Download quantity_module/static/quantity_COU.html from dmsaylor/CHRIS: direct link, hf CLI and curl.
- Browser
- Download file 2.51 kB
-
https://huggingface.co/spaces/dmsaylor/CHRIS/resolve/main/quantity_module/static/quantity_COU.html
- Command line
-
hf download hf://spaces/dmsaylor/CHRIS/quantity_module/static/quantity_COU.html
-
curl -L -o quantity_COU.html https://huggingface.co/spaces/dmsaylor/CHRIS/resolve/main/quantity_module/static/quantity_COU.html
2.51 kB
| <html lang="en"> | |
| <head> | |
| <title>Total Quantity-COU</title> | |
| <link rel="stylesheet" href="../../static/styles.css"> | |
| <meta charset="UTF-8"> | |
| </head> | |
| <header> | |
| <img src="images/FDAlogo.png" style="float: left;" height="100"/> | |
| <img src="images/FDAgraphic.png" style="float: right;" height="100"/> | |
| <br clear="all" /> | |
| <h1 style="text-align:center">CHRIS: <font color="#0070C0">CH</font>emical <font color="#0070C0">RIS</font>k calculators - Total Quantity </h1> | |
| </header> | |
| <h2 id="context-of-use-cou">Context of Use (COU)</h2> | |
| <p>The total quantity module of the CHemical RISk calculator (CHRIS) | |
| allows the user to …</p> | |
| <p>The CHRIS - Total Quantity module outputs a predicted … For | |
| additional details on the model please see this <a | |
| href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0273230023000739">article</a>.</p> | |
| <p>The tool is limited by the assumptions upon which the model is based. | |
| The salient limitations are enumerated below:</p> | |
| <ol type="1"> | |
| <li>The extractable is macroscopically homogeneous within the matrix. | |
| Therefore, the output is only applicable to compounds that are | |
| introduced either intentionally or unintentionally during synthesis | |
| (e.g., residual monomers and oligomers, catalysts, initiators) or | |
| compounding (e.g., stabilizers, antioxidants, plasticizers). The model | |
| is not appropriate for surface residuals from processing, cleaning, and | |
| sterilization.</li> | |
| <li>The solvent is “perfectly mixed”. This should be a reasonable | |
| assumption provided the samples are adequately agitated over the | |
| timeframe of the testing. However, this assumption may not be | |
| appropriate if sufficient agitation is not applied and a signficant | |
| boundary layer develops that slows the release rate or if the extraction | |
| is conducted under flow conditions.</li> | |
| <li>Possible chemical reactions are not considered. Therefore, if the | |
| polymer matrix undergoes substantive degradation during the extraction | |
| test, the predictions may not be relevant. Further, the model does not | |
| consider the potential for individual extractable compounds to degrade | |
| over the selected timeframe.</li> | |
| <li>The test article is comprised of a single polymer matrix. In | |
| practice, complex devices may be comprised of multiple components and/or | |
| polymer matrices. In these scenarios, careful consideration of the | |
| potential contributions of each material constituent of the test article | |
| to the extractables profile is critical when attempting to leverage the | |
| model predictions.</li> | |
| </ol> | |