File size: 9,430 Bytes
1118181 | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 | """Blind human A/B validation for OCR judge quality."""
from __future__ import annotations
import json
import os
import random
from collections import defaultdict
from dataclasses import dataclass, field
from typing import Any
import structlog
logger = structlog.get_logger()
# Confidence thresholds
MIN_ANNOTATIONS_FOR_CONFIDENCE = 15
HIGH_AGREEMENT_THRESHOLD = 0.75
@dataclass
class AgreementStats:
"""Tracks agreement between human and VLM judge."""
agree: int = 0
soft_disagree: int = 0 # one picks tie, other picks winner
hard_disagree: int = 0 # both pick winners but opposite
total: int = 0
@property
def agreement_rate(self) -> float:
"""Rate including soft disagreements as partial agreement."""
return (self.agree + self.soft_disagree) / self.total if self.total else 0.0
@property
def hard_disagree_rate(self) -> float:
return self.hard_disagree / self.total if self.total else 0.0
@dataclass
class ValidationComparison:
"""A single comparison for human validation.
Built from enriched comparison data published by the judge.
"""
comparison_id: int
sample_idx: int
model_a: str
model_b: str
winner: str # judge's verdict (hidden during annotation)
reason: str
agreement: str # jury agreement (e.g. "2/2")
text_a: str # OCR text from model A
text_b: str # OCR text from model B
col_a: str
col_b: str
swapped: bool # position-bias randomization for human display
display_text_a: str = "" # text shown to human (may be swapped)
display_text_b: str = ""
@dataclass
class ValidationSession:
"""Holds state for a validation session."""
comparisons: list[ValidationComparison]
model_names: list[str]
metadata: dict[str, Any] = field(default_factory=dict)
annotations: list[dict[str, Any]] = field(default_factory=list)
completed_ids: set[int] = field(default_factory=set)
def _is_split_jury(agreement: str) -> bool:
"""Check if a jury vote was split (e.g. '1/2' not '2/2')."""
parts = agreement.split("/")
return len(parts) == 2 and parts[0] != parts[1]
def _interleave_by_sample(
comparisons: list[ValidationComparison],
) -> list[ValidationComparison]:
"""Interleave comparisons so you see different samples before repeating."""
by_sample: dict[int, list[ValidationComparison]] = defaultdict(list)
for comp in comparisons:
by_sample[comp.sample_idx].append(comp)
result: list[ValidationComparison] = []
queues = list(by_sample.values())
while queues:
next_round = []
for q in queues:
result.append(q.pop(0))
if q:
next_round.append(q)
queues = next_round
return result
def build_validation_comparisons(
comparison_rows: list[dict[str, Any]],
*,
n: int | None = None,
prioritize_splits: bool = True,
seed: int = 42,
) -> list[ValidationComparison]:
"""Build validation comparisons from published judge results.
Args:
comparison_rows: Rows from the comparisons config of a results dataset.
n: Max number of comparisons to include (None = all).
prioritize_splits: Show split-jury cases first (most informative).
seed: Random seed for position-bias randomization.
"""
rng = random.Random(seed)
comps: list[ValidationComparison] = []
for i, row in enumerate(comparison_rows):
swapped = rng.random() < 0.5
text_a = row.get("text_a", "")
text_b = row.get("text_b", "")
if swapped:
display_a, display_b = text_b, text_a
else:
display_a, display_b = text_a, text_b
comps.append(
ValidationComparison(
comparison_id=i,
sample_idx=row.get("sample_idx", i),
model_a=row.get("model_a", ""),
model_b=row.get("model_b", ""),
winner=row.get("winner", "tie"),
reason=row.get("reason", ""),
agreement=row.get("agreement", "1/1"),
text_a=text_a,
text_b=text_b,
col_a=row.get("col_a", ""),
col_b=row.get("col_b", ""),
swapped=swapped,
display_text_a=display_a,
display_text_b=display_b,
)
)
if prioritize_splits:
splits = [c for c in comps if _is_split_jury(c.agreement)]
unanimous = [c for c in comps if not _is_split_jury(c.agreement)]
ordered = _interleave_by_sample(splits) + _interleave_by_sample(unanimous)
else:
ordered = _interleave_by_sample(comps)
if n is not None and n < len(ordered):
ordered = ordered[:n]
# Re-assign comparison IDs after reordering
return [
ValidationComparison(
comparison_id=i,
sample_idx=c.sample_idx,
model_a=c.model_a,
model_b=c.model_b,
winner=c.winner,
reason=c.reason,
agreement=c.agreement,
text_a=c.text_a,
text_b=c.text_b,
col_a=c.col_a,
col_b=c.col_b,
swapped=c.swapped,
display_text_a=c.display_text_a,
display_text_b=c.display_text_b,
)
for i, c in enumerate(ordered)
]
def compute_agreement(
annotations: list[dict[str, Any]],
comparisons: list[ValidationComparison],
) -> AgreementStats:
"""Compute agreement between human annotations and judge verdicts."""
