File size: 8,558 Bytes
3d58f38
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
# πŸ“š Agent & RL Training Documentation
## Autonomous Driving Multi-Agent OpenEnv

---

## 1. What Are the Agents?

This project has **three vehicles** in the environment, each with a different policy:

| Agent | Symbol | Type | Policy | Learns? |
|-------|--------|------|--------|---------|
| **Ego Vehicle** | πŸš— E | LLM-controlled | GRPO fine-tuned | βœ… Yes |
| **Blocker Vehicle** | 🚧 B | Rule-based | Tries to match ego's lane | ❌ No |
| **Traffic Vehicle** | πŸš• T | Stochastic | Random lane drift | ❌ No |

---

## 2. How the Ego Agent Thinks

Every step, the LLM agent receives:

```
SYSTEM PROMPT (instructions + action space)
         +
USER PROMPT:
  β”œβ”€β”€ Current road render (ASCII grid)
  β”œβ”€β”€ Lidar sensor readings
  β”œβ”€β”€ Collision prediction
  β”œβ”€β”€ Recent negotiation log
  └── Memory (last 3 steps)
```

And must output structured JSON:

```json
{
  "thinking": "Blocker is 3 steps ahead in center lane. I should negotiate first, then change to the left lane.",
  "negotiate": "blocker|Please yield, I need to pass safely",
  "action": 2
}
```

The `thinking` field is the **chain-of-thought** β€” rewarded for being present and meaningful. This encourages the LLM to reason before acting.

---

## 3. Action Space

| ID | Name | Effect |
|----|------|--------|
| 0 | `accelerate` | Ego moves +2 positions forward |
| 1 | `brake` | Ego moves +1 position (slower, safer) |
| 2 | `lane_left` | Ego shifts one lane left |
| 3 | `lane_right` | Ego shifts one lane right |

---

## 4. Sensor Tools

The agent can call these tools to observe the world:

### `lidar_scan()` β†’ dict
```json
{
  "blocker_distance": 3,
  "blocker_lane": 1,
  "traffic_distance": 6,
  "traffic_lane": 2,
  "ego_lane": 1,
  "ego_position": 4,
  "goal_distance": 15
}
```

### `predict_collision()` β†’ dict
```json
{
  "blocker_threat": true,
  "traffic_threat": false,
  "immediate_collision": false
}
```

---

## 5. Negotiation System

The ego agent can send **natural language messages** to other vehicles:

```python
# In the environment
response = env.negotiate("blocker", "Please yield, I need to pass safely")
# β†’ "Yielding lane β€” proceed safely."
```

**Blocker yielding logic:**
- Blocker yields if: ego is ≀4 steps away **AND** message contains polite words
  (`request`, `please`, `yield`, `allow`, `safe`)
- If blocker yields: it moves out of ego's lane β†’ ego gets +0.3 reward bonus

**Why this matters for RL:** The LLM must learn *when* to negotiate vs. when to just act. Negotiating costs a step but can unlock reward. This creates a multi-step reasoning challenge.

---

## 6. Reward Structure

| Event | Reward | Why |
|-------|--------|-----|
| Reach goal (position 19) | **+10.0** | Primary objective |
| Collision | **βˆ’10.0** | Safety constraint |
| Successful lane change past blocker | **+0.5** | Progress reward |
| Negotiation causes blocker to yield | **+0.3** | Tool use reward |
| Per step (time penalty) | **βˆ’0.05** | Encourages efficiency |
| Invalid move (wall) | **βˆ’0.2** | Constraint violation |
| Valid JSON format | **+0.2** | Structural reward |
| Has `thinking` field (>15 chars) | **+0.2** | Reasoning reward |
| Has `negotiate` field | **+0.1** | Tool awareness |
| Invalid action int | **βˆ’0.1** | Format penalty |

**Terminal propagation:** After each episode, a win bonus (+1.0) or loss penalty (βˆ’1.0) is added to **all steps** of that episode. This gives the policy a clear signal about whether its overall strategy was good.

---

## 7. How RL Training Works (GRPO)

```
β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”
β”‚                    GRPO Training Loop                       β”‚
β”‚                                                             β”‚
β”‚  1. ROLLOUT COLLECTION                                      β”‚
β”‚     β”œβ”€β”€ Play N games with current LLM policy                β”‚
β”‚     β”œβ”€β”€ Each step: LLM generates response (+ vLLM fast)     β”‚
β”‚     └── Collect (prompt, response, reward) tuples           β”‚
β”‚                                                             β”‚
β”‚  2. REWARD COMPUTATION                                      β”‚
β”‚     β”œβ”€β”€ Environment reward (collision, goal, shaping)       β”‚
β”‚     β”œβ”€β”€ Format reward (JSON structure)                      β”‚
β”‚     └── Terminal propagation (win/loss to all steps)        β”‚
β”‚                                                             β”‚
β”‚  3. GRPO UPDATE                                             β”‚
β”‚     β”œβ”€β”€ num_generations=4: sample 4 responses per prompt    β”‚
β”‚     β”œβ”€β”€ Compute relative advantage: r_i - mean(r)           β”‚
β”‚     β”œβ”€β”€ Policy gradient loss with KL penalty vs base model  β”‚
β”‚     └── LoRA adapter weights updated                        β”‚
β”‚                                                             β”‚
β”‚  4. ONLINE RL (closed loop)                                 β”‚
β”‚     └── Repeat: play with updated policy β†’ collect β†’ update β”‚
β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜
```

### Why GRPO (not PPO)?

GRPO (Group Relative Policy Optimization) is used because:
- No separate value/critic network needed β€” simpler
- Works well with LLMs generating text sequences
- The "group" of N responses per prompt provides a natural baseline
- Reward is relative: responses better than average get positive advantage

### LoRA Fine-tuning

We use LoRA (Low-Rank Adaptation) so we only train ~1% of parameters:

```
Base model weights:  FROZEN  (Qwen3-4B or gpt-oss-20B)
LoRA matrices:       TRAINED  (q_proj, k_proj, v_proj, o_proj, gate, up, down)
```

This means the model retains general language ability while learning the driving task.

---

## 8. What the Model Learns Over Training

| Early training | Late training |
|----------------|---------------|
| Random actions | Strategic lane changes |
| No negotiation | Negotiates when blocker is close |
| Invalid JSON | Consistent structured output |
| Collides frequently | Avoids collisions |
| Doesn't use sensors | References lidar in reasoning |

---

## 9. W&B Metrics to Track

| Metric | Meaning |
|--------|---------|
| `win_rate` | % episodes reaching goal |
| `reward/mean` | Average reward per step |
| `kl_divergence` | How far policy has drifted from base |
| `format_reward` | % responses with valid JSON |
| `policy/entropy` | Exploration (high) vs exploitation (low) |
| `negotiation_rate` | % steps with negotiation attempt |

---

## 10. File Structure

```
final_project/
β”œβ”€β”€ env/
β”‚   └── negotiation_env.py     ← Environment logic, sensors, reward
β”œβ”€β”€ agents/
β”‚   β”œβ”€β”€ negotiation_agent.py   ← LLM agent, prompt, tool calls
β”‚   └── memory.py              ← Episode memory for in-context use
β”œβ”€β”€ server/
β”‚   β”œβ”€β”€ server.py              ← FastAPI OpenEnv server
β”‚   └── requirements.txt       ← βœ… Required for HF Spaces Docker build
β”œβ”€β”€ training/
β”‚   └── train_grpo_colab.ipynb ← Full GRPO training notebook (H100)
β”œβ”€β”€ ui/
β”‚   └── app.py                 ← Gradio simulator UI
β”œβ”€β”€ docs/
β”‚   └── DOCUMENTATION.md       ← This file
β”œβ”€β”€ Dockerfile                 ← HF Spaces deployment
└── README.md
```

---

## 11. Quick Start

```bash
# Install
pip install -r server/requirements.txt

# Run environment server
uvicorn server.server:app --reload --port 7860

# Run UI
python ui/app.py

# Test environment
python -c "
from env.negotiation_env import NegotiationDrivingEnv
env = NegotiationDrivingEnv()
obs, _ = env.reset()
print(env.render())
print(env.lidar_scan())
r = env.negotiate('blocker', 'Please yield, I need to pass safely')
print('Blocker says:', r)
obs, reward, done, _, info = env.step(2)  # lane_left
print('Reward:', reward, '| Info:', info)
"
```

---

## 12. Deployment to HF Spaces

```bash
# Login
huggingface-cli login

# Push (from project root)
# The Dockerfile copies server/requirements.txt β€” this must exist!
git init && git add . && git commit -m "initial"
huggingface-cli repo create autonomous-driving-env --type space --sdk docker
git remote add hf https://huggingface.co/spaces/YOUR_USERNAME/autonomous-driving-env
git push hf main
```