## 1. What is UI GreenMetric Sustainable University Rankings? 

Universitas Indonesia (UI) initiated a world university ranking in 2010, known through 2025 as the UI GreenMetric World University Rankings, to measure universities’ sustainability efforts. It was designed as an online survey to capture sustainability policies and programs implemented by universities across the globe. 

The ranking is broadly based on the conceptual framework of Environment, Economy, and Equity. Its categories, indicators, and weightings are intended to be relevant to a wide range of stakeholders while minimizing bias as much as possible. Data collection and submission are designed to be relatively straightforward and typically require a reasonable amount of staff time. 

In the 2010 edition, 95 universities from 35 countries participated: 18 from America, 35 from Europe, 40 from Asia, and two from Australia. In the 2025 edition, 1,745 universities from 105 countries participated. This growth reflects the global recognition of the UI GreenMetric as a pioneering sustainability-focused university ranking. 

Starting in 2026, the ranking was renamed the UI GreenMetric Sustainable University Rankings. The theme for 2026 is “Advancing Sustainable Campuses through Governance, Digitalization, and Integrated Performance.” This highlights how universities strengthen sustainability through effective governance structures, transparent leadership, and accountable policies. 

## 2. What are the objectives? 

The UI GreenMetric Sustainable University Rankings aim to: 

- Contribute to the academic discourse on sustainability in higher education and campus greening 
- Promote university-led social change toward sustainability goals 
- Serve as a self-assessment tool for campus sustainability for higher education institutions (HEIs) worldwide; and 
- Inform governments, international and local environmental agencies, and society about sustainability programs on campuses. 

## 3. Who can participate? 

Any university worldwide with a strong commitment to sustainability can participate in the annual UI GreenMetric Sustainable University Rankings. 

## 4. What are the benefits? 

Universities that participate in UI GreenMetric Sustainable University Rankings by submitting their data can benefit from internationalization and recognition, greater awareness of sustainability, social change and action, and networking opportunities for collaboration. Registration is free of charge. 

### a. Internationalization and recognition 

Participation in the UI GreenMetric Sustainable University Rankings can support a university’s internationalization and recognition by increasing the visibility of its sustainability efforts. This may lead to greater traffic to the university website, more online references to the institution in relation to sustainability, increased communication with potential partners, and stronger recognition from alumni and the public as a university committed to sustainability. 

### b. Increasing awareness of sustainability issues 

Participation can strengthen sustainability awareness within the university and beyond. The world faces major challenges, including population pressure, global warming, overexploitation of natural resources, dependence on fossil fuels, and water and food insecurity. Higher education plays a crucial role in responding to these challenges. The UI GreenMetric Sustainable University Rankings supports this role by assessing and comparing efforts in education for sustainable development, sustainability research, campus greening, and social outreach. 

### c. Social change and action 

The UI GreenMetric Sustainable University Rankings is not only about raising awareness; it encourages concrete action. Turning knowledge into practice is essential for responding to today’s sustainability challenges. Through shared learning and collective efforts, universities can contribute meaningfully to sustainability transitions. 

### d. Networking 

UI GreenMetric Network was established in 2017, and all participants automatically become members of the UI GreenMetric Sustainable University Rankings Network (UIGM-SUREN).  Through this network, participants can share best practices and build collaborations by joining the annual UI GreenMetric International Workshop and regional and national workshops hosted by approved universities. Participants may also organize technical workshops on the UI GreenMetric at their respective institutions. 

As a platform to support sustainability action, the network is managed by UI GreenMetric as the secretariat. Programs and directions are proposed and decided by a steering committee that includes the UI GreenMetric Secretariat and regional and national coordinators, as shown below. 

Table 1. National Coordinators of the UI GreenMetric Sustainable University Rankings Network (UIGM-SUREN) [ refer to table1_nationalcoordinators.csv ] 

As of the 2025 edition, the network comprises 1,745 participating universities across Asia, Europe, Africa, Australia, America, and Oceania. Collectively, these universities represent more than 3 million faculty members, 35 million students, and USD 98 billion in total research funding related to the environment and sustainability. These figures are Secretariat estimates based on aggregation of self-reported institutional data submitted by participating universities (reference year: 2025). 

### e. How can universities participate? 

Participation in the ranking process is straightforward. The sustainability director or other designated person in charge may visit https://uigreenmetric.com to learn about the ranking. If interested, the university may email the UI GreenMetric Secretariat at support@uigreenmetric.com to request an invitation letter and access to the online system. 

Universities that participated in previous editions will receive an invitation to participate again. If your university decides not to participate for specific reasons, we would appreciate it if you could inform the secretariat. Your university is welcome to participate in future surveys. 

We strongly recommend that each university appoints a dedicated contact person to coordinate data submissions and communication with the secretariat. Please feel free to contact the secretariat if you have any questions regarding the survey or submission process. 

## 5. How was the UI GreenMetric Sustainable University Rankings developed? 

The establishment of the UI GreenMetric Sustainable University Rankings was influenced by several key considerations. 

### a. Idealism and the role of universities 

Future challenges to civilization include population pressure, climate change, energy security, environmental degradation, water and food security, and sustainable development. Despite extensive scientific research and public discussions, many governments have struggled to commit to sustainability agendas. At Universitas Indonesia, this concern led to the view that universities are well-positioned to help build consensus and advance action in key areas. These include the Triple Bottom Line, the 3Es (Equity, Economy, Environment), Green Building, and Education for Sustainable Development (ESD). 

UI GreenMetric Sustainable University Rankings serves as a tool for universities to address sustainability challenges. Many institutions use the UI GreenMetric questionnaire to measure, monitor, and evaluate their sustainability strategies. By participating, universities can learn from each other and collaborate to reduce their negative environmental impact. UI GreenMetric is a non-profit initiative; therefore, universities may participate without registration fees. 

### b. UI GreenMetric Sustainable University Rankings model 

Although UI GreenMetric was not developed from a single pre-existing ranking system, its model and questionnaire were designed with awareness of established sustainability assessment frameworks and university ranking approaches. During the design phase, several references informed the construction of indicators and scoring logic, including the Holcim Sustainability Awards, GREENSHIP (developed by the Green Building Council of Indonesia and informed by LEED), the Sustainability Tracking, Assessment, and Rating System (STARS), and the College Sustainability Report Card (also known as the Green Report Card). 

The guidelines position UI GreenMetric within the broader sustainability agenda of the United Nations. It notes the UN Environment’s emphasis on integrated approaches in the 2030 Agenda, where improvements in environmental health can generate social and economic benefits, and states that the 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) are captured within the UI GreenMetric criteria and indicators. 

### c. Methodology development over time 

The UI GreenMetric Sustainable University Rankings has continuously refined its indicators to reflect emerging sustainability priorities and improve clarity and comparability. 

- 2010: 23 indicators across five categories were used to calculate ranking scores. 

- 2011: The number of indicators increased to 34. 

- 2012: The “smoke-free and drug-free campus environment” indicator was removed, resulting in 33 indicators. Indicators were reorganized into six categories, including education-related criteria, and the development of a dedicated category for sustainability education and research began to be considered. 

• 2015: The theme was carbon footprint, and two questions were added to the Energy and Climate Change section. Additional sub-indicators were introduced, particularly in Water and Transportation. 

- 2017: A major revision was implemented to better reflect new trends in sustainability. 

- 2018: The theme was Universities, Impacts, and Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Detailed answer options were introduced for many indicators, including forest and planted vegetation coverage, additional water absorption areas, energy-efficient appliances, smart buildings, renewable energy ratio, green building elements, greenhouse gas reduction programs, waste and water criteria, parking area ratio, transportation initiatives to reduce private vehicles, parking reduction programs, shuttle services, Zero-Emission Vehicles (ZEV), pedestrian policies, and university-run sustainability websites. A new item was also added under the Education category regarding the availability of a published sustainability report. In addition, the bicycle-related item was updated to better reflect global developments in green transportation by focusing on Zero-Emission Vehicles. 

- 2019: The theme was sustainable universities in a changing world: Lessons, challenges, and opportunities. The questionnaire was improved by expanding the answer options and providing clearer explanations, particularly for smart building indicators. 

- 2020: The theme was universities’ responsibility for sustainable development goals and the world’s Complex Challenges. The questionnaire emphasized the potential impact universities can have through green campus planning and community engagement. 

- 2021: New questions were added to better capture social, cultural, and economic impacts and reflect pandemic-related conditions. 

- 2022: Indicators were adjusted to reflect ongoing pandemic conditions, and a new indicator related to water pollution was added. 

- 2023: Several new indicators were added, including those related to 3R waste programs, student organization activities, and international collaboration. 

