Please create an infographic suitable for print with these requirements. Print suitable means it will be included in a print publication and legible and correctly spelled text is vital. Please create an infographic suitable for print with these requirements. Print suitable means it will be included in a print publication and legible and correctly spelled text is vital. [SUGGESTED VISUAL: Trailer Selection Guide] To complement the table below, create a visual guide showing silhouettes of the main trailer types (Dry Van, Reefer, Flatbed, Step Deck). For each silhouette, include icons and brief text callouts highlighting its key features (e.g., for Reefer: "Temp Control," "Insulated Walls"; for Flatbed: "Open Deck," "Side Loading Access"). - Follow Up Deployment

Please create an infographic suitable for print with these requirements. Print suitable means it will be included in a print publication and legible and correctly spelled text is vital. Please cite sources. [SUGGESTED VISUAL: Truckload Market Size] [Visual: Infographic showing the massive scale of the truckload market with key statistics and economic impact] - Follow Up Deployment

Please create an infographic suitable for print with these requirements. Print suitable means it will be included in a print publication and legible and correctly spelled text is vital. Freight Class (NMFC) [SUGGESTED VISUAL: Freight Class Decision Guide] Create a flowchart or a visual guide that helps readers estimate their freight class. Start with the primary factor: Density (lbs per cubic foot). Create branches for different density ranges (e.g., <1 lb/cu ft, 1-5 lbs/cu ft, 5-10 lbs/cu ft, >15 lbs/cu ft). Within each branch, show how other factors like Stowability, Handling, and Liability can adjust the final class up or down. Use icons and simple language. The National Motor Freight Classification (NMFC) system categorizes freight into 18 classes (50, 55, 60, 65, 70, 77.5, 85, 92.5, 100, 110, 125, 150, 175, 200, 250, 300, 400, and 500) based on four characteristics: • Density: Weight per cubic foot • Stowability: How easily the freight fits in a standard trailer • Handling difficulty: Whether special equipment or care is required • Liability: Value, fragility, and damage potential Lower class numbers represent denser, easier-to-handle freight and typically receive lower rates. Higher class numbers (e.g., Class 400 or 500) represent low-density, difficult items that command premium rates. Freight Class ExamplesDescriptionExamples Class 50 (Very Dense)Clean freight on pallets, very denseSteel parts, brick, cement Class 85-92.5 (Medium Density)Average density, standard handlingCrated machinery, appliances Class 125-150 (Lower Density)Less dense, more careful handlingFurniture, electronics Class 300-400 (Very Low Density)Extremely light or fragilePing pong balls, light fixtures - Follow Up Deployment

Please create an infographic suitable for print with these requirements. Print suitable means it will be included in a print publication and legible and correctly spelled text is vital. Freight Class (NMFC) [SUGGESTED VISUAL: Freight Class Decision Guide] Create a flowchart or a visual guide that helps readers estimate their freight class. Start with the primary factor: Density (lbs per cubic foot). Create branches for different density ranges (e.g., <1 lb/cu ft, 1-5 lbs/cu ft, 5-10 lbs/cu ft, >15 lbs/cu ft). Within each branch, show how other factors like Stowability, Handling, and Liability can adjust the final class up or down. Use icons and simple language. The National Motor Freight Classification (NMFC) system categorizes freight into 18 classes (50, 55, 60, 65, 70, 77.5, 85, 92.5, 100, 110, 125, 150, 175, 200, 250, 300, 400, and 500) based on four characteristics: • Density: Weight per cubic foot • Stowability: How easily the freight fits in a standard trailer • Handling difficulty: Whether special equipment or care is required • Liability: Value, fragility, and damage potential Lower class numbers represent denser, easier-to-handle freight and typically receive lower rates. Higher class numbers (e.g., Class 400 or 500) represent low-density, difficult items that command premium rates. Freight Class ExamplesDescriptionExamples Class 50 (Very Dense)Clean freight on pallets, very denseSteel parts, brick, cement Class 85-92.5 (Medium Density)Average density, standard handlingCrated machinery, appliances Class 125-150 (Lower Density)Less dense, more careful handlingFurniture, electronics Class 300-400 (Very Low Density)Extremely light or fragilePing pong balls, light fixtures - Follow Up Deployment

