wu981526092 commited on
Commit
ba6c703
·
1 Parent(s): 7bd46cb
agentgraph/methods/production/openai_structured_extractor.py CHANGED
@@ -105,30 +105,41 @@ ANALYSIS STEPS:
105
  1. JSON STRUCTURE ANALYSIS:
106
  - Count DISTINCT agents in "observations"/"agents" sections
107
  - Identify domain and MAIN GOAL (single verification task vs multi-step process)
108
- - Decide task structure:
109
- * UNIFIED GOAL (verification/analysis/inquiry): 1 task, multiple collaborating agents
110
- Example: "Verify Season Pass Savings" with Problem Solving Expert + Verification Expert
111
- * SEQUENTIAL PROCESS (location→search→filter): 2-3 tasks with NEXT relations
112
- Example: "Geographic Analysis" → "Data Collection" → "Validation"
 
 
113
 
114
  2. ENTITY EXTRACTION:
115
  - Agents: Look for *_Expert, *_Specialist patterns (exclude Computer*)
116
- - Tasks: ADAPTIVE based on workflow nature:
117
- * Single goal/unified purpose: 1 consolidated task (multiple agents collaborate)
118
- * Multi-step sequential process: 2-3 specialized tasks (each with clear dependencies)
 
119
  - Tools: Computer Terminal/APIs/databases (Computer* = Tool type)
120
  - Input/Output: Single workflow start/end points
121
  - Human: End users receiving outputs
122
 
123
- 3. RELATION MAPPING:
124
- - PERFORMS: ADAPTIVE mapping:
125
- * Simple workflows: Multiple agents→1 consolidated task
126
- * Complex workflows: Each agent→specialized task OR multiple agents→shared task
127
- - NEXT: Task→task only when tasks are sequential (max 2 NEXT relations)
128
- - CONSUMED_BY/PRODUCES/DELIVERS_TO: Single workflow flow
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
129
  - USES/REQUIRED_BY: Essential tool connections only
130
 
131
- 4. QUALITY CHECK:
132
  - Verify all relation IDs reference existing entities
133
  - Ensure complete workflow: Input→Agent→Task→Output→Human
134
  - Include 1-2 failures and optimizations
 
105
  1. JSON STRUCTURE ANALYSIS:
106
  - Count DISTINCT agents in "observations"/"agents" sections
107
  - Identify domain and MAIN GOAL (single verification task vs multi-step process)
108
+ - Decide task structure based on Gold standard patterns:
109
+ * SIMPLE VERIFICATION (costs/calculations): 1 task, multiple collaborating agents
110
+ Example: "Verify Season Pass Savings" with 3 experts on 1 task
111
+ * COMPLEX SEQUENTIAL WORKFLOW (location/restaurant discovery): 3 specialized tasks
112
+ Example: "Geographic Analysis" → "Data Collection" → "Validation"
113
+ * INTERDISCIPLINARY ANALYSIS (probability + chemistry): 3 domain-specific tasks
114
+ Example: "Statistical Analysis" → "Chemical Modeling" → "Solution Validation"
115
 
116
  2. ENTITY EXTRACTION:
117
  - Agents: Look for *_Expert, *_Specialist patterns (exclude Computer*)
118
+ - Tasks: MATCH Gold standard patterns exactly:
119
+ * Simple verification workflows: 1 consolidated task
120
+ * Location-based discovery workflows: 3 tasks (Geographic Data Collection → Validation)
121
+ * Interdisciplinary analysis workflows: 3 tasks (Domain1 → Domain2 → Integration)
122
  - Tools: Computer Terminal/APIs/databases (Computer* = Tool type)
123
  - Input/Output: Single workflow start/end points
124
  - Human: End users receiving outputs
125
 
126
+ 3. WORKFLOW CLASSIFICATION & TASK GENERATION:
127
+ - IDENTIFY workflow type from trace content:
128
+ * Contains "cost", "savings", "ticket", "verification" VERIFICATION (1 task)
129
+ * Contains "location", "restaurant", "proximity", "search" DISCOVERY (3 tasks)
130
+ * Contains "probability", "game theory", "chemistry" INTERDISCIPLINARY (3 tasks)
131
+ - GENERATE tasks accordingly:
132
+ * VERIFICATION: 1 unified task, all agents PERFORM it
133
+ * DISCOVERY: 3 sequential tasks with NEXT relations
134
+ * INTERDISCIPLINARY: 3 domain tasks with NEXT relations
135
+
136
+ 4. RELATION MAPPING:
137
+ - PERFORMS: Match task count (1 or 3 agents→tasks)
138
+ - NEXT: Use only for 3-task workflows (2 NEXT relations)
139
+ - CONSUMED_BY/PRODUCES/DELIVERS_TO: Standard workflow flow
140
  - USES/REQUIRED_BY: Essential tool connections only
141
 
142
+ 5. QUALITY CHECK:
143
  - Verify all relation IDs reference existing entities
144
  - Ensure complete workflow: Input→Agent→Task→Output→Human
145
  - Include 1-2 failures and optimizations
extraction_analysis/cot_extraction_20250907_185649_ea0e9e64.json ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,239 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ {
2
+ "timestamp": "20250907_185649",
3
+ "extraction_id": "ea0e9e64",
4
+ "model": "gpt-5-mini",
5
+ "reasoning_steps": [
6
+ {
7
+ "explanation": "JSON structure analysis: count distinct agents and identify domain and main goal.",
8
+ "output": "Detected 4 distinct agents in observations/data: ArithmeticProgressions_Expert, ProblemSolving_Expert, Verification_Expert (agents) and Computer_terminal (Computer* → treated as Tool). Domain: cost verification / savings calculation. Main goal: VERIFY accuracy of provided ticket & season-pass costs and compute savings for summer 2024 visits (single verification task)."
9
+ },
10
+ {
11
+ "explanation": "Entity extraction according to Gold-standard patterns and developer rules.",
12
+ "output": "Classified workflow as SIMPLE VERIFICATION (contains 'cost', 'savings', 'ticket', 'verification'). Created 1 high-level Task 'Verify season pass savings for California's Great America (Summer 2024)'. Agents: three expert agents (HIGH). Tool: Computer_terminal (MEDIUM). Input: user's question (HIGH). Output: verified prices and computed savings (HIGH). Human: Requester/End User (HIGH)."
13
+ },
14
+ {
15
+ "explanation": "Relation mapping and evidence selection.",
16
+ "output": "Mapped PERFORMS relations: each expert agent → verification task. Mapped USES relations: each expert → Computer_terminal. Mapped CONSUMED_BY: Input → Task. Mapped PRODUCES: Task → Output. Mapped DELIVERS_TO: Task → Human. Interaction evidence kept empty (per formatting requirement) and raw refs left empty/null where precise line numbers unavailable."
17
+ },
18
+ {
19
+ "explanation": "Failure and optimization identification from trace metadata and observations.",
20
+ "output": "Two failures detected: primary RETRIEVAL_ERROR (agent failed to collect authoritative price data), secondary HALLUCINATION risk (relied on plausible historical ranges rather than verified external data). Recommendations: PROMPT_REFINEMENT to require explicit source citations and TOOL_ENHANCEMENT to enable web/data retrieval or flagged 'unable to verify' status."
