[ { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/frontiers-in-anesthesiology-bias/", "name": "Frontiers in Anesthesiology", "source_url": "https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/anesthesiology", "bias_rating": "PRO-SCIENCE", "bias_score": -0.5, "factual_reporting": "MOSTLY FACTUAL", "factual_score": 2.1, "credibility_rating": "HIGH CREDIBILITY", "country": "Switzerland", "country_freedom_rating": "EXCELLENT", "media_type": "Journal", "traffic_popularity": "Minimal Traffic", "bias_category_description": "These sources consist of legitimate science or are evidence based through the use of credible scientific sourcing.  Legitimate science follows the scientific method, is unbiased, and does not use emotional words.  These sources also respect the consensus of experts in the given scientific field and strive to publish peer-reviewed science. Some sources in this category may have a slight political bias but adhere to scientific principles.See all Pro-Science sources.", "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate Frontiers in Anesthesiology as a Pro-Science journal based on peer review and a clean fact-check record. We also rate them Mostly Factual due to Frontier Media’s retractions of studies either pre or post-publication. Detailed Report Bias Rating: PRO-SCIENCE (-0.5) Factual Reporting: MOSTLY FACTUAL (2.", "history": "Frontiers in Anesthesiology is a peer-reviewed open-access journal that covers the field of medical anesthesiology. According to itsabout page, they “Explore advances across the field of perioperative medicine and anesthesia to improve standard of care and reduce the risk of postoperative complications. ” Read our profile on Switzerland’s media and government.", "ownership": "Frontiers in Anesthesiology is owned byFrontiers Media SA, which is a for-profit corporation. Funding comes from digital sales of content and author fees for publication.", "analysis": "In review, Frontiers in Anesthesiology is an open-access journal that publishes information and research related to the field of Anesthesiology. The journal primarily publishes research such as thisCase report: Nasal polyp exfoliated into the tracheal tube in a patient with a difficult airway during nasotracheal intubation. Frontiers Mediahas been criticized for being a predatory open-access publisher.In short, Predatory Open Access publishing is an exploitative open-access publishing business model that involves charging publication fees to authors without providing the editorial and publishing services associated with legitimate journals. However, Frontiers in Anesthesiology is a credible scientific journal, as we have not found any controversy or significant retractions. Although, Frontiers Media hasretractedsome studies in other publications that were found to be of poor methodology and not thoroughly peer-reviewed.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "None in the Last 5 years" ], "last_updated": "February 4, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/public-notice-bias-and-credibility/", "name": "Public Notice", "source_url": "https://www.publicnotice.co/", "bias_rating": "LEFT", "bias_score": -6.4, "factual_reporting": "MOSTLY FACTUAL", "factual_score": 2.8, "credibility_rating": "HIGH CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Website", "traffic_popularity": "Medium Traffic", "bias_category_description": "These media sources are moderate to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation.  They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appealing to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports, and omit information that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy.See all Left Bias sources.", "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate Public Notice as Left-Biased due to its progressive editorial stance and emphasis on criticizing conservative policies and figures. We rate its reporting as Mostly Factual, as it relies on credible sources. However, the one-sided nature of its coverage affects the factuality by potentially omitting or underrepresenting alternative viewpoints, which can lead to a skewed presentation of facts. Detailed Report Bias Rating: LEFT (-6.", "history": "Public Noticeis a subscription-based newsletter and online news outlet founded and operated byAaron Rupar, a prominent journalist known for his political analysis on platforms like  X, formerly Twitter. Public Notice, based in Minnesota, provides progressive perspectives on major political developments, emphasizing accountability and transparency in governance. The platform has gained attention for its detailed critiques of conservative politics and media. Read more on the United States media and government.", "ownership": "Public Notice is owned and operated by Aaron Rupar and primarily funded throughpaid subscriptionsand advertisements via Substack.", "analysis": "These media sources are moderate to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation.  They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appealing to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports, and omit information that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy.See all Left Bias sources. Public Notice articles frequently analyze Republican politicians’ actions, often with sharp commentary and minimal coverage of opposing perspectives. Articles like“Trump: Time’s Person of the Year Interview is a Case Study in Delusion”provide a strong progressive critique of Donald Trump’s recentTimeinterview, highlighting his lack of policy knowledge, reliance on conspiracy theories, and erratic rhetoric. The article focuses on his contradictory statements on abortion, immigration, and trans rights, portraying him as unfit for office. It incorporates both mainstream media sources, likeCNN, and primary materials, such as interview excerpts and screenshots, to support its analysis. The sharply opinionated tone aligns with Public Notice’s left-leaning perspective. Similarly,“Tulsi Gabbard Biography Suggests Trump’s DNI Pick is Unqualified”critiques political appointments within the Trump administration, emphasizing perceived risks and controversies. Regarding sourcing,Public Noticehyperlinks to sources such asABC NewsandCivil Beat, as well as its own prior reporting. Although these sources improve factual accuracy, the article’s emotionally charged language—such as phrases like Tulsi Gabbard’s “fondness for Putin” and “right-wing culture warring”—demonstrates a subjective and opinionated perspective. Public Notice frequently provides hyperlinks to government documents, reputable media sources, and official statements in its reporting. However, the tone and framing of its articles tend to be distinctly one-sided. Additionally, the outlet’s reliance on Aaron Rupar’s analysis centralizes its editorial voice, which may restrict the diversity of viewpoints presented.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "None in the Last 5 years" ], "last_updated": "December 19, 2024" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/newfoundland-independent-bias-and-credibility/", "name": "Newfoundland Independent", "source_url": "https://theindependent.ca/", "bias_rating": "LEFT", "bias_score": -6.0, "factual_reporting": "HIGH", "factual_score": 1.8, "credibility_rating": "HIGH CREDIBILITY", "country": "Canada", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Newspaper", "traffic_popularity": "Minimal Traffic", "bias_category_description": "These media sources are moderate to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation.  They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appealing to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports, and omit information that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy.See all Left Bias sources.", "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate Newfoundland Independent as Left-Biased due to its consistent focus on progressive policy positions. We also rate its reporting as High for factual accuracy based on editorial transparency and good sourcing practices. Detailed Report Bias Rating: LEFT (-6.0) Factual Reporting: HIGH (1.", "history": "The Independentis a progressive, nonprofit news outlet based in Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada. Originally a print publication from 2003–2008, it relaunched in 2011 as a digital media collective. After nearly collapsing, it was reorganized by journalists Justin Brake and Rhea Rollmann into a not-for-profit model centered on grassroots reporting and social justice. It is a member of thePress Forward network, a collective of independent Canadian media outlets emphasizing community-based, public-interest journalism. Newfoundland Independent adheres to the network’s 10 guiding principles, which emphasize truth-telling, accountability, equity, and service to local communities. Read our profile on the Canadian government and media.", "ownership": "The Independent is not corporately funded and does not run ads or paywalls. It operates through a combination of grants, reader subscriptions, and donations. It also receives support through the Canadian Government’s Local Journalism Initiative", "analysis": "These media sources are moderate to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation.  They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appealing to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports, and omit information that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy.See all Left Bias sources. The Independent clearly aligns with progressive, left-leaning values. It prioritizes stories focused on Indigenous rights, environmental justice, decolonization, and grassroots movements. For example, itscoverage of Hydro-Québec’s work halthighlights Indigenous resistance to resource extraction. The publication’seditorial defending the questioning of Justin Trudeau on genocidedemonstrates its commitment to holding power accountable from a justice-oriented lens. Articles are grounded in journalism ethics and supported by on-the-ground reporting and sourcing. While commentary pieces are ideologically framed, straight news articles tend to maintain factual integrity. One such example is its critique of the Liberal government’sclimate plan, which is grounded in policy detail and evidence rather than partisan rhetoric. The outlet has won numerous awards, including several Atlantic Journalism Awards in 2023 and 2024. It is respected within the independent Canadian media sphere but lacks the reach of mainstream national outlets.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "None in the Last 5 years" ], "last_updated": "July 10, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/londonnewstoday-bias/", "name": "LondonNewsToday", "source_url": "https://londonnewstoday.ca/", "bias_rating": "LEFT-CENTER", "bias_score": -2.7, "factual_reporting": "HIGH", "factual_score": 1.0, "credibility_rating": "HIGH CREDIBILITY", "country": "Canada", "country_freedom_rating": "EXCELLENT", "media_type": "Website", "traffic_popularity": "Minimal Traffic", "bias_category_description": "These media sources have a slight to moderate liberal bias.  They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appeals to emotion or stereotypes) to favor liberal causes.  These sources are generally trustworthy for information but may require further investigation.See all Left-Center sources.", "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate LondonNewsToday Left-Center biased based on editorial perspectives that slightly favor the left. We also rate them High for factual reporting due to a clean fact-check record. Detailed Report Bias Rating: LEFT-CENTER (-2.7) Factual Reporting: HIGH (1.", "history": "LondonNewsToday is a part of Blackburn Media Inc., originally known as Blackburn Radio Inc., which was founded in 1852 byJosiah Blackburnas the London Free Press. Today, it operates 13 radio stations and local news sites, serving Southwestern Ontario. LondonNewsToday, established to provide local news, sports, and event coverage across the London communities, is headquartered in Ontario, Canada. Read our profile on Canadian media and government.", "ownership": "LondonNewsToday is owned byBlackburn Media Inc., a Canadian media company. The company operates several radio stations and news websites in Ontario. The revenue for LondonNewsToday is generated through advertising and sponsorships.", "analysis": "These media sources have a slight to moderate liberal bias.  They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appeals to emotion or stereotypes) to favor liberal causes.  These sources are generally trustworthy for information but may require further investigation.See all Left-Center sources. The news articles on LondonNewsToday generally focus on local events and issues within the communities they cover, such asSouth London business evacuated after chemical spill.Generally, articles are sourced through quotes, and they do not cover national or international news. Editorially, LondonNewsToday does not have a strong editorial stance, as its primary focus is on local news and events. However, they have a left-leaning perspective on the issues they present that the progressive left favors, such asDowntown Chatham art exhibit to focus on climate change.In general, the website is fact-based and holds a slight left-leaning editorial bias.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "None in the Last 5 years" ], "last_updated": "December 19, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/mto-news-bias/", "name": "MTO News", "source_url": "https://mediatakeout.com/", "bias_rating": "LEFT-CENTER", "bias_score": -3.5, "factual_reporting": "LOW", "factual_score": 7.0, "credibility_rating": "LOW CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Website", "traffic_popularity": "High Traffic", "bias_category_description": null, "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate MTO News Questionable based on the publishing of misinformation and numerous false claims. We also rate them low for factual reporting due to poor or no sourcing and several failed fact checks. Detailed Report Questionable Reasoning: Poor Sourcing, Failed Fact Checks, Misinformation Bias Rating: LEFT-CENTER (-3.5) Factual Reporting: LOW (7.", "history": "Founded in 2006by Fred Mwangaguhunga, MTO News (MediaTakeout) is a website that publishes entertainment news and celebrity gossip for an African American audience. According to theircontact page, “The site covers celebrity, entertainment, and general interest news, with a focus on African American culture.” Read our profile on the United States government and media.", "ownership": "Fred Mwangaguhunga owns MTO News through MediaTakeOut.com LLC. Sponsored content and advertising generate revenue.", "analysis": "MTO News covers news about African Americans and celebrity news. Most articles originate from other sources such asTMZand theHollywood Reporter. They also conduct original reporting that usually features celebrity gossip or rumors sourced from social media or sometimes not at all. Editorially, more stories favor the left, such as thisTrump Without His Wig; featuring a doctored video. Although more stories favor the left, MTO does not discriminate if a story is shocking or sensational. Further, MTO News routinely publishes unsubstantiated or outright false claims, as seen below in Failed Fact Checks. Finally, during the covid-19 pandemic, they frequently published misinformation such as DMX dying from a heart attack after taking the vaccine. There isno evidencethat he had gotten the vaccine as statements from his family and the hospital did not mention a COVID-19 vaccine. In general, MTO News frequently publishes unsourced gossip and makes false claims without evidence. They also hold a left-leaning political bias when covering conservatives.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "DMX took the COVID-19 vaccine days before he suffered a heart attack.–Unproven", "“NFL Star Patrick Mahomes: ‘I believe George Zimmerman is INNOCENT’!!”–False", "“Boss FORGETS Hang Up Video Conf Call . . . Livestreams S*x w/ Secretary”–False", "A new photograph of Malia Obama’s credit card was found on Hunter Biden’s laptop along with lines of cocaine on the device that Biden snorted. –False", "An Asian man wearing a surgical mask passed out yesterday in the middle of a crowded street in Queens. The man was rushed to the hospital, where according to social media reports, he is believed to have died.–False", "“Black Student MURDERED For Dating Chinese Girl…On LIVESTREAM!!”–False" ], "last_updated": "April 11, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/transparency-international/", "name": "Transparency International", "source_url": "https://www.transparency.org/", "bias_rating": "LEAST BIASED", "bias_score": -0.1, "factual_reporting": "VERY HIGH", "factual_score": 0.0, "credibility_rating": "HIGH CREDIBILITY", "country": "Germany", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Organization/Foundation", "traffic_popularity": "Medium Traffic", "bias_category_description": "These sources have minimal bias and use very few loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using an appeal to emotion or stereotypes).  The reporting is factual and usually sourced.  These are the most credible media sources.See all Least Biased sources.", "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate Transparency International Least Biased based on balanced story selection and a singular focus on their mission. We also rate them Very-High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing and as a reliable source for fact-checkers. Detailed Report Bias Rating: LEAST BIASED (-0.1) Factual Reporting: VERY HIGH (0.", "history": "Transparency International (TI) is an international non-governmental organization which is based in Berlin, Germany, and wasfounded in 1993. Its nonprofit purpose is to take action to combat corruption and prevent criminal activities arising from corruption. It publishes, for example, the Global Corruption Barometer and the Corruption Perceptions Index. Read our profile on Germany’s media and government", "ownership": "Transparency International is funded through donations from corporations, foundations, individuals, and world government organizations. Theyfully disclosetheir financials and donors.", "analysis": "These sources have minimal bias and use very few loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using an appeal to emotion or stereotypes).  The reporting is factual and usually sourced.  These are the most credible media sources.See all Least Biased sources. In review, Transparency International measures and reports corruption to prevent criminal activities. The organizationdefines corruptionas “the abuse of entrusted power for private gain, which eventually hurts everyone who depends on the integrity of people in a position of authority.” The website features theCorruption Perceptions Index, which ranks 180 countries and territories by their perceived levels of public sector corruption, according to experts and business people. For example, the United States is ranked 23/180 and has a low to moderate corruption level, whereas the Scandinavian countries have very low corruption. In case you are wondering, Somalia is rated last with extremely high corruption levels. The website also publishes well-sourced news such as thisWHY DON’T THE VICTIMS OF BRIBERY SHARE IN THE RECORD-BREAKING AIRBUS SETTLEMENT? Politically, Transparency International takes pro-science positions such as concern forclimate changewhere they monitor countries’ efforts,CLIMATE ADAPTATION FINANCE GOVERNANCE STANDARDS – A NEW APPROACH PILOTED IN THE MALDIVES AND BANGLADESH. When reporting on world leaders such as USA president Donald Trump they often report negatively, such as this:TRUMP’S GOLD-PLATED SON-IN-LAW AND OTHER POTENTIAL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST IN THE WHITE HOUSE. In general, information is highly factual and displays a minimal bias as they stay focused on their agenda of monitoring corruption, which frequently crosses party lines.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "Afactual searchreveals they have not failed a fact check. In fact, they are frequently used by IFCN fact-checkers for credible information." ], "last_updated": "June 21, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/newswars/", "name": "NewsWars", "source_url": "https://newswars.com/", "bias_rating": "EXTREME RIGHT", "bias_score": 8.8, "factual_reporting": "LOW", "factual_score": 8.0, "credibility_rating": "LOW CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Website", "traffic_popularity": "Medium Traffic", "bias_category_description": null, "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate NewsWars Questionable based on extreme right-wing bias, the promotion of pseudoscience and conspiracies, as well as the publication of fake news from poor sources. Detailed Report Reasoning: Propaganda, Conspiracy, False Claims, Fake News Bias Rating: EXTREME RIGHT (8.8) Factual Reporting: LOW (8.0) Country: USA MBFC’s Country Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE Media Type: Website Traffic/Popularity: Medium Traffic MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY History Founded in 2017, NewsWars is a news and opinion website by Infowars publisher and far-right conspiracy theorist Alex Jones, where he claims to be bringing “truth back to the media.", "history": "Founded in 2017, NewsWars is a news and opinion website byInfowarspublisher and far-right conspiracy theorist Alex Jones, where he claims to be bringing “truth back to the media.” He’s infamously madefalse claimsconcerning the2012 Sandy Hook massacre, and federal investigators said he inspired a gunman to open fire inside a Washington, D.C., pizzeria by touting unfounded allegations on his shows and websites about its supposed ties to former Democratic candidateHillary Clintonandhuman trafficking. This is a conspiracy website, period. Read our profile on the United States government and media.", "ownership": "NewsWars is owned by conspiracy theorist Alex Jones, who is the host and producer ofInfowars. The website is funded through advertising.", "analysis": "In review, the website is laid out to look similar to theNew York Times, which both Alex Jones and Donald Trump claim is a fake news source. All news articles are curated from other sources, including Jones’ own Infowars. Common sources used are Russian propaganda news siteRT, Alt-rightBreitbart, and other conspiracy websites such asZero Hedge. This site is not placed in our Conspiracy-Pseudoscience category is due to having more political news than conspiracy information. Though there is plenty of conspiracy, Jones shares numerous stories from Infowars and provides a link to listen to his radio show live on the website. This website is also different in that the majority of news is real. The reason for the Questionable classification is that all stories favor the right, indicating extreme bias, there areunproven conspiraciespublished, and Jones’ longtime reputation as a purveyor offake news stories. In general, this is a far-right media source that publishes conspiracy theories.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "A picture of U.S. President Joe Biden kneeling in front of outgoing Israeli President Reuven Rivlin–False", "Ivermectin is an effective COVID-19 treatment; COVID-19 PCR tests lead to false positives; COVID-19 vaccines aren’t working.–False", "“EMERGENCY REPORT: Trump Planning Mass Arrests, Military Tribunals for Deep State Traitors”–False" ], "last_updated": "January 16, 2026" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/jehovahs-witnesses-jw-org/", "name": "Jehovah’s Witnesses (jw.org)", "source_url": "https://www.jw.org/", "bias_rating": "CONSPIRACY-PSEUDOSCIENCE", "bias_score": 5.3, "factual_reporting": "LOW", "factual_score": 7.1, "credibility_rating": "LOW CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": null, "media_type": "Organization/Foundation", "traffic_popularity": "High Traffic", "bias_category_description": null, "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate the Jehovah’s Witnesses (JW.org) a strong conspiracy and pseudoscience organization based on promoting unproven claims, theories that are impossible to predict, and a strong rejection of science. Detailed Report Bias Rating: CONSPIRACY-PSEUDOSCIENCE (5.3) Factual Reporting: LOW (7.", "history": "In 1870,Charles Taze Russell, a minister from Pennsylvania, founded “The Bible Student Movement,” which eventually became Jehovah’s Witnesses after his death. However,JW.ORGdoes not regard him as the founder of a new religion. They point out Russel’s goal was to promote the teachings of Jesus Christ, and they state, “Since Jesus is the Founder of Christianity, we view him as the founder of our organization.” Russell expressed his religious views through journals, books, and lectures, and in July 1879, he published “the journal Zion’s Watch Tower and Herald of Christ’s Presence.” This journal is the official journal of the Jehovah’s Witnesses. Russell was the pastor of The Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society, which has become the present-day Jehovah’s Witnesses. Joseph Franklin Rutherford, aka “Judge” Rutherford, was the second president of the incorporated Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society. He played a primary role in the organization’s doctrinal development and, in 1931, introduced the name “Jehovah’s Witnesses” and, in 1935, the term “Kingdom Hall” for worship place. Charles Taze Russell predicted thatChrist would return in 1914. The prophecy failed; since then, the society has indicated at leasteightother dates when Armageddon would occur, but all failed. Jehovah’s Witnesses refuse to salute the Flag, object to military service and accept blood transfusions. They do not lobby, vote, or try to influence public policy. These convictions resulted in manylegal battles,therefore, impacting and expanding the First Amendment free exercise of religion. Read our profile on the United States media and government.", "ownership": "TheJW.orgFAQ section details, “Our worldwide work is primarily financed by voluntary donations from individuals who are Jehovah’s Witnesses.” They state, “Every congregation of Jehovah’s Witnesses provides monthly financial reports at its meetings, which are open to the public. The accounting records of each congregation are audited regularly to ensure that donated funds are being handled properly.” However, they don’t disclose their financial records; therefore, there is total secrecy surrounding their finances.", "analysis": "Jehovah’s Witnesses are best known for going door to door to spread their message and distributing their Watchtower magazine. The JW.org website provides information on the organization as well as links to theonline versionsof The Watchtower and Awake magazines. Politically, Jehovah’s Witnesses do not participate by not voting, refusing to salute the flag, and objecting to military service. However, they hold conservative positions, such as beingopposed to abortionandsame-sex marriage. Scientifically, they do not support the evolutionary theory but rather a modified version of Biblical Creationism. A quote reads, “Jehovah God created all the basic kinds of plant and animal life, as well as a perfect man and woman who were capable of self-awareness, love, wisdom, and justice. The Bible account of creation does not conflict with the scientific observation that variations occur within a kind.” Further, Jehovah’s Witnesses oftenrefuse blood transfusionsnot because of perceived risk but due to biblical scripture that leads them to believe that the “procedure creates a risk of losing eternal salvation.” Finally, as mentioned above, Jehovah’s Witnesses believe we are in the “Last Days” where all humans will die, and God’s Kingdom will return to earth.Since 1914, they have predicted “The End” numerous times and have failed. In general, Jehovah’s Witnesses promote pseudoscience and the conspiracy theory that they can predict the “Last Days” based on their interpretation of the bible. This is not possible.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "None Found. See above for false and unproven claims." ], "last_updated": "March 3, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/american-wire-news/", "name": "American Wire News", "source_url": "https://americanwirenews.com/", "bias_rating": "RIGHT", "bias_score": 8.0, "factual_reporting": "MIXED", "factual_score": 5.6, "credibility_rating": "MEDIUM CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Website", "traffic_popularity": "Medium Traffic", "bias_category_description": "These media sources are moderate to strongly biased toward conservative causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports, and omit information reporting that may damage conservative causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy.See all Right Bias sources.", "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate American Wire News right biased based on editorial positions that routinely favor the right. We also rate them Mixed for factual reporting due to poor sources, promotion of propaganda, and a lack of transparency with funding. Detailed Report Bias Rating: RIGHT (8.0) Factual Reporting: MIXED (5.", "history": "Founded in 2021, American Wire News is a conservative political news site featuring news and opinion articles. According to theirabout page, “American Wire is a daily independent news service dedicated to bringing our readers accurate, reliable news, commentary, analysis, video content, and information from a conservative perspective.” The American Wire is a part of the publishing division of Olympic Media that also includes the conservative news websiteBizPac Review. Read our profile on the United States media and government.", "ownership": "Olympic Mediaowns and publishes American Wire News. According toOpen Secrets, Olympic Mediareceives fundingfrom prominent Republican politicians and PACS. For example, in the 2022 election cycle, they received a total of $4,831,681. Notable funders include Jim Jordan for Congress $1,293,441,Great American Patriot Project$1,102,481, Cawthorn for North Carolina $488,408, and Josh Hawley for Senate $244,084. The American Wire News website lacks transparency as they do not disclose these funders. Advertising, donations, and a store that sells conservative branded merchandise generate revenue.", "analysis": "These media sources are moderate to strongly biased toward conservative causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports, and omit information reporting that may damage conservative causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy.See all Right Bias sources. American Wire publishes conservative commentary, news stories, and a daily newsletter for subscribers. Articles and headlines often contain emotionally loaded language such as thisFather desperately tries to stop pediatrician wife from chemically castrating 9-yr-old son, Cali law is against him, andCatfight! MTG delivers smackdown of dramatic AOC when the two go rounds on Twitter. Regarding sourcing, American Wire typically relies on credible sources likeThe Hill,Politico, andReuters. They also republish articles from the factually MixedDaily Callerand link toBizPac Reviewarticles and social media posts. We have also found evidence of themreferencingthe discreditedGateway Pundit. Editorially, story selection and opinion pieces exclusively favor the right, such as this‘We’re ashamed of nothing’: Matt Gaetz breaks Dem hype to ‘expose the truth’ about Jan 6th. Articles frequently denigrate Democrats, such as thisPelosi mocked for botching final speech as House Speaker: ‘Happy Shwanza to all and to all a good night!’Further, articles oftenpromote politicianswho have funded Olympic Media. When reporting on scientific issues such as Covid-19 vaccines, they generally report factually. Still, they tend to highlight the negatives of the vaccine, such as thisStudy reveals myocarditis risk up to 3 times higher with Moderna COVID-19 vaccine than with Pfizer. Regarding the “stolen 2020 election” conspiracy theory, they do not directly endorse that the election was stolen; however, they report the claims of others, such as thisTrump claps back at Chris Christie for calling on GOP to move beyond 2020 election. In general, American Wire News is a conservative propaganda website based on promoting paying Republican politicians and consistent one-sided reporting that favor the right.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "None in the Last 5 years" ], "last_updated": "September 18, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-liberal-ireland-bias-and-credibility/", "name": "The Liberal (Ireland)", "source_url": "https://theliberal.ie/", "bias_rating": "FAR RIGHT", "bias_score": 7.9, "factual_reporting": "LOW", "factual_score": 7.8, "credibility_rating": "LOW CREDIBILITY", "country": "Ireland", "country_freedom_rating": "EXCELLENT", "media_type": "Website", "traffic_popularity": "Minimal Traffic", "bias_category_description": null, "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate The Liberal as right-biased and questionable due to its use of conspiracy theories, emotionally charged language, and lack of transparency. While it covers news topics relevant to Ireland, its framing often aligns with nationalist, anti-immigration, and socially conservative viewpoints. Detailed Report Questionable Reasoning: Conspiracy Theories, Propaganda, Poor Sources, Lack of Transparency Bias Rating: FAR RIGHT (7.9) Factual Reporting: LOW (7.", "history": "The Liberal is an Irish online news website presenting as an alternative media platform. According to itsAbout Uspage, it aims to provide news “unfiltered by mainstream media narratives,” implying skepticism toward conventional journalism. The site covers Irish news, world events, politics, and opinion pieces, often focusing on immigration, social issues, and government policies. Read our profile on Ireland’s media and government.", "ownership": "There is no information regarding the ownership or financial backing of The Liberal on its website. Advertising generates revenue. A lack of transparency in ownership and funding is a common characteristic among less reliable news sources.", "analysis": "The Liberal exhibits a strong right-wing bias in its reporting, particularly in its coverage of immigration, government policies, and social issues. Headlines and articles often use emotionally charged language, with a tendency to frame topics in a way that aligns with conservative, nationalist, and anti-immigration perspectives. We also found that they do not rely on hyperlinked sourcing. The website regularly features nationalist, anti-globalist, and socially conservative themes, aligning it with right-wing populist perspectives. The lack of transparency, poor sourcing techniques and promotion of conspiracy theories renders it questionable.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "None in the Last 5 years. However, The Liberal has published claims about the “population replacement” conspiracy, whichfact-checkers have widely debunked." ], "last_updated": "February 4, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/nomorefakenews-com-bias/", "name": "NoMoreFakeNews.com", "source_url": "https://nomorefakenews.com/", "bias_rating": "RIGHT CONSPIRACY- PSEUDOSCIENCE", "bias_score": 9.7, "factual_reporting": "VERY LOW", "factual_score": 9.9, "credibility_rating": "LOW CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Website", "traffic_popularity": "Minimal Traffic", "bias_category_description": null, "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate NoMoreFakeNews.com right biased and tin-foil hat conspiracy and quackery level pseudoscience website based on the promotion of false or unproven disinformation. Detailed Report Bias Rating: RIGHT CONSPIRACY- PSEUDOSCIENCE (9.7) Factual Reporting: VERY LOW (9.", "history": "Founded in 2000, NoMoreFakeNews.com is a conspiracy and pseudoscience website published by Jon Rappoport, an author who promoted in the 1980s that a virus did not cause AIDS. According to theabout page, “Over the last 30 years, Jon’s independent research has encompassed such areas as deep politics, conspiracies, alternative health, the potential of the human imagination, mind control, the medical cartel, symbology, and solutions to the takeover of the planet by hidden elites.” Read our profile on the United States government and media.", "ownership": "Jon Rappoport owns NoMoreFakeNews.com as he is listed as the author for all stories. Book sales generate revenue.", "analysis": "NoMoreFakeNews.com has a tagline that reads “The Real News,” which ironically contradicts what this website publishes. Jon Rappoport promotes conspiracy theories and pseudoscience using emotional wording such as thisOpen letter to FBI, NYT, WaPo: ongoing destruction of food processing plants across America. This story references the disreputable sources of theGateway PunditandTucker Carlson. While NoMoreFakeNews.com covers a wide range of conspiracy theories at this time, they are focused on promoting disinformation regarding Covid-19 and vaccines. For example, the articleVaccine shedding spreads disaster to unvaccinated pregnant women?Promotes the false claim that the vaccinated shed the vaccine to others.This is not true. They have also claimed that the Coronavirus does not existThe Smoking Gun: Where is the coronavirus? The CDC says it isn’t available.This is also false as the virusdoes exist. Finally, Jon Rappoport holds a right-leaning bias by promoting that the Jan 6 Capitol Riot was afalse flag operation. In general, NoMoreFakeNews.com is an actual fake news website that promotes conspiracy theories and pseudoscience.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "RNA and DNA vaccines, can modify the genome or lead to autoimmune reactions and are therefore unsafe. –Inaccurate", "Vaccine for the China virus—the planet is the guinea pig for a vast experiment–False", "Zika: Who launched the fake-epidemic story in Brazil?–False" ], "last_updated": "July 15, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/tulsa-world/", "name": "Tulsa World", "source_url": "https://tulsaworld.com/", "bias_rating": "RIGHT-CENTER", "bias_score": 3.4, "factual_reporting": "HIGH", "factual_score": 1.1, "credibility_rating": "HIGH CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": null, "media_type": "Newspaper", "traffic_popularity": "Medium Traffic", "bias_category_description": "These media sources are slight to moderately conservative in bias. They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appeals to emotion or stereotypes) to favor conservative causes. These sources are generally trustworthy for information but may require further investigation.See all Right-Center sources.", "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate the Tulsa World Right-Center Biased based on reasonable editorial positions that slightly favor the right. We also rate them High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing and a clean fact-check record. Detailed Report Bias Rating: RIGHT-CENTER (3.4) Factual Reporting: HIGH (1.", "history": "Founded in 1905, Tulsa World is the daily newspaper for Tulsa, Oklahoma. It is the primary newspaper for the northeastern and eastern portions of Oklahoma and is the second-most widely circulated newspaper in the state. Read our profile on the United States government and media.", "ownership": "Lee Enterprises owns and publishes the Tulsa World. According toOpen Secrets, Lee Enterprises donated 88% of its money toRepublican politiciansfrom 1990 until 2016. However, during the 2020 election cycle, they donated 70% to Democratic candidates and causes. Advertising and subscription fees generate revenue.", "analysis": "These media sources are slight to moderately conservative in bias. They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appeals to emotion or stereotypes) to favor conservative causes. These sources are generally trustworthy for information but may require further investigation.See all Right-Center sources. In review, Tulsa World reports on news, sports, weather, crime, and entertainment for the greater Tulsa region. Reporters demonstrate minimal bias when reporting local news, such as thisRecreational marijuana petition campaign still on schedule despite challenges, organizer says. Further, the website publishes national and international news from theAssociated Press. Finally, all information is sourced via first-person accounts or through credible media. Editorially, the Tulsa World reasonably represents both sides. A review of editorial articles demonstrates a reasonable balance; however, slightly more op-eds favor the right. Further, Tulsa World has always endorsedRepublican candidates, and op-eds reflect a conservative perspective; therefore, we rate them right-center biased and high for factual news reporting.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "None in the Last 5 years" ], "last_updated": "June 28, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/fredericksburg-free-lance-star-bias/", "name": "Fredericksburg Free Lance Star", "source_url": "https://fredericksburg.com/", "bias_rating": "LEAST BIASED", "bias_score": 1.5, "factual_reporting": "HIGH", "factual_score": 1.0, "credibility_rating": "HIGH CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Newspaper", "traffic_popularity": "Medium Traffic", "bias_category_description": "These sources have minimal bias and use very few loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appeals to emotion or stereotypes).  The reporting is factual and usually sourced.  These are the most credible media sources.See all Least Biased sources.", "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate Fredericksburg Free Lance Star Least Biased based on reasonably balanced editorial positions that slightly favor the right. We also rate them High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing and a clean fact check record. Detailed Report Bias Rating: LEAST BIASED (1.5) Factual Reporting: HIGH (1.", "history": "The Fredericksburg Free Lance Star is a newspaper published in Fredericksburg, Virginia, United States. The paper covers news, sports, entertainment, lifestyle, and opinion for Fredericksburg and the surrounding area. Fredericksburg.com serves as the domain for the online version of the newspaper. Read our profile on the United States government and media.", "ownership": "Lee Enterprises owns and publishes The Fredericksburg Free Lance Star. According toOpen Secrets, Lee Enterprises donated 88% of its money toRepublican politiciansfrom 1990 until 2016. However, during the 2020 election cycle, they donated 70% to Democratic candidates and causes. Advertising and subscription fees generate revenue.", "analysis": "These sources have minimal bias and use very few loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appeals to emotion or stereotypes).  The reporting is factual and usually sourced.  These are the most credible media sources.See all Least Biased sources. In review, The Fredericksburg Free Lance Star reports on news, sports, weather, crime, and entertainment for the greater Fredericksburg, Virginia region. Reporters demonstrate minimal bias when reporting local news, such as thisTeen arrested after allegedly bringing gun, ammo to middle school in Fredericksburg. Further, the website publishes national and international news from theAssociated Press. Finally, all information is sourced via first-person accounts or through credible media. Editorially, The Fredericksburg Free Lance Star reasonably represents both sides. A review of editorial articles demonstrates a reasonable low bias; however, slightly more op-eds favor the right. While more op-eds favor the right, liberal perspectives have fair representation; therefore, they earn a least biased rating on the right side of the scale. In general, the news is reported factually and with minimal bias.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "None in the Last 5 years" ], "last_updated": "January 31, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/kaliningrad-news-bias-and-credibility/", "name": "Kaliningrad News", "source_url": "https://kaliningrad-news.net/", "bias_rating": "RIGHT", "bias_score": 6.0, "factual_reporting": "VERY LOW", "factual_score": 9.8, "credibility_rating": "LOW CREDIBILITY", "country": "Russia", "country_freedom_rating": "TOTAL OPPRESSION", "media_type": "Website", "traffic_popularity": "Minimal Traffic", "bias_category_description": null, "overall_summary": null, "history": "Kaliningrad News is a Russian-state-backeddisinformation websitethat is designed to impersonate a legitimate news source. It is part of the Pravda Network, a Moscow-based conglomerate of at least 193 websites, each tailored to specific languages and regions. The network was first identified by France’s VIGINUM agency in 2024 and is structured to mimic real news outlets while promoting pro-Kremlin narratives and anti-Western propaganda. The Pravda Network lacks transparency, as it does not disclose its ownership, editorial policies, or funding sources. The network is part of a larger Russian disinformation ecosystem, aiming to influence global public opinion in favor of the Kremlin. Read our profile on Russian media and government.", "ownership": "Kaliningrad News does not disclose its ownership or funding sources. However,investigationshave confirmed that the Pravda Network is a Kremlin-backed project. Funding likely comes from Russian state-sponsored entities, and the website is part of Russia’s broader information warfare strategy.", "analysis": "In review, Kaliningrad News is one of many disinformation websites operated by thePravda Network. The site mimics a legitimate news source but routinely promotes pro-Russian narratives, anti-Western disinformation, and Kremlin-approved propaganda. Content often includes: Generally, this source is unreliable on any level and should be avoided.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "Pro-Russian messaging, including justifications for Russia’s military actions.", "Anti-EU and anti-NATO content, designed to erode support for Western alliances.", "Fabricated or misleading reports, particularly regarding the West’s relationship with Russia and Ukraine." ], "last_updated": "October 7, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/freedomproject-media/", "name": "FreedomProject Media", "source_url": "https://www.freedomproject.com/", "bias_rating": "EXTREME RIGHT", "bias_score": 9.1, "factual_reporting": "LOW", "factual_score": 8.0, "credibility_rating": "HIGH CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Website", "traffic_popularity": "Minimal Traffic", "bias_category_description": null, "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate FreedomProject Media, Questionable based on Extreme Right bias, promoting both propaganda and conspiracies, a lack of transparency, using poor sources connected to hate groups, and several failed fact checks. Detailed Report Reasoning: Propaganda, Conspiracy, Poor Sourcing, Lack of Transparency, Failed Fact Checks Bias Rating: EXTREME RIGHT (9.1) Factual Reporting: LOW (8.0) Country: USA MBFC’s Country Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE Media Type: Website Traffic/Popularity: Minimal Traffic MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY History Founded in 2002, FreedomProject Media is a website that features conservative video shows, podcasts, and text-based news.", "history": "Founded in 2002, FreedomProject Media is a website that features conservative video shows, podcasts, and text-based news. The website does not contain an about page; however, a domain search indicates FreedomProject.com was registered in 2002 to theJohn Birch Society. FreedomProject Media is connected to theFreedomProject Academy, which is a private, online, Judeo-Christian school for students from kindergarten through high school that teaches from a Classical Christian education perspective. FPA is a school, not a self-paced program or tutorial service. Read our profile on the United States government and media.", "ownership": "FreedomProject Media does not disclose ownership on the website; however, the FreedomProject Academy is managed by FreedomProject Education, which is owned by theAmerican Opinion Foundation, a 501(c)(3) organization with ties to theJohn Birch Society. Revenue appears to be derived from donations.", "analysis": "This review will focus on text-based articles found on the website. FreedomProject Media reports news and opinions with a strong right-wing bias in story selection and wording. For example, this story contains strong loaded language,California Pushes K-12 Sex Ed Indoctrination That Will Blow Your Mind.The story primarily sources back to older articles on their own website. However, they provide outside links to the Conspiracy-PseudoscienceChristian Broadcasting Network (CBN)and the Anti-LGBT Family Research Institute, which is classified as an activeHate Groupin the USA. Stories generally revolve around education and how liberal education is destroying morality. They frequently promote a far-right Christian agenda such as anti-LGBT, anti-abortion, and pretty much anything left of right-center. They also promote baseless conspiracy theories like this:Snopes Defends Teaching Child Rape to Children. Further, FreedomProject has beenaccusedof promoting Far-Right Propaganda regarding Common Core State Standards andclimate change.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "In 2019, California education authorities formulated a policy that, if implemented, would force parents to allow their children to be taught that “there are 15 genders.”–FALSE", "Abandoning the Common Core set of standards for English and mathematics caused a Florida charter school’s test results to go from mediocre to outstanding.–FALSE", "In 2018 or 2019, Brea Olinda Unified School District in California “taught pedophilia as a sexual orientation.”–FALSE" ], "last_updated": "February 13, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/reduxx-bias-and-credibility/", "name": "Reduxx", "source_url": "https://reduxx.info/", "bias_rating": "FAR RIGHT", "bias_score": 7.9, "factual_reporting": "MIXED", "factual_score": 6.2, "credibility_rating": "LOW CREDIBILITY", "country": "Canada", "country_freedom_rating": "EXCELLENT", "media_type": "Website", "traffic_popularity": "Medium Traffic", "bias_category_description": null, "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate Reduxx as Far-Right biased based on its strong anti-transgender stance and affiliation with far-right narratives. We also rate them as Questionable and Mixed for factual reporting due to selective story choices and failed fact checks. Detailed Report Questionable Reasoning: Promotion of Propaganda, Hate, Failed Fact Checks Bias Rating: FAR RIGHT (7.9) Factual Reporting: MIXED (6.", "history": "Reduxxis a website founded in 2021 byAnna Slatz, a former contributor toRebel News, a factually questionable Canadian outlet.Reduxxclaims to focus on women’s rights and gender ideology but has beencriticizedfor consistently publishing content that targets transgender individuals, often portraying them in criminal contexts. Reduxx’s sister publication, ThePublica, was also founded and edited by Slatz. View our media country profile on Canada.", "ownership": "Reduxxis run by Anna Slatz, who has also gone by the nameAnna De Luca, according toCanadaland. The site is funded by reader donations on platforms like Patreon.", "analysis": "Reduxxdemonstrates a strong bias against transgender individuals, particularly transgender women, with much of its coverage focused on alleged criminal activities involving transgender people. Its articles often use sensationalized language to promote an anti-transgender narrative. Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC)criticizesReduxxfor using tactics akin to white nationalist sites, emphasizing criminal cases involving transgender individuals to suggest inherent criminality. The SPLC labels Reduxx’s content as“rabidly transphobic,”noting its focus on “transgender criminality.” The site consistently features emotionally charged stories. Examples of Reduxx’s reporting include articles like“UK: Trans-Identified Male Sentenced To 40 Months In Prison After Creating Child Pornography, Contacting A 9-Year-Old Girl For Sexual Abuse”and“Transgender Martial Artist Who Kicked Female Opponent So Hard She Forfeited Match Aims to Compete as a Woman at the 2028 Olympics”. These articles highlight negative incidents involving transgender individuals, reinforcing an anti-trans narrative. The website does not extensively cover broader feminist issues, such as reproductive rights or pay equity, instead focusing primarily on transgender issues, particularly in criminal contexts.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "As of late September 2023, the Berlin government was “offering children a pro-prostitution picture book” to teach them about sex work.–Misleading", "‘Pro-Pedophile’ Activist Group Celebrates As Germany Decriminalizes Child Porn Possession.–Mostly False" ], "last_updated": "December 31, 2024" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/american-compass-bias-and-credibility/", "name": "American Compass", "source_url": "https://americancompass.org/", "bias_rating": "RIGHT-CENTER", "bias_score": 2.8, "factual_reporting": "HIGH", "factual_score": 1.5, "credibility_rating": "HIGH CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Organization/Foundation", "traffic_popularity": "Minimal Traffic", "bias_category_description": "These media sources are slight to moderately conservative in bias. They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appealing to emotion or stereotypes) to favor conservative causes. These sources are generally trustworthy for information but may require further investigation.See all Right-Center sources.", "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate American Compass as right-center biased based on moderate conservative economic viewpoints. We also rate them High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing and a clean fact check record. Detailed Report Bias Rating: RIGHT-CENTER (2.8) Factual Reporting: HIGH (1.", "history": "TheAmerican Compassis a conservative think tank founded in 2020 by Oren Cass, a former advisor to Mitt Romney’s presidential campaign. The organization seeks to reorient conservative economic policy by prioritizing family, community, and domestic industry over traditional free-market ideology. American Compass challenges laissez-faire capitalism and promotes national industrial policy, a shift away from libertarian economic principles. Read our profile on the United States media and government.", "ownership": "American Compass operates as a501(c)(3) nonprofit organization. While its 2023 Annual Report provides insights into its work, it does not specify exact funding sources. However, external sources confirm notable funders:", "analysis": "These media sources are slight to moderately conservative in bias. They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appealing to emotion or stereotypes) to favor conservative causes. These sources are generally trustworthy for information but may require further investigation.See all Right-Center sources. American Compass promotes a conservative economic framework that rejects libertarian free-market ideology in favor of domestic industry protectionism, worker-oriented policies, and economic nationalism. These positions are reflected in their policy proposals and publications. The handbook“Rebuilding American Capitalism”outlines a policy roadmap aimed at aligning corporate profit-seeking with national economic interests, advocating for public policies that direct capital toward productive domestic uses rather than financial speculation. Their“Issues & Proposals”section covers globalization, financialization, industrial policy, labor, family, education, and technology, promoting trade restrictions, incentives for domestic production, and stricter immigration policies to support American workers. Two articles demonstrate American Compass’s mild conservative bias. In“Why DOGE Will Fail”, Oren Cass critiques easy-money solutions, warning against simplistic economic policies that avoid long-term investment in productive industries. The argument aligns with conservative economic skepticism of speculative digital assets. Similarly,“USMCA Was Never Meant to Be Permanent”by Daniel Kishi argues that U.S. trade agreements must continuously evolve to protect domestic workers and industries, reflecting conservative views on economic nationalism and skepticism of international trade pacts. In general, American Compass is a moderate conservative think tank that challenges free-market orthodoxy in favor of nationalist, worker-oriented economic policies. While it does not promote extreme right-wing libertarianism, it advocates for government intervention in trade, finance, and industry to support domestic economic interests.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "None in the Last 5 years" ], "last_updated": "March 4, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-purist-magazine-bias/", "name": "The Purist Magazine", "source_url": "https://thepuristonline.com/", "bias_rating": "PSEUDOSCIENCE", "bias_score": -3.5, "factual_reporting": "LOW", "factual_score": 7.8, "credibility_rating": "LOW CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Magazine", "traffic_popularity": "Minimal Traffic", "bias_category_description": null, "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate The Purist Magazine a Quackery Level Pseudoscience website based on the promotion of unproven, misleading, and false medical and health information. Detailed Report Bias Rating: PSEUDOSCIENCE (-3.5) Factual Reporting: LOW (7.8) Country: USA MBFC’s Country Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE Media Type: Magazine Traffic/Popularity: Minimal Traffic MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY History Founded in 2017 by Christina Cuomo, The Purist is a health and wellness print magazine and website that has promoted unsupported claims.", "history": "Founded in 2017 by Christina Cuomo, The Purist is a health and wellness print magazine and website that has promoted unsupported claims.Christina Cuomois the wife of CNN’s Chris Cuomo, the brother of former New York governor Andrew Cuomo. According to theirabout page, “The Purist will help you refine and define the life you seek. Here, you will find strength, equilibrium, peace of mind, lots of laughter, and loads of love.” Read our profile on the United States government and media.", "ownership": "The website does not disclose ownership, though Christina Cuomo lists herself as the founder. Display advertising and magazine subscription fees generate revenue.", "analysis": "The Purist divides content into categories such as fitness, beauty, food, style, food, and wellness, to name a few. The majority of articles focus on health and wellness. Articles and headlines do not use loaded wording such as thisDo You Have a Food Allergy or Just an Intolerance—How To Tell. The website also frequently covers celebrities such as thisWelcome To Selma’s World, discussing Selma Blair’s battle with multiple sclerosis. The Purist also publishes (Pseudo) science-based information that is not always factual. For example, they promote unproven and dangerous health claims such asdetox programs, which are proven impossiblethrough diet.Further, they have promotedbiomagnetismas a cure-all, including cancer.Research studiesdo not support the use of magnets for health benefits. Finally, during Covid-19, Christa Cuomopromoted her own cures and remediesthat are not supported by science, such as “broth of cayenne pepper, ginger, and garlic or the lemon and ginger tea or vitamin C.” She also promoted bleach baths, which obviously would have zero effect on a virus inside the body. In general, the Purist promotes quackery-level pseudoscience that may be dangerous if a person chooses not to seek qualified medical attention.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "None by fact-checkers; see above for examples of misinformation." ], "last_updated": "June 15, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/countervortex-bias-and-credibility/", "name": "CounterVortex", "source_url": "https://countervortex.org/mission-statement/", "bias_rating": "FAR LEFT", "bias_score": -8.8, "factual_reporting": "MIXED", "factual_score": 5.0, "credibility_rating": "MEDIUM CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Website", "traffic_popularity": "Minimal Traffic", "bias_category_description": "These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation.  They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using an appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports, and omit information that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy.See all Left Bias sources.", "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate CounterVortex as Far-Left biased based on editorial positions that align with the anarchist left. We also rate them Mixed for factual reporting due to the use of some factually mixed sources and consistent one-sided reporting that may leave out important context. Detailed Report Bias Rating: FAR LEFT (-8.8) Factual Reporting: MIXED (5.", "history": "Launched in 2001,CounterVortexis a news website/blog offering critical analysis of global issues. It provides comprehensive daily coverage of U.S. military operations, the War on Terror, resource conflicts, autonomy movements, and non-mainstream left-wing viewpoints from various regions. Named initially World War 4 Report, it evolved into CounterVortex. Bill Weinberg, the founder of CounterVortex, owns several websites, including Global Ganja Report, New Jewish Resistance, and EthnoGrub.com (currently under development). CounterVortex is based in New York. Read our profile on USA Media and Government.", "ownership": "Bill Weinbergis the owner of CounterVortex. Revenue is generated throughdonations and subscriptions.", "analysis": "These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation.  They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using an appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports, and omit information that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy.See all Left Bias sources. Weinberg’s basic self-described political orientation is left-anarchist. CounterVortex distinguishes its content by type, offeringopinionpieces and straightforward reporting. Opinion pieces, often found in Bill Weinberg’s blog, reflect editorial perspectives, showcasing a more subjective and analytical approach consistent with Weinberg’s political stance. An example of such an editorial piece is Weinberg’s blog post titled“Putin Design to Rebuild Russian Empire: blatanter and blatanter.”In this critical examination ofRussia’sforeign policy, Weinberg’s left-anarchist viewpoint influences the framing, language, and analysis. He highlights Russian expansionism, uses emotionally loaded language to condemn it, supports his claims with sources like theNew York Times,Newsweek,The Guardian,Russian Komsomolskaya Pravda, Chinese internet service provider NetEase, Inc.(163.com), andNPR, and maintains a consistent bias against authoritarianism and imperialism. The article combines factual reporting with a subjective analysis, offering a critical perspective on Russian geopolitical strategies. Another example is Podcasts such as“Ukraine and the Weaponization of History —again,”whichincludes a clear anti-Russian stance, skepticism towards accusations of Ukrainian Nazism, and support forUkraine’swar effort against Russian aggression. Regarding news reporting, the article titled“Trump’s America: No Longer Safe For Refugees”describes the treatment of refugees in the U.S. under theTrumpadministration in stark, downbeat terms. Phrases like “brutally transgressed American as well as international law” and “obliterate the basic human rights of refugees” are emotionally charged, emphasizing the severity and perceived inhumanity of these policies. This story relies on proper sourcing fromReuters, constituteproject.org, ohchr.org, hrlibrary.umn.edu., andAl Jazeera.The article presents a unique perspective critical of both Western and non-Western power structures. In general, CounterVortex holds far-left biases in favor of anti-war, anti-imperialism, and anti-fascism (Left Anarchism). News reporting is usually rooted in fact; however, they sometimes rely on factually mixed sources and consistently provide only one side of the story, leaving out important context.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "They have not been checked by a third-party fact-checker." ], "last_updated": "October 10, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/nowthis-news/", "name": "NowThis News", "source_url": "https://nowmedianetwork.co/", "bias_rating": "FAR LEFT BIAS", "bias_score": -8.5, "factual_reporting": "MIXED", "factual_score": 6.2, "credibility_rating": "LOW CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": null, "media_type": "Website", "traffic_popularity": "Medium Traffic", "bias_category_description": null, "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate NowThis News Questionable based on far-left bias, promotion of liberal propaganda and five verified failed fact checks. Detailed Report Questionable Reasoning: Propaganda, Failed Fact Checks Bias Rating: FAR LEFT BIAS (-8.5) Factual Reporting: MIXED (6.2) Country: USA MBFC Country Freedom Rank: MOSTLY FREE Media Type: Website Traffic/Popularity: Medium Traffic MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY History NowThis News was founded in 2012 by Huffington Post co-founder and former chairman Kenneth Lerer and former Huffington Post CEO Eric Hippeau.", "history": "NowThis News was founded in 2012 byHuffington Postco-founder and former chairman Kenneth Lerer and former Huffington Post CEO Eric Hippeau. They use Facebook, Snapchat, Twitter, Instagram, Vine, Tumblr, and YouTube as their primary news distribution outlets. Read our profile on the United States government and media.", "ownership": "NowThis News is owned by Accelerate Change as of April 2024 and has been rebranded as NowMedia. Revenue is generated through advertising.", "analysis": "In review, NowThis News reports political news with a strong liberal/progressive leaning bias, heavily relying on meme culture and soundbites, often omitting certain key facts spoken in video clips. There is the use of loaded emotional headlines that favor the left, such as this:Bill Nye the Science Guy on Trump’s Climate Change Denial. NowThis News favors more progressive Democrats with flattering headlines like this:Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez Gives Inspiring Speech at Bernie Sanders Town Hall. In general, they support progressive candidates over establishment Democrats and routinely denigrate the right.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "No, Internet, CNN did not delete its poll showing Bernie Sanders won the Democratic debate–Pants on Fire", "NowThis news site says Donald Trump wrong and Bill Clinton didn’t sign NAFTA–False", "Wood in Cheese?–Mostly False", "DID BUSH’S POPULARITY DOUBLE AFTER TRUMP WAS ELECTED?–False", "Democrats were at a 9/11 memorial service when NC Republicans held a controversial vote–False" ], "last_updated": "January 7, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/fdesouche-bias-and-credibility/", "name": "Fdesouche", "source_url": "https://www.fdesouche.com/", "bias_rating": "FAR RIGHT", "bias_score": 8.0, "factual_reporting": "MIXED", "factual_score": 6.4, "credibility_rating": "LOW CREDIBILITY", "country": "France", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Website", "traffic_popularity": "High Traffic", "bias_category_description": null, "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate Fdesouche as Far-Right Biased due to its consistent nationalist and anti-immigration framing. We rate its reporting as Questionable and Mixed in factuality due to misleading article selection, lack of balance, and a history of spreading false or misleading claims. Detailed Report Questionable Reasoning: Propaganda, Poor Sources, Conspiracy, False Claims, Lack of Transparency Bias Rating: FAR RIGHT (8.0) Factual Reporting: MIXED (6.", "history": "Fdesoucheis a French news aggregator that focuses on topics related to immigration, national identity, and crime. The site was founded in 2005 and originally functioned as a blog under the nameFrançois Desouche, which translates toNative Frenchman. Fdesouche has a significant following among far-right and nationalist audiences in France. It often republishes news articles focusing on perceived societal changes due to immigration. The platform does not produce original reporting but curates content from other media sources, often framing stories through an anti-immigration and nationalist perspective. Read our profile on France’s Media and Government.", "ownership": "Fdesouche is believed to be associated withPierre Sautarel, although its exact ownership structure remains unclear. The website operates primarily through advertising revenue and reader donations.", "analysis": "Fdesouche is often called the“Breitbart of France,”a term used to describe its far-right, nationalist, and anti-immigration editorial stance, similar toBreitbartNews in the United States. Fdesouche consistently promotes nationalist,anti-immigration, andanti-Islamperspectives. The site frequently amplifies content that portrays immigrants and minority groups in a negative light, often emphasizing crime, social unrest, and cultural tensions linked to immigration. Articles are selected and headlined in ways that align with right-wing populist and identitarian narratives, often without providing broader statistical context or alternative perspectives. For example, the articleLydia Mugambe, a Ugandan magistrate serving as a judge at the United Nations and a doctoral student at Oxford, held her housekeeper as a slave; upon her arrest, she cited her “immunity”, focuses on a high-profile crime involving an African judge, reinforcing a narrative of corruption and criminality among immigrants. Similarly, the article“He is unmanageable, In Bourges (18), Mustafa B. was sentenced for the 43rd time after having robbed and threatened a shopkeeper with a bladed weapon” highlights repeated criminal offenses by an immigrant but lacks broader crime statistics or comparative data, making it an example of cherry-picking stories that reinforce negative stereotypes about immigrants. Additionally, the website frames political events in ways that criticize progressive policies. It often portrays immigration as a societal crisis while downplaying counterarguments. In general, Fdesouche reinforce a one-sided narrative that fuels anti-immigration sentiments and nationalist rhetoric.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "Photo shows “Chuck Schumer kissing this child on Epstein island!”–False" ], "last_updated": "March 16, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/kurdistan-24/", "name": "Kurdistan 24", "source_url": "https://www.kurdistan24.net/", "bias_rating": "LEFT-CENTER", "bias_score": -4.0, "factual_reporting": "MIXED", "factual_score": 4.7, "credibility_rating": "MEDIUM CREDIBILITY", "country": "Iraq", "country_freedom_rating": "LIMITED FREEDOM", "media_type": "Website", "traffic_popularity": "Medium Traffic", "bias_category_description": "These media sources have a slight to moderate liberal bias.  They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appeals to emotion or stereotypes) to favor liberal causes.  These sources are generally trustworthy for information but may require further investigation.See all Left-Center sources.", "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate Kurdistan 24 mixed for factual reporting due to poor sourcing without linking and left-center biased based on story selection and wording. Detailed Report Bias Rating: LEFT-CENTER (4.0) Factual Reporting: MIXED (4.7) Country: Iraq MBFC’s Country Freedom Rank: LIMITED FREEDOM Media Type: Website Traffic/Popularity: Medium Traffic MBFC Credibility Rating: MEDIUM CREDIBILITY History Launched on October 31, 2015, Kurdistan 24 is an online Kurdish news service based in Erbil.", "history": "Launched on October 31, 2015, Kurdistan 24 is an online Kurdish news service based in Erbil.Kurdistan 24covers news in the Kurdistan Region, the Middle East, and internationally. The founder and General Manager isNoreldin Waisy, and Karzan Sulaivany is the website’s editor.Kurdistan 24mainly focuses on news, economy, culture, sports, and interviews in Kurdistan and worldwide. Read our profile on Iraq’s media and government.", "ownership": "Kurdistan24 for Media and Research owns the website. It is not clear how they are funded.", "analysis": "These media sources have a slight to moderate liberal bias.  They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appeals to emotion or stereotypes) to favor liberal causes.  These sources are generally trustworthy for information but may require further investigation.See all Left-Center sources. In review, Kurdistan 24 is moderately biased towardliberal causessuch as “Ethnic and religious diversity, tolerance cornerstone of new Kurdistan state.” Kurdistan 24 uses moderate loaded language in headlines and also the body of articles, such as: “Any Turkish military operation in Afrin will fail, be faced with strong resistance: Kurdish official.” Although the articles tend to be well written, they are often poorly sourced, mostly through quotes, instead of links.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "None in the Last 5 years" ], "last_updated": "December 12, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/phillydaily-bias-and-credibility/", "name": "PhillyDaily", "source_url": "https://phillydaily.com/", "bias_rating": "RIGHT-CENTER", "bias_score": 2.8, "factual_reporting": "HIGH", "factual_score": 1.5, "credibility_rating": "HIGH CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Website", "traffic_popularity": "Minimal Traffic", "bias_category_description": "These media sources are slight to moderately conservative in bias. They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appealing to emotion or stereotypes) to favor conservative causes. These sources are generally trustworthy for information but may require further investigation.See all Right-Center sources.", "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate PhillyDaily as Right-Center Biased based on its story selection and Op-eds, which slightly favor the right. We rate its Factual Reporting as High due to consistent sourcing from reputable outlets and the absence of any known IFCN-verified failed fact checks. Detailed Report Bias Rating: RIGHT-CENTER (2.8) Factual Reporting: HIGH (1.", "history": "PhillyDaily is a news and opinion website based in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. They cover local news, politics and opinion. Read our profile on the United States government and media.", "ownership": "PhillyDaily is a nonprofit 501(c)(3) organization primarily funded through advertising. They are also part of theFideri News Network, consisting of 19 news sites in the Philadelphia and Jersey Shore areas.", "analysis": "These media sources are slight to moderately conservative in bias. They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appealing to emotion or stereotypes) to favor conservative causes. These sources are generally trustworthy for information but may require further investigation.See all Right-Center sources. The PhillyDaily website reports local news with minimal bias, highlighting facts and events such as thisPennsylvanians retain Supreme Court justices.This story is fact-based and, like all others reviewed, relies on credible sources of information. The website focuses on local and regional news and therefore does not cover national news stories. Editorially, op-eds tend to moderately favor the right with opinions like thisBlame for violence continuing in Philadelphia lies at DA’s doorstep.However, some op-eds slightly favored the left to offer some balance, but on the whole, more favor the right.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "None in the Last 5 years" ], "last_updated": "November 7, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/greenfield-daily-reporter-bias/", "name": "Greenfield Daily Reporter", "source_url": "https://www.greenfieldreporter.com/", "bias_rating": "RIGHT-CENTER", "bias_score": 3.3, "factual_reporting": "HIGH", "factual_score": 1.1, "credibility_rating": "HIGH CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Newspaper", "traffic_popularity": "Minimal Traffic", "bias_category_description": "These media sources are slightly to moderately conservative in bias. They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appeals to emotion or stereotypes) to favor conservative causes. These sources are generally trustworthy for information but may require further investigation.See all Right-Center sources.", "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate the Greenfield Daily Reporter right-center biased based on editorial positions that slightly favor the right. We also rate them High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing and a clean fact checks record. Detailed Report Bias Rating: RIGHT-CENTER (3.3) Factual Reporting: HIGH (1.", "history": "The Greenfield Daily Reporter is a newspaper based in Greenfield, Indiana, serving Greenfield and the surrounding area. The website for the paper is located at greenfieldreporter.net. Read our profile on the United States government and media.", "ownership": "AIM Mediaowns the Greenfield Daily Reporter and several small newspapers in Texas, Ohio, and Indiana. Advertising and subscription fees generate revenue.", "analysis": "These media sources are slightly to moderately conservative in bias. They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appeals to emotion or stereotypes) to favor conservative causes. These sources are generally trustworthy for information but may require further investigation.See all Right-Center sources. The Greenfield Daily Reporter publishes local news through the use of local journalists. Local news uses minimally loaded wording like thisON CAMERA: Police agencies expand their network of traffic monitors. The national news is covered by the least biasedAssociated Press. Editorially, the Greenfield Daily Reporter leans right in its views and endorsementsANOTHER VIEWPOINT: Biden overreaches with mandate.b In general, the news is reported factually and with a right-leaning editorial bias.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "None in the Last 5 years" ], "last_updated": "February 7, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/international-consortium-of-investigative-journalists/", "name": "International Consortium of Investigative Journalists", "source_url": "https://www.icij.org/", "bias_rating": "LEAST BIASED", "bias_score": 1.2, "factual_reporting": "VERY HIGH", "factual_score": 0.0, "credibility_rating": "HIGH CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Organization/Foundation", "traffic_popularity": "Medium Traffic", "bias_category_description": "These sources have minimal bias and use very few loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using an appeal to emotion or stereotypes).  The reporting is factual and usually sourced.  These are the most credible media sources.See all Least Biased sources.", "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists (ICIJ) as Least Biased and High factual based on well-sourced credible journalism. Detailed Report Bias Rating: LEAST BIASED (1.2) Factual Reporting: VERY HIGH (0.0) Country: USA MBFC’s Country Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE Media Type: Organization/Foundation Traffic/Popularity: Medium Traffic MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY History The International Consortium of Investigative Journalists (ICIJ) is a Washington-based international network launched in 1997 by the Center for Public Integrity which includes 165 investigative journalists in over 65 countries who work together on “issues such as “cross-border crime, corruption, and the accountability of power.", "history": "The International Consortium of Investigative Journalists (ICIJ) is a Washington-based international network launched in 1997 by theCenter for Public Integritywhich includes 165 investigative journalists in over 65 countries who work together on “issues such as “cross-border crime, corruption, and the accountability of power.” Read our profile on the United States government and media.", "ownership": "The ICIJ is a non-profit that is funded through donations and according to theirabout page, “Recent ICIJ funders include: Adessium Foundation,Open Society Foundations, The Sigrid Rausing Trust, The Ford Foundation, Fritt Ord Foundation and the Pulitzer Center on Crisis Reporting. We also receive support from Australian philanthropist Graeme Wood.”", "analysis": "These sources have minimal bias and use very few loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using an appeal to emotion or stereotypes).  The reporting is factual and usually sourced.  These are the most credible media sources.See all Least Biased sources. In review, the ICIJ website provides investigations, data, and a “global network of267 investigative journalistsin 100 countries who collaborate on in-depth investigative stories.” The primary purpose of this website is to expose and report credibly on stories from strict countries with accuracy. Many times countries limit free journalism, and ICIJ covers what may be suppressed, such as thisInvestigating Malaysia’s history, to understand the present. The ICIJ also reports negatively on former President Donald Trump’s business ties but is always evidence-based such as thisOffshore Trove Exposes Trump-Russia links and Piggy Banks of the Wealthiest 1 Percent. In general, this is a low-biased source that is factual.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "None in the Last 5 years" ], "last_updated": "November 24, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/military-review-topwar-ru-bias/", "name": "Military Review (topwar.ru)", "source_url": "https://topwar.ru/news/", "bias_rating": "RIGHT", "bias_score": 6.5, "factual_reporting": "MIXED", "factual_score": 6.4, "credibility_rating": "LOW CREDIBILITY", "country": "Russia", "country_freedom_rating": "TOTAL OPPRESSION", "media_type": "Website", "traffic_popularity": "Medium Traffic", "bias_category_description": null, "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate Topwar.ru or Military Review as Right Biased and questionable based on promoting pro-Russian propaganda, poor sourcing, censorship, and failed fact checks. Detailed Report Questionable Reasoning: Propaganda, Poor Sourcing, Failed Fact Checks, Censorship Bias Rating: RIGHT (6.5) Factual Reporting: MIXED (6.", "history": "Launched in 2010,Military Reviewis an online publication focusing on military and geopolitical issues; it covers military affairs, geopolitics, military hardware, conflict zones, and public opinion on several social and economic issues. Topwar.ru is the URL address. “Military Review” is headquartered in Moscow, Russia. The site also has anEnglish edition. Roskomnadzor(Russian Federal Service for Supervision of Communications, Information Technology, and Mass Media ) lists TOPWAR.RU as its domain name and Military Review as its media name. Read our profile on Russian media and government.", "ownership": "Topwar.ru is owned and operated by VO-Media LLC, a Russian media company.Roskomnadzorlists the Limited Liability Company “VO-media” as Military Review’s founder. The website generates revenue through online advertising and sponsored content.", "analysis": "Military Review or TopWar.ru features the following sections: News, Weaponry, History, Opinions, Analytics, and Video. The website primarily covers military and geopolitical issues from a Russian perspective, such as this article titled“Finnish Navy on the eve of joining NATO,”which presents information about the Finnish navy’s size, equipment, and composition. However, the article lacks specific sources to support its claims and doesn’t provide a clear author or editorial team responsible for its content. Therefore the information presented is unreliable. Furthermore, the website publishes articles with strong, emotionally loaded words, such as“Berlin Chronicles: how Germany was left defenseless.”The article discusses Germany’s current military defenses and dependence on NATO allies for protection, ultimately attributing these factors to the country’s limited military capabilities. Regarding sourcing, it sourcesDie Zeitby saying, “According to Die Zeit, the country is not protected from the air, the shelters are in a deplorable state, and the public emergency warning system does not work.” But no hyperlink was provided. Editorially, the website tends to have a pro-Russian bias and frequently criticizes the policies of the United States and its allies. For example, a quote from the article reads, “There is nothing surprising in this – NATO countries a priori calculated their arsenals and supplies for one month of active hostilities.” While the website does provide analysis and commentary on a wide range of military and geopolitical issues, its perspective is consistently pro-Russian. Finally, fact-checkerPolygraph.infodescribesMiliary Reviewas it “Promotes radical nationalistic ideas and portrays Russian military capabilities as the world’s most advanced.” In general, Military Review is a pro-Russian Government propaganda site that has published misinformation and is restricted by government censorship.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "Britain apologized to Putin.–False", "F-35 ‘Epic Failure’ Intercepting Russian Bomber Tu-160.–Fake" ], "last_updated": "December 29, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/right-wing-watch/", "name": "Right Wing Watch", "source_url": "https://www.rightwingwatch.org/", "bias_rating": "LEFT", "bias_score": -7.3, "factual_reporting": "HIGH", "factual_score": 1.8, "credibility_rating": "HIGH CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Organization/Foundation", "traffic_popularity": "Medium Traffic", "bias_category_description": "These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation.  They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports, and omit information that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy.See all Left Bias sources.", "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate Right Wing Watch Left Biased based on story selection and editorial positions that favor the left. We also rate them High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing of information and a clean fact check record. Detailed Report Bias Rating: LEFT (-7.3) Factual Reporting: HIGH (1.", "history": "Right Wing Watch keeps track of various organizations, but the groups they track do tend to be conservative extremists in one regard or another. According to theirabout page, “Right Wing Watch is a project ofPeople For the American Way (PFAW)dedicated to monitoring and exposing the activities and rhetoric of right-wing activists and organizations to expose their extreme agenda.” Adele M. Stan is the research director. On June 28, 2021, it was revealed that Right Wing Watch’s YouTube channel had beenpermanently suspended and deletedfor community Guidelines violations. While we don’t have the details, we have seen this before where Google/Youtube cannot distinguish a source exposing and debunking conspiracy theories. Hopefully, this situation will be resolved as Right Wing Watch provides a valuable service for fact-checkers. Read our profile on the United States government and media.", "ownership": "Right Wing Watch is a People For the American Way (PFAW) project, a progressive advocacy group in the United States.“Organized as a 501(c)(4) non-profit organization, PFAW was registered in 1981 by the television producerNorman Lear. PFAW was founded in opposition to the publicized agenda of the Moral Majority, a formerly prominent and influential American political organization associated with the Christian right.” Funding is derived from donations to the People For the American Way.", "analysis": "These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation.  They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports, and omit information that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy.See all Left Bias sources. In review, the mission of Right Wing Watch is to “expose the activities and rhetoric of right-wing activists and organizations to expose their extreme agenda.” They frequently report on right-wing conspiracy theories such as this:This GOP Challenger to Ilhan Omar ‘100%’ Stands with QAnon. This story is properly sourced to the left-leaning sourcesThe Daily BeastandRolling Stone. Right Wing Watch also frequently reports negatively on the Trump administration:Is Donald Trump Fulfilling White Nationalist Jared Taylor’s Dreams?This story is also properly sourced to theGuardianandVanity Fair. Finally, they report on the Alt-Right and White Nationalism, such as this:Infowars is Working to Sanitize the White Nationalist Group Formerly Known as Identity Evropa. In general, story selection always favors the left and is properly sourced.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "None in the Last 5 years. In fact, Right Wing Watch is frequently used as a reliable source for IFCN fact-checkers." ], "last_updated": "May 16, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/international-organization/", "name": "International Organization", "source_url": "https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/international-organization", "bias_rating": "LEAST BIASED", "bias_score": 0.3, "factual_reporting": "VERY HIGH", "factual_score": 0.0, "credibility_rating": "HIGH CREDIBILITY", "country": "United Kingdom", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Organization/Foundation", "traffic_popularity": "Minimal Traffic", "bias_category_description": "These sources have minimal bias and use very few loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using an appeal to emotion or stereotypes).  The reporting is factual and usually sourced.  These are the most credible media sources.See all Least Biased sources.", "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate the International Organization a Least Biased Journal based on balanced story selection. We also rate them Very High for factual reporting due to extensive sourcing of information. Detailed Report Bias Rating: LEAST BIASED (0.3) Factual Reporting: VERY HIGH (0.", "history": "International Organization is a peer-reviewed academic journal that covers the entire field of international affairs.  The Cambridge University Press publishes it on behalf of the International Organization Foundation. According to the Journal Citation Reports, the journal has a 2017 impact factor of 4.517, ranking it 2nd out of 169 journals in the category “Political Science” and 1st out of 85 journals in the category “International Relations.” Read our profile on the United States government and media.", "ownership": "The publisher and owner is Cambridge University Press. Revenue is derived through a paid subscription or pay-per-article download", "analysis": "These sources have minimal bias and use very few loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using an appeal to emotion or stereotypes).  The reporting is factual and usually sourced.  These are the most credible media sources.See all Least Biased sources. In review, the International Organization offers links to their journal articles that lead to abstracts and the option to pay for the article and, in some cases, to view it for free. All information on this site is very well-sourced and factual. There is little bias detected here.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "None in the Last 5 years." ], "last_updated": "November 24, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/rushlimbaugh-com/", "name": "RushLimbaugh.com", "source_url": "https://www.rushlimbaugh.com/", "bias_rating": "FAR-RIGHT", "bias_score": 8.8, "factual_reporting": "VERY LOW", "factual_score": 9.2, "credibility_rating": "LOW CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Website", "traffic_popularity": "Minimal Traffic", "bias_category_description": null, "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate RushLimbaugh.com Right Biased and Questionable based on the promotion of propaganda and conspiracy theories as well as numerous failed fact checks. Detailed Report Reasoning: Propaganda, Conspiracy, Failed Fact Checks, Fake News Bias Rating: FAR-RIGHT (8.8) Factual Reporting: VERY LOW (9.", "history": "Founded in 1995, RushLimbaugh.com is the official website for conservative radio personality Rush Limbaugh. The Rush Limbaugh radio program debuted in 1988 and is nationally syndicated on AM and FM radio. According to theirabout page, “Rush Limbaugh, the “Doctor of Democracy,” is known as the pioneer of AM radio. Limbaugh revolutionized the media and political landscape with his unprecedented combination of serious discussion of political, cultural, and social issues along with satirical and biting humor, which parodies previously “untouchable” personalities and topics. His passion inspires millions of Americans to be the best they can be and keeps the country on course to a bright future.” In February 2020, Rush Limbaugh was awarded thePresidential Medal of Freedomby Donald Trump during the State of the Union address. On February 17, 2021, Rush Limbaugh passed away at age 70. The website continues to provide transcripts of Limbaugh’s years of radio broadcasts. Read our profile on the United States government and media.", "ownership": "RushLimbaugh.com is owned by Premiere Radio Networks, which in turn is owned by iHeartMedia. iHeartMedia owns approximately 850 radio stations across the USA. Revenue is derived through advertising, memberships, and merchandise sold in an online store. In review, RushLimbaugh.com publishes information about the radio show, transcripts, and news articles from a strong conservative perspective. News stories often contain clips from his radio program in both text and audio format. There is the frequent use of emotionally loaded language that denigrates the left, such as thisFor Democrats, More Death Equals More Blame on Trump. While the website publishes content from a conservative perspective, there is a strong emphasis on promoting former President Donald Trump:Trump Conducts Press Corps Like an Orchestra. Reporting on Donald Trump is propagandistic, with only positive reporting directed at Trump and harshly negative reporting on his opponents. Reporting on the Democratic Party and the left has relied on propaganda and conspiracy theories such as claiming thatBarack Obama removed the citizenship questionfrom the census. This is afalse claim. Regarding false claims, Rush Limbaugh has an abysmalrecord with fact-checkers. Editorially, RushLimbaugh.com holds right-leaning positions that align with former President Trump. It was rare for Rush Limbaugh to criticize the former President. In general, this website provides far-right biased information that is frequently not factual. Failed Fact Checks(Rush Limbaugh hasfailed over 50 fact checks. Below is a shortlist.) Overall, we rate RushLimbaugh.com Right Biased and Questionable based on the promotion of propaganda and conspiracy theories as well as numerous failed fact checks. (D. Van Zandt 5/23/2020) Updated (05/16/2025) Source:https://www.rushlimbaugh.com/ Last Updated on May 16, 2025 byMedia Bias Fact Check Do you appreciate our work? Please consider one of the following ways to sustain us.MBFC Ad-FreeorMBFC DonationLeft vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sourcesFound this insightful? Please consider sharing on your Social Media:Explore Similar Sources:JD Supra Bias and Credibility – Bias and Credibility", "analysis": null, "failed_fact_checks": [ "Says “11 straight years of no major hurricanes striking land” in the United States “bores a hole right through the whole climate change argument.”–Pants on Fire", "“Obama regime planned the influx of illegal alien children at the border.”–Pants on Fire", "“The coronavirus is the common cold, folks.”–False", "“It appears that the (Jacksonville) shooter was part of the Trump’ Resistance’.”–False", "Says House Democrats’ impeachment inquiry of President Donald Trump “doesn’t feature the opposition party, it doesn’t feature cross-examination.”–False", "Jeffrey Goldberg, Editor-in-Chief for The Atlantic, confessed that the central claim in his publication’s reprehensible hit piece on the President could very well be false.–False" ], "last_updated": "May 16, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-liberty-loft/", "name": "The Liberty Loft", "source_url": "https://thelibertyloft.com/", "bias_rating": "FAR RIGHT", "bias_score": 8.4, "factual_reporting": "MIXED", "factual_score": 6.3, "credibility_rating": "LOW CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Website", "traffic_popularity": "Medium Traffic", "bias_category_description": null, "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate The Liberty Loft Far-Right Biased and Questionable due to promoting propaganda, false and misleading information, and a lack of transparency with ownership. Detailed Report Questionable Reasoning: Pseudoscience, Propaganda, Lack of Transparency, False Claims Bias Rating: FAR RIGHT (8.4) Factual Reporting: MIXED (6.3) Country: USA MBFC’s Country Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE Media Type: Website Traffic/Popularity: Medium Traffic MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY History Founded in 2020 by Jared Dyson , The Liberty Loft is a conservative news and opinion website.", "history": "Founded in 2020 byJared Dyson, The Liberty Loft is a conservative news and opinion website. Their about page states, “We believe there is room for additional conservative content that is not necessarily pushing a straightforward agenda like typical mainstream media. We want to be fair and balanced. We do not hide the fact that we are conservative focused, but you will not see us specifically carrying a party agenda.” The website also lists partnerships with several Questionable sources such asZenith News,The Liberty Daily,NewsAmmo, and the Right BiasedWhatFingerNews. Read our profile on the United States government and media.", "ownership": "The Liberty Loft lacks transparency as they do not clearly state ownership; however, theirprivacy policy pageindicates Premier Media Group LLC owns it. Advertising, donations, and a shop that sells branded and conservative-themed merchandise generate revenue.", "analysis": "In review, The Liberty Loft provides conservative news and commentary and links to the Jared Dyson Podcast. Articles and headlines often contain emotionally loaded wording such as thisBiden’s Policies Will Kill More Than COVID. This article is properly labeled as an opinion piece and is properly sourced to credible media outlets such asThe HillandReuters. Story selection always favors the right and quite often denigrates the left such as thisGovernors and Mayors are criminalizing families and holidays. This opinion piece is also properly sourced. During the 2020 election, The Liberty Loft has promoted the widespread voter fraud narrative, which as of this date, is unprovenDemocrats admit elections are rigged and encourage fraud in Georgia. Further, during the Covid-19 pandemic, they frequently promoted misinformation related to the vaccine, such as thisOpinion: Pfizer testing Omicron specific vaccine proves vaccine narrative is propaganda. In another false story,FDA Admits Home PCR Test Kits Contain Known ‘Hazardous’ Drug, they state, “One warning not given is the potential risk of death. Sodium azide has been known to cause death, as detailed in a 1990 government study titled “Death following accidental sodium azide ingestion.” They fail to mention that Sodium Azide does not contact the skin and is not ingested in any way; therefore, it is not an issue. In general, Liberty Loft promotes far-right biased propaganda and often publishes misinformation.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "A nine-year-old girl was arrested at the Natural History Museum in New York City for refusing to show proof of vaccination. –False" ], "last_updated": "July 15, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/biotechnology-innovation-organization-bio/", "name": "Biotechnology Innovation Organization (BIO)", "source_url": "https://www.bio.org", "bias_rating": "PRO-SCIENCE", "bias_score": -0.3, "factual_reporting": "VERY HIGH", "factual_score": 0.0, "credibility_rating": "HIGH CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Organization/Foundation", "traffic_popularity": "Minimal Traffic", "bias_category_description": "These sources consist of legitimate science or are evidence-based through the use of credible scientific sourcing.  Legitimate science follows the scientific method, is unbiased, and does not use emotional words.  These sources also respect the consensus of experts in the given scientific field and strive to publish peer-reviewed science. Some sources in this category may have a slight political bias but adhere to scientific principles.See all Pro-Science sources.", "overall_summary": "Overall, this is a pro-Science source. Detailed Report Bias Rating: PRO-SCIENCE (-0.3) Factual Reporting: VERY HIGH (0.0) Country: USA MBFC’s Country Freedom Rank: MOSTLY FREE Media Type: Organization/Foundation Traffic/Popularity: Minimal Traffic MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY History Founded in 1993, the Biotechnology Innovation Organization (BIO) is the largest trade organization globally that represents the biotechnology industry.", "history": "Founded in 1993, the Biotechnology Innovation Organization (BIO) is the largest trade organization globally that represents the biotechnology industry. According to theirabout page, “BIO members are involved in researching and developing innovative healthcare, agricultural, industrial and environmental biotechnology products. BIO also produces theBIO International Convention, the world’s largest gathering of the biotechnology industry, along with industry-leading investor and partnering meetings held around the world.” Read our profile on the United States government and media.", "ownership": "BIO is a Nonprofit Tax-Exempt: 501(c)(6) and is funded through donations by persons, organizations, and corporations.", "analysis": "Biotechnology Innovation Organization does not post news related to politics but instead focuses on advocacy for the advancement of biotechnology. They do have a section on the website calledNews & Reports, where they opine primarily about healthcare news. In some cases, they have a favorable view of Trump’s policies, such ashereand others, where theyvilify his policiestowards health care. Everything on this website is well-sourced and related to science or the politics that drive it. Overall, this is a pro-Science source. (D. Van Zandt 10/27/2018) Updated (02/11/2025) Source:https://www.bio.org Last Updated on February 11, 2025 byMedia Bias Fact Check Do you appreciate our work? Please consider one of the following ways to sustain us.MBFC Ad-FreeorMBFC DonationLeft vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sourcesFound this insightful? Please consider sharing on your Social Media:Explore Similar Sources:Applied System Innovation – Bias and CredibilityInnovation Journal – Bias and CredibilityInternational Organization – Bias and CredibilityWorld Health Organization (WHO) – Bias and CredibilityNational Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws (NORML) – Bias and Credibility", "failed_fact_checks": [], "last_updated": "February 11, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/colorado-times-recorder-bias/", "name": "Colorado Times Recorder", "source_url": "https://coloradotimesrecorder.com/", "bias_rating": "LEFT", "bias_score": -6.3, "factual_reporting": "HIGH", "factual_score": 1.0, "credibility_rating": "HIGH CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Website", "traffic_popularity": "Minimal Traffic", "bias_category_description": "These media sources are moderate to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation.  