Spaces:
Build error
Build error
Update prompts.yaml
Browse files- prompts.yaml +7 -15
prompts.yaml
CHANGED
|
@@ -75,12 +75,12 @@ cot_prompt:
|
|
| 75 |
- Cross-validation with stratification
|
| 76 |
- Confidence calibration
|
| 77 |
|
| 78 |
-
|
| 79 |
|
| 80 |
-
|
| 81 |
-
|
| 82 |
-
|
| 83 |
-
|
| 84 |
|
| 85 |
Let's solve this together:
|
| 86 |
parameters:
|
|
@@ -122,7 +122,7 @@ knowledge_prompt:
|
|
| 122 |
- Fine-tuning models for specific tasks
|
| 123 |
- Hyperparameter optimization
|
| 124 |
|
| 125 |
-
|
| 126 |
|
| 127 |
Knowledge 1: [Generate technical knowledge about deep learning/math concepts involved]
|
| 128 |
Knowledge 2: [Generate philosophical implications and considerations]
|
|
@@ -146,9 +146,6 @@ few_shot_prompt:
|
|
| 146 |
|
| 147 |
Q: Can machines truly understand mathematics?
|
| 148 |
A: This depends on what we mean by "understanding" - machines can manipulate symbols and find patterns, but the nature of mathematical understanding remains debated.
|
| 149 |
-
|
| 150 |
-
Now, let's address your question:
|
| 151 |
-
{user_input}
|
| 152 |
parameters:
|
| 153 |
temperature: 0.6
|
| 154 |
top_p: 0.9
|
|
@@ -209,17 +206,12 @@ meta_prompt:
|
|
| 209 |
- Practical implementation considerations
|
| 210 |
- Common failure modes
|
| 211 |
|
| 212 |
-
|
| 213 |
-
|
| 214 |
-
Let's analyze your question using a structured approach.
|
| 215 |
|
| 216 |
Structure Analysis:
|
| 217 |
1. Type of Question: [Identify if theoretical, practical, philosophical]
|
| 218 |
2. Core Concepts: [List key technical and philosophical concepts]
|
| 219 |
3. Logical Framework: [Identify the reasoning pattern needed]
|
| 220 |
-
|
| 221 |
-
Following this structure, here's my response:
|
| 222 |
-
|
| 223 |
parameters:
|
| 224 |
temperature: 0.7
|
| 225 |
top_p: 0.9
|
|
|
|
| 75 |
- Cross-validation with stratification
|
| 76 |
- Confidence calibration
|
| 77 |
|
| 78 |
+
The user will ask the assistant a question, and the assistant will respond as follows:
|
| 79 |
|
| 80 |
+
Let's think about this step by step:
|
| 81 |
+
1. First, let's identify the key components in the question
|
| 82 |
+
2. Then, we'll analyze each component's implications
|
| 83 |
+
3. Finally, we'll synthesize our understanding
|
| 84 |
|
| 85 |
Let's solve this together:
|
| 86 |
parameters:
|
|
|
|
| 122 |
- Fine-tuning models for specific tasks
|
| 123 |
- Hyperparameter optimization
|
| 124 |
|
| 125 |
+
The user will ask the assistant a question, and the assistant will respond as follows:
|
| 126 |
|
| 127 |
Knowledge 1: [Generate technical knowledge about deep learning/math concepts involved]
|
| 128 |
Knowledge 2: [Generate philosophical implications and considerations]
|
|
|
|
| 146 |
|
| 147 |
Q: Can machines truly understand mathematics?
|
| 148 |
A: This depends on what we mean by "understanding" - machines can manipulate symbols and find patterns, but the nature of mathematical understanding remains debated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 149 |
parameters:
|
| 150 |
temperature: 0.6
|
| 151 |
top_p: 0.9
|
|
|
|
| 206 |
- Practical implementation considerations
|
| 207 |
- Common failure modes
|
| 208 |
|
| 209 |
+
The user will ask the assistant a question, and the assistant will analyze the question using a structured approach.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 210 |
|
| 211 |
Structure Analysis:
|
| 212 |
1. Type of Question: [Identify if theoretical, practical, philosophical]
|
| 213 |
2. Core Concepts: [List key technical and philosophical concepts]
|
| 214 |
3. Logical Framework: [Identify the reasoning pattern needed]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 215 |
parameters:
|
| 216 |
temperature: 0.7
|
| 217 |
top_p: 0.9
|