 95708, 97106, 103868, 117094, 127973, 148440, 159781, 171323",,16,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: macos stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #171323: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: macos, module: openmp, has workaround; title: Segmentation fault when calling `torch.tensor()` after importing xgboost | issue #159781: stale/low urgency; labels: oncall: releng, triaged, module: macos; title: MacOS Python 3.13t wheel is build for macOS 14.0+ ARM64 while Py3.9-3.13 wheels are for macOS 11.0+ ARM64 | issue #57185: stale/low urgency; labels:...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",6bc3e73d2bcd499174bf7fc4aec5ad819d673cdb3b00a7729e30678c66a888b7
BUNDLE-1335,bundle:bundle-1335,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: masked operators (15 issues),issue_group,,module: masked operators stale/low urgency,module: masked operators,"Run one module: masked operators stale-resolution sweep covering 15 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"69359, 74301, 81985, 87076, 89416, 92350, 109009, 115422, 115624, 116461, 117287, 132608, 150186, 166401, 169191",,15,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: masked operators stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #169191: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: masked operators; title: dim broadcast in masked tensor between mask and data. | issue #166401: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: masked operators; title: torch.masked.argmax returns different results on CPU vs CUDA when multiple maximum values exist | issue #150186: stale/low urgency; labels: module: performance, triaged, module: masked operator...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",27902b544536db43e66285075a0fe502146ffc68bd249e126bf8fb38ee9cd367
BUNDLE-1336,bundle:bundle-1336,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: memory format (30 issues),issue_group,,module: memory format stale/low urgency batch 2,module: memory format,"Run one module: memory format stale-resolution sweep covering 30 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"28221, 33571, 34812, 43195, 45823, 50549, 51558, 53510, 56525, 58979, 60028, 60063, 60092, 62925, 63299, 65687, 68430, 69213, 70171, 71630, 71978, 74442, 74935, 87451, 88612, 90708, 96743, 110387, 133665, 144711",,30,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: memory format stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #69213: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: memory format; title: torch.stack should have a pin_memory parameter | issue #68430: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: memory format; title: Strides issue on unsqueezed channels last tensor | issue #45823: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: memory format; title: Traceback for ""Warning: Mixed memory format inputs detected while calling the...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",b4fd5981e458f722fbf3eb684bf1ab9b51d0a53b9b523753f8c26d14da9ef37d
BUNDLE-1337,bundle:bundle-1337,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: memory usage (52 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #34257: CustomFromMask pruning stores a copy of the user-provided mask,module: memory usage,"Run one module: memory usage stale-resolution sweep covering 52 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"3931, 5161, 5434, 5528, 23382, 28055, 31655, 33864, 34257, 36874, 38177, 40400, 44182, 45321, 46084, 48377, 49139, 49394, 50835, 54713, 55260, 55607, 58980, 64043, 66162, 68422, 71266, 72450, 73709, 73883, 77839, 78274, 83914, 84944, 85538, 87090, 92252, 100656, 102334, 103422, 109445, 117467, 124487, 125217, 132596, 134051, 152550, 154128, 159622, 161381, 164966, 165319",,52,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: memory usage stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"This seems to be a duplicate of #34257. Is there any plans on fixing this? | oblems regarding your use case: There is a known issue that the SYSMAN/L0 driver provides inconsistent free memory result. The issue is in: #161381 . For internal track, see JIRA: GSD-11670 The provided reproducer trys to allocate big memory at once. The Driver team said the U... | issue #71266: stale/low urgency; labels: module: memory u...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",bb6fcaa388bd8833a9e4f39b805145942d08cb6b8c07a322beceba2cf908149a
BUNDLE-1338,bundle:bundle-1338,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: meta tensors (19 issues),issue_group,,module: meta tensors stale/low urgency batch 1,module: meta tensors,"Run one module: meta tensors stale-resolution sweep covering 19 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"55192, 65577, 71305, 72650, 73065, 74329, 79848, 80067, 80921, 89301, 99414, 105105, 108671, 108870, 127754, 138396, 138399, 140602, 147643",,19,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: meta tensors stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #147643: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: meta tensors, module: python frontend; title: Representation string of a meta tensor is not a valid `tensor` call | issue #140602: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: numpy, module: meta tensors; title: torch.from_numpy() returns a cpu tensor, even under `with torch.device(""meta"")` | issue #127754: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: meta t...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",fd809e78fb84bff4c28f1a4430217371fffd85fb1f6eed3abb2cf64d195da528
BUNDLE-1339,bundle:bundle-1339,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: minifier (1 issue),issue_group,,"#114356 [WARNING] could not load None, generating random data instead is too spammy",module: minifier,"Run one module: minifier stale-resolution sweep covering 1 issue: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,114356,,1,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: minifier stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #114356: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: minifier; title: [WARNING] could not load None, generating random data instead is too spammy",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",66da658cfe37af645cf696adc9c09cd67b87dc90842dda2d1916c9ea2397e3c0
BUNDLE-1340,bundle:bundle-1340,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: mkl (2 issues),issue_group,,module: mkl stale/low urgency,module: mkl,"Run one module: mkl stale-resolution sweep covering 2 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"74167, 93275",,2,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: mkl stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #93275: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: mkl; title: Bug in torch.linalg.svd | issue #74167: stale/low urgency; labels: module: sparse, triaged, module: mkl; title: Slower performance of `torch.mm` method with sparse CSR tensor",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",941f47ef3412f03a6386a4d7acc6bb78365f2cdf29490cf2dff9bdf1616bb6fa
BUNDLE-1341,bundle:bundle-1341,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: mkldnn (13 issues),issue_group,,module: mkldnn stale/low urgency,module: mkldnn,"Run one module: mkldnn stale-resolution sweep covering 13 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"4186, 21120, 22415, 23657, 27497, 32826, 32909, 60459, 62788, 62933, 96140, 103272, 114188",,13,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: mkldnn stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #21120: stale/low urgency; labels: oncall: jit, oncall: quantization, triaged, module: mkldnn; title: [RFC] Adding MKL-DNN Int8 functions to PyTorch/Aten/JIT backend | issue #114188: stale/low urgency; labels: module: onnx, triaged, module: mkldnn, onnx-triaged, onnx-needs-info; title: Unsupported operator error: `aten::to_mkldnn` export to ONNX not supported | issue #103272: stale/low urgency; labels: triag...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",e8077bebe7a5320b25abea41558a141002269e914e94479b043d3cf11f7b6ed9
BUNDLE-1342,bundle:bundle-1342,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: molly-guard (2 issues),issue_group,,module: molly-guard stale/low urgency,module: molly-guard,"Run one module: molly-guard stale-resolution sweep covering 2 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"76383, 116533",,2,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: molly-guard stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #76383: stale/low urgency; labels: module: nn, module: molly-guard, triaged; title: Suggestion to throw a UserWarning when a user forgot .eval() mode during inference | issue #116533: stale/low urgency; labels: module: molly-guard, triaged, actionable, module: python frontend; title: `backward` implicit conversion from tuple to `torch.Tensor` results in an indexing error message",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",aa5976e0bef2b7d9a9278fef5a2d2ee32d5c3b09d1352faf423975032b228367
BUNDLE-1343,bundle:bundle-1343,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: mpi (5 issues),issue_group,,module: mpi stale/low urgency,module: mpi,"Run one module: mpi stale-resolution sweep covering 5 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"22791, 25570, 51207, 134700, 139178",,5,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: mpi stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #25570: stale/low urgency; labels: oncall: distributed, feature, triaged, module: mpi; title: Remote memory access similar to MPI one-sided in pytorch | issue #139178: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: mpi; title: the mpi backend not support to transfer float16/bfloat16 tensor and would post ""IndexError: map::at"" when transferring float16/bfloat16 tensor | issue #134700: stale/low urgency; labels:...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",fbab39d82f651487933e7ff100f1ce698f4843331da0aca11a32726098fdfd37
BUNDLE-1344,bundle:bundle-1344,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: mps (47 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #116567: [MPS] `sort` incorrectly handles 'negative' NaNs,module: mps,"Run one module: mps stale-resolution sweep covering 47 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"78210, 84813, 86060, 87129, 88893, 92148, 95622, 99160, 101251, 104188, 104315, 104761, 106408, 109943, 111374, 112849, 112956, 115152, 115350, 116567, 116857, 117617, 117949, 118517, 119108, 119968, 121632, 122973, 124056, 125098, 127676, 127743, 138199, 138898, 140787, 141789, 143864, 143955, 145693, 148219, 149184, 152736, 153976, 156792, 161283, 169290, 170175",,47,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: mps stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"#116567 related nan sorting issue | issue #115152: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: scatter & gather ops, module: mps; title: scatter_ op after permute op not working correctly on mps device | issue #106408: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: mps; title: PyTorchMPS not showing up in Instruments for `torch.mps.profiler` | issue #118517: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: mps; title: Val...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",5ae3af65d0f28cd61f7829b304084bcf4724e197f917e86ef067f4c2fcf104ec
BUNDLE-1345,bundle:bundle-1345,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: mta (13 issues),issue_group,,module: mta stale/low urgency,module: mta,"Run one module: mta stale-resolution sweep covering 13 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"106427, 106931, 108445, 111351, 117233, 117884, 117981, 124726, 128395, 129329, 133586, 139795, 162911",,13,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: mta stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #162911: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: mta; title: `torch._foreach_...` functions error on zero-length inputs | issue #117884: stale/low urgency; labels: feature, module: optimizer, triaged, actionable, module: mta, oncall: pt2, module: pt2 optimizer; title: Foreach Where support | issue #133586: stale/low urgency; labels: module: nn, triaged, module: mta, oncall: pt2; title: No way for low-ove...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",30711dcfb9a5c1417a6525969c23dc9609ed764dcb0e555dec2c07a5506d4224
BUNDLE-1346,bundle:bundle-1346,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: multi-gpu (2 issues),issue_group,,module: multi-gpu stale/low urgency,module: multi-gpu,"Run one module: multi-gpu stale-resolution sweep covering 2 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"78185, 87794",,2,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: multi-gpu stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #87794: stale/low urgency; labels: module: multi-gpu, triaged; title: CUDA error: operation not permitted when stream is capturing (2 GPUs) | issue #78185: stale/low urgency; labels: module: multi-gpu, triaged, actionable; title: test_to (__main__.TestTorch) fails with multiple gpus",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",fb27e3dac62af3e1e028bf27cb1bf2f8cea852cd666a981104b96677d88be20b
BUNDLE-1347,bundle:bundle-1347,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: multiprocessing (56 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #151549: multiprocessing.pool.MaybeEncodingError Reason: 'RuntimeError('_share_fd_: only available on CPU')',module: multiprocessing,"Run one module: multiprocessing stale-resolution sweep covering 56 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"8126, 8913, 10996, 11786, 13300, 14047, 16954, 20248, 29172, 30461, 31571, 31596, 32322, 33799, 35472, 36922, 41639, 41694, 42049, 42444, 44545, 46093, 49672, 56480, 56921, 59546, 60401, 65418, 68861, 68935, 75662, 77050, 78075, 80765, 84994, 86467, 87056, 91889, 97902, 101293, 103397, 106989, 120354, 121430, 122186, 122626, 128351, 129656, 133010, 133210, 134755, 134926, 135705, 137777, 151549, 170636",,56,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: multiprocessing stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"Duplicated with #151549 | issue #80765: stale/low urgency; labels: module: multiprocessing, triaged, module: tensorboard; title: Let torch.utils.tensorboard support multiprocessing | issue #42444: stale/low urgency; labels: module: multiprocessing, triaged, module: random; title: torch.random.randperm stuck in multiprocess | issue #77050: stale/low urgency; labels: module: performance, module: multiprocessing, tri...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",31483f85c1959d55a8663146177d05e6340e90959d7996b5edd22ed546d4f3e9
BUNDLE-1348,bundle:bundle-1348,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: multithreading (21 issues),issue_group,,module: multithreading stale/low urgency,module: multithreading,"Run one module: multithreading stale-resolution sweep covering 21 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"20189, 25601, 31461, 33327, 33367, 38510, 42094, 42502, 56794, 64864, 65229, 70241, 70940, 71383, 71409, 76966, 77140, 96036, 110032, 138468, 140012",,21,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: multithreading stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #140012: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: multithreading; title: Default value for get_num_threads | issue #138468: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: multithreading; title: os.environ modification is not thread safe | issue #110032: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: multithreading, module: sanitizers; title: Race condition on shutdown involving PThreadPool and autograd | issue...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",dd6f2b808042ad71cc9c31eb8e653720679579236dbdf1d3d224b700df8779ea
BUNDLE-1349,bundle:bundle-1349,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: named tensor (26 issues),issue_group,,module: named tensor stale/low urgency batch 1,module: named tensor,"Run one module: named tensor stale-resolution sweep covering 26 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"27175, 28142, 28146, 28742, 29010, 31759, 33006, 33007, 37995, 38457, 41667, 43692, 46254, 49427, 60832, 61117, 61136, 63297, 64743, 67168, 70735, 79091, 83902, 94586, 119464, 121725",,26,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: named tensor stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #121725: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: named tensor, actionable, module: python frontend; title: torch.logsumexp throws RuntimeError instead of reducing all dimensions when dim=None | issue #41667: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, enhancement, module: named tensor; title: [Feature Request] named tensor support for `tensordot`(tensor contract) | issue #119464: stale/low urgency; labels: modul...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",59d28c39e5d5cfef5e3f6e0f13866769bd858f9de9d377a1f4e883b951f2f87e
BUNDLE-1350,bundle:bundle-1350,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: nans and infs (14 issues),issue_group,,module: nans and infs stale/low urgency,module: nans and infs,"Run one module: nans and infs stale-resolution sweep covering 14 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"19126, 51906, 51911, 64525, 65663, 71475, 78484, 102400, 106604, 132614, 135992, 138570, 161500, 165537",,14,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: nans and infs stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #165537: stale/low urgency; labels: low priority, triaged, module: NaNs and Infs, topic: fuzzer; title: `torch.linspace` with `inf` endpoint and `float16` dtype returns all `nan`,inconsistent with NumPy | issue #161500: stale/low urgency; labels: module: nn, triaged, module: NaNs and Infs; title: nn.TransformerEncoder NaNs with float mask and float src_key_padding_mask only when in both eval() and torch.no_g...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",17d90ea2d8f83593d4af74bcffa3a6ae27004b65ca89a4b058b894b15df22d43
BUNDLE-1351,bundle:bundle-1351,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: nccl (25 issues),issue_group,,module: nccl stale/low urgency batch 1,module: nccl,"Run one module: nccl stale-resolution sweep covering 25 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"8386, 32162, 37598, 40095, 40633, 42332, 44169, 67158, 113128, 115301, 117748, 118421, 118472, 129140, 130739, 132747, 135095, 139245, 146021, 146118, 149984, 152220, 159559, 168480, 168481",,25,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: nccl stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #67158: stale/low urgency; labels: oncall: distributed, triaged, module: nccl; title: Make streams used for NCCL operations configurable | issue #159559: stale/low urgency; labels: oncall: distributed, triaged, module: nccl; title: Support NCCL register userbuffer for P2P communication in NCCL backend | issue #149984: stale/low urgency; labels: oncall: distributed, triaged, module: nccl; title: ncclSystemErr...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",f66f16afd10a9802a80809299b96013ea24941ed3ae9e86a4dfcddf0cc50b43f
BUNDLE-1352,bundle:bundle-1352,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: nestedtensor (57 issues),issue_group,,module: nestedtensor stale/low urgency batch 3,module: nestedtensor,"Run one module: nestedtensor stale-resolution sweep covering 57 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"1591, 49016, 73479, 75940, 78754, 80577, 81405, 82534, 82687, 83749, 83910, 84009, 84247, 86888, 90560, 90866, 93859, 95485, 95562, 95815, 97111, 104163, 108859, 110516, 118580, 122701, 124216, 125940, 126453, 129191, 130470, 131967, 132695, 133138, 135930, 136656, 136747, 137167, 137336, 137514, 138180, 138552, 138831, 138993, 145158, 145214, 145837, 148379, 149720, 150242, 151717, 152962, 153238, 153472, 159380, 161287, 168253",,57,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: nestedtensor stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #135930: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: nestedtensor; title: Integer overflow while creating nested tensors | issue #133138: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: nestedtensor; title: Layer normalization for Nested Tensors does not return the correct tensor types | issue #131967: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: nestedtensor; title: Layer normalization on Nested Tensor ragged di...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",0f849a178c4fb6372c8ceafc70b47977c685fa750a48b92fe9ebaf7b3b99817b
BUNDLE-1353,bundle:bundle-1353,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: nn (128 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #38208: nn.Module Abstract Class attribute overrides Child.,module: nn,"Run one module: nn stale-resolution sweep covering 128 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"1686, 1932, 4927, 6442, 9046, 10006, 20967, 28746, 28884, 30413, 30440, 30535, 30589, 30899, 30947, 30962, 31110, 31277, 31367, 31651, 32264, 33241, 33360, 33436, 34453, 34760, 34765, 36317, 37386, 38000, 38184, 38208, 39524, 40763, 41070, 43865, 46031, 49555, 49791, 60939, 64509, 66678, 67999, 69321, 78618, 80738, 82919, 86274, 90842, 91435, 92990, 95210, 96633, 96883, 97128, 98203, 98291, 99012, 99304, 100087, 102333, 102374, 103484, 103668, 104739, 105925, 106630, 107573, 109987, 110154, 114796, 115024, 115472, 116077, 116472, 118628, 118853, 119371, 119482, 120790, 120793, 123642, 124937, 126973, 127736, 128412, 131254, 132136, 133833, 135150, 137173, 137192, 138320, 138420, 139191, 139381, 139582, 139701, 139910, 140703, 140881, 141018, 141801, 141828, 142301, 143293, 143424, 143669, 143754, 143860, 144116, 144223, 145468, 145851, 146034, 146708, 146711, 146831, 147389, 147495, 147506, 148232, 149040, 149120, 149841, 150402, 152152, 152188",,128,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: nn stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"ar = Bar(123) print(bar.x) # prints 123 bar = Bar(nn.Linear(1, 2)) print(bar.x) # prints None dir(bar).count('x') # prints 2 Edit: See also #38208 | issue #49791: stale/low urgency; labels: module: performance, feature, module: nn, triaged; title: Caching for autoregressive decoding of Transformer | issue #49555: stale/low urgency; labels: module: nn, triaged; title: Gunicorn preload flag not working with PyTorch...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",2e47304d9e0a9bc934817fce012b2cd2166658d7a754f43951ffed4724a265e5
BUNDLE-1354,bundle:bundle-1354,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: nn (140 issues),issue_group,,module: nn stale/low urgency batch 24,module: nn,"Run one module: nn stale-resolution sweep covering 140 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"285, 1410, 1927, 2400, 5435, 5790, 5912, 7773, 7865, 8921, 9678, 9681, 11624, 12159, 12460, 12675, 13162, 17313, 18728, 18796, 20058, 20424, 21411, 26527, 26781, 27839, 30658, 31818, 31856, 34874, 35775, 35798, 38394, 38955, 39674, 41099, 41256, 41528, 42625, 43402, 43876, 46149, 46971, 47175, 47588, 47699, 48235, 48511, 48526, 48626, 48645, 49723, 51320, 52011, 53103, 55030, 55804, 57406, 57631, 58093, 58846, 59925, 61149, 61452, 62545, 63004, 65163, 65520, 65622, 65688, 65774, 66874, 67481, 67565, 68179, 68337, 68420, 68512, 68655, 68752, 69207, 69325, 69721, 69756, 70095, 70100, 70348, 70455, 70500, 70995, 71211, 71877, 72452, 72580, 72643, 72672, 72821, 73222, 73484, 74143, 74296, 74411, 74554, 75251, 75680, 75923, 76011, 76613, 76636, 76906, 76920, 77067, 78450, 78744, 78786, 80458, 80932, 80951, 80954, 83032, 83152, 83169, 83221, 83229, 83232, 83238, 86356, 89344, 89597, 95290, 121160, 148065, 152607, 154241, 155193, 156177, 158832, 159138, 161869, 163821",,140,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: nn stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #35775: stale/low urgency; labels: module: numerical-stability, module: nn, triaged; title: Unexpected behaviour for affine_grid and grid_sample with 3D inputs | issue #34874: stale/low urgency; labels: module: nn, triaged, function request; title: Extend nn.functional.softmax for arbitrary dimensions | issue #30658: stale/low urgency; labels: module: nn, triaged, module: vision, module: pooling, function re...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",2ab1dc290fb619d326c4a497b51844f04d28898dfb8a93d23e2a6dabccae846b
BUNDLE-1355,bundle:bundle-1355,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: nn (120 issues),issue_group,,module: nn stale/low urgency batch 15,module: nn,"Run one module: nn stale-resolution sweep covering 120 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"1362, 7733, 15994, 18206, 18220, 19682, 20022, 20165, 20204, 22277, 22879, 24089, 25034, 25092, 26551, 28962, 29429, 31423, 34772, 37092, 37554, 40859, 44989, 44991, 45009, 45352, 45851, 53785, 55457, 55910, 60466, 67913, 71203, 72283, 88810, 94428, 97915, 102999, 103316, 104698, 104788, 104823, 105448, 106011, 106545, 109586, 110356, 110959, 111368, 114093, 114107, 114131, 115064, 116175, 116502, 116608, 116861, 117275, 117437, 117546, 118294, 118972, 119368, 119474, 120396, 120587, 121193, 122250, 122660, 122803, 124194, 125116, 125389, 126000, 126755, 127535, 127701, 127732, 127733, 127734, 128165, 128493, 128779, 129564, 130342, 131110, 131307, 131688, 132034, 132231, 133522, 133527, 133535, 133818, 134948, 136071, 136072, 136073, 136096, 136098, 136110, 136138, 136409, 136926, 136937, 136938, 136955, 136994, 137086, 137089, 152308, 156062, 165312, 165982, 166080, 166378, 168010, 170382, 170691, 170851",,120,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: nn stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #34772: stale/low urgency; labels: module: nn, triaged, module: vision; title: Unsupported ONNX op (Upsample 3D, bicubic) contrary to documentation | issue #106545: stale/low urgency; labels: module: nn, triaged; title: `softmax` to handle dimensions comprised of `-inf` | issue #55457: stale/low urgency; labels: module: nn, triaged; title: [feature request] TupleSequential module or an option for Sequential...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",50b6511bedb8cec7811911fbe4a8ff8cbbcbd26a1979a05bbc62f2b38c24d675
BUNDLE-1356,bundle:bundle-1356,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: nn (21 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 3 issues - issue #102977: raise `RuntimeError` faster when loading an object with a torch CUDA tensor on a CPU-only machine,module: nn,"Run one module: nn stale-resolution sweep covering 21 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"499, 2001, 5580, 13218, 15457, 15617, 16797, 28594, 42295, 42316, 43369, 51471, 51782, 51896, 57815, 62009, 62094, 63034, 74519, 86162, 102977",,21,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: nn stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"#16797 solution This solution works for me! Thank you man! | motivation and pitch Currently when loading an object with a torch CUDA tensor on a CPU-only machine, torch will raise a RuntimeError like #16797 mentioned. A problem in this situation is that torch will spend time (maybe trying to load the tensor bytes) before raise that Runt... | rror, for TestNllLossBackward) @wconstab ASAN: test_ts_opinfo.py failure...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",7dd80ab264eea6d6d7d196ee139f45bbb7d9efae94184b9aacd24391e8d1d389
BUNDLE-1357,bundle:bundle-1357,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: nn (4 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #11514: [feature request] - Allow sequences lengths to be 0 in PackSequence,module: nn,"Run one module: nn stale-resolution sweep covering 4 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"11514, 50192, 107896, 128785",,4,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: nn stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,Related: #50192 | Related: #107896,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",36806245c52209af6b887978a35dd293822cdb06a875d2918dd55b3947441ca2
BUNDLE-1358,bundle:bundle-1358,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: nn.utils.parametrize (2 issues),issue_group,,module: nn.utils.parametrize stale/low urgency,module: nn.utils.parametrize,"Run one module: nn.utils.parametrize stale-resolution sweep covering 2 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"102740, 125064",,2,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: nn.utils.parametrize stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #125064: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: nn.utils.parametrize; title: ValueError: weight_norm of 'weight' not found in ParametrizedConvTranspose1d | issue #102740: stale/low urgency; labels: module: rnn, triaged, module: nn.utils.parametrize; title: parameterizations.orthogonal does not work as intended with nn.GRU or nn.LSTM",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",a543239b057148d8d00cdee1b30fe72a49518ea7f5faa1df5144e26a224b4d5f
BUNDLE-1359,bundle:bundle-1359,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: nnpack (2 issues),issue_group,,module: nnpack stale/low urgency,module: nnpack,"Run one module: nnpack stale-resolution sweep covering 2 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"84045, 107534",,2,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: nnpack stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #107534: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: nnpack; title: NNPACK slow down M1/M2 Mac CPU | issue #84045: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: nnpack; title: COREMLTOOLs/NNPACK Python Issue",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",69f2610a4398cdbf5912350eb615a4b727323aa460d3a442dd880886f1bb8735
BUNDLE-1360,bundle:bundle-1360,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: norms and normalization (12 issues),issue_group,,module: norms and normalization stale/low urgency,module: norms and normalization,"Run one module: norms and normalization stale-resolution sweep covering 12 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"8035, 12189, 12760, 12812, 20551, 49431, 50090, 73161, 78656, 98075, 104853, 137172",,12,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: norms and normalization stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #78656: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, enhancement, module: norms and normalization; title: Allow batch_norm_backward_elemt and batch_norm_gather_stats_with_counts handle 0 counts | issue #137172: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: norms and normalization; title: `torch._batch_norm_impl_index` performs inconsistently on CPU and CUDA | issue #20551: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: nu...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",98df385dbde75f9b55156cc319cc1aac9b150951507339a7f3a3292b07394256
BUNDLE-1361,bundle:bundle-1361,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: numba (1 issue),issue_group,,#23067 creation of a tensor from a numba.cuda array,module: numba,"Run one module: numba stale-resolution sweep covering 1 issue: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,23067,,1,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: numba stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #23067: stale/low urgency; labels: feature, low priority, triaged, module: numba; title: creation of a tensor from a numba.cuda array",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",0ffb81ed91c2e2b8f0f4175d7e79d04834600aadc377d8d3706000fb87295c72
BUNDLE-1362,bundle:bundle-1362,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: numerical-reproducibility (8 issues),issue_group,,module: numerical-reproducibility stale/low urgency,module: numerical-reproducibility,"Run one module: numerical-reproducibility stale-resolution sweep covering 8 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"8242, 51426, 54947, 58758, 68102, 73475, 80808, 121595",,8,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: numerical-reproducibility stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #121595: stale/low urgency; labels: low priority, triaged, module: random, module: numerical-reproducibility, actionable; title: Different Dropout behavior on macOS and Linux | issue #68102: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: numerical-reproducibility; title: Can not guarantee reproducible for `nn.ReflectionPad2d` | issue #8242: stale/low urgency; labels: module: numerical-stability, module: rnn, tr...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",11f9fa54ee22e221a2d8a1fa1cdd3212d63c79dc04524080ce7ffd357457b6e6
