update

app.py

@@ -5,8 +5,110 @@ from codedog_demo.callbacks import get_sample_choices, request_pr_review, show_s
 sample_choices = get_sample_choices()
 
 
+text = """# [codedog-ai/codedog #2 - feat(telemetry): :sparkles: collect gpt api cost](https://github.com/codedog-ai/codedog/pull/2) Pull Request Report
+
+*powered by GPT and codedog 0.8.2*
+
+## Execution
+- Start at: 2023-09-07 07:18:18
+- Time usage: 12.72s
+- Openai api tokens: 3506
+- Openai api costs: $0.0460
+
+
+
+
+## PR Summary
+
+### PR Overview
+This PR is a new feature :sparkles:
+
+This PR aims to collect the cost of GPT API calls from the openai callback of langchain. It modifies several functions in the 'codedog/review.py' file to include an additional parameter 'cb.total_cost' in the '_meter_api_call_tokens' function call and updates the value of the 'cost' key in the '_telemetry' dictionary. It also modifies the 'examples/github/github_review.py' file to update the variables 'repository_name_or_id' and 'pull_request_number'.
+
+
+
+### Change Details
+
+| Major Changes | Description |
+|---|---|
+| **[review.py](https://github.com/codedog-ai/codedog/pull/2/files#diff-10471033f603ac7fae28b2c7c57040e8732947f0 "codedog/review.py")** | This diff contains the following changes in the file codedog/review.py:		- Added a new key "cost" to the dictionary `_telemetry` in the `__init__` function.	- Modified the `_single_file_summarize` function to include an additional parameter `cb.total_cost` in the `_meter_api_call_tokens` function call.	- Modified the `_changelist_summarize` function to include an additional parameter `cb.total_cost` in the `_meter_api_call_tokens` function call.	- Modified the `_feedback` function to include an additional parameter `cb.total_cost` in the `_meter_api_call_tokens` function call.	- Modified the `_meter_api_call_tokens` function to include a new parameter `cost` and update the value of the "cost" key in the `_telemetry` dictionary.	- No other changes were made in the file. |
+| **[github_review.py](https://github.com/codedog-ai/codedog/pull/2/files#diff-78de2b9548d0316c55661aaf9b2222ad80a07012 "examples/github/github_review.py")** | This diff contains changes in the file `github_review.py`. 		The changes include:	- Commenting out the lines that set the variables `repository_name_or_id` and `pull_request_number` to "ClickHouse/ClickHouse" and 49113 respectively.	- Adding new lines that set the variables `repository_name_or_id` to "Arcadia822/codedog" and `pull_request_number` to 2.	- The function `build_pull_request_event` is called with the updated `repository_name_or_id` and `pull_request_number` variables. |
+
+
+
+
+<details>
+<summary><h3>Change File List</h3></summary>
+
+Modified files:
+- codedog/review.py
+- examples/github/github_review.py
+
+
+</details>
+
+
+
+## Code Review (preview)
+
+*This feature is still under test. Suggestions are given by AI and might be incorrect.*
+
+**[codedog/review.py](https://github.com/codedog-ai/codedog/pull/2/files#diff-10471033f603ac7fae28b2c7c57040e8732947f0)**
+
+Based on the code diff, here are my observations and suggestions:
+
+1. Line 44: The code change to add a new key "cost" to the `_telemetry` dictionary seems correct. It allows tracking the cost associated with API calls.
+
+2. Line 113 and 130: The code changes to the `_meter_api_call_tokens` method seem correct. It now accepts an additional parameter `cb.total_cost` to track the cost associated with API calls.
+
+3. Line 144: The code change to pass `cb.total_cost` as the second argument to `_meter_api_call_tokens` method seems correct. It ensures that the cost is properly tracked for API calls made during the feedback process.
+
+4. Line 175: The code change to add the `cost` key to the `TEMPLATE.REPORT_HEADER` format seems correct. It allows displaying the total cost in the generated report.
+
+Overall, the code changes seem correct and aligned with the purpose of tracking API call costs. However, here are a few suggestions for the author:
+
+- It would be helpful to include comments or docstrings explaining the purpose and usage of the `_meter_api_call_tokens` method and its parameters.
+
+- Consider using more descriptive variable names instead of abbreviations like `cb` to improve code readability.
+
+- Ensure that the `cb.total_cost` value passed to `_meter_api_call_tokens` is calculated correctly and represents the actual cost of API calls.
+
+- Consider adding unit tests to verify the correctness of the code changes and to ensure that the cost tracking functionality works as expected.
+
+- Double-check if there are any other places in the codebase where the `cost` value needs to be updated or used.
+
+These suggestions will help improve the clarity, maintainability, and reliability of the code.
+
+**[examples/github/github_review.py](https://github.com/codedog-ai/codedog/pull/2/files#diff-78de2b9548d0316c55661aaf9b2222ad80a07012)**
+
+Based on the code diff, it seems that the author has made some changes to the `github_review.py` file. Here are my observations and suggestions:
+
+1. The author has commented out the lines that set the `repository_name_or_id` and `pull_request_number` variables for the "ClickHouse/ClickHouse" repository. It appears that the author wants to disable this repository for now. If this change is intentional, it is fine.
+
+2. The author has uncommented the lines that set the `repository_name_or_id` and `pull_request_number` variables for the "Arcadia822/codedog" repository and pull request number 2. If this change is intentional, it is fine.
+
+3. It is important to ensure that the correct repository and pull request number are set for the desired review. Please double-check that the "Arcadia822/codedog" repository and pull request number 2 are the intended targets for the review.
+
+Overall, the code change seems to be correct, assuming the author's intention is to disable the "ClickHouse/ClickHouse" repository and review the "Arcadia822/codedog" repository's pull request number 2.
+
+
+
+
+"""
+
+
 with gr.Blocks(theme="xiaobaiyuan/theme_brief") as demo:
-    gr.Markdown("# Codedog Demo")
+    gr.Markdown("# Codedog - A pull reqeust review tool")
+
+    gr.Markdown(
+        """**Codedog is designed to save reviewer's time by providing useful information based on PR context.**
+
+- Github App (Rate limit is low): https://github.com/apps/codedog-assistant
+- Source Code: https://github.com/codedog-ai/codedog
+- Deploy as a service: https://github.com/codedog-ai/codedog/tree/master/examples
+- Feedback or showcase ❤️: https://github.com/codedog-ai/codedog/discussions
+"""
+    )
 