Please create an infographic suitable for print with these requirements. Print suitable means it will be included in a print publication and legible and correctly spelled text is vital. [SUGGESTED VISUAL: Dim Weight Example] [Visual: Side-by-side comparison of two packages with same actual weight but different dimensions, showing cost difference] A package measures 20" × 15" × 10" and weighs 5 pounds. Its dimensional weight would be: (20 × 15 × 10) ÷ 139 = 3,000 ÷ 139 = 21.58, rounded to 22 pounds Since the dimensional weight (22 pounds) exceeds the actual weight (5 pounds), the package would be charged at the 22-pound rate. This same package could be shipped much more economically if repackaged to dimensions of 12" × 10" × 6", which would yield a dimensional weight of: (12 × 10 × 6) ÷ 139 = 720 ÷ 139 = 5.18, rounded to 6 pounds The difference in shipping cost between a 22-pound and 6-pound package could be $10-15 or more, highlighting the importance of efficient packaging. - Follow Up Deployment

Please create an infographic suitable for print with these requirements. Print suitable means it will be included in a print publication and legible and correctly spelled text is vital. [SUGGESTED VISUAL: Service Level Ladder] [Visual: show parcel service levels from ground to overnight, with typical transit times and relative costs] Parcel carriers typically offer several service tiers: • Next-day/overnight: Guaranteed delivery by the following business day, often with morning options • Two-day: Guaranteed delivery within two business days • Ground/standard: Economical option with delivery times based on distance (typically 1-5 business days) • International: Cross-border shipping with customs clearance assistance • Specialized services: Time-definite, weekend delivery, signature required, etc. Pricing typically correlates directly with speed and service guarantees. - Follow Up Deployment

can you update the infographic with this data and cite ShipMatrix as the source? Here’s the updated U.S. parcel delivery market share by volume for 2024, covering the top six players: Rank Carrier 2024 Volume (Billion Parcels) Approx. % of Total (≈23.8 B) 1 USPS 7.2 30% marketwatch.com +14 shipmatrix.com +14 dcvelocity.com +14 2 Amazon Logistics 6.1 25.6% 3 UPS 4.8 20% 4 FedEx 3.4 14% 5 Other Carriers (e.g., Walmart, OnTrac, Veho) 2.3 10% 6 DHL (U.S. operations) ~0.1 <1% (major global presence, small U.S. volume)** Total U.S. parcel volume reached ~23.8 billion in 2024 . 🔍 Key Insights USPS maintains the largest share—around 30%—thanks to its universal service network. Amazon Logistics has surged to ~25.6%, reinforcing its status as the second-largest U.S. parcel carrier en.wikipedia.org +13 shipmatrix.com +13 supplychaindive.com +13 . UPS (~20%) and FedEx (~14%) remain strong but continue to face pressure from Amazon and regional carriers . Other Carriers collectively capture 10% — a mix of private retailer fleets and regional providers like Walmart, Target, OnTrac, Veho, and Better Trucks pitneybowes.com +10 supplychaindive.com +10 shipmatrix.com +10 . DHL’s U.S. market share is minimal (<1%), though globally it's much larger. Its U.S. parcel-centric operations rank outside the top 5 by volume. - Follow Up Deployment

Please create an infographic suitable for print with these requirements. Print suitable means it will be included in a print publication and legible and correctly spelled text is vital. [SUGGESTED VISUAL: Global Parcel Market Share] [Visual: Pie chart showing market share of major parcel providers with key statistics for each] The global parcel market is dominated by several major players: • UPS: The world's largest package delivery company, delivering 25+ million packages daily • FedEx: Known for innovation in overnight delivery and global reach • USPS/National Postal Services: Government-affiliated operators with universal service obligations • DHL: Particularly strong in international shipping and emerging markets • Regional carriers: Specialized in specific geographic markets (LaserShip, OnTrac, etc.) • Amazon Logistics: Rapidly growing in-house delivery operation - Follow Up Deployment

can we make this adjustment in the html code? To ensure the .stats-bubble never overlays any foreground text in each .pyramid-section, you need to structure the HTML and CSS so that the bubble: Does not sit above text (in terms of layering or position). Respects the padding/margin/layout of the text content. Here’s how you can fix this cleanly: ✅ Recommended Fix: Place .stats-bubble outside of the text container but inside .pyramid-section, and align with Flexbox Update your .pyramid-section structure like this: html Copy Edit <div class="pyramid-section ... flex justify-between items-center px-6"> <div class="text-center px-4 py-6 flex-1"> <h3 class="text-lg md:text-xl font-bold">Title Here</h3> <p class="text-sm md:text-base opacity-90 mt-1">Subtitle here</p> </div> <div class="stats-bubble">Label</div> </div> Then update your CSS for .stats-bubble to be non-absolute, so it sits naturally at the right side: css Copy Edit .stats-bubble { background-color: white; color: #1e293b; border-radius: 9999px; padding: 0.5rem 1rem; font-size: 0.8rem; box-shadow: 0 4px 6px rgba(0,0,0,0.1); margin-left: 1rem; white-space: nowrap; } - Follow Up Deployment