They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using an appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports, and omit information that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy.See all Left Bias sources.", "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate the Colorado Times Recorder left biased based on holding progressive left editorial positions. We also rate them High for factual reporting due to the use of credible sources and a clean fact-check record. Detailed Report Bias Rating: LEFT (-6.3) Factual Reporting: HIGH (1.", "history": "Founded in 2016 by journalist and author Jason Salzman, The Colorado Times Recorder is a news and opinion website covering Colorado politics from a progressive perspective. According to theirabout page, “We aim to be fair and accurate. Our work is nonpartisan, with a progressive orientation, which means we emphasize coverage of Colorado stories that advance or illuminate the progressive values of freedom, justice, responsibility, opportunity, and equality. Conversely, call out/correct/challenge bigotry, racism, misinformation, and conspiracies, particularly — at this moment — election conspiracies.” Read our profile on the United States government and media.", "ownership": "Although not clearly stated, Jason Salzman appears to be the owner and editor of the Colorado Times Recorder Advertising and donations generate revenue.", "analysis": "These media sources are moderate to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation.  They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using an appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports, and omit information that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy.See all Left Bias sources. The Colorado Times Recorder primarily covers Colorado Politics using moderately loaded language that favors the leftGOP Candidate Buckley Paid Himself Thousands in Improper Mileage Reimbursements. This story and others analyzed rely on credible sources such asThe Colorado Springs Gazetteand government sources. Editorially, they appropriately label opinion pieces that routinely favor the left, such as thisLatinas Should Vote Their Values, Including Reproductive Rights, This Midterm Election.They also frequently denigrate conservatives like thisI Thought Boebert’s Book Would Be Worthless, But I Reviewed It Anyway. Generally, the news is reported factually and with a left-leaning editorial bias.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "None in the Last 5 years" ], "last_updated": "July 6, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/reuters/", "name": "Reuters", "source_url": "https://www.reuters.com", "bias_rating": "LEAST BIASED", "bias_score": -0.5, "factual_reporting": "VERY HIGH", "factual_score": 0.0, "credibility_rating": "HIGH CREDIBILITY", "country": "United Kingdom", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "News Agency", "traffic_popularity": "High Traffic", "bias_category_description": "These sources have minimal bias and use very few loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes).  The reporting is factual and usually sourced.  These are the most credible media sources.See all Least Biased sources.", "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate Reuters Least Biased based on objective reporting and Very High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing of information with minimal bias and a clean fact check record. Detailed Report Bias Rating: LEAST BIASED (-0.5) Factual Reporting: VERY HIGH (0.0) Country: United Kingdom MBFC’s Country Freedom Rank: MOSTLY FREE Media Type: News Agency Traffic/Popularity: High Traffic MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY History Founded in 1851, Reuters is the world’s leading international multimedia news agency.", "history": "Founded in 1851,Reutersis the world’s leading international multimedia news agency. It is headquartered in London, United Kingdom. Reuters was founded byPaul Julius Reuter,a German-born immigrant who moved to London and opened an office that transmitted stock market quotations between London and Paris via the new Calais-Dover cable. He had previously used pigeons to fly stock prices between Aachen and Brussels, which was also common to dispatch news. However,theAgence Havas(the predecessor of today’sAFP) was the first to start using the Morse telegraph. According to an article titled”CHRONOLOGY: Reuters, from pigeons to multimedia merger,”overland telegraph and undersea cables enabled Reuters to expand its service beyond Europe to the Far East in 1872 and South America by 1874. During both World Wars, Reuters came under pressure from the British government to serve British interests. In 1941 Reuters avoided this pressure by restructuring itself as a private company.Stephen J. Adleris the President and Editor-in-Chief of Reuters. Read our government and media profile in the United Kingdom.", "ownership": "In April 2008, the British companyReuters Groupwas acquired by Thomson Corporation and formed Thomson Reuters. Reuters is thenews and media divisionof Thomson Reuters,which is the world’s leading source of intelligent information for businesses and professionals and is owned by TheWoodbridge Company Limited, which owns approximately 62.35% of common shares and is the principal and controlling shareholder of Thomson Reuters – seeFact Book 2017(pg 83) andAnnual Report 2017. The Woodbridge Company Limited is based in Toronto, Canada. The chief executive officer of Thomson Reuters is James (Jim) C. Smith, and the chairman isDavid Thomson,whois also a Chairman of Woodbridge.", "analysis": "These sources have minimal bias and use very few loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes).  The reporting is factual and usually sourced.  These are the most credible media sources.See all Least Biased sources. In 2018, Reuters was named the winner of twoPulitzer Prizeson international reporting for exposing the methods of police killing squads in Rodrigo Duterte’s war on drugs and for feature photographydocumentingthe Rohingya refugee crisis in Myanmar and Bangladesh. In review, when covering Trump administration news, Reuters Editor In Chief wrote this message to staff“Covering Trump the Reuters Way,”urging them to stick with the Reuters “Trust Principles.” However, after theCapital Gazetteshooting, Reuters Breaking news editor Rob Cox tweeted, “This is what happens when @realDonaldTrump calls journalists the enemy of the people. Blood is on your hands, Mr. President. Save your thoughts and prayers for your empty soul.” Coxlaterapologizedand deleted the tweet. Regarding the incident, Steve Adler, Editor-in-Chief, published astatementregarding Rob Cox’s tweet stating, “Mr. Cox’s actions were inconsistent with the Thomson Reuters Trust Principles requiring journalists to maintain freedom from bias. We do not condone his behavior and will take appropriate action.” In reporting, Reuters uses minimally biased emotional language in their headlines such as“Oregon right-wingers clash with anti-fascists at march in Portland”and “Trump lawyer Cohen vows to defend himself, puts family first: ABC News,”sourcing credible local sources such as theOregonian newspaperandABC news.In most cases, Reuters journalists are the primary source of stories and consistently report with minimal bias, covering both sides of issues.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "They are a certified IFCN Fact-Checker." ], "last_updated": "April 8, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/neo-new-eastern-outlook/", "name": "NEO – New Eastern Outlook", "source_url": "https://journal-neo.su/", "bias_rating": "RIGHT", "bias_score": 8.1, "factual_reporting": "LOW", "factual_score": 7.6, "credibility_rating": "LOW CREDIBILITY", "country": "Russia", "country_freedom_rating": "TOTAL OPPRESSION", "media_type": "Website", "traffic_popularity": "Medium Traffic", "bias_category_description": null, "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate New Eastern Outlook (NEO) Right Biased and Questionable based on promoting pro-Russian propaganda, conspiracy theories, pseudoscience, false claims, and a lack of transparency with authors and ownership. Detailed Report Reasoning: State Propaganda, Conspiracy, Poor Sourcing, Pseudoscience, False Claims, Lack of Transparency Bias Rating: RIGHT (8.1) Factual Reporting: LOW (7.6) Country: Russia MBFC’s Country Freedom Rating: TOTAL OPPRESSION Media Type: Website Traffic/Popularity: Medium Traffic MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY History New Eastern Outlook (NEO) is a journal operated by the Russian Academy of Sciences Institute for Oriental Studies , a nonprofit research institute based in Russia.", "history": "New Eastern Outlook (NEO)is a journal operated by theRussian Academy of Sciences Institute for Oriental Studies, a nonprofit research institute based in Russia. According to theNew Eastern Outlook (NEO)about page, they cover political events as they relate to the Orient and regions “from Japan and the remote coasts of Africa.” NEOfocuses primarily on “political and religious issues, economic and ideological trends, regional security topics and social problems.”Vitaly Naumkinis the president of Oriental Studies.Critics of NEO claim they are a source of disinformation and pro-Russian propaganda. Read how the Russian Government influences Media.", "ownership": "Ownership information is not transparent; however, according to the NEO about page, its address is “12, Rozhdestvenka Street, office 111, Moscow.” The exact address is also used by “The Institute of Oriental Studies of the Russian Academy of Sciences.”Typically, the Putin government gives theResearch Institutes’control to the Ministry of Education; therefore, the Russian government funds and owns this journal through the Russian Academy of Sciences. The U.S. Department of the Treasurystates that New Eastern Outlook is “a pseudo-academic publication of the Russian Academy of Science’s Institute of Oriental Studies.” It further says that “it combines pro-Kremlin views of Russian academics with anti-U.S. views; of Western fringe voices and conspiracy theorists.” Also, a U.S. Department of State special report indicatesNew Eastern Outlookis “obscuring its links to state-funded institutions.” In review, New Eastern Outlook (NEO) presents news in line with the Russian Government’s narrative, such as“The Donbas Dilemma”and“Can the Conflict with Turkey over NATO Enlargement be Resolved?”They sometimes utilize credible news sources such asBloombergandNational Interest. However, they also publish articles that promote conspiracy theories, such as“Ukraine’s Nazi Legions a Real Threat to America and the World”and“Why is the United States Getting Away with Unleashing a Global Biological War?”These stories are sourced from conspiracy-pseudoscience sites such asVeterans TodayandThe Daily Expose.Furthermore, EUvsDisinfo reports that NEO usesghost authors. In 2019, NEO was one of12 Facebook Pagesremoved “for engaging in coordinated inauthentic behavior.” Finally, in 2021,Politifactreportedthat The U.S. State Department says it “has identified four online publications used by Russian intelligence services to spread disinformation about Western COVID-19 vaccines.” One of these sources was NEO. In general, New Eastern Outlook is a right biased propaganda mouthpiece for the Russian government that frequently promotes disinformation.", "analysis": null, "failed_fact_checks": [ "“Russia has never participated in such information campaigns against other vaccines and has no intention to do so.”–False" ], "last_updated": "April 15, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/le-figaro-bias/", "name": "Le Figaro", "source_url": "https://www.lefigaro.fr/", "bias_rating": "RIGHT-CENTER", "bias_score": 4.0, "factual_reporting": "HIGH", "factual_score": 1.3, "credibility_rating": "HIGH CREDIBILITY", "country": "France", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Newspaper", "traffic_popularity": "High Traffic", "bias_category_description": "These media sources are slightly to moderately conservative in bias. They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appealing to emotion or stereotypes) to favor conservative causes. These sources are generally trustworthy for information but may require further investigation.See all Right-Center sources.", "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate Le Figaro Right-Center biased based on story selection and editorial positions that moderately favor the right. We also rate them High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing and a clean fact check record. Detailed Report Bias Rating: RIGHT-CENTER (4.0) Factual Reporting: HIGH (1.", "history": "Launched in 1826,Le Figarois a daily newspaper based in Paris, France. The paper consists of three weeklies: Le Figaro Magazine, Madame Figaro, and TV Magazine. The paper covers French current events, world news, economy, sports, politics, and lifestyle. Le Figaro’s editorial stance is considered Centre-Right. In 1975, Socpresse, owned by theHersant family, bought Le Figaro and in 1999,the Carlyle Group(American Investment firm) obtained 40% of Le Figaro. In 2004,Serge Dassaulttook control of Socpresse and eventually bought all the shares. Groupe Dassaultwas owned by conservative politician (A member of the centre-right Union for a Popular Movement party – UMPand apredecessor ofLes Républicains), Serge Dassault when he inherited Dassault Aviation following the death of his father—French aircraft industrialistWorld War I aircraft-designerMarcel Dassault. Dassault Aviation, a subsidiary of the Dassault Group, builds the Rafale combat aircraft andFalcon business jets.According toBloomberg,Dassault Aviationwas the French air force’s largest supplier in the ’60s, and as of 2020, Dassault Aviation is one of the top25 arms companiesglobally. Following Serge Dassault’s death in 2018, Charles Edelstenne became the board chairman as Serge’s eldest son Olivier Dassault was an MP ofLes Republicains party.and wanted to avoid a conflict of interest.Charles Edelstenneand his family own around 6% of Dassault Systèmes; Serge Dassault’s other sonThierry Dassaultis a director at Groupe Dassault, Serge Dassault’s 3 children split the estate equally when in 2021, his eldest sonOlivier Dassaultdied in a helicopter crash. The editor-in-chief of Le Figaro isAlexis Brézet. Read our profile on France’s Media and Government.", "ownership": null, "analysis": "These media sources are slightly to moderately conservative in bias. They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appealing to emotion or stereotypes) to favor conservative causes. These sources are generally trustworthy for information but may require further investigation.See all Right-Center sources. Le Figaro’s ownership bySerge Dassaultand his late son was subject to conflict-of-interest, as both of them were members of the center-right political party Les Républicains. Further, the Dassault Group produces the Rafale combataircraft for the military, which is often subject to corrupt business dealings and “influence peddling” allegations such as“French judge tasked with investigating Rafale fighter jet sale to India.” In review, Le Figaro publishes articles with theAFPsuch as this interview with President Macron andElle Magazine,“Emmanuel Macron is alarmed by a “society which is racialized.”They also report on climate change and global warming related news from apro-scienceconsensus perspective such as“Climate: “The worst is yet to come,” according to IPCC experts”and“Dome of heat”: could France experience temperature peaks of 50 ° C?”sourcing from theIPCC. Editorially, Le Figaro publishes articles from a conservative perspective regarding topics such as political correctness, for example,“Éric Zemmour: “Why ‘political correctness’ criminalizes freedom of thought.”Eric Zemmour is a far-right TV personality and writer for Le Figaro who is considering running for president in the futureFrench far-right TV personality Eric Zemmour mulls presidential bid, alarming Marine Le Pen. In general, Le Figaro reports factually and uses a wide variety of credible sources, however editorially, they promote right-center positions on most issues.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "None in the Last 5 years" ], "last_updated": "March 12, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/brookings-institute/", "name": "Brookings Institution", "source_url": "https://www.brookings.edu/", "bias_rating": "LEFT-CENTER", "bias_score": -2.7, "factual_reporting": "VERY HIGH", "factual_score": 0.0, "credibility_rating": "HIGH CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Organization/Foundation", "traffic_popularity": "Medium Traffic", "bias_category_description": "These media sources have a slight to moderate liberal bias.  They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appeals to emotion or stereotypes) to favor liberal causes.  These sources are generally trustworthy for information but may require further investigation.See all Left-Center sources.", "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate Brooking Institution Left-Center biased based on donations to primarily Democratic candidates and policy advocacy that slightly favors the left. We also rate them Very High for factual reporting due to strong sourcing and a clean fact check record. Detailed Report Bias Rating: LEFT-CENTER (-2.7) Factual Reporting: VERY HIGH (0.", "history": "Founded in 1916, The Brookings Institution is an American research group. It conducts research and education in the social sciences, primarily in economics, metropolitan policy, governance, foreign policy, and global economy and development. Themissionof the Brookings Institution is to “provide innovative and practical recommendations that advance three broad goals: strengthen American democracy; foster the economic and social welfare, security and opportunity of all Americans; and secure a more open, safe, prosperous, and cooperative international system.” Brookings is themost frequently citedthink tank by the U.S. media and politicians. Read our profile on the United States government and media.", "ownership": "Brookings Institution is a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization funded through donations. Each year they provide a transparentannual reportregarding finances and funding. According toOpen Secrets,Brookings hasdonated96% or $824,259 to Democratic candidates and causes since 1990.", "analysis": "These media sources have a slight to moderate liberal bias.  They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appeals to emotion or stereotypes) to favor liberal causes.  These sources are generally trustworthy for information but may require further investigation.See all Left-Center sources. In review, The research agenda and recommendations of Brookings’ 300+ scholars represent diverse points of view. “Research topicscover foreign policy, economics, development, governance, and metropolitan policy.” Anacademic analysisof Congressional records from 1993 to 2002 found that Brookings was referred to by conservative politicians almost as frequently as liberal politicians, earning 53 on a 1–100 scale, with 100 representing the most liberal score. Further, Brookings has been accused of having aliberal biasand aconservative bias; however, the consensus is they arecentrist. Brookings utilizes moderately loaded language in their headlines and articles, such as this:Don’t ignore the national debt. It will only get worse if we don’t act now. This article and all others are properly sourced and labeled appropriately as an Op-Ed. Brookings also publishes their research on the website:Empowering women entrepreneurs in developing countries.Their research provides deep sourcing from credible information and outlets. In general, the Brookings website’s scope of stories and information tends to lean left politically slightly.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "None in the Last 5 years" ], "last_updated": "December 13, 2024" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/cosmonaut-magazine-bias-and-credibility/", "name": "Cosmonaut Magazine", "source_url": "https://cosmonautmag.com/", "bias_rating": "LEFT", "bias_score": -8.8, "factual_reporting": "MOSTLY FACTUAL", "factual_score": 3.6, "credibility_rating": "MEDIUM CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Magazine", "traffic_popularity": "Minimal Traffic", "bias_category_description": "These media sources are moderate to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation.  They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appealing to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports, and omit information that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy.See all Left Bias sources.", "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate Cosmonaut Magazine as an extreme left publication dedicated to Marxist revolutionary theory and critique of capitalist structures. While editorial content is highly ideological and lacks political balance, some articles are impressively sourced. It earns a Mostly Factual rating due to its one-sided commentary. Cosmonaut is a more theoretical journal than a news source, and its content should be interpreted accordingly.", "history": "Cosmonaut Magazine is a self-described Marxist platform founded to promote “scientific socialism” in the 21st century. It operates as a digital publication with a rotating collective of editors and contributors, including Donald Parkinson and Jackson Albert Mann. Its goal is to rebuild Marxist intellectual traditions outside academia and develop a communist strategy for modern conditions. TheAbout pageemphasizes internationalism, opposition to capitalism, and the creation of a classless society. Read our profile on the United States media and government.", "ownership": "Cosmonaut Magazine does not disclose ownership as it is not a corporate media entity. It appears to be operated collectively. It is primarily funded throughPatreon,book sales, and merchandise via a unionizedworker-owned print shop. No financial transparency, IRS status, or named institutional funders are listed.", "analysis": "These media sources are moderate to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation.  They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appealing to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports, and omit information that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy.See all Left Bias sources. Cosmonaut is an ideologically driven publication advocating revolutionary Marxism. Articles like “Election 2024: Don’t Mourn, Organize” and “Between Agnosticism and Commitment” demonstrate deep theoretical engagement and philosophical militancy. The magazine routinely uses terms like “white supremacy,” “bourgeoisie,” and “imperialism” in radical critiques of both right-wing and liberal institutions. While editorial tone is intense and activist, sourcing is often surprisingly strong for a niche political outlet. References includeLenin’s writings, cited academic works, and political speeches. The article “What Kind of Freedom?” cites organizational letters and firsthand accounts from UT Austin. Still, because of its ideological commitment, reporting can be interpretive and lacks balance or opposing perspectives.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "None found from third-party fact-checkers. However, because the magazine publishes overtly political commentary, it is unlikely to be the subject of mainstream fact-checking efforts." ], "last_updated": "July 5, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/prntly/", "name": "Prntly", "source_url": "https://prntly.com/", "bias_rating": "EXTREME RIGHT", "bias_score": 9.2, "factual_reporting": "LOW", "factual_score": 8.0, "credibility_rating": "LOW CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Website", "traffic_popularity": "Minimal Traffic", "bias_category_description": null, "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate Prntly Questionable and right-biased based on story selection, poor sourcing, lack of transparency, and false claims. Detailed Report Reasoning: Propaganda, False Claims Bias Rating: EXTREME RIGHT (9.2) Factual Reporting: LOW (8.0) Country: USA MBFC’s Country Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE Media Type: Website Traffic/Popularity: Minimal Traffic MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY History Prntly is a politically conservative American website.", "history": "Prntlyis a politically conservative American website.  It was described bySnopesas “a disreputable outlet that has a penchant for publishing both fake news and spurious pro-Trump articles.”  According to theirabout page“Prntly has a long history of providing news to readers online and in social media. Prntly was started in 2014 in New Hampshire has an online printing website for conservative and libertarian candidates for office. The goal was to provide affordable, discounted campaign materials to both movements’ candidates, as an army marches on what it’s equipped with.” Read our profile on United States government and media.", "ownership": "Prntly does not clearly state ownership; however, revenue is derived through advertising.", "analysis": "In review, Prntly does not produce original stories, but rather summarizes and links to external information. Headlines are biased such as this:Police Departments Refusing To Police Democrat National Convention. This headline is not true. This website also heavily reports favorably for Trump with articles such as theseArrest Made In Violent Assault of 82 Year Old Man For His Trump Hatand thisBlack Trump Supporter MURDERED In Broad Daylight By Gunfire. The common theme is to portray African Americans and other minorities as the source of crime.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "Democratic vice presidential candidate Tim Kaine admitted on Twitter to having an open marriage. –False" ], "last_updated": "February 15, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/politika-bias-and-credibility/", "name": "Politika", "source_url": "https://www.politika.rs/", "bias_rating": "RIGHT-CENTER", "bias_score": 2.7, "factual_reporting": "MOSTLY FACTUAL", "factual_score": 3.6, "credibility_rating": "MEDIUM CREDIBILITY", "country": "Serbia", "country_freedom_rating": "MODERATE FREEDOM", "media_type": "Newspaper", "traffic_popularity": "High Traffic", "bias_category_description": "These media sources are slight to moderately conservative in bias. They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appealing to emotion or stereotypes) to favor conservative causes. These sources are generally trustworthy for information but may require further investigation.See all Right-Center sources.", "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate Politika.rs as Right-Center Biased due to its favorable framing of the Serbian government and emphasis on national-interest perspectives. We rate its reporting as Mostly Factual for factual accuracy due to generally conventional journalism practices; however, readers should be aware that Politika is majority state-owned, and ownership transparency is limited, which may influence editorial independence. Detailed Report Bias Rating: RIGHT-CENTER (2.", "history": "Politika.rsis Serbia’s oldest daily newspaper, founded in 1904 in Belgrade. It presents itself as a moderate, professional news outlet with a tradition of independence, having resisted political influence during multiple historical periods. Politika covers national news, international affairs, culture, society, and opinion commentary, and is considered an important national institution in Serbia. Read our profile on Serbian media and government.", "ownership": "Politika is published byPolitika a.d.,a state owned company. Ownership includes a mix of private and government-associated holdings through Politika Newspapers and Magazines. Exact shareholder details are not fully transparent but the Republic of Serbia maintains a significant role. Politika generates revenue through print subscriptions, advertising, and digital operations.", "analysis": "These media sources are slight to moderately conservative in bias. They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appealing to emotion or stereotypes) to favor conservative causes. These sources are generally trustworthy for information but may require further investigation.See all Right-Center sources. Politika generally maintains a professional and conventional news tone. Articles such as“Europeans are not giving up on wars”offer foreign policy commentary using restrained, factual language without overt ideological framing. Reporting on domestic politics, such as“Vučić: Good news – Serbia receives new postponement of sanctions for NIS,”primarily relies on direct quotes fromPresident Aleksandar Vučić, presenting his statements without substantial counterpoints. This type of framing reflects the government’s position but does not fully explore alternative viewpoints or broader implications of the sanctions issue. While Politika uses official sources and maintains factual accuracy, its domestic political coverage often favors government narratives, contributing to a slight center-right bias.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "None in the Last 5 years" ], "last_updated": "April 26, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/jacobin/", "name": "Jacobin", "source_url": "https://jacobin.com/", "bias_rating": "LEFT", "bias_score": -7.0, "factual_reporting": "HIGH", "factual_score": 1.9, "credibility_rating": "HIGH CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Magazine", "traffic_popularity": "Medium Traffic", "bias_category_description": "These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation.  They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using an appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports, and omit information that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy.See all Left Bias sources.", "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate Jacobin Magazine, Left Biased, based on story selection and editorial positions that always favor the Democratic Socialist Left. We also rate them High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing of information and a clean fact check record. Detailed Report Bias Rating: LEFT (7.0) Factual Reporting: HIGH (1.", "history": "Founded in 2011, Jacobin is a democratic socialist quarterly magazine based in New York offering American leftist perspectives on politics, economics, and culture.Bhaskar Sunkarais the founder and editor. You can find a complete list of staff on theirabout page. Read our profile on the United States government and media.", "ownership": "Jacobin is owned by Bhaskar Sunkara and generates revenue through subscription fees and advertising.", "analysis": "These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation.  They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using an appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports, and omit information that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy.See all Left Bias sources. In review, Jacobin is a well-written quarterly magazine and website that publishes news from a strongly left-leaning perspective. There is moderate to strong use of loaded emotional language such as this:Sanders and Ocasio-Cortez Pick a Fight With the Loan Sharks. This article, like most on Jacobin, is properly sourced from a variety of High factual sources. Although Jacobin harshly criticizes former President Trump, they also frequently criticize centrist Democrats, often described as corporate and establishment Democrats:Trump’s Sadism — and Democrats’ Accomodationism. Again, this article may contain loaded language, but it is properly sourced from only High factual sources. Editorially, all stories favor the Democratic Socialist left. Jacobin has received praise from notable figures such asNoam Chomsky, who states they are “a bright light in dark times.” They have alsofaced criticismfrom free-market advocates,Reason Magazine.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "None in the Last 5 years" ], "last_updated": "November 15, 2024" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/granma-cuba-bias/", "name": "Granma (Cuba)", "source_url": "http://en.granma.cu/", "bias_rating": "FAR LEFT", "bias_score": -9.6, "factual_reporting": "MIXED", "factual_score": 6.0, "credibility_rating": "LOW CREDIBILITY", "country": "Cuba", "country_freedom_rating": "TOTAL OPPRESSION", "media_type": "Newspaper", "traffic_popularity": "Medium Traffic", "bias_category_description": null, "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate Granma Far-Left Biased and questionable based on poor sourcing of information, the promotion of one-sided pro-government propaganda, and failed fact checks. Detailed Report Reasoning: State Propaganda, Poor Sourcing, Failed Fact Checks Bias Rating: FAR LEFT (-9.6) Factual Reporting: MIXED (6.0) Country: Cuba MBFC’s Country Freedom Rating: TOTAL OPPRESSION Media Type: Newspaper Traffic/Popularity: Medium Traffic MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY History Founded in 1965, Granma is the official newspaper of The Communist Party Of Cuba Central Committee and headquartered in Havana, Cuba.", "history": "Founded in 1965, Granma is the official newspaper of The Communist Party Of Cuba Central Committee and headquartered in Havana, Cuba. Published in English, French, German, Portuguese, and Italian, Granma covers National News and Politics, World News, Culture, Tourism, and Sports.  Since the Cuban Government and its only political party, The Communist Party of Cuba, controls the paper, Granma is regarded as a government mouthpiece. Granma also states on itsabout pagethat the newspaper is “loyal to the Party’s policy, its ethical principles, in both its focus on events unfolding within Cuban society and international relations.” In 2017, The Political Bureau of the Central Committee of the Party promotedYailin Orta Riverato be the director of “Granma.” Press freedom in Cuba is virtually non-existent, pleaseread our profile on the Cuban government and media.", "ownership": "The government owns Granma, and it is theofficial organof The Communist Party Of Cuba Central Committee.", "analysis": "In review, Granma publishes articles utilizing loaded headlines such asThe blockade asphyxiates and kills, just like the virus, and must end,”andWithin the Revolution there continues to be room for everything and everyone, except those who seek to destroy the collective project.” Editorially, Granma holds a far-left bias through the promotion of Marxism. Furthermore, Granma also publishes articles that glorify Fidel Castro, such as this article dated 1988,“Why we don’t need more than one party.”The basic editorial position of the paper is to advance Communist Party propaganda. Additionally, they regularly criticize American Foreign Policy“Washington’s accusation in its report that Cuba engages in people trafficking is a lie Declaration by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs”and they completely lack linked sourcing. In general, Granma promotes a strong left-wing bias with the endorsement of Marxism and pro-Government propaganda. Finally, Granma cannot seem to glorify Fidel Castro enough.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "“The alleged concerns of the United States about Cuba’s cooperation, in this case about the ‘More Doctors’ program, are neither legitimate nor pertinent to be discussed at PAHO.”–Misleading", "1,500 Chinese citizens managed to recover from Wuhan pneumonia thanks to a Cuban drug called Interferon alfa 2B.–False" ], "last_updated": "February 7, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/vaccines-revealed/", "name": "Vaccines Revealed", "source_url": "https://vrevealed.com/", "bias_rating": "CONSPIRACY-PSEUDOSCIENCE", "bias_score": 9.0, "factual_reporting": "VERY LOW", "factual_score": 9.9, "credibility_rating": "LOW CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Website", "traffic_popularity": "Minimal Traffic", "bias_category_description": null, "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate Vaccines Revealed a 100% quackery website that promotes dangerous misinformation that can damage the health of people who are sick or avoiding disease. Detailed Report Bias Rating: CONSPIRACY-PSEUDOSCIENCE (9.0) Factual Reporting: VERY LOW (9.9) Country: USA MBFC’s Country Freedom Rank: MOSTLY FREE Media Type: Website Traffic/Popularity: Minimal Traffic MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY History Vaccines Revealed is a news and information website related specifically to the dangers of vaccines.", "history": "Vaccines Revealed is a news and information website related specifically to the dangers of vaccines. Interestingly the people behind this website arechiropractors, which, as far as I know, have nothing to do with the science of vaccinations. Since the Covid-19 pandemic, they have renamed the website “Covid Edition.” The website also redirects to a new domain in 2020: vrevealed.com. The website lacks transparency as they do not offer an about page or disclose ownership or funding. Read our profile on the United States government and media.", "ownership": "Vaccines Revealed does not disclose ownership or how they generate revenue.", "analysis": "In our past review of this site, they provided dangerous information about vaccines where they say:Just say No to Flu Vaccinations. A recent report from the CDC indicates flu vaccinations have saved up to 40,000 lives in the last 9 years. However, in 2021 they are solely focused on promoting misleading and false information regarding Covid-19 and the associated vaccines. The website offers this: FINALLY, GET REAL ANSWERS TO THESE QUESTIONS AND MORE… Do Masks Really Work? What Is The Real Risk Of Dying From COVID? How Will We Really Know That a COVID Vaccine is Safe? Is there really no treatment for COVID? Has America Heard The Facts? How do I know What’s Real? It then links to documentaries and videos from some of the most discredited names in the anti-vax business, such as Robert F Kennedy Jr. (Children’s Health Defense), Del Bigtree (The Highwire), Ben Tapper (Chiropractor), and Mary Holland (Attorney)…absent on this list is an expert on vaccines. They conclude the website by stating:", "failed_fact_checks": [], "last_updated": "July 5, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/architecture-journal-bias/", "name": "Architecture Journal", "source_url": "https://www.mdpi.com/journal/architecture", "bias_rating": "PRO-SCIENCE", "bias_score": -0.5, "factual_reporting": "MOSTLY FACTUAL", "factual_score": 3.6, "credibility_rating": "MEDIUM CREDIBILITY", "country": "Switzerland", "country_freedom_rating": "EXCELLENT", "media_type": "Journal", "traffic_popularity": "Minimal Traffic", "bias_category_description": "These sources consist of legitimate science or are evidence based through credible scientific sourcing.  Legitimate science follows the scientific method, is unbiased, and does not use emotional words.  These sources also respect the consensus of experts in the given scientific field and strive to publish peer-reviewed science. Some sources in this category may have a slight political bias but adhere to scientific principles.See all Pro-Science sources.", "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate Architecture Journal Pro-Science and Mostly Factual for reporting due to being published by a company that has failed fact checks in other journals. Detailed Report Bias Rating: PRO-SCIENCE (-0.5) Factual Reporting: MOSTLY FACTUAL (3.6) Country: Switzerland MBFC’s Country Freedom Rating: EXCELLENT Media Type: Journal Traffic/Popularity: Minimal Traffic MBFC Credibility Rating: MEDIUM CREDIBILITY History Architecture Journal is published by MDPI (Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute) , formerly Molecular Diversity Preservation International, an open-access journal publisher based in Basel, Switzerland.", "history": "Architecture Journal is published byMDPI (Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute), formerly Molecular Diversity Preservation International, an open-access journal publisher based in Basel, Switzerland.Architectureis an international,peer-reviewed, open access journal on studies related to architectural research published quarterly online by MDPI. MDPI publishes over400 journals. Read our profile on Swiss Media and Government.", "ownership": "The publisher of Architecture Journal isMDPI AG,which Shu-Kun Lin owns. Here is the list ofthe Management Team.According to“MDPI Open Access Information and Policy.”MDPI articles and all its journals are open access where authors pay a one-time Article Processing Charge (APC) to cover the costs of peer review administration and management; here is“General Information on MDPI’s Article Processing Charges (APC).”", "analysis": "Architecture Journal covers the study of Aquatic Science. Studies are published via open access, such as thisIslamic Influence on the Local Majapahit Hindu Dwelling of Indonesia in the 15th Century.Like all others reviewed, this study is Pro-Science, well-researched, and low-biased. While Architecture Journal has not failed a fact-check, its publisher has faced criticism as an open-access predatory journal. Read our full review onMDPI.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "None for Architecture Journal; however, other MDPI journals havefailed fact checks." ], "last_updated": "September 19, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/felix-rex-bias/", "name": "Felix Rex", "source_url": "https://felixrex.net/", "bias_rating": "EXTREME RIGHT", "bias_score": 9.5, "factual_reporting": "LOW", "factual_score": 8.4, "credibility_rating": "LOW CREDIBILITY", "country": "Canada", "country_freedom_rating": "EXCELLENT FREEDOM", "media_type": "Website/Video", "traffic_popularity": "Minimal Traffic", "bias_category_description": null, "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate Felix Rex as extreme right-biased and questionable based on the promotion of conspiracy theories, propaganda, and advocacy for white nationalism and supremacy. Detailed Report Reasoning: Propaganda, Conspiracy, Hate Bias Rating: EXTREME RIGHT (9.5) Factual Reporting: LOW (8.4) Country: Canada MBFC’s Country Freedom Rank: EXCELLENT FREEDOM Media Type: Website/Video Traffic/Popularity: Minimal Traffic MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY History Felix Rex is the online platform of Felix Lace, who is also known for his work on Black Pigeon Speaks (BPS) , a channel on YouTube and other video platforms.", "history": "Felix Rex is the online platform of Felix Lace, who is also known for his work onBlack Pigeon Speaks (BPS), a channel on YouTube and other video platforms. Lace, based in Canada, uses these platforms to share his thoughts and content and interact with followers and supporters. The content often touches upon current social and political issues, with a particular focus on right-leaning perspectives​. Read our profile on Canadian media and government.", "ownership": "The website and its content are owned by Felix Lace. Revenue generation for Felix Rex and Black Pigeon Speaks primarily comes through advertising, donations, and the sale of themed merchandise. The site actively solicits memberships and donations from its audience to support its operations​​.", "analysis": "Felix Rex and Black Pigeon Speaks display a strong right-leaning bias in their content. The media produced often portrays right-wing positions positively while being critical of left-wing perspectives. For instance, past content has included the promotion of conspiracy theories and critical takes on movements and figures associated with the left:Democrats TERRIFIED and TERRORIZED by VERBAL JU-JITSU Reports from external sourceslike theShorenstein Centerand the Soufan Center suggest that the content on these platforms overlaps with ideologies such as white nationalism, neo-Nazism, anti-Semitism, conservatism, classical liberalism, libertarianism, and Christian conservatism. The platforms have been noted for themes and imagery often associated with white nationalism and anti-feminism, and the commentary sections are known for anti-Semitic overtones. Specific examples of content from Felix Rex include discussions on the latest video game releases with societal commentary, videos on Canadian politics with a satirical tone toward figures like Justin Trudeau, and videos addressing issues in the United States, such as spending problems and social cohesion. Overall, the content on Felix Rex and Black Pigeon Speaks is characterized by a strong right-wing bias, with elements of conspiracy theory promotion and a focus on controversial societal and political issues.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "None by a third-party fact checker." ], "last_updated": "November 1, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/best-news-here/", "name": "Best News Here", "source_url": "https://bestnewshere.com/", "bias_rating": "RIGHT CONSPIRACY-PSEUDOSCIENCE", "bias_score": 9.9, "factual_reporting": "VERY LOW", "factual_score": 10.0, "credibility_rating": "LOW CREDIBILITY", "country": "Macedonia", "country_freedom_rating": "MODERATE FREEDOM", "media_type": "Website", "traffic_popularity": "Medium Traffic", "bias_category_description": null, "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate Best News Here far-right biased and a Tin-Foil Hat Conspiracy and Quackery Level Pseudoscience website based on the near-constant promotion of false and misleading information. Detailed Report Bias Rating: RIGHT CONSPIRACY-PSEUDOSCIENCE (9.9) Factual Reporting: VERY LOW (10.0) Country: Macedonia MBFC’s Country Freedom Rating: MODERATE FREEDOM Media Type: Website Traffic/Popularity: Medium Traffic MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY History Launched in 2018, Best News Here is an anonymously run far-right conspiracy and pseudoscience website.", "history": "Launched in 2018, Best News Here is an anonymously run far-right conspiracy and pseudoscience website. According to adomain search, the website is registered in North Macedonia to Bisera Nedeva. Since 2016, Macedonians have producednumerous fake conservative websitesto dupe American conservative readers and generate advertising revenue through social media sharing.", "ownership": "The website completely lacks transparency as they do not name an owner. Advertising generates revenue.", "analysis": "Best News Here publishes news and information in big, bold print that always favors the right and routinely promotes pseudoscience and conspiracy theories. For example, they often publish disinformation related to Covid-19 such as thisDr. Sherri Tenpenny: MD’s Agree The Covid Vaccine Is A Bioweapon!Sherri Tenpenny frequently makes false claims about Covid-19 such as spoons sticking to people’s faces due to magnetism in the Covid-19 vaccine.Obviously, this is not true. Whilepro-Trump propagandaand anti-vaccine conspiracies are common, they also publish conspiracies regardingHAARP(weather control), QAnon, 9/11 conspiracies, and stories from purveyors of disinformation such asNatural NewsandX22 Report.Best News Here is a typical fake Macedonian news site that preys on conservatives and conspiracy theorists for clicks. We would more appropriately name this website Worst News Here.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "“The Supreme Court In The Us Has Ruled That The Covid Pathogen Is Not A Vaccine, Is Unsafe, And Must Be Avoided At All Costs.”–False", "Pope Francis has died. –False", "“The CDC and county health officials have obtained 2020 Census records to enhance their vaccination enforcement protocols.”–Pants on Fire", "mRNA COVID-19 vaccines alter DNA of mother and baby, cause birth defects–False" ], "last_updated": "January 13, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-new-indian-express-bias/", "name": "The New Indian Express – Bias and Credibility", "source_url": "https://www.newindianexpress.com/", "bias_rating": "LEFT-CENTER", "bias_score": -3.6, "factual_reporting": "MOSTLY FACTUAL", "factual_score": 2.7, "credibility_rating": "HIGH CREDIBILITY", "country": "India", "country_freedom_rating": "MODERATE FREEDOM", "media_type": "Newspaper", "traffic_popularity": "High Traffic", "bias_category_description": "These media sources have a slight to moderate liberal bias.  They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appeals to emotion or stereotypes) to favor liberal causes.  These sources are generally trustworthy for information but may require further investigation.See all Left-Center sources.", "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate the New Indian Express Left-Center biased based on editorial positions that moderately favor the left. We also rate them as Mostly Factual rather than High due to poor sourcing techniques. Detailed Report Bias Rating: LEFT-CENTER (-3.6) Factual Reporting: MOSTLY FACTUAL (2.", "history": "The New Indian Expressis a daily English-language newspaper founded in 1932 in Chennai, India. The website and newspaper cover Indian national news as well as international, lifestyle, and entertainment news. The Group is owned by Manoj Kumar Sonthalia, the grandson of the publication’s founder, Shri Ramnath Goenka. After Ramnath Goenka’s death in 1991, The Indian Express Group split into two companies.The northern editionskept the original name, while the southern editions became The New Indian Express. In addition to the print newspaper, The New Indian Express Group also operates the newindianexpress.com website, launched in 2011. Read our profile on Indian media and government.", "ownership": "Shri Manoj Kumar Sonthalia owns The Indian Express throughExpress Publications (Madurai) Private Limited,which also owns several other publications, including Dinamani, Kannada, Prabha, Samakalika Malayalam, Cinema Express, Indulgexpress, and Edex Live. The publications generate revenue through advertising.", "analysis": "These media sources have a slight to moderate liberal bias.  They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appeals to emotion or stereotypes) to favor liberal causes.  These sources are generally trustworthy for information but may require further investigation.See all Left-Center sources. The New Indian Express often uses moderately loaded emotional language in its reporting, such as in the article“PM Modi doubles down on women empowerment.”This article does not contain hyperlinks and sources its information from the Prime Minister’s speech, experts, and the event itself without relying on additional sources or commentary. The article presents the news in a straightforward manner. However, the article titled “How much money did Adani give to BJP?’: Rahul tears into the BJP government”contains emotionally loaded language in the headline, which uses the phrase “tears into” to describe Rahul Gandhi’s criticism of the BJP government. The body of the article presents the response of the accused party, BJP, to the allegations made by Rahul Gandhi without specifically refuting them. The article appears to contain a bias against the BJP government and is critical of their financial relationship with Adani Group. The article sources direct quotes from both Rahul Gandhi and BJP leaders. On the other hand, the article titled“Caring, Sharing in Ramadan: ‘Sehri,’ ‘Iftar’ for fasting Muslims in Hospitals,”presents a positive story about a local NGO’s efforts to provide sehri and iftar meals to Muslim patients in hospitals in the state of Andhra Pradesh. The article quotes the NGO’s founder and hospital staff to provide additional information. It presents a positive narrative about efforts to care for the needs of Muslim patients during Ramadan without taking any political or social stance. Regarding news about the USA, articles such as“Trump’s Indictment is a Double-Edged Sword for Global Order.”contain biased language with negative tones towards former president Trump. For example, the article refers to Trump’s policies as “hair-brained sanctions” and describes him as a “foul-mouthing narcissist.” The publication thoroughly sources its international news from the White House, state.gov,CNN,andthe New York Times,Council on Foreign Relations,andNBC News. In general, they hold a left-leaning editorial bias and usually present fact-based information with poor sourcing techniques.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "None in the Last 5 years" ], "last_updated": "January 12, 2026" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/west-end-phoenix-bias-and-credibility/", "name": "West End Phoenix", "source_url": "https://www.westendphoenix.com/", "bias_rating": "LEFT", "bias_score": -6.0, "factual_reporting": "HIGH", "factual_score": 1.8, "credibility_rating": "HIGH CREDIBILITY", "country": "Canada", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Newspaper", "traffic_popularity": "Minimal Traffic", "bias_category_description": "These media sources are moderate to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation.  They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appealing to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports, and omit information that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy.See all Left Bias sources.", "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate West End Phoenix as Left-Biased due to its consistent focus on progressive policy positions. We also rate its reporting as High for factual accuracy based on editorial transparency and good sourcing practices. Detailed Report Bias Rating: LEFT (-6.0) Factual Reporting: HIGH (1.", "history": "West End Phoenixis a local, nonprofit community newspaper founded in 2017 and based in Toronto’s West End. It publishes a broadsheet print edition and online features focused on hyperlocal reporting, arts, and cultural commentary. It is a member of thePress Forward network, a collective of independent Canadian media outlets emphasizing community-based, public-interest journalism. West End Phoenix adheres to the network’s 10 guiding principles, which emphasize truth-telling, accountability, equity, and service to local communities. Read our profile on the Canadian government and media.", "ownership": "West End Phoenix is independently operated and sustained primarily through reader subscriptions, donations from patrons, and ad partnerships with local businesses. It does not rely on corporate advertising, instead offeringsubscriptions,patronage, and limitedadvertising opportunitiesto fund its operations. It is led by Editor-in-Chief Dave Bidini, a Canadian journalist and musician.", "analysis": "These media sources are moderate to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation.  They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appealing to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports, and omit information that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy.See all Left Bias sources. West End Phoenix exhibits a progressive editorial focus consistent with other Press Forward members. For example, “Why the Future of Toronto is a Pile of Garbage” critiques the city’s waste management failures, linking local neglect to broader systemic and environmental issues. “Vanishing Point” examines queer erasure in urban development, centering LGBTQ+ perspectives and cultural memory. The publication avoids sensationalism and emphasizes arts, activism, and civic dialogue. Its articles are generally well-written, fact-based, and focused on local voices. It aligns with a Left-Leaning perspective due to its consistent framing around equity, inclusion, and environmental responsibility.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "None in the Last 5 years" ], "last_updated": "June 24, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/smithsonian-magazine/", "name": "Smithsonian Magazine", "source_url": "https://www.smithsonianmag.com", "bias_rating": "PRO-SCIENCE", "bias_score": -2.0, "factual_reporting": "VERY HIGH", "factual_score": 0.0, "credibility_rating": "HIGH CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Magazine", "traffic_popularity": "High Traffic", "bias_category_description": "These sources consist of legitimate science or are evidence-based through the use of credible scientific sourcing.  Legitimate science follows the scientific method, is unbiased, and does not use emotional words.  These sources also respect the consensus of experts in the given scientific field and strive to publish peer-reviewed science. Some sources in this category may have a slight political bias but adhere to scientific principles.See all Pro-Science sources.", "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate Smithsonian Magazine a Pro-Science source based on publishing research-based information on science. We also rate them Very High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing to credible research and a clean fact check record. Detailed Report Bias Rating: PRO-SCIENCE (-2.0) Factual Reporting: VERY HIGH (0.", "history": "Smithsonian Magazine is the official journal published by the Smithsonian Institution in Washington, D.C. The first issue waspublished in 1970.  Smithsonian magazine and Smithsonian.com provide an in-depth analysis of varied topics within a diverse range of scientific areas. The current editor is Michael Caruso. Read our profile on the United States government and media.", "ownership": "Smithsonian Magazine is owned and published by theSmithsonian Institution, a group of museums and research centers administered by the Government of the United States. The Smithsonian Institution is funded through a variety of avenues, with two-thirds coming from annual federal appropriations.Other funding comes from the Institution’s endowment, private and corporate contributions, membership dues, and earned retail, concession, and licensing revenue.", "analysis": "In review, the website contains select stories from the print magazine and original web-only content. Smithsonian.com covers history, hard science, popular science, nature, and technology. Articles are typically sourced to research and generally are low in bias such as this:This Solar-Powered Dehydrator Could Help Small Farmers Reduce Food Waste. The Smithsonian typically steers away from politics and only reports about science such as this:Trump Administration Overhauls How the Endangered Species Act Is Enforced. Further, they also promote the consensus of science onClimate ChangeandGMOs.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "None in the Last 5 years" ], "last_updated": "January 3, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/mackinac-center-for-public-policy/", "name": "Mackinac Center for Public Policy", "source_url": "https://www.mackinac.org/", "bias_rating": "RIGHT-CENTER", "bias_score": 4.2, "factual_reporting": "MOSTLY FACTUAL", "factual_score": 3.9, "credibility_rating": "MEDIUM CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Organization/Foundation", "traffic_popularity": "Minimal Traffic", "bias_category_description": "These media sources are slightly to moderately conservative in bias. They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes) to favor conservative causes. These sources are generally trustworthy for information but may require further investigation.See all Right-Center sources.", "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate the Mackinac Center for Public Policy Right-Center biased based on editorial positions that strongly favor free-market Libertarianism. We also rate them as Mostly Factual in reporting rather than High due to a lack of transparency with funding, a failed fact check, and somewhat misleading positions regarding climate change. Detailed Report Bias Rating: RIGHT-CENTER (4.2) Factual Reporting: MOSTLY FACTUAL (3.", "history": "Founded in 1987, The Mackinac Center for Public Policy is an American non-profit Libertarian-leaning free-market think tank headquartered in Midland, Michigan. It is the largest state-based free-market think tank in the United States. Read our profile on the United States government and media.", "ownership": "The Mackinac Center is a nonprofit, tax-exempt organization under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code. According to their about page, the Mackinac Center “neither seeks nor accepts any government funding. It enjoys the support of foundations, individuals, and businesses who share a concern for Michigan’s future and recognize the important role of free markets and economic liberty.” However, it lacks transparency by not listing top donors.Some known donorsare Dow Chemical, Cornerstone Foundation, and the Charles G. Koch Foundation.", "analysis": "These media sources are slightly to moderately conservative in bias. They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes) to favor conservative causes. These sources are generally trustworthy for information but may require further investigation.See all Right-Center sources. In review, the Mackinac Center publishes an agenda that includesProtecting Taxpayers and Entrepreneurs,Revitalizing Healthcare for Patients and Providers,Removing Government Barriers to Prosperity. In the simplest terms, they advocate for limited government and free-market capitalism. The website also features a blog that aligns with a libertarian agenda such as this:The Safety Net Already There: Unemployment Insurance. This story is properly sourced to the Department of Labor. Editorially, the Mackinac Center is not critical of President Trump, but they do encourage him to follow a free-market model such as this:Mackinac Center Joins Nationwide Free Market Coalition Letter. When it comes to science, Mackinac does not deny the human influence onclimate change; however, they do question the severity of models and suggest free-market solutions, which does not entirely align with the consensus. In general, reporting is mostly factual and with a strong libertarian bias.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "Employees in “workplace freedom” states make more money–Mostly False" ], "last_updated": "December 22, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/un-watch/", "name": "UN Watch", "source_url": "https://www.unwatch.org", "bias_rating": "RIGHT", "bias_score": 6.6, "factual_reporting": "MOSTLY FACTUAL", "factual_score": 2.5, "credibility_rating": "HIGH CREDIBILITY", "country": "Switzerland", "country_freedom_rating": "EXCELLENT", "media_type": "Organization/Foundation", "traffic_popularity": "Medium Traffic", "bias_category_description": "These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward conservative causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using an appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports, and omit information that may damage conservative causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy.See all Right Bias sources.", "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate UN Watch Right Biased based on information and political positions that favor the right and Mostly Factual due to the use of poor sources that have failed fact checks. Detailed Report Bias Rating: RIGHT (6.6) Factual Reporting: MOSTLY FACTUAL (2.5) Country: Switzerland MBFC’s Country Freedom Rank: EXCELLENT Media Type: Organization/Foundation Traffic/Popularity: Medium Traffic MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY History Launched in 1993 , UN Watch is a non-governmental organization based in Geneva, Switzerland, that monitors the performance of the United Nations and its adherence to its charter.", "history": "Launched in 1993, UN Watch is a non-governmental organization based in Geneva, Switzerland, that monitors the performance of the United Nations and its adherence to its charter. Ambassador Alfred H. Moses serves as Chair for Un Watch, and Hillel Neuer is the Executive Director. UN Watch was founded byMorris Berthold Abram,civil rights activist and former U.S. Honorary President of the American Jewish Committee,focusing on“monitoring the continuing discriminatory treatment of Israel in the UN system and attitudes toward Jews in the world body as well as those matters which concern American interests.“ Read our profile on Switzerland’s media and government.", "ownership": "According toSourcewatch, the UN Watch lobby is for the removal of UN personnel who are considered critical of Israel:“US calls for resignation of UN’s Richard Falk Special rapporteur for Palestinian territories said NGO UN Watch should be investigated to ensure it’s not controlled by Israel”Further, according to Sourcewatch, UN Watch also is funded by theAmerican Jewish Committeesince 2001.", "analysis": "These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward conservative causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using an appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports, and omit information that may damage conservative causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy.See all Right Bias sources. A former UN Secretary-General, Kofi Annan, praises UN Watch. TheEconomistdescribes UN Watch as a “Geneva-based pro-Israeli monitor.” In contrast,Right webdescribes UN Watch’s political stance as “UN Watch has repeatedly been accused of having a staunchly “pro-Israel” bias and an outlook on Middle East peace that is closely aligned with that of Israel’s right-wing Likud Party.” In review, UN Watch has a strong use of loaded emotional language in their headlines and articles, such as“UN Clash: China Fails to Silence UN Watch Dissident Yang Jianli” and “U.N. in Shock: Heads Turn in Stunned Disbelief as Palestinian Exposes PLO Lies, Watch heads turn & eyes bulge!” UN Watch utilizes credible sources such as theNew York Times,Reuters, and usun.state.gov; however, they also utilize factually Questionable sources such asCnsnewsand theDaily Wire.Story selection mostly favors Israel and holds the same positions as the former right-winggovernment of Israel.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "None in the Last 5 years (removed a fact check listed here because it was not a direct fact check of UN Watch)" ], "last_updated": "June 29, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/el-financiero-bias/", "name": "El Financiero", "source_url": "https://i0.wp.com/mediabiasfactcheck.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/rightcenter041.png?ssl=1", "bias_rating": "RIGHT-CENTER", "bias_score": 3.7, "factual_reporting": "MOSTLY FACTUAL", "factual_score": 2.6, "credibility_rating": "HIGH CREDIBILITY", "country": "Mexico", "country_freedom_rating": "MODERATE FREEDOM", "media_type": "Newspaper", "traffic_popularity": "High Traffic", "bias_category_description": "These media sources are slightly to moderately conservative in bias. They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appealing to emotion or stereotypes) to favor conservative causes. These sources are generally trustworthy for information but may require further investigation.See all Right-Center sources.", "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate El Financiero as right-center biased based on story selection that moderately aligns with the right. We also rate them mostly factual rather than high for reporting due to poor sourcing techniques. Detailed Report Bias Rating: RIGHT-CENTER (3.7) Factual Reporting: MOSTLY FACTUAL (2.", "history": "El Financierois a Mexican financial daily newspaper that was established in 1981. According to its About page, in 2013, the newspaper underwent a transformation to adapt to modern informational needs. The newspaper partnered withBloombergto provide specialized business news in Spanish, and it updated its digital platform to feature content from internationally recognized sources likeBloomberg,Financial Times, andThe New York Times. El Financiero operates under the umbrella ofGrupo Multimedia Lauman, a conglomerate based in Mexico City, which also owns entities like Foro TV, La Octava radio, Expansión magazine, andFox Sports. Read our profile on Mexico’s media and government.", "ownership": "El Financiero is owned byGrupo Multimedia Lauman, a Mexican media conglomerate. The company acquired El Financiero in 2012 for $5 million USD and 300 million MXN.Manuel Arroyois the owner of Grupo Multimedia Lauman. Advertising generates revenue.", "analysis": "These media sources are slightly to moderately conservative in bias. They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appealing to emotion or stereotypes) to favor conservative causes. These sources are generally trustworthy for information but may require further investigation.See all Right-Center sources. El Financiero specializes in financial news, as seen in articles like“Generación de empleos vive su mejor momento en la última década, informa el IMSS.”The article references the IMSS (Mexican Social Security Institute) but does not include direct links to the reports. Instead, it uses circular hyperlinks to other content on its site. This approach is consistent across many of their articles, which typically do not link to external sources. In addition to financial news, El Financiero also covers national politics. In our review, we analyzed two articles about President Andrés Manuel López Obrador (Left-Leaning). The first article, titled“La derrota del Presidente,”is an opinion piece that critiques the president’s approach to security. Notable quotes include him being “politically defeated” and “His morning press conferences have become an electrocardiogram of his frustrations and impotence,” suggesting a portrayal of an emotionally reactive and ineffective leader. The second article,“AMLO responde a denuncia de Xóchitl Gálvez: ‘Yo no ofendo a las mujeres,'”reports on the president’s response to accusations of gender-based political violence. While it presents his defense, the tone leans towards supporting Xóchitl Gálvez’s (Right-Leaning) perspective, especially with quotes emphasizing the president’s repeated mentions of her. In summary, El Financiero’s coverage of the left-leaning president is critical, often supporting criticisms raised against him. Hence El Finaciero is right-center biased and mostly factual due to poor sourcing techniques.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "None in the Last 5 years" ], "last_updated": "October 30, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/patrickhahn-net-bias-and-credibility/", "name": "PatrickHahn.net", "source_url": "https://www.patrickhahn.net/", "bias_rating": "PSEUDOSCIENCE", "bias_score": 3.0, "factual_reporting": "LOW", "factual_score": 7.8, "credibility_rating": "LOW CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Website", "traffic_popularity": "Minimal Traffic", "bias_category_description": null, "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate Patrick Hahn’s website and Substack as Right-Center biased based on its distrust of mainstream science and frequent alignment with populist health skepticism. We also rate it Low for factual reporting due to repeated pseudoscientific claims, lack of medical expertise, and failure to align with credible scientific consensus. Detailed Report Bias Rating: PSEUDOSCIENCE (3.0) Factual Reporting: LOW (7.", "history": "Patrick Hahn is a writer, lecturer, and self-described researcher with no verifiable background in medicine, epidemiology, or virology. He maintains multiple online platforms, including his personal websitepatrickhahn.net, a teaching site, and aSubstackwhere he publishes personal commentary and vaccine-skeptical essays. He has also authored five books, includingNever the Same: Unheard Stories of the COVID-19 Vaccine, which presents anecdotal accounts alleging severe harm from COVID-19 vaccines. Read our profile on the United States government and media.", "ownership": "Hahn’s work is self-published and monetized through book sales onAmazonand subscriptions onSubstack. He does not appear to have institutional or corporate funding, and there is no evidence of peer review or professional editorial oversight. His online presence promotes his own writings and interpretations of public health topics.", "analysis": "Patrick Hahn’s content routinely misrepresents or distorts scientific findings related to COVID-19 and vaccines. His Substack post“Spike in Cardiac Deaths Caused by Covid ‘Vaccines’”falsely claims that COVID-19 vaccinations caused increases in cardiac deaths after 2020, citing misinterpreted data fromJAMAand public health agencies. In contrast,FactCheck.organd theCDCconfirm there is no evidence linking vaccination to increased cardiac mortality, and that such claims are based on distortions of statistical context. While some of Hahn’s writings—such as“On James Watson, ‘Race,’ and the Heritability of Intelligence”—critique pseudoscience and racism, his COVID-related commentary demonstrates pseudoscientific reasoning and confirmation bias. His lack of medical training and reliance on misinterpreted studies, anecdotal reports, and speculative conclusions place his platform within the pseudoscience genre. The tone is distrustful of mainstream science and government, a hallmark of right-leaning health misinformation ecosystems. Overall, Hahn’s presentation of data lacks scientific rigor, peer-reviewed support, and balanced perspective. The combination of anti-vaccine narratives, conspiratorial framing, and populist distrust of public health institutions places his work in the pseudoscience category, with mild right-leaning tendencies.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "Claims COVID-19 vaccines caused a “spike” in cardiac deaths (debunked byFactCheck.org, CDC, and WHO)." ], "last_updated": "November 15, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/abilene-times-bias-and-credibility/", "name": "Abilene Times", "source_url": "https://abilenetimes.com/", "bias_rating": "RIGHT-CENTER", "bias_score": 4.3, "factual_reporting": "MIXED", "factual_score": 6.1, "credibility_rating": "LOW CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Website", "traffic_popularity": "Minimal Traffic", "bias_category_description": null, "overall_summary": null, "history": "Abilene Times is a conservative news and opinion website published byMetric Media LLCthat is designed to look like a local news source. Metric Media publishes over 1000 websites with the same design and about page that reads “Metric Media was established to fill the void in community news after years of decline in local reporting by legacy media. Our approach is to provide objective, data-driven information without political bias. We provide 100% original reporting, including to share as much data as possible from government and other publicly available sources.” Metric Media LLC lacks transparency as they do not have an about page that describes their conservative agenda, nor discloses funding and ownership. Read our profile on United States government and media.", "ownership": "The Metric Media LLC website does not disclose ownership. However, the Metric Media Foundation owns each local website. Conservative political consultantBradley Cameronis the CEO of Metric Media. The Foundation funds the website’s production by receiving revenue from advertising and donations.", "analysis": "In review, Abilene Times is one of over 1000 conservative-leaning news websites published by the Metric Media LLC Network.Each of the websites in the network has the same design and generally relies onalgorithmicallyproduced content. Furthermore, the original content produced on the website holds a right-leaning editorial bias. Please see the full review of Metric Media websiteshere.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "SeeMetric Media" ], "last_updated": "December 29, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/rodong-sinmun-north-korea/", "name": "Rodong Sinmun (North Korea)", "source_url": "http://www.rodong.rep.kp/en", "bias_rating": "EXTREME LEFT", "bias_score": -9.7, "factual_reporting": "VERY LOW", "factual_score": 9.6, "credibility_rating": "LOW CREDIBILITY", "country": "North Korea", "country_freedom_rating": "TOTAL OPPRESSION", "media_type": "Newspaper", "traffic_popularity": "Medium Traffic", "bias_category_description": null, "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate Rodong Sinmun a Questionable source based on Extreme Left-wing bias with the overt promotion of state propaganda and near 100% censorship of facts. Detailed Report Reasoning: Propaganda, Conspiracy, Nationalism, Censorship Bias Rating: EXTREME LEFT (-9.7) Factual Reporting: VERY LOW (9.6) Country: North Korea MBFC’s Country Freedom Rating: TOTAL OPPRESSION Media Type: Newspaper Traffic/Popularity: Medium Traffic MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY History Launched in 1945, Rodong Sinmun, formerly known as Chǒngro, is the newspaper of the Central Committee of the Workers’ Party of Korea.", "history": "Launched in 1945, Rodong Sinmun, formerly known as Chǒngro, is the newspaper of theCentral Committee of the Workers’ Party of Korea.It is the main national daily and acts as the party’s official mouthpiece. Kim Jong-un has been the Chairman of the Workers’ Party of Korea since 2012 and the grandson of Kim Il Sung, the first leader of North Korea from 1948 to1994.Kim Jong-unis serving as the third and currentSupreme Leaderof North Korea, and he is the second child ofKim Jong-il(1941–2011).Rodong Sinmun is headquartered inPyongyang, North Korea. Rodong Sinmun is blocked in the United States. Read our profile on North Korean Media and Government.", "ownership": "The Editor-in-Chief of Rodong Sinmun, the organ of the Party Central Committee, isRi Yong Sik.The central committee appoints the newspaper’s editor-in-chiefin a plenary session.", "analysis": "In review, most of its content is dedicated to leaderKim Jong-un,such as the“Supreme Leader’s Activity”section, which covers Kim Jong Un’s daily activities.  Rodong Sinmun typically republishes stories from the Korean Central News Agency (KCNA). Many of the news articles are verbatim copies of KCNA stories. For example, an article titled“Kim Jong Un Tours Singapore”appeared in KCNA and with thesame headlinein Rodong Sinmun. Rodong Sinmun journalists write other articles. Further, they often publish stories with emotionally loaded language, such as“Children’s Union Members Are Masters of Future of Socialist Korea.” Editorialsusually offer praise for theSongun and Juche policy.Songun refers to North Korea’s military-first policy, and Juche refers to North Korea’s ideology of self-reliance, named by founder Kim Il-sung.  A few quotes from the article read “The great leader President Kim Il Sung, the red sun of Korea” and “Kim Jong Il is the prominent thinker and theoretician who developed in-depth the Juche idea, peerlessly brilliant commander of Songun and shining star of world progressive mankind.[…] the nation with his unique Songun politics and consolidated the DPRK (North Korea) to be an invincible socialist fortress.” Another quote:“The valiant spirit and the immensely bright future of Juche Korea are inseparable from the nation-building feats of President Kim Il Sung, who provided an eternal foundation for the nation’s prosperity in his lifetime.” Editorials also use extremely loaded language when North Korea is criticized, such as this:Hideous Provocation of Reptile Media. A quote from this article is not just emotionally loaded; it is threatening: “It is the height of evil deed that can be done only by those villains who are steeped in hostility towards the DPRK to the marrow. The NHK should clearly understand the catastrophic aftermath which its false report about the DPRK can create, and make an apology to the Korean people on its knees.” Rodong Sinmunis far Left biased based on North Korea’s politics of being aJuche Socialist State(Communist). ABBC articlefrom 2000 describes how difficult life is in North Korea andremains the same today. Essentially, Rodong Sinmun and all media in North Korea provide a rundown of Supreme Leader’s daily agenda, with a lot of flattery thrown in for good measure.”", "failed_fact_checks": [ "They only publish pro-state propaganda." ], "last_updated": "May 16, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/dagestan-news-bias-and-credibility/", "name": "Dagestan News", "source_url": "https://dagestan-news.net/", "bias_rating": "RIGHT", "bias_score": 6.0, "factual_reporting": "VERY LOW", "factual_score": 9.8, "credibility_rating": "LOW CREDIBILITY", "country": "Russia", "country_freedom_rating": "TOTAL OPPRESSION", "media_type": "Website", "traffic_popularity": "Minimal Traffic", "bias_category_description": null, "overall_summary": null, "history": "Dagestan News is a Russian-state-backeddisinformation websitethat is designed to impersonate a legitimate news source. It is part of the Pravda Network, a Moscow-based conglomerate of at least 193 websites, each tailored to specific languages and regions. The network was first identified by France’s VIGINUM agency in 2024 and is structured to mimic real news outlets while promoting pro-Kremlin narratives and anti-Western propaganda. The Pravda Network lacks transparency, as it does not disclose its ownership, editorial policies, or funding sources. The network is part of a larger Russian disinformation ecosystem, aiming to influence global public opinion in favor of the Kremlin. Read our profile on Russian media and government.", "ownership": "Dagestan News does not disclose its ownership or funding sources. However,investigationshave confirmed that the Pravda Network is a Kremlin-backed project. Funding likely comes from Russian state-sponsored entities, and the website is part of Russia’s broader information warfare strategy.", "analysis": "In review, Dagestan News is one of many disinformation websites operated by thePravda Network. The site mimics a legitimate news source but routinely promotes pro-Russian narratives, anti-Western disinformation, and Kremlin-approved propaganda. Content often includes: Generally, this source is unreliable on any level and should be avoided.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "Pro-Russian messaging, including justifications for Russia’s military actions.", "Anti-EU and anti-NATO content, designed to erode support for Western alliances.", "Fabricated or misleading reports, particularly regarding the West’s relationship with Russia and Ukraine." ], "last_updated": "August 18, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/gab-news-bias/", "name": "GAB News", "source_url": "https://news.gab.com/", "bias_rating": "EXTREME RIGHT", "bias_score": 8.8, "factual_reporting": "LOW", "factual_score": 8.1, "credibility_rating": "LOW CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Website", "traffic_popularity": "High Traffic", "bias_category_description": null, "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate GAB News as extreme right biased and Questionable based on the promotion of conspiracies, propaganda, pseudoscience, a lack of transparency, poor sourcing, and third-party labeling as a hate group . Detailed Report Questionable Reasoning: Propaganda, Conspiracies, Pseudoscience, Poor Sourcing, Failed Fact Checks, Lack of Transparency, Hate Bias Rating: EXTREME RIGHT (8.8) Factual Reporting: LOW (8.1) Country: USA MBFC’s Country Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE Media Type: Website Traffic/Popularity: High Traffic MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY History Launched in 2016 by Andrew Torba and a Turkey-based developer Ekrem Buyukkaya Gab, GAB is a social media platform similar to Twitter and Reddit based in Pennsylvania.", "history": "Launched in 2016 by Andrew Torba and a Turkey-based developer Ekrem Buyukkaya Gab, GAB is a social media platform similar to Twitter and Reddit based in Pennsylvania. GAB News (news.gab.com) is the news arm of GAB. Gabdescribes its platform as “A social network that champions free speech, individual liberty, and the free flow of information online. All are welcome.” Gab claims its main priority is freedom of speech. GAB states its values are grounded in the Christian faith in Jesus Christ, but they welcome those from all religious backgrounds.However, Gab is often referred to as “a haven for hate and disinformation,”“home for antisemitic speech,”and a “haven” for white supremacists and neo-Nazis. In 2018, thePittsburgh synagogue shootingbrought new attention to Gab as it receivedmillions of hitsper hour due to the shooters’ posts on their platform. Further, after the January 6 Capitol Riot, Twitter and Facebook suspended former president Donald Trump and other prominent conservatives, resulting in GABreportingan increase in their users. As of 2022, according toVice,trafficto GAB “has been steadily declining throughout 2022—which could in part be due to Trump launching his own social media platform, “Truth Social,” despite Andrew Torba’s “newfound religious outlook.” Read our profile on the United States media and government.", "ownership": "GAB lacks transparency as they do not disclose ownership; however, Andrew Torba is the founder and CEO. According toAndrew Torba,“GAB has been no-platformed and banned by 25+ service providers over the years including both App Stores, payment processors, hosting providers, and even VISA.” Therefore GAB built its own “in-house infrastructure”  with revenue derived through advertising, subscriptions, donations, and campaign consulting fees, such as PennsylvaniaRepublican Doug Mastriano,who paid GAB $5000.", "analysis": "In analysis, GAB publishes articles with emotionally loaded language, such as “Musk Is In Over His Head.”A quote from the article reads, “Given Elon’s Reddit-tier political takes and patchy soy beard, it wouldn’t surprise me at all to find out that he is low on the testosterone side. But I digress.” According to a Stanford Universityreport,they found that GAB content is “Extreme anti-Semitic, racist and homophobic content is rife, with open praise of Nazism, encouragement of violence against minorities, and “Great Replacement” narratives.” Editorially, GAB identifies with the extreme right by endorsing Christian Nationalism. The website has acategorythat only reports on Christian Nationalism. For example, a quote from the articleAgainst Christian Globalismreads, “But today, he sent outa short emailthat denounced Christian Nationalism. To say I disagree with his take is an understatement. And given the respect, I have for him it is absolutely necessary to offer him a rebuttal, breaking his argument down line by line.” The website frequently promotes conspiracy theories and makes false claims such as this regarding election fraud in the 2020 electionThe Big List of Voter Fraud News And What Can Be Done To #StopTheSteal. There isno evidence of widespread election fraudor that the election was stolen. They also make false claims regarding Covid-19 vaccines like thisGab Welcomes Pushback Against Experimental Vaccines. This story is sourced from an anti-vaccine advocacy group. According to fact checkers, theCovid Vaccine is not experimental.Finally,accordingto theSouthern Poverty Law Center, GAB is a “social media network that serves as an organizing hub for white supremacists.” GAB News generally holds extreme right views and frequently promotes false or misleading information.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "Gab has failed dozens of fact-checks. See the complete list here." ], "last_updated": "February 3, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/dailyjournal24hr-bias-and-credibility/", "name": "DailyJournal24hr", "source_url": "https://dailyjournal24hr.com/", "bias_rating": "LEAST BIASED", "bias_score": 0.0, "factual_reporting": "LOW", "factual_score": 7.1, "credibility_rating": "LOW CREDIBILITY", "country": "Unknown", "country_freedom_rating": null, "media_type": "Website", "traffic_popularity": "Minimal Traffic", "bias_category_description": null, "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate DailyJournal24hr as questionable based on a complete lack of transparency, AI-generated content without oversight, and confirmed false claims. Detailed Report Questionable Reasoning: Imposter Site, Lack of Transparency, False Claims Bias Rating: LEAST BIASED (0.0) Factual Reporting: LOW (7.1) Country: Unknown MBFC’s Country Freedom Rating: N/A Media Type: Website Traffic/Popularity: Minimal Traffic MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY History DailyJournal24hr.", "history": "DailyJournal24hr.com is an online platform that publishes a wide array of articles, primarily focusing on entertainment and celebrity news.The website lacks transparency regarding its ownership, editorial team, and physical location, which raises concerns about its credibility and legitimacy.", "ownership": "The website does not disclose any information about its funding sources or ownership structure.The absence of such transparency is a common characteristic of dubious or potentially fraudulent websites. Advertising generates revenue.​", "analysis": "DailyJournal24hr.com has been identified as a source of misinformation.For instance, it published an articlefalsely claimingthat the television show “The View” was officially canceled after decades on air.This claim was debunked byLead Stories, which noted that there was no official announcement regarding the show’s cancellation and that the article appeared to be AI-generated. Additionally, the website has been flagged for its low trustworthiness.Scam Detector’s algorithmassigned DailyJournal24hr.com a score of 30 out of 100, indicating a “Medium Risk” and advising caution when engaging with the site.​ In general, DailyJournal24hr appears to be a clickbait AI-generated website.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "As mentioned, DailyJournal24hr.com published a false article claiming that “The View” was canceled, which was thoroughly debunked by fact-checking organizations." ], "last_updated": "March 1, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/stratford-herald-bias-and-credibility/", "name": "Stratford Herald", "source_url": "https://www.stratford-herald.com/", "bias_rating": "LEAST BIASED", "bias_score": -0.6, "factual_reporting": "HIGH", "factual_score": 1.0, "credibility_rating": "HIGH CREDIBILITY", "country": "United Kingdom", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Newspaper", "traffic_popularity": "Minimal Traffic", "bias_category_description": "These sources have minimal bias and use very few loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appeals to emotion or stereotypes).  The reporting is factual and usually sourced.  These are the most credible media sources.See all Least Biased Sources.", "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate the Stratford Herald as least biased based on minimal editorializing of content. We also rate them High for factual reporting due to the use of credible sources and a clean fact-check record. Detailed Report Bias Rating: LEAST BIASED (-0.6) Factual Reporting: HIGH (1.", "history": "The Stratford Heraldis a local newspaper published in Stratford, England. It mainly reports local news and events and is theprimary information source for the community. Read our profile on UK media and government", "ownership": "Iliffe Media Groupowns the publication. They publish several newspapers in the United Kingdom. It is funded throughsubscriptionsand online advertising.", "analysis": "These sources have minimal bias and use very few loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appeals to emotion or stereotypes).  The reporting is factual and usually sourced.  These are the most credible media sources.See all Least Biased Sources. The Stratford Herald covers local news for the Stratford area through reporters with minimal bias, such as thisWarwickshire County Council facing more questions over £265k a year spend on empty building.Regarding sourcing, they rely on first-person accounts and large quotes, which is appropriate for a print publication.The paper does not cover national or international news; it focuses solely on local community news. Editorially, they do not produce op-eds.Generally, the Stratford Herald is fact-based and presents a minimal bias in reporting.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "None in the Last 5 years" ], "last_updated": "April 1, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-daily-boulder-bias/", "name": "The Daily Boulder", "source_url": "https://dailyboulder.com/", "bias_rating": "FAR LEFT", "bias_score": -8.5, "factual_reporting": "MIXED", "factual_score": 6.3, "credibility_rating": "LOW CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Website", "traffic_popularity": "Minimal Traffic", "bias_category_description": null, "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate The Daily Boulder Left Biased and Questionable based on a lack of transparency, poor sourcing, promotion of propaganda, and failed fact checks. Detailed Report Reasoning: Propaganda, Poor Sourcing, Lack of Transparency, Failed Fact Checks Bias Rating: FAR LEFT (-8.5) Factual Reporting: MIXED (6.3) Country: USA MBFC’s Country Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE Media Type: Website Traffic/Popularity: Minimal Traffic MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY History The Daily Boulder is a news and opinion website based in Dallas, Texas.", "history": "The Daily Boulderis a news and opinion website based in Dallas, Texas. According to theirabout page, they focus on covering “politics, culture, and power.”Carl Anthonyis the Editor-in-Chief, and Mathew Pierce is the Managing Editor. Read our profile on USA Media and Government.", "ownership": "Information such as ownership and funding is not disclosed.Revenue appears to be generated from advertising.", "analysis": "In review, The Daily Boulder presents news with a left-wing bias through story selection that always favors the left. Quotations rather than hyperlinks generally source articles. Editorially, The Daily Boulder has a strong left-leaning bias with frequent use of strong emotional loaded words that favor the left and denigrate the right such as this“MAGA Rioter Whines He’s a ‘Political Prisoner,’ Blames Trump For His Legal Troublesand“Trump’s Wild Theory Of How He’ll Be Reinstated As President Baffles NYT Reporter.” The Daily Boulder uses mainstream media outlets such asCNNandThe Spectatoreither by quoting or hyperlinking the source. Another example is“Close Friend Of Trump Charged After Grabbing Woman By The ‘P—-‘: Report.”In this article, they use the Times-Tribune as its source and properly hyperlink.  However, the title is sensationalized as the original source title is “Scranton dentist charged with groping patient.” The original article does not mention what parts were groped. In general, the Daily Boulder promotes a far-left perspective and sometimes is not factual.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "The White House Is Selling Coronavirus Coins–False", "“USPS failed to deliver 27% of mail-in ballots in South Florida”–Pants on Fire" ], "last_updated": "January 5, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/war-room-steve-bannon-bias/", "name": "War Room (Steve Bannon)", "source_url": "https://warroom.org/", "bias_rating": "EXTREME RIGHT", "bias_score": 9.4, "factual_reporting": "VERY LOW", "factual_score": 9.6, "credibility_rating": "LOW CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Website", "traffic_popularity": "Medium Traffic", "bias_category_description": null, "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate Steve Bannon’s War Room Questionable based on extreme right-wing bias, promotion of conspiracies, pseudoscience, propaganda, and numerous instances of publishing disinformation and false news. Detailed Report Questionable Reasoning: Propaganda, Conspiracy, Pseudoscience, White Nationalism, Numerous Failed Fact Checks, Lack of Transparency Bias Rating: EXTREME RIGHT (9.4) Factual Reporting: VERY LOW (9.6) Country: USA MBFC’s Country Freedom Rank: MOSTLY FREE Media Type: Website Traffic/Popularity: Medium Traffic MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY History Launched in 2019, War Room is the podcast of conservative former Trump campaign CEO Steve Bannon.", "history": "Launched in 2019, War Room is the podcast of conservative former Trump campaign CEO Steve Bannon. The website warroom.org is the associated website that hosts the podcast and publishes news and opinion articles. According to theirabout page, “War Room: Pandemic is a news site and podcast with former Trump campaign CEO and White House Chief Strategist Stephen K. Bannon, former chief of staff to Nigel Farage, Raheem Kassam, and WarRoom’s own Jack Maxey.” Bannon is also the founder of the conservative advocacy group calledCitizens of the American Republicand was a formerBreitbart Newsexecutive chairman. In October 2022, Bannon was convicted on two counts of contempt of Congress and sentenced to 4 months in prison. The indictment alleged that Bannon failed to comply with a subpoena from the U.S. House of Representatives Select Committee seeking information about his role on the January 6, 2021, riot at the U.S. Capitol. Steve Bannon has beenlabeleda racist and white supremacist by some sources. Read our profile on the United States government and media.", "ownership": "Warroom.org does not disclose ownership. It is assumed to be owned by Steve Bannon. His podcast is also aired on the far right and QuestionableReal America’s VoiceandNewsmax. Advertising generates revenue.", "analysis": "The War Room website publishes Bannon’s War Room podcast. The website also features text news and opinion articles by Bannon and others. Bannon’s podcast frequently promotes conspiracy theories and pseudoscience through questionable guests likeMike Lindell,Peter Navarro,Alex Jones, andNaomi Wolfe. All of these people have eitherpromotedunsubstantiated claims of election fraud in the 2020 election or pseudoscience related toCovid-19 and vaccines. Editorially, all stories favor the extreme right, such as thisFauci’s Replacement Signed Deals Pushing Research Collaboration With Chinese Communist Party In Wuhan, Responsible For Secret Reversal Of Gain-of-Function Funding Ban.Others denigrate the left like this:Biden’s Deceitful Open Border Plan Increases Legal Pathways For Title XIII Workarounds. Further, almost every story reviewed either promotes conspiracy theories, pseudoscience, or disinformation, such as thisEpisode 845 – An Infinite Bioweapon … How the CCP Virus Weakened the Church and How to Fix It (w/ Maria Luisa, Brian McCall, Dr. Maria Ryan, Dr. Yan, Drew Mason)and thisEpisode 1,232 – Exposing the Stolen Election. There isno evidencethat Covid is a bioweapon or that the2020 election was stolen. In general, Steve Bannon’s War Room is a vehicle to promote far-right disinformation propaganda as a means to sow division and create chaos. To put it in perspective, “War Room” is less credible than theGateway Punditand rivals Infowars in its blatant promotion of disinformation.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "Social media users are sharing the false claim that people aged 25 to 44 in the United States experienced an 84% increase in excess mortality due to the COVID-19 vaccine rollout.–False", "Babies of vaccinated mothers are dying in disproportionate numbers and the COVID-19 vaccines are responsible.–Inaccurate", "“The Biden administration is bringing amendments that would propose that all nations of the earth cede their sovereignty over national health care decisions to the WHO.”–False", "COVID-19 vaccines will make SARS-CoV-2 more dangerous due to a mechanism called antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE)–Misleading", "Kari Lake’s lawsuit “exposes Arizona used no signature verification.”–False", "There are many more." ], "last_updated": "July 14, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-epoch-times/", "name": "The Epoch Times", "source_url": "https://www.theepochtimes.com", "bias_rating": "RIGHT-CENTER", "bias_score": 4.5, "factual_reporting": "MOSTLY FACTUAL", "factual_score": 3.9, "credibility_rating": "MEDIUM CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Newspaper", "traffic_popularity": "High Traffic", "bias_category_description": "These media sources are slight to moderately conservative in bias. They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appealing to emotion or stereotypes) to favor conservative causes. These sources are generally trustworthy for information but may require further investigation.See all Right-Center sources.", "overall_summary": "Overall, The Epoch Times is rated Right-Center biased due to its consistent conservative framing and editorial support for traditional values and Republican viewpoints. Its Factual Reporting rating has improved to Mostly Factual, reflecting major corrections and stronger sourcing. While remnants of one-sided reporting persist, the publication has transitioned mainly from a Questionable source to a higher Credibility outlet committed to more responsible journalism. Detailed Report Bias Rating: RIGHT-CENTER (4.", "history": "The Epoch Times is an international, multilingual newspaper and digital media organization founded in 2000 by John Tang and other Chinese-American Falun Gong practitioners. Initially established to counter Chinese state censorship, it has since expanded to more than 35 countries and 22 languages. The publication’s mission, according to itsAbout Uspage, is to provide “value-driven journalism that informs, inspires, and provides clarity,” emphasizing “truth and tradition” as guiding principles. In 2024, the Epoch Times faced significant controversy when its CFO, Weidong “Bill” Guan, was charged with laundering $67 million through fraudulent means. Following this, founder John Tang resigned as CEO, and a new management team led by Janice Trey, formerly of Philips HealthCare and GlobalFoundries, took over, pledging to restore transparency and editorial integrity. Read our profile on theUSA government’s influence on media.", "ownership": "The Epoch Times is owned by the nonprofit Epoch Times Association, Inc., affiliated with the Epoch Media Group. It generates funding primarily from subscriptions (accounting for roughly 90% of revenue), sponsorships, and advertisements. While historically linked to Falun Gong, the outlet now describes itself as an independent, reader-supported media organization governed by a board of directors.", "analysis": "These media sources are slight to moderately conservative in bias. They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appealing to emotion or stereotypes) to favor conservative causes. These sources are generally trustworthy for information but may require further investigation.See all Right-Center sources. Under new leadership since mid-2024, the Epoch Times has taken substantial steps to improve editorial accuracy and journalistic responsibility. According to a March 2025NewsGuard review, the outlet corrected or removed 41 of 50 previously false or misleading articles and had not published any verifiably false claims for 10 consecutive months. However, NewsGuard noted that these corrections primarily occurred only after inquiries, and some misleading articles remain uncorrected. Editorially, the Epoch Times maintains a clear Right-Center bias, with coverage frequently supportive of Republican policies and critical of Democrats. For example, recent pieces such as“Senate Confirms Zeldin to Head Environmental Protection Agency”and “Rolling Back DEI: Resisting Forced Equality”highlight conservative perspectives while limiting opposing views. Its opinion section, including essays like“The Hidden Crisis in Our Classrooms: Why Education Without Character Is Failing America”, reflects traditionalist and moralist framing consistent with conservative social values. In contrast to its past reliance on conspiracy theories and pseudoscientific claims, the current Epoch Times now adheres more closely to mainstream fact-based journalism. Articles such as“29-Year-Old Florida Man Arrested Over Palisades Fire”and“Illegal Immigrants and Federal Health Benefits: What to Know”demonstrate an improved commitment to sourcing and balanced reporting, particularly in straight news. While its ideological tone remains conservative, there is no longer consistent promotion of conspiratorial or anti-science content that once defined its coverage.