// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
// settings / permsModel.ts — wave 15, contract C-PERM (ruling R9).
//
// The permission editor's PURE HALF: the wire shapes, the parse, the draft the
// admin is editing, and the body the PUT sends. No React, no fetch, so the
// rules that decide who can see what are testable under node without a browser
// or a server (verify_login's `_test` harness runs them).
//
// ⛔ NOTHING HERE ENFORCES ANYTHING. Every rule below is about producing a
// WELL-FORMED and HONEST payload; the wall is `core/perm_scope.permits()` on the
// server, and it re-validates all of this. An editor that produced a malformed
// record would be refused — the point of the care here is that it never gets
// that far, and that the admin is never shown a state the server does not hold.
//
// THREE RULES THAT LOOK LIKE STYLE AND ARE NOT:
//
//   1. **A module with no readable schema renders as an ACCESS TOGGLE ONLY, and
//      saves `{access, filter: null, hiddenFields: []}`** (R9). The failure mode
//      it prevents: half a filter tree, PUT against a field list nobody could
//      read. Fail-closed is not "deny everything" here — it is "never write a
//      restriction you could not show the admin".
//   2. **An unknown field TYPE lands on `text`**, it does not disappear and it
//      is not passed through. Passing it through would hand the condition
//      builder an operator set for a type it does not have; dropping the field
//      would take away an admin's ability to HIDE a column just because they
//      cannot filter on it. `text` is the house fallback the viz layer already
//      uses for exactly this (verify_ui's `field-vocabulary-not-whitelisted`).
//   3. **A module the server no longer declares is DROPPED by the whole-record
//      replace — and the editor says so out loud** (`orphanModules`). A silent
//      drop of somebody's permanent filter is a permission change nobody made.
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------

import type { Field, FieldType, FilterTree } from "../customer-grid/types";

// --- who may reach the editor at all ----------------------------------------

/** The modal's rail entries. Declared HERE, beside the rule that gates them, so
 *  the component and the gate read one definition of the vocabulary rather than
 *  two that can drift by one member. `SettingsModal` re-exports it. */
export type SettingsSection =
  | "account"
  | "scope"
  | "users"
  // Wave 18 (C7): the tenant's credential store and its data-source status board.
  | "keychains"
  | "connectors"
  /** EXIT-6: the statement-of-account sender, ported off `app.py` when Streamlit
   *  was deleted. Admin-only for the same reason the Streamlit section was —
   *  it is THE one sanctioned Odoo writer in the product. */
  | "statements"
  /**
   * Wave 19 (R3 / contract C2): the Loopable admin plane — the cross-TENANT
   * console, visible only to a `platform_admin` account.
   *
   * ⛔ DELIBERATELY ABSENT FROM `reachableSection` BELOW, and that is not an
   * oversight. Every other admin room is gated on `admin`, a boolean the shell
   * already holds on the user record. `platform_admin` is a different predicate
   * that arrives ASYNCHRONOUSLY on the settings payload — and R3 is explicit
   * that a tenant-scoped `is_admin` does NOT qualify for it. Folding it into a
   * function whose only input is `admin` would either grant the section to every
   * tenant admin or deny it to the one account that has it. It is gated where
   * the flag actually lives, at the render site in `SettingsModal`.
   */
  | "padmin";

/**
 * A non-admin never LANDS on the users pane — and therefore never reaches the
 * permission editor, which lives inside it.
 *
 * ⛔ THIS IS A COURTESY, NOT THE CHECK. The server refuses every `/admin/*`
 * route to a member regardless, and `/perms` is one of them. What this prevents
 * is a member deep-linked (or restored) into a room whose every control would
 * 403 — an empty frame that reads as a broken product rather than as a closed
 * door. It is a named function instead of an inline ternary for one reason: an
 * inline ternary cannot have a negative control, and "the pane a non-admin gets
 * bounced out of" is exactly the kind of rule that gets refactored away by
 * someone who does not know it is load-bearing.
 */
export function reachableSection(section: SettingsSection, admin: boolean): SettingsSection {
  // ⭐⭐ WAVE 32 · R4 — `keychains` AND `connectors` LEFT THIS LIST, and the ruling is the reason.
  //
  // Wave 18 (C7) put them here because "every control inside them would 403 a member" — which was
  // TRUE while every credential was tenant-wide. R4 ends that: *"the business-wide vs personal
  // split lands on ALL connections … business-wide is admin-only"*, i.e. a member now genuinely
  // owns something in these rooms — their own personal connections.
  //
  // ⛔ THE SERVER MOVED FIRST, and this line follows it rather than leading. `routes_keychain`
  // dropped `admin_gate` for `require_session` and put the wall in the ROW (`may_see` /
  // `_may_touch`): a member sees the business-wide entries plus their own, may create only a
  // personal one, and gets `403 not_admin` with a sentence if they ask for business-wide. Had
  // this list changed alone, a member would land in a room whose every control 403s — the empty
  // frame this function's own header calls "a broken product rather than a closed door".
  const adminOnly =
    section === "users" ||
    // EXIT-6: every control in the statements room would 403 a member, and the
    // one at the bottom sends customer email. It belongs in this list twice over.
    section === "statements";
  return adminOnly && !admin ? "account" : section;
}

// --- the wire (C-PERM) ------------------------------------------------------

/** One module's rule for one user. The shape `PUT /admin/users/{u}/perms` takes. */
export interface PermsEntry {
  /** May this account open the module at all. `false` ⇒ `may_open` denies. */
  access: boolean;
  /** The PERMANENT filter, AND-ed under everything the user does. `null` = none.
   *  ⚠ The whole tree — `{conj?, nodes}` — never a bare node list: `[A, B]` under
   *  `or` means something entirely different from `[A, B]` under `and`, and the
   *  loss is invisible in every payload (C-PERM amendment 2). */
  filter: FilterTree | null;
  /** Field keys this account never receives. Server-stripped from every wire. */
  hiddenFields: string[];
}

export type PermsRecord = Record<string, PermsEntry>;

/** A module the editor can draw a full rule for: it came with a field list. */
export interface PermsModule {
  key: string;
  label: string;
  /** Empty ⇒ no readable schema ⇒ access toggle only (rule 1 above). */
  fields: Field[];
}

export interface PermsPayload {
  /** In server order — the order the sections render in. */
  modules: PermsModule[];
  entries: PermsRecord;
  /** Keys in `perms` that the server no longer declares. A whole-record replace
   *  drops them; the editor states that before the admin saves. */
  orphanModules: string[];
  /** C-PERM amendment 4's migration marker. ABSENT means this record still runs
   *  under the LEGACY wall (`bus`/`agent` query scope + the `modules` grant), so
   *  the editor must not present empty perms as "no access" — that would be a
   *  confident lie about an account that can currently see everything. */
  migrated: boolean;
  /** This account is an ADMIN, and admins bypass `perms` entirely. Every rule
   *  the editor can draw for them is inert — which it has to say out loud. */
  isAdmin: boolean;
}

// --- parsing ----------------------------------------------------------------

/** Every `FieldType`, as a runtime set.
 *
 *  ⚠ The `Record<FieldType, true>` is the point, not the Set: it is a
 *  COMPILE-TIME exhaustiveness check. Add a type to the union in
 *  `customer-grid/types.ts` and this file stops compiling until it is listed
 *  here — which is how a whitelist stays honest across a tree boundary S3 does
 *  not own. A hand-maintained array would silently narrow instead. */
const FIELD_TYPE_TABLE: Record<FieldType, true> = {
  text: true, status: true, currency: true, int: true, date: true, pct: true,
  select: true, user: true, multiselect: true, checkbox: true, phone: true,
  email: true, url: true, rating: true, created_time: true, formula: true,
  automation: true,
  // Wave-22 C7 (added by C, the same one-key edit the alarm demands).
  metric: true,
  // Wave-19 R7 (added by session A — see the dated amendment in the split doc). This ONE key is
  // the whole edit: the exhaustiveness alarm above did exactly what it promises, and the fix it
  // names is a listing here. Nowhere near `SettingsSection` / the rail, which is B's half of
  // this file.
  image: true,
  // Wave-23 C7 (added by session D — `settings/**` is frozen this wave and this ONE key is the
  // exception the freeze cannot cover: the alarm four lines up is a COMPILE error, so the union
  // and this listing cannot land in two different changes. Posted in D's mailbox for C.)
  json: true,
  // 2026-08-07 — the relational pair, listed for the reason the alarm above states and for no
  // other: the exhaustiveness check is a COMPILE error, so the union and this listing cannot
  // land in two separate changes. Nothing about the permissions wall treats either kind
  // specially — a link/rollup column is granted and hidden like any other column.
  link: true, rollup: true,
  // ⭐ Wave-27 item 13 (R13) — same one-key edit, same reason, and `settings/**` is D's fence
  // this wave so it is not even an exception: the alarm above is a COMPILE error, so the union
  // and this listing cannot land in two changes. Nothing about the permissions wall treats a
  // code column specially — it is granted and hidden like any other column.
  code: true,
};

export const KNOWN_FIELD_TYPES: ReadonlySet<string> = new Set(Object.keys(FIELD_TYPE_TABLE));

