Spaces:
Sleeping
Sleeping
File size: 9,671 Bytes
08123aa |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 |
# 🧪 Test Cases for Heart Attack Risk Prediction App
## Test Case 1: Low Risk Patient (Healthy Individual)
**Input:**
- Gender: Female (2)
- Age: 35 years
- Height: 165 cm
- Weight: 60 kg
- Systolic BP: 120 mmHg
- Diastolic BP: 80 mmHg
- Cholesterol: Normal (1)
- Glucose: Normal (1)
- Smoking: No (0)
- Alcohol: No (0)
- Physical Activity: Yes (1)
- Protein Level: 14.0
- Ejection Fraction: 60.0
**Expected Output:**
- Risk Level: ✅ Low Risk
- Risk Probability: < 10% (typically 2-8%)
- Prediction: No Heart Disease
- Key Risk Factors: ✅ Health Status: Healthy indicators
- Model Breakdown:
- XGBoost: ~5-8% risk
- CatBoost: ~1-2% risk (most accurate for low risk)
- LightGBM: ~20-25% risk (Note: LightGBM tends to be more conservative/risk-averse)
- Ensemble: ~2-5% risk (weighted: 5% XGB + 85% CAT + 10% LGB)
- Recommendation: ✅ Low Risk - Continue maintaining a healthy lifestyle!
**Note:** LightGBM may show higher individual risk percentages due to its training characteristics, but the ensemble weights (85% CatBoost) ensure the final prediction remains accurate.
---
## Test Case 2: Moderate Risk Patient (Some Risk Factors)
**Input:**
- Gender: Male (1)
- Age: 55 years
- Height: 175 cm
- Weight: 85 kg (BMI ~27.8 - Overweight)
- Systolic BP: 135 mmHg
- Diastolic BP: 88 mmHg
- Cholesterol: Above Normal (2)
- Glucose: Normal (1)
- Smoking: No (0)
- Alcohol: Yes (1)
- Physical Activity: No (0)
- Protein Level: 6.5
- Ejection Fraction: 55.0
**Expected Output:**
- Risk Level: ⚠️ Moderate Risk
- Risk Probability: 30-50% (typically 35-45%)
- Prediction: May indicate risk
- Key Risk Factors: ⚠️ High BP, High cholesterol, Alcohol consumption, Physical inactivity
- Model Breakdown:
- XGBoost: ~35-45% risk
- CatBoost: ~35-45% risk
- LightGBM: ~35-45% risk
- Ensemble: ~35-45% risk
- Recommendation: ⚠️ Moderate Risk - Consider consulting a healthcare professional.
---
## Test Case 3: High Risk Patient (Multiple Risk Factors)
**Input:**
- Gender: Male (1)
- Age: 65 years
- Height: 170 cm
- Weight: 95 kg (BMI ~32.9 - Obese)
- Systolic BP: 150 mmHg
- Diastolic BP: 100 mmHg
- Cholesterol: Well Above Normal (3)
- Glucose: Well Above Normal (3)
- Smoking: Yes (1)
- Alcohol: Yes (1)
- Physical Activity: No (0)
- Protein Level: 6.0
- Ejection Fraction: 45.0
**Expected Output:**
- Risk Level: 🚨 Very High Risk
- Risk Probability: > 70% (typically 75-90%)
- Prediction: Heart Disease Detected
- Key Risk Factors: ⚠️ High BMI (>30), High BP, High cholesterol, High glucose, Smoking, Alcohol consumption, Physical inactivity
- Model Breakdown:
- XGBoost: ~75-90% risk
- CatBoost: ~75-90% risk
- LightGBM: ~75-90% risk
- Ensemble: ~75-90% risk
- Recommendation: ⚠️ High Risk Detected! Please consult with a healthcare professional immediately.
---
## Test Case 4: Borderline Case (Age Factor)
**Input:**
- Gender: Female (2)
- Age: 50 years
- Height: 160 cm
- Weight: 70 kg (BMI ~27.3 - Overweight)
- Systolic BP: 130 mmHg
- Diastolic BP: 85 mmHg
- Cholesterol: Above Normal (2)
- Glucose: Normal (1)
- Smoking: No (0)
- Alcohol: No (0)
- Physical Activity: Yes (1)
- Protein Level: 7.0
- Ejection Fraction: 58.0
**Expected Output:**
- Risk Level: ⚠️ Moderate Risk
- Risk Probability: 20-40% (typically 25-35%)
- Prediction: May indicate risk
- Key Risk Factors: ⚠️ High BMI (>30), High BP, High cholesterol
- Model Breakdown:
- XGBoost: ~25-35% risk
- CatBoost: ~25-35% risk
- LightGBM: ~25-35% risk
- Ensemble: ~25-35% risk
- Recommendation: ⚠️ Moderate Risk - Consider consulting a healthcare professional.
---
## Test Case 5: Young Patient with Lifestyle Risks
**Input:**
- Gender: Male (1)
- Age: 28 years
- Height: 180 cm
- Weight: 75 kg (BMI ~23.1 - Normal)
- Systolic BP: 125 mmHg
- Diastolic BP: 82 mmHg
- Cholesterol: Normal (1)
- Glucose: Normal (1)
- Smoking: Yes (1)
- Alcohol: Yes (1)
- Physical Activity: No (0)
- Protein Level: 14.5
- Ejection Fraction: 62.0
**Expected Output:**
- Risk Level: ⚠️ Moderate Risk
- Risk Probability: 15-30% (typically 20-28%)
- Prediction: May indicate risk
- Key Risk Factors: ⚠️ Smoking, Alcohol consumption, Physical inactivity
- Model Breakdown:
- XGBoost: ~20-28% risk
- CatBoost: ~20-28% risk
- LightGBM: ~20-28% risk
- Ensemble: ~20-28% risk
- Recommendation: ⚠️ Moderate Risk - Consider consulting a healthcare professional.
---
## Test Case 6: Elderly Patient with Good Health
**Input:**
- Gender: Female (2)
- Age: 70 years
- Height: 155 cm
- Weight: 58 kg (BMI ~24.1 - Normal)
- Systolic BP: 125 mmHg
- Diastolic BP: 78 mmHg
- Cholesterol: Normal (1)
- Glucose: Normal (1)
- Smoking: No (0)
- Alcohol: No (0)
- Physical Activity: Yes (1)
- Protein Level: 13.5
- Ejection Fraction: 58.0
**Expected Output:**
- Risk Level: ✅ Low to Moderate Risk
- Risk Probability: 10-25% (typically 15-22%)
- Prediction: No Heart Disease (or low risk)
- Key Risk Factors: ✅ Health Status: Healthy indicators (or minimal risk factors)
- Model Breakdown:
- XGBoost: ~15-22% risk
- CatBoost: ~15-22% risk
- LightGBM: ~15-22% risk
- Ensemble: ~15-22% risk
- Recommendation: ✅ Low Risk - Continue maintaining a healthy lifestyle! (or Moderate Risk warning)
---
## Test Case 7: Extreme High Risk (All Risk Factors)
**Input:**
- Gender: Male (1)
- Age: 60 years
- Height: 168 cm
- Weight: 100 kg (BMI ~35.4 - Obese)
- Systolic BP: 160 mmHg
- Diastolic BP: 105 mmHg
- Cholesterol: Well Above Normal (3)
- Glucose: Well Above Normal (3)
- Smoking: Yes (1)
- Alcohol: Yes (1)
- Physical Activity: No (0)
- Protein Level: 5.5
- Ejection Fraction: 40.0
**Expected Output:**
- Risk Level: 🚨 Very High Risk
- Risk Probability: > 85% (typically 88-95%)
- Prediction: Heart Disease Detected
- Key Risk Factors: ⚠️ High BMI (>30), High BP, High cholesterol, High glucose, Smoking, Alcohol consumption, Physical inactivity
- Model Breakdown:
- XGBoost: ~88-95% risk
- CatBoost: ~88-95% risk
- LightGBM: ~88-95% risk
- Ensemble: ~88-95% risk
- Recommendation: ⚠️ High Risk Detected! Please consult with a healthcare professional immediately.
