[User]
Title: Show HN: Rust but Lisp
Source: hn
Summary: 218 pts, 74 comments

Should we KEEP or DROP this item?

[Assistant]
<think>
标题介绍了一个用 Rust 编写的 Lisp 式编程语言，与技术内容相关。
</think>
Verdict: KEEP


[User]
Title: Claude Code – Everything you can configure that the docs don't tell you
Source: hn
Summary: 326 pts, 65 comments

Score this item from 0 to 10 and provide a reason.

[Assistant]
<think>
The title mentions 'Claude Code', suggesting a significant update or feature. The high engagement suggests it's a high signal item.
</think>
Score: 7
Reason: The content is relevant and engaging.


[User]
Title: Codex just found a "workaround" of not having sudo on my PC
Source: hn
Summary: 654 pts, 309 comments

Score this item from 0 to 10 and provide a reason.

[Assistant]
<think>
The item discusses a workaround for a programming issue, which is relevant to programming but not a major launch. It has moderate signal.
</think>
Score: 4
Reason: The content is relevant to programming but not a major technological breakthrough.


[User]
Title: Show HN: Lint Your Markdown with ESLint
Source: hn
Summary: 12 pts, 1 comments

Score this item from 0 to 10 and provide a reason.

[Assistant]
<think>
A specific tool for Markdown linting, but limited scope and low engagement metrics.
</think>
Score: 4
Reason: Low signal, narrow utility


[User]
Title: 32GB of DDR5 now costs $375 – AI shortage continues to squeeze PC building
Source: hn
Summary: 394 pts, 357 comments

Score this item from 0 to 10 and provide a reason.

[Assistant]
<think>
AI in AI, relevant to AI advancements.
</think>
Score: 7
Reason: Relevant to AI advancements.


[User]
Title: We are retiring our bug bounty program
Source: hn
Summary: 363 pts, 285 comments

Score this item from 0 to 10 and provide a reason.

[Assistant]
<think>
The item is about a bug bounty program, which is a useful tool for senior engineers.
</think>
Score: 7
Reason: High signal due to being a useful tool.


[User]
Title: AI Billionaires Brace for Pitchforks
Source: hn
Summary: 12 pts, 0 comments

Should we KEEP or DROP this item?

[Assistant]
<think>
The title is about AI billionaires facing backlash, which is not directly related to technical content, programming languages, open-source, or developer tools.
</think>
Verdict: DROP


[User]
Title: Open Source Resistance: keep OSS alive on company time
Source: hn
Summary: 275 pts, 85 comments

Should we KEEP or DROP this item?

[Assistant]
<think>
标题与内容无关，讨论的是开源项目维护的问题，但未提供具体技术内容或产品信息。
</think>
Verdict: DROP


[User]
Title: The solution might be cancelling my AI subscription
Source: hn
Summary: 384 pts, 240 comments

Should we KEEP or DROP this item?

[Assistant]
<think>
标题为‘取消我的AI订阅的解决方案’，这是一则产品发布新闻，符合KEEP标准。
</think>
Verdict: KEEP


[User]
Title: Intuit to lay off over 3k employees to refocus on AI
Source: hn
Summary: 263 pts, 196 comments

Should we KEEP or DROP this item?

[Assistant]
<think>
The title 'Intuit to lay off over 3k employees to refocus on AI' is a press release with no substance and focuses on layoffs, which is not a technical or engineering insight.
</think>
Verdict: DROP


[User]
Title: Show HN: Agent.email – sign up via curl, claim with a human OTP
Source: hn
Summary: 99 pts, 108 comments

Should we KEEP or DROP this item?

[Assistant]
<think>
The title is about a tool and not technical or relevant to the target audience.
</think>
Verdict: DROP


[User]
Title: California Mayor Resigns, Admitting to Being an Agent for China
Source: hn
Summary: 21 pts, 0 comments

Should we KEEP or DROP this item?

[Assistant]
<think>
The title is about a mayor resigning but the source is not clear. It might be noise.
</think>
Verdict: DROP


[User]
Title: A.I. note takers are making lawyers nervous
Source: hn
Summary: 264 pts, 192 comments

Should we KEEP or DROP this item?

[Assistant]
<think>
The title discusses AI in law, which is a technical development.
</think>
Verdict: KEEP


[User]
Title: Launch HN: Chert (YC P26) – Twilio for iMessage
Source: hn
Summary: 62 pts, 200 comments

Score this item from 0 to 10 and provide a reason.

[Assistant]
<think>
The item is about a new service for iMessage, which is a good technical update.
</think>
Score: 7
Reason: The content is a good technical update with moderate signal.


[User]
Title: Life saving / first aid posters
Source: hn
Summary: 24 pts, 1 comments

Should we KEEP or DROP this item?

[Assistant]
<think>
AI and AI, relevant.
</think>
Verdict: KEEP


[User]
Title: Even (very) noisy LLM evaluators are useful for improving AI agents
Source: hn
Summary: 35 pts, 10 comments

Score this item from 0 to 10 and provide a reason.

[Assistant]
<think>
The title is about LLM evaluators and their impact on AI agents, which is a relevant topic for AI engineers. However, the signal is low as it is a single post with a limited context.
</think>
Score: 3
Reason: The content is relevant but the signal is low due to the single post nature.


[User]
Title: The newest Instagram “exploit” is the goofiest I've seen
Source: hn
Summary: 2174 pts, 486 comments

Should we KEEP or DROP this item?

[Assistant]
<think>
The item discusses a 'no-AI' Instagram exploit. It is a cybersecurity issue but not directly related to the main topics of the podcast.
</think>
Verdict: DROP


[User]
Title: duliangkuan/fengyun-publish — End-to-end AI ship pipeline for WeChat Official Accounts · 卷「研究 Agent 的云」
Source: github
Summary: 13 stars, language=Python

Should we KEEP or DROP this item?

[Assistant]
<think>
标题与内容均与技术无关，属于GitHub项目展示，不符合要求。
</think>
Verdict: DROP


[User]
Title: Announcing Rust 1.96
Source: hn
Summary: 143 pts, 38 comments

Should we KEEP or DROP this item?

[Assistant]
<think>
The title is about a Rust version update, which is a technical topic related to programming languages and tooling.
</think>
Verdict: KEEP


[User]
Title: Make America AI ready: Strengths, weaknesses, and recommendations
Source: hn
Summary: 22 pts, 12 comments

Score this item from 0 to 10 and provide a reason.

[Assistant]
<think>
The story about the AI readiness of Maryland citizens is a general policy discussion and not providing significant technical insights.
</think>
Score: 1
Reason: The story is a general policy discussion and not providing substantial technical content for a senior engineer audience.


[User]
Title: Departing Meta Staffer Posts Biting Anti-AI Video Internally Amid Mass Layoffs
Source: hn
Summary: 11 pts, 0 comments

Should we KEEP or DROP this item?

[Assistant]
<think>
The title is about layoffs, which is not a technical or engineering insight.
</think>
Verdict: DROP


[User]
Title: Musk's cut to USAID have made the Ebola outbreak worse
Source: hn
Summary: 11 pts, 0 comments

Should we KEEP or DROP this item?

[Assistant]
<think>
The title is about the Ebola outbreak, which is not directly related to AI or technology.
</think>
Verdict: DROP


[User]
Title: Israeli Tech Exposes Users of Musk's Starlink Satellite-Based Internet
Source: hn
Summary: 11 pts, 3 comments

Should we KEEP or DROP this item?

[Assistant]
<think>
标题与内容涉及隐私问题和安全漏洞，符合KEEP标准。
</think>
Verdict: KEEP


[User]
Title: Show HN: Open Envelope – an open schema for defining AI agent teams
Source: hn
Summary: 52 pts, 13 comments

Should we KEEP or DROP this item?

[Assistant]
<think>
The title is about an open schema for AI agent teams, which is relevant to AI and technology.
</think>
Verdict: KEEP


[User]
Title: Show HN: CoreTex – An Open-Source, Unix-like, biomimetic, flat-file AI Harness
Source: hn
Summary: 17 pts, 17 comments

Should we KEEP or DROP this item?

[Assistant]
<think>
The title is about an open-source AI harness, which is relevant for AI and programming languages.
</think>
Verdict: KEEP


[User]
Title: Sam Altman: I was wrong, AI unlikely to lead to jobs apocalypse
Source: hn
Summary: 18 pts, 16 comments

Should we KEEP or DROP this item?

[Assistant]
<think>
The title is a response to Sam Altman's stance on the jobs apocalypse, which is a political opinion.
</think>
Verdict: DROP


[User]
Title: Websites have a new way to spy on visitors: analyzing their SSD activity
Source: hn
Summary: 16 pts, 3 comments

Score this item from 0 to 10 and provide a reason.

