File size: 14,894 Bytes
1080b26
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
c4f6575
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1080b26
 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
import gradio as gr
import pandas as pd
import plotly.graph_objects as go
import plotly.express as px
from pathlib import Path

# Read reference text
reference_text_path = Path("text/reference.txt")
if reference_text_path.exists():
    with open(reference_text_path, "r") as f:
        reference_text = f.read()
else:
    reference_text = "Reference text not available"

# Check if audio file exists
audio_path = Path("audio/001.wav")
audio_exists = audio_path.exists()

# Prepare WER data for visualizations
wer_data = {
    "Model": ["tiny", "base", "small", "medium", "large-v3-turbo"],
    "WER (%)": [15.05, 9.95, 11.17, 6.07, 7.04],
    "Speed (s)": [2.73, 5.01, 5.14, 19.42, 33.08],
    "Model Size": ["39M", "74M", "244M", "769M", "809M"]
}
df_wer = pd.DataFrame(wer_data)

# Engine comparison data
engine_data = {
    "Engine": ["faster-whisper", "openai-whisper", "distil-whisper"],
    "WER (%)": [9.95, 9.95, 21.6],
    "Speed (s)": [4.87, 6.51, 38.49]
}
df_engine = pd.DataFrame(engine_data)

# Create interactive WER by model visualization
fig_wer = go.Figure()
fig_wer.add_trace(go.Bar(
    x=df_wer["Model"],
    y=df_wer["WER (%)"],
    text=df_wer["WER (%)"].round(2),
    textposition='auto',
    marker_color=['#FF6B6B', '#4ECDC4', '#45B7D1', '#96CEB4', '#FFEAA7'],
    hovertemplate='<b>%{x}</b><br>WER: %{y:.2f}%<br>Size: %{customdata}<extra></extra>',
    customdata=df_wer["Model Size"]
))
fig_wer.update_layout(
    title="Word Error Rate by Model Size",
    xaxis_title="Model",
    yaxis_title="WER (%)",
    template="plotly_white",
    height=400
)

# Create speed vs accuracy scatter plot
fig_scatter = go.Figure()
fig_scatter.add_trace(go.Scatter(
    x=df_wer["Speed (s)"],
    y=df_wer["WER (%)"],
    mode='markers+text',
    marker=dict(size=15, color=['#FF6B6B', '#4ECDC4', '#45B7D1', '#96CEB4', '#FFEAA7']),
    text=df_wer["Model"],
    textposition="top center",
    hovertemplate='<b>%{text}</b><br>Speed: %{x:.2f}s<br>WER: %{y:.2f}%<extra></extra>'
))
fig_scatter.update_layout(
    title="Speed vs Accuracy Tradeoff",
    xaxis_title="Inference Time (seconds)",
    yaxis_title="WER (%)",
    template="plotly_white",
    height=400
)

# Create engine comparison visualization
fig_engine = go.Figure()
fig_engine.add_trace(go.Bar(
    x=df_engine["Engine"],
    y=df_engine["WER (%)"],
    name="WER (%)",
    marker_color='#4ECDC4',
    text=df_engine["WER (%)"].round(2),
    textposition='auto'
))
fig_engine.update_layout(
    title="WER by Engine (Base Model)",
    xaxis_title="Engine",
    yaxis_title="WER (%)",
    template="plotly_white",
    height=400
)

# Custom CSS
custom_css = """
.gradio-container {
    font-family: 'Inter', sans-serif;
}
.limitation-box {
    background-color: #FFF3CD;
    border-left: 4px solid #FFC107;
    padding: 15px;
    margin: 10px 0;
}
.question-box {
    background-color: #E3F2FD;
    border-left: 4px solid #2196F3;
    padding: 15px;
    margin: 15px 0;
}
"""

# Build the interface
with gr.Blocks(css=custom_css, theme=gr.themes.Soft()) as demo:
    gr.Markdown(
        """
        # Local ASR/STT Benchmark Evaluation
        ### A Single Sample Evaluation on Local Hardware

        Testing different Whisper model sizes to find the optimal balance between accuracy and speed for daily transcription workflow.
        """
    )

    with gr.Tabs():
        # Tab 1: Overview & Test Sample
        with gr.Tab("πŸ“Š Overview"):
            gr.Markdown(
                """
                ## About This Evaluation

                This was a "back of the envelope" style experiment to determine which Whisper model size works best
                for daily transcription on local hardware, focusing on the tradeoff between accuracy (WER) and inference speed.
                """
            )

            gr.Markdown("### 🎯 Test Sample")

            if audio_exists:
                gr.Audio(
                    value=str(audio_path),
                    label="Test Audio (001.wav)",
                    type="filepath"
                )
            else:
                gr.Markdown("**Note:** Audio file will be added soon.")

            gr.Markdown("### πŸ“ Reference Text (Ground Truth)")
            gr.Textbox(
                value=reference_text,
                label="Reference Transcription",
                lines=10,
                max_lines=15,
                interactive=False
            )

            gr.Markdown(
                """
                ### ⚠️ Important Limitations

                - **Quick experiment**: Not a definitive scientific evaluation
                - **Hardware specific**: AMD GPU with ROCm (not ideal for STT), using CPU inference
                - **Single sample**: Results based on one audio clip
                - **Variable conditions**: ASR accuracy depends on mic quality, background noise, speaking style
                - **Personal use case**: Optimized for one user's voice and workflow
                """
            )

        # Tab 2: Results & Visualizations
        with gr.Tab("πŸ“ˆ Results"):
            gr.Markdown("## Key Findings")

            with gr.Row():
                with gr.Column():
                    gr.Markdown(
                        """
                        ### Best Accuracy
                        **medium** model
                        - 6.07% WER
                        - 19.42s inference

                        ### Fastest
                        **tiny** model
                        - 15.05% WER
                        - 2.73s inference

                        ### Recommended for Daily Use
                        **base** model (faster-whisper)
                        - 9.95% WER
                        - ~5s inference
                        - Good balance
                        """
                    )

                with gr.Column():
                    gr.Markdown(
                        """
                        ### Key Takeaways

                        1. **Biggest jump**: tiny β†’ base (15% β†’ 10% WER)
                        2. **Diminishing returns**: After base, accuracy gains are smaller
                        3. **faster-whisper**: Same accuracy as OpenAI, 1.2x faster
                        4. **distil-whisper**: Unexpectedly slower AND less accurate on this sample
                        """
                    )

            gr.Markdown("## Interactive Visualizations")

            with gr.Row():
                gr.Plot(fig_wer, label="WER by Model Size")

            with gr.Row():
                gr.Plot(fig_scatter, label="Speed vs Accuracy")

            with gr.Row():
                gr.Plot(fig_engine, label="Engine Comparison")

            gr.Markdown("## Original Charts from Benchmark")

            with gr.Row():
                with gr.Column():
                    gr.Image("results/wer_by_size.png", label="WER by Size")
                with gr.Column():
                    gr.Image("results/speed_by_size.png", label="Speed by Size")

            with gr.Row():
                with gr.Column():
                    gr.Image("results/accuracy_speed_tradeoff.png", label="Accuracy vs Speed")
                with gr.Column():
                    gr.Image("results/engine_comparison.png", label="Engine Comparison")

            with gr.Row():
                gr.Image("results/variants_comparison.png", label="All Variants Tested")

        # Tab 3: Q&A
        with gr.Tab("❓ Questions & Answers"):
            gr.Markdown(
                """
                # Research Questions & Findings

                ## Q1: How much does model size actually matter for accuracy?

                **Answer:** On my hardware, diminishing returns set in around **medium**.

                The biggest accuracy jump was from tiny (15.05% WER) β†’ base (9.95% WER). After that, improvements are smaller:
                - tiny β†’ base: 5.1% improvement
                - base β†’ medium: 3.88% improvement
                - medium β†’ large-v3-turbo: Actually worse (1% regression)

                The "sweet spot" depends on your use case:
                - **Live transcription**: Even small lags matter β†’ base or small
                - **Batch processing**: Can afford slower β†’ medium or large

                ---

                ## Q2: Is faster-whisper really as good as OpenAI Whisper?

                **Answer:** Yes! On this test, identical accuracy with better speed.

                Testing the base model:
                - **faster-whisper**: 9.95% WER in 5.01s
                - **openai-whisper**: 9.95% WER in 6.17s

                faster-whisper was ~1.2x faster with no accuracy loss. Clear winner for my use case.