---
## Test Case 8: Only Physical Inactivity
**Input:**
- Gender: Female (2)
- Age: 40 years
- Height: 165 cm
- Weight: 65 kg (BMI ~23.9 - Normal)
- Systolic BP: 118 mmHg
- Diastolic BP: 75 mmHg
- Cholesterol: Normal (1)
- Glucose: Normal (1)
- Smoking: No (0)
- Alcohol: No (0)
- Physical Activity: No (0)
- Protein Level: 14.0
- Ejection Fraction: 60.0
**Expected Output:**
- Risk Level: ✅ Low Risk
- Risk Probability: < 15% (typically 5-12%)
- Prediction: No Heart Disease
- Key Risk Factors: ℹ️ Lifestyle Note: Physical inactivity - Consider adding regular physical activity to reduce risk.
- Model Breakdown:
- XGBoost: ~5-12% risk
- CatBoost: ~5-12% risk
- LightGBM: ~5-12% risk
- Ensemble: ~5-12% risk
- Recommendation: ✅ Low Risk - Continue maintaining a healthy lifestyle!
---
## ✅ Verification Checklist
### UI Elements to Verify:
- [ ] Page title displays correctly: "Predicting Heart Attack Risk: An Ensemble Modeling Approach"
- [ ] Subtitle includes: "XGBoost, CatBoost, and LightGBM"
- [ ] Sidebar shows optimized ensemble weights (XGB: 5%, CAT: 85%, LGB: 10%)
- [ ] Sidebar displays Accuracy: 80.77% and Recall: 93.27%
- [ ] All input fields are present and functional
- [ ] Prediction button works correctly
- [ ] Results display with proper formatting
### Model Display to Verify:
- [ ] All 4 models displayed horizontally: XGBoost, CatBoost, LightGBM, Ensemble
- [ ] Each model shows progress bar with percentage inside
- [ ] Risk percentage displayed below each bar
- [ ] Color coding: Green (low), Orange (moderate), Red (high)
- [ ] Ensemble metrics section shows Accuracy and Recall
### Prediction Results to Verify:
- [ ] Risk probability displayed correctly
- [ ] Risk level matches probability range
- [ ] Key risk factors identified correctly
- [ ] Recommendations match risk level
- [ ] Model breakdown shows all 4 models
- [ ] Ensemble method info displayed
### Error Handling:
- [ ] App handles missing models gracefully
- [ ] Invalid inputs show appropriate warnings
- [ ] Error messages are user-friendly
---
## 📊 Expected Ensemble Metrics (Sidebar)
- **Accuracy**: 80.77%
- **Recall**: 93.27%
- **Ensemble Weights**: XGBoost: 5.0%, CatBoost: 85.0%, LightGBM: 10.0%
---
## 🎯 Quick Test Scenarios
1. **Minimum Input Test**: Use default values, click predict → Should show low risk
2. **Maximum Risk Test**: Set all risk factors to maximum → Should show very high risk
3. **Edge Case Test**: Age 20, all normal → Should show very low risk
4. **Edge Case Test**: Age 100, all normal → Should show moderate risk due to age
5. **Single Risk Factor**: Only smoking → Should show moderate risk
6. **Physical Inactivity Only**: Only inactive, all else normal → Should show info message (not warning)
---
## 📝 Notes
- Actual risk percentages may vary slightly (±2-3%) due to model variations
- The ensemble uses weighted average: 5% XGBoost + 85% CatBoost + 10% LightGBM
- **Important:** LightGBM may show higher individual risk percentages (15-25% for low-risk cases) due to its training characteristics. This is expected behavior and does not affect the final ensemble prediction, which is heavily weighted toward CatBoost (85%).
- The final ensemble prediction is the weighted average of all three models, so even if LightGBM shows higher values, the ensemble result remains accurate.
- For low-risk patients: CatBoost typically shows the most accurate low values (~1-2%), while LightGBM may show 20-25%. The ensemble (weighted) will be closer to CatBoost's prediction.
|