Update app.py

app.py

@@ -33,17 +33,14 @@ PQC_rules="""
 2. PQC should be unrestrictive enough to not exclude any capable vendor/contractor.
 3. PQC should be restrictive enough to exclude incapable vendors/contractors.
 4. Framing of PQC requires due consideration to adequacy of competition.
-5. PQC should be carefully decided for each procurement with approval of Competent Authority (CA).
-6. Bidders must submit authenticated documents in support of eligibility criteria.
-7. For MSEs and past successful bidders, PQC can be proportional to quantity quoted.
+5. Functional head approval is mandatory if there is PQC is written in a proposal.
+6. PQC should be carefully decided for each procurement with approval of Competent Authority (CA).
+7. Bidders must submit authenticated documents in support of eligibility criteria.
 8. Sudden multiple times increase in requirement should not blindly adopt past PQCs.
 9. PQC misjudgement in either direction (too restrictive or unrestrictive) is detrimental.
 10. PQC should be clarified in tender documents that authenticated documents are required.
-11. Encourage MSEs by considering proportional PQC application.
-12. Past successful bidders should not be disqualified due to sudden requirement increase.
-13. Functional head approval is mandatory for PQC acceptance.
-14. Adequacy of competition must be evaluated while framing PQC.
-15. PQC should balance inclusion of capable vendors and exclusion of incapable ones."""
+11. Adequacy of competition must be evaluated while framing PQC.
+12. PQC should balance inclusion of capable vendors and exclusion of incapable ones."""
 
 #============starting extract_docx_text