comp_by_id = {c.comparison_id: c for c in comparisons}
stats = AgreementStats()
for ann in annotations:
comp = comp_by_id.get(ann.get("comparison_id"))
if not comp:
continue
# Unswap human vote
human_winner = ann["winner"]
if comp.swapped:
if human_winner == "A":
human_winner = "B"
elif human_winner == "B":
human_winner = "A"
judge_winner = comp.winner
stats.total += 1
if human_winner == judge_winner:
stats.agree += 1
elif human_winner == "tie" or judge_winner == "tie":
stats.soft_disagree += 1
else:
stats.hard_disagree += 1
return stats
def compute_human_elo(
annotations: list[dict[str, Any]],
comparisons: list[ValidationComparison],
) -> Any:
"""Compute ELO leaderboard from human annotations.
Returns a ``Leaderboard`` from ``elo.py``, or None if no annotations.
"""
from ocr_bench.elo import ComparisonResult, compute_elo
comp_by_id = {c.comparison_id: c for c in comparisons}
model_set: set[str] = set()
results: list[ComparisonResult] = []
for ann in annotations:
comp = comp_by_id.get(ann.get("comparison_id"))
if not comp:
continue
# Unswap human vote to get canonical winner
human_winner = ann["winner"]
if comp.swapped:
if human_winner == "A":
human_winner = "B"
elif human_winner == "B":
human_winner = "A"
model_set.add(comp.model_a)
model_set.add(comp.model_b)
results.append(
ComparisonResult(
sample_idx=comp.sample_idx,
model_a=comp.model_a,
model_b=comp.model_b,
winner=human_winner,
)
)
if not results:
return None
return compute_elo(results, sorted(model_set))
def save_annotations(
path: str,
metadata: dict[str, Any],
annotations: list[dict[str, Any]],
) -> None:
"""Atomically save annotations to JSON file."""
data = {"metadata": metadata, "annotations": annotations}
tmp = path + ".tmp"
with open(tmp, "w") as f:
json.dump(data, f, indent=2)
os.replace(tmp, path)
def load_annotations(path: str) -> tuple[dict[str, Any], list[dict[str, Any]]]:
"""Load annotations from JSON file. Returns (metadata, annotations)."""
if not os.path.exists(path):
return {}, []
with open(path) as f:
data = json.load(f)
return data.get("metadata", {}), data.get("annotations", [])
def _agreement_banner(stats: AgreementStats) -> str:
"""Format agreement stats for display."""
if stats.total == 0:
return ""
parts = [f"Agree: {stats.agree}"]
if stats.soft_disagree:
parts.append(f"Soft: {stats.soft_disagree}")
if stats.hard_disagree:
parts.append(f"**Hard: {stats.hard_disagree}**")
parts.append(f"(of {stats.total})")
confidence = ""
if stats.total >= MIN_ANNOTATIONS_FOR_CONFIDENCE:
if stats.hard_disagree_rate == 0:
confidence = (
f" -- No hard disagreements after {stats.total} annotations. "
"Judge rankings reliable for this domain."
)
elif stats.hard_disagree_rate <= 0.1:
confidence = (
f" -- Very few hard disagreements ({stats.hard_disagree}). "
"Rankings likely trustworthy."
)
elif stats.hard_disagree_rate > 0.25:
confidence = (
f" -- Many hard disagreements ({stats.hard_disagree}/{stats.total}). "
"Judge may not be calibrated for this content."
)
return f"Judge: {' | '.join(parts)}{confidence}"
|