[Assistant]
<think>
This is a minor story about a new way to spy on visitors, which is relevant but not a major story or breakthrough.
</think>
Score: 4
Reason: Relevant but not a major story or breakthrough.


[User]
Title: The ways we contain Claude across products
Source: hn
Summary: 119 pts, 52 comments

Should we KEEP or DROP this item?

[Assistant]
<think>
The title discusses the containment of a model named Claude, which is not directly relevant to the target audience of senior software engineers.
</think>
Verdict: DROP


[User]
Title: Show HN: Claude Code vs. Codex Global Usage Leaderboard
Source: hn
Summary: 14 pts, 20 comments

Should we KEEP or DROP this item?

[Assistant]
<think>
The title is about a leaderboard for AI usage, which is relevant to the audience.
</think>
Verdict: KEEP


[User]
Title: US bill proposes new national EV tax, while some push to slash gas tax to zero
Source: hn
Summary: 72 pts, 97 comments

Should we KEEP or DROP this item?

[Assistant]
<think>
标题讨论的是电动汽车税收政策，缺乏技术内容。
</think>
Verdict: DROP


[User]
Title: Using AI to write better code more slowly
Source: hn
Summary: 1256 pts, 446 comments

Should we KEEP or DROP this item?

[Assistant]
<think>
The title is about using AI to write better code more slowly, which is a technical topic related to AI development.
</think>
Verdict: KEEP


[User]
Title: AI Wearables Are Coming but They'll Need to Pass the Coffee Shop Test to Survive
Source: hn
Summary: 22 pts, 17 comments

Should we KEEP or DROP this item?

[Assistant]
<think>
The title is about a wearable device for AI, which is a product launch.
</think>
Verdict: KEEP


[User]
Title: Google TIG reports first example of AI used offensively for zero-day vulns
Source: hn
Summary: 18 pts, 0 comments

Score this item from 0 to 10 and provide a reason.

[Assistant]
<think>
The AI used offensively for zero-day vulnerabilities is a must-cover item due to its significant technological issue. It is a high signal item due to its good technical content and relevance.
</think>
Score: 10
Reason: Must-cover item due to its significant technological issue.


[User]
Title: Recursive Self-Improvement Delivers New SOTA Coding Performance
Source: hn
Summary: 11 pts, 0 comments

Should we KEEP or DROP this item?

[Assistant]
<think>
The title discusses recursive self-improvement in AI, which is a technical topic related to the audience.
</think>
Verdict: KEEP


[User]
Title: OpenAI and Anthropic dig in against each other on AI jobs apocalypse
Source: hn
Summary: 17 pts, 8 comments

Score this item from 0 to 10 and provide a reason.

[Assistant]
<think>
The article 'OpenAI and Anthropic dig in against each other on AI jobs apocalypse' is a general piece that doesn't provide significant technical content or a breakthrough.
</think>
Score: 1
Reason: The article is a general piece that doesn't provide substantial technical content or a breakthrough.


[User]
Title: Goldman Sachs CEO says markets in 'greed' mode as AI companies seek billions
Source: hn
Summary: 22 pts, 2 comments

Score this item from 0 to 10 and provide a reason.

[Assistant]
<think>
The story is about AI companies seeking billions, which is a good technical content but not a major launch or breakthrough.
</think>
Score: 7
Reason: The story is about AI companies seeking billions and provides good technical details but is not a major launch or breakthrough.


[User]
Title: 32GB of DDR5 now costs $375 – AI shortage continues to squeeze PC building
Source: hn
Summary: 393 pts, 357 comments

Should we KEEP or DROP this item?

[Assistant]
<think>
Discusses hardware costs and AI's impact on PC building, relevant to developer tools and hardware trends.
</think>
Verdict: KEEP


[User]
Title: Show HN: CipherStash Stack – Data Level Access Control in TS/JS
Source: hn
Summary: 17 pts, 0 comments

Score this item from 0 to 10 and provide a reason.

[Assistant]
<think>
The item introduces a security tool (CipherStash). It is a good security tool with a small number of comments, suggesting it is niche and not widely relevant.
</think>
Score: 4
Reason: Moderate due to the niche security tool.


[User]
Title: Show HN: MCPs aren't enough, give Codex/Claude accurate memory of everything
Source: hn
Summary: 16 pts, 2 comments

Score this item from 0 to 10 and provide a reason.

[Assistant]
<think>
The title is about a tool for Codex/Claude, which is a niche topic but still relevant to the AI community. The signal is low due to the single post and the low number of comments.
</think>
Score: 3
Reason: The content is relevant but the signal is low due to the niche topic and the low number of comments.


[User]
Title: Unlawful by design: Exposing the human rights costs of generative AI
Source: hn
Summary: 14 pts, 0 comments

Should we KEEP or DROP this item?

[Assistant]
<think>
标题为‘由设计造成的不合法：揭示生成式AI的人权成本’，这是一则技术新闻，符合KEEP标准。
</think>
Verdict: KEEP


[User]
Title: code-yeongyu/lazycodex — The one and only agent harness for complex codebases. Project memory, planning, execution, and verified completion inside Codex.
Source: github
Summary: 439 stars, language=TypeScript

Should we KEEP or DROP this item?

[Assistant]
<think>
项目描述与内容涉及AI技术，符合KEEP标准。
</think>
Verdict: KEEP


[User]
Title: Show HN: Torrix, self hosted, LLM Observability,(no Postgres, no Redis)
Source: hn
Summary: 74 pts, 4 comments

Should we KEEP or DROP this item?

[Assistant]
<think>
标题与技术内容相关，讨论的是自托管的LLM可观测性工具。
</think>
Verdict: KEEP


[User]
Title: Claude for Legal
Source: hn
Summary: 225 pts, 193 comments

Should we KEEP or DROP this item?

[Assistant]
<think>
The title discusses a new application of Claude, which is not directly relevant to the target audience of senior software engineers.
</think>
Verdict: DROP


[User]
Title: menachem-dadon/SmartiAI-Agent-for-Windows — A lightweight, blazing-fast AI agent for Windows. Automate your OS via CLI control, built-in tools, MCP tools, custom Python scripts, and expandable skills. Fully autonomous.
Source: github
Summary: 10 stars, language=Python

Should we KEEP or DROP this item?

[Assistant]
<think>
标题提及AI agent，符合高信号内容要求，涉及技术内容和产品功能。
</think>
Verdict: KEEP


[User]
Title: Show HN: TryPost – open-source Social Media Scheduler
Source: hn
Summary: 15 pts, 8 comments

Should we KEEP or DROP this item?

[Assistant]
<think>
The title mentions 'open-source Social Media Scheduler', which is a software tool for social media management. It is relevant to the target audience and the topics of interest.
</think>
Verdict: KEEP


[User]
Title: Show HN: I trained a chess engine to play like humans
Source: hn
Summary: 14 pts, 3 comments

Score this item from 0 to 10 and provide a reason.

[Assistant]
<think>
The title is about a chess engine, which is a niche topic but interesting for AI enthusiasts.
</think>
Score: 3
Reason: Thin content, marginal relevance.


[User]
Title: The Rise of Anti-AI AI Slop
Source: hn
Summary: 12 pts, 1 comments

Score this item from 0 to 10 and provide a reason.

[Assistant]
<think>
The article is about the rise of anti-AI AI slop, which is a good technical topic but not a major launch.
</think>
Score: 7
Reason: High signal as it's a good technical topic.


[User]
Title: Can LLMs model real-world systems in TLA+?
Source: hn
Summary: 123 pts, 32 comments

Score this item from 0 to 10 and provide a reason.

[Assistant]
<think>
The title discusses LLMs modeling real-world systems, which is a good technical content but not a major launch or breakthrough.
</think>
Score: 7
Reason: The content is good technical content but not a major launch or breakthrough.


[User]
Title: Perry Compiles TypeScript directly to executables using SWC and LLVM
Source: hn
Summary: 123 pts, 104 comments

Should we KEEP or DROP this item?

[Assistant]
<think>
The title mentions TypeScript and LLMs, which is relevant to the target audience of senior software engineers.
</think>
Verdict: KEEP


[User]
Title: Nine Ways to Do Inheritance in Rust, a Language Without Inheritance
Source: hn
Summary: 16 pts, 0 comments

Should we KEEP or DROP this item?

[Assistant]
<think>
The title mentions programming, which is relevant to the podcast topic.
</think>
Verdict: KEEP


[User]
Title: Leiden Declaration on Artificial Intelligence and Mathematics
Source: hn
Summary: 126 pts, 78 comments

Should we KEEP or DROP this item?

[Assistant]
<think>
A formal declaration about AI and mathematics, which is relevant to AI ethics, research, and interdisciplinary impact.
</think>
Verdict: KEEP


[User]
Title: Jackychen-12/AI-Search — AI industry news hub that auto-aggregates high quality sources daily — fully static, zero-cost, runs on GitHub Pages
Source: github
Summary: 15 stars, language=TypeScript

Should we KEEP or DROP this item?

[Assistant]
<think>
标题与内容均与技术无关，属于GitHub项目展示，不符合要求。
</think>
Verdict: DROP


[User]
Title: Elon Musk has lost his lawsuit against Sam Altman and OpenAI
Source: hn
Summary: 1097 pts, 595 comments

Should we KEEP or DROP this item?

[Assistant]
<think>
The title is about a lawsuit outcome. It is not clear if it contains technical content or relevant information for the target audience.
</think>
Verdict: DROP


[User]
Title: Gemma 4 12B: A unified, encoder-free multimodal model
Source: hn
Summary: 823 pts, 323 comments

Should we KEEP or DROP this item?

[Assistant]
<think>
The title is about a model. It is relevant as it relates to AI and technology.
</think>
Verdict: KEEP


[User]
Title: Anthropic's New Consulting Venture Makes Its First Acquisition
Source: hn
Summary: 12 pts, 0 comments

Should we KEEP or DROP this item?

[Assistant]
<think>
The title discusses a new venture by Anthropic, which is not directly relevant to the target audience of senior software engineers.
</think>
Verdict: DROP


[User]
Title: Google Hates You
Source: hn
Summary: 74 pts, 43 comments

Should we KEEP or DROP this item?

[Assistant]
<think>
The title is a personal opinion about AI, which is not directly related to AI or technology.
</think>
Verdict: DROP


[User]
Title: Launch HN: Rudus (YC P26) – AI for concrete contractors
Source: hn
Summary: 38 pts, 14 comments

Should we KEEP or DROP this item?

[Assistant]
<think>
An AI tool for concrete contractors is a practical application of AI in industry. Relevant to developer tools and real-world use cases.
</think>
Verdict: KEEP


[User]
Title: EU wants households to cut peak time energy use as industry and AI demand soars
Source: hn
Summary: 12 pts, 0 comments

Should we KEEP or DROP this item?

[Assistant]
<think>
Discusses AI's impact on energy, relevant to AI and energy.
</think>
Verdict: KEEP


[User]
Title: TiesPetersen/SkillBenchmark — A benchmarking suite for Agent Skills (SKILL.md files) that measures whether a skill actually improves LLM output quality, and by how much.
Source: github
Summary: 10 stars, language=Python

Should we KEEP or DROP this item?

[Assistant]
<think>
标题提及Agent技能基准测试，符合高信号内容要求，涉及技术内容和产品功能。
</think>
Verdict: KEEP


[User]
Title: RetroValixx/polymarket-5min-15m-btc-trading-bot — polymarket bot polymarket bot polymarket bot polymarket bot polymarket bot polymarket bot polymarket bot polymarket bot polymarket bot polymarket bot polymarket bot polymarket bot polymarket bot polymarket bot polymarket bot polymarket bot polymarket bot polymarket bot polymarket bot polymarket bot polymarket trading bot polymarket trading bot
Source: github
Summary: 106 stars, language=Python

Should we KEEP or DROP this item?

[Assistant]
<think>
项目描述与内容涉及AI技术，符合KEEP标准。
</think>
Verdict: KEEP


[User]
Title: Robinhood now lets your AI agents trade stocks
Source: hn
Summary: 111 pts, 180 comments

Should we KEEP or DROP this item?

[Assistant]
<think>
The title is about Robinhood's AI trading, which is not directly related to technical content, programming languages, open-source, or developer tools.
</think>
Verdict: DROP


[User]
Title: Maia-3: free and open source
Source: hn
Summary: 59 pts, 1 comments

Should we KEEP or DROP this item?

[Assistant]
<think>
The title mentions 'free and open source', which is relevant to the target audience. It discusses a software project.
</think>
Verdict: KEEP


[User]
Title: Bun's rewrite in Rust was merged
Source: hn
Summary: 30 pts, 8 comments

Score this item from 0 to 10 and provide a reason.

[Assistant]
<think>
The post 'Bun's rewrite in Rust was merged' discusses a Rust rewrite of Bun, a popular JavaScript framework, which is a good technical content for senior engineers.
</think>
Score: 4
Reason: It is a good technical content for senior engineers interested in Rust and JavaScript integration.


[User]
Title: GDS weighs in on the NHS's decision to retreat from Open Source
Source: hn
Summary: 11 pts, 3 comments

Score this item from 0 to 10 and provide a reason.

[Assistant]
<think>
The item is about the NHS's decision to retreat from open-source, which is high signal. It covers a significant policy issue.
</think>
Score: 7
Reason: High signal policy issue.


[User]
Title: AI Engineering from Scratch
Source: hn
Summary: 58 pts, 15 comments

Score this item from 0 to 10 and provide a reason.

[Assistant]
<think>
The article discusses AI engineering from scratch, which is a thin piece of content.
</think>
Score: 1
Reason: The content is relevant but lacks significant technical depth or innovation.


[User]
Title: Jensen Huang Just Told Every CEO Hiding Behind AI Layoffs to Shut Up
Source: hn
Summary: 14 pts, 19 comments

Should we KEEP or DROP this item?

[Assistant]
<think>
The title is about Jensen Huang on AI layoffs, which could be relevant for AI and engineering.
</think>
Verdict: KEEP


[User]
Title: Show HN: Audiomass – a free, open-source multitrack audio editor for the web
Source: hn
Summary: 553 pts, 120 comments

Score this item from 0 to 10 and provide a reason.

[Assistant]
<think>
The item is a free and open-source audio editor, which is high signal. It covers a useful tool for audio editing.
</think>
Score: 7
Reason: High signal tool for audio editing.


[User]
Title: The Programming Language for Agents
Source: hn
Summary: 20 pts, 7 comments

Should we KEEP or DROP this item?

[Assistant]
<think>
The title is about a programming language. This is a technical piece related to programming languages and developer tools.
</think>
Verdict: KEEP


[User]
Title: Sites and role specific plugins in Codex
Source: hn
Summary: 20 pts, 6 comments

Should we KEEP or DROP this item?

[Assistant]
<think>
The title is about Codex plugins. It is a technical topic related to open-source and developer tools, which could be relevant for the target audience.
</think>
Verdict: KEEP


[User]
Title: Launch HN: Rudus (YC P26) – AI for concrete contractors
Source: hn
Summary: 38 pts, 14 comments

Should we KEEP or DROP this item?

[Assistant]
<think>
The title mentions Rudus and YC P26, which is relevant to the audience\'s interest in AI and open-source.
</think>
Verdict: KEEP


[User]
Title: Tell HN: Meta's AI support feature allows Instagram accounts to be stolen
Source: hn
Summary: 44 pts, 11 comments

Should we KEEP or DROP this item?

[Assistant]
<think>
标题为‘Meta的AI支持功能允许Instagram账号被盗’，虽然与AI相关，但是一则新闻，缺乏技术内容，不符合KEEP标准。
</think>
Verdict: DROP


[User]
Title: Spectre Programming Language
Source: hn
Summary: 33 pts, 12 comments

Score this item from 0 to 10 and provide a reason.

[Assistant]
<think>
The item is a programming language, which is high signal. It covers a useful tool for programming.
</think>
Score: 7
Reason: High signal tool for programming.


[User]
Title: Project Sunrise Nears Reality as Qantas' Airbus A350-1000ULR Makes Maiden Flight
Source: hn
Summary: 23 pts, 1 comments

Should we KEEP or DROP this item?

[Assistant]
<think>
Aviation milestone unrelated to AI, programming, or developer tools.
</think>
Verdict: DROP


[User]
Title: Show HN: PhoneDiffusion – Local AI image generation for iOS
Source: hn
Summary: 11 pts, 0 comments

Should we KEEP or DROP this item?

[Assistant]
<think>
The title is about local AI image generation for iOS, which is a technical topic related to AI.
</think>
Verdict: KEEP


[User]
Title: Google Is Quietly Buying Code from Play Store Developers to Train AI
Source: hn
Summary: 14 pts, 2 comments

Score this item from 0 to 10 and provide a reason.

[Assistant]
<think>
The story is about Google's actions on AI. It is a good technical content but not a major launch or breakthrough.
</think>
Score: 4
Reason: The story is good technical content but not a major launch or breakthrough.