Please create an infographic suitable for print with these requirements. Print suitable means it will be included in a print publication and legible and correctly spelled text is vital. The ultimate output should be in png format: [SUGGESTED VISUAL: Intermodal Challenge Points] [Visual: Diagram showing potential failure points in intermodal chains with mitigation strategies for each] Despite its advantages, intermodal transportation presents several challenges: • Transfer points: Each modal transfer creates potential for delay, damage, or disruption • Coordination complexity: Multiple carriers must be synchronized • Equipment compatibility: Container sizes, lift capabilities, and infrastructure must align • Documentation requirements: Each mode may have different paperwork • Responsibility gaps: When problems occur, determining which carrier is responsible can be difficult Effective intermodal transportation requires specialized expertise and often benefits from using third-party logistics providers who can coordinate across modes. - Follow Up Deployment

please create a print suitable infographic with these requirements: [SUGGESTED VISUAL: Intermodal Combinations Network] [Visual: Network diagram showing how different modes connect, with typical handoff points and cargo types for each combination] Several intermodal combinations have become standard in global logistics: • Truck-Rail: Containers or trailers move by truck for local pickup/delivery and by rail for long-haul • Truck-Air: Road transportation feeds into and from airports for global movements • Truck-Ocean: Local trucking connects to seaports for international shipping • Rail-Ocean: Rail connections to seaports enable efficient inland movement of containers • Barge-Ocean: River barges feed containers to coastal ports for deep-sea shipping The most sophisticated supply chains use multiple intermodal combinations, optimizing different segments of the journey separately. - Follow Up Deployment

please create a print suitable infographic with these requirements: [SUGGESTED VISUAL: Intermodal Combinations Network] [Visual: Network diagram showing how different modes connect, with typical handoff points and cargo types for each combination] Several intermodal combinations have become standard in global logistics: • Truck-Rail: Containers or trailers move by truck for local pickup/delivery and by rail for long-haul • Truck-Air: Road transportation feeds into and from airports for global movements • Truck-Ocean: Local trucking connects to seaports for international shipping • Rail-Ocean: Rail connections to seaports enable efficient inland movement of containers • Barge-Ocean: River barges feed containers to coastal ports for deep-sea shipping The most sophisticated supply chains use multiple intermodal combinations, optimizing different segments of the journey separately. - Follow Up Deployment

please create the following print suitable infographic: [SUGGESTED VISUAL: Pharmaceutical Decision Comparison] [Visual: Side-by-side comparison of air vs. ocean options for pharmaceutical shipment with all cost factors illustrated] A pharmaceutical company needs to transport temperature-sensitive medication from Brussels to Chicago: • Requirements: Temperature control between 2-8°C, delivery within one week, high reliability • Product characteristics: High value ($250,000 per pallet), 24-month shelf life, critical medication with no substitutes • Mode analysis: o Air freight: 2-day transit, temperature-controlled service available, 98% on-time reliability, $12,000 cost o Ocean with reefer container: 12-day transit, temperature control available, 85% on-time reliability, $5,500 cost • Total landed cost calculation: o Air: $12,000 transportation + $342 inventory cost (2 days) + $1,250 insurance = $13,592 o Ocean: $5,500 transportation + $2,055 inventory cost (12 days) + $3,125 risk premium due to reliability issues = $10,680 While ocean appears cheaper by about $2,900, the company ultimately chooses air freight because the reliability factor is critical for this life-saving medication, and the risk of temperature excursions during longer ocean transit represents an unacceptable risk. - Follow Up Deployment

please create the following print suitable infographic: [SUGGESTED VISUAL: Pharmaceutical Decision Comparison] [Visual: Side-by-side comparison of air vs. ocean options for pharmaceutical shipment with all cost factors illustrated] A pharmaceutical company needs to transport temperature-sensitive medication from Brussels to Chicago: • Requirements: Temperature control between 2-8°C, delivery within one week, high reliability • Product characteristics: High value ($250,000 per pallet), 24-month shelf life, critical medication with no substitutes • Mode analysis: o Air freight: 2-day transit, temperature-controlled service available, 98% on-time reliability, $12,000 cost o Ocean with reefer container: 12-day transit, temperature control available, 85% on-time reliability, $5,500 cost • Total landed cost calculation: o Air: $12,000 transportation + $342 inventory cost (2 days) + $1,250 insurance = $13,592 o Ocean: $5,500 transportation + $2,055 inventory cost (12 days) + $3,125 risk premium due to reliability issues = $10,680 While ocean appears cheaper by about $2,900, the company ultimately chooses air freight because the reliability factor is critical for this life-saving medication, and the risk of temperature excursions during longer ocean transit represents an unacceptable risk. - Follow Up Deployment