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "From 2020–2023, The Epoch Times published several false claims related to COVID-19 and U.S. politics. Most of these have since been corrected or removed as part of the 2024–Present editorial reforms." ], "last_updated": "October 8, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/breakingnews60s-com-bias-and-credibility/", "name": "BreakingNews60s.com", "source_url": "https://breakingnews60s.com/", "bias_rating": "LEAST BIASED", "bias_score": 0.0, "factual_reporting": "VERY LOW", "factual_score": 9.9, "credibility_rating": "LOW CREDIBILITY", "country": "Unknown", "country_freedom_rating": null, "media_type": "Website", "traffic_popularity": "Minimal Traffic", "bias_category_description": null, "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate BreakingNews60s.com as Questionable. Due to the complete lack of factual reporting, transparency, and journalistic integrity, BreakingNews60s.com earns a Very Low factual rating and is designated a fake news site.", "history": "BreakingNews60s.com is a deceptive and inauthentic news website that falsely presents itself as a professional media outlet named “News Hour Productions,” a name which it misleadingly associates with legitimate PBS programming. Its“About”and“Contact”pages list a fake Arlington, Virginia address (1234 Broad Street) and a fake phone number (+1 (555) 123-4567), both of which are commonly reused on other known fake news and imposter websites including: These websites appear to be part of a larger network of imposter or fabricated clickbait sites, many of which use recycled layouts, phony branding, and invented staff information There is no transparency about ownership or editorial leadership, and no verifiable legal entity is listed. The only contact given is an unverifiable Gmail address. There is no trace of a legitimate business registration matching “NEW NEWS PAPERUSA” or the supposedly affiliated “News Hour Productions” at the given address. The site is monetized exclusively through low-quality digital ads, indicating a clear financial incentive to produce viral misinformation for click revenue.", "ownership": null, "analysis": "BreakingNews60s.com primarily pushes viral misinformation cloaked in a sensationalist news format. A key example includes a fabricated viral article falsely claiming that NBC’s Garrett Haake humiliated Karoline Leavitt during a press briefing. This article was fullydebunked by Lead Stories, confirming that the event never occurred. Other articles on the site present exaggerated, misleading, or fictional stories involving major media figures like David Muir, with zero sourcing or corroboration, and no bylines or timestamps, common traits of coordinated disinformation sites. There is no evidence of original reporting, credible sourcing, or journalistic standards. Most stories are clearly fabricated to mislead readers for profit. In general, it is a fraudulent imposter website that fabricates news stories to generate ad revenue through viral disinformation. It uses fake contact information, no editorial transparency, and recycles infrastructure from other known imposter sites. It has zero credibility and regularly publishes provably false claims.", "failed_fact_checks": [], "last_updated": "July 8, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/tasnim-news-agency/", "name": "Tasnim News Agency", "source_url": "https://www.tasnimnews.com/en", "bias_rating": "RIGHT", "bias_score": 6.7, "factual_reporting": "MIXED", "factual_score": 6.2, "credibility_rating": "LOW CREDIBILITY", "country": "Iran", "country_freedom_rating": "TOTAL OPPRESSION", "media_type": "News Agency", "traffic_popularity": "High Traffic", "bias_category_description": null, "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate Tasnim News Questionable based on the promotion of state propaganda and conspiracy theories as well as use of poor sources. Detailed Report Reasoning: State Propaganda , Conspiracy, Poor Sourcing Bias Rating: RIGHT (6.7) Factual Reporting: MIXED (6.2) Country: Iran MBFC’s Country Freedom Rating: TOTAL OPPRESSION Media Type: News Agency Traffic/Popularity: High Traffic MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY History Launched in 2012, Tasnim News Agency is an English language news website from Iran.", "history": "Launched in 2012,Tasnim News Agencyis an English language news website from Iran. Majid Gholizadeh is the managing director and as of 2014, the headquarters is based in Tehran. In addition to Persian reporting,Tasnim News Agencyalso provides news in Turkish, which features World and National Politics, Opinions, a wide variety of political, social, economic, and international subjects. Tasnim News Agencydescribes its mission as “Defending the Islamic Revolution against negative media propaganda campaign and providing our readers with realities on the ground about Iran and Islam, especially the current wave of the Islamic Awakening in the region are top on our agenda in Tasnim News Agency.” Read our report on how Government influences media in Iran.", "ownership": "Tasnim is owned and funded by the Islamic Ideology Dissemination Organization (IIDO), which promotesIslamic ideology.", "analysis": "Tasnim has stronglinkswith the Iranian Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC) and according toThe Guardianthe US accuses the IRGC of terror mainly because of its military support for Hezbollah and Hamas, organizations that the US and EU have both designated as terrorist groups. Although the Iranian Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC) don’t openly affiliate themselves with any political parties, theAlliance of Builders of Islamic Iran (ABADGARAN) is widely viewed as a political front for the Revolutionary Guards and they are described as “Iran’s neocons”, therefore we rate the political stance of Tasnim as right-wing bias. Reporters without Borders hasreportedIran as “One of the most oppressive countries” According to theReporters without Borders2023 report, Iran ranks 177 out of 180 countries in the World Press Freedom Index. The content of headlines and articles use loaded words pertaining to national news such as “Battle against Daesh Still Continuing in Cultural, Ideological Fields: Iran’s Shamkhani” However, they poorly source their articles, heavily quoting without sourcing or providing links to theoriginal source. In general, they promote pro-state propaganda and anti-west conspiracies.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "“Shocking evidence of ISIS involvement in the Ukrainian armed forces has emerged.”–False" ], "last_updated": "July 15, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/to-vima/", "name": "To Vima", "source_url": "https://www.tovima.gr/", "bias_rating": "RIGHT-CENTER", "bias_score": 3.7, "factual_reporting": "MIXED", "factual_score": 5.0, "credibility_rating": "MEDIUM CREDIBILITY", "country": "Greece", "country_freedom_rating": "LIMITED FREEDOM", "media_type": "Newspaper", "traffic_popularity": "High Traffic", "bias_category_description": "These media sources are slightly to moderately conservative in bias. They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes) to favor conservative causes. These sources are generally trustworthy for information, but may require further investigation.See all Right-Center sources.", "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate To Vima Right-Center Biased based on story selection and editorial positions that currently favor the right. We also rate them Mixed for factual reporting due to a lack of transparency regarding ownership, poor sourcing, and a few failed fact checks. Detailed Report Bias Rating: RIGHT-CENTER (3.7) Factual Reporting: MIXED (5.", "history": "Founded in 1922 by Dimitris Lambrakis, Georgios Roussos, Alexandros Diomidis, Emmanouil Tsouderos originally asEleftheron Vima, later renamed To Vima, is a Greek newspaper based in Athens, Greece. In 2017 Alter Ego Media S.A.acquiredthe publisher and owner Lambrakis Press Group (DOL). Read our profile on Greece’s media and government.", "ownership": "Ownership information is not transparent. To Vima is published by Alter Ego Media S.A. (no website) which is owned by shipownerEvangelos Marinakis.Revenue is derived through advertising and subscription fees.", "analysis": "These media sources are slightly to moderately conservative in bias. They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes) to favor conservative causes. These sources are generally trustworthy for information, but may require further investigation.See all Right-Center sources. To Vima was known to have acenter-leftstance, however, the new owner businessman Evangelos Marinakisis, according toan articlepublished byThe Nation,is known for “His close friendship and family ties with the Mitsotakis family.” Kyriakos Mitsotakis is the current center-right Prime Minister of Greece and is the son of former Prime MinisterKonstantinos Mitsotakis. In review, To Vima uses minimally emotional worded headlines such as“What the Turkish ambassador to Athens said about the tripartite Berlin, Hagia Sophia and EEZ”.When covering national politics To Vima publishes articles that are critical in tone towards oppositionleft-wingparty leader Alexis Tsipras and favorable towards center-right Mitsotakis“SYRIZA raises the spectre of a New Democracy neo-liberal restoration”. Aquote from the article reads “As he did in the European Parliament election, Tsipras himself is taking the lead in the campaign for the simple reason that despite all his broken promises and tragic policy errors –  especially in the first six months of his first term but also in economic policy.” Another article is favorable to the current Prime Minister“Mitsotakis calls for unity, personal responsibility, the cooperation of Archbishop to limit COVID-19”. To Vima covers the Trump administration critically“Editorial: Messages of the US elections.” When it comes to sourcing they utilize sister news websites such asIn.gr(owned by Alter Ego Media S.A.), however most sourcing consists of quotes without hyperlinking. In general, To Vima holds a right-leaning editorial bias and does not always report news factually.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "Meeting of bodies that took place at the Headquarters (Macedonia-Thrace Undersecretariat) under the Prime Minister Kyriakos Mitsotakis, the decision was made on the mark that will be registered internationally to recognize Macedonian products.–False", "“The Mufti of Komotini was prosecuted for abuse of power”–Inaccurate", "Emmanuel Macron is preparing a law that will oblige tax evaders to circulate bearing a characteristic sign, which will make clear to those who associate with the tax crime they have committed–False" ], "last_updated": "June 20, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/thinking-humanity/", "name": "Thinking Humanity", "source_url": "https://www.thinkinghumanity.com/", "bias_rating": "PSEUDOSCIENCE", "bias_score": -5.5, "factual_reporting": "LOW", "factual_score": 7.7, "credibility_rating": "LOW CREDIBILITY", "country": "Unknown", "country_freedom_rating": null, "media_type": "Website", "traffic_popularity": "Minimal Traffic", "bias_category_description": null, "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate Thinking Humanity a moderate Pseudoscience source based on the promotion of debunked scientific claims. We also rate them Mixed for factual reporting due to a lack of transparency and the publication of false information. Detailed Report Bias Rating: PSEUDOSCIENCE (-5.5) Factual Reporting: LOW (7.", "history": "Founded in 2014, Thinking Humanity is a website that publishes science/pseudoscience, spirituality, and culture news. According to theirabout page, “Thinking Humanity is a community and a website that tries to provoke our thoughts, inspire and motivate our spirits, and give a better perspective on the injustices across the world.” The website lacks transparency as it does not list owners or authors.", "ownership": "Thinking Humanity does not disclose ownership; revenue is derived through advertising and an online shop selling merchandise.", "analysis": "In review, Thinking Humanity does not publish original material but summarizes content from other sources. For example, this story,Having Only One Guinea Pig In Switzerland Is Illegal Because They Get Lonely, iscopied verbatimfromEducateInspireChange. Politically, they align with the left through frequent criticism of conservatives and former President Donald Trump, such as this:Psychologists Say Donald Trump Shows Signs of Mental Illness, ‘Malignant Narcissism. This story is properly sourced to theIndependent. Thinking Humanity also publishes scientific news, which for the most part is accurate; however, they also have promoted pseudoscience such as miracle curesThis recipe will easily clear your lungs in 3 days, even if you smoke more than 5 yearsas well as the dangers of fluoride15 Facts Most People Don’t Know About Fluoride. There isn’t anyscientifically proven dangerto the use of fluoride. These articles have been removed without explanation. In general, this is a source that moderately promotes pseudoscience and, in the past, occasionally plagiarized the work of others.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "A video shows a group of whales coming to the surface after hearing an orchestra playing music.–False" ], "last_updated": "June 19, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/treason-news/", "name": "Treason.News", "source_url": "https://treason.news/", "bias_rating": "RIGHT CONSPIRACY-PSEUDOSCIENCE", "bias_score": 9.5, "factual_reporting": "VERY LOW", "factual_score": 10.0, "credibility_rating": "LOW CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Website", "traffic_popularity": "Minimal Traffic", "bias_category_description": null, "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate Treason.news an extreme right biased Tin-Foil Hat Conspiracy website that also publishes pseudoscience. This source is associated with Natural News, which is one of the most discredited sources on the internet. Detailed Report Bias Rating: RIGHT CONSPIRACY-PSEUDOSCIENCE (9.", "history": "Treason.news is a right-wing conspiracy and pseudoscience website that routinely publishes false information. The founder is Mike Adams, who owns several Questionable websites such asNatural NewsandNews Target. Treason.news is a part of the Natural News Network. This website lacks transparency and does not disclose ownership. According to Politifact:Health misinformation website rebrands as pro-Trump outlet to get around ban from Facebook. This website publishes disinformation regarding election fraud during the 2020 election. Read our profile on United States government and media.", "ownership": "Treason.news is owned by Mike Adams, who owns numerous other fake and/or controversial right-wing conspiracy websites. The website, like all of Mike Adams’s properties, is funded through online advertising.", "analysis": "In review, Mike Adams is known as theHealth Rangeraccording toRationalwiki. However, they point out dozens of cases where his claims are false. Besides promoting pseudoscience, Treason.news is an extreme right-wing biased source that frequently promotes false or misleading information regarding vaccines, alternative health, and government conspiracies. For more information read our review onNatural News. In general, politically, all Mike Adam’s stories favor the right and promote pseudoscience such aschemtrails, the Sandy Hook shooting being a false flag:Sandy Hook was theater! Actor who played law enforcement sniper was recorded walking around carrying rifle by the magazine. Further, they routinely publishanti-vaccination propagandaand conspiracy theories. Lastly, this source denies the consensus onclimate changewithout evidence, as seen here:Climate change cultists are now taking over your local weather forecast.This particular site publishes fake and or misleading news regarding voting fraud during the 2020 election.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "SeeNatural News" ], "last_updated": "June 21, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/john-birch-society-bias/", "name": "John Birch Society", "source_url": "https://jbs.org/", "bias_rating": "EXTREME RIGHT", "bias_score": 9.0, "factual_reporting": "LOW", "factual_score": 7.7, "credibility_rating": "LOW CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Organization/Foundation", "traffic_popularity": "Minimal Traffic", "bias_category_description": null, "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate the John Birch Society extreme right biased and Questionable based on the promotion of conspiracy theories, propaganda, poor sourcing, lack of transparency, the publication of misinformation, and charges of racism and antisemitism by third-party evaluators. Detailed Report Questionable Reasoning: Propaganda, Poor Sourcing, Conspiracies, Lack of Transparency, Misinformation, Hate Bias Rating: EXTREME RIGHT (9.0) Factual Reporting: LOW (7.7) Country: USA MBFC’s Country Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE Media Type: Organization/Foundation Traffic/Popularity: Minimal Traffic MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY History Founded in 1958 by candy magnate Robert Welch, the John Birch Society was formed to combat the Communist conspiracy theory that they had infiltrated the federal government.", "history": "Founded in 1958by candy magnate Robert Welch, the John Birch Society was formed to combat the Communist conspiracy theory that they had infiltrated the federal government. On December 9, 1958, Robert Welch invited the country’s wealthiest men to a meeting, and the John Birch Society was formed. Welch christened the group theJohn Birch Society—named in memory of a U.S. soldier-turned-Baptist missionary killed by Chinese Communists in 1945—and laid out its goal: Destroying the “Communist conspiracy … or at least breaking its grip on our government and shattering its power within the United States.” According to their currentabout page, “Our mission is to bring about less government, more responsibility, and – with God’s help – a better world by providing leadership, education, and organized volunteer action in accordance with moral and Constitutional principles. The John Birch Society enthusiastically endorses the U.S. Constitution, and we have worked for over 60 years toward educating and activating Americans to abide by the original intent of the Founding Fathers.” They also publish the Right Biased and Mixed factualThe New American Magazine. For a detailed history of the organization, seehere. Read our profile on the United States government and media.", "ownership": "The John Birch Society is a for-profit organization funded through private donations, membership fees, and corporate sponsors. Somenotable corporate sponsorsinclude Big Daddy Guns, Creation Today, Batton Forestry Services, and Action Group Incorporated. In the past, the John Birch Society was funded by theKoch Brothersand other large right-leaning corporations. Finally,Fred Trump(Donald Trump’s father) was a financier of the JBS and a personal friend of founder Robert Welch.", "analysis": "The John Birch Society was initially formed as a right-wing advocacy group opposed to communism and in support of social conservativism. The society rose quickly in membership and influence and was controversial for promotingconspiracy theories. Bircherism existed on the fringes of the far-right for 50 years, until the 2010s and increased further after the election of Donald Trump in 2016. The members and followers of the John Birch Society are known as Birchers, and their movement is Bircherism. The Society has been compared to an early version ofQanon, where they promote anti-left conspiracies and fears of globalism. They opposed the civil and equal rights movements and perceived threats to the family, including abortion, drugs, homosexuality, crime, violence, teenage pregnancy, teen suicide, feminism, and pornography. They also promote Christian conservatism and the libertarian principles of states’ rights and limited government. The current platform of the Society isnearly identicalto Trumpism. Further, Right-wing conspiracy theorist Alex Jones, who hosted Trump on hisInfowarsradio show and claimed to have a personal relationship with the president, called Trump a “John Birch Society president”and previously said Trump was “more John Birch Society than the John Birch Society.” It should be noted that Alex Jones is a fountain of misinformation, but he did say it. According to the Southern Poverty Law Center, “The John Birch Society, the conspiracist group exiled by the right a half-century ago, is on the march and gaining influence.” TheSPLCstates, “Charges of racism and anti-Semitism have dogged the John Birch Society since its earliest days.” Currently, JBS promotes conspiracy theories onCovid-19where they claim the Chinese control theWorld Health Organization. Other conspiracies include the governmenttaking guns away,replacement theory, baselesselection fraud conspiracies, and thenew world order(agenda21). In general, JBS is an extreme right-wing advocacy group that often promotes conspiracy theories and misinformation.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "None found in the last 5 years. See examples above." ], "last_updated": "March 7, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/actualized-org-bias/", "name": "Actualized.org", "source_url": "https://actualized.org/", "bias_rating": "PSEUDOSCIENCE", "bias_score": -3.0, "factual_reporting": "LOW", "factual_score": 7.8, "credibility_rating": "LOW CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Website", "traffic_popularity": "Medium Traffic", "bias_category_description": null, "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate Actualized.org as a pseudoscience website based on promoting unproven and questionable methods for treating depression. Additionally, Leo Gura’s controversial reputation may raise questions about the credibility of the website’s advice and recommendations. Detailed Report Bias Rating: PSEUDOSCIENCE (-3.", "history": "Actualized.orgis a website that publishes content related to self-actualization,self-improvement,personal development, and spirituality. According to their about page, the website is about “REAL, results-driven personal development without fluff, bullshit, or hype.” Leo Guralaunched Actualized.org in 2013, describing himself as a “YouTuber, Philosopher, Speaker, Psychonaut, Mystic.” The website’s About page also promotes Gura’s Ultimate Life Purpose Course, “Want to master your life? Check out my Ultimate Life Purpose Course, which shows you the most important principles I used to create my own success.” Read our profile on the United States media and government.", "ownership": "Leo Gura owns Actualized.org. The website generates revenue through various sources, including advertising, affiliate marketing, donations, and the sale of online courses and coaching sessions. As of this date, for one-on-one coaching sessions, he charges clients $2,640 for three months, and for access to exclusive content on his website, such as videos, he charges $249, as stated at the bottom ofthis page.", "analysis": "Most of Actualized.org’s articles focus on personal development and self-help; however, some have criticized the website for promoting pseudoscientific ideas. Leo Gura is the founder and administrator of Actualized.org, which includes a forum. In hisforum, Leo Gura discusses Alpha and theta brainwave frequencies for meditation “You have to train your mind to sync the peaks of alpha and theta, which requires an EEG machine, which is too complicated to go into here. Theta beats are good for purifying trauma and shadow work.” The scientific community generally does not accept some of Leo Gura’s claims about the brain and neuroscience. Some may even be considered pseudoscientific or misleading. For example, he has promoted usingpsychedelic drugsto promote enlightenment. While studies have shown that Psychedelic drugs may havetherapeutic benefits, they must be prescribed by a licensed Doctor in a clinical setting. While Leo Gura’s website mainly emphasizes self-help, he also has YouTube videos presenting himself as non-partisan and critiquing the political left. For example, he discusses his beliefs about the political left in a video titled “When Does The Left Go Too Far?”In another video, he criticizes the political right,“Understanding The Liberal Mind.” In general, Actualized.org is apseudosciencewebsite that advocates questionable methods for self-help and encourages psychedelic drug use.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "None by a third party." ], "last_updated": "September 16, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/move-on/", "name": "MoveOn", "source_url": "https://front.moveon.org", "bias_rating": "FAR LEFT", "bias_score": -8.9, "factual_reporting": "MIXED", "factual_score": 6.3, "credibility_rating": "LOW CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Organization/Foundation", "traffic_popularity": "Minimal Traffic", "bias_category_description": null, "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate MoveOn a Left Biased, Questionable Source based on the promotion of propaganda and numerous failed fact checks. Detailed Report Reasoning: Propaganda, Numerous Failed Fact Checks Bias Rating: FAR LEFT (-8.9) Factual Reporting: MIXED (6.3) Country: USA MBFC’s Country Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE Media Type: Organization/Foundation Traffic/Popularity: Minimal Traffic MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY History MoveOn is an American, non-profit, progressive public policy advocacy group and political action committee.", "history": "MoveOn is an American, non-profit,progressive public policy advocacy groupand political action committee. Formed in 1998 in response to the impeachment of President Bill Clinton by the U.S. House of Representatives, MoveOn.org has raised millions of dollars for candidates it identifies as “progressives” in the United States. MoveOn comprises two legal entities, organized under different sections of U.S. tax and election laws. MoveOn.org Civic Action is a 501(c)(4) nonprofit corporationand was formerly called MoveOn.org.It focuses on education and advocacy on national issues. MoveOn.org Political Action is a federal political action committee and was formerly known as MoveOn PAC. It contributes to the campaigns of many candidates across the country. Read our profile on the United States government and media.", "ownership": "MoveOn is a non-profit as well as a political action committee (PAC) that is funded through donations.Accordingto the right-leaningInfluence Watch, which tracks left-leaning funding, MoveOn has had donors such asOpen Society Policy Center($150,000),Ploughshares Fund($475,000),Naral Pro-Choice America Foundation($10,000) and Hollywood personalities such as Matt Damon ($5000). A review ofOpen Secretsshows that in 2018, MoveOndonated$447,500 Democratic candidates and $0 to Republicans. Additional revenue is generated through anonline storethat sells merchandise.", "analysis": "In review, MoveOn is a political advocacy organization that 100% favors Democratic candidates and liberal policies. The website features alink to start petitionsthat is similar toChange.org. They also have alinkfor campaigns they support and a list of events. Some of the campaigns listed are Confront gun violence and white nationalism, Win Elections Endorse Progressive Candidates, and Oppose Trump. Lastly, the website features news that often utilizes loaded emotional language such as this:MoveOn Criticizes Sen. Coons’ Reckless Comments on Iran. In general, MoveOn has supported progressive Democratic candidates such as Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "The newly proposed House Republican budget “abolishes Medicare within 10 years.”–FALSE", "Gov. Rick Scott “tried to kick 180,000 people off the voter rolls.”–FALSE", "“Every one of the 67 supervisors of elections” in Florida refused to carry out the effort to remove noncitizens from the voter rolls.–FALSE", "“(Palin) supported right-wing extremist Pat Buchanan for president in 2000.”–FALSE", "Says U.S. Sen. Ron Johnson “voted to cut $700m from Medicare.”–MOSTLY FALSE", "John McCain, “one of the richest people in a Senate filled with millionaires,” says the solution to the housing crisis is for people to get a “second job” and “skip their vacations.”–FALSE" ], "last_updated": "December 31, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/uncoverdc/", "name": "UncoverDC", "source_url": "https://uncoverdc.com/", "bias_rating": "EXTREME RIGHT", "bias_score": 9.4, "factual_reporting": "LOW", "factual_score": 8.0, "credibility_rating": "LOW CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Website", "traffic_popularity": "Medium Traffic", "bias_category_description": null, "overall_summary": "Overall, we UncoverDC extreme right biased and Questionable based on the promotion of debunked conspiracy theories and pseudoscience, the use of poor sources who routinely fail fact checks, and a lack of transparency with ownership. Detailed Report Questionable Reasoning: Conspiracies, Pseudoscience, Propaganda, Poor Sourcing, Lack of Transparency, False Claims Bias Rating: EXTREME RIGHT (9.4) Factual Reporting: LOW (8.0) Country: USA MBFC’s Country Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE Media Type: Website Traffic/Popularity: Medium Traffic MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY History Founded in 2019 by Qanon promoter Tracy Diaz , who goes by the professional name Tracy Beanz, UncoverDC is a far-right conspiracy website.", "history": "Founded in 2019byQanon promoterTracy Diaz, who goes by the professional name Tracy Beanz, UncoverDC is a far-right conspiracy website. According to theirabout page, “At UncoverDC, we pledge to work hard to bring you the unvarnished truth, a concept the legacy media abandoned long ago.”Tracy Beanzis listed as the Editor-in-Chief. Read our profile on the United States government and media.", "ownership": "UncoverDC lacks transparency as they do not clearly disclose ownership. The website generates revenue through advertising, donations, subscription fees, and a shop selling branded merchandise.", "analysis": "UncoverDC primarily publishes commentary and analysis on their perception that the media does not report truthfully, whereas they do. The website also features links to podcasts. Articles and headlines contain highly emotional wording that favors the right such as thisCNN Shows Its Naked Bias About The Arizona Audit. This story is reasonably sourced to credible media outlets such asThe Hilland theAssociated Press. Editorially, UncoverDC frequently promotes debunked right-wing conspiracy theories such as the Presidential election of 2020 being stolen from Donald TrumpLindell v. Dominion/Smartmatic: Exhibit 12 Forensics. The source for the story isMike Lindell(My Pillow Guy), who routinely promotes false claims regarding the election. Further, throughout 2020-2021 they consistently advanced false or misleading information regarding the coronavirus. For example, they promotemask informationsuch as thisStudy Concludes Facemasks Ineffective and Detrimental. Theconsensus of scienceis that mask use is safe and reduces the rate of transmission. They have also reported that hydroxychloroquine is an effective treatment for Covid-19.Evidence suggests that it not effective. In general, this source promotes false and misleading information to advance a far-right agenda, which validates former President Trump. The website publishes other conspiracy theories on various topics, such as theSeth Rich Murderand Qanon, which is considered a domestic terrorist threat. On the whole, they are not a credible source of information.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "None found. See the above examples." ], "last_updated": "June 29, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-odyssey-online/", "name": "The Odyssey Online", "source_url": "https://www.theodysseyonline.com", "bias_rating": "LEFT-CENTER", "bias_score": -4.7, "factual_reporting": "MIXED", "factual_score": 4.8, "credibility_rating": "MEDIUM CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Website", "traffic_popularity": "Medium Traffic", "bias_category_description": "These media sources have a slight to moderate liberal bias.  They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appealing to emotion or stereotypes) to favor liberal causes.  These sources are generally trustworthy for information but may require further investigation.See all Left-Center sources.", "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate The Odyssey Online Left-Center Biased and Mixed for factual reporting due to the use of factually mixed sources and rapidly publishing content that may not be vetted. Detailed Report Bias Rating: LEFT-CENTER (-4.7) Factual Reporting: MIXED (4.8) Country: USA MBFC’s Country Freedom Rank: MOSTLY FREE Media Type: Website Traffic/Popularity: Medium Traffic MBFC Credibility Rating: MEDIUM CREDIBILITY History Launched in 2009, Odyssey , also known as The Odyssey Online, is a news and entertainment website headquartered in Indianapolis, Indiana.", "history": "Launched in 2009,Odyssey, also known as The Odyssey Online, is a news and entertainment website headquartered in Indianapolis, Indiana. The website was founded byEvan Burns, who was fired and is now run by Eoin Townsend. Odyssey’s coverage features news, politics, fashion, relationships, sports, ideas, tech, and the future. Read our profile on the United States government and media.", "ownership": "The Odyssey Online utilizes acrowdsourcingmodel, described by Fortune Magazine as “receiving articles from unpaid college kids already well-versed in social media.” According to theFortune article, “editors told Fortunethey began creating fake profiles and writing under pseudonyms to increase their article count—whatever it took to meet the arbitrary content targets.”", "analysis": "These media sources have a slight to moderate liberal bias.  They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appealing to emotion or stereotypes) to favor liberal causes.  These sources are generally trustworthy for information but may require further investigation.See all Left-Center sources. Odyssey’s coverage features news, politics, fashion, relationships, sports, ideas, tech, and the future. The Odyssey Online covers tabloid-style news, emphasizing sensational headlines such as “10 Ways Young Adult Women Can Conceal Carry And Still Be Hot AF.” In review, their political reporting utilizes emotionally loaded words in their headlines, such as “Comey’s Failure”and“A Love Letter To You, Paul Ryan.”The Odyssey Online typically sources credible sources such asABC News,Rolling Stone,The Guardian,NPR, andNY Times; however, they also occasionally use factually mixed sources such asCNN. The Odyssey Online on domestic matters favors the left, usually supportingsocially liberal valuessuch as: “One of our civil liberties as United States citizens is the freedom of religion. If you believe your religion doesn’t support homosexuality, that’s OK. What isn’t OK is thinking that your religious beliefs should dictate others’ lives. What isn’t OK is using your religion or your beliefs to take away rights from those who chose to live their life differently than you.”", "failed_fact_checks": [ "None in the Last 5 years" ], "last_updated": "November 15, 2024" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-ohio-independent-bias/", "name": "The Ohio Independent", "source_url": "https://ohioindependent.com/", "bias_rating": "LEFT", "bias_score": -7.0, "factual_reporting": "MIXED", "factual_score": 6.2, "credibility_rating": "LOW CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Website", "traffic_popularity": "Minimal Traffic", "bias_category_description": null, "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate The Ohio Independent Left Biased and Questionable based on serving as an imposter local news site that promotes hyper-partisan left-leaning propaganda in support of the Democratic Party and lacks transparency. Detailed Report Questionable Reasoning: Imposter Site, Lack of Transparency, Propaganda Bias Rating: LEFT (-7.0) Factual Reporting: MIXED (6.2) Country: USA MBFC’s Country Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE Media Type: Website Traffic/Popularity: Minimal Traffic MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY History The Ohio Independent is one of five progressive-liberal imposter news websites designed to look like a local media outlet.", "history": "The Ohio Independent is one of five progressive-liberal imposter news websites designed to look like a local media outlet. The website is published by American Independent Media, which appears to be connected to the American Independent Foundation, a progressive liberal organization started byDavid Brock in 2014.David Brock also controlsMedia Matters for Americaand the super PACAmerican Bridge 21stCentury, which focuses on “tracking” Republican candidates. According to its about us page, the “mission is to use journalism to educate the public, giving them the information they need about local and federal issues.” Read our profile on the United States government and media.", "ownership": "The Ohio Independent is owned and published by American Independent Media. The website appears connected to True Blue Media, which publishesThe American Independent, using content from The American Independent Foundation, a non-partisan 501(c)(3) organization. The website is not transparent in how it is funded as they do not have advertising or solicit donations.", "analysis": "The Ohio Independent website is designed to look like a local media outlet. The website uses the same template as the other five American Independent Media Network imposter sites. The network also republishes articles from The American Independent’s website, with a disclosure at the bottom of articles that reads “Published with permission of The American Independent Foundation,” the nonprofit arm of The American Independent. In review, the Ohio Independent publishes original news stories with loaded language:Ohio GOP Rep. Steve Chabot’s vote against contraception bill slammed in new ads. Articles are adequately sourced from outlets such as theWashington Post,Daily Beast, andCNN. The website also republishes news content from theAssociated Press. Editorially, all stories and opinions favor the left and usually denigrate the right. Furthermore, the Ohio Independent has a link for community news, leading to a recipe for Coffee Cakes. While some stories mention Ohio, most are hyper-partisan political pieces promoting the Democratic Party. In general, this is a left-biased imposter website that promotes Democratic Party propaganda and lacks transparency.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "None in the Last 5 years; however,The American Independenthas failed a fact check." ], "last_updated": "June 6, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/medical-medium/", "name": "Medical Medium", "source_url": "https://www.medicalmedium.com/", "bias_rating": "PSEUDOSCIENCE", "bias_score": 3.3, "factual_reporting": "LOW", "factual_score": 8.7, "credibility_rating": "LOW CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Website", "traffic_popularity": "Medium Traffic", "bias_category_description": null, "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate Medical Medium a Quackery level Pseudoscience website based on promoting miracle cures that are not supported by science. Detailed Report Bias Rating: PSEUDOSCIENCE (3.3) Factual Reporting: LOW (8.7) Country: USA MBFC’s Country Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE Media Type: Website Traffic/Popularity: Medium Traffic MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY History Founded in 2003 by Anthony William (Coviello) , Medical Medium is a website that publishes pseudoscientific medical and health advice based on alleged communication with a spirit.", "history": "Founded in 2003 byAnthony William (Coviello), Medical Medium is a website that publishes pseudoscientific medical and health advice based on alleged communication with a spirit. Anthony William claims to be a Medium, and according to theabout page, he “was born with the unique ability to converse with the Spirit of Compassion, who provides him with extraordinarily accurate health information that’s far ahead of its time.” The spirit that advises Anthony William has apparently helped himsell pseudoscientific books. Read our profile on the United States government and media.", "ownership": "Anthony William owns medical Medium through his company, Anthony William, Inc. Revenue is derived through the sale of his books and the sale of herbal supplements through Amazon Affiliate links.", "analysis": "In review, Medical Medium publishes news on alternative health and nutrition. Anthony William does not hold any medical degrees; however, he claims his information comes from the “Spirit of Compassion.” This spirit has misinformed him numerous times, such as advising him that Celery Juice is a miracle food that can cure numerous ailments. For example, he claims that celery juice can help chronic fatigue syndromeHow Celery Juice Helps Chronic Fatigue Syndrome. In fact, Anthony William claimswithout evidencethat celery juice will cure most medical problems. Medical Medium alsopromotesthatCelery Juice will detox the bodyfrom heavy metals such as mercury, which they falsely claim causesautism:Study: No Link Between Mercury Exposure and Autism-like Behaviors. In general, this is a quackery-level pseudoscience website that frequently makes false or misleading claims regarding health.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "“Bananas are a powerful antiviral food—so powerful that they have the capacity to repel growth of the retrovirus HIV“–Incorrect" ], "last_updated": "March 16, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/international-press-institute/", "name": "International Press Institute", "source_url": "https://ipi.media/", "bias_rating": "LEAST BIASED", "bias_score": -0.1, "factual_reporting": "VERY HIGH", "factual_score": 0.0, "credibility_rating": "HIGH CREDIBILITY", "country": "Austria", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Organization/Foundation", "traffic_popularity": "Minimal Traffic", "bias_category_description": "These sources have minimal bias and use very few loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using an appeal to emotion or stereotypes).  The reporting is factual and usually sourced.  These are the most credible media sources.See all Least Biased sources.", "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate The International Press Institute Least Biased based on the promotion of press freedom. We also rate them Very-High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing and a clean fact check record. Detailed Report Bias Rating: LEAST BIASED (-0.1) Factual Reporting: VERY HIGH (0.", "history": "The International Press Institute (IPI) is a global organization dedicated to promoting and protecting press freedom and the improvement of journalism practices. Founded in October 1950, the IPI has members in over 120 countries. The IPI is a member of the International Freedom of Expression Exchange, a global network of non-governmental organizations that monitors press freedom and free expression violations worldwide. According to theirabout page, “IPI members work cooperatively to shape the debate on policies affecting the media and to push back against those seeking to restrict the free flow of news and information in order to protect political, economic, or other interests. Equally important, IPI membership offers solidarity in the face of oppression.” Read our profile on Austria’s media and government.", "ownership": "The International Press Institute is owned by an executive board headed byMarkus Spillmann. Donations generate revenue. IPI transparently lists its top donorshere.", "analysis": "These sources have minimal bias and use very few loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using an appeal to emotion or stereotypes).  The reporting is factual and usually sourced.  These are the most credible media sources.See all Least Biased sources. In review, The International Press Institute reports on reporters’ ability to report the news freely and without threat. For example, they rate countries such as the USA through news stories such as thisMedia freedom in the US under threat. They also investigate freedom with topical information such as the Coronavirus outbreak like thisCOVID-19: Number of Media Freedom Violations by Region. This story mainly looks at the suppression of truthful media reporting regarding Covid-19. In General, IPI supports journalists and seeks to protect them from danger in the field.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "None in the Last 5 years" ], "last_updated": "February 28, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/national-taxpayers-union-bias-and-credibility/", "name": "National Taxpayers Union", "source_url": "https://www.ntu.org/", "bias_rating": "RIGHT", "bias_score": 5.7, "factual_reporting": "MOSTLY FACTUAL", "factual_score": 4.2, "credibility_rating": "MEDIUM CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Organization/Foundation", "traffic_popularity": "Minimal Traffic", "bias_category_description": "These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward conservative causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports and omit reporting of information that may damage conservative causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy.See all Right Bias sources.", "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate the National Taxpayers Union (NTU) as Right Biased based on strong alignment with Republican tax policy, a uniformly conservative legislative agenda, and partisan lobbying. It earns a Mostly Factual rating due to a lack of failed fact checks and generally credible research, but its ideological tone and selective framing reduce its neutrality. Detailed Report Bias Rating: RIGHT (5.7) Factual Reporting: MOSTLY FACTUAL (4.", "history": "Founded in 1969, the National Taxpayers Union (NTU) is a “nonpartisan organization working for lower taxes, limited government, and economic freedom at all levels.” It advocates for fiscal conservatism, reduced government spending, and regulatory reform. According to itsAbout page, NTU is closely affiliated with its educational arm, the National Taxpayers Union Foundation (NTUF). NTU and NTUF are based in Washington, D.C., and regularly publish reports, track legislation, and engage in policy advocacy. Read our profile on the United States media and government.", "ownership": "NTU is a nonprofit 501(c)(4) organization, and its companion arm, NTUF, is a 501(c)(3). Its2023 Annual Reportdiscloses donors such as the Sarah Scaife Foundation and support from corporate and private sources. According toOpenSecrets, NTU spends 100% of its political contributions on Republican candidates, with over $1.3 million in lobbying expenditures since 1998, detailed further in itslobbying profile. This confirms a clear ideological and partisan preference despite the group’s nonpartisan branding.", "analysis": "These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward conservative causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports and omit reporting of information that may damage conservative causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy.See all Right Bias sources. NTU consistently promotes fiscally conservative positions and frequently aligns with Republican legislative goals. It strongly supportsPresident Donald Trump’stax policies, notably advocating for the permanence of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) inthis article, using favorable framing of Trump-era policy. On climate-related issues, NTU echoes right-leaning economic messaging by criticizing the cancellation of the Keystone XL pipeline, emphasizing job loss over environmental impact inthis editorial. Despite this ideological framing, NTU’s research and foundation work maintain high credibility. Reports likethis studyon tax season costs andthis analysison tax code complexity are data-driven, well-sourced, and methodologically sound. The line between advocacy and analysis is delineated on their site. Overall, NTU blends credible economic reporting through its foundation with strong, right-leaning editorial bias in its policy advocacy.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "None in the last 5 years" ], "last_updated": "April 13, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/concealed-nation-bias/", "name": "Concealed Nation", "source_url": "https://www.concealednation.org/", "bias_rating": "RIGHT", "bias_score": 6.6, "factual_reporting": "HIGH", "factual_score": 1.5, "credibility_rating": "HIGH CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Website", "traffic_popularity": "Minimal Traffic", "bias_category_description": "These media sources are moderate to strongly biased toward conservative causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports and omit reporting of information that may damage conservative causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy.See all Right Bias sources.", "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate Concealed Nation Right Biased based editorial positions that align with a conservative perspective. We also rate them High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing and responsible fact-check record. Detailed Report Bias Rating: RIGHT (6.6) Factual Reporting: HIGH (1.", "history": "Concealed Nation is a website that focuses on news, stories, and information related to concealed carry, self-defense, and firearms. The website provides resources, guides, and articles aimed at promoting responsible firearm ownership and self-defense awareness. According to theirabout page: “Having it’s start in January 2013, Concealed Nation has grown to the largest concealed carry website in the world. Our primary focus of promoting responsible concealed carry has helped many on their journey to successfully implementing the carrying of firearms into their daily lives.” Read our profile on the United States media and government.", "ownership": "Concealed Nation is owned byBrandon Curtis. Advertising generates revenue.", "analysis": "These media sources are moderate to strongly biased toward conservative causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports and omit reporting of information that may damage conservative causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy.See all Right Bias sources. As a website dedicated to firearms-related topics, concealednation.org tends to present information from a pro-Second Amendment perspective. The articles often highlight stories of self-defense, legal cases related to firearms, and topics relevant to concealed carry permit holders. It is important to note that the website’s content is geared towards promoting responsible firearm ownership and self-defense practices. Articles and headlines use minimally loaded wording and often focus on alleged crimes being stopped by guns, such as thisWoman Shot While Reportedly Attempting To Break Into Home. This story, like most others on the website, relies on credible local news sources such asNBC Chicago. Editorially most stories favor a conservative perspective advocating for 2nd amendment rights, such as thisThings That Pro-2nd Amendment People Are Tired Of Hearing. They also view Democrats unfavorably like thisNorth Dakota Expands Places You Can Carry Concealed, One Democrat Has Some Things To Say That Make No Sense. In general, Concealed Nation is fact-based and holds moderate-right-leaning political biases.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "Antifa Promises Violence In Residential Areas Tonight, FBI warns National Guard Of ‘credible, lethal threat’– False (Corrected)" ], "last_updated": "October 10, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/news-hour-first/", "name": "News Hour First", "source_url": "https://newshourfirst.com/", "bias_rating": "FAR RIGHT", "bias_score": 8.4, "factual_reporting": "LOW", "factual_score": 8.0, "credibility_rating": "LOW CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Website", "traffic_popularity": "Minimal Traffic", "bias_category_description": null, "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate News Hour First Far-Right Biased and Questionable based on the promotion of conspiracy theories, right-wing propaganda, the use of poor sources, a lack of transparency, and evidence of misinformation. Detailed Report Questionable Reasoning: Poor Sourcing, Conspiracy Theories, Propaganda, Lack of Transparency, False Information Bias Rating: FAR RIGHT (8.4) Factual Reporting: LOW (8.0) Country: USA MBFC’s Country Freedom Rank: MOSTLY FREE Media Type: Website Traffic/Popularity: Minimal Traffic MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY History Founded in 2020 , News Hour First is an anonymously run blog that features conservative news and commentary.", "history": "Founded in 2020, News Hour First is an anonymously run blog that features conservative news and commentary. There is a lack of transparency as they do not provide an about page, disclose editors or ownership. Further, links to their social media pages do not work. Read our profile on the United States government and media.", "ownership": "News Hour First lacks transparency as they do not disclose ownership. Revenue is derived through advertising.", "analysis": "In review, News Hour First does not feature original reporting but rather summarized news stories with added conservative commentary. Articles and headlines almost always contain strong, loaded, emotionally charged wording that favors the right such as thisDemocrats FORCED to Admit All Their Sly Covid Pork Vocally on the Senate Floorand thisAfter Republicans Put a Stop to Joes Nonsense, Beijing Biden Crying like the Kids He Sniffs. Editorially, all stories favor the right and especially former President Donald Trump, while denigrating the left. During 2020, they promotedanti-mask propagandasuch as thisNew Study Shows Mask mandate POINTLESS. In this article, they reference a Danish Mask StudyDanish study finds masks don’t do muchthat has been rated asUnsupportedby IFCN fact-checkerHealth Feedback. Further, during and after the 2020 Presidential Election, News Hour First promoted election fraud conspiracies such as thisMassive Voter Fraud DUMP Discovered!As of this date, there has not beenevidence producedto indicate any widespread, consequential election fraud occurred. In general, News Hour First is a far-right biased source that completely lacks credibility.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "They have not officially been fact-checked; however, we provide examples above of misinformation." ], "last_updated": "April 16, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/reverse-canary-mission-bias-and-credibility/", "name": "Reverse Canary Mission", "source_url": "https://www.reversecanarymission.org/", "bias_rating": "LEFT", "bias_score": -8.8, "factual_reporting": "MIXED", "factual_score": 4.6, "credibility_rating": "MEDIUM CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Organization/Foundation", "traffic_popularity": "Medium Traffic", "bias_category_description": "These media sources are moderate to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation.  They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appealing to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports, and omit information that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy.See all Left Bias sources.", "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate Reverse Canary Mission as Left Biased due to its explicit activist mission, inflammatory language, and one-sided story selection. We also rate it as Mixed for factual reporting because, while it references real institutions and documents, it routinely blends advocacy and interpretation with selective evidence and lacks transparency and neutral sourcing standards. Detailed Report Bias Rating: LEFT (-8.8) Factual Reporting: MIXED (4.", "history": "Reverse Canary Mission is a grassroots activist website created in response to the pro-Israel blacklist project, Canary Mission. According to itsAbout Uspage, the initiative defines itself as a volunteer-based effort dedicated to Palestinian liberation, collective justice, and exposing individuals and institutions it claims support Israel’s occupation, apartheid, ethnic cleansing, or genocide of Palestinians. Read our profile on the United States media and government.", "ownership": "Reverse Canary Mission does not disclose formal ownership, editorial leadership, or an organizational structure. The site states it is volunteer-run and does not list donors, sponsors, or institutional funding. Instead, it directs users to activist and mutual-aid initiatives through itsSupport Hub, indicating decentralized grassroots support rather than a traditional media funding model.", "analysis": "These media sources are moderate to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation.  They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appealing to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports, and omit information that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy.See all Left Bias sources. Reverse Canary Mission is an openly activist platform whose content is framed to persuade and mobilize rather than inform. The site consistently employs highly loaded language, including accusations of “genocide,” “ethnic cleansing,” and “apartheid,” which are presented as settled facts rather than disputed legal determinations. Profiles of public figures such asIlhan Omar,Benjamin Netanyahu, andDonald Trumprely heavily on ideological framing, moral condemnation, and selective sourcing, often mixing factual information with opinionated characterizations and inflammatory descriptors. The site’s story choices are uniformly one-sided, focusing exclusively on individuals and organizations it deems complicit in Israel’s actions, while omitting counterarguments, contextual explanations, or alternative interpretations of events. Its database onRecognition of Genocide & War Crimes in Palestineaggregates statements from international bodies and advocacy organizations but presents them as conclusive proof, without acknowledging ongoing investigations, dissenting legal opinions, or the provisional status of many findings. Additionally, the criteria for inclusion on the site are expansive, at times encompassing individuals for indirect associations, silence, or mainstream political positions, which further reinforces its ideological nature. Overall, Reverse Canary Mission prioritizes advocacy, exposure, and political pressure over balanced reporting or rigorous journalistic standards.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "None in the Last 5 years." ], "last_updated": "December 25, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/djhj-media/", "name": "DJHJ Media", "source_url": "https://djhjmedia.com/", "bias_rating": "EXTREME RIGHT", "bias_score": 9.3, "factual_reporting": "LOW", "factual_score": 8.1, "credibility_rating": "LOW CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Website", "traffic_popularity": "Medium Traffic", "bias_category_description": null, "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate DJHJ Media extreme right-biased and Questionable based on the use of poor sources, promotion of propaganda, and conspiracy theories, as well as consistent one-sided sensationalized reporting. Detailed Report Reasoning: Poor Sourcing, Propaganda, Conspiracy, Sensationalism Bias Rating: EXTREME RIGHT (9.3) Factual Reporting: LOW (8.1) Country: USA MBFC’s Country Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE Media Type: Website Traffic/Popularity: Medium Traffic MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY History Launched in March 2019, DJHJ Media is a conservative commentary news website founded by entrepreneur David J.", "history": "Launched in March 2019, DJHJ Media is a conservative commentary news website founded by entrepreneur David J. Harris Jr., who runs the websitedavidharrisjr.com. According to their about page, “DJHJ Media is an opinion and commentary source for conservatives everywhere.” David Harris Jr. is the CEO and founder ofUncorked Health and Wellness. Read our profile on the United States government and media.", "ownership": "David Harris Jr. owns the website through DJHJ Media, LLC. Advertising and book sales generate revenue.", "analysis": "In review, DJHJ Media publishes summarized news stories with the addition of conservative commentary and straight opinion pieces. News stories utilize highly emotional wording that favors the right such as this:‘Defund the Police’ Movement Gets Smacked With Reality After Significant Spikes in Violent Crime. This story is sourced from the factually mixedNew York Post. Another story readsTrump Administration Warns Anti-White Discrimination May Cost Corporations Their Federal Contracts,sourced from the QuestionableBig League Politics. Further, DJHJ media frequently promotes right-wing conspiracy theories such as Kamala Harris not being eligible to be Vice PresidentKamala Harris Fights Back Against Questions of Her Eligibility to Be Vice President. Kamala Harris is obviously qualified to be Vice President as she is an AmericanCitizen. Further, they have promoted misinformation regarding Coronavirus as well as furthering conspiracies regardingmail-in ballots, in which they claim without evidence that “It has been their plan for some time because mail-in voting is how the Democrats expect to cheat enough to beat Donald Trump in November.” In general, story selection always favors the right and denigrates the left. DJHJ Media promotes far-right propaganda and conspiracy theories, as evidenced by the above claims.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "CIA Whistleblower Exposes Biden’s Alleged Role with the Deaths of Seal Team- Claims to have Documented Proof–No Evidence", "“Leftists” sent “Proud Boys” emails threatening Democratic voters.–False", "“SoS Brad Raffensperger to Investigate Himself Over Voter Fraud…10 to 1 He Will Find Himself Innocent,”–False", "Arizona House bill to “decertify” 2020 results “could effectively recall the Biden electors.”–Pants on Fire" ], "last_updated": "January 20, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/altavista-journal-bias-and-credibility/", "name": "Altavista Journal", "source_url": "https://www.altavistajournal.com/", "bias_rating": "LEAST BIASED", "bias_score": 1.5, "factual_reporting": "HIGH", "factual_score": 1.0, "credibility_rating": "HIGH CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Newspaper", "traffic_popularity": "Minimal Traffic", "bias_category_description": "These sources have minimal bias and use very few loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appeals to emotion or stereotypes).  The reporting is factual and usually sourced.  These are the most credible media sources.See all Least Biased sources.", "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate the Altavista Journal as least biased based on straight news reporting and a reasonably balanced editorial perspective. We also rate them High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing of local news and a clean fact check record. Detailed Report Bias Rating: LEAST BIASED (1.5) Factual Reporting: HIGH (1.", "history": "The Altavista Journal is a local newspaper serving Altavista, Virginia, and surrounding communities. According to itsAbout page, the publication covers local news, sports, business, and community events. The newspaper is part of a network of local papers owned by Womack Publishing Company, which operates multiple small-town newspapers in Virginia and North Carolina. Read our profile on the United States media and government.", "ownership": "The Altavista Journal is owned byWomack Publishing Company, a family-owned regional newspaper publisher based in Chatham, Virginia. Womack Publishing owns several local newspapers, including the Chatham Star-Tribune and the South Hill Enterprise. The company generates revenue through subscriptions, local advertising, and classifieds.", "analysis": "These sources have minimal bias and use very few loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appeals to emotion or stereotypes).  The reporting is factual and usually sourced.  These are the most credible media sources.See all Least Biased sources. The Altavista Journal focuses on local news coverage, such as town government, community events, and high school sports. There is no strong indication of partisan bias in its news reporting, as the publication largely sticks to factual and straightforward reporting on local affairs. A review of the article“Town Council approves budget amendments, discusses dog Ordinance,” shows a neutral tone, presenting facts without opinion or ideological framing. The paper does not cover national or international news. The editorial and opinion section (view here) contains a mix of letters to the editor and opinion pieces, but there is no clear pattern of partisan favoritism. Many opinion articles discuss community concerns, local government matters, and broader social issues from various perspectives. This suggests that the newspaper allows a range of viewpoints rather than adhering to a specific ideological stance.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "None in the Last 5 years" ], "last_updated": "February 13, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/flat-earth-society-bias/", "name": "Flat Earth Society", "source_url": "https://www.tfes.org/", "bias_rating": "CONSPIRACY-PSEUDOSCIENCE", "bias_score": 2.5, "factual_reporting": "VERY LOW", "factual_score": 10.0, "credibility_rating": "LOW CREDIBILITY", "country": "Unknown", "country_freedom_rating": null, "media_type": "Organization/Foundation", "traffic_popularity": "Minimal Traffic", "bias_category_description": null, "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate The Flat Earth Society as an extreme pseudoscience organization that advocates for a discredited, pseudoscientific view of the Earth’s shape. Detailed Report Bias Rating: CONSPIRACY-PSEUDOSCIENCE (2.5) Factual Reporting: VERY LOW (10.0) Country: Unknown MBFC’s Country Freedom Rank: N/A Media Type: Organization/Foundation Traffic/Popularity: Minimal Traffic MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY History The Flat Earth Society, a modern proponent of the flat Earth theory, originated in the 19th century with English writer Samuel Rowbotham.", "history": "The Flat Earth Society, a modern proponent of the flat Earth theory, originated in the 19th century with English writer Samuel Rowbotham. The society promotes the pseudoscientific belief that the Earth is flat, contrary to established scientific consensus. It is not clear where this website originates from.", "ownership": "TFES operates a website that includes forums, a wiki, a library, and a store. Funding details are unclear, but the website suggests revenue throughmerchandise saleswith no profit markups.", "analysis": "The TFES website represents extreme pseudoscientific views and science denial. It embraces conspiracy theories to counteract overwhelming scientific evidence of the Earth’s sphericity. The society’s content, including forums and articles, consistently disregards scientific methodology, preferring personal conjecture and misinterpretation of observations. These examples demonstrate the site’s tendency to promote conspiracy theories, reject scientific evidence, and propagate pseudoscientific ideas. The overall content of the website is aligned with extreme science denial, selectively cherry-picking information that supports their narrative while dismissing vast amounts of scientific evidence to the contrary. As of this review, the website does not produce much original content; however, the forum remains active, with users posting flat earth theories.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "The core beliefs of the TFES, such as the Earth being flat, directly contradict established scientific facts and are inherently pseudoscientific." ], "last_updated": "November 4, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/omni-bias-and-credibility/", "name": "Omni", "source_url": "https://omni.se/", "bias_rating": "LEAST BIASED", "bias_score": -0.7, "factual_reporting": "MIXED", "factual_score": 4.8, "credibility_rating": "MEDIUM CREDIBILITY", "country": "Sweden", "country_freedom_rating": "EXCELLENT", "media_type": "Website", "traffic_popularity": "High Traffic", "bias_category_description": "These sources have minimal bias and use very few loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appeals to emotion or stereotypes).  The reporting is factual and usually sourced.  These are the most credible media sources.See all Least Biased Sources.", "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate Omni as Least Biased based on providing diverse viewpoints with a wide range of sources. We also rate them Mixed for factual reporting due to the use of sources that fail fact checks. Detailed Report Bias Rating: LEAST BIASED (-0.7) Factual Reporting: MIXED (4.", "history": "Omniprovides a comprehensive news experience by aggregating news from various sources into one platform. It is designed to offer a broad spectrum of perspectives on current events, aiming to present multiple viewpoints to its readers. Omni is part of Schibsted Media Group, a major Scandinavian media company. The platform’s mission is to provide all the news from all perspectives. Markus Gustafsson is the Editor-in-Chief and CEO of Omni. Read our profile on Swedish media and government.", "ownership": "Schibsted, a leading media group in Scandinavia, owns Omni. It offers free and premium content and generates revenue fromsubscriptionsthrough Omni Mer and advertisements.", "analysis": "These sources have minimal bias and use very few loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appeals to emotion or stereotypes).  The reporting is factual and usually sourced.  These are the most credible media sources.See all Least Biased Sources. Omni focuses on various topics, including politics, economics, technology, and international news, providing concise summaries and in-depth analysis. An example of Omni’s reporting can be seen in its coverage of the ongoing conflict between Israel and Hamas. The article titled“Analys: Pressen på Israel har aldrig varit såhär stor”discusses the increasing international pressure on Israel due to its military actions in Gaza. It citesThe Guardian’sPeter Beaumont, who highlights the recent setbacks for Israel on the global stage, including the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) desire to arrest Prime Minister Netanyahu and several European countries recognizing Palestine as a state. The article also referencesCNN’s Abbas Al Lawati, who notes the unprecedented international pressure on Israel while pointing out the strong support Israel still receives from the United States, and it references background info regarding the International Court of Justice in The Hague (ICJ), withWikipedia, Another example is the article“Ukraina slår tillbaka mot Putin – vägrar ‘knäböja’,”which covers Ukraine’s response to Russia’s invasion. The article reports President Volodymyr Zelensky’s advisor, Mychajlo Podoljak, rejecting a proposed ceasefire based on current frontlines, labeling it “vile.” The piece cites a statement from Mykhailo Podolyak, who described such a proposal as “abominable.” The report also mentions Russian claims suggesting President Vladimir Putin is open to a ceasefire. Additionally, the article references a post by Podolyak on social media platforms expressing Ukraine’s stance against these proposals. Like the others, this article can be considered a summary report as it compiles views and statements from different stakeholders about a specific issue, providing an overview rather than an in-depth analysis. It presents the key points regarding Ukraine’s response to Russian ceasefire proposals and the broader geopolitical dialogues.​ ​Omni is a widely used online news platform in Sweden, known for aggregating news from many sources. While this approach offers diverse perspectives, the factual accuracy can vary depending on the source’s credibility.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "None in the Last 5 years; however, some sources used fail fact checks." ], "last_updated": "January 30, 2026" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/rocketnews/", "name": "RocketNews", "source_url": "https://www.rocketnews.com/", "bias_rating": "LEFT-CENTER", "bias_score": -3.3, "factual_reporting": "MIXED", "factual_score": 4.9, "credibility_rating": "MEDIUM CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Website", "traffic_popularity": "Minimal Traffic", "bias_category_description": "These media sources have a slight to moderate liberal bias.  They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appealing to emotion or stereotypes) to favor liberal causes.  These sources are generally trustworthy for information but may require further investigation.See all Left-Center sources.", "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate RocketNews Left-Center biased based on the frequent use of sources that we rate as left-leaning. We also rate them Mixed for factual reporting as some of the sources utilized have failed facts and promote unsourced information. Detailed Report Bias Rating: LEFT-CENTER (-3.3) Factual Reporting: MIXED (4.", "history": "Founded in 2000 by Murray Owen, RocketNews is a news aggregator that also features sponsored articles. According to theirabout page, “Rocketnews delivers the top stories and the latest news in market news, financial news, business news, science news, health news, technology news, world, and international news, sports news, celebrity news, and online news.” Read our profile on the United States government and media.", "ownership": "Murray Owen owns RocketNews through Murray Owen LLC. The website does not display ads; however, revenue is derived through sponsored content or what they refer to as “commercial news posts.”Commercial Poststypically advertise a product or website that is pre-paid at $100 for one article, $200 for three articles, and $300 for six articles. RocketNews disclaims, “We reserve the right to refuse service to websites we deem inappropriate, objectionable, or used for spam or other questionable ethical purposes other than best practices defined by the major search engines. If your content is deemed inappropriate, we’ll refund your money in full.”", "analysis": "These media sources have a slight to moderate liberal bias.  They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appealing to emotion or stereotypes) to favor liberal causes.  These sources are generally trustworthy for information but may require further investigation.See all Left-Center sources. In review, RocketNews features two primary sections, one dedicated to aggregated news from other sources and the other to “features articles,” which lists commercial posts. Aggregated news comes primarily fromAl JazeeraandYahoo News,which we rate Left-Center Biased. Other sources used less frequently are theWashington Post,BBC,Associated Press, and local news affiliates. Paid Commercial Posts generally promote services or products through articles such as this:What Materials Are Needed to Repair a Roof?While the article is informative and helpful, the purpose of this article is to drive traffic to aroof repairs servicewebsite. Although most of the content is harmless and informative, some do not provide a source and advocate unproven claims such as this:5 High Protein Vegetables For Weight Loss. This article does not source scientific evidence that the claims made have been proven. In general, RocketNews does not express editorial positions; however, most news sources fall along the left-leaning spectrum.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "None in the Last 5 years" ], "last_updated": "May 16, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/workers-world/", "name": "Workers World", "source_url": "https://www.workers.org/", "bias_rating": "FAR LEFT", "bias_score": -8.0, "factual_reporting": "MIXED", "factual_score": 5.0, "credibility_rating": "MEDIUM CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Newspaper", "traffic_popularity": "Medium Traffic", "bias_category_description": "These media sources are moderate to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation.  They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports, and omit information reporting that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy.See all Left Bias sources.", "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate Workers World Far Left Biased based on promoting and affiliation with Communism and progressive socialism. We also rate them Mixed for factual reporting due to one-sided propaganda and the occasional use of poor sources. Detailed Report Bias Rating: FAR LEFT (-8.0) Factual Reporting: MIXED (5.", "history": "Founded in 1959, Workers World is the official newspaper of theWorkers’ World Party(WWP), a communist party in the United States. The paper is published weekly with headquarters based in New York City. Read our profile on the United States government and media.", "ownership": "Workers World is published through volunteers. Donations and subscription fees generate revenue.", "analysis": "These media sources are moderate to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation.  They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports, and omit information reporting that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy.See all Left Bias sources. The ideological positions of Workers World consist primarily of workers’ struggles, anti-racism, and anti-discrimination. There is moderate to heavy use of loaded emotional words in both headlines and articles that favor the far left and socialist/communist viewpoints, such as thisWorkers Assembly Against Racism: Union rights, cancel rent!. All articles reviewed favored the left over the right. Workers World tends to source their information; however, sometimes they used far-left sources that have not always been factual in the past. Under the editorial section, they publish opinion pieces that align with Marxist-Leninist beliefs such as thisHousing is a right!In general, all information published strongly favors the progressive-socialist-communist left through rejection of racism, concern for climate change, strong unionization, redistribution of wealth, and equity under the law.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "None in the Last 5 years" ], "last_updated": "August 31, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/information-liberation/", "name": "Information Liberation", "source_url": "http://www.informationliberation.com/", "bias_rating": "EXTREME RIGHT", "bias_score": 9.2, "factual_reporting": "LOW", "factual_score": 8.0, "credibility_rating": "LOW CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": null, "media_type": "Website", "traffic_popularity": "Minimal Traffic", "bias_category_description": null, "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate Information Liberation Questionable based on extreme right-wing bias, promoting propaganda/conspiracies, a lack of transparency, poor sourcing and false claims. Detailed Report Questionable Reasoning: Propaganda, Conspiracy, Poor Sourcing, Failed Fact Checks, Lack of Transparency Bias Rating: EXTREME RIGHT (9.2) Factual Reporting: LOW (8.0) Country: USA MBFC Country Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE Media Type: Website Traffic/Popularity: Minimal Traffic MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY History According to their about page , InformationLiberation was founded in 2005 as an “independent news site dedicated to pursuing the truth wherever it leads, without apology and without care for being politically correct.", "history": "According to theirabout page, InformationLiberation was founded in 2005 as an “independent news site dedicated to pursuing the truth wherever it leads, without apology and without care for being politically correct.” Although the website does not indicate who the editor or owner is,Chris Menahanis listed as the publisher of news stories.", "ownership": "Information Liberation does not disclose ownership; however, Chris Menahan is the only name associated with the website. Revenue is derived from online advertising.", "analysis": "In review, Information Liberation is a news and opinion website with an extreme right-wing bias. Virtually every article reports positively for conservative causes and negatively for liberals. Information Liberation uses loaded words to convey either positive or negative emotions, such as this:Hillary Clinton Scolds Trump Over Syria, Explains Why We Need Permanent War. While Information Liberation does publish credible news that is sourced properly, it also publishes news that is sourced to right-wing biased, conspiracy, and questionable sources. They provide a list of sources they link to on their sidebar. This list reads like a who’s who of conspiracy and questionable sources such asInfoWars,Gateway Pundit, and theCenter for Immigration Studies. They also perform misleading fact checks such as this:FACT CHECK: Hillary Said 90% of Clinton Foundation Donations go to Charity. Actual Number? 5.7%. This fact check simply is not true. Either this is a very poorly done fact check, or they were intentionally trying to mislead. The actual number that goes to charity is 89%. The deception in this fact check is in the wording. 5.7% of donations go to outside charity groups; this much is true. With this fact check Information Liberation is misleading people to believe that only 5.7% goes to actual charity when it is closer to 90%. In general, Information Liberation is a right-wing disinformation propaganda site.", "failed_fact_checks": [], "last_updated": "November 21, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-grayzone/", "name": "The Grayzone", "source_url": "https://thegrayzone.com/", "bias_rating": "FAR LEFT", "bias_score": -9.0, "factual_reporting": "MIXED", "factual_score": 6.4, "credibility_rating": "LOW CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Website", "traffic_popularity": "Medium Traffic", "bias_category_description": null, "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate The Grayzone Far-Left Biased and Questionable based on the promotion of propaganda, conspiracy theories, and consistent one-sided reporting. Detailed Report Reasoning: Propaganda, Conspiracies, False Claims Bias Rating: FAR LEFT (-9.0) Factual Reporting: MIXED (6.4) Country: USA MBFC’s Country Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE Media Type: Website Traffic/Popularity: Medium Traffic MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY History Founded in 2015 by Max Blumenthal, The Gray Zone is a far-left news and opinion website that produces long-form journalism.", "history": "Founded in 2015 by Max Blumenthal, The Gray Zone is a far-left news and opinion website that produces long-form journalism. Max Blumenthal is a writing fellow of the Nation Institute. He also is a journalist, author, and filmmaker who is a regular contributor to the Questionable Russian news sites,RTandSputnik. According to theirabout page, “The Grayzone is an independent news website dedicated to original investigative journalism and analysis on politics and empire.” Read our profile on the United States government and media.", "ownership": "The left-leaning websiteAlternetsponsored the Grayzone until 2018. In 2018, The Grayzone became independent, with Max Blumenthal as the owner. Donations generate revenue.", "analysis": "The Grayzone produces in-depth journalism from a far-left perspective such as thisThe US is turning oil-rich Nigeria into a proxy for its Africa wars. All stories reviewed were properly sourced from mostly credible media and information sources. Max Blumenthal edits The Grayzone, and therefore, the website reflects his political views. He is a strong supporter of Venezuela and firmly against the USA policies of sanctions and regime changeUN expert details crushing human toll of US sanctions on Venezuela. Blumenthal and The Grayzone are vehemently opposed to Israeli occupation and treatment of PalestiniansTrump’s fake ‘peace plan’ is permanent apartheid for Palestine. Another common theme is anti-corporate bias, such asHow big corporations and Bill Gates took over the UN food Summit. The Grayzone publishes questionable material, stating that a Chemical Attack did not occur in Douma, SyriaOPCW investigator testifies at UN that no chemical attack took place in Douma, Syria. They have also promoted conspiracy theories, such as claiming that Pete Buttigieg is a CIA agent. There isno evidenceto support this claim. Finally, according toRadio Free Asia, The Grayzone content is frequently shared by the Chinese Communist Party media outlets “CCP propaganda is also increasingly laundered through Western influencers and denialist fringe media outlets like The Grayzone,” the report said, adding that, betweenDecember 2019andFebruary 2021, The Grayzone was cited at least 313 times in Chinese state media.” Finally, The Grayzone promotes conspiracy theories involvingGeorge Soros funding regime changes, and the editor Max Blumenthal claims that Bill Gates ran aCovid simulationbefore it occurred.This is false.In general, The Grayzone promotes a socialist left perspective that promotes conspiracy theories and pro-Russian/Chinese propaganda.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "A third-party fact-checker has not directly fact-checked them." ], "last_updated": "January 4, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/illinois-policy-institute/", "name": "Illinois Policy Institute", "source_url": "https://www.illinoispolicy.org/", "bias_rating": "RIGHT", "bias_score": 5.2, "factual_reporting": "MOSTLY FACTUAL", "factual_score": 2.9, "credibility_rating": "HIGH CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Organization/Foundation", "traffic_popularity": "Medium Traffic", "bias_category_description": "These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward conservative causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using an appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports, and omit information that may damage conservative causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy.See all Right Bias sources.", "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate Illinois Policy Institute as right-biased due to story selection and political affiliation and mostly factual for reporting based on one failed fact check. Detailed Report Bias Rating: RIGHT (5.2) Factual Reporting: MOSTLY FACTUAL (2.9) Country: USA MBFC’s Country Freedom Rank: MOSTLY FREE Media Type: Organization/Foundation Traffic/Popularity: Medium Traffic MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY History Founded in 2002, the Illinois Policy Institute is a nonprofit think tank.", "history": "Founded in 2002, theIllinois Policy Instituteis a nonprofit think tank. They describe themselves on their about page as: “an independent organization generating public policy solutions aimed at promoting personal freedom and prosperity in Illinois.” The Institute’s founder is Springfield nativeGreg Blankenship, who left the group in 2009. According to Rachel Wells from the Illinois Times, the Institute’s CEO and the president isJohn Tillman. Tillman states their mission is “to advance free-market principles and policies, so we look for data that supports that.” Tillman also attendsTea Party ralliespromoting revolution. Illinois Policy Institute covers topics such as economics, education, politics, and more.", "ownership": "The Illinois Policy Instituteis a 501(c)(3) public charity with an associated lobbying unit called the Illinois Policy Action, a 501(c)(4).The Institute also has an affiliated public-interest law firm named the Liberty Justice Center. According toSourcewatch,the Illinois Policy Institutereceives fundingfrom several donors connected to Koch Industries and those who promote fossil fuels.", "analysis": "These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward conservative causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using an appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports, and omit information that may damage conservative causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy.See all Right Bias sources. In review, they typically use credible sources in their reporting, such as the Illinois General Assembly,Chicago Tribune, andForbes. However, they are right-biased through the political causes they support. For example, they oppose Obamacare and support repealing it and through theirposition on public education.They also use emotional headlines such as“HUNDREDS ON MEDICAID WAITING LIST IN ILLINOIS DIE WHILE WAITING FOR CARE.”In general, they promote a libertarian perspective and are reasonably fact-based.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "“Illinois School Finance Bill Bails Out Chicago”–False" ], "last_updated": "November 20, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/illuminati-watcher/", "name": "Illuminati Watcher", "source_url": "https://illuminatiwatcher.com/", "bias_rating": "CONSPIRACY-PSEUDOSCIENCE", "bias_score": 9.0, "factual_reporting": "LOW", "factual_score": 8.0, "credibility_rating": "LOW CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Website", "traffic_popularity": "Minimal Traffic", "bias_category_description": null, "overall_summary": "Overall, this is a strong Conspiracy website based on promoting unproven or false claims. Detailed Report Bias Rating: CONSPIRACY-PSEUDOSCIENCE (9.0) Factual Reporting: LOW (8.0) Country: USA MBFC’s Country Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE Media Type: Website Traffic/Popularity: Minimal Traffic MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY History Founded in 2012, Illuminati Watcher (IW) is an online magazine published by Isaac Weishaupt.", "history": "Founded in 2012, Illuminati Watcher (IW) is an online magazine published by Isaac Weishaupt. As the title suggests, it seeks to uncover and expose the Illuminati conspiracy that, according to Mr. Weishaupt, permeates society, emphasizing its influence in the music and entertainment industries. According to theirabout page, Isaac Weishaupt has been “researching my entire life as an ongoing mission to determine if this reality is the truth or a cunning holographic deception. I don’t fully subscribe to any conspiracy theories, but I do find some intriguing if they resonate with any logic (also if they don’t, who am I kidding, some of them are just clever).” Read our profile on USA Media and Government.", "ownership": "Illuminati Watcher is owned by Isaac Weishaupt and is funded through a Patreon Account and advertising.", "analysis": "In review, the articles and YouTube videos are long on theory and conjecture, with little or no hard facts to substantiate the claims. In fairness, even Mr. Weishaupt himself states that the information provided is just theories. “Let it be clear that these are all theories. I am merely looking at factual events and occult history and attempting to make links in the name of entertainment.” The stories and videos, however, are heavily worded and weighted in favor of belief. Due to the bias in the reporting, and a lack of hard factual evidence to support the claims, Illuminati Watcher is rated as a Conspiracy-Pseudoscience source. (D. Kelley 3/12/2017) Further, Illuminati Watchers covers such topics asAliens and Transhumanismas well asstoriesaboutChemtrailsthat links back toInfowars.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "They have not been fact-checked by a third party." ], "last_updated": "November 20, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/united24-media-bias-and-credibility/", "name": "United24 Media", "source_url": "https://united24media.com/", "bias_rating": "LEFT-CENTER", "bias_score": -3.5, "factual_reporting": "MOSTLY FACTUAL", "factual_score": 3.9, "credibility_rating": "MEDIUM CREDIBILITY", "country": "Ukraine", "country_freedom_rating": "MODERATE FREEDOM", "media_type": "Website", "traffic_popularity": "Medium Traffic", "bias_category_description": "These media sources have a slight to moderate progressive/liberal bias.  They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes) to favor progressive/liberal causes.  These sources are generally trustworthy for information, but may require further investigation.See all Left-Center sources.", "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate UNITED24 Media as Left-Center biased based on a pro-Ukrainian editorial bias. We also rate them as mostly factual rather than high due to a lack of transparency. Detailed Report Bias Rating: LEFT-CENTER (-3.5) Factual Reporting: MOSTLY FACTUAL (3.", "history": "UNITED24 Mediais an English-language digital media platform created to inform international audiences about Ukraine’s struggle against Russian aggression and its broader contributions to global affairs. It focuses on topics including war coverage, culture, business, and technology from a Ukraine-centric lens. The platform launched amid the ongoing conflict and appears to be part of a broader strategy to bolster international understanding and support for Ukraine. Read our profile on the Ukrainian media and government.", "ownership": "The outlet does not disclose any ownership, leadership team, or funding sources on its website. There are no donation options, and basic transparency elements such as staff bios or organizational affiliations are absent. However, its brand and editorial tone align closely with Ukraine’s public diplomacy efforts. The name “United24” also matches a Ukrainian government fundraising campaign. Thedomain registrationalso lists only a generic email and no organization name.", "analysis": "These media sources have a slight to moderate progressive/liberal bias.  They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes) to favor progressive/liberal causes.  These sources are generally trustworthy for information, but may require further investigation.See all Left-Center sources. UNITED24 Media presents information that is largely factual and well-sourced but is overtly sympathetic to the Ukrainian government. Its editorial policy explicitly states that “balanced representation does not mean we give voice to internationally recognized enemies of human rights”—a clear stance that rules out providing a platform for Russian state narratives. Many articles, such as“Germany’s Drone Killer in Action”, are military-oriented reports that cite official sources like the Ukrainian Air Force and German defense manufacturers. Another long-form article,“How Russia Fabricates Reality”, explores Russian disinformation strategies using credible documentation and reporting from NGOs, the OSCE, and the UN. Opinion is clearly separated from news, but the overall tone of the platform consistently affirms Ukraine’s position while portrayingRussianactions as criminal or deceitful. Even more balanced updates, likeZelenskyy’s outreach to Trump, include only the Ukrainian government’s framing of events. Despite this strong slant, the platform references high-integrity sources and does not appear to fabricate or misreport information. However, the lack of organizational transparency, combined with overt pro-government bias, places it in the realm of state-aligned advocacy journalism.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "None in the Last 5 years" ], "last_updated": "July 12, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/coed-com/", "name": "COED.com", "source_url": "https://coed.com/", "bias_rating": "LEFT-CENTER", "bias_score": -4.4, "factual_reporting": "MOSTLY FACTUAL", "factual_score": 3.8, "credibility_rating": "MEDIUM CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Website", "traffic_popularity": "Minimal Traffic", "bias_category_description": "These media sources have a slight to moderate liberal bias.  They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appeals to emotion or stereotypes) to favor liberal causes.  These sources are generally trustworthy for information but may require further investigation.See all Left-Center sources.", "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate COED Left-Center Biased based on editorial positions that moderately favor the left. We also rate them Mostly Factual in reporting rather than High due to one failed fact check. Detailed Report Bias Rating: LEFT-CENTER (-4.4) Factual Reporting: MOSTLY FACTUAL (3.", "history": "Founded in 2004, COED is a news website geared toward college readers. According to theirabout page, “COED.com is the leading college news and lifestyle destination for men and women, reaching over five million unique visitors per month. We focus on breaking news, college sports, original content, pop culture, and the best parts of college life.” Read our profile on the United States government and media.", "ownership": "COED Media Group, a New York-based technology company, owns and publishes COED. Advertising and sponsored content generate revenue.", "analysis": "These media sources have a slight to moderate liberal bias.  They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appeals to emotion or stereotypes) to favor liberal causes.  These sources are generally trustworthy for information but may require further investigation.See all Left-Center sources. COED publishes news and analysis on entertainment news, Covid-19, economics, lifestyle, and politics. Articles and headlines contain minimally loaded language such as thisMan Faces 20 Years In Prison For Selling Fake COVID Vaccination Cards. Articles are properly sourced from credible media outlets such as theAssociated Press, local news stations, and justice.gov. Editorially, COED does not have a dedicated opinion section; however, they report on political issues with a left-leaning bias. For example, many articles argue for marijuana legalizationIllinois Governor Pardons Over 11,000 People With Low-Level Marijuana Convictions.Other articles focus onclimate changeandsocial justice. Generally, stories are mostly factual and hold a left-leaning editorial bias through story selection.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "Harambe received 15,000 votes in the presidential election.–Pants on Fire" ], "last_updated": "January 17, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/smerconish-com-bias-and-credibility/", "name": "Smerconish.com", "source_url": "https://www.smerconish.com/", "bias_rating": "LEFT-CENTER", "bias_score": -4.8, "factual_reporting": "MOSTLY FACTUAL", "factual_score": 3.6, "credibility_rating": "MEDIUM CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Website", "traffic_popularity": "Medium Traffic", "bias_category_description": "These media sources have a slight to moderate progressive/liberal bias.  They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes) to favor progressive/liberal causes.  These sources are generally trustworthy for information, but may require further investigation.See all Left-Center sources.", "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate Smerconish.com as Left-Center Biased due to its selection of articles that more frequently scrutinize conservative figures while highlighting progressive-leaning social topics in its exclusive content. We also rate its reporting as Mostly Factual for accuracy due to reliance on republished content from sources with varying credibility and the presence of sponsored health articles promoting questionable claims. Detailed Report Bias Rating: LEFT-CENTER (-4.", "history": "Smerconish.comis an online news and opinion platform founded by Michael Smerconish, a political commentator, radio host, andCNNanalyst. The site curates news, analysis, and opinion pieces on politics, culture, and current events while publishing exclusive content from contributors. It presents itself as a platform for discussion, featuring viewpoints across the political spectrum. However, its selection of republished articles and contributors can influence the framing of issues. Read our profile on the United States government and media.", "ownership": "Michael Smerconishowns Smerconish.com,and the site generates revenue through advertising and sponsored content.", "analysis": "These media sources have a slight to moderate progressive/liberal bias.  They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes) to favor progressive/liberal causes.  These sources are generally trustworthy for information, but may require further investigation.See all Left-Center sources. Smerconish.com demonstrates curation bias in its selection of topics and sources.The platform features a mix of mainstream news fromPolitico,USA Today, andDaily Mirrorandan exclusive content section that includes political and social comments that reflect center- and left-leaning perspectives.For example, in the article titled“Living to Serve, Living as Myself: A Transgender Service Member’s Perspective,”Jo Ellis, a transgender pilot, shares her journey through gender transition, her personal experiences, and struggles serving in the Virginia Army National Guard, and institutional responses. Similarly, the article“Powerful Evidence that Pardoning J6ers Damages Civil Society“argues that granting pardons to January 6 offenders risks normalizing political violence and undermining democratic norms. Meanwhile,“What Now for Democrats?”analyzes the party’s electoral setbacks and discusses how Democrats should strategize following electoral losses. These opinion articles, while diverse, suggest a focus on progressive topics. Additionally, Sponsored content islabeledbut includes health and wellness promotions, such as“Cardiologists Reveal: Eliminate Belly Fat with This Simple Bedtime Trick (Watch Now!)”,which promote questionable health claims.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "None in the Last 5 years" ], "last_updated": "January 31, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-19th-news/", "name": "The 19th News", "source_url": "https://19thnews.org/", "bias_rating": "LEFT", "bias_score": -7.0, "factual_reporting": "HIGH", "factual_score": 1.9, "credibility_rating": "HIGH CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Organization/Foundation", "traffic_popularity": "Medium Traffic", "bias_category_description": "These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation.  They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports and omit reporting of information that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy.See all Left Bias sources.", "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate The 19th News Left Biased based on editorial positions and advocacy for progressive causes. We also rate them High for factual reporting due to full transparency, proper sourcing and a clean fact check record. Detailed Report Bias Rating: LEFT (7.0) Factual Reporting: HIGH (1.", "history": "Founded in 2020 by Emily Ramshaw and Amanda Zamora, The 19th News is a nonprofit organization and website that serves women, people of color, and the LGBTQ community. According to theirabout pagethey state “We’re an independent, nonprofit newsroom reporting on gender, politics and policy.” The name of the organization is based on the 19th Amendment which gave women the right to vote. They add an asterisk at the end to indicate that work still needs to be done as women and minorities continue to be disenfranchised at the ballot box. Both Emily Ramshaw and Amanda Zamora were formerly on staff at the left-leaningTexas Tribune. Read our profile on United States government and media.", "ownership": "The 19th is a nonprofit that was initially funded with5 million dollarsby Craig Newmark (500,000); Kathryn Murdoch ($1 million); Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors’ Reproductive Health and Women’s Rights Collaborative ($1 million); and various amounts from Ford Foundation, Emerson Collective, Knight Foundation, Abigail Disney, Arnold Ventures, and the Packard Foundation. Revenue is currently derived through donations and membership fees.", "analysis": "These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation.  They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports and omit reporting of information that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy.See all Left Bias sources. In review, The 19th primarily reports news and commentary on government and politics as it relates to women, the LGBTQ community, and people of color. The 19th publishes original news reporting and often with minimally loaded wording such as thisLaw enforcement officers keep arresting Black women elected officials. This story like all the rest is properly sourced to credible media and information outlets such as theAssociated Press, Rutgers.edu,PBS, and theWashington Post. Story selection favors the left covering topics such as climate change, human rights, and inequality. Editorially, The 19th aligns with the left as they frequently publish negative articles concerning conservatives and in particular former President Trump such as thisTrump wielded toxic masculinity as a weapon. It hurt America.In 2020 and 2021, they reported on the Coronavirus as it relates to women, POC, and the LGBTQ always taking a pro-science approachCDC study shows gender, racial gaps in COVID cases among young people. Further, they support the consensus of science when it comes to climate change. In general, The 19th reports the news factually and with a consistent left-leaning progressive bias.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "None in the Last 5 years" ], "last_updated": "November 25, 2024" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/sfg-media-bias-and-credibility/", "name": "SFG Media", "source_url": "https://sfg.media/", "bias_rating": "LEFT-CENTER", "bias_score": -3.5, "factual_reporting": "MOSTLY FACTUAL", "factual_score": 3.7, "credibility_rating": "MEDIUM CREDIBILITY", "country": "Ukraine", "country_freedom_rating": "MODERATE FREEDOM", "media_type": "Website", "traffic_popularity": "Minimal Traffic", "bias_category_description": "These media sources have a slight to moderate progressive/liberal bias.  They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes) to favor progressive/liberal causes.  These sources are generally trustworthy for information, but may require further investigation.See all Left-Center sources.", "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate SFG Media and Left-Center biased based on its editorial positions, which moderately favor a progressive perspective. We also rate them as Mostly Factual in reporting due to a lack of hyperlinks in their reports. Detailed Report Bias Rating: LEFT-CENTER (-3.5) Factual Reporting: MOSTLY FACTUAL (3.", "history": "SFG Media was launched in 2022 by a small group of Kyiv-based journalists and volunteers during theRussianinvasion of Ukraine. It identifies as a non-commercial, non-registered media collective run by six individuals. According to theirAbout page, they publish English-language content primarily to offer independent Ukrainian perspectives to international audiences. While not a formally registered media outlet, they describe their work as journalism reflecting their “social and political position.” Read our profile on the Ukrainian media and government.", "ownership": "SFG Media is independently run and not grant-funded. They state that their only revenue comes from Google Ads and small donations viaBuy Me a Coffee.", "analysis": "These media sources have a slight to moderate progressive/liberal bias.  They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes) to favor progressive/liberal causes.  These sources are generally trustworthy for information, but may require further investigation.See all Left-Center sources. SFG Media exhibits a Left-Center editorial stance with a strong emphasis on anti-authoritarian, anti-corruption, pro-human rights, and anti-war narratives, especially regarding Russian aggression in Ukraine. While it sources major breaking news stories from reputable wire services like theAssociated Press, many of its political stories are presented in a sharply critical tone toward powerful institutions or figures, includingTrump,Israelimilitary operations, and Western inaction. For example, its piece onTrump’s support for Epstein file secrecystrongly criticizes both Trump and U.S. institutions, presenting opinionated commentary alongside factual reporting. Similarly, the article onRussia circumventing sanctionsis detailed and sourced, though it lacks hyperlink citations. SFG Media does not typically include hyperlinked sourcing; however, many of its claims are traceable to established outlets such asNBC News, the AP, andBloomberg. Its content style mirrors hybrid reporting/opinion journalism commonly seen in advocacy publications. There is a focus on injustice, inequality, and corruption, generally viewed through a progressive lens.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "As of this review, SFG Media has not been the subject of a formal fact check by third-party organizations. No egregious falsehoods were found, and key claims often align with existing public records or mainstream journalism. However, the lack of visible sourcing in some investigative stories (e.g.,Epstein case fallout) lowers transparency." ], "last_updated": "July 18, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/cherry-hill-courier-post-bias/", "name": "Cherry Hill Courier-Post", "source_url": "https://www.courierpostonline.com/", "bias_rating": "LEFT-CENTER", "bias_score": -2.5, "factual_reporting": "HIGH", "factual_score": 1.0, "credibility_rating": "HIGH CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Newspaper", "traffic_popularity": "Medium Traffic", "bias_category_description": "These media sources have a slight to moderate liberal bias.  They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appeals to emotion or stereotypes) to favor liberal causes.  These sources are generally trustworthy for information but may require further investigation.See all Left-Center sources.", "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate The Cherry Hill Courier-Post Left-Center Biased based on editorial positions that slightly favor the left. We also rate them High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing and a clean fact-check record. Detailed Report Bias Rating: LEFT-CENTER (-2.5) Factual Reporting: HIGH (1.", "history": "The Cherry Hill Courier-Post is a newspaper that serves Cherry Hill, New Jersey, and the surrounding area. The paper covers local, national, and international news, sports, entertainment, lifestyle, and opinion. courierpostonline.com serves as the online domain for the newspaper. Read our profile on the United States government and media.", "ownership": "Gannett, the publisher ofUSA Today, owns The Cherry Hill Courier-Post. In August 2019,Gatehouse Mediapurchased and merged with Gannett becoming the largest newspaper chain in the USA. After the merger, the companies retained the Gannett name. Advertising and paid subscriptions generate revenue.", "analysis": "These media sources have a slight to moderate liberal bias.  They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appeals to emotion or stereotypes) to favor liberal causes.  These sources are generally trustworthy for information but may require further investigation.See all Left-Center sources. In review, The Cherry Hill Courier-Post covers news, sports, lifestyle, and entertainment for the greater Cherry Hill, New Jersey area. They report local news with minimal loaded emotional languageWestmont man gets prison term for child-porn crime. National and international news comes from other Gannett publications and theAssociated Press. Editorially, The Cherry Hill Courier-Post does not make Presidential endorsements; however, a review of op-eds shows that both sides are represented, such as this that favors the left:The surprising details behind New Jersey’s rise in gun sales. After reviewing dozens of op-eds, we found slightly more favor a liberal perspective. Finally, the news is generally reported factually and with a slight left-leaning editorial bias.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "None in the Last 5 years" ], "last_updated": "October 3, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/sinhala-guide-bias-and-credibility/", "name": "Sinhala Guide", "source_url": "https://sinhalaguide.com/", "bias_rating": "LEFT-CENTER", "bias_score": -4.3, "factual_reporting": "LOW", "factual_score": 6.9, "credibility_rating": "LOW CREDIBILITY", "country": "Sri Lanka", "country_freedom_rating": "LIMITED FREEDOM", "media_type": "Website", "traffic_popularity": "Minimal Traffic", "bias_category_description": null, "overall_summary": "Overall, Sinhalaguide.com is a low-transparency website that publishes sensationalized content with a Left-Center Bias. The lack of ownership information, minimal sourcing, and potential use of AI-generated articles raise concerns about the site’s credibility and journalistic standards. Hence, it earns a questionable rating.", "history": "Sinhalaguide.com is a digital content website that appears to have originated as a Sri Lankan resource for online income strategies, SEO tutorials, and digital tools. The site lacks an “About” page, and there is no publicly disclosed editorial staff, ownership, or organizational structure.A relatedFiverr profilesuggests that the operator is a 27-year-old graphic designer based in Sri Lanka, offering web traffic services. Read our profile on Sri Lankan government and media.", "ownership": "The site is monetized through display advertising and possibly affiliate links.There is no evidence of institutional funding or formal journalistic oversight.The site’s domain registration isanonymized, and no ownership information is available through WHOIS or the website itself.", "analysis": "Sinhalaguide.com exhibits a Left-Center Bias, primarily through its selection of topics and framing.The site frequently publishes articles that critique conservative figures and policies, often using sensational headlines and emotionally charged language.For example, the article titled“Pro-Trump Freight CEO Tariff Collapse”discusses the economic downturn in the freight industry, attributing it to pro-Trump tariffs, but lacks substantial sourcing or data to support the claims. Another piece,“Federal Report Says Millennials Are Killing Plenty of Industries Because They’re Poor”, uses a provocative headline to discuss economic challenges faced by millennials, again with minimal sourcing.The article“One in Four Americans Have Stopped Shopping at Their Favorite Stores Due to Corporate Politics and Beliefs: Poll”cites a poll but does not provide a link to the original source or details about the methodology. The site’s content often lacks hyperlinks to original sources, and there is minimal evidence of original reporting or fact-checking.Some articles appear to be AI-generated or rewritten from other sources without proper attribution.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "None by a third-party fact checker." ], "last_updated": "May 31, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/counterfire-bias/", "name": "CounterFire", "source_url": "https://www.counterfire.org/", "bias_rating": "FAR LEFT", "bias_score": -8.5, "factual_reporting": "MOSTLY FACTUAL", "factual_score": 4.0, "credibility_rating": "MEDIUM CREDIBILITY", "country": "United Kingdom", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Newspaper", "traffic_popularity": "Minimal Traffic", "bias_category_description": "These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation.  They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using an appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports, and omit information that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy.See all Left Bias sources.", "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate Counterfire.org Far-Left biased based on editorial positions that favor a progressive socialist perspective. We also rate them as Mostly Factual rather than High due to a lack of transparency with ownership and one-sided reporting. Detailed Report Bias Rating: FAR LEFT (-8.", "history": null, "ownership": "Counterfire lacks transparency as they do not disclose ownership or funding. The organization generates revenue through advertising, donations, and merchandise sales.", "analysis": "These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation.  They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using an appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports, and omit information that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy.See all Left Bias sources. Read our profile on United Kingdom media and government. Counterfire takes a far-left political stance and provides analysis and commentary from a progressive socialist perspective. The website covers various social and political issues, including anti-war activism, labor rights, and social justice movements. The articles on counterfire.org often reflect a critical view of the establishment, capitalism, and imperialism, such as thisThe spread of cholera: An indictment of global capitalism. This story relies on credible sources such asReutersandWHO.  Generally, the website promotes grassroots activism, mobilization, and solidarity with progressive causes. It typically highlights the voices and perspectives of marginalized groups and social movements like thisSwiss burqa ban: the racist right digs in deeper. Editorially all stories favor a socialist left perspective that frequently denigrates the right, such as thisRefugees are welcome here: Protesters stand up to Boris and Priti’s racist plan.While counterfire.org presents a far-left bias, it generally maintains high factual reporting. The website provides well-researched articles, analyses, and opinion pieces that support their progressive viewpoints. However, readers should be aware of the inherent bias and consider seeking alternative perspectives for a comprehensive understanding of the issues discussed.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "None in the Last 5 years" ], "last_updated": "October 10, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/libertytalk-fm/", "name": "LibertyTalk.FM", "source_url": "https://libertytalk.fm/", "bias_rating": "FAR RIGHT", "bias_score": 8.7, "factual_reporting": "MIXED", "factual_score": 6.4, "credibility_rating": "LOW CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Website", "traffic_popularity": "Medium Traffic", "bias_category_description": null, "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate LibertyTalk.FM as strongly Right Biased and Questionable based on radio programs that have failed numerous fact checks, a lack of transparency in ownership, and the rejection of scientific consensus with climate change. Detailed Report Reasoning: Lack of Transparency, Poor Sourcing, Failed Fact Checks, Pseudoscience, Conspiracy Bias Rating: FAR RIGHT (8.7) Factual Reporting: MIXED (6.", "history": "Launched in 2013, LibertyTalk.FM is a website that broadcasts live radio programming 24 hours per day. According to theirabout page“LibertyTalk FM broadcasts 24 hours per day, seven days per week and features continuous live content Monday through Friday and a mix of the best-syndicated podcasts and shows during the weekend. Our current line up of hosts includes the best and brightest voices fervently advocating for Liberty, such as Ernest Hancock,Alex Jones, Todd “Bubba” Horwitz, Ian Freeman, The Freedom Feens.” The website lists an address to aVirtual Office in Chicagoand amailing addressto amailbox rental companyin Indiana. Other than these, there is a lack of transparency in regard to ownership and business model. Read our profile on the United States government and media.", "ownership": "Although it is not openly disclosed in an easy-to-find area,Allison Brickeris the founder and owner of LibertyTalk.fm. Revenue is derived through an online shop that sells merchandise.", "analysis": "In review, the website features live internet radio broadcasts, on-demand podcasts, and news stories. The most notable radio broadcast is theAlex Jones Show. Alex Jones is a well known extreme right conspiracy theorist and promoter of pseudoscience who makesfalse claims.  The website also features news stories and opinion pieces that often use loaded emotional wording such as this:President Trump: Please Pardon Edward Snowden to Defeat DEEP STATE Coup. A quote from the article reads, “their anger unmasked & laid bare: it was wholly obvious that you shook the DEEP STATE to their rotten core and they were already scheming to double-down on seeking revenge.” Editorially, LibertyTalk.fm leans strongly right with advocacy for small government,free-market capitalism, and skepticism regarding human influence onclimate changesuch as this:Climate Change Fear Mongers’ Horrible Track Record. Theconsensus of climate scientistsis that the earth is currently warming at an accelerated pace due to human’s use of fossil fuels. From a story selection standpoint, virtually all stories favor the Libertarian Right.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "A factual search reveals that LibertyTalk.fm has not been fact-checked by an IFCN fact checker; however, the radio broadcasts of the Alex Jones show have made several false claims such as this:Infowars’ Alex Jones wrong about Alabama Senate recountandNo, Hillary Clinton did not meet with Broward elections supervisor Brenda Snipes." ], "last_updated": "December 18, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/gaia/", "name": "Gaia", "source_url": "https://www.gaia.com/", "bias_rating": "CONSPIRACY-PSEUDOSCIENCE", "bias_score": -7.0, "factual_reporting": "LOW", "factual_score": 7.7, "credibility_rating": "LOW CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Website", "traffic_popularity": "High Traffic", "bias_category_description": null, "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate Gaia.com a quackery-level pseudoscience and strong conspiracy website based on promoting misleading and/or debunked scientific claims. Detailed Report Bias Rating: CONSPIRACY-PSEUDOSCIENCE (-7.0) Factual Reporting: LOW (7.", "history": "Founded in 1988 by Jirka Rysavy, Gaia, Inc is a company that produces video and TV programming that promotes meditation, yoga, andalternative health. Gaia.com is the associated website that publishes videos and articles that sometimes promote pseudoscience. According to theirabout page“, they are a member-supported media network of truth-seekers and believers empowering an evolution of consciousness.” Read our profile on the United States government and media.", "ownership": "Gaia, Inc is a publicly-traded company on the NASDAQ under GAIA. Revenue is derived through paid memberships for content as well as advertising.", "analysis": "In review, Gaia.com provides videos and information that promotes Yoga, Meditation, Documentaries, and films, as well as a section that breaks down videos into categories such asEmotional Healing. The website also features news and information articles that contain moderately loaded language, such asThe Wonderful Benefits of Japanese Knotweed. This story is primarily sourced back to Gaia’s videos. It should be pointed out that the claims made in this article are not supported by medical evidence. Gaia.com frequently promotes pseudoscience, such as thedangers of fluoride, which has beendebunked.They also encourage other pseudosciences such asastrology, pseudo-archeology, and energy healing. Further, they promoteanti-GMO propagandasuch as thisExposing GMO Agendas with Jeffrey Smithandvaccinations and autism links, which have beenthoroughlydebunked. Finally, they also promotehuman-influenced climate denialism, such as thisWaging War Against Climate Science with Tim Ball. Lastly, Gaia.com reports onconspiracy theoriessuch as aliens,chemtrails, Illuminati, and secret space programs. Gaia generally promotes a wide variety of misleading and false information regarding science, medicine, and health.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "A corpse found in Nazca, Peru, is that of an alien.–False", "A missing airliner (Santiago Flight 513) mysteriously landed 35 years later with a cockpit and passenger cabin full of skeletons.–False", "The act of fasting for as little as three days can regenerate the entire immune system–Inaccurate" ], "last_updated": "February 4, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/center-for-constitutional-rights-bias-and-credibility/", "name": "Center for Constitutional Rights", "source_url": "https://ccrjustice.org/", "bias_rating": "LEFT", "bias_score": -6.0, "factual_reporting": "MOSTLY FACTUAL", "factual_score": 2.7, "credibility_rating": "HIGH CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Organization/Foundation", "traffic_popularity": "Minimal Traffic", "bias_category_description": "These media sources are moderate to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation.  They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appealing to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports, and omit information that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy.See all Left Bias sources.", "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate the Center for Constitutional Rights as Left Biased due to its explicit role as a progressive advocacy organization that consistently advances activist positions and challenges governmental and institutional power from a left-wing perspective. We also rate the site Mostly Factual because its content is grounded in verifiable litigation, court documents, and documented cases, but is presented through a one-sided advocacy framework rather than neutral or balanced reporting. Detailed Report Bias Rating: LEFT (-6.0) Factual Reporting: MOSTLY FACTUAL (2.", "history": "The Center for Constitutional Rights is a U.S.-based nonprofit legal advocacy organization founded in 1966 during the Civil Rights Movement. It was established by progressive attorneys to provide legal support for civil rights activists in the South and has since expanded its mission to include litigation, advocacy, and strategic communications on a wide range of domestic and international human rights issues. The organization focuses on constitutional law, international human rights law, and systemic challenges to government power, as outlined on itsWhat We Dopage. Read our profile on the United States government and media.", "ownership": "The Center for Constitutional Rights is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization based in the United States. It is funded primarily through donations, grants, and foundation support. CCR publishesannual reports and financialsdetailing its funding sources and operations, and states that it operates independently of political parties and governments.", "analysis": "These media sources are moderate to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation.  They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appealing to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports, and omit information that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy.See all Left Bias sources. The Center for Constitutional Rights functions as a progressive legal advocacy organization rather than a neutral news outlet. Its work centers on litigation and public advocacy related to issues such asracial injustice,abusive immigration practices,LGBTQI persecution, mass incarceration, andPalestinian solidarity. Press releases such asAmerican Families Make Historic Trip to D.C. to Demand Justice for Loved Ones Killed by Israeli Violenceframe events using strong advocacy language and moral judgments. Opinion pieces and issue pages consistently criticize U.S. government policies, law enforcement agencies, and Israeli government actions, while rarely presenting opposing perspectives. Although CCR relies heavily on court filings, legal records, and documented cases, the overall presentation is explicitly activist and one-sided.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "No failed fact checks by IFCN-approved fact-checking organizations were identified within the last five years." ], "last_updated": "December 15, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/lets-address-this-with-qasim-rashid-bias-and-credibility/", "name": "Let’s Address This with Qasim Rashid", "source_url": "https://www.qasimrashid.com/", "bias_rating": "LEFT", "bias_score": -7.4, "factual_reporting": "MOSTLY FACTUAL", "factual_score": 3.6, "credibility_rating": "MEDIUM CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Website", "traffic_popularity": "Medium Traffic", "bias_category_description": "These media sources are moderate to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation.  They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appealing to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports, and omit information that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy.See all Left Bias sources.", "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate Let’s Address This with Qasim Rashid as left-biased due to its explicit activist orientation, strong ideological framing, and consistent advocacy for progressive policy positions. We also rate it Mostly Factual, as the site frequently relies on verifiable data, legal documents, and mainstream reporting, though heavy opinionated language, selective sourcing, and lack of opposing perspectives reduce balance and neutrality. Detailed Report Bias Rating: LEFT (-7.4) Factual Reporting: MOSTLY FACTUAL (3.", "history": "Let’s Address This with Qasim Rashid is a human-rights advocacy and political commentary project published on the personal website ofQasim Rashid. According to the site’sAbout page, the project was launched to address declining trust in legacy media by offering accessible analysis of civil liberties, immigration enforcement, U.S. foreign policy, and social justice issues. The platform explicitly frames itself as an advocacy-driven human rights initiative rather than a neutral news organization and states that all content is available without a paywall. Read our profile on the United States media and government.", "ownership": "Let’s Address This is independently owned and operated by Qasim Rashid through his personal website. Funding comes primarily from reader subscriptions, along with podcast and book sales, with the site explicitly stating it is not funded by billionaires or corporate interests and relies on grassroots, small-donor support.", "analysis": "These media sources are moderate to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation.  They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appealing to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports, and omit information that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy.See all Left Bias sources. Let’s Address This functions as an activist opinion platform consistently aligned with progressive and left-wing political positions. Coverage strongly emphasizes systemic racism, human rights abuses, corporate influence in politics, and U.S. militarism, often employing emotionally charged language. For example, in the article“Did Your Democratic Member of Congress Praise ICE Fascists?”, Rashid characterizes Immigration and Customs Enforcement as a fascist institution, calls for its abolition, and urges voters to remove Democratic lawmakers who support ICE, citing death statistics attributed toThe Guardianand civil liberties organizations. While the article cites identifiable data sources, it offers no substantive defense of ICE policies or alternative interpretations, resulting in a highly one-sided framing. Similarly,“Mayor Mamdani Proves Progress Does Not Need To Be Slow”strongly endorses democratic socialist governance by praising New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani’s universal childcare initiative. The piece frames critics as corporate-aligned cynics and treats policy success as a repudiation of capitalism-oriented governance, offering little engagement with fiscal or administrative counterarguments. In foreign policy coverage,“Trump’s Illegal Act of War in Venezuela”argues that U.S. military action constitutes an illegal act of war and an impeachable offense. The article cites the United Nations Charter, constitutional law, and statements from U.S. lawmakers to support its claims, but does not meaningfully engage with opposing legal interpretations or national security rationales. Across the site, sourcing is generally identifiable and rooted in legal texts, government data, and mainstream reporting, yet selection bias and moral framing consistently reinforce a progressive worldview.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "None in the Last 5 years" ], "last_updated": "January 13, 2026" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/goop/", "name": "Goop", "source_url": "https://goop.com/", "bias_rating": "PSEUDOSCIENCE", "bias_score": -3.3, "factual_reporting": "LOW", "factual_score": 7.6, "credibility_rating": "LOW CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Website", "traffic_popularity": "Medium Traffic", "bias_category_description": null, "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate Goop.com a quackery-level Pseudoscience website based on promoting unproven and dangerous health and beauty claims. Detailed Report Bias Rating: PSEUDOSCIENCE (-3.3) Factual Reporting: LOW (7.", "history": "Founded in 2008 by actress Gweneth Paltrow,Goopis a wellness and lifestyle company selling beauty, health, and style products. Goop.com is the associated website for the brand. In 2017,Truth in Advertisingfiled a complaint with regulators in the state of California regarding over 50 health claims made by Goop, which resulted in a $125,000 settlement and a five-year injunction prohibiting the company from making unsubstantiated claims about the characteristics or health benefits of its products. Read our profile on the United States government and media.", "ownership": "Goop does not openly disclose ownership; however, it is owned byGweneth Paltrow. Revenue is derived through the sale of merchandise and advertising on the website.", "analysis": "In review, Goop.com publishes health, beauty news, and product reviews that many times are unproven pseudoscience. Headlines and articles do not contain loaded language such as thisGrieving, Mourning, and Honoring Loved Ones in Social Isolation. This story does not contain hyperlinked sourcing. Goop has been accused of peddling pseudoscience such as his byThe Conversation“Gwyneth Paltrow’s new Goop Lab is an infomercial for her pseudoscience business.” Further,Insider.compublished an article exposing 50 false claims by Goop.com:A new investigation says Gwyneth Paltrow’s Goop has made more than 50 illegal health claims. In reviewing the site, we found several instances where Goop.com peddled pseudoscience. Below is a shortlist of a few:", "failed_fact_checks": [ "$29 is what “families on SNAP (i.e., food stamps) have to live on for a week.”–Mostly False" ], "last_updated": "February 7, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/veterans-today/", "name": "Veterans Today", "source_url": "https://www.veteranstoday.com/", "bias_rating": "CONSPIRACY-PSEUDOSCIENCE", "bias_score": -9.0, "factual_reporting": "VERY LOW", "factual_score": 9.2, "credibility_rating": "LOW CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Website", "traffic_popularity": "Medium Traffic", "bias_category_description": null, "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate Veterans Today as a Tin Foil Hat Conspiracy website that frequently promotes antisemitism. We also rate them Low for factual reporting due to numerous failed fact checks and the promotion of misleading information. Detailed Report Bias Rating: CONSPIRACY-PSEUDOSCIENCE (-9.0) Factual Reporting: VERY LOW (9.", "history": "Founded in 2003 byJohn Allen, Veterans Today is a news and opinion website that generally promotes conspiracies related to the military and Israel. According to theirabout page, “VT is dedicated to providing comprehensive news, information, and advocacy to U.S Military Veterans and the greater global community.” They further state, “Editors and writers are NOT employees or contractors of VT. They receive NO salary or fee for their content.  They control all their content.  VT does NOT censor or vet their articles.” Veteran’s Today lists its board and staffhere. Read our profile on the United States government and media.", "ownership": "John Allen owns Veterans Today through Success Spear LLC. Revenue is derived through advertising and donations.", "analysis": "In review, Veterans Today has been labeled anAntisemitic hate groupandPro-Kremlin. Articles and headlines often contain loaded emotional language such as thisRussia strongly supports cancelling US election to keep puppet Trump in office. This story is essentially unsourced, though there is one link to the Russian propaganda sourceSputnik News. In general, Veterans Today hold a very negative view of former President Trump, such as thisWaPo: Election Rigging Underway with Trump Abuses of Power. Veterans Today routinely publishes conspiracy theories, such asclaiming9/11 was orchestrated by Israel and claiming Julian Assange and Wikileaks are controlled by Israel. They frequently display antisemitic views, such as promoting holocaust denial,The six-million figure: another holocaust lie and the lying liars who enable it. TheAnti-Defamation LeaguehasdescribedVT as a “web­site that presents anti-Semitic con­spir­acy the­o­ries.” Further, according toThe Jerusalem Post, the website haspublished“articles defending Hitler, and promotes Ku Klux Klan leaderDavid Dukeand the anti-semitic musicianGilad Atzmon.” When not promoting hate, Veterans Today frequently publishes false and misleading information, as seen below in our failed fact checks. In general, they are a tin foil hat conspiracy website that routinely promotes antisemitic messages.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "Claimed that the CIA official in charge of the U.S. operation that killed Qassem Soleimani, commander of the elite Quds Force of Iran’s Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), died in the crash.–Unsupported", "“Israel dropped a tactical nuclear weapon on the port of Beirut.”–False", "Has Russian President Vladimir Putin issued a warrant for the arrest of George Soros?– False", "Conspiracy claims that Syrian gas attack was ‘false flag’ are unproven–False" ], "last_updated": "July 5, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/digital-research-bias-and-credibility/", "name": "Digital Research", "source_url": "https://www.digitalresearch.com/", "bias_rating": "LEAST BIASED", "bias_score": -0.3, "factual_reporting": "MIXED", "factual_score": 4.6, "credibility_rating": "MEDIUM CREDIBILITY", "country": "United States", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Organization/Foundation", "traffic_popularity": "Minimal Traffic", "bias_category_description": "These sources have minimal bias and use very few loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appeals to emotion or stereotypes).  The reporting is factual and usually sourced.  These are the most credible media sources.See all Least Biased Sources.", "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate Digital Research as Least Biased based on polling that minimally favors the left. We also rate them as Mixed Factual based on a 1.4-star rating in predictive polling. Detailed Report Bias Rating: LEAST BIASED (-0.", "history": "Digital Research is based in Maine and specializes in market research. According to itsabout page, “DIGITAL RESEARCH, INC. (DRI) is rooted in a rich tradition of survey research. Our founder, Bob Domine, trained at the University of Michigan’s Institute for Social Research, in the late 1970’s.” Read our profile on the United States media and government.", "ownership": "Digital Research is a private company. The sale of surveys and market research generates revenue.", "analysis": "These sources have minimal bias and use very few loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appeals to emotion or stereotypes).  The reporting is factual and usually sourced.  These are the most credible media sources.See all Least Biased Sources. Digital Research conducts market research and polling via various mediums. The website does not generally report on politics. FiveThirtyEight, an expert on measuring and rating pollster performance, hasevaluated 29 pollsby Digital Research, earning 1.4 stars for accuracy, indicating they are mixed factually by MBFC’s criteria. They also conclude that their polling slightly favors the Left with a score of +0.1, which equates to Least Biased overall in polling. In general, Digital research is not always an accurate pollster but demonstrates minimal bias in polling.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "None in the Last 5 years" ], "last_updated": "February 13, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/empire-center-bias-and-credibility/", "name": "Empire Center", "source_url": "https://www.empirecenter.org/", "bias_rating": "RIGHT-CENTER", "bias_score": 4.5, "factual_reporting": "MOSTLY FACTUAL", "factual_score": 3.6, "credibility_rating": "MEDIUM CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Organization/Foundation", "traffic_popularity": "Minimal Traffic", "bias_category_description": "These media sources are slight to moderately conservative in bias. They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appealing to emotion or stereotypes) to favor conservative causes. These sources are generally trustworthy for information but may require further investigation.See all Right-Center sources.", "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate the Empire Center Right-Center Biased for consistently promoting free-market economics, limited government, school choice, and skepticism toward progressive social and climate policies. We also rate it Mostly Factual, as the organization generally bases its arguments on identifiable data and official sources, but strong ideological framing and selective presentation of evidence reduce balance and neutrality. Detailed Report Bias Rating: RIGHT-CENTER (4.5) Factual Reporting: MOSTLY FACTUAL (3.", "history": "The Empire Center for Public Policy is a New York–based think tank publishing policy research and commentary. According to itsWho We Arepage, the organization describes itself as independent, non-partisan, and non-profit, with a mission centered on promoting public policy reforms grounded in free-market principles, personal responsibility, and accountable government. The Empire Center is headquartered in Albany, New York, and focuses heavily on state and local policy issues, including taxation, labor, education, health care, and energy. Read our profile on the United States media and government.", "ownership": "The Empire Center is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit. While it solicits donations on its website, it does not disclose the names of individual donors, thereby limiting transparency. According to InfluenceWatch, it is affiliated with theState Policy Network (SPN), a coalition of conservative think tanks funded by organizations such as DonorsTrust, the Walton Family Foundation, and the Bradley Foundation. SPN members have been linked to opposition to climate policy and national deregulatory campaigns.", "analysis": "These media sources are slight to moderately conservative in bias. They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appealing to emotion or stereotypes) to favor conservative causes. These sources are generally trustworthy for information but may require further investigation.See all Right-Center sources. The Empire Center functions as a policy advocacy and research organization rather than a straight news outlet. While it publishes reports grounded in data, legislative analysis, and third-party studies, its work consistently reflects a free-market, fiscally conservative perspective on public policy. This orientation places it to the right of center on economic issues, particularly in opposition to expansive government spending, regulation, and taxation. For example, the reportGreen Guardrailscritically examines New York’s Climate Leadership and Community Protection Act, emphasizing cost projections, governance concerns, and risks to grid reliability. The analysis relies on state data, official reports, and cost estimates but frames climate policy primarily through economic risk, regulatory overreach, and legislative accountability, with limited engagement with environmental or public-health benefits emphasized by supporters of the law. Similarly, the articleDouble Talk on Single Payercritiques Democratic support for the New York Health Act by highlighting projected tax increases and fiscal risks. While the piece references external estimates, such as studies by theRAND Corporation, it selectively emphasizes cost burdens and political contradictions, reinforcing the Center’s broader skepticism of large-scale government-run programs. Across its publications, the Empire Center tends to prioritize fiscal impact, taxpayer burden, and government transparency, while giving less weight to equity-based or redistributive policy arguments.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "There are no direct failed fact checks of the Empire Center. However, its association with theState Policy Network, which has supported climate denial and anti-regulatory lobbying, raises concerns about the selective use of evidence and ideological framing." ], "last_updated": "January 25, 2026" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/government-slaves/", "name": "Government Slaves", "source_url": "https://govtslaves.com", "bias_rating": "RIGHT CONSPIRACY-PSEUDOSCIENCE", "bias_score": 9.5, "factual_reporting": "VERY LOW", "factual_score": 10.0, "credibility_rating": "LOW CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Website", "traffic_popularity": "Minimal Traffic", "bias_category_description": null, "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate Government Slaves an extreme right-biased Tin-Foil Hat Conspiracy website that also publishes pseudoscience. This source is associated with Natural News, one of the most discredited sources on the internet. Detailed Report Bias Rating: RIGHT CONSPIRACY-PSEUDOSCIENCE (9.5) Factual Reporting: VERY LOW (10.", "history": "Government Slaves is a right-wing conspiracy and pseudoscience website that routinely publishes false information. The founder is Mike Adams, who owns several Questionable websites such asNatural NewsandNews Target. Government Slaves is a part of the Natural News Network. This website lacks transparency and does not disclose ownership. According to Politifact, theHealth misinformation website rebrands as a pro-Trump outlet to get around a ban from Facebook. Read our profile on the United States government and media.", "ownership": "Government Slaves is owned by Mike Adams, who owns numerous other fake and/or controversial right-wing conspiracy websites. Like all of Mike Adams’s properties, the website is funded through online advertising.", "analysis": "In review, Mike Adams is known as theHealth Ranger, according toRationalwiki. However, they point out dozens of cases where his claims are false. Besides promoting pseudoscience, Government Slaves is an extreme right-wing biased source that frequently promotes false or misleading information regarding vaccines, alternative health, and government conspiracies. For more information, read our review onNatural News. In general, politically, all of Mike Adam’s stories favor the right and promote pseudoscience, such aschemtrails, and the Sandy Hook shooting being a false flag:Sandy Hook was theater! Actor who played law enforcement sniper was recorded walking around carrying rifle by the magazine. Further, they routinely publishanti-vaccination propagandaand conspiracy theories. Lastly, this source denies the consensus onclimate changewithout evidence, as seen here:Climate change cultists are now taking over your local weather forecast.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "SeeNatural News" ], "last_updated": "February 13, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/uk-column/", "name": "UK Column", "source_url": "https://www.ukcolumn.org", "bias_rating": "RIGHT CONSPIRACY", "bias_score": 8.0, "factual_reporting": "LOW", "factual_score": 8.0, "credibility_rating": "LOW CREDIBILITY", "country": "United Kingdom", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Newspaper", "traffic_popularity": "Medium Traffic", "bias_category_description": null, "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate the UK Column a strong right-wing biased conspiracy website that frequently promotes false or misleading information. Detailed Report Bias Rating: RIGHT CONSPIRACY (8.0) Factual Reporting: LOW (8.0) Country: United Kingdom MBFC’s Country Freedom Rank: MOSTLY FREE Media Type: Newspaper Traffic/Popularity: Medium Traffic MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY History The UK Column is an alternative multimedia news website and associated British news pamphlet launched in January 2006.", "history": "TheUK Columnis an alternative multimedia news website and associated British news pamphlet launched in January 2006. UK Column is headquartered in Plymouth in South West England.Mike Robinsonis the editor of the UK Column, andBrian Gerrishis the Author/Editor/Owner of the UK Column Newspaper. Further, Brian Gerrish hasappearedon US conspiracy theoristAlex Jones’sshow. Read our profile on UK Media and Government.", "ownership": "The UK Column does not clearly disclose ownership; however, Brian Gerrish claims to be the owner. Revenue is derived through advertising, paid membership, and donations.", "analysis": "In review, UK Column uses loaded language both in their headlines and articles such as: ”Cameron and Obama’s Hired Thugs Now Butchering Their Way Through Syria.” This article, like many on the website, does not link to a single source. However, they sometimes utilize credible sources such as theNY Times, gov.uk and questionable sources such as theDaily Mailand conspiracy sites such as21st Century Wire:“White Helmets.”When covering USA politics, the UK Column favorsDonald Trump and his policies. They also promote conspiracy theories such as theNew World Order,False Flag Operations, andWorld War 3. While the UK Column does produce credible, well-sourced news, they also promote conspiracy theories. During the Coronavirus pandemic of 2020, they frequently published misinformation such asLockdown Deaths, Not Covid Deaths. In this article, they state, “COVID-19 has been circulating for at least a year, and yet there was no notable increase in unseasonable mortality anywhere until Lockdown regimes were imposed between late February and late March 2020.” This statement is false as lockdowns havesaved numerous lives. They have alsopromotedanti-mask propaganda with this statement, “Masks are utterly useless. There is no evidence base for their effectiveness whatsoever. Paper masks and fabric masks are simply virtue signaling. They’re not even worn most of the time effectively.”This also is not true. In general, the UK Column is not a credible source of information that routinely publishes right-wing conspiracy theories.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "21 people were dying daily of Covid-19 in October in England.–False" ], "last_updated": "June 28, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/nation-of-change/", "name": "Nation of Change", "source_url": "https://www.nationofchange.org/", "bias_rating": "LEFT", "bias_score": -7.0, "factual_reporting": "MOSTLY FACTUAL", "factual_score": 2.9, "credibility_rating": "HIGH CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Organization", "traffic_popularity": "Minimal Traffic", "bias_category_description": "These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation.  They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports and omit reporting of information that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy.See all Left Bias sources.", "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate Nation of Change far-Left Biased based on editorial positions that always favor the progressive left. We also rate them Mostly Factual in reporting, rather than High, due to not always aligning with the consensus of science when it comes to GMOs. Detailed Report Bias Rating: LEFT (-7.0) Factual Reporting: MOSTLY FACTUAL (2.", "history": "Nation of Change is a news and activism organization founded in 2011 and based out of Albuquerque, New Mexico. Nation of Change provides a free daily newsletter with articles from progressive writers and initiates activist calls to action. According to theirabout page, the mission is to “help people create a more compassionate, responsible, and value-driven world, powered by communities that focus on positive solutions to social and economic problems. We strive to accomplish this mission through fearless journalism combined with boots-on-the-ground activism in order to create real-world, actionable strategies for change.” Read our profile on United States government and media.", "ownership": "Nation of Change is a 501(c) nonprofit that is funded through donations.", "analysis": "These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation.  They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports and omit reporting of information that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy.See all Left Bias sources. In review, Nation of Change provides a daily newsletter written from a progressive liberal perspective. The website features news stories that always favor the left and often uses moderately loaded language in their headlines and articles such as this:The Trump administration’s latest attempt to undermine science – and how to stop it. This story is sourced properly to theNew York Times, Congress.gov, and theNational Academy of Sciences. Nation of Change frequently reports on the environment and takes a pro-sciencepositionregardinghuman-influenced climate change. However, reporting onGMOsis alwaysnegativeand does not always align with the consensus of science. Editorially, Nation of Change favors left-leaning causes such as combating climate change, feminism, anti-corporate fascism, and social justice. They frequently report negatively on conservatives such as this:The 4 biggest conservative lies about inequalityand positively for socialism,‘Socialism’ made America great. In general, Nation of Change reports news factually from a far-left progressive perspective.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "None in the Last 5 years" ], "last_updated": "December 31, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/covertaction-magazine-bias/", "name": "CovertAction Magazine", "source_url": "https://covertactionmagazine.com/", "bias_rating": "LEFT", "bias_score": -8.9, "factual_reporting": "MIXED", "factual_score": 6.1, "credibility_rating": "LOW CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Magazine", "traffic_popularity": "Minimal Traffic", "bias_category_description": null, "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate CovertAction Magazine Left-Biased and Questionable based on the promotion of conspiracy theories, pseudoscience, propaganda, poor sourcing, lack of transparency, numerous false claims, and failed fact checks. Detailed Report Questionable Reasoning: Conspiracy Theories, Pseudoscience, Propaganda, Poor Sourcing, Lack of Transparency, Failed Fact Checks Bias Rating: LEFT (-8.9) Factual Reporting: MIXED (6.1) Country: USA MBFC’s Country Freedom Rank: MOSTLY FREE Media Type: Magazine Traffic/Popularity: Minimal Traffic MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY History CovertAction Magazine was launched in 2018 as a project of CovertAction Institute, Inc.", "history": "CovertAction Magazinewas launched in 2018 as a project ofCovertAction Institute, Inc.,a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization based in New York. It was co-founded by Philip Agee, William Kunstler, Michael Ratner, Ellen Ray, William Schaap, James Wilcott, Elsie Wilcott, and Louis Wolf. The magazine was formerly known as CovertAction Quarterly, an American journal published from 1978 to 2005. The magazine focuses on issues like intervention, war, and covert actions. It often criticizes U.S. foreign policy, intelligence, and U.S. imperialism. Read our profile on the United States government and media.", "ownership": "Subscriptions and donations fund the magazine. The CovertAction Institute is a501(c)(3)not-for-profit organization. The website does not disclose donors.", "analysis": "CovertAction Magazine focuses on investigative journalism with a left-leaning bias. The website covers various topics, including politics, history, and social issues. The tone is often critical, especially towards U.S. foreign policy and capitalist systems. For example, in the article“Biden’sFirst Year Foreign Policy Record May Be Worse Than Trump’s,” the magazine criticizesPresident Biden’sforeign policy, arguing that it has been “more hawkish” thanTrump’s. The article uses biased language such as “escalated dangerous conflicts,” “murderous drone strikes,” and “illegal U.S. war.” It also fails to offer a balanced view of Biden’s foreign policy by not offering counter-arguments. Additionally, the article mentions the magazine had previously endorsed Biden as a “lesser evil” to Trump, indicating a complex but not necessarily balanced editorial stance. The author cites various sources, some of which are rated questionable, such as theNew York Times,Military Times,Kremlin.ru (Questionable),Bloomberg, andGlobal Times (China)(Questionable). In the article ”Ruling Class Faction Mounts Coup Against Nixon and Trump: Should Progressives Support Such Efforts?” the magazine argues that Richard Nixon and Donald Trump were the victims of “orchestrated efforts” by factions within the ruling class to remove them from power. The article cites a variety of sources, includingUSAToday, Libertysentinel.org, gov.info,cbsnews.com,Salon,wikipedia.org,cnn.com,and BBC, including some that are considered to be unreliable, such asthegrayzoneproject.com. It also presents a contradictory message, as it suggests that progressives should support grassroots activism while also arguing that there is a powerful “deep state” that can thwart such efforts. Editorially, CovertAction strongly supports anti-war and anti-imperialism measures as well as support for progressive social issues such asLGBTQ rights,climate change activism, andanti-racism. However, they have frequently reported misinformation and false claims related toCovid-19and theUkraine(See failed fact checks.)", "failed_fact_checks": [ "Ukraine War Reveals Possible U.S. Preparations for Biological Warfare–False", "The USA and NATO staged the Maidan Coup–No Evidence", "The Bucha killings were a staged false flag–False", "The Pentagon and CIA Behind the COVID-19 Pandemic.–False", "Thousands of deaths from the Pfizer Covid-19 Vaccine–False" ], "last_updated": "October 10, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/metro-estados-unidos-bias-and-credibility/", "name": "Metro Estados Unidos", "source_url": "https://www.metroworldnews.com/", "bias_rating": "LEAST BIASED", "bias_score": -1.1, "factual_reporting": "MOSTLY FACTUAL", "factual_score": 2.1, "credibility_rating": "HIGH CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Newspaper", "traffic_popularity": "Minimal Traffic", "bias_category_description": "These sources have minimal bias and use very few loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appeals to emotion or stereotypes).  The reporting is factual and usually sourced.  These are the most credible media sources.See all Least Biased Sources.", "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate Metro Estados Unidos as Least Biased due to minimal editorializing of news stories. Its reporting is rated as Mostly Factual as it incorporates credible sources but heavily relies on social media and brief formats typical of commuter tabloids, which can limit the depth and context of its coverage. Detailed Report Bias Rating: LEAST BIASED (-1.1) Factual Reporting: MOSTLY FACTUAL (2.", "history": "Metro Estados Unidos (USA)is a free commuter tabloid newspaper based in the USA that provides concise and accessible news to urban commuters. It is part ofMetro International,a Swedish media company headquartered in Luxembourg known for pioneering the free newspaper model globally. Read our profile on the USA’s media and government.", "ownership": "Metro Estados Unidos is owned byMetro International, which operates numerous free newspapers worldwide.Metro Estados Unidos generates revenue through advertising in its print and digital platforms, sponsored content, and partnerships.", "analysis": "These sources have minimal bias and use very few loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appeals to emotion or stereotypes).  The reporting is factual and usually sourced.  These are the most credible media sources.See all Least Biased Sources. Metro Estados Unidos, as a commuter tabloid, focuses on quick, easily digestible stories aimed at urban audiences. Its articles often present factual information but are framed in an engaging and accessible manner, sometimes relying on social media or public profiles as primary sources. In review, news is covered by reporters with minimal bias, such as thisNew visa restrictions for Cuban officials in the United States.The paper reports national and world news through theAssociated Press. Editorially, most op-eds are balanced, though more tend to lean slightly left. In general, the news is reported factually and with a slight left-leaning bias.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "None in the Last 5 years" ], "last_updated": "February 28, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/bonsens/", "name": "BonSens", "source_url": "https://bonsens.info/", "bias_rating": "RIGHT CONSPIRACY-PSEUDOSCIENCE", "bias_score": 7.8, "factual_reporting": "LOW", "factual_score": 7.9, "credibility_rating": "LOW CREDIBILITY", "country": "France", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Organization/Foundation", "traffic_popularity": "Medium Traffic", "bias_category_description": null, "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate BonSens a moderate conspiracy and quackery level pseudoscience website based on the frequent publication of disinformation regarding Covid-19 and vaccines. Detailed Report Bias Rating: RIGHT CONSPIRACY-PSEUDOSCIENCE (7.8) Factual Reporting: LOW (7.9) Country: France MBFC’s Country Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE Media Type: Organization/Foundation Traffic/Popularity: Medium Traffic MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY History Founded in 2020 , under the domain BonSens.", "history": "Founded in 2020, under the domain BonSens.org, later directed to BonSens.info, the BonSens (GoodSense) Association is an organization that promotes Covid-19 vaccine hesitancy. According to theirabout page, “Citizens, artisans, entrepreneurs, peasants, lawyers, workers, scientists, doctors, teachers … people of goodwill and common sense have decided to act to face the health and ecological challenges that the world will face in the coming decades.” The website lacks transparency as they do not clearly express their anti-vaccination mission, name authors, or disclose who owns the organization. Read our profile on the media and government of France.", "ownership": "The website does not disclose ownership but namesXavier Azalbertas the publisher. Xavier Azalbert owns the french online news website France-Soir, and according toNewsguard, they “repeatedly publish false content,” especially as it relates to Covid-19. The organization generates revenue through membership fees.", "analysis": "The BonSens website provides information on the mission and actions of BonSens, which include reporting adverse reactions to the Covid-19 vaccine and a way for people tofile complaintsagainst Doctors for their treatment with Covid-19 and Doctors to complain about their limitations in treatment options. The website also features a news section for information and press releases regarding BonSens and their advocacy. For example, in this article, they advise separated parents on how to prevent their child from getting vaccinatedVaccination choice for the child of separated/divorced parents. They also writeopen lettersto the European Union Parliament and United Nations using highly biased words such as this “France is currently in the process of falling into an authoritarian regime. Around half of the French population refuses to receivean experimental productsinjection developed by various laboratories in a quest to help in the fight against the COVID-19 pandemic. This is false because the vaccines are not experimental as theyunderwent testingbefore emergency release. In our research, we also found that BonSens funds scientific studies that align with their anti-vaccination positions. For example, they paid for publishing a study that shows it may be possible that vaccinations are leading to the new variants of covid and conclude that vaccines may not be necessary to control Covid-19:May Vaccines Select SARS-Cov-2 Variants More Readily Escaping Immunity – An Analysis of Public Data. While this study may or may not be valid, it does not align with the consensus that vaccines slow mutations rather than increase them:Vaccines Will Not Produce Worse Variants. In general, BonSens promotes anti-vaccination propaganda and pseudoscience.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "A third-party fact-checker has not checked them." ], "last_updated": "January 14, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/influence-watch/", "name": "Influence Watch", "source_url": "https://www.influencewatch.org", "bias_rating": "RIGHT", "bias_score": 6.2, "factual_reporting": "HIGH", "factual_score": 1.2, "credibility_rating": "HIGH CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": null, "media_type": "Organization/Foundation", "traffic_popularity": "Medium Traffic", "bias_category_description": "These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward conservative causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports, and omit information that may damage conservative causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy.See all Right Bias sources.", "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate Influence Watch Right Biased based on the left-leaning sources they more frequently profile, as well as the use of loaded words such as “extremist” to describe liberal policy. We also rate them High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing and a clean fact check record. Detailed Report Bias Rating: RIGHT (6.2) Factual Reporting: HIGH (1.", "history": "Founded in 2016, Influence Watch is a project of the conservative think tankCapital Research Center. According to theirabout page, “Capital Research Center conceived of this project after identifying a need for more fact-based, accurate descriptions of all of the various influencers of public policy issues.” In simpler terms, Influence Watch attempts to be the right-leaning counter to the left-leaningSourcewatch, which profiles how and where think tanks, organizations, and media are funded.", "ownership": "Capital Research Center owns Influence Watch, which in turn is funded through donations. Some of theirtop donorsare Exxon-Mobil, Koch Industries, and theLynde and Harry Bradley Foundation.“CRC’s president is Scott Walter, who took office in 2016. A philanthropic consultant and former editor of publications released by the Philanthropy Roundtable andAmerican Enterprise Institute.” Influence Watch has also beendirectly fundedby the Bradley Foundation and the John William Pope Foundation. The common theme among all donors is conservative political affiliation and ties to the fossil fuel industry.", "analysis": "These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward conservative causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports, and omit information that may damage conservative causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy.See all Right Bias sources. In review, Influence Watch profiles non-profits, for-profits, labor unions, and groups, detailing their funding and political affiliation. Where Sourcewatch tends to profile right-leaning organizations, Influence Watch profiles more left-leaning organizations, influence Watch also profiles activist groups such asBlack Lives MatterandANTIFA, which they describe as “extreme left and violent.” The sourcing used for the ANTIFA profile comes from credible sources such asThe EconomistandThe Atlantic. Influence Watch also profiles movements such as theFight for $15 (Minimum Wage), which they portray negatively, calling the idea a “radical policy.” Influence Watch also profilesnumerous organizationsthat are concerned withclimate change. Their profile of350.org, an environmental group that opposes new oil, gas, and coal exploration, labels them “extreme left-wing policy.” In general, Influence Watch uses strongly loaded words to describe the organizations they are profiling, often labeling them extremists. However, as biased as their words may be, the information is properly sourced, and while they may bring attention to climate change activists, they do not state denial of global warming.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "None in the Last 5 years" ], "last_updated": "February 27, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-conversation/", "name": "The Conversation", "source_url": "https://theconversation.com/us", "bias_rating": "LEAST BIASED", "bias_score": -0.9, "factual_reporting": "VERY HIGH", "factual_score": 0.0, "credibility_rating": "HIGH CREDIBILITY", "country": "Australia", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Website", "traffic_popularity": "High Traffic", "bias_category_description": "These sources have minimal bias and use very few loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes).  The reporting is factual and usually sourced.  These are the most credible media sources.See all Least Biased sources.", "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate The Conversation Least Biased based on covering both the right-center and left-center politically, as well as covering evidence-based topics. We also rate them Very High for factual reporting due to excellent sourcing of information and a clean fact-check record. Detailed Reporting Bias Rating: LEAST BIASED (-0.9) Factual Reporting: VERY HIGH (0.", "history": "Founded in 2010, The Conversationis an independent, not-for-profit media outlet. Academics, edited by professional journalists author articles, and freely available online and for republication through a creative commons license. The Australian website launched in March 2011,and has expanded into editions in the United Kingdom (UK) in 2013,United States (U.S.) in 2014,Africa in 2015,France in 2015,Canada in 2017,Indonesia in 2017,Spain in 2018 and Europe and Brazil in the 2020s. In 2016, The Conversation’s FactCheck unit became the first fact-checking team in Australia and one of only two worldwide accredited by the International Fact-Checking Network, an alliance of fact-checkers hosted at thePoynter Institutein the U.S. Read our profile on the Australian government and media.", "ownership": "The Conversation websites are held by the not-for-profit educational charity owned by The Conversation Trust. The Conversation is funded by the university and research sector, government, and business.", "analysis": "These sources have minimal bias and use very few loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes).  The reporting is factual and usually sourced.  These are the most credible media sources.See all Least Biased sources. In review, The Conversation is covered by acharterof editorial independence. The authors must be academics or researchers. Authors have final sign-off on their articles and complete statements that disclose potential conflicts. The articles reviewed on the US Conversation website demonstrate the use of minimally loaded language such as this:Why the US has higher drug prices than other countries. Like most on The Conversation, this article is thoroughly sourced from credible educational and media outlets such asCommonwealth Fund,New York Times, HHS.gov, andKaiser Health News. In general, The Conversation covers a wide range of topics, most of which are evidence-based. Opinions expressed come from both the slightly left and slightly right, with more coming from a more liberal perspective.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "None in the Last 5 years." ], "last_updated": "July 5, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/alaska-landmine-bias-and-credibility/", "name": "Alaska Landmine", "source_url": "https://alaskalandmine.com/", "bias_rating": "RIGHT", "bias_score": 5.9, "factual_reporting": "MOSTLY FACTUAL", "factual_score": 4.0, "credibility_rating": "MEDIUM CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Website", "traffic_popularity": "Minimal Traffic", "bias_category_description": "These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward conservative causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using an appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports, and omit information that may damage conservative causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy.See all Right Bias sources.", "overall_summary": "Overall, the Alaska Landmine is rated Right Biased due to its frequent use of charged language, commentary-driven reporting, and story selection that consistently challenge progressive political figures and institutions. Despite its rhetorical style and blending of news and opinion, the outlet generally includes sourcing and has no known fact-checking failures, earning a Mostly Factual rating. Detailed Report Bias Rating: RIGHT (5.9) Factual Reporting: MOSTLY FACTUAL (4.", "history": "The Alaska Landmine was founded in 2017 by Jeff Landfield, who describes the outlet as a fast-paced and entertaining political news site focused on stories that other Alaska media “don’t always report,” as stated on itsabout page. The site is based in Anchorage and has grown notably through legislative coverage, commentary, and personality-driven features. It is owned and operated by Speedogate Media, part of the Landfield Global Group. Read our profile on the United States media and government.", "ownership": "It is owned and operated by Speedogate Media, part of the Landfield Global Group, and generates revenue through display advertising and paid subscriptions offered on itssubscription page. There is no disclosure of institutional donors or external funding partners beyond standard ad and subscriber revenue.", "analysis": "These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward conservative causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using an appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports, and omit information that may damage conservative causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy.See all Right Bias sources. Although the Alaska Landmine presents itself as nonpartisan, its coverage consistently reflects a strong right-leaning editorial voice that blends reporting with aggressive commentary. The outlet is currently involved in a defamation lawsuit, reported externally inthis article, which highlights repeated disputes over tone and accuracy in its public characterizations of officials. Reporting often incorporates loaded language, such as in Landfield’s piececriticizing Adam Crum, which uses descriptors like “crooked” and “loose” to frame political actors. Another article,attacking the First Alaskans Institute, relies heavily on rhetoric, referring to opponents as “anti-development lunatics” and framing institutional decisions as capitulation. Similarly, the piece on Mayor LaFrance’s inauguration, foundhere, uses highly charged ideological labels and offers minimal separation between news reporting and opinion. While the outlet frequently links to public documents and official statements, its narrative framing consistently aligns with anti-progressive actors, environmental opposition groups, and left-leaning municipal leadership. The combination of one-sided topic selection and highly subjective characterization supports a Right Bias rating.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "A review of IFCN-participating fact-checkers found no verified failed fact checks for the Alaska Landmine." ], "last_updated": "November 26, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/libcom-org/", "name": "Libcom.org", "source_url": "http://libcom.org", "bias_rating": "FAR LEFT", "bias_score": -8.5, "factual_reporting": "MOSTLY FACTUAL", "factual_score": 4.2, "credibility_rating": "MEDIUM CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Website", "traffic_popularity": "Medium Traffic", "bias_category_description": "These media sources are moderate to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation.  They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports, and omit information reporting that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy.See all Left Bias sources.", "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate LibCom.org Left Biased based on editorial positions and advocacy for far-left ideology. We also rate them Mostly Factual in reporting rather than High due to a lack of transparency with ownership and authors. Detailed Report Bias Rating: FAR LEFT (-8.", "history": "According to theirabout page: “libcom.org is a resource for all people who wish to fight to improve their lives, their communities, and their working conditions. We want to discuss, learn from successes and failures of the past, and develop strategies to increase the power we, as ordinary people, have over our own lives.” The website was founded in 2003, and they lack transparency by not clearly stating ownership and use of pseudonyms for authors. Read our profile on the United States government and media.", "ownership": "The LibCom website lacks transparency as they do not disclose ownership. Donations generate revenue.", "analysis": "These media sources are moderate to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation.  They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports, and omit information reporting that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy.See all Left Bias sources. Overall, we rate LibCom.org Left Biased based on editorial positions and advocacy for far-left ideology. We also rate them Mostly Factual in reporting rather than High due to a lack of transparency with ownership and authors. Libcom is the abbreviation for Libertarian Communism, also known as Anarcho-Communism. The definition is as follows: a theory ofanarchismwhich advocates the abolition of the state, capitalism, wage labor, and private property (while retaining respect for personal property)and in favor of common ownership of the means of production,direct democracy, and a horizontal network of workers’ councils with production and consumption based on the guiding principle: “From each according to his ability, to each according to his need.” In review, Libcom.org uses minimally loaded language, and most articles/information is sourced properly. News stories are contributed to the site through their users, such as this supportstriking university workers and build worker-student solidarity! The website also features a blog,a library, and a history section with over 20K articles. Editorially, there is a strong left-wing bias in story selection based on political philosophy. News is generally factual and adequately sourced.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "None in the Last 5 years" ], "last_updated": "December 17, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/populist-wire/", "name": "Populist Wire", "source_url": "https://www.populistwire.com", "bias_rating": "FAR RIGHT", "bias_score": 7.9, "factual_reporting": "LOW", "factual_score": 8.0, "credibility_rating": "LOW CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": null, "media_type": "Website", "traffic_popularity": "Minimal Traffic", "bias_category_description": null, "overall_summary": "Overall, Populist Wire is a low-credibility, right-biased website that offers minimal journalistic value. Its lack of transparency, operational functionality, and reliance on emotionally charged, unbalanced content make it an unreliable source of information. Due to its history of promoting misinformation and current inactivity, it holds little relevance in the current media landscape. Detailed Report Questionable Reasoning: Poor Sourcing, Conspiracy Theories, Propaganda, Complete Lack of Transparency Bias Rating: FAR RIGHT (7.", "history": "Populist Wire is a U.S.-based news and opinion website that first launched in 2017.It was offline for a period but has recently returned to limited activity.The site lacks an “About” page, and its domain registration is private, offering no transparency regarding its ownership or editorial leadership.Itsstoreis currently empty, and thedonation pageis non-functional, suggesting operational or financial instability. Read our profile on the Unied States government and media.​", "ownership": "Ownership of Populist Wire remains undisclosed due to the absence of an “About” page and private domain registration.The site appears to generate revenue through display advertising, as evidenced by ads present on its pages.Attempts to solicit donations are currently ineffective, and the merchandise store is inactive.This lack of transparency and operational functionality raises questions about the site’s sustainability and credibility.​", "analysis": "Populist Wire exhibits a strong right-wing bias, characterized by its editorial choices and language.The site frequently publishes content that is favorable to President Donald Trump and critical of his opponents.For example, a recent article titled“President Trump Returns to Butler to Fight for America”portrays Trump in a heroic light, emphasizing his commitment to the nation.​ The site’s content often lacks journalistic rigor, with articles that are emotionally charged and lacking in-depth analysis.An example is the article“Chad Pelley Denied: Free Speech Injunction Hearing to Proceed Friday in Linn County”, which presents a legal case with a clear bias, lacking balanced reporting.The site’s infrequent updates and limited content further diminish its reliability as a news source.​ Historically, Populist Wire has been known to source information from outlets with poor fact-checking records, such asInfoWars, and has promoted misinformation, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic.The site’s current inactivity and lack of new content suggest a decline in its influence and relevance.​", "failed_fact_checks": [ "There are no specific failed fact checks attributed to Populist Wire by independent fact-checking organizations.However, the site’s history of promoting misinformation and sourcing from unreliable outlets undermines its credibility.​" ], "last_updated": "May 2, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/marxist-left-review-bias-and-credibility/", "name": "Marxist Left Review", "source_url": "https://marxistleftreview.org/", "bias_rating": "LEFT", "bias_score": -8.8, "factual_reporting": "MOSTLY FACTUAL", "factual_score": 3.6, "credibility_rating": "MEDIUM CREDIBILITY", "country": "Australia", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Magazine", "traffic_popularity": "Minimal Traffic", "bias_category_description": "These media sources are moderate to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation.  They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appealing to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports, and omit information that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy.See all Left Bias sources.", "overall_summary": "Overall, Marxist Left Review is a transparently far-left, theory-driven journal dedicated to Marxist and Trotskyist perspectives. While factual distortions are not evident, the extreme ideological framing, lack of opposing viewpoints, and inconsistent sourcing support a rating of “Mostly Factual” with an “Extreme Left” bias. Detailed Report Bias Rating: LEFT (-8.8) Factual Reporting: MOSTLY FACTUAL (3.", "history": "Marxist Left Review is a theoretical journal affiliated with Socialist Alternative, a Trotskyist organization in Australia. The publication promotes revolutionary Marxist thought and socialist transformation. It publishes quarterly essays and is available bysubscriptionorsingle-issue purchase, as outlined on itsAbout page. Read our profile on Australian media and government.", "ownership": "Marxist Left Review is transparently owned and operated by Socialist Alternative. The journal does not runadvertisements and is funded throughreader subscriptionsandthe saleof individual issues. Authorship is clearly attributed, and editorial oversight is visible.", "analysis": "These media sources are moderate to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation.  They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appealing to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports, and omit information that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy.See all Left Bias sources. This publication reflects a consistently far-left perspective rooted in Trotskyism and anti-capitalist activism. TheLeninismsection focuses on theoretical defenses of revolutionary leadership and class struggle. Articles are overtly ideological, such as: The journal uses heavily interpretive, ideological framing and rarely engages opposing perspectives. While many essays reference historical sources and academic work, some arguments lack external sourcing or verification.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "There are no known failed fact checks by third-party fact-checkers. However, ideological bias may color interpretations and conclusions." ], "last_updated": "June 6, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-spectator-world-bias/", "name": "The Spectator World", "source_url": "https://spectatorworld.com/", "bias_rating": "RIGHT-CENTER", "bias_score": 4.3, "factual_reporting": "MOSTLY FACTUAL", "factual_score": 2.9, "credibility_rating": "HIGH CREDIBILITY", "country": "United Kingdom", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Magazine", "traffic_popularity": "Minimal Traffic", "bias_category_description": "These media sources are slightly to moderately conservative in bias. They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appealing to emotion or stereotypes) to favor conservative causes. These sources are generally trustworthy for information but may require further investigation.See all Right-Center sources.", "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate The Spectator World Right-Center biased based on story selection and editorial positions that moderately favor the right. We also rate them Mostly Factual in reporting, rather than High, due to misleading articles and a few failed fact checks regarding climate change. Detailed Report Bias Rating: RIGHT-CENTER (4.3) Factual Reporting: MOSTLY FACTUAL (2.", "history": "The Spectator is a weekly British conservative magazine. It was first published on 6 July 1828, making it the oldest continuously published magazine in the English language. The magazine covers politics, culture, current affairs, and arts pages on books, music, opera, and film and TV reviews. In 2018, they launched Spectator World, which is published monthly, covering stories from the weekly magazine. Many previous editors of The Spectator have gone on to have careers as conservative politicians. These include Boris Johnson (1999–2005) and other former cabinet members Iain Macleod, Ian Gilmour, and Nigel Lawson. The current editor is Freddy Gray. The Spectator also has theUSAand Australian versions. Read our profile on UK media and Government", "ownership": "The Spectator is currently owned by David and Frederick Barclay, who also own the right-leaningThe Daily Telegraphnewspaper via Press Holdings. Fee-based subscriptions and the sale of classifieds advertising generates revenue.", "analysis": "These media sources are slightly to moderately conservative in bias. They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appealing to emotion or stereotypes) to favor conservative causes. These sources are generally trustworthy for information but may require further investigation.See all Right-Center sources. In review, The Spectator primarily covers politics and culture with a right-leaning bias in story selection. Headlines and articles usually contain moderately loaded language that favors the right such as this:Left is the new rightand thisWhat does Vladimir Putin have on Joe Biden?Information contained in articles is typically properly sourced to credible media outlets or via direct quotes. The Spectator has alsopublished misleading articlesregarding climate change. Editorially, The Spectator is generallyEuroscepticin outlook, favoring close ties with the United States rather than with the European Union and supporting Israel. In British politics, they are generally strongly opposed to the Labour Party and favor the Conservative Party. In the USA, they have an unfavorable opinion of Democratic President Joe Biden, as evidenced above.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "None by the world edition, but theSpectatorhas failed fact checks." ], "last_updated": "June 15, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/new-york-sun-bias/", "name": "New York Sun", "source_url": "https://www.nysun.com/", "bias_rating": "RIGHT", "bias_score": 6.0, "factual_reporting": "HIGH", "factual_score": 1.8, "credibility_rating": "HIGH CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": null, "media_type": "Website", "traffic_popularity": "Medium Traffic", "bias_category_description": "These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward conservative causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports, and omit information reporting that may damage conservative causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy.See all Right Bias sources.", "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate the New York Sun Right Biased based on editorial positions that favor a conservative perspective. We also rate them High in factual reporting due to proper sourcing and a clean fact-check record. Detailed Report Bias Rating: RIGHT (6.0) Factual Reporting: HIGH (1.", "history": "Founded in 2002 as a daily New York City newspaper, the New York Sun became entirely online in 2008. The website publishes New York City, national, and world news from a conservative perspective. The original New York Sun was published from 1833 to 1950. The current website claims to be the successor to the original. According to theirabout page, “The New York Sun covers America and the world from a base at New York. Its report comprises straightforward, unblinkered news dispatches and an editorial page that puts a premium on principles over politics and people over party.” Seth Lipsky, the site’s founder, serves as Editor-in-Chief. He also writes for theWall Street JournalandNew York Post. Read our profile on the United States government and media.", "ownership": "TheNew York Sun Company LLCowns the website. Dovid Efune, the former CEO and editor of theAlgemeiner Journal, leads the company. Advertising and subscription fees generate revenue.", "analysis": "These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward conservative causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports, and omit information reporting that may damage conservative causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy.See all Right Bias sources. The New York Sun offers news and commentary on New York City, the nation, the world, and politics. The website provides original reporting and republished news from theAssociated Press. Straight news reporting features minimal bias in wording, such as thisParents Await Baby Formula Flights From Switzerland. News articles rely on first-hand accounts, quotes, and sourcing from credible media outlets. Editorially, the New York Sun appropriately labels opinion commentary that typically favors a conservative perspective. The website features conservative columnists like Larry Kudlow fromFox Newsand conservative commentator Michael Barone. Commentary favors the right such as thisThe Many Reasons Why Radical Progressivism Is a Total Failure, and this‘Vinegar Joe’ Biden Thinks His Mistake Is Being Too Sweet to the GOP. While the opinions are one-sided, they often are rooted in fact. In general, The New York Sun publishes news from a conservative perspective.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "None in the last 5 years" ], "last_updated": "November 22, 2024" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/kccu-npr-lawton-bias-and-credibility/", "name": "KCCU – NPR – Lawton", "source_url": "https://www.kccu.org/", "bias_rating": "LEFT-CENTER", "bias_score": -3.0, "factual_reporting": "HIGH", "factual_score": 0.5, "credibility_rating": "HIGH CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Radio Station", "traffic_popularity": "Minimal Traffic", "bias_category_description": "These media sources have a slight to moderate liberal bias.  They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appealing to emotion or stereotypes) to favor liberal causes.  These sources are generally trustworthy for information but may require further investigation.See all Left-Center sources.", "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate KCCU – NPR – Lawton as Left-Center Biased based on story selection and editorial perspectives that slightly favor the left. We also rate them High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing of information and a clean fact-check record. Detailed Report Bias Rating: LEFT-CENTER (-3.0) Factual Reporting: HIGH (0.", "history": "KCCU – NPR – Lawton is an NPR radio station (89.3 FM) based in Lawton, Oklahoma. Read our profile on the United States media and government.", "ownership": "KCCU – NPR – Lawton is owned and broadcast by Cameron University. Revenue is derived through institutional grants, individual contributions, and fees paid by users of the Public Radio Satellite System. NPR stations have historically receivedless than 1%of their funding from the federal government.", "analysis": "These media sources have a slight to moderate liberal bias.  They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appealing to emotion or stereotypes) to favor liberal causes.  These sources are generally trustworthy for information but may require further investigation.See all Left-Center sources. In review, the KCCU – NPR – Lawton website reports news and radio programming information with a slight liberal bias. News on the website is derived fromNPRand often utilizes minimally loaded language, such as thisHow a great-grandmother helped researchers unravel a dinosaur mummy mystery.This story is fact-based and, like all others reviewed, relies on credible sources of information. The website also publishes content fromAmerican Public Media.. In general, story selection tends to lean slightly left, as does editorial content, such as thisGender inequality accelerates Japan’s rural depopulation.Finally, news reporting is fact-based and tends to lean left from an editorial perspective.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "None in the Last 5 years" ], "last_updated": "November 3, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/discern-report-bias/", "name": "Discern Report", "source_url": "https://discernreport.com/", "bias_rating": "FAR RIGHT", "bias_score": 8.6, "factual_reporting": "LOW", "factual_score": 8.1, "credibility_rating": "LOW CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Website", "traffic_popularity": "Medium Traffic", "bias_category_description": null, "overall_summary": "Overall, The Discern Report leans far right, favoring conservative topics and viewpoints while criticizing the left. Due to its one-sided reporting, promotion of antivaccine propaganda, election conspiracy, and lack of evidence for some claims, its credibility and factual accuracy are questionable. Detailed Report Questionable Reasoning: Poor Sourcing, Conspiracy Theories, Propaganda, False/Unproven Claims Bias Rating: FAR RIGHT (8.6) Factual Reporting: LOW (8.", "history": "The Discern Reportis a news outlet that aggregates, curates, and produces original content with a conspiratorial tone. It prioritizes “mission-critical” stories, opposes COVID-19 vaccines,promotes voter fraud claims, and believes in a globalist elite cabal. It is run by JD Rucker and based in Southern California. JD Rucker also ownsAmerica First ReportandThe Liberty Daily. Read our profile on the United States media and government.", "ownership": "JD Ruckerowns the website, and it generates revenue through advertising, sponsored content, and donations. SomesponsorsincludePrepper All-Naturalsand Genesis Gold Group.", "analysis": "The Discern Report’s reporting has a right-leaning bias. For instance, an article titled“What Jill Biden’s Latest Covid-Positive Test Means for Pandemic Panic Theater 2.0”questions established scientific guidelines related to COVID-19 and suggests news about Jill Biden’s COVID-19 infection is part of a fearmongering campaign aimed at future lockdowns. An article titled“Beef Company CEO: ‘The Climate Change Argument Against Cows Is Garbage, and We Will Not Comply,'”is sponsored content that presents the views of a beef company CEO on the debate surrounding beef production and climate change. However, the article lacks verifiable references and cites a source known to spread misinformation. Despite being sponsored content, upholding standards of factual accuracy, unbiased reporting, and ethical journalism is still crucial. The article features Jason Nelson, CEO of freeze-dried food company Prepper All-Naturals, who challenges the argument that alternative protein sources should replace real beef due to the impact of cattle on climate change. Nelson contends that this narrative is based on false claims and is being used to control the food supply and people. The article mentions studies that suggest lab-grown meat is more harmful to the environment than real beef but fails to provide sources for these claims. Further, the article relies heavily onDr. Joseph Mercola, a known spreader ofmisinformation, as a primary source. Regarding sources, they also aggregate content from the Questionable and Very Low FactualGateway Punditwebsite. In general, the Discern Report demonstrates far-right biases and is not always factual.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "DNA in COVID mRNA shots “may have the ability to alter the human genome”; “SV40 has been linked to cancer in humans”; “Regulatory Agencies Knew There Was a Contamination Problem”–Inaccurate", "“Since the COVID jabs were rolled out, at least 1.1 million Americans have ‘died suddenly.’”–False" ], "last_updated": "October 24, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/alternative-daily-bias/", "name": "Alternative Daily", "source_url": "https://www.thealternativedaily.com/", "bias_rating": "PSEUDOSCIENCE", "bias_score": 3.3, "factual_reporting": "LOW", "factual_score": null, "credibility_rating": "LOW CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Website", "traffic_popularity": "Medium Traffic", "bias_category_description": null, "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate Alternative Daily and quackery level pseudoscience website based on the promotion of unproven or debunked scientific claims related to health. Detailed Report Bias Rating: PSEUDOSCIENCE (3.3) Factual Reporting: LOW Country: USA MBFC’s Country Freedom Rank: MOSTLY FREE Media Type: Website Traffic/Popularity: Medium Traffic MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY History Founded in 2011 , Alternative Daily is a website that promotes alternative/holistic health . According to their about page , “Our topics range from personal health to environmental issues and beyond as we strive to bring you the latest as well as the most Ancient in alternative thoughts and therapies.", "history": "Founded in 2011, Alternative Daily is a website that promotesalternative/holistic health. According to theirabout page, “Our topics range from personal health to environmental issues and beyond as we strive to bring you the latest as well as the most Ancient in alternative thoughts and therapies.” The website lacks transparency as they do not disclose editors, while ownership is only mentioned on theTerms of Usepage. Read our profile on the United States government and media.", "ownership": "Splash Campaign LLC, based in Jupiter, Florida, owns Alternative Daily. Advertising and an online store generate revenue.", "analysis": "The Alternative Daily primarily publishes health and wellness articles from an alternative or holistic perspective. While many articles are properly sourced to credible outlets such as theCDCand peer-reviewed journals, others are not. For example, they promote unproven cancer cures such as this6 Peruvian Cures For Cancer, Inflammation, Staph Infections And MoreandA Mother’s Son Was Dying From Cancer, So She Secretly Gave Him This. This last article claims that a cannabis tincture cured terminal cancer. While cannabis may be beneficial for symptom treatment, there iszero evidencethat it can cure cancer. Alternative Daily has also promoted anti-vaccination propaganda, such as advancing the idea that vaccines cause autismReport: Monkeys Subjected To Vaccines Develop Symptoms of Autism. There is no connection between vaccines andautismin humans. Finally, they promoted misinformation during the Covid-19 pandemic by claiming that Oregano Oil can kill viruses on surfacesAntibacterial Wipes are Sold Out: How to Make Your Own.According toReutersFact Check, this claim isfalse. In general, Alternative Daily publishes a mix of credible news and quackery level pseudoscience.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "None by a third party. See the above examples." ], "last_updated": "January 10, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/presidential-hill-bias/", "name": "Presidential Hill", "source_url": "https://presidentialhill.com/", "bias_rating": "FAR RIGHT", "bias_score": 8.7, "factual_reporting": "LOW", "factual_score": 7.7, "credibility_rating": "LOW CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Website", "traffic_popularity": "Medium Traffic", "bias_category_description": null, "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate Presidential Hill as far-right biased and questionable based on the promotion of right-wing propaganda, conspiracy theories, and pseudoscience. Further, they utilize poor sources, have made false claims, and completely lack transparency. Detailed Report Questionable Reasoning: Poor Sourcing, Conspiracy Theories, Propaganda, Pseudoscience, False Claims, Lack of Transparency Bias Rating: FAR RIGHT (8.7) Factual Reporting: LOW (7.", "history": "Presidential Hill is a conservative-leaning news and opinion website. According to theirabout page, they claim they are “a fact-based news publication specializing in reports on politics and current events from an objective point of view.” The website lacks transparency as it does not disclose its conservative leanings or name authors, editors, and ownership. The domain is registered with information redacted for privacy. Read our profile on the United States media and government.", "ownership": "Presidential Hill lacks transparency as they do not provide ownership information. However, the contact page provides a physical mailing address @1985 Henderson Rd STE 1156 Columbus, OH 43220. This address leads to a strip mall and a company calledPak Mail, which provides shipping services and personal and business mailbox rentals. It appears Patriotic Post has rented a mailbox with Pak Mail. Further, when searching the mailing address, we found several other conservative websites linked to this mailbox rental. This is what we have discovered thus far: These websites have the same design and appear to be owned by the same company/person. Advertising generates revenue.", "analysis": "Presidential Hill does not conduct original reporting. Instead, they curate news from other sources and add conservative commentary. Articles and headlines feature loaded emotional wording such as thisCNN Host Gets Attacked By Democrats For Calling Out Biden’s Improper Use Of Troops. A biased quote from the article reads: “Biden is the fascist. The tweeting loons have it entirely backward.” This story does not provide a source. Regarding sourcing, most articles do not utilize hyperlinked sourcing which is unacceptable for a web-only publication. In reviewing numerous articles, we found they generally rely on questionable right biased sources such asAmerican Greatness,Breitbart, andJudicial Watch. Editorially, most stories strongly favor the right, and former President Donald Trump, such as thisTrump Surges 10 Points After FBI Raid, A Reversal From Expectations. Our review also found instances of promoting debunked conspiracy theories, such as thisRancher Says CCP And Bill Gates’ Purchase Of Land Is About Planned Food Shortages. This is debunkedconspiracy theory. Finally, Presidential Hill has promotedCovid-19 disinformation. In general, Presidential Hill is a far-right biased source that promotes conspiracy theories and pseudoscience that are not rooted in fact.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "There is no record of them being fact-checked by a third party. See above." ], "last_updated": "May 2, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/idaho-tribune-bias/", "name": "Idaho Tribune", "source_url": "https://www.idahotribune.org/", "bias_rating": "EXTREME RIGHT", "bias_score": 9.1, "factual_reporting": "LOW", "factual_score": 8.4, "credibility_rating": "LOW CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Website", "traffic_popularity": "Minimal Traffic", "bias_category_description": null, "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate the Idaho Tribune as Far Right Biased and questionable based on the promotion of propaganda and conspiracy theories, the use of poor sources, and a lack of transparency with ownership. Detailed Report Questionable Reasoning: Propaganda, Conspiracy, Poor Sourcing, Lack of Transparency Bias Rating: EXTREME RIGHT (9.1) Factual Reporting: LOW (8.4) Country: USA MBFC’s Country Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE Media Type: Website Traffic/Popularity: Minimal Traffic MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY History The Idaho Tribune is a local media source focusing on news and issues relevant to Idaho.", "history": "The Idaho Tribuneis a local media source focusing on news and issues relevant to Idaho. It emphasizes conservative viewpoints. The specific history of the Idaho Tribune, such as its founding date and key figures in its establishment, is not detailed on the About/Contact Page. However, the emphasis on local issues and events, such as activities inNorth Idaho Collegeand theKootenai Healthsaga, suggests a strong regional focus. The call to “support conservative news” and uphold “Christian Values that Idaho loves and cherishes”indicates a funding approach that appeals specifically to a conservative reader base. Read our profile on the United States government and media.", "ownership": "The Idaho Tribune’s ownership is unclear, but theIdaho Capital Sunreportsit’s managed by David Reilly, an “alt-right propagandist” linked to Idaho’s far-right politics and the Idaho Freedom Foundation. While the Tribune doesn’t explicitly state a connection with theIdaho Freedom Foundationon its website, it has a section dedicated to news about the Foundation, indicating significant interest in Foundation-related topics. The Idaho Tribune’s revenue model relies on multiple sources. It includes reader support throughsubscriptionsand donations. Additionally, the platform generates income through advertising. The Tribune also engages inmerchandise salesas part of its revenue strategy.", "analysis": "The Idaho Tribune displays a distinct conservative bias, evident in its use of emotionally loaded language in headlines like“SELLOUTS,” “UNHINGED,”and“Ad Hominem Ad Nauseam.”This bias is also apparent in articles such as“Happy 4/20? Top 10 Reasons Why Marijuana Should NOT Be Legalized In Idaho” and “SHOCK POLL: 1 in 4 High School Students Now Identifies As LGBTQ — And We’re Supposed To Believe That Kids AREN’T Being Groomed?”Authored bySamantha Collins, reportedly a likely pseudonym with an AI-generated image, these articles showcase selective sourcing and a partisan stance. Finally, another articleHow Agenda 21 Was Implemented In The United Statesattempts to link organizations like the Trilateral Commission, Bilderberg Group, and initiatives such asAgenda 21and theGreat Resetto a covert global conspiracy that lacks credible evidence and is based on misinterpretations. These entities, in reality, function as think tanks and discussion forums for global issues, operating transparently and without the sinister motives ascribed to them by conspiracy theorists. The combination of poor sourcing, sensational language, the promotion of conspiracy theories, and a lack of ownership transparency makes this source questionable. The reporting often targets liberal or progressive actions, indicating a preference for conservative narratives and potential selective reporting. This approach, marked by sensational language and a clear editorial stance supporting conservative causes, suggests a right-leaning bias in the Idaho Tribune.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "They have not been fact-checked by a third-party fact-checker." ], "last_updated": "November 20, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/gatestone-institute/", "name": "Gatestone Institute", "source_url": "https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/", "bias_rating": "EXTREME RIGHT", "bias_score": 8.8, "factual_reporting": "MIXED", "factual_score": 6.3, "credibility_rating": "LOW CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Organization/Foundation", "traffic_popularity": "Medium Traffic", "bias_category_description": null, "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate the Gatestone Institute Questionable based on extreme right-wing bias, promotion of propaganda and conspiracies, poor sourcing, a lack of transparency, and the publication of misleading or false information regarding Muslims. Detailed Report Reasoning: Propaganda, Conspiracy, Poor Sourcing, Lack of Transparency, False Information, Hate Bias Rating: EXTREME RIGHT (8.8) Factual Reporting: MIXED (6.3) Country: USA MBFC’s Country Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE Media Type: Organization/Foundation Traffic/Popularity: Medium Traffic MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY History Founded in 2008, The Gatestone Institute is a far right-wing think tank that frequently publishes anti-Islamic information.", "history": "Founded in 2008, The Gatestone Institute is a far right-wing think tank that frequently publishes anti-Islamic information. The founder is Nina Rosenwald, with former U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations and former Trump national security adviserJohn R. Bolton, serving as its chairman from 2013 to March 2018. Read our profile on United States government and media.", "ownership": "The Gatestone Institute is a non-profit that is funded through donations. The website lacks transparency as they do not list who funds them. The Gatestone Institute has received funding from theMercer familyand theWilliam Rosenwald Family Fund, which is considered a top funder of Islamophobia.", "analysis": "In review, the Gatestone Institute is anti-Islamic, pro-Christian, and Jewish/Israel. Many of the articles will link back to sites that don’t say what they claim or make the same rash judgments without proof. Example: Obama tells Christians to not protest in Egypt, then doesn’t provide quotes or sources saying he said that. Story selection often revolves around portraying Muslims negatively, such as thisEurope: The Great White Death?This poorly sourced story arouses fear that Europe could have a larger Muslim population than the Christian population. Based on the title, apparently, only Whites are Christian in Europe? Further, the Gatestone Institute has been frequently criticized for publishing misleading or false information about Muslims, such as these: Other organizations, such as theSouthern Poverty Law Center, havecalledthe Gatestone Institute “an organization known for spreading anti-Muslim conspiracy theories.” Further, they are closely connected to the former Trump administration as John Bolton served as National Security Adviser for Trump, and Alan Dershowitz is represented fprmer President Trump in his Impeachment:This Anti-Muslim Think Tank Paid Alan Dershowitz and John Bolton Over $250k.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "London closed 500 churches and opened 423 new mosques.–FALSE", "Muslims in Switzerland burned a Swiss flag and demanded the cross be removed from it.–FALSE" ], "last_updated": "January 28, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/times-san-diego/", "name": "Times of San Diego", "source_url": "https://timesofsandiego.com/", "bias_rating": "LEAST BIASED", "bias_score": -1.0, "factual_reporting": "HIGH", "factual_score": 1.0, "credibility_rating": "HIGH CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Website", "traffic_popularity": "Medium Traffic", "bias_category_description": "These sources have minimal bias and use very few loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appealing to emotion or stereotypes).  The reporting is factual and usually sourced.  These are the most credible media sources.See all Least Biased Sources.", "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate the Times of San Diego as Least Biased based on mostly neutral reporting. We also rate them High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing and a clean fact-check record. Detailed Report Bias Rating: LEAST BIASED (-1.0) Factual Reporting: HIGH (1.", "history": "The Times of San Diego is a Web-based news outlet founded in 2014. The Times of San Diego provides full daily news coverage in a large metro area rather than infrequent in-depth articles. According to theirabout page, “Times of San Diego’s focus is timely, comprehensive news about this unique county. We cover politics and crime, business and sports, education and arts, military and science, life and opinion.” Read our profile on the United States government and media.", "ownership": "The website is owned by Times of San Diego LLC. Advertising is generated through advertising.", "analysis": "These sources have minimal bias and use very few loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appealing to emotion or stereotypes).  The reporting is factual and usually sourced.  These are the most credible media sources.See all Least Biased Sources. The Times of San Diego covers news for the city of San Diego. Articles and headlines use minimally loaded language, such as thisMan Pleads Not Guilty to Killing Man Found Buried on Fallbrook Property. Despite an opinion piece by editor Chris Jennewein:http://timesofsandiego.com/opinion/2017/07/28/opinion-what-the-uss-rafael-peralta-says-about-the-idea-of-america/that indicates a slight left bias, most of the articles have minimal bias and maintain factual reporting and neutral words.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "None in the Last 5 years" ], "last_updated": "June 20, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/ecologies-journal-bias-and-credibility/", "name": "Ecologies Journal", "source_url": "https://www.mdpi.com/journal/ecologies", "bias_rating": "PRO-SCIENCE", "bias_score": -0.5, "factual_reporting": "MOSTLY FACTUAL", "factual_score": 2.1, "credibility_rating": "MEDIUM CREDIBILITY", "country": "Switzerland", "country_freedom_rating": "EXCELLENT", "media_type": "Journal", "traffic_popularity": "Minimal Traffic", "bias_category_description": "These sources consist of legitimate science or are evidence-based through credible scientific sourcing.  Legitimate science follows the scientific method, is unbiased, and does not use emotional words.  These sources also respect the consensus of experts in the given scientific field and strive to publish peer-reviewed science. Some sources in this category may have a slight political bias but adhere to scientific principles.See all Pro-Science sources.", "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate Ecologies Journal Pro-Science and Mostly Factual for reporting because it is published by a company that has failed fact checks in other journals. Detailed Report Bias Rating: PRO-SCIENCE (-0.5) Factual Reporting: MOSTLY FACTUAL (2.1) Country: Switzerland MBFC’s Country Freedom Rating: EXCELLENT Media Type: Journal Traffic/Popularity: Minimal Traffic MBFC Credibility Rating: MEDIUM CREDIBILITY History Ecologies Journal is published by MDPI (Multidisciplinary Ecologies Journal Publishing Institute) , formerly Molecular Diversity Preservation International, an open-access journal publisher based in Basel, Switzerland.", "history": "Ecologies Journal is published byMDPI (Multidisciplinary Ecologies Journal Publishing Institute), formerly Molecular Diversity Preservation International, an open-access journal publisher based in Basel, Switzerland.MDPI publishesover 400 journals, includingEcologies Journal, aninternational,peer-reviewed, open-access journal published online by MDPI. Read our profile on Swiss Media and Government.", "ownership": "The publisher of Ecologies Journal isMDPI AG,which Shu-Kun Lin owns. Here is the list ofthe Management Team.According to“MDPI Open Access Information and Policy.”MDPI articles and all its journals are open access where authors pay a one-time Article Processing Charge (APC) to cover the costs of peer review administration and management; here is“General Information on MDPI’s Article Processing Charges (APC).”", "analysis": "Ecologies Journal covers the study of Ecology. Studies are published via open access, such as this:Impact of Grazing Intensity onFloristic Diversity and Soil Properties in Semi-Natural Grasslands of Jbel Bouhachem (Northern Morocco).Like all others reviewed, this study is Pro-Science, well-researched, and low-biased. While the Ecologies Journal has not failed a fact-check, its publisher has faced criticism as an open-access predatory journal. Read our full review onMDPI.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "None for the Ecologies Journal; however, other MDPI journals havefailed fact checks." ], "last_updated": "August 26, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/gma-network-bias/", "name": "GMA Network", "source_url": "https://www.gmanetwork.com/", "bias_rating": "LEFT-CENTER", "bias_score": -3.9, "factual_reporting": "MIXED", "factual_score": 4.9, "credibility_rating": "MEDIUM CREDIBILITY", "country": "Philippines", "country_freedom_rating": "MODERATE FREEDOM", "media_type": "TV Station", "traffic_popularity": "High Traffic", "bias_category_description": "These media sources have a slight to moderate liberal bias.  They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appealing to emotion or stereotypes) to favor liberal causes.  These sources are generally trustworthy for information but may require further investigation.See all Left-Center sources.", "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate GMA Network Left-Center Biased based on the promotion of state propaganda. We also rate them Mixed for factual reporting due to a lack of hyperlinked sourcing and the promotion of one-sided propaganda favoring President Duterte. Detailed Report Bias Rating: LEFT-CENTER (-3.9) Factual Reporting: MIXED (4.", "history": "Established in 1961, GMA Network is a Philippine television and radio network based in Quezon City, Philippines.Felipe L. Gozonis the Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer of GMA Network, Inc. Launched in 2007, GMA News Online is the official site of GMA News. Its main focus is news, business, sports, technology, and entertainment. Read our profile on the Philippines government and media.", "ownership": "GMA News Online is owned byGMA Network, Inc.,ownedby Menardo Jimenez, Felipe L. Gozon, and Gilberto M. Duavit. Sr. Advertising generates revenue.", "analysis": "These media sources have a slight to moderate liberal bias.  They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appealing to emotion or stereotypes) to favor liberal causes.  These sources are generally trustworthy for information but may require further investigation.See all Left-Center sources. After President Duterte’s administration’s pressures on main rivalABS-CBNCorp, GMANetwork Inc.became the dominant network. Former President Rodrigo Duterte is the former chairman of the left-wingPDP-Laban party. GMA News publishes articles with a favorable tone towards President Rodrigo Duterte“Duterte approves purchase of 15 Black Hawk helicopters for military.”Further, when reporting on the opposition party, 1Sambayan, they report less favorably, such as thisDuterte hits 1Sambayan, Carpio: What have you done for Filipinos?. When covering USA politics, they usually rely on theReuterswire service. Finally, they also republisharticlesfromThe Associated Press. In general, GMA reports news that is mostly factual and with a left-leaning pro-government perspective.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "None in the Last 5 years" ], "last_updated": "February 7, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/kxtv-sacramento-news-bias/", "name": "KXTV – Sacramento News", "source_url": "https://www.abc10.com/", "bias_rating": "LEAST BIASED", "bias_score": -0.6, "factual_reporting": "HIGH", "factual_score": 1.0, "credibility_rating": "HIGH CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "TV Station", "traffic_popularity": "Medium Traffic", "bias_category_description": "These sources have minimal bias and use very few loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appeals to emotion or stereotypes).  The reporting is factual and usually sourced.  These are the most credible media sources.See all Least Biased Sources.", "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate KXTV – Sacramento News Least Biased based on neutral wording and minimal editorial content. We also rate them High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing and a clean fact-check record. Detailed Report Bias Rating: LEAST BIASED (-0.6) Factual Reporting: HIGH (1.", "history": "Founded in 1955, KXTV – Sacramento Newsis anABC-affiliated TV station based in Sacramento, California. abc10.com is the website for KXTV that covers news, sports, and weather. On June 29, 2015, the Gannett Company split in two, specializing in print media and the other specializing in broadcast and digital media. The broadcasting company retained KXTV, which took the nameTEGNA. Read our profile on the United States government and media.", "ownership": "KXTV – Sacramento News is owned and operated by TEGNA Inc., which operates 66 television stations in 54 markets. They stateTEGNA’s purpose is to serve the greater good of our communities.Advertising and sponsored content generate revenue.", "analysis": "These sources have minimal bias and use very few loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appeals to emotion or stereotypes).  The reporting is factual and usually sourced.  These are the most credible media sources.See all Least Biased Sources. In review, KXTV – Sacramento News reports local news primarily through TV news videos and accompanying text.Local information is presented with minimally loaded wording:3 arrested after man killed in downtown Merced shootout. National and International news is provided by theAssociated Pressand other TEGNA TV stations. Editorially, KXTV – Sacramento News does not produce op-eds and reports on politics with minimal bias. Finally, the website features fact checks from TEGNA’s fact check serviceVERIFY Fact check.In general, the news is reported factually and with minimal bias.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "None in the Last 5 years" ], "last_updated": "April 4, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/anya-vien/", "name": "Anya Vien", "source_url": "https://anyavien.com/", "bias_rating": "PSEUDOSCIENCE", "bias_score": 3.0, "factual_reporting": "VERY LOW", "factual_score": 9.5, "credibility_rating": "LOW CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Website", "traffic_popularity": "Minimal Traffic", "bias_category_description": null, "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate Anya Vien a quackery-level pseudoscience website based on promoting unproven or debunked medical and health claims. Detailed Report Bias Rating: PSEUDOSCIENCE (3.0) Factual Reporting: VERY LOW (9.5) Country: USA MBFC’s Country Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE Media Type: Website Traffic/Popularity: Minimal Traffic MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY History Founded in 2016 , Anya Vien is an alternative health website promoting natural products in an online store.", "history": "Founded in 2016, Anya Vien is an alternative health website promoting natural products in an online store. The website was founded by Anya Vien, a natural health advocate who states the website’smissionis to “empower people with factual facts about the toxic chemicals, heavy metals, hormone disruptors found in foods, medicine, and personal care products.” She also states that she “does not trust the mainstream media.” Read our profile on the United States government and media.", "ownership": "The owner and publisher of the website is Anya Vien. She also publishes livingtradionally.com and LAhealthyliving.com, which all direct to an online store livingtraditionallystore.com that sells various health, nutritional, and pseudoscience products. The website also generates revenue through advertising and sponsored content.", "analysis": "The primary purpose of the Anya Vien website is to sell health and nutrition-related products. This is accomplished by publishing articles on health, nutrition, and wellness that usually link to an Amazon affiliate link or products in their online store. Articles and headlines use minimally biased wording such as thisSIMPLE APPLE CIDER VINEGAR DETOX DRINK TO BOOST THE IMMUNE SYSTEM AND IMPROVE YOUR HEALTH. Anya Vien consistently promotes false information and pseudoscience, especially when it relates to the dangers of certain foods. For example, this articleMCDONALD’S USES LIVING TOXIC PESTICIDES ON POTATOES THAT MUST “GAS OFF” FOR SIX WEEKS BEFORE THEY ARE SAFE FOR CONSUMPTION,which does not contain a single hyperlink to support the claim.It also is not true. The website also promotes the debunked claims that Fluoride is harmfulTOP 11 BRANDS OF BOTTLED WATER THAT ARE FULL OF TOXIC FLUORIDE. Finally, since the Covid-19 pandemic, they have frequently promoted false information, such as claiming Covid-19 is not worse than the flu andmiracle treatments for virusessuch asessential oils, which are considered a pseudoscience. In general, this website promotes quackery-level pseudoscience to sell products.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "“How turmeric kills cancer and how to take it to be more effective”–False", "“SCIENTISTS FINALLY ISSUE WARNING AGAINST CANOLA OIL: IT DAMAGES YOUR BRAIN, CAN CAUSE DEMENTIA, AND WEIGHT GAIN”–False", "Cancer can be treated with baking soda. –Unsupported" ], "last_updated": "September 19, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/frontiers-in-environmental-chemistry-bias/", "name": "Frontiers in Environmental Chemistry", "source_url": "https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/environmental-chemistry/", "bias_rating": "PRO-SCIENCE", "bias_score": -0.5, "factual_reporting": "MOSTLY FACTUAL", "factual_score": 2.1, "credibility_rating": "HIGH CREDIBILITY", "country": "Canada", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Journal", "traffic_popularity": "Minimal Traffic", "bias_category_description": "These sources consist of legitimate science or are evidence-based through credible scientific sourcing.  Legitimate science follows the scientific method, is unbiased, and does not use emotional words.  These sources also respect the consensus of experts in the given scientific field and strive to publish peer-reviewed science. Some sources in this category may have a slight political bias but adhere to scientific principles.See all Pro-Science sources.", "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate Frontiers in Environmental Chemistry as a Pro-Science journal based on peer review and a clean fact-check record. We also rate them Mostly Factual due to Frontier Media’s retractions of studies either pre or post-publication. Detailed Report Bias Rating: PRO-SCIENCE (-0.5) Factual Reporting: MOSTLY FACTUAL (2.", "history": "Frontiers in Environmental Chemistry is a peer-reviewed open-access journal that covers environmental chemistry. According to itsAbout page, “Frontiers in Environmental Chemistry is a multidisciplinary journal focusing on the fate, characterization, analysis, monitoring, prevention, transportation, treatment, and control of anthropogenic and natural contaminants across all environmental matrices (air, water, soil, and sediment).” Read our profile on Italy’s media and government.", "ownership": "Frontiers in Environmental Chemistry is owned by Frontiers Media SA, a for-profit corporation. Funding comes from digital sales of content and author fees for publication.", "analysis": "Frontiers in Environmental Chemistry is an open-access journal that publishes information and research related to environmental Chemistry. The journal primarily publishes research like this:Synthesis and characterization of peanut shells derived ferromagnetic activated carbon: Application in the Fenton Process for the Degradation of Methyl Orange. Frontiers Mediahas been criticized for being a predatory open-access publisher.In short, Predatory Open Access publishing is an exploitative open-access publishing business model that involves charging publication fees to authors without providing the editorial and publishing services associated with legitimate journals. However, Frontiers in Environmental Chemistry is a credible scientific journal, as we have not found any controversy or significant retractions. However, Frontiers Media hasretractedsome studies in other publications that were found to be of poor methodology and not thoroughly peer-reviewed.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "None in the Last 5 years" ], "last_updated": "February 14, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/mint-press-news/", "name": "Mint Press News", "source_url": "http://www.mintpressnews.com/", "bias_rating": "FAR LEFT", "bias_score": -8.1, "factual_reporting": "LOW", "factual_score": 7.8, "credibility_rating": "LOW CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Website", "traffic_popularity": "Medium Traffic", "bias_category_description": null, "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate Mint Press Far-Left Biased and Questionable based on the publication of conspiracy theories, pseudoscience anti-Israel propaganda, poor sourcing, failed fact checks, and false claims. Detailed Report Reasoning: Propaganda, Conspiracies, Pseudoscience, Poor Sources, Failed Fact Checks Bias Rating: FAR LEFT (-8.1) Factual Reporting: LOW (7.8) Country: USA MBFC’s Country Freedom Rank: MOSTLY FREE Media Type: Website Traffic/Popularity: Medium Traffic MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY History Mint Press News is an independent Minnesota-based news website launched in 2012 by Mnar Muhawesh .", "history": "Mint Press News is an independent Minnesota-based news website launched in 2012 byMnar Muhawesh. It covers political, economic, foreign affairs, and environmental issues. According to theirabout page, “We focus our coverage on issues relating to the effects of special interest groups, big business and lobbying efforts and how they shape policies at home and abroad, including American foreign policy.  Through the lens of social justice and human rights, we report on how these dynamics drive our foreign affairs and impact the world, and examine the effects they have on our democracy and freedoms as defined by the constitution.” Read our profile on the United States government and media.", "ownership": "Mint Press is owned byMnar Muhaweshthrough Mint Press, LLC. The website is funded through donations and online advertising.", "analysis": "Mint Press presents news with a strong left-leaning bias in story selection. Headlines and articles use moderately loaded language like this:NFL Freezes Policy Barring Players From Kneeling During Anthem.This particular story is republished from the conspiracy websiteZeroHedge. Typically, Mint Press sources their information, but sometimes it is from Mixed factual or conspiracy websites. In general, story selection moderately favors the left, such as thisTrump Administration Opens Door for Corporate Attack on Vulnerable Wildlife. Mint Press News primarily focuses on stories about the middle east, Iran, Syria, and Israel. Most stories are negative when covering Israel, such as thisCHRIS HEDGES: ISRAEL AND THE RISE OF JEWISH FASCISM. Further, they have frequently promoted conspiracy theories and misinformation regarding Covid-19, such as thisA DARPA-FUNDED IMPLANTABLE BIOCHIP TO DETECT COVID-19 COULD HIT MARKETS BY 2021.The Covid vaccinedoes not alter DNA. They have also published conspiracy theories related to9/11andChemtrails. Finally, they frequently rely on Russian government sources likeRT NewsandSputnik. Politically, Mint Press News aligns with the far-left and frequently reports negatively on establishment Democrats like thisWHO IS BIDEN WORKING FOR? ON ISRAEL VISIT, “ZIONIST” BIDEN WHITEWASHES ISRAEL’S CRIMESand conservative such as thisEMBOLDENED BY TRUMP AND NETANYAHU, JEWISH SETTLER TERRORISM IS SPIKING. Finally,accordingto the Rutgers University Network Contagion Research Institute, Mint Press “promotes anti-Jewish conspiracy theories.”", "failed_fact_checks": [ "Millions of Muslims protested against the Islamic State in November 2016, but a “media blackout” prevented people from hearing about the event.–Mostly False", "“The push to privatize the Guarani Aquifer comes amid an increased militarization of the region by the Pentagon.”–No Evidence" ], "last_updated": "December 31, 2024" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/uawire/", "name": "UAWire", "source_url": "https://uawire.org/", "bias_rating": "LEFT-CENTER", "bias_score": -3.5, "factual_reporting": "MIXED", "factual_score": 5.0, "credibility_rating": "MEDIUM CREDIBILITY", "country": "Ukraine", "country_freedom_rating": "MODERATE FREEDOM", "media_type": "Website", "traffic_popularity": "Minimal Traffic", "bias_category_description": "These media sources have a slight to moderate liberal bias.  They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appeals to emotion or stereotypes) to favor liberal causes.  These sources are generally trustworthy for information but may require further investigation.See all Left-Center sources.", "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate the UAWire left-center biased and mixed for factual reporting based on poor sourcing and lack of publisher information. Detailed Report Bias Rating: LEFT-CENTER  (-3.5) Factual Reporting: MIXED (5.0) Country: Ukraine MBFC’s Country Freedom Rating: MODERATE FREEDOM Media Type: Website Traffic/Popularity: Minimal Traffic MBFC Credibility Rating: MEDIUM CREDIBILITY History The UAWire provides news focused on Ukraine and Russia.", "history": "The UAWire provides news focused on Ukraine and Russia. The UAWire does not have an About page; therefore, we cannot determine their mission or ownership/authorship of the site, decreasing credibility. Read our profile on Ukraine media and government.", "ownership": "UAWire does not disclose ownership and therefore lacks transparency. Revenue is derived through advertising.", "analysis": "These media sources have a slight to moderate liberal bias.  They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appeals to emotion or stereotypes) to favor liberal causes.  These sources are generally trustworthy for information but may require further investigation.See all Left-Center sources. UAWire publishes articles sourcing mainly through quotes such as“US has put two Ukrainian air carriers on sanctions list over ties with Iran?”and “Ukrainian army will receive a new batch of Hummers from the USA.”Editorially, they have a left-leaning bias. Overall, we rate the UAWire left-center biased and mixed for factual reporting based on poor sourcing and lack of publisher information. (M. Huitsing 9/16/2017) Updated (06/25/2025) Source:https://uawire.org/ Last Updated on June 28, 2025 byMedia Bias Fact Check Do you appreciate our work? Please consider one of the following ways to sustain us.MBFC Ad-FreeorMBFC DonationLeft vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sourcesFound this insightful? Please consider sharing on your Social Media:Explore Similar Sources:JD Supra Bias and Credibility – Bias and CredibilityLiberal Bias Press – Bias and CredibilityGreatReject Bias – Bias and CredibilityGMO Watch Bias – Bias and Credibility", "failed_fact_checks": [], "last_updated": "June 28, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/basnews-agency/", "name": "Basnews Agency", "source_url": "http://www.basnews.com/", "bias_rating": "LEFT", "bias_score": -6.0, "factual_reporting": "MIXED", "factual_score": 6.1, "credibility_rating": "LOW CREDIBILITY", "country": "Iraq", "country_freedom_rating": "LIMITED FREEDOM", "media_type": "News Agency", "traffic_popularity": "Medium Traffic", "bias_category_description": null, "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate Basnews Questionable due to a complete lack of transparency and poor sourcing of information. Detailed Report Reasoning: Lack of Transparency, Poor Sourcing, Censorship Bias Rating: LEFT (-6.0) Factual Reporting: MIXED (6.1) Country: Iraq MBFC’s Country Freedom Rating: LIMITED FREEDOM Media Type: News Agency Traffic/Popularity: Medium Traffic MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY History Founded in 2011 , Basnews Agency is a news site from Northern Iraq.", "history": "Founded in 2011, Basnews Agency is a news site from Northern Iraq. Basnews is based in Erbil (the capital of the Kurdistan Region of Iraq) and published in two dialects of Kurdish and English, Arabic and Turkish. Basnews covers a wide range of topics from the economy, politics, and interviews to lifestyle, including all events in the Kurdistan Region. The website lacks transparency as there is no about page, nor is ownership disclosed. However, theirFacebook pageindicates Botan Tahseen founded the site. Read our profile on Iraq’s Government and Media", "ownership": "The website is not transparent in ownership. However, it appearsBotan Tahseenmay be the owner, though we cannot confirm this. Further, the website does not disclose a business or funding model. Therefore we cannot determine how they generate revenue.", "analysis": "The Kurdistan Regionis an autonomous region in Northern Iraq. This Region is divided into four governorates: Duhok, Erbil, Sulaymaniya, and Halabja. Erbil is the Capital city. The Kurdistan Region has a presidential system with the current president Nechirvan Barzani. TheKDPis one of the main Kurdish parties in Iraq and is described as a tribal (Note tribes are KDP-Barzanis and the PUK-Talabani’s), consideredtheleftist nationalistbig tent party. In review, Basnews isleft-leaningand believed to beaffiliatedwith the KDP in Erbil.When reporting regional news, Basnews utilizes headlines with emotionally loaded language such as“PUK Leadership, Talabani Family in War of Words”however, this article is poorly sourced with only quotes. Usually, Basnews publishes short news stories, and they rarely use hyperlinks. For example, they use the Turkish news agencyAnadolu. However, they do not provide a hyperlink:“Iraq’s Judiciary Asks Parliament to Lift Immunity of 28 MPs”. In general, story selection favors a leftist perspective and is poorly sourced.", "failed_fact_checks": [], "last_updated": "January 13, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/informer-serbia-bias/", "name": "Informer – Serbia", "source_url": "https://informer.rs", "bias_rating": "RIGHT", "bias_score": 8.0, "factual_reporting": "MIXED", "factual_score": 6.3, "credibility_rating": "LOW CREDIBILITY", "country": "Serbia", "country_freedom_rating": "MODERATE FREEDOM", "media_type": "Website", "traffic_popularity": "High Traffic", "bias_category_description": null, "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate the Informer right biased and Questionable based on the promotion of pro-government propaganda, poor sourcing, and highly sensationalized news that is difficult to verify. Detailed Report Questionable Reasoning: Propaganda, Poor Sourcing, Sensationalism Bias Rating: RIGHT (8.0) Factual Reporting: MIXED (6.3) Country: Serbia MBFC’s Country Freedom Rank: MODERATE FREEDOM Media Type: Website Traffic/Popularity: High Traffic MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY History Founded in 2012, the Informer is a Serbian online tabloid news magazine.", "history": "Founded in 2012, the Informer is a Serbian online tabloid news magazine. The Informer focuses on tabloid-style sensational news content focusing on lifestyle and entertainment with little actual news and political reporting. Read our profile on Serbian media and government.", "ownership": null, "analysis": "In review, the Informer predominantly delivers tabloid-style lifestyle news and crime stories that are heavily image-focused with sensational headlines such as“Even half of the men can’t get it up, and they are to blame for everything.” When covering national news, the headlines support the government, such as“SERBIA NEEDS VUCIC! Dacic at the pre-election rally: He is the best solution for the crisis times that follow!”According toBalkan Insight, pro-Serbian government media such as theInformer“hailed the Russian invasion of Ukraine on their front pages,” with the headline titled ”Russia reached Kyiv in a day.”When it comes to sourcing, the Informer rarely uses hyperlinks but does offer quotations andsocial media links. In general, they promote right-wing pro-government propaganda and lack credibility due to poor sourcing and overly sensationalized stories. Overall, we rate the Informer right biased and Questionable based on the promotion of pro-government propaganda, poor sourcing, and highly sensationalized news that is difficult to verify. (M. Huitsing 03/18/2022)Updated (02/27/2025) Source:https://informer.rs Last Updated on February 27, 2025 byMedia Bias Fact Check Do you appreciate our work? Please consider one of the following ways to sustain us.MBFC Ad-FreeorMBFC DonationLeft vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sourcesFound this insightful? Please consider sharing on your Social Media:Explore Similar Sources:Blue Informer – Bias and CredibilityThe Fullerton Informer – Bias and CredibilityAleksandar Vučić – Serbia – Fact and BiasSerbia Government and Media Profile", "failed_fact_checks": [ "Kosovar Albanians were planning to kidnap Serbian tennis star Novak Djokovic in retribution for statements he made on Kosovo.–False" ], "last_updated": "February 27, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/more-perfect-union-bias-and-credibility/", "name": "More Perfect Union", "source_url": "https://perfectunion.us/", "bias_rating": "LEFT", "bias_score": -6.9, "factual_reporting": "MOSTLY FACTUAL", "factual_score": 3.8, "credibility_rating": "MEDIUM CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Website", "traffic_popularity": "Medium Traffic", "bias_category_description": "These media sources are moderate to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation.  They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appealing to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports, and omit information that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy.See all Left Bias sources.", "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate More Perfect Union Left Biased based on its progressive advocacy journalism focusing on labor rights and economic inequality. We also rate them Mostly Factual in reporting rather than High due to the promotion of one-sided perspectives that do not offer balanced viewpoints. Detailed Report Bias Rating: LEFT (-6.9) Factual Reporting: MOSTLY FACTUAL (3.", "history": "Launched in February 2021, More Perfect Union is a progressive non-profit news media organization founded byFaiz Shakir.The outlet specializes in video reporting and opinion coverage about the American labor movement, economic policy, and corporate accountability.The organization aims to embolden and empower the working class to engage in building democracy for the betterment of all working Americans.​ Read our profile on the United States media and government.", "ownership": "More Perfect Union is funded through grassroots donations and values-aligned philanthropic organizations.The organization explicitly states that it does not receive funding from corporations or union entities. Notably, it hasreceived contributions from non-profit organizations such as theOpen Society Foundations.​", "analysis": "These media sources are moderate to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation.  They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appealing to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports, and omit information that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy.See all Left Bias sources. More Perfect Union publishes news and opinion content with a strong focus on labor rights, economic inequality, and corporate accountability, all from a progressive perspective.The website features videos, articles, and investigative reports highlighting issues affecting the working class.For example, their Substack articles include titles like“Trump Said Immigrants Ruined This City. Here’s the Real Story,”which challenges narratives about immigrants, and“This Is How Saudi Arabia Bought Donald Trump,”examining foreign influence in U.S. politics. The organization also produces video content, such as the series“Worker Power,”focusing on labor movements and worker rights.The language used in their reporting is often emotionally charged and aimed at advocating for progressive viewpoints, which aligns with their mission of “building power for the working class.”While their reporting is generally factual, the strong advocacy and selective story choice reflect a left-leaning bias.​", "failed_fact_checks": [ "None in the Last 5 years" ], "last_updated": "March 15, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/co-efficient-bias-and-credibility/", "name": "co/efficient", "source_url": "https://coefficient.org/", "bias_rating": "RIGHT-CENTER", "bias_score": 3.7, "factual_reporting": "MIXED", "factual_score": 4.7, "credibility_rating": "MEDIUM CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Organization/Foundation", "traffic_popularity": "Minimal Traffic", "bias_category_description": "These media sources are slight to moderately conservative in bias. They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appeals to emotion or stereotypes) to favor conservative causes. These sources are generally trustworthy for information but may require further investigation.See all Right-Center sources.", "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate co/efficient as Right-Center Biased based on polling that moderately favors the right. We also rate them as Mixed Factual pollsters based on a 0.7-star rating in predictive polling. Detailed Report Bias Rating: RIGHT-CENTER (3.", "history": "co/efficient is a research and polling organization. According to theirabout page, “With over 30 years of experience in political, nonprofit, and corporate campaigns, the co/efficient team knows how to help your campaign evaluate any situation and execute on a strategy that is guided by accurate, fast, and affordable research and intelligence to ensure you are always using the right tool for the job.” Read our profile on the United States media and government.", "ownership": "co/efficient is a privately owned company. Revenue is generated through the sales of services.", "analysis": "These media sources are slight to moderately conservative in bias. They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appeals to emotion or stereotypes) to favor conservative causes. These sources are generally trustworthy for information but may require further investigation.See all Right-Center sources. co/efficient conducts political research and polling on a wide range of topics, including elections. The website does not publish news. However, co/efficient also states that it provides research for mostly Republicans, such as Gregory Steube (R-FL) FiveThirtyEight, an expert on measuring and rating pollster performance, hasevaluated 20 pollsby co/efficient, earning 0.7 stars for accuracy, indicating they are Mixed Factual by MBFC’s criteria. They also conclude that their polling moderately favors the Right with a score of -2.7, which equates to a Right-Center polling bias. In general, co/efficient is considered moderately accurate and demonstrates a right-leaning bias in polling.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "None in the Last 5 years" ], "last_updated": "February 12, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/cnn/", "name": "CNN", "source_url": "https://www.cnn.com/", "bias_rating": "LEFT-CENTER", "bias_score": -3.6, "factual_reporting": "MOSTLY FACTUAL", "factual_score": 3.7, "credibility_rating": "MEDIUM CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "TV Station/Website", "traffic_popularity": "High Traffic", "bias_category_description": "These media sources have a slight to moderate liberal bias.  They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appeals to emotion or stereotypes) to favor liberal causes.  These sources are generally trustworthy for information but may require further investigation.See all Left-Center sources.", "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate CNN moderately left-center biased based on editorial positions by TV hosts that consistently favor the left, while straight news reporting falls just left of center through bias by omission. We also rate them as Mostly Factual in reporting rather than high due to two failed fact checks in the last five years. Detailed Report Bias Rating: LEFT-CENTER (-3.6) Factual Reporting: MOSTLY FACTUAL (3.", "history": "In 1980, Ted TurnerfoundedCNN, introducing the first 24-hour news channel. CNN’s original anchors, Bernard Shaw, and Lois Hart, helped establish comprehensive news coverage. The network gained recognition for covering events like the 1986 Challenger disaster and the 1991 Gulf War. Over time, CNN evolved into an international media organization, offering news segments in business, entertainment, and sports. CNN International and HLN emerged, catering to global audiences. Today,CNN is a leading news sourcewith a robust digital presence through its website and mobile app. On 04/24/2023, Don Lemon announced that he had been fired by CNN. On 1/17/2025 CNN was foundliable for defamationagainst a navy veteran. CNN’s claims were deemed false because the report allegedly implied that Zachary Young’s business profiteered from Afghan refugees during the U.S. withdrawal, which Young argued was misleading and harmed his reputation and business. Evidence presented during the trial, including messages between CNN reporter Alex Marquardt and Young, suggested that the report lacked accurate context and fairness, ultimately convincing the jury that CNN defamed him by portraying his actions dishonestly. Read our profile on the United States government and media.", "ownership": null, "analysis": "These media sources have a slight to moderate liberal bias.  They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appeals to emotion or stereotypes) to favor liberal causes.  These sources are generally trustworthy for information but may require further investigation.See all Left-Center sources. CNNis known for its comprehensive news coverage. However, some critics argue that the network exhibits aliberal biasin its reporting and editorial stance. CNN’s content may sometimes lean towards progressive viewpoints through the presentation of news stories, selection of guests, and framing of debates.For example, a2017 Harvard studyanalyzing media coverage of President Trump’s first 100 days in office found that CNN’s coverage was 93% negative. Former President Trump and many of his supporters have criticized them asfake news. CNN’s TV programming provides a platform for diverse perspectives by hosting Democratic and Republican commentators and analysts.Ana Navarrois a Republican commentator who frequently appears on CNN’s programming to provide commentary from a conservative perspective.S.E. Cuppis also a conservative commentator who serves as a political analyst for CNN, providing insights on Republican policy and strategy. CNN also hiredChris WallacefromFox News, another right-leaning commentator. By hosting commentators from both sides of the political spectrum, CNN aims to provide viewers with a well-rounded and balanced perspective on the news. However, the network has also experienced failed fact-checks in the past involving a few TV hosts, such as formerDon Lemonand former Prime Time host Chris Cuomo, who is no longer with the network. Nonetheless, news reporting on the website generally remains well-sourced and fact-based. Editorially, CNN’s programming favors the left. For example, a typical panel discussion will feature 4 to 8 guest commentators, one being a Republican, such as S.E. Cupp or Ana Navarro. This creates a situation where left-leaning voices drown out the right. Prominent news hosts include Wolf Blitzer,Erin Burnett,Jake Tapper, andAnderson Cooper. The network’s website, CNN.com, serves as a primary source for breaking news, analysis, and opinion pieces across a spectrum of topics, from politics and health to entertainment and technology. While CNN has faced criticism for a perceived liberal bias, particularly in its television editorial content, its online news reporting endeavors to maintain balance and objectivity. News Articles and headlines on the website typically do not contain loaded emotional wording such as thisThe Odysseus lunar lander is sideways on the moon, company that built it says. This story, like all reviewed, is properly sourced. CNN’s website frequently reports on political news stories such as thisWhat to know about South Carolina’s GOP primary. While this story is low biased, others demonstrate a left-leaning bias typically through bias by omission by not reporting negatively on Democrats, but frequently portraying conservatives and former President Trump negatively like this‘I couldn’t be more offended’: Analyst reacts to Trump’s comments about Black voters. Editorially, the website features opinion pieces by writers and hosts that usually favor the left, such as thisOpinion: Seven reasons a second Trump term would be dangerous.However, they also criticize President Biden in thisOpinion: How Trump made one of ‘the worst diplomatic agreements’ in US history and how Biden carried it out. On 08/01/2024 CNN announced it was shutting down its opinion page on the website. In general, CNN.com holds left-leaning biases with opinion pieces and political news reporting, while straight news reporting is usually reliable and factual. Overall, we rate CNN moderately left-center biased based on editorial positions by TV hosts that consistently favor the left, while straight news reporting falls just left of center through bias by omission. We also rate them as Mostly Factual in reporting rather than high due to two failed fact checks in the last five years. (5/16/2016) Updated (M. Huitsing 01/20/2025) Source:https://www.cnn.com/ Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.Rate the Bias of CNN*LeftLeft-CenterLeast BiasedRight-CenterRightThis poll is for entertainment purposes and does not change our overall rating.Captcha*=MessageVote Last Updated on January 20, 2025 byMedia Bias Fact Check Do you appreciate our work? Please consider one of the following ways to sustain us.MBFC Ad-FreeorMBFC DonationLeft vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sourcesFound this insightful? Please consider sharing on your Social Media:Explore Similar Sources:Cnn.com.de – Bias and Credibilitycnn-globalnews.com – Bias and CredibilityCNN So Fake News – Bias and CredibilityAnalyzing CNN’s Media Bias and CredibilityCNN Live TV", "failed_fact_checks": [ "If President Trump decides to deploy the U.S. military domestically, he would be “mobilizing U.S. military troops on American soil for the first time since 1807.”–False(Corrected)", "“Greenland’s ice sheet has melted to a point of no return, according to new study”–Low Scientific Credibility" ], "last_updated": "January 20, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/ice-news/", "name": "IceNews", "source_url": "https://www.icenews.is/", "bias_rating": "LEFT-CENTER", "bias_score": -3.4, "factual_reporting": "MOSTLY FACTUAL", "factual_score": 3.8, "credibility_rating": "MEDIUM CREDIBILITY", "country": "Iceland", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Newspaper", "traffic_popularity": "Minimal Traffic", "bias_category_description": "These media sources have a slight to moderate liberal bias.  They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appeals to emotion or stereotypes) to favor liberal causes.  These sources are generally trustworthy for information but may require further investigation.See all Left-Center sources.", "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate IceNews Left-Center biased based on political positions that moderately favor the left. We also rate them Mostly Factual rather than High due to sensationalized headlines and lack of transparency. Detailed Report Bias Rating: LEFT-CENTER (-3.4) Factual Reporting: MOSTLY FACTUAL (3.", "history": "IceNews is an Icelandic English Language Newspaper distributed predominantly in Nordic countries. IceNews is based in Reykjavik, Iceland. According to itsabout page, the main focus is current events, politics, entertainment, culture, travel, and forthcoming events in Scandinavia and Northern Europe. IceNews does not disclose staff names. Read our profile on Iceland’s media and government.", "ownership": "IceNews does not disclose its ownership; however, it generates revenue throughadvertising.", "analysis": "These media sources have a slight to moderate liberal bias.  They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appeals to emotion or stereotypes) to favor liberal causes.  These sources are generally trustworthy for information but may require further investigation.See all Left-Center sources. In review, IceNews features articles with sensational headlines such as“Topless nurse advert gets pulses racing in Denmark.”IceNews also publishes articles with loaded emotional language in their headlines, such as“Icelandic Man Arrested After Escaping Prison and Fleeing on Same Plane as Prime Minister.” This story isunder the section called “bizarre news.” When reporting on political news, they usually remain neutral such as thisThe president summons Katrin Jakobsdottir of the Left-Green party. When covering world news pertaining to the USA, they cover the Trump administration with a critical tone, such as“Icelandic government releases a statement condemning US President Trump’s executive order on immigration.”When it comes to sourcing, they use local sources that we have yet to evaluate, such asgrapevine.is,ruv.is, visir.is. Editorially, IceNews promotes concern for human-influencedclimate changeandLGBTQ rights, andpro-immigrationpositions. In general, IceNews reports news mostly factually and with a left-leaning editorial bias. Overall, we rate IceNews Left-Center biased based on political positions that moderately favor the left. We also rate them Mostly Factual rather than High due to sensationalized headlines and lack of transparency. (D. Van Zandt 8/14/2016) Updated (M. Huitsing 02/27/2025) Source:https://www.icenews.is/ Last Updated on February 27, 2025 byMedia Bias Fact Check Do you appreciate our work? Please consider one of the following ways to sustain us.MBFC Ad-FreeorMBFC DonationLeft vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sourcesFound this insightful? Please consider sharing on your Social Media:No related posts.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "None in the Last 5 years" ], "last_updated": "February 27, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/city-journal/", "name": "City Journal", "source_url": "https://www.city-journal.org", "bias_rating": "RIGHT", "bias_score": 6.1, "factual_reporting": "MOSTLY FACTUAL", "factual_score": 2.8, "credibility_rating": "HIGH CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Magazine", "traffic_popularity": "Medium Traffic", "bias_category_description": "These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward conservative causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports, and omit information that may damage conservative causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy.", "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate City Journal Right Biased based on policy positions that favor conservative and libertarian causes and Mostly Factual in reporting due to a few misleading statements regarding climate change and same-sex marriage. Detailed Report Bias Rating: RIGHT (6.1) Factual Reporting: MOSTLY FACTUAL (2.8) Country: USA MBFC’s Country Freedom Rank: MOSTLY FREE Media Type: Magazine Traffic/Popularity: Medium Traffic MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY History Founded in 1990, City Journal is a quarterly magazine and website published by the Manhattan Institute for Policy Research , a conservative think tank based in New York City.", "history": "Founded in 1990, City Journal is a quarterly magazine and website published by theManhattan Institute for Policy Research, a conservative think tank based in New York City. According to theirabout page, “City Journal offers a stimulating mix of hard-headed practicality and cutting-edge theory, with articles on everything from school financing, policing strategy, and welfare policy to urban architecture, family policy, and the latest theorizing emanating from the law schools, the charitable foundations, even the schools of public health.” The current editor isBrian C. Anderson. City Journal writes on their about page that they helped save New York City in the ’90s: “During the Giuliani Administration, the magazine served as an idea factory as the then-mayor revivified New York City, quickly becoming, in the words of theNew York Post, “the place where Rudy gets his ideas.”The Public Interestwent further, calling City Journal “the magazine that saved the city.” Read our profile on the United States government and media.", "ownership": "City Journal is published byManhattan Institute for Policy Research, a conservative 501(c)(3) non-profit American think tank focused on domestic policy and urban affairs. Foundations that have contributed over $1 million to the Manhattan Institute include theJohn M. Olin Foundation,Bradley Foundation,Sarah Scaife Foundation,Searle Freedom Trust,Smith Richardson Foundation,William E. Simon Foundation, the Claude Lambe Foundation, the Gilder Foundation, the Curry Foundation, and the Jaquelin Hume Foundation. City Journal generates revenue throughsubscription fees.", "analysis": "These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward conservative causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports, and omit information that may damage conservative causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy. In review, City Journal reports news and information regarding urban planning and politics with a right-leaning bias. There is the moderate use of loaded language such as this:Making Affordable Housing Even Scarcer. This article is critical of Democratic Mayor Bill De Blasio’s rent regulations in favor of a more free-market approach. This article is also not sourced with hyperlinks. Although City Journal is a conservative publication, they do not always approve of President Trump’s economic policies:Trump’s Tariff Gambit. The magazine is also highly critical of Democratic Socialism such as this:Rebranding Socialism. A quote from the article reads, “Democrats increasingly suggest that the failed ideology is just another word for benevolent government.” When it comes to science, they proclaimClimate Changeto be exaggeratedIt’s the End of the World . . . Sort Of. This article does not deny climate change is influenced by humans but questions the severity and the solutions. It is also properly sourced to such sources asThe GuardianandNature. City Journal also offers a controversial view thatgay marriage may lead to polygamy. In general, most stories favor the right and are reasonably sourced.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "None in the Last 5 years" ], "last_updated": "November 27, 2024" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/georgia-record-bias/", "name": "Georgia Record", "source_url": "https://www.georgiarecord.com/", "bias_rating": "EXTREME RIGHT", "bias_score": 9.1, "factual_reporting": "LOW", "factual_score": 8.2, "credibility_rating": "LOW CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Website", "traffic_popularity": "Minimal Traffic", "bias_category_description": null, "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate the Georgia Record as an extreme right-biased imposter website and Questionable based on the promotion of propaganda, conspiracy theories, pseudoscience, poor sourcing, and false claims. Detailed Report Questionable Reasoning: Propaganda, Conspiracy, Pseudoscience, Poor Sourcing, False Claims, Imposter Bias Rating: EXTREME RIGHT (9.1) Factual Reporting: LOW (8.2) Country: USA MBFC’s Country Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE Media Type: Website Traffic/Popularity: Minimal Traffic MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY History Founded in 2021 by L Todd Wood , the Georgia Record is a conservative news and opinion website with a history of publishing misinformation.", "history": "Founded in 2021 byL Todd Wood, the Georgia Record is a conservative news and opinion website with a history of publishing misinformation. According to itsabout page, “The Georgia Record was relaunched in June of 2021 and has been extremely successful fighting corruption in the state named after King George of England. The original paper was started in 1899 and published into the early 20th century.” Read our profile on the United States media and government.", "ownership": "Creative Destruction Media, owned by L Todd Wood, publishes the Georgia Record.CDM publishes several websitesusing the names of old defunct newspapers. Advertising and ad-free subscriptions generate revenue.", "analysis": "The Georgia Record is a conservative imposter website that is designed to look like a legitimate local newspaper. All of the websites use the same design template using an old newspaper font for their logos. The website publishes local news related to Georgia that routinely favors the right, such as thisFreedom Caucus Press Conference and Rally Brings Groups Together From Across Georgia And Beyond. This article does not provide hyperlinked sourcing but relies on video clips from the press conference. Editorially, all stories favor the right, and particularly formerPresident Trump, such asTrump’s Caravan Greeted By Atlanta Residents Along His Trip Through The Citywhile denigrating the left with conspiracy theories like thisBidens regime is negotiating to relinquish U.S. ability to govern ourselves when it comes to pandemic policies.Based on their support for Trump, they have endorsed his lies regarding election fraud, such as this“Explosive Revelation: Fani Willis Linked To Massive Election Fraud And Money Laundering RICO Enterprise!”This claim isfalse, and there is no evidence of significant election fraud in the 2020 or 2022 elections. The Georgia Record also promotesCovid-19 disinformation. In general, this is an imposter website that promotes extreme right-wing conspiracy theories and pseudoscience.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "Explosive Revelation: Fani Willis Linked To Massive Election Fraud And Money Laundering RICO Enterprise!–False", "Georgia Can’t Produce Over 17k 2020 Election Ballot Images Required By Law, More Than Margin Of Error In Biden ‘Win.–False" ], "last_updated": "November 7, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/climate-cosmos-bias-and-credibility/", "name": "Climate Cosmos", "source_url": "https://climatecosmos.com/", "bias_rating": "RIGHT-CENTER", "bias_score": 4.8, "factual_reporting": "MIXED", "factual_score": 5.0, "credibility_rating": "HIGH CREDIBILITY", "country": "Germany", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Website", "traffic_popularity": "Minimal Traffic", "bias_category_description": "These media sources are slight to moderately conservative in bias. They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appealing to emotion or stereotypes) to favor conservative causes. These sources are generally trustworthy for information but may require further investigation.See all Right-Center sources.", "overall_summary": "Overall, we Climate Cosmos Right-Center biased based on editorial perspectives aligned with conservative environmental positions. We also rate them Mixed for factual reporting due to reporting that does not always align with the consensus and a significant lack of transparency. Detailed Report Bias Rating: RIGHT-CENTER (4.8) Factual Reporting: MIXED (5.", "history": "Climate Cosmosis a media platform focused on climate news, renewable energy, and space science. The site claims to provide insights into climate change, sustainability, and science-related topics. While it presents itself as a science-focused website, its reporting leans heavily toward right-leaning conservative climate viewpoints. Read our profile on German media and government.", "ownership": "NextVision Media UG, a Germany-based company in Kist, Germany, owns Climate Cosmos. The company is structured as a “Unternehmergesellschaft (haftungsbeschränkt)” (UG), which is a type of limited liability company similar to an LLC. However, there is no additional public information about NextVision Media UG, including its leadership, funding sources, or other media properties it may operate. The website does not disclose whether advertising, donations, or other revenue streams support it. The lack of transparency regarding its financial backing and editorial oversight is a concern.", "analysis": "These media sources are slight to moderately conservative in bias. They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appealing to emotion or stereotypes) to favor conservative causes. These sources are generally trustworthy for information but may require further investigation.See all Right-Center sources. While Climate Cosmos claims to focus on climate-related issues, its editorial stance consistently leans skeptical toward renewable energy and environmental initiatives. Articles such as“The Hidden Cost of Renewable Energy Expansion”and“Why Are Climate Models Always Wrong – And Why Does No One Question It?”suggest a pattern of casting doubt on widely accepted climate science and renewable technology. The website sources information inconsistently, often relying on commentary or unsourced claims. Though some articles support climate action, the overall editorial tone presents renewables and climate models with skepticism, suggesting a possible alignment with right-leaning environmental critics. The blend of climate advocacy with a contrarian tone toward green energy initiatives contributes to a confusing and ideologically mixed narrative. While Climate Cosmos does publish science-related content, such as“12 Ways to Reduce Climate Change”and“Multiverse: What Was Before the Big Bang?”, some of these articles veer into speculative territory rather than strictly scientific reporting. Articles about the multiverse theory and what happened before the Big Bang discuss topics that are highly theoretical and not fully accepted within mainstream physics. Overall, the site favors right-leaning environmental policies and frames renewable energy viewpoints negatively, resulting in a moderate right-leaning bias.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "None in the Last 5 years" ], "last_updated": "March 24, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/university-business/", "name": "University Business", "source_url": "https://www.universitybusiness.com/", "bias_rating": "LEFT-CENTER", "bias_score": -2.7, "factual_reporting": "MIXED", "factual_score": 4.7, "credibility_rating": "HIGH CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Website", "traffic_popularity": "Minimal Traffic", "bias_category_description": "These media sources have a slight to moderate liberal bias.  They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appealing to emotion or stereotypes) to favor liberal causes.  These sources are generally trustworthy for information but may require further investigation.See all Left-Center sources.", "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate University Business Left-Center Biased based on story selection and editorial positions. We also rate them Mixed for factual reporting due to poor sourcing techniques and a complete lack of transparency. Detailed Report Bias Rating: LEFT-CENTER (-2.7) Factual Reporting: MIXED (4.", "history": "University Business provides coverage of education news, technology, academics, facilities management, security, financial services, policy, profiles, and opinion. They typically serve college professionals. They lack transparency as they do not provide an about page. Read our profile on the United States government and media.", "ownership": "The University Business website lacks transparency as they do not disclose ownership. Subscription fees generate revenue.", "analysis": "These media sources have a slight to moderate liberal bias.  They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appealing to emotion or stereotypes) to favor liberal causes.  These sources are generally trustworthy for information but may require further investigation.See all Left-Center sources. University Business reports on education news and its relation to teaching, mostly at the college level, such as this3 ways ed-tech makes learning more accessible in the shift online. This story does not offer hyperlinked sourcing. Editorially, they are pro-science when it comes to Covid-19 and endorse vaccinationsWhy you should require students to get vaccinated as COVID retreats. This story also features no external hyperlinks. While the information may be factual, the lack of sourcing and transparency renders this source Mixed for factual reporting.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "None in the Last 5 years" ], "last_updated": "June 30, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/realitatea-net-bias-and-credibility/", "name": "Realitatea.net", "source_url": "https://www.realitatea.net/", "bias_rating": "FAR RIGHT", "bias_score": 7.9, "factual_reporting": "MIXED", "factual_score": 6.2, "credibility_rating": "LOW CREDIBILITY", "country": "Romania", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Website", "traffic_popularity": "High Traffic", "bias_category_description": null, "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate Realitatea.net as right-biased and questionable based on the promotion of propaganda and a track record of publishing misleading information and poor sourcing practices. Detailed Report Questionable Reasoning: Conspiracy Theories, Propaganda, Poor Sources, Misinformation Bias Rating: FAR RIGHT (7.9) Factual Reporting: MIXED (6.", "history": "Realitatea TV, the predecessor of Realitatea Plus, was launched on November 7, 2001, as Romania’s first all-news television channel. Over the years, it became a key source of breaking news, covering politics, social issues, health, justice, and international affairs. In 2011, the channel faced insolvency, leading to a shift in ownership. By 2013, it was acquired by Romanian politician Cozmin Gușă and businessman Maricel Păcuraru. Due to bankruptcy issues, Realitatea TV ceased operations on October 30, 2019, and was replaced by Realitatea Plus on November 1, 2019. Today,Realitatea.netcontinues to deliver real-time news, live events, and in-depth coverage. Read our profile on Romanian media and government.", "ownership": "Realitatea Plus is owned by Geopol International SRL, a company established byCozmin Gușă, a Romanian politician and media consultant. Gușă has had a shifting political career, initially serving as the general secretary of the center-left Social Democratic Party (PSD) before moving to the center-right Democratic Party (PD) and later founding the nationalist-populist National Initiative Party (PIN). Under his leadership, Realitatea Plus continues to operate as a major news channel, replacing Realitatea TV in 2019 after its insolvency. The channel is primarily funded through advertising revenue and media partnerships while maintaining its focus on domestic and international news coverage.", "analysis": "Realitatea.net covers a broad range of political and justice-related topics, often focusing on government actions, corruption cases, and legal proceedings. The platform includes statements from multiple political actors, covering both ruling and opposition parties. However, a noticeable pattern emerges in the use of emotionally charged language and subjective framing, particularly when addressing government decisions and judicial matters:Bombshell on the political scene. One of the Coalition leaders calls for Klaus Iohannis’ resignation. This story, like others, does not provide sourcing from external sources. A review of their political coverage indicates a critical stance towards certain government officials and policies, often using irony or strong language to frame narratives. This suggests an inclination towards right-leaning populism, as the outlet emphasizes government failures and corruption, a common theme in right-wing populist discourse:Boundless audacity of the illegitimate pharaoh Iohannis. He talks about democracy and the rule of law, while clinging to the position he illegally occupies. What did he convey to the heads of the SIE? Similarly, their justice coverage frequently highlights corruption cases and judicial investigations, sometimes using terms like “puppeteers” and “manipulation,” which indicate skepticism towards certain political or institutional actors. This aligns with right-leaning anti-establishment rhetoric, often found in media skeptical of mainstream governance and judicial structures. The website also publishes misinformation related to the Covid-19 vaccine like this:A study on the effects of the anti-COVID vaccine shocked the medical world: 610% increase in the risk of myocarditis. While the study did report an increase in the relative risk of myocarditis following mRNA COVID-19 vaccination, the absolute risk remains low, and the benefits of vaccination continue to outweigh the risks. These findings show Realitatea.net exhibits a Right bias, with tendencies towards populist and anti-establishment narratives. While they provide diverse coverage, their editorial tone suggests a preference for right-leaning perspectives, particularly when discussing government oversight and corruption.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "None in the Last 5 years" ], "last_updated": "February 13, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/sault-michigan-news-bias-and-credibility/", "name": "Sault Michigan News", "source_url": "https://www.sooleader.com/", "bias_rating": "LEFT-CENTER", "bias_score": -3.4, "factual_reporting": "HIGH", "factual_score": 1.1, "credibility_rating": "HIGH CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Website", "traffic_popularity": "Minimal Traffic", "bias_category_description": "These media sources have a slight to moderate liberal bias.  They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appealing to emotion or stereotypes) to favor liberal causes.  These sources are generally trustworthy for information but may require further investigation.See all Left-Center sources.", "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate Sault Michigan News Left-Center Biased based on story selection that moderately favors the left. We also rate them High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing and a clean fact-check record. Detailed Report Bias Rating: LEFT-CENTER (-3.4) Factual Reporting: HIGH (1.", "history": "Sault Michigan News (Soo Leader) is a 24/7 news source from Sault Ste. Marie, Michigan. According to theirabout page, “At Soo Leader, we strive to strengthen our community by connecting you to reliable, timely and accurate information about the issues, people and businesses that matter to Sault Ste. Marie.” Read our profile on Canada’s media and government.", "ownership": "Village Mediaowns Sault Michigan News, and revenue is generated through advertising and subscriptions.", "analysis": "These media sources have a slight to moderate liberal bias.  They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appealing to emotion or stereotypes) to favor liberal causes.  These sources are generally trustworthy for information but may require further investigation.See all Left-Center sources. Sault Michigan News reports the news for Sault Ste. Marie, Michigan, and the surrounding region with low bias, such as thisFunding available to enhance deer habitat in the UP. National and world news is derived from theCanadian Press,similar to theAPandReutersfor Canada. Sault Michigan News publishes op-eds and political stories with more stories favoring the left, such as thisEGLE seeks next generation of ‘climate leaders’ for MHC Corps. In general, the news is reported factually and with a very slight left-leaning story selection bias.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "None in the Last 5 years" ], "last_updated": "January 28, 2026" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/govfacts-bias-and-credibility/", "name": "GovFacts", "source_url": "https://govfacts.org/", "bias_rating": "LEFT-CENTER", "bias_score": -3.0, "factual_reporting": "MOSTLY FACTUAL", "factual_score": 3.6, "credibility_rating": "MEDIUM CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Website", "traffic_popularity": "Minimal Traffic", "bias_category_description": "These media sources have a slight to moderate liberal bias.  They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appealing to emotion or stereotypes) to favor liberal causes.  These sources are generally trustworthy for information but may require further investigation.See all Left-Center sources.", "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate GovFacts.org as Left-Center biased due to consistent framing critical of Donald Trump and sympathetic toward regulatory and progressive perspectives. We rate them Mostly Factual in reporting, reflecting generally accurate summaries of government information with occasional opinion framing and a lack of transparency. Detailed Report Bias Rating: LEFT-CENTER (-3.", "history": "GovFacts.org launched in 2022 as a project aimed at simplifying U.S. government information for the public. The site’s stated goal is to transform bureaucratic content into plain, actionable language. According to itsAbout page, the site grew out of efforts by its founders to assist family members struggling with landlord disputes and child support issues. By utilizing AI-assisted research in conjunction with editorial review, GovFacts began producing explainers and summaries of U.S. government programs, laws, and processes. The site has since expanded to include broader coverage, featuring policy explainers, historical contexts, and weekly summaries of government activity. It claims recognition fromFox Newsas a “nonpartisan educational resource that explains U.S. government legalities.” The project is experimenting with new initiatives likeGovFacts Pulse, which summarizes federal activity, and expandedresources pages.", "ownership": "GovFacts is privately owned and operated. It began as a public resource without advertising but added Google AdSense in July 2025 after a spike in traffic to offset operational costs. The site does not disclose individual ownership or detailed financials, limiting transparency. Revenue now comes from advertising, and the site mentions possible reinvestment into editorial capacity. No information is available on outside investors, nonprofits, or foundations.", "analysis": "These media sources have a slight to moderate liberal bias.  They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appealing to emotion or stereotypes) to favor liberal causes.  These sources are generally trustworthy for information but may require further investigation.See all Left-Center sources. GovFacts presents itself as nonpartisan and educational, but its editorial framing indicates a Left-Center bias. While many explainers are straightforward summaries (e.g.,“Can Government Oversight Fix Toxic Fumes on Planes?”), others contain subtle framing critical of Republican figures, particularlyDonald Trump. For example,“Do Trump’s Tactics Echo McCarthyism?”and“How the Trump Administration Uses Courts as Policy Tool Against Universities, Media, and States”emphasize authoritarian parallels, executive overreach, and threats to civil society. The writing generally cites historical context, academic sources, or government data, but mixes factual reporting with editorialized language (e.g., describing Trump’s approach as “unrestrained plunge into authoritarianism”). While articles aim to be educational, they often blur the line between neutral government explanations and opinionated political analysis. On balance, GovFacts appears reliable for general information about U.S. government processes but less so for political coverage, where ideological leanings become evident. Its reliance on AI-assisted drafting with human review further introduces potential consistency issues, lowering its factual reporting score.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "None in the Last 5 years by major fact-checking organizations." ], "last_updated": "September 27, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/american-gulag/", "name": "American Gulag", "source_url": "https://americangulag.org/", "bias_rating": "EXTREME RIGHT", "bias_score": 9.5, "factual_reporting": "VERY LOW", "factual_score": 9.5, "credibility_rating": "LOW CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Website", "traffic_popularity": "Minimal Traffic", "bias_category_description": null, "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate American Gulag Questionable based on extreme right-wing bias, promotion of conspiracies and propaganda, use of poor sources, and numerous instances of publishing false (fake) news. Detailed Report Questionable Reasoning: Propaganda, Conspiracy, Nationalism, Some Fake News, Numerous Failed Fact Checks Bias Rating: EXTREME RIGHT (9.5) Factual Reporting: VERY LOW (9.5) Country: USA MBFC’s Country Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE Media Type: Website Traffic/Popularity: Minimal Traffic MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY History Founded in 2021 by Jim Hoft, owner of the Far-Right Questionable Gateway Pundit , American Gulag is a website that reports on what they deem “political prisoners” from the January 6th, 2021 Capitol Riot.", "history": "Founded in 2021 by Jim Hoft, owner of the Far-Right QuestionableGateway Pundit, American Gulag is a website that reports on what they deem “political prisoners” from the January 6th, 2021 Capitol Riot. According to theabout page, “AmericanGulag.org is a project of Jim Hoft for the benefit of the public and to provide sunshine and publicity to the scores of political prisoners wrongfully imprisoned as a result of the protest on January 6th.” The about page adds, “There were a handful of bad actors, but the overwhelming majority of the prisoners are husbands and fathers and sons, wives and mothers and daughters — good Americans whose only crime was being invited into a public building. To suit the political purposes of the Democratic Party, these Americans have been abused, assaulted, locked in solitary confinement, and denied medical treatment.” Read our profile on the United States government and media.", "ownership": "Jim Hoft owns American Gulag. The website does not have advertising but solicits donations that it allegedly gives to the so-called “Political Prisoners.” They state: “We are raising money for the families of the Jan. 6 political prisoners. Any amount raised over and above the amount needed for our investigations will be applied to legal fees and other expenses incurred. Please consider supporting these persecuted and suffering men and women today.”", "analysis": "American Gulag lists the names of those arrested during the Capitol Riots. They provide links to the individual’s demographics and their charges such as this on theQAnon Shaman. The profiles are designed to elicit sympathy, such as claiming the QAnon Shaman led people in prayer and gave instructions on obeying police orders. The website also provides news related to the Capitol Riot and the defendants, republished from The Gateway Pundit. For example, they promote false flag conspiracies from the Gateway Pundit, such as thisIT WAS A SETUP! FBI Admits Jan. 6 Was Deep State Operation – They Were Running At Least One Operative in the Crowd at the US Capitol (VIDEO). In general, they promote misinformation and conspiracy theories on the January 6th Capitol Riot directly from the Gateway Pundit. The Gateway Pundit is considered one of the least credible sources on the internet.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "They republish fromThe Gateway Pundit." ], "last_updated": "January 10, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-intercept/", "name": "The Intercept", "source_url": "https://theintercept.com/", "bias_rating": "LEFT", "bias_score": -6.8, "factual_reporting": "MOSTLY FACTUAL", "factual_score": 2.4, "credibility_rating": "HIGH CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Website", "traffic_popularity": "High Traffic", "bias_category_description": "These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation.  They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using an appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports, and omit information that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy.See all Left Bias sources.", "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate The Intercept progressive Left Biased based on story selection that routinely favors the left. We also rate them as Mostly Factual in reporting rather than High due to previous fabricated work and censorship of writers. Detailed Report Bias Rating: LEFT (-6.8) Factual Reporting: MOSTLY FACTUAL (2.", "history": "Launched in 2014 by First Look Media,The Interceptis a news organization covering national security, digital privacy, government secrets, politics, civil liberties, the environment, international affairs, technology, and more. The Intercept was founded by formerGuardiancolumnist Glenn Greenwald, documentary filmmaker Laura Poitras, and formerNationwriter Jeremy Scahill. The editors areBetsy ReedandJeremy Scahill.Glenn Greenwaldis a former constitutional law andcivil rights litigatorknown for obtaining and publishing Edward Snowden’s leaks about NSA surveillance while working for The Guardian. On 10/29/20, Glenn Greenwaldresignedfrom the Intercept, citing censorship of his reporting on Joe Biden. The Intercept’slong-term missionis “to provide aggressive and independent adversarial journalism across a wide range of issues, from secrecy, criminal and civil justice abuses and civil liberties violations to media conduct, societal inequality and all forms of financial and political corruption.” Read our profile on the United States government and media.", "ownership": "The Interceptwas funded by eBay founder Pierre Omidyar’s media company,First Look Media, anon-profit media organization focused on entertainment studios, consumer businesses, and journalism. Omidyar initially committed$250 millionand continues to support it through First Look Media.  First Look Media’s other brands include Topic, Field of Vision, and the Nib. The Intercept also receives reader donations. However,it increasingly relies on reader donations. First Look Media’s focus has shifted, with The Intercept as its primary journalism outlet and Topic Studios producing film and television content.", "analysis": "These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation.  They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using an appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports, and omit information that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy.See all Left Bias sources. The Intercept has been criticized by both Republicans and Democrats, such as this New Yorkerarticlethat reads, “Greenwald’s focus on “deep state” depredations has exiled him fromMSNBCbut has given him a place onFox News.” Intercept co-founder Glenn Greenwald hascriticizedMSNBC host Rachel Maddow for turning into an “utterly scripted, intellectually dishonest, partisan hack.” Greenwald says this criticism has led to the end of his appearances on MSNBC. Greenwald often criticizedleft-leaning mediacoverage of Trump-Russia collusion, namelyCNN, MSNBC, andCBS,arguingthat “very little evidence supported the ideathat Moscow was hot for Donald.” However, The Intercept is harshly critical of Donald Trump and right-wing policies with articles such as this:Trump’s Muslim Ban Is Culmination of War on Terror Mentality but Still Uniquely Shameful. In review, The Intercept publishes articles with strongly emotionally loaded language, such as“The Ignored Legacy of George H.W. Bush: War Crimes, Racism, and Obstruction of Justice”and “The 10 Most Appalling Articles in the Weekly Standard’s Short and Dreadful Life.”The Intercept rejects mainstream establishment politics in favor of progressive liberalism with this pro-Bernie Sanders quote: “ignore the opinion polls and the bogus arguments against him: whether you like him or not, Bernie Sanders is the frontrunner right now,” from “Critics Say Bernie Sanders Is Too Old, Too White, and Too Socialist to Run for President in 2020. They’re Wrong.”Regarding sourcing, The Intercept always uses credible sources such asThe Economist,The Hill,Politico,NYMag,and theWashington Post. In general, The Intercept provides in-depth investigative stories that are sensational in nature. Most stories are critical of the right-left establishment and lean strongly progressive left in ideology.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "A factual search reveals they have not failed a fact check; however, in 2016, theyfired Juan Thompsonfor fabricating quotes and establishing email accounts to trick editors. The Intercept reported: “Thompson admitted to creating fake email accounts and fabricating messages but stood by his published work. He did not cooperate in the review,”" ], "last_updated": "December 20, 2024" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/cell-communication-and-signaling-bias-and-credibility/", "name": "Cell Communication and Signaling", "source_url": "https://biosignaling.biomedcentral.com/", "bias_rating": "PRO-SCIENCE", "bias_score": -0.5, "factual_reporting": "HIGH", "factual_score": 0.5, "credibility_rating": "HIGH CREDIBILITY", "country": "United Kingdom", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Organization/Foundation", "traffic_popularity": "Minimal Traffic", "bias_category_description": "These sources consist of legitimate science or are evidence-based through credible scientific sourcing.  Legitimate science follows the scientific method, is unbiased, and does not use emotional words.  These sources also respect the consensus of experts in the given scientific field and strive to publish peer-reviewed science. Some sources in this category may have a slight political bias but adhere to scientific principles.See all Pro-Science sources.", "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate Cell Communication and Signaling as a Pro-Science open-source journal. We also rate them High for factual reporting due to a clean fact check record. Detailed Report Bias Rating: PRO-SCIENCE (-0.5) Factual Reporting: HIGH (0.", "history": "Cell Communication and Signaling is a peer-reviewed open-access journal published by BioMed Central (BMC) covering research on Cell Communications. According to itsabout page, “Cell Communication and Signaling(CCS) is an open access journal that encompasses all basic and translational aspects of cellular communications and signaling pathways in normal and pathological conditions.” Founded in 2000, BioMed Central, or BMC, is a United Kingdom-based, for-profit scientific open-access publisher. They publish more than 300 journals that are entirely online. According to their about page, “Our leading research journals include selective titles such asCell Communication and Signaling,BMC Medicine,Genome BiologyandRadiation Ocology, academic journals such asJournal of Hematology & Oncology,Radiation Ocology, andMicrobiome, and theBMC series, 65 inclusive journals focused on the needs of individual research communities. We also partner with leading institutions and societies to publish journals on their behalf.” Read our profile on the UK government and media.", "ownership": "BioMed Centralis owned bySpringer Nature, an academic publishing company created by the May 2015 merger of Springer Science+Business Media and Holtzbrinck Publishing Group’s Nature Publishing Group, Palgrave Macmillan, and Macmillan Education.The company reported revenues of over 1 billion USD.", "analysis": "Cell Communication and Signaling is an open-access journal that publishes information and research related to the field of Cell Communications. Typical research is as follows:Extracellular matrix protein signaling promotes multi-step cancer vasculogenic mimicry formation. BioMed Central (BMC) is an open-access publisher of scientific journals. There are two types of Open Access Journals, legitimate and predatory, both of which charge the author for publication.Predatory journalsoften lack peer review and are generally considered not credible. BioMed Central is considered alegitimate, open-access publisherthat is frequently indexed inPubMed. However, BMC journals have been criticized forretracting numerous studiesdue to fake peer reviews or poor methodology. Although BMC has retracted some studies in other publications that were found to be of poor methodology and not thoroughly peer-reviewed, the International Journal for Education Integrity publishes credible scientific studies that are factual and appropriately peer-reviewed.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "None by Cell Communication and Signaling; however,BioMed Central has." ], "last_updated": "October 8, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/palmer-report/", "name": "Palmer Report", "source_url": "https://i0.wp.com/mediabiasfactcheck.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/left3.png?ssl=1", "bias_rating": "LEFT", "bias_score": -8.2, "factual_reporting": "MIXED", "factual_score": 5.8, "credibility_rating": "MEDIUM CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Website", "traffic_popularity": "Medium Traffic", "bias_category_description": "These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation.  They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using an appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports, and omit information that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy.See all Left Bias sources.", "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate the Palmer Report Left Biased based on story selection and editorial positions that routinely favor the left. We also rate them Mixed for factual reporting due to several failed fact checks. Detailed Report Bias Rating: LEFT (-8.2) Factual Reporting: MIXED (5.", "history": "Founded in 2016, The Palmer Report is a liberal news and opinion blog/website created by Bill Palmer, the former writer and owner ofDaily News Bin. According to theirabout page, the “Palmer Report has built a growing and loyal audience based on the timeliness and accuracy of our reporting. At times we’ve been so early to a story that we’ve been questioned for it, only to be fully vindicated weeks or months later as the mainstream media has finally caught up to the story.” The Palmer Report has amastheadand indicates that Bill Palmer is the Senior Editor. In 2017, The Palmer Report negative articles criticizing Media Bias Fact Check. You can read themHereandHere. In 2018, The Palmer Report alsodisagreedwith NewsGuard’s rating. Read our profile on the United States government and media.", "ownership": "The Palmer Report is owned by Bill Palmer and is funded through advertising and donations.", "analysis": "These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation.  They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using an appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports, and omit information that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy.See all Left Bias sources. The Palmer Report is typically well-sourced and usually points to credible sources.  However, there is a very strong liberal bias in reporting and story content.  The Palmer Report uses loaded words and sensational headlines that don’t always reflect the article’s content. An example headline is as follows:Donald Trump’s demented “Happy New Year” tweet is the worst thing you’ll read all year.The Palmer Report has been criticized bySlatefor publishing misinformation. According to Snopes, Palmer Report also has false and unproven claims, which Mr. Palmer calls theNational Enquirer. From the well-respectedAtlantic regarding fake news: “It’s more wish-fulfillment stuff. “Trump About to be Arrested!” Well, yeah, when’s that gonna happen? And we know it’s coming from the left because I know it’s coming from known players. Bill Palmer used to run the Daily News Bin, and it was basically a pro-Hillary Clinton“news site.” It was out there to counter misinformation. Which, okay, fair enough. But then he started to reinvent it as a news site, more and more, and he changed the name to the Palmer Report. The stuff that he puts out there, it’s nominally true. When you click on it,it’s some innocuous story[with an outlandish headline]. That is very harmful, I think.”", "failed_fact_checks": [ "https://www.snopes.com/jared-kushner-go-saudi-arabia-doesnt-extradition-treaty-us/", "https://www.snopes.com/russia-kompromat-jason-chaffetz/", "https://www.snopes.com/denis-voronenkov-paul-manafort/", "https://www.snopes.com/trump-staged-speechwriting-picture/" ], "last_updated": "April 26, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/national-right-to-life-committee-nrlc/", "name": "National Right to Life Committee (NRLC)", "source_url": "https://www.nrlc.org/", "bias_rating": "EXTREME RIGHT", "bias_score": 9.3, "factual_reporting": "MIXED", "factual_score": 6.3, "credibility_rating": "LOW CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Organization/Foundation", "traffic_popularity": "Minimal Traffic", "bias_category_description": null, "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate the National Right to Life Committee as far-right biased and Questionable based on the promotion of anti-abortion propaganda and conspiracy theories, as well as a lack of transparency and several failed fact checks. Detailed Report Reasoning: Propaganda, Conspiracy, Lack of Transparency, Failed Fact Checks Bias Rating: EXTREME RIGHT (9.3) Factual Reporting: MIXED (6.3) Country: USA MBFC’s Country Freedom Rank: MOSTLY FREE Media Type: Organization/Foundation Traffic/Popularity: Minimal Traffic MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY History Founded in 1968 by Mildred Fay Jefferson (mentioned as one of the founders , however, t he others are not known as their history page is “undergoing maintenance.", "history": "Founded in 1968 byMildred Fay Jefferson(mentioned asone of the founders, however, the others are not known as their history page is “undergoing maintenance.”) The National Right to Life Committee (NRLC) is a national anti-abortion organization that states itsmissionas “Devoted to disseminating information and support for pro-life issues.” Furthermore, the National Right to Life Committee also lobbies to put in place pro-life policies and states itspurposeas “to elect pro-life men and women to Congress and the White House who will lead our country back to the day when innocent human life is protected by our laws.” They are headquartered in Washington, D.C., andCarol Tobiasis the organization’s president. Read our profile on the United States government and media.", "ownership": "The National Right to Life Committee is anonprofit 501(c)(4)organizationfunded through donations. Compared to similar organizations such as PRO-LIFE Across AMERICA (MN), which has a 4-star rating, Charity Navigator rated NRLC 1 out of 4 stars. Please view their Accountability & Transparency Performance Metricshere. The website does not include board members or the names of donors.", "analysis": "In review, the National Right to Life Committee primarily reports on anti-abortion and pro-Evangelical Christian issues such as euthanasia and assisted suicide. Editorially, they support Republicans and oppose Democrats“Democrats Unapologetically  Advocate for Abortion up until Birth and beyond. They alsofund“Texans for Ronny Jackson” (Ronny L. Jackson is a former White House physician running for Congress as a Republican in Texas). When reporting on the issues, they are passionate about; they utilize factually mixed sources such asfirst thingsandFox News. The website also provides a link to their news website calledNRL News, which strongly endorses President Trump, such as thisA glorious day to remember: November 8, 2016, when Donald Trump was elected President. Read our dedicated review of NRL News. In general, they advocate for anti-abortion legislation and a pro-conservative agenda while sometimes publishing false information, as seen below.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "“Under the Baucus bill … federal funds would subsidize coverage of elective abortions.”–False", "The Obama White House recognizes a “baby that has not been born” for security purposes.–Mostly False", "The Obama administration will give Pennsylvania $160 million to pay for health insurance plans that cover “any legal abortion.”–False", "Will all legal abortions be covered by federally subsidized health insurance policies in state “high-risk pools”?–False" ], "last_updated": "April 11, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/press-california-bias/", "name": "Press California", "source_url": "https://presscalifornia.com/", "bias_rating": "EXTREME RIGHT", "bias_score": 9.6, "factual_reporting": "VERY LOW", "factual_score": 9.6, "credibility_rating": "LOW CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": null, "media_type": "Website", "traffic_popularity": "Medium Traffic", "bias_category_description": null, "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate Press California Far-right biased and Questionable based on the promotion of propaganda, conspiracy theories, the use of poor sources, and the false and misleading information. Detailed Report Questionable Reasoning: Propaganda, Conspiracy, Poor Sourcing, False Information Bias Rating: EXTREME RIGHT (9.6) Factual Reporting: VERY LOW (9.6) Country: USA MBFC’s CountryFreedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE Media Type: Website Traffic/Popularity: Medium Traffic MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY History Founded in 2017 by Richard Stenger, Press California is primarily a conservative news curation website.", "history": "Founded in 2017by Richard Stenger, Press California is primarily a conservative news curation website. Richard Stenger is a formerCNN.comandNYTDigital journalist. Theabout pageis titled “Help Spread the Right News” and claims, “PressCalifornia.com is the largest independent news curator in California and posts original reporting and content from a wide range of media.” Read our profile on the United States government and media.", "ownership": "The website does not clearly state ownership but is assumed to be owned by Richard Stenger. Advertising and donations generate revenue.", "analysis": "Press California is primarily a conservative news curation service that sometimes publishes original content. Articles and headlines feature loaded emotional wording that favors the right such as thisSanta Monica wants its citizens to serve as the mask Nazis against businesses. This piece is not a news story but rather a tweet. The website curates news stories from far-right biased and questionable sources such asThe California Globe,Gateway Pundit,Revolver News,Whatfinger,Red State,the Liberty Daily,the NOQ Report, andCitizen Free Press. All of these sources routinely fail fact checks and promote misinformation. Editorially, all stories favor the right and denigrate the left, such as thisVideo: Unbelievable Stretch of Nonsensical Drunken Speech And Arm Waving From Nancy Pelosi. Press California frequently links to sources who promote anti-vaccination propaganda, such as thisDr. Robert Malone: ‘The Vaccinated Are Actually the Ones That Are Creating the Highest Risk for Everybody.’ The source for this story is the discredited pseudoscience quackJoseph Mercolaand Dr. Robert Malone, who has advocated vaccine hesitancy. In general, they are extreme right-biased and completely lack credibility based on the poor sources they curate.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "Press California uses sources that frequently fail fact checks." ], "last_updated": "July 15, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/mises-daily/", "name": "Mises Institute", "source_url": "https://mises.org/", "bias_rating": "RIGHT", "bias_score": 6.0, "factual_reporting": "MIXED", "factual_score": 5.2, "credibility_rating": "MEDIUM CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Organization/Foundation", "traffic_popularity": "Medium Traffic", "bias_category_description": "These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward conservative causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports, and omit information that may damage conservative causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy.See all Right Bias sources.", "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate the Mises Institute Right Biased based on strong advocacy for free-market capitalism and limited government (Libertarian), as well as right-leaning positions regarding climate change. We also rate them Mixed for factual reporting due to the promotion of Pseudoscience and misleading statements regarding race and climate change. Detailed Report Bias Rating: RIGHT (6.0) Factual Reporting: MIXED (5.", "history": "TheMises Instituteis a non-profit libertarian think tank from Auburn, Alabama, which promotes the philosophy of Ludwig von Mises and Murray N. Rothbard’s Austrian School of free-market economics and anarcho-capitalism. Mises Institute wasfoundedin 1982 byLew Rockwell, Murray Rothbard, and Burton Blumert. Mises Institute states itsmissionas “to promote the Misesian tradition of thought through the defense of the market economy, private property, sound money, and peaceful international relations while opposing government intervention.” Read our profile on the United States government and media.", "ownership": "According to independent.org, Ludwig von Mises was initially funded by the Rockefeller Foundation. A quote from thearticlestates, “Mises himself in the years immediately after he came to the United States were kept afloat financially through generous grants from the Rockefeller Foundation.” Mises Institutestatesthat The institute “operates as a non-profit corporation using funds donated almost entirely by individuals. Our donors are our shareholders.” However, they don’t reveal thosedonors. Here you can view the 2017 unauditedfinancial data. The Board consists of founder and chairman of the Mises InstituteLlewellyn H. Rockwell Jr., board member, and CounselorDr. Ron Paul,and the President is former Ron Paul adviser and chief of staff,Jeff Deist.Please find the complete list of board membershere.", "analysis": "These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward conservative causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports, and omit information that may damage conservative causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy.See all Right Bias sources. Mises Institute consists of sections such as Mises Wire, Blog Media, virtual courses under the Learn Online section, and a store where they sell books. In review, Mises Institute publishes articles with a critical tone of the Trump administration. Theyuse strong, emotionally loaded language in their headlines such as“AS DEMOCRATS PUSH A “WEALTH TAX,” HERE’S WHY OTHER COUNTRIES GOT RID OF IT,”and“Trump Shows Us Why Its So Hard to “Drain the Swamp.”Paul-Martin Foss authors this second article, and a quote from the article reads, “If Trump supporters don’t wake up and recognize what is transpiring very soon, by the time they realize that they’ve been hoodwinked and that Trump has become the establishment’s Manchurian president it will be too late.” Finally, Mises frequently publishes articles that attempt to portray socialism negatively, such as this:Two Reasons Why Socialism Repeatedly Fails. In general, story selection mostly favors the Libertarian right. Although they utilize credible sources such asAOL,Vanity Fair,Washington Examiner,New York Times,The Guardian,Washington Post,Scientific American,NPR,Daily Beast,The American Conservative,Reason.com,and mixed sources such as theWall Street Journal,they also utilize conservative blogs such asdanieljmitchellto back their claims. When it comes to science, Mises does not deny the existence ofhuman-influenced climate change. However, they consistently downplay the consequences andreject government interventionas a solution. Further, their founder Lew Rockwell has published outright human-influencedclimate change denialon his blog. Mises has also promoted pseudoscience by claiming thatMMR vaccines cause autism:CDC, PHARMA, And Mainstream Media On The Same Team. According to theSouthern Poverty Law Center, Mises Institute scholarspromoted“anti-immigrant views” and “promotes a type of Darwinian view of society in which elites are seen as natural and any intervention by the government on behalf of social justice is destructive.” Further, Ludwig von Mises states inHuman Action, “It is nonsensical to fight the racial hypothesis by negating obvious facts. It is vain to deny that up to now certain races have contributed nothing or very little to the development of civilization and can, in this sense, be called inferior.” Overall, we rate the Mises Institute Right Biased based on strong advocacy for free-market capitalism and limited government (Libertarian), as well as right-leaning positions regarding climate change. We also rate them Mixed for factual reporting due to the promotion of Pseudoscience and misleading statements regarding race and climate change. (7/16/2016) Updated (M. Huitsing 04/04/2025) Source:https://mises.org/ Last Updated on April 4, 2025 byMedia Bias Fact Check Do you appreciate our work? Please consider one of the following ways to sustain us.MBFC Ad-FreeorMBFC DonationLeft vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sourcesFound this insightful? Please consider sharing on your Social Media:Explore Similar Sources:Foreign Policy Research Institute – Bias and CredibilityGatestone Institute – Bias and CredibilityThe Badger Institute – Bias and CredibilityMalone Institute – Bias and CredibilityStrategic Studies Institute (SSI) – Bias and Credibility", "failed_fact_checks": [ "None in the Last 5 years" ], "last_updated": "April 4, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/national-zero/", "name": "National Zero", "source_url": "https://nationalzero.com/", "bias_rating": "FAR LEFT", "bias_score": -8.8, "factual_reporting": "MIXED", "factual_score": 6.4, "credibility_rating": "LOW CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Website", "traffic_popularity": "Medium Traffic", "bias_category_description": null, "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate National Zero Far-Left Biased and questionable based on a complete lack of transparency and the promotion of propaganda through one-sided hyper-partisan reporting. Detailed Report Reasoning: Propaganda, Lack of Transparency Bias Rating: FAR LEFT (8.8) Factual Reporting: MIXED (6.4) Country: USA MBFC’s Country Freedom Rank: MOSTLY FREE Media Type: Website Traffic/Popularity: Medium Traffic MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY History Founded in 2020 , National Zero is an anonymously published progressive/liberal news and opinion blog.", "history": "Founded in 2020, National Zero is an anonymously published progressive/liberal news and opinion blog. The website lacks transparency as they do not have an about page, disclose ownership, editors or authors. The domain is registered in Iceland, but the website appears to be based in the United States. Social mediafeatures the tagline “Political news for the discerning cynic.” Read our profile on the United States government and media.", "ownership": "National Zero lacks transparency as they do not disclose ownership. At this time, the website does not appear to have a revenue model. Our previous report mistakenly thought a placeholder banner was an ad.", "analysis": "National Zero publishes news and opinion articles from a progressive liberal perspective. Articles typically summarize a known news story and add left-leaning commentary. Headlines and the content of articles often use emotional wording such as thisEight confirmed deaths, more expected in massive Kentucky flooding; Governor sends rescuers, while Rand Paul, wife are dicks. This story is sourced from theWashington Postand Tweets. Editorially, all stories favor the left and denigrate the right such as thisText messages from Trump’s Homeland Security Secretary, deputy missing from days around January 6th GOP terrorist attack. The wording within articlesharshly criticizes the right“Like the vast majority of young Republican politicians, Lauren Boebert is an idiot. Declaring that the US “officially enter[ed] into a recession” is not just factually inaccurate, it demonstrates that the GED-issued alleged former prostitute abortionist didn’t study economics to “graduate” from high school.” In general, the information presented on National Zero is rooted in fact and sourced from credible media outlets; however, the wording and one-sided reporting render the source misleading and propagandistic.