BUNDLE-1363,bundle:bundle-1363,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: numerical-stability (17 issues),issue_group,,module: numerical-stability stale/low urgency,module: numerical-stability,"Run one module: numerical-stability stale-resolution sweep covering 17 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"38051, 50473, 53263, 53758, 56698, 57690, 65050, 65868, 66460, 66491, 76555, 78741, 95934, 101666, 121789, 141802, 165906",,17,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: numerical-stability stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #165906: stale/low urgency; labels: module: numerical-stability, triaged; title: `torch.bmm` returns wrong results for large tensors with torch.set_float32_matmul_precision(""medium"") | issue #101666: stale/low urgency; labels: module: numerical-stability, triaged; title: Unexpected behavior of fmod op in some float32 input | issue #141802: stale/low urgency; labels: module: numerical-stability, triaged, modu...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",6240c2eaeaea33e5674c467c9644652edfea9e5a2b6caf1cea86b4240214690e
BUNDLE-1364,bundle:bundle-1364,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: numpy (93 issues),issue_group,,module: numpy stale/low urgency batch 6,module: numpy,"Run one module: numpy stale-resolution sweep covering 93 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"7610, 9186, 16330, 16703, 18315, 19143, 19172, 20323, 29372, 31895, 32589, 35499, 36058, 36309, 36748, 37809, 38272, 38323, 38328, 39656, 42053, 42223, 42671, 42805, 43064, 43255, 44968, 47841, 48338, 50333, 50360, 51199, 51280, 51284, 51406, 51849, 52334, 52552, 52722, 53090, 53095, 53284, 54116, 54620, 55286, 55289, 55356, 56671, 56774, 57018, 59247, 61292, 61816, 62026, 64107, 64502, 66489, 67011, 69386, 69822, 69892, 70555, 71204, 74236, 74420, 78413, 84539, 85606, 86315, 89419, 90412, 90820, 91447, 92778, 94909, 97760, 109873, 110285, 114679, 120209, 121926, 127194, 129085, 129634, 132026, 135484, 135611, 136305, 137045, 137182, 139281, 141343, 142174",,93,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: numpy stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #9186: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: numpy, module: pybind, module: ux; title: [pytorch] Make dtype second positional argument of tensor factory methods | issue #16703: stale/low urgency; labels: feature, triaged, module: numpy; title: split_with_sizes should accept a LongTensor as the split_sizes parameter | issue #48338: stale/low urgency; labels: feature, triaged, module: numpy; title: torch...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",8a733ba794d3dce0399a4e0f8ebdbc3b71d9f853381d860046ce2dbcd06872f0
BUNDLE-1365,bundle:bundle-1365,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: numpy (2 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #165244: torch.tensor slicing with negative step raises ValueError,module: numpy,"Run one module: numpy stale-resolution sweep covering 2 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"38271, 165244",,2,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: numpy stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"See #38271 and many other discussions related to this. While we're not opposed to this, the implication are huge as all the implementation needs to be",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",4a0fd7d79b7d0d6ef4d2ca103ae9c60cfa1789101076bfd26511573afded7490
BUNDLE-1366,bundle:bundle-1366,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: nvfuser (37 issues),issue_group,,module: nvfuser stale/low urgency batch 2,module: nvfuser,"Run one module: nvfuser stale-resolution sweep covering 37 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"75371, 75474, 76007, 76070, 76491, 76933, 79244, 79246, 79261, 79325, 80187, 80189, 80230, 80231, 80541, 80551, 80851, 80966, 80986, 81307, 81358, 81531, 83388, 83726, 84311, 85081, 85258, 85520, 85544, 86529, 86554, 86601, 88194, 88931, 88991, 89609, 94161",,37,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: nvfuser stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #80541: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: nvfuser, module: primTorch; title: [Prims+NVFuser] Prims with missing NVFuser ops | issue #84311: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: nvfuser; title: DecompositionInterpreter creates invalid graph | issue #83726: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: nvfuser, module: primTorch; title: nvfuser + prim stack generated illegal PTX code on hardware...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",f3b4b54213950ca88848df4abd7735e7d71651fde91a3526a800f68460848b16
BUNDLE-1367,bundle:bundle-1367,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: onnx (99 issues),issue_group,,module: onnx stale/low urgency batch 6,module: onnx,"Run one module: onnx stale-resolution sweep covering 99 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"39245, 44878, 52230, 61167, 64477, 65657, 65698, 66200, 68944, 70446, 74034, 75625, 81084, 89634, 89675, 90607, 94164, 94675, 98727, 99770, 103089, 105299, 107016, 108342, 109292, 110056, 110131, 110866, 111186, 112831, 113817, 116182, 116965, 117209, 119442, 121629, 122107, 122290, 122321, 122359, 122957, 123353, 123555, 123628, 124711, 124915, 124956, 124973, 125835, 125893, 125902, 126065, 126549, 126660, 126774, 126856, 126921, 126972, 127518, 127606, 127875, 128323, 128325, 129200, 130114, 130366, 130539, 130644, 131349, 134664, 134827, 135398, 136083, 136592, 136622, 136918, 137419, 139429, 140130, 140237, 143474, 143497, 144464, 147720, 147859, 148098, 150544, 151064, 151402, 151793, 152097, 155997, 156811, 156873, 157220, 161365, 162449, 164116, 167063",,99,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: onnx stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #108342: stale/low urgency; labels: module: onnx, triaged; title: ONNX export constant folding messes up with shared weight deduplication | issue #70446: stale/low urgency; labels: module: onnx, triaged, onnx-triaged; title: Exporting the operator prim_DictConstruct to ONNX opset version 13 is not supported | issue #124915: stale/low urgency; labels: module: onnx, triaged; title: Exporting torch slice_scatte...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",47d131e18e6c20e67d946ef661c43863c70759f3f6327920e9282299f0692266
BUNDLE-1368,bundle:bundle-1368,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: opcheck (4 issues),issue_group,,module: opcheck stale/low urgency,module: opcheck,"Run one module: opcheck stale-resolution sweep covering 4 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"111924, 111930, 111931, 112251",,4,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: opcheck stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #111931: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: opcheck; title: [opcheck] Faster gradcheck execution | issue #112251: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: opcheck; title: Optest is unable to xfail on parametrized tests | issue #111930: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: opcheck; title: [opcheck] Way to reduce Hypothesis sampling when running opcheck | issue #111924: stale/low urgency; la...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",0eeafcc8a1f05c6962a0c15b22f29f5e82858439a9c7a81790c14140f1495667
BUNDLE-1369,bundle:bundle-1369,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: openmp (1 issue),issue_group,,#101188 Weird dataloader performance degradation caused by torch and numpy import order,module: openmp,"Run one module: openmp stale-resolution sweep covering 1 issue: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,101188,,1,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: openmp stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #101188: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: openmp; title: Weird dataloader performance degradation caused by torch and numpy import order",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",1d7c7840fd4c7bbd316aaeff9bc3e382c04ee6cbfff49885ec2ac63adeebd3ed
BUNDLE-1370,bundle:bundle-1370,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: optimizer (94 issues),issue_group,,module: optimizer stale/low urgency batch 6,module: optimizer,"Run one module: optimizer stale-resolution sweep covering 94 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"1329, 1489, 2478, 2545, 2849, 2854, 3790, 5737, 6138, 6564, 7066, 7342, 8741, 9560, 9952, 12146, 14467, 15070, 18414, 20086, 20138, 20405, 22281, 22343, 28194, 29814, 29816, 30386, 30873, 34660, 36989, 38471, 38853, 39625, 40492, 40997, 41006, 41322, 41623, 41839, 42428, 43706, 46809, 46822, 46947, 47307, 47560, 48518, 49082, 49300, 49630, 49885, 50366, 50402, 50694, 51407, 51794, 52236, 52911, 56237, 56843, 58127, 70352, 81162, 86339, 97004, 101291, 101370, 104789, 106121, 106221, 111025, 116052, 116592, 116707, 118370, 122550, 123238, 124133, 124523, 126638, 127189, 128208, 133268, 137387, 138248, 141216, 143836, 143947, 146157, 147288, 149269, 168967, 169170",,94,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: optimizer stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #41322: stale/low urgency; labels: module: optimizer, triaged; title: SGD documentatiuon detail on g_{t+1} | issue #41623: stale/low urgency; labels: module: optimizer, triaged, enhancement; title: Can we have a way to reset a scheduler back to epoch -1 | issue #40997: stale/low urgency; labels: module: optimizer, triaged; title: Is this a bug? The values calculated according to the document isn't equal to t...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",2ea50f178534a4700d6dc079cf2a4720a72bba7931477697f5ab0f342eeeb7c0
BUNDLE-1371,bundle:bundle-1371,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: optimizer (5 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #145710: LBFGS-B with cuda implementation (and CPU one too),module: optimizer,"Run one module: optimizer stale-resolution sweep covering 5 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"6083, 137367, 137373, 145710, 146201",,5,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: optimizer stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"There is currently no plan for adding bounds support to L-BFGS, though there has been at least 1 issue talking about it lately: #145710 We typically are conservative about adding new functions/optimizers to the codebase and would encourage development in third-party repos fi | See my comment here: #137373 (comment) | issue #6083: stale/low urgency; labels: oncall: distributed, module: optimizer, triaged; title: [f...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",87f9b2bd72c9349edb2d2b90f8cde47e3ca3c1d6ff7c8a183d629dc003c3c702
BUNDLE-1372,bundle:bundle-1372,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: padding (2 issues),issue_group,,module: padding stale/low urgency,module: padding,"Run one module: padding stale-resolution sweep covering 2 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"32912, 170536",,2,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: padding stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #170536: stale/low urgency; labels: low priority, triaged, module: padding; title: accept int padding value for F.pad | issue #32912: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, function request, module: padding; title: Optional seq_len argument to torch.nn.utils.rnn.pad_sequence",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",3ccb4ca0042cc6e0cd290421763cbe04751021255f408beec1aaad9e80ef54cc
BUNDLE-1373,bundle:bundle-1373,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: partial aliasing (2 issues),issue_group,,module: partial aliasing stale/low urgency,module: partial aliasing,"Run one module: partial aliasing stale-resolution sweep covering 2 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"82303, 144861",,2,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: partial aliasing stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #144861: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: partial aliasing; title: Region check for in-place read and write does not always work | issue #82303: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: partial aliasing; title: Race condition between torch.tensor's view and /= (/= returns incorrect result)",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",bbabd698c9f3f4b79ed8ab85641a5d0b835f9c6b32729f4f7262f6d2815ccb39
BUNDLE-1374,bundle:bundle-1374,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: performance (54 issues),issue_group,,module: performance stale/low urgency batch 3,module: performance,"Run one module: performance stale-resolution sweep covering 54 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"3076, 19953, 22578, 23655, 23865, 28761, 30248, 32754, 36140, 37487, 39358, 39852, 39864, 40916, 41162, 41383, 44274, 44504, 45764, 47688, 47702, 47912, 50328, 50852, 51393, 52465, 52578, 53194, 53491, 57611, 65512, 66249, 66787, 74951, 75599, 78800, 82397, 82793, 85147, 92223, 101070, 104296, 115434, 120667, 121661, 124465, 132612, 134388, 137872, 138773, 142875, 148045, 151066, 158080",,54,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: performance stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #52465: stale/low urgency; labels: module: performance, triaged, NNC; title: [nnc][perf] Performance decrease with CPU fusion on `freeze(script(pytorch_mobilenet_v3))` | issue #53491: stale/low urgency; labels: module: performance, triaged; title: Very slow backward speed when using gather with small-range indices | issue #53194: stale/low urgency; labels: module: performance, triaged, module: sorting and se...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",af3a1f4e765c843f85357a28e9a542433d4d1b3c345a57f7953eeaefacef76a0
BUNDLE-1375,bundle:bundle-1375,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: pickle (6 issues),issue_group,,module: pickle stale/low urgency,module: pickle,"Run one module: pickle stale-resolution sweep covering 6 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"3473, 6107, 18436, 19529, 51836, 145665",,6,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: pickle stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #145665: stale/low urgency; labels: module: pickle, triaged; title: Pickling duplicates Storage | issue #51836: stale/low urgency; labels: module: pickle, triaged, better-engineering; title: TypeError: can't pickle _thread.lock objects when using spawn / forkserver | issue #3473: stale/low urgency; labels: oncall: distributed, feature, module: pickle, module: serialization, triaged; title: Feature Request: D...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",55415e0786c9f2c662f1b47246e0fdf367031dad6db96abe7afed78ab27251ac
BUNDLE-1376,bundle:bundle-1376,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: pipelining (11 issues),issue_group,,module: pipelining stale/low urgency,module: pipelining,"Run one module: pipelining stale-resolution sweep covering 11 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"127964, 128665, 128910, 129732, 130055, 130058, 138726, 144530, 147348, 151269, 164756",,11,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: pipelining stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #164756: stale/low urgency; labels: oncall: distributed, triaged, module: pipelining; title: [PP] Unshard and reshard not working with FSDP | issue #144530: stale/low urgency; labels: oncall: distributed, triaged, module: pipelining; title: [Pipelining] PP+DDP does not work for Zero Bubble | issue #151269: stale/low urgency; labels: oncall: distributed, triaged, module: pipelining; title: [PP] Hang when num_...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",1b276b65a0a16ff2f715464f09070e9a7493edc408883cf2270f848d4d2b4393
BUNDLE-1377,bundle:bundle-1377,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: pooling (13 issues),issue_group,,module: pooling stale/low urgency,module: pooling,"Run one module: pooling stale-resolution sweep covering 13 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"1468, 9570, 14907, 17169, 33086, 39757, 39959, 46929, 51038, 51622, 54499, 73841, 107412",,13,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: pooling stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #1468: stale/low urgency; labels: feature, triaged, module: pooling; title: avg_pool functions hold input for backward | issue #39757: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, enhancement, module: pooling; title: max_unpool2d and max_unpool3d cpp signature should be similar | issue #107412: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, actionable, module: pooling; title: max_pool1d, max_pool2d, max_pool3d Integers for cpu...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",9667b08a592187b9273912caaf97d98578dfb3c6f51d8396612f355809fab727
BUNDLE-1378,bundle:bundle-1378,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: porting (2 issues),issue_group,,module: porting stale/low urgency,module: porting,"Run one module: porting stale-resolution sweep covering 2 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"11439, 18351",,2,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: porting stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #11439: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: porting, better-engineering, module: tensor creation; title: High leverage TH operations to port to ATen | issue #18351: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: porting; title: Port SpatialConvolutionMM and VolumetricConvolutionMM to ATen",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",5ee82348649e5292fff3c72e9891f66be510567c574cd2e210ac55255644177a
BUNDLE-1379,bundle:bundle-1379,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: power (12 issues),issue_group,,module: power stale/low urgency,module: power,"Run one module: power stale-resolution sweep covering 12 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"2466, 2703, 12980, 39671, 40114, 41531, 41844, 54407, 57533, 74614, 109870, 115820",,12,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: power stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #74614: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: POWER; title: compilation error with PyTorch v1.11 for CPU on ppc64le | issue #115820: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: third_party, module: POWER, module: xnnpack; title: Question on XNNPACK support for PowerPC | issue #109870: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: POWER; title: Wrongly returns nan for vectorized complex numbers division o...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",e63c381ac852cc3e79a49224f1934252080cad97fe15b09c610f215c5d396238
BUNDLE-1380,bundle:bundle-1380,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: primtorch (30 issues),issue_group,,module: primtorch stale/low urgency batch 1,module: primtorch,"Run one module: primtorch stale-resolution sweep covering 30 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"37160, 74616, 76804, 76806, 76871, 76944, 77216, 77675, 78053, 78070, 78071, 78738, 79089, 79177, 80154, 81649, 81669, 81959, 83931, 84335, 84412, 84529, 84717, 85121, 85438, 85834, 101669, 102609, 102610, 107494",,30,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: primtorch stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #107494: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: primTorch; title: Mismatch in type of error raised when reducing along empty slice between eager and primtorch | issue #102609: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: primTorch; title: [prims] torch.ops.aten.le decomposition confuses scalars and tensors | issue #102610: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: primTorch; title: Cannot invoke prims....",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",1cf5189c42ec77e7f80787a5674eebeef8631b79aff12647bddc4101951345f5
BUNDLE-1381,bundle:bundle-1381,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: printing (7 issues),issue_group,,module: printing stale/low urgency,module: printing,"Run one module: printing stale-resolution sweep covering 7 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"8821, 12797, 21028, 35071, 63855, 74138, 84710",,7,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: printing stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #63855: stale/low urgency; labels: module: printing, triaged, enhancement; title: Include tensor shape in its default print formatting | issue #35071: stale/low urgency; labels: module: printing, triaged; title: Options for printing the shape with print(tensor) | issue #84710: stale/low urgency; labels: module: printing, triaged; title: About the different ways to print models | issue #74138: stale/low urgen...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",ea31b65d38e79547d5bf0fe7b85534cc3b0ca78b19919cdddd0f05e90e71ebca
BUNDLE-1382,bundle:bundle-1382,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: privateuse1 (7 issues),issue_group,,module: privateuse1 stale/low urgency,module: privateuse1,"Run one module: privateuse1 stale-resolution sweep covering 7 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"125895, 133183, 134293, 135153, 156444, 161954, 171956",,7,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: privateuse1 stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #171956: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: PrivateUse1; title: [Inductor] Eliminate triton-related hardcode | issue #161954: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: PrivateUse1; title: [RFC] CUDA code decoupling and directory refactoring | issue #156444: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: PrivateUse1; title: Tensor.is_pinned() raises error after renaming privateuseone backend. | issue...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",63af53d726182af782cb5e2792d7fcf0a70b404d79d17699618b6f60fcf3751a
BUNDLE-1383,bundle:bundle-1383,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: protobuf (3 issues),issue_group,,module: protobuf stale/low urgency,module: protobuf,"Run one module: protobuf stale-resolution sweep covering 3 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"24037, 69199, 127270",,3,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: protobuf stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #127270: stale/low urgency; labels: module: protobuf, triaged; title: Not supporting higher protobuf versions | issue #69199: stale/low urgency; labels: module: protobuf, triaged, module: tensorboard; title: Protocol buffers library mismatch. | issue #24037: stale/low urgency; labels: module: protobuf, caffe2, triaged; title: Tests do not pass with the latest protobuf",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",bfcefc466018e2ac4316fb09f6f05be2921c3768dd954ba10f12dcd4e2c86afd
BUNDLE-1384,bundle:bundle-1384,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: proxytensor (2 issues),issue_group,,module: proxytensor stale/low urgency,module: proxytensor,"Run one module: proxytensor stale-resolution sweep covering 2 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"89060, 132759",,2,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: proxytensor stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #132759: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: ProxyTensor; title: Delete ProxyTorchDispatchMode.enable_tracing | issue #89060: stale/low urgency; labels: module: tests, triaged, module: ProxyTensor; title: Extend test_proxy_tensor tests to support ops test non floating point types",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",28b5550f0068afafe8abe1dfe318f0a7b024acdb6b5fe15998fbf91a342c23cb
BUNDLE-1385,bundle:bundle-1385,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: pruning (4 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #69353: Pruning `torch.nn.MultiheadAttention` causes RuntimeError,module: pruning,"Run one module: pruning stale-resolution sweep covering 4 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"69353, 78109, 85397, 157218",,4,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: pruning stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"ttention, it will never be called. Which may cause some abnormal behaviors when use tools implemented with hook, e.g. torch.nn.utils.prune (#69353). And this is because when you forward a MultiheadAttention, it directly call the out_proj.weight without forwarding it in torch._... | issue #157218: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: pruning; title: [Feature] Taylor expansion pruning | issue #85397: stale/lo...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",aa64f2e6541f3fe0f41a951a3aae94825fe0de4d37932447da83ab91dd740495
BUNDLE-1386,bundle:bundle-1386,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: pt2 accuracy (2 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #111384: [quant][pt2] Default batchnorm aten op has poor numerics during QAT,module: pt2 accuracy,"Run one module: pt2 accuracy stale-resolution sweep covering 2 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"111384, 114859",,2,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: pt2 accuracy stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"the numeric differences between torch.ops.aten._native_batch_norm_legit.default and torch.ops.aten.cudnn_batch_norm.default as point out in #111384, since if we move model to cuda before export also gives similar accuracy as * Acc@1 61.326 Acc@5 83.250. Versions (quantization)...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",48eb1baa44034092a86612289825854277082ae3d4da024b9c06f6699cdf1a4c
BUNDLE-1387,bundle:bundle-1387,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: pt2-dispatcher (5 issues),issue_group,,module: pt2-dispatcher stale/low urgency,module: pt2-dispatcher,"Run one module: pt2-dispatcher stale-resolution sweep covering 5 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"121967, 158401, 161937, 168977, 169152",,5,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: pt2-dispatcher stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #168977: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, oncall: pt2, module: pt2-dispatcher; title: Easier way to correlate DebugMode with FX graph | issue #121967: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, oncall: pt2, module: pt2-dispatcher; title: [PT2.2] PyTorch dispacthing non core ATen ops in .compile mode for torch ops. | issue #169152: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, oncall: pt2, module: pt2-dispatcher; title: [d...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",2094f135db634910c82faa20fbb32995eca29ccae0dc72ff4f3f8caa3020c32d
BUNDLE-1388,bundle:bundle-1388,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: pybind (12 issues),issue_group,,module: pybind stale/low urgency,module: pybind,"Run one module: pybind stale-resolution sweep covering 12 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"7330, 19637, 19685, 23540, 34172, 43646, 49370, 49476, 55784, 91251, 94474, 162685",,12,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: pybind stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #162685: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: pybind; title: Prevent py::class_ with no pointer type from being used on structs that inherit from intrusive_ptr_target | issue #91251: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: pybind, shadow review; title: Potential bug found with pybind11 dec_ref while gil released | issue #49370: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: pybind; title: PyEval_Save...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",67a99c938ca694c02a555a665d48963cf2f0438db90d0cbe8f2ecd6c7f4a21b2
BUNDLE-1389,bundle:bundle-1389,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: python array api (5 issues),issue_group,,module: python array api stale/low urgency,module: python array api,"Run one module: python array api stale-resolution sweep covering 5 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"56300, 62255, 116610, 118093, 150368",,5,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: python array api stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #150368: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: python array api; title: Support `copy` kwarg in `torch.reshape()` following Python array API standard | issue #116610: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: python array api; title: Align `torch.sign` with Array API | issue #62255: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: python array api; title: Support `torch.linalg.trace` | oat (excluding spec...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",f561c33cd8d441b24fcbc880b75c88aab1c67c1122081b965babac418f209c5a
BUNDLE-1390,bundle:bundle-1390,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: python frontend (89 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #108046: Enhanced Available Backend Discovery and Selection in PyTorch 2,module: python frontend,"Run one module: python frontend stale-resolution sweep covering 89 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"30702, 36380, 62148, 72388, 76106, 78513, 80377, 80549, 81104, 81186, 84353, 85302, 90284, 91039, 91809, 92251, 93121, 94233, 95882, 96615, 97189, 97823, 98948, 101185, 101930, 104935, 105062, 107701, 108046, 110080, 111819, 115614, 117762, 118488, 122081, 126006, 126014, 126021, 126034, 126041, 126045, 126244, 126247, 126250, 126253, 126404, 126947, 127009, 127010, 127019, 127020, 127083, 130512, 130529, 130693, 130807, 131463, 131769, 132483, 133564, 133985, 133998, 134978, 139200, 141295, 142129, 142852, 143208, 143306, 143334, 143440, 144671, 146765, 148536, 149815, 150124, 150284, 154557, 156701, 156956, 158125, 158738, 158871, 159739, 161886, 162790, 165799, 170426, 170573",,89,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: python frontend stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"('xla') d.is_built() d.is_available() etc It might be also useful to have a generic interface to work with any device type (similar to what #108046 proposed): torch.devices.is_available() # if any device type is available devices = torch.devices.available() # returns ['X'] (al... | because, at the moment, each device type has its own API. I would be happy to implement such an API if there is support from the commu...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",25e240bd07d7650ba8ac14f84560befebd7f745afc166b483e0620bf3f789044
BUNDLE-1391,bundle:bundle-1391,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: python frontend (6 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #130217: `unique()` is not intuitively understandable at all.,module: python frontend,"Run one module: python frontend stale-resolution sweep covering 6 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"87371, 118736, 126037, 126039, 130217, 148743",,6,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: python frontend stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,guarantee nothing is missed just specify the len of that dimension from the input. Hopefully I made this part clear. NOTE: I disagree with: #130217 I find the simple 1d case understandable and usable. But with an additional dimension(s) it isn't that it couldn't be understanda... | same as #126037 (comment) said | ike this can be fixed by either removing the __new__ annotation or replacing the return type with {ty...,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",e9157dcf0b29b84a1d1659eec2e8618656c5f1298c156179a605f0a2382eb20f