                ---

                ## Q3: What's the speed vs. accuracy tradeoff?

                **Answer:** For daily transcription of my own voice, base or small hits the sweet spot.

                - **tiny**: 2.73s but 15% WER is too rough
                - **base**: 5s with 10% WER - acceptable for daily use
                - **small**: Similar to base, slightly slower
                - **medium**: 6% WER but 7x slower than tiny
                - **large-v3-turbo**: 33s for 7% WER - overkill for casual use

                ---

                ## Q4: Which model should I use for my daily STT workflow?

                **My personal answer:** base model with faster-whisper

                **Why it works for me:**
                - ~10% WER is acceptable for dictation (I can quickly fix errors)
                - 5 seconds per clip is fast enough
                - 140MB model size is manageable
                - Good balance for daily workflow

                **When I'd use something else:**
                - **tiny**: Quick tests or very long recordings where speed matters most
                - **medium/large**: Publishing or professional work needing better accuracy

                ---

                ## Bonus Finding: distil-whisper

                I tested distil-whisper expecting it to be faster, but on my sample:
                - **distil-whisper**: 21.6% WER in 38.49s βœ—

                Both slower AND less accurate than the standard models. Unexpected, but that's the data.
                """
            )

        # Tab 4: Hardware & Setup
        with gr.Tab("πŸ’» Hardware & Setup"):
            gr.Markdown(
                """
                ## Test Environment

                ### Hardware
                - **GPU**: AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT (ROCm available but using CPU inference)
                - **CPU**: Intel Core i7-12700F (12 cores, 20 threads)
                - **RAM**: 64 GB
                - **OS**: Ubuntu 25.04

                ### Why CPU Inference?
                - AMD GPU with ROCm isn't ideal for STT workloads
                - CPU inference provided more consistent results
                - Your performance will differ based on your hardware

                ### Models Tested

                **Whisper model sizes:**
                - tiny (39M params)
                - base (74M params)
                - small (244M params)
                - medium (769M params)
                - large-v3-turbo (809M params)

                **Engines compared:**
                - OpenAI Whisper (original implementation)
                - faster-whisper (optimized CTranslate2)
                - distil-whisper (distilled variant)

                ### Metrics
                - **WER (Word Error Rate)**: Lower is better - percentage of words transcribed incorrectly
                - **Inference Time**: How long it takes to transcribe the audio sample

                ## Running Your Own Tests

                Want to benchmark on your own voice and hardware?

                1. Clone the repository: [github.com/danielrosehill/Local-ASR-STT-Benchmark](https://github.com/danielrosehill/Local-ASR-STT-Benchmark)
                2. Set up the conda environment (see `setup.md`)
                3. Record your own audio and create reference transcriptions
                4. Run the benchmark scripts
                5. Generate visualizations

                Your results will likely differ based on:
                - Your hardware (GPU/CPU)
                - Your voice characteristics
                - Your microphone quality
                - Background noise conditions
                - Speaking style and pace
                """
            )

        # Tab 5: About
        with gr.Tab("ℹ️ About"):
            gr.Markdown(
                """
                ## About This Project

                ### Motivation

                I was tired of guessing which Whisper model size to use for speech-to-text. There are plenty of
                benchmarks out there, but they're often:
                - Run on different hardware than mine
                - Tested on different voice characteristics
                - Using different microphones and conditions

                So I decided to run my own evaluation on my actual setup with my actual voice.

                ### Why This Matters

                If you're doing hours of transcription per day (like I am), optimizing your STT setup is worth it:
                - Faster models = less waiting
                - More accurate models = less editing
                - Finding the sweet spot = better workflow

                ### Next Steps

                For a more robust evaluation, I'd want to:
                - Test on multiple audio samples
                - Include different speaking styles (casual, technical, professional)
                - Test on different microphones
                - Evaluate punctuation and capitalization accuracy
                - Compare ASR (Automatic Speech Recognition) vs traditional STT
                - Test GPU inference on NVIDIA hardware

                ### Repository

                Full benchmark code and results:
                [github.com/danielrosehill/Local-ASR-STT-Benchmark](https://github.com/danielrosehill/Local-ASR-STT-Benchmark)

                ### License

                MIT License - Feel free to use and adapt for your own benchmarks!

                ---

                *Built with Gradio β€’ Whisper models by OpenAI β€’ Hosted on Hugging Face Spaces*
                """
            )

    gr.Markdown(
        """
        ---
        ### πŸ“§ Questions or feedback?
        Visit the [GitHub repository](https://github.com/danielrosehill/Local-ASR-STT-Benchmark) to open an issue or contribute.
        """
    )

    gr.HTML(
        """
        <div style="text-align: center; margin-top: 20px;">
            <a href="https://danielrosehill.com" target="_blank">
                <img src="/file/badge.png" alt="Daniel Rosehill" style="width: 480px;">
            </a>
        </div>
        """
    )

if __name__ == "__main__":
    demo.launch()