Please create an infographic suitable for print with these requirements:: [SUGGESTED VISUAL: Total Landed Cost Worksheet] Create a visual worksheet or checklist graphic that outlines the components of Total Landed Cost. Use categories with icons: 1. Transportation Charges (truck icon), 2. Inventory Costs (boxes icon), 3. Risk-related Costs (shield icon), and 4. Administrative Costs (document icon). For viable options, calculate the comprehensive cost impact, including: • Direct transportation charges: Base rates plus accessorials • Inventory carrying costs: Cost of capital for goods in transit • Risk-related costs: Insurance, potential damages, potential stockouts • Administrative costs: Documentation, communication, tracking • Infrastructure costs: Specialized equipment or facilities needed - Follow Up Deployment

Please create an infographic suitable for print with these requirements:: [SUGGESTED VISUAL: Total Landed Cost Worksheet] Create a visual worksheet or checklist graphic that outlines the components of Total Landed Cost. Use categories with icons: 1. Transportation Charges (truck icon), 2. Inventory Costs (boxes icon), 3. Risk-related Costs (shield icon), and 4. Administrative Costs (document icon). For viable options, calculate the comprehensive cost impact, including: • Direct transportation charges: Base rates plus accessorials • Inventory carrying costs: Cost of capital for goods in transit • Risk-related costs: Insurance, potential damages, potential stockouts • Administrative costs: Documentation, communication, tracking • Infrastructure costs: Specialized equipment or facilities needed - Follow Up Deployment

can you create an infographic with these requirements: [SUGGESTED VISUAL: Mode Selection Decision Tree] [Visual: guide users through mode selection based on shipment characteristics and requirements] Choosing the optimal transportation mode for specific shipments requires a systematic approach. The following framework provides a structured decision process: Step 1: Define Requirements Begin by clarifying the essential requirements for the shipment: • Transit time requirements: When must the shipment arrive? • Budget constraints: What is the maximum acceptable transportation cost? • Service level expectations: What reliability is needed? • Special handling needs: Does the product require temperature control, special handling, etc.? • Size and weight parameters: What are the physical characteristics of the shipment? • Origin and destination: What infrastructure is available at both endpoints? Step 2: Evaluate Product Characteristics Assess the nature of the product being shipped: • Value density: High-value products can typically justify premium transportation • Shelf life: Perishable items need faster modes • Product lifecycle: Trendy items benefit from speed to market • Demand predictability: Unpredictable demand requires faster, more flexible transportation • Substitutability: If customers can easily switch to alternatives, reliability becomes critical Step 3: Analyze Potential Modes Screen available transportation options against your requirements: • Availability: Which modes can actually service your origin-destination pair? • Capacity: Can the mode handle your shipment size and weight? • Transit time: Does the mode meet your timing requirements? • Cost: Is the mode within budget constraints? • Reliability: Does the mode offer acceptable consistency? • Risk factors: What is the likelihood of disruption, damage, or delay? - Follow Up Deployment

can you create an infographic with these requirements: [SUGGESTED VISUAL: Mode Selection Decision Tree] [Visual: guide users through mode selection based on shipment characteristics and requirements] Choosing the optimal transportation mode for specific shipments requires a systematic approach. The following framework provides a structured decision process: Step 1: Define Requirements Begin by clarifying the essential requirements for the shipment: • Transit time requirements: When must the shipment arrive? • Budget constraints: What is the maximum acceptable transportation cost? • Service level expectations: What reliability is needed? • Special handling needs: Does the product require temperature control, special handling, etc.? • Size and weight parameters: What are the physical characteristics of the shipment? • Origin and destination: What infrastructure is available at both endpoints? Step 2: Evaluate Product Characteristics Assess the nature of the product being shipped: • Value density: High-value products can typically justify premium transportation • Shelf life: Perishable items need faster modes • Product lifecycle: Trendy items benefit from speed to market • Demand predictability: Unpredictable demand requires faster, more flexible transportation • Substitutability: If customers can easily switch to alternatives, reliability becomes critical Step 3: Analyze Potential Modes Screen available transportation options against your requirements: • Availability: Which modes can actually service your origin-destination pair? • Capacity: Can the mode handle your shipment size and weight? • Transit time: Does the mode meet your timing requirements? • Cost: Is the mode within budget constraints? • Reliability: Does the mode offer acceptable consistency? • Risk factors: What is the likelihood of disruption, damage, or delay? - Follow Up Deployment

please create an illustration suitable for print for these requirements: [SUGGESTED VISUAL: Air Cargo Network] [Visual: Global map showing major air cargo hubs with flight paths, distinguishing between dedicated freighters and belly cargo] - Initial Deployment

initial commit