/** Rule 2: whitelist, never pass through, never drop. */
export function fieldType(raw: unknown): FieldType {
  return typeof raw === "string" && KNOWN_FIELD_TYPES.has(raw) ? (raw as FieldType) : "text";
}

function asStringArray(raw: unknown): string[] {
  return Array.isArray(raw) ? raw.filter((v) => typeof v === "string") : [];
}

/** One field of a module's schema, from the nav/schema payload shape.
 *  `key` and `label` are the minimum that makes a row renderable — a field
 *  without them cannot be shown OR named in a rule, so it is skipped rather
 *  than rendered as a blank the admin might tick. */
export function parseField(raw: unknown): Field | null {
  if (!raw || typeof raw !== "object") return null;
  const r = raw as Record<string, unknown>;
  if (typeof r.key !== "string" || r.key === "") return null;
  const label = typeof r.label === "string" && r.label !== "" ? r.label : r.key;
  const options = asStringArray(r.options);
  return {
    key: r.key,
    label,
    type: fieldType(r.type),
    // Anything not explicitly the overlay stratum is treated as source data.
    // Consequence in this editor: nothing here offers to EDIT a field, so the
    // only thing `source` drives is the "Pre-set" chip in the hide list.
    source: r.source === "overlay" ? "overlay" : "odoo",
    // Carried because `identityKey` reads it — see the rule there.
    ...(r.pinned === true ? { pinned: true } : {}),
    ...(options.length ? { options } : {}),
    ...(typeof r.note === "string" ? { note: r.note } : {}),
    ...(typeof r.description === "string" && r.description !== ""
      ? { note: r.description }
      : {}),
  };
}

/** `fields_by_module[key]` is a BARE ARRAY of fields — S1's canonical answer
 *  (routes_admin `get_perms`), not the nav/schema envelope the contract line
 *  implied. The earlier tolerant branch that also read `{fields: […]}` is gone:
 *  one shape, asserted here, beats two readings of a sentence.
 *
 *  The LABEL does not come from here — it rides the payload's `modules` list,
 *  which is also what fixes the ORDER. Anything unreadable yields an EMPTY field
 *  list, which R9 already has a defined rendering for (access toggle only). */
export function parseModule(key: string, label: string, raw: unknown): PermsModule {
  const fields: Field[] = [];
  for (const f of Array.isArray(raw) ? raw : []) {
    const parsed = parseField(f);
    if (parsed) fields.push(parsed);
  }
  return { key, label: label || key, fields };
}

/** A filter is taken WHOLE or not at all. A tree whose `nodes` is not a list is
 *  not a narrower filter, it is an unreadable one — and this editor's job is to
 *  never show a rule it could not also save back. */
export function parseFilter(raw: unknown): FilterTree | null {
  if (!raw || typeof raw !== "object" || Array.isArray(raw)) return null;
  const r = raw as Record<string, unknown>;
  if (!Array.isArray(r.nodes)) return null;
  const conj = r.conj === "or" ? "or" : r.conj === "and" ? "and" : undefined;
  return {
    ...(conj ? { conj } : {}),
    nodes: r.nodes as FilterTree["nodes"],
  };
}

/** ⚠ ABSENT ENTRY ⇒ `access: false`, matching what the server will ENFORCE for a
 *  migrated record (C-PERM amendment 4: `perms_v == 1` + no entry ⇒ DENY). The
 *  editor showing "access on" for a module the wall denies would send an admin
 *  to debug a permission that was never granted.
 *
 *  For an UN-migrated record the same absence means the opposite — the legacy
 *  wall still applies and may grant everything — which is why `PermsPayload`
 *  carries `migrated` and the editor states it rather than letting this default
 *  speak for a case it does not describe. */
export function parseEntry(raw: unknown): PermsEntry {
  if (!raw || typeof raw !== "object" || Array.isArray(raw)) {
    return { access: false, filter: null, hiddenFields: [] };
  }
  const r = raw as Record<string, unknown>;
  return {
    access: r.access === true,
    filter: parseFilter(r.filter),
    hiddenFields: normalizeHidden(asStringArray(r.hiddenFields)),
  };
}

/** Sorted + de-duplicated, always. Dirty-detection compares payloads, so a list
 *  whose ORDER can drift would make an untouched module read as edited. */
export function normalizeHidden(keys: readonly string[]): string[] {
  return [...new Set(keys)].sort();
}

/**
 * The IDENTITY column — the one field a module may never hide.
 *
 * ⛔ WHY THIS EXISTS AT ALL. `FieldsHidePanel` takes an optional `lockedKey` and
 * documents that "absent = nothing is locked". Absent, a single click on
 * "Hide all" hides EVERY field including the row's own name — and with
 * amendment 5's server-side transitive closure behind it, that writes a record
 * whose faithful enforcement is a table of blank rows. The user could open the
 * module and see nothing in it, the wall doing exactly what the record said.
 * Nothing in C-PERM's PUT validation refuses that: it refuses UNKNOWN field
 * keys, and the identity column is perfectly known.
 *
 * ⚠ MIRRORED, NOT INVENTED: this is `useGridColumns.ts:201-204`'s rule verbatim
 * — the pinned field, else the first. The grid computes the same key to decide
 * which column its own Hide-fields panel locks, so an editor using a different
 * rule would lock a different column from the one the table protects.
 */
export function identityKey(fields: readonly Field[]): string {
  return fields.find((f) => f.pinned)?.key ?? fields[0]?.key ?? "";
}

/** Every field a module MAY hide — the whole list minus its identity column. */
export function hideableKeys(fields: readonly Field[]): string[] {
  const locked = identityKey(fields);
  return fields.filter((f) => f.key !== locked).map((f) => f.key);
}

/** `{perms, fields_by_module}` → everything the editor renders. Returns `null`
 *  only for a body that is not an object at all; a body missing either half
 *  parses to an editor with nothing to offer, which is the honest rendering of
 *  "the server told us nothing". */
export function parsePermsPayload(body: unknown): PermsPayload | null {
  if (!body || typeof body !== "object") return null;
  const b = body as Record<string, unknown>;
  const byModule =
    b.fields_by_module && typeof b.fields_by_module === "object"
      ? (b.fields_by_module as Record<string, unknown>)
      : {};
  const rawPerms =
    b.perms && typeof b.perms === "object" && !Array.isArray(b.perms)
      ? (b.perms as Record<string, unknown>)
      : {};

  // ⚠ `modules` CARRIES THE LABELS AND THE ORDER, and `fields_by_module` carries
  // neither. Deriving sections from the field map alone renders every heading as
  // a registry KEY — "customer_data" where the product says "Customer" — and in
  // whatever order the JSON happens to enumerate. The field map is still the
  // outer bound: a module named in `modules` with no field list is the
  // schema-less case, not an error.
  const declared: Array<{ key: string; label: string }> = Array.isArray(b.modules)
    ? (b.modules as unknown[]).flatMap((m) => {
        if (!m || typeof m !== "object") return [];
        const r = m as Record<string, unknown>;
        return typeof r.key === "string" && r.key
          ? [{ key: r.key, label: typeof r.label === "string" ? r.label : r.key }]
          : [];
      })
    : Object.keys(byModule).map((k) => ({ key: k, label: k }));

  const modules = declared.map((d) => parseModule(d.key, d.label, byModule[d.key]));
  const entries: PermsRecord = {};
  for (const m of modules) entries[m.key] = parseEntry(rawPerms[m.key]);

  return {
    modules,
    entries,
    orphanModules: Object.keys(rawPerms).filter((k) => !(k in entries)).sort(),
    migrated: typeof b.perms_v === "number" && b.perms_v >= 1,
    // `role == 'admin'` bypasses `perms` entirely (C-PERM amendment 4). Sent by
    // the route so the editor can SAY so instead of rendering stored rules that
    // do not apply — the one misreading of that clause that could hurt.
    isAdmin: b.is_admin === true,
  };
}

// --- the draft the admin is editing -----------------------------------------

/** Immutable edits: every setter returns a NEW record, so React sees the change
 *  and `isDirty` compares against a snapshot that no setter has mutated under
 *  it. In-place edits are how a Save button ends up permanently greyed. */
function withEntry(rec: PermsRecord, key: string, patch: Partial<PermsEntry>): PermsRecord {
  const cur = rec[key] ?? { access: false, filter: null, hiddenFields: [] };
  return { ...rec, [key]: { ...cur, ...patch } };
}

export function setAccess(rec: PermsRecord, key: string, access: boolean): PermsRecord {
  return withEntry(rec, key, { access });
}

export function setFilter(rec: PermsRecord, key: string, filter: FilterTree | null): PermsRecord {
  // An empty tree is NO filter, not an empty one. `{nodes: []}` matches every
  // row, so persisting it would mean "restricted, to everything" — a rule that
  // reads as a restriction in the record and is not one on screen.
  const empty = !filter || filter.nodes.length === 0;
  return withEntry(rec, key, { filter: empty ? null : filter });
}

export function setHidden(rec: PermsRecord, key: string, hidden: readonly string[]): PermsRecord {
  return withEntry(rec, key, { hiddenFields: normalizeHidden(hidden) });
}

export function toggleHidden(rec: PermsRecord, key: string, fieldKey: string): PermsRecord {
  const cur = rec[key]?.hiddenFields ?? [];
  const next = cur.includes(fieldKey)
    ? cur.filter((k) => k !== fieldKey)
    : [...cur, fieldKey];
  return setHidden(rec, key, next);
}

export function hiddenSet(rec: PermsRecord, key: string): ReadonlySet<string> {
  return new Set(rec[key]?.hiddenFields ?? []);
}

export function filterOf(rec: PermsRecord, key: string): FilterTree {
  // The panel takes a tree, never null — an absent filter is an EMPTY tree to
  // edit, which is what "add your first condition" has to render against.
  return rec[key]?.filter ?? { nodes: [] };
}

// --- what gets sent ---------------------------------------------------------

/**
 * The PUT body. Whole-record replace, so this emits an entry for EVERY module
 * the server declared — including the ones the admin never touched, because a
 * missing key in a replace is a deletion, not a no-op.
 *
 * ⚠ A module with no readable schema is emitted `{access, filter: null,
 * hiddenFields: []}` (R9). Its access toggle is real and is honoured; what is
 * refused is inventing a restriction against a field list nobody could read.
 */
export function toPutBody(payload: PermsPayload, rec: PermsRecord): { perms: PermsRecord } {
  const perms: PermsRecord = {};
  for (const m of payload.modules) {
    const e = rec[m.key] ?? { access: false, filter: null, hiddenFields: [] };
    // ⚠ The identity column is stripped at the BOUNDARY as well as withheld
    // from the UI. The panel never offers it, but a record written before this
    // rule — or by anything else — could still name it, and this editor is the
    // last place that record passes through before the wall enforces it
    // faithfully. Two layers for the same reason C-PERM validates at PUT time
    // AND `permits()` re-checks: records go stale in ways forms cannot.
    const locked = identityKey(m.fields);
    perms[m.key] = m.fields.length
      ? {
          access: e.access,
          filter: e.filter,
          hiddenFields: normalizeHidden(e.hiddenFields.filter((k) => k !== locked)),
        }
      : { access: e.access, filter: null, hiddenFields: [] };
  }
  return { perms };
}

/** Which slice of one account's access a copy carries onto another. */
export type CopyScope = { kind: "all" } | { kind: "module"; key: string };

/**
 * C-PERMCOPY (wave 17, item 16) — the record to PUT onto ONE target, composed
 * from that target's OWN payload and this account's SAVED entries.
 *
 * ⛔ WHY THIS IS A FUNCTION AND NOT FOUR LINES IN THE COMPONENT. It is the
 * SECOND producer of a PUT body in the product, and the first one aimed at
 * somebody else's record. A PUT is a whole-record replace: a key that does not
 * come back is DELETED. `toPutBody` already carries a negative control named
 * `replace-omits-untouched-modules` for exactly that failure — and every way of
 * getting it wrong from here reaches the same place by a different road. Inline
 * in a `useCallback`, no gate could see any of it.
 *
 * THE RULE, in one line: **the target's tree is the base; the copy overwrites
 * a slice of it.** Never the source's tree with the target's bits merged in —
 * that composes a record out of modules the TARGET may not declare.
 *
 *   · `{kind:'all'}`    — the whole record is replaced by the source's.
 *   · `{kind:'module'}` — that one module is replaced; every other module keeps
 *                         the value the target's own GET returned, byte for byte.
 *
 * ⚠ TWO EDGES, both currently unreachable because `_PERM_MODULES` is server-wide
 * (every payload declares the same modules), and both named rather than left to
 * be discovered if that ever stops being true:
 *   1. The source has a module the TARGET does not declare. `toPutBody` iterates
 *      the TARGET's modules, so the copy is dropped — silently, under a message
 *      that says it was copied. `copyDropped()` below is what lets the caller
 *      tell the truth about that.
 *   2. The target declares a module the SOURCE has no entry for. It lands on
 *      `NO_ACCESS`, which is the honest reading of "apply this account's access":
 *      if the source does not grant it, the target must not keep it. Deliberate,
 *      and it is why a whole-record copy is offered as "replace", not "merge".
 */
export function copyTargetRecord(
  target: PermsPayload,
  source: PermsRecord,
  scope: CopyScope
): PermsRecord {
  if (scope.kind === "all") {
    const out: PermsRecord = {};
    for (const m of target.modules) {
      out[m.key] = source[m.key] ?? { access: false, filter: null, hiddenFields: [] };
    }
    return out;
  }
  return {
    ...target.entries,
    [scope.key]: source[scope.key] ?? { access: false, filter: null, hiddenFields: [] },
  };
}

/** The modules a copy CANNOT carry, because the target does not declare them.
 *  Empty in every deployment where the module list is server-wide; a caller that
 *  reports "copied" without consulting it would be guessing. */
export function copyDropped(
  target: PermsPayload,
  source: PermsRecord,
  scope: CopyScope
): string[] {
  const declared = new Set(target.modules.map((m) => m.key));
  const wanted = scope.kind === "all" ? Object.keys(source) : [scope.key];
  return wanted.filter((k) => !declared.has(k)).sort();
}

/** Compares the SENT SHAPE, not the draft, so a change the payload cannot carry
 *  (a hidden-field list on a schema-less module) never lights up Save. */
export function isDirty(payload: PermsPayload, saved: PermsRecord, draft: PermsRecord): boolean {
  return (
    JSON.stringify(toPutBody(payload, saved)) !== JSON.stringify(toPutBody(payload, draft))
  );
}

// --- how a rule reads -------------------------------------------------------

/** Counts a tree's leaves, groups included. The editor states the size of a
 *  restriction rather than showing "Filtered" for one condition and for twenty. */
export function countLeaves(tree: FilterTree | null): number {
  if (!tree) return 0;
  let n = 0;
  const walk = (nodes: readonly unknown[]) => {
    for (const node of nodes) {
      if (node && typeof node === "object" && Array.isArray((node as { children?: unknown[] }).children)) {
        walk((node as { children: unknown[] }).children);
      } else {
        n += 1;
      }
    }
  };
  walk(tree.nodes);
  return n;
}

/**
 * One sentence per module for the accounts list and the section head.
 *
 * ⚠ NO EMOJI, no icon vocabulary — this string is read aloud by a screen reader
 * and printed in the gate's output. It also never says "restricted" without
 * saying to WHAT: "Filtered" alone is the kind of summary that makes an admin
 * open every section to find the one that is set.
 */
export function moduleSummary(entry: PermsEntry | undefined, schemaless = false): string {
  if (!entry || !entry.access) return "No access";
  if (schemaless) return "Full access";
  const conds = countLeaves(entry.filter);
  const hidden = entry.hiddenFields.length;
  if (!conds && !hidden) return "Full access";
  const parts: string[] = [];
  if (conds) parts.push(`${conds} condition${conds === 1 ? "" : "s"}`);
  if (hidden) parts.push(`${hidden} field${hidden === 1 ? "" : "s"} hidden`);
  return parts.join(", ");
}

/** The account-list cell: what this user may open, across all modules. */
export function accessSummary(payload: PermsPayload | null, rec: PermsRecord): string {
  if (!payload || payload.modules.length === 0) return "";
  const open = payload.modules.filter((m) => rec[m.key]?.access);
  if (open.length === 0) return "No access";
  // ⚠ A SCHEMA-LESS MODULE CANNOT BE RESTRICTED, so it is never counted as one
  // — the same guard `moduleSummary` takes. Without it a draft filter on a
  // module whose rule `toPutBody` strips would be summarised as "1 restricted",
  // describing a restriction that is not going to be saved. The header and the
  // Save confirmation both read this sentence, so it must describe the PAYLOAD.
  const restricted = open.filter(
    (m) =>
      m.fields.length > 0 &&
      ((rec[m.key]?.filter?.nodes.length ?? 0) > 0 ||
        (rec[m.key]?.hiddenFields.length ?? 0) > 0)
  ).length;
  const all = open.length === payload.modules.length;
  const head = all
    ? `All ${open.length} module${open.length === 1 ? "" : "s"}`
    : `${open.length} of ${payload.modules.length} modules`;
  return restricted ? `${head}, ${restricted} restricted` : head;
}