willystumblr commited on
Commit
2a54ac9
ยท
verified ยท
1 Parent(s): c8dc8ed

Update README.md

Browse files
Files changed (1) hide show
  1. README.md +57 -2
README.md CHANGED
@@ -3,8 +3,63 @@ title: README
3
  emoji: ๐Ÿ“Š
4
  colorFrom: purple
5
  colorTo: indigo
6
- sdk: static
7
  pinned: false
8
  ---
9
 
10
- Edit this `README.md` markdown file to author your organization card.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
3
  emoji: ๐Ÿ“Š
4
  colorFrom: purple
5
  colorTo: indigo
6
+ โ€ฆ: static
7
  pinned: false
8
  ---
9
 
10
+ # Labeling Guidelines
11
+
12
+ Thank you for contributing to our project! ๐Ÿค—
13
+ Your task is to read a conversation between two people and assess whether the intervieweeโ€™s responses (shown in blue chat bubbles) are **valid**.
14
+
15
+ A response is considered:
16
+
17
+ - `valid`: The interviewee's answers are logically consistent with each otherโ€” there are no contradictions.
18
+ - `invalid`: There is a clear contradiction or inconsistency between the intervieweeโ€™s responses.
19
+
20
+ > **Example**
21
+ > **Q:** What was your favorite subject during the school year?
22
+ > **A:** *I loved science and math.*
23
+ > โ€ฆ
24
+ > **Q:** In which subject did you excel the most?
25
+ > **A:** English. I always got low grades in science and maths because *I never enjoyed them.*
26
+ >
27
+ > **Label:** `invalid`
28
+ > **Reason:** The interviewee first said they loved science and math, but later claimed they never enjoyed them and received low gradesโ€”this is a contradiction (Refer to the italicised text.).
29
+
30
+ Please read each conversation carefullyโ€“ it's easy to overlook subtle contradictions!
31
+
32
+ โš ๏ธ **Important:** When evaluating consistency, rely only on the information provided within **a single conversation**.
33
+ You do **not** need to consider consistency across different conversationsโ€” even if they feature the same interviewee.
34
+ (Some samples come from different interviewers and are unrelated.)
35
+
36
+ You also do **not** need any external or real-world knowledgeโ€”basic reasoning (like simple arithmetic) is sufficient.
37
+
38
+ We sincerely appreciate your time.
39
+
40
+ ---
