Spaces:
Running
Running
Update README.md
Browse files
README.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -3,8 +3,63 @@ title: README
|
|
| 3 |
emoji: ๐
|
| 4 |
colorFrom: purple
|
| 5 |
colorTo: indigo
|
| 6 |
-
|
| 7 |
pinned: false
|
| 8 |
---
|
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 3 |
emoji: ๐
|
| 4 |
colorFrom: purple
|
| 5 |
colorTo: indigo
|
| 6 |
+
โฆ: static
|
| 7 |
pinned: false
|
| 8 |
---
|
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
+
# Labeling Guidelines
|
| 11 |
+
|
| 12 |
+
Thank you for contributing to our project! ๐ค
|
| 13 |
+
Your task is to read a conversation between two people and assess whether the intervieweeโs responses (shown in blue chat bubbles) are **valid**.
|
| 14 |
+
|
| 15 |
+
A response is considered:
|
| 16 |
+
|
| 17 |
+
- `valid`: The interviewee's answers are logically consistent with each otherโ there are no contradictions.
|
| 18 |
+
- `invalid`: There is a clear contradiction or inconsistency between the intervieweeโs responses.
|
| 19 |
+
|
| 20 |
+
> **Example**
|
| 21 |
+
> **Q:** What was your favorite subject during the school year?
|
| 22 |
+
> **A:** *I loved science and math.*
|
| 23 |
+
> โฆ
|
| 24 |
+
> **Q:** In which subject did you excel the most?
|
| 25 |
+
> **A:** English. I always got low grades in science and maths because *I never enjoyed them.*
|
| 26 |
+
>
|
| 27 |
+
> **Label:** `invalid`
|
| 28 |
+
> **Reason:** The interviewee first said they loved science and math, but later claimed they never enjoyed them and received low gradesโthis is a contradiction (Refer to the italicised text.).
|
| 29 |
+
|
| 30 |
+
Please read each conversation carefullyโ it's easy to overlook subtle contradictions!
|
| 31 |
+
|
| 32 |
+
โ ๏ธ **Important:** When evaluating consistency, rely only on the information provided within **a single conversation**.
|
| 33 |
+
You do **not** need to consider consistency across different conversationsโ even if they feature the same interviewee.
|
| 34 |
+
(Some samples come from different interviewers and are unrelated.)
|
| 35 |
+
|
| 36 |
+
You also do **not** need any external or real-world knowledgeโbasic reasoning (like simple arithmetic) is sufficient.
|
| 37 |
+
|
| 38 |
+
We sincerely appreciate your time.
|
| 39 |
+
|
| 40 |
+
---
|
| 41 |
+
|
| 42 |
+
๋ ์ด๋ธ๋ง์ ์ฐธ์ฌํด์ฃผ์
์ ์ง์ฌ์ผ๋ก ๊ฐ์ฌํฉ๋๋ค! ๐ค
|
| 43 |
+
๋ ์ฌ๋์ ๋ํ๋ฅผ ์ฝ๊ณ , ์ธํฐ๋ทฐ์ด(ํ๋์ ์ฑํ
๋ฉ์์ง)์ ์๋ต๋ค์ด ๋ชจ์ ์์ด ์ผ๊ด๋๋์ง๋ฅผ ๋ ์ด๋ธ๋ง ํด์ฃผ์๋ฉด ๋ฉ๋๋ค.
|
| 44 |
+
|
| 45 |
+
- `valid`: ์๋ต๋ค ๊ฐ์ ๋ชจ์์ด ์๊ณ , ๋
ผ๋ฆฌ์ ์ผ๋ก ํ๋นํ ๊ฒฝ์ฐ.
|
| 46 |
+
- `invalid`: ์ผ๋ถ ์๋ต๋ค์ ํ์คํ ๋ชจ์์ ์ด ๋ฐ๊ฒฌ๋์์ ๋.
|
| 47 |
+
|
| 48 |
+
> **์์)**
|
| 49 |
+
> **Q**: ํ์ฐฝ ์์ ์ข์ํ๋ ๊ณผ๋ชฉ์ด ์๋์?
|
| 50 |
+
> **A**: ์ํ๊ณผ ๊ณผํ์ ์ข์ํ์ด์.
|
| 51 |
+
> โฆ
|
| 52 |
+
> **Q**: ๊ฐ์ฅ ์ ํ๋ ๊ณผ๋ชฉ์ด ๋ฌด์์ธ๊ฐ์?
|
| 53 |
+
> **A**: ์์ด์. ์ํ์ด๋ ๊ณผํ์ *์ ๊ฐ ์ซ์ดํ๋ ๊ณผ๋ชฉ๋ค์ด๋ผ* ์ ์๊ฐ ํญ์ ๋ฎ์์ด์.
|
| 54 |
+
>
|
| 55 |
+
> **Label**: `invalid`
|
| 56 |
+
> **Reason**: ์ฒ์์ ์ํ์ด๋ ๊ณผํ์ ์ข์ํ๋ค๊ณ ํ๋๋ฐ, ์ดํ์ ์ซ์ดํ๋ ๊ณผ๋ชฉ๋ค์ด๋ผ๊ณ ๋งํจ.
|
| 57 |
+
|
| 58 |
+
๋์น์ฑ๊ธฐ ์ด๋ ต๊ณ ๋ฏธ๋ฌํ ๋ชจ์์ ์ด ์์ ์ ์์ผ๋, ๊ผผ๊ผผํ ์ฃผ์๊น๊ฒ ์ฝ์ด์ฃผ์๊ธธ ๋ถํ๋๋ฆฝ๋๋ค.
|
| 59 |
+
|
| 60 |
+
โ ๏ธ **์ฃผ์์ฌํญ**: ๋ ์ด๋ธ๋งํ ๋, ํ๋ฉด ์์ ๋ณด์ฌ์ง๋ ํ๋์ ๋ํ์๋ง ๊ทผ๊ฑฐํ์ฌ ๋ ์ด๋ธ์ ๊ฒฐ์ ํด์ฃผ์๋ฉด ๋ฉ๋๋ค(์๋ก ๋ค๋ฅธ ์ํ๋ค์ ์ธํฐ๋ทฐ์ด๊ฐ ๋ค๋ฅผ ์ ์์ต๋๋ค).
|
| 61 |
+
์ค๋ น ๊ฐ์ ์ธํฐ๋ทฐ์ด์ฒ๋ผ ๋๊ปด์ง๋ ๋ํ๋ค์ด ์๋๋ผ๋, ํ์ฌ ๋ ์ด๋ธ๋ง ์ค์ธ ํ๋์ ๋ํ๋ก๋ง ํ๋จํด์ฃผ์ธ์!
|
| 62 |
+
|
| 63 |
+
๋ํ, ์ผ๊ด์ฑ์ ํ๋จํ๊ธฐ ์ํ ์ธ๋ถ ์ง์(์ค์ ๋ฐ์ํ ์ฌ๊ฑด ๋ฑ)์ ์ ํ ํ์ํ์ง ์์ต๋๋ค. ๊ธฐ์ด์ ์ธ ์ฐ์ ์ ๋๋ฉด ์ถฉ๋ถํฉ๋๋ค.
|
| 64 |
+
|
| 65 |
+
์๊ฐ ๋ด์ด ์ฐธ์ฌํด์ฃผ์
์ ๋ค์ ํ ๋ฒ ๊ฐ์ฌ๋๋ฆฝ๋๋ค :)
|