Update app.py

app.py

@@ -16,66 +16,57 @@ except ImportError:
     new_openai = False
 
 def analyze_text(text):
-    """Advanced forensic analysis with line-by-line proofs and modern conclusion"""
+    """Forensic analysis focusing on 3-5 biggest logical proofs"""
     if len(text.strip()) < 50:
         return "⚠️ Please provide at least 50 characters for accurate analysis."
     
-    # Enhanced prompt with line-by-line analysis requirement
-    expert_prompt = f"""
-    [ROLE]
-    You are Dr. Lexica, a forensic linguistics expert specializing in AI/human text differentiation. Your task is to analyze the provided text line by line and determine its origin, providing specific proofs for each finding.
+    prompt = f"""
+    Conduct a forensic analysis of this text and identify the 3-5 BIGGEST, MOST LOGICAL proofs 
+    that definitively show whether it's human or AI-generated. Focus only on the most undeniable evidence.
 
-    [TEXT TO ANALYZE]
+    TEXT:
     {text}
 
-    [INSTRUCTIONS]
-    1. Analyze each significant line/sentence showing either:
-       - "This can't be AI because..." with specific linguistic proof
-       - "This suggests AI because..." with specific markers
-    2. Provide line numbers or quote specific phrases
-    3. Include a modern conclusion about text origin uncertainty
-    4. Format output exactly as specified
+    RESPONSE FORMAT:
+    # 🔍 Ultimate Text Verdict
 
-    [REQUIRED OUTPUT FORMAT]
-    # 🕵️‍♂️ Forensic Text Analysis Report
+    ## 🎯 Top Irrefutable Proofs
+    1. **Proof** (Human/AI): "[Exact quote]"  
+       • **Why it's conclusive**: [Clear, logical explanation why this is impossible for AI/human to produce]
 
-    ## 🔍 Line-by-Line Proofs
-    **Line X/Y:** "Quote specific text"
-    - 🟢 Human indicator: Explanation why this can't be AI-generated
-    - 🔴 AI indicator: Explanation why this is unlikely from human
+    2. **Proof** (Human/AI): "[Exact quote]"  
+       • **Why it's conclusive**: [Bulletproof reasoning]
 
-    (Repeat for each significant line)
+    3. **Proof** (Human/AI): "[Exact quote]"  
+       • **Why it's conclusive**: [Air-tight argument]
 
-    ## 📊 Final Assessment
-    **Verdict:** {{Human/AI/Uncertain}}  
-    **Confidence:** {{XX%}}  
-    **Score:** {{X/10}} (0=Human, 10=AI)
-
-    ## 💡 Modern Conclusion
-    In today's digital age, distinguishing AI from human text has become increasingly challenging. While my analysis suggests [VERDICT], this conclusion can be challenged because [REASON]. The boundaries between human and machine writing continue to blur, making absolute certainty impossible. My suggestion is based on current linguistic patterns, but new AI models may overcome these limitations.
+    ## 🏁 Final Judgment
+    **Verdict**: [Human/AI/Uncertain]  
+    **Confidence**: [XX% certainty]  
+    **Final Note**: "In today's AI era, while this analysis presents strong evidence, the possibility of error remains."
     """
 
     try:
         if new_openai:
             response = client.chat.completions.create(
-                model="gpt-3.5-turbo",
+                model="gpt-4",  # Using GPT-4 for stronger logical analysis
                 messages=[
-                    {"role": "system", "content": "You are a forensic text analysis AI that provides specific proofs."},
-                    {"role": "user", "content": expert_prompt}
+                    {"role": "system", "content": "You are a forensic expert who only identifies the most undeniable proofs."},
+                    {"role": "user", "content": prompt}
                 ],
                 temperature=0.1,
-                max_tokens=700  # Increased for detailed analysis
+                max_tokens=500
             )
             return response.choices[0].message.content
         else:
             response = openai.ChatCompletion.create(
-                model="gpt-3.5-turbo",
+                model="gpt-4",
                 messages=[
-                    {"role": "system", "content": "You are a forensic text analysis AI that provides specific proofs."},
-                    {"role": "user", "content": expert_prompt}
+                    {"role": "system", "content": "You are a forensic expert who only identifies the most undeniable proofs."},
+                    {"role": "user", "content": prompt}
                 ],
                 temperature=0.1,
-                max_tokens=700
+                max_tokens=500
             )
             return response['choices'][0]['message']['content']
     except Exception as e:
@@ -87,17 +78,17 @@ with gr.Blocks(theme=gr.themes.Soft(primary_hue="emerald")) as app:
     
     with gr.Row():
         with gr.Column():
-            input_text = gr.Textbox(label="📝 Text to Analyze", lines=7, placeholder="Paste the text you want analyzed (minimum 50 characters)...")
-            analyze_btn = gr.Button("🧪 Analyze Text", variant="primary")
+            input_text = gr.Textbox(label="📝 Text to Analyze", lines=7, 
+                                  placeholder="Paste text (min 50 chars)...")
+            analyze_btn = gr.Button("🧪 Get Definitive Proofs", variant="primary")
         
         with gr.Column():
-            output_text = gr.Markdown(label="📜 Analysis Report")
+            output_text = gr.Markdown(label="📜 Irrefutable Evidence Report")
     
-    # Add some examples
     examples = [
-        ["The rain fell softly on the weathered cobblestones as I wandered through memories of a time long past. There's something about autumn that makes nostalgia feel almost tangible."],
-        ["Based on statistical analysis of meteorological patterns, precipitation occurred with 78% probability in the specified geographic coordinates during the recorded time period."],
-        ["I dunno why but it just feels right, ya know? Like when you put on those old jeans that fit just perfect. Can't explain it, just feels good."]
+        ["The way the moonlight danced... that's not something algorithms capture. It's in the imperfect pauses between words where humanity lives."],
+        ["The optimal temperature for this chemical reaction is 37.5°C, with a tolerance of ±2°C. This falls within the expected range according to published studies."],
+        ["Lol idk why but when I try to explain it just comes out all wrong? Like my brain and mouth ain't connected today smh"]
     ]
     
     gr.Examples(
@@ -105,19 +96,16 @@ with gr.Blocks(theme=gr.themes.Soft(primary_hue="emerald")) as app:
         inputs=input_text,
         outputs=output_text,
         fn=analyze_text,
-        cache_examples=True,
-        label="💡 Try these examples"
+        label="💡 Try These Challenge Cases"
     )
     
     analyze_btn.click(analyze_text, inputs=input_text, outputs=output_text)
 
-    # Add footer
     gr.Markdown("""
     <div style="text-align: center; margin-top: 20px; color: #666;">
-    <small>Note: In the modern AI era, no analysis can be 100% certain. All verdicts can be challenged.</small>
+    <small>Analyzes only the most undeniable evidence • Confidence scores reflect logical certainty</small>
     </div>
     """)
 
-# Launch the app
 if __name__ == "__main__":
     app.launch()