41
+
42
+ ๋ ˆ์ด๋ธ”๋ง์— ์ฐธ์—ฌํ•ด์ฃผ์…”์„œ ์ง„์‹ฌ์œผ๋กœ ๊ฐ์‚ฌํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค! ๐Ÿค—
43
+ ๋‘ ์‚ฌ๋žŒ์˜ ๋Œ€ํ™”๋ฅผ ์ฝ๊ณ , ์ธํ„ฐ๋ทฐ์ด(ํŒŒ๋ž‘์ƒ‰ ์ฑ„ํŒ… ๋ฉ”์‹œ์ง€)์˜ ์‘๋‹ต๋“ค์ด ๋ชจ์ˆœ ์—†์ด ์ผ๊ด€๋˜๋Š”์ง€๋ฅผ ๋ ˆ์ด๋ธ”๋ง ํ•ด์ฃผ์‹œ๋ฉด ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.
44
+
45
+ - `valid`: ์‘๋‹ต๋“ค ๊ฐ„์— ๋ชจ์ˆœ์ด ์—†๊ณ , ๋…ผ๋ฆฌ์ ์œผ๋กœ ํƒ€๋‹นํ•œ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ.
46
+ - `invalid`: ์ผ๋ถ€ ์‘๋‹ต๋“ค์— ํ™•์‹คํ•œ ๋ชจ์ˆœ์ ์ด ๋ฐœ๊ฒฌ๋˜์—ˆ์„ ๋•Œ.
47
+
48
+ > **์˜ˆ์‹œ)**
49
+ > **Q**: ํ•™์ฐฝ ์‹œ์ ˆ ์ข‹์•„ํ–ˆ๋˜ ๊ณผ๋ชฉ์ด ์žˆ๋‚˜์š”?
50
+ > **A**: ์ˆ˜ํ•™๊ณผ ๊ณผํ•™์„ ์ข‹์•„ํ–ˆ์–ด์š”.
51
+ > โ€ฆ
52
+ > **Q**: ๊ฐ€์žฅ ์ž˜ ํ–ˆ๋˜ ๊ณผ๋ชฉ์ด ๋ฌด์—‡์ธ๊ฐ€์š”?
53
+ > **A**: ์˜์–ด์š”. ์ˆ˜ํ•™์ด๋ž‘ ๊ณผํ•™์€ *์ œ๊ฐ€ ์‹ซ์–ดํ•˜๋Š” ๊ณผ๋ชฉ๋“ค์ด๋ผ* ์ ์ˆ˜๊ฐ€ ํ•ญ์ƒ ๋‚ฎ์•˜์–ด์š”.
54
+ >
55
+ > **Label**: `invalid`
56
+ > **Reason**: ์ฒ˜์Œ์—” ์ˆ˜ํ•™์ด๋ž‘ ๊ณผํ•™์„ ์ข‹์•„ํ–ˆ๋‹ค๊ณ  ํ–ˆ๋Š”๋ฐ, ์ดํ›„์— ์‹ซ์–ดํ•˜๋Š” ๊ณผ๋ชฉ๋“ค์ด๋ผ๊ณ  ๋งํ•จ.
57
+
58
+ ๋ˆˆ์น˜์ฑ„๊ธฐ ์–ด๋ ต๊ณ  ๋ฏธ๋ฌ˜ํ•œ ๋ชจ์ˆœ์ ์ด ์žˆ์„ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์œผ๋‹ˆ, ๊ผผ๊ผผํžˆ ์ฃผ์˜๊นŠ๊ฒŒ ์ฝ์–ด์ฃผ์‹œ๊ธธ ๋ถ€ํƒ๋“œ๋ฆฝ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.
59
+
60
+ โš ๏ธ **์ฃผ์˜์‚ฌํ•ญ**: ๋ ˆ์ด๋ธ”๋งํ•  ๋•Œ, ํ™”๋ฉด ์ƒ์— ๋ณด์—ฌ์ง€๋Š” ํ•˜๋‚˜์˜ ๋Œ€ํ™”์—๋งŒ ๊ทผ๊ฑฐํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ ˆ์ด๋ธ”์„ ๊ฒฐ์ •ํ•ด์ฃผ์‹œ๋ฉด ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค(์„œ๋กœ ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ์ƒ˜ํ”Œ๋“ค์€ ์ธํ„ฐ๋ทฐ์ด๊ฐ€ ๋‹ค๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค).
61
+ ์„ค๋ น ๊ฐ™์€ ์ธํ„ฐ๋ทฐ์ด์ฒ˜๋Ÿผ ๋А๊ปด์ง€๋Š” ๋Œ€ํ™”๋“ค์ด ์žˆ๋”๋ผ๋„, ํ˜„์žฌ ๋ ˆ์ด๋ธ”๋ง ์ค‘์ธ ํ•˜๋‚˜์˜ ๋Œ€ํ™”๋กœ๋งŒ ํŒ๋‹จํ•ด์ฃผ์„ธ์š”!
62
+
63
+ ๋˜ํ•œ, ์ผ๊ด€์„ฑ์„ ํŒ๋‹จํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•œ ์™ธ๋ถ€ ์ง€์‹(์‹ค์ œ ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•œ ์‚ฌ๊ฑด ๋“ฑ)์€ ์ „ํ˜€ ํ•„์š”ํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ธฐ์ดˆ์ ์ธ ์‚ฐ์ˆ  ์ •๋„๋ฉด ์ถฉ๋ถ„ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.
64
+
65
+ ์‹œ๊ฐ„ ๋‚ด์–ด ์ฐธ์—ฌํ•ด์ฃผ์…”์„œ ๋‹ค์‹œ ํ•œ ๋ฒˆ ๊ฐ์‚ฌ๋“œ๋ฆฝ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค :)