Mimir / LightEval_Mimir.py
jdesiree's picture
Upload LightEval_Mimir.py
04db454 verified
# LightEval_Mimir.py
'''This document outlines hte LightEval setu for tracking performance metrics of Mimir, to be sent to the trackio page for viszulization.'''
# Imports
from lighteval.metrics.metrics_sample import BertScore, ROUGE
from lighteval.tasks.requests import Doc
async def evaluate_educational_quality(user_query, response, thread_id):
"""Dynamic evaluation using LightEval metrics"""
# Create ephemeral task for this turn
doc = Doc(
task_name=f"turn_{thread_id}",
query=user_query,
choices=[response],
gold_index=-1, # No ground truth initially
specific_output=response
)
# Use BertScore for semantic quality
bert_score = BertScore().compute(doc)
# Custom educational coherence metric
educational_indicators = {
'has_examples': 'example' in response.lower(),
'structured_explanation': '##' in response or '1.' in response,
'appropriate_length': 100 < len(response) < 1500,
'encourages_learning': any(phrase in response.lower()
for phrase in ['practice', 'try', 'consider', 'think about'])
}
return {
'semantic_quality': bert_score,
'educational_score': sum(educational_indicators.values()) / len(educational_indicators),
'response_time': time.time() - start_time
}
def track_rag_performance(query, retrieved_docs, used_in_response):
"""Evaluate RAG retrieval quality"""
from lighteval.metrics.utils.metric_utils import SampleLevelMetric
# Track retrieval-to-response alignment
retrieval_relevance = calculate_relevance(query, retrieved_docs)
retrieval_usage = len(used_in_response) / len(retrieved_docs) if retrieved_docs else 0
# Log to trackio with LightEval structure
metric_payload = {
"evaluation_id": str(uuid.uuid4()),
"task": "rag_retrieval",
"metrics": {
"retrieval_relevance": retrieval_relevance,
"retrieval_usage_rate": retrieval_usage,
"num_docs_retrieved": len(retrieved_docs)
},
"metadata": {
"query": query[:100],
"sources": [doc.metadata.get('source') for doc in retrieved_docs]
}
}
send_evaluation_to_trackio(metric_payload)
def evaluate_prompt_classification(predicted_mode, actual_conversation_outcome, thread_id):
"""Track prompt classifier accuracy in production"""
# Did the predicted mode lead to successful interaction?
success_indicators = {
'discovery_mode': lambda outcome: 'clarified_topic' in outcome,
'teaching_mode': lambda outcome: outcome.get('quality_score', 0) > 3.5,
'conversational': lambda outcome: outcome.get('user_satisfied', False)
}
mode_was_correct = success_indicators.get(
predicted_mode,
lambda x: True
)(actual_conversation_outcome)
# Create LightEval-style evaluation
from lighteval.metrics import Metrics
accuracy_metric = Metrics.ACCURACY if mode_was_correct else 0
return {
"prompt_classifier_accuracy": accuracy_metric,
"predicted_mode": predicted_mode,
"conversation_length": len(conversation_state)
}
def process_user_feedback(response_id, feedback_type, conversation_state):
"""Convert user feedback to LightEval ground truth"""
last_exchange = {
"query": conversation_state[-2]["content"], # User's question
"response": conversation_state[-1]["content"], # Agent's response
"gold_index": 0 if feedback_type == "thumbs_up" else -1
}
# Create retrospective evaluation with ground truth
from lighteval.tasks.requests import Doc
doc = Doc(
task_name="user_feedback_eval",
query=last_exchange["query"],
choices=[last_exchange["response"]],
gold_index=last_exchange["gold_index"]
)
# Now you have ground truth for accuracy metrics!
accuracy = 1.0 if feedback_type == "thumbs_up" else 0.0
return {"user_feedback_accuracy": accuracy, "response_id": response_id}