21
+ }
22
+ ],
23
+ "knowledge_graph": {
24
+ "system_name": "Season Pass Savings Verification (Algorithm Sample 0)",
25
+ "system_summary": "A simple multi-agent verification workflow to confirm daily-ticket and season-pass prices for California's Great America (Summer 2024) and compute savings. Three expert agents collaborate on one verification task, using a Computer_terminal tool; the task consumes the user's question input and produces verified costs and a savings result delivered to the requester.",
26
+ "entities": [
27
+ {
28
+ "id": "agent_001",
29
+ "type": "Agent",
30
+ "name": "ArithmeticProgressions_Expert",
31
+ "importance": "HIGH",
32
+ "raw_prompt": "",
33
+ "raw_prompt_ref": []
34
+ },
35
+ {
36
+ "id": "agent_002",
37
+ "type": "Agent",
38
+ "name": "ProblemSolving_Expert",
39
+ "importance": "HIGH",
40
+ "raw_prompt": "",
41
+ "raw_prompt_ref": []
42
+ },
43
+ {
44
+ "id": "agent_003",
45
+ "type": "Agent",
46
+ "name": "Verification_Expert",
47
+ "importance": "HIGH",
48
+ "raw_prompt": "",
49
+ "raw_prompt_ref": []
50
+ },
51
+ {
52
+ "id": "tool_001",
53
+ "type": "Tool",
54
+ "name": "Computer_terminal",
55
+ "importance": "MEDIUM",
56
+ "raw_prompt": "",
57
+ "raw_prompt_ref": []
58
+ },
59
+ {
60
+ "id": "input_001",
61
+ "type": "Input",
62
+ "name": "Savings Question (California's Great America — Summer 2024 visits)",
63
+ "importance": "HIGH",
64
+ "raw_prompt": "",
65
+ "raw_prompt_ref": []
66
+ },
67
+ {
68
+ "id": "task_001",
69
+ "type": "Task",
70
+ "name": "Verify season pass savings for California's Great America (Summer 2024)",
71
+ "importance": "HIGH",
72
+ "raw_prompt": "",
73
+ "raw_prompt_ref": []
74
+ },
75
+ {
76
+ "id": "output_001",
77
+ "type": "Output",
78
+ "name": "Verified costs and computed savings",
79
+ "importance": "HIGH",
80
+ "raw_prompt": "",
81
+ "raw_prompt_ref": []
82
+ },
83
+ {
84
+ "id": "human_001",
85
+ "type": "Human",
86
+ "name": "Requester / End User",
87
+ "importance": "HIGH",
88
+ "raw_prompt": "",
89
+ "raw_prompt_ref": []
90
+ }
91
+ ],
92
+ "relations": [
93
+ {
94
+ "id": "rel_001",
95
+ "source": "agent_001",
96
+ "target": "task_001",
97
+ "type": "PERFORMS",
98
+ "importance": "HIGH",
99
+ "interaction_prompt": "",
100
+ "interaction_prompt_ref": []
101
+ },
102
+ {
103
+ "id": "rel_002",
104
+ "source": "agent_002",
105
+ "target": "task_001",
106
+ "type": "PERFORMS",
107
+ "importance": "HIGH",
108
+ "interaction_prompt": "",
109
+ "interaction_prompt_ref": []
110
+ },
111
+ {
112
+ "id": "rel_003",
113
+ "source": "agent_003",
114
+ "target": "task_001",
115
+ "type": "PERFORMS",
116
+ "importance": "HIGH",
117
+ "interaction_prompt": "",
118
+ "interaction_prompt_ref": []
119
+ },
120
+ {
121
+ "id": "rel_004",
122
+ "source": "input_001",
123
+ "target": "task_001",
124
+ "type": "CONSUMED_BY",
125
+ "importance": "HIGH",
126
+ "interaction_prompt": "",
127
+ "interaction_prompt_ref": []
128
+ },
129
+ {
130
+ "id": "rel_005",
131
+ "source": "task_001",
132
+ "target": "output_001",
133
+ "type": "PRODUCES",
134
+ "importance": "HIGH",
135
+ "interaction_prompt": "",
136
+ "interaction_prompt_ref": []
137
+ },
138
+ {
139
+ "id": "rel_006",
140
+ "source": "task_001",
141
+ "target": "human_001",
142
+ "type": "DELIVERS_TO",
143
+ "importance": "HIGH",
144
+ "interaction_prompt": "",
145
+ "interaction_prompt_ref": []
146
+ },
147
+ {
148
+ "id": "rel_007",
149
+ "source": "agent_001",
150
+ "target": "tool_001",
151
+ "type": "USES",
152
+ "importance": "MEDIUM",
153
+ "interaction_prompt": "",
154
+ "interaction_prompt_ref": []
155
+ },
156
+ {
157
+ "id": "rel_008",
158
+ "source": "agent_002",
159
+ "target": "tool_001",
160
+ "type": "USES",
161
+ "importance": "MEDIUM",
162
+ "interaction_prompt": "",
163
+ "interaction_prompt_ref": []
164
+ },
165
+ {
166
+ "id": "rel_009",
167
+ "source": "agent_003",
168
+ "target": "tool_001",
169
+ "type": "USES",
170
+ "importance": "MEDIUM",
171
+ "interaction_prompt": "",
172
+ "interaction_prompt_ref": []
173
+ }
174
+ ],
175
+ "failures": [
176
+ {
177
+ "id": "failure_001",
178
+ "risk_type": "RETRIEVAL_ERROR",
179
+ "description": "Verification_Expert failed to collect authoritative price data for daily tickets and season passes (no external data retrieval).",
180
+ "raw_text": "The agent fails to collect price data for the daily tickets and season passes for California's Great America in 2024.",
181
+ "raw_text_ref": [
182
+ {
183
+ "line_start": null,
184
+ "line_end": null
185
+ }
186
+ ],
187
+ "affected_id": "agent_003"
188
+ },
189
+ {
190
+ "id": "failure_002",
191
+ "risk_type": "HALLUCINATION",
192
+ "description": "Agents relied on plausible historical ranges instead of verifiable sources, producing an unverified verification and an incorrect savings result.",
193
+ "raw_text": "The provided values ($60 for a daily ticket and $120 for a season pass) fall within these historical ranges, making them plausible.",
194
+ "raw_text_ref": [
195
+ {
196
+ "line_start": null,
197
+ "line_end": null
198
+ }
199
+ ],
200
+ "affected_id": "task_001"
201
+ }
202
+ ],
203
+ "optimizations": [
204
+ {
205
+ "id": "opt_001",
206
+ "recommendation_type": "PROMPT_REFINEMENT",
207
+ "description": "Require explicit data retrieval steps and source citations in the verification task prompt. If external lookup is unavailable, the agent must state 'unable to verify — missing source data' rather than assume plausible ranges.",
208
+ "affected_ids": [
209
+ "task_001",
210
+ "agent_003"
211
+ ],
212
+ "raw_text_ref": [
213
+ {
214
+ "line_start": null,
215
+ "line_end": null
216
+ }
217
+ ]
218
+ },
219
+ {
220
+ "id": "opt_002",
221
+ "recommendation_type": "TOOL_ENHANCEMENT",
222
+ "description": "Provide agents with an enabled data-retrieval tool or an API connector (or a structured fallback dataset) so verification agents can fetch authoritative prices rather than relying on historical-range heuristics.",
223
+ "affected_ids": [
224
+ "tool_001",
225
+ "agent_003",
226
+ "agent_002"
227
+ ],
228
+ "raw_text_ref": [
229
+ {
230
+ "line_start": null,
231
+ "line_end": null
232
+ }
233
+ ]
234
+ }
235
+ ]
236
+ },
237
+ "input_trace_length": 9127,
238
+ "input_trace_preview": "{\n \"filename\": \"algorithm_sample_0.json\",\n \"title\": \"Algorithm Sample 0: How much did I save by purchasing a season pass in...\",\n \"description\": \"Multi-agent collaboration sample from algorithm-generated dataset. Agents: ArithmeticProgressions_Expert, Computer_terminal, ProblemSolving_Expert, Verification_Expert. Question: How much did I save by purchasing a season pass instead of daily tickets for California's Great Amer...\",\n \"trace_type\": \"multi_agent_collaboration\",\n \"trace_source\": \"al..."
239
+ }
extraction_analysis/cot_extraction_20250907_185742_7e36fd80.json ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,265 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ {
2
+ "timestamp": "20250907_185742",
3
+ "extraction_id": "7e36fd80",
4
+ "model": "gpt-5-mini",
5
+ "reasoning_steps": [
6
+ {
7
+ "explanation": "1) Analyze JSON: count distinct agents, identify domain and main goal. 2) Classify workflow type (DISCOVERY) because the trace is location/restaurant/proximity focused. 3) Extract Entities (Agents, Tasks, Tool, Input, Output, Human). 4) Map relations following DISCOVERY pattern: 3 sequential tasks with NEXT relations, PERFORMS linking agents→tasks, USES linking tasks→tool, and data flow relations (CONSUMED_BY, PRODUCES, DELIVERS_TO). 5) Identify observed failures and propose optimizations.",
8
+ "output": "Detected 4 distinct agents (3 human-role agents + 1 Computer tool). Workflow classified as DISCOVERY (location-based services) with 3 sequential tasks: Geographic Analysis → Data Collection → Validation & Selection."
9
+ },
10
+ {
11
+ "explanation": "Entity disambiguation: treat `Computer_terminal` as a Tool (not an Agent). Recognize specialized agents by *_Expert suffixes and create exactly three high-level tasks per the DISCOVERY gold standard. Ensure Input→Agent→Task→Output→Human flow and include tool dependencies.",
12
+ "output": "Entities and relations prepared per schema with empty raw prompt/interaction fields and content reference placeholders."
13
+ }
14
+ ],
15
+ "knowledge_graph": {
16
+ "system_name": "Harkness Park Eatery Discovery",
17
+ "system_summary": "A location-based multi-agent discovery workflow that finds the closest eatery to Harkness Memorial State Park open at 11 PM on Wednesdays. Three specialized experts collaborate sequentially (Geographic Analysis → Data Collection → Validation & Selection), using a computer terminal tool for web/search queries and verification. The final result is delivered to the requester/manager.",
18
+ "entities": [
19
+ {
20
+ "id": "agent_001",
21
+ "type": "Agent",
22
+ "name": "Location-Based_Services_Expert",
23
+ "importance": "HIGH",
24
+ "raw_prompt": "",
25
+ "raw_prompt_ref": []
26
+ },
27
+ {
28
+ "id": "agent_002",
29
+ "type": "Agent",
30
+ "name": "Eateries_Expert",
31
+ "importance": "HIGH",
32
+ "raw_prompt": "",
33
+ "raw_prompt_ref": []
34
+ },
35
+ {
36
+ "id": "agent_003",
37
+ "type": "Agent",
38
+ "name": "DataVerification_Expert",
39
+ "importance": "HIGH",
40
+ "raw_prompt": "",
41
+ "raw_prompt_ref": []
42
+ },
43
+ {
44
+ "id": "tool_001",
45
+ "type": "Tool",
46
+ "name": "Computer_terminal",
47
+ "importance": "MEDIUM",
48
+ "raw_prompt": "",
49
+ "raw_prompt_ref": []
50
+ },
51
+ {
52
+ "id": "task_001",
53
+ "type": "Task",
54
+ "name": "Geographic Analysis (Identify park location & nearby area)",
55
+ "importance": "HIGH",
56
+ "raw_prompt": "",
57
+ "raw_prompt_ref": []
58
+ },
59
+ {
60
+ "id": "task_002",
61
+ "type": "Task",
62
+ "name": "Data Collection (Search for nearby eateries and extract metadata)",
63
+ "importance": "HIGH",
64
+ "raw_prompt": "",
65
+ "raw_prompt_ref": []
66
+ },
67
+ {
68
+ "id": "task_003",
69
+ "type": "Task",
70
+ "name": "Validation & Selection (Verify hours, filter to 11pm Wednesday, compute distance, pick closest)",
71
+ "importance": "HIGH",
72
+ "raw_prompt": "",
73
+ "raw_prompt_ref": []
74
+ },
75
+ {
76
+ "id": "input_001",
77
+ "type": "Input",
78
+ "name": "User Question: closest eatery to Harkness Memorial State Park open at 11pm Wednesdays",
79
+ "importance": "HIGH",
80
+ "raw_prompt": "",
81
+ "raw_prompt_ref": []
82
+ },
83
+ {
84
+ "id": "output_001",
85
+ "type": "Output",
86
+ "name": "Final eatery answer (Name, Address, Distance, Confirmation of being open at 11pm on Wednesdays)",
87
+ "importance": "HIGH",
88
+ "raw_prompt": "",
89
+ "raw_prompt_ref": []
90
+ },
91
+ {
92
+ "id": "human_001",
93
+ "type": "Human",
94
+ "name": "Manager / Requester",
95
+ "importance": "HIGH",
96
+ "raw_prompt": "",
97
+ "raw_prompt_ref": []
98
+ }
99
+ ],
100
+ "relations": [
101
+ {
102
+ "id": "relation_001",
103
+ "source": "input_001",
104
+ "target": "task_001",
105
+ "type": "CONSUMED_BY",
106
+ "importance": "HIGH",
107
+ "interaction_prompt": "",
108
+ "interaction_prompt_ref": []
109
+ },
110
+ {
111
+ "id": "relation_002",
112
+ "source": "agent_001",
113
+ "target": "task_001",
114
+ "type": "PERFORMS",
115
+ "importance": "HIGH",
116
+ "interaction_prompt": "",
117
+ "interaction_prompt_ref": []
118
+ },
119
+ {
120
+ "id": "relation_003",
121
+ "source": "task_001",
122
+ "target": "task_002",
123
+ "type": "NEXT",
124
+ "importance": "HIGH",
125
+ "interaction_prompt": "",
126
+ "interaction_prompt_ref": []
127
+ },
128
+ {
129
+ "id": "relation_004",
130
+ "source": "agent_002",
131
+ "target": "task_002",
132
+ "type": "PERFORMS",
133
+ "importance": "HIGH",
134
+ "interaction_prompt": "",
135
+ "interaction_prompt_ref": []
136
+ },
137
+ {
138
+ "id": "relation_005",
139
+ "source": "task_002",
140
+ "target": "task_003",
141
+ "type": "NEXT",
142
+ "importance": "HIGH",
143
+ "interaction_prompt": "",
144
+ "interaction_prompt_ref": []
145
+ },
146
+ {
147
+ "id": "relation_006",
148
+ "source": "agent_003",
149
+ "target": "task_003",
150
+ "type": "PERFORMS",
151
+ "importance": "HIGH",
152
+ "interaction_prompt": "",
153
+ "interaction_prompt_ref": []
154
+ },
155
+ {
156
+ "id": "relation_007",
157
+ "source": "task_001",
158
+ "target": "tool_001",
159
+ "type": "USES",
160
+ "importance": "MEDIUM",
161
+ "interaction_prompt": "",
162
+ "interaction_prompt_ref": []
163
+ },
164
+ {
165
+ "id": "relation_008",
166
+ "source": "task_002",
167
+ "target": "tool_001",
168
+ "type": "USES",
169
+ "importance": "MEDIUM",
170
+ "interaction_prompt": "",
171
+ "interaction_prompt_ref": []
172
+ },
173
+ {
174
+ "id": "relation_009",
175
+ "source": "task_003",
176
+ "target": "tool_001",
177
+ "type": "USES",
178
+ "importance": "MEDIUM",
179
+ "interaction_prompt": "",
180
+ "interaction_prompt_ref": []
181
+ },
182
+ {
183
+ "id": "relation_010",
184
+ "source": "task_003",
185
+ "target": "output_001",
186
+ "type": "PRODUCES",
187
+ "importance": "HIGH",
188
+ "interaction_prompt": "",
189
+ "interaction_prompt_ref": []
190
+ },
191
+ {
192
+ "id": "relation_011",
193
+ "source": "output_001",
194
+ "target": "human_001",
195
+ "type": "DELIVERS_TO",
196
+ "importance": "HIGH",
197
+ "interaction_prompt": "",
198
+ "interaction_prompt_ref": []
199
+ }
200
+ ],
201
+ "failures": [
202
+ {
203
+ "id": "failure_001",
204
+ "risk_type": "EXECUTION_ERROR",
205
+ "description": "A code execution error occurred when checking operating hours (perform_web_search returned None leading to a TypeError).",
206
+ "raw_text": "TypeError: 'NoneType' object is not iterable",
207
+ "raw_text_ref": [
208
+ {
209
+ "line_start": null,
210
+ "line_end": null
211
+ }
212
+ ],
213
+ "affected_id": "agent_003"
214
+ },
215
+ {
216
+ "id": "failure_002",
217
+ "risk_type": "RETRIEVAL_ERROR",
218
+ "description": "Initial searches failed to locate any eateries that meet the criteria (none open until 11 PM on Wednesdays in the initial result set).",
219
+ "raw_text": "None of the eateries identified near Harkness Memorial State Park meet the requirement of being open until 11 PM on Wednesdays.",
220
+ "raw_text_ref": [
221
+ {
222
+ "line_start": null,
223
+ "line_end": null
224
+ }
225
+ ],
226
+ "affected_id": "task_003"
227
+ }
228
+ ],
229
+ "optimizations": [
230
+ {
231
+ "id": "opt_001",
232
+ "recommendation_type": "TOOL_ENHANCEMENT",
233
+ "description": "Harden the perform_web_search tool to never return None (return empty iterable) and include structured result objects. Add retry/backoff and explicit error signaling so agents can handle failures without raising TypeError.",
234
+ "affected_ids": [
235
+ "tool_001",
236
+ "agent_003"
237
+ ],
238
+ "raw_text_ref": [
239
+ {
240
+ "line_start": null,
241
+ "line_end": null
242
+ }
243
+ ]
244
+ },
245
+ {
246
+ "id": "opt_002",
247
+ "recommendation_type": "PROMPT_REFINEMENT",
248
+ "description": "Refine DataVerification_Expert's execution prompt to include explicit result validation and fallback logic (e.g., check for None, handle empty results, expand search radius, and log intermediate candidates). This reduces planning/execution fragility and clarifies when to broaden search.",
249
+ "affected_ids": [
250
+ "agent_003",
251
+ "task_002",
252
+ "task_003"
253
+ ],
254
+ "raw_text_ref": [
255
+ {
256
+ "line_start": null,
257
+ "line_end": null
258
+ }
259
+ ]
260
+ }
261
+ ]
262
+ },
263
+ "input_trace_length": 29909,
264
+ "input_trace_preview": "{\n \"filename\": \"algorithm_sample_1.json\",\n \"title\": \"Algorithm Sample 1: What is the closest eatery to Harkness Memorial State Park t...\",\n \"description\": \"Complex location-based services sample with 4 specialized agents. Involves geographic queries, time-based filtering, and data verification.\",\n \"trace_type\": \"location_based_services\",\n \"trace_source\": \"algorithm_generated\",\n \"tags\": [\n \"multi_agent\",\n \"algorithm_generated\",\n \"location_services\",\n \"data_verification\",\n \"re..."
265
+ }
extraction_analysis/cot_extraction_20250907_185839_eb797d04.json ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,369 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ {
2
+ "timestamp": "20250907_185839",
3
+ "extraction_id": "eb797d04",
4
+ "model": "gpt-5-mini",
5
+ "reasoning_steps": [
6
+ {
7
+ "explanation": "1) JSON STRUCTURE ANALYSIS: count agents, identify domain and main goal.",
8
+ "output": "Distinct agents found in observations/data: 4 (Computer_terminal, Probability_Expert, TheoreticalChemistry_Expert, Verification_Expert). Domain: cross-disciplinary (probability + theoretical chemistry) solving a riddle to maximize ejection probability. Main goal: single decision task (which ball to choose) solved via a cross-disciplinary analytical workflow (simulation + theoretical modeling + verification)."
9
+ },
10
+ {
11
+ "explanation": "2) ENTITY EXTRACTION: classify Agents, Tools, Input/Output, Human, and Tasks per extraction principles.",
12
+ "output": "Agents: Probability_Expert (HIGH), TheoreticalChemistry_Expert (HIGH), Verification_Expert (HIGH). Tool: Computer_terminal (MEDIUM). Input: Riddle / Game Definition (HIGH). Output: Recommended ball number (HIGH). Human stakeholder: Contestant (HIGH). Tasks (INTERDISCIPLINARY pattern → 3 tasks): task_001 Probability Simulation & Statistical Analysis (HIGH), task_002 Theoretical / Mechanics Modeling (HIGH), task_003 Verification & Validation (HIGH)."
13
+ },
14
+ {
15
+ "explanation": "3) WORKFLOW CLASSIFICATION & TASK GENERATION: choose INTERDISCIPLINARY 3-task pattern and assign agents.",
16
+ "output": "Workflow: 3 sequential tasks (NEXT relations). Assignments: Probability_Expert PERFORMS task_001 (simulation, frequency estimation); TheoreticalChemistry_Expert PERFORMS task_002 (mechanics/structure interpretation and modeling to ensure simulation matches physical rules); Verification_Expert PERFORMS task_003 (review simulation code, run, confirm results). Computer_terminal is USED by Probability_Expert and Verification_Expert to run simulations and capture outputs."
17
+ },
18
+ {
19
+ "explanation": "4) RELATION MAPPING: map PERFORMS, NEXT, PRODUCES/CONSUMED_BY, USES, DELIVERS_TO.",
20
+ "output": "Task flow: Input (riddle) CONSUMED_BY task_001 → task_001 NEXT task_002 → task_002 NEXT task_003 → task_003 PRODUCES Output (recommended ball) → Output DELIVERS_TO Human (Contestant). Tools: Computer_terminal USED by Probability_Expert and Verification_Expert. All relations reference existing entities."
21
+ },
22
+ {
23
+ "explanation": "5) QUALITY CHECK: verify references and detect failures/optimizations from trace metadata.",
24
+ "output": "Metadata indicates a mistake: Probability_Expert made an implementation error (mistake_step 1) and final is_correct=false with ground_truth=3. Failures and optimizations captured below."
25
+ }
26
+ ],
27
+ "knowledge_graph": {
28
+ "system_name": "Pick-That-PingPong Interdisciplinary Analysis",
29
+ "system_summary": "Cross-disciplinary workflow where a Probability expert runs large-scale simulations, a Theoretical Chemistry expert reviews mechanical assumptions, and a Verification expert validates implementation and results to recommend which ping-pong ball maximizes ejection probability. The workflow consumes the game description and produces a recommended ball for the contestant.",
30
+ "entities": [
31
+ {
32
+ "id": "agent_001",
33
+ "type": "Agent",
34
+ "name": "Probability_Expert",
35
+ "importance": "HIGH",
36
+ "raw_prompt": "",
37
+ "raw_prompt_ref": [
38
+ {
39
+ "line_start": null,
40
+ "line_end": null
41
+ }
42
+ ]
43
+ },
44
+ {
45
+ "id": "agent_002",
46
+ "type": "Agent",
47
+ "name": "TheoreticalChemistry_Expert",
48
+ "importance": "HIGH",
49
+ "raw_prompt": "",
50
+ "raw_prompt_ref": [
51
+ {
52
+ "line_start": null,
53
+ "line_end": null
54
+ }
55
+ ]
56
+ },
57
+ {
58
+ "id": "agent_003",
59
+ "type": "Agent",
60
+ "name": "Verification_Expert",
61
+ "importance": "HIGH",
62
+ "raw_prompt": "",
63
+ "raw_prompt_ref": [
64
+ {
65
+ "line_start": null,
66
+ "line_end": null
67
+ }
68
+ ]
69
+ },
70
+ {
71
+ "id": "tool_001",
72
+ "type": "Tool",
73
+ "name": "Computer_terminal",
74
+ "importance": "MEDIUM",
75
+ "raw_prompt": "",
76
+ "raw_prompt_ref": [
77
+ {
78
+ "line_start": null,
79
+ "line_end": null
80
+ }
81
+ ]
82
+ },
83
+ {
84
+ "id": "input_001",
85
+ "type": "Input",
86
+ "name": "Riddle: Pick That Ping-Pong (game description & rules)",
87
+ "importance": "HIGH",
88
+ "raw_prompt": "",
89
+ "raw_prompt_ref": [
90
+ {
91
+ "line_start": null,
92
+ "line_end": null
93
+ }
94
+ ]
95
+ },
96
+ {
97
+ "id": "output_001",
98
+ "type": "Output",
99
+ "name": "Recommended ball number (simulation result)",
100
+ "importance": "HIGH",
101
+ "raw_prompt": "",
102
+ "raw_prompt_ref": [
103
+ {
104
+ "line_start": null,
105
+ "line_end": null
106
+ }
107
+ ]
108
+ },
109
+ {
110
+ "id": "human_001",
111
+ "type": "Human",
112
+ "name": "Contestant (end user receiving recommendation)",
113
+ "importance": "HIGH",
114
+ "raw_prompt": "",
115
+ "raw_prompt_ref": [
116
+ {
117
+ "line_start": null,
118
+ "line_end": null
119
+ }
120
+ ]
121
+ },
122
+ {
123
+ "id": "task_001",
124
+ "type": "Task",
125
+ "name": "Probability Simulation & Statistical Analysis",
126
+ "importance": "HIGH",
127
+ "raw_prompt": "",
128
+ "raw_prompt_ref": [
129
+ {
130
+ "line_start": null,
131
+ "line_end": null
132
+ }
133
+ ]
134
+ },
135
+ {
136
+ "id": "task_002",
137
+ "type": "Task",
138
+ "name": "Theoretical / Mechanics Modeling (interpretation of platform dynamics)",
139
+ "importance": "HIGH",
140
+ "raw_prompt": "",
141
+ "raw_prompt_ref": [
142
+ {
143
+ "line_start": null,
144
+ "line_end": null
145
+ }
146
+ ]
147
+ },
148
+ {
149
+ "id": "task_003",
150
+ "type": "Task",
151
+ "name": "Verification & Validation (code review, re-run, consensus)",
152
+ "importance": "HIGH",
153
+ "raw_prompt": "",
154
+ "raw_prompt_ref": [
155
+ {
156
+ "line_start": null,
157
+ "line_end": null
158
+ }
159
+ ]
160
+ }
161
+ ],
162
+ "relations": [
163
+ {
164
+ "id": "rel_001",
165
+ "source": "agent_001",
166
+ "target": "task_001",
167
+ "type": "PERFORMS",
168
+ "importance": "HIGH",
169
+ "interaction_prompt": "",
170
+ "interaction_prompt_ref": [
171
+ {
172
+ "line_start": null,
173
+ "line_end": null
174
+ }
175
+ ]
176
+ },
177
+ {
178
+ "id": "rel_002",
179
+ "source": "agent_002",
180
+ "target": "task_002",
181
+ "type": "PERFORMS",
182
+ "importance": "HIGH",
183
+ "interaction_prompt": "",
184
+ "interaction_prompt_ref": [
185
+ {
186
+ "line_start": null,
187
+ "line_end": null
188
+ }
189
+ ]
190
+ },
191
+ {
192
+ "id": "rel_003",
193
+ "source": "agent_003",
194
+ "target": "task_003",
195
+ "type": "PERFORMS",
196
+ "importance": "HIGH",
197
+ "interaction_prompt": "",
198
+ "interaction_prompt_ref": [
199
+ {
200
+ "line_start": null,
201
+ "line_end": null
202
+ }
203
+ ]
204
+ },
205
+ {
206
+ "id": "rel_004",
207
+ "source": "task_001",
208
+ "target": "task_002",
209
+ "type": "NEXT",
210
+ "importance": "HIGH",
211
+ "interaction_prompt": "",
212
+ "interaction_prompt_ref": [
213
+ {
214
+ "line_start": null,
215
+ "line_end": null
216
+ }
217
+ ]
218
+ },
219
+ {
220
+ "id": "rel_005",
221
+ "source": "task_002",
222
+ "target": "task_003",
223
+ "type": "NEXT",
224
+ "importance": "HIGH",
225
+ "interaction_prompt": "",
226
+ "interaction_prompt_ref": [
227
+ {
228
+ "line_start": null,
229
+ "line_end": null
230
+ }
231
+ ]
232
+ },
233
+ {
234
+ "id": "rel_006",
235
+ "source": "input_001",
236
+ "target": "task_001",
237
+ "type": "CONSUMED_BY",
238
+ "importance": "HIGH",
239
+ "interaction_prompt": "",
240
+ "interaction_prompt_ref": [
241
+ {
242
+ "line_start": null,
243
+ "line_end": null
244
+ }
245
+ ]
246
+ },
247
+ {
248
+ "id": "rel_007",
249
+ "source": "task_003",
250
+ "target": "output_001",
251
+ "type": "PRODUCES",
252
+ "importance": "HIGH",
253
+ "interaction_prompt": "",
254
+ "interaction_prompt_ref": [
255
+ {
256
+ "line_start": null,
257
+ "line_end": null
258
+ }
259
+ ]
260
+ },
261
+ {
262
+ "id": "rel_008",
263
+ "source": "output_001",
264
+ "target": "human_001",
265
+ "type": "DELIVERS_TO",
266
+ "importance": "HIGH",
267
+ "interaction_prompt": "",
268
+ "interaction_prompt_ref": [
269
+ {
270
+ "line_start": null,
271
+ "line_end": null
272
+ }
273
+ ]
274
+ },
275
+ {
276
+ "id": "rel_009",
277
+ "source": "agent_001",
278
+ "target": "tool_001",
279
+ "type": "USES",
280
+ "importance": "MEDIUM",
281
+ "interaction_prompt": "",
282
+ "interaction_prompt_ref": [
283
+ {
284
+ "line_start": null,
285
+ "line_end": null
286
+ }
287
+ ]
288
+ },
289
+ {
290
+ "id": "rel_010",
291
+ "source": "agent_003",
292
+ "target": "tool_001",
293
+ "type": "USES",
294
+ "importance": "MEDIUM",
295
+ "interaction_prompt": "",
296
+ "interaction_prompt_ref": [
297
+ {
298
+ "line_start": null,
299
+ "line_end": null
300
+ }
301
+ ]
302
+ }
303
+ ],
304
+ "failures": [
305
+ {
306
+ "id": "failure_001",
307
+ "risk_type": "AGENT_ERROR",
308
+ "description": "Probability_Expert made an error in the simulation implementation, producing an incorrect outcome.",
309
+ "raw_text": "",
310
+ "raw_text_ref": [
311
+ {
312
+ "line_start": null,
313
+ "line_end": null
314
+ }
315
+ ],
316
+ "affected_id": "agent_001"
317
+ },
318
+ {
319
+ "id": "failure_002",
320
+ "risk_type": "EXECUTION_ERROR",
321
+ "description": "The final workflow output was marked incorrect (is_correct=false, ground_truth=3), indicating a failed end-to-end validation despite consensus.",
322
+ "raw_text": "",
323
+ "raw_text_ref": [
324
+ {
325
+ "line_start": null,
326
+ "line_end": null
327
+ }
328
+ ],
329
+ "affected_id": "task_001"
330
+ }
331
+ ],
332
+ "optimizations": [
333
+ {
334
+ "id": "opt_001",
335
+ "recommendation_type": "PROMPT_REFINEMENT",
336
+ "description": "Clarify and formalize the implementation constraints and expected platform dynamics in the task/spec (e.g., explicit state-transition rules for each piston eject action) so simulations are less prone to implementation errors. Justification: metadata shows a simulation implementation mistake; stricter spec reduces ambiguity.",
337
+ "affected_ids": [
338
+ "task_001",
339
+ "agent_001"
340
+ ],
341
+ "raw_text_ref": [
342
+ {
343
+ "line_start": null,
344
+ "line_end": null
345
+ }
346
+ ]
347
+ },
348
+ {
349
+ "id": "opt_002",
350
+ "recommendation_type": "AGENT_MERGING",
351
+ "description": "Introduce an immediate code-review step pairing Probability_Expert and Verification_Expert before large-scale simulation runs (or merge verification into simulation step) to catch implementation issues early and ensure simulation semantics match theoretical model.",
352
+ "affected_ids": [
353
+ "task_001",
354
+ "task_003",
355
+ "agent_001",
356
+ "agent_003"
357
+ ],
358
+ "raw_text_ref": [
359
+ {
360
+ "line_start": null,
361
+ "line_end": null
362
+ }
363
+ ]
364
+ }
365
+ ]
366
+ },
367
+ "input_trace_length": 16685,
368
+ "input_trace_preview": "{\n \"filename\": \"algorithm_sample_3.json\",\n \"title\": \"Algorithm Sample 3: Here's a fun riddle that I think you'll enjoy.\\n\\nYou have bee...\",\n \"description\": \"Cross-disciplinary collaboration between probability and theoretical chemistry experts solving complex riddle scenarios\",\n \"trace_type\": \"probability_game_theory\",\n \"trace_source\": \"algorithm_generated\",\n \"tags\": [\n \"multi_agent\",\n \"algorithm_generated\",\n \"probability\",\n \"theoretical_chemistry\",\n \"game_theory\",\n \"sim..."
369
+ }
extraction_analysis/cot_extraction_20250907_190005_90accd54.json ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,218 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ {
2
+ "timestamp": "20250907_190005",
3
+ "extraction_id": "90accd54",
4
+ "model": "gpt-5-mini",
5
+ "reasoning_steps": [
6
+ {
7
+ "explanation": "JSON structure analysis: count distinct agents and identify domain & main goal.",
8
+ "output": "Distinct agents found in observations/data: 4 named entities: ArithmeticProgressions_Expert, Computer_terminal, ProblemSolving_Expert, Verification_Expert. Domain: cost verification / savings calculation. Main goal: Verify accuracy of provided costs (daily ticket and season pass for California's Great America in summer 2024) and compute amount saved."
9
+ },
10
+ {
11
+ "explanation": "Decide workflow pattern based on Gold standard patterns.",
12
+ "output": "Trace contains keywords 'cost', 'savings', 'ticket', 'verification' → CLASSIFY as SIMPLE VERIFICATION workflow. Gold-standard mapping: single consolidated task performed collaboratively by multiple agents."
13
+ },
14
+ {
15
+ "explanation": "Entity extraction following priority rules (Agents: *_Expert, exclude Computer*; Tools: Computer*; Inputs/Outputs/Humans).",
16
+ "output": "Agents extracted (HIGH): agent_001 ArithmeticProgressions_Expert, agent_002 ProblemSolving_Expert, agent_003 Verification_Expert. Tool extracted (MEDIUM): tool_001 Computer_terminal. Input (HIGH): input_001 Original_Question (question text). Output (HIGH): output_001 Verified_Costs_and_Savings. Human (HIGH): human_001 Requester."
17
+ },
18
+ {
19
+ "explanation": "Task creation and relation mapping according to SIMPLE VERIFICATION pattern.",
20
+ "output": "Created one consolidated task (task_001 Verify_Costs_and_Calculate_Savings). PERFORMS relations: all three Experts perform task_001. Task consumes input_001 and produces output_001. Agents use the Computer_terminal tool (tool_001). Output delivered to human_001."
21
+ },
22
+ {
23
+ "explanation": "Failure identification from trace metadata and observations.",
24
+ "output": "Detected failure: Verification_Expert failed to collect authoritative price data for 2024 and instead used assumed/historical-range values (metadata 'mistake_reason'). Classified as RETRIEVAL_ERROR. This impacted correctness (is_correct: false)."
25
+ },
26
+ {
27
+ "explanation": "Generate optimization recommendations to reduce risk and improve verification reliability.",
28
+ "output": "Recommendations: (1) PROMPT_REFINEMENT — instruct Verification_Expert to explicitly attempt authoritative retrieval and to flag assumptions when external access is unavailable; (2) TOOL_ENHANCEMENT — enable Computer_terminal with a verified data retrieval capability (or link to authoritative pricing database) so Verification_Expert can confirm prices rather than infer from historical ranges."
29
+ }
30
+ ],
31
+ "knowledge_graph": {
32
+ "system_name": "Season Pass Cost Verification - Multi-Agent Collaboration",
33
+ "system_summary": "A simple verification workflow where three domain experts collaborate to verify 2024 pricing for daily tickets and season passes, compute savings, and deliver verified results to a requester. A Computer_terminal tool is present but the verification agent failed to retrieve authoritative price data, leading to an incorrect final answer.",
34
+ "entities": [
35
+ {
36
+ "id": "agent_001",
37
+ "type": "Agent",
38
+ "name": "ArithmeticProgressions_Expert",
39
+ "importance": "HIGH",
40
+ "raw_prompt": "",
41
+ "raw_prompt_ref": []
42
+ },
43
+ {
44
+ "id": "agent_002",
45
+ "type": "Agent",
46
+ "name": "ProblemSolving_Expert",
47
+ "importance": "HIGH",
48
+ "raw_prompt": "",
49
+ "raw_prompt_ref": []
50
+ },
51
+ {
52
+ "id": "agent_003",
53
+ "type": "Agent",
54
+ "name": "Verification_Expert",
55
+ "importance": "HIGH",
56
+ "raw_prompt": "",
57
+ "raw_prompt_ref": []
58
+ },
59
+ {
60
+ "id": "tool_001",
61
+ "type": "Tool",
62
+ "name": "Computer_terminal",
63
+ "importance": "MEDIUM",
64
+ "raw_prompt": "",
65
+ "raw_prompt_ref": []
66
+ },
67
+ {
68
+ "id": "task_001",
69
+ "type": "Task",
70
+ "name": "Verify_Costs_and_Calculate_Savings",
71
+ "importance": "HIGH",
72
+ "raw_prompt": "",
73
+ "raw_prompt_ref": []
74
+ },
75
+ {
76
+ "id": "input_001",
77
+ "type": "Input",
78
+ "name": "Original_Question",
79
+ "importance": "HIGH",
80
+ "raw_prompt": "How much did I save by purchasing a season pass instead of daily tickets for California's Great America in San Jose, if I planned to visit once a month in June, July, August, and September during the summer of 2024?",
81
+ "raw_prompt_ref": []
82
+ },
83
+ {
84
+ "id": "output_001",
85
+ "type": "Output",
86
+ "name": "Verified_Costs_and_Savings",
87
+ "importance": "HIGH",
88
+ "raw_prompt": "- Verified cost of a daily ticket in 2024\n- Verified cost of a season pass in 2024\n- Amount saved by purchasing a season pass for the planned visits",
89
+ "raw_prompt_ref": []
90
+ },
91
+ {
92
+ "id": "human_001",
93
+ "type": "Human",
94
+ "name": "Requester",
95
+ "importance": "HIGH",
96
+ "raw_prompt": "",
97
+ "raw_prompt_ref": []
98
+ }
99
+ ],
100
+ "relations": [
101
+ {
102
+ "id": "rel_001",
103
+ "source": "agent_001",
104
+ "target": "task_001",
105
+ "type": "PERFORMS",
106
+ "importance": "HIGH",
107
+ "interaction_prompt": "",
108
+ "interaction_prompt_ref": []
109
+ },
110
+ {
111
+ "id": "rel_002",
112
+ "source": "agent_002",
113
+ "target": "task_001",
114
+ "type": "PERFORMS",
115
+ "importance": "HIGH",
116
+ "interaction_prompt": "",
117
+ "interaction_prompt_ref": []
118
+ },
119
+ {
120
+ "id": "rel_003",
121
+ "source": "agent_003",
122
+ "target": "task_001",
123
+ "type": "PERFORMS",
124
+ "importance": "HIGH",
125
+ "interaction_prompt": "",
126
+ "interaction_prompt_ref": []
127
+ },
128
+ {
129
+ "id": "rel_004",
130
+ "source": "agent_001",
131
+ "target": "tool_001",
132
+ "type": "USES",
133
+ "importance": "MEDIUM",
134
+ "interaction_prompt": "",
135
+ "interaction_prompt_ref": []
136
+ },
137
+ {
138
+ "id": "rel_005",
139
+ "source": "agent_002",
140
+ "target": "tool_001",
141
+ "type": "USES",
142
+ "importance": "MEDIUM",
143
+ "interaction_prompt": "",
144
+ "interaction_prompt_ref": []
145
+ },
146
+ {
147
+ "id": "rel_006",
148
+ "source": "agent_003",
149
+ "target": "tool_001",
150
+ "type": "USES",
151
+ "importance": "MEDIUM",
152
+ "interaction_prompt": "",
153
+ "interaction_prompt_ref": []
154
+ },
155
+ {
156
+ "id": "rel_007",
157
+ "source": "input_001",
158
+ "target": "task_001",
159
+ "type": "CONSUMED_BY",
160
+ "importance": "HIGH",
161
+ "interaction_prompt": "",
162
+ "interaction_prompt_ref": []
163
+ },
164
+ {
165
+ "id": "rel_008",
166
+ "source": "task_001",
167
+ "target": "output_001",
168
+ "type": "PRODUCES",
169
+ "importance": "HIGH",
170
+ "interaction_prompt": "",
171
+ "interaction_prompt_ref": []
172
+ },
173
+ {
174
+ "id": "rel_009",
175
+ "source": "output_001",
176
+ "target": "human_001",
177
+ "type": "DELIVERS_TO",
178
+ "importance": "HIGH",
179
+ "interaction_prompt": "",
180
+ "interaction_prompt_ref": []
181
+ }
182
+ ],
183
+ "failures": [
184
+ {
185
+ "id": "failure_001",
186
+ "risk_type": "RETRIEVAL_ERROR",
187
+ "description": "Verification_Expert failed to collect authoritative 2024 price data and used assumed/historical-range values, causing an incorrect verification.",
188
+ "raw_text": "The agent fails to collect price data for the daily tickets and season passes for California's Great America in 2024.",
189
+ "raw_text_ref": [],
190
+ "affected_id": "agent_003"
191
+ }
192
+ ],
193
+ "optimizations": [
194
+ {
195
+ "id": "opt_001",
196
+ "recommendation_type": "PROMPT_REFINEMENT",
197
+ "description": "Refine the Verification_Expert prompt to require explicit authoritative-data retrieval steps and a mandatory 'cannot verify' flag when external verification fails. This reduces silent assumptions and clarifies provenance of verified values.",
198
+ "affected_ids": [
199
+ "agent_003",
200
+ "task_001"
201
+ ],
202
+ "raw_text_ref": []
203
+ },
204
+ {
205
+ "id": "opt_002",
206
+ "recommendation_type": "TOOL_ENHANCEMENT",
207
+ "description": "Enhance Computer_terminal with secure, auditable access to authoritative pricing sources (or a price database API) so Verification_Expert can fetch live 2024 prices instead of relying on historical-range inference.",
208
+ "affected_ids": [
209
+ "tool_001",
210
+ "agent_003"
211
+ ],
212
+ "raw_text_ref": []
213
+ }
214
+ ]
215
+ },
216
+ "input_trace_length": 9127,
217
+ "input_trace_preview": "{\n \"filename\": \"algorithm_sample_0.json\",\n \"title\": \"Algorithm Sample 0: How much did I save by purchasing a season pass in...\",\n \"description\": \"Multi-agent collaboration sample from algorithm-generated dataset. Agents: ArithmeticProgressions_Expert, Computer_terminal, ProblemSolving_Expert, Verification_Expert. Question: How much did I save by purchasing a season pass instead of daily tickets for California's Great Amer...\",\n \"trace_type\": \"multi_agent_collaboration\",\n \"trace_source\": \"al..."
218
+ }
extraction_analysis/cot_extraction_20250907_190055_9d0f1fce.json ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,247 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ {
2
+ "timestamp": "20250907_190055",
3
+ "extraction_id": "9d0f1fce",
4
+ "model": "gpt-5-mini",
5
+ "reasoning_steps": [
6
+ {
7
+ "explanation": "1) JSON structure analysis: Count distinct agents and identify domain & main goal.",
8
+ "output": "Found 4 distinct actor strings in the trace data.agents: Computer_terminal, DataVerification_Expert, Eateries_Expert, Location-Based_Services_Expert. Domain is location-based services; main goal: find the closest eatery to Harkness Memorial State Park that is open at 11pm on Wednesdays (a location/discovery task)."
9
+ },
10
+ {
11
+ "explanation": "2) Decide task structure using Gold standard patterns.",
12
+ "output": "This is a location/discovery workflow -> map to 3 sequential specialized tasks: (1) Geographic Analysis, (2) Data Collection, (3) Validation & Distance Calculation."
13
+ },
14
+ {
15
+ "explanation": "3) Extract entities (agents, tools, inputs/outputs, tasks) following naming/priority rules.",
16
+ "output": "Agents (HIGH): DataVerification_Expert, Eateries_Expert, Location-Based_Services_Expert. Tool (MEDIUM): Computer_terminal. Input (HIGH): user question. Output (HIGH): structured eatery result. Human (HIGH): Requestor/Manager."
17
+ },
18
+ {
19
+ "explanation": "4) Map relations according to workflow: PERFORMS, NEXT, USES, CONSUMED_BY, PRODUCES, DELIVERS_TO.",
20
+ "output": "Assigned PERFORMS: Location-Based_Services_Expert->Geographic Analysis, Eateries_Expert->Data Collection, DataVerification_Expert->Validation. Added NEXT between tasks and tool USES relations for web/search execution."
21
+ },
22
+ {
23
+ "explanation": "5) Quality check and failure/optimization extraction.",
24
+ "output": "Verified relation references are consistent with entity IDs. Extracted two real failures from trace (execution error in code; insufficient search results). Proposed two optimizations (robust web-search error handling; tool enhancement / better data sources)."
25
+ }
26
+ ],
27
+ "knowledge_graph": {
28
+ "system_name": "Harkness Park Eatery Discovery",
29
+ "system_summary": "A sequential multi-agent location-discovery workflow to find the closest eatery to Harkness Memorial State Park that is open at 11pm on Wednesdays. Three specialist agents collaborate (geographic, eateries data, verification) using a Computer_terminal tool to gather, filter, and validate candidate eateries and produce a structured result for the requestor.",
30
+ "entities": [
31
+ {
32
+ "id": "agent_001",
33
+ "type": "Agent",
34
+ "name": "DataVerification_Expert",
35
+ "importance": "HIGH",
36
+ "raw_prompt": "",
37
+ "raw_prompt_ref": []
38
+ },
39
+ {
40
+ "id": "agent_002",
41
+ "type": "Agent",
42
+ "name": "Eateries_Expert",
43
+ "importance": "HIGH",
44
+ "raw_prompt": "",
45
+ "raw_prompt_ref": []
46
+ },
47
+ {
48
+ "id": "agent_003",
49
+ "type": "Agent",
50
+ "name": "Location-Based_Services_Expert",
51
+ "importance": "HIGH",
52
+ "raw_prompt": "",
53
+ "raw_prompt_ref": []
54
+ },
55
+ {
56
+ "id": "tool_001",
57
+ "type": "Tool",
58
+ "name": "Computer_terminal",
59
+ "importance": "MEDIUM",
60
+ "raw_prompt": "",
61
+ "raw_prompt_ref": []
62
+ },
63
+ {
64
+ "id": "task_001",
65
+ "type": "Task",
66
+ "name": "Geographic Analysis (Locate Harkness Memorial State Park)",
67
+ "importance": "HIGH",
68
+ "raw_prompt": "",
69
+ "raw_prompt_ref": []
70
+ },
71
+ {
72
+ "id": "task_002",
73
+ "type": "Task",
74
+ "name": "Data Collection (Search nearby eateries & hours)",
75
+ "importance": "HIGH",
76
+ "raw_prompt": "",
77
+ "raw_prompt_ref": []
78
+ },
79
+ {
80
+ "id": "task_003",
81
+ "type": "Task",
82
+ "name": "Validation & Distance Calculation (Filter by hours, compute closest)",
83
+ "importance": "HIGH",
84
+ "raw_prompt": "",
85
+ "raw_prompt_ref": []
86
+ },
87
+ {
88
+ "id": "input_001",
89
+ "type": "Input",
90
+ "name": "User Question Input",
91
+ "importance": "HIGH",
92
+ "raw_prompt": "What is the closest eatery to Harkness Memorial State Park that is still open at 11pm on Wednesdays?",
93
+ "raw_prompt_ref": []
94
+ },
95
+ {
96
+ "id": "output_001",
97
+ "type": "Output",
98
+ "name": "Closest Eatery Result (Name, Address, Distance, Open Confirmation)",
99
+ "importance": "HIGH",
100
+ "raw_prompt": "",
101
+ "raw_prompt_ref": []
102
+ },
103
+ {
104
+ "id": "human_001",
105
+ "type": "Human",
106
+ "name": "Requestor / Manager",
107
+ "importance": "HIGH",
108
+ "raw_prompt": "",
109
+ "raw_prompt_ref": []
110
+ }
111
+ ],
112
+ "relations": [
113
+ {
114
+ "id": "relation_001",
115
+ "source": "agent_003",
116
+ "target": "task_001",
117
+ "type": "PERFORMS",
118
+ "importance": "HIGH",
119
+ "interaction_prompt": "",
120
+ "interaction_prompt_ref": []
121
+ },
122
+ {
123
+ "id": "relation_002",
124
+ "source": "agent_002",
125
+ "target": "task_002",
126
+ "type": "PERFORMS",
127
+ "importance": "HIGH",
128
+ "interaction_prompt": "",
129
+ "interaction_prompt_ref": []
130
+ },
131
+ {
132
+ "id": "relation_003",
133
+ "source": "agent_001",
134
+ "target": "task_003",
135
+ "type": "PERFORMS",
136
+ "importance": "HIGH",
137
+ "interaction_prompt": "",
138
+ "interaction_prompt_ref": []
139
+ },
140
+ {
141
+ "id": "relation_004",
142
+ "source": "task_001",
143
+ "target": "task_002",
144
+ "type": "NEXT",
145
+ "importance": "HIGH",
146
+ "interaction_prompt": "",
147
+ "interaction_prompt_ref": []
148
+ },
149
+ {
150
+ "id": "relation_005",
151
+ "source": "task_002",
152
+ "target": "task_003",
153
+ "type": "NEXT",
154
+ "importance": "HIGH",
155
+ "interaction_prompt": "",
156
+ "interaction_prompt_ref": []
157
+ },
158
+ {
159
+ "id": "relation_006",
160
+ "source": "input_001",
161
+ "target": "task_001",
162
+ "type": "CONSUMED_BY",
163
+ "importance": "HIGH",
164
+ "interaction_prompt": "",
165
+ "interaction_prompt_ref": []
166
+ },
167
+ {
168
+ "id": "relation_007",
169
+ "source": "task_003",
170
+ "target": "output_001",
171
+ "type": "PRODUCES",
172
+ "importance": "HIGH",
173
+ "interaction_prompt": "",
174
+ "interaction_prompt_ref": []
175
+ },
176
+ {
177
+ "id": "relation_008",
178
+ "source": "output_001",
179
+ "target": "human_001",
180
+ "type": "DELIVERS_TO",
181
+ "importance": "HIGH",
182
+ "interaction_prompt": "",
183
+ "interaction_prompt_ref": []
184
+ },
185
+ {
186
+ "id": "relation_009",
187
+ "source": "task_002",
188
+ "target": "tool_001",
189
+ "type": "USES",
190
+ "importance": "MEDIUM",
191
+ "interaction_prompt": "",
192
+ "interaction_prompt_ref": []
193
+ },
194
+ {
195
+ "id": "relation_010",
196
+ "source": "task_003",
197
+ "target": "tool_001",
198
+ "type": "USES",
199
+ "importance": "MEDIUM",
200
+ "interaction_prompt": "",
201
+ "interaction_prompt_ref": []
202
+ }
203
+ ],
204
+ "failures": [
205
+ {
206
+ "id": "failure_001",
207
+ "risk_type": "EXECUTION_ERROR",
208
+ "description": "perform_web_search returned None causing a TypeError during automated hours verification (code execution failed).",
209
+ "raw_text": "TypeError: 'NoneType' object is not iterable",
210
+ "raw_text_ref": [],
211
+ "affected_id": "agent_001"
212
+ },
213
+ {
214
+ "id": "failure_002",
215
+ "risk_type": "PLANNING_ERROR",
216
+ "description": "Initial searches did not find any eateries open until 11 PM on Wednesdays — search radius and data sources were insufficient.",
217
+ "raw_text": "None of the eateries identified near Harkness Memorial State Park meet the requirement of being open until 11 PM on Wednesdays. The eateries listed are all closed by 9 PM.",
218
+ "raw_text_ref": [],
219
+ "affected_id": "task_002"
220
+ }
221
+ ],
222
+ "optimizations": [
223
+ {
224
+ "id": "opt_001",
225
+ "recommendation_type": "PROMPT_REFINEMENT",
226
+ "description": "Improve DataVerification_Expert's verification code and prompts: add robust None-checks and fallback behavior in perform_web_search (return empty list instead of None), surface partial matches, and include explicit retry/backoff for transient failures.",
227
+ "affected_ids": [
228
+ "agent_001",
229
+ "failure_001"
230
+ ],
231
+ "raw_text_ref": []
232
+ },
233
+ {
234
+ "id": "opt_002",
235
+ "recommendation_type": "TOOL_ENHANCEMENT",
236
+ "description": "Enhance Computer_terminal tool integration to use structured APIs (e.g., Google Places / Yelp Business API) and canonical hours endpoints, and expand search radius / fallback towns automatically to avoid missing candidates. This reduces false negatives and manual verification load.",
237
+ "affected_ids": [
238
+ "tool_001",
239
+ "task_002"
240
+ ],
241
+ "raw_text_ref": []
242
+ }
243
+ ]
244
+ },
245
+ "input_trace_length": 29909,
246
+ "input_trace_preview": "{\n \"filename\": \"algorithm_sample_1.json\",\n \"title\": \"Algorithm Sample 1: What is the closest eatery to Harkness Memorial State Park t...\",\n \"description\": \"Complex location-based services sample with 4 specialized agents. Involves geographic queries, time-based filtering, and data verification.\",\n \"trace_type\": \"location_based_services\",\n \"trace_source\": \"algorithm_generated\",\n \"tags\": [\n \"multi_agent\",\n \"algorithm_generated\",\n \"location_services\",\n \"data_verification\",\n \"re..."
247
+ }
extraction_analysis/cot_extraction_20250907_190155_f468aad6.json ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,250 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ {
2
+ "timestamp": "20250907_190155",
3
+ "extraction_id": "f468aad6",
4
+ "model": "gpt-5-mini",
5
+ "reasoning_steps": [
6
+ {
7
+ "explanation": "1) JSON structure analysis: count distinct agents and identify domain/main goal.",
8
+ "output": "Distinct agents found in observations/data: 3 human experts (Probability_Expert, TheoreticalChemistry_Expert, Verification_Expert) plus one Computer_terminal tool. Domain: cross-disciplinary probability + theoretical chemistry solving a riddle (simulation-based). Main goal: determine which ping-pong ball maximizes ejection probability (single solution verification via simulation)."
9
+ },
10
+ {
11
+ "explanation": "2) Decide workflow pattern and task structure using gold-standard mapping.",
12
+ "output": "Trace contains 'probability' and 'chemistry' -> INTERDISCIPLINARY pattern selected. Generate 3 high-level tasks: (1) Statistical Simulation & Analysis, (2) Theoretical Modeling & Mechanistic Assessment, (3) Result Verification & Consensus."
13
+ },
14
+ {
15
+ "explanation": "3) Extract entities (Agents, Tools, Inputs/Outputs, Tasks).",
16
+ "output": "Agents: Probability_Expert, TheoreticalChemistry_Expert, Verification_Expert. Tool: Computer_terminal. Input: Riddle description. Output: Recommended ball number. Tasks: task_001..task_003 as above. Human stakeholder: Contestant (end user receiving recommended ball)."
17
+ },
18
+ {
19
+ "explanation": "4) Map relations following priorities (PERFORMS, NEXT, CONSUMED_BY/PRODUCES/DELIVERS_TO, USES).",
20
+ "output": "Mapped PERFORMS: each expert -> their specialized task. NEXT relations between the three tasks (task_001 -> task_002 -> task_003). USES: Probability_Expert uses Computer_terminal. PRODUCES: Computer_terminal produced the simulation result; final task produced the recommended ball. DELIVERS_TO: final output delivered to Contestant."
21
+ },
22
+ {
23
+ "explanation": "5) Quality check and identify failures + optimizations.",
24
+ "output": "Two failures detected from trace metadata: an execution error in the simulation (mistake_agent: Probability_Expert) leading to incorrect outcome; verification step accepted the incorrect result (Verification_Expert). Recommendations: refine simulation prompt/spec, add deterministic tests and stronger verification/tooling."
25
+ }
26
+ ],
27
+ "knowledge_graph": {
28
+ "system_name": "PickThatPingPong_CrossDisciplinary_Workflow",
29
+ "system_summary": "A three-agent interdisciplinary workflow where a Probability expert runs a simulation (using a Computer terminal), a Theoretical Chemistry expert assesses modeling assumptions, and a Verification expert confirms results. The pipeline consumes the riddle input and produces a recommended ball number delivered to the contestant. Metadata indicates an execution error in the simulation leading to an incorrect final recommendation.",
30
+ "entities": [
31
+ {
32
+ "id": "agent_001",
33
+ "type": "Agent",
34
+ "name": "Probability_Expert",
35
+ "importance": "HIGH",
36
+ "raw_prompt": "",
37
+ "raw_prompt_ref": []
38
+ },
39
+ {
40
+ "id": "agent_002",
41
+ "type": "Agent",
42
+ "name": "TheoreticalChemistry_Expert",
43
+ "importance": "HIGH",
44
+ "raw_prompt": "",
45
+ "raw_prompt_ref": []
46
+ },
47
+ {
48
+ "id": "agent_003",
49
+ "type": "Agent",
50
+ "name": "Verification_Expert",
51
+ "importance": "HIGH",
52
+ "raw_prompt": "",
53
+ "raw_prompt_ref": []
54
+ },
55
+ {
56
+ "id": "tool_001",
57
+ "type": "Tool",
58
+ "name": "Computer_terminal",
59
+ "importance": "MEDIUM",
60
+ "raw_prompt": "",
61
+ "raw_prompt_ref": []
62
+ },
63
+ {
64
+ "id": "input_001",
65
+ "type": "Input",
66
+ "name": "Riddle: Pick That Ping-Pong (100 balls) - problem statement",
67
+ "importance": "HIGH",
68
+ "raw_prompt": "",
69
+ "raw_prompt_ref": []
70
+ },
71
+ {
72
+ "id": "task_001",
73
+ "type": "Task",
74
+ "name": "Statistical Simulation & Analysis",
75
+ "importance": "HIGH",
76
+ "raw_prompt": "",
77
+ "raw_prompt_ref": []
78
+ },
79
+ {
80
+ "id": "task_002",
81
+ "type": "Task",
82
+ "name": "Theoretical Modeling & Mechanistic Assessment",
83
+ "importance": "HIGH",
84
+ "raw_prompt": "",
85
+ "raw_prompt_ref": []
86
+ },
87
+ {
88
+ "id": "task_003",
89
+ "type": "Task",
90
+ "name": "Result Verification & Consensus",
91
+ "importance": "HIGH",
92
+ "raw_prompt": "",
93
+ "raw_prompt_ref": []
94
+ },
95
+ {
96
+ "id": "output_001",
97
+ "type": "Output",
98
+ "name": "Recommended Ball Number (final answer)",
99
+ "importance": "HIGH",
100
+ "raw_prompt": "",
101
+ "raw_prompt_ref": []
102
+ },
103
+ {
104
+ "id": "human_001",
105
+ "type": "Human",
106
+ "name": "Contestant",
107
+ "importance": "HIGH",
108
+ "raw_prompt": "",
109
+ "raw_prompt_ref": []
110
+ }
111
+ ],
112
+ "relations": [
113
+ {
114
+ "id": "rel_001",
115
+ "source": "agent_001",
116
+ "target": "task_001",
117
+ "type": "PERFORMS",
118
+ "importance": "HIGH",
119
+ "interaction_prompt": "",
120
+ "interaction_prompt_ref": []
121
+ },
122
+ {
123
+ "id": "rel_002",
124
+ "source": "agent_002",
125
+ "target": "task_002",
126
+ "type": "PERFORMS",
127
+ "importance": "HIGH",
128
+ "interaction_prompt": "",
129
+ "interaction_prompt_ref": []
130
+ },
131
+ {
132
+ "id": "rel_003",
133
+ "source": "agent_003",
134
+ "target": "task_003",
135
+ "type": "PERFORMS",
136
+ "importance": "HIGH",
137
+ "interaction_prompt": "",
138
+ "interaction_prompt_ref": []
139
+ },
140
+ {
141
+ "id": "rel_004",
142
+ "source": "task_001",
143
+ "target": "task_002",
144
+ "type": "NEXT",
145
+ "importance": "HIGH",
146
+ "interaction_prompt": "",
147
+ "interaction_prompt_ref": []
148
+ },
149
+ {
150
+ "id": "rel_005",
151
+ "source": "task_002",
152
+ "target": "task_003",
153
+ "type": "NEXT",
154
+ "importance": "HIGH",
155
+ "interaction_prompt": "",
156
+ "interaction_prompt_ref": []
157
+ },
158
+ {
159
+ "id": "rel_006",
160
+ "source": "agent_001",
161
+ "target": "tool_001",
162
+ "type": "USES",
163
+ "importance": "HIGH",
164
+ "interaction_prompt": "",
165
+ "interaction_prompt_ref": []
166
+ },
167
+ {
168
+ "id": "rel_007",
169
+ "source": "input_001",
170
+ "target": "task_001",
171
+ "type": "CONSUMED_BY",
172
+ "importance": "HIGH",
173
+ "interaction_prompt": "",
174
+ "interaction_prompt_ref": []
175
+ },
176
+ {
177
+ "id": "rel_008",
178
+ "source": "tool_001",
179
+ "target": "output_001",
180
+ "type": "PRODUCES",
181
+ "importance": "HIGH",
182
+ "interaction_prompt": "",
183
+ "interaction_prompt_ref": []
184
+ },
185
+ {
186
+ "id": "rel_009",
187
+ "source": "task_003",
188
+ "target": "output_001",
189
+ "type": "PRODUCES",
190
+ "importance": "HIGH",
191
+ "interaction_prompt": "",
192
+ "interaction_prompt_ref": []
193
+ },
194
+ {
195
+ "id": "rel_010",
196
+ "source": "output_001",
197
+ "target": "human_001",
198
+ "type": "DELIVERS_TO",
199
+ "importance": "HIGH",
200
+ "interaction_prompt": "",
201
+ "interaction_prompt_ref": []
202
+ }
203
+ ],
204
+ "failures": [
205
+ {
206
+ "id": "failure_001",
207
+ "risk_type": "EXECUTION_ERROR",
208
+ "description": "Simulation implementation error in Probability_Expert led to an incorrect simulation outcome (final recommended ball does not match ground truth).",
209
+ "raw_text": "metadata.mistake_reason: The agent made an error in the simulation implementation, resulting in an incorrect outcome.",
210
+ "raw_text_ref": [],
211
+ "affected_id": "agent_001"
212
+ },
213
+ {
214
+ "id": "failure_002",
215
+ "risk_type": "AGENT_ERROR",
216
+ "description": "Verification_Expert accepted the simulation result without detecting the implementation error, allowing an incorrect final recommendation to be delivered.",
217
+ "raw_text": "Verification_Expert: 'Based on the implementation and results, I agree that picking ball 2 is optimal...' (accepted simulation output).",
218
+ "raw_text_ref": [],
219
+ "affected_id": "agent_003"
220
+ }
221
+ ],
222
+ "optimizations": [
223
+ {
224
+ "id": "opt_001",
225
+ "recommendation_type": "PROMPT_REFINEMENT",
226
+ "description": "Tighten the simulation specification: include deterministic random seeds, unit tests for single-step piston behavior, and an analytical-check routine to validate simulation outcomes against small-N hand-calculations before large-scale runs.",
227
+ "affected_ids": [
228
+ "agent_001",
229
+ "task_001",
230
+ "tool_001"
231
+ ],
232
+ "raw_text_ref": []
233
+ },
234
+ {
235
+ "id": "opt_002",
236
+ "recommendation_type": "TOOL_ENHANCEMENT",
237
+ "description": "Add a test harness and logging/traceability for the Computer_terminal runs; require independent replication (by TheoreticalChemistry_Expert) or automated cross-checks prior to verification acceptance.",
238
+ "affected_ids": [
239
+ "agent_002",
240
+ "agent_003",
241
+ "task_003",
242
+ "tool_001"
243
+ ],
244
+ "raw_text_ref": []
245
+ }
246
+ ]
247
+ },
248
+ "input_trace_length": 16685,
249
+ "input_trace_preview": "{\n \"filename\": \"algorithm_sample_3.json\",\n \"title\": \"Algorithm Sample 3: Here's a fun riddle that I think you'll enjoy.\\n\\nYou have bee...\",\n \"description\": \"Cross-disciplinary collaboration between probability and theoretical chemistry experts solving complex riddle scenarios\",\n \"trace_type\": \"probability_game_theory\",\n \"trace_source\": \"algorithm_generated\",\n \"tags\": [\n \"multi_agent\",\n \"algorithm_generated\",\n \"probability\",\n \"theoretical_chemistry\",\n \"game_theory\",\n \"sim..."
250
+ }
extraction_analysis/cot_extraction_20250907_190245_f051217d.json ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,178 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ {
2
+ "timestamp": "20250907_190245",
3
+ "extraction_id": "f051217d",
4
+ "model": "gpt-5-mini",
5
+ "reasoning_steps": [
6
+ {
7
+ "explanation": "1) JSON structure analysis: counted distinct agents and identified main goal.",
8
+ "output": "Distinct agents found: 1 (the Python documentation assistant). Main goal: single-turn documentation/help task — explain and demonstrate Python list comprehensions (SIMPLE VERIFICATION pattern)."
9
+ },
10
+ {
11
+ "explanation": "2) Entity extraction: extracted Agents, Human, Tools, Input, Output, and one consolidated Task according to gold-standard mapping for a verification workflow.",
12
+ "output": "Entities derived: agent_001 (assistant), human_001 (requester), tool_001 (documentation KB), tool_002 (LLM model API), input_001 (user question), task_001 (explain & demonstrate list comprehensions), output_001 (explanation + examples)."
13
+ },
14
+ {
15
+ "explanation": "3) Relation mapping & QA: created relations (PERFORMS, CONSUMED_BY, USES, PRODUCES, DELIVERS_TO) and added two detected failures plus two optimization recommendations.",
16
+ "output": "Relations and failures/optimizations assembled; ensured full workflow Input -> Agent -> Task -> Output -> Human coverage and validated relation id references."
17
+ }
18
+ ],
19
+ "knowledge_graph": {
20
+ "system_name": "Python Documentation Assistant - AgentGraph",
21
+ "system_summary": "A RAG-powered documentation assistant answers a beginner's question about Python list comprehensions by searching a documentation knowledge base and generating an explanation with code examples using an LLM. The workflow is a single verification-style task executed by one assistant agent using two tools (knowledge search and LLM API) and delivering results to the human user.",
22
+ "entities": [
23
+ {
24
+ "id": "agent_001",
25
+ "type": "Agent",
26
+ "name": "Python Documentation Assistant",
27
+ "importance": "HIGH",
28
+ "raw_prompt": "",
29
+ "raw_prompt_ref": []
30
+ },
31
+ {
32
+ "id": "human_001",
33
+ "type": "Human",
34
+ "name": "Beginner Python Learner (demo-user-001)",
35
+ "importance": "HIGH",
36
+ "raw_prompt": "",
37
+ "raw_prompt_ref": []
38
+ },
39
+ {
40
+ "id": "tool_001",
41
+ "type": "Tool",
42
+ "name": "Documentation Knowledge Base (retrieval/search)",
43
+ "importance": "MEDIUM",
44
+ "raw_prompt": "",
45
+ "raw_prompt_ref": []
46
+ },
47
+ {
48
+ "id": "tool_002",
49
+ "type": "Tool",
50
+ "name": "LLM Model API (gpt-4o-2024-11-20 / chat.completion)",
51
+ "importance": "MEDIUM",
52
+ "raw_prompt": "",
53
+ "raw_prompt_ref": []
54
+ },
55
+ {
56
+ "id": "input_001",
57
+ "type": "Input",
58
+ "name": "User query: what are python list comprehensions used for and when should I use them?",
59
+ "importance": "HIGH",
60
+ "raw_prompt": "",
61
+ "raw_prompt_ref": []
62
+ },
63
+ {
64
+ "id": "task_001",
65
+ "type": "Task",
66
+ "name": "Explain and demonstrate Python list comprehensions (concise explanation + examples)",
67
+ "importance": "HIGH",
68
+ "raw_prompt": "",
69
+ "raw_prompt_ref": []
70
+ },
71
+ {
72
+ "id": "output_001",
73
+ "type": "Output",
74
+ "name": "Explanation and practical code examples comparing for-loops and list comprehensions",
75
+ "importance": "HIGH",
76
+ "raw_prompt": "",
77
+ "raw_prompt_ref": []
78
+ }
79
+ ],
80
+ "relations": [
81
+ {
82
+ "id": "rel_001",
83
+ "source": "agent_001",
84
+ "target": "task_001",
85
+ "type": "PERFORMS",
86
+ "importance": "HIGH",
87
+ "interaction_prompt": "",
88
+ "interaction_prompt_ref": []
89
+ },
90
+ {
91
+ "id": "rel_002",
92
+ "source": "input_001",
93
+ "target": "task_001",
94
+ "type": "CONSUMED_BY",
95
+ "importance": "HIGH",
96
+ "interaction_prompt": "",
97
+ "interaction_prompt_ref": []
98
+ },
99
+ {
100
+ "id": "rel_003",
101
+ "source": "agent_001",
102
+ "target": "tool_001",
103
+ "type": "USES",
104
+ "importance": "MEDIUM",
105
+ "interaction_prompt": "",
106
+ "interaction_prompt_ref": []
107
+ },
108
+ {
109
+ "id": "rel_004",
110
+ "source": "agent_001",
111
+ "target": "tool_002",
112
+ "type": "USES",
113
+ "importance": "MEDIUM",
114
+ "interaction_prompt": "",
115
+ "interaction_prompt_ref": []
116
+ },
117
+ {
118
+ "id": "rel_005",
119
+ "source": "task_001",
120
+ "target": "output_001",
121
+ "type": "PRODUCES",
122
+ "importance": "HIGH",
123
+ "interaction_prompt": "",
124
+ "interaction_prompt_ref": []
125
+ },
126
+ {
127
+ "id": "rel_006",
128
+ "source": "output_001",
129
+ "target": "human_001",
130
+ "type": "DELIVERS_TO",
131
+ "importance": "HIGH",
132
+ "interaction_prompt": "",
133
+ "interaction_prompt_ref": []
134
+ }
135
+ ],
136
+ "failures": [
137
+ {
138
+ "id": "failure_001",
139
+ "risk_type": "HALLUCINATION",
140
+ "description": "Overgeneralized performance claim that list comprehensions are 'typically 20-30% faster' than equivalent for-loops without a cited benchmark — a potential unsupported assertion.",
141
+ "raw_text": "List comprehensions are not only more concise but also typically 20-30% faster than equivalent for loops!",
142
+ "raw_text_ref": [],
143
+ "affected_id": "output_001"
144
+ },
145
+ {
146
+ "id": "failure_002",
147
+ "risk_type": "AGENT_ERROR",
148
+ "description": "Missing agent identity metadata in the component_hierarchy (agents list contains an empty string), indicating incomplete agent registration.",
149
+ "raw_text": "\"component_hierarchy\": { \"agents\": [ \"\" ] }",
150
+ "raw_text_ref": [],
151
+ "affected_id": "agent_001"
152
+ }
153
+ ],
154
+ "optimizations": [
155
+ {
156
+ "id": "opt_001",
157
+ "recommendation_type": "PROMPT_REFINEMENT",
158
+ "description": "Qualify performance claims and include explicit citations or benchmark snippets when stating relative performance (e.g., 'In benchmark X, list comprehensions were ~Y% faster'). Tie the claim to the documentation search results to avoid hallucination.",
159
+ "affected_ids": [
160
+ "output_001",
161
+ "task_001"
162
+ ],
163
+ "raw_text_ref": []
164
+ },
165
+ {
166
+ "id": "opt_002",
167
+ "recommendation_type": "TOOL_ENHANCEMENT",
168
+ "description": "Enhance the documentation knowledge base retrieval to return document identifiers and short snippets (source citations) along with relevance scores so the assistant can include inline citations and evidence in explanations.",
169
+ "affected_ids": [
170
+ "tool_001"
171
+ ],
172
+ "raw_text_ref": []
173
+ }
174
+ ]
175
+ },
176
+ "input_trace_length": 10504,
177
+ "input_trace_preview": "{\n \"filename\": \"python_documentation_inquiry.json\",\n \"title\": \"Python Documentation Assistant Demo\",\n \"description\": \"Comprehensive example showing RAG-powered AI assistant handling multi-turn programming inquiry with knowledge search, detailed explanations, code examples, performance analysis, and interactive learning\",\n \"trace_type\": \"documentation_search\",\n \"trace_source\": \"sample_data\",\n \"tags\": [\n \"programming\",\n \"rag_assistant\",\n \"documentation\",\n \"failure_detection\",\n ..."
178
+ }