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "There is no record of this source being fact-checked by a third party." ], "last_updated": "April 11, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-highwire/", "name": "The Highwire", "source_url": "https://thehighwire.com/", "bias_rating": "CONSPIRACY-PSEUDOSCIENCE", "bias_score": 6.0, "factual_reporting": "LOW", "factual_score": 7.8, "credibility_rating": "LOW CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Website", "traffic_popularity": "Medium Traffic", "bias_category_description": null, "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate The Highwire a Strong Conspiracy and a Quackery level Pseudoscience site based on the routine promotion of unproven claims. We also rate them Low for factual reporting due to promoting propaganda not aligned with the consensus of science and several failed fact checks. Detailed Report Bias Rating: CONSPIRACY-PSEUDOSCIENCE (6.0) Factual Reporting: LOW (7.", "history": "Founded in 2004by Del Matthew Bigtree, The Highwire is the website for his internet radio program. The website publishesalternative healthand medical news that frequently promotes pseudoscience and conspiracy theories. Del Bigtree, an American television and film producer and CEO of the anti-vaccination groupInformed Consent Action Network, produced the filmVaxxed: From Cover-Up to Catastrophebased on the discreditedviews ofAndrew Wakefieldon an alleged connection betweenvaccines and autism. The website does not have an about page; however, Mr. Bigtree describes himself as follows: “Del Bigtree is one of the preeminent voices of the Vaccine Risk Awareness Movement. His career as an Emmy-winning producer of the CBS talk show The Doctors changed abruptly when he produced the documentaryVAXXED, credited with igniting a revolution against Pharmaceutical Tyranny worldwide.” Read our country media profile of the USA.", "ownership": "The Highwire does not openly disclose ownership. However, it is presumed to be owned by Del Bigtree and funded through theInformed Consent Action Networkvia donations.", "analysis": "In review, the primary purpose of this website is to promote anti-vaccination propaganda and health misinformation. Besides Bigtree, the website also publishes articles byJefferey Jaxen, whose writing has been featured in discredited sources such asRT,Natural News,InfoWars,Collective-Evolution,Waking Times, Om Times, and countless others.” Recently, The Highwire has been covering the Covid-19 pandemic with articles that utilize strongly loaded wording, such as thisBREAKING: REMDESIVIR STUDY “A SHAM.” This article links directly to a video segment of The Highwire radio program. The Highwire routinely downplays the Coronavirus and has published debunked information regarding death totals such as this:SHOULD WE TRUST THE COVID-19 CASE COUNT? This story promotes the conspiracy that Doctors and hospitals are recording more Corona deaths to receive more money. While it is true that the use of ventilators costs more and that Medicare reimburses 20% more, the claim suggests that the number of COVID-19 cases being padded is not proven; rather, evidence indicates the cases arebeing undercounted. As mentioned above, the primary purpose of this website is to promote anti-vaccination propaganda. The Highwire frequently promotes thedebunked claimthat vaccines cause autism, such asDenialists & Gatekeepers: While CDC Ignores Autism Crisis, Experts Busy ‘Debunking’ Alternative Therapies. Further, they also promotecures for autism, which have zero scientific evidence to support the claim, such as this:Autism ‘could one day be treated with a probiotic pill.’ Currently, there isn’t a known cure for Autism, and this headline is grossly misleading as probiotics cannot cure autism. However, it has improvedgastrointestinal healthin those with autism. Finally, the website promotesanti-GMO propagandaand conspiracy theories about how big tech suppresses alternative medicine.Is Big Tech Killing American Health?", "failed_fact_checks": [ "“There are no studies that prove vaccines don’t cause autism”–Inaccurate", "“Toxic vaccine ingredients in the MMR vaccine cause encephalopathy”–Inaccurate", "“2019 novel coronavirus contains “shuttle-SN” sequence proving laboratory origin”–Inaccurate", "COVID-19 mass vaccination will select for more virulent variants of the virus that causes COVID-19, which will escape vaccine-induced immunity and cause more severe disease–Misleading", "Natural immunity is far superior to COVID-19 vaccines–Misleading", "Covid-19 vaccines are responsible for soaring RSV cases.–False", "COVID-19 mRNA vaccines could aid cancer development.–False" ], "last_updated": "June 5, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/manhattan-times-bias-and-credibility/", "name": "Manhattan Times", "source_url": "https://mhtntimes.com/", "bias_rating": "LEFT", "bias_score": -6.6, "factual_reporting": "LOW", "factual_score": 6.1, "credibility_rating": "LOW CREDIBILITY", "country": "Unknown", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Website", "traffic_popularity": "Minimal Traffic", "bias_category_description": null, "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate The Manhattan Times as Left Biased and Questionable due to its anti-Trump framing, advocacy tone, and lack of transparent sourcing. Its factual reliability is also Mixed due to signs of AI-assisted writing and missing citations. Detailed Report Questionable Reasoning: Propaganda, Poor Sourcing, Lack of Transparency Bias Rating: LEFT (-6.6) Factual Reporting: LOW (6.", "history": "The Manhattan Timesis a digital news outlet based in New York, claiming to cover “top stories in North America and Europe.” It presents itself as an independent, nonpartisan publication and does not list any sponsors or political affiliations. The publication provides a contact email for Steven Mouk but does not include staff names, business registration information, a physical address, or verifiable editorial credentials.", "ownership": "The Manhattan Times does not disclose its ownership or publisher, providing only a contact email and a broad mission statement. The absence of identifiable staff and its reliance on advertising networks indicate that it may operate as a privately owned for-profit entity.", "analysis": "Although The Manhattan Times claims to be neutral, its editorial content appears to lean toward a leftist perspective, raising questions about the authenticity of its authorship. For instance, the article titled “Trump’s Fantasy of Violent Blue Cities Collapses in Court” uses strong negative language when discussingDonald Trump, referring to his assertions as “fantasy” and “untethered to the facts.” While it mentions actual court cases, it doesn’t provide links, judicial citations, or any sourcing, making it tough to verify the claims being made. The way the article is written, dense and stylistically polished, feels more like something generated by AI or heavily edited, rather than traditional journalism. Another example is the piece about‘ICE Kidnapping’ Signs appearing around D.C., which seems to favor the activists’ perspective and question government officials. Although it includes quotes from residents and a DHS spokesperson, it lacks the necessary corroboration or linked sources to support them. The writing style is consistent throughout, with phrases like “When there’s great injustice, moral clarity takes a long time,” creating a rhythm that tools like GPTZero have flagged as potentially AI-generated. All in all, while the topics discussed may be relevant, the lack of bylines, verifiable sources, and direct citations makes one wary about the credibility of The Manhattan Times. Its emotional language, critical tone towards Trump, and signs of possible automated authorship lead to a conclusion that places it in the category of mixed factual reporting.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "None in the Last 5 years, but the source lacks transparency entirely." ], "last_updated": "October 16, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/mision-verdad-bias-and-credibility/", "name": "Mision Verdad", "source_url": "https://misionverdad.com/", "bias_rating": "FAR LEFT", "bias_score": -8.3, "factual_reporting": "MIXED", "factual_score": 6.2, "credibility_rating": "LOW CREDIBILITY", "country": "Venezuela", "country_freedom_rating": "TOTAL OPPRESSION", "media_type": "Website", "traffic_popularity": "Medium Traffic", "bias_category_description": null, "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate Misión Verdad as Pro-Government and Left-Biased due to its consistent alignment with the Venezuelan government’s narratives and its strong opposition to Western policies. We rate its reporting as Questionable and Mixed for factual accuracy, as it provides detailed analysis but relies heavily on ideological framing and selective sourcing and lacks independent verification of claims. Detailed Report Reasoning: Lack of Transparency, Poor Sourcing, Propaganda Bias Rating: FAR LEFT (-8.3) Factual Reporting: MIXED (6.", "history": "Misión Verdadis an online news platform that covers political, social, and investigative topics, with a focus on issues affecting Latin America and the broader Spanish‑speaking world. Its content includes news reports, interviews, and opinion pieces. Misión Verdad is based in Venezuela. Read our profile on Venezuela’s media and government.", "ownership": "Misión Verdad’s governance details are unknown. The site relies on advertising revenue but does not disclose its funding sources, leaving its financial backing unclear.", "analysis": "Misión Verdad covers Venezuelan politics and geopolitical issues, often aligning with the currentgovernment’snarratives. Its reporting is highly ideological and often frames opposition groups and foreign actors as destabilizing forces, reinforcing a pro-Maduro stance in its domestic coverage. For national politics, the article“Nicolás Maduro: Cinco razones estratégicas que sustentan su candidatura”presents a favorable narrative onMaduro’sreelection, outlining strategic reasons for his continued leadership. The piece emphasizes economic recovery, geopolitical stability, and social progress under Maduro’s government without critically analyzing his administration’s economic challenges, inflation, or opposition concerns. The framing supports his candidacy as a necessary continuation of Venezuela’s current trajectory rather than presenting a neutral electoral analysis. For international coverage, the article “Reality hits Trump’s (criminal) Gaza real estate plan“strongly criticizes U.S. and Israeli policies, labeling Trump’s alleged involvement in a Gaza redevelopment plan as a criminal enterprise. The article uses loaded language to frame the initiative as part of a broader strategy of Western imperialism and Palestinian dispossession; a quote from the article reads,  “gentrifying the Gaza Strip through ethnic cleansing with the aim of building and installing a luxury real estate industry and industrial enclaves,” Misión Verdad’s content is openly partisan, consistently reflecting a pro-government and anti-Western stance through framing and selective sourcing. It lacks balance and independent verification, reinforcing ideological perspectives rather than objective reporting. The platform has also been criticized for spreading unverified claims and using tactics similar toRussian propagandato support pro-government narratives.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "None by a Fact-Checker" ], "last_updated": "February 15, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/bleeding-heartland-bias-and-credibility/", "name": "Bleeding Heartland", "source_url": "https://www.bleedingheartland.com/", "bias_rating": "LEFT", "bias_score": -6.8, "factual_reporting": "MOSTLY FACTUAL", "factual_score": 3.3, "credibility_rating": "HIGH CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Website", "traffic_popularity": "Minimal Traffic", "bias_category_description": "These media sources are moderate to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation.  They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appealing to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports, and omit information that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy.See all Left Bias sources.", "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate Bleeding Heartland as left-biased based on its editorial and advocacy positions, which align with a progressive perspective. While it avoids misinformation, its one-sided editorial stance and advocacy-driven style support a rating of “Mostly Factual” rather than “High”. Detailed Report Bias Rating: LEFT (-6.8) Factual Reporting: MOSTLY FACTUAL (3.", "history": "Bleeding Heartland is an independent, Iowa-focused political blog founded and edited by journalist and activist Laura Belin. The site covers local, state, and national political developments, with a strong emphasis on Iowa state government and elections. ItsAbout pagedescribes its mission as providing original reporting and progressive commentary for engaged readers across Iowa and beyond. TheFAQ sectionfurther clarifies its editorial standards, reader engagement policies, and commitment to factual reporting with an explicitly progressive viewpoint. Read our profile on the United States government and media.", "ownership": "Bleeding Heartland is solely owned and operated by Laura Belin. It is funded through individual reader donations via credit card, PayPal, Patreon, Venmo, Substack, and mailed personal checks. While it avoids funding from political candidates or campaign staff, it is otherwise donation-driven without corporate sponsorship, shareholders, or a marketing division. This structure supports its editorial independence but limits financial transparency beyond the owner’s public identity.", "analysis": "These media sources are moderate to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation.  They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appealing to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports, and omit information that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy.See all Left Bias sources. Bleeding Heartland is a strongly progressive news site with a consistent left-leaning editorial stance. Most articles combine political reporting with advocacy. For example,“Who’s who in the Iowa House for 2024”is a nonpartisan legislative breakdown, but subsequent analysis in other posts reflects a Democratic policy lens. The piece“Dutch devotion belies Trump’s message to West Point grads”sharply criticizes Donald Trump’s speech, presenting him as unfit to lead. Similarly,“Former Iowa judges condemn Trump administration’s attacks on judiciary”amplifies judicial rebukes of Trump’s rhetoric. The editorial stance also extends to social justice, as in“Iowans need to step up and be LGBTQ allies”, which advocates strongly for LGBTQ rights. Environmental reporting, such as“As climate change produces excess moisture, crop insurance costs balloon”, focuses on the economic consequences of climate inaction and urges reform. While the site sources data and official records, the commentary often lacks opposing views and leans heavily on emotional appeals aligned with progressive advocacy.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "None in the Last 5 years" ], "last_updated": "June 9, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/fairport-educational-alliance-bias/", "name": "Fairport Educational Alliance", "source_url": "https://fairporteducationalalliance.org/about-us", "bias_rating": "RIGHT", "bias_score": 8.2, "factual_reporting": "MIXED", "factual_score": 6.2, "credibility_rating": "LOW CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Organization/Foundation", "traffic_popularity": "Minimal Traffic", "bias_category_description": null, "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate the Fairport Educational Alliance as Far Right Biased based on the organization’s positions that align with conservative ideologies. We also rate them Questionable due to a lack of transparency with ownership, the promotion of propaganda, and misinformation directed at educators and the LGBTQ community. Detailed Report Questionable Reasoning: Propaganda, Poor Sources, Lack of Transparency Bias Rating: RIGHT (8.2) Factual Reporting: MIXED (6.", "history": "According to theirAbout Uspage, Fairport Educational Alliance was established because they believe education should be based on scholarship and facts. They express concern over introducing new curricula that they describe as “toxic” and divisive, particularly those that align with New York State’s Culturally Responsive-Sustaining Framework. While the page addresses what the organization aims to do and why it feels compelled to do so, it lacks information on how it plans to achieve its goals. The website does not provide information about its founder, owner, or key persons involved. The organization appears to be focused on issues in New York. Read our profile on the United States government and media.", "ownership": "According to the information provided on theirAbout Us/ FAQ page, Fairport Educational Alliance is a volunteer organization with no formalized funding.", "analysis": "The Fairport Educational Alliancewebsite exhibits a conservative bias. It opposes educational frameworks focusing on diversity, equity, and inclusion, arguing that these approaches contradict “traditional family structures” and “basic American values.” However, the website does not explicitly define these terms, leaving them open to interpretation and potentially excluding various family configurations. The site features articles that use emotionally loaded language to emphasize frustration and concern. For example, the article“It’s Time to Take Back Our Schools: Mom’s Eye-Opening Experience”is written by an anonymous parent, raising questions about the experiences’ verifiability. The article includes phrases like “I’m at my wits’ end” and “sick and tired of this nonsense.” Another article,“What is Gender Theory?”discusses gender theory. The page also includes videos discussing gender and sexual identity in schools, including a video by Ben Shapiro, a conservative commentator. These videos contribute to the overall conservative stance of the page on issues related to gender theory. Further,Ben Shapirois a political commentator and not a subject matter expert in gender studies or related fields. Additionally, the “News” section mainly provides links to other organizations like“Moms for Liberty,““Parents Defending Education,”“No Left Turn in Education,”and“Parents Against Critical Theory”. In general, the Fairport Educational Alliance holds far-right-leaning political biases and sometimes relies on sources thatpromote misinformationon Critical Race Theory and the LGBTQ community.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "None in the Last 5 years" ], "last_updated": "November 1, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/wdcw-dc-news-now-bias/", "name": "WDCW – DC News Now", "source_url": "https://www.dcnewsnow.com/", "bias_rating": "LEAST BIASED", "bias_score": -0.7, "factual_reporting": "HIGH", "factual_score": 1.0, "credibility_rating": "HIGH CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "TV Station", "traffic_popularity": "Medium Traffic", "bias_category_description": "These sources have minimal bias and use very few loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appeals to emotion or stereotypes).  The reporting is factual and usually sourced.  These are the most credible media sources.See all Least Biased Sources.", "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate the WDCW – DC News Now Least Biased based on neutral straight news reporting without offering opinion pieces. We also rate them High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing and a clean fact-check record. Detailed Report Bias Rating: LEAST BIASED (-0.7) Factual Reporting: HIGH (1.", "history": "Founded in 1981, WDCW – DC News Now is a CW-affiliated television station licensed to Washington, DC. The associated website is dcnewsnow.com.com which provides news, sports, weather, politics, and crime reporting. Read our profile on the United States government and media.", "ownership": "WDCW – DC News Now is owned byNexstar Media Group, which owns around 200 TV stations nationwide. The founder, chairman, president, and CEO of Nexstar is Perry A. Sook.AccordingtoOpen Secrets, Nexstar Media group gave more money to Republicans in the 2018 election cycle (45% to Democrats, 55% to Republicans). However, in 2020 they gave more to Democrats (55% Democrats, 45% to Republicans). Advertising generates revenue.", "analysis": "These sources have minimal bias and use very few loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appeals to emotion or stereotypes).  The reporting is factual and usually sourced.  These are the most credible media sources.See all Least Biased Sources. The WDCW – DC News Now website publishes news for the greater Hagerstown and Washington, DC, area. Local news features original reporting with minimal bias, such as this:Mother of infant that died of fentanyl surrenders to police. Many stories also contain videos from the TV Station. National and international news is covered through Nexstar Media Wire, theAssociated Press, and other large, credible media outlets. Editorially, they do not produce op-eds; however, they report political news with minimal bias, such as thisWhat’s next for the $1 trillion bipartisan infrastructure bill? Political reporting is reasonably balanced, covering both sides, and avoids using emotional language. In general, they report news factually and with minimal bias.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "None in the Last 5 years" ], "last_updated": "July 24, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/medscape/", "name": "Medscape", "source_url": "https://www.medscape.com/", "bias_rating": "PRO-SCIENCE", "bias_score": 0.0, "factual_reporting": "VERY HIGH", "factual_score": 0.0, "credibility_rating": "HIGH CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Website", "traffic_popularity": "High Traffic", "bias_category_description": "These sources consist of legitimate science or are evidence-based through the use of credible scientific sourcing.  Legitimate science follows the scientific method, is unbiased, and does not use emotional words. These sources also respect the consensus of experts in the given scientific field and strive to publish peer-reviewed science. Some sources in this category may have a slight political bias but adhere to scientific principles.See all Pro-Science sources.", "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate Medscape a Pro-Science website based on fact-based scientific material that is usually peer-reviewed. Detailed Report Bias Rating: PRO-SCIENCE (0.0) Factual Reporting: VERY HIGH (0.0) Country: USA MBFC’s Country Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE Media Type: Website Traffic/Popularity: High Traffic MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY History Medscape is a web resource for physicians and health professionals.", "history": "Medscape is a web resource for physicians and health professionals. It features peer-reviewed original medical journal articles, CME (Continuing Medical Education), a customized version of the National Library of Medicine’s MEDLINE database, daily medical news, major conference coverage, and drug information—including a drug database (Medscape Drug Reference, or MDR) and drug interaction checker. Read our profile on the United States government and media.", "ownership": "KKR & Company owns Medscape. They also own the WebMD website. Advertising and sponsored content generate revenue.", "analysis": "Medscape publishes general medical news articles, videos, and medical data geared toward health professionals. What separates Medscape from other medical news sites is that they cover more technical terminology geared toward an educated audience. News stories do not use loaded language, such as thisFDA Panel BacksPfizer’s COVID Booster for 65 and Older, Those at High Risk. They also publish studies such as thisTicagrelor of Net Clinical Benefit After Stroke, TIA: THALES. Finally, they republish news articles from theAssociated Press,Reuters, andWebMD.Finally, the website offers the ability to search the Medline information database. Editorially, Medscape steers clear of politics, but they will report when it involves healthcare such as thisBiden Vaccine Mandate Will Test US Workplace Regulator. In general, there is little bias with political reporting.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "None in the Last 5 years" ], "last_updated": "December 25, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/drtrozzi-org-bias/", "name": "DrTrozzi.org", "source_url": "https://drtrozzi.org/", "bias_rating": "PSEUDOSCIENCE", "bias_score": 3.5, "factual_reporting": "LOW", "factual_score": 7.9, "credibility_rating": "LOW CREDIBILITY", "country": "Canada", "country_freedom_rating": "EXCELLENT", "media_type": "Website", "traffic_popularity": "Minimal Traffic", "bias_category_description": null, "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate Dr. Mark Trozzi’s website as Pseudoscience based on the promotion of alternative medical perspectives, often challenging established medical consensus, which may lead readers toward potentially unverified health approaches. Detailed Report Bias Rating: PSEUDOSCIENCE (3.5) Factual Reporting: LOW (7.", "history": "Dr. Trozzi’s websitewas established as a platform for Dr. Mark Trozzi, a former ER doctor, to share his perspectives on various health-related topics. Dr. Trozzi is based in Ontario, Canada. As of recent developments, Dr. Mark Raymond Trozzi wassuspendedfrom practicing medicine in Ontario due to allegations of professionalmisconduct, particularly in relation to his communications about the COVID-19 pandemic. Read our profile on Canadian media and government.", "ownership": "The specific funding sources for Dr. Trozzi’s website are not explicitly mentioned. However, a “Donate” option suggests that the platform may receive funding through donations.", "analysis": "Dr. Mark Trozzi has associations with sources flagged for promoting conspiracy theories, such as “Druthers.” He has contributed to this publication, as evidenced by hispersonal testimonyon their platform. In our review of content from Dr. Mark Trozzi’s website, we will focus on a few articles to identify potential biases. In the article“Great News | Resolving and Preventing Cancer,” Dr. Trozzi presents a paradigm shift, suggesting that cancer is not just a genetic disease but a metabolic one. This view isn’t widely accepted ortaken seriouslyin medical circles. He advocates for a metabolic treatment approach, contrasting traditional methods like surgery and chemotherapy. While he cites experts Dr. Seyfried and Dr. Marik in support, it’s important to weigh these views against the broader medical consensus. Exploring alternative perspectives is essential for scientific progress; it is also crucial to approach them with caution and skepticism, especially when they diverge from well-established medical understanding. Promoting such views without comprehensive evidence can be seen as irresponsible, especially when it concerns a critical health issue like cancer. Dr. Trozzi’s article“Ending Type 2 Diabetes | Dr. Paul Marik and Iron Will”shares Dr. Marik’s personal journey of overcoming type 2 diabetes through lifestyle and dietary changes. While lifestyle modifications are crucial in managing chronic diseases, the article’s emphasis on personal anecdotes rather than peer-reviewed research may indicate bias. Additionally, the distrust of pharmaceutical companies suggests a bias against established medical interventions, and the promotion of alternative news sources may indicate a bias against established medical and media institutions. Finally, the article promotes IronWillReport.com, a website that claims to present truths that mainstream media ignores, further supporting the narrative of being skeptical of traditional sources of information. In general, Dr. Trozzi promotes pseudoscience and has published false information regarding Covid-19 vaccines, as evidenced by a failed fact check.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "80 Canadian doctors VAXXED and dead. –False" ], "last_updated": "October 24, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/radaronline-bias/", "name": "RadarOnline", "source_url": "https://radaronline.com/", "bias_rating": "LEAST BIASED", "bias_score": -0.1, "factual_reporting": "LOW", "factual_score": 7.0, "credibility_rating": "LOW CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Website", "traffic_popularity": "High Traffic", "bias_category_description": null, "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate RadarOnline as least biased based on covering both sides with sensational stories. We also rate them Questionable based on the promotion of unproven claims and numerous failed fact checks. Detailed Report Questionable Reasoning: Poor Sourcing, Sensationalism, Numerous Failed Fact Checks Bias Rating: LEAST BIASED (-0.1) Factual Reporting: LOW (7.", "history": "Launched in 2008,RadarOnlineis a website focusing on breaking news, celebrity stories, true crime, politics, and more.Maer Roshanis the founder and editor of the RadarOnline. Radar is managed by Empire Media Group Holdings LLC, which has its headquarters in New York City. Read our profile on the United States government and media.", "ownership": "Dylan Howardis the owner of Radar, as he holds the positions of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer forRadar Media Group LLC., which is the entity that manages the website.The site is monetized through advertisements.", "analysis": "RadarOnline specializes in sensational and exclusive stories, often featuring eye-catching headlines and strong language. For example, an article aboutLamar Odom and Shannon Beadoruses exclusive language like “insider” and portrays the individuals in a non-neutral manner. Here is a quote from the article: “An insider tells us Odom has yet to hear back from Beador but has not given up.” The article citesVanity Wellness Center and factually mixedTMZas external sources. Similarly, an article about Lauren Boebert,“Political Group Accuses Lauren Boebert of ‘Illegal Acts,’ Calling On U.S. Attorney in Colorado to Investigate Embattled GOP Rep,”employs strong language like “embattled” and “illegal acts” to create a sense of urgencyand “accusing the two-term congresswoman of ‘allegedly using drugs'” indicate a framing that is critical of Boebert. The article employs sensational elements to capture the reader’s attention. Terms like “embattled,” “MAGA-loving,” and “illegal acts” are used to create a sense of scandal. The article cites a letter from David B. Wheeler, the head of the political action group American Muckrakers. It includes quotes from Lauren Boebert and her estranged husband, Jayson Boebert, and justice.gov.Despite citing some sources like justice.gov, the sensational tone undermines journalistic standards. The outlet’s coverage spans Democratic (‘It Doesn’t Matter’: Stuttering President Joe Biden Struggles to Pronounce Acronym for Pacific Islands Infrastructure Initiative)and Republican (See Boebert above) figures,emphasizing their flaws or controversies rather than their policy positions or achievements.Given its sensational tone and focus on questionable exclusive claims, RadarOnline fits the characteristics of tabloid journalism. With numerous failed fact checks, they are also rated low for factual reporting.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "Michael Jackson’s cremated body made into necklaces for his children.–False", "Heavy metal singer Ozzy Osbourne was on his “death bed” at the start of 2020.–False", "Michael Jackson’s body could be removed from his coffin to be examined for DNA evidence.–False", "Was a woman found dead in the Arkansas River linked to the “suspicious death” of former Clinton advisor Mark Middleton.–False", "See All failed fact checks." ], "last_updated": "November 27, 2024" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/western-journalism/", "name": "Western Journal", "source_url": "https://www.westernjournal.com/", "bias_rating": "FAR RIGHT", "bias_score": 8.0, "factual_reporting": "MIXED", "factual_score": 6.3, "credibility_rating": "LOW CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Website", "traffic_popularity": "High Traffic", "bias_category_description": null, "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate Western Journal Right Biased and Questionable based on story selection and editorial opinions that strongly favor the right and numerous failed fact checks. Detailed Report Questionable Reasoning: Far Right, Failed Fact Checks, Propaganda, Conspiracy Bias Rating: FAR RIGHT (8.0) Factual Reporting: MIXED (6.3) Country: USA MBFC’s Country Freedom Rank: MOSTLY FREE Media Type: Website Traffic/Popularity: High Traffic MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY History The Western Journal, previously known as Western Journalism, is an American conservative news and political website based in Phoenix, Arizona.", "history": "The Western Journal, previously known as Western Journalism, is an American conservative news and political website based in Phoenix, Arizona. The site was founded by political consultant Floyd Brown in 2008. According to theirabout page, “The Western Journal is a news company that drives positive cultural change by equipping readers with truth. Every day, WesternJournal.com publishes conservative, libertarian, free-market, and pro-family writers and broadcasters.” Read our profile on the United States government and media.", "ownership": "Liftable Media, Inc. acquired Western Journal in 2014, which also owns the political opinion websiteConservative Tribune. Funding appears to be derived primarily from online advertising.", "analysis": "The Western Journal is a news and opinion website with a story selection that always favors the right and is negative toward the left. There is the frequent use of moderately loaded language in headlines such as this:The Clinton State Department’s Major Security Breach That Everyone Is Ignoring.The Western Journal typically sources its information from credible media outlets, though story selection and wording usually spin information favorably to the right. They have also failed several fact-checks. Finally, during the 2020 Presidential election and years after, they promoted misinformation about a stolen election. They also consistently promote misinformation regarding Covid-19 and vaccines. See numerous failed fact checks below as evidence.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "Did the Boy Scouts Lose 425,000 Members Because of a Gender-Inclusive Name Change?–Unproven", "“Media Hysteria: Climate Change’ Heat Records’ Are a Huge Data Manipulation”–False", "“Pelosi Sinks to New Low, Tells Dems: If You Have to Lie to Voters to Win, Do It,”–False", "Is California considering legislation that would ban the Bible?– False", "A Misleading Take on Immigrant, Veterans Health Care–False", "With Only 9 Days To Go Before Election, Biden Calls Another Lid While Trump Is Securing Peace in the Middle East–False", "Did six people in Pennsylvania die and then register and vote in the 2020 election?–No evidence", "45,000 people died from COVID-19 vaccines–No Evidence", "a “game-changing study” showed that “COVID vaccines [were] more dangerous than the virus itself”; “children aged 12 to 17 are more likely to be hospitalized for myocarditis than for COVID.”–Inaccurate", "Geotracking is the only evidence being used by the Justice Department to place January 6, 2020, defendants inside the U.S. Capitol.–False" ], "last_updated": "August 3, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/dc-journal-bias/", "name": "DC Journal", "source_url": "https://dcjournal.com/", "bias_rating": "RIGHT-CENTER", "bias_score": 3.4, "factual_reporting": "MOSTLY FACTUAL", "factual_score": 4.0, "credibility_rating": "MEDIUM CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": null, "media_type": "Website", "traffic_popularity": "Minimal Traffic", "bias_category_description": "These media sources are slightly to moderately conservative in bias. They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appealing to emotion or stereotypes) to favor conservative causes. These sources are generally trustworthy for information but may require further investigation.See all Right-Center sources.", "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate DC Journal Mostly Factual for reporting rather than High due to not always aligning with the consensus on human-influenced climate change and a lack of transparency with ownership. We also rate them Right-Center biased based on story selection and editorial perspectives that moderately favor the right. Detailed Report Bias Rating: RIGHT-CENTER (3.4) Factual Reporting: MOSTLY FACTUAL (4.", "history": "The DC Journal is a technology news and political opinion website. They are a part of the InsideSources Network.InsideSourcesstates: “Since launching in 2014, InsideSources has become a trusted source of news, reaching upwards of 25 million readers each month. Our news and opinion content syndicates to nearly 300 of the nation’s top newspapers.” InsideSources also publishes the DV Journal and NH Journal. Read our profile on the United States government and media.", "ownership": "The DC Journal is owned byInsideSources LLC, which may or not be headed by Michael Graham, as there is a lack of transparency. It is not clear how they generate revenue.", "analysis": "These media sources are slightly to moderately conservative in bias. They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appealing to emotion or stereotypes) to favor conservative causes. These sources are generally trustworthy for information but may require further investigation.See all Right-Center sources. The DC Journal utilizes strong loaded words in headlines and articles, such asEmails Reveal CDC Role in Silencing COVID Dissent on Facebook. However, they typically present both sides of political news, such asMinority-Owned Broadcast Deal Experiences Perplexing Delays at FCC. DC Journal usually uses credible sources to support their information, such asReason, bls.gov, andForbes. In opinion pieces regarding economics and climate change, DC Journal has a right-leaning bias and utilizes sources such as the corporately fundedNational Center, which does not always support the consensus of science regarding climate change. Some authors downplayclimate change, and its impacts, such as thisHypocrisy Abounds at Climate Summit. This story is written by Bjorn Lomborg, the author of the book “False Alarm — How Climate Change Panic Costs Us Trillions, Hurts the Poor, and Fails to Fix the Planet.” Lomborg believes that climate change isoccurringand humans are responsible but disputes that the effects and economic impacts will be negative. Finally, Lomborg has madefalse and unsupported claimsregarding climate change.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "None in the Last 5 years" ], "last_updated": "October 17, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/first-post/", "name": "First Post", "source_url": "https://www.firstpost.com/", "bias_rating": "RIGHT-CENTER", "bias_score": 2.0, "factual_reporting": "MOSTLY FACTUAL", "factual_score": 3.1, "credibility_rating": "HIGH CREDIBILITY", "country": "India", "country_freedom_rating": "MODERATE FREEDOM", "media_type": "Website", "traffic_popularity": "High Traffic", "bias_category_description": "These media sources are slightly to moderately conservative in bias. They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes) to favor conservative causes. These sources are generally trustworthy for information, but may require further investigation.See all Right-Center sources.", "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate First Post Right-Center biased based on editorial positions that slightly favor the right. We also rate them Mostly Factual rather than High due to two failed fact checks. Detailed Report Bias Rating: RIGHT-CENTER (2.0) Factual Reporting: MOSTLY FACTUAL (3.", "history": "First Post is a news and opinion website based in India. First Post’saboutpage states Jaideep V. Giridhar is Executive Editor, and the site is part of Network 18. First Post publishes stories about politics, sports, business, technology, and entertainment. Read our profile on India’s media and government.", "ownership": "The website is a part of theNetwork 18media conglomerate owned byReliance Industries, which also runs CNN-News18 and CNBC-TV18. Revenue is derived through advertising.", "analysis": "These media sources are slightly to moderately conservative in bias. They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes) to favor conservative causes. These sources are generally trustworthy for information, but may require further investigation.See all Right-Center sources. In review, First Post was originally considered left-leaning due to merging with the Indian edition ofForbes. However, in 2022 they routinely favor conservative Prime Minister Modi and his BJP party with articles such as this1,200 years of servitude: PM Modi offers food for thought. While covering USA political news, they provide links to their sources, which are credible mainstream media such asBloomberg,NY Times,WaPo, andBBC; however, they also utilize strong loaded words in their headlines and articles such as: “Donald Trump: An incredibly indecent man, a poor orator and a failing president.” In general, First Post offers left and right-leaning opinions; however, they rarely criticize and often praise conservative PM Modi and his ruling government.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "“#WATCH – Dramatic visuals of the eye of #CycloneNisarga.”–Misleading", "A ‘time capsule’ under Ayodhya Ram Mandir’s foundation–False" ], "last_updated": "December 20, 2024" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/kentucky-today-bias-and-credibility/", "name": "Kentucky Today", "source_url": "https://www.kentuckytoday.com/", "bias_rating": "RIGHT", "bias_score": 5.1, "factual_reporting": "MOSTLY FACTUAL", "factual_score": 3.8, "credibility_rating": "MEDIUM CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Organization/Foundation", "traffic_popularity": "Minimal Traffic", "bias_category_description": "These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward conservative causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports, and omit information that may damage conservative causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy.See all Right Bias sources.", "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate Kentucky Today as Right Biased based on its ownership by the Kentucky Baptist Convention, its explicitly stated Christian conservative mission, and consistent editorial framing on social and political issues. We also rate it as Mostly Factual due to its use of official data and straightforward sourcing in news reporting, though opinion content and story selection reflect a one-sided perspective. Detailed Report Bias Rating: RIGHT (5.1) Factual Reporting: MOSTLY FACTUAL (3.", "history": "Kentucky Today is an online news publication covering state, national, and world news, with additional emphasis on religion, culture, and sports. According to itsAbout Kentucky Todaypage, the outlet was created to provide news and commentary from a Christian perspective, particularly serving members of the Kentucky Baptist Convention. The publication also republishes content from Baptist Press and offers a daily email newsletter. Read our profile on the United States media and government.", "ownership": "Kentucky Today is owned and operated by the Kentucky Baptist Convention, the state’s largest religious organization. The outlet is funded through member donations and institutional support from the Convention rather than through a traditional for-profit media model. Its stated mission includes delivering news without what it describes as the “liberal filter” of secular media, while maintaining fairness in straight news reporting.", "analysis": "These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward conservative causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports, and omit information that may damage conservative causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy.See all Right Bias sources. Kentucky Today functions as a hybrid outlet, combining straight news reporting with explicitly ideological commentary rooted in conservative Christian values. Standard news articles, such asKentucky Center for Statistics breaks down September unemployment data, rely heavily on official government data and named agencies, with neutral language and minimal editorializing. These reports resemble wire-style coverage. In contrast, the Perspectives section features strongly ideological opinion content. For example, the columnOP-ED: Freedoms of speech and association for pro-lifers before SCOTUSadvances a clear pro-life legal and political argument, framed through conservative constitutional interpretation and religious liberty concerns. While such articles may cite court proceedings and mainstream reporting, they are advocacy-driven by design. Coverage of political issues also reflects a conservative framing through source selection and emphasis. InBeshear vetoes DEI measure that he says is ‘about hate’, the article includes direct quotes from Democratic officials but gives prominent space to conservative policy organizations criticizing diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives. The story selection and framing align with the outlet’s stated mission to address pro-life, pro-family, and anti-DEI themes, resulting in a consistent Right bias.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "None in the Last 5 years" ], "last_updated": "December 23, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-guardian/", "name": "The Guardian", "source_url": "https://www.theguardian.com", "bias_rating": "LEFT-CENTER", "bias_score": -3.6, "factual_reporting": "HIGH", "factual_score": 1.8, "credibility_rating": "HIGH CREDIBILITY", "country": "United Kingdom", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Newspaper", "traffic_popularity": "High Traffic", "bias_category_description": "These media sources have a slight to moderate liberal bias.  They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appeals to emotion or stereotypes) to favor liberal causes.  These sources are generally trustworthy for information but may require further investigation.See all Left-Center sources.", "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate The Guardian as Left-Center biased based on its story selection, which moderately favors the left. We also now rate them High for factual reporting due to minimal failed fact checks in the last five years. Detailed Report Bias Rating: LEFT-CENTER (-3.6) Factual Reporting: HIGH (1.", "history": "Launched in 1821,The Guardianis a British daily newspaper published in London, UK. Its original name is The Manchester Guardian, and cotton merchant John Edward Taylor founded it. Taylor’s nephew Charles Prestwich Scott (CP Scott) was the first editor and later became the paper owner (1846 –1932). He was also a Liberal Member of Parliament. After CP Scott, his son John Russell Scott became the Manchester Guardian’s manager and founder of the Scott Trust. The Manchester Guardian was renamed the Guardian in 1959. In 1993 the Guardian Media Group acquired the Observer. The Guardian U.S. was launched in 2011 in New York. They also have an Australia Edition (Launched in 2013, digital edition) and an International edition. The paper focuses on politics, policy, business, and international relations. Their coverage includes News and Opinion, Sports, Culture, Lifestyle, Podcasts, and more. You can view the Guardian U.S. editorial teamhere. Read our country and media profile.", "ownership": "The Guardian and its companion publication, the Sunday newspaperThe Observer, are owned byGuardian Media Group plc (GMG).Scott Trust Limitedwas created in 1936 to ensure the editorial independence of the publications and owns Guardian Media Group plc (GMG). The Guardian states that “The Scott Trust is the sole shareholder in Guardian Media Group, and its profits are reinvested in journalism and do not benefit a proprietor or shareholders.” Donations and advertising fund the Guardian. The Guardian switched to atabloidprint format in 2018 to cut costs. According to The New York Times, The Guardian “refused to set up a paywall — the preferred strategy of many of its rivals, from The Times of London to The Wall Street Journal and The New York Times — opting instead to ask its readers for donations, even setting up a nonprofit arm to help fund its journalism.”", "analysis": "These media sources have a slight to moderate liberal bias.  They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appeals to emotion or stereotypes) to favor liberal causes.  These sources are generally trustworthy for information but may require further investigation.See all Left-Center sources. The Guardian has always been a left-leaning publication throughout its history, as they have stated in variousarticles. In review, story selection favors the left but is generally factual. They utilize emotionally loaded headlines such as“The cashless society is a con – and big finance is behind it”and“Trump back-pedals on Russian meddling remarks after an outcry.”The Guardian typically utilizes credible sources such asthoughtco.com,gov.uk.,and factually mixed sources such asHuffPostandindependent.co.uk. APew Research Surveyfound that 72% of The Guardian’s audience is consistently or primarily liberal, 20% Mixed, and 9% consistently or mostly conservative. This indicates that a more liberal audience strongly prefers the Guardian. Further, aReutersInstitute survey found that 52% of respondentstrust their news coverageand 19% do not, ranking them #7 in trust of the major UK news providers. The Guardian has a left-leaning editorial bias and sometimes relies on sources that have failed fact-checks. Furthermore, while The Guardian had failed numerous fact checks before 2020, it has significantly improved, with only one failed fact check and one retraction, upgrading its rating to High factual and High credibility.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "Nine percent of parents surveyed say their children have started self-harming in response to the cost of living crisis.–False", "The Guardian has retracted quotes from a source said to have known Tyler Robinson that claimed the alleged Charlie Kirk shooter was “really leftist.”–Retraction" ], "last_updated": "September 26, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-new-inquiry-bias/", "name": "The New Inquiry", "source_url": "https://thenewinquiry.com/", "bias_rating": "FAR-LEFT", "bias_score": -7.5, "factual_reporting": "MOSTLY FACTUAL", "factual_score": 3.9, "credibility_rating": "MEDIUM CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Magazine", "traffic_popularity": "Medium Traffic", "bias_category_description": "These media sources are moderate to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports, and omit information reporting that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy.See all Left Bias sources.", "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate The New Inquiry as left-biased based on editorial positions that routinely favor a progressive perspective. We also rate them as Mostly Factual rather than High due to one-sided reporting that may lack context. Detailed Report Bias Rating: FAR-LEFT (-7.5) Factual Reporting: MOSTLY FACTUAL (3.", "history": "The New Inquiry is an online magazine dedicated to cultural and literary criticism, founded in 2009 by Mary Borkowski, Jennifer Bernstein, and Rachel Rosenfelt. It operates as a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization and is based in New York City. According to itsabout page“We’re concerned with building a left that doesn’t reproduce what we critique, be that the Democratic party, anti-Blackness, transmisogyny, settler colonialism, or liberal optimism.” Read our profile on the United States media and government.", "ownership": "The New Inquiry is owned by The New Inquiry, Inc., a nonprofit organization. It generates revenue through subscription fees and a shop that sells merchandise.", "analysis": "These media sources are moderate to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports, and omit information reporting that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy.See all Left Bias sources. The New Inquiry publishes articles on a wide range of social issues, politics, and culture, often from an intellectual and critical perspective. Articles and headlines rely on emotional wording that favors a progressive perspective, such as thisFREE PALESTINE. STOP COP CITY.This well-written piece discusses the Stop Cop City movement’s efforts to prevent the development of a police mega-training center, known as Cop City, in part of the Welaunee Forest in South Dekalb County, Georgia. Despite facing resistance from the Atlanta Police Department and the federal government, the movement continues its fight against the project, expressing solidarity with the Palestinian struggle and aiming to challenge systems of oppression. Both of these perspectives favor the left. Editorially, stories routinely favor the left and denigrate the right like thisA Conspiracy Between the Far-Right and the #J20 Prosecutions. Other stories favorworkers’ rights,social justice,LGBTQ+ rights, and concern forclimate change. Finally, the New Inquiry strongly supports Palestine with writings from thePalestinian Youth Movement. In general, The New Inquiry promotes strongly left-biased opinions and is reasonably fact-based; however, bias by omission is common as they focus on one side of issues.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "None in the Last 5 years" ], "last_updated": "June 6, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/korean-central-news-agency/", "name": "Korean Central News Agency", "source_url": "http://www.kcna.kp/", "bias_rating": "EXTREME LEFT", "bias_score": -9.7, "factual_reporting": "VERY LOW", "factual_score": 9.8, "credibility_rating": "LOW CREDIBILITY", "country": "North Korea", "country_freedom_rating": "TOTAL OPPRESSION", "media_type": "News Agency", "traffic_popularity": "Medium Traffic", "bias_category_description": null, "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate the Korean Central News Agency Questionable due to consistently being one-sided, providing exaggerated coverage lacking in facts, and extreme promotion of government propaganda. Detailed Report Reasoning: Propaganda, Conspiracy, Nationalism, Censorship Bias Rating: EXTREME LEFT (-9.7) Factual Reporting: VERY LOW (9.8) Country: North Korea MBFC’s Country Freedom Rating: TOTAL OPPRESSION Media Type: News Agency Traffic/Popularity: Medium Traffic MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY History Launched in 1946, The Korean Central News Agency (KCNA) is the state-run news agency of North Korea.", "history": "Launched in 1946,The Korean Central News Agency (KCNA)is the state-runnews agencyof North Korea. KCNA works under the Korean Central Broadcasting Committee.The Korean Central News Agency (KCNA)provides the only source of information for all media outlets in North Korea. Kim Jong-un has been the Chairman of the Workers’ Party of Korea since 2012. The Korean Central News Agency (KCNA) is headquartered inPyongyang, North Korea. TheAssociated Presshas a permanent bureau in Pyongyang since 2012 andAgence France-Presssince 2016. The website is blocked in the United States. Read our profile on North Korean Media and Government.", "ownership": "The Korean Central News Agency (KCNA) is owned byThe State Affairs Commission of the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (SAC),which replaced the military-oriented National Defense Commission (NDC).Kim Jong-unis the current chairman of the SAC.", "analysis": "Reporters Without Borders ranksNorth Korea177 out of 180 in the 2024 World Press Freedom Index (last place), and according to aMic article:“The KCNA has reported that North Korea’s former leader, Kim Jong Il, was beloved worldwide and that North Korea is the envy of the world.” Further, they report that“North Koreans are also told that Kim is a style icon and that he invented the hamburger” and “The KNCA reported that North Korea won the 2010 FIFA World Cup. Spain won that year.” In review, most ofThe Korean Central News Agency (KCNA)content is dedicated to the activities ofKim Jong-un,such as“Kim Jong Un Praised in Nepal”and typically, they use emotionally loaded language and publish poorly sourced articles such as this one:“U.S. Aegis Destroyer Deployed around Korean Peninsula.”In this article, they source their claim with a vague statement without a link or a source’s name: “Foreign press says that the U.S. deployment of the destroyer is aimed to intensify military pressure upon the DPRK.” The Korean Central News Agency (KCNA) employs negative language toward the nations that are seen as critical of North Korea, such as inthis quote:“The article, authored by the notorious reptile journalist, is run through with lies told by the scum of society, and it was carried by the Tokyo head office of the newspaper.”", "failed_fact_checks": [ "The media of North Korea only reports favorably on the state. Period." ], "last_updated": "March 28, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/healthy-holistic-living/", "name": "Healthy Holistic Living", "source_url": "https://www.healthy-holistic-living.com", "bias_rating": "PSEUDOSCIENCE", "bias_score": -3.0, "factual_reporting": "LOW", "factual_score": 9.0, "credibility_rating": "LOW CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Website", "traffic_popularity": "Minimal Traffic", "bias_category_description": null, "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate Healthy Holistic Living a Quackery Level Pseudoscience website based on promoting anti-vaccine and GMO propaganda and failed fact checks. Detailed Report Bias Rating: PSEUDOSCIENCE (-3.0) Factual Reporting: LOW (9.0) Country: USA MBFC’s Country Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE Media Type: Website Traffic/Popularity: Minimal Traffic MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY History Founded in 2006 , Healthy Holistic Living is a pseudoscience website with an about page that reads, “Healthy Holistic Living is one of the world’s largest online communities that supports people with a passion for holistic living and serves as a resource for those who desire to create a shift in their lives.", "history": "Founded in 2006, Healthy Holistic Living is a pseudoscience website with anabout pagethat reads, “Healthy Holistic Living is one of the world’s largest online communities that supports people with a passion for holistic living and serves as a resource for those who desire to create a shift in their lives.” The founder is Michelle Toole, an entrepreneur, mother, adventurer, author, and independent health researcher. Read our profile on the United States government and media.", "ownership": "Michelle Milea owns the website as of 2015, which is a part of theMLT Enterprises GroupInc. Advertising generates revenue.", "analysis": "In review, Healthy Holistic Living is a typical pseudoscience website promotinganti-vaccinationandanti-GMO propaganda. Healthy Holistic Living also promotes miracle cures: Study:Manuka honey kills more bacteria than all available antibiotics. There isn’t anyevidenceto support this claim. This site also promotesChemtrail conspiracy theories.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "“The noodles that are linked to chronic inflammation, weight gain, Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s.”–False", "Boiling the same water twice will make your water dangerous to drink.–Mostly False", "Manuka honey, as a topical treatment, is better than all known antibiotics.–Mostly False", "“The flu is not a season! It is an inability to adapt due to decreased sun exposure and water intake, combined with increased sugar intake and stress.”–Incorrect" ], "last_updated": "February 11, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/medium/", "name": "Medium", "source_url": "https://medium.com/", "bias_rating": "LEFT-CENTER", "bias_score": -3.1, "factual_reporting": "MIXED", "factual_score": 5.0, "credibility_rating": "MEDIUM CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Website", "traffic_popularity": "High Traffic", "bias_category_description": "These media sources have a slight to moderate liberal bias.  They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appeals to emotion or stereotypes) to favor liberal causes.  These sources are generally trustworthy for information but may require further investigation.See all Left-Center sources.", "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate Medium Left-Center biased based on story selection that moderately favors the left and Mixed for factual reporting due to a lack of sourcing and some articles that promote conspiracy theories and pseudoscience. Detailed Report Bias Rating: LEFT-CENTER (-3.1) Factual Reporting: MIXED (5.0) Country: USA MBFC’s Country Freedom Rank: MOSTLY FREE Media Type: Website Traffic/Popularity: High Traffic MBFC Credibility Rating: MEDIUM CREDIBILITY History Founded in 2012, Medium is an online publishing platform developed by Twitter co-founder Evan Williams.", "history": "Founded in 2012, Medium is an online publishing platform developed by Twitter co-founder Evan Williams. Medium considers its platform social journalism, having a hybrid collection of amateur and professional people and publications or exclusive blogs or publishers. Basically, they are a blog host. Read our profile on the United States government and media.", "ownership": "Medium is owned by the A Medium Corporation. Funding is derived from users’ subscriptions for a monthly or yearly fee of $5 or $50, respectively.", "analysis": "These media sources have a slight to moderate liberal bias.  They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appeals to emotion or stereotypes) to favor liberal causes.  These sources are generally trustworthy for information but may require further investigation.See all Left-Center sources. In review, Medium has a variety of writers from many different political perspectives.  Therefore, the only way to check for bias is by sampling a variety of recently published articles. We chose the politics category as our gauge for bias. We sampled 25 top stories in their political section and found that 19 out of 25 or 76% leaned left. That doesn’t mean it represents the site’s entirety but indicates that more stories come from a left-leaning perspective. We also searched for stories that promote conspiracy theories and pseudoscience. We found most were scientifically sound; however, there were some that presentedanti-vaccinationandGMO positionsas well as human-influencedclimate change denial, geoengineering viachemtrails, and false flag operations. Lastly, because Medium publishes a wide variety of sources, there are times that theyfail fact checks. Again, this is not Medium’s fault. They simply are the “medium” for various sources, some of which may not be factual. In general, Medium provides a mixed bag of stories that lean left, with some lacking evidence and sourcing. Overall, we rate Medium Left-Center biased based on story selection that moderately favors the left and Mixed for factual reporting due to a lack of sourcing and some articles that promote conspiracy theories and pseudoscience. (5/14/2016) Updated (D. Van Zandt 12/20/2024) Source:https://medium.com/ Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.Rate the Bias of Medium*LeftLeft-CenterLeast BiasedRight-CenterRightThis poll is for entertainment purposes and does not change our overall rating.EmailVote Last Updated on December 20, 2024 byMedia Bias Fact Check Do you appreciate our work? Please consider one of the following ways to sustain us.MBFC Ad-FreeorMBFC DonationLeft vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sourcesFound this insightful? Please consider sharing on your Social Media:Explore Similar Sources:Medical Medium – Bias and Credibility", "failed_fact_checks": [], "last_updated": "December 20, 2024" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/randolph-county-news-bias/", "name": "Randolph County News", "source_url": "https://randolphcountynews.com/", "bias_rating": "RIGHT-CENTER", "bias_score": 4.3, "factual_reporting": "MIXED", "factual_score": 6.1, "credibility_rating": "LOW CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Website", "traffic_popularity": "Minimal Traffic", "bias_category_description": null, "overall_summary": null, "history": "Randolph County News is a conservative news and opinion website published byMetric Media LLCthat is designed to look like a local news source. Metric Media publishes over 1000 websites with the same design and about page that reads “Metric Media was established to fill the void in community news after years of decline in local reporting by legacy media. Our approach is to provide objective, data-driven information without political bias. We provide 100% original reporting, including to share as much data as possible from government and other publicly available sources.” Metric Media LLC lacks transparency as they do not have an about page that describes their conservative agenda, nor discloses funding and ownership. Read our profile on United States government and media.", "ownership": "The Metric Media LLC website does not disclose ownership. The Metric Media Foundation owns each local website. The CEO of Metric Media is conservative political consultantBradley Cameron. Each website receives revenue through advertising and donations to the Metric Media Foundation. The Foundation then funds the websites’ production.", "analysis": "In review, Randolph County News is one of over 1000 conservative-leaning news websites published by the Metric Media LLC Network.Each of the websites in the network has the same design and generally relies onalgorithmicallyproduced content. Furthermore, the original content produced on the website holds a right-leaning editorial bias. Please see the full review of Metric Media websiteshere.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "SeeMetric Media" ], "last_updated": "May 9, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-sprawl-calgary-bias-and-credibility/", "name": "The Sprawl – Calgary", "source_url": "https://www.sprawlcalgary.com/", "bias_rating": "LEFT", "bias_score": -6.0, "factual_reporting": "HIGH", "factual_score": 1.8, "credibility_rating": "HIGH CREDIBILITY", "country": "Canada", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Organization/Foundation", "traffic_popularity": "Minimal Traffic", "bias_category_description": "These media sources are moderate to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation.  They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appealing to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports, and omit information that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy.See all Left Bias sources.", "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate The Sprawl as Left-Biased due to its consistent focus on progressive policy positions. We also rate its reporting as High for factual accuracy based on editorial transparency and good sourcing practices. Detailed Report Bias Rating: LEFT (-6.0) Factual Reporting: HIGH (1.", "history": "The Sprawl is a local journalism outlet based in Calgary, Alberta. It provides community-centered reporting on civic affairs, urban development, the environment, and social justice. The Sprawl is a member ofPress Forward, a collective of independent Canadian media outlets. Read our profile on the Canadian government and media.", "ownership": "The Sprawl is an independent, donor-funded media organization that relies on reader memberships rather than advertising or corporate backing. As a nonprofit model, it aligns closely with other Press Forward outlets focused on sustainability and public-interest reporting.", "analysis": "These media sources are moderate to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation.  They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appealing to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports, and omit information that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy.See all Left Bias sources. The Sprawl’s editorial focus and issue selection lean toward a progressive worldview. For example: Articles often frame issues through a lens of social equity, climate responsibility, and public accountability. While the reporting is fact-based and supported by interviews and data, the outlet’s story selection and framing emphasize progressive solutions and underrepresented voices. This places it clearly within the Left-Leaning bias category.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "None in the Last 5 years" ], "last_updated": "May 26, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/true-activist/", "name": "True Activist", "source_url": "http://www.trueactivist.com/", "bias_rating": "EXTREME LEFT", "bias_score": -9.0, "factual_reporting": "LOW", "factual_score": 8.1, "credibility_rating": "LOW CREDIBILITY", "country": "Germany", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Website", "traffic_popularity": "Minimal Traffic", "bias_category_description": null, "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate True Activist Questionable based on extreme left-wing bias, promotion of propaganda and conspiracies, poor sourcing of information, and a complete lack of transparency. Detailed Report Reasoning: Conspiracy, Propaganda, Pseudoscience , Poor Sourcing, Lack of Transparency Bias Rating: EXTREME LEFT (-9.0) Factual Reporting: LOW (8.1) Country: Germany MBFC’s Country Freedom Rank: MOSTLY FREE Media Type: Website Traffic/Popularity: Minimal Traffic MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY History Founded in 2011 , True Activist is a news and opinion website that republishes articles from other sources, often with a liberal perspective.", "history": "Founded in 2011, True Activist is a news and opinion website that republishes articles from other sources, often with a liberal perspective. The website offers the tagline “Exposing the truth one lie at a time,” but completely lacks transparency as they do not provide an about page or disclose ownership or author names. Read our profile on Germany’s media and government", "ownership": "True Activist does not disclose ownership; revenue is derived through advertising and sponsored content.", "analysis": "In review, True Activist mainly publishes positive stories from other sources or pseudoscience; however, they often don’t credit these sources, making it difficult to determine if the stories are factual. Headlines and wording are often sensationalized:UK Accidentally Admits Use Of Horrifying, Organ Rupturing Weapons In Syria. This story is sourced to the conspiracy/pseudoscience websiteThe Mind Unleashed. Politically, True Activist does not have a favorable view of President Trump, as evidenced by this article:Scientists Are Being Demoted By Trump Administration For Studying Climate Change. When it comes to science, True Activists support the consensus onclimate changebut do not when it comes toGMOs, as they often promoteanti-GMO propaganda. They also promoteanti-vaccine propagandaas well aschemtrails.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "The FDA said Frosted Flakes are healthier than avocados. –MOSTLY FALSE", "“Now All Americans Will Be Microchipped On the Will Of Police: Resolution (H.R.4919) Passed by Senate.”–False", "Say George Soros’s money “went straight into the (Women’s March) protesters’ pockets.”–False" ], "last_updated": "June 23, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/opednews-oen/", "name": "OpEdNews (OEN)", "source_url": "https://www.opednews.com/", "bias_rating": "LEFT", "bias_score": -7.9, "factual_reporting": "MIXED", "factual_score": 5.4, "credibility_rating": "MEDIUM CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Website", "traffic_popularity": "Minimal Traffic", "bias_category_description": "These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation.  They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports and omit reporting of information that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy.See all Left Bias sources.", "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate OpEdNews Left Biased based on editorial positions that favor the left. We also rate them Mixed for factual reporting due to the use of unsourced information and a failed fact check. Detailed Report Bias Rating: LEFT (7.9) Factual Reporting: MIXED (5.", "history": "Founded in 2003, OpEdNews is an open progressive forum for opinion and news. It is a hybrid news, community blog, and article aggregation site that publishes opinion-based articles, news stories, and diaries while its mission, according to the site, is to “… provide a content management, social networking website that supports progressive communications resources and tools for activism and advocacy organizations.” Rob Krall is the founder and editor. Read our profile on United States government and media.", "ownership": "OpEdNews is owned by Rob Krall with revenue derived through advertising and donations.", "analysis": "These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation.  They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports and omit reporting of information that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy.See all Left Bias sources. In review, because each individual author is wholly responsible for the content she or he submits, veracity varies with the individual writer, and it’s entirely up to readers to assess journalistic quality and bias. There is no firewall between biased opinions and well-sourced analytical reporting. Volunteer editors moderate the posts for bad taste and seek to discourage libelous and slanderous content. Posts the editors like get headlined on the front page. Frequent contributors may earn the trust of the publisher and bypass editor pre-screening to post directly. Spirited and thought-provoking discussions often follow articles as comments. In general, the news is factual and left-leaning; however, sometimes information is unsourced.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "Irish people were forced into slavery in British Colonies for hundreds of years.–False" ], "last_updated": "April 25, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/autulu-bias-and-credibility/", "name": "Autulu", "source_url": "https://autulu.com/", "bias_rating": "LEAST BIASED", "bias_score": 0.0, "factual_reporting": "VERY LOW", "factual_score": 9.9, "credibility_rating": "LOW CREDIBILITY", "country": "Unknown", "country_freedom_rating": null, "media_type": "Website", "traffic_popularity": "Minimal Traffic", "bias_category_description": null, "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate Autulu.com as Very Low for factual reporting due to its publication of fabricated, clickbait stories involving public figures, lack of transparency, and documented false claims. While the content is not overtly political, it is misleading and clearly designed for virality and ad revenue without journalistic standards. Readers should avoid Autulu entirely as a source of reliable or accurate information.", "history": "Autulu.com is a clickbait website that lacks an About page, editorial disclosure, or contact information. The site presents as a viral entertainment or sports platform but provides no transparency regarding who operates it, where it’s based, or what standards (if any) guide its content. It appears designed purely to drive clicks and ad revenue, using misleading headlines and sensationalized stories.", "ownership": "There is no information about ownership or funding on the site. It relies on ad-heavy layouts and questionable pop-up behavior, suggesting it may be monetized through low-tier ad networks. No evidence of independent or institutional funding exists, and there are no visible donation or subscription models.", "analysis": "Autulu’s content is non-political but often entirely fabricated, featuring fake celebrity encounters and emotional stories involving famous athletes. For example: The story titled“Patrick Mahomes Shocks the World by Rejecting Elon Musk’s $10 Million Offer”was debunked by Lead Stories, which found no evidence the event occurred and confirmed it was completely false. (Lead Stories fact check) Another article,“They Mock the Black Waitress Until Patrick Mahomes Shows Up”, presents a fictionalized feel-good revenge scenario featuring Mahomes, but it offers no sources, no quotes, and no factual basis. Similarly, the piece“Receptionist Humiliates Sidney Crosby Not Knowing His Father Owns the Hotel”appears entirely invented and contains no factual or verifiable elements. The stories follow a formula common in AI-generated or low-effort viral content farms: an underdog is mistreated, a celebrity intervenes, and a moral lesson is forced into the ending. These stories appeal to emotion and manufacture false narratives around real public figures.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "The story titled“Patrick Mahomes Shocks the World by Rejecting Elon Musk’s $10 Million Offer”was debunked by Lead Stories, which found no evidence the event occurred and confirmed it was completely false. (Lead Stories fact check)", "Another article,“They Mock the Black Waitress Until Patrick Mahomes Shows Up”, presents a fictionalized feel-good revenge scenario featuring Mahomes, but it offers no sources, no quotes, and no factual basis.", "Similarly, the piece“Receptionist Humiliates Sidney Crosby Not Knowing His Father Owns the Hotel”appears entirely invented and contains no factual or verifiable elements." ], "last_updated": "April 4, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/altcensored-bias-and-credibility/", "name": "altCensored", "source_url": "https://altcensored.com/", "bias_rating": "RIGHT CONSPIRACY-PSEUDOSCIENCE", "bias_score": 9.0, "factual_reporting": "LOW", "factual_score": 8.5, "credibility_rating": "LOW CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Website", "traffic_popularity": "Medium Traffic", "bias_category_description": null, "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate altCensored.com as a right-biased conspiracy and pseudoscience site based on the publication of videos that contain false, misleading, or unsubstantiated information. Detailed Report Bias Rating: RIGHT CONSPIRACY-PSEUDOSCIENCE (-9.0) Factual Reporting: LOW (8.", "history": "altCensored.comis a non-profit, open-source communityarchivethat began in February 2019. The platform focuses on archiving censored YouTube videos, including those placed in “Limited State,” entirely removed by YouTube or self-censored by the YouTube channel owner. The website highlights online censorship’s rise and free speech’s decline. In October 2020, altCensored.com assisted the legal team at “PunchGoogle.com” in their lawsuit against YouTube. They also maintain aGitLab repositoryfor their project. The domain isregisteredin the United States. Read our profile on the United States media and government.", "ownership": "altCensored.com does not disclose its ownership details. Donations generate revenue.", "analysis": "altCensored.com primarily focuses on archiving censored content, serving as a repository for videos removed or limited on YouTube. Due to the nature of the content it archives, the site may host videos with various biases and factual inaccuracies. Since the site does not produce original content, assessing its bias or factual reporting is challenging. However, upon reviewing several video headlines, it appears that many lean toward a conservative perspective, and there is evidence of the publication of conspiracy theories and pseudoscience. Here are the headlines fromAlternative Media Television (AMTV), a source known to be right-biased and a strong conspiracy website: Another example from a YouTube channel, ” The Truth They Don’t Want You To Know”: These headlines can serve as evidence for the types of content that altCensored.com archives, which often lean towards a conservative perspective and contain conspiracy theories and pseudoscience.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "The videos they host come from sources who routinely fail fact checks, such asTurning Point USAandNurse John Campbell." ], "last_updated": "September 17, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/pakistan-today-bias-and-credibility/", "name": "Pakistan Today", "source_url": "https://www.pakistantoday.com.pk/", "bias_rating": "RIGHT-CENTER", "bias_score": 3.6, "factual_reporting": "MIXED", "factual_score": 4.6, "credibility_rating": "MEDIUM CREDIBILITY", "country": "Pakistan", "country_freedom_rating": "LIMITED FREEDOM", "media_type": "Newspaper", "traffic_popularity": "Medium Traffic", "bias_category_description": "These media sources are slightly to moderately conservative in bias. They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appeals to emotion or stereotypes) to favor conservative causes. These sources are generally trustworthy for information but may require further investigation.See all Right-Center sources.", "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate Pakistan Today as Right-Center Biased due to favorable coverage of ruling political figures and supportive framing of right-leaning international leaders. We rate its reporting as Mixed for factual accuracy due to poor sourcing practices and one-sided coverage of key political topics. Detailed Report Bias Rating: RIGHT-CENTER (3.6) Factual Reporting: MIXED (4.", "history": "Pakistan Todayis an English-language newspaper based in Lahore, Pakistan. It was launched in 2010 by journalistArif Nizami,former editor ofThe Nation.The newspaper is published by Nawa Media Corporation (Pvt) and maintains affiliated publications, including the business magazineProfit. The outlet aims to coverpolitical, economic, and social issues within Pakistan and abroad. Please readour report on how Government influences the Pakistani media.", "ownership": "Pakistan Today is owned and operated by Nawa Media Corporation (Pvt) Limited. According to theprivacy policy,all associated websites are owned by the same company. The paper generates revenue through advertising andsubscriptions.", "analysis": "These media sources are slightly to moderately conservative in bias. They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appeals to emotion or stereotypes) to favor conservative causes. These sources are generally trustworthy for information but may require further investigation.See all Right-Center sources. Pakistan Today shows a center-right bias, reflected in its positive coverage of ruling political figures and selective international commentary. Pakistan Today often avoids critical examination of domestic issues related to the ruling party in Pakistan, thePakistan Muslim League (N). For example, the article titled“LHC rejects pleas filed against PM Shehbaz, sons’ acquittal in graft case”presents the Lahore High Court’s decision as a “big relief” for Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif and his sons, emphasizing the dismissal of the petitions against them. The language used—such as calling the verdict a relief—suggests a somewhat favorable framing. Regarding sourcing,Pakistan Today’sarticle on the Lahore High Court’s decision lacks citations or references to official documents, legal experts, or opposing perspectives. The outlet’s opinion content sometimes aligns with right-leaning global figures. For instance, in the article“A recalibration of realism: Trump’s transactional turn in the Middle East,”the author framesDonald Trump’sMiddle East foreign policy as a strategic and realistic departure from liberal internationalism. The piece praises Trump’s “transactional” diplomacy as pragmatic and effective. The tone is analytical but favorable, portraying Trump’s approach as a necessary correction to traditional U.S. policy. Across both domestic and foreign coverage, Pakistan Today uses restrained, professional language and generally avoids sensationalism. However, the lack of critical reporting on ruling politicians and the absence sourcing or counterpoints in its commentary contribute to a narrow editorial perspective. Hyperlinking is sparse, and original investigative content is limited.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "None in the Last 5 years" ], "last_updated": "May 24, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/xenia-gazette-bias/", "name": "Xenia Gazette", "source_url": "https://www.xeniagazette.com/", "bias_rating": "RIGHT-CENTER", "bias_score": 3.3, "factual_reporting": "HIGH", "factual_score": 1.1, "credibility_rating": "HIGH CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Newspaper", "traffic_popularity": "Minimal Traffic", "bias_category_description": "These media sources are slightly to moderately conservative in bias. They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appeals to emotion or stereotypes) to favor conservative causes. These sources are generally trustworthy for information but may require further investigation.See all Right-Center sources.", "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate the Xenia Gazette right-center biased based on editorial positions that slightly favor the right. We also rate them High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing and a clean fact-checking record. Detailed Report Bias Rating: RIGHT-CENTER (3.3) Factual Reporting: HIGH (1.", "history": "The Xenia Gazette is a newspaper based in Xenia, Ohio, serving the surrounding area. The website for the paper is located at xeniagazette.com. Read our profile on the United States government and media.", "ownership": "AIM Mediaowns the Xenia Gazette and several small newspapers in Texas, Ohio, and Indiana. Advertising and subscription fees generate revenue.", "analysis": "These media sources are slightly to moderately conservative in bias. They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appeals to emotion or stereotypes) to favor conservative causes. These sources are generally trustworthy for information but may require further investigation.See all Right-Center sources. The Xenia Gazette publishes local news through the use of local journalists. Local news uses minimally loaded wording like thisXenia schools set to bring custodial work back in-house. The website does not cover national news. Editorially, the Xenia Gazette leans right in its views as more op-eds slightly favor the right. In general, the news is reported factually and with a right-leaning editorial bias.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "None in the Last 5 years" ], "last_updated": "September 12, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/eurasia-daily-bias-and-credibility/", "name": "EurAsia Daily", "source_url": "https://eadaily.com/", "bias_rating": "RIGHT-CENTER", "bias_score": 4.6, "factual_reporting": "LOW", "factual_score": 8.0, "credibility_rating": "LOW CREDIBILITY", "country": "Russia", "country_freedom_rating": "TOTAL OPPRESSION", "media_type": "Website", "traffic_popularity": "High Traffic", "bias_category_description": null, "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate EADaily Right-Center Biased and Questionable based on the promotion of state propaganda, numerous false claims, the use of poor sources, and failed fact checks. Detailed Report Reasoning: Russian Propaganda, Poor Sourcing, False Claims, Failed Fact Checks Bias Rating: RIGHT-CENTER (4.6) Factual Reporting: LOW (8.0) Country: Russia MBFC’s Country Freedom Rank: TOTAL OPPRESSION Media Type: Website Traffic/Popularity: High Traffic MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY History EADaily (Eurasia Daily) is a Russian-language news website that focuses on politics, economics, and international relations, particularly in the post-Soviet space.", "history": "EADaily (Eurasia Daily) is a Russian-language news website that focuses on politics, economics, and international relations, particularly in the post-Soviet space. The website wasfounded in 2015and positions itself as a provider of analytical journalism with a strong focus onEurasian geopolitical issues. The site frequently covers topics related to Russian foreign policy, energy markets, and military affairs, with a strong emphasis on Russian interests in regions such as Ukraine, the Caucasus, and Central Asia. EADaily’s reporting often aligns with the Kremlin’s geopolitical narratives, making it a key player in Russian state-influenced media. Read our profile on Russian media and government.", "ownership": "EADaily does not publicly disclose its ownership or funding sources on its website. However, media analysts have noted that its content frequently reflectspro-Russian government viewpoints, suggesting potential state influence or indirect funding . While not officially recognized as state media likeRTorSputnik, EADaily often publishes narratives that align with Russian government messaging, particularly regardingUkraine, NATO, and Western policies. According to Reporters Without Borders (RSF), a lack of transparency in Russian media is often a sign of state ties or influence, and EADaily falls into this category due to its opaque funding sources.", "analysis": "EADaily exhibits a strong pro-Russian, nationalist, and right-leaning bias, particularly in its coverage of international affairs. Its reporting often portrays Russia as a stabilizing force in global politics while casting Western nations, especially theUnited States, NATO, and the European Union, as aggressive or destabilizing actors. Coverage of conflicts involving Russia, such as the war in Ukraine, tends to present Ukrainian forces negatively while amplifying Russian military successes. The European Union’s East StratCom Task Force has flagged EADaily as a pro-Kremlin outlet that spreads Russian government-aligned narratives, particularly in its reporting on Ukraine and NATO. Similarly, theDigital Forensic Research Lab (DFRLab) has documented how EADaily publishes anti-Western and anti-NATO content, reinforcing Russian geopolitical messaging. EADaily frequently criticizes Western sanctions, democratic movements in post-Soviet states, and NATO expansion, framing them as threats to Russian sovereignty. The website often describes pro-European governments in Georgia, Moldova, and Ukraine as being manipulated by the West, reinforcing Russian foreign policy talking points. Additionally, it promotes Eurasian economic integration while downplaying internal economic or political issues within Russia. The site also publishes opinion pieces and analysis that blend nationalism with conservative social values, often attacking liberal policies in Western countries. While it does provide some factual reporting, the selective nature of its coverage, lack of critical reporting on Russian government actions, frequent promotion of state-aligned narratives, and numerous failed fact checks contribute to its Low factual rating.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "This source has failed numerous fact-checks." ], "last_updated": "February 16, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/gopusa/", "name": "GOPUSA", "source_url": "https://www.gopusa.com/", "bias_rating": "RIGHT", "bias_score": 8.0, "factual_reporting": "MIXED", "factual_score": 6.1, "credibility_rating": "LOW CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Website", "traffic_popularity": "Minimal Traffic", "bias_category_description": null, "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate GOPUSA Right Biased and questionable based on the publication of conspiracies, propaganda, pseudoscience, poor sourcing, and false claims regarding the 2020 election and covid-19. Detailed Report Questionable Reasoning: Conspiracy Theories, Pseudoscience, Propaganda, Poor Sourcing, False Claims Bias Rating: RIGHT (8.0) Factual Reporting: MIXED (6.1) Country: USA MBFC’s Country Freedom Rank: MOSTLY FREE Media Type: Website Traffic/Popularity: Minimal Traffic MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY History GOPUSA is a conservative news and opinion website founded by Dr.", "history": "GOPUSA is a conservative news and opinion website founded by Dr. Robert Eberle, President, and CEO of GOPUSA. According to theirabout page, “GOPUSA is not affiliated with the Republican National Committee.  GOPUSA is a private company whose mission is to spread the conservative message throughout America. We strive to be the first source Republicans and conservatives turn to for news and information, both at the state and national levels.” Read our profile on the United States government and media.", "ownership": "Robert Eberle owns GOPUSA through Endeavor Media Group LLC. Revenue is derived through a monetized Youtube channel and membership fees.", "analysis": "The website links to Dr. Robert Eberle’s Youtube channel and publishes conservative news and commentary. Most news stories are from other sources such as theOrange Country Register,Associated Press, andFox News. Commentary articles are usually original and always favor the right such as thisCancel Culture And Wokeness Will Destroy Our Country. This opinion piece makes claims without providing hyperlinked supporting evidence. GOPUSA has also promoted false election fraud conspiracies such as thisAttorney Sidney Powell Drops Massive Bomb: “We’ve Identified 450,000 Ballots That Miraculously Only Have A Vote For Joe Biden”. There has been no evidence of election fraud, as claimed by Sidney Powell. Regarding climate change, they are skeptical and not deniers; however, with Covid-19 they havefalsely claimed Ivermectin is beneficialin the treatment and prevention of Covid-19. In general, their editorial positions align strongly with the conservative right and have promoted conspiracy theories related toSeth Rich.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "None in the last 5 years. See the above examples." ], "last_updated": "February 13, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/tabasco-post-bias/", "name": "Tabasco Post", "source_url": "https://tabascopost.com/", "bias_rating": "LEFT-CENTER", "bias_score": -4.5, "factual_reporting": "MIXED", "factual_score": 6.1, "credibility_rating": "LOW CREDIBILITY", "country": "Unknown", "country_freedom_rating": null, "media_type": "Website", "traffic_popularity": "Minimal Traffic", "bias_category_description": null, "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate the Tabasco Post as Left-Center biased and questionable based on being an imposter site that completely lacks transparency, uses poor sourcing techniques, and plagiarizes content. Detailed Report Questionable Reasoning: Imposter Site, Lack of Transparency, Poor Sourcing, Plagiarism Bias Rating: LEFT-CENTER (4.5) Factual Reporting: MIXED (6.1) Country: Unknown MBFC’s Country Freedom Rating: N/A Media Type: Website Traffic/Popularity: Minimal Traffic MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY History Tabasco Post is an online English-language news website focusing on topics related to Mexican politics, business, culture, sports, and local news related to Tabasco.", "history": "Tabasco Post is an online English-language news website focusing on topics related to Mexican politics, business, culture, sports, and local news related to Tabasco. It serves English-speaking ex-pats and international readers. It is a part of the Mexico Daily Postnetwork of websites. The website lacks transparency as it does not have an about page, name authors, or disclose ownership.", "ownership": "Tabasco Post does not publicly disclose its ownership, and the website provides no further information regarding this. However, it is a part of the Mexico Daily Post network of websites that are all identical to each other. The site generates revenue through advertising.", "analysis": "The Tabasco Post does not publish original content but rather republishes content from the Mexico Daily Post, the MDP Newsroom, or other sources. The Mexico Daily Post is an imposter website that lacks transparency, uses poor sourcing techniques, and plagiarizes content. See our full reviewhere. Further, the Mexico Daily Post/Tabasco Post also tends to republish articles that are critical of right-wing figures and movements, such as“Tucker Carlson’s extremist recommendation to the Republicans: The US should bomb Mexico”and “Donald Trump Jr. says it’s no big deal if his dad bombs Mexico,” indicating a left-leaning political bias. In general, this website is an imposter website that is designed to look like a credible news site.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "See Mexico Daily Post" ], "last_updated": "May 27, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/heimildin-bias-and-credibility/", "name": "Heimildin", "source_url": "https://heimildin.is/", "bias_rating": "LEFT", "bias_score": -5.8, "factual_reporting": "HIGH", "factual_score": 1.5, "credibility_rating": "HIGH CREDIBILITY", "country": "Iceland", "country_freedom_rating": "EXCELLENT", "media_type": "Website", "traffic_popularity": "Medium Traffic", "bias_category_description": "These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation.  They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports and omit reporting of information that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy.See all Left Bias sources.", "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate Heimildin as left-biased due to its advocacy for progressive social issues and emphasis on equality and inclusivity. We also rate them factually high, supported by their use of credible sources and a clean fact-check record. Detailed Report Bias Rating: LEFT (-5.8) Factual Reporting: HIGH (1.", "history": "Heimildinisan Icelandic news outlet founded in 2023 through the merger of Stundin and Kjarninn. Heimildin focuses on investigative journalism and in-depth reporting, covering topics such as government accountability, social justice, environmental issues, and Icelandic politics. Read our profile on Iceland’s media and government.", "ownership": "The outlet operates under adistributed ownership model,with nearly 40 shareholders, none holding more than an 8% stake. The company’s bylaws stipulate that no individual can exercise more than 10% of voting rights at the annual general meeting, regardless of their shareholding. Heimildin is funded throughsubscriptions,donations, and reader support.", "analysis": "These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation.  They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports and omit reporting of information that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy.See all Left Bias sources. Heimildin combines neutral reporting with cultural critique and advocacy for progressive social issues. The article “Snörp orðaskipti í réttarsal: ‘Þú hefur ekki orðið'”(Sharp exchange in the courtroom ) provides a factual recounting of dramatic courtroom exchanges during a legal proceeding. The piece captures the tension between the defense attorney and the presiding judge. Similarly, the article “Glamúrvæðing áfengis í íslensku raunveruleikasjónvarpi: ‘Freyðivínið Altaf við höndina'”(The sparkling wine always at hand) critiques the glamorization of alcohol consumption in Icelandic reality television, using research to provoke reflection on media influence and societal norms. This piece reflects Heimildin’s tendency to engage with cultural and societal issues from an opinion-driven perspective. Furthermore, “Ár bakslagsins” (The Year of the Setback) emphasizes the struggles encountered by the LGBTQ+ community in light of increasing anti-LGBTQ+ rhetoric. This article reinforces Heimildin’s progressive stance on human rights and advocacy for marginalized groups. The platform prioritizes inclusivity and social justice and avoids sensationalism while emphasizing equality and social awareness in its storytelling. Heimildin also demonstrates strong sourcing by including interviews and expert commentary. For example, “Síðasta tilraun Ingu Sæland” (Last attempt by Inga Sæland) includes direct interviews, and “Innantóm orð eða afneitun: Hvort er verra?” (Empty words or denial: Which is worse?) features analysis by the chairman of the Norwegian Land Protection Agency.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "None in the Last 5 years" ], "last_updated": "November 20, 2024" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/kommersant-bias-and-credibility/", "name": "Kommersant", "source_url": "https://www.kommersant.ru/", "bias_rating": "RIGHT-CENTER", "bias_score": 4.8, "factual_reporting": "MIXED", "factual_score": 5.9, "credibility_rating": "MEDIUM CREDIBILITY", "country": "Russia", "country_freedom_rating": "TOTAL OPPRESSION", "media_type": "Newspaper", "traffic_popularity": "High Traffic", "bias_category_description": "These media sources are slight to moderately conservative in bias. They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appeals to emotion or stereotypes) to favor conservative causes. These sources are generally trustworthy for information but may require further investigation.See all Right-Center sources.", "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate Kommersant as Right-Center Biased due to its alignment with pro-Kremlin narratives in political reporting while maintaining neutrality in its business and economic coverage. We rate its reporting as Mixed in factuality due to selective framing in politically sensitive articles, the promotion of propaganda, and several failed fact checks. Detailed Report Bias Rating: RIGHT-CENTER (4.8) Factual Reporting: MIXED (5.", "history": "Kommersantis a Russian daily newspaper and online publication founded in 1989 following the liberalization of the press in Russia. The outlet primarily covers politics, economics, business, and culture, positioning itself as a business-oriented publication. It is headquartered in Moscow. The current owner,Alisher Usmanov, is a prominent Russian businessman with ties to the government. Read our profile on the Russian media and government.", "ownership": "Alisher Usmanovowns Kommersant through his company,USM Holdings. Usmanov is a prominent figure in Russia, known for his wealth and influence, and is often associated with pro-Kremlin views. Advertising is a significant revenue source for Kommersant, with the website prominently featuring advertisements and sponsored content.", "analysis": "These media sources are slight to moderately conservative in bias. They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appeals to emotion or stereotypes) to favor conservative causes. These sources are generally trustworthy for information but may require further investigation.See all Right-Center sources. Kommersant’s political and economic coverage often focuses on Russia’s strategic interests and policies, with detailed analyses that align with the broader geopolitical narratives relevant to the Russian state. In the article“The US has allocated Ukraine a $20 billion loan using revenue from Russian assets”, Kommersant examines the G7’s initiative to support Ukraine, detailing the use of profits from frozen Russian assets to finance a $50 billion aid package. The article emphasizes the financial mechanisms and international coordination while focusing on the implications for Russia, including the scale of assets frozen and the revenue generated from these holdings. The publication cites aU.S. Treasury press releaseand incorporates details from prominent outlets likeThe New York Times. While these sources enhance the factual foundation of Kommersant’s reporting, its framing often emphasizes narratives aligned with Russia’s strategic perspective, which may affect the overall neutrality of the presentation. Similarly, in the article“Budget at the Start of Spending,”Kommersant analyzes the Russian federal budget’s planned expenditures for December and projects a significant increase in the budget deficit due to accelerated spending. The piece reflects the publication’s strength in economic reporting, focusing on government debt, military spending, and social payments. Kommersant provides in-depth, factual information supported by detailed data and expert commentary. Its editorial choices often align with state priorities, framing issues through Russia’s interests. While an important information source, the reporting reflects right-leaning, pro-state perspectives.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "In schools in a number of Western countries, children are convinced as part of their curriculum that Jesus Christ was bisexual.”–False", "In fact, only his compatriots could have dealt with him – both Russian Chechens and “Ichkeria” militants, hiding in Europe from criminal prosecution [in Russia].–Unproven", "“In Sevastopol, Ukrainian nationalists beat up a 70-year-old pensioner who pasted the letter Z on his car… the elderly man was hospitalized with numerous injuries and a dislocated leg, now he is being treated on an outpatient basis.”–False" ], "last_updated": "December 11, 2024" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-library-of-economics-and-liberty-econlib/", "name": "The Library of Economics and Liberty (Econlib)", "source_url": "https://www.econlib.org/", "bias_rating": "RIGHT", "bias_score": 5.8, "factual_reporting": "MOSTLY FACTUAL", "factual_score": 4.0, "credibility_rating": "MEDIUM CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Organization/Foundation", "traffic_popularity": "Minimal Traffic", "bias_category_description": "These media sources are moderate to strongly biased toward conservative causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports, and omit information reporting that may damage conservative causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy.See all Right Bias sources.", "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate The Library of Economics and Liberty (Econlib) Right Biased based on political positions and advocacy that favors the right. We also rate them Mostly Factual in reporting rather than High due to a lack of transparency with funding. Detailed Report Bias Rating: RIGHT (5.8) Factual Reporting: MOSTLY FACTUAL (4.", "history": "Founded in 2013,The Library of Economics and Liberty (Econlib)is a website for the American right-wing libertarian think tank, Liberty Fund.Econlib is based in Indianapolis, Indiana, and has severalcategoriessuch as “a blog for the discussion of economic ideas (EconLog), a collection of interviews and podcasts (EconTalk), resources for high school teachers of economics, and an Encyclopedia of Economics.” They also feature books, articles, an online encyclopedia, and more. Read our profile on the United States government and media.", "ownership": "The Library of Economics and Liberty (Econlib) website is owned and published by theLiberty Fund,which is a501(c)(3) non-profit organization funded through donations.Pierre Frist Goodrichfounded the Liberty Fund in 1960. Goodrich left most ofhis considerableestate to the Liberty Fund. The Econlib website and Liberty Fund lack transparency with funding.", "analysis": "These media sources are moderate to strongly biased toward conservative causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports, and omit information reporting that may damage conservative causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy.See all Right Bias sources. The organization has been criticized recently as it isdrifting awayfrom its founder’s vision as the board has been avocal advocatefor Former President Trump. The website publishes articles such as“The Beef with Greed: Leo Tolstoy and Adam Smith.”Econlib also provides articles that favor the right and often the policies of President Trump, such as this“The Threats to Democracy, Part I.”The Library of Economics and Liberty (Econlib) generally advocates for a free-market economy with minimal regulations. When reporting on climate change, the Library of Economics and Liberty (Econlib) publishes articles minimizing the effects of climate change“William Nordhaus versus the United Nations on Climate Change Economics.”In this article, the author states, “Nordhaus’s work shows that such an aggressive goal would make humanity much worse off than if we simply adapted to climate change withnogovernment measures.” The authorRobert P. Murphyis an economist for a Houston, Texas-based think-tank called the Institute for Energy Research (IER). According toDesMog, “The IER has received over $307,000 in funding from ExxonMobil and $237,000 From Koch Family Foundations. PRI has received over $600,000 from Koch Foundations and significant donations from Scaife Foundations.” Finally, in another article, they do not deny climate change but again disagree with government solutionsClimate Change: What is (Not) To Be Done. In general, Econlib promotes free-market capitalism and advocates for limited government.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "None in the Last 5 years" ], "last_updated": "June 6, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/aceshowbiz-asb/", "name": "AceShowbiz (ASB)", "source_url": "https://www.aceshowbiz.com/", "bias_rating": "LEFT-CENTER", "bias_score": -3.5, "factual_reporting": "MIXED", "factual_score": 4.6, "credibility_rating": "MEDIUM CREDIBILITY", "country": "Indonesia", "country_freedom_rating": "LIMITED FREEDOM", "media_type": "Website", "traffic_popularity": "Medium Traffic", "bias_category_description": "These media sources have a slight to moderate liberal bias.  They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appeals to emotion or stereotypes) to favor liberal causes.  These sources are generally trustworthy for information but may require further investigation.See all Left-Center sources.", "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate AceShowbiz (ASB) Left-Center Biased based on story selection that moderately favors the left. We also rate them Mixed for factual reporting due to poor sourcing and a lack of transparency with ownership and authors. Detailed Report Bias Rating: LEFT-CENTER (-3.5) Factual Reporting: MIXED (4.", "history": "Launched in 2005,AceShowbiz (ASB)is an online entertainment magazine covering topics ranging from celebrity gossip, interviews, news pertaining to TV, movies, music, and lifestyle. The co-founder/publisher isDenny Lee, and theco-founder/editor is Anita Yang. The website lacks transparency as they do not clearly indicate ownership or location. For example, Denny Lee’s profile states that AceShowbiz is from Hong Kong; however, at the bottom of all pages on the website, it indicates they are a part of theKanal247.com&WowKeren.comnetworks, which originates from Indonesia. Further, they do not publish author names or bios. Read our profile on Indonesian media and government.", "ownership": "AceShowbiz (ASB) does not openly disclose ownership; however, it is presumed to be owned and published by Denny Lee and Anita Yang. Revenue is derived through advertising.", "analysis": "These media sources have a slight to moderate liberal bias.  They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appeals to emotion or stereotypes) to favor liberal causes.  These sources are generally trustworthy for information but may require further investigation.See all Left-Center sources. AceShowbiz (ASB) typically publishes articles with short text and big colorful pictures. They often publish sensational stories with emotionally loaded language such as“Lil Wayne’s Daughter Reginae Carter Almost Got Into Trouble With Her Mom For Posing In Lingerie”and“The ‘Cravings’ Author Is ‘Bummed And Hit Hard.'”When it comes to sourcing AceShowbiz (ASB) hyperlinks to themselves or utilizing sources such asNew York Post’sgossip column Page Six, and when reporting news, they most often use large quotes fromCBS,MSNBC, andCNN. When covering political news such as President Trump, AceShowbiz (ASB) uses strong emotionally loaded language andsources through quotes“This Is Not The First Time For Trump To Patronize CBS’ Weijia Jiang As During A COVID-19 News Conference As Last Month, POTUS Told Her To ‘Relax’ And ‘Keep Your Voice Down.”Under theInterview section, we couldn’t find any interviews. In general, AceShowbiz demonstrates a left-leaning bias through story selection and sometimes does not source properly or name authors.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "None in the Last 5 years." ], "last_updated": "December 26, 2024" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/robert-reich-substack-bias-and-credibility/", "name": "Robert Reich (Substack)", "source_url": "https://robertreich.substack.com/", "bias_rating": "LEFT", "bias_score": -7.0, "factual_reporting": "HIGH", "factual_score": 1.8, "credibility_rating": "HIGH CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Website", "traffic_popularity": "High Traffic", "bias_category_description": "These media sources are moderate to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation.  They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appealing to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports, and omit information that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy.See all Left Bias sources.", "overall_summary": "Overall, Robert Reich’s Substack is rated Left Biased due to its strong progressive editorial stance and consistent criticism of conservative economic and social policies. However, Reich’s commentary is generally supported by reputable evidence and transparent sourcing, earning a High rating for factual reporting. Detailed Report Bias Rating: LEFT (-7.0) Factual Reporting: HIGH (1.", "history": "Robert Reich’s Substack is a political commentary newsletter authored by former U.S. Secretary of Labor Robert B. Reich, an economist, professor at UC Berkeley, and co-founder ofThe American ProspectandInequality Media. According to theAbout page, Reich created the publication to “arm readers with the truth” about inequality, authoritarianism, and social justice. Reich has served in multiple U.S. administrations and authored numerous books, includingThe System,Saving Capitalism, and his 2024 memoir,Coming Up Short: A Memoir of My America. Read our profile on the United States media and government.", "ownership": "The newsletter operates independently through paid Substack subscriptions. Reich also runs a relatedpodcastand offers online lectures such asWelcome to My Class.", "analysis": "These media sources are moderate to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation.  They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appealing to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports, and omit information that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy.See all Left Bias sources. Robert Reich’s Substack exhibits a consistent progressive and anti-authoritarian worldview. In hisAbout page, Reich states that the goal of the newsletter is to “fight for democracy, social justice, and a sustainable planet,” aligning with progressive economic and social values. His posts often target Republican policies, corporate greed, and systemic inequality. For instance, inSenate Dems: Don’t cave! And explain the big picture!, Reich criticizes GOP budget proposals as “the most anti-environment legislation ever passed” and urges Democrats to oppose Republican fiscal policy. InOffice Hours: What was the REAL reason Trump met with more than 800 of America’s top military leaders this week?, Reich speculates aboutPresident Trump’smotives, describing the event as “unorthodox” and raising concerns about authoritarian tendencies. He also covers broader social and academic themes. InThe shameful legacy of systemic racism and inequality — Class 9, he features academic sources includingThe New York Times, Duke University’s Samuel DuBois Cook Center, and theInstitute for Policy Studies, highlighting persistent racial wealth gaps and structural racism. Overall, Reich’s writing is heavily opinionated and emotionally charged, emphasizing moral and democratic imperatives. His framing consistently favors the political left but is supported by credible data and research. His approach resembles that of a progressive editorialist rather than a neutral journalist.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "No major false claims have been documented by reputable fact-checkers. The only related instance involves a misattributed debate quote about COVID-19 later clarified byUSA Today." ], "last_updated": "October 4, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-texan/", "name": "The Texan", "source_url": "https://thetexan.news/", "bias_rating": "RIGHT", "bias_score": 6.4, "factual_reporting": "HIGH", "factual_score": 1.7, "credibility_rating": "HIGH CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Website", "traffic_popularity": "Medium Traffic", "bias_category_description": "These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward conservative causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports and omit reporting of information that may damage conservative causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy.See all Right Bias sources.", "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate The Texan Right Biased based on editorial positions that routinely favor the right. We also rate them High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing and a clean fact-check record. Detailed Report Bias Rating: RIGHT (6.4) Factual Reporting: HIGH (1.", "history": "Founded in 2019 by former Republican Texas State Senator Konni Burton, The Texan is a conservative news website focused on Texan and national politics. The website frequently covers immigration news. According to theirabout page, “The Texan,a statewide political news organization that is dedicated to providing readers with fact-based news regarding issues, policies, elected officials, and campaigns, The Texan is the alternative to the narratives and spin that is so pervasive in news media today.” McKenzie Taylor serves as senior editor. Read our profile on the United States government and media.", "ownership": "The Texan discloses they are owned byiTexasPolitics LLCon itsTerms of Servicepage. The Texan generates revenue through subscriptions and a shop that sells merchandise.", "analysis": "These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward conservative causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports and omit reporting of information that may damage conservative causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy.See all Right Bias sources. The Texan provides original reporting on Texas and national politics with a primary focus on immigration. In fact, they have a section dedicated to immigration under the section “Border Crisis.” This name in itself is biased as it conveys negative language towards immigration. In this section, almost all stories are negative toward immigration, focusing on crimes and dangers such as thisIllegal Alien Apprehensions Will Break 20 Year Record, Republicans Call On Texas Attorney General To Sue Biden. Although clearly right-leaning in bias, they properly source information from credible sources such as DHS, local papers, and theAssociated Press. The Texan does not produce op-eds; however, story selection and wording of stories favor conservatives. For example, they report favorably on Republican politiciansCruz, Cornyn, 17 Other U.S. Senators Tour Rio Grande River in ‘Heartbreaking’ Border Visit,while reporting negatively on DemocratsGas Prices Rise With Vaccine Distribution, Biden Administration’s Environmental Policies. In general, the news is factual and holds a right editorial bias.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "None in the Last 5 years" ], "last_updated": "February 18, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/briarpatch-magazine-bias/", "name": "Briarpatch Magazine", "source_url": "https://briarpatchmagazine.com/", "bias_rating": "LEFT", "bias_score": -8.4, "factual_reporting": "HIGH", "factual_score": 1.8, "credibility_rating": "HIGH CREDIBILITY", "country": "Canada", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Magazine", "traffic_popularity": "Minimal Traffic", "bias_category_description": "These media sources are moderate to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation.  They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appealing to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports, and omit information that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy.See all Left Bias sources.", "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate Briarpatch Magazine Left Biased based on editorial bias that favors progressive perspectives and social justice issues. We also rate them High for factual reporting due to the use of credible sources and a clean fact-check record. Detailed Report Bias Rating: LEFT (-8.4) Factual Reporting: HIGH (1.", "history": "Established in 1973,Briarpatch Magazineis a bimonthly Canadian publication produced by Briarpatch Incorporated, an independent non-profit organization. The magazine is printed by union labor on environmentally friendly paper using vegetable-based ink. Briarpatch Magazine focuses on politics, social justice issues, and culture. The magazine covers a range of topics, including activism, labor, Indigenous rights, feminism, and environmentalism. It is headquartered in Saskatchewan, Canada. Read our profile on Canada’s Media and Government.", "ownership": "Briarpatch Magazineoperates as a non-profit publication and receives financial support from the Government of Canada through the Canada Periodical Fund (CPF) for its publishing activities. It has a combination of revenue sources, including subscriptions, advertising, and donations.", "analysis": "These media sources are moderate to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation.  They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appealing to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports, and omit information that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy.See all Left Bias sources. Briarpatch Magazine has a left-leaning bias and is known for providing progressive perspectives on social, political, and economic issues. The magazine promotes grassroots activism, social movements, and marginalized voices. It covers topics through investigative reporting, in-depth analysis, and essays. For instance, one article titled“Fighting Fascism in Feminism”critiques factions within feminism that hold anti-sex work and anti-trans ideologies and criticizes mainstream feminists for collaborating with law enforcement. Another article titled“In Canada’s Federal Women’s Prisons, reproductive rights are under Threat”advocates for policy changes to ensure reproductive justice and improve conditions for incarcerated individuals. While the magazine clearly leans left in its editorial stance, it relies on credible sources such as Xtra, peopleshub.org,CTV News,World Health Organization (WHO),Democracy Now,Reuters, and publicsafety.gc.ca, law.georgetown.edu. to support its claims. In general, Briarpatch is fact-based and advocates for far-left ideology.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "None in the Last 5 years" ], "last_updated": "September 25, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/def-con-news-bias/", "name": "Def-Con News", "source_url": "https://defconnews.com/", "bias_rating": "FAR RIGHT", "bias_score": 8.2, "factual_reporting": "LOW", "factual_score": 7.7, "credibility_rating": "LOW CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Website", "traffic_popularity": "Minimal Traffic", "bias_category_description": null, "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate Def-Con News extreme right-biased and Questionable based on the promotion of propaganda, conspiracy theories, poor sourcing, false claims, and lack of transparency. Detailed Report Questionable Reasoning: Poor Sourcing, Conspiracy Theories, Propaganda, False Claims, Lack of Transparency Bias Rating: FAR RIGHT (8.2) Factual Reporting: LOW (7.7) Country: USA MBFC’s Country Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE Media Type: Website Traffic/Popularity: Minimal Traffic MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY History Founded in 2018 , Def-Con News is a conservative news and opinion website.", "history": "Founded in 2018, Def-Con News is a conservative news and opinion website. According to theirabout page, “Def-Con News is conservative news, definitely. It’s also conservative news defiantly because we’re out to counter the liberal media push to demonize conservatives and silence conservative points of view.” They also state, “The information and breaking news on Def-Con News are 100% true and properly sourced. There are no conspiracy theories and wild speculation here; the left is crazy enough that we don’t need to make things up. Fake news is for the mainstream liberal media; DFC is real news for real conservatives.” The website lacks transparency as they do not disclose editors or ownership. Read our profile on the United States government and media.", "ownership": "Def-Con News does not disclose ownership. Advertising and donations generate revenue.", "analysis": "Def-Con News does not report original news but rather opines from a far-right perspective on news stories. News is broken down into the following categories: CrazyJoe, KamalToe, NastyNancy, Leftist Violence, Democrats, Guns, America Haters, and The Purge. In reviewing articles in the America Haters category, it is evident that anyone who is LGBTQ, anti-racist, or a Democrat hates AmericaU.S. WOMEN’S SOCCER TEAM ELIMINATED BUT STILL TAKE GOLD FOR HATING AMERICA. The about page claims that articles are 100% true and properly sourced; perhaps that is true if you consider theGateway Pundita proper source. We don’t. Editorially, all stories favor the right and frequently promote false and misleading conspiracy theories. For example, they report the baseless claim that the Presidential Election was stolen from Donald TrumpELECTIONS EXPERT SETH KESHEL RELEASES NATIONAL FRAUD NUMBERS: FINDS 8.1 MILLION EXCESS VOTES IN US ELECTION, AFFIRMS TRUMP WON PA, MI, WI, NV, AZ, GA AND MN. This story isfalse. Further, they promote covid-19 anti-vaccination propaganda such as thisTHE REGIME UNLEASHES THE NEEDLE NAZIS. In general, Def-Con News lacks credibility as it frequently promotes far-right propaganda and conspiracy theories that are not true.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "A third-party fact-checker has not checked them." ], "last_updated": "January 17, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/wrok-1440-am-rockford-bias-and-credibility/", "name": "WROK – 1440 AM – Rockford", "source_url": "https://1440wrok.com/", "bias_rating": "RIGHT", "bias_score": 5.9, "factual_reporting": "MIXED", "factual_score": 5.0, "credibility_rating": "MEDIUM CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Radio Station", "traffic_popularity": "Minimal Traffic", "bias_category_description": "These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward conservative causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using an appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports, and omit information that may damage conservative causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy.See all Right Bias sources.", "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate WROK – 1440 AM – Rockford as Right-Biased based on the political affiliation of conservative radio hosts. We also rate them as Mixed for factual reporting due to hosting news show personalities with poor fact-check records. Detailed Report Bias Rating: RIGHT (5.9) Factual Reporting: MIXED (5.", "history": "WROK – 1440 AM – Rockford is a Rockford, Illinois, talk radio station. The radio station features conservative news talk shows, while the website publishes local and political news. The web domain for the station is 1140wrok.com. Read our profile on the United States government and media.", "ownership": "WROK – 1440 AM – Rockfordis owned byTownsquare Media,a publicly traded company.According toOpenSecrets, Townsquare Media has made political contributions exclusively to Republican candidates and causes.The publication’s revenue model includes digital advertising and sponsorships.", "analysis": "These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward conservative causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using an appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports, and omit information that may damage conservative causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy.See all Right Bias sources. WROK – 1440 AM – Rockfordpublishes local news stories that utilize minimally loaded language, such as this:West Nile Virus Found in 17 Illinois Counties in Early Summer. The radio station and website broadcast a daily lineup of news radio hosts who generally hold conservative perspectives. They also feature nationally syndicated hosts likeMark LevinandSean Hannity, who have poor fact-check records. Editorially, the majority of radio hosts hold conservative viewpoints. While local news reporting is usually not opinionated, it publishes opinionated political content with strong conservative perspectives. In general, local news appears to be fact-based, while the radio shows exhibit a conservative bias and sometimes promote misleading or false claims.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "The radio hosts frequently fail fact checks." ], "last_updated": "June 20, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/blue-states-blues-news-bias/", "name": "Blue State Blues News", "source_url": "https://bluestatebluesnews.com/", "bias_rating": "FAR RIGHT", "bias_score": 8.1, "factual_reporting": "MIXED", "factual_score": 6.4, "credibility_rating": "LOW CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Website", "traffic_popularity": "Medium Traffic", "bias_category_description": null, "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate Blue State Blues News Questionable based on Far-right-wing bias, promotion of propaganda and conspiracies, poor sourcing, and a complete lack of transparency. Detailed Report Questionable Reasoning: Conspiracy Theories, Propaganda, Poor Sourcing, Lack of Transparency Bias Rating: FAR RIGHT (8.1) Factual Reporting: MIXED (6.4) Country: USA Press Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE Media Type: Website Traffic/Popularity: Medium Traffic MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY History Blue State Blues News is a hyper-partisan conservative news and opinion website.", "history": "Blue State Blues News is a hyper-partisan conservative news and opinion website. According to their about page, “Blue State Blues News scours the news from states like California, New York, Illinois, and more Democrat-run wastelands so you don’t have to.”The website otherwise lacks transparency as the authors are not named, the domain is registered privately, and ownership is not revealed. Read our profile on the United States government and media.", "ownership": "Blue State Blues News does not disclose ownership or funding; however, they list a mailing address on itscontact page: “1807 South Church St. Suite 108, PMB #221, Smithfield, VA 23430.” This address belongs to a UPS Store mailbox andRighters Group, LLC, which describes itself as a “professional fundraiser.” The Righters Group claim they raise money for “only the most deserving and effective conservative/libertarian clients raise the millions of dollars they need to fight for a freer future for all Americans.” We have found 11 websites that share this same mailing address without disclosing ownership. Advertising generates revenue.", "analysis": "Blue State Blues News does not publish original news stories but rather interjects right-wing biased opinions around news stories. All stories favor the right and often harshly denigrate the left, such as this:Democrats got control of one city in this red state—and what happened next is truly horrifying. This story does not use hyperlinked sourcing on the information they are referencing. Editorially, all stories strongly favor the right such as thisAbbott Press Secretary goes off after D.C.’s Mayor hit the panic button over the Lone Star State giving leftists a taste of their own medicine, andGavin Newsom targeted women with this sick crusade – and what he wants them to do will turn your stomach. In general, many stories on this website advance right-wing pro-Trump conspiracy theories and propaganda while sometimes using poor sources such asBreitbart.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "A third party has not fact-checked them." ], "last_updated": "January 14, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/lifespa/", "name": "LifeSpa", "source_url": "https://lifespa.com/", "bias_rating": "PSEUDOSCIENCE", "bias_score": -5.0, "factual_reporting": "LOW", "factual_score": 7.8, "credibility_rating": "LOW CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Website", "traffic_popularity": "Low Traffic", "bias_category_description": null, "overall_summary": "Overall, this is a natural health, quackery level Pseudoscience website for promoting anti-vaccination propaganda. Detailed Report Bias Rating: PSEUDOSCIENCE (-5.0) Factual Reporting: LOW (7.8) Country: USA MBFC’s Country Freedom Rank: MOSTLY FREE Media Type: Website Traffic/Popularity: Low Traffic MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY History LifeSpa is a news and information website that promotes Ayurveda, which is the traditional Hindu system of medicine, which is based on the idea of balance in bodily systems and uses diet, herbal treatment, and yogic breathing.", "history": "LifeSpa is a news and information website that promotes Ayurveda, which is the traditional Hindu system of medicine, which is based on the idea of balance in bodily systems and uses diet, herbal treatment, and yogic breathing. Chiropractor and Author John Douillard founded the website. Read our profile on the United States government and media.", "ownership": "John Douillard owns LifeSpa. The website is funded through the sale of purported wellness products and online advertising.", "analysis": "In review, LifeSpa promotesdebunkedmedical practices such asLeech Therapyandanti-vaccination propaganda. While most information on this website is legitimate, safe, and somewhat backed by science, there are several examples of LifeSpa promoting Pseudoscience.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "A third party has not fact-checked this source. See above." ], "last_updated": "December 19, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-nation-pakistan/", "name": "The Nation Pakistan", "source_url": "https://nation.com.pk/", "bias_rating": "RIGHT-CENTER", "bias_score": 3.7, "factual_reporting": "MIXED", "factual_score": 5.1, "credibility_rating": "MEDIUM CREDIBILITY", "country": "Pakistan", "country_freedom_rating": "LIMITED FREEDOM", "media_type": "Newspaper", "traffic_popularity": "Medium Traffic", "bias_category_description": "These media sources are slightly to moderately conservative in bias. They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appealing to emotion or stereotypes) to favor conservative causes. These sources are generally trustworthy for information but may require further investigation.See all Right-Center sources.", "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate The Nation Pakistan Right-Center Biased based on editorial positions that moderately favor the right. We also rate them Mixed for factual reporting due to a lack of sourcing and the use of poor sources for world news that have failed fact checks. Detailed Report Bias Rating: RIGHT-CENTER (3.7) Factual Reporting: MIXED (5.", "history": "Founded in 1986, The Nation Pakistan is an English-language daily newspaper based in Lahore. According to the newspaper’s about page, apart from the main news events, the newspaper provides separate sections for city, national, sports, foreign, and commerce news. The Newspaper belongs toNawa-i-Waqt Group, and Rameeza Nizami is the Executive Editor of The Nation and the Managing Director of Nawa-i-Waqt Group of Publications. Please readour report on how Government influences the Pakistani media.", "ownership": "Majid Nizami Trust owns the newspaper and theNawa-i-Waqt Group. Advertising generates revenue.", "analysis": "These media sources are slightly to moderately conservative in bias. They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appealing to emotion or stereotypes) to favor conservative causes. These sources are generally trustworthy for information but may require further investigation.See all Right-Center sources. Nawa-i-Waqt Group’s position in Pakistan’s media is defined aswell-established center-right and nationalist credentials. The Nation Pakistan publishes news and opinion articles covered national and world news. National news uses minimally loaded language such as thisHigh flood flow in Chenab after India releases water. This story, like most, does not rely on hyperlinked sourcing. When reporting on world news, they often republish from poor sources such as the QuestionableSputnikand the factually mixedAnadolu News Agency. Further, they also label some international news as being published by “Agencies” without actually naming the agencies. Editorially, the paper aligns with the right and supports current right-leaning prime minister Imran KhanPM Imran Khan launches initiative to feed poor. In general, they favor the government of Pakistan (not much choice) and hold a right-leaning editorial bias. Although the news appears to be reported factually, they often use poor sources for international news.", "failed_fact_checks": [], "last_updated": "June 6, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/vaccines-news/", "name": "Vaccines News", "source_url": "http://www.vaccines.news/", "bias_rating": "RIGHT CONSPIRACY-PSEUDOSCIENCE", "bias_score": 9.5, "factual_reporting": "VERY LOW", "factual_score": 10.0, "credibility_rating": "LOW CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Website", "traffic_popularity": "Minimal Traffic", "bias_category_description": null, "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate Vaccines.News an extreme right biased Quackery Level Pseudoscience website that also publishes conspiracy theories. This source is associated with Natural News, which is one of the most discredited sources on the internet. Detailed Report Bias Rating: RIGHT CONSPIRACY-PSEUDOSCIENCE (9.", "history": "Vaccines.News is a right-wing conspiracy and pseudoscience website that routinely publishes false information. The founder is Mike Adams, who owns several Questionable websites such asNatural NewsandNews Target. Vaccines.News is a part of the Natural News Network. This website lacks transparency and does not disclose ownership. According to PolitifactHealth misinformation website rebrands as pro-Trump outlet to get around ban from Facebook Read our profile on United States government and media.", "ownership": "Vaccines.News is owned by Mike Adams, who owns numerous other fake and/or controversial right-wing conspiracy websites. The website, like all of Mike Adams’s properties, is funded through online advertising.", "analysis": "In review, Mike Adams is known as theHealth Rangeraccording toRationalwiki. However, they point out dozens of cases where his claims are false. Besides promoting pseudoscience, Vaccines.News is an extreme right-wing biased source that frequently promotes false or misleading information regarding vaccines, alternative health, and government conspiracies. For more information read our review onNatural News. In general, politically, all Mike Adam’s stories favor the right and promote pseudoscience such aschemtrails, the Sandy Hook shooting being a false flag:Sandy Hook was theater! Actor who played law enforcement sniper was recorded walking around carrying rifle by the magazine. Further, theyroutinely publishanti-vaccination propagandaand conspiracy theories. Lastly, this source denies the consensus onclimate changewithout evidence, as seen here:Climate change cultists are now taking over your local weather forecast.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "SeeNatural News" ], "last_updated": "July 5, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/labdoor-bias-and-credibility/", "name": "Labdoor", "source_url": "https://labdoor.com/", "bias_rating": "LEAST BIASED", "bias_score": -0.5, "factual_reporting": "MIXED", "factual_score": 4.6, "credibility_rating": "MEDIUM CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Organization/Foundation", "traffic_popularity": "Medium Traffic", "bias_category_description": "These sources have minimal bias and use very few loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appeals to emotion or stereotypes).  The reporting is factual and usually sourced.  These are the most credible media sources.See all Least Biased Sources.", "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate Labdoor as Least Biased, as it does not exhibit overt political or ideological leanings. Its factual reporting is rated Mixed due to concerns about potential conflicts of interest arising from its revenue model and questions about the transparency and currency of its product evaluations. Detailed Report Bias Rating: LEAST BIASED (-0.5) Factual Reporting: MIXED (4.", "history": "Labdoor is a privately held company founded in 2012 by Neil Thanedar and others.Headquartered in South San Francisco, California,Labdoor provides informationon dietary supplements, which are not required to undergo FDA testing in the United States.The company purchases dietary supplements directly from retailers, sends them to FDA-registered laboratories for analysis, and publishes the findings to help consumers make informed decisions about supplement safety and efficacy. Read our profile on the United States government and media.", "ownership": "Labdoor is afor-profit entitythat generates revenue through affiliate marketing, certification services, and direct sales.The company has received investments from venture capital firms and angel investors, including Rock Health, Mark Cuban, Y Combinator, and Floodgate.Labdoor emphasizes its independence by stating that it does not accept contributions or donations from manufacturers to rank products on its site.", "analysis": "These sources have minimal bias and use very few loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appeals to emotion or stereotypes).  The reporting is factual and usually sourced.  These are the most credible media sources.See all Least Biased Sources. Labdoor positions itself as an independent supplement testing and ranking platform, aiming to provide consumers with transparent information about product quality.The company’stesting processinvolves purchasing products from retail outlets, analyzing them in FDA-registered laboratories, and scoring them based on label accuracy, product purity, nutritional value, ingredient safety, and projected efficacy. Labdoor’sbusiness modelincludes affiliate marketing, where the company earns commissions from sales of products it has tested and certified.While Labdoor asserts that it maintains objectivity and does not allow manufacturers to influence its ratings, the reliance on affiliate revenue and certification fees may presentpotential conflicts of interest. The company’ssupplement rankingscover various categories, including melatonin, where products are graded based on the aforementioned criteria.However, some users have raised concerns about the transparency of Labdoor’s scoring process and the potential for outdated information.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "None in the Last 5 years. Some of the products they sell are classified as pseudoscience." ], "last_updated": "May 18, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/alliance-for-human-research-protection-ahrp-bias/", "name": "Alliance for Human Research Protection (AHRP)", "source_url": "https://ahrp.org/", "bias_rating": "PSEUDOSCIENCE", "bias_score": 4.0, "factual_reporting": "LOW", "factual_score": 8.0, "credibility_rating": "LOW CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Organization/Foundation", "traffic_popularity": "Minimal Traffic", "bias_category_description": null, "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate the Alliance for Human Research Protection (AHRP) as a pseudoscience organization based on the promotion of false information regarding vaccines and GMOs that do not reflect the consensus of science. Detailed Report Bias Rating: PSEUDOSCIENCE (4.0) Factual Reporting: LOW (8.0) Country: USA MBFC’s Country Freedom Rank: MOSTLY FREE Media Type: Organization/Foundation Traffic/Popularity: Minimal Traffic MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY History Established in 2001, The Alliance for Human Research Protection (AHRP) is a non-profit, tax-exempt advocacy organization for patient rights and ethical medical practices.", "history": "Established in 2001,The Alliance for Human Research Protection (AHRP)is a non-profit, tax-exempt advocacy organization for patient rights and ethical medical practices.Vera Sharavis the founder of AHRP. Read more on the United States media and government.", "ownership": "The Alliance for Human Research Protection (AHRP) is a non-profit 501(c)3 funded through donations. The website does not disclose donors or amounts.", "analysis": "The Alliance for Human Research Protection (AHRP) presents a narrative more aligned with pseudoscience than evidence-based scientific consensus. For example, the article”Vaccine-Contaminated Mothers’ Milk is Poisoning Newborn Infants”claims that the COVID-19 vaccine contaminates breast milk, posing harm to infants, a claim that is not supported by mainstreamscientific researchor health authorities. Contrary to the article’s claims, health organizations such as theCDCandWHOhave stated COVID-19 vaccines aresafe for breastfeeding women. These organizations base their guidance onscientific studiesshowing no harmful effects on breastfed infants from the vaccine. The article’s framing is sensational and alarmist, evident in its title and language. Phrases like “being poisoned” and “experimental COVID-19 injections” are emotionally charged and designed to evoke fear and distrust in vaccines. This communication style is a common characteristic of pseudoscientific discourse, where the aim is often to persuade through emotion rather than factual accuracy. Furthermore, the article broadly generalizes that public health officials and the pharmaceutical industry have embarked on a vaccination campaign “without confirmed evidence of safety.” This statement overlooks the extensive clinical trials and ongoing monitoring that form the basis of vaccine approval and recommendations. In conclusion, the article from AHRP uses non-scientific language and unsupported claims, contradicting the established scientific consensus on COVID-19 vaccine safety for breastfeeding mothers. Therefore, It leans towards pseudoscience, not evidence-based facts. Another article,“Weapons of mass deception: false claims, corrupted science”presents a critical view of the use of genetically engineered or modified organisms (GMOs) in agriculture. AHRP suggests that the debate over GMOs is often misrepresented as a conflict between science and superstition, with opponents of GMOs labeled as anti-science. However, it argues that much opposition is based on scientific concerns about environmental and health hazards. While the article from the Alliance for Human Research Protection presents a critical perspective, it’s important to recognize that there is substantial scientific research supporting the safety and benefits of GMOs. Numerous scientific bodies, including theNational Academy of Sciences, World Health Organization, andAmerican Medical Association, have concluded that GMOs are safe to eat and can provide significant benefits, such as improved crop yields, enhanced nutritional content, and reduced need for pesticides. In general, AHRP promotes pseudoscience and sometimes relies onpoor sourcessuch asChildren’s Health Defense, which has a poor record with fact-checkers.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "None by a third-party fact checker. See the above examples." ], "last_updated": "September 17, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/drnorthrup-com/", "name": "DrNorthrup.com", "source_url": "https://www.drnorthrup.com/", "bias_rating": "PSEUDOSCIENCE", "bias_score": 6.8, "factual_reporting": "LOW", "factual_score": 8.1, "credibility_rating": "LOW CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Website", "traffic_popularity": "Minimal Traffic", "bias_category_description": null, "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate DrNorthrup.com a quackery level pseudoscience website based on consistently promoting false or misleading information regarding science, health and especially Covid-19. Detailed Report Bias Rating: PSEUDOSCIENCE (6.8) Factual Reporting: LOW (8.", "history": "Founded in 1998, DrNorthrup.com is the website for Dr. Christiane Northrup. The website publishes holistic health information and routinely publishes pseudoscience misinformation. According to theabout page, “Christiane Northrup, M.D., is a visionary pioneer and a leading authority in the field of women’s health and wellness, which includes the unity of mind, body, emotions, and spirit. Internationally known for her empowering approach to women’s health and wellness, Dr. Northrup teaches women how to thrive at every stage of life. “A board-certified OB/GYN physician, Dr. Northrup graduated from Dartmouth Medical School and completed her residency at Tufts New England Medical Center in Boston. She was also an assistant clinical professor of OB/GYN at Maine Medical Center for 20 years.” Dr. Northrup has also been featured on The Oprah Winfrey Show, the Today Show, NBC Nightly News, The View, Rachael Ray, Good Morning America, 20/20, andThe Dr. Oz Show. Dr. Northrup is no longer alicensed physician. Read our profile on the United States government and media.", "ownership": "Christiane Northrup, Inc owns and operates the website. Advertisements for her published books, an onlineBookstore, and aHealthstorewhere she sells supplements, herbs and other alternative products generate revenue.", "analysis": "DrNorthrup.com consists of the sections Health Wisdom, Daily Health Inspiration, and Watch & Listen. The Health Wisdom section is the personal blog of Dr. Northrup, while Watch & Listen consists of Video and Audio clips discussing general health topics. Within this section, you can findpseudosciencesuch as thisHow to Use Astrology to Improve Your Life. The Health Wisdom Blog publishes a combination of pseudoscience such as thisPrayer is Real Medicineand questionable medical advice such as thisWhy You Should Skip Your Annual Check-Up. Throughout the Covid-19 pandemic, the website has promoted misinformation regarding the virus and vaccines. More on that later. Before Covid-19, Ms. Northrup routinely promoted vaccine hesitation such as thisBe One Less…to Get the Gardasil Vaccine. Regarding Covid-19, there is significant evidence that DrNorthrup.com consistently makes false claims related to covid-19. See failed fact checks below. In general, Ms. Northrup promotes quackery level pseudoscience, as evidenced by the promotion of astrology, prayer, and numerous false claims.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "Ten countries “announced the cancellation of all quarantine procedures, Corona tests, and compulsory vaccination”–Inaccurate", "COVID-19 vaccines cause menstrual problems in women; vaccinated people are causing health problems in unvaccinated people around them–Unsupported", "COVID-19 vaccines rewriting patients’ DNA–False", "Pfizer instructed male COVID-19 vaccine recipients to refrain from donating sperm, to wear condoms and/or be abstinent for at least 28 days after getting a shot.–False", "COVID-19 RNA, also called mRNA, vaccine change a person’s DNA–False", "Coronavirus vaccines “experimental weapons against humanity”–False" ], "last_updated": "January 21, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-unz-report/", "name": "The Unz Review", "source_url": "http://www.unz.com/", "bias_rating": "EXTREME RIGHT", "bias_score": 9.3, "factual_reporting": "LOW", "factual_score": 8.1, "credibility_rating": "LOW CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Website", "traffic_popularity": "Medium Traffic", "bias_category_description": null, "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate The Unz Review a Questionable Source due to extreme right-wing bias, promotion of propaganda and hate, and utilizing poor sources. Detailed Report Reasoning: Propaganda, Conspiracy, Hate Group Bias Rating: EXTREME RIGHT (9.3) Factual Reporting: LOW (8.1) Country: USA MBFC’s Country Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE Media Type: Website Traffic/Popularity: Medium Traffic MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY History Launched in 2013, The Unz Review is a political analysis website that defines itself as an ‘alternative’ to the ‘mainstream media.", "history": "Launched in 2013,The Unz Reviewis a political analysis website that defines itself as an ‘alternative’ to the ‘mainstream media.’ According toRon Unz, who is the Editor-in-Chief and the owner of the site, their mission is: “I would always prefer reading something disturbing than something dull.” The Unz Review has a long list of columnists and bloggers; although we couldn’t go through the lists, some known names are Pat Buchanan, Steve Sailer, Ilana Mercer, and Ron Paul. Steve Sailer has been criticized as both aracistand an Islamophobe. He is also listed as a promoter of hate by utilizingprimitive stereotypesto describe people of color. Ilana Mercer is also listed as apromoter of hatetoward Muslims, according to the Southern Poverty Law Center. Further, Ron Unz hasdonated moneyto known hate groups and anti-Semite organizations. Read our profile on United States government and media.", "ownership": "The website is owned by Ron Unz, and funding is not clear.", "analysis": "In review, The Unz Review publishes articles with loaded words such as“Trump’s Strategy Working—He’s Maneuvered Democrats, RINOS, Into Favoring Foreigners Over Americans.“ In this particular article, they utilize questionable sources such asvdare.com,which is classified as anextremist White Nationalist group. They also use a different approach in which they utilize minimally loaded emotional language in their headlines, such as“’Shithole Countries’: What Makes a Country? the Place or the People?”However, in the body of the article, one can find plenty of racism and hate under the disguise of a philosophical discussion. Further, they also utilize factually mixed sources such asMises InstituteandConsortium Newsand credible sources likePolitico; however, they use them only to illustrate their far-right views via questionable sources. Throughout the Covid-19 pandemic, they have advanced conspiracy theories such as thisIs the Covid “vaccine” a Bioweapon?There isno evidenceto support that the vaccine is a bioweapons. They also claim the vaccine is an attempt todepopulate the earth.", "failed_fact_checks": [], "last_updated": "June 17, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/west-central-tribune/", "name": "West Central Tribune", "source_url": "https://www.wctrib.com/", "bias_rating": "RIGHT-CENTER", "bias_score": 3.0, "factual_reporting": "HIGH", "factual_score": 1.0, "credibility_rating": "HIGH CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Newspaper", "traffic_popularity": "Medium Traffic", "bias_category_description": "These media sources are slight to moderately conservative in bias. They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appealing to emotion or stereotypes) to favor conservative causes. These sources are generally trustworthy for information but may require further investigation.See all Right-Center sources.", "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate the West Central Tribune Right-Center Biased based on story selection and editorial positions that slightly favor the right. We also rate them High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing and a clean fact-check record. Detailed Report Bias Rating: RIGHT-CENTER (3.0) Factual Reporting: HIGH (1.", "history": "Launched in 1895, the West Central Tribune is a daily newspaper published in digital, print, and e-edition formats in Willmar, Minnesota.The West Central Tribunewas formerly known as the Willmar Tribune and was founded by Dr. Christian Johnson. In 1901 the editor Victor Lawson became the owner. In 1979, the West Central Tribune was purchased by Forum Communications Co. The West Central Tribune features local and national news, politics, sports, entertainment, business, classifieds, and technology. The publisher is Steve W. Ammermann (since 2000), and the news editor isSusan Lunneborg. Read our profile on the United States government and media.", "ownership": "The West Central Tribune is owned byForum Communications Company,which is based in North Dakota and has additional locations across South Dakota, Minnesota, and Wisconsin.Revenue is derived through advertising andsubscriptions.", "analysis": "These media sources are slight to moderately conservative in bias. They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appealing to emotion or stereotypes) to favor conservative causes. These sources are generally trustworthy for information but may require further investigation.See all Right-Center sources. In review, the West Central Tribune publishes articles with emotionally loaded language such as“Rumors swirl around Minnesota state rep taking part in citizen patrol during Floyd protest in Bemidji.”There is also a right-leaning political bias as most stories favor the right such as this“Ruben Navarrette: I’ll let you in on a little secret: Latinos don’t like Biden.“A quote from the article reads, “Joe Biden’s weak and pathetic relationship with Latinos is all about geography.” However, they also republish editorial pieces from their sister papers such as the Grand Forks Herald in favor of democratic politicians such as“Minnesota Opinion: Joe Biden should put Amy Klobuchar on 2020 ticket”. On the issues such as immigration, the West Central Tribune reports with balance:“The economy of immigration: New Americans motivated to be a part of the economy.”Further, they also support the consensus of science regardinghuman-influenced climate change:Scientists try to plant forests of the future in a fast-warming Minnesota. The West Central Tribune mostly uses quotes when sourcing; however, they utilize credible sources such asNPRand government sources such as content.govdelivery,  minneapolismn.gov, and sister publications such as the Bemidji pioneer. Finally, they alsorepublisharticles fromThe Washington Post. During the 2016 election, the West Central Tribune stated:“Presidential Endorsement: This time for president, none of the above,”and its owner, Forum Communications Editorial Board, declined to endorse a Republican candidate for the first time in their history. However, the West Central Tribune is known to endorseRepublican candidates,including Mitt Romney, in 2012. Generally, the news is reported factually and with a right-leaning editorial bias.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "None in the Last 5 years" ], "last_updated": "August 1, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/rt-de-rt-news-germany-bias/", "name": "RT DE (RT News Germany)", "source_url": "https://de.rt.com/", "bias_rating": "RIGHT-CENTER", "bias_score": 4.7, "factual_reporting": "VERY LOW", "factual_score": 9.0, "credibility_rating": "LOW CREDIBILITY", "country": "Russia", "country_freedom_rating": "TOTAL OPPRESSION", "media_type": "TV Station", "traffic_popularity": "High Traffic", "bias_category_description": null, "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate RT Questionable based on promoting pro-Russian propaganda, conspiracy theories, numerous failed fact checks, and a lack of author transparency. Detailed Report Reasoning: Russian Propaganda, Conspiracy, Lack of Transparency, Some Fake News Bias Rating: RIGHT-CENTER (4.7) Factual Reporting: VERY LOW (9.0) Country: Russia MBFC’s Country Freedom Rank: TOTAL OPPRESSION Media Type: TV Station Traffic/Popularity: High Traffic MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY History Founded in 2005, RT, originally Russia Today, is a television network funded by the Russian Government.", "history": "Founded in 2005, RT, originally Russia Today, is a television network funded by the Russian Government. It operates cable and satellite television channels directed to audiences outside of Russia and provides Internet content in various languages, including Russian. Critics of RT claim they are a source of disinformation andpro-Russian propaganda. RT DE was launched in 2014, covering German and international news from a pro-Russian perspective. According to their about page, “RT DE gives its audience a glimpse into the logic, interests, and views of Russia. We strongly believe that the Russian position does not have to be shared but that it should be understood. We give our viewers and readers the opportunity to turn the large chessboard to see the playing field from a different perspective.” Read how the Russian Government influences Media.", "ownership": "ANO “TV-Novosti,” owns RT News, which the Russian Government funds. The network is supported through advertising and307 million USDfrom the Russian Government as of 2016. The Russian Federation continues to fund RT and RT DE.", "analysis": "In review, RT DE News presents news generally in line with the Russian Government’s narrative, often opposed to the German media. When it comes to covering USA/International News, they provide right-of-center coverage.  They are highly biased in favor of Russia and occasionally runPro-state conspiracy stories. TheColumbia Journalism Reviewcalls RT “The Kremlin’s propaganda outlet.” In general, most international news stories on RT are factual and relate to actual events; however, there are occasional pieces that spin these facts into a different narrative that is misleading. Another concerning aspect of RT is they do not list author information for articles published on the website. This presents a lack of transparency that makes it difficult to verify the information. During the Covid-19 Pandemic, they have made false and misleading claims regarding vaccines such as thisCanadian Immunologist on Corona Vaccines: “We Made a Big Mistake.”In the article, they claim that Spike Proteins are dangerous and toxic.This is not true.In general, RT DE is no different than the original RT promoting conspiracy theories, misinformation, and pro-Russian propaganda from a right-leaning perspective.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "While RT Bemoans Ukrainian Propaganda, it is Russians who Feel the Disinfo Fallout–FALSE", "RT: OPCW Got its Chemical Weapons Samples from ‘Jihadists’–FALSE", "RT Distorts Disinformation Detective’s Guide to Russian Trolls–FALSE", "RT’s FARA examined. Part I–FALSE", "RT: US Special Envoy Says Russia Seeks to ‘Freeze’ Conflict in …–FALSE", "“Melting statues to create modern art is a sign America hates its own history & no different from ISIS destroying Palmyra.”–FALSE" ], "last_updated": "May 16, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/mycentraljersey-com/", "name": "MyCentralJersey.com", "source_url": "https://www.mycentraljersey.com/", "bias_rating": "LEFT-CENTER", "bias_score": -2.5, "factual_reporting": "HIGH", "factual_score": 1.0, "credibility_rating": "HIGH CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Newspaper", "traffic_popularity": "Medium Traffic", "bias_category_description": "These media sources have a slight to moderate liberal bias.  They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appeals to emotion or stereotypes) to favor liberal causes.  These sources are generally trustworthy for information but may require further investigation.See all Left-Center sources.", "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate MyCentralJersey.com Left-Center biased based on editorial positions that slightly favor the left. We also rate them High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing and a clean fact check record. Detailed Report Bias Rating: LEFT-CENTER (-2.", "history": "MyCentralJersey.com is the home page for the Courier News (Founded 1884) and the Home News Tribune (Founded 1879). Both papers provide central New Jersey news, sports, crime, and lifestyle. The website provides news from both sources. Read our profile on the United States government and media.", "ownership": "MyCentralJersey.com is owned by Gannett (Gatehouse Media), which publishesUSA Today. In August 2019,Gatehouse Mediapurchased and merged with Gannett becoming the largest newspaper chain in the USA. After the merger, the companies retained the Gannett name. Advertising and subscription fees generate revenue.", "analysis": "These media sources have a slight to moderate liberal bias.  They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appeals to emotion or stereotypes) to favor liberal causes.  These sources are generally trustworthy for information but may require further investigation.See all Left-Center sources. In review, MyCentralJersey.com covers news, sports, lifestyle, and entertainment for the greater central New Jersey area. Local news is reported with minimal loaded emotional language, such as thisNew Brunswick shooting under investigation. National and international news comes from other Gannett publications and theAssociated Press. Editorially, MyCentralJersey.com publishes opinion pieces in a dedicated section. Editorials often lean slightly left, such as thisJoe Biden, the victor, and 46th president, must move America forward | Editorial. The news is generally reported factually and with a slight left-leaning bias.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "None in the Last 5 years" ], "last_updated": "April 11, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/oxford-eagle-bias-and-credibility/", "name": "Oxford Eagle", "source_url": "https://www.oxfordeagle.com/", "bias_rating": "RIGHT-CENTER", "bias_score": 2.8, "factual_reporting": "HIGH", "factual_score": 1.0, "credibility_rating": "HIGH CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Newspaper", "traffic_popularity": "Minimal Traffic", "bias_category_description": "These media sources are slight to moderately conservative in bias. They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appealing to emotion or stereotypes) to favor conservative causes. These sources are generally trustworthy for information but may require further investigation.See all Right-Center sources.", "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate the Oxford Eagle Right-Center Biased based on editorial positions that slightly favor the right. We also rate them High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing and a clean fact-check record. Detailed Report Bias Rating: RIGHT-CENTER (2.8) Factual Reporting: HIGH (1.", "history": "The Oxford Eagle is a newspaper published in Oxford, Mississippi. The paper covers local, national, crime, and sports news. Read our profile on the United States government and media.", "ownership": "The Oxford Eagle is owned byCarpenter Media Group, which publishes over 100 community papers in the United States. Revenue is derived through advertising and subscription fees.", "analysis": "These media sources are slight to moderately conservative in bias. They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appealing to emotion or stereotypes) to favor conservative causes. These sources are generally trustworthy for information but may require further investigation.See all Right-Center sources. In review, the Oxford Eagle primarily covers local news, sports, weather, and entertainment through the use of local journalists. Articles and headlines use minimal loaded emotional language, such as thisSupervisors approved animal shelter management contract. TheAssociated Presstypically serves national and international news. Editorially, the Oxford Eagle labels its opinion section appropriately, with more op-eds favoring the right. In general, the Oxford Eagle is factual with a right-leaning editorial bias.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "None in the Last 5 years" ], "last_updated": "February 22, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/action-in-teacher-education-bias-and-credibility/", "name": "Action in Teacher Education", "source_url": "https://www.tandfonline.com/journals/uate20", "bias_rating": "PRO-SCIENCE", "bias_score": -0.5, "factual_reporting": "HIGH", "factual_score": 0.5, "credibility_rating": "HIGH CREDIBILITY", "country": "United Kingdom", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Organization/Foundation", "traffic_popularity": "Minimal Traffic", "bias_category_description": "These sources consist of legitimate science or are evidence-based through credible scientific sourcing.  Legitimate science follows the scientific method, is unbiased, and does not use emotional words.  These sources also respect the consensus of experts in the given scientific field and strive to publish peer-reviewed science. Some sources in this category may have a slight political bias but adhere to scientific principles.See all Pro-Science sources.", "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate Action in Teacher Education as a Pro-Science source. We also rate them High for factual reporting due to rigorous peer review and a clean fact-check record. Detailed Report Bias Rating: PRO-SCIENCE (-0.5) Factual Reporting: HIGH (0.", "history": "Action in Teacher Education is a peer-reviewed open-access journal published by Taylor & Francis that covers developments in Teacher Education. According to itsabout page,“Action in Teacher Educationis published as a service to members of the Association of Teacher Educators and people concerned with teacher education.” Taylor & Francisis anacademic and professional publishing platformthat hosts a wide range of peer-reviewed journals and research articles across various disciplines, including social sciences, humanities, health sciences, engineering, and more. Founded in 1798, Taylor & Francis is a major global publisher that provides resources for researchers, scholars, and students. Read our profile on the UK’s media and government.", "ownership": "Informa PLC, a multinational publishing, business intelligence, and exhibitions group, owns the publisher Taylor & Francis. It generates revenue from institutional subscriptions, pay-per-view article purchases, and through partnerships with academic institutions.", "analysis": "Action in Teacher Education is an open-access journal that publishes information and research related to Education. An example article is as follows:Autonomy Supportive Teaching Behaviors: Perceptions of Teachers in Special, General, Gifted, and Bilingual Education Settings. Taylor & Francis is an open-access publisher of scientific journals. There are two types of Open Access Journals, legitimate and predatory, both of which charge the author for publication.Predatory journalsoften lack peer review and are generally considered not credible. Taylor & Francis is considered alegitimate, open-access publisherthat is frequently indexed inPubMed. Although Taylor & Francis has retracted some studies in other publications that were found to be of poor methodology and not thoroughly peer-reviewed, Action in Teacher Education publishes credible scientific studies that are factual and appropriately peer-reviewed.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "None in the Last 5 years" ], "last_updated": "February 14, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/daily-kenosha-bias-and-credibility/", "name": "Daily Kenosha", "source_url": "https://dailykenosha.com/", "bias_rating": "LEAST BIASED", "bias_score": 0.0, "factual_reporting": "MIXED", "factual_score": 6.1, "credibility_rating": "LOW CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Website", "traffic_popularity": "Minimal Traffic", "bias_category_description": null, "overall_summary": null, "history": "Daily Kenosha is part of an extensive network of AI-generated local newsletters initially launched by Good Daily Inc., a company founded in 2023 by engineer Matthew Henderson. In July 2025, the network, which spanned over 350 small and mid-sized towns, was acquired by6AM City, a digital media company known for running human-edited newsletters in cities like Greenville, SC, and Knoxville, TN. Under Good Daily, the network was widely criticized for using fabricated testimonials and concealing its use of artificial intelligence (AI) to generate content. According toNieman Lab, the newsletters operated under a false pretense of local community connection while being entirely automated from New York. Following theacquisition by 6AM City, fake testimonials were removed, and the new owner committed to gradually aligning the newsletters with its editorial and ethical standards. However, Daily Kenosha remains AI-generated and unedited by human staff. The newsletter is based in Kenosha, Wisconsin; however, 6AM City is run out of South Carolina, despite its emphasis on local communities. Read our profile on the United States Media and Government.", "ownership": "Daily Kenosha is owned by6AM City, a South Carolina–based media company. It is monetized through: While ownership is now clear, the newsletter does not disclose that its content is produced by AI, nor does it identify any editorial staff or local reporters.", "analysis": "Daily Kenosha presents itself as a local newsletter focused on community events, weather, business openings, and culture. It avoids politics and crime stories, making it Least Biased in tone and content. Despite this neutrality, several concerns persist: While 6AM City has expressed intentions to improve transparency and may eventually add editors to some of these “seed markets,” that has not yet occurred.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "None in the Last 5 years" ], "last_updated": "August 7, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/owen-jones-news-bias-and-credibility/", "name": "Owen Jones News", "source_url": "https://www.owenjones.news/", "bias_rating": "LEFT", "bias_score": -7.3, "factual_reporting": "MOSTLY FACTUAL", "factual_score": 2.6, "credibility_rating": "HIGH CREDIBILITY", "country": "United Kingdom", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Website", "traffic_popularity": "Medium Traffic", "bias_category_description": "These media sources are moderate to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation.  They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appealing to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports, and omit information that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy.See all Left Bias sources.", "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate Owen Jones News as Far-Left Biased and Mostly Factual in reporting. While the site uses credible sources, the content is advocacy-oriented, heavily one-sided, and written with strong ideological framing that leaves out opposing context. Detailed Report Bias Rating: LEFT (-7.3) Factual Reporting: MOSTLY FACTUAL (2.", "history": "Owen Jones News is the personal Substack of Owen Jones, a British journalist, author, and commentator. Jones is known for his socialist political stance and activism. He previously authored Chavs: The Demonization of the Working Class (2011) and The Establishment: And How They Get Away With It (2014). Jones is a columnist forThe Guardianand has also written forNew Statesman,The Independent,The New York Times,and others. He also operates aYouTube channel. Read our profile on the UK’s media and government.", "ownership": "The site is independently operated and monetized through Substack subscriptions. Jones also earns income through his journalism, books, and YouTube content.", "analysis": "These media sources are moderate to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation.  They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appealing to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports, and omit information that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy.See all Left Bias sources. Owen Jones’ Substack primarily features commentary rather than straight news. His writing is unapologetically ideological, with articles such as“Trump plots far-right dictatorship”describing the U.S. right as authoritarian and dangerous. Similarly, incoverage of Gaza, he adopts the language of genocide, citing UN reports and NGOs but presenting them through strongly activist framing. This tone positions his Substack as advocacy journalism rather than neutral reporting. While Jones cites credible sources, such as the UN and Amnesty International, articles are presented in an emotionally charged and adversarial style. The site appeals to a progressive/leftist audience, often portraying right-wing figures as existential threats to democracy and social justice. This ideological framing, while consistent with Jones’ public persona as a socialist commentator, limits balance and creates a Far-Left bias profile.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "No known failed fact checks." ], "last_updated": "September 21, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-dominion-post/", "name": "The Dominion Post", "source_url": "https://www.dominionpost.com/", "bias_rating": "LEFT-CENTER", "bias_score": -2.8, "factual_reporting": "HIGH", "factual_score": 1.0, "credibility_rating": "HIGH CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Newspaper", "traffic_popularity": "Minimal Traffic", "bias_category_description": "These media sources have a slight to moderate liberal bias.  They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appeals to emotion or stereotypes) to favor liberal causes.  These sources are generally trustworthy for information but may require further investigation.See all Left-Center sources.", "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate The Dominion Post Left-Center Biased based on editorial positions that slightly favor the left. We also rate them High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing and a clean fact check record. Detailed Report Bias Rating: LEFT-CENTER (-2.8) Factual Reporting: HIGH (1.", "history": "Founded in 1863, The Dominion Post is a daily newspaper serving Morgantown, West Virginia, and the surrounding area. The paper covers local news, sports, crime, opinion, and lifestyle. The current editor is Pam Queen. Read our profile on the United States government and media.", "ownership": "John and David Raese own the Dominion Post.John Raesewas an unsuccessful Republican candidate for the United States Senate in 1984, 2006, and 2011 and Governor in 1988. Revenue is derived through advertising and subscription fees.", "analysis": "These media sources have a slight to moderate liberal bias.  They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appeals to emotion or stereotypes) to favor liberal causes.  These sources are generally trustworthy for information but may require further investigation.See all Left-Center sources. In review, The Dominion Post covers news for the Morgantown, West Virginia area. Local news articles and headlines are presented with minimal bias, such as thisFederal judge denies Morrisey motion to dismiss challenge of Parking Lot Gun Bill. The Dominion Post does not report national news; however, op-eds cover national interests. For example, when reporting on former President Trump, they often have negative opinions like thisW.Va. GOP needs to convince Trump to concede election, and thisTrump may be most memorable for his lies. When reporting on President Joe Biden, they offer more positive opinions such as thisBiden’s Homeland Security pick can bring improvement. Some national political stories are also republished through theAssociated Press. Although ownership is affiliated with the Republican Party, The Dominion Post often holds left-leaning editorial positions and reports news factually.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "None in the Last 5 years" ], "last_updated": "May 28, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/international-business-times/", "name": "International Business Times", "source_url": "https://www.ibtimes.com/", "bias_rating": "LEFT-CENTER", "bias_score": -3.2, "factual_reporting": "MOSTLY FACTUAL", "factual_score": 3.0, "credibility_rating": "HIGH CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Website", "traffic_popularity": "High Traffic", "bias_category_description": "These media sources have a slight to moderate liberal bias.  They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appealing to emotion or stereotypes) to favor liberal causes.  These sources are generally trustworthy for information but may require further investigation.See all Left-Center sources.", "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate IBT Mostly Factual for factual reporting due to a false claim and occasional use of factually mixed sources, and Left-Center biased due to story selection that slightly favors the left. Detailed Report Bias Rating: LEFT-CENTER (-3.2) Factual Reporting: MOSTLY FACTUAL (3.0) Country: USA MBFC’s Country Freedom Rank: MOSTLY FREE Media Type: Website Traffic/Popularity: High Traffic MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY History Founded in 2006, The International Business Times / IB Times or IBT is an online news publication.", "history": "Founded in 2006,The International Business Times/ IB Times or IBT is an online news publication. According to their about page, they provide “comprehensive coverage and analysis of the most important business, economic, political and technological issues around the world.” Headquartered in New York, the founders of The International Business Times are Etienne Uzac and Johnathan Davis, who also ownsNewsweek Media Group. Read our profile on the United States government and media.", "ownership": "In 2013, Etienne Uzac and Johnathan DavisacquiredNewsweek, and IBT Media re-branded itself as Newsweek Media Group in 2017.  Recently, Newsweek reported that Etienne Uzac, co-owner of Newsweek Media Group, and Marion Kim, the company’s finance director, both stepped down due to a long-term financial fraud probe. International Business Times is funded through online advertising.", "analysis": "These media sources have a slight to moderate liberal bias.  They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appealing to emotion or stereotypes) to favor liberal causes.  These sources are generally trustworthy for information but may require further investigation.See all Left-Center sources. In review, IBT publishes slightly left-leaning tabloid-style, attention-grabbing stories, or those with shock value such as: “Passenger’s Repeated Farts Force Airline To Make Emergency Landing”and”“Dustin Snyder, Teenage Cancer Patient, Dies Weeks After Marrying Girlfriend.” In their articles, The International Business Times publishes news stories utilizing credible news sources such asThe Daily BeastandAtlanta Journal-Constitution. They also utilize factually mixed sources such asFox NewsandDaily Mirror.The International Business Times sometimes reports news such as“Man Claims He Time Traveled From 2048 To Warn Of Alien Invasion.”This story originally appeared in Huff Po as “Weird News,”; however, The International Business Times / IBT published this story as “National News.” Further, The International Business Times has made a false claim that was identified byfact-checkers.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "The Navy discharged a black sailor named Janaye Ervin for refusing to stand for the National Anthem. –Mostly False" ], "last_updated": "January 18, 2026" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/lousiana-illuminator-bias/", "name": "Louisiana Illuminator", "source_url": "https://lailluminator.com/", "bias_rating": "LEFT", "bias_score": -5.9, "factual_reporting": "HIGH", "factual_score": 1.5, "credibility_rating": "HIGH CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Organization/Foundation", "traffic_popularity": "Minimal Traffic", "bias_category_description": "These media sources are moderate to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation.  They may use strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appealing to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports, and omit information that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy.See all Left Bias sources.", "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate the Louisiana Illuminator Left Biased based on editorial positions that routinely favor the left. We also rate them High in factual reporting due to proper sourcing and a clean check record. Detailed Report Bias Rating: LEFT (-5.9) Factual Reporting: HIGH (1.", "history": "The Louisiana Illuminator is an online news website from Louisiana. Theiraboutstatement reads, “The Louisiana Illuminator is an independent, nonprofit, nonpartisan news organization driven by its mission to cast light on how decisions are made in Baton Rouge and how they affect the lives of everyday Louisianians, particularly those who are poor or otherwise marginalized.” Read our profile on the United States government and media.", "ownership": "According to their about page, the Louisiana Illuminator is part ofStates Newsroom, a national 501(c)(3) nonprofitsupported by grants and a coalition of donors and readers. States Newsroom publishes 28 otherpublications. The Georgia Recorder is transparent as they link to the States Newsroom donors page. Initially, when they launched, they got fiscal sponsorship from the Hopewell Foundation; however, once the IRS approved their application for 501(c)(3) charity certification, they severed their ties with Hopewell Foundation. There has been criticism of their involvement withthe Hopewell Foundation,and they have responded to the criticismhere.", "analysis": "These media sources are moderate to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation.  They may use strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appealing to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports, and omit information that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy.See all Left Bias sources. The Louisiana Illuminator publishes original news reporting on politics and policy from Louisiana. Coverage focuses on the legislature, the environment, and how national policy affects Louisianans. Articles and headlines promote liberal perspectives through moderate, loaded languageYoung Black and Latino voters seen as key in turning back midterm ‘red wave.’ They properly source, linking to the Louisiana Illuminator and credible sources such aswhitehouse.gov,Washington Post,Politico,Center for Responsive Politics (Open Secrets), and bls.gov (U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics). Editorially, opinion pieces favor the left, such as thisConspiracy theorists urge voting as late as possible on Election Day to ‘stop the steal’.On the issues, the Louisiana Illuminator promotes LGBT equality and has concerns about climate change. Finally, theyfrequently report negatively on Republican politicians, such as thisAt Nevada rally, Trump brags about size of crowd on January 6. The Louisiana Illuminator generallyreports news factually; however, story selection and op-eds strongly favor a liberal perspective.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "None in the Last 5 years" ], "last_updated": "March 14, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/world-cant-wait/", "name": "The World Can’t Wait", "source_url": "https://worldcantwait.net/", "bias_rating": "FAR LEFT", "bias_score": -8.9, "factual_reporting": "MIXED", "factual_score": 5.4, "credibility_rating": "MEDIUM CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Organization/Foundation", "traffic_popularity": "Minimal Traffic", "bias_category_description": "These media sources are moderate to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation.  They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports, and omit information reporting that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy.See all Left Bias sources.", "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate The World Can’t-Wait Far-Left Biased based on editorial positions aligned with Socialism/Communism. We also rate them Mixed for factual reporting due to a lack of transparency and one-sided reporting. Detailed Report Bias Rating: FAR LEFT  (-8.9) Factual Reporting: MIXED (5.", "history": "Founded in 2005, The World Can’t-Wait (WCW) is agroupin the United States dedicated to mobilizing mass resistance to what it describes as crimes committed by the US government. According to theirmission statement, “World Can’t-Wait mobilizes people living in the United States to stand up and stop war on the world, repression, and torture carried out by the US government. We take action, regardless of which political party holds power, to expose the crimes of our government, from war crimes to systematic mass incarceration, and to put humanity and the planet first.” Read our profile on the United States government and media.", "ownership": "The World Can’t Wait does not disclose its ownership. When you click on the donation button, it informs you that you are donating to the “Alliance for Global Justice, our 501 (c) (3) fiscal sponsor.”The goal of theAfGJis to build a strong, grassroots movement capable of challenging the economic and foreign policies of our government and corporations. Donations generate revenue.", "analysis": "These media sources are moderate to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation.  They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports, and omit information reporting that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy.See all Left Bias sources. In review, The World Can’t-Wait is an organization and website that fights against fascism, empire, and war. All articles are well-sourced with credible information. The issues favored by The World Can’t-Wait are those aligned with the political and socialist left. The wording is somewhat loaded to favor the left as well. Currently, WCW is very muchagainst the former Trump administration,as they are viewed as fascists. However, WCW also opposed Obama and his use of military force in many regions of the world. Editorially, WCW has been described as aRevolutionary Communist Party(RCP) affiliate. While they oppose the conservative right, they frequently rail against corporate-leaning Democrats such as Joe BidenNever-Ending Injustice: State Secrets and the Torture of Abu Zubaydah. Generally, stories are reasonably factual; however, there is a lack of transparency with ownership and one-sided propagandistic reporting that favors the socialist/communist left.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "A Third Party has not fact-checked them to date." ], "last_updated": "June 19, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/door-county-knock-bias-and-credibility/", "name": "Door County Knock", "source_url": "https://doorcountyknock.org/", "bias_rating": "LEFT-CENTER", "bias_score": -3.5, "factual_reporting": "HIGH", "factual_score": 1.0, "credibility_rating": "HIGH CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Organization/Foundation", "traffic_popularity": "Minimal Traffic", "bias_category_description": "These media sources have a slight to moderate liberal bias.  They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes) to favor liberal causes.  These sources are generally trustworthy for information, but may require further investigation.See all Left-Center sources.", "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate the Door County Knock as Left-Center biased based on political reporting and editorial positions that moderately favor the left. We also rate them High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing and a clean fact-check record. Detailed Report Bias Rating: LEFT-CENTER (-3.5) Factual Reporting: HIGH (1.", "history": "The Door County Knock is a nonprofit news publication based in Egg Harbor, Wisconsin. According to itsabout page, “Door County Knock is an independent, nonprofit news organization covering Door County, Wisconsin. Knock empowers residents, works to improve public discourse in Door County and binds our community together by providing a solid source of in-depth local news on critical issues facing residents.“ The Door County Knock subscribes tothe standards of editorial independence adopted by theInstitute for Nonprofit News,whichcurrently has450 members. The Institute for Nonprofit News (INN) is a consortium founded in 2009 to support nonprofit journalism focused on investigative and public service reporting. Read our profile on the United States media and government.", "ownership": "Door County Knock is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization supported by donations and grants.", "analysis": "These media sources have a slight to moderate liberal bias.  They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes) to favor liberal causes.  These sources are generally trustworthy for information, but may require further investigation.See all Left-Center sources. The Door County Knock engages in investigative journalism and community news reporting, often highlighting issues related to government transparency, social justice, and inequality concerns. Its reports focus on state politics and policy.Articles and headlines contain moderately loaded emotional language, such as thisTotal Door County property value rose 12 percent, surpasses $15 billion this year.All stories reviewed relied on credible sources such as government documents and outlets like theAssociated Press. Editorially, story selection and opinion pieces, such asLocal businesses and LGBTQIA+ organizations respond to threat accusationsfavor the left. They also promote social justice and environmental concerns, which are views favored by the left. In general, theDoor County Knockis fact-based and holds moderately progressive viewpoints.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "None in the Last 5 years" ], "last_updated": "August 28, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/samtripoli-com-bias-and-credibility/", "name": "SamTripoli.com", "source_url": "https://samtripoli.com/", "bias_rating": "RIGHT CONSPIRACY-PSEUDOSCIENCE", "bias_score": 7.5, "factual_reporting": "LOW", "factual_score": 8.0, "credibility_rating": "LOW CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": null, "media_type": "Website", "traffic_popularity": "Mimial Traffic", "bias_category_description": null, "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate Sam Tripoli’s content as right-biased conspiracy and pseudoscience due to its reliance on speculative narratives and unverified claims. We also rate it low for factual reporting due to verified failed fact checks. Detailed Report Bias Rating: RIGHT CONSPIRACY-PSEUDOSCIENCE (7.5) Factual Reporting: LOW (8.", "history": "Sam Tripoliis an American stand-up comedian, writer, producer, and podcaster best known for exploring conspiracy theories and alternative viewpoints in his work. Active in the entertainment industry for over two decades, he gained recognition for his stand-up performances and his podcast, “Tin Foil Hat,”which focuses on conspiracy-related topics. Read our profile on the United States media and government.", "ownership": "Sam Tripoli operates as a content creator, funding his work through multiple channels such asLive Performances,podcast sponsorships,merchandise sales, andpremium content subscriptions.", "analysis": "Sam Tripoli’s Tin Foil Hat podcast often explores speculative subjects, including conspiracy theories about government cover-ups and secret societies, blending entertainment with provocative narratives. While some episodes present alternative perspectives, they frequently amplify conspiracy theories. For instance, episodes such as “TFH 814: Trump, 9/11, and Kabbalistic Prophecies” explore speculative connections between historical events and numerology. The guest discusses Israel’s alleged role in shaping global events in this interview. The conversation relies heavily on interpretive commentary and unsubstantiated claims. Similarly, “Tin Foil Hat With Sam Tripoli #149: Big Pharma With The Ripple Effects Podcast Ricky Varandas” critiques the pharmaceutical industry, raising concerns about corporate greed but intertwining these with unverified conspiracy claims. Although the podcast’s primary aim is entertainment, its reliance on speculative narratives and lack of clear boundaries between satire and genuine belief risks leading audiences to misinterpret its content as factual. This ambiguity contributes to the spread of misinformation, particularly among viewers less familiar with differentiating speculation from evidence-based analysis.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "“Since Trump labeled ANTIFA a terrorist organization their rights were stripped by the Patriot Act which states if someone is labeled a terrorist they are not afforded due process.”–False", "Not for the faint hearted. Chap thought he was meeting 13 year old girl. He met her uncle.–False" ], "last_updated": "January 3, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/conservative-brief-bias/", "name": "Conservative Brief", "source_url": "https://conservativebrief.com/", "bias_rating": "RIGHT", "bias_score": 6.7, "factual_reporting": "MOSTLY FACTUAL", "factual_score": 3.4, "credibility_rating": "HIGH CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Website", "traffic_popularity": "High Traffic", "bias_category_description": "These media sources are moderate to strongly biased toward conservative causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports, and omit information reporting that may damage conservative causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy.See all Right Bias sources.", "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate Conservative Brief Right-Biased based on editorial perspectives that strongly favor the right. We also rate them Mostly Factual rather than Mixed due to deleting or correcting false information. Detailed Report Bias Rating: RIGHT (6.7) Factual Reporting: MOSTLY FACTUAL (3.", "history": "Launched in January by Eugene Garan, Conservative Brief is a website that publishes news and commentary from a conservative perspective. According to theirabout page, “Conservativebrief.com is one of America’s fastest-growing conservative media websites and counter-cultural outlets for news, politics, opinion, and entertainment. We are a conservative website featuring breaking daily news on the most important political and social topics. We do not claim to be without bias.” Read our profile on the United States government and media.", "ownership": "Apse Media LLCowns and publishes Conservative Brief. Eugene Garan serves as CEO. Advertising generates revenue.", "analysis": "These media sources are moderate to strongly biased toward conservative causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports, and omit information reporting that may damage conservative causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy.See all Right Bias sources. Conservative Brief publishes news and commentary on USA politics favorable toward former President Trump and conservatives. They do not publish original reporting but rather take an existing story and add conservative commentary. Articles and headlines usually contain emotionally charged wording such as thisKamala Harris Whines That She’s Only Unpopular Because Of Racism And Sexism. In another story, they denigrate DemocratsWhite House Has To Fix Another Biden Lie, President Misquoted Manchin. When it comes to sourcing they generally use a credible source such as theNew York Timesand factually mixed sources such asFox NewsandCNN. In June 2021, Conservative Brief advancedTucker Carlson’sbaseless conspiracy theory that the FBI was involved in the January 6th riots. However, Conservative Brief has improved its journalistic practices by correcting the storyCORRECTED HEADLINE: Tucker Carlson Offer Unverified Theory On January 6. Further, the list of failed fact checks seen below has either been removed from the website or corrected. Conservative Brief generally publishes highly right biased opinion content; however, most stories are rooted in fact and earn a mostly factual rating.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "A U.S. law allows children as young as 11 to get vaccinated without their parents’ consent.–Mostly False", "“Joe Suffers Brain Fart! Biden Visits Elementary School, Asks The Children If They’re High Schoolers (VIDEO).”–False", "Majority Of Republicans Believe Trump Will Be Reinstated As President This Year.”–False", "“Report: Biden administration busing ‘thousands’ of illegals to red states to get permanent status.”–False" ], "last_updated": "February 8, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/good-day-amarillo-bias-and-credibility/", "name": "Good Day Amarillo", "source_url": "https://gooddayamarillo.com/", "bias_rating": "LEAST BIASED", "bias_score": 0.0, "factual_reporting": "MIXED", "factual_score": 6.1, "credibility_rating": "LOW CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Website", "traffic_popularity": "Minimal Traffic", "bias_category_description": null, "overall_summary": null, "history": "Good Day Amarillo is part of an extensive network of AI-generated local newsletters initially launched by Good Daily Inc., a company founded in 2023 by engineer Matthew Henderson. In July 2025, the network, which spanned over 350 small and mid-sized towns, was acquired by6AM City, a digital media company known for running human-edited newsletters in cities like Greenville, SC, and Knoxville, TN. Under Good Daily, the network was widely criticized for using fabricated testimonials and concealing its use of artificial intelligence (AI) to generate content. According toNieman Lab, the newsletters operated under a false pretense of local community connection while being entirely automated from New York. Following theacquisition by 6AM City, fake testimonials were removed, and the new owner committed to gradually aligning the newsletters with its editorial and ethical standards. However, Good Day Amarillo remains AI-generated and unedited by human staff. The newsletter is based in Amarillo, Texas; however, 6AM City is run out of South Carolina, despite its emphasis on local communities. Read our profile on the United States Media and Government.", "ownership": "Good Day Amarillo is owned by6AM City, a South Carolina–based media company. It is monetized through: While ownership is now clear, the newsletter does not disclose that its content is produced by AI, nor does it identify any editorial staff or local reporters.", "analysis": "Good Day Amarillo presents itself as a local newsletter focused on community events, weather, business openings, and culture. It avoids politics and crime stories, making it Least Biased in tone and content. Despite this neutrality, several concerns persist: While 6AM City has expressed intentions to improve transparency and may eventually add editors to some of these “seed markets,” that has not yet occurred.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "None in the Last 5 years" ], "last_updated": "August 11, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/alberta-worker-bias-and-credibility/", "name": "Alberta Worker", "source_url": "https://albertaworker.ca/", "bias_rating": "LEFT", "bias_score": -8.8, "factual_reporting": "MOSTLY FACTUAL", "factual_score": 3.6, "credibility_rating": "MEDIUM CREDIBILITY", "country": "Canada", "country_freedom_rating": "EXCELLENT", "media_type": "Website", "traffic_popularity": "Minimal Traffic", "bias_category_description": "These media sources are moderate to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation.  They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appealing to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports, and omit information that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy.See all Left Bias sources.", "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate Alberta Worker as left-biased based on its advocacy for worker rights, union actions, and anti-corporate critique. While well-sourced, we rate them Mostly Factual rather than High due to one-sided reporting that omits countercontext. Detailed Report Bias Rating: LEFT (-8.8) Factual Reporting: MOSTLY FACTUAL (3.", "history": "The Alberta Workerwas founded in April 2020 byKim Siever, an independent journalist based in Lethbridge, Alberta. Siever, who uses they/he pronouns, brings decades of grassroots journalism and organizing experience to the outlet. The site focuses on labour, left-wing politics, and investigative reporting, especially issues affecting workers in Alberta and Canada. Read our profile on Canadian media and government.", "ownership": "The Alberta Worker is a personal, independent media project solely operated and written by Kim Siever. The outlet issupported directlyby readers through donations and subscriptions. It does not run traditional advertising and does not have outside investors.", "analysis": "These media sources are moderate to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation.  They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appealing to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports, and omit information that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy.See all Left Bias sources. The Alberta Worker provides daily coverage of labour struggles and government policy, offering an openly leftist editorial perspective. Stories such as “Calgary fire alarm company accused of unionbusting” and “Carney Liberals force posties to vote on offer” illustrate the site’s critical stance toward the Liberal government’s record on workers’ rights, especially regarding back-to-work legislation and arbitration. It also publishes reports like “Liberals & Conservatives vote against NDP motion for low-income dental care” that support social programs typically associated with progressive platforms. While the reporting is well-sourced and grounded in primary documents (e.g., union filings, board decisions, and parliamentary voting records), the editorial tone is strongly sympathetic to unions and worker causes. There is little to no coverage favorable to conservative or centrist policy approaches, indicating a clear bias to the left.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "None in the Last 5 years" ], "last_updated": "July 28, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/logan-morning-news-bias-and-credibility/", "name": "Logan Morning News", "source_url": "https://loganmorningnews.com/", "bias_rating": "LEAST BIASED", "bias_score": 0.0, "factual_reporting": "MIXED", "factual_score": 6.1, "credibility_rating": "LOW CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Website", "traffic_popularity": "Minimal Traffic", "bias_category_description": null, "overall_summary": null, "history": "Logan Morning News is part of an extensive network of AI-generated local newsletters initially launched by Good Daily Inc., a company founded in 2023 by engineer Matthew Henderson. In July 2025, the network, which spanned over 350 small and mid-sized towns, was acquired by6AM City, a digital media company known for running human-edited newsletters in cities like Greenville, SC, and Knoxville, TN. Under Good Daily, the network was widely criticized for using fabricated testimonials and concealing its use of artificial intelligence (AI) to generate content. According toNieman Lab, the newsletters operated under a false pretense of local community connection while being entirely automated from New York. Following theacquisition by 6AM City, fake testimonials were removed, and the new owner committed to gradually aligning the newsletters with its editorial and ethical standards. However, Logan Morning News remains AI-generated and unedited by human staff. The newsletter is based in Logan, Utah; however, 6AM City is run out of South Carolina, despite its emphasis on local communities. Read our profile on the United States Media and Government.", "ownership": "Logan Morning News is owned by6AM City, a South Carolina–based media company. It is monetized through: While ownership is now clear, the newsletter does not disclose that its content is produced by AI, nor does it identify any editorial staff or local reporters.", "analysis": "Logan Morning News presents itself as a local newsletter focused on community events, weather, business openings, and culture. It avoids politics and crime stories, making it Least Biased in tone and content. Despite this neutrality, several concerns persist: While 6AM City has expressed intentions to improve transparency and may eventually add editors to some of these “seed markets,” that has not yet occurred.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "None in the Last 5 years" ], "last_updated": "August 8, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/nutrientreference-com/", "name": "NutrientReference.com", "source_url": "http://nutrientreference.com/", "bias_rating": "RIGHT CONSPIRACY-PSEUDOSCIENCE", "bias_score": 9.5, "factual_reporting": "VERY LOW", "factual_score": 10.0, "credibility_rating": "LOW CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": null, "media_type": "Website", "traffic_popularity": "Minimal Traffic", "bias_category_description": null, "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate NutrientReference.com an extreme right biased Quackery Level Pseudoscience website that also publishes conspiracy theories. This source is associated with Natural News, which is one of the most discredited sources on the internet. Detailed Report Bias Rating: RIGHT CONSPIRACY-PSEUDOSCIENCE (9.", "history": "NutrientReference.com is a right-wing conspiracy and pseudoscience website that routinely publishes false information. The founder is Mike Adams, who owns several Questionable websites such asNatural NewsandNews Target. NutrientReference.com is a part of the Natural News Network. This website lacks transparency and does not disclose ownership. According to PolitifactHealth misinformation website rebrands as pro-Trump outlet to get around ban from Facebook Read our profile on United States government and media.", "ownership": "NutrientReference.com is owned by Mike Adams, who owns numerous other fake and/or controversial right-wing conspiracy websites. The website, like all of Mike Adams’s properties, is funded through online advertising.", "analysis": "In review, Mike Adams is known as theHealth Rangeraccording toRationalwiki. However, they point out dozens of cases where his claims are false. Besides promoting pseudoscience, NutrientReference.com is an extreme right-wing biased source that frequently promotes false or misleading information regarding vaccines, alternative health, and government conspiracies. For more information read our review onNatural News. In general, politically, all Mike Adam’s stories favor the right and promote pseudoscience such aschemtrails, the Sandy Hook shooting being a false flag:Sandy Hook was theater! Actor who played law enforcement sniper was recorded walking around carrying rifle by the magazine. Further, they routinely publishanti-vaccination propagandaand conspiracy theories. Lastly, this source denies the consensus onclimate changewithout evidence, as seen here:Climate change cultists are now taking over your local weather forecast.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "SeeNatural News" ], "last_updated": "January 23, 2026" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/newsready/", "name": "NewsReady", "source_url": "https://www.newsready.com/", "bias_rating": "EXTREME RIGHT", "bias_score": 8.9, "factual_reporting": "MIXED", "factual_score": 6.4, "credibility_rating": "LOW CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Website", "traffic_popularity": "Medium Traffic", "bias_category_description": null, "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate NewsReady far-right biased and Questionable based on the promotion of right-wing propaganda, poor sourcing, a complete lack of transparency, and false claims. Detailed Report Reasoning: Propaganda, Poor Sourcing, Lack of Transparency, False Claims Bias Rating: EXTREME RIGHT (8.9) Factual Reporting: MIXED (6.4) Country: USA MBFC’s Country Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE Media Type: Website Traffic/Popularity: Medium Traffic MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY History Launched in 2019, NewsReady is an anonymously run conservative news and opinion website.", "history": "Launched in 2019, NewsReady is an anonymously run conservative news and opinion website. According to theirabout page, “The onslaught of fake news financed by the corrupt minority and distributed by the mainstream media has become increasingly difficult to fight. Americans are constantly overwhelmed by an onslaught of fake news and do not have time to fact check everything they see online or on TV.” The website lacks transparency as they do not name authors, editors or clearly indicate who owns the website. Read our profile on the United States government and media.", "ownership": "NewsReady does not clearly indicate who owns the website. For example, on the contact page, they indicate the contact as Beachside Media, Inc. A search forBeachside Mediareveals that Rob Greenstein is the owner. On their Terms page, they describeEarnware Corporationas the owner. Earnware is a digital marketing company. Regardless, they lack transparency in ownership. Revenue is derived through advertising and sponsored content.", "analysis": "In review, NewsReady provides news summaries from a far-right conservative perspective. The frequent use of highly emotional language denigrates the left, such as thisOcasio-Cortez and Democrats Unveil New SchemeandDid Obama Commit Treason?On the other hand, they often praise the right, particularly former President Donald Trump, such as thisHere’s How Trump Has Improved International Standing. All of the stories listed above and the others reviewed lacked hyperlinked sourcing. Editorially, NewsReady is primary a far-right biased opinion website that is not always factual. For example, during the 2020 Presidential Election, they amplified election fraud claims such as thisNewt Gingrich Says 2020 Election Might Be Biggest Theft Since 1824.  As of this date, there has not been any evidence presented in court tosubstantiate voter fraud. Finally, they also amplified false information that was not corrected when it turned out not to be true:Senator Josh Hawley Says His Wife Was Threatened. This story isfalse.In general, NewsReady reports news that is not always factual and with a far-right editorial bias.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "They have never been directly fact-checked; however, we provide two examples above." ], "last_updated": "April 16, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/infinite-unknown/", "name": "Infinite Unknown", "source_url": "https://www.infiniteunknown.net/", "bias_rating": "EXTREME RIGHT CONSPIRACY-PSEUDOSCIENCE", "bias_score": 9.0, "factual_reporting": "VERY LOW", "factual_score": 9.8, "credibility_rating": "LOW CREDIBILITY", "country": "Unknown", "country_freedom_rating": null, "media_type": "Website", "traffic_popularity": "Minimal Traffic", "bias_category_description": null, "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate Infinite Unknown as a tin-foil hat conspiracy and quackery-level pseudoscience website that promotes ridiculous debunked conspiracy and junk science claims. Detailed Report Bias Rating: EXTREME RIGHT CONSPIRACY-PSEUDOSCIENCE (9.0) Factual Reporting: VERY LOW (9.8) Country: Unknown MBFC Country Freedom Rank: N/A Media Type: Website Traffic/Popularity: Minimal Traffic MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY History Founded in 2000, Infinite Unknown is a right-wing biased news and opinion website that promotes conspiracies and pseudoscience.", "history": "Founded in 2000, Infinite Unknown is a right-wing biased news and opinion website that promotes conspiracies and pseudoscience. According to theirabout page“This site is created to link the political, the economical and the environmental situation of planet earth.” The website lacks transparency as they do not offer names of those associated or disclose ownership.", "ownership": "Infinite Unknown does not disclose ownership, and revenue is derived through donations.", "analysis": "Infinite Unknown is a website that does not usually publish original content but links to other sources. Many of the sources they link to fall under theConspiracy-PseudoscienceorQuestionablecategories. For example, they link to the conspiracy websiteZero Hedge, quack pseudoscientistJoseph Mercolaand the far-rightGateway Pundit. Besides publishing standard conspiracy fares likeFalse FlagsandChemtrails, they have recently begun publishing hysterical fears overCovid-19 vaccinationsandelection fraudin the 2020 election. In general, this is one of the least credible sources on the internet. Virtually everything is either false, misleading, or unproven. Overall, we rate Infinite Unknown as a tin-foil hat conspiracy and quackery-level pseudoscience website that promotes ridiculous debunked conspiracy and junk science claims. (D. Van Zandt 7/20/2016) Updated (11/21/2025) Source:https://www.infiniteunknown.net/ Last Updated on November 21, 2025 byMedia Bias Fact Check Do you appreciate our work? Please consider one of the following ways to sustain us.MBFC Ad-FreeorMBFC DonationLeft vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sourcesFound this insightful? Please consider sharing on your Social Media:Explore Similar Sources:JD Supra Bias and Credibility – Bias and Credibility", "failed_fact_checks": [ "It appears this website has not registered on the fact-checkers radar." ], "last_updated": "November 21, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/south-palm-beach-today/", "name": "South Palm Beach Today", "source_url": "https://southpalmbeachtoday.com/", "bias_rating": "RIGHT-CENTER", "bias_score": 4.3, "factual_reporting": "MIXED", "factual_score": 6.1, "credibility_rating": "LOW CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Website", "traffic_popularity": "Minimal Traffic", "bias_category_description": null, "overall_summary": null, "history": "South Palm Beach Today is a conservative news and opinion website published byMetric Media LLCthat is designed to look like a local news source. Metric Media publishes over 1000 websites with the same design and about page that reads “Metric Media was established to fill the void in community news after years of decline in local reporting by legacy media. Our approach is to provide objective, data-driven information without political bias. We provide 100% original reporting, including to share as much data as possible from government and other publicly available sources.” Metric Media LLC lacks transparency as they do not have an about page that describes their conservative agenda, nor discloses funding and ownership. Read our profile on United States government and media.", "ownership": "The Metric Media LLC website does not disclose ownership. The Metric Media Foundation owns each local website. The CEO of Metric Media is conservative political consultantBradley Cameron. Each website receives revenue through advertising and donations to the Metric Media Foundation. The Foundation then funds the websites’ production.", "analysis": "In review, South Palm Beach Today is one of over 1000 conservative-leaning news websites published by the Metric Media LLC Network.Each of the websites in the network has the same design and generally relies onalgorithmicallyproduced content. Furthermore, the original content produced on the website holds a right-leaning editorial bias. Please see the full review of Metric Media websiteshere.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "SeeMetric Media" ], "last_updated": "May 23, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/trending-politics/", "name": "Trending Politics", "source_url": "https://trendingpoliticsnews.com/", "bias_rating": "RIGHT", "bias_score": 8.2, "factual_reporting": "LOW", "factual_score": 8.0, "credibility_rating": "LOW CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Website", "traffic_popularity": "Medium Traffic", "bias_category_description": null, "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate Trending Politics Right Biased and Questionable based on poor sourcing, promotion of propaganda, conspiracy theories, and several failed fact checks. Detailed Report Reasoning: Poor Sourcing, Propaganda, Conspiracy, Failed Fact Checks Bias Rating: RIGHT (8.2) Factual Reporting: LOW (8.0) Country: USA MBFC’s Country Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE Media Type: Website Traffic/Popularity: Medium Traffic MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY History Founded in 2019 , Trending Politics is a hyper-partisan conservative news and opinion website.", "history": "Founded in 2019, Trending Politics is a hyper-partisan conservative news and opinion website. They fully disclose their bias on theabout pageas follows: “We provide conservative commentary on the news stories of the day. Studies have shown that 90%+ of the stories about President Trump are negative, so we like to bring the other side of the story to you. With that being said, we aren’t shy to admit we’re biased. The majority of our articles will have a good amount of Pro-Trump opinion weaved into it.” They do not disclose editors or ownership of the website. Read our profile on the United States government and media.", "ownership": "Trending Politics does not openly state who owns them; however, social media links on the homepageconnectwithIlovemyfreedom.org, rated as a Questionable source. I Love My Freedom discloses on their about page that “ILoveMyFreedom.org is Co-Owned by A. Ferretti, R. Nosbish,Jack Murphy, andClayton Keirns. We are proud to say that we’ve never taken a single penny from any donor, and we are completely funded by our loyal customers and subscribers by the revenue generated through the website.” They also have anonline storethat sells Pro-Trump and Conservative merchandise. Trending Politics displays ads and links to the ILoveMyFreedom store.", "analysis": "In review, Trending Politics rarely publishes original reporting but rather offers commentary to news stories from other sources. Headlines and wording of articles often use emotionally loaded language such as this:House Democrats Sue Trump For Another Ridiculous Reason. This story is sourced from the QuestionableBreitbart, which has failed numerous fact checks. Regarding sourcing information, they use a combination of credible sources such as theNew York Times,Politico, andReutersand poor sources such as theGateway PunditandDefiant America. Editorially, story selection always favors the right and typically reports on President Trump positively:Don’t Impeach Trump. He Puts America, Not Ukraine, Firstand negatively on liberals such as this,Schiff Exposed After Report Reveals Disturbing Ties Within His Own Committee. Trending Politics also promotes conspiracy theories such as this:Investigation Into Ilhan Omar Reveals Fraudulent Tax Returns Possibly Linked to Marriage to Her Brother. Fact-checkers have determined that the claim she married her brother isunprovenand hence a conspiracy theory at this point. Finally, Trending Politics frequently publishes disinformation regarding Covid-19 and vaccines. See failed fact checks below.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "Disinformation targets Republicans who criticize Trump or support the impeachment inquiry–FALSE", "“The House Democrats snuck a provision into their $3 trillion bailout bill today that would keep the house in recess until July 21.”–PANTS ON FIRE", "Says the governors of Michigan, New York, and Nevada “have issued orders banning the prescription of hydroxychloroquine to patients with COVID-19.”–FALSE", "“Biden is making ‘maternity flight suits’ so pregnant women can fight in the military.”–MOSTLY FALSE", "Barack Obama Signals That Democrats Intend to Cheat in the Virginia Governor’s Election–FALSE", "Dr. Fauci Admits That Covid Vaccines May Actually Make People ‘Worse’–False", "The Lancet Published Medical Professor’s Warning That Natural Immunity Has Made Vaccine Mandates Irrelevant–False", "“The risk of myocarditis is 800 times higher for vaccinated than unvaccinated young adults, according to a recent Swiss study”–Inaccurate" ], "last_updated": "February 18, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/left-action/", "name": "Left Action", "source_url": "http://leftaction.com/", "bias_rating": "EXTREME LEFT", "bias_score": -8.9, "factual_reporting": "LOW", "factual_score": 8.0, "credibility_rating": "LOW CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Website", "traffic_popularity": "Minimal Traffic", "bias_category_description": null, "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate Left Action Questionable based on Extreme Left-wing bias, poor sourcing, and a complete lack of transparency. Detailed Report Reasoning: Propaganda, Conspiracy, Poor Sourcing, Lack of Transparency Bias Rating: EXTREME LEFT (-8.9) Factual Reporting: LOW (8.0) Country: USA MBFC’s Country Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE Media Type: Website Traffic/Popularity: Minimal Traffic MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY History Left Action is a network that proclaims over 1,000,000 activists committed to making a difference and fighting for progressive causes.", "history": "Left Action is a network that proclaims over 1,000,000 activists committed to making a difference and fighting for progressive causes. According to their about page: “Left Action is a network encompassing a range of sites and Facebook pages, powered by millions of progressives. The flagship website is athttp://LeftAction.com, and the main Facebook page is athttp://Facebook.com/LeftAction.” Read our profile on the United States government and media.", "ownership": "The Left Action Website does not disclose ownership or any names in their contact form. There does not appear to be a source of revenue for this website/organization.", "analysis": "In review, the Left Action sporadically provides news that often targets former President Donald Trump, such as this:“Trump Sucks” FB page tops 800,000 fans. This entire story appears to be the headline. This emotionally loaded headline links to a Facebook poll, which is not credible:Poll: Which is smarter, Trump supporters or a rock? In general, this source does not provide credible information, and its purpose is unknown.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "“Hunter Biden was chairman of the World Food Program, which just won the Nobel Peace Prize. Eric Trump, Donald J Trump Jr, Ivanka Trump are banned from ever operating a charity again because they stole donations to children with cancer.”–False", "Social Media Posts Misrepresent Tennessee Bill Allowing Common Law Marriage.–False" ], "last_updated": "December 16, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-communist-bias-and-credibility/", "name": "The Communist", "source_url": "https://communist.red/", "bias_rating": "EXTREME LEFT", "bias_score": -9.5, "factual_reporting": "MIXED", "factual_score": 4.9, "credibility_rating": "MEDIUM CREDIBILITY", "country": "United Kingdom", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Organization/Foundation", "traffic_popularity": "Medium Traffic", "bias_category_description": "These media sources are moderate to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation.  They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appealing to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports, and omit information that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy.See all Left Bias sources.", "overall_summary": "Overall, The Communist is rated Extreme Left Biased based on its promotion of revolutionary communism, strong social progressivism, and one-sided editorial content. While the site is mostly transparent and has not failed external fact checks, its poor sourcing and heavy propaganda lead to a Mixed rating for factual reporting. Detailed Report Bias Rating: EXTREME LEFT (-9.5) Factual Reporting: MIXED (4.", "history": "The Communist is theofficial websiteof the Revolutionary Communist Party (RCP), established in May 2024 as the British section of the Revolutionary Communist International. The party positions itself as the “political home of Britain’s communist generation,” advocating revolutionary Marxism and organizing youth and workers against capitalism. Read our profile on the UK’s media and government.", "ownership": "The site is owned by the RCP and funded primarily throughdonations, subscriptions, and merchandise sales. It also promotes its publications,The Communistnewspaper andIn Defence of Marxismmagazine.", "analysis": "These media sources are moderate to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation.  They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appealing to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports, and omit information that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy.See all Left Bias sources. The Communist is an explicitly ideological website operated by the Revolutionary Communist Party. Its stated mission is to “educate, agitate, and organise” around Marxist principles, and the content reflects this orientation. Articles are not written with journalistic neutrality; instead, they aim to mobilize readers toward revolutionary communism. For instance,“Capitalism’s neverending crisis – Marx was right!”argues that the 2008 financial crash and subsequent global crises prove that capitalism is inherently unstable and must be replaced with socialism. The article frames all economic downturns as confirmation of Marxist theory and rejects reformist solutions, presenting only the communist alternative. Similarly,“Supreme Court attacks trans rights – Fight their culture war with class war!”portrays mainstream debates over gender rights as distractions created by the “ruling class” to divide workers, again framing communism as the only viable solution. The site rarely includes counterarguments or alternative perspectives, and sourcing is minimal. When external references are cited, they often come from ideologically friendly or activist outlets rather than neutral or academic sources. The language is highly emotional and militant, frequently using terms like “fight,” “revolution,” and “war criminals” to galvanize readers. This reflects a strong editorial bias that prioritizes persuasion and ideology over balanced reporting. In summary, The Communist functions less as a news outlet and more as a propaganda and organizing platform for the RCP. Its bias is evident both in topic selection and in the ideological framing of nearly every article, offering little balance or acknowledgment of competing viewpoints.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "None in the Last 5 years" ], "last_updated": "October 2, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/madison-courier-bias/", "name": "Madison Courier", "source_url": "https://www.madisoncourier.com/", "bias_rating": "RIGHT-CENTER", "bias_score": 2.8, "factual_reporting": "HIGH", "factual_score": 1.0, "credibility_rating": "HIGH CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Newspaper", "traffic_popularity": "Minimal Traffic", "bias_category_description": "These media sources are slight to moderately conservative in bias. They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appealing to emotion or stereotypes) to favor conservative causes. These sources are generally trustworthy for information but may require further investigation.See all Right-Center sources.", "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate The Madison Courier as right-center biased based on editorial positions that slightly favor the right and High for factual reporting due to credible news sources and a clean fact-check record. Detailed Report Bias Rating: RIGHT-CENTER (2.8) Factual Reporting: HIGH (1.0) Country: USA MBFC’s Country Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE Media Type: Newspaper Traffic/Popularity: Minimal Traffic MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY History The Madison Courier is a newspaper published in Madison, Indiana.", "history": "The Madison Courieris a newspaper published in Madison, Indiana. madisoncourier.comdelivers local news, hometown politics, business news, local events, and sports. Read our profile on the United States government and media.", "ownership": "The paper is owned byPaxton Media Group,which owns several right-leaning newspapers across the USA, such as theElkhart Truth. Revenue is derived from advertising and subscriptions.", "analysis": "These media sources are slight to moderately conservative in bias. They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appealing to emotion or stereotypes) to favor conservative causes. These sources are generally trustworthy for information but may require further investigation.See all Right-Center sources. In review, The Madison Courier reports national news by republishing articles from credible newsagents such as theAssociated Press.They report local news through the use of journalists with minimal bias using neutral headlines such asCounty adopts resolution supporting battery farm. All information is properly sourced. Editorially, there is a reasonable balance between left and right-leaning opinions, with slightly more favoring the right.In general, the paper is fact-based and holds a slight right-leaning editorial bias.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "None in the Last 5 years" ], "last_updated": "December 23, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/independent-sentinel/", "name": "Independent Sentinel", "source_url": "https://www.independentsentinel.com", "bias_rating": "RIGHT", "bias_score": 8.4, "factual_reporting": "LOW", "factual_score": 7.6, "credibility_rating": "LOW CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Website", "traffic_popularity": "Medium Traffic", "bias_category_description": null, "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate the Independent Sentinel Right Biased and Questionable based on the use of poor sources, the promotion of propaganda and conspiracy theories, and some false claims. Detailed Report Questionable Reasoning: Far Right, Poor Sources, Propaganda, Conspiracy, False Claims Bias Rating: RIGHT (8.4) Factual Reporting: LOW (7.6) Country: USA MBFC’s Country Freedom Rank: MOSTLY FREE Media Type: Website Traffic/Popularity: Medium Traffic MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY History Founded in 2011, the Independent Sentinel is a conservative news and opinion website/blog.", "history": "Founded in 2011, the Independent Sentinel is a conservative news and opinion website/blog. According to the Independent Sentinel’sabout page, they “provide news, opinion, and commentary, analysis, factual and original content, mostly political, usually right-of-center, for a Conservative, Libertarian, Republican audience.” The website is operated by the pseudonymSara Noble. The website lists other authors and providesbiographical informationfor each. On this page, Sara Noble indicates that she was the former copy editor for This Week Magazine and “for 33 years, worked in education as a teacher of English and Special Education, and spent years as an elementary principal, secondary principal, central office administrator, and consultant.” Mrs. Noble reached out to us via email and provided her real name to protect for privacy. She states that she uses the pseudonym because “many of my family members are liberals and don’t want their last name out there on a center-right blog.” Read our profile on the United States government and media.", "ownership": "The Independent Sentinel is held by Independent Sentinel LLC, which Sara Noble owns. Revenue is derived from onsite advertising.", "analysis": "In review, the Independent Sentinel does not produce original news stories but summarizes and opines news stories from other sources. Headlines and articles frequently use emotionally loaded wording such as this:Pelosi shamelessly claims Schiff’s parody were the “President’s words.” This story is sourced back to videos and tweets. In another story,Dems’ Impeachment Narrative Is Blowing Up & It’s Getting Better & Better, information is sourced to mainstream outlets such as theLA TimesandFox News. Regarding sourcing in general, they often utilize credible mainstream sources; however, on occasion, they use poor sources such as Rush Limbaugh, who had an abysmal track record with fact-checkers, and the QuestionableBreitbart. Editorially, all stories favor the right and often denigrate the left, such as this:“Damning, Brutal, Explosive” Testimony by Bill Taylor Was 100% GOSSIP. The website also often reports on the successes of the Trump Administration:Trump’s Leading USA to Economic Victory Over a Badly Slumping China-Shh!. However, the Independent Sentinel fully disclaims the site is geared toward the right-leaning audience and, therefore, is not deceptive. In 2020, the Independent Sentinel promoted false or misleading information regarding covid-19. For example, they promoted a danish mask studyDanish study finds masks don’t do muchthat has been rated asUnsupportedby IFCN fact-checkerHealth Feedback. They have also published false information about anAsthma medicationthat can cure Covid-19.This is false. During and after the 2020 Presidential Election, they also promoted election fraud conspiracies such as thisRead forensics report on Dominion software “intentionally designed” for fraud. This is misinformation as there hasnot been proofthat Dominion committed fraud. In fact,Dominion is suingthose who have made these false claims.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "After Cancelling Keystone, Looks Like Biden’s Promoting a Taliban Pipeline–False", "Joe Biden says he “proposed” defunding the police, “they’ve become the enemy”–Mostly False" ], "last_updated": "February 27, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/atmosphere-journal-bias/", "name": "Atmosphere Journal", "source_url": "https://www.mdpi.com/about/history", "bias_rating": "PRO-SCIENCE", "bias_score": -0.5, "factual_reporting": "MOSTLY FACTUAL", "factual_score": 3.6, "credibility_rating": "MEDIUM CREDIBILITY", "country": "Switzerland", "country_freedom_rating": "EXCELLENT", "media_type": "Journal", "traffic_popularity": "Minimal Traffic", "bias_category_description": "These sources consist of legitimate science or are evidence based through credible scientific sourcing.  Legitimate science follows the scientific method, is unbiased, and does not use emotional words.  These sources also respect the consensus of experts in the given scientific field and strive to publish peer-reviewed science. Some sources in this category may have a slight political bias but adhere to scientific principles.See all Pro-Science sources.", "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate Atmosphere Journal Pro-Science and Mostly Factual for reporting due to being published by a company that has failed fact checks in other journals. Detailed Report Bias Rating: PRO-SCIENCE (-0.5) Factual Reporting: MOSTLY FACTUAL (3.6) Country: Switzerland MBFC’s Country Freedom Rating: EXCELLENT Media Type: Journal Traffic/Popularity: Minimal Traffic MBFC Credibility Rating: MEDIUM CREDIBILITY History Atmosphere Journal is published by MDPI (Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute) , formerly Molecular Diversity Preservation International, an open-access journal publisher based in Basel, Switzerland.", "history": "Atmosphere Journal is published byMDPI (Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute), formerly Molecular Diversity Preservation International, an open-access journal publisher based in Basel, Switzerland.Atmosphereis an international,peer-reviewed, open-access journal of scientific studies related to the atmosphere published monthly online by MDPI. MDPI publishes over400 journals. Read our profile on Swiss Media and Government.", "ownership": "The publisher of Atmosphere Journal isMDPI AG,which Shu-Kun Lin owns. Here is the list ofthe Management Team.According to“MDPI Open Access Information and Policy.”MDPI articles and all its journals are open access where authors pay a one-time Article Processing Charge (APC) to cover the costs of peer review administration and management; here isClimate Suitability for Tourism in Romania Based on HCI: Urban Climate Index in the Near-Future Climate.", "analysis": "Atmosphere Journal covers the study of the atmosphere. Studies are published via open access, such as thisGravitational versus Magnetohydrodynamic Waves in Curved Spacetime in the Presence of Large-Scale Magnetic Fields.Like all others reviewed, this study is Pro-Science, well-researched, and low-biased. While Atmosphere Journal has not failed a fact-check, its publisher has faced criticism as an open-access predatory journal. Read our full review onMDPI.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "None for Atmosphere Journal; however, other MDPI journals havefailed fact checks." ], "last_updated": "September 19, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/international-crisis-group/", "name": "International Crisis Group", "source_url": "https://www.crisisgroup.org/", "bias_rating": "LEFT-CENTER", "bias_score": -3.2, "factual_reporting": "VERY HIGH", "factual_score": 0.0, "credibility_rating": "HIGH CREDIBILITY", "country": "Belgium", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Organization/Foundation", "traffic_popularity": "Medium Traffic", "bias_category_description": "These media sources have a slight to moderate liberal bias.  They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes) to favor liberal causes.  These sources are generally trustworthy for information but may require further investigation.See all Left-Center sources.", "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate the International Crisis Group Left-Center Biased based on policy positions that mostly favor the left. We also rate them Very-High for factual reporting due to extensive sourcing and for being used as a source for fact-checkers. Detailed Report Bias Rating: LEFT-CENTER (-3.2) Factual Reporting: VERY HIGH (0.", "history": "The International Crisis Group (Crisis Group) is a transnational non-profit, non-governmental organization founded in 1995 that carries out field research on violent conflict and advances policies to prevent, mitigate or resolve conflict. It advocates policies directly with governments, multilateral organizations, and other political actors as well as the media. According to their about page, the mission is to “work to prevent wars and shape policies that will build a more peaceful world.” Read our profile on Belgium Media and Government.", "ownership": "The International Crisis Group is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit that is supported through donations. Theydisclose their financialsindicating that 43% comes from Governments, 31% from Foundations, 22% Private Sector, Other contributions, and investments 4%.", "analysis": "These media sources have a slight to moderate liberal bias.  They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes) to favor liberal causes.  These sources are generally trustworthy for information but may require further investigation.See all Left-Center sources. In review, the International Crisis Group performs field research, analysis, and advocacy. Headlines and articles contain minimally loaded language such as this:Calibrating the Response: Turkey’s ISIS Returnees. This analysis is extremely well-sourced and researched. Politically, the group is concerned aboutclimate change, such as thisClimate Change Is Shaping the Future of Conflictas well as concerns for human rightsNepal: Dealing with a Human Rights Crisis. Further, when reporting on US politics, they generally do not agree with the former Trump administrationWe Don’t Need A Wall To Manage Migration From Mexico. In general, the news is reported factually and with a moderate left-leaning policy bias.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "None in the Last 5 years. IFCN fact-checkers use them to verify the information." ], "last_updated": "November 24, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/demstate-bias-and-credibility/", "name": "DemState", "source_url": "https://demstate.com/", "bias_rating": "RIGHT-CENTER", "bias_score": 2.6, "factual_reporting": "LOW", "factual_score": 8.1, "credibility_rating": "LOW CREDIBILITY", "country": "Unknown", "country_freedom_rating": null, "media_type": "Website", "traffic_popularity": "Minimal Traffic", "bias_category_description": null, "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate DemState Questionable based on a lack of transparency, fictitious author profiles, a probable Imposter site, and pro-Kremlin narrative framing. We also rate it Low for factual reporting due to poor sourcing, misleading health claims, and signs of recycled or AI-generated content. Detailed Report Questionable Reasoning: Imposter Site, Lack of Transparency, Misleading Content Bias Rating: RIGHT-CENTER (2.6) Factual Reporting: LOW (8.", "history": "DemState describes itself as a source for “progressive news & commentary.” It was launched in 2025, as indicated by the timestamps on its articles, and it features sections dedicated to U.S. politics, international news, and culture. The About page outlines its mission to “advance democratic principles and social justice” and claims to adhere to rigorous fact-checking and maintain editorial independence. However, the site lacks a masthead, a list of newsroom personnel, a physical address, or specific contact names, providing only generic contact forms and emails. DemState appears to sit inside a small network of uniform, template-driven sites that all advertise in the footer: “A Division of 2Dash Media Group.” Two other sites carry the same footer or ownership line:PozorMedia / “Russian Insider”andAqui24. All three share near-identical architecture, category lists, and boilerplate pages, indicating a common backend and operator. We can find no company details for 2Dash Media Group. The site’s legal pages show template carry-over from unrelated brands:DemState’s Privacy Policy and Terms of Servicestill refer to“RedStatePost,” “Freedom Media,”and“GlobalVoice Media.”This suggests recycled boilerplate rather than a legitimate organization with a consistent legal identity.", "ownership": "DemState says it is owned by “2Dash Media Group” (private) and is funded by subscriptions, advertising, and private investment. The site runs a public Advertise page (“Reach Engaged Liberal Americans”) yet the sales deck mixes incongruous targeting like “Traditional values, Faith & family, Second Amendment” — messaging that does not match the stated progressive niche. We observed no third-party display ads on article pages; monetization currently appears minimal. The sibling sites also claim 2Dash ownership in footers or About pages: PozorMedia/“Russian Insider” and Aqui24. None of the network sites discloses verifiable corporate registration details, a newsroom location, or named executives.", "analysis": "Self-description:DemState explicitly markets aprogressiveeditorial perspective. Observed content: The front page and “International” section include narratives and framing that do not match a typical U.S. progressive outlet and at times echo pro-Kremlin lines. For example, coverage ofZapad-2025 military drills in Belarus(“Putin thanks countries attending…”) lists a long roster of participants/observers (including the U.S. and DPRK) without sourcing. Independent reporting confirms Zapad-2025 took place and that U.S. officers observed portions of the drills. DemState also features COVID-19 vaccine content with misleading claims, e.g.,“EU Commission admits mRNA injections were released without complete safety data.”The European Commission’s health/disinformation page and major science fact-checkersdirectly contradictthis statement; regulators (EMA/FDA) describe ongoing evaluation with updated approvals rather than any “admission” of unsafe authorization. Where DemState mirrors real news (e.g.,judge dismisses terrorism counts in the Luigi Mangione/UnitedHealthcare CEO case),mainstream outlets/AP reporting match the basic fact, but DemState does not consistently link sources. The story is accurate; the sourcing practice is weak. Imposter Network signals & AI:— Identical site templates/footers across DemState, PozorMedia, and Aqui24;— Legal pages with mismatched brand names;— Generic author bios (e.g., “Dr. Aisha Washington,” “Priya Patel,” “Maya Rodriguez”) lacking contact details or corroboration;— Repetitive headline scaffolding (“Breaking,” short video stubs), placeholder “Advertisement” zones, and inconsistent political targeting on the Advertise page.These are hallmarks of a low-transparency content network that may be mixing machine-generated drafts with manual edits. While we can’t prove AI authorship conclusively, the pattern is strong. Bias verdict:Although the site markets itself as progressive, the observable framing skews toward pro-Kremlin international coverage and sensational, low-sourced claims, inconsistent with its stated mission. We classify the editorial bias as “Propaganda/Disinformation-leaning (Pro-Kremlin narratives), not reliably left/right in the U.S. sense.”", "failed_fact_checks": [ "“EU Commission admits mRNA vaccines were released without complete safety data” — Misleading. EU/EMA/FDA materials and independent fact-checks show continuous safety evaluation and updated formula approvals; there is no EU “admission” matching DemState’s headline." ], "last_updated": "September 16, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/c2c-journal/", "name": "C2C Journal", "source_url": "https://c2cjournal.ca/", "bias_rating": "RIGHT", "bias_score": 6.7, "factual_reporting": "MOSTLY FACTUAL", "factual_score": 3.6, "credibility_rating": "MEDIUM CREDIBILITY", "country": "Canada", "country_freedom_rating": "EXCELLENT", "media_type": "Magazine", "traffic_popularity": "Minimal Traffic", "bias_category_description": "These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward conservative causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports, and omit information that may damage conservative causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy.See all Right Bias sources.", "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate the C2C Journal Right Biased based on editorial positions that consistently align with conservative/libertarian perspectives. We also rate them Mostly Factual rather than High due to a lack of transparency in disclosing ownership by the Manning Foundation. Detailed Report Bias Rating: RIGHT (6.7) Factual Reporting: MOSTLY FACTUAL (3.", "history": "Founded in 2007, C2C Journal is a Canadian print and online publication covering current political, cultural, and economic issues from a libertarian perspective. According to theirabout page, “C2C’s unabashed bias is in favor of free markets, democratic governance, and individual liberty. We strive for balance, fairness, and accuracy in our reporting and commentary. Our mission is to explore and develop “Ideas that Lead” by encouraging writers to push boundaries, challenge orthodoxies, and advance arguments rooted in the values and principles of classical liberalism and western civilization.” The current editor-in-chief is George Koch. Read our profile on Canada’s media and government.", "ownership": "The C2C Journal lacks transparency as they do not clearly indicate the Manning Foundation owns them. According toPress Progress, the Manning Foundation is a conservative nonprofit that has madecontroversial claims. Revenue for C2C is derived through donations and subscription fees.", "analysis": "These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward conservative causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports, and omit information that may damage conservative causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy.See all Right Bias sources. In review, the C2C Journal produces original long-form journalism from a libertarian/conservative perspective. Articles and headlines often utilize loaded emotional wording such as thisStatue Smashers: Why History Protesters Are The New Totalitarians. This long-form article is properly sourced to local media and larger publications such as theNew York Times. Story selection favors the right and often denigrates the left such asThe Unbearable Wokeness Of Being In Stratford. When it comes to reporting on scientific issues, they do not deny human influence onclimate change. Still, they do not agree with progressive solutionsJustin Trudeau’s Job-Killing Climate Change Plan. In general, most stories favor a free-market conservative platform and are mostly factual.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "None in the Last 5 years" ], "last_updated": "January 14, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/red-flag-bias-and-credibility/", "name": "Red Flag", "source_url": "https://redflag.org.au/", "bias_rating": "LEFT", "bias_score": -8.8, "factual_reporting": "MIXED", "factual_score": 4.6, "credibility_rating": "MEDIUM CREDIBILITY", "country": "Australia", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Newspaper", "traffic_popularity": "Minimal Traffic", "bias_category_description": "These media sources are moderate to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation.  They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appealing to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports, and omit information that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy.See all Left Bias sources.", "overall_summary": "Overall, Red Flag is a transparently far-left, theory-driven journal dedicated to Marxist and Trotskyist perspectives. We also rate them Mixed for factual reporting due to their extreme one-sidedness that completely leaves out context. Detailed Report Bias Rating: LEFT (-8.8) Factual Reporting: MIXED (4.", "history": "Red Flag is an Australian fortnightly newspaper founded in 2013 by Socialist Alternative, a Trotskyist political organization. The publication functions as the group’s main media outlet, advocating revolutionary Marxist theory and direct class struggle. Read our profile on Australian media and government.", "ownership": "Red Flag is a non-profit, reader-funded outlet with no corporate advertising. It is owned and operated by Socialist Alternative and explicitly serves as its propaganda and agitation organ. Donations and subscriptions support the publication, which discloses editorial leadership but offers little detail on financial operations beyond this.", "analysis": "These media sources are moderate to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation.  They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appealing to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports, and omit information that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy.See all Left Bias sources. Red Flag consistently promotes a revolutionary Marxist worldview, and its reporting reflects this ideological orientation without balance or moderation. In“Israel is replicating Nazi starvation tactics in Gaza”, the outlet likens Israeli policy in Gaza to Holocaust-era tactics. This comparison relies heavily on emotionally provocative language and rhetorical extremity. In“Labor sacrifices Indigenous cultural sites and the climate for fossil fuel profits again”, the publication condemns the Australian Labor Party as complicit in both climate destruction and the erasure of Indigenous heritage, offering no countervailing view. Similarly,“Capitalism can’t end women’s oppression — we need a revolution”asserts that only socialist revolution can end gender-based oppression, dismissing reforms or liberal progress as distractions. In“What makes the Democrats different from, but the same as, the Republicans”, U.S. electoral politics are framed as a false dichotomy under capitalism, with both parties serving the same elite interests. These articles exhibit a clear editorial bias, as perspectives that do not support radical socialism are omitted entirely, and the terminology is often inflammatory or militant in tone. Though Red Flag occasionally references outside sources, its content is heavily filtered through ideological interpretation, reducing factual balance and enhancing its function as a political tool rather than a journalistic outlet.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "There are no documented failed fact checks by third-party organizations. However, the site uses extreme analogies, particularly equating Israel’s actions with Nazi atrocities, and often makes sweeping generalizations about capitalism, political parties, and social systems. These tendencies diminish the site’s credibility." ], "last_updated": "June 8, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/arte/", "name": "ARTE", "source_url": "https://www.arte.tv/", "bias_rating": "LEFT-CENTER", "bias_score": -3.9, "factual_reporting": "MOSTLY FACTUAL", "factual_score": 2.2, "credibility_rating": "HIGH CREDIBILITY", "country": null, "country_freedom_rating": null, "media_type": "TV Station", "traffic_popularity": "High Traffic", "bias_category_description": "These media sources have a slight to moderate liberal bias.  They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appealing to emotion or stereotypes) to favor liberal causes.  These sources are generally trustworthy for information but may require further investigation.See all Left-Center sources.", "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate ARTE Left-Center Biased based on story selection and editorial positions that moderately favor the left. We also rate them Mostly Factual rather than High due to a lack of sourcing. Detailed Report Bias Rating: LEFT-CENTER (-3.9) Factual Reporting: MOSTLY FACTUAL (2.", "history": "Initiated in 1990 byF. Mitterand and H. Kohlwhen they signed an agreement to increase cooperation between the two countries, ARTE was founded as a Franco-German television channel. ARTE is now a European cultural TV network, and it ismade upof two original members, ARTE France and ARTE Deutschland TV GmbH. They have one central office based in Strasbourg, France, and 10 European partners. Currently,Peter Boudgoustis the president. ARTE produces diverse cultural programs, documentaries, magazine shows, concerts, short video clips about politics, and more. ARTE broadcasts insix languages;French, German, English, Spanish, Polish and Italian,", "ownership": "ARTE isfundedby a combination of public funding (95%) through TV license fees from France and Germany, and they are also co-funded by the European Union. ARTE is a GEIE/EEIG, orEuropean Economic Interest Grouping(legal entity that enablescross-border alliancesin the EU) and owned by The two-member companies, which are ARTE France and ARTE Deutschland TV GmbH. As a public channel, ARTE states that they do not run any advertising, but they also state they “may generate some income of its own,” mainly through sponsorships.", "analysis": "These media sources have a slight to moderate liberal bias.  They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appealing to emotion or stereotypes) to favor liberal causes.  These sources are generally trustworthy for information but may require further investigation.See all Left-Center sources. Read our profile on France’s media and governmentandGermany’s media and government. In review,  Arte reports that 15% of their programs are news-related, and their news coverage, particularly in regards to Germany, has a biased tone, such as in this short video“Europe is Swamped with Migrants.”where they tackle Euromyths regarding immigration problems and Mass immigration to Estonia and Europe.In this video, ARTE uses emotionally loaded language describing Estonia, such as this quote from the video “No offense to Estonia, but it is not an attractive country; it is Germany that is taking over half of the new asylum seekers.” Another one is titled“Euromyth No. 2 Germany Controls Europe,”where ARTE states, “Some see Angela Merkel as a dominant figure in Europe with Germany imposing its will over other EU member states,” and they conclude  “Germany has just one vote in the Council, the same as any other member state.” On the contrary, Angela Merkel is oftendubbedthe “new leader of the free world”. According to Sueddeutsche,  Germany is said to have morekey positionsin the European Commission than any other European country. Germanyis “considered Europe’s strongest nation, both politically and economically. “ The last video from the politics and society section we analyzed is“A Populist Future Euromyth No 12,”wherethey conclude, It is not a myth that “EU populist parties are on the rise with the far-right making significant gains by exploiting the migrant crisis.” and “It’s up to European citizens in European elections to decide what kind of Europe they want.” ARTE also produces documentaries which are55%of the programs, such as“Re: The Fall of Hasankeyf Historic Remains Threatened by Rising Waters,”which brings awareness to the 12,000 years old Turkish heritage site of Hasankeyf, which is threatened by a hydroelectric dam. Another documentary we reviewed is about high-tech surveillance systems in Europe, The United States use, and China,“7 Billion Suspects The Surveillance Society”. The rest of the programs are 25% feature films and 5% featuring the performing arts. Editorially, they are pro-EU and promote liberal perspectives such as Feminism,Screaming Against Patriarchy, and pro-environmental positions such as thisEurope is Letting Our Planet Die.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "None in the Last 5 years" ], "last_updated": "January 11, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/indicator-bias-and-credibility/", "name": "Indicator", "source_url": "https://indicator.media/", "bias_rating": "LEFT-CENTER", "bias_score": -2.2, "factual_reporting": "HIGH", "factual_score": 0.5, "credibility_rating": "HIGH CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Website", "traffic_popularity": "Minimal Traffic", "bias_category_description": "These media sources have a slight to moderate liberal bias.  They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appealing to emotion or stereotypes) to favor liberal causes.  These sources are generally trustworthy for information but may require further investigation.See all Left-Center sources.", "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate Indicator as left-center biased due to its issue framing and emphasis on exposing right-leaning misinformation. It earns a High Factual rating for its strong sourcing, transparency, and adherence to journalistic standards. Detailed Report Bias Rating: LEFT-CENTER (-2.2) Factual Reporting: HIGH (0.", "history": "Indicator is a U.S.-based digital journalism project that focuses on misinformation, fact-checking, and social media accountability. Launched in 2024 by Casey Newton (ofPlatformer) and Zoe Schiffer (ofCommand Line), it aims to address the growing issue of online disinformation, particularly in relation to content moderation, tech platforms, and user-driven fact-checking, such as Twitter’s Community Notes. In 2025,Nieman Lab featured the project in an article, describing it as a rigorously reported, newsletter-first venture designed to serve journalists, researchers, and public institutions. Rather than operating as a traditional newsroom, Indicator integrates newsletter reporting, analysis, and media criticism. Read our profile on the United States media and government.", "ownership": "Indicator is an independent publication supported by subscribers. It is operated through Substack and offers paid subscriptions via its“Upgrade”page. The publication does not receive any corporate or institutional funding, emphasizing its commitment to independence. TheAbout pageidentifies Newton and Schiffer as the co-founders and writers, with no external editorial board involved.", "analysis": "These media sources have a slight to moderate liberal bias.  They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appealing to emotion or stereotypes) to favor liberal causes.  These sources are generally trustworthy for information but may require further investigation.See all Left-Center sources. Indicator exhibits a Left-leaning bias primarily through its issue framing, topic selection, and critiques of right-wing media ecosystems. It is deeply critical of unregulated disinformation and the way that social media platforms both enable and obscure accountability. For example, in“Turns Out Community Notes Are Also Biased”, the site explores how X/Twitter’s user-driven fact-checking is vulnerable to ideological manipulation, noting the disproportionate influence of certain high-activity contributors and the lack of platform transparency. Similarly,“The Top Community Notes Contributor Is an Antivirus Startup”investigates how commercial and political interests intersect in what’s billed as a democratic content-moderation tool. In“Faked Up 24”, the site dissects how AI-generated and manipulated media infiltrated the 2024 election cycle, showing how these tools are disproportionately used to mislead or exaggerate right-wing narratives. Indicator does not explicitly endorse partisan positions, but its reporting often examines figures, structures, and misinformation that primarily originate from right-leaning digital spaces. The tone is analytical, with a clear editorial stance that emphasizes institutional transparency, platform accountability, and evidence-based discourse. These values, along with its focus on platform power and asymmetrical misinformation, categorize it within the Left-Center spectrum. The articles are well-researched and typically link to primary or supporting documentation.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "None in the Last 5 years" ], "last_updated": "May 29, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/blacknews-com/", "name": "BlackNews.com", "source_url": "https://www.blacknews.com/", "bias_rating": "LEFT", "bias_score": -7.4, "factual_reporting": "MIXED", "factual_score": 6.3, "credibility_rating": "LOW CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Website", "traffic_popularity": "Medium Traffic", "bias_category_description": null, "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate BlackNews.com Left Biased and Questionable due to a complete lack of transparency and poor sourcing of information. Detailed Report Reasoning: Lack of Transparency, Poor Sourcing Bias Rating: LEFT (-7.4) Factual Reporting: MIXED (6.", "history": "Founded in 2001, BlackNews.com is a website that publishes and aggregates news on politics, culture, and accomplishments by African Americans. The website lacks transparency as they do not provide an about page or disclose ownership. Read our profile on the United States government and media.", "ownership": "The website does not disclose ownership; however, at the bottom of the pages, it says it is copyrighted toDante Lee International, a company that publishes websites for African American readers. Revenue is derived through advertising.", "analysis": "In review, BlackNews.com publishes social justice, culture, entertainment, and politics news. Articles and headlines contain moderately loaded language such as this:Still No Jail Time For White Couple Who Starved and Abused Their Black Adopted Children. This story does not have an author name or any sourcing or citations as to where it came from. Many stories on the website highlight social injustice, such as the one above and thisBlack Mom Who Adopted White Baby Says the Police Have Been Called on Her Twice. Editorially, they frequently report negatively on President Donald Trump, such as this,6 Lies and Truths About Black Unemployment Under Trump’s Administration. Generally, the news is reported with a left-leaning bias and is usually factual. However, this is a questionable source with a complete lack of transparency and little to no sourcing of information.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "None in the Last 5 years" ], "last_updated": "January 13, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-rfangle/", "name": "The RFAngle", "source_url": "https://rfangle.com/", "bias_rating": "EXTREME RIGHT", "bias_score": 8.9, "factual_reporting": "MIXED", "factual_score": 6.3, "credibility_rating": "LOW CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Organization/Foundation", "traffic_popularity": "Minimal Traffic", "bias_category_description": null, "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate The RFAngle, as far-right biased and Questionable based on poor sourcing, promotion of right-wing propaganda, lack of transparency, and the publication of misleading and false information. Detailed Report Reasoning: Poor Sourcing, Propaganda, Lack of Transparency, False Claims Bias Rating: EXTREME RIGHT (8.9) Factual Reporting: MIXED (6.3) Country: USA MBFC’s Country Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE Media Type: Organization/Foundation Traffic/Popularity: Minimal Traffic MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY History The RFAngle is a conservative website founded by Ryan Fournier, who also co-founded Students for Trump with John Lambert.", "history": "The RFAngle is a conservative website founded by Ryan Fournier, who also co-foundedStudents for Trumpwith John Lambert. In 2019, Lambert was arrested in Tennessee on charges ofwire fraud.Students for Trumpis currently the college campus arm ofTurning Point USA, founded by Charlie Kirk. The RFAngle covers political developments, economics, culture, and world news. Read our profile on the United States government and media.", "ownership": "The RFAngle completely lacks transparency as they do not provide an about page or clearly disclose ownership. The staff page lists Ryan Fournier and Peter Van Voorhis asexecutive staff; however, it is unclear who owns the site. The online bio ofFournierstates that “Ryan is the founder and co-chairman of Students for Trump, a national effort seeking to win the youth vote for President Trump.Fournieris also a member of Turning Point USA, where he serves as President of xStrategies Political Consulting and President of OpenPoll. Further, many staff writers are also affiliated with Turning Point USA, leading us to believe that TPUSA is the true publisher/owner of this website. Revenue is derived through advertising.", "analysis": "In review, The RFAngle publishes summarized news stories from other sources and conservative commentary. Articles and headlines feature-loaded emotional wording such as thisMitch McConnell’s Home Vandalized by Leftists Demanding Money. This story is properly sourced to the local newspaperCourier-Journal. Story selection always favors the right, particularly former President Donald Trump, such as thisTrump Is 2020’s Most Admired Man, Ends Obama’s 12-Year Streak. They usually provide hyperlinks to credible media outlets; however, they often utilize poor sources with numerous failed fact checks, such as theGateway Pundit. During and after the 2020 Presidential election, RFAngle published misinformation related to election fraud such asMI Dominion Voting Systems Have “Systemic Fraud,” Independent Audit Alleges,and thisEXCLUSIVE: Sidney Powell stands by fraud allegations – willing to risk personal career. Thus far, there has not been proven evidence of substantialvoter fraud. Further, they frequently report negatively on the left, such as thisANTIFA is not an idea, it’s a domestic terrorist organization. According to theFBI director, Antifa is an ideology, not an organization. In general, RFAngle reports news with a far-right bias that sometimes is misleading or not factual.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "Was corrupted voting system software used in Michigan to steal 6,000 votes from President Donald Trump, and was that software also used in seven U.S. swing states?–False", "Have 132,000 ballots in Fulton County, Georgia, been identified as likely ineligible?–False", "Antifa is a domestic terrorist organization–False" ], "last_updated": "June 15, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/24jours-com/", "name": "24Jours.com", "source_url": "https://www.24jours.com/", "bias_rating": "RIGHT-CENTER", "bias_score": 3.1, "factual_reporting": "LOW", "factual_score": 7.1, "credibility_rating": "LOW CREDIBILITY", "country": "Cameroon", "country_freedom_rating": "LIMITED FREEDOM", "media_type": "Website", "traffic_popularity": "Minimal Traffic", "bias_category_description": null, "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate 24jours.com a Questionable source based on the promotion of conspiracy theories, fake news, poor sources, and a complete lack of transparency. Detailed Report Questionable Reasoning: Conspiracy, Fake News, Poor Sourcing, Lack of Transparency Bias Rating: RIGHT-CENTER (3.1) Factual Reporting: LOW (7.", "history": "Founded in 2017with a domain registered in Cameroon, 24jours.com (24 Days in English) is a website that repeatedly publishes false or misleading information. The website completely lacks transparency as they do not have an about page or disclose ownership.", "ownership": "24jours.com completely lacks transparency as they do not disclose ownership. Advertising generates revenue.", "analysis": "24jours.com primarily covers news from French-speaking African countries. Articles come from credible sources such asFrance 24, but others come from Questionable sources suchRT NewsandPress TV, which routinely promote false information. Other stories such as thisPanjshir resistance hands over bodies of Taliban fighters killed in clashesdo not provide a source link. The website does not typically produce opinion pieces, but they often promote false or misleading information. See failed fact checks below.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "Is FIFA looking to annul the French victory over the Belgian Red Devils in the semi-finals of the world cup in Russia?–False", "Did a man named Robertson have his brain replaced with his wife’s, and was that the way in which he found out about her 27 lovers?–False", "No, Maduro hasn’t called on France to open its borders to Africans–False", "Did French troops intervene during the short-lived coup attempt in Gabon today, capturing the military officers responsible?–False", "Did an African migrant from Senegal seek revenge on his boss in Paris, France by impregnating the wife and three daughters of the man before taking flight?–False" ], "last_updated": "December 25, 2024" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/rt-news/", "name": "RT News (RT.Com)", "source_url": "https://www.rt.com/news/", "bias_rating": "RIGHT-CENTER", "bias_score": 4.7, "factual_reporting": "VERY LOW", "factual_score": 9.0, "credibility_rating": "LOW CREDIBILITY", "country": "Russia", "country_freedom_rating": "TOTAL OPPRESSION", "media_type": "TV Station", "traffic_popularity": "High Traffic", "bias_category_description": null, "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate RT Questionable based on promoting pro-Russian propaganda, conspiracy theories, numerous failed fact checks, and a lack of author transparency. Detailed Report Reasoning: Russian Propaganda, Conspiracy, Lack of Transparency, Some Fake News Bias Rating: RIGHT-CENTER (4.70) Factual Reporting: VERY LOW (9.0) Country: Russia MBFC’s Country Freedom Rank: TOTAL OPPRESSION Media Type: TV Station Traffic/Popularity: High Traffic MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY History Founded in 2005, RT, originally Russia Today, is a television network funded by the Russian government.", "history": "Founded in 2005, RT, originally Russia Today, is a television network funded by the Russian government. It operates cable and satellite television channels directed to audiences outside of Russia and provides Internet content in various languages, including Russian. Critics of RT claim they are a source of disinformation andpro-Russian propaganda. Read how the Russian Government influences Media.", "ownership": "ANO “TV-Novosti,” owns RT News, which the Russian Government funds. The network is funded through advertising and307 million USDfrom the Russian Government as of 2016.", "analysis": "In review, RT News presents news that is generally in line with the Russian Government’s narrative. When it comes to covering USA/International News, they provide right-of-center coverage.  They are highly biased in favor of Russia and occasionally runPro-state conspiracy stories. TheColumbia Journalism Reviewcalls RT “The Kremlin’s propaganda outlet.” In general, most international news stories on RT are factual and relate to actual events; however, there are occasional pieces that spin these facts into a different narrative that is misleading. Another concerning aspect of RT is they do not list author information for articles published on the website. This presents a lack of transparency that makes it difficult to verify the information.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "While RT Bemoans Ukrainian Propaganda, it is Russians who Feel the Disinfo Fallout–FALSE", "RT: OPCW Got its Chemical Weapons Samples from ‘Jihadists’–FALSE", "RT Distorts Disinformation Detective’s Guide to Russian Trolls–FALSE", "RT’s FARA examined. Part I–FALSE", "RT: US Special Envoy Says Russia Seeks to ‘Freeze’ Conflict in …–FALSE", "“Melting statues to create modern art is a sign America hates its own history & no different from ISIS destroying Palmyra.”–FALSE", "Did Russian Ka-52 destroy Ukraine barge near nuclear plant?–False" ], "last_updated": "May 16, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/everytown-for-gun-safety/", "name": "Everytown for Gun Safety", "source_url": "https://everytownresearch.org", "bias_rating": "LEFT", "bias_score": -6.3, "factual_reporting": "MIXED", "factual_score": 6.4, "credibility_rating": "LOW CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Organization/Foundation", "traffic_popularity": "Minimal Traffic", "bias_category_description": null, "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate Everytown for Gun Safety Questionable based on a methodology that is often misleading, as well as the promotion of propaganda through exaggerated statistics. We also rate them Mixed for factual reporting due to numerous failed fact checks by IFCN fact checkers. Detailed Report Reasoning: Propaganda, Numerous Failed Fact Checks Bias Rating: LEFT (-6.3) Factual Reporting: MIXED (6.", "history": "Founded in 2006by Michael R. Bloomberg, Everytown for Gun Safety is an American nonprofit organization that advocates for gun control and against gun violence. According to theirabout page, “Everytown for Gun Safety seeks to improve our understanding of the causes of gun violence and the means to reduce it – by conducting groundbreaking original research, developing evidence-based policies, and communicating this knowledge in the courts and the court of public opinion.” Read our profile on the United States government and media.", "ownership": "Everytown for Gun Safety is an independent, non-partisan 501(c)(3) organization that is primarily funded by Michael Bloomberg. Additional funding comes throughdonations.", "analysis": "In review, Everytown for Gun Safety is an organization that advocates for gun safety through stronger background checks, prohibiting domestic abusers from obtaining firearms, and holding the gun industry accountable. The website presents fact sheets under different categories that highlight their reasoning. For example, under the stronger background checks category, they reportBackground Checks Save Lives and Protect Our Communities. This fact sheet is well researched and thoroughly sourced from credible medical journals and university studies. According to the right-leaningInfluence Watch(The right’s version ofSourcewatch), Everytown is alobbying groupthat has been criticized for playing “loose with the facts.” They sight several examples of criticism from theNew York Times,Washington Post,Washington Times, andWashington Examiner. One example of this criticism is how Everytown calculates school shootings. Everytown counts a school shooting as “any time a firearm discharges a live round inside a school building or on a school campus or grounds.” This includes security officers’ accidental discharges or other accidental incidents that did not result in injuries.Politifacthas rated their calculation methodMostly False. In general, Everytown publishes news and research that supports gun control to increase safety. While they most often properly source their information, their methodology for calculating gun-related events has been criticized as being exaggerated or simply not accurate.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "18 U.S. school shootings so far in 2018 and 18 in rest of the world over past 20 years–MOSTLY FALSE", "There have been 74 “school shootings in America since Sandy Hook.”–MOSTLY FALSE", "“Once again, a police officer has been killed with an illegal gun from Georgia – a state that last year did the NRA’s bidding and weakened its already lax gun laws.”–MOSTLY FALSE", "Says that “perpetrators of domestic violence accounted for 54% of mass shootings between 2009 and 2016, according to the advocacy group Everytown for Gun Safety.”–FALSE", "Georgia has had 12 school shootings in the two years since the mass killing at Sandy Hook Elementary School, more than any other state.–MOSTLY FALSE", "Sen. Ron Johnson voted “against funding for the police, preventing local departments from hiring more officers.”–Misleading" ], "last_updated": "January 5, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/public-radio-international-pri/", "name": "The World from PRX", "source_url": "https://theworld.org/", "bias_rating": "LEFT-CENTER", "bias_score": -3.5, "factual_reporting": "VERY HIGH", "factual_score": 0.0, "credibility_rating": "HIGH CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Radio Station", "traffic_popularity": "Medium Traffic", "bias_category_description": "These media sources have a slight to moderate liberal bias.  They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appeals to emotion or stereotypes) to favor liberal causes.  These sources are generally trustworthy for information but may require further investigation.See all Left-Center sources.", "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate The World from PRX Left-Center Biased based on editorial positions and story selection that moderately favors the left. We also rate them Very-High for factual reporting due to excellent sourcing of information and a clean fact check record. Detailed Report Bias Rating: LEFT-CENTER (-3.5) Factual Reporting: VERY HIGH (0.", "history": "Founded in 1983, The World from PRX, formerly Public Radio International (PRI), is a Minneapolis-based American public radio organization with locations in Boston, New York, London, and Beijing. The World is a media content creator and distributes programs from many sources, competing with National Public Radio, American Public Media, and the Public Radio Exchange to provide programming to public radio stations. According to theirabout page, “Public Radio International (PRI) is an independent, non-profit multi-media organization that seeks to build knowledge and understanding of the world’s peoples, issues, and events through storytelling.” They further state, “Programs produced by PRI are featured on almost 900 radio stations across the U.S.” Read our profile on the United States government and media.", "ownership": "The World from PRX is a nonprofit funded through donations, government grants, and advertising. The website lists their most prominent foundation supporters as the “John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation, the Henry Luce Foundation, the Carnegie Corporation, and more.” In review, The World from PRX distributes programming to public radio stations. Among its programs is the global news program “The World,” which PRI co-produces with theBBCand WGBH Boston. The World from PRX stories mostly come from staff reporting from different locations worldwide and are typically highly factual. Headlines and articles do not use loaded language such as this:What we know about the new, novel coronavirus: A timelineand thisThe US has renewed its support for Venezuela’s opposition. What does it mean?These examples are strongly supported byReuters,New York Times, andNPR. Politically, The World from PRX does not offer strong opinions in either direction; however, when reporting on theTrump administration, there tend to be more negative stories by a slight margin. When it comes toclimate change, PRI aligns with the consensus of science and the political left. The news is generally reported factually and with some left-leaning bias in story selection. All stories are evidence-based.", "analysis": "These media sources have a slight to moderate liberal bias.  They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appeals to emotion or stereotypes) to favor liberal causes.  These sources are generally trustworthy for information but may require further investigation.See all Left-Center sources.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "None in the Last 5 years" ], "last_updated": "February 18, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/inland-nw-report-bias-and-credibility/", "name": "Inland NW Report", "source_url": "https://inlandnwreport.com/", "bias_rating": "EXTREME RIGHT", "bias_score": 9.2, "factual_reporting": "VERY LOW", "factual_score": 9.7, "credibility_rating": "LOW CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Website", "traffic_popularity": "Minimal Traffic", "bias_category_description": null, "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate Inland NW Report as Extreme Right Biased and questionable due to its consistent publication of unsubstantiated conspiracies, far-right propaganda, and partisan disinformation. Its factual reporting is rated Very Low due to a lack of transparency, reliance on discredited sources, and regular promotion of false or misleading claims. The site fails to meet even minimal standards of responsible journalism and should be regarded as highly unreliable. Detailed Report Questionable Reasoning: Propaganda, Poor Sourcing, False Claims, Lack of Transparency.", "history": "Inland NW Report is a hyperpartisan political website that publishes far-right opinion content, conspiracy theories, and unverified claims. The site provides no “About” page, no editorial staff listings, no mission statement, and no contact information. ItsFacebook profileoffers no verifiable identity or organizational structure, demonstrating a complete lack of transparency in ownership, funding, and editorial oversight. Read our profile on the United States media and government.", "ownership": "The website does not disclose any ownership or funding information. There are no visible ads, donation pages, or subscription models, and no indication of who maintains the site. The absence of these details is a significant transparency failure, disqualifying it from meeting minimum standards for accountability in journalism.", "analysis": "Inland NW Report exhibits an Extreme Right bias through its consistent promotion of conspiracy theories, pseudoscientific claims, and hyper-partisan attacks, particularly against Democrats and perceived “deep state” actors. In“Is Supreme Court Justice John Roberts Being Blackmailed?”, the author recycles an old conspiracy theory implying blackmail of a Supreme Court justice without presenting any credible evidence. A 2022 article titled “INWR SPECIAL REPORT – Covid-19PLANDEMIC(Socialists’/Globalists’ Scheme for Control), FAL$E MEDICAL REPORT$, the $$$$$, MASK FACTS and VACCINE DANGERS!  – BIGGEST SCAM EVER!!!” spreads vaccine misinformation and depopulation conspiracy theories, falsely alleging a globalist plan to harm billions through COVID-19 vaccines. Similarly, in“DOJ: Investigate the Unexplained 6.3M Dem 2020 Votes”, the site promotes debunked election fraud narratives, repeating false claims that have been extensively disproven by audits, courts, and independent fact-checkers. The editorial tone is intensely partisan and, at times, apocalyptic. In“Would Democrats, Deep State Rather Destroy America…”, the author suggests Democrats and intelligence agencies would prefer nuclear war overDonald Trump’sre-election—a claim that reflects cult-like devotion to Trump and vilifies his opponents in extreme, conspiratorial terms. Importantly, the website’s sidebar highlights its favorite sources, all of which are far-right and rated as questionable by MBFC. These includeNatural News(a known promoter of health misinformation and conspiracy theories),Independent Sentinel(a fringe right-wing site), andJudicial Watch(a politically active group with a strong partisan agenda). This list of preferred outlets reinforces Inland NW Report’s conspiratorial and extreme-right orientation.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "There are no official third-party fact checks directly targeting Inland NW Report. However, the site repeatedly promotes debunked claims, vaccine misinformation, and false election narratives, qualifying it as Very Low Factual under MBFC standards." ], "last_updated": "March 22, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/good-day-laramie-bias-and-credibility/", "name": "Good Day Laramie", "source_url": "https://gooddaylaramie.com/", "bias_rating": "LEAST BIASED", "bias_score": 0.0, "factual_reporting": "MIXED", "factual_score": 6.1, "credibility_rating": "LOW CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Website", "traffic_popularity": "Minimal Traffic", "bias_category_description": null, "overall_summary": null, "history": "Good Day Laramie is part of an extensive network of AI-generated local newsletters initially launched by Good Daily Inc., a company founded in 2023 by engineer Matthew Henderson. In July 2025, the network, which spanned over 350 small and mid-sized towns, was acquired by6AM City, a digital media company known for running human-edited newsletters in cities like Greenville, SC, and Knoxville, TN. Under Good Daily, the network was widely criticized for using fabricated testimonials and concealing its use of artificial intelligence (AI) to generate content. According toNieman Lab, the newsletters operated under a false pretense of local community connection while being entirely automated from New York. Following theacquisition by 6AM City, fake testimonials were removed, and the new owner committed to gradually aligning the newsletters with its editorial and ethical standards. However, Good Day Laramie remains AI-generated and unedited by human staff. The newsletter is based in Laramie, Wyoming; however, 6AM City is run out of South Carolina, despite its emphasis on local communities. Read our profile on the United States Media and Government.", "ownership": "Good Day Laramie is owned by6AM City, a South Carolina–based media company. It is monetized through: While ownership is now clear, the newsletter does not disclose that its content is produced by AI, nor does it identify any editorial staff or local reporters.", "analysis": "Good Day Laramie presents itself as a local newsletter focused on community events, weather, business openings, and culture. It avoids politics and crime stories, making it Least Biased in tone and content. Despite this neutrality, several concerns persist: While 6AM City has expressed intentions to improve transparency and may eventually add editors to some of these “seed markets,” that has not yet occurred.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "None in the Last 5 years" ], "last_updated": "August 8, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/third-way/", "name": "Third Way", "source_url": "https://www.thirdway.org/", "bias_rating": "LEAST BIASED", "bias_score": 1.3, "factual_reporting": "MOSTLY FACTUAL", "factual_score": 2.2, "credibility_rating": "HIGH CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Organization/Foundation", "traffic_popularity": "Minimal Traffic", "bias_category_description": "These sources have minimal bias and use very few loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes).  The reporting is factual and usually sourced.  These are the most credible media sources.See all Least Biased sources.", "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate Third Way Least Biased based on a mix of right and left-leaning positions, with a stronger right-leaning bias concerning economics. We also rate them as Mostly Factual in reporting rather than High due to a lack of transparency with funding, as well as the use of poor sources. Detailed Report Bias Rating: LEAST BIASED (1.3) Factual Reporting: MOSTLY FACTUAL (2.", "history": "Third Way is a Washington, D.C.-based public policy think tankfounded in 2005. The think tank develops policy ideas, conducts public opinion research, and hosts issue briefings. The organization has four policy divisions: Economics, National Security, Clean Energy, and Social Policy & Politics. Third Way develops and advocates for policies representing the “vital center.” According to theirabout page, “Third Way is a national think tank that champions modern center-left ideas. Read our profile on the United States government and media.", "ownership": "Third Way is a nonprofit that is funded through donations. However, the website lacks transparency as it does not disclose financial information or large donors. In 2019, theInterceptreported that Koch Industries funded a report titled “Why Lou Dobbs is Winning.” In 2013,The Nationreported, “The Democratic think tank Third Way relies on money from corporate interests, lobbyists, and Republican donors.” Finally,Salonreports thatThird Way senior vice president admits majority of think tank’s funding comes from Wall Street.", "analysis": "These sources have minimal bias and use very few loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes).  The reporting is factual and usually sourced.  These are the most credible media sources.See all Least Biased sources. In review, Third Way publishes news and information from a neoliberal (free market) economic and socially liberal perspective. The website lists many issues and their positions, with curated links to outside news stories supporting their agenda. For example, underClimate Change, they support the consensus of science and list policy changes they advocate for, such as this “evidence-based solutions to the climate challenge that include advanced nuclear and carbon capture technology, as well as renewables, hydropower, existing nuclear, energy storage, and efficiency.” Under this heading, they list outside stories that come mostly from the Right-leaningWashington Examiner, which also has a poor record with fact-checkers andhuman-influenced climate denialism. Under the economy tag, they advocate for an “innovative, modernized government that must work in tandem with a thriving and dynamic private sector to achieve sustained economic growth and broad prosperity.” A press release under this tab shows they do not advocate for Republican tax policy such as thisThird Way rejects GOP’s morally bankrupt attack on entitlement programs. Here is their perspective on some other issues: When it comes to progressive Democratic politicians, they have a negative viewpoint such as this:How the Sanders Social Security Plan is Not Progressive. However, when reporting on Trump, they have a much stronger negative viewpointUntruthful Hyperbole: Trump vs. Facts on Jobs and the Economy. Third Way generally endorses and supports a more favorable policy to the establishment, corporate-friendly Democrats but is nevertheless opposed to social conservatives.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "None in the Last 5 years" ], "last_updated": "January 3, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/babnet-bias/", "name": "Babnet Tunisia", "source_url": "https://www.babnet.net/", "bias_rating": "LEAST BIASED", "bias_score": 1.7, "factual_reporting": "MIXED", "factual_score": 5.1, "credibility_rating": "MEDIUM CREDIBILITY", "country": "Tunisia", "country_freedom_rating": "LIMITED FREEDOM", "media_type": "Website", "traffic_popularity": "Medium Traffic", "bias_category_description": "These sources have minimal bias and use very few loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using an appeal to emotion or stereotypes).  The reporting is factual and usually sourced.  These are the most credible media sources.See all Least Biased Sources.", "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate Babnet as least biased based on balanced story selection and minimal editorializing. We also rate them Mixed for factual reporting due to a lack of hyperlinked sourcing. Detailed Report Bias Rating: LEAST BIASED (1.7) Factual Reporting: MIXED (5.", "history": "Established in 2000,Babnet.netis a news aggregator website based in Tunisia that mainly focuses on news, politics, society, economy, education, culture, health, and sport. Read our profile on Tunisia’s media and government.", "ownership": "Slim Mansouriowns Babnet.net. Advertising generates revenue.", "analysis": "These sources have minimal bias and use very few loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using an appeal to emotion or stereotypes).  The reporting is factual and usually sourced.  These are the most credible media sources.See all Least Biased Sources. Babnet.net publishes articles regarding the President with a positive tone, such as“The President of the Republic..“The implementing orders related to the “Feda Foundation” decree will be issued in the near future.”When reporting on other political parties, Babnet uses a neutral tone as in this articleIn his meeting with Ghannouchi … Chebbi presents his initiative to form a “National Salvation Front. In the article, they report with minimal editorializing about a leading member of the Al-Amal Party, Ahmed Najib Chebbi who wants to form a big tent movement by meeting with The Ennahda Movement (Islamic Democratic Party) leader Rached Ghannouchi.Chebbi is critical of the president, as reported by othermedia outlets. Finally, when it comes to sourcing, they do not provide hyperlinks but instead use quotations, which does not meet our standard for proper sourcing of information. The news is generally reported with minimal bias, but it is not possible to verify all information due to a lack of sourcing.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "None in the Last 5 years" ], "last_updated": "May 13, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/bnr-newsradio/", "name": "BNR NewsRadio", "source_url": "https://www.bnr.nl/nieuws/media/10387540/disclaimer", "bias_rating": "RIGHT-CENTER", "bias_score": 3.8, "factual_reporting": "MOSTLY FACTUAL", "factual_score": 2.2, "credibility_rating": "HIGH CREDIBILITY", "country": "Netherlands", "country_freedom_rating": "EXCELLENT", "media_type": "Radio Station", "traffic_popularity": "Medium Traffic", "bias_category_description": "These media sources are slightly to moderately conservative in bias. They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appealing to emotion or stereotypes) to favor conservative causes. These sources are generally trustworthy for information but may require further investigation.See all Right-Center sources.", "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate BNR NewsRadio Right-Center Biased based on editorial and economic positions that favor the right. We also rate them Mostly Factual in reporting rather than high due to a lack of hyperlinked sourcing. Detailed Report Bias Rating: RIGHT-CENTER (3.8) Factual Reporting: MOSTLY FACTUAL (2.", "history": "Founded in 1998,BNR Newsradio(BNR Nieuwsradio) is a Dutch commercial radio station headquartered in Amsterdam, Netherlands. BNR NewsRadio features all-day political, economic, and business-related news programming. They primarily target a business audience.Mireille van Arkis the editor-in-chief. Read our profile on the Netherlands government and media.", "ownership": "The FD Mediagroep(also known as FDMG) is a Dutch company that owns BNR Nieuwsradio. The parent company isHal Investment,and R.Kers, J.N. van Wiechen, A.S. Vink, G. van den Rozenberg arelistedas managing directors. Advertising and subscription fees generate revenue.", "analysis": "These media sources are slightly to moderately conservative in bias. They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appealing to emotion or stereotypes) to favor conservative causes. These sources are generally trustworthy for information but may require further investigation.See all Right-Center sources. In review, BNR Nieuwsradio utilizes minimally loaded language both in their headlines and articles such as“UK SHARES ON SALE AFTER BREXIT.”When reporting on national political news, they use more emotional language that favors the pro-business right, such as this“FIFTEEN YEARS PVV”(PVV or Partij voor de Vrijheid, is a far-right party)  and“PVDA LASHES OUT AT BUSINESS”(PvdA is a center-left party and PvdA stands for Partij van de Arbeid, or the Labour Party). A quote reads, “Party leader Lilianne Ploumen lashed out extremely hard at the business community.” Since BNR reports on business from the perspective of business people, they tend to be critical of the Labor party. Furthermore, while the wording of the articles is generally neutral, BNRacceptsthe right-wing anti-immigrant and nationalist positions of the PVV party headed by Geert Wilders. In general, the content appears to be factual; however, there is very little hyperlinked sourcing to validate the claims.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "None in the Last 5 years" ], "last_updated": "January 14, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/domino-theory-bias-and-credibility/", "name": "Domino Theory", "source_url": "https://dominotheory.com/", "bias_rating": "LEFT-CENTER", "bias_score": -3.0, "factual_reporting": "MOSTLY FACTUAL", "factual_score": 2.6, "credibility_rating": "HIGH CREDIBILITY", "country": "Taiwan", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Website", "traffic_popularity": "Minimal Traffic", "bias_category_description": "These media sources have a slight to moderate liberal bias.  They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appealing to emotion or stereotypes) to favor liberal causes.  These sources are generally trustworthy for information but may require further investigation.See all Left-Center sources.", "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate the Domino Theory as Left-Center Biased, reflecting a pro-democracy, transparency-focused orientation that occasionally critiques authoritarian systems, particularly the CCP. It earns a Mostly Factual rating due to strong sourcing, but lacks transparency regarding funding. Detailed Report Bias Rating: LEFT-CENTER (-3.0) Factual Reporting: MOSTLY FACTUAL (2.", "history": "Domino Theoryis a Taiwan-based online publication launched by journalists with backgrounds atThe New York Times,Newsweek, and theTaipei Times. It provides in-depth coverage and commentary on East Asian geopolitics, with a focus on China-Taiwan relations, maritime security, and regional diplomacy. The publication aims to bridge the gap between academic and journalistic perspectives, combining on-the-ground reporting with accessible analysis. Read our profile on Taiwan’s media and government.", "ownership": "The Domino Theory is an independent outlet founded and edited by Ron Brownlow, part of a small Taiwan-based media team. It discloses staff details, contact information, and editorial mission, but does not specify outside investors.", "analysis": "These media sources have a slight to moderate liberal bias.  They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appealing to emotion or stereotypes) to favor liberal causes.  These sources are generally trustworthy for information but may require further investigation.See all Left-Center sources. Domino Theory publishes investigative and analytical reporting grounded in factual documentation and global sourcing. For instance,Exclusive: Two More Chinese Oil Rigs Found to Have Been Operating in Taiwan’s EEZuses official maritime data and citesReuters,The Guardian,andJamestown Foundationreports, reflecting rigorous sourcing. Similarly,The Political Minefield of China’s Planned ‘Mega Embassy’ in Londonpresents a balanced analysis that incorporates multiple perspectives, ranging from those of British officials to Chinese dissidents and academic experts, highlighting both national security and diplomatic trade considerations. Opinion pieces such asChinese Women Hold Up Half the Sky?Critique Chinese government gender policies and leadership structures through a liberal democratic lens, promoting equality and human rights while challenging authoritarian narratives. This reveals mild ideological alignment with Western democratic values but does not compromise factual integrity. The tone is analytical rather than activist, and sources are properly attributed.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "None in the Last 5 years" ], "last_updated": "October 31, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/bossip/", "name": "Bossip", "source_url": "https://bossip.com/", "bias_rating": "EXTREME LEFT", "bias_score": -9.0, "factual_reporting": "MIXED", "factual_score": 6.4, "credibility_rating": "LOW CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Magazine", "traffic_popularity": "High Traffic", "bias_category_description": null, "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate Bossip strongly left-biased and questionable based on hyper-sensationalized news reporting, poor sourcing, and a failed fact check. Detailed Report Reasoning: Poor Sourcing, Sensationalism, Failed Fact Check Bias Rating: EXTREME LEFT (-9.0) Factual Reporting: MIXED (6.4) Country: USA MBFC’s Country Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE Media Type: Magazine Traffic/Popularity: High Traffic MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY History Founded in 2006, Bossip is an online entertainment and celebrity gossip magazine that focuses on African American celebrities.", "history": "Founded in 2006, Bossip is an online entertainment and celebrity gossip magazine that focuses on African American celebrities. According to theirabout page, Bossip.com is the premier destination for African American popular culture and entertainment, with a voice that’s edgy, viciously hilarious, politically aware–and completely unique. During 2016 and 2017, Bossip was accused of sexism for harsh criticism of Kellyanne Conway, calling her a “blonde bimbo” and “potato salad faced” Read our profile on the United States government and media.", "ownership": "The site is owned byiOneDigital, which runs “urban lifestyle” websites. Revenue is generated through advertising and sponsored content.", "analysis": "In review, Bossip publishes news and commentary on black celebrities and entertainment from a liberal perspective. They usually summarize news from other sources and utilize loaded emotional language such as this:What The Hell?! Louisiana Cop Gets Fired For Saying It’s ‘Unfortunate’ More Black People Haven’t Died From COVID-19and thisYoung Jeezy’s Baby Mama Complains Rapper Reneged On $30K For New Car In Child Support Deal (Exclusive). Articles are usually properly sourced. However, they have previously linked tofake news sourcessuch as ABC 14. Editorially, Bossip presents with a strong left-leaning bias with frequent criticism of conservatives such as thisMeghan McCain Disrespects Joy Behar On ‘The View’ & The Internet Slowly Dissects Her Conservative Mediocrity. This story links to another iOneDigital website. They also frequently refer to President Trump as a racist:Out Of PocKKKet: Faded Dookie Skid Mark Donald Trump Characterizes Coronavirus As “Chinese Virus,” He’s Racist Than A MF. In general, Bossip is a strongly left-biased website that publishes sensationalized news stories that are not always factual.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "Fox has canceled the second season of Empire.–False" ], "last_updated": "January 14, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/abp-live-bias-and-credibility/", "name": "ABP Live", "source_url": "https://news.abplive.com/", "bias_rating": "RIGHT-CENTER", "bias_score": 3.2, "factual_reporting": "MOSTLY FACTUAL", "factual_score": 3.9, "credibility_rating": "MEDIUM CREDIBILITY", "country": "India", "country_freedom_rating": "MODERATE FREEDOM", "media_type": "Website", "traffic_popularity": "High Traffic", "bias_category_description": "These media sources are slight to moderately conservative in bias. They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appealing to emotion or stereotypes) to favor conservative causes. These sources are generally trustworthy for information but may require further investigation.See all Right-Center sources.", "overall_summary": "Overall, ABP Live is a mainstream Indian news site that exhibits a Right-Center Bias and rates as Mostly Factual. It is generally reliable, although sourcing and transparency could be improved. Editorial framing favors the BJP and PM Modi, but without overt disinformation. Detailed Report Bias Rating: RIGHT-CENTER (3.", "history": "ABP Live is the English-language digital news outlet of the ABP Network, focused solely on web-based content. It offers breaking news, opinion, and feature coverage on Indian and international affairs. The site was launched as part of the digital expansion of ABP Network after rebranding from its earlier television-era collaboration with Star India. The website operates independently from the broadcast channels and targets an English-speaking, digitally engaged audience. Read our profile on India’s media and government.", "ownership": "ABP Live is owned by ABP Network Pvt. Ltd., a subsidiary of the ABP Group. Ownership and corporate details are available on theAbout Us page. Funding comes primarily from advertising and partnerships. While transparency about ownership exists, information about individual editors and authors is limited.", "analysis": "These media sources are slight to moderately conservative in bias. They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appealing to emotion or stereotypes) to favor conservative causes. These sources are generally trustworthy for information but may require further investigation.See all Right-Center sources. ABP Live primarily offers mainstream English-language news and entertainment. While the site includes international and domestic reporting (e.g.,Supreme Court on Tamil deportationandPutin’s Ukraine comments), editorial framing and article emphasis often lean toward nationalist-conservative sentiments. An example of favorable coverage ofPM Modiincludes a glowing feature on India’s global diplomacy under him:Modi Meets Biden, Sunak, Zelenskyy At G7 Summit In Japan, which uses positive framing and omits critical analysis. Although straight news coverage is present, there’s a tendency to omit critical perspectives on Modi’s policies or the BJP, signaling a mild but consistent Right-Center editorial slant. The outlet uses mixed sourcing—some stories link to primary or credible institutional sources, such as the news agencyPTI, while others lack detailed citations.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "None in the Last 5 years. However, it maintains a fact-check section (e.g.,Pakistani pilot capture hoax) which suggests internal fact-checking efforts. No major failed fact checks from third-party organizations have been recorded as of now." ], "last_updated": "May 19, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/brokeonomics-news-bias-and-credibility/", "name": "Brokeonomics.News", "source_url": "https://brokeonomics.news/", "bias_rating": "FAR LEFT", "bias_score": -8.3, "factual_reporting": "LOW", "factual_score": 8.0, "credibility_rating": "LOW CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Website", "traffic_popularity": "Minimal Traffic", "bias_category_description": null, "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate Brokeonomics.News as Far-Left Biased and Low in Factual Reporting due to its reliance on social media sourcing, lack of transparency, and clickbait sensationalism. The site provides little to no verifiable news content and should be treated as unreliable. Detailed Report Questionable Reasoning: Propaganda, Poor Sourcing, Sensationalism, Lack of Transparