data/feedback_dataset.csv

teacher_name,subject,feedback_text,semester,date
Mr. Carlos Mendez,Economics,"The energy in the classroom is infectious — you cannot help but get involved On the downside, deadlines are unrealistically tight and show no consideration for students' other commitments.",Spring 2023,2023-01-12
Dr. Sophia Patel,Artificial Intelligence,Creates an incredibly interactive learning environment where every student feels heard.,Spring 2023,2023-01-12
Dr. Emily Chen,Chemistry,"Written feedback on essays is detailed and constructive — clear articulation extends beyond lectures With that in mind, group projects lack structure, leading to unequal distribution of work and unfair grading.",Spring 2023,2023-01-13
Mr. Ethan Brooks,Business Studies,"Explains historical context of theories, giving students a richer understanding of the subject With that in mind, graded assignments are returned weeks after the deadline with no explanation for the delay.",Spring 2023,2023-01-14
Mr. David Kimani,Geography,"rarely repeats key points, so if you miss something, you have no way to catch up To give credit where it is due, Uses a blend of visual aids and verbal narration that caters to all kinds of learners.",Spring 2023,2023-01-16
Dr. Yuki Tanaka,Robotics,"instructions for assignments are vague and lead to widespread misunderstandings every semester Despite this, Responds to emails within hours — remarkable availability for such a senior faculty member.",Spring 2023,2023-01-18
Prof. Samuel Adeyemi,Biology,"The creative freedom given in project briefs encourages innovative thinking and ownership However, often trails off mid-sentence and changes direction, which disrupts the flow of learning.",Spring 2023,2023-01-19
Dr. Fatima Al-Zahra,Data Science,"Feedback on assignments is generic, copy-pasted, and returns no useful guidance.",Spring 2023,2023-01-23
Ms. Lakshmi Iyer,History,"speaks far too fast and frequently skips steps mid-explanation, leaving students confused That said, Always follows up on unanswered questions from previous lectures at the start of the next class.",Spring 2023,2023-01-24
Dr. Fatima Al-Zahra,Data Science,"Cites primary research papers during lectures, showing genuine depth of scholarship One area needing improvement: rarely repeats key points, so if you miss something, you have no way to catch up.",Spring 2023,2023-01-25
Prof. Omar Hassan,Philosophy,"The enthusiasm for the subject is contagious; I started loving a topic I once dreaded On the downside, rarely acknowledges student questions and often dismisses them without adequate explanation.",Spring 2023,2023-01-25
Ms. Anjali Desai,Psychology,"The passion for the subject translates directly into deeply informed, inspiring lectures On the downside, classes are purely lecture-based with zero opportunities for student interaction or questions.",Spring 2023,2023-01-26
Dr. Emily Chen,Chemistry,"Cites primary research papers during lectures, showing genuine depth of scholarship On the downside, dismisses students who ask for extra support, citing time constraints that seem exaggerated.",Spring 2023,2023-01-26
Mr. David Kimani,Geography,"dismisses students who ask for extra support, citing time constraints that seem exaggerated To give credit where it is due, Gives clear instructions before each assignment, eliminating confusion from the start.",Spring 2023,2023-01-26
Dr. Sophia Patel,Artificial Intelligence,"Connects the current topic to related fields seamlessly, enriching the overall learning experience.",Spring 2023,2023-02-06
Dr. Fatima Al-Zahra,Data Science,The breadth and depth of knowledge is remarkable — genuinely one of the most learned educators I have met.,Spring 2023,2023-02-08
Prof. Omar Hassan,Philosophy,"When asked a complex question in class, promises a full answer by email and always delivers With that in mind, grading is inconsistent — the same quality of work receives vastly different marks week to week.",Spring 2023,2023-02-12
Ms. Priya Nair,Computer Science,Has never missed a scheduled office hour — reliability and responsiveness go hand in hand.,Spring 2023,2023-02-14
Ms. Lakshmi Iyer,History,"The energy in the classroom is infectious — you cannot help but get involved On the downside, jumps between topics without transitions — lectures feel disjointed and hard to follow.",Spring 2023,2023-02-14
Dr. Sophia Patel,Artificial Intelligence,"no model answers or solutions are provided after submission, leaving students to guess Despite this, Makes students feel like co-creators of knowledge rather than passive receivers of information.",Spring 2023,2023-02-14
Dr. Maria Fernandez,Sociology,"When a student struggles, proactively reaches out rather than waiting for the student to ask With that in mind, made multiple factual errors in a single lecture with no acknowledgment or correction.",Spring 2023,2023-02-17
Prof. Linda Osei,Nursing & Healthcare,"When a student struggles, proactively reaches out rather than waiting for the student to ask However, uses acronyms and shorthand without ever defining them — very frustrating for new students.",Spring 2023,2023-02-17
Ms. Anjali Desai,Psychology,"The practical coding exercises assigned weekly are the best preparation for real-world work With that in mind, the same presentation format, week after week, with no variation — painfully dull.",Spring 2023,2023-02-18
Ms. Neha Gupta,Environmental Science,"Can discuss nuanced debates within the field, exposing students to the complexity of real scholarship.",Spring 2023,2023-02-20
Mr. Rohan Verma,Physical Education,"Brings personal research expertise into the classroom, making lectures uniquely insightful.",Spring 2023,2023-02-21
Dr. Maria Fernandez,Sociology,The assignments push beyond memorization into genuine critical analysis and synthesis.,Spring 2023,2023-02-23
Mr. Rohan Verma,Physical Education,Never addresses doubt-clearing requests — students are left to figure out everything on their own.,Spring 2023,2023-02-23
Ms. Lakshmi Iyer,History,Adequate communicator — covers the material but could make lectures more engaging with better delivery.,Spring 2023,2023-03-01
Mr. Rohan Verma,Physical Education,"Never dismisses a query — even seemingly simple questions receive a thorough, patient response.",Spring 2023,2023-03-03
Dr. Fatima Al-Zahra,Data Science,"gives feedback on submissions in one-word comments that offer no direction for improvement That said, The use of polls, debates, and role-plays keeps every lecture dynamic and participatory.",Spring 2023,2023-03-05
Dr. Sophia Patel,Artificial Intelligence,Uses acronyms and shorthand without ever defining them — very frustrating for new students.,Spring 2023,2023-03-06
Prof. Wei Zhang,Statistics,"relies entirely on powerpoint slides with no supplementary engagement — very passive experience That said, Maintains an open-door policy that students actually use — approachability is a real strength.",Spring 2023,2023-03-07
Ms. Chloe Dubois,French Language,Poses thought-provoking questions mid-lecture that ignite genuine curiosity among students One area needing improvement: gives feedback on submissions in one-word comments that offer no direction for improvement.,Spring 2023,2023-03-07
Ms. Chloe Dubois,French Language,"deadlines are unrealistically tight and show no consideration for students' other commitments To give credit where it is due, Speaks at a perfect pace — clear, confident, and never rushes through important material.",Spring 2023,2023-03-09
Prof. Samuel Adeyemi,Biology,"announced a change in exam format via a brief note buried in slides — zero proactive communication Despite this, Gives clear instructions before each assignment, eliminating confusion from the start.",Spring 2023,2023-03-09
Dr. Sophia Patel,Artificial Intelligence,"Uses gamified quizzes and group challenges that make learning genuinely fun and competitive Nevertheless, group projects lack structure, leading to unequal distribution of work and unfair grading.",Spring 2023,2023-03-10
Mr. Ethan Brooks,Business Studies,"rarely repeats key points, so if you miss something, you have no way to catch up To give credit where it is due, Group assignments are structured to ensure fair contribution and accountability from all members.",Spring 2023,2023-03-11
Dr. Fatima Al-Zahra,Data Science,"Lab assignments perfectly complement theory lectures — a seamlessly integrated curriculum Nevertheless, announced a change in exam format via a brief note buried in slides — zero proactive communication.",Spring 2023,2023-03-12
Mr. James Okafor,English Literature,"Maintains an open-door policy that students actually use — approachability is a real strength On the downside, the teaching style feels like reading directly from the textbook — completely disengaging.",Spring 2023,2023-03-13
Dr. Emily Chen,Chemistry,"His tone is always encouraging, making it easy to follow along even when the content is tough One area needing improvement: group projects lack structure, leading to unequal distribution of work and unfair grading.",Spring 2023,2023-03-16
Prof. Samuel Adeyemi,Biology,"Uses gamified quizzes and group challenges that make learning genuinely fun and competitive However, dismisses students who ask for extra support, citing time constraints that seem exaggerated.",Spring 2023,2023-03-18
Prof. Wei Zhang,Statistics,Always available after class and never seems in a rush to leave — truly student-centered.,Spring 2023,2023-03-19
Dr. Emily Chen,Chemistry,"takes over two weeks to reply to emails, and the responses are often incomplete Despite this, Always follows up on unanswered questions from previous lectures at the start of the next class.",Spring 2023,2023-03-19
Mr. David Kimani,Geography,"Sets up one-on-one review sessions for students who fall behind, at no additional cost However, jumps between topics without transitions — lectures feel disjointed and hard to follow.",Spring 2023,2023-03-19
Mr. Ethan Brooks,Business Studies,"Student participation is actively encouraged and rewarded — the class feels like a community Nevertheless, does not check for understanding — just moves on regardless of whether students are following.",Spring 2023,2023-03-21
Dr. Emily Chen,Chemistry,"Maintains an open-door policy that students actually use — approachability is a real strength With that in mind, no model answers or solutions are provided after submission, leaving students to guess.",Spring 2023,2023-03-22
Ms. Priya Nair,Computer Science,"the same presentation format, week after week, with no variation — painfully dull To give credit where it is due, Creates an incredibly interactive learning environment where every student feels heard.",Spring 2023,2023-03-23
Ms. Priya Nair,Computer Science,"many assignments are reused year after year without update — students access past solutions easily To give credit where it is due, The assignments push beyond memorization into genuine critical analysis and synthesis.",Spring 2023,2023-03-24
Prof. Omar Hassan,Philosophy,"Uses gamified quizzes and group challenges that make learning genuinely fun and competitive On the downside, jumps between topics without transitions — lectures feel disjointed and hard to follow.",Spring 2023,2023-03-24
Dr. Aisha Rahman,Mathematics,"explanations are overly technical without building up from foundational concepts first Despite this, His verbal explanations are accompanied by excellent analogies that stick in your memory.",Spring 2023,2023-03-24
Dr. Aisha Rahman,Mathematics,"Gives clear instructions before each assignment, eliminating confusion from the start On the downside, the course content feels dated — no references to modern developments or current research.",Spring 2023,2023-03-29
Ms. Chloe Dubois,French Language,"Connects the current topic to related fields seamlessly, enriching the overall learning experience One area needing improvement: core concepts are sometimes explained incorrectly, raising serious concerns about subject mastery.",Spring 2023,2023-03-31
Prof. Wei Zhang,Statistics,Every claim in lectures is backed by evidence and peer-reviewed sources — intellectually rigorous One area needing improvement: ignores follow-up questions posted on the course forum — makes students feel unsupported.,Spring 2023,2023-03-31
Prof. Omar Hassan,Philosophy,"Encourages critical thinking by consistently challenging students to question assumptions With that in mind, students who try to contribute are often interrupted or hurried along, discouraging participation.",Spring 2023,2023-03-31
Mr. Rohan Verma,Physical Education,Responds to emails within hours — remarkable availability for such a senior faculty member.,Spring 2023,2023-04-01
Dr. Maria Fernandez,Sociology,"The way she narrates case studies makes abstract concepts come alive in the classroom With that in mind, the same presentation format, week after week, with no variation — painfully dull.",Spring 2023,2023-04-02
Ms. Neha Gupta,Environmental Science,"core concepts are sometimes explained incorrectly, raising serious concerns about subject mastery To give credit where it is due, The breadth and depth of knowledge is remarkable — genuinely one of the most learned educators I have met.",Spring 2023,2023-04-04
Mr. David Kimani,Geography,The classroom environment feels tense and unwelcoming — students are afraid to speak up.,Spring 2023,2023-04-05
Ms. Anjali Desai,Psychology,Always uses well-structured language that makes the subject feel intuitive rather than intimidating.,Spring 2023,2023-04-05
Mr. Rohan Verma,Physical Education,"group projects lack structure, leading to unequal distribution of work and unfair grading Despite this, Lab assignments perfectly complement theory lectures — a seamlessly integrated curriculum.",Spring 2023,2023-04-07
Ms. Anjali Desai,Psychology,"the board work is illegible — notes are cramped and the handwriting is difficult to read To give credit where it is due, Brings in guest speakers and industry professionals to keep the content real and relevant.",Spring 2023,2023-04-09
Prof. Wei Zhang,Statistics,"Assignments are thoughtfully designed to bridge theory and real-world application brilliantly On the downside, the board work is illegible — notes are cramped and the handwriting is difficult to read.",Spring 2023,2023-04-14
Ms. Neha Gupta,Environmental Science,"Students who try to contribute are often interrupted or hurried along, discouraging participation.",Spring 2023,2023-04-16
Dr. Aisha Rahman,Mathematics,The breadth and depth of knowledge is remarkable — genuinely one of the most learned educators I have met One area needing improvement: office hours are scheduled but rarely actually held — very disappointing for students who need help.,Spring 2023,2023-04-16
Ms. Priya Nair,Computer Science,Deadlines are unrealistically tight and show no consideration for students' other commitments.,Spring 2023,2023-04-18
Dr. Emily Chen,Chemistry,"gives feedback on submissions in one-word comments that offer no direction for improvement To give credit where it is due, Student participation is actively encouraged and rewarded — the class feels like a community.",Spring 2023,2023-04-20
Dr. Sophia Patel,Artificial Intelligence,"Cites primary research papers during lectures, showing genuine depth of scholarship.",Spring 2023,2023-04-21
Dr. Yuki Tanaka,Robotics,"Quickly acknowledged a mistake in the lecture notes and corrected them with a detailed email One area needing improvement: the marking scheme is never shared in advance, creating unnecessary anxiety among students.",Spring 2023,2023-04-21
Prof. Linda Osei,Nursing & Healthcare,"Maintains an open-door policy that students actually use — approachability is a real strength With that in mind, the teaching style feels like reading directly from the textbook — completely disengaging.",Spring 2023,2023-04-21
Prof. Linda Osei,Nursing & Healthcare,"When asked a complex question in class, promises a full answer by email and always delivers One area needing improvement: students who visit during office hours are frequently told to 'check the textbook' without help.",Spring 2023,2023-04-24
Ms. Lakshmi Iyer,History,"Assignment rubrics are crystal clear, so students know exactly what is expected of them One area needing improvement: explanations are overly technical without building up from foundational concepts first.",Spring 2023,2023-04-27
Ms. Priya Nair,Computer Science,"dismisses students who ask for extra support, citing time constraints that seem exaggerated That said, Classroom discussions feel genuinely democratic — every opinion is valued and explored.",Spring 2023,2023-04-27
Mr. James Okafor,English Literature,"Every claim in lectures is backed by evidence and peer-reviewed sources — intellectually rigorous On the downside, uses acronyms and shorthand without ever defining them — very frustrating for new students.",Spring 2023,2023-04-29
Dr. Maria Fernandez,Sociology,The practical coding exercises assigned weekly are the best preparation for real-world work One area needing improvement: the practical examples used are poorly chosen and sometimes technically inaccurate.,Spring 2023,2023-04-29
Prof. Wei Zhang,Statistics,"Workload is manageable and coverage is reasonable, though depth could be improved.",Spring 2023,2023-05-02
Dr. Yuki Tanaka,Robotics,"Remembers individual student names and learning styles — a personal touch that boosts engagement One area needing improvement: speaks far too fast and frequently skips steps mid-explanation, leaving students confused.",Spring 2023,2023-05-02
Prof. Omar Hassan,Philosophy,"Always relates lessons to current events, which makes abstract theories feel immediately relevant On the downside, the marking scheme is never shared in advance, creating unnecessary anxiety among students.",Spring 2023,2023-05-02
Ms. Priya Nair,Computer Science,An absolute authority on the subject — references cutting-edge research with ease in every lecture.,Spring 2023,2023-05-03
Prof. Wei Zhang,Statistics,"Uses gamified quizzes and group challenges that make learning genuinely fun and competitive On the downside, the accent is at times hard to understand and no effort is made to slow down or repeat.",Spring 2023,2023-05-06
Dr. Yuki Tanaka,Robotics,"feedback on assignments is superficial — just a score with a single line of generic comment Despite this, Every claim in lectures is backed by evidence and peer-reviewed sources — intellectually rigorous.",Spring 2023,2023-05-07
Prof. Omar Hassan,Philosophy,"Keeps the course content updated with the latest industry developments — always current On the downside, grading is inconsistent — the same quality of work receives vastly different marks week to week.",Spring 2023,2023-05-07
Ms. Priya Nair,Computer Science,"explanations are overly technical without building up from foundational concepts first Despite this, Remembers individual student names and learning styles — a personal touch that boosts engagement.",Spring 2023,2023-05-07
Ms. Anjali Desai,Psychology,Uses a blend of visual aids and verbal narration that caters to all kinds of learners One area needing improvement: rarely acknowledges student questions and often dismisses them without adequate explanation.,Spring 2023,2023-05-08
Prof. Wei Zhang,Statistics,"Group projects lack structure, leading to unequal distribution of work and unfair grading.",Spring 2023,2023-05-11
Prof. Ravi Shankar,Physics,Every slide and every word is intentionally placed — communication is precise and efficient.,Spring 2023,2023-05-14
Ms. Neha Gupta,Environmental Science,"the workload is excessive relative to the credit hours allocated to this course Despite this, When asked a complex question in class, promises a full answer by email and always delivers.",Spring 2023,2023-05-16
Dr. Maria Fernandez,Sociology,"Live coding demonstrations paired with immediate student practice sessions are highly effective However, uses acronyms and shorthand without ever defining them — very frustrating for new students.",Spring 2023,2023-05-18
Ms. Lakshmi Iyer,History,Feedback on assignments is superficial — just a score with a single line of generic comment.,Spring 2023,2023-05-24
Ms. Priya Nair,Computer Science,"Uses gamified quizzes and group challenges that make learning genuinely fun and competitive On the downside, students who visit during office hours are frequently told to 'check the textbook' without help.",Spring 2023,2023-05-24
Dr. Emily Chen,Chemistry,Response time is acceptable for emails but could be faster given the volume of student queries.,Spring 2023,2023-05-25
Prof. Samuel Adeyemi,Biology,The case study assignments are genuinely challenging and deeply relevant to the industry One area needing improvement: feedback on assignments is superficial — just a score with a single line of generic comment.,Spring 2023,2023-05-27
Ms. Neha Gupta,Environmental Science,"relies too heavily on notes and struggles to answer questions that deviate from the slide deck Despite this, Grading is consistent and transparent — students never feel that marks are arbitrary.",Spring 2023,2023-05-27
Prof. Ravi Shankar,Physics,"Even during difficult Q&A sessions, maintains composure and communicates answers clearly On the downside, no model answers or solutions are provided after submission, leaving students to guess.",Spring 2023,2023-05-29
Dr. Maria Fernandez,Sociology,"Rarely repeats key points, so if you miss something, you have no way to catch up.",Spring 2023,2023-06-02
Mr. James Okafor,English Literature,"Speaks at a perfect pace — clear, confident, and never rushes through important material One area needing improvement: takes over two weeks to reply to emails, and the responses are often incomplete.",Spring 2023,2023-06-02
Dr. Aisha Rahman,Mathematics,"Feedback on draft submissions is returned within 48 hours with detailed, actionable comments.",Spring 2023,2023-06-03
Prof. Omar Hassan,Philosophy,"Grading is consistent and transparent — students never feel that marks are arbitrary Nevertheless, students who try to contribute are often interrupted or hurried along, discouraging participation.",Spring 2023,2023-06-03
Dr. Maria Fernandez,Sociology,"Every slide and every word is intentionally placed — communication is precise and efficient Nevertheless, speaks far too fast and frequently skips steps mid-explanation, leaving students confused.",Spring 2023,2023-06-03
Dr. Emily Chen,Chemistry,"gives feedback on submissions in one-word comments that offer no direction for improvement Despite this, The passion for the subject translates directly into deeply informed, inspiring lectures.",Spring 2023,2023-06-04
Mr. Carlos Mendez,Economics,"Remembers individual student names and learning styles — a personal touch that boosts engagement Nevertheless, made multiple factual errors in a single lecture with no acknowledgment or correction.",Spring 2023,2023-06-05
Prof. Omar Hassan,Philosophy,The practical examples used are poorly chosen and sometimes technically inaccurate.,Spring 2023,2023-06-06
Mr. James Okafor,English Literature,"Responds thoughtfully to even the most off-topic questions, redirecting with patience However, gives feedback on submissions in one-word comments that offer no direction for improvement.",Spring 2023,2023-06-06
Mr. James Okafor,English Literature,"relies entirely on powerpoint slides with no supplementary engagement — very passive experience Despite this, Always follows up on unanswered questions from previous lectures at the start of the next class.",Spring 2023,2023-06-10
Mr. David Kimani,Geography,Subject expertise is adequate for the level of the course though not particularly inspiring.,Spring 2023,2023-06-11
Mr. Rohan Verma,Physical Education,Lab assignments perfectly complement theory lectures — a seamlessly integrated curriculum.,Spring 2023,2023-06-14
Ms. Priya Nair,Computer Science,Always follows up on unanswered questions from previous lectures at the start of the next class.,Spring 2023,2023-06-17
Ms. Lakshmi Iyer,History,The accent is at times hard to understand and no effort is made to slow down or repeat.,Spring 2023,2023-06-17
Prof. Linda Osei,Nursing & Healthcare,Group projects are assigned but never meaningfully supervised or supported.,Spring 2023,2023-06-20
Dr. Sophia Patel,Artificial Intelligence,The tasks are standard for the subject and neither particularly inspiring nor discouraging.,Spring 2023,2023-06-22
Prof. Ravi Shankar,Physics,"Can discuss nuanced debates within the field, exposing students to the complexity of real scholarship With that in mind, assignments are poorly worded and often require clarification that is slow to come.",Spring 2023,2023-06-26
Mr. Ethan Brooks,Business Studies,"Uses a blend of visual aids and verbal narration that caters to all kinds of learners With that in mind, the practical examples used are poorly chosen and sometimes technically inaccurate.",Spring 2023,2023-06-28
Dr. Emily Chen,Chemistry,"Every slide and every word is intentionally placed — communication is precise and efficient With that in mind, group projects are assigned but never meaningfully supervised or supported.",Spring 2023,2023-06-30
Dr. Emily Chen,Chemistry,"The creative freedom given in project briefs encourages innovative thinking and ownership However, does not seem interested in teaching — the lack of enthusiasm is demoralizing for the class.",Fall 2023,2023-07-01
Prof. Arjun Mehta,Electrical Engineering,The case study assignments are genuinely challenging and deeply relevant to the industry.,Fall 2023,2023-07-03
Dr. Yuki Tanaka,Robotics,"rarely acknowledges student questions and often dismisses them without adequate explanation Despite this, The enthusiasm for the subject is contagious; I started loving a topic I once dreaded.",Fall 2023,2023-07-03
Prof. Arjun Mehta,Electrical Engineering,"unavailable outside of class time and discourages emails unless they are 'truly urgent' Despite this, Creates an incredibly interactive learning environment where every student feels heard.",Fall 2023,2023-07-03
Dr. Fatima Al-Zahra,Data Science,Quickly acknowledged a mistake in the lecture notes and corrected them with a detailed email.,Fall 2023,2023-07-04
Prof. Wei Zhang,Statistics,"Brings in guest speakers and industry professionals to keep the content real and relevant However, email replies are written in a confusing manner; often raises more questions than it answers.",Fall 2023,2023-07-04
Mr. Carlos Mendez,Economics,"relies too heavily on notes and struggles to answer questions that deviate from the slide deck To give credit where it is due, Live coding demonstrations paired with immediate student practice sessions are highly effective.",Fall 2023,2023-07-04
Ms. Priya Nair,Computer Science,Created a class WhatsApp group to answer real-time doubts — incredibly supportive initiative.,Fall 2023,2023-07-05
Mr. Carlos Mendez,Economics,Grading is consistent and transparent — students never feel that marks are arbitrary.,Fall 2023,2023-07-06
Prof. Ravi Shankar,Physics,"Assignments are thoughtfully designed to bridge theory and real-world application brilliantly Nevertheless, written assignments are assigned but the grading focuses almost entirely on formatting, not content.",Fall 2023,2023-07-07
Prof. Wei Zhang,Statistics,"tends to mumble during lectures, making it nearly impossible to take accurate notes Despite this, Projects require independent research that significantly deepens understanding of the subject.",Fall 2023,2023-07-09
Dr. Yuki Tanaka,Robotics,"Explains historical context of theories, giving students a richer understanding of the subject Nevertheless, feedback on assignments is generic, copy-pasted, and returns no useful guidance.",Fall 2023,2023-07-10
Ms. Anjali Desai,Psychology,Students who visit during office hours are frequently told to 'check the textbook' without help.,Fall 2023,2023-07-12
Ms. Lakshmi Iyer,History,Projects require independent research that significantly deepens understanding of the subject One area needing improvement: ignores follow-up questions posted on the course forum — makes students feel unsupported.,Fall 2023,2023-07-12
Mr. Carlos Mendez,Economics,Provides model answers after submission that serve as excellent study resources.,Fall 2023,2023-07-14
Ms. Priya Nair,Computer Science,"Speaks at a perfect pace — clear, confident, and never rushes through important material.",Fall 2023,2023-07-17
Ms. Chloe Dubois,French Language,The way she narrates case studies makes abstract concepts come alive in the classroom.,Fall 2023,2023-07-17
Prof. Arjun Mehta,Electrical Engineering,"never poses questions to students, making it easy to zone out for the entire lecture Despite this, Explains every topic with exceptional clarity, making even the most complex ideas accessible.",Fall 2023,2023-07-17
Prof. Linda Osei,Nursing & Healthcare,"jumps between topics without transitions — lectures feel disjointed and hard to follow Despite this, Lab assignments perfectly complement theory lectures — a seamlessly integrated curriculum.",Fall 2023,2023-07-18
Dr. Maria Fernandez,Sociology,Occasionally uses case studies but could incorporate more active learning strategies consistently.,Fall 2023,2023-07-22
Ms. Priya Nair,Computer Science,"grading is inconsistent — the same quality of work receives vastly different marks week to week To give credit where it is due, Live coding demonstrations paired with immediate student practice sessions are highly effective.",Fall 2023,2023-07-23
Prof. Samuel Adeyemi,Biology,Each task builds on the last in a perfectly scaffolded progression toward mastery.,Fall 2023,2023-07-24
Prof. Arjun Mehta,Electrical Engineering,"Always relates lessons to current events, which makes abstract theories feel immediately relevant.",Fall 2023,2023-07-24
Mr. James Okafor,English Literature,"cannot confidently field student questions that go slightly beyond the textbook material That said, Explains every topic with exceptional clarity, making even the most complex ideas accessible.",Fall 2023,2023-07-26
Prof. Arjun Mehta,Electrical Engineering,"The energy in the classroom is infectious — you cannot help but get involved With that in mind, never addresses doubt-clearing requests — students are left to figure out everything on their own.",Fall 2023,2023-07-29
Prof. Ravi Shankar,Physics,"Created a class WhatsApp group to answer real-time doubts — incredibly supportive initiative However, group projects lack structure, leading to unequal distribution of work and unfair grading.",Fall 2023,2023-08-01
Prof. Arjun Mehta,Electrical Engineering,"Lacks clarity when explaining grading criteria, making it hard to know what is expected.",Fall 2023,2023-08-02
Ms. Lakshmi Iyer,History,"Her tone is always encouraging, making it easy to follow along even when the content is tough Nevertheless, made multiple factual errors in a single lecture with no acknowledgment or correction.",Fall 2023,2023-08-02
Mr. Ethan Brooks,Business Studies,The class is neither overly boring nor particularly exciting — solidly mediocre engagement.,Fall 2023,2023-08-06
Prof. Ravi Shankar,Physics,"announced a change in exam format via a brief note buried in slides — zero proactive communication Despite this, Quickly acknowledged a mistake in the lecture notes and corrected them with a detailed email.",Fall 2023,2023-08-07
Dr. Aisha Rahman,Mathematics,"Never dismisses a query — even seemingly simple questions receive a thorough, patient response Nevertheless, feedback on assignments is superficial — just a score with a single line of generic comment.",Fall 2023,2023-08-07
Ms. Anjali Desai,Psychology,"Student participation is actively encouraged and rewarded — the class feels like a community One area needing improvement: no group activities, no discussions, no real connection with students — deeply monotonous.",Fall 2023,2023-08-07
Ms. Anjali Desai,Psychology,"The case study assignments are genuinely challenging and deeply relevant to the industry Nevertheless, never poses questions to students, making it easy to zone out for the entire lecture.",Fall 2023,2023-08-09
Ms. Priya Nair,Computer Science,Rarely acknowledges student questions and often dismisses them without adequate explanation.,Fall 2023,2023-08-11
Dr. Emily Chen,Chemistry,"Even during difficult Q&A sessions, maintains composure and communicates answers clearly.",Fall 2023,2023-08-12
Prof. Linda Osei,Nursing & Healthcare,"Maintains an open-door policy that students actually use — approachability is a real strength Nevertheless, lacks clarity when explaining grading criteria, making it hard to know what is expected.",Fall 2023,2023-08-12
Ms. Neha Gupta,Environmental Science,"The engagement level is average — some days are interactive, but most follow a standard lecture format.",Fall 2023,2023-08-13
Mr. Rohan Verma,Physical Education,"Possesses encyclopaedic knowledge and can link any student question back to broader theoretical frameworks With that in mind, many assignments are reused year after year without update — students access past solutions easily.",Fall 2023,2023-08-14
Prof. Ravi Shankar,Physics,"the teaching style feels like reading directly from the textbook — completely disengaging Despite this, Poses thought-provoking questions mid-lecture that ignite genuine curiosity among students.",Fall 2023,2023-08-14
Ms. Anjali Desai,Psychology,Demonstrates mastery by going well beyond the syllabus to give broader intellectual context.,Fall 2023,2023-08-15
Prof. Arjun Mehta,Electrical Engineering,"Classroom discussions feel genuinely democratic — every opinion is valued and explored With that in mind, the practical examples used are poorly chosen and sometimes technically inaccurate.",Fall 2023,2023-08-17
Prof. Linda Osei,Nursing & Healthcare,"When a student struggles, proactively reaches out rather than waiting for the student to ask However, unavailable outside of class time and discourages emails unless they are 'truly urgent'.",Fall 2023,2023-08-18
Prof. Linda Osei,Nursing & Healthcare,"email replies are written in a confusing manner; often raises more questions than it answers That said, Can discuss nuanced debates within the field, exposing students to the complexity of real scholarship.",Fall 2023,2023-08-18
Prof. Omar Hassan,Philosophy,"Brings in guest speakers and industry professionals to keep the content real and relevant With that in mind, cannot confidently field student questions that go slightly beyond the textbook material.",Fall 2023,2023-08-18
Dr. Fatima Al-Zahra,Data Science,"Encourages critical thinking by consistently challenging students to question assumptions With that in mind, the course seems to be delivered from memory of a single outdated textbook from years ago.",Fall 2023,2023-08-19
Dr. Fatima Al-Zahra,Data Science,"tasks feel disconnected from what is taught in lectures, making them very frustrating to complete To give credit where it is due, Makes the purpose of every assignment explicit — students understand why each task matters.",Fall 2023,2023-08-20
Mr. David Kimani,Geography,"No model answers or solutions are provided after submission, leaving students to guess.",Fall 2023,2023-08-21
Dr. Fatima Al-Zahra,Data Science,"appears to read slides for the first time in class — little evidence of deep preparation That said, Cites primary research papers during lectures, showing genuine depth of scholarship.",Fall 2023,2023-08-21
Mr. Ethan Brooks,Business Studies,"graded assignments are returned weeks after the deadline with no explanation for the delay To give credit where it is due, Quickly acknowledged a mistake in the lecture notes and corrected them with a detailed email.",Fall 2023,2023-08-22
Prof. Linda Osei,Nursing & Healthcare,"Explains every topic with exceptional clarity, making even the most complex ideas accessible With that in mind, the teaching style feels like reading directly from the textbook — completely disengaging.",Fall 2023,2023-08-24
Prof. Linda Osei,Nursing & Healthcare,Engagement improves in smaller tutorial sessions but is lacking in the main lectures.,Fall 2023,2023-08-27
Mr. David Kimani,Geography,"Communication is generally fine, though sometimes explanations could be more structured.",Fall 2023,2023-08-28
Prof. Wei Zhang,Statistics,"The passion for the subject translates directly into deeply informed, inspiring lectures On the downside, cannot confidently field student questions that go slightly beyond the textbook material.",Fall 2023,2023-09-01
Prof. Omar Hassan,Philosophy,"lacks clarity when explaining grading criteria, making it hard to know what is expected To give credit where it is due, Demonstrates mastery by going well beyond the syllabus to give broader intellectual context.",Fall 2023,2023-09-02
Mr. Ethan Brooks,Business Studies,"Keeps the course content updated with the latest industry developments — always current With that in mind, students who try to contribute are often interrupted or hurried along, discouraging participation.",Fall 2023,2023-09-02
Prof. Ravi Shankar,Physics,"Explains every topic with exceptional clarity, making even the most complex ideas accessible One area needing improvement: unable to explain foundational theories beyond the surface level when probed by students.",Fall 2023,2023-09-05
Prof. Omar Hassan,Philosophy,"The use of polls, debates, and role-plays keeps every lecture dynamic and participatory With that in mind, written assignments are assigned but the grading focuses almost entirely on formatting, not content.",Fall 2023,2023-09-05
Mr. Carlos Mendez,Economics,"No group activities, no discussions, no real connection with students — deeply monotonous.",Fall 2023,2023-09-10
Prof. Linda Osei,Nursing & Healthcare,"core concepts are sometimes explained incorrectly, raising serious concerns about subject mastery To give credit where it is due, Poses thought-provoking questions mid-lecture that ignite genuine curiosity among students.",Fall 2023,2023-09-11
Ms. Neha Gupta,Environmental Science,Makes the purpose of every assignment explicit — students understand why each task matters One area needing improvement: gives feedback on submissions in one-word comments that offer no direction for improvement.,Fall 2023,2023-09-13
Dr. Fatima Al-Zahra,Data Science,Reasonable clarity in lectures; some ambiguity in written feedback but nothing insurmountable.,Fall 2023,2023-09-17
Dr. Emily Chen,Chemistry,"The way she narrates case studies makes abstract concepts come alive in the classroom However, unavailable outside of class time and discourages emails unless they are 'truly urgent'.",Fall 2023,2023-09-18
Ms. Anjali Desai,Psychology,"Group assignments are structured to ensure fair contribution and accountability from all members One area needing improvement: written assignments are assigned but the grading focuses almost entirely on formatting, not content.",Fall 2023,2023-09-18
Dr. Maria Fernandez,Sociology,Explanations are overly technical without building up from foundational concepts first.,Fall 2023,2023-09-19
Ms. Priya Nair,Computer Science,Her verbal explanations are accompanied by excellent analogies that stick in your memory.,Fall 2023,2023-09-19
Prof. Omar Hassan,Philosophy,"When asked a complex question in class, promises a full answer by email and always delivers.",Fall 2023,2023-09-20
Ms. Chloe Dubois,French Language,"Brings in guest speakers and industry professionals to keep the content real and relevant Nevertheless, often trails off mid-sentence and changes direction, which disrupts the flow of learning.",Fall 2023,2023-09-24
Mr. Carlos Mendez,Economics,"uses acronyms and shorthand without ever defining them — very frustrating for new students That said, Assignment rubrics are crystal clear, so students know exactly what is expected of them.",Fall 2023,2023-09-25
Ms. Lakshmi Iyer,History,"dismisses students who ask for extra support, citing time constraints that seem exaggerated To give credit where it is due, Creates an incredibly interactive learning environment where every student feels heard.",Fall 2023,2023-09-26
Prof. Omar Hassan,Philosophy,"Gives clear instructions before each assignment, eliminating confusion from the start On the downside, made multiple factual errors in a single lecture with no acknowledgment or correction.",Fall 2023,2023-09-28
Dr. Aisha Rahman,Mathematics,"takes over two weeks to reply to emails, and the responses are often incomplete To give credit where it is due, Brings in guest speakers and industry professionals to keep the content real and relevant.",Fall 2023,2023-09-30
Prof. Omar Hassan,Philosophy,"Student participation is actively encouraged and rewarded — the class feels like a community Nevertheless, the workload is excessive relative to the credit hours allocated to this course.",Fall 2023,2023-09-30
Dr. Maria Fernandez,Sociology,Keeps the course content updated with the latest industry developments — always current One area needing improvement: never addresses doubt-clearing requests — students are left to figure out everything on their own.,Fall 2023,2023-10-04
Ms. Priya Nair,Computer Science,"Maintains an open-door policy that students actually use — approachability is a real strength With that in mind, graded assignments are returned weeks after the deadline with no explanation for the delay.",Fall 2023,2023-10-06
Ms. Anjali Desai,Psychology,The creative freedom given in project briefs encourages innovative thinking and ownership One area needing improvement: explanations are overly technical without building up from foundational concepts first.,Fall 2023,2023-10-06
Mr. David Kimani,Geography,"email replies are written in a confusing manner; often raises more questions than it answers That said, Makes the purpose of every assignment explicit — students understand why each task matters.",Fall 2023,2023-10-06
Prof. Omar Hassan,Philosophy,"never addresses doubt-clearing requests — students are left to figure out everything on their own To give credit where it is due, Brings personal research expertise into the classroom, making lectures uniquely insightful.",Fall 2023,2023-10-09
Prof. Ravi Shankar,Physics,"tends to mumble during lectures, making it nearly impossible to take accurate notes That said, The creative freedom given in project briefs encourages innovative thinking and ownership.",Fall 2023,2023-10-09
Ms. Priya Nair,Computer Science,"Problem sets are challenging yet fair — they stretch thinking without being unreasonable On the downside, deadlines are unrealistically tight and show no consideration for students' other commitments.",Fall 2023,2023-10-11
Dr. Aisha Rahman,Mathematics,"Gives clear instructions before each assignment, eliminating confusion from the start.",Fall 2023,2023-10-13
Prof. Samuel Adeyemi,Biology,"speaks far too fast and frequently skips steps mid-explanation, leaving students confused To give credit where it is due, Quickly acknowledged a mistake in the lecture notes and corrected them with a detailed email.",Fall 2023,2023-10-13
Ms. Lakshmi Iyer,History,"no group activities, no discussions, no real connection with students — deeply monotonous Despite this, Responds to emails within hours — remarkable availability for such a senior faculty member.",Fall 2023,2023-10-15
Dr. Emily Chen,Chemistry,Many assignments are reused year after year without update — students access past solutions easily.,Fall 2023,2023-10-19
Prof. Linda Osei,Nursing & Healthcare,"Grading is consistent and transparent — students never feel that marks are arbitrary With that in mind, email replies are written in a confusing manner; often raises more questions than it answers.",Fall 2023,2023-10-19
Ms. Chloe Dubois,French Language,"group projects are assigned but never meaningfully supervised or supported Despite this, Created a class WhatsApp group to answer real-time doubts — incredibly supportive initiative.",Fall 2023,2023-10-19
Prof. Linda Osei,Nursing & Healthcare,Maintains an open-door policy that students actually use — approachability is a real strength.,Fall 2023,2023-10-20
Prof. Arjun Mehta,Electrical Engineering,"Always follows up on unanswered questions from previous lectures at the start of the next class Nevertheless, no group activities, no discussions, no real connection with students — deeply monotonous.",Fall 2023,2023-10-21
Prof. Omar Hassan,Philosophy,Has never missed a scheduled office hour — reliability and responsiveness go hand in hand One area needing improvement: jumps between topics without transitions — lectures feel disjointed and hard to follow.,Fall 2023,2023-10-22
Dr. Yuki Tanaka,Robotics,Encourages critical thinking by consistently challenging students to question assumptions.,Fall 2023,2023-10-24
Prof. Linda Osei,Nursing & Healthcare,"the board work is illegible — notes are cramped and the handwriting is difficult to read That said, Poses thought-provoking questions mid-lecture that ignite genuine curiosity among students.",Fall 2023,2023-10-24
Mr. Carlos Mendez,Economics,"Gives clear instructions before each assignment, eliminating confusion from the start One area needing improvement: speaks far too fast and frequently skips steps mid-explanation, leaving students confused.",Fall 2023,2023-10-30
Ms. Priya Nair,Computer Science,"The energy in the classroom is infectious — you cannot help but get involved On the downside, many assignments are reused year after year without update — students access past solutions easily.",Fall 2023,2023-10-31
Ms. Anjali Desai,Psychology,"Her tone is always encouraging, making it easy to follow along even when the content is tough.",Fall 2023,2023-10-31
Prof. Ravi Shankar,Physics,"instructions for assignments are vague and lead to widespread misunderstandings every semester That said, Uses gamified quizzes and group challenges that make learning genuinely fun and competitive.",Fall 2023,2023-10-31
Prof. Ravi Shankar,Physics,Relies entirely on PowerPoint slides with no supplementary engagement — very passive experience.,Fall 2023,2023-11-08
Mr. David Kimani,Geography,"appears to read slides for the first time in class — little evidence of deep preparation That said, Makes students feel like co-creators of knowledge rather than passive receivers of information.",Fall 2023,2023-11-11
Prof. Omar Hassan,Philosophy,"Explains historical context of theories, giving students a richer understanding of the subject With that in mind, the board work is illegible — notes are cramped and the handwriting is difficult to read.",Fall 2023,2023-11-11
Dr. Fatima Al-Zahra,Data Science,"Sets up one-on-one review sessions for students who fall behind, at no additional cost However, classes are purely lecture-based with zero opportunities for student interaction or questions.",Fall 2023,2023-11-12
Prof. Linda Osei,Nursing & Healthcare,"Grading is consistent and transparent — students never feel that marks are arbitrary With that in mind, speaks far too fast and frequently skips steps mid-explanation, leaving students confused.",Fall 2023,2023-11-15
Ms. Neha Gupta,Environmental Science,"Lab assignments perfectly complement theory lectures — a seamlessly integrated curriculum With that in mind, no group activities, no discussions, no real connection with students — deeply monotonous.",Fall 2023,2023-11-15
Prof. Ravi Shankar,Physics,"classes are purely lecture-based with zero opportunities for student interaction or questions That said, Never dismisses a query — even seemingly simple questions receive a thorough, patient response.",Fall 2023,2023-11-18
Ms. Anjali Desai,Psychology,"Makes students feel like co-creators of knowledge rather than passive receivers of information However, office hours are scheduled but rarely actually held — very disappointing for students who need help.",Fall 2023,2023-11-21
Ms. Lakshmi Iyer,History,"The creative freedom given in project briefs encourages innovative thinking and ownership With that in mind, unable to explain foundational theories beyond the surface level when probed by students.",Fall 2023,2023-11-21
Prof. Arjun Mehta,Electrical Engineering,"Never poses questions to students, making it easy to zone out for the entire lecture.",Fall 2023,2023-11-24
Prof. Wei Zhang,Statistics,Classes are purely lecture-based with zero opportunities for student interaction or questions.,Fall 2023,2023-11-24
Ms. Anjali Desai,Psychology,"Creates an incredibly interactive learning environment where every student feels heard With that in mind, the practical examples used are poorly chosen and sometimes technically inaccurate.",Fall 2023,2023-11-24
Prof. Samuel Adeyemi,Biology,"Can explain the same concept ten different ways until every student in the room understands However, tasks feel disconnected from what is taught in lectures, making them very frustrating to complete.",Fall 2023,2023-11-24
Prof. Linda Osei,Nursing & Healthcare,"Responds to emails within hours — remarkable availability for such a senior faculty member On the downside, office hours are scheduled but rarely actually held — very disappointing for students who need help.",Fall 2023,2023-11-26
Prof. Ravi Shankar,Physics,"Responds to emails within hours — remarkable availability for such a senior faculty member On the downside, the teaching style feels like reading directly from the textbook — completely disengaging.",Fall 2023,2023-11-27
Prof. Samuel Adeyemi,Biology,"the course seems to be delivered from memory of a single outdated textbook from years ago To give credit where it is due, Connects the current topic to related fields seamlessly, enriching the overall learning experience.",Fall 2023,2023-11-28
Ms. Priya Nair,Computer Science,"feedback on assignments is generic, copy-pasted, and returns no useful guidance Despite this, The use of polls, debates, and role-plays keeps every lecture dynamic and participatory.",Fall 2023,2023-11-29
Ms. Anjali Desai,Psychology,"Often trails off mid-sentence and changes direction, which disrupts the flow of learning.",Fall 2023,2023-11-30
Ms. Neha Gupta,Environmental Science,"the course content feels dated — no references to modern developments or current research To give credit where it is due, Can explain the same concept ten different ways until every student in the room understands.",Fall 2023,2023-12-03
Mr. Rohan Verma,Physical Education,"The way she narrates case studies makes abstract concepts come alive in the classroom On the downside, rarely acknowledges student questions and often dismisses them without adequate explanation.",Fall 2023,2023-12-07
Dr. Sophia Patel,Artificial Intelligence,"Each task builds on the last in a perfectly scaffolded progression toward mastery With that in mind, dismisses students who ask for extra support, citing time constraints that seem exaggerated.",Fall 2023,2023-12-09
Prof. Omar Hassan,Philosophy,"His verbal explanations are accompanied by excellent analogies that stick in your memory Nevertheless, relies entirely on powerpoint slides with no supplementary engagement — very passive experience.",Fall 2023,2023-12-12
Mr. Carlos Mendez,Economics,"Makes students feel like co-creators of knowledge rather than passive receivers of information However, gives feedback on submissions in one-word comments that offer no direction for improvement.",Fall 2023,2023-12-15
Dr. Aisha Rahman,Mathematics,"explanations are overly technical without building up from foundational concepts first Despite this, The passion for the subject translates directly into deeply informed, inspiring lectures.",Fall 2023,2023-12-17
Ms. Lakshmi Iyer,History,"Lab assignments perfectly complement theory lectures — a seamlessly integrated curriculum With that in mind, interaction is limited to 'any questions?' at the very end when there is no time left.",Fall 2023,2023-12-18
Prof. Wei Zhang,Statistics,Remembers individual student names and learning styles — a personal touch that boosts engagement.,Fall 2023,2023-12-21
Dr. Fatima Al-Zahra,Data Science,"students who try to contribute are often interrupted or hurried along, discouraging participation Despite this, Every slide and every word is intentionally placed — communication is precise and efficient.",Fall 2023,2023-12-22
Prof. Arjun Mehta,Electrical Engineering,Email replies are written in a confusing manner; often raises more questions than it answers.,Fall 2023,2023-12-23
Mr. James Okafor,English Literature,His verbal explanations are accompanied by excellent analogies that stick in your memory.,Fall 2023,2023-12-24
Mr. Carlos Mendez,Economics,"the practical examples used are poorly chosen and sometimes technically inaccurate To give credit where it is due, One of the most articulate teachers I have ever encountered; never leaves a concept half-explained.",Fall 2023,2023-12-24
Ms. Chloe Dubois,French Language,"The way she narrates case studies makes abstract concepts come alive in the classroom However, graded assignments are returned weeks after the deadline with no explanation for the delay.",Fall 2023,2023-12-25
Ms. Neha Gupta,Environmental Science,"The marking scheme is never shared in advance, creating unnecessary anxiety among students.",Fall 2023,2023-12-29
Dr. Emily Chen,Chemistry,"Gives clear instructions before each assignment, eliminating confusion from the start With that in mind, grading is inconsistent — the same quality of work receives vastly different marks week to week.",Fall 2023,2023-12-30
Prof. Samuel Adeyemi,Biology,"classes are purely lecture-based with zero opportunities for student interaction or questions Despite this, Projects require independent research that significantly deepens understanding of the subject.",Fall 2023,2023-12-30
Prof. Ravi Shankar,Physics,"The practical coding exercises assigned weekly are the best preparation for real-world work On the downside, email replies are written in a confusing manner; often raises more questions than it answers.",Spring 2024,2024-01-02
Dr. Aisha Rahman,Mathematics,"Demonstrates mastery by going well beyond the syllabus to give broader intellectual context With that in mind, feedback on assignments is superficial — just a score with a single line of generic comment.",Spring 2024,2024-01-04
Dr. Emily Chen,Chemistry,Every claim in lectures is backed by evidence and peer-reviewed sources — intellectually rigorous.,Spring 2024,2024-01-05
Prof. Wei Zhang,Statistics,The course content feels dated — no references to modern developments or current research.,Spring 2024,2024-01-06
Prof. Ravi Shankar,Physics,Unable to explain foundational theories beyond the surface level when probed by students.,Spring 2024,2024-01-06
Mr. David Kimani,Geography,"The practical coding exercises assigned weekly are the best preparation for real-world work With that in mind, unable to explain foundational theories beyond the surface level when probed by students.",Spring 2024,2024-01-06
Ms. Anjali Desai,Psychology,"Always available after class and never seems in a rush to leave — truly student-centered With that in mind, many assignments are reused year after year without update — students access past solutions easily.",Spring 2024,2024-01-07
Mr. Ethan Brooks,Business Studies,"When asked a complex question in class, promises a full answer by email and always delivers Nevertheless, never addresses doubt-clearing requests — students are left to figure out everything on their own.",Spring 2024,2024-01-10
Prof. Samuel Adeyemi,Biology,"The enthusiasm for the subject is contagious; I started loving a topic I once dreaded Nevertheless, the accent is at times hard to understand and no effort is made to slow down or repeat.",Spring 2024,2024-01-13
Prof. Arjun Mehta,Electrical Engineering,"Responds thoughtfully to even the most off-topic questions, redirecting with patience.",Spring 2024,2024-01-14
Mr. David Kimani,Geography,"never addresses doubt-clearing requests — students are left to figure out everything on their own To give credit where it is due, Designs collaborative projects that build both subject mastery and interpersonal skills.",Spring 2024,2024-01-15
Ms. Priya Nair,Computer Science,"assignments are poorly worded and often require clarification that is slow to come That said, The enthusiasm for the subject is contagious; I started loving a topic I once dreaded.",Spring 2024,2024-01-16
Dr. Emily Chen,Chemistry,Makes the purpose of every assignment explicit — students understand why each task matters.,Spring 2024,2024-01-17
Dr. Emily Chen,Chemistry,The practical coding exercises assigned weekly are the best preparation for real-world work.,Spring 2024,2024-01-19
Mr. Carlos Mendez,Economics,"Tends to mumble during lectures, making it nearly impossible to take accurate notes.",Spring 2024,2024-01-20
Dr. Yuki Tanaka,Robotics,"Never dismisses a query — even seemingly simple questions receive a thorough, patient response However, grading is inconsistent — the same quality of work receives vastly different marks week to week.",Spring 2024,2024-01-20
Prof. Samuel Adeyemi,Biology,"never addresses doubt-clearing requests — students are left to figure out everything on their own That said, Every claim in lectures is backed by evidence and peer-reviewed sources — intellectually rigorous.",Spring 2024,2024-01-22
Ms. Priya Nair,Computer Science,Uses slides well but misses opportunities to spark discussion around the presented material.,Spring 2024,2024-01-24
Mr. James Okafor,English Literature,"Always relates lessons to current events, which makes abstract theories feel immediately relevant With that in mind, often trails off mid-sentence and changes direction, which disrupts the flow of learning.",Spring 2024,2024-01-26
Mr. Rohan Verma,Physical Education,Cannot confidently field student questions that go slightly beyond the textbook material.,Spring 2024,2024-01-27
Prof. Samuel Adeyemi,Biology,Created a class WhatsApp group to answer real-time doubts — incredibly supportive initiative One area needing improvement: uses acronyms and shorthand without ever defining them — very frustrating for new students.,Spring 2024,2024-01-29
Mr. David Kimani,Geography,"Keeps the course content updated with the latest industry developments — always current With that in mind, lacks clarity when explaining grading criteria, making it hard to know what is expected.",Spring 2024,2024-01-29
Dr. Sophia Patel,Artificial Intelligence,"Always uses well-structured language that makes the subject feel intuitive rather than intimidating On the downside, the workload is excessive relative to the credit hours allocated to this course.",Spring 2024,2024-02-01
Prof. Wei Zhang,Statistics,Submissions are marked fairly but feedback is minimal — you know your score but not much else.,Spring 2024,2024-02-02
Prof. Arjun Mehta,Electrical Engineering,"Lab assignments perfectly complement theory lectures — a seamlessly integrated curriculum Nevertheless, rarely repeats key points, so if you miss something, you have no way to catch up.",Spring 2024,2024-02-06
Mr. James Okafor,English Literature,"relies entirely on powerpoint slides with no supplementary engagement — very passive experience Despite this, Assignment rubrics are crystal clear, so students know exactly what is expected of them.",Spring 2024,2024-02-07
Mr. David Kimani,Geography,Assignments are thoughtfully designed to bridge theory and real-world application brilliantly.,Spring 2024,2024-02-08
Mr. David Kimani,Geography,Provides model answers after submission that serve as excellent study resources One area needing improvement: the practical examples used are poorly chosen and sometimes technically inaccurate.,Spring 2024,2024-02-09
Dr. Sophia Patel,Artificial Intelligence,"His tone is always encouraging, making it easy to follow along even when the content is tough Nevertheless, the accent is at times hard to understand and no effort is made to slow down or repeat.",Spring 2024,2024-02-11
Prof. Ravi Shankar,Physics,"Can explain the same concept ten different ways until every student in the room understands On the downside, the board work is illegible — notes are cramped and the handwriting is difficult to read.",Spring 2024,2024-02-11
Dr. Emily Chen,Chemistry,"the practical examples used are poorly chosen and sometimes technically inaccurate Despite this, The assignments push beyond memorization into genuine critical analysis and synthesis.",Spring 2024,2024-02-13
Dr. Yuki Tanaka,Robotics,"The case study assignments are genuinely challenging and deeply relevant to the industry On the downside, announced a change in exam format via a brief note buried in slides — zero proactive communication.",Spring 2024,2024-02-13
Prof. Linda Osei,Nursing & Healthcare,"The assignments push beyond memorization into genuine critical analysis and synthesis With that in mind, feedback on assignments is superficial — just a score with a single line of generic comment.",Spring 2024,2024-02-14
Prof. Ravi Shankar,Physics,Possesses encyclopaedic knowledge and can link any student question back to broader theoretical frameworks.,Spring 2024,2024-02-16
Prof. Ravi Shankar,Physics,Written feedback on essays is detailed and constructive — clear articulation extends beyond lectures.,Spring 2024,2024-02-17
Dr. Maria Fernandez,Sociology,"Always follows up on unanswered questions from previous lectures at the start of the next class With that in mind, feedback on assignments is generic, copy-pasted, and returns no useful guidance.",Spring 2024,2024-02-17
Ms. Lakshmi Iyer,History,"the classroom environment feels tense and unwelcoming — students are afraid to speak up To give credit where it is due, Quickly acknowledged a mistake in the lecture notes and corrected them with a detailed email.",Spring 2024,2024-02-17
Dr. Aisha Rahman,Mathematics,"office hours are scheduled but rarely actually held — very disappointing for students who need help That said, Projects require independent research that significantly deepens understanding of the subject.",Spring 2024,2024-02-18
Mr. James Okafor,English Literature,Solid knowledge of core syllabus topics but seems less confident with advanced or edge-case material.,Spring 2024,2024-02-19
Prof. Omar Hassan,Philosophy,"tasks feel disconnected from what is taught in lectures, making them very frustrating to complete Despite this, Projects require independent research that significantly deepens understanding of the subject.",Spring 2024,2024-02-20
Dr. Fatima Al-Zahra,Data Science,"Explains historical context of theories, giving students a richer understanding of the subject.",Spring 2024,2024-02-22
Prof. Linda Osei,Nursing & Healthcare,"students who visit during office hours are frequently told to 'check the textbook' without help Despite this, Speaks at a perfect pace — clear, confident, and never rushes through important material.",Spring 2024,2024-02-23
Ms. Neha Gupta,Environmental Science,"The use of polls, debates, and role-plays keeps every lecture dynamic and participatory Nevertheless, jumps between topics without transitions — lectures feel disjointed and hard to follow.",Spring 2024,2024-02-24
Mr. Rohan Verma,Physical Education,"When asked a complex question in class, promises a full answer by email and always delivers Nevertheless, the marking scheme is never shared in advance, creating unnecessary anxiety among students.",Spring 2024,2024-02-25
Dr. Aisha Rahman,Mathematics,"Always uses well-structured language that makes the subject feel intuitive rather than intimidating However, written assignments are assigned but the grading focuses almost entirely on formatting, not content.",Spring 2024,2024-02-29
Mr. Carlos Mendez,Economics,"Responds to emails within hours — remarkable availability for such a senior faculty member Nevertheless, announced a change in exam format via a brief note buried in slides — zero proactive communication.",Spring 2024,2024-03-02
Dr. Yuki Tanaka,Robotics,"Makes the purpose of every assignment explicit — students understand why each task matters Nevertheless, the same presentation format, week after week, with no variation — painfully dull.",Spring 2024,2024-03-02
Ms. Chloe Dubois,French Language,Never uses jargon without explaining it first — a rare and appreciated quality in an educator One area needing improvement: deadlines are unrealistically tight and show no consideration for students' other commitments.,Spring 2024,2024-03-08
Mr. David Kimani,Geography,"Always relates lessons to current events, which makes abstract theories feel immediately relevant On the downside, tends to mumble during lectures, making it nearly impossible to take accurate notes.",Spring 2024,2024-03-13
Ms. Priya Nair,Computer Science,"Gives clear instructions before each assignment, eliminating confusion from the start Nevertheless, no model answers or solutions are provided after submission, leaving students to guess.",Spring 2024,2024-03-13
Mr. Ethan Brooks,Business Studies,Assignments are poorly worded and often require clarification that is slow to come.,Spring 2024,2024-03-16
Ms. Lakshmi Iyer,History,"unavailable outside of class time and discourages emails unless they are 'truly urgent' To give credit where it is due, Creates an incredibly interactive learning environment where every student feels heard.",Spring 2024,2024-03-17
Mr. Ethan Brooks,Business Studies,Can explain the same concept ten different ways until every student in the room understands.,Spring 2024,2024-03-20
Prof. Samuel Adeyemi,Biology,"Poses thought-provoking questions mid-lecture that ignite genuine curiosity among students Nevertheless, the course seems to be delivered from memory of a single outdated textbook from years ago.",Spring 2024,2024-03-21
Dr. Maria Fernandez,Sociology,Brings in guest speakers and industry professionals to keep the content real and relevant.,Spring 2024,2024-03-24
Ms. Anjali Desai,Psychology,Made multiple factual errors in a single lecture with no acknowledgment or correction.,Spring 2024,2024-03-24
Mr. Carlos Mendez,Economics,"announced a change in exam format via a brief note buried in slides — zero proactive communication To give credit where it is due, When a student struggles, proactively reaches out rather than waiting for the student to ask.",Spring 2024,2024-03-24
Mr. James Okafor,English Literature,"appears to read slides for the first time in class — little evidence of deep preparation To give credit where it is due, Masterfully simplifies dense academic papers into understandable summaries during class.",Spring 2024,2024-03-24
Dr. Aisha Rahman,Mathematics,"The enthusiasm for the subject is contagious; I started loving a topic I once dreaded With that in mind, the marking scheme is never shared in advance, creating unnecessary anxiety among students.",Spring 2024,2024-03-26
Prof. Arjun Mehta,Electrical Engineering,Does not seem interested in teaching — the lack of enthusiasm is demoralizing for the class.,Spring 2024,2024-03-30
Ms. Anjali Desai,Psychology,Jumps between topics without transitions — lectures feel disjointed and hard to follow.,Spring 2024,2024-03-31
Ms. Neha Gupta,Environmental Science,"no model answers or solutions are provided after submission, leaving students to guess Despite this, Brings in guest speakers and industry professionals to keep the content real and relevant.",Spring 2024,2024-03-31
Ms. Priya Nair,Computer Science,"written assignments are assigned but the grading focuses almost entirely on formatting, not content To give credit where it is due, Possesses encyclopaedic knowledge and can link any student question back to broader theoretical frameworks.",Spring 2024,2024-03-31
Ms. Chloe Dubois,French Language,Knows the topic well enough to teach it effectively but rarely goes beyond prescribed material.,Spring 2024,2024-04-01
Mr. Ethan Brooks,Business Studies,Makes students feel like co-creators of knowledge rather than passive receivers of information.,Spring 2024,2024-04-01
Mr. David Kimani,Geography,"Possesses encyclopaedic knowledge and can link any student question back to broader theoretical frameworks On the downside, core concepts are sometimes explained incorrectly, raising serious concerns about subject mastery.",Spring 2024,2024-04-03
Ms. Lakshmi Iyer,History,"Reliable knowledge base — delivers accurate content consistently, if without great depth.",Spring 2024,2024-04-04
Mr. David Kimani,Geography,"takes over two weeks to reply to emails, and the responses are often incomplete To give credit where it is due, Can discuss nuanced debates within the field, exposing students to the complexity of real scholarship.",Spring 2024,2024-04-04
Ms. Priya Nair,Computer Science,"Created a class WhatsApp group to answer real-time doubts — incredibly supportive initiative Nevertheless, students who try to contribute are often interrupted or hurried along, discouraging participation.",Spring 2024,2024-04-05
Dr. Yuki Tanaka,Robotics,Uses gamified quizzes and group challenges that make learning genuinely fun and competitive.,Spring 2024,2024-04-06
Mr. James Okafor,English Literature,"The creative freedom given in project briefs encourages innovative thinking and ownership However, tends to mumble during lectures, making it nearly impossible to take accurate notes.",Spring 2024,2024-04-07
Prof. Ravi Shankar,Physics,"Can explain the same concept ten different ways until every student in the room understands With that in mind, the accent is at times hard to understand and no effort is made to slow down or repeat.",Spring 2024,2024-04-07
Ms. Anjali Desai,Psychology,"Live coding demonstrations paired with immediate student practice sessions are highly effective With that in mind, the practical examples used are poorly chosen and sometimes technically inaccurate.",Spring 2024,2024-04-08
Prof. Omar Hassan,Philosophy,Good foundational knowledge; the integration of recent research could be improved.,Spring 2024,2024-04-10
Dr. Aisha Rahman,Mathematics,"classes are purely lecture-based with zero opportunities for student interaction or questions To give credit where it is due, Brings personal research expertise into the classroom, making lectures uniquely insightful.",Spring 2024,2024-04-12
Prof. Linda Osei,Nursing & Healthcare,"the workload is excessive relative to the credit hours allocated to this course That said, Quickly acknowledged a mistake in the lecture notes and corrected them with a detailed email.",Spring 2024,2024-04-12
Dr. Yuki Tanaka,Robotics,Problem sets are challenging yet fair — they stretch thinking without being unreasonable.,Spring 2024,2024-04-13
Prof. Ravi Shankar,Physics,Announced a change in exam format via a brief note buried in slides — zero proactive communication.,Spring 2024,2024-04-14
Mr. Rohan Verma,Physical Education,"Explains every topic with exceptional clarity, making even the most complex ideas accessible.",Spring 2024,2024-04-15
Dr. Emily Chen,Chemistry,"Student participation is actively encouraged and rewarded — the class feels like a community On the downside, students who try to contribute are often interrupted or hurried along, discouraging participation.",Spring 2024,2024-04-16
Mr. Ethan Brooks,Business Studies,"unable to explain foundational theories beyond the surface level when probed by students Despite this, His verbal explanations are accompanied by excellent analogies that stick in your memory.",Spring 2024,2024-04-17
Mr. Carlos Mendez,Economics,"written assignments are assigned but the grading focuses almost entirely on formatting, not content To give credit where it is due, Never dismisses a query — even seemingly simple questions receive a thorough, patient response.",Spring 2024,2024-04-18
Prof. Ravi Shankar,Physics,"appears to read slides for the first time in class — little evidence of deep preparation That said, Even during difficult Q&A sessions, maintains composure and communicates answers clearly.",Spring 2024,2024-04-19
Ms. Anjali Desai,Psychology,"Creates an incredibly interactive learning environment where every student feels heard With that in mind, the classroom environment feels tense and unwelcoming — students are afraid to speak up.",Spring 2024,2024-04-22
Dr. Fatima Al-Zahra,Data Science,"rarely acknowledges student questions and often dismisses them without adequate explanation That said, Masterfully simplifies dense academic papers into understandable summaries during class.",Spring 2024,2024-04-22
Mr. James Okafor,English Literature,Uses a blend of visual aids and verbal narration that caters to all kinds of learners.,Spring 2024,2024-04-24
Mr. Ethan Brooks,Business Studies,"Assignment rubrics are crystal clear, so students know exactly what is expected of them.",Spring 2024,2024-04-25
Dr. Sophia Patel,Artificial Intelligence,The practical coding exercises assigned weekly are the best preparation for real-world work One area needing improvement: unavailable outside of class time and discourages emails unless they are 'truly urgent'.,Spring 2024,2024-04-30
Prof. Omar Hassan,Philosophy,"Can explain the same concept ten different ways until every student in the room understands With that in mind, does not seem interested in teaching — the lack of enthusiasm is demoralizing for the class.",Spring 2024,2024-04-30
Dr. Yuki Tanaka,Robotics,"Poses thought-provoking questions mid-lecture that ignite genuine curiosity among students With that in mind, the same presentation format, week after week, with no variation — painfully dull.",Spring 2024,2024-05-02
Dr. Sophia Patel,Artificial Intelligence,"Projects require independent research that significantly deepens understanding of the subject With that in mind, rarely repeats key points, so if you miss something, you have no way to catch up.",Spring 2024,2024-05-04
Mr. Carlos Mendez,Economics,"Tasks feel disconnected from what is taught in lectures, making them very frustrating to complete.",Spring 2024,2024-05-06
Prof. Ravi Shankar,Physics,"Uses gamified quizzes and group challenges that make learning genuinely fun and competitive Nevertheless, email replies are written in a confusing manner; often raises more questions than it answers.",Spring 2024,2024-05-06
Ms. Chloe Dubois,French Language,"Feedback on draft submissions is returned within 48 hours with detailed, actionable comments Nevertheless, often trails off mid-sentence and changes direction, which disrupts the flow of learning.",Spring 2024,2024-05-08
Mr. David Kimani,Geography,"uses acronyms and shorthand without ever defining them — very frustrating for new students That said, Uses a blend of visual aids and verbal narration that caters to all kinds of learners.",Spring 2024,2024-05-11
Ms. Lakshmi Iyer,History,"Her communication style is outstanding — she breaks down difficult theories into simple, digestible parts.",Spring 2024,2024-05-12
Prof. Arjun Mehta,Electrical Engineering,Generally available but sometimes the guidance offered is too brief to be truly helpful.,Spring 2024,2024-05-12
Prof. Arjun Mehta,Electrical Engineering,Handles even the most unexpected or advanced questions with confidence and precision.,Spring 2024,2024-05-14
Prof. Samuel Adeyemi,Biology,"Connects the current topic to related fields seamlessly, enriching the overall learning experience On the downside, explanations are overly technical without building up from foundational concepts first.",Spring 2024,2024-05-15
Mr. James Okafor,English Literature,"Encourages critical thinking by consistently challenging students to question assumptions On the downside, the board work is illegible — notes are cramped and the handwriting is difficult to read.",Spring 2024,2024-05-15
Dr. Aisha Rahman,Mathematics,Office hours are scheduled but rarely actually held — very disappointing for students who need help.,Spring 2024,2024-05-16
Ms. Lakshmi Iyer,History,"Group assignments are structured to ensure fair contribution and accountability from all members However, instructions for assignments are vague and lead to widespread misunderstandings every semester.",Spring 2024,2024-05-17
Dr. Emily Chen,Chemistry,Assignment quality is acceptable — they test course material adequately if not innovatively.,Spring 2024,2024-05-18
Dr. Fatima Al-Zahra,Data Science,The course seems to be delivered from memory of a single outdated textbook from years ago.,Spring 2024,2024-05-18
Mr. Ethan Brooks,Business Studies,Delivers content accurately but without much flair — the pace is steady if unexciting.,Spring 2024,2024-05-18
Ms. Chloe Dubois,French Language,Classroom discussions feel genuinely democratic — every opinion is valued and explored.,Spring 2024,2024-05-19
Mr. David Kimani,Geography,The way she narrates case studies makes abstract concepts come alive in the classroom One area needing improvement: group projects are assigned but never meaningfully supervised or supported.,Spring 2024,2024-05-19
Prof. Wei Zhang,Statistics,"tends to mumble during lectures, making it nearly impossible to take accurate notes That said, The energy in the classroom is infectious — you cannot help but get involved.",Spring 2024,2024-05-19
Mr. Rohan Verma,Physical Education,The teaching style feels like reading directly from the textbook — completely disengaging.,Spring 2024,2024-05-21
Dr. Fatima Al-Zahra,Data Science,Ignores follow-up questions posted on the course forum — makes students feel unsupported.,Spring 2024,2024-05-24
Dr. Emily Chen,Chemistry,Written feedback on essays is detailed and constructive — clear articulation extends beyond lectures One area needing improvement: explanations are overly technical without building up from foundational concepts first.,Spring 2024,2024-05-24
Prof. Ravi Shankar,Physics,"The use of polls, debates, and role-plays keeps every lecture dynamic and participatory.",Spring 2024,2024-05-26
Mr. Rohan Verma,Physical Education,"Can discuss nuanced debates within the field, exposing students to the complexity of real scholarship With that in mind, tasks feel disconnected from what is taught in lectures, making them very frustrating to complete.",Spring 2024,2024-05-27
Prof. Samuel Adeyemi,Biology,"relies too heavily on notes and struggles to answer questions that deviate from the slide deck To give credit where it is due, Assignments are thoughtfully designed to bridge theory and real-world application brilliantly.",Spring 2024,2024-05-28
Dr. Maria Fernandez,Sociology,"graded assignments are returned weeks after the deadline with no explanation for the delay That said, Cites primary research papers during lectures, showing genuine depth of scholarship.",Spring 2024,2024-05-28
Prof. Samuel Adeyemi,Biology,"Assignments are thoughtfully designed to bridge theory and real-world application brilliantly With that in mind, unavailable outside of class time and discourages emails unless they are 'truly urgent'.",Spring 2024,2024-05-31
Mr. David Kimani,Geography,One of the most articulate teachers I have ever encountered; never leaves a concept half-explained.,Spring 2024,2024-06-02
Prof. Arjun Mehta,Electrical Engineering,"Responds to emails within hours — remarkable availability for such a senior faculty member Nevertheless, the classroom environment feels tense and unwelcoming — students are afraid to speak up.",Spring 2024,2024-06-05
Ms. Neha Gupta,Environmental Science,"explanations are overly technical without building up from foundational concepts first To give credit where it is due, The use of polls, debates, and role-plays keeps every lecture dynamic and participatory.",Spring 2024,2024-06-05
Dr. Fatima Al-Zahra,Data Science,"lacks clarity when explaining grading criteria, making it hard to know what is expected To give credit where it is due, His tone is always encouraging, making it easy to follow along even when the content is tough.",Spring 2024,2024-06-07
Ms. Anjali Desai,Psychology,"appears to read slides for the first time in class — little evidence of deep preparation To give credit where it is due, Uses a blend of visual aids and verbal narration that caters to all kinds of learners.",Spring 2024,2024-06-07
Ms. Priya Nair,Computer Science,"When asked a complex question in class, promises a full answer by email and always delivers However, tasks feel disconnected from what is taught in lectures, making them very frustrating to complete.",Spring 2024,2024-06-09
Prof. Linda Osei,Nursing & Healthcare,"Quickly acknowledged a mistake in the lecture notes and corrected them with a detailed email Nevertheless, no group activities, no discussions, no real connection with students — deeply monotonous.",Spring 2024,2024-06-11
Mr. Ethan Brooks,Business Studies,"instructions for assignments are vague and lead to widespread misunderstandings every semester That said, Makes students feel like co-creators of knowledge rather than passive receivers of information.",Spring 2024,2024-06-12
Dr. Aisha Rahman,Mathematics,Relies too heavily on notes and struggles to answer questions that deviate from the slide deck.,Spring 2024,2024-06-14
Prof. Ravi Shankar,Physics,"Responds to emails within hours — remarkable availability for such a senior faculty member Nevertheless, unable to explain foundational theories beyond the surface level when probed by students.",Spring 2024,2024-06-14
Ms. Priya Nair,Computer Science,"When a student struggles, proactively reaches out rather than waiting for the student to ask Nevertheless, often trails off mid-sentence and changes direction, which disrupts the flow of learning.",Spring 2024,2024-06-16
Prof. Omar Hassan,Philosophy,"Explains historical context of theories, giving students a richer understanding of the subject One area needing improvement: feedback on assignments is generic, copy-pasted, and returns no useful guidance.",Spring 2024,2024-06-17
Dr. Maria Fernandez,Sociology,"the same presentation format, week after week, with no variation — painfully dull To give credit where it is due, Demonstrates mastery by going well beyond the syllabus to give broader intellectual context.",Spring 2024,2024-06-19
Dr. Aisha Rahman,Mathematics,The energy in the classroom is infectious — you cannot help but get involved.,Spring 2024,2024-06-21
Mr. James Okafor,English Literature,"the accent is at times hard to understand and no effort is made to slow down or repeat That said, Live coding demonstrations paired with immediate student practice sessions are highly effective.",Spring 2024,2024-06-21
Ms. Priya Nair,Computer Science,"Every slide and every word is intentionally placed — communication is precise and efficient Nevertheless, unable to explain foundational theories beyond the surface level when probed by students.",Spring 2024,2024-06-22
Dr. Sophia Patel,Artificial Intelligence,Student participation is actively encouraged and rewarded — the class feels like a community.,Spring 2024,2024-06-27
Mr. Ethan Brooks,Business Studies,"Holds extra office hours before every major exam, showing genuine care for student success.",Spring 2024,2024-06-27
Prof. Wei Zhang,Statistics,"Created a class WhatsApp group to answer real-time doubts — incredibly supportive initiative One area needing improvement: written assignments are assigned but the grading focuses almost entirely on formatting, not content.",Spring 2024,2024-06-28
Prof. Wei Zhang,Statistics,"made multiple factual errors in a single lecture with no acknowledgment or correction That said, Handles even the most unexpected or advanced questions with confidence and precision.",Spring 2024,2024-06-28
Prof. Wei Zhang,Statistics,The creative freedom given in project briefs encourages innovative thinking and ownership.,Spring 2024,2024-06-30
Mr. Carlos Mendez,Economics,"gives feedback on submissions in one-word comments that offer no direction for improvement To give credit where it is due, Group assignments are structured to ensure fair contribution and accountability from all members.",Fall 2024,2024-07-01
Prof. Omar Hassan,Philosophy,"Speaks at a perfect pace — clear, confident, and never rushes through important material With that in mind, the course content feels dated — no references to modern developments or current research.",Fall 2024,2024-07-01
Mr. James Okafor,English Literature,"Remembers individual student names and learning styles — a personal touch that boosts engagement However, the classroom environment feels tense and unwelcoming — students are afraid to speak up.",Fall 2024,2024-07-02
Dr. Yuki Tanaka,Robotics,"group projects are assigned but never meaningfully supervised or supported Despite this, Can discuss nuanced debates within the field, exposing students to the complexity of real scholarship.",Fall 2024,2024-07-02
Ms. Chloe Dubois,French Language,"tends to mumble during lectures, making it nearly impossible to take accurate notes To give credit where it is due, Always follows up on unanswered questions from previous lectures at the start of the next class.",Fall 2024,2024-07-03
Mr. Carlos Mendez,Economics,"His communication style is outstanding — she breaks down difficult theories into simple, digestible parts With that in mind, explanations are overly technical without building up from foundational concepts first.",Fall 2024,2024-07-03
Mr. Carlos Mendez,Economics,"email replies are written in a confusing manner; often raises more questions than it answers Despite this, Poses thought-provoking questions mid-lecture that ignite genuine curiosity among students.",Fall 2024,2024-07-04
Dr. Fatima Al-Zahra,Data Science,"Brings personal research expertise into the classroom, making lectures uniquely insightful One area needing improvement: the practical examples used are poorly chosen and sometimes technically inaccurate.",Fall 2024,2024-07-06
Prof. Ravi Shankar,Physics,"Always uses well-structured language that makes the subject feel intuitive rather than intimidating Nevertheless, never poses questions to students, making it easy to zone out for the entire lecture.",Fall 2024,2024-07-07
Mr. David Kimani,Geography,Always available after class and never seems in a rush to leave — truly student-centered One area needing improvement: grading is inconsistent — the same quality of work receives vastly different marks week to week.,Fall 2024,2024-07-07
Mr. James Okafor,English Literature,"The enthusiasm for the subject is contagious; I started loving a topic I once dreaded Nevertheless, never poses questions to students, making it easy to zone out for the entire lecture.",Fall 2024,2024-07-08
Mr. David Kimani,Geography,"His communication style is outstanding — she breaks down difficult theories into simple, digestible parts With that in mind, the practical examples used are poorly chosen and sometimes technically inaccurate.",Fall 2024,2024-07-15
Dr. Sophia Patel,Artificial Intelligence,"The assignments push beyond memorization into genuine critical analysis and synthesis One area needing improvement: core concepts are sometimes explained incorrectly, raising serious concerns about subject mastery.",Fall 2024,2024-07-18
Mr. Ethan Brooks,Business Studies,"Grading is consistent and transparent — students never feel that marks are arbitrary With that in mind, ignores follow-up questions posted on the course forum — makes students feel unsupported.",Fall 2024,2024-07-18
Dr. Aisha Rahman,Mathematics,"relies too heavily on notes and struggles to answer questions that deviate from the slide deck Despite this, Makes students feel like co-creators of knowledge rather than passive receivers of information.",Fall 2024,2024-07-21
Ms. Lakshmi Iyer,History,"explanations are overly technical without building up from foundational concepts first That said, Classroom discussions feel genuinely democratic — every opinion is valued and explored.",Fall 2024,2024-07-21
Prof. Samuel Adeyemi,Biology,"the practical examples used are poorly chosen and sometimes technically inaccurate To give credit where it is due, Connects the current topic to related fields seamlessly, enriching the overall learning experience.",Fall 2024,2024-07-26
Mr. Ethan Brooks,Business Studies,"Remembers individual student names and learning styles — a personal touch that boosts engagement On the downside, assignments are poorly worded and often require clarification that is slow to come.",Fall 2024,2024-07-26
Prof. Samuel Adeyemi,Biology,"explanations are overly technical without building up from foundational concepts first That said, Possesses encyclopaedic knowledge and can link any student question back to broader theoretical frameworks.",Fall 2024,2024-07-26
Ms. Lakshmi Iyer,History,"Grading is consistent and transparent — students never feel that marks are arbitrary However, tends to mumble during lectures, making it nearly impossible to take accurate notes.",Fall 2024,2024-07-27
Mr. Rohan Verma,Physical Education,Never uses jargon without explaining it first — a rare and appreciated quality in an educator.,Fall 2024,2024-07-28
Dr. Aisha Rahman,Mathematics,Student interaction happens but feels forced rather than organic within the lesson structure.,Fall 2024,2024-08-01
Mr. Rohan Verma,Physical Education,Designs collaborative projects that build both subject mastery and interpersonal skills.,Fall 2024,2024-08-02
Mr. Carlos Mendez,Economics,"The use of polls, debates, and role-plays keeps every lecture dynamic and participatory Nevertheless, grading is inconsistent — the same quality of work receives vastly different marks week to week.",Fall 2024,2024-08-05
Mr. Ethan Brooks,Business Studies,"relies too heavily on notes and struggles to answer questions that deviate from the slide deck That said, The assignments push beyond memorization into genuine critical analysis and synthesis.",Fall 2024,2024-08-05
Mr. Rohan Verma,Physical Education,"Responds to emails within hours — remarkable availability for such a senior faculty member With that in mind, office hours are scheduled but rarely actually held — very disappointing for students who need help.",Fall 2024,2024-08-05
Prof. Linda Osei,Nursing & Healthcare,"Cites primary research papers during lectures, showing genuine depth of scholarship On the downside, the teaching style feels like reading directly from the textbook — completely disengaging.",Fall 2024,2024-08-05
Dr. Fatima Al-Zahra,Data Science,"deadlines are unrealistically tight and show no consideration for students' other commitments To give credit where it is due, An absolute authority on the subject — references cutting-edge research with ease in every lecture.",Fall 2024,2024-08-07
Dr. Aisha Rahman,Mathematics,"announced a change in exam format via a brief note buried in slides — zero proactive communication To give credit where it is due, Remembers individual student names and learning styles — a personal touch that boosts engagement.",Fall 2024,2024-08-07
Prof. Arjun Mehta,Electrical Engineering,"Responds thoughtfully to even the most off-topic questions, redirecting with patience Nevertheless, never poses questions to students, making it easy to zone out for the entire lecture.",Fall 2024,2024-08-11
Mr. Carlos Mendez,Economics,Grading turnaround is reasonable; rubrics exist but could be more detailed.,Fall 2024,2024-08-13
Mr. Carlos Mendez,Economics,"the course content feels dated — no references to modern developments or current research To give credit where it is due, The energy in the classroom is infectious — you cannot help but get involved.",Fall 2024,2024-08-13
Mr. Ethan Brooks,Business Studies,"Every slide and every word is intentionally placed — communication is precise and efficient However, takes over two weeks to reply to emails, and the responses are often incomplete.",Fall 2024,2024-08-14
Ms. Neha Gupta,Environmental Science,"Explains concepts at a satisfactory level, though more real-world examples would help.",Fall 2024,2024-08-17
Prof. Wei Zhang,Statistics,"Always relates lessons to current events, which makes abstract theories feel immediately relevant On the downside, explanations are overly technical without building up from foundational concepts first.",Fall 2024,2024-08-21
Mr. Rohan Verma,Physical Education,"Provides model answers after submission that serve as excellent study resources On the downside, never addresses doubt-clearing requests — students are left to figure out everything on their own.",Fall 2024,2024-08-24
Prof. Samuel Adeyemi,Biology,"Speaks far too fast and frequently skips steps mid-explanation, leaving students confused.",Fall 2024,2024-08-25
Dr. Maria Fernandez,Sociology,"The passion for the subject translates directly into deeply informed, inspiring lectures On the downside, rarely repeats key points, so if you miss something, you have no way to catch up.",Fall 2024,2024-08-26
Dr. Maria Fernandez,Sociology,"Can explain the same concept ten different ways until every student in the room understands On the downside, made multiple factual errors in a single lecture with no acknowledgment or correction.",Fall 2024,2024-08-27
Prof. Wei Zhang,Statistics,"Makes students feel like co-creators of knowledge rather than passive receivers of information However, the classroom environment feels tense and unwelcoming — students are afraid to speak up.",Fall 2024,2024-08-27
Ms. Lakshmi Iyer,History,"feedback on assignments is superficial — just a score with a single line of generic comment Despite this, Encourages critical thinking by consistently challenging students to question assumptions.",Fall 2024,2024-08-27
Dr. Fatima Al-Zahra,Data Science,"Creates an incredibly interactive learning environment where every student feels heard However, cannot confidently field student questions that go slightly beyond the textbook material.",Fall 2024,2024-08-28
Ms. Priya Nair,Computer Science,"Holds extra office hours before every major exam, showing genuine care for student success With that in mind, tasks feel disconnected from what is taught in lectures, making them very frustrating to complete.",Fall 2024,2024-08-29
Prof. Samuel Adeyemi,Biology,"Never dismisses a query — even seemingly simple questions receive a thorough, patient response On the downside, takes over two weeks to reply to emails, and the responses are often incomplete.",Fall 2024,2024-09-02
Mr. Rohan Verma,Physical Education,"When a student struggles, proactively reaches out rather than waiting for the student to ask Nevertheless, deadlines are unrealistically tight and show no consideration for students' other commitments.",Fall 2024,2024-09-05
Prof. Ravi Shankar,Physics,"the accent is at times hard to understand and no effort is made to slow down or repeat To give credit where it is due, Always available after class and never seems in a rush to leave — truly student-centered.",Fall 2024,2024-09-06
Prof. Linda Osei,Nursing & Healthcare,"Takes over two weeks to reply to emails, and the responses are often incomplete.",Fall 2024,2024-09-10
Dr. Sophia Patel,Artificial Intelligence,"When a student struggles, proactively reaches out rather than waiting for the student to ask.",Fall 2024,2024-09-10
Prof. Samuel Adeyemi,Biology,Grading is inconsistent — the same quality of work receives vastly different marks week to week.,Fall 2024,2024-09-11
Mr. Rohan Verma,Physical Education,The lectures are informative but can feel a bit dry due to a monotonous speaking style.,Fall 2024,2024-09-13
Ms. Lakshmi Iyer,History,"Explains every topic with exceptional clarity, making even the most complex ideas accessible With that in mind, does not check for understanding — just moves on regardless of whether students are following.",Fall 2024,2024-09-13
Mr. Rohan Verma,Physical Education,"never poses questions to students, making it easy to zone out for the entire lecture Despite this, Sets up one-on-one review sessions for students who fall behind, at no additional cost.",Fall 2024,2024-09-16
Dr. Aisha Rahman,Mathematics,"The energy in the classroom is infectious — you cannot help but get involved On the downside, written assignments are assigned but the grading focuses almost entirely on formatting, not content.",Fall 2024,2024-09-16
Prof. Linda Osei,Nursing & Healthcare,Keeps the course content updated with the latest industry developments — always current.,Fall 2024,2024-09-18
Ms. Chloe Dubois,French Language,Poses thought-provoking questions mid-lecture that ignite genuine curiosity among students.,Fall 2024,2024-09-18
Dr. Fatima Al-Zahra,Data Science,"Responds thoughtfully to even the most off-topic questions, redirecting with patience Nevertheless, does not seem interested in teaching — the lack of enthusiasm is demoralizing for the class.",Fall 2024,2024-09-18
Ms. Chloe Dubois,French Language,Appears to read slides for the first time in class — little evidence of deep preparation.,Fall 2024,2024-09-20
Mr. Rohan Verma,Physical Education,Graded assignments are returned weeks after the deadline with no explanation for the delay.,Fall 2024,2024-09-23
Dr. Aisha Rahman,Mathematics,"the teaching style feels like reading directly from the textbook — completely disengaging That said, Cites primary research papers during lectures, showing genuine depth of scholarship.",Fall 2024,2024-09-23