- 2024: UI GreenMetric introduced new and revised indicators focusing on Information and Communication Technology (ICT), encouraging universities to develop digital innovations that support sustainability. 

- 2025: Further adjustments will emphasize the impact and effectiveness of sustainability programs to strengthen their relevance in today’s context. 

- 2026: UI GreenMetric added the Governance and Digitalization (GD) criterion and began referring to the rankings as the UI GreenMetric Sustainable University Rankings (UIGM SUR) (previously branded as the UI GreenMetric World University Rankings, WUR). 

In addition, evidence is essential for the review process. Please ensure that the supporting evidence provided is complete, clear, and consistent with the data submitted. 

### d. Realities and challenges 

The goal of developing a Sustainable University ranking was pursued with a clear understanding that the diversity of universities—their types, missions, and local contexts—creates methodological challenges. Universities differ in their levels of sustainability awareness and commitment, available budgets, extent of green space on campus, and many other dimensions. 

These differences are complex in nature. However, UI GreenMetric Sustainable University Rankings is committed to continuously improving the ranking so that it remains useful and fair for all participants. We welcome feedback and suggestions from our members. 

## 6. Who are the team? 

From 2010 to 2020, the UI GreenMetric Sustainable University Rankings were managed by a team operating under the Rector of Universitas Indonesia. Since 2021, UI GreenMetric has operated more independently and has gradually shifted toward a self-financing model. 

Our team consists of three main groups: the management team, expert members, and reviewers. Team members come from a wide range of academic and professional backgrounds, including Public Administration, Library & Information Science, Cultural Studies, Environmental Sciences, Engineering, Architecture, Urban Design, Dentistry, Public Health, Statistics, Chemistry, Physics, and Linguistics. 

## 7. What is the methodology? 

### a. The criteria 

UI GreenMetric Sustainable University Rankings evaluates university policies and performance using the following seven categories: 

- Setting and Infrastructure (SI) 
- Energy and Climate Change (EC)
- Waste (WS)
- Water (WR)
- Transportation (TR)
- Education and Research (ED)
- Governance and Digitalization (GD)

Each category has a weight, as shown below. 

Table 2. Categories used in the rankings and their weighting [refer to table2_categoriesusedandweighting.csv]

Table 3. Indicators and categories suggested for use in the 2026 rankings [refer to appendix1_questionnairemasterandscoring.csv]
Light green indicates the new indicators for 2026.

### b. Revised indicators 

To respond to current developments and better capture the social, cultural, and economic dimensions of sustainability, several indicators were revised in this year’s questionnaire. 

### c. Scoring 

Each item is scored numerically to allow for statistical processing of the data. Scores are based on simple counts (e.g., number of programs, volume of waste) or responses on a defined scale. Detailed scoring guidance is provided in Appendix 1 . 

### d. Weighting of criteria 

Each criterion falls under a broader category. After data submission, the raw scores are weighted according to the category weightings to produce the final score. 

### e. Tie-breaking rules 

If two or more universities obtain the same total score, the UI GreenMetric Sustainable University Rankings 2026 applies the following tie-breaking rules: 

   1. Energy and Climate Change (EC) score (20%) 
   2. If the tie remains, Waste (WS) score (17%), followed by Transportation (TR) score (17%) 
   3. If the tie still remains, Education and Research (ED) score (13%) 
   4. If the tie still remains, Setting and Infrastructure (SI) (11%), followed by Water (WR) (11%), and then Governance and Digitalization (GD) (11%), to determine the final ranking order 

- Note: These tie-breaking steps follow the category weightings presented in Table 2. 

### f. Refining and improving the research instrument 

Although we have made every effort to design and implement the questionnaire carefully, we recognize that there may still be some limitations. Therefore, we regularly review the criteria and weightings to incorporate feedback from participants and reflect current developments in the field. We welcome your comments and suggestions for improvement. 

### g. Data submission 

Universities should submit data through the online system between February and June 2026. Data may be reported using a one-year reference period, either on a calendaryear basis (e.g., January 2025 to December 2025) or as a rolling 12month period (e.g., May 2025 to May 2026), in accordance with the applicable UI GreenMetric data reference policy. 

We also welcome supporting documentation, including electronic or hard copies of your university’s sustainability evaluations and reports, as well as evidence of sustainability activities conducted at your university. 

### h. Results 

Final results will be released in September 2026 . The overall ranking results and detailed scores can be accessed at: https://uigreenmetric.com 

## 9. Who are our networks? 

The growing awareness of sustainability has helped build a global network of likeminded universities and organizations. This network is coordinated by the UI GreenMetric Sustainable University Rankings Secretariat and guided by a steering 

committee that includes national and/or regional coordinators in cooperation with universities that host UI GreenMetric events. 

Since 2017, UI GreenMetric has supported and participated in many national and regional workshops hosted by universities in various countries. In 2017, UI GreenMetric collaborated with Kazakh National Agrarian University (Kazakhstan), El Bosque University (Colombia), University of São Paulo (Brazil), Universitas Diponegoro (Indonesia), University of Bologna (Italy), Aalborg University (Denmark), King Abdulaziz University (Saudi Arabia), and People’s Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University) (Russia). The 3[rd] International Workshop on UI GreenMetric (IWGM) was hosted by Zonguldak Bülent Ecevit University (Turkey). 

In 2018, UI GreenMetric also shared its progress at international and regional forums, including the IREG Forum (Belgium), the ISCN Conference (Sweden), the CRUI Working Group on International Academic Rankings (Italy), the International Association for Impact Assessment (IAIA) Conference (Malaysia), and the Global Symposium on Green Campus Development (China). In the same year, UI GreenMetric contributed to national workshops hosted by several universities, including the University of Zanjan and Ferdowsi University of Mashhad (Iran), Atyrau State University (Kazakhstan), King Abdulaziz University (Saudi Arabia), University of Nottingham (United Kingdom), National University of Colombia and Universidad del Rosario (Colombia), University of São Paulo (Brazil), Pakistan Higher Education Commission (Pakistan), Universiti Utara Malaysia (Malaysia), Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember (Indonesia), Riga Technical University (Latvia), RUDN University (Russia), Universidad Técnica Federico Santa María (Chile), and OMNES Education (France). The 4[th] International Workshop on UI GreenMetric (IWGM) was hosted by Universitas Diponegoro (Indonesia). 

In 2019, UI GreenMetric was invited to engage with various organizations and communities, including the 4th General Assembly Meeting of the Green University Union of Taiwan, CRUE Meeting, World Environmental Education Congress, and Building Universities’ Reputations (BUR) Conference. National and regional workshops were also hosted by universities such as Universidad Autónoma de Occidente and Universidad Icesi (Colombia), University of Szeged and University of Pécs (Hungary), Universitas Hasanuddin (Indonesia), Nazarbayev University (Kazakhstan), Universidade Federal de Lavras (Brazil), Holy Spirit University of Kaslik (USEK) (Lebanon), RUDN University (Russia), Escuela Superior Politécnica de Chimborazo (ESPOCH) (Ecuador), University of Sousse (Tunisia), and Cyprus International University (North Cyprus). The 5[th] International Workshop on UI GreenMetric (IWGM) was hosted by University College Cork (Ireland). 

In early 2020, two workshops were held in France and Saudi Arabia. During the COVID-19 pandemic, UI GreenMetric continued its engagement through online activities, conducting more than 60 workshops and webinars virtually. 

In 2020, UI GreenMetric held virtual workshops with university representatives from different countries, including the University of Nottingham (United Kingdom), Mahidol University (Thailand), Universitas Riau (Indonesia), Fundación Universidad del Norte (Colombia), University of Sharjah (United Arab Emirates), RUDN University (Russia), University of Campinas (Brazil), and Universidad de Sonora (Mexico). The 6[th] International Workshop on UI GreenMetric (IWGM) was hosted by University of Zanjan (Iran). 

In 2021, the virtual workshops continued, with additional hosts and participating countries, including University of Szeged (Hungary), Mahidol University (Thailand), University of Zanjan (Iran), Tarbiat Modares University (Iran), Universitas Sebelas Maret (Indonesia), Universidad Hemisferios (Ecuador), RUDN University (Russia), Universidad Tecnológica de Pereira (Colombia), Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León (Mexico), and INSEEC U (France). The 7[th] International Workshop on UI GreenMetric (IWGM) was hosted by Universiti Putra Malaysia (Malaysia). 

As part of its thematic priorities, UI GreenMetric—together with University of São Paulo, Universitas Indonesia, El Bosque University, University of Szeged, University of Sharjah, ESPOCH, and the University of Sousse—launched the UI GreenMetric Online Course on Sustainability 2021 (Team A). This initiative offered an undergraduate-level introduction to sustainable development through a global learning experience involving universities across four continents and seven countries. It introduces students to key sustainability challenges and pathways in Brazil, Colombia, Ecuador, Hungary, Indonesia, Tunisia, and the United Arab Emirates and explores the relationships between economic development, social inclusion, and environmental protection. 

In 2022, UI GreenMetric organized workshops with university representatives from countries including Universidad EAFIT (Colombia), Mahidol University (Thailand), Universidad Tecnológica ECOTEC (Ecuador), RUDN University (Russia), University of Sharjah (United Arab Emirates), and Universitas Multimedia Nusantara (Indonesia). The 8[th] International Workshop on UI GreenMetric (IWGM) was hosted by National Pingtung University of Science and Technology (Taiwan). 

The UI GreenMetric Online Course on Sustainability continued to expand. In 2021-2024, 17 Indonesian universities collaborated to organize online courses for their students: Institut Teknologi Nasional Bandung, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Telkom University, Universitas Diponegoro, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Universitas Islam Negeri Jakarta, Universitas Lampung, Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang, Universitas Negeri Surabaya, Universitas Padjadjaran, Universitas Palangka Raya, Universitas Pancasila, Universitas Pattimura, Universitas Sam Ratulangi, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Universitas Sriwijaya, and Universitas Syiah Kuala. 

In 2023, national workshops were hosted by Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (Mexico), University of L’Aquila (Italy), Bukhara State University (Uzbekistan), Institut Teknologi Sumatera (Indonesia), Tarbiat Modares University (Iran), Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul (Brazil), Universidad San Francisco de Quito (Ecuador), Universidad Militar Nueva Granada (Colombia), Hasan Kalyoncu University (Turkey), Cyprus International University (Cyprus), Khwaja Fareed University of Engineering and Information Technology (Pakistan), Batangas State University (Philippines), Universitas Hasanuddin (Indonesia) and RUDN University (Russia). The 9[th] International Workshop on UI GreenMetric (IWGM) was hosted by University of Minho (Portugal). The UI GreenMetric Results and Awards was hosted by the Abu Dhabi University (United Arab Emirates). 

In 2024, national workshops were hosted by Lagos State University (Nigeria), BUAP (Mexico), Ege University (Turkey), Universidad de Vigo (Spain), UPEC (Ecuador), KFUEIT (Pakistan), Batangas State University (Philippines), Universitas Tanjungpura (Indonesia), University of Pécs (Hungary), RUDN University (Russia), Universitas Padjadjaran (Indonesia) and Bukhara State University (Uzbekistan). The 10[th] International Workshop on UI GreenMetric (IWGM) was hosted by Universidad del Rosario, Universidad Javeriana, Universidad Autonoma de Occidente, Universidad Nacional and Universidad El Bosque (Colombia). The UI GreenMetric Results and Awards 2024 were hosted by the University of São Paulo (USP) (Brazil). 

The online course for Team B was also organized by the National Pingtung University of Science and Technology (Taiwan), University of Pécs (Hungary), Universitas Diponegoro (Indonesia), Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta (Indonesia), Mahidol University (Thailand), and Zonguldak Bülent Ecevit University (Turkey). In 2024, one new university joined Team A—Oguz Han Engineering and Technology University (Turkmenistan)—and one new university joined Team B— Arab American University Palestine (Palestine). 

In 2025, national workshops were hosted by CETYS Universidad, Campus Tijuana (Mexico), Universidad Técnica Particular de Loja (UTPL) (Ecuador), Universidad de Santander (UDES) (Colombia), Burdur Mehmet Akif Ersoy University (Turkey), Kazakh National Agrarian University (KazNAU) (Kazakhstan), Università degli Studi dell’Aquila (Italy), Universidad Privada Dr. Rafael Belloso Chacín (URBE) (Venezuela), Grand Asian University Sialkot (GAUS) (Pakistan), UIN Raden Fatah Palembang (Indonesia) and Universitas Diponegoro (Indonesia). The 11[th] International Workshop on UI GreenMetric (IWGM) was hosted by Université Côte d’Azur (France). The UI GreenMetric Results and Awards 2025 were hosted by the National Chi Nan University (NCNU) (Taiwan). 

## 10. What are our plans? 

UI GreenMetric continuously reflects on how to better achieve its goals, learns from constructive feedback on university rankings and the advancement of Education for Sustainable Development (ESD), and benefits from the diverse experiences of participating universities across different contexts. 

We plan to continue improving the questionnaire and provide more consultation services to members of our network. We will also strengthen collaboration through innovative programs and new opportunities for shared learning to achieve this goal. 

## Questionnaire (Criteria and Indicators) 

The UI GreenMetric Sustainable University Rankings questionnaire is structured around seven categories used in the assessment: Setting and Infrastructure (SI), Energy and Climate Change (EC), Waste (WS), Water (WR), Transportation (TR), Education and Research (ED), and Governance and Digitalization (GD). Each category is broken down into specific questions with detailed guidance to help universities report their sustainability policies, programs, and performance in a consistent manner. Generally, universities may use the questionnaire to present sustainability efforts as accurately as possible, and supporting evidence is strongly recommended and required for most questions/indicators, especially campus maps and/or a campus master plan, because these help reviewers verify locations, area sizes, and the distribution of relevant facilities across indicators. 

### 1. Setting and Infrastructure (SI) — 11% 

This category provides baseline information on campus context and physical infrastructure to assess sustainability performance. It supports the assessment of whether a campus demonstrates the key characteristics of a green or sustainable campus, including land use patterns, open spaces, and ecosystem-related features. The category is designed to encourage universities to expand and protect green spaces, strengthen environmental stewardship, and support sustainable development through planning and infrastructure. 

#### 1.1. Type of higher education institution 

#### 1.2. Climate 
Please select the option that best describes the climate in your region. 

#### 1.3. Number of campus sites 

Please state the number of separate locations where your university conducts academic activities. For example, if your university operates more than one campus in different districts, towns, or cities, please report the total number of campuses . 

If more than one campus site is reported, all relevant data must be consistently applied across all listed campuses for the related indicators. 

Recommended evidence: Campus maps and/or a campus master plan showing campus location, area size, and the distribution of facilities relevant to the indicators. 

#### 1.4. Campus setting 

Please select one of the following options: 

#### 1.5. Total campus area (m²) 

Please state the total campus area in square meters in the footnote. Only areas used for academic activities should be included (for example, administration buildings, teaching facilities, student and staff activity buildings, dormitories, and canteens). 

Forests, fields, and other land areas may be counted only if they are used for academic purposes , such as field lectures, practicum, training, research, teaching, and/or community engagement activities. 

Recommended evidence: Campus maps showing locations, area size, and relevant land use. 

#### 1.6. Total campus ground floor area of buildings (m²) 
Please provide the total area occupied by buildings by reporting the combined ground floor footprint of all university buildings on campus. 

#### 1.7. Total campus buildings area (m²) 
Please provide the total floor area of all buildings , including the ground and upper floors. 

Recommended evidence: Campus maps showing building locations and/or documented building area calculations. 

#### 1.8. Ratio of open space area to total area (SI.1) 
Please provide the percentage ratio of the open space area to the total campus area. 

Formula: 
SI1 (%) = ((1.5 – 1.6) / 1.5) × 100% 

Recommended evidence: Campus maps showing open spaces and building footprints. 

#### 1.9. Total area covered by forest vegetation used for research, teaching, and/or community engagement (SI.2) 

Please provide the percentage of the campus area covered by forest vegetation relative to the total campus area. Forest vegetation refers to an area dominated 

by trees and associated biodiversity (natural and/or planted), including vertical stratification and undergrowth, and is typically managed for conservation. 

To support consistent reporting across different national contexts, please specify the forest definition applied by your institution (e.g., a national definition where applicable). If no national definition is applied, you may refer to the FAO Forest Resources Assessment (FRA) definition: land spanning more than 0.5 ha with trees higher than 5 m and a canopy cover of more than 10%, or trees that can reach these thresholds in situ; land predominantly under agricultural or urban land use is excluded. 

The forested area must: 
- be owned by the university; and 
- be used for academic or community purposes (research, teaching, and/or community engagement). 

If your university is located in an arid zone, you may claim that the area developed as forest vegetation, provided it meets the requirements of the zone and is supported by evidence. 

Recommended evidence includes campus maps, land ownership documentation (if applicable), photos, and clear location markers. 

#### 1.10. Total area covered by planted vegetation (SI.3) 

Please provide the percentage of campus area covered by planted vegetation, excluding forests , relative to the total campus area. The following may be considered as planted vegetation: 

- lawns and gardens 
- green roofs 
- indoor planting areas 
- vertical gardens 

All claimed areas must be supported by clear visual evidence , such as site maps, building names, and images that clearly show the exact location of the vegetation. 

#### 1.11. Total number of regular students 

Please provide the total number of regular students (full-time and part-time). Regular students are defined as registered and active students in one semester (Effective FullTime Students/EFTS), excluding short-term students (for example, exchange students, continuing education, and short-course students). 

#### 1.12. Total number of online students 

Please provide the total number of students registered as online-only students , excluding regular students. 

#### 1.13. Total number of academic and administrative staff 

Please report the total number of effective full-time academic staff (lecturers, professors, and researchers) and administrative staff working at your university, using a clearly stated reference date or reporting period. 

#### 1.14. Open space area per campus population (SI.4) 

Please provide the open-space area per person on the campus. Only open spaces within the campus were included. If your university has a campus forest used for research, it may be reported under forest vegetation (SI.2), but it should not be included in this indicator . 

The formula (open space per person) is as follows: 
SI4 (m²/person) = (1.5 – 1.6) / (1.11 + 1.13) 

#### 1.15. Facilities for disabled persons, special needs, and/or maternity care (SI.5) 

Please provide information on campus facilities that support disabled persons, individuals with special needs, and/or maternity care (for example, library access, classrooms, toilets, lactation rooms, transportation access, daycare services). 

For each facility, please provide the following: 
- Campus maps showing the location, and 
- Clear identification of relevant buildings. 
You may also provide a table listing each Building A facilities available (for example, “Building A: lactation room, accessible toilet”). 

#### 1.16. Security and safety facilities (SI.6) 
Please provide information on the campus infrastructure that supports the security and safety of campus residents. 

#### 1.17. Health infrastructure for students, academics, and administrative staff well-being (SI.7) 

Please provide information on campus infrastructure supporting physical and mental health services for students, academic staff and administrative staff. 

#### 1.18. Conservation of flora, fauna, wildlife, and genetic resources (SI.8) 
Please provide information on campus programs for the conservation of flora (plants), fauna (animals), wildlife, and/or genetic resources for food and agriculture. You may include information such as the following: 

- program name and scope 
- types of species 
- number of species 
- duration of conservation 
- targeted population and/or conservation area 

Progress may be reported as a percentage of the total planned program (implemented or ongoing) and should reflect the annual achievements. 

We encourage institutions to provide the following: 
- a baseline list of identified species, 
- a list of species planned for conservation, and 
- a timeline for conservation activities, to demonstrate a structured and measurable plan for the same. 

If conservation activities are conducted in another location, your university may include them in the evidence document and include that conservation area in the total campus area (Question 1.5). 

#### 1.19. Impact of Setting and Infrastructure programs in supporting the SDGs 

Please indicate the extent to which your Setting and Infrastructure (SI) programs contribute to the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Select the option that best reflects the number of SDGs directly supported by these programs. 

### 2. Energy and Climate Change (EC) — 20% 

Energy and Climate Change is the highest-weighted category in the ranking, reflecting the central role of energy management and climate action in campus sustainability. It evaluates how universities manage energy use and respond to climate change through policies, programs, and infrastructure, including efficiency measures and climate-related initiatives. The indicators cover areas such as energy-efficient appliances, smart buildings, renewable energy, electricity consumption, green building elements, GHG reduction programs, and carbon footprint measurement to promote responsible energy management and reduced environmental impacts. 

#### 2.1. Energy-efficient appliances usage (EC.1) 

Please compare the number of energy-efficient appliances to conventional appliances used on campus and report the percentage. Examples of energy-efficient appliances include environmentally friendly air conditioners, LED lighting, and Energy Star certified computers. 

Recommended evidence includes inventory lists, procurement records, photos, and/or facility documentation. Campus maps may be included, where relevant. 

#### 2.2. Total smart building area on campus (m²) 
Please provide the total floor area (including ground and all upper floors) of the smart buildings on your campus. 

A building may be classified as a smart building if it includes core smart building features, such as the following: 

- Automation, 
- Safety and security (e.g., sensors, access control, CCTV/video surveillance), 
- Energy management, 
- Water and sanitation systems, 
- Indoor environmental quality (thermal comfort and air quality), and 
- Lighting efficiency (illumination management and low-power lighting). 

Detailed requirements can be found in Appendix 3 and the Evidence Template. 

Smart buildings are expected to be supported by systems such as 

- Building Management System (BMS), 
- Building Information Modelling (BIM), 
- Building Automation System (BAS), and/or  
- Facility Management System (FMS), and to include at least five (5) additional smart building features (where possible) that are integrated or interoperable with BMS/BIM/BAS/FMS. 

These systems typically support the data collection, monitoring, control, and management of building systems, such as ventilation, hydraulics, lighting, motor-driven systems, security, and fire prevention. 

All smart features should contribute to a positive environmental performance across the building lifecycle. Any efficiency gains achieved through smart systems must be explained in the university’s annual sustainability report. 

Recommended evidence: building list, floor area documentation, BMS/BIM/BAS/FMS proof (screenshots or certificates), and system description. 

#### 2.3. Smart building implementation (EC.2) 

Please indicate the stage of smart building implementation by reporting the percentage of smart building floor area compared with the total floor area of all campus buildings. 

Formula: 
EC2 (%) = (2.2 / 1.7) × 100 

Recommended evidence: campus maps (optional), a building list with areas, and supporting documentation. 

#### 2.4. Number of renewable energy sources on campus (EC.3) 

The use of multiple renewable energy sources indicates a greater effort to diversify the energy supply. 

Please select one option: 

#### 2.5. Renewable energy sources and annual energy produced (kWh) 

Please select one or more renewable energy sources used on campus and provide the amount of energy produced (in kilowatt-hours [kWh]). If your university uses other renewable energy sources, you may include them in the evidence documents. 

Notes (definitions): 

- Biodiesel: a renewable fuel made from natural oils and fats and used as an alternative to diesel. 
- Clean biomass: Organic materials (e.g., wood, agricultural residues, and algae) used for energy with minimal environmental impact. 
- Solar power: Energy from the sun using photovoltaic (PV) or solar thermal systems. 
- Wind power: Electricity generated by wind turbines. 
- Hydropower: electricity generated from moving water (rivers/dams). 
- CHP: systems that simultaneously produce electricity and useful heat, thereby improving efficiency. 

Recommended evidence: System specifications, monitoring output reports, photos, and/or utility or meter records. 

#### 2.6. Electricity usage per year (kWh) 

Please provide the total electricity used in the last 12 months across the entire university area (in kWh), including electricity for lighting, heating, cooling, laboratories, and other university operations. 

Recommended evidence: utility bills, metering reports, or certified energy audit documents. 

#### 2.7. Electricity usage per campus population (kWh per person) (EC.4)
Please provide the total electricity usage divided by the total campus population.
Formula:

EC4 = 2.6 / (1.11 + 1.13) 

Please select one option: 

#### 2.8. Ratio of renewable energy production to total energy usage per year (EC.5) 
Please provide the ratio of renewable energy production to total annual energy usage.

#### 2.9. Green building implementation elements across all buildings (EC.6) 

Please report how many green building elements have been implemented across campus buildings (e.g., natural ventilation, full natural daylighting, a building energy manager, certified green building status, etc.). Green building element classifications are available in Appendix 2 and the evidence templates. 

Recommended evidence includes building documentation, policies, photos, certification documents, and/or audit reports. 

#### 2.10. Greenhouse gas (GHG) emission reduction program (EC.7) 

Please select the option that best reflects your university’s formal programs (at any scale) for reducing GHG emissions. 

Please use Table 4 to support your answers. 

Table 4. List of greenhouse gas emission sources (Woo & Choi, 2013) [refer to table4_greenhousegasemissionsources.csv] 

Note: Air travel is listed in Table 4 as a common Scope 3 emission source. However, for Question 2.11 in UI GreenMetric 2026, universities should exclude emissions from flights, as stated in the questionnaire. 

#### 2.11. Total carbon footprint (CO ₂ emissions in the last 12 months, metric tons) 

Please provide the total carbon footprint of your university. Please exclude emissions from flights and secondary carbon sources (e.g., food consumption, dishes, and clothing). For calculation guidance, please refer to Appendix 4 . 

Recommended evidence: calculation sheets, data sources, assumptions, and references. 

#### 2.12. Carbon footprint per campus population (metric tons per person) (EC.8) 
Please provide the total carbon footprint divided by the total campus population.

Formula: 
EC8 = 2.11 / (1.11 + 1.13) 

#### 2.13. Number of innovative program(s) in energy and climate change (EC.9) 
Please provide the total number of innovative programs related to energy and climate change (e.g., Smart Indoor Health and Comfort Systems, novel energy approaches, new mitigation solutions, etc.). 

Innovative programs are defined as those created and developed by the university , resulting in new approaches or solutions for energy efficiency, climate mitigation, and sustainability outcomes. Eligible innovations include novel technologies, patented inventions, university-developed products, and recognized discoveries. 

Technologies or systems purchased from external manufacturers are not qualified. 
Recommended evidence includes patents/IP documents, project reports, prototypes, publications, awards, or formal recognition. 

#### 2.14. Impactful university program(s) on climate change (EC.10) 

Please select the option that best describes your university’s climate change programs (risk, impacts, mitigation, adaptation, impact reduction, and/or early warning). The supporting evidence must include the training materials and a participant list. 

#### 2.15. Impact of Energy and Climate Change programs in supporting the SDGs 

Please indicate the extent to which your Energy and Climate Change (EC) programs contribute to the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Select the option that best reflects the number of SDGs directly supported by these programs. 

### 3. Waste (WS) — 17% 

This category focuses on how universities reduce and manage waste generated through daily campus activities. It emphasizes waste prevention, recycling, and treatment systems that support sustainable campus operations and reduce pollution risks. The scope includes three R initiatives, paper and plastic reduction efforts, organic and inorganic waste treatment, toxic waste handling, and sewage treatment as core elements of accountable waste governance on campus. 

#### 3.1. 3R (Reduce, Reuse, Recycle) program for university waste (WS.1) 

Please select the option that best reflects your university’s current efforts to encourage staff and students to practice the 3R (Reduce, Reuse, and Recycle): 

Recommended evidence includes policy documents, campaign materials, photos of facilities, and program reports. 

#### 3.2. Total volume of paper and plastic produced this year (tons) 

Please provide the total volume of paper and plastic produced in the last 12 months across your entire university area (tons). 

#### 3.3. Total volume of paper and plastic produced last year (tons) 

Please provide the total volume of paper and plastic produced in the previous year across your entire university (in tons). 

#### 3.4. Program to reduce the use of paper and plastic on campus (WS.2) 

Please select the option that best reflects your university’s current programs and/or formal policies to reduce the use of paper and plastic (e.g., double-sided printing, paperless meetings, digital notes/books, reusable tumblers, reusable bags, ecofriendly packaging, “print only when necessary,” reusable goodie bags): 

Recommended evidence includes policy documents, circular letters, posters, program documentation, photos, and/or procurement records. 

#### 3.5. Total volume of organic waste produced this year (tons) 

Please provide the total volume of organic waste produced in the last 12 months across your university area (tons). 

#### 3.6. Total volume of organic waste produced last year (tons) 

Please provide the total volume of organic waste produced in the previous year across your university (in tons). 

#### 3.7. Total volume of organic waste treated this year (tons) 

Please provide the total volume of organic waste treated in the last 12 months across your entire university area (tons). 

#### 3.8. Organic waste treatment (WS.3) 

This indicator assesses how a university manages organic waste (e.g., food waste, vegetable waste, plant matter, and other biodegradable waste). 

Please select the option that best describes your university’s overall treatment of the majority of organic waste : 

Recommended evidence: treatment facility documentation, photographs, contracts with service providers, and campus maps showing facility locations (if relevant). 

#### 3.9. Total volume of inorganic waste produced this year (tons) 

Please provide the total volume of inorganic waste produced in the last 12 months across your entire university (in tons). 

#### 3.10. Total volume of inorganic waste produced last year (tons) 

Please provide the total volume of inorganic waste produced in the previous year across your entire university (tons). 

#### 3.11. Total volume of inorganic waste treated this year (tons) 

Please provide the total volume of inorganic waste treated in the last 12 months across your entire university area (tons). 

#### 3.12. Inorganic waste treatment (WS.4) 

Please describe the treatment method for non-toxic inorganic waste (e.g., paper, plastic, metal, glass, and e-waste that is not classified as hazardous). 

Please select the option that best describes your university’s overall treatment of the majority of inorganic waste : 

Recommended evidence includes waste management reports, contracts with recyclers, photos of sorting stations, and campus maps (if relevant). 

#### 3.13. Total volume of toxic waste produced this year (tons) 

Please provide the total volume of toxic (hazardous) waste produced in the last 12 months across your entire university (in tons). 

#### 3.14. Total volume of toxic waste produced last year (tons) 

Please provide the total volume of toxic (hazardous) waste produced in the previous year across your entire university (tons). 

#### 3.15. Total volume of toxic waste treated this year (tons) 

Please provide the total volume of toxic (hazardous) waste treated in the last 12 months across your entire university (in tons). 

#### 3.16. Toxic waste treatment (WS.5) 

Please select the option that best reflects how your university handles toxic (hazardous) waste (e.g., batteries, fluorescent lamps, and laboratory chemical waste). This includes whether toxic waste is separated, documented and transferred to certified third-party handlers. 

Recommended evidence includes 
hazardous waste SOPs, manifests/logbooks, contracts with certified companies, photos of labelled storage areas, and permits (if available). 

#### 3.17. Sewage disposal (WS.6) 

Please describe the primary method of sewage treatment at your university in detail. Select the option that best describes how most of the sewage is treated and disposed of: 

Notes (definitions and examples of evidence): 

- Preliminary treatment: screening (large solids), grit removal (sand/heavy materials), and oil/grease removal. 
Evidence: Photos or documentation of screens/grit chambers. 

- Primary treatment: sedimentation and/or coagulation–flocculation. 
Evidence: diagrams or operational records of the sedimentation tanks. 

- Secondary treatment: Biological processes (attached or suspended growth), such as activated sludge or biofilters. 
- Evidence: Reports/photos of biological treatment units and monitoring records. 

- Tertiary treatment: advanced treatment enabling reuse (disinfection, filtration, and advanced oxidation). 
Evidence: Water quality test results and system descriptions showing the final polishing processes. 

#### 3.18. Impact of Waste Management programs in supporting the SDGs 

Please indicate the extent to which your Waste Management (WS) programs contribute to the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Select the option that best reflects the number of SDGs directly supported. 

### 4. Water (WR) — 11% 

This category assesses water stewardship and ecosystem protection within and around the campus environment. It encourages universities to reduce groundwater use, strengthen water conservation, expand recycling or reuse, and protect surrounding habitats and ecosystems. Indicators include water absorption areas, conservation programs, recycling implementation, water-efficient appliances, treated water consumption, and water pollution control to support responsible water management and reduce environmental pressure. 

#### 4.1. Total area on campus for water absorption besides forest and planted vegetation (WR.1) 

Please provide the percentage of ground surfaces on campus that support water absorption (e.g., soil, grass, permeable paving blocks, infiltration areas, and synthetic fields designed for drainage), excluding forest and planted vegetation areas already counted under SI indicators. A larger water absorption area is desirable. 

Evidence may include campus maps, site plans, or documentation showing the locations and sizes of water absorption areas. 

#### 4.2. Water conservation program and implementation (WR.2) 

Please select the option that best describes your university’s current stage of a systematic and formal water conservation program (e.g., lake/pond management systems, rainwater harvesting, water tanks, biopores, recharge wells, infiltration wells, or other conservation infrastructure): 

Evidence may include policies, implementation reports, photographs, technical drawings, and campus maps showing system locations. 

#### 4.3. Water recycling program implementation (WR.3) 

This indicator assesses whether the university has formal policies and implementation for water recycling/reuse (e.g., using recycled water for toilet flushing, vehicle washing, landscape irrigation, or other non-potable uses). 

Evidence may include policies, SOPs, reuse system documentation, photographs, and campus maps. 

#### 4.4. Water-efficient appliances usage (WR.4) 

This indicator measures the extent to which conventional fixtures are replaced with water-efficient appliances (e.g., sensor/automatic taps, low-flow faucets, dualflush or high-efficiency toilets, and water-saving showerheads). 

Evidence may include procurement records, photographs, inventory lists, and/or maps showing installation locations. 

#### 4.5. Consumption of treated water (WR.5) 

Please indicate the percentage of treated water consumed compared with all water sources used by your university (e.g., rainwater tanks, groundwater, surface water, municipal supply). Treated water may come from treatment systems located on campus and/or outside campus , as long as the university uses the treated water. 

Evidence may include water bills, treatment system reports, meter readings, and water source documentation. 

#### 4.6. Water pollution control in campus area (WR.6) 

Please indicate the stage of your university’s water pollution control efforts to prevent polluted water from entering the campus water system and the surrounding waterways. Polluted water may include stormwater runoff contaminated with litter or chemicals, laboratory wastewater containing hazardous substances, and drainage contaminated by oil and grease from parking areas. 

Examples of relevant measures include water quality monitoring (physical, chemical, and biological parameters), stormwater management, wastewater treatment improvement, and pollution prevention programs. 

Evidence may include monitoring reports, laboratory waste management systems, SOPs, photographs, and campus drainage/system maps. 

#### 4.7. Impact of Water Management programs in supporting the SDGs 

Please indicate the extent to which your university Water Management (WR) programs contribute to the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Select the option that best reflects the number of SDGs directly supported. 

### 5. Transportation (TR) — 17% 

Transportation indicators address the relationship between mobility, campus emissions, and local air quality. This category promotes policies and programs that reduce dependence on private motor vehicles while improving access to loweremission options, such as campus shuttles, shared mobility, and zeroemission transport (e.g., bicycles and electric vehicles). It also highlights 

pedestrian-friendly design and better access to environmentally friendly public transport as practical ways to reduce the campus carbon footprint and improve health outcomes. 

#### 5.1. Number of cars actively used and managed by the university 
Please indicate the number of cars operated on campus that are owned and managed by the university , including vehicles operated through third-party service providers on behalf of the university. 

Please count only cars with emissions (i.e., cars with internal combustion engines). 

#### 5.2. Number of cars entering the university daily 

Please indicate the average number of cars that enter your campus daily. Use a balanced sampling period that considers both regular academic days and holiday/term breaks. 

Please count only cars with emissions (i.e., cars with internal combustion engines). 

#### 5.3. Number of motorcycles entering the university daily 
Please indicate the average number of motorcycles/motorbikes entering your campus per day. Use a balanced sampling period that considers both regular academic days and holiday/term breaks. 

Please count only  motorcycles/motorbikes  with  emissions (i.e., motorcycles/motorbikes with internal combustion engines). 

#### 5.4. Total number of vehicles with emissions divided by total campus population (TR.1) 

Please calculate the total number of vehicles with emissions, divided by the total campus population. 

Formula: TR1 = (5.1 + 5.2 + 5.3) / (1.11 + 1.13) 

#### 5.5. Shuttle services (TR.2) 

Please describe whether shuttle services are available for travel within the campus , including whether the service is free or paid and whether it is operated by the university or another party. 

Evidence may include route maps, shuttle schedules, service policies, photographs, and campus maps showing routes and stops. 

If shuttle services are not provided for a positive reason (e.g., the campus area is very small, or another zero-emission transport service is available), please select “Not applicable.” 

#### 5.6. Number of shuttles operating in the university 

Please indicate the number of campus shuttles operating at your university. Shuttles may include buses, MPVs, or minivans that operate within the campus. 

#### 5.7. Average number of passengers per shuttle trip 

Please indicate the average number of passengers per trip for each shuttle bus. This can be estimated based on seat capacity and typical occupancy. 

#### 5.8. Total number of shuttle trips per day 
Please indicate the total number of trips per day for each shuttle service in the table. 

#### 5.9. Zero Emission Vehicles (ZEV) availability on campus (TR.3) 
Please describe the extent to which your university supports the use of Zero Emission Vehicles (ZEV) for transportation on campus (e.g., bicycles, e-bikes, e- scooters, and electric vehicles such as electric cars and motorcycles; other nonemitting mobility options may also be included where relevant). 

#### 5.10. Average number of Zero Emission Vehicles (ZEV) on campus per day 

Please indicate the average daily number of ZEV on your campus, including both university-owned and privately owned vehicles. 

#### 5.11. Total number of ZEV divided by total campus population (TR.4)
Please calculate the total number of ZEV divided by the total campus population.

Formula: 
TR4 = 5.10 / (1.11 + 1.13) 

#### 5.12. Total ground parking area (m²) 

Please provide the total area of ground-level parking on campus (in square meters). This area can be estimated or validated using mapping tools (e.g., satellite imagery). 

#### 5.13. Ratio of ground parking area to total campus area (TR.5) 

Please calculate the ratio of the parking area to the total campus area. 

Formula: (5.12 / 1.5) × 100% 
Evidence may include campus maps, site plans, or annotated images of parking areas. 

#### 5.14. Program to limit or decrease parking area in the last 3 years (TR.6) 
Please select the option that best reflects your university’s program to limit or reduce parking areas in the last three years. 

Evidence may include campus maps showing reduced areas and before and after documentation. 

#### 5.15. Number of initiatives to decrease private vehicles on campus (TR.7) 

Please select the option that best reflects your university’s initiatives to reduce the use of private vehicles on campus (e.g., car-free days, car-sharing, increased parking fees, public transport integration, bike-sharing, low-fare subscriptions, and restrictions on student vehicles). 

#### 5.16. Pedestrian path on campus (TR.8) 

Please describe the extent to which pedestrian pathways are available and supported on the campus. 

Evidence may include pedestrian network maps, photographs, and campus maps showing pedestrian routes. 

Notes (definitions): 

- Safety: adequate lighting, separation from vehicle lanes, and handrails where required 
- Convenience: gentle slopes/ramps, partial shading/covered paths, comfortable walking surfaces (e.g., rubber or wood), and clear wayfinding and signage 
- Disability-friendly: ramps and guiding blocks with appropriate designs for people with physical disabilities. 

#### 5.17. Approximate daily travel distance of vehicles inside the campus only (km) 

Please provide the approximate daily travel distance (in kilometers) of vehicles operating within the campus area only (e.g., buses, cars, and motorcycles). 

#### 5.18. Impact of Transportation programs in supporting the SDGs 

Please indicate how strongly your transportation (TR) programs contribute to the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), based on the number of SDGs directly supported. 

### 6. Education and Research (ED) — 13% 

This category provides baseline information on how universities build sustainability awareness and capacity through education, research, and related academic activities. It encourages institutions to document and communicate sustainabilityrelated teaching, research outputs, events, and engagement activities as part of their sustainability strategy and accountability. In practice, the category helps demonstrate how sustainability is integrated into institutional learning and knowledge production, including how activities and targets are communicated to internal and external stakeholders. 

#### 6.1. Number of sustainability-related courses/subjects offered 

Please report the number of courses/subjects whose content is related to sustainability offered by your university. Some universities have already tracked this information. 

A course may be counted as sustainability-related if sustainability themes (environmental, social, cultural, and/or economic) are a meaningful part of the learning outcomes—not just a brief mention. You may identify relevant courses using sustainability-related keywords in the course titles or descriptions. 

Example: Environmental Chemistry can be counted as a sustainability-related course within a chemistry program. 

#### 6.2. Total number of courses/subjects offered 

Please report the total number of courses/subjects offered by your university in an academic year. This figure was used to determine the proportion of sustainability related education within the university’s teaching and learning activities. 

#### 6.3. Total number of sustainability-related study program offered 

Please report the total number of study programs related to sustainability offered by your university. This information helps to describe how sustainability is represented across the university’s academic offerings. 

#### 6.4. Ratio of sustainability-related courses to total courses/subjects (ED.1) 

Please calculate the percentage of sustainability-related courses compared with the total number of courses/subjects. 

Formula: (6.1 / 6.2) × 100% 

#### 6.5. Total research funds dedicated to sustainability research (USD) 

Please provide the average annual amount of research funding dedicated to sustainability research over the past three years . 

#### 6.6. Total research funds (USD) 

Please provide the average annual total research funding for the last three years . This will be used to calculate the share of sustainability research funding relative to the overall research funding. 

#### 6.7. Ratio of sustainability research funding to total research funding (ED.2) 

Please calculate the percentage of sustainability research funding compared to the total research funding. Formula: (6.5 / 6.6) × 100% 

#### 6.8. Number of lecturers and researchers in one year 

Please provide the total number of lecturers and researchers for the reporting year. 

#### 6.9. Number of scholarly publications on sustainability in one year 

Please provide the total number of indexed scholarly publications on sustainability for the reporting year. Data may be obtained from Google Scholar, Scopus, or other indexing services using keywords such as g reen, environment, sustainability, renewable energy, and climate change. 

#### 6.10. Ratio of sustainability publications to lecturers and researchers (ED.3) 
The ratio is calculated by dividing the number of sustainability publications (6.9) by the total number of lecturers and researchers (6.8) during the same one-year period. 

Formula: 6.9 / 6.8 

#### 6.11. Number of sustainability-related events (ED.4) 

Please report the average annual number of sustainability-related events hosted or organized by your university over the last three years (e.g., conferences, workshops, awareness campaigns, practical training, and festivals). Please select one option: 

#### 6.12. Student organisation activities related to sustainability per year (ED.5) 

Please report the number of sustainability-related activities organized by student organizations (faculty- or university-level) per year. Examples include seminars, webinars, training, sports events, bazaars promoting recycled materials and community outreach activities. 

#### 6.13. Number of cultural activities on campus (ED.6) 

Public access to campus facilities during cultural activities may indicate the broader societal impact of the university’s campus environment and sustainability efforts. Cultural activities may also be related to sustainability themes. Evidence can be provided as a table or a list of activities. 

Please report the number of cultural activities held on campus per year (e.g., cultural festivals, theatre, music performances, exhibitions). 

#### 6.14. University sustainability programs with international collaboration (ED.7) 

Please report the number of university sustainability programs with international collaborations per year. Examples include joint research, online courses, educational trips, dual-degree programs, student/staff exchanges, and internships. 

Evidence may include MoUs/MoAs, official letters, or event materials showing institutional involvement (e.g., logos and co-hosting information). 

#### 6.15. Community service projects related to sustainability involving students (ED.8) 

Please report the number of sustainability-related community service projects organized by the university that involve students per year. 

#### 6.16. Number of sustainability-related start-ups (ED.9) 

Please report the number of sustainability-related start-ups initiated and managed by your university. Start-ups may be profit or non-profit, digital or non-digital, and may involve students. Only start-ups established within the last three years were counted. 

Evidence may include the start-up’s establishment date, operating period, annual revenue (if available), and the number of employees. Please select one option: 

#### 6.17. Total number of graduates with green jobs (last 3 years) 

Please report the total number of graduates who obtained green jobs in the past three years. Green jobs are decent jobs that help preserve or restore the environment, including roles in traditional (e.g., manufacturing and construction) and emerging (e.g., renewable energy and energy efficiency) sectors. 

Green jobs may contribute to improving energy and material efficiency, reducing greenhouse gas emissions, minimizing waste and pollution, protecting ecosystems, and supporting climate change adaptation. 

Evidence may be provided as a table or list (e.g., graduation year, industry/sector, and distribution). 

#### 6.18. Total number of graduates (last 3 years) 

Please report the total number of university graduates over the past three years, regardless of the employment sector. Evidence may be provided in the form of tables or lists. 

#### 6.19. Percentage of graduates with green jobs (last 3 years) (ED.10) 

Please calculate the percentage of graduates with green jobs over the past three years, compared to the total number of graduates in the same period. 

Formula: (6.17 / 6.18) × 100% 

#### 6.20. Impact of Education and Research programs in supporting the SDGs 

Please indicate how strongly your Education and Research (ED) programs contribute to the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) based on the number of SDGs directly supported. 

### 7. Governance and Digitalization (GD) — 11% 

Governance and Digitalization capture the institutional enablers that support sustainability implementation, including governance structures, transparency, and the use of digital approaches. It measures how universities strengthen sustainability awareness and implementation among students, academic staff, and professional staff through policies, systems, and institutional arrangements. The category also encourages universities to publish sustainability and financial reports and communicate strategies, targets, and progress transparently to stakeholders as part of accountable sustainability governance. 

#### 7.1. Total university budget (USD) 
Please provide the average annual university budget over the last three years (USD). 

#### 7.2. University budget for sustainability efforts (USD) 

Please provide the average annual budget allocated to sustainability efforts over the last three years (USD). This may include infrastructure, facilities, personnel costs, research, programs, and other sustainability-related expenditures. 

Where possible, please break down the sustainability budget by the UI GreenMetric category (SI, EC, WS, WR, TR, ED, GD). For each category, please state the following: 

- the amount allocated (USD), and 
- Percentage of the total sustainability budget . 

#### 7.3. Percentage of university budget for sustainability efforts (GD1) 

Please calculate the percentage of the sustainability budget (as described in Section 7.2) compared to the total university budget (Section 7.1). 

Formula: (7.2 / 7.1) × 100% 

#### 7.4. University-run sustainability website (GD2) 

If your university has a sustainability website, please provide the website address here. A good sustainability website may include information such as sustainability programs, plans, targets, achievements, and updates that help educate students and staff and inform external stakeholders. 

#### 7.5. Sustainability website URL (if available) 

Please provide the URL of your university’s sustainability website. 

#### 7.6. Sustainability report (GD3) 

Please provide a sustainability report. The report may be based on SDGs reporting and/or UI GreenMetric indicators. At a minimum, it should describe the university’s vision, strategy, policies, programs, and implementation. Regular annual reporting should be demonstrated for at least the past three years . Clear information on targets and achievements is strongly encouraged. 

#### 7.7. Sustainability report URL (if available) 

Please provide a URL link to your sustainability report. 

#### 7.8. Financial report (GD4) 

Please provide the university’s official financial report for the most recent fiscal year. The report should be formally approved by an authorized university body 

and clearly present institutional revenue, expenditure, and budget allocation. If publicly available, please include the direct URL link to the data. 

#### 7.9. Financial report URL (if available) 
Please provide a URL link to your financial report. 

#### 7.10. Availability of unit or office that coordinate sustainability on campus (GD5) 

Please describe whether your university has a unit or office that coordinates sustainability programs. Evidence may include an official decree/letter of establishment, organizational structure, duties, and a summary of programs or work plans. 

#### 7.11. Number of dedicated staff supporting sustainability coordination 

Please provide the total number of staff formally assigned to the unit/office responsible for coordinating sustainability initiatives. Staff may include full-time or part-time personnel with official sustainability coordination responsibilities. 

#### 7.12. Use of ICT for sustainability program planning, implementation, monitoring and evaluation (GD6) 
Please provide information on how ICT is used to support the planning, implementation, monitoring, and evaluation of sustainability programs aligned with the UI GreenMetric criteria (e.g., digital platforms, dashboards, systems, applications) 

#### 7.13. Policy of advanced digital technologies usage, such as Artificial Intelligence and Internet of Things, to support decision-making, operational efficiency, and service delivery across university administrative and academic business processes (GD7) 

Please provide information on university policies related to the use of advanced digital technologies (e.g., AI and IoT) to support decision-making, operational efficiency, and service delivery in administrative and academic processes. 

#### 7.14. Compliance with the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) or equivalent national data protection regulations 

Please provide information on the university’s compliance with data protection regulations (e.g., GDPR, PDP, ISO or equivalent national/local regulations). Evidence may include policies, procedures, consent mechanisms, privacy notices, and institutional structures for data protection and privacy management. 

#### 7.15. Total number of institutional leaders and deputy leaders 

Please provide the total number of institutional leaders and deputy leaders at all 

levels, including university, faculty, study program, and university-level units. 

#### 7.16. Number of female representation on leadership position 

Please provide the total number of female leaders holding leadership or deputy 

leadership positions at the university, faculty, study program and university-level units. 

#### 7.17. Ratio of female leaders to total institutional leaders (GD8) 

Please calculate the percentage of female leaders compared to the total number of institutional leaders based on Equations 7.15 and 7.16. 

Formula: (7.16 / 7.15) × 100% 

#### 7.18. Anti-corruption and integrity system of the university (GD9) 

Please provide information on the existence and implementation of anti-corruption and integrity systems at the university. Evidence may include policies, regulations, institutional units, reporting mechanisms and integrity programs. 

#### 7.19. Whistleblowing and complaint system of the university (GD10) 

Please provide information on the availability and implementation of a whistleblowing and complaints system. Evidence may include reporting channels, procedures, and official platforms for submitting complaints or reports of sexual harassment. 

#### 7.20. LMS-enabled digital literacy program for student and staff (GD11) 

Please provide information on digital literacy programs for students, academic staff and administrative staff. Programs may include training, courses, workshops, and institutional initiatives related to digital skills and the responsible use of technology. 

#### 7.21. Written code of ethics that applies to university leaders, academic staff, administrative staff, and students (GD12) 

Please provide information on the availability of a written code of ethics that applies to university leaders, academic staff, administrative staff, and students. Evidence may include official documents, regulations, and institutional policies. 

## Data Submission 

Please submit the most recent annual data available based on your university’s 12month data collection cycle (e.g., for Questions 1.19, 2.6, and 2.8), unless a different reporting period is specifically requested. 

## Evidence Guidelines 

This is the eighth year in which we have required evidence to accompany the questionnaire. Evidence is used to support the data submitted during the review process by our assessors. Please read the following guidelines carefully. 

1. Evidence is mandatory, except for certain questions where evidence may be optional or uploaded separately. Missing evidence may result in a reduced score or a decline in the score for that item. 

2. All evidence should follow the template provided at: https://bit.ly/UIGreenmetricEvidences2026 

3. Evidence may be submitted in the form of photographs, graphs, tables, datasets, documents, or other relevant materials. 

4. Please include a clear quantitative explanation for each piece of evidence (e.g., numbers, percentages, total area, counts, dates, or measured results) to support what is shown in the figure. 

5. Evidence may also include campus maps showing the location, area size, or distribution of facilities relevant to each indicator. 

6. All descriptions must be written in English. If the original document is not in English, please provide an English translation. 

7. Please note that the maximum file size for each evidence file is 2 MB, and the accepted formats are .pdf. If you prefer to provide a link as evidence, please make sure the link can be accessed publicly. 

## Acknowledgments 

UI GreenMetric would like to express its sincere appreciation to Vishnu Juwono, S.E., M.I.A., Ph.D.; Dr Abellia Anggi Wardani, S.Hum., M.A.; Rahmi, S.Hum., M.Sc., Ph.D.; Sabrina Hikmah Ramadianti, S.Si.; Dewinda Novitasari, S.T; Dr. Jauzak Hussaini W., S.Kom., M.T.; Riska Putri Hariyadi, S.IP., M.Si.; Rayhana, S.Gz.; Rinoto Cahyo Utomo, S.Tr.; Siti Anisah, S.Si, M.A.B.; Febi Priska Litami, S.I.A., M.A; Elza Yunita Anwar, S.I.A.; Anin Naimatul Kumala, S.Hum., and Muhamad Ferdy Firmansyah, S.E., M.Sc. for their valuable support and assistance in preparing the 2026 UI GreenMetric Guideline.

UI GreenMetric also extends its sincere gratitude to Dr. Nyoman Suwartha, S.T., M.T., M.Agr.; Prof. Ir. Gunawan Tjahjono, M.Arch., Ph.D.; Prof. Dr. Raldi Hendro T.  Koestoer, M.Sc.; Prof. Dr. Ir. Tommy Ilyas, M.Eng.; Prof. Dr.-Ing. Ir. Dwita Sutjiningsih, Dipl. HE.; Dr. Ruki Harwahyu, M.T., M.Sc.; Dr. Ir. Jaka Fajar 
Fatriansyah, M.Sc., IPM.; and Dr.-Ing. Ir. Ova Candra Dewi, S.T., M.Sc., GP., IPU. for their expert insights and constructive feedback. 

## Appendix 1 

Below are how we score your data. Please note that the final score will be based on our validators’ review. Details of the scoring are described as follows [refer to appendix1_questionnairemasterandscoring.csv]

## Appendix 2 

List of Green Building Elements [refer to appendix2_listofgreenbuildingelements.csv] 

Adapted from ‘The Green Building Index (GBI)” For more information: https://www.greenbuildingindex.org/gbi-tools/ Note: Please classify the green building elements in your university. 

## Appendix 3 

List and Description of Smart Building Requirements [refer to appendix3_listanddescriptionofsmartbuildingrequirements.csv] 

Note : 

Please state the Building Management System (BMS)/Building Information Modelling (BIM)/Building Automation System (BAS)/Facility Management System (FMS) used in your university 

Adapted from ‘UI GreenMetric 2018: Energy and Climate Change Guidelines for Compilation’, by RUS Energia, 2019. 

## Appendix 4 

### Calculation of Carbon Footprint Per Year 

This appendix provides a simplified example for estimating annual greenhouse gas emissions (carbon footprint) using two main activity data sources: purchased electricity and transportation activity on campus . Where data are available, universities are encouraged to calculate the carbon footprint more comprehensively by including additional emission sources listed in Table 4 (Scope 1–3) , such as stationary fuel combustion, fugitive emissions (refrigerants), waste, purchased water, and commuting. The worked example below covers electricity and on-campus transportation only. 

However, for Question 2.11, please exclude emissions from flights and secondary carbon sources (e.g., food consumption, dishes, and clothing), as stated in the questionnaire. For calculation purposes, carbon footprint is treated as CO₂-equivalent (CO ₂ e). Please report the final result in metric tons, as required in Question 2.11. 

Important: The emission factors used below may vary by country, year, and methodology. Always use the most relevant and recent emission factors for your context and document them clearly in the evidence file. 

#### A. Required activity data (minimum dataset) 

Prepare the following annual or daily activity data: 

- Electricity usage per year (kWh) 
- Shuttle buses operating on campus: number of buses, trips per day, average distance per trip (km), number of operating days per year 
- Vehicles entering campus (cars, motorcycles): average number per day, average distance traveled inside campus per visit (km), number of operating days per year 

#### B. Emission factors (what to use and how to document) 

Use credible emission factors and record, at minimum: factor value, unit, year, and source. 

 1. Electricity (grid emission factor) 

Use an electricity emission factor in kgCO₂ e/kWh (or equivalently tCO₂ e/MWh ). The factor should reflect the electricity grid relevant to your campus and the most recent reference year available. 

2. Transportation (choose one method) 

Choose one approach and apply consistently:

- Method 1 (preferred): vehicle-kilometer factor (kgCO₂e per vehicle-km) 
- Method 2: fuel-based calculation (liters × kgCO₂e/liter) 

Note: Example factors below are for illustration only. Replace them with documented factors for your context. 

#### C. Calculation steps (with worked example)
##### a. Electricity usage per year (Question 2.6) 
Emissions from purchased electricity (tCO₂ e/year): 

Emissions_elec = Electricity (kWh) × EF_elec (kgCO₂e/kWh) / 1,000

Example: 
Electricity usage per year = 1,633,286 kWh 
Assumed EF_elec = 0.84 kgCO₂e/kWh (example only) Emissions_elec = (1,633,286 × 0.84) / 1,000 = 1,371.96 tCO₂e

##### b. Transportation per year (Shuttle buses on campus) 

Step 1: VKT_bus (km/year) = N_bus × Trips/day × Distance/trip × Days/year
Step 2: Emissions_bus (tCO₂e/year) = VKT_bus × EF_bus (kgCO₂e/km) / 1,000 

Example: 
N_bus = 15; Trips/day = 150; Distance/trip = 5 km; Days/year = 240 
VKT_bus = 15 × 150 × 5 × 240 = 2,700,000 km/year  
Assumed EF_bus = 0.10 kgCO₂e/km (example only) Emissions_bus = (2,700,000 × 0.10) / 1,000 = 270 tCO₂e

##### c. Transportation per year (Cars entering campus) 

VKT_car (km/year) = N_car/day × Distance/visit × Days/year × Trip_multiplier 
(Trip_multiplier = 2 if round trip is assumed)

Emissions_car (tCO₂e/year) = VKT_car × EF_car (kgCO₂e/km) / 1,000  

Example:  
N_car/day = 2,000; Distance/visit = 5 km; Days/year = 240; Trip_multiplier = 2  
VKT_car = 2,000 × 5 × 240 × 2 = 4,800,000 km/year  
Assumed EF_car = 0.20 kgCO₂e/km (example only)  
Emissions_car = (4,800,000 × 0.20) / 1,000 = 960 tCO₂e

##### d. Transportation per year (Motorcycles entering campus) 

VKT_mc (km/year) = N_mc/day × Distance/visit × Days/year × Trip_multiplier 
Emissions_mc (tCO₂e/year) = VKT_mc × EF_mc (kgCO₂e/km) / 1,000 

Example:  
N_mc/day = 4,000; Distance/visit = 5 km; Days/year = 240; Trip_multiplier = 2  
VKT_mc = 4,000 × 5 × 240 × 2 = 9,600,000 km/year  
Assumed EF_mc = 0.10 kgCO₂e/km (example only) Emissions_mc = (9,600,000 × 0.10) / 1,000 = 960 tCO₂e

##### e. Total emissions per year 

Total Emissions = Emissions_elec + Emissions_bus + Emissions_car +  Emissions_mc  
Example: = 1,371.96 + 270 + 960 + 960 = 3,561.96 tCO₂e/year 

##### f. Optional (recommended): Carbon footprint per campus population (EC8) 

Carbon footprint per capita = Total Emissions (tCO₂e/year) / Campus population (students + staff) 
Document the campus population figure and its source in the evidence file. 

#### D. Evidence checklist (what to attach / describe)

In the evidence file, provide: 

- Activity data table (with reference year ) 
- Emission factors table (value, unit, reference year, source) 
- Spreadsheet showing formulas and intermediate steps 
- Boundary statement (e.g., on-campus only vs commuting included) 
- Confirmation that flights and secondary carbon sources are excluded for Question 2.11