BUNDLE-1392,bundle:bundle-1392,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: pytree (9 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #114392: [BUG][pytree] equal `dict`s do not imply equal leaves and equal treespecs,module: pytree,"Run one module: pytree stale-resolution sweep covering 9 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"109460, 111962, 112342, 112352, 113378, 114392, 116987, 159848, 183060",,9,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: pytree stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"This is a historical issue that was reported: #114392 But I want to point out that both JAX PyTree and PyTorch Python PyTree have their limitation: JAX PyTree does not preserve the key order of | See discussion here: #112342 (comment) Summary: Avoid polluting global registrations with custom registrations Persist custom registration info into TreeSpec - This avo | fn(): with using_pytree_namespace(""torch.vmap.Size...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",d38433533b374ab2c3542aaeaf4483cd60a6dd209d90262db900406a22c18134
BUNDLE-1393,bundle:bundle-1393,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: random (26 issues),issue_group,,module: random stale/low urgency batch 1,module: random,"Run one module: random stale-resolution sweep covering 26 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"22557, 25070, 25071, 29692, 32047, 33388, 33664, 37373, 38662, 43816, 56805, 64162, 66924, 67571, 79018, 79703, 88775, 89054, 89438, 94454, 106563, 114945, 127164, 128126, 133453, 157662",,26,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: random stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #89438: stale/low urgency; labels: feature, triaged, module: random; title: Allow `low` and `high` to be tensors in `torch.randint` | issue #157662: stale/low urgency; labels: oncall: distributed, triaged, module: random; title: OffsetBasedRNGTracker's run_state_sync causes deadlock due to inconsistent broadcast order across ranks | issue #133453: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: random; title: [r...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",da8de741ab6b5817f7f054fb284920afc737e40e940449835359afb25ef7dd8f
BUNDLE-1394,bundle:bundle-1394,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: reductions (6 issues),issue_group,,module: reductions stale/low urgency,module: reductions,"Run one module: reductions stale-resolution sweep covering 6 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"67457, 71629, 101334, 105790, 143561, 153360",,6,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: reductions stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #153360: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: reductions; title: torch.aminmax reducing over all dims should not accept keepdim | issue #143561: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: reductions, module: unsigned int; title: ""aten::any"" and ""aten::all"" behavior for unsigned tensors different than signed | issue #105790: stale/low urgency; labels: module: sparse, feature, triaged, module: reductio...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",621ea3fd9113caec4a0a7969dfe900a4d235729bf2d555de2210744f3813a250
BUNDLE-1395,bundle:bundle-1395,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: rnn (22 issues),issue_group,,module: rnn stale/low urgency batch 1,module: rnn,"Run one module: rnn stale-resolution sweep covering 22 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"1794, 7032, 9193, 12482, 12715, 26110, 30150, 37731, 43072, 47439, 64635, 65890, 68377, 80605, 82577, 88643, 89357, 135198, 145368, 149194, 149227, 169213",,22,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: rnn stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #169213: stale/low urgency; labels: module: rnn, triaged; title: CPU bad-free in `torch.nn.utils.rnn.pad_packed_sequence` / `unpack_sequence` | issue #149194: stale/low urgency; labels: module: rnn, triaged, topic: performance; title: LSTM slow on PackedSequence | issue #149227: stale/low urgency; labels: module: rnn, triaged; title: Unexpected behaviour in using torch.nn.utils.rnn.pack_padded_sequence API |...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",d871916f49c78c081fc2d0ed22cb158ac1cc2c994c674eafe50d860d275559ad
BUNDLE-1396,bundle:bundle-1396,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: rocm (64 issues),issue_group,,module: rocm stale/low urgency batch 1,module: rocm,"Run one module: rocm stale-resolution sweep covering 64 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"84044, 91630, 96643, 100795, 103608, 104147, 106529, 106608, 138360, 145608, 159226, 162606, 168503, 168515, 168516, 168517, 168518, 168519, 168522, 168523, 168524, 168525, 168526, 168527, 168528, 168529, 168532, 168533, 168534, 168535, 168784, 168788, 168789, 168791, 168792, 168801, 168806, 168807, 168831, 168832, 168833, 168834, 168835, 168836, 168837, 168838, 168839, 168840, 168841, 168842, 168843, 168844, 168845, 168846, 168847, 168848, 168849, 168850, 168851, 168852, 168853, 168854, 168935, 169378",,64,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: rocm stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #168935: stale/low urgency; labels: module: rocm, triaged; title: [ROCm] enabling compile should not cause signficiant accuracy loss on many important models | issue #162606: stale/low urgency; labels: module: rocm, triaged, module: tensorpipe, rocm; title: Tensorpipe - ROCm support | issue #169378: stale/low urgency; labels: module: rocm, triaged, rocm; title: [rocm triton 3.6] rocm-periodic-dynamo-benchmar...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",7d20baa45029a4608da840771cad7cb736b7962e9c8d81a36ae92f82ab0420c0
BUNDLE-1397,bundle:bundle-1397,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: rocm (14 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 3 issues - issue #168720: TestModule: test/test_cuda.py::TestCudaMallocAsync,module: rocm,"Run one module: rocm stale-resolution sweep covering 14 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"64426, 69233, 95921, 168536, 168537, 168720, 168721, 168722, 168742, 168743, 168798, 168800, 168855, 168858",,14,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: rocm stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,text Source file: test/test_cuda.py Test class: TestCudaMallocAsync Test name: test_memory_profiler_viz Defined at line: 4139 Parent issue: #168720 Code reference: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/blob/main/test/test_cuda.py cc @sunway513 @jithunnair-amd @pruthvistony @ROCmS... | ntext Source file: test/test_cuda.py Test class: TestCudaMallocAsync Test name: test_device_memory_used Defined at line: 4847 Parent i...,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",f45fbf32362cf4174bf9f6fbf1ba945bf2a824219dbd4238c3aa9c24970c3993
BUNDLE-1398,bundle:bundle-1398,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: rpc (79 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 3 issues - issue #80017: RPC init fails and crashes when world_size is greater than 18,module: rpc,"Run one module: rpc stale-resolution sweep covering 79 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"23110, 24130, 24946, 26119, 26446, 26759, 27099, 27517, 27671, 28245, 28882, 29402, 30633, 30807, 31228, 31752, 31842, 31937, 31979, 32130, 32269, 32363, 32565, 32752, 32784, 33115, 33363, 33482, 33738, 33982, 33983, 33989, 33990, 33991, 34080, 34754, 35758, 37136, 37529, 38118, 38245, 39124, 39280, 39355, 39411, 40266, 40880, 40936, 40974, 41369, 41561, 42345, 42544, 42705, 43561, 44084, 44771, 45044, 46904, 49101, 49911, 50346, 50462, 50468, 51778, 53696, 55757, 56244, 57475, 57960, 65022, 71029, 73721, 73722, 78367, 80017, 80104, 85607, 104620",,79,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: rpc stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"_worker_threads=64) # ADD THIS ) worker_init() # no-op rpc.shutdown() if __name__ == '__main__': main() I've filed this as an issue before (#80104), but will mark it as high-pri since its been hit twice now so we can provide a better error message | ocesses, ), nprocs=tot_processes, join=True, ) if __name__ == '__main__': main() TODO: we should error out with a more descriptive message, #80104 | 🐛 Describe the bug...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",0b105970f52ca683abd3c1f96647b8b2c5fa734abc0ac0f1386e752d86142f4c
BUNDLE-1399,bundle:bundle-1399,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: sanitizers (7 issues),issue_group,,module: sanitizers stale/low urgency,module: sanitizers,"Run one module: sanitizers stale-resolution sweep covering 7 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"88185, 88944, 88945, 88947, 88949, 88950, 90526",,7,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: sanitizers stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #90526: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: sanitizers; title: valgrind failure `Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)` | issue #88950: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: sanitizers; title: `torch.nn.functional.embedding_bag` Trigger RuntimeError under UndefinedBehaviorSanitizer | issue #88949: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: sanitizers; title: `torch.set_rng...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",b9d181289dab95c56b0af4c2edbdec435d9eda76100dd14fca4f5a57667fa804
BUNDLE-1400,bundle:bundle-1400,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: scatter & gather ops (11 issues),issue_group,,module: scatter & gather ops stale/low urgency,module: scatter & gather ops,"Run one module: scatter & gather ops stale-resolution sweep covering 11 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"6850, 31394, 56464, 71300, 77231, 80439, 83980, 94083, 108569, 124783, 151978",,11,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: scatter & gather ops stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #151978: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: scatter & gather ops; title: torch.gather returns incorrect output on cuda after unsqueezing and expanding with double precision | issue #71300: stale/low urgency; labels: module: sparse, triaged, module: scatter & gather ops; title: Kernel fusion for Gather, Apply, Scatter (GAS) model | issue #124783: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: scatter &...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",b77e206913c087387ca055f100574aee9abde9e5995188375c4ab4349d201a2c
BUNDLE-1401,bundle:bundle-1401,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: scipy compatibility (1 issue),issue_group,,#119462 Python 3.12 CPU TestBinaryUfuncsCPU.test_cumulative_trapezoid_cpu is failing,module: scipy compatibility,"Run one module: scipy compatibility stale-resolution sweep covering 1 issue: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,119462,,1,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: scipy compatibility stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #119462: stale/low urgency; labels: module: tests, triaged, module: scipy compatibility; title: Python 3.12 CPU TestBinaryUfuncsCPU.test_cumulative_trapezoid_cpu is failing",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",b1e1692b266ba5ed19f7f8c0416e6da2b090520b2da22fe276abb9e3b7adc8d2
BUNDLE-1402,bundle:bundle-1402,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: sdpa (23 issues),issue_group,,module: sdpa stale/low urgency batch 1,module: sdpa,"Run one module: sdpa stale-resolution sweep covering 23 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"103836, 112015, 113524, 116237, 116350, 119188, 119653, 121465, 124718, 125070, 132700, 135590, 137486, 138907, 144960, 145040, 146848, 147585, 152257, 158969, 162592, 163400, 167754",,23,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: sdpa stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #116350: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, enhancement, module: sdpa; title: RuntimeError: derivative for aten::_scaled_dot_product_flash_attention_backward is not implemented | issue #163400: stale/low urgency; labels: module: sparse, triaged, module: sdpa; title: Add Flash Dynamic Mask Attention (FDMA) as an SDPA backend for sparse, extremely long-context attention | issue #167754: stale/low urgency; lab...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",6499fbfffc8b91b96bfc8c65143625aa55a2f5fd1b42a13c6b1830a44a6d7f0f
BUNDLE-1403,bundle:bundle-1403,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: serialization (67 issues),issue_group,,module: serialization stale/low urgency batch 4,module: serialization,"Run one module: serialization stale-resolution sweep covering 67 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"5106, 8430, 10577, 21745, 24139, 24432, 25137, 25892, 26567, 30867, 31615, 32165, 32167, 32706, 37985, 38643, 43672, 44295, 47753, 53185, 53708, 57843, 58671, 60165, 60933, 61923, 62271, 62273, 63720, 64458, 65604, 65694, 76108, 78720, 79145, 87276, 88320, 91325, 94238, 98187, 100244, 103895, 109791, 112395, 120708, 124195, 125622, 126154, 126952, 127001, 127525, 129356, 132024, 132067, 132991, 134680, 137409, 141350, 146885, 149224, 149313, 149545, 157624, 158187, 161960, 166686, 169763",,67,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: serialization stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #60933: stale/low urgency; labels: module: serialization, triaged; title: jit.load error when changed Folder Name | issue #62273: stale/low urgency; labels: module: serialization, triaged; title: Serialization map_location silently ignores xla/mlc/meta (any serialization mechanism that skips storage) | issue #62271: stale/low urgency; labels: module: tests, module: serialization, triaged; title: Refactor ser...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",7b93e9346a24c37b8e00c60633e3575f56e6bf06382a70f42b9af3b7886dd5c1
BUNDLE-1404,bundle:bundle-1404,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: shape checking (1 issue),issue_group,,#56542 CrossEntropyLoss target shape expectation is inconsistent with BCEWithLogits,module: shape checking,"Run one module: shape checking stale-resolution sweep covering 1 issue: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,56542,,1,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: shape checking stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #56542: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: shape checking; title: CrossEntropyLoss target shape expectation is inconsistent with BCEWithLogits",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",a60d2f28943dd1febf12a8ef76a228f5cda15155722f321ba0d7d09aba6e3064
BUNDLE-1405,bundle:bundle-1405,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: sorting and selection (15 issues),issue_group,,module: sorting and selection stale/low urgency,module: sorting and selection,"Run one module: sorting and selection stale-resolution sweep covering 15 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"11072, 19150, 29398, 32305, 32306, 43867, 57301, 60825, 67597, 68610, 80296, 88142, 88227, 108642, 140396",,15,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: sorting and selection stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #88227: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: sorting and selection; title: Enable `torch.topk` to support `stable` flag | issue #140396: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, enhancement, has workaround, module: sorting and selection; title: Optional ```clamp_k``` Argument for Handling Out-of-Range Values in ```torch.topk``` | issue #29398: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: sorting and selecti...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",d6e9b33223376af128a4386543e8ef66b7dff687a71ecd5b51d1b8c3647751e4
BUNDLE-1406,bundle:bundle-1406,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: sparse (128 issues),issue_group,,module: sparse stale/low urgency batch 9,module: sparse,"Run one module: sparse stale-resolution sweep covering 128 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"1462, 3152, 3898, 4247, 4829, 6257, 14112, 16187, 16328, 30402, 31742, 31942, 34375, 34951, 39437, 43904, 46705, 46980, 48892, 52738, 54309, 55453, 55944, 58735, 58814, 64079, 65230, 65400, 67092, 69348, 69516, 69665, 70926, 71156, 71678, 72065, 74454, 74855, 75721, 76519, 76638, 78422, 81648, 81650, 81979, 82140, 82494, 85642, 86111, 86494, 87433, 88053, 89080, 91599, 91615, 94185, 95463, 96428, 98495, 98861, 98929, 98947, 99797, 100158, 100411, 101189, 101385, 102162, 103643, 104845, 105529, 105548, 105916, 106141, 107102, 107451, 107590, 108102, 108483, 109194, 109462, 111509, 114808, 114871, 116565, 116633, 117146, 117242, 117243, 117244, 117247, 117248, 117250, 117256, 117259, 119076, 119711, 120989, 121797, 122089, 122711, 123500, 124778, 125493, 129843, 131318, 132028, 134396, 134953, 135091, 137542, 138168, 140778, 141144, 141472, 144210, 144688, 146910, 146976, 148548, 153497, 154419, 155333, 160517, 161357, 162482, 164707, 169119",,128,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: sparse stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #14112: stale/low urgency; labels: module: sparse, triaged; title: [sparse] add descriptions and examples for methods at torch.sparse doc page | issue #52738: stale/low urgency; labels: module: sparse, module: tests, triaged; title: [OpInfo] Improvements for sparse ops tests | issue #64079: stale/low urgency; labels: module: sparse, triaged; title: torch.equal does not support sparse tensors | issue #16328:...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",175ede6cfd0858ac914ea791196701d4efab16c0a53a6ea6047d0c44cfe231f0
BUNDLE-1407,bundle:bundle-1407,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: sparse (6 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #69786: Implement aten::equal for sparse tensors,module: sparse,"Run one module: sparse stale-resolution sweep covering 6 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"14489, 69786, 95776, 98675, 150277, 152226",,6,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: sparse stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"h the following code. If the commented codes is enabled, the result will output False, which is as expected. In some previous issues (e.g., #69786), there is a similar lack of support for sparse tensor in torch.equal and other APIs. It seems that there are still many APIs that... | exing can be formulated as a element wise multiplication with a sparse mask tensor having ones values and indices corresponding to idx...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",3bf3ccfa0a1ef4a04c39ba3205a1f29e0fc89924d71324be4879fc0f0ccf4f19
BUNDLE-1408,bundle:bundle-1408,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: special (10 issues),issue_group,,module: special stale/low urgency,module: special,"Run one module: special stale-resolution sweep covering 10 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"69451, 69452, 69453, 71071, 74940, 86326, 108948, 137888, 140701, 140796",,10,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: special stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #108948: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: special, topic: new features; title: Add Lambert W function as torch.special.lambertw | issue #137888: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: special; title: Inconsistent digamma result with other frameworks (1e-6 difference) | issue #140796: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: special; title: inconsistency in ```torch.special.xlog1py``` on CP...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",25e6c0906c70561c56eb2bb80e3da16d3399a1fde87e6e0af3a2c02522bddf52
BUNDLE-1409,bundle:bundle-1409,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: static linking (4 issues),issue_group,,module: static linking stale/low urgency,module: static linking,"Run one module: static linking stale-resolution sweep covering 4 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"46464, 48167, 48450, 57065",,4,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: static linking stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #57065: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: static linking; title: Static Linking Pytorch | issue #46464: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: static linking, enhancement; title: [META] Assert that expected libraries appear in libtorch | issue #48450: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: static linking; title: Qt 5.14.2, libtorch1.7.0 cuda10.2，Error after using header file | issue #4816...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",b765d132a92d6a68782602c2fc159197dfefa4304bb01e4b877043464540e5b5
BUNDLE-1410,bundle:bundle-1410,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: structured kernels (10 issues),issue_group,,module: structured kernels stale/low urgency,module: structured kernels,"Run one module: structured kernels stale-resolution sweep covering 10 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"52274, 53141, 56691, 57949, 63057, 64644, 69831, 70242, 70678, 74788",,10,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: structured kernels stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #74788: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, enhancement, module: structured kernels; title: [Structured] Make it possible to override create_out implementation on a per dispatch key basis (structured sparse) | issue #69831: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: type promotion, module: structured kernels; title: Incorrect error for integer `out=` dtypes when a float is expected. | issue #64644: stale/lo...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",fe96eb1a3c27036af6480e797753e14a0585455a5659ae05221bba40b09dccee
BUNDLE-1411,bundle:bundle-1411,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: symm_mem (1 issue),issue_group,,#167765 [RFC] Extend MemPool support to SymmMem CUDA backend,module: symm_mem,"Run one module: symm_mem stale-resolution sweep covering 1 issue: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,167765,,1,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: symm_mem stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #167765: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: symm_mem; title: [RFC] Extend MemPool support to SymmMem CUDA backend",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",350817f37221e7b5f3631db13dddc2a8d6edb9ffe8e0adfd02b36c48d7ee3028
BUNDLE-1412,bundle:bundle-1412,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: tbb (1 issue),issue_group,,#90555 [RFC] Add torch.backends.tbb.is_available(),module: tbb,"Run one module: tbb stale-resolution sweep covering 1 issue: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,90555,,1,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: tbb stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #90555: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, enhancement, module: tbb; title: [RFC] Add torch.backends.tbb.is_available()",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",a908d9a2c5e5f695ff8aea530b5b8dde6554658a65fddadb69ce6216d90bccc9
BUNDLE-1413,bundle:bundle-1413,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: tensor creation (12 issues),issue_group,,module: tensor creation stale/low urgency,module: tensor creation,"Run one module: tensor creation stale-resolution sweep covering 12 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"33040, 38197, 38470, 40419, 51112, 68703, 73832, 82230, 82242, 87861, 92920, 98673",,12,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: tensor creation stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #68703: stale/low urgency; labels: feature, triaged, module: tensor creation; title: Feature request: Extend `torch.eye` for creating a batch of eye matrices | issue #98673: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, enhancement, has workaround, module: tensor creation; title: [ux] Non-blocking tensor constructors | issue #51112: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: tensor creation; title: torch.tensor(x) fa...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",a34e73c38bfbe302a9c29e23e404e21a5ebbddd6240bd9972c9edd7c345348c8
BUNDLE-1414,bundle:bundle-1414,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: tensorboard (47 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 4 issues - issue #24904: tensorboard add_graph error,module: tensorboard,"Run one module: tensorboard stale-resolution sweep covering 47 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"23749, 23771, 24234, 24236, 24468, 24904, 26097, 26790, 27030, 27300, 28206, 30459, 32651, 38564, 38614, 38980, 39370, 39537, 42861, 44931, 45481, 46202, 46739, 47627, 49284, 54269, 61186, 63725, 67989, 73131, 73909, 79120, 79647, 88304, 91887, 93017, 95460, 102501, 104029, 107536, 107820, 113942, 125298, 139269, 144677, 147317, 154855",,47,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: tensorboard stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"gradient, but if I only passed in one GPU, it would not throw that error. My original error when passing in multiple GPUs seems related to #30459, #28206, and #24904, although I'm not sure if the error in from this code snippet is related. cc @suo | t, but if I only passed in one GPU, it would not throw that error. My original error when passing in multiple GPUs seems related to #30459, #28206, and #24904, althoug...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",f4fe048ba904b60f6032daee85d1428793f90dc0dd7bb100084c47c10d0308fb
BUNDLE-1415,bundle:bundle-1415,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: tensoriterator (2 issues),issue_group,,module: tensoriterator stale/low urgency,module: tensoriterator,"Run one module: tensoriterator stale-resolution sweep covering 2 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"33166, 70238",,2,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: tensoriterator stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #70238: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: TensorIterator; title: `TensorIterator`: refactor `build_ternary_op` to match binary versions | issue #33166: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, enhancement, module: vectorization, module: TensorIterator; title: TensorIterator does not work with different input/output types",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",a945c3e5309d2a4e6be9ad2edd632e500ce6a45141a65f3e399efbc997d7e841
BUNDLE-1416,bundle:bundle-1416,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: tensorpipe (1 issue),issue_group,,#39082 [TensorPipe] Avoid wrapping the future message in order to do atomic test-and-set,module: tensorpipe,"Run one module: tensorpipe stale-resolution sweep covering 1 issue: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,39082,,1,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: tensorpipe stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #39082: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: tensorpipe; title: [TensorPipe] Avoid wrapping the future message in order to do atomic test-and-set",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",d0abd353cc1540583296a56cfe2a695b248e7ccb8fb4b53353bdb66912ecdb1b
BUNDLE-1417,bundle:bundle-1417,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: testing (28 issues),issue_group,,module: testing stale/low urgency batch 2,module: testing,"Run one module: testing stale-resolution sweep covering 28 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"55331, 61758, 72194, 74320, 74328, 74500, 74531, 74642, 78761, 82669, 83019, 97761, 98977, 99248, 104875, 106828, 111126, 111564, 116762, 118352, 122017, 125028, 139252, 140560, 141758, 142029, 152647, 162964",,28,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: testing stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #99248: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: testing; title: tools PYTHONPATH trick in run_test.py does not work reliably | issue #98977: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: testing; title: [BE] Dedup the functorch skipOps mechanism and the common_method_invocations one | issue #97761: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: testing; title: torch.testing.assert_close: allow check to fail o...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",14c7bb366d89560ebada303b013f29c0e9bad59c8c04a131a2997f631719d38c
BUNDLE-1418,bundle:bundle-1418,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: tests (94 issues),issue_group,,module: tests stale/low urgency batch 6,module: tests,"Run one module: tests stale-resolution sweep covering 94 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"3791, 5096, 5326, 6135, 8577, 11496, 15142, 19016, 19177, 20245, 23103, 23849, 29717, 29720, 30611, 32132, 33089, 33249, 35553, 35636, 35648, 35651, 38188, 38189, 38190, 38241, 38677, 40086, 40470, 41187, 41337, 42498, 43663, 43677, 44159, 46102, 46222, 46272, 46276, 53256, 53623, 53627, 54278, 54282, 54629, 55174, 55340, 55583, 56023, 59185, 60748, 61825, 62354, 62449, 63337, 63781, 64048, 64106, 64284, 65522, 66224, 66403, 67008, 67773, 71575, 72915, 74052, 74187, 74544, 74613, 74911, 76127, 76128, 76609, 76611, 76733, 77380, 77589, 78729, 80221, 84014, 84538, 84972, 86381, 86694, 94705, 98904, 115202, 121162, 138673, 141963, 143965, 159510, 162004",,94,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: tests stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #38677: stale/low urgency; labels: module: tests, triaged; title: TestCase.assertEqual does not distinguish Python builtin types and single-element Tensor | issue #3791: stale/low urgency; labels: module: tests, triaged, enhancement; title: Make pytest stop printing docstrings in its default diagnostic output | issue #38241: stale/low urgency; labels: module: tests, triaged; title: SIGXCPU at test_cholesky_s...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",78873daa3ab31a5685fd0444fea73e9cdecb389b1e237d8539c39e6efea35f03
BUNDLE-1419,bundle:bundle-1419,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: tf32 (2 issues),issue_group,,module: tf32 stale/low urgency,module: tf32,"Run one module: tf32 stale-resolution sweep covering 2 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"69921, 76025",,2,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: tf32 stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #76025: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: tf32; title: Numerical instability: matrix multiplication got different results on cpu and gpu | issue #69921: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: tf32; title: Context manager to enable/disabled TensorFloat32 on demand",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",dcff25e30bd9fa51c985e581b3e8fe3c4492379063a71102e6b9b6c6e2d2cf2f
BUNDLE-1420,bundle:bundle-1420,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: third_party (3 issues),issue_group,,module: third_party stale/low urgency,module: third_party,"Run one module: third_party stale-resolution sweep covering 3 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"70392, 149324, 150118",,3,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: third_party stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #150118: stale/low urgency; labels: oncall: releng, triaged, module: third_party; title: PyTorch 2.6 License Issues | issue #149324: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: third_party, oncall: pt2; title: Unguarded Usage of Facebook Internal Code? | issue #70392: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: third_party; title: third_party/breakpad/ compilation failure",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",089fb5a228ed4364ceb2394077a08fd8603ec8cd88ab53302edd226c7edffc98
BUNDLE-1421,bundle:bundle-1421,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: torchbind (5 issues),issue_group,,module: torchbind stale/low urgency,module: torchbind,"Run one module: torchbind stale-resolution sweep covering 5 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"42949, 42950, 85392, 133689, 170458",,5,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: torchbind stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #170458: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: torchbind, topic: performance; title: must_in_dispatch takes a long time in torch registered ops | issue #133689: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: torchbind, vllm-compile, module: vllm; title: [torchbind x PT2] Handle vllm's ScalarType | issue #85392: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: torchbind; title: please report a bug to PyTorch. E...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",a173b089d843b3e4d870e280a98781fe08a75fc75e62f0b04af06a309cf71014
BUNDLE-1422,bundle:bundle-1422,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: type promotion (6 issues),issue_group,,module: type promotion stale/low urgency,module: type promotion,"Run one module: type promotion stale-resolution sweep covering 6 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"32098, 37895, 40891, 50213, 71058, 71918",,6,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: type promotion stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #71918: stale/low urgency; labels: feature, triaged, module: type promotion; title: Support mixed python scalar/tensor types for torch.clamp's min/max args | issue #71058: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: type promotion; title: `torch.Tensor.where` cannot work when `y` is float | issue #50213: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: type promotion; title: torch.float_power out= and inplace var...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",3ee7c413fcad8696c82804795f6489b917439ac022dca96cb9394c5d8e4a7d5d
BUNDLE-1423,bundle:bundle-1423,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: typing (39 issues),issue_group,,module: typing stale/low urgency batch 2,module: typing,"Run one module: typing stale-resolution sweep covering 39 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"38240, 38876, 39009, 39670, 40659, 42969, 42971, 43091, 43617, 45414, 47027, 50031, 60766, 61233, 73359, 76465, 81046, 82095, 83313, 98260, 101080, 103375, 103393, 103761, 103787, 103798, 103800, 103803, 115806, 117449, 125390, 131054, 131432, 141869, 148552, 150257, 157266, 167119, 169073",,39,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: typing stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #98260: stale/low urgency; labels: module: typing, triaged; title: Broken mypy check in test_type_hints.py::TestTypeHints::test_doc_examples | issue #83313: stale/low urgency; labels: module: typing, triaged; title: torch.Tag doesn't have accurate mypy info | issue #39009: stale/low urgency; labels: module: typing, triaged; title: Missing OneCycleLR and MultiplicativeLR in lr_scheduler.pyi | issue #38240: st...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",892e89d4f996470bd20918db25c2025cc1d83e8013fc2082a0a404fb59eeeb24
BUNDLE-1424,bundle:bundle-1424,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: undefined reference (2 issues),issue_group,,module: undefined reference stale/low urgency,module: undefined reference,"Run one module: undefined reference stale-resolution sweep covering 2 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"56144, 58591",,2,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: undefined reference stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #56144: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: undefined reference; title: libtorch static linking results in undefined references to onnx_torch and caffe2::EmbeddingLookup | issue #58591: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: undefined reference; title: link error on BatchNormImplBase<D, Derived>::pretty_print when using icpc",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",f8f09b487ea45084fc8a76dcb22f10c05dbf28548c1f2eb94955926d6ae60322
BUNDLE-1425,bundle:bundle-1425,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: unknown (1 issue),issue_group,,#70180 Can you provide the torch.trt module to directly convert the pytorch weights to tensorrt?,module: unknown,"Run one module: unknown stale-resolution sweep covering 1 issue: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,70180,,1,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: unknown stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #70180: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, enhancement, module: unknown; title: Can you provide the torch.trt module to directly convert the pytorch weights to tensorrt?",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",bd04deb9044e1adb1c20392b40c971cb89dcec929e2a64b7b5e630a4786cad41
BUNDLE-1426,bundle:bundle-1426,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: user triton (3 issues),issue_group,,module: user triton stale/low urgency,module: user triton,"Run one module: user triton stale-resolution sweep covering 3 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"141686, 152608, 155519",,3,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: user triton stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #155519: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: user triton; title: [Tracking] Triton 3.2 deprecation | issue #152608: stale/low urgency; labels: oncall: releng, triaged, module: user triton; title: [triton pin update] Run Inductor CI on pin updates for Triton and the PyTorch nightly branch | issue #141686: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, oncall: pt2, module: user triton; title: [PT2] Fine-grained c...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",9c4c22e452ffa305e388bca2a08033ad7b789dddcb7c19967a1c23271309ed89
BUNDLE-1427,bundle:bundle-1427,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: ux (9 issues),issue_group,,module: ux stale/low urgency,module: ux,"Run one module: ux stale-resolution sweep covering 9 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"27147, 28223, 39260, 58820, 60956, 67745, 68575, 69288, 127737",,9,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: ux stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #127737: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: ux; title: `torch.tensor()` can also be used with a list of the `float`, `complex` or `bool` type tensors which have a single element each | issue #69288: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: ux, Stale; title: Inplace and `out` variants for `positive` operator in PyTorch | issue #67745: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, enhancement, module: ux, mo...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",83279674abc6257b0a07ef4062475ad22f841d7b9776ccfd9c43b8c7a3ebe4ad
BUNDLE-1428,bundle:bundle-1428,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: vectorization (3 issues),issue_group,,module: vectorization stale/low urgency,module: vectorization,"Run one module: vectorization stale-resolution sweep covering 3 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"10956, 43033, 56187",,3,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: vectorization stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #10956: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: vectorization; title: Better dev docs for writing native CPU kernels with Vec256 | issue #56187: stale/low urgency; labels: feature, triaged, module: vectorization; title: AVX512 and Vec512 | issue #43033: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: vectorization, better-engineering; title: No vectorization for int8 and uint8",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",8b550671105e7bf107367e20c45c206ab151db7e3d84de4ddc4be87fa7a4e166
BUNDLE-1429,bundle:bundle-1429,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: viewing and reshaping (12 issues),issue_group,,module: viewing and reshaping stale/low urgency,module: viewing and reshaping,"Run one module: viewing and reshaping stale-resolution sweep covering 12 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"10978, 27276, 57095, 59617, 64709, 69433, 76891, 78759, 106173, 107026, 153542, 169870",,12,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: viewing and reshaping stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #169870: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: viewing and reshaping, oncall: pt2; title: Capturing ViewAndMutationMeta for training graphs for PyTorch 2.8 | issue #153542: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: viewing and reshaping; title: torch.set_ on a view does not sever view relation | issue #10978: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, enhancement, module: viewing and reshaping; title: [feat...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",cc770cdd5d12315a0f09c85d77357e4dbcfa4933ab620e53142c8b4c2d170222
BUNDLE-1430,bundle:bundle-1430,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: vision (22 issues),issue_group,,module: vision stale/low urgency batch 1,module: vision,"Run one module: vision stale-resolution sweep covering 22 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"4958, 6934, 10719, 15864, 18998, 21477, 27740, 31471, 31685, 32402, 32751, 38009, 38619, 38630, 38709, 39993, 40756, 42012, 43123, 49752, 53890, 79130",,22,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: vision stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #6934: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: vision, function request; title: Feature request: SSIM/MS-SSIM | issue #79130: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: vision; title: torchvision.models.mobilenetv3 can't save pre-trained model to custom dir? | issue #49752: stale/low urgency; labels: caffe2, triaged, module: vision; title: IndexError: Input _features.0.weight is undefined! | issue #4958...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",34c7ff5c25be35fb4228c2cf8a7d9416d39b05bc3afe2ea0e9429397336ec313
BUNDLE-1431,bundle:bundle-1431,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: vllm (6 issues),issue_group,,module: vllm stale/low urgency,module: vllm,"Run one module: vllm stale-resolution sweep covering 6 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"148983, 150190, 166733, 169133, 170495, 170563",,6,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: vllm stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #170563: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: vllm; title: vLLM v1/distributed/test_eagle_dp.py Tests failing on PyTorch 2.10 | issue #170495: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: vllm; title: vLLM Blackwell Fusion and Compile Tests failing PyTorch 2.10 | issue #169133: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: vllm; title: vLLM tlparse sometimes missing compilation_metrics | issue #166733: s...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",97bf5b1bb0bde5ae893de014dcfc18b11263325463363dea50f07a8fd3cc5b10
BUNDLE-1432,bundle:bundle-1432,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: vmap (6 issues),issue_group,,module: vmap stale/low urgency,module: vmap,"Run one module: vmap stale-resolution sweep covering 6 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"47378, 52295, 94593, 130768, 141890, 151286",,6,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: vmap stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #151286: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: vmap; title: vmap- out of memory | issue #141890: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: vmap; title: Does vmap accept None out_dims? | issue #130768: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: vmap; title: Migrate gradcheck with check_batched_grad=True to use the new torch.vmap | issue #94593: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: vmap; title:...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",251b79a0d133556223c7fd8c7dd9c725ba38b59ff63359c94ab424056ac6cbbe
BUNDLE-1433,bundle:bundle-1433,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: vulkan (13 issues),issue_group,,module: vulkan stale/low urgency,module: vulkan,"Run one module: vulkan stale-resolution sweep covering 13 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"72046, 72775, 77733, 82316, 89105, 89601, 90920, 92285, 95956, 106549, 122641, 123702, 142331",,13,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: vulkan stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #142331: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: vulkan; title: torch.is_vulkan_available() false in windows | issue #123702: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: vulkan; title: Issue with Vulkan Device for nn.Conv2d Operation | issue #90920: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: vulkan; title: Support for Transformer Models on Android with Vulkan Backend | issue #106549: stale/low urgency;...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",dfdc57deb5980693773f75840a33415d111c7ca7c9d6ba189bca6acb4b9f242d
BUNDLE-1434,bundle:bundle-1434,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: windows (11 issues),issue_group,,module: windows stale/low urgency,module: windows,"Run one module: windows stale-resolution sweep covering 11 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"21176, 39226, 42095, 55869, 68405, 89688, 101968, 114565, 146944, 155667, 162786",,11,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: windows stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #162786: stale/low urgency; labels: module: windows, triaged; title: [MSVC] LINK : fatal error LNK1181: cannot open input file 'sleef\src\libm\CMakeFiles\mkrename.dir\mkrename.c.obj' | issue #155667: stale/low urgency; labels: module: windows, triaged; title: [libtorch] Debug and Release should be shipped together on Windows | issue #21176: stale/low urgency; labels: module: windows, triaged; title: Adding a...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",deec543b3d7868e7091f12b88cbd96c9240ee4a506e7e9aa1ce8ae5307c933c3
BUNDLE-1435,bundle:bundle-1435,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: wsl (2 issues),issue_group,,module: wsl stale/low urgency,module: wsl,"Run one module: wsl stale-resolution sweep covering 2 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"97503, 111187",,2,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: wsl stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #111187: stale/low urgency; labels: oncall: distributed, triaged, module: wsl; title: torch.distributed.DistBackendError: NCCL error in: ../torch/csrc/distributed/c10d/ProcessGroupNCCL.cpp:1331, unhandled cuda error (run with NCCL_DEBUG=INFO for details) | issue #97503: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: wsl; title: torch.cppExtension won't work with wsl2",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",4dd22556931a34d51facf2819cd70b5575c65bd8ca90b194ac0544d4182e7964
BUNDLE-1436,bundle:bundle-1436,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: xla (8 issues),issue_group,,module: xla stale/low urgency,module: xla,"Run one module: xla stale-resolution sweep covering 8 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"65131, 65132, 77808, 92909, 97676, 111033, 113382, 130985",,8,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: xla stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #92909: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: xla; title: [RFC] XLA Lazy Backend Support In DistributedTensor API | issue #130985: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: xla; title: Runtime error when running huggingface pretrained model with torch-xla | issue #111033: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: xla, oncall: fx; title: `CapabilityBasedPartitioner` returns invalid partitions. | iss...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",606f4d50b4bbd9dfeb3f55cedf3d03e292dc26918e45f8e12ae0e669dd7e7212
BUNDLE-1437,bundle:bundle-1437,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: xnnpack (1 issue),issue_group,,#36517 XNNPACK operators are not actually registered under xnnpack namespace,module: xnnpack,"Run one module: xnnpack stale-resolution sweep covering 1 issue: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,36517,,1,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: xnnpack stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #36517: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, better-engineering, module: xnnpack; title: XNNPACK operators are not actually registered under xnnpack namespace",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",c76dfec79d4abbfc828dec6275e13b7c53909ac59266602697c81e5b9633603d
BUNDLE-1438,bundle:bundle-1438,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: xpu (6 issues),issue_group,,module: xpu stale/low urgency,module: xpu,"Run one module: xpu stale-resolution sweep covering 6 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"144766, 151308, 157714, 160787, 162837, 167170",,6,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: xpu stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #160787: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: xpu; title: [Intel Arc XPU] NaN Values in Gradients after SDPA with is_causal | issue #151308: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: xpu; title: [Intel GPU][UT failure] Depthwise conv related UT failures | issue #144766: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: xpu; title: Matmul with int32 parameters on Intel GPU leads to errors | issue #167170:...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",81749d0810f8fa7d13bf6852264d4c56819b20e7cfdd232a25ca06de410fa5f3
BUNDLE-1439,bundle:bundle-1439,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: oncall: cpu inductor (7 issues),issue_group,,oncall: cpu inductor stale/low urgency,oncall: cpu inductor,"Run one oncall: cpu inductor stale-resolution sweep covering 7 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"93477, 101273, 119181, 126691, 130948, 133458, 158664",,7,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a oncall: cpu inductor stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #158664: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, skipped, oncall: pt2, oncall: cpu inductor; title: DISABLED test_sum_all_cpu_float64 (__main__.TestReductionsCPU) | issue #133458: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, oncall: pt2, oncall: cpu inductor; title: [CPU] jx_nest_base AMP both inductor and eager performance regression in 2024-08-10 nightly release | issue #130948: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, onca...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",caa6756a6869197ca6d88bf3c920b96fcb3e7e4de5b9143ce9bdc2b5be5b61c5
BUNDLE-1440,bundle:bundle-1440,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: oncall: distributed (116 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #55571: Update TCPStore.wait() error message to be more friendly,oncall: distributed,"Run one oncall: distributed stale-resolution sweep covering 116 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"7471, 8290, 10471, 14632, 17041, 18920, 19330, 21015, 22049, 22128, 22340, 22400, 22455, 22788, 23230, 25417, 25552, 28552, 29115, 30723, 41485, 44544, 50820, 55571, 57278, 66627, 68104, 75512, 92132, 104507, 109401, 116393, 117883, 120466, 120847, 121519, 121650, 123070, 123528, 124228, 125173, 125620, 125800, 126216, 126347, 126773, 126899, 127517, 128066, 128128, 128204, 128696, 128699, 128706, 128821, 128963, 129477, 129672, 130137, 130621, 131450, 131691, 132428, 132649, 132696, 133092, 133119, 133224, 133380, 133761, 134190, 134668, 134803, 134945, 134960, 135267, 137006, 137245, 137610, 137969, 137974, 138811, 139304, 139324, 140712, 141335, 141746, 142229, 143969, 145043, 145263, 145592, 145978, 146119, 147263, 147732, 148150, 148162, 148302, 148689, 148837, 148858, 148976, 149049, 149516, 149934, 150585, 150928, 151159, 151222, 151240, 151457, 151556, 151759, 152127, 152269",,116,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a oncall: distributed stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"Related #55571 | Filed on the lightning repo with issue #10471. | issue #126347: stale/low urgency; labels: oncall: distributed, triaged; title: Break the dependency between torch.nn and torch.distributed | issue #125800: stale/low urgency; labels: oncall: distributed, triaged, better-engineering; title: [BE][DTensor] get rid of @with_comms decorator for tests, and use run_test to init pg | issue #29115: stale/low...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",8270869b499662be9f3889fd932ca1d153ecc287110dc8405db87b64049a11de
BUNDLE-1441,bundle:bundle-1441,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: oncall: distributed (140 issues),issue_group,,oncall: distributed stale/low urgency batch 20,oncall: distributed,"Run one oncall: distributed stale-resolution sweep covering 140 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"4406, 11324, 11793, 13865, 14372, 15716, 17113, 17703, 19267, 21144, 25767, 27955, 29033, 30469, 30505, 30718, 31710, 32018, 32372, 32490, 32924, 33684, 35160, 35671, 36516, 36519, 37079, 37149, 38782, 39022, 39662, 40147, 40566, 41101, 41236, 41428, 42879, 43238, 43510, 44403, 45042, 46753, 47433, 49347, 49481, 49846, 50303, 50323, 51014, 51429, 52040, 53427, 54823, 55448, 55967, 56583, 56772, 56838, 57136, 57158, 57646, 57776, 57787, 58352, 58371, 61289, 61591, 61636, 61659, 61661, 61662, 61781, 61839, 65038, 65428, 65569, 65628, 65650, 65664, 65670, 69663, 70654, 72022, 75129, 75213, 75480, 76069, 76225, 76745, 76747, 78047, 79073, 79467, 79468, 79847, 80241, 80242, 83193, 84468, 87555, 87634, 89686, 91760, 91855, 91856, 91940, 91943, 92128, 93947, 94806, 95309, 95403, 97114, 97484, 97670, 97991, 98286, 98617, 99432, 101177, 101505, 101506, 101586, 102435, 102812, 103306, 114357, 124714, 138329, 148086, 150836, 152261, 152645, 152746, 152964, 153673, 155680, 157321, 157391, 158244",,140,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a oncall: distributed stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #35671: stale/low urgency; labels: oncall: distributed, triaged; title: allgather_coalesced for tensors of different types seems to be broken | issue #35160: stale/low urgency; labels: todo, oncall: distributed, triaged; title: Documentation doesn't cover MWE using launch.py script | issue #17703: stale/low urgency; labels: oncall: distributed, triaged; title: Training hangs when using DistributedDataParalle...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",ad0c1b01267ba434ec4c430748bb54acc8ac94044f5917aba6c692c1929f6e07
BUNDLE-1442,bundle:bundle-1442,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: oncall: distributed (52 issues),issue_group,,oncall: distributed stale/low urgency batch 11,oncall: distributed,"Run one oncall: distributed stale-resolution sweep covering 52 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"25416, 28244, 37002, 38642, 38995, 42849, 43536, 47885, 50092, 88621, 102953, 103258, 103372, 103498, 103829, 104389, 104510, 107352, 107575, 107855, 108016, 108047, 108231, 108484, 108976, 109191, 109934, 110363, 111623, 111789, 115309, 116400, 116691, 116980, 118891, 122529, 129442, 129749, 132292, 140563, 140879, 146371, 149990, 155472, 157445, 157606, 157627, 164843, 164925, 165122, 167349, 171179",,52,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a oncall: distributed stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #108976: stale/low urgency; labels: oncall: distributed, triaged; title: About FSDP | issue #108047: stale/low urgency; labels: oncall: distributed, triaged; title: DDP training can not accept subnet address in IPV6 | issue #108231: stale/low urgency; labels: oncall: distributed, triaged; title: DistributedSampler class: Change total_size into num_samples | issue #107575: stale/low urgency; labels: oncall: d...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",dcf734680f0d8eb346845e6bfb351d1626dd8ec8b85ddb6fad5d97c02108790b
BUNDLE-1443,bundle:bundle-1443,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: oncall: distributed checkpointing (5 issues),issue_group,,oncall: distributed checkpointing stale/low urgency,oncall: distributed checkpointing,"Run one oncall: distributed checkpointing stale-resolution sweep covering 5 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"119070, 126047, 126881, 137327, 146566",,5,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a oncall: distributed checkpointing stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #126881: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, enhancement, oncall: distributed checkpointing; title: [DCP] DCP does not support objects which are lazy initialized. | issue #146566: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, oncall: distributed checkpointing; title: [DCP] Allow for rank-specific tensors with duplicate keys | issue #137327: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, oncall: distributed checkpointing; title:...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",dd87b00b7310e662425b0363e41dad5ace1d05ad080b444b91e10502c5a2686a
BUNDLE-1444,bundle:bundle-1444,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: oncall: export (33 issues),issue_group,,"Review thread: 2 issues - issue #162700: RuntimeError: The tensor has a non-zero number of elements, but its data is not allocated yet during torch.backward with InternVL",oncall: export,"Run one oncall: export stale-resolution sweep covering 33 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"96386, 103483, 106137, 111902, 112079, 112095, 112443, 113122, 113507, 113552, 113985, 117791, 118922, 123971, 123973, 133262, 134180, 136381, 137274, 139305, 139401, 142025, 142176, 148193, 148568, 148748, 148946, 152337, 153832, 156411, 160937, 162700, 184996",,33,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a oncall: export stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"ve(). This makes the exported artifact state inconsistent and harder to diagnose. Related issue check The closest related report I found is #162700, which also mentions tensors with non-zero elements but unallocated/zero storage. I did not find an existing minimal report for t... | This feels like a duplicate #148748 | issue #123973: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, oncall: pt2, oncall: export; title: Dynamo-ba...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",ac74892b942e57217cd4cde3f94dc6dcb06381802219febf77f19bcc4e555f58
BUNDLE-1445,bundle:bundle-1445,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: oncall: fx (1 issue),issue_group,,#97659 How do I get the original object wrapped by the torch.fx.proxy class？,oncall: fx,"Run one oncall: fx stale-resolution sweep covering 1 issue: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,97659,,1,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a oncall: fx stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #97659: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, oncall: fx; title: How do I get the original object wrapped by the torch.fx.proxy class？",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",c006d0028e8933204ec3c493d9c094c1e80a1d65b0e3314793d12a895ea9bab2
BUNDLE-1446,bundle:bundle-1446,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: oncall: java (2 issues),issue_group,,oncall: java stale/low urgency,oncall: java,"Run one oncall: java stale-resolution sweep covering 2 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"45399, 58973",,2,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a oncall: java stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #58973: stale/low urgency; labels: feature, triaged, oncall: java; title: First-class Java API | issue #45399: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, enhancement, oncall: java; title: Load ExtraFilesMap with Java library",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",5a86731ea974347338317c8f271406456e8a915146cfe81bd8c9319444e9d6d9
BUNDLE-1447,bundle:bundle-1447,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: oncall: jit (69 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 3 issues - issue #24243: hasSideEffects INTERNAL ASSERT FAILED when using .split method with JIT,oncall: jit,"Run one oncall: jit stale-resolution sweep covering 69 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"14219, 18094, 18776, 22155, 22454, 22487, 24243, 27504, 28258, 29108, 29190, 29843, 30138, 30786, 31545, 31565, 31772, 32287, 32641, 32988, 33463, 33672, 33876, 33887, 34126, 34483, 34814, 35116, 35180, 35408, 35788, 35820, 36370, 36575, 36739, 36917, 36931, 37103, 37104, 37987, 37988, 38142, 38472, 38473, 38863, 39356, 39362, 39365, 39463, 39719, 39745, 39806, 40027, 40070, 40071, 40679, 40882, 40886, 42366, 42459, 42882, 42912, 44077, 48153, 48549, 54133, 67955, 68340, 71548",,69,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a oncall: jit stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"Dup of #24243. cc @smessmer | This seems to be related to #24243. If I replace x.requires_grad_(True).split(1, -1) by x_splitted = list(x.requires_grad_(True).split(1, -1)) It throws another error (only o | 🐛 Bug Hello. I was having a MAGMA problem and updated my torch version as was recommended in #67955 to 1.10.0. Now, the code that ran in 1.9. is raising this function error: File ""/home/luis/Desktop/cog/vqgan-c...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",2236c065728fbf7be9e7e20e484855340c81bd1429d2f440bf2087d1eca80c81
BUNDLE-1448,bundle:bundle-1448,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: oncall: jit (140 issues),issue_group,,oncall: jit stale/low urgency batch 5,oncall: jit,"Run one oncall: jit stale-resolution sweep covering 140 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"17655, 17688, 17970, 18005, 18106, 18157, 18212, 18850, 19117, 19349, 19581, 19628, 19978, 20119, 20591, 21275, 21442, 21544, 22911, 22954, 23355, 23850, 23890, 23958, 24102, 24225, 24229, 24248, 24786, 25047, 25329, 25387, 25410, 25648, 25661, 25803, 26730, 26744, 27003, 27094, 27343, 27406, 27505, 27970, 28220, 28239, 28517, 28519, 29063, 29254, 29377, 29419, 29597, 29637, 29642, 29662, 29750, 29822, 30161, 30182, 30226, 30489, 30754, 30788, 31141, 31191, 31202, 31259, 31386, 31391, 31430, 31551, 31574, 31815, 31866, 31882, 31953, 32039, 32253, 32268, 32337, 32357, 32358, 32375, 32390, 32488, 32511, 32690, 32695, 32822, 32840, 33114, 33353, 33396, 33501, 33782, 33844, 34837, 34839, 35074, 35108, 35290, 35520, 35534, 35881, 37384, 38138, 38964, 39357, 39421, 40024, 40507, 40635, 47650, 55083, 55230, 56183, 58720, 60156, 61919, 63475, 65253, 66476, 67687, 72263, 74112, 85229, 90000, 94441, 97595, 97638, 101716, 104195, 107321, 107503, 108224, 108432, 120820, 120822, 134860",,140,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a oncall: jit stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #63475: stale/low urgency; labels: oncall: jit, triaged; title: C++ Inference error causes Identity Module | issue #18106: stale/low urgency; labels: oncall: jit, triaged, jit-backlog; title: copy.copy not working for ScriptModule | issue #38964: stale/low urgency; labels: oncall: jit, triaged; title: [JIT] jit can not recognize the imported function | issue #61919: stale/low urgency; labels: oncall: jit, tr...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",1ac0e07977685854d18d3ecc884eeaea6e754770c000e2537565c75864d0921b
BUNDLE-1449,bundle:bundle-1449,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: oncall: jit (20 issues),issue_group,,oncall: jit stale/low urgency batch 15,oncall: jit,"Run one oncall: jit stale-resolution sweep covering 20 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"19504, 20734, 21165, 21454, 24336, 24343, 25591, 27144, 27475, 29987, 30421, 30965, 31129, 32300, 32365, 32463, 32544, 33034, 34361, 35446",,20,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a oncall: jit stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #24343: stale/low urgency; labels: oncall: jit, triaged; title: Unified representation for enum types | issue #24336: stale/low urgency; labels: oncall: jit, triaged; title: Auto tuner takes too much time in serialized model | issue #21454: stale/low urgency; labels: oncall: jit, triaged; title: [JIT] Memory Leak during tracing? | issue #21165: stale/low urgency; labels: oncall: jit, triaged; title: Getting...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",428468aba870418ec0a51f7c225b3e27c233bebd3e53c625ce39bcc2ec187130
BUNDLE-1450,bundle:bundle-1450,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: oncall: mobile (9 issues),issue_group,,oncall: mobile stale/low urgency,oncall: mobile,"Run one oncall: mobile stale-resolution sweep covering 9 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"37343, 38319, 47609, 53365, 73160, 92086, 104606, 112716, 116515",,9,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a oncall: mobile stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #116515: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, oncall: mobile; title: mobile model has very different inference result | issue #112716: stale/low urgency; labels: oncall: quantization, triaged, oncall: mobile; title: Quantized model's size gets doubled on optimizing and saving it for mobile | issue #37343: stale/low urgency; labels: oncall: quantization, triaged, oncall: mobile; title: qnnpack's quantized-add...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",3faca4ceee56acdc0b6f109056e94d9db95155b832695681fe8a0340dc3fec9a
BUNDLE-1451,bundle:bundle-1451,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: oncall: package/deploy (3 issues),issue_group,,oncall: package/deploy stale/low urgency,oncall: package/deploy,"Run one oncall: package/deploy stale-resolution sweep covering 3 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"60977, 65261, 71317",,3,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a oncall: package/deploy stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #71317: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, days, oncall: package/deploy, imported; title: [torch.deploy] Using zipped torch modules in torch.deploy interpreter | issue #65261: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, oncall: package/deploy, imported; title: Add an `all_paths` method to PackageExporter | issue #60977: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, oncall: package/deploy, imported; title: [package] pattern u...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",e5d7ffcdecf543059e2bc2cfeeeae7acba76e200d3ecae82c8b8d03c25464c58
BUNDLE-1452,bundle:bundle-1452,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: oncall: profiler (5 issues),issue_group,,oncall: profiler stale/low urgency,oncall: profiler,"Run one oncall: profiler stale-resolution sweep covering 5 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"58447, 60146, 78871, 155001, 158364",,5,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a oncall: profiler stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #158364: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, oncall: profiler; title: [feature request] [memory_viz] Flexible time/range memory event filtering controls to skip loading all memory events from pickle in the browser's memory | issue #155001: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, oncall: profiler; title: The profiler does not seem to be able to record cuda runtime nodes | issue #78871: stale/low urgency; labels:...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",cadce453710a7676de6e11d013c635e6fb95686a8c92d50d5fab47526b9e7527
BUNDLE-1453,bundle:bundle-1453,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: oncall: pt2 (33 issues),issue_group,,oncall: pt2 stale/low urgency batch 2,oncall: pt2,"Run one oncall: pt2 stale-resolution sweep covering 33 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"100241, 100637, 102853, 104531, 105092, 105859, 106269, 106388, 111519, 124427, 126190, 126644, 138299, 141560, 141727, 147239, 149094, 149096, 149318, 149452, 149453, 149454, 149455, 150961, 150963, 153242, 154214, 154463, 155065, 155332, 157918, 162259, 167895",,33,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a oncall: pt2 stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #153242: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, oncall: pt2; title: [RFC] Add a SlimTensor representation to help AOTInductor generate standalone binaries | issue #150963: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, oncall: pt2, empathy-day; title: [ued] `torch.compile` yields lower latency when compiling transformer blocks only for ComfyUI GGUF Flux | issue #150961: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, oncall: pt2, emp...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",15bb4672573969f38108c1dd4cb029bfc638ed0d28cf4e9164a6071732372bd8
BUNDLE-1454,bundle:bundle-1454,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: oncall: quantization (91 issues),issue_group,,oncall: quantization stale/low urgency batch 6,oncall: quantization,"Run one oncall: quantization stale-resolution sweep covering 91 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"25314, 29657, 31316, 32262, 36508, 38569, 39058, 39495, 40759, 41149, 42336, 42594, 44676, 45635, 46604, 47311, 47363, 47535, 47857, 48106, 51152, 54816, 55464, 55912, 55945, 56978, 58969, 60008, 60210, 61046, 67651, 68892, 69158, 70480, 71028, 71721, 71889, 73507, 73738, 73941, 74540, 74627, 74953, 75440, 75785, 76304, 76755, 78722, 79709, 79739, 81287, 81381, 81667, 82053, 83521, 83672, 83929, 83941, 84052, 84064, 84148, 84178, 85745, 85851, 86848, 87126, 88505, 88579, 88800, 89303, 90288, 90289, 90394, 90553, 91263, 91604, 94371, 95785, 100051, 106780, 108399, 110515, 112833, 114928, 117508, 118634, 118829, 127391, 144403, 157591, 170402",,91,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a oncall: quantization stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #84052: stale/low urgency; labels: oncall: quantization, triaged; title: Index out of bounds Error with PerChannel Quantization | issue #40759: stale/low urgency; labels: oncall: quantization, low priority, triaged; title: Quantization support for F.Softmax | issue #81667: stale/low urgency; labels: oncall: quantization, low priority, triaged; title: [Tracker] AO migration of quantization from `torch.nn` to...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",75f047842ce4789b737710fa69e940ec4261dfa35cb23ff420526e7eeffa0e1a
BUNDLE-1455,bundle:bundle-1455,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: oncall: r2p (5 issues),issue_group,,oncall: r2p stale/low urgency,oncall: r2p,"Run one oncall: r2p stale-resolution sweep covering 5 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"68553, 69197, 69520, 77737, 78061",,5,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a oncall: r2p stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #77737: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, oncall: r2p; title: torchrun leads to `ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'tensorboard'`, but python -m torch.distributed.launch is ok | issue #69197: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, oncall: r2p; title: RendezvousConnectionError when use C10d on multi nodes | issue #69520: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, Stale, oncall: r2p; title: race condition of agent'...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",e5a3fd418663684f4e3631dadca855aabdbf2174d81320b840255b8dbfa978ad
BUNDLE-1456,bundle:bundle-1456,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: oncall: releng (18 issues),issue_group,,oncall: releng stale/low urgency batch 1,oncall: releng,"Run one oncall: releng stale-resolution sweep covering 18 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"58533, 61261, 69009, 73985, 81654, 83257, 92310, 98006, 101798, 107611, 109958, 124974, 136691, 137370, 143206, 148984, 149660, 156085",,18,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a oncall: releng stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #156085: stale/low urgency; labels: feature, oncall: releng, triaged, security; title: Idea: Add SBOM Generation (and optional vuln scan) for better supply chain insight | issue #149660: stale/low urgency; labels: oncall: releng, triaged, better-engineering; title: cd: Migrate binary builds off of Jinja | issue #148984: stale/low urgency; labels: oncall: releng, triaged; title: [Sync file] the new file is no...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",87c1770e5dec2d1da7fb3db124b720c22e4478548bdf78ea5ba7ee38c349edc5
BUNDLE-1457,bundle:bundle-1457,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: oncall: visualization (2 issues),issue_group,,oncall: visualization stale/low urgency,oncall: visualization,"Run one oncall: visualization stale-resolution sweep covering 2 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"34953, 36028",,2,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a oncall: visualization stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #34953: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, oncall: visualization; title: Graphic tool to view the backward(Gradient Graph) and forward graph in Pytorch | issue #36028: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, oncall: visualization; title: About tensorboard in pytorch record graph in different state",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",7ef51b44d30c7843fdd37208cc2593fa71b01f6e824324bf95db831a9872388b
BUNDLE-1458,bundle:bundle-1458,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: activation checkpointing (1 issue),issue_group,,"#155924 Activation Checkpointing breaks ""torch.distributed.checkpoint.state_dict._get_fqns""",module: activation checkpointing,Create one module: activation checkpointing triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: activation checkpointing paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,155924,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: activation checkpointing bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #155924: needs triage; labels: oncall: distributed, module: activation checkpointing, oncall: distributed checkpointing, bot-triaged, ptd-bot-triaged; title: Activation Checkpointing breaks ""torch.distributed.checkpoint.state_dict._get_fqns""",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",917d207cce2c3de2a3248a7e81ee1ba57ed39d847101fbc737b0c4416f7903b1
BUNDLE-1459,bundle:bundle-1459,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: amp (automated mixed precision) (4 issues),issue_group,,module: amp (automated mixed precision) needs triage,module: amp (automated mixed precision),Create one module: amp (automated mixed precision) triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: amp (automated mixed precision) paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"50231, 59257, 69616, 104959",,4,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: amp (automated mixed precision) bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #104959: needs triage; labels: oncall: jit, has workaround, module: amp (automated mixed precision); title: Saving a LightningModule torch.jit.ScriptModule is incompatible with torch.amp.autocast | issue #69616: needs triage; labels: oncall: distributed, module: cuda, module: amp (automated mixed precision), Stale; title: Multi-GPU training stuck when using grad scaler | issue #59257: needs triage; labels: o...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",d07a3cf7848ae7749910bc90d0008f21dbead6541cef8ab8f1df94c0b6a3244f
BUNDLE-1460,bundle:bundle-1460,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: android (24 issues),issue_group,,module: android needs triage batch 1,module: android,Create one module: android triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: android paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"18380, 40906, 42355, 42427, 50531, 52970, 56703, 57271, 59690, 59865, 60172, 61693, 61709, 61951, 62165, 62676, 62821, 64333, 64488, 65058, 65734, 66545, 68330, 68871",,24,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: android bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #59690: needs triage; labels: module: memory usage, module: android, oncall: mobile; title: Inference ran on new thread leak memory on Android | issue #61709: needs triage; labels: module: android, oncall: mobile, module: vulkan; title: [pytorch android] use Vulkan backend crash | issue #68330: needs triage; labels: oncall: jit, module: android, oncall: mobile; title: isObject()INTERNAL ASSERT FAILED at ""../...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",4c55744c0d937cb3d89650f0673a9aece7ef503c69e88d568b5d7deb5379a5dc
BUNDLE-1461,bundle:bundle-1461,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: aotdispatch (1 issue),issue_group,,#189293 AttributeError: Can't get local object 'WeakValueDictionary.__init__.<locals>.remove' during AOTAutograd graph caching on Python 3.13,module: aotdispatch,Create one module: aotdispatch triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: aotdispatch paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,189293,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: aotdispatch bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #189293: needs triage; labels: triage review, module: pickle, tensor subclass, oncall: pt2, module: aotdispatch, module: pt2-dispatcher, module: python version, bot-triaged; title: AttributeError: Can't get local object 'WeakValueDictionary.__init__.<locals>.remove' during AOTAutograd graph caching on Python 3.13",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",3dc1bf1ea2cebd99c2a10f0f572578bee7d2f79d0cde485919e022806f6530ae
BUNDLE-1462,bundle:bundle-1462,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: aotinductor (12 issues),issue_group,,module: aotinductor needs triage,module: aotinductor,Create one module: aotinductor triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: aotinductor paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"140805, 145394, 145610, 148557, 151746, 152612, 154094, 159269, 162365, 162451, 165929, 166939",,12,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: aotinductor bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #145610: needs triage; labels: module: crash, module: arm, oncall: pt2, export-triaged, oncall: export, module: aotinductor; title: mmap fails on 64k page aarch64 systems for AOTI model loading | issue #166939: needs triage; labels: oncall: pt2, export-triaged, oncall: export, module: aotinductor; title: Reduce aten::empty Calls for Models with Constant Input Shapes in AOTInductor | issue #165929: needs tria...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",2cf85315fda6aef86b9987aaa81003dc85574c6fe868af608f9aefe46f843023
BUNDLE-1463,bundle:bundle-1463,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: arm (12 issues),issue_group,,module: arm needs triage,module: arm,Create one module: arm triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: arm paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"48452, 88617, 125734, 144770, 146483, 146914, 146915, 148902, 157668, 173907, 177254, 177258",,12,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: arm bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #157668: needs triage; labels: high priority, triage review, needs reproduction, oncall: distributed, module: cuda, triaged, module: nccl, module: arm, bot-triaged, oncall: distributed infra, ptd-bot-triaged; title: NCCL error caused due to use of NVLS in torch 2.7.1-cu128 on aarch64 gb200 cluster | issue #173907: needs triage; labels: needs reproduction, oncall: quantization, module: nnpack, module: arm, bo...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",6fc143812b98d2763469abe4efee4580a8415b56193a868f8429788934cbc65f
BUNDLE-1464,bundle:bundle-1464,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: assert failure (1 issue),issue_group,,#21255 IsType<T>() ASSERT FAILED [Detectron e2e_mask_rcnn_R-50-C4_1x.yaml],module: assert failure,Create one module: assert failure triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: assert failure paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,21255,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: assert failure bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #21255: needs triage; labels: caffe2, module: assert failure; title: IsType<T>() ASSERT FAILED [Detectron e2e_mask_rcnn_R-50-C4_1x.yaml]",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",7b2d02002e2cad066f888b55447c9fec0f8ada21e0c03b926078242b709b30f4
BUNDLE-1465,bundle:bundle-1465,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: autograd (7 issues),issue_group,,module: autograd needs triage,module: autograd,Create one module: autograd triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: autograd paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"49157, 57457, 69741, 69744, 73972, 74590, 166577",,7,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: autograd bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #166577: needs triage; labels: triage review, oncall: distributed, module: autograd, triaged, actionable, module: pipelining, bot-triaged, oncall: distributed parallelisms, ptd-bot-triaged; title: Pipelining - cannot calculate dWeight if a custom torch.autograd.Function is used with a schedule that performs separate dWeight and dInput backward passes | issue #74590: needs triage; labels: triage review, oncal...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",efffd63051a2ae359089bca974b3a07351fbc38bd8694cd601e33b8c8d7bf774
BUNDLE-1466,bundle:bundle-1466,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: binaries (11 issues),issue_group,,module: binaries needs triage,module: binaries,Create one module: binaries triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: binaries paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"68385, 75336, 83271, 96060, 110259, 121597, 139745, 159265, 174488, 175045, 189194",,11,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: binaries bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #189194: needs triage; labels: high priority, triage review, module: binaries, module: rocm, triaged, module: vectorization, module: regression, oncall: pt2, module: inductor, bot-triaged; title: [ROCm] torch 2.13 wheel: ""Can't detect vectorized ISA for CPU"" in torch.compile smoke test on non-ROCm image (regression vs 2.12.1) | issue #175045: needs triage; labels: module: binaries, oncall: releng, module: ci...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",48cddb3f9a6f56ef7dea4e12bdce1e92d8c96105cd3522d3fb0e1553bc611d04
BUNDLE-1467,bundle:bundle-1467,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: bootcamp (24 issues),issue_group,,module: bootcamp needs triage batch 1,module: bootcamp,Create one module: bootcamp triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: bootcamp paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"5489, 37387, 38034, 41419, 43409, 45549, 47565, 48045, 51673, 55577, 60062, 61344, 61966, 63171, 63247, 63403, 63917, 64060, 66094, 68014, 71261, 71277, 84318, 126276",,24,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: bootcamp bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #63917: needs triage; labels: high priority, triage review, oncall: distributed, module: bootcamp, pt_distributed_rampup, module: ddp; title: Add tests for DDP broadcast_buffers=True | issue #45549: needs triage; labels: high priority, triage review, oncall: distributed, module: bootcamp, triaged, module: nccl, pt_distributed_rampup; title: Can't initialize NCCL/GLOO process group if default process group is...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",6e67b8f83006c18b9f600a2c859ebcfba79da51c77e7fd070e3ab7998770a20f
BUNDLE-1468,bundle:bundle-1468,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: build (10 issues),issue_group,,module: build needs triage,module: build,Create one module: build triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: build paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"7036, 16602, 48932, 71359, 79003, 86791, 95124, 96185, 156915, 172348",,10,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: build bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #7036: needs triage; labels: module: crash, module: build, caffe2; title: [Caffe2] compilation linker error `libtbb.so.2: undefined reference to std::__exception_ptr` | issue #172348: needs triage; labels: oncall: distributed, module: build, module: nccl, bot-triaged, oncall: distributed infra, ptd-bot-triaged; title: Build failure in NCCLSymmetricMemory.cu: undefined identifier `offset_` | issue #156915: ne...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",d2bd77943e8d0651c143676f9b92fc23578dc47c4645a1f205bb70278a52023b
BUNDLE-1469,bundle:bundle-1469,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: c10d (36 issues),issue_group,,module: c10d needs triage batch 1,module: c10d,Create one module: c10d triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: c10d paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"52607, 59552, 59612, 62007, 62283, 62300, 62314, 62780, 63486, 63740, 63812, 63929, 64688, 68088, 68866, 69594, 70054, 70155, 71049, 71303, 73542, 73960, 80349, 81684, 83289, 83824, 85234, 106164, 106633, 130251, 130407, 137007, 143593, 170707, 177959, 179848",,36,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: c10d bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #106164: needs triage; labels: oncall: distributed, module: crash, module: c10d, bot-triaged, oncall: distributed infra, ptd-bot-triaged; title: distributed.batch_isend_irecv() crash when send/recv refers to itself | issue #71303: needs triage; labels: high priority, triage review, oncall: distributed, feature, triaged, module: c10d, module: ddp, module: distributed_tool, bot-triaged, oncall: distributed par...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",f7838ef70d7ed858d442b0cbe217612dffc6c3917325a8094840fd8ba503fb4c
BUNDLE-1470,bundle:bundle-1470,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: ci (8 issues),issue_group,,module: ci needs triage,module: ci,Create one module: ci triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: ci paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"52788, 52800, 55905, 56090, 153517, 161179, 162878, 169069",,8,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: ci bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #153517: needs triage; labels: oncall: distributed, module: ci, module: nccl, module: regression, bot-triaged, oncall: distributed infra, ptd-bot-triaged; title: [CI][CUDA][Distributed] test_non_blocking_with_eager_init timeout | issue #162878: needs triage; labels: module: cuda, oncall: releng, module: ci; title: CUDA 13.0 Segmentation Fault in test/test_numba_integration.py::TestNumbaIntegration::test_arra...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",c7254cfc482bff87ecb8939f7fa0146b5cfcac1ceaa406464b96b04139ec08dd
BUNDLE-1471,bundle:bundle-1471,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: complex (2 issues),issue_group,,module: complex needs triage,module: complex,Create one module: complex triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: complex paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"154324, 156814",,2,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: complex bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #156814: needs triage; labels: oncall: jit, module: complex; title: torchscript: RuntimeError Unsupported dtype complex | issue #154324: needs triage; labels: oncall: jit, module: complex; title: torch.jit.script gives false results for autograd if complex data types are involved",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",f19deb037194c835cca1636a8961636fe4a17a3d2a27ccfad1bca50ce31798e3
BUNDLE-1472,bundle:bundle-1472,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: convolution (4 issues),issue_group,,module: convolution needs triage,module: convolution,Create one module: convolution triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: convolution paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"61268, 154354, 188323, 189239",,4,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: convolution bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #188323: needs triage; labels: triage review, module: crash, module: cpu, module: convolution, triaged, oncall: pt2, module: dynamic shapes, module: inductor, oncall: cpu inductor, bot-triaged; title: [Inductor][CPU] dynamic=True convolution lowering crashes with ValueError: Exponent must be non-negative | issue #189239: needs triage; labels: triage review, module: performance, module: convolution, module: r...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",87e0804a14c3bf23c13403304d699166823c1e23607391d0315f33fc7edb9dfe
BUNDLE-1473,bundle:bundle-1473,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: correctness (silent) (3 issues),issue_group,,module: correctness (silent) needs triage,module: correctness (silent),Create one module: correctness (silent) triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: correctness (silent) paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"86597, 86616, 153315",,3,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: correctness (silent) bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #153315: needs triage; labels: oncall: jit, module: correctness (silent); title: [JIT] Compilation-induced discrepancy in F.instance_norm when passing input as running stats | issue #86616: needs triage; labels: oncall: jit, module: correctness (silent); title: JIT returns different values for a model on cuda and returns a strange error message on cpu | issue #86597: needs triage; labels: oncall: jit, module...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",6ff6214865840fdebdc8d42a5168de62ba40f9ac68a4602f74f9f0a88f9eae16
BUNDLE-1474,bundle:bundle-1474,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: cpp (6 issues),issue_group,,module: cpp needs triage,module: cpp,Create one module: cpp triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: cpp paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"18476, 68049, 73352, 84055, 88301, 89484",,6,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: cpp bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #73352: needs triage; labels: oncall: jit, module: crash, module: cpp; title: Segfault on unloading a model | issue #18476: needs triage; labels: oncall: jit, module: cpp; title: [CPP] Allow binding config structs into the Python front end | issue #89484: needs triage; labels: oncall: jit, module: cpp; title: kind_.is_prim() INTERNAL ASSERT FAILED at ""../torch/csrc/jit/ir/ir.cpp"":1098 | issue #88301: needs t...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",23d70cfe2383f4dbb1d918831e8dbdf0ac67d8a71faf2180df71433c90a300d8
BUNDLE-1475,bundle:bundle-1475,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: cpp-extensions (2 issues),issue_group,,module: cpp-extensions needs triage,module: cpp-extensions,Create one module: cpp-extensions triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: cpp-extensions paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"46505, 189245",,2,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: cpp-extensions bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #189245: needs triage; labels: triage review, module: cpp-extensions, module: deadlock, bot-triaged; title: [cpp_extension] Stale .lock file from FileBaton causes permanent deadlock when compilation process is killed | issue #46505: needs triage; labels: oncall: jit, module: cpp-extensions, internals, module: torchbind; title: Cannot script when a static method or cross module function calls custom op",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",be130c4278418556803bc9c004e29722dc71b7391a1ff65593b396ec1dfa29fc
BUNDLE-1476,bundle:bundle-1476,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: cpu (5 issues),issue_group,,module: cpu needs triage,module: cpu,Create one module: cpu triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: cpu paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"116240, 122813, 153145, 181621, 187912",,5,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: cpu bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #187912: needs triage; labels: high priority, triage review, needs reproduction, module: crash, module: cpu, triaged, module: mkldnn, module: multithreading, module: linear algebra, module: intel, bot-triaged; title: [CPU] Concurrent `cpublas::brgemm` calls can crash in the AMX path when the underlying oneDNN ukernel is shared | issue #153145: needs triage; labels: module: crash, module: cpu, module: intel,...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",a6a45680409cf937a52c537c6ef6038442c69f54c7117f078ffc4967230a198a
BUNDLE-1477,bundle:bundle-1477,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: crash (11 issues),issue_group,,module: crash needs triage,module: crash,Create one module: crash triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: crash paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"73885, 116254, 122019, 128693, 128694, 153260, 162476, 170003, 186535, 189126, 189150",,11,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: crash bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #186535: needs triage; labels: triage review, oncall: distributed, module: multi-gpu, module: crash, module: windows, module: cuda, bot-triaged, oncall: distributed infra; title: Windows, gloo: Access violation (0xC0000005) in ProcessGroupGloo::enqueue when calling allreduce on CUDA tensors — GlooAllreduceRegistry has no kCUDA creator | issue #189150: needs triage; labels: triage review, module: crash, modul...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",47debe36b119875b2278672f5a574b4e7d496e381821160a7cf6db5ceebcbdf1
BUNDLE-1478,bundle:bundle-1478,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: cuda (16 issues),issue_group,,module: cuda needs triage,module: cuda,Create one module: cuda triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: cuda paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"19053, 42350, 45745, 49961, 50112, 53451, 65985, 72859, 93134, 132009, 165230, 165231, 167304, 169970, 181865, 187094",,16,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: cuda bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #72859: needs triage; labels: high priority, triage review, module: cuda, oncall: profiler; title: Profiler crashes with ProfilerActivity.CUDA on AWS p4d.24xlarge with A100-SXM4-40GB | issue #167304: needs triage; labels: oncall: distributed, module: cuda, module: rpc, bot-triaged, oncall: distributed infra, ptd-bot-triaged; title: RPC cannot run in jetson orin because of the specific uuid of orin | issue #1...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",23eb6be01c030ce872e74a5f9acc4f6e68217acbcbf019accc04be71712e0a8a
BUNDLE-1479,bundle:bundle-1479,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: cuda graphs (1 issue),issue_group,,#109719 Make torch.cuda.graphs.is_current_stream_capturing() available in TorchScript,module: cuda graphs,Create one module: cuda graphs triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: cuda graphs paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,109719,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: cuda graphs bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #109719: needs triage; labels: oncall: jit, module: cuda graphs; title: Make torch.cuda.graphs.is_current_stream_capturing() available in TorchScript",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",4f267d85831edf47f5aa5f06c7685daf25fd5e9a38abe8dab93277f48d1c0603
BUNDLE-1480,bundle:bundle-1480,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: cudnn (1 issue),issue_group,,#6898 [Caffe2] cudnn versions compatibility issue.,module: cudnn,Create one module: cudnn triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: cudnn paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,6898,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: cudnn bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #6898: needs triage; labels: module: cudnn, caffe2; title: [Caffe2] cudnn versions compatibility issue.",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",bbd8824bed4790c56d19cbe3326513c9d718613a3cac585ab809b2b140a87f51
BUNDLE-1481,bundle:bundle-1481,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: custom-operators (2 issues),issue_group,,module: custom-operators needs triage,module: custom-operators,Create one module: custom-operators triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: custom-operators paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"33110, 51994",,2,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: custom-operators bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #51994: needs triage; labels: oncall: jit, feature, module: custom-operators, weeks; title: Allow Custom Classes to register a handler for .to operations | issue #33110: needs triage; labels: oncall: jit, module: custom-operators, actionable; title: InlineAutodiffSubgraphs in JIT inlines non-differentiable custom groups unexpectedly.",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",6504a602891e1dfa9cf47bb37149f2bc90e1200af830f1f887d94f98ff4c4b03
BUNDLE-1482,bundle:bundle-1482,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: data (1 issue),issue_group,,#92294 jit.fork stalls multiprocessing dataloader,module: data,Create one module: data triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: data paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,92294,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: data bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #92294: needs triage; labels: oncall: jit, module: dataloader, module: data; title: jit.fork stalls multiprocessing dataloader",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",fa3f0ffdf76f7ba784c9fbe00768ec935092bcf5f73229f7efca9c83c5eff96b
BUNDLE-1483,bundle:bundle-1483,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: data parallel (2 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #15421: JIT is not compatible with data parallel,module: data parallel,Create one module: data parallel triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: data parallel paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"15421, 30635",,2,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: data parallel bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"t-in-evaluation-mode-using-multi-gpu-learned-model/33280/4 -- is tracing inside of the module still the recommended route here? Referencing #15421 #16891 #17540 ... the last one in particular might be the most relevant to the eventual solution, but I'm not sure.",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",506937e98d72407e9077648411c0b82734abc3d4443aad1901bb95f583ff3e61
BUNDLE-1484,bundle:bundle-1484,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: dataloader (3 issues),issue_group,,module: dataloader needs triage,module: dataloader,Create one module: dataloader triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: dataloader paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"62885, 64986, 69352",,3,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: dataloader bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #69352: needs triage; labels: oncall: distributed, module: dataloader; title: I want to know how to read the LMDB file once when using DDP | issue #64986: needs triage; labels: oncall: distributed, module: dataloader; title: RandomSampler / DistributedSampler does not seem really random | issue #62885: needs triage; labels: oncall: distributed, module: dataloader; title: Type of first constructor parameter o...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",07e2f96eb26213ce2ce2ea43a0690a5f097df4348130cc37adc6a93a4c05a328
BUNDLE-1485,bundle:bundle-1485,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: ddp (28 issues),issue_group,,module: ddp needs triage batch 1,module: ddp,Create one module: ddp triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: ddp paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"47163, 47260, 48478, 58111, 60844, 62403, 62542, 62998, 63445, 65813, 66504, 68297, 68407, 68862, 68917, 69308, 69591, 70865, 71855, 73332, 74115, 76449, 80832, 85671, 106690, 111138, 112152, 124666",,28,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: ddp bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #76449: needs triage; labels: high priority, triage review, oncall: distributed, triaged, enhancement, better-engineering, pt_distributed_rampup, module: ddp, module: fsdp, bot-triaged, oncall: distributed parallelisms, ptd-bot-triaged; title: Enhance _verify_param_shape_across_processes | issue #71855: needs triage; labels: high priority, triage review, oncall: distributed, triaged, module: regression, modu...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",e3ed780681e929016d2a434cf11b39bb2f246afac26c0611b30614386e53cb14
BUNDLE-1486,bundle:bundle-1486,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: ddp (2 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #67570: RFC: Overlap optimizer computation with DDP/FSDP backward,module: ddp,Create one module: ddp triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: ddp paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"67570, 71595",,2,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: ddp bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"🚀 The feature, motivation and pitch A process to overlap optimizer + allreduce in DDP is being implemented as described in #67570, although as a prototype feature there is limited support for some use cases. This issue exists to maintain a list of currently missing fea",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",d457c615f083bb51d5de7af2d753938156684af4b788f8059cd07e32e69411bc
BUNDLE-1487,bundle:bundle-1487,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: deadlock (2 issues),issue_group,,module: deadlock needs triage,module: deadlock,Create one module: deadlock triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: deadlock paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"67241, 145743",,2,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: deadlock bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #145743: needs triage; labels: oncall: jit, module: deadlock; title: TorchScript run_method fails from 2.5.0 onward on Ubuntu | issue #67241: needs triage; labels: oncall: distributed, module: nccl, module: deadlock; title: init_process_group hangs for multi-node, Pytorch > v1.3.1 and file init_method",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",5f15ee777347c6ed6d4a1325ff36e0beac491d75eb012b22d51bec30c1bca491
BUNDLE-1488,bundle:bundle-1488,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: decompositions (1 issue),issue_group,,#125266 [export] linalg ops after core aten decomposition,module: decompositions,Create one module: decompositions triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: decompositions paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,125266,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: decompositions bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #125266: needs triage; labels: module: decompositions, oncall: export; title: [export] linalg ops after core aten decomposition",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",7422eb06013d6da937d21149cd4a65bbb29d271631bcc245d201223b8adfb02d
BUNDLE-1489,bundle:bundle-1489,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: deploy (2 issues),issue_group,,module: deploy needs triage,module: deploy,Create one module: deploy triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: deploy paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"72482, 76686",,2,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: deploy bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #72482: needs triage; labels: module: deploy, oncall: package/deploy, imported; title: Improve torch::deploy documentation | issue #76686: needs triage; labels: module: deploy, oncall: package/deploy, imported; title: [torch::deploy] Remove `manager_` from the constructor and deconstructor of `InterpreterSession`",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",48214e77c645d80c38c41b5749c37119c9833cb02455cb9ba57263dee3f0206b
BUNDLE-1490,bundle:bundle-1490,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: deprecation (1 issue),issue_group,,"#184982 deprecation of derived quantized dtypes (quint8, qint8, qint32)",module: deprecation,Create one module: deprecation triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: deprecation paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,184982,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: deprecation bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #184982: needs triage; labels: oncall: quantization, module: deprecation, topic: deprecation; title: deprecation of derived quantized dtypes (quint8, qint8, qint32)",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",3fa8edff4d09569fb6182323c3009c46121778ed3c7aedad978ef49470e70034
BUNDLE-1491,bundle:bundle-1491,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: devicemesh (2 issues),issue_group,,module: devicemesh needs triage,module: devicemesh,Create one module: devicemesh triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: devicemesh paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"172218, 173815",,2,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: devicemesh bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #173815: needs triage; labels: oncall: distributed, feature, module: DeviceMesh, bot-triaged, oncall: distributed infra, ptd-bot-triaged; title: [RFC] Abort a DeviceMesh | issue #172218: needs triage; labels: oncall: distributed, enhancement, module: DeviceMesh, bot-triaged, oncall: distributed infra, ptd-bot-triaged; title: `_expand_group` can get DeviceMesh ranks more directly",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",96500c491f8eb9ecbe6b6ed3343c84e65d74fb2f3496476158fe60acf2422e92
BUNDLE-1492,bundle:bundle-1492,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: dispatch (1 issue),issue_group,,#54728 JIT prim ops v.s. dispatcher,module: dispatch,Create one module: dispatch triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: dispatch paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,54728,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: dispatch bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #54728: needs triage; labels: oncall: jit, module: dispatch, oncall: mobile; title: JIT prim ops v.s. dispatcher",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",e6dbfe47096fe0e6a66dab09b5fc56dc8db9c16d7555b0d36d20f3f47a4b7e8f
BUNDLE-1493,bundle:bundle-1493,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: docs (16 issues),issue_group,,module: docs needs triage,module: docs,Create one module: docs triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: docs paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"6465, 37442, 46574, 52517, 54599, 60953, 67111, 67392, 74221, 76659, 77869, 87268, 92855, 95560, 130958, 139063",,16,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: docs bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #130958: needs triage; labels: triage review, oncall: distributed, module: docs, triaged, bot-triaged, oncall: distributed infra, ptd-bot-triaged; title: Document ProcessGroupOptions | issue #92855: needs triage; labels: module: docs, oncall: profiler; title: Profiler documentation doesn't mention some exports are mutually exclusive | issue #139063: needs triage; labels: module: docs, oncall: quantization; t...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",295863a003d033f2fda6cd8195e6efea67085d020c1c0b7bf26f01c872827ced
BUNDLE-1494,bundle:bundle-1494,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: dtensor (13 issues),issue_group,,module: dtensor needs triage,module: dtensor,Create one module: dtensor triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: dtensor paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"149447, 161147, 162731, 173988, 173990, 174276, 174732, 175469, 177059, 179502, 180088, 182031, 185167",,13,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: dtensor bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #162731: needs triage; labels: high priority, triage review, oncall: distributed, triaged, module: dtensor, bot-triaged, oncall: distributed parallelisms, ptd-bot-triaged; title: DTensor cached op propagation results can be mutated when propagating other ops | issue #180088: needs triage; labels: high priority, triage review, oncall: distributed, triaged, module: dtensor, bot-triaged, oncall: distributed par...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",c4e66238c7a5216014f74375cfa95b5eb41bf3fc651347963742ad50d68b1a89
BUNDLE-1495,bundle:bundle-1495,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: dynamic shapes (3 issues),issue_group,,module: dynamic shapes needs triage,module: dynamic shapes,Create one module: dynamic shapes triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: dynamic shapes paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"126127, 132930, 153179",,3,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: dynamic shapes bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #153179: needs triage; labels: module: error checking, oncall: pt2, module: dynamic shapes, oncall: export; title: export: No error raised on data-dependent assertion. | issue #132930: needs triage; labels: module: dynamic shapes, export-triaged, oncall: export; title: Treating SymNode compute more fungibly for the purpose of export flattener (or not?) | issue #126127: needs triage; labels: module: dynamic s...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",92c1fa891de17a4229d0d46c458402702d67139af21d2649fcd415f9f02e15cd
BUNDLE-1496,bundle:bundle-1496,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: dynamo (10 issues),issue_group,,module: dynamo needs triage,module: dynamo,Create one module: dynamo triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: dynamo paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"112844, 123499, 125245, 145088, 151016, 156558, 172568, 174481, 186107, 186465",,10,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: dynamo bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #145088: needs triage; labels: oncall: pt2, module: dynamo, oncall: export, pt2-pass-rate-regression; title: [torchbench] torch._dynamo.exc.Unsupported: Graph break due to unsupported builtin None.morphologyEx | issue #156558: needs triage; labels: oncall: jit, oncall: pt2, module: dynamo, oncall: export; title: Using collections. namedtuple in the forward method of the model resulted in compilation failure...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",d58bfecdc3bd218bdbc44858ae236e23517249dfb78baf89ca57753266c4b446
BUNDLE-1497,bundle:bundle-1497,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: edge cases (1 issue),issue_group,,#156955 `torch.jit.load()` crashes with C++ `c10::Error` if file system is full (no graceful handling),module: edge cases,Create one module: edge cases triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: edge cases paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,156955,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: edge cases bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #156955: needs triage; labels: oncall: jit, module: error checking, actionable, module: edge cases; title: `torch.jit.load()` crashes with C++ `c10::Error` if file system is full (no graceful handling)",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",b309ef639d163de480f5b15aacc81a70c062b4fae9c9a94d759b153ae1cb57e8
BUNDLE-1498,bundle:bundle-1498,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: elastic (4 issues),issue_group,,module: elastic needs triage,module: elastic,Create one module: elastic triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: elastic paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"63832, 100310, 103221, 181429",,4,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: elastic bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #103221: needs triage; labels: oncall: distributed, module: elastic, bot-triaged, oncall: distributed infra, ptd-bot-triaged; title: [help] did torch.distributed.launch can be applied on k8s cluster with pytorch-operator | issue #100310: needs triage; labels: oncall: distributed, module: elastic, bot-triaged, oncall: distributed infra, ptd-bot-triaged; title: Using ddp training with different machine | issue...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",e13341e8b74d5884e250187a2adc213579c6d6ef600dd291861ab9e0040f54d1
BUNDLE-1499,bundle:bundle-1499,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: error checking (1 issue),issue_group,,#149737 `INTERNAL ASSERT FAILED` in `interpolate` and `torch.import_ir_module`,module: error checking,Create one module: error checking triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: error checking paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,149737,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: error checking bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #149737: needs triage; labels: oncall: quantization, module: error checking; title: `INTERNAL ASSERT FAILED` in `interpolate` and `torch.import_ir_module`",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",4d3144a7050f245b0de464a07068cb80372c465ecbf08247f2b93f56f2a33797
BUNDLE-1500,bundle:bundle-1500,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: flaky-tests (2 issues),issue_group,,module: flaky-tests needs triage,module: flaky-tests,Create one module: flaky-tests triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: flaky-tests paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"158331, 164534",,2,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: flaky-tests bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #164534: needs triage; labels: oncall: jit, module: flaky-tests, skipped, module: unknown; title: DISABLED RecordDebugHandles.ScopedCallbacks (__main__.test_jit) | issue #158331: needs triage; labels: module: flaky-tests, skipped, oncall: cpu inductor; title: DISABLED test_conv2d_unary_cpu_cpp_wrapper (__main__.TestCppWrapper)",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",0214208f7b79742e6860b666eebd05a2a3ab6f0860611b70ad495dd7d2b0002c
BUNDLE-1501,bundle:bundle-1501,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: flex attention (1 issue),issue_group,,#189144 [XPU][B580] `flex-attn-causal` performance drop with `last_level_cache_size` cache clear between runs,module: flex attention,Create one module: flex attention triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: flex attention paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,189144,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: flex attention bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #189144: needs triage; labels: triage review, module: performance, module: regression, has workaround, oncall: pt2, module: inductor, module: xpu, module: flex attention, bot-triaged; title: [XPU][B580] `flex-attn-causal` performance drop with `last_level_cache_size` cache clear between runs",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",02cbe961ebc06748032e9eb92bcfbec0cf1c33c87d96ebbd82b2de4dd7f08754
BUNDLE-1502,bundle:bundle-1502,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: fsdp (7 issues),issue_group,,module: fsdp needs triage,module: fsdp,Create one module: fsdp triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: fsdp paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"91165, 140183, 143536, 169448, 173680, 182988, 183702",,7,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: fsdp bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #91165: needs triage; labels: high priority, triage review, oncall: distributed, triaged, module: fsdp; title: [FSDP] FSDP with CPU offload consumes `1.65X` more GPU memory when training models with most of the params frozen | issue #169448: needs triage; labels: oncall: distributed, module: fsdp, oncall: distributed checkpointing, bot-triaged, ptd-bot-triaged; title: FSDP2 model saving broken unless ignorin...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",38e6a60e22c7669d9fd6f2634c5adb9c7e5c473a270359cd5d8f1738aaf36bb8
BUNDLE-1503,bundle:bundle-1503,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: functionalization (1 issue),issue_group,,#84495 functionalize: Does not compose cleanly with torch.jit.script/torch.jit.trace,module: functionalization,Create one module: functionalization triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: functionalization paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,84495,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: functionalization bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #84495: needs triage; labels: oncall: jit, module: functionalization; title: functionalize: Does not compose cleanly with torch.jit.script/torch.jit.trace",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",cdd9d6f7e8018a642db44f1b9178a6381ba24cb2c244124e254d8d2b10fa4127
BUNDLE-1504,bundle:bundle-1504,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: fx (8 issues),issue_group,,module: fx needs triage,module: fx,Create one module: fx triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: fx paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"76181, 103947, 119454, 120437, 149186, 149497, 163312, 175493",,8,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: fx bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #103947: needs triage; labels: high priority, triage review, module: fx, oncall: fx; title: [torch.fx] Deserialization Error - TypeError: ones() received an invalid combination of arguments - got (tuple, device=Attribute) | issue #149497: needs triage; labels: module: fx, oncall: fx; title: symbolic_trace failed on deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-1.5B | issue #163312: needs triage; labels: module: fx, o...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",621e5482b16984075039c96f6063b7329723f4ec92682e9ad1dac1b188c07f15
BUNDLE-1505,bundle:bundle-1505,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: inductor (7 issues),issue_group,,module: inductor needs triage,module: inductor,Create one module: inductor triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: inductor paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"135689, 135690, 136618, 150526, 173546, 173921, 174081",,7,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: inductor bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #173921: needs triage; labels: high priority, oncall: pt2, module: inductor, oncall: cpu inductor, bot-triaged, PT2-Bug-Bash; title: [Inductor] Significant numerical divergence (4.7% relative error) in Conv2d on CPU with torch.compile | issue #150526: needs triage; labels: oncall: pt2, module: inductor, oncall: cpu inductor; title: Consider context when tuning kernels for max-autotune to more accurately refl...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",e9f2d03dcc8ad9401698eddd4c7e2081676037b0a7863d794715ef77f70c7288
BUNDLE-1506,bundle:bundle-1506,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: intel (1 issue),issue_group,,#61221 Unable to add a scalar to an MKLDNN tensor,module: intel,Create one module: intel triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: intel paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,61221,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: intel bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #61221: needs triage; labels: oncall: jit, module: mkldnn, module: intel; title: Unable to add a scalar to an MKLDNN tensor",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",054b67c398e5bd14fd82517da8c49ab98c237323af045f4dc9c0b005360907d7
BUNDLE-1507,bundle:bundle-1507,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: internals (1 issue),issue_group,,#28786 RPC couldn't match torch.ones with requires_grad=True,module: internals,Create one module: internals triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: internals paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,28786,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: internals bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #28786: needs triage; labels: high priority, triage review, oncall: distributed, module: internals, triaged, better-engineering, module: rpc; title: RPC couldn't match torch.ones with requires_grad=True",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",9f5e8303982d1c3384131ab5b396209f1676283b0fb2bbac0e09343880ec447a
BUNDLE-1508,bundle:bundle-1508,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: ios (6 issues),issue_group,,module: ios needs triage,module: ios,Create one module: ios triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: ios paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"33285, 59551, 66768, 72330, 82216, 85149",,6,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: ios bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #85149: needs triage; labels: oncall: mobile, module: ios; title: Pytorch on iOS (iPhone X & XR) throwing can't allocate memory exception. Ref Logs: | issue #82216: needs triage; labels: oncall: mobile, module: ios; title: iOS TestApp from mobile performance recipes tutorial doesn't build on macOS | issue #72330: needs triage; labels: oncall: mobile, module: ios; title: Add and Mul torch tensors on Metal (IO...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",776143bd57486e2170dc8da46e7e4686f0e2bb7517b02feb701e196012e9357a
BUNDLE-1509,bundle:bundle-1509,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: lazy (2 issues),issue_group,,module: lazy needs triage,module: lazy,Create one module: lazy triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: lazy paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"63610, 64005",,2,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: lazy bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #63610: needs triage; labels: oncall: jit, module: lazy; title: Enable some amount of CI tests on lazy_tensor_staging branch | issue #64005: needs triage; labels: oncall: jit, module: lazy; title: [LTC] Find a way to convert at::Generator into torch::jit::NamedValue",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",13965fb5833554317ca7316fd6eba22eba6b868b8df16b128c98b236aaec3590
BUNDLE-1510,bundle:bundle-1510,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: linear algebra (2 issues),issue_group,,module: linear algebra needs triage,module: linear algebra,Create one module: linear algebra triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: linear algebra paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"52655, 188553",,2,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: linear algebra bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #188553: needs triage; labels: triage review, module: rocm, triaged, module: linear algebra, bot-triaged; title: test_cholesky_solve_batched_many_batches_cuda_float64 fails on ROCm gfx942 (Tensor-likes are not close) | issue #52655: needs triage; labels: module: performance, oncall: jit, feature, module: linear algebra; title: Optimize `einsum` in TorchScript profile guided optimization",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",547dcfc650274bd8ec886a7a58dc721537b9a044705a3c2fbbbf96afcf13866e
BUNDLE-1511,bundle:bundle-1511,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: loss (2 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #118462: Inconsistency in Output for `torch.nn.functional.poisson_nll_loss` in JIT Compiled Model,module: loss,Create one module: loss triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: loss paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"118462, 118463",,2,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: loss bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"🐛 Describe the bug torch.argmin output is diffrent between eager mode and JIT-compiled mode. Similar with #118462 Allthough the model output is irrelevant from torch.special.erfc, deleting the torch.special.erfc from the code would prevent error from ha",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",d12870019f32904588a9c883cec7eb5909b2e4c5ab38f72d18ed4e527d4f2bcd
BUNDLE-1512,bundle:bundle-1512,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: memory format (1 issue),issue_group,,#72110 Conversion Error in pytorch mobile with metal,module: memory format,Create one module: memory format triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: memory format paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,72110,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: memory format bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #72110: needs triage; labels: module: memory format, oncall: mobile; title: Conversion Error in pytorch mobile with metal",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",4fa12307e85cf816fa4ce452a5280ac2ec0342457e79c112af2a4a5f744c7d1f
BUNDLE-1513,bundle:bundle-1513,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: memory usage (1 issue),issue_group,,#146698 Possible memory leak when running test_model_exports_to_core_aten.py test,module: memory usage,Create one module: memory usage triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: memory usage paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,146698,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: memory usage bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #146698: needs triage; labels: module: memory usage, oncall: pt2, oncall: export; title: Possible memory leak when running test_model_exports_to_core_aten.py test",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",b5f2a18e5a28cf1c0ca87f9ea53863f2c139544d6255a2c734ee911c61dd992c
BUNDLE-1514,bundle:bundle-1514,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: mkldnn (3 issues),issue_group,,module: mkldnn needs triage,module: mkldnn,Create one module: mkldnn triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: mkldnn paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"56024, 61267, 86667",,3,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: mkldnn bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #86667: needs triage; labels: triage review, oncall: jit, module: mkldnn; title: Adding a linear layer leads to failure of `optimize_for_mobile` | issue #61267: needs triage; labels: oncall: jit, module: mkldnn; title: Incorrect trace with MKLDNN (adding scalar) | issue #56024: needs triage; labels: oncall: distributed, module: mkldnn; title: Support for mkldnn + ddp",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",1bc4a06ca5fa842f624a58050a846ca71b5e61dcf454c9926b2d13122ff646b4
BUNDLE-1515,bundle:bundle-1515,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: multithreading (2 issues),issue_group,,module: multithreading needs triage,module: multithreading,Create one module: multithreading triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: multithreading paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"52047, 64795",,2,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: multithreading bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #52047: needs triage; labels: oncall: jit, module: tests, module: multithreading, days; title: Detect OpenMP Loop and this application may hang warnings | issue #64795: needs triage; labels: oncall: distributed, module: multithreading, oncall: profiler; title: profiler crashes the program when trying to stop on different threads without context manager",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",7c7a9a442f5f34d056ae7971fa79dba36209a1f96ebe24fa34a15441fbbe2c36
BUNDLE-1516,bundle:bundle-1516,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: nans and infs (1 issue),issue_group,,#154708 torch.quantized_batch_norm API return different output when input is nan/inf or undefined mathematical calculation method,module: nans and infs,Create one module: nans and infs triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: nans and infs paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,154708,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: nans and infs bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #154708: needs triage; labels: needs reproduction, oncall: quantization, module: NaNs and Infs; title: torch.quantized_batch_norm API return different output when input is nan/inf or undefined mathematical calculation method",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",838800e9cc07c7c90261413f6c141ac8f8720d3ede05167fe88fbba9989f1cf1
BUNDLE-1517,bundle:bundle-1517,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: nccl (10 issues),issue_group,,module: nccl needs triage,module: nccl,Create one module: nccl triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: nccl paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"52471, 68893, 70267, 86849, 109941, 114396, 129341, 137016, 172873, 178138",,10,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: nccl bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #172873: needs triage; labels: oncall: distributed, module: nccl, module: symm_mem, bot-triaged, oncall: distributed infra, ptd-bot-triaged; title: Need for all_reduce to initialize NCCL communicator | issue #137016: needs triage; labels: oncall: distributed, feature, module: nccl, bot-triaged, oncall: distributed infra, ptd-bot-triaged; title: [RFC] Accelerate intra-node communication via NCCL buffer regist...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",a9d3b7192e3c3e11e847297c01b1b6c031f315c83776b1270ab542bb0d8c775e
BUNDLE-1518,bundle:bundle-1518,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: nestedtensor (1 issue),issue_group,,#156544 `TorchScript` does not allow accessing methods of nested tensors,module: nestedtensor,Create one module: nestedtensor triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: nestedtensor paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,156544,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: nestedtensor bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #156544: needs triage; labels: oncall: jit, module: nestedtensor; title: `TorchScript` does not allow accessing methods of nested tensors",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",672fcfd3ad1c6f6430a3a0d6cc81c8a6e6f19f5a1ed0a24f1d5f9f7dc87a19c9
BUNDLE-1519,bundle:bundle-1519,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: nn (3 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #42847: Get test_jit.py below 10k lines,module: nn,Create one module: nn triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: nn paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"42847, 63085, 115511",,3,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: nn bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"Update: the test_nn.py part of this is now tracked by #63085 Currently, many files, such as test_jit.py and test_nn.py, are larger than what GitHub can handle. For these files, you will not be able to | issue #115511: needs triage; labels: module: nn, oncall: export; title: [Export] aten::_transformer_encoder_layer_fwd is not core aten and has no decomposition.",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",84e1cf264a30f41145d0a885c010b766200ddabfb4fd7a0ff87bd7c25753f1f0
BUNDLE-1520,bundle:bundle-1520,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: nn.utils.parametrize (1 issue),issue_group,,#60971 jit scripting for the parametrizations,module: nn.utils.parametrize,Create one module: nn.utils.parametrize triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: nn.utils.parametrize paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,60971,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: nn.utils.parametrize bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #60971: needs triage; labels: oncall: jit, module: nn.utils.parametrize; title: jit scripting for the parametrizations",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",810da1b5c05f34e2d2af5c38e861f57a99c99c7dcb9f6e7e63567117b086acb5
BUNDLE-1521,bundle:bundle-1521,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: nvfuser (3 issues),issue_group,,module: nvfuser needs triage,module: nvfuser,Create one module: nvfuser triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: nvfuser paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"75903, 80606, 94908",,3,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: nvfuser bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #94908: needs triage; labels: oncall: jit, module: nvfuser; title: ASSERT(initialized()) Debug Error after JIT fusion on Windows | issue #75903: needs triage; labels: oncall: jit, NNC, module: nvfuser; title: torch.jit.script'd function very slow on first invocation on latest nightly | issue #80606: needs triage; labels: oncall: jit, module: nvfuser; title: [jit.script] jit.script give uncertain results usin...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",37bd822cdd2a6de3084f721cd434c57aadbd9085a8018b868756a8288207be64
BUNDLE-1522,bundle:bundle-1522,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: onnx (7 issues),issue_group,,module: onnx needs triage,module: onnx,Create one module: onnx triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: onnx paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"47887, 74799, 120166, 133227, 134303, 141854, 172561",,7,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: onnx bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #172561: needs triage; labels: module: onnx, onnx-triaged, oncall: pt2, oncall: export; title: [export] Constraint expression suggested by torch export is not supported | issue #133227: needs triage; labels: needs reproduction, module: onnx, onnx-needs-info, oncall: export; title: Issue Exporting PyTorch Model with pytorch3d.ops.ball_query to ONNX: Bug or Compatibility Problem? | issue #141854: needs triage;...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",d15192596d8617a78d1da70fb7b8250defdc85d314c731aa4b5c2281f15f470d
BUNDLE-1523,bundle:bundle-1523,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: op-unification (1 issue),issue_group,,#14750 [caffe2] ConvTranspose with group attribute,module: op-unification,Create one module: op-unification triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: op-unification paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,14750,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: op-unification bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #14750: needs triage; labels: caffe2, module: op-unification; title: [caffe2] ConvTranspose with group attribute",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",b8009a622abee6482e11326e8af69977015e51b2f478fba8f7e5b4a4fccf4c21
BUNDLE-1524,bundle:bundle-1524,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: optimizer (1 issue),issue_group,,#60440 DDP with cuda rpc failed with DistributedOptimizer Adagrad,module: optimizer,Create one module: optimizer triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: optimizer paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,60440,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: optimizer bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #60440: needs triage; labels: oncall: distributed, module: optimizer; title: DDP with cuda rpc failed with DistributedOptimizer Adagrad",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",a28e686049a7e1633f19e6ca624453553b62a22451beb8e4750b2269acb6927d
BUNDLE-1525,bundle:bundle-1525,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: power (4 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #92910: torch.jit.save() generates different contents in a file among different endian machines,module: power,Create one module: power triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: power paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"41242, 92910, 92987, 110332",,4,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: power bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"the multiple-byte data without swapping on a big-endian machine while pickle serialization store data as mostly little-endian (as shown in #92910). Versions PyTorch version: 2.0.0a0+git215f4fc Is debug build: True CUDA used to build PyTorch: None ROCM used to build PyTorch: N/... | issue #110332: needs triage; labels: oncall: jit, module: POWER; title: `torch.jit.load()` might unresponsive in IBM s390x when loadin...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",d34760c148a8dfad4b090acb1394a8f2621a7c7fd15ad02c18a410a452d4a3a0
BUNDLE-1526,bundle:bundle-1526,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: privateuse1 (2 issues),issue_group,,module: privateuse1 needs triage,module: privateuse1,Create one module: privateuse1 triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: privateuse1 paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"166205, 169357",,2,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: privateuse1 bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #166205: needs triage; labels: feature, oncall: profiler, module: PrivateUse1; title: Enable Graph Capture & Profiler Integration for PrivateUse1 Backends | issue #169357: needs triage; labels: oncall: profiler, module: PrivateUse1; title: prepareProfiler() skips collecting info of ""privateuseone""",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",6f15b11ecda8fcc35d998b92dfd04656795756f167cc5102ed9162c224395486
BUNDLE-1527,bundle:bundle-1527,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: pt2-dispatcher (1 issue),issue_group,,"#124328 PreDispatch tracing doesn't produce correct ""val"" for Sparse Fake tensors.",module: pt2-dispatcher,Create one module: pt2-dispatcher triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: pt2-dispatcher paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,124328,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: pt2-dispatcher bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #124328: needs triage; labels: oncall: export, module: pt2-dispatcher, PT2-Bug-Bash; title: PreDispatch tracing doesn't produce correct ""val"" for Sparse Fake tensors.",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",a74599063e15e53214e03ce5d09a198ccff98e802e101b91255f44cdf2779088
BUNDLE-1528,bundle:bundle-1528,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: python frontend (2 issues),issue_group,,module: python frontend needs triage,module: python frontend,Create one module: python frontend triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: python frontend paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"106764, 142170",,2,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: python frontend bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #142170: needs triage; labels: oncall: package/deploy, module: python frontend; title: [3.13] Fix failing torch.package dynamo-wrapped test | issue #106764: needs triage; labels: triage review, oncall: jit, feature, module: python frontend; title: [Feature request] Add new API Tensor.device_as",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",1d06e6557d07c6f44c7d1be14104aa7d353cce7ef31463b094a07088dd7ec95c
BUNDLE-1529,bundle:bundle-1529,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: python version (2 issues),issue_group,,module: python version needs triage,module: python version,Create one module: python version triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: python version paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"124190, 172254",,2,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: python version bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #172254: needs triage; labels: needs reproduction, oncall: jit, module: python version; title: Python 3.14 test error: `AttributeError: 'MobileNetV2' object has no attribute '__annotations__'.` | issue #124190: needs triage; labels: oncall: profiler, module: python version; title: Re-enable skipped 3.12 dynamo-wrapped profiler tests",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",ada9183f45f34a13aeb2f70f8f396cb261656fa24a7020d32a6f09ad986d8cdf
BUNDLE-1530,bundle:bundle-1530,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: regression (3 issues),issue_group,,module: regression needs triage,module: regression,Create one module: regression triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: regression paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"81115, 100253, 153941",,3,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: regression bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #100253: needs triage; labels: high priority, module: regression, oncall: profiler; title: profiler.export_stacks doesn't return stack trace unless experimental_config is provided | issue #153941: needs triage; labels: oncall: jit, module: regression; title: TorchScript Fails Type Inference When Using .item()-Derived Scalar in Tensor Construction | issue #81115: needs triage; labels: high priority, module: v...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",bd44b6ad2996e7a9e71430dfad9a4d7c78f3467c373ec63fea90981f87b5feb5
BUNDLE-1531,bundle:bundle-1531,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: rocm (2 issues),issue_group,,module: rocm needs triage,module: rocm,Create one module: rocm triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: rocm paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"177309, 182373",,2,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: rocm bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #182373: needs triage; labels: module: rocm, oncall: profiler, bot-triaged; title: [ROCm] torch.profiler drops GPU activity in spawn child if parent calls torch.cuda.init() (regression in 2.12, 2.10/2.11 pass) | issue #177309: needs triage; labels: oncall: distributed, module: rocm, bot-triaged, oncall: distributed infra, ptd-bot-triaged; title: [ROCm][NCCL watchdog] Cross-thread stream-capture mode restrict...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",919b0969bd5786d75ea0f42476e126238f812c4081874060c99a2d0af1c8d760
BUNDLE-1532,bundle:bundle-1532,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: rpc (6 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #39351: Clean up RPC request callback implementation,module: rpc,Create one module: rpc triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: rpc paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"39351, 46564, 51616, 66624, 86962, 106711",,6,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: rpc bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"Is this the same as #39351? | issue #106711: needs triage; labels: oncall: distributed, module: rpc, bot-triaged, oncall: distributed infra, ptd-bot-triaged; title: 'CUDA out of memory' when using a GPU services for reinforcement learning in Torch rpc tutorial | issue #86962: needs triage; labels: oncall: distributed, module: rpc, bot-triaged, oncall: distributed infra, ptd-bot-triaged; title: PyTorch RPC crashed...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",154a5bdae89802e1f50bb6396e81831edfa799245ed8f10587f47d51968df353
BUNDLE-1533,bundle:bundle-1533,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: sanitizers (1 issue),issue_group,,"#71849 addcmul, byte_channels_last fail test_nnc_correctness opinfo tests under UBSAN",module: sanitizers,Create one module: sanitizers triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: sanitizers paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,71849,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: sanitizers bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #71849: needs triage; labels: module: sanitizers, NNC; title: addcmul, byte_channels_last fail test_nnc_correctness opinfo tests under UBSAN",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",f1469165d8a98f03316f9bae3448a8b05b63f48e782f04684a014f749f5d13bc
BUNDLE-1534,bundle:bundle-1534,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: serialization (2 issues),issue_group,,module: serialization needs triage,module: serialization,Create one module: serialization triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: serialization paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"38273, 57716",,2,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: serialization bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #57716: needs triage; labels: oncall: jit, module: serialization, module: vision; title: Unknown builtin op: torchvision::nms in LibTorch | issue #38273: needs triage; labels: triage review, oncall: jit, module: serialization; title: Adding model metadata in TorchScript model file",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",8e0c78404e8f845feaee44ed41c4a10a3725bc2f64eb50c40fd5246b081deb0a
BUNDLE-1535,bundle:bundle-1535,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: sparse (1 issue),issue_group,,#160631 torch.quantize_per_tensor not implemented for SparseCPU tensors,module: sparse,Create one module: sparse triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: sparse paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,160631,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: sparse bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #160631: needs triage; labels: module: sparse, oncall: quantization; title: torch.quantize_per_tensor not implemented for SparseCPU tensors",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",a468e6381773597e4b70768d6567c7be024b0f9a39455e29b47eccd63ef7a55a
BUNDLE-1536,bundle:bundle-1536,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: static linking (1 issue),issue_group,,#9797 Build torch as a submodule with static linking doesn't work (CAFFE2_PERF_WITH_AVX2 is not defined),module: static linking,Create one module: static linking triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: static linking paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,9797,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: static linking bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #9797: needs triage; labels: caffe2, module: static linking; title: Build torch as a submodule with static linking doesn't work (CAFFE2_PERF_WITH_AVX2 is not defined)",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",c8a569810f7077992009e4b818532fc2550677575c498d03b7c6d9e0bce122a4
BUNDLE-1537,bundle:bundle-1537,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: symm_mem (3 issues),issue_group,,module: symm_mem needs triage,module: symm_mem,Create one module: symm_mem triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: symm_mem paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"167966, 172617, 176439",,3,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: symm_mem bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #176439: needs triage; labels: oncall: distributed, feature, module: symm_mem, bot-triaged, oncall: distributed infra, ptd-bot-triaged; title: [wip][RFC] Symmetric Memory pool explicit lending semantics | issue #172617: needs triage; labels: oncall: distributed, module: symm_mem, bot-triaged, oncall: distributed infra, ptd-bot-triaged; title: Symmetric utils missing | issue #167966: needs triage; labels: onc...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",759411b27cd08e09f91cd9c1433e24fc07936033c2ee6778fd3cdfcb5500e31a
BUNDLE-1538,bundle:bundle-1538,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: tensorboard (19 issues),issue_group,,module: tensorboard needs triage batch 1,module: tensorboard,Create one module: tensorboard triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: tensorboard paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"30525, 30812, 33670, 33691, 35095, 36718, 37740, 39292, 40500, 42379, 45327, 46907, 64258, 75502, 90915, 101962, 125033, 144148, 173311",,19,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: tensorboard bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #101962: needs triage; labels: triage review, oncall: distributed, module: tensorboard, bot-triaged, ptd-bot-triaged; title: SummaryWriter background thread holds the GIL for too long | issue #173311: needs triage; labels: module: tensorboard, oncall: profiler; title: Issue: Remove unnecessary restriction on num_thresholds in TensorBoard PR curve summary | issue #30525: needs triage; labels: needs reproducti...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",d44bfcb112ac3038dc0d97ec7b3cb6b81eda2ec4b922d60c15171029935c3ee0
BUNDLE-1539,bundle:bundle-1539,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: tensorpipe (1 issue),issue_group,,#60640 Building fails on a node with libibverbs installed with no Infiniband hardware present on RHEL8.,module: tensorpipe,Create one module: tensorpipe triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: tensorpipe paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,60640,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: tensorpipe bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #60640: needs triage; labels: oncall: distributed, module: tensorpipe; title: Building fails on a node with libibverbs installed with no Infiniband hardware present on RHEL8.",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",9e553524563c0946f7792bf8e145c897d3e7c2e21e5cd2ae74ebbaa32181b0ca
BUNDLE-1540,bundle:bundle-1540,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: testing (1 issue),issue_group,,"#146776 INTERNAL ASSERT FAILED at ""/pytorch/torch/csrc/jit/testing/file_check.cpp"":607, please report a bug to PyTorch",module: testing,Create one module: testing triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: testing paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,146776,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: testing bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #146776: needs triage; labels: oncall: jit, module: testing; title: INTERNAL ASSERT FAILED at ""/pytorch/torch/csrc/jit/testing/file_check.cpp"":607, please report a bug to PyTorch",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",5dbd8780ea653fc647ac534a9a657b1bf7c5b4eb294d40a294bb09213485a3a5
BUNDLE-1541,bundle:bundle-1541,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: tests (8 issues),issue_group,,module: tests needs triage,module: tests,Create one module: tests triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: tests paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"56314, 58507, 64119, 64518, 66894, 67646, 83606, 92175",,8,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: tests bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #83606: needs triage; labels: high priority, triage review, module: tests, triaged, oncall: profiler; title: test_profiler_experimental_tree_cuda_detailed is too unstable, and as its CUDA only difficult to regen | issue #67646: needs triage; labels: high priority, triage review, oncall: jit, module: tests, NNC; title: test_jit_fuser_legacy and test_jit_fuser_te are failing with SIGIOT | issue #66894: needs t...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",cb7c2e0c4c9d6e5aded7ed6cbde0f98fbddea749239de3671a043b53b73a9e8d
BUNDLE-1542,bundle:bundle-1542,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: typing (1 issue),issue_group,,#123464 torch._C.JitType annotation is busted,module: typing,Create one module: typing triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: typing paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,123464,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: typing bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #123464: needs triage; labels: oncall: jit, module: typing; title: torch._C.JitType annotation is busted",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",a2ceb401096aa9fbe845bb3ca632e55b2632bc9007cccfdbfb0360979096d8d8
BUNDLE-1543,bundle:bundle-1543,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: vision (2 issues),issue_group,,module: vision needs triage,module: vision,Create one module: vision triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: vision paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"82598, 91738",,2,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: vision bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #91738: needs triage; labels: oncall: jit, module: vision; title: tracing torchvision detection model results in an error | issue #82598: needs triage; labels: triage review, triaged, module: vision, oncall: fx; title: Deep copy models with `create_feature_extractor` produces different parameters",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",95ac91d36ce470c9a1ae37cb9d8073edc8859991cf36a96c59c19a4b09df4c75
BUNDLE-1544,bundle:bundle-1544,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: vllm (1 issue),issue_group,,#174288 [distributed] Batched isend/irecv with NCCL backend hangs on high load,module: vllm,Create one module: vllm triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: vllm paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,174288,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: vllm bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #174288: needs triage; labels: high priority, triage review, oncall: distributed, triaged, module: vllm, bot-triaged, oncall: distributed infra, ptd-bot-triaged; title: [distributed] Batched isend/irecv with NCCL backend hangs on high load",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",41d5b451f4d1238b60545d3ac18ad076462f8e149c9622df2ce5a9bf4aa7f33f
BUNDLE-1545,bundle:bundle-1545,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: vulkan (4 issues),issue_group,,module: vulkan needs triage,module: vulkan,Create one module: vulkan triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: vulkan paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"56006, 82065, 84831, 116662",,4,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: vulkan bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #116662: needs triage; labels: oncall: mobile, module: vulkan; title: test/test_vulkan.py fails with vulkan_prepack::conv2d_clamp_prepack not found | issue #82065: needs triage; labels: oncall: mobile, module: vulkan; title: optimize_for_mobile vulkan_prepack::conv2d_clamp_prepack | issue #84831: needs triage; labels: oncall: jit, oncall: mobile, module: vulkan; title: INTERNAL ASSERT FAILED for _jit_pass_vu...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",0742d2a0db1e9a29b5f22f726dce23578a101238de5c36659365e4ced67b1599
BUNDLE-1546,bundle:bundle-1546,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: windows (2 issues),issue_group,,module: windows needs triage,module: windows,Create one module: windows triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: windows paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"146127, 161815",,2,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: windows bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #161815: needs triage; labels: module: windows, oncall: releng, better-engineering; title: Windows AMI release issues and improvements | issue #146127: needs triage; labels: oncall: jit, module: windows; title: When I try to run rt-detr model in C++ libtorch i face the given error",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",6d63a4e2342536f6129e2d16794db00b740d30617569228148fc6408242825aa
BUNDLE-1547,bundle:bundle-1547,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: xla (1 issue),issue_group,,#96448 Unable to move torch.jit.load-ed models to XLA devices,module: xla,Create one module: xla triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: xla paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,96448,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: xla bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #96448: needs triage; labels: oncall: jit, module: xla; title: Unable to move torch.jit.load-ed models to XLA devices",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",ef25b17c30faf1a483e1af2fc142aefbc0c31d4d2320cbf908bfc74a986f27e3
BUNDLE-1548,bundle:bundle-1548,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: xnnpack (1 issue),issue_group,,#92246 test_qnnpack_add fails,module: xnnpack,Create one module: xnnpack triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: xnnpack paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,92246,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: xnnpack bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #92246: needs triage; labels: oncall: mobile, module: xnnpack; title: test_qnnpack_add fails",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",7c326ff1048cb65f8068d5bcb6333e0f1d893411977b8a382bcf36dc3475c5b8
BUNDLE-1549,bundle:bundle-1549,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: xpu (1 issue),issue_group,,"#171689 After enabling XPU Graph, I cannot collect profile data during the replay phase.",module: xpu,Create one module: xpu triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: xpu paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,171689,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: xpu bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #171689: needs triage; labels: oncall: profiler, module: xpu; title: After enabling XPU Graph, I cannot collect profile data during the replay phase.",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",d9b7427bb7aa1d1091cd7780fba33079f1024c1182f91438e8581487c66be1fa
BUNDLE-1550,bundle:bundle-1550,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: oncall: cpu inductor (21 issues),issue_group,,oncall: cpu inductor needs triage batch 1,oncall: cpu inductor,Create one oncall: cpu inductor triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for oncall: cpu inductor paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"124697, 134679, 135569, 137691, 140689, 143886, 144039, 146824, 146974, 147919, 148071, 148382, 149501, 151525, 151536, 152921, 160391, 162135, 167199, 183888, 188227",,21,0,patch_plan_candidate,This oncall: cpu inductor bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #188227: needs triage; labels: oncall: pt2, oncall: cpu inductor, bot-triaged; title: [inductor] generated kernel calls `empty_strided_cpu` with a negative stride → `Expected result >= 0` | issue #151525: needs triage; labels: oncall: pt2, oncall: cpu inductor; title: [inductor] [cpu] [silent incorrectness] `nn.LazyConvTranspose2d-torch.randn-F.linear-torch.argmax` output incorrect results on CPU inductor |...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",2850ea1734f43fba4b18a576780b7efd23724de88dcdf9a322a5d274b0cd3540
BUNDLE-1551,bundle:bundle-1551,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: oncall: distributed (70 issues),issue_group,,oncall: distributed needs triage batch 1,oncall: distributed,Create one oncall: distributed triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for oncall: distributed paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"35372, 47999, 51574, 51931, 51932, 54524, 54912, 56111, 58982, 59441, 59823, 60518, 62381, 62474, 63455, 64130, 64150, 64419, 64799, 65052, 65907, 65918, 66046, 66547, 67972, 68256, 68785, 69522, 69563, 70037, 70099, 73602, 76039, 80151, 91535, 102186, 123983, 124007, 130515, 162466, 164929, 166301, 174669, 175145, 175724, 176276, 177371, 177730, 178191, 178473, 178756, 179770, 180550, 181061, 181086, 182102, 182915, 184010, 184147, 186591, 186938, 187138, 187432, 188193, 188266, 188304, 188567, 188833, 189228, 189308",,70,0,patch_plan_candidate,This oncall: distributed bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #164929: needs triage; labels: high priority, triage review, oncall: distributed, triaged, oncall: distributed checkpointing; title: get_optimizer_state_dict modifies optimizer state | issue #73602: needs triage; labels: high priority, triage review, oncall: distributed, triaged; title: Report DDP efficiency metric to users and guide them for setting up DDP correctly | issue #80151: needs triage; labels: hig...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",d0ca9d54539747ab8b1d268ee2f7337d7dc88059b3e3358711ddebf5eff7379b
BUNDLE-1552,bundle:bundle-1552,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: oncall: distributed (3 issues),issue_group,,oncall: distributed needs triage batch 6,oncall: distributed,Create one oncall: distributed triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for oncall: distributed paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"8818, 48710, 48928",,3,0,patch_plan_candidate,This oncall: distributed bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #48928: needs triage; labels: oncall: distributed; title: When multiple GPUs run multiple processes, it is found that any process not running in GPU 0 will have some more memory (such as 200m) in GPU 0. What is the cause of this?（多个GPU跑多进程时候，发现只要不在0号GPU跑的进程都会在0号GPU多出一些内存(如200M)，请问这是什么情况导致的？） | issue #8818: needs triage; labels: oncall: distributed; title: MPI causing job to hang --- unresponsive to external...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",813b0440c373a0ed4e24703fde01db5493d48b8ee40d17ab2c761fea48697867
BUNDLE-1553,bundle:bundle-1553,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: oncall: distributed checkpointing (1 issue),issue_group,,#162948 Metadata object loses arbitrary attributes added dynamically,oncall: distributed checkpointing,Create one oncall: distributed checkpointing triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for oncall: distributed checkpointing paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,162948,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This oncall: distributed checkpointing bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,issue #162948: needs triage; labels: oncall: distributed checkpointing; title: Metadata object loses arbitrary attributes added dynamically,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",9cdb1c0e7f3ab54e76e3ccd8c12bfa7885f7e8d0a9780b97c142159f4bca9f40
BUNDLE-1554,bundle:bundle-1554,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: oncall: export (58 issues),issue_group,,oncall: export needs triage batch 1,oncall: export,Create one oncall: export triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for oncall: export paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"113572, 121191, 122934, 123345, 125007, 126291, 126770, 127357, 127571, 127643, 128385, 130555, 130820, 130861, 131941, 132459, 133255, 139470, 141116, 141893, 141996, 143379, 144331, 144683, 145456, 146152, 146315, 146576, 147187, 151654, 151726, 152283, 152465, 153429, 153705, 154853, 155550, 155862, 156882, 157625, 159316, 163791, 164083, 165395, 167631, 167645, 167730, 169009, 170548, 170673, 170783, 171516, 172930, 176148, 177510, 178618, 179176, 184647",,58,0,patch_plan_candidate,This oncall: export bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #113572: needs triage; labels: high priority, triage review, triaged, export-triage-review, oncall: export; title: Deepcopying an exported model changes numerics for MobileNetV2 | issue #172930: needs triage; labels: oncall: pt2, oncall: export; title: torch.export failed while exporting alpamayo model (Qwen3_vl) with symbolic error | issue #178618: needs triage; labels: oncall: pt2, oncall: export, bot-tria...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",05748b198e7dfbc060cfb898e62b5d51a39c955341231231d5743bbda4536409
BUNDLE-1555,bundle:bundle-1555,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: oncall: export (7 issues),issue_group,,oncall: export needs triage batch 5,oncall: export,Create one oncall: export triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for oncall: export paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"115055, 115488, 116544, 118410, 119484, 124507, 124796",,7,0,patch_plan_candidate,This oncall: export bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #124796: needs triage; labels: oncall: pt2, oncall: export; title: Dynamo Export Support for Qwen/Qwen-7B-Chat: Mutating module attribute _ntk_alpha_cached_list during export | issue #124507: needs triage; labels: oncall: export; title: torch.export of ResNet with dynamic height fails due to constraint violation | issue #119484: needs triage; labels: onnx-needs-info, export-triaged, oncall: export; title: Fo...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",ff47be32f3658d916b61fd849950f17deb683f3f6990c19baaa0e7d5c6a21489
BUNDLE-1556,bundle:bundle-1556,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: oncall: fx (6 issues),issue_group,,oncall: fx needs triage,oncall: fx,Create one oncall: fx triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for oncall: fx paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"88574, 91000, 92812, 93002, 98422, 115818",,6,0,patch_plan_candidate,This oncall: fx bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #115818: needs triage; labels: high priority, triage review, triaged, oncall: fx; title: Fx graph recompilation along with partitioner produces different node order even though graph operations are same | issue #91000: needs triage; labels: oncall: fx; title: node.stack_trace does not handle escaping correctly | issue #98422: needs triage; labels: oncall: fx; title: [FX] Symbolic trace over `torch.Tensor.${f...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",5c8f9913b38a8b14d016d70ec3898eb655cf8812a2ffa0a0739aaa7b286eb245
BUNDLE-1557,bundle:bundle-1557,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: oncall: java (5 issues),issue_group,,oncall: java needs triage,oncall: java,Create one oncall: java triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for oncall: java paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"33631, 49536, 78483, 83551, 89868",,5,0,patch_plan_candidate,This oncall: java bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #89868: needs triage; labels: oncall: java; title: No pytorch_jni.dll file in libtorch 1.13.0 lib folder | issue #78483: needs triage; labels: oncall: java; title: is the issue resolved? windows not pytorch_jni in path | issue #83551: needs triage; labels: oncall: java; title: OpenJDK libtorch_cpu.so stack guard warning | issue #49536: needs triage; labels: oncall: mobile, oncall: java; title: Pytorch mobile...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",3e2f765d46bf0bd09d4dbbdbac4eed4bbae398c2240d4116cfb296185c2163ae
BUNDLE-1558,bundle:bundle-1558,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: oncall: jit (43 issues),issue_group,,"Review thread: 2 issues - issue #144965: RuntimeError ""global alloc not supported yet"" when using TorchScript optimization.",oncall: jit,Create one oncall: jit triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for oncall: jit paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"16592, 33692, 35998, 40867, 41289, 41695, 42258, 42317, 43548, 46944, 46946, 47218, 50444, 51135, 51136, 51137, 51138, 51140, 51563, 51856, 52920, 53017, 53022, 60930, 61210, 67541, 69078, 81085, 106846, 144965, 173643, 175708, 177239, 178044, 181231, 181473, 181480, 183520, 185440, 185441, 185442, 185443, 189309",,43,0,patch_plan_candidate,This oncall: jit bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"der some specific conditions, raise a RuntimeError with message: ""Global alloc not supported yet."". I think this is linked to an old issue: #69078, however, I managed to consistently reproduce this error. The code that reproduces the bug is quite long and needs some explanatio... | issue #81085: needs triage; labels: high priority, triage review, oncall: jit; title: RuntimeError: required keyword attribute 'value'...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",49a9fb50449c702fd1dcc5eccafe6a6c6b415159675d43ddb0a9975dd08fb15a
BUNDLE-1559,bundle:bundle-1559,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: oncall: jit (70 issues),issue_group,,oncall: jit needs triage batch 3,oncall: jit,Create one oncall: jit triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for oncall: jit paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"15342, 36061, 49460, 65607, 69250, 70450, 70544, 75960, 76026, 76774, 81855, 81912, 82550, 92041, 107568, 111142, 112372, 114112, 121581, 132240, 134922, 134923, 134924, 134937, 134971, 136654, 136829, 137202, 137561, 138973, 139556, 140101, 140468, 140539, 140702, 141855, 143831, 143854, 143857, 145995, 146757, 146758, 146759, 146760, 146773, 146775, 146778, 147055, 147444, 147739, 147844, 148447, 148543, 149223, 149251, 149391, 149619, 149736, 149800, 160392, 161854, 161935, 163945, 164208, 165400, 165900, 167412, 168077, 170680, 171377",,70,0,patch_plan_candidate,This oncall: jit bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #15342: needs triage; labels: needs reproduction, oncall: jit; title: [JIT] Batch op. batch_sum return a mask which is on cpu | issue #171377: needs triage; labels: oncall: jit, low priority; title: PyTorch JIT `get_debug_state()` triggers INTERNAL ASSERT FAILED after `torch.jit.trace` | issue #170680: needs triage; labels: oncall: jit; title: Error when composing jit.script and jacrev | issue #168077: needs...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",1b2ec0bbec416d35f5327528d63c2db368a60f4e60f7f14968b106324027629b
BUNDLE-1560,bundle:bundle-1560,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: oncall: jit (70 issues),issue_group,,oncall: jit needs triage batch 51,oncall: jit,Create one oncall: jit triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for oncall: jit paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"7904, 9595, 14270, 15116, 17126, 18312, 28191, 28267, 29125, 29128, 33281, 33810, 33993, 34851, 35526, 35606, 36211, 36603, 36926, 38744, 39309, 39539, 39569, 40696, 41141, 41291, 41418, 41433, 41683, 42081, 42145, 42170, 42947, 42948, 43119, 43134, 43378, 44446, 44503, 44608, 44800, 44992, 45012, 46368, 46654, 47010, 47335, 47682, 47883, 48089, 48090, 48094, 48307, 48984, 49253, 49377, 94974, 150342, 150577, 150607, 151165, 151233, 151428, 151468, 153224, 153722, 153931, 154101, 154407, 154423",,70,0,patch_plan_candidate,This oncall: jit bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #35526: needs triage; labels: triage review, oncall: jit, triaged; title: RuntimeError during converting Reformer model to TorchScript | issue #35606: needs triage; labels: triage review, oncall: jit, triaged; title: Could not find any similar ops to ""foo..."" in the `Libtorch` | issue #34851: needs triage; labels: oncall: jit, low priority; title: [jit] `__hash__` magic method is missing | issue #29125: need...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",131fcd580b9b2ecf82ebcd2e5f4c6b3a3e0bd327469d870b54a99e3c5de2d1fe
BUNDLE-1561,bundle:bundle-1561,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: oncall: jit (70 issues),issue_group,,oncall: jit needs triage batch 47,oncall: jit,Create one oncall: jit triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for oncall: jit paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"13164, 35215, 39690, 41046, 41415, 41512, 41513, 42673, 43249, 43261, 43765, 43873, 45199, 45524, 47692, 48191, 48408, 48869, 49261, 49569, 49585, 49614, 49650, 49820, 49935, 50127, 50772, 50834, 50933, 50971, 51055, 51379, 51409, 51465, 51808, 51942, 52147, 52309, 52589, 52599, 52720, 52768, 52772, 52777, 52795, 52821, 53140, 53344, 53414, 53753, 53824, 53862, 53867, 53877, 53878, 53904, 53921, 54146, 54348, 54365, 54435, 54598, 54625, 55072, 55194, 55541, 56096, 56159, 56571, 57035",,70,0,patch_plan_candidate,This oncall: jit bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #41513: needs triage; labels: oncall: jit, days, TSUsability, TSRootCause:UnsupportedConstructs; title: Python object None check not supported | issue #41415: needs triage; labels: oncall: jit, weeks, TSUsability, TSRootCause:UnsupportedConstructs; title: [jit] `set` builtin support | issue #41046: needs triage; labels: triage review, oncall: jit, TSUsability, TSRootCause:PoorIRVisibility; title: Human-reada...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",5305003b40ada0bbc2371ca525107041b2b11ec7d756ec295a43cdcc30507545
BUNDLE-1562,bundle:bundle-1562,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: oncall: jit (70 issues),issue_group,,oncall: jit needs triage batch 42,oncall: jit,Create one oncall: jit triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for oncall: jit paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"8473, 34713, 42267, 42592, 48066, 50734, 53421, 53472, 53744, 54593, 54937, 55282, 55742, 55749, 55999, 56660, 56969, 57313, 57559, 57592, 57639, 57717, 57739, 57793, 57894, 58516, 58804, 58836, 58857, 58907, 59114, 59153, 59174, 59528, 59652, 59806, 60143, 60359, 60732, 60847, 62154, 62325, 62394, 62543, 62556, 62603, 62775, 62854, 63124, 63405, 63648, 64096, 64247, 64260, 64334, 64487, 64628, 111480, 130309, 154478, 154502, 154607, 155003, 155004, 155007, 155009, 156557, 157103, 157603, 158227",,70,0,patch_plan_candidate,This oncall: jit bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,issue #42267: needs triage; labels: oncall: jit; title: assertRaisesRegxWithHighlight isn't triggered correctly | issue #58857: needs triage; labels: oncall: jit; title: Call non class methods from `torch::jit::Module` in C++ | issue #58836: needs triage; labels: oncall: jit; title: Latest nightly produces CUDA torchscript that cannot be run | issue #58804: needs triage; labels: oncall: jit; title: A Null pointer...,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",f67e190d9bbc388d614484d2bb6c5b6b7e035bf038c2f5d8f34641fd051d7c52
BUNDLE-1563,bundle:bundle-1563,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: oncall: jit (70 issues),issue_group,,oncall: jit needs triage batch 38,oncall: jit,Create one oncall: jit triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for oncall: jit paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"14455, 17932, 18520, 41416, 41492, 43237, 49643, 51154, 51892, 51941, 52214, 52271, 54612, 54821, 56595, 57929, 58456, 59905, 63395, 64490, 64775, 64896, 64918, 64957, 65098, 65144, 65297, 65397, 65398, 65611, 65630, 65643, 65776, 65814, 65824, 65915, 65983, 66065, 66150, 66651, 66791, 66816, 66841, 67099, 67160, 67420, 67458, 67473, 67474, 67542, 67659, 67838, 67889, 68064, 68065, 68759, 68800, 68968, 69084, 69320, 69608, 69938, 70573, 70627, 71151, 71165, 71286, 71288, 71784, 72029",,70,0,patch_plan_candidate,This oncall: jit bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #65630: needs triage; labels: oncall: jit; title: Constants in torch.Jit.script | issue #65611: needs triage; labels: oncall: jit; title: `torch.jit.trace` fails claiming ""forward method already defined"" | issue #65397: needs triage; labels: oncall: jit; title: Vague linkage when using libcxxabi built torch in torch_glow | issue #65398: needs triage; labels: oncall: jit; title: [JIT] JIT does not support non...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",b86ba18afb4d93e15f5ddb8ca77f6dc6b59b17b86f8e60ef6acd16f95c7309e8
BUNDLE-1564,bundle:bundle-1564,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: oncall: jit (70 issues),issue_group,,oncall: jit needs triage batch 33,oncall: jit,Create one oncall: jit triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for oncall: jit paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"30365, 41417, 46460, 47162, 55211, 58744, 62313, 67142, 69434, 69435, 69814, 69830, 69931, 70102, 70223, 70240, 70511, 71912, 71929, 72220, 72338, 72516, 72617, 72746, 73072, 73419, 73571, 73608, 74030, 74095, 74589, 75005, 75038, 75217, 75280, 75309, 75654, 75655, 75794, 75935, 75956, 76503, 76672, 77027, 77354, 77837, 78133, 78486, 78559, 78805, 78812, 78920, 79008, 79275, 79375, 79684, 79751, 80829, 80939, 81100, 81245, 81460, 82084, 82324, 82451, 82634, 82635, 82762, 82872, 83045",,70,0,patch_plan_candidate,This oncall: jit bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #73571: needs triage; labels: oncall: jit; title: conv with padding='same' fails on lazy torchscript nvfuser | issue #73419: needs triage; labels: oncall: jit; title: test_jit_cuda_fuser fails on non-CUDA node for 1.11.0rc3 | issue #70240: needs triage; labels: oncall: jit, Stale; title: JIT: wrong list/tuple length if using Union | issue #70223: needs triage; labels: oncall: jit, Stale; title: jit: Confusin...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",2e83bd7c96c1ded088414300026cee6b86b9f7c42ab3ca875a1ae84b53e5e10a
BUNDLE-1565,bundle:bundle-1565,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: oncall: jit (70 issues),issue_group,,oncall: jit needs triage batch 28,oncall: jit,Create one oncall: jit triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for oncall: jit paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"21064, 37883, 44951, 46375, 47336, 51376, 58109, 69006, 76013, 77167, 81337, 81635, 83349, 83585, 84049, 84135, 84187, 84189, 84304, 84588, 84615, 84628, 84646, 84673, 84681, 84685, 85072, 85342, 85505, 85513, 85514, 85568, 85570, 85573, 85585, 85588, 85706, 85804, 85805, 85813, 85893, 86110, 86112, 86116, 86124, 86276, 86287, 86351, 86455, 86552, 86553, 86598, 86816, 86818, 87289, 87390, 87487, 87781, 87787, 87792, 88491, 88765, 89065, 89076, 89483, 90181, 90301, 90305, 90369, 90466",,70,0,patch_plan_candidate,This oncall: jit bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,issue #84673: needs triage; labels: oncall: jit; title: Autograd will take `init` module API into account when using `jit` | issue #84628: needs triage; labels: oncall: jit; title: INTERNAL ASSERT when the type of argument is not considered in JIT | issue #84615: needs triage; labels: oncall: jit; title: Serialize the warmed up torchscript module | issue #84588: needs triage; labels: oncall: jit; title: torch.jit....,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",595edb4ef74d43aae6549592c6a3dbc6924fe4529d405829c9652173c00e2dc2
BUNDLE-1566,bundle:bundle-1566,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: oncall: jit (70 issues),issue_group,,oncall: jit needs triage batch 23,oncall: jit,Create one oncall: jit triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for oncall: jit paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"33491, 36910, 43520, 48082, 51969, 58789, 62221, 68921, 70058, 72498, 73142, 79875, 80007, 84340, 86662, 91098, 91229, 91358, 91360, 91396, 91504, 91562, 91686, 92230, 92375, 92548, 92558, 92563, 92654, 92674, 92740, 92742, 92866, 92888, 93255, 93826, 95194, 95497, 95789, 95858, 95960, 96098, 96420, 96735, 97343, 97913, 98064, 98210, 98888, 99821, 100636, 100730, 101055, 101855, 102653, 103250, 103788, 104041, 104450, 104458, 104712, 104732, 104906, 105196, 105900, 105917, 105918, 105997, 106435, 106699",,70,0,patch_plan_candidate,This oncall: jit bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #92563: needs triage; labels: oncall: jit; title: [JIT] INTERNAL ASSERT FAILED when `Conv2d` and `clamp` used together | issue #92558: needs triage; labels: oncall: jit; title: [JIT][TracingCheckError] inplace ops incompatible with `contiguous(.., channels_last)` | issue #92548: needs triage; labels: oncall: jit; title: [JIT] Inconsistency in tensor shape between eager mode and JIT | issue #92375: needs tria...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",78b040ed24233f396054fef3b5fb90d073b945778fd50a552cd5f6687c5ea1bd
BUNDLE-1567,bundle:bundle-1567,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: oncall: jit (70 issues),issue_group,,oncall: jit needs triage batch 18,oncall: jit,Create one oncall: jit triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for oncall: jit paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"14867, 40561, 41869, 41909, 42885, 43388, 48325, 49538, 52363, 54140, 55603, 58845, 60937, 62962, 66017, 66930, 67146, 68568, 69425, 70051, 75556, 75788, 76295, 82417, 87145, 89114, 89185, 89386, 90885, 93913, 97047, 98695, 103070, 105821, 107771, 108226, 108332, 108665, 108670, 108865, 109113, 109488, 109699, 111135, 111792, 111863, 112425, 113945, 114543, 115622, 115639, 115733, 115736, 115914, 116010, 116498, 116612, 117541, 118086, 118189, 118297, 118300, 118302, 118303, 118400, 118401, 119192, 120485, 122020, 123066",,70,0,patch_plan_candidate,This oncall: jit bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #109699: needs triage; labels: oncall: jit; title: [TorchScript] Support ScriptFunction arguments in torch.jit.script calls. | issue #67146: needs triage; labels: oncall: jit; title: `torch.jit.is_scripting()` not set when scripting a Module | issue #109113: needs triage; labels: oncall: jit; title: The API ""torch::jit::_load_for_mobile"" is limited to create an object living on the stack. | issue #108865: ne...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",13c4ea4f1ef712d8d991d0d90a38e11986ff47ddbee5b54c5275f3e05ef71604
BUNDLE-1568,bundle:bundle-1568,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: oncall: jit (69 issues),issue_group,,oncall: jit needs triage batch 13,oncall: jit,Create one oncall: jit triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for oncall: jit paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"6007, 6010, 8453, 8556, 11532, 13170, 13477, 14332, 14484, 15043, 16263, 18376, 18975, 40870, 42207, 48387, 51328, 58298, 59530, 66623, 67834, 67983, 76486, 76881, 80861, 82099, 89064, 93943, 104405, 123168, 123961, 124458, 125003, 125293, 125749, 126167, 126277, 126843, 127283, 127679, 128019, 128125, 128261, 128491, 128496, 128585, 129282, 129347, 130229, 130726, 130735, 131022, 132315, 132385, 133537, 133675, 133678, 133795, 133840, 133847, 134559, 134562, 134849, 134898, 134903, 134918, 135580, 136127, 136256",,69,0,patch_plan_candidate,This oncall: jit bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,issue #67983: needs triage; labels: oncall: jit; title: torch.jit.export does not working | issue #127679: needs triage; labels: oncall: jit; title: RuntimeError: `jit.freeze` fails to find externally assigned attributes | issue #126843: needs triage; labels: oncall: jit; title: Torchscript export of `Salesforce/blip2-opt-2.7b` model fails with Conv shape error | issue #125293: needs triage; labels: oncall: jit; t...,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",067a32bddefa2ff3cd6ac6757d2321c2e5da1a5adec7597c3fc3fed823d11ca6
BUNDLE-1569,bundle:bundle-1569,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: oncall: jit (15 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 6 issues - issue #16293: Unexpected behavior of jit.trace when PYTORCH_JIT=0,oncall: jit,Create one oncall: jit triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for oncall: jit paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"16293, 25066, 29092, 29177, 32976, 40914, 48108, 51835, 68559, 80561, 85792, 85877, 86804, 90366, 90367",,15,0,patch_plan_candidate,This oncall: jit bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"s all us use PyTorch for research. It also does not help that JIT UX improvement issues are almost never worked on: #29092, #29177, #16293, #40914 Related to 2: #25066 Finally, I have two solution proposals. They may not be viable, but are nice from UX perspectives. To solve 1... | hat makes all us use PyTorch for research. It also does not help that JIT UX improvement issues are almost never worked on: #29092, #2...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",7b76df4daf0f861d7dec194be2c7eb5aa306e76222945c18d734b202f52a2043
BUNDLE-1570,bundle:bundle-1570,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: oncall: jit (10 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #76578: [JIT][Autocast] Batchnorm folding pass during freezing doesn't preserve types,oncall: jit,Create one oncall: jit triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for oncall: jit paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"45465, 46749, 47964, 51018, 60333, 71470, 76578, 88448, 90365, 92073",,10,0,patch_plan_candidate,This oncall: jit bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"expected (weight and bias can have different dtypes) ========================================= Original Context: Similar to conv-bn folding #76578, lin-bn folding #86706 with autocast freeze on gpu casts the inputs to linear to half, while inputs to batchnorm are not casted, r... | Same as #71470 ... definitely an issue, and looks like easy fix | dea on how well torch.nn.ModuleList is supported in TorchScript? I h...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",281ec96a5fb36e261b2d614111eb4e41559ae74f4fa3fb58eefce0544d9e2f68
BUNDLE-1571,bundle:bundle-1571,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: oncall: jit (10 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #44768: [JIT] function decorated with @torch.no_grad() can not be exported when another function is called inside it.,oncall: jit,Create one oncall: jit triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for oncall: jit paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"11967, 44768, 45208, 52312, 63145, 75002, 124461, 131452, 137252, 143258",,10,0,patch_plan_candidate,This oncall: jit bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"Using torch.no_grad is only supported in with statements, not as a decorator. There is an open issue I am working on (#44768) to fail better if it is used as a decorator. Can you use a with statement for whatever it is you're trying to do? | ality). Of course that is pretty bad, because we are forced to lie to the type checker, sweeping bugs under the carpet. Possibly related to #75002 cc @EikanWang @jgong5 @wenzh...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",c92a13add7b600c1b17296684cb9d93228ee034829e0676ce22911c7faf3d3d5
BUNDLE-1572,bundle:bundle-1572,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: oncall: jit (2 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #106128: Torchscript optimizer incorrectly applies constant propagation to convert prim::ListConstruct() into prim::Constant,oncall: jit,Create one oncall: jit triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for oncall: jit paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"106128, 106129",,2,0,patch_plan_candidate,This oncall: jit bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"merous issues with torchscipt optimization and have had to disabled it to avoid breaking the code. I recently debugged one such issue here: #106128 torch::jit::setGraphExecutorOptimize sets a thread-local variable, but the model may be run on a different thread. This was diffi...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",f23328b5b8f93d806589adac411e2a5eb48a586f7cb79e72d7ac3325b6d9a89f
BUNDLE-1573,bundle:bundle-1573,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: oncall: mobile (70 issues),issue_group,,oncall: mobile needs triage batch 1,oncall: mobile,Create one oncall: mobile triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for oncall: mobile paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"32901, 34682, 36182, 37016, 38312, 39240, 39724, 42039, 42308, 43488, 44469, 44630, 45398, 46979, 46995, 47177, 47342, 48410, 48703, 49782, 50714, 50943, 52144, 53264, 55779, 55782, 56007, 57887, 57893, 61765, 63476, 65490, 65662, 67599, 67603, 68536, 68984, 68987, 69347, 69354, 69609, 70159, 72252, 74272, 75308, 75864, 76029, 76807, 77840, 80142, 80321, 81552, 81651, 82312, 83161, 83250, 86572, 91387, 96639, 109579, 110379, 114102, 114283, 116795, 118069, 120976, 127013, 129633, 143565, 186670",,70,0,patch_plan_candidate,This oncall: mobile bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #186670: needs triage; labels: oncall: mobile, bot-triaged; title: _load_mobile_module_from_bytes SIGSEGVs on malformed flatbuffer model (unchecked Function.class_type index) | issue #63476: needs triage; labels: oncall: mobile; title: Error loading Pytorch lite model in Android | issue #81552: needs triage; labels: oncall: mobile; title: Support Swift Package Manager (SPM) for iOS | issue #143565: needs tri...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",2da5f5b9d3bebbeeb7a6d6c6489e69cf394570e1badd2f0ee013dc0f71ad7015
BUNDLE-1574,bundle:bundle-1574,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: oncall: mobile (3 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #50533: Non-avairable nightly version for converting models to NNAPI,oncall: mobile,Create one oncall: mobile triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for oncall: mobile paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"33124, 50533, 50678",,3,0,patch_plan_candidate,This oncall: mobile bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,This is the same issue as #50533 | issue #33124: needs triage; labels: oncall: mobile; title: QNNPACK: GNU aarch64 assembler does not support 4s on neon mov,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",50cc2705abd0a3010d16ddc8796147809fb3133a34a14aac10faf4550f3a6040
BUNDLE-1575,bundle:bundle-1575,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: oncall: package/deploy (20 issues),issue_group,,oncall: package/deploy needs triage batch 1,oncall: package/deploy,Create one oncall: package/deploy triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for oncall: package/deploy paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"60089, 60189, 64462, 65305, 72659, 74909, 74956, 74964, 75467, 76682, 76683, 76685, 78172, 83143, 88735, 138341, 139297, 152532, 155321, 180307",,20,0,patch_plan_candidate,This oncall: package/deploy bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #152532: needs triage; labels: oncall: package/deploy; title: The 2.7.0 release tarball is missing `.ci/docker/ci_commit_pins/nccl-cu12.txt` required for building | issue #180307: needs triage; labels: oncall: package/deploy, bot-triaged; title: PackageImporter.load_pickle() race can silently deserialize the wrong tensor across concurrent loads | issue #155321: needs triage; labels: oncall: package/deploy; t...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",3f6e02632064aa3d52bcdcc2530e26c2f4bfdb9c45265a7da9254845ecc1abac
BUNDLE-1576,bundle:bundle-1576,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: oncall: profiler (53 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #121219: Torch profiler corrupted names with Python 3.11,oncall: profiler,Create one oncall: profiler triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for oncall: profiler paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"64345, 69506, 69782, 70951, 74605, 76309, 82951, 83769, 91311, 91903, 98124, 121219, 121471, 124674, 125272, 126703, 127215, 128292, 132738, 133444, 135003, 138193, 140684, 144613, 144778, 147604, 147722, 151969, 152617, 153614, 153901, 153949, 157728, 159256, 162481, 164145, 166121, 166311, 167605, 169666, 170319, 170774, 170867, 174273, 174555, 175790, 176288, 178087, 181238, 183842, 186026, 188481, 188490",,53,0,patch_plan_candidate,This oncall: profiler bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"mes. However, there seems to be a discrepancy between Python 3.10 and Python 3.11 and how imports are handled. I believe this is related to #64345 and #113564. The following snippet produces good trace files with Python 3.10, but occasionally produces corrupted output on Pytho... | issue #181238: needs triage; labels: oncall: profiler, bot-triaged; title: torch.cuda.synchronize() syncs on device 0 when current dev...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",dc57b45d2733ef18accb1acfc3cd37c2bb0bb9231dd57dd579da66d885d5acb1
BUNDLE-1577,bundle:bundle-1577,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: oncall: quantization (54 issues),issue_group,,oncall: quantization needs triage batch 1,oncall: quantization,Create one oncall: quantization triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for oncall: quantization paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"115985, 116250, 116251, 116252, 116253, 116865, 116992, 117102, 117229, 117239, 117920, 118165, 120705, 121230, 122183, 122224, 122303, 123824, 125004, 125564, 126140, 126266, 126974, 127076, 128114, 131055, 132029, 133552, 133557, 134220, 136094, 136828, 138820, 139464, 143289, 147112, 147818, 148171, 149500, 152813, 153358, 154323, 159505, 165829, 170169, 171675, 172082, 173075, 179109, 179111, 180995, 181181, 186363, 187048",,54,0,patch_plan_candidate,This oncall: quantization bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #187048: needs triage; labels: oncall: quantization, bot-triaged; title: [Bug][Quantization] Inconsistent numerical behavior in _choose_qparams_per_tensor and redundant code in test_quantized_tensor.py | issue #186363: needs triage; labels: oncall: quantization, bot-triaged; title: test_quantization.py int8 tests fail on AArch64 | issue #180995: needs triage; labels: oncall: quantization, bot-triaged; title:...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",f29980fe25a892b2c3ccd448046e0411f2317631ff51e18dfe98febb59faf49a
BUNDLE-1578,bundle:bundle-1578,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: oncall: releng (1 issue),issue_group,,#160005 [BE][download.pytorch.org] Index fix user navigation,oncall: releng,Create one oncall: releng triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for oncall: releng paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,160005,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This oncall: releng bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #160005: needs triage; labels: oncall: releng, better-engineering; title: [BE][download.pytorch.org] Index fix user navigation",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",89753fbfca31dcbe3fdd95cc917230d564770541c60091d518555d8d85208a92
BUNDLE-1579,bundle:bundle-1579,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: oncall: visualization (22 issues),issue_group,,oncall: visualization needs triage batch 1,oncall: visualization,Create one oncall: visualization triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for oncall: visualization paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"30863, 31603, 39250, 43323, 43328, 47265, 49823, 51445, 56010, 57163, 65449, 65588, 68927, 68940, 72906, 75673, 80863, 83589, 90374, 93350, 174375, 184078",,22,0,patch_plan_candidate,This oncall: visualization bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #184078: needs triage; labels: oncall: visualization, bot-triaged; title: add_params metric_dict values not shown in tensorboard hparams tab | issue #174375: needs triage; labels: oncall: visualization, bot-triaged; title: [CUDA] flamegraph.pl download fails on cross-device filesystems | issue #90374: needs triage; labels: oncall: visualization; title: torch.utils.tensorboard import fails if a new protobuf >...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",cf0da24e2e7d967b56ed5e8e8ad58928b9de7ad241cf7eabdb311a3d8d866a7d