Mr. Ethan Brooks,Business Studies,Responds to most messages but occasionally misses queries sent close to deadlines.,Fall 2024,2024-09-24
Prof. Arjun Mehta,Electrical Engineering,"students who try to contribute are often interrupted or hurried along, discouraging participation Despite this, Quickly acknowledged a mistake in the lecture notes and corrected them with a detailed email.",Fall 2024,2024-09-24
Prof. Arjun Mehta,Electrical Engineering,The board work is illegible — notes are cramped and the handwriting is difficult to read.,Fall 2024,2024-09-25
Ms. Chloe Dubois,French Language,"often trails off mid-sentence and changes direction, which disrupts the flow of learning That said, Cites primary research papers during lectures, showing genuine depth of scholarship.",Fall 2024,2024-09-26
Prof. Samuel Adeyemi,Biology,"Designs collaborative projects that build both subject mastery and interpersonal skills One area needing improvement: feedback on assignments is generic, copy-pasted, and returns no useful guidance.",Fall 2024,2024-09-29
Dr. Aisha Rahman,Mathematics,"Remembers individual student names and learning styles — a personal touch that boosts engagement With that in mind, the marking scheme is never shared in advance, creating unnecessary anxiety among students.",Fall 2024,2024-10-03
Dr. Maria Fernandez,Sociology,"Responds to emails within hours — remarkable availability for such a senior faculty member Nevertheless, group projects lack structure, leading to unequal distribution of work and unfair grading.",Fall 2024,2024-10-07
Prof. Wei Zhang,Statistics,Grading is consistent and transparent — students never feel that marks are arbitrary One area needing improvement: relies entirely on powerpoint slides with no supplementary engagement — very passive experience.,Fall 2024,2024-10-09
Ms. Neha Gupta,Environmental Science,"relies entirely on powerpoint slides with no supplementary engagement — very passive experience Despite this, The enthusiasm for the subject is contagious; I started loving a topic I once dreaded.",Fall 2024,2024-10-12
Mr. Rohan Verma,Physical Education,"Created a class WhatsApp group to answer real-time doubts — incredibly supportive initiative On the downside, made multiple factual errors in a single lecture with no acknowledgment or correction.",Fall 2024,2024-10-12
Ms. Lakshmi Iyer,History,The enthusiasm for the subject is contagious; I started loving a topic I once dreaded.,Fall 2024,2024-10-13
Mr. Carlos Mendez,Economics,"The assignments push beyond memorization into genuine critical analysis and synthesis One area needing improvement: lacks clarity when explaining grading criteria, making it hard to know what is expected.",Fall 2024,2024-10-13
Dr. Yuki Tanaka,Robotics,"never addresses doubt-clearing requests — students are left to figure out everything on their own That said, The creative freedom given in project briefs encourages innovative thinking and ownership.",Fall 2024,2024-10-13
Prof. Linda Osei,Nursing & Healthcare,"classes are purely lecture-based with zero opportunities for student interaction or questions To give credit where it is due, Possesses encyclopaedic knowledge and can link any student question back to broader theoretical frameworks.",Fall 2024,2024-10-14
Prof. Arjun Mehta,Electrical Engineering,Instructions for assignments are vague and lead to widespread misunderstandings every semester.,Fall 2024,2024-10-16
Ms. Priya Nair,Computer Science,"Remembers individual student names and learning styles — a personal touch that boosts engagement With that in mind, written assignments are assigned but the grading focuses almost entirely on formatting, not content.",Fall 2024,2024-10-17
Prof. Ravi Shankar,Physics,The workload is excessive relative to the credit hours allocated to this course.,Fall 2024,2024-10-18
Mr. Ethan Brooks,Business Studies,"Assignments are thoughtfully designed to bridge theory and real-world application brilliantly On the downside, instructions for assignments are vague and lead to widespread misunderstandings every semester.",Fall 2024,2024-10-19
Dr. Sophia Patel,Artificial Intelligence,Projects require independent research that significantly deepens understanding of the subject.,Fall 2024,2024-10-21
Dr. Fatima Al-Zahra,Data Science,"Holds extra office hours before every major exam, showing genuine care for student success With that in mind, dismisses students who ask for extra support, citing time constraints that seem exaggerated.",Fall 2024,2024-10-22
Dr. Sophia Patel,Artificial Intelligence,Does not check for understanding — just moves on regardless of whether students are following.,Fall 2024,2024-10-23
Dr. Aisha Rahman,Mathematics,"deadlines are unrealistically tight and show no consideration for students' other commitments That said, Can discuss nuanced debates within the field, exposing students to the complexity of real scholarship.",Fall 2024,2024-10-24
Dr. Maria Fernandez,Sociology,Masterfully simplifies dense academic papers into understandable summaries during class.,Fall 2024,2024-10-26
Dr. Fatima Al-Zahra,Data Science,"Written assignments are assigned but the grading focuses almost entirely on formatting, not content.",Fall 2024,2024-10-29
Ms. Lakshmi Iyer,History,"gives feedback on submissions in one-word comments that offer no direction for improvement That said, The energy in the classroom is infectious — you cannot help but get involved.",Fall 2024,2024-10-30
Prof. Samuel Adeyemi,Biology,"relies too heavily on notes and struggles to answer questions that deviate from the slide deck To give credit where it is due, Gives clear instructions before each assignment, eliminating confusion from the start.",Fall 2024,2024-11-01
Mr. David Kimani,Geography,"the workload is excessive relative to the credit hours allocated to this course Despite this, Every claim in lectures is backed by evidence and peer-reviewed sources — intellectually rigorous.",Fall 2024,2024-11-02
Mr. Carlos Mendez,Economics,"The creative freedom given in project briefs encourages innovative thinking and ownership With that in mind, the course seems to be delivered from memory of a single outdated textbook from years ago.",Fall 2024,2024-11-05
Prof. Samuel Adeyemi,Biology,"ignores follow-up questions posted on the course forum — makes students feel unsupported Despite this, Feedback on draft submissions is returned within 48 hours with detailed, actionable comments.",Fall 2024,2024-11-09
Ms. Neha Gupta,Environmental Science,"Every slide and every word is intentionally placed — communication is precise and efficient However, does not check for understanding — just moves on regardless of whether students are following.",Fall 2024,2024-11-10
Prof. Samuel Adeyemi,Biology,"Poses thought-provoking questions mid-lecture that ignite genuine curiosity among students On the downside, the same presentation format, week after week, with no variation — painfully dull.",Fall 2024,2024-11-11
Prof. Omar Hassan,Philosophy,"His communication style is outstanding — she breaks down difficult theories into simple, digestible parts.",Fall 2024,2024-11-12
Ms. Anjali Desai,Psychology,"often trails off mid-sentence and changes direction, which disrupts the flow of learning To give credit where it is due, Can explain the same concept ten different ways until every student in the room understands.",Fall 2024,2024-11-14
Ms. Lakshmi Iyer,History,"Always relates lessons to current events, which makes abstract theories feel immediately relevant However, rarely repeats key points, so if you miss something, you have no way to catch up.",Fall 2024,2024-11-14
Ms. Neha Gupta,Environmental Science,Satisfactory responsiveness overall — not exceptional but not problematic either.,Fall 2024,2024-11-15
Prof. Ravi Shankar,Physics,"dismisses students who ask for extra support, citing time constraints that seem exaggerated That said, Live coding demonstrations paired with immediate student practice sessions are highly effective.",Fall 2024,2024-11-15
Mr. James Okafor,English Literature,"takes over two weeks to reply to emails, and the responses are often incomplete Despite this, Written feedback on essays is detailed and constructive — clear articulation extends beyond lectures.",Fall 2024,2024-11-17
Prof. Wei Zhang,Statistics,"Core concepts are sometimes explained incorrectly, raising serious concerns about subject mastery.",Fall 2024,2024-11-18
Prof. Arjun Mehta,Electrical Engineering,"Feedback on draft submissions is returned within 48 hours with detailed, actionable comments Nevertheless, the accent is at times hard to understand and no effort is made to slow down or repeat.",Fall 2024,2024-11-18
Ms. Anjali Desai,Psychology,Live coding demonstrations paired with immediate student practice sessions are highly effective.,Fall 2024,2024-11-19
Ms. Anjali Desai,Psychology,"Office hours are maintained consistently, though the depth of support provided could improve.",Fall 2024,2024-11-21
Dr. Emily Chen,Chemistry,"His tone is always encouraging, making it easy to follow along even when the content is tough.",Fall 2024,2024-11-21
Dr. Yuki Tanaka,Robotics,Gives feedback on submissions in one-word comments that offer no direction for improvement.,Fall 2024,2024-11-22
Ms. Chloe Dubois,French Language,"The passion for the subject translates directly into deeply informed, inspiring lectures.",Fall 2024,2024-11-23
Mr. Carlos Mendez,Economics,"Responds to emails within hours — remarkable availability for such a senior faculty member With that in mind, the board work is illegible — notes are cramped and the handwriting is difficult to read.",Fall 2024,2024-11-23
Dr. Emily Chen,Chemistry,"The passion for the subject translates directly into deeply informed, inspiring lectures On the downside, the workload is excessive relative to the credit hours allocated to this course.",Fall 2024,2024-11-24
Prof. Wei Zhang,Statistics,Interaction is limited to 'any questions?' at the very end when there is no time left.,Fall 2024,2024-11-25
Prof. Omar Hassan,Philosophy,"explanations are overly technical without building up from foundational concepts first To give credit where it is due, Every slide and every word is intentionally placed — communication is precise and efficient.",Fall 2024,2024-11-26
Dr. Sophia Patel,Artificial Intelligence,"graded assignments are returned weeks after the deadline with no explanation for the delay Despite this, Can explain the same concept ten different ways until every student in the room understands.",Fall 2024,2024-11-26
Dr. Fatima Al-Zahra,Data Science,"Dismisses students who ask for extra support, citing time constraints that seem exaggerated.",Fall 2024,2024-11-27
Dr. Emily Chen,Chemistry,"Quickly acknowledged a mistake in the lecture notes and corrected them with a detailed email Nevertheless, feedback on assignments is superficial — just a score with a single line of generic comment.",Fall 2024,2024-11-30
Dr. Sophia Patel,Artificial Intelligence,"often trails off mid-sentence and changes direction, which disrupts the flow of learning Despite this, Each task builds on the last in a perfectly scaffolded progression toward mastery.",Fall 2024,2024-12-01
Dr. Maria Fernandez,Sociology,Unavailable outside of class time and discourages emails unless they are 'truly urgent'.,Fall 2024,2024-12-05
Ms. Priya Nair,Computer Science,"the course content feels dated — no references to modern developments or current research To give credit where it is due, When asked a complex question in class, promises a full answer by email and always delivers.",Fall 2024,2024-12-05
Prof. Ravi Shankar,Physics,Group assignments are structured to ensure fair contribution and accountability from all members.,Fall 2024,2024-12-07
Prof. Arjun Mehta,Electrical Engineering,"One of the most articulate teachers I have ever encountered; never leaves a concept half-explained Nevertheless, many assignments are reused year after year without update — students access past solutions easily.",Fall 2024,2024-12-07
Prof. Linda Osei,Nursing & Healthcare,"Sets up one-on-one review sessions for students who fall behind, at no additional cost On the downside, feedback on assignments is generic, copy-pasted, and returns no useful guidance.",Fall 2024,2024-12-08
Mr. Carlos Mendez,Economics,"The same presentation format, week after week, with no variation — painfully dull.",Fall 2024,2024-12-09
Dr. Yuki Tanaka,Robotics,"Sets up one-on-one review sessions for students who fall behind, at no additional cost.",Fall 2024,2024-12-09
Mr. Carlos Mendez,Economics,"Quickly acknowledged a mistake in the lecture notes and corrected them with a detailed email Nevertheless, graded assignments are returned weeks after the deadline with no explanation for the delay.",Fall 2024,2024-12-11
Dr. Yuki Tanaka,Robotics,"core concepts are sometimes explained incorrectly, raising serious concerns about subject mastery Despite this, When a student struggles, proactively reaches out rather than waiting for the student to ask.",Fall 2024,2024-12-12
Dr. Maria Fernandez,Sociology,"office hours are scheduled but rarely actually held — very disappointing for students who need help Despite this, The use of polls, debates, and role-plays keeps every lecture dynamic and participatory.",Fall 2024,2024-12-12
Dr. Emily Chen,Chemistry,"Responds to emails within hours — remarkable availability for such a senior faculty member On the downside, the marking scheme is never shared in advance, creating unnecessary anxiety among students.",Fall 2024,2024-12-16
Ms. Neha Gupta,Environmental Science,"ignores follow-up questions posted on the course forum — makes students feel unsupported That said, Maintains an open-door policy that students actually use — approachability is a real strength.",Fall 2024,2024-12-16