     with gr.Tab(label="Try Yourself"):
         with gr.Row():
@@ -20,20 +122,24 @@ with gr.Blocks(theme="xiaobaiyuan/theme_brief") as demo:
             custom_submit = gr.Button(value="Review It")
         with gr.Row():
             with gr.Tab(label="Markdown"):
-                custom_content = gr.Markdown(value="")
+                custom_content = gr.Markdown(value=text)
             with gr.Tab(label="Raw"):
-                custom_content_raw = gr.Textbox(show_label=False, lines=100, max_lines=500)
+                custom_content_raw = gr.Textbox(
+                    value=text, show_label=False, lines=100, max_lines=500
+                )
         custom_submit.click(
             request_pr_review,
             inputs=[custom_pr_url],
             outputs=[custom_content, custom_content_raw],
         )
 
-    with gr.Tab(label="Samples"):
-        sample_choice = gr.Radio(choices=sample_choices, type="index", show_label=False)
-        sample_content = gr.Markdown(value="")
+    # with gr.Tab(label="Samples"):
+    #     sample_choice = gr.Radio(choices=sample_choices, type="index", show_label=False)
+    #     sample_content = gr.Markdown(value="")
 
-        sample_choice.input(show_sample, inputs=[sample_choice], outputs=[sample_content])
+    #     sample_choice.input(
+    #         show_sample, inputs=[sample_choice], outputs=[sample_content]
+    #     )
 
 
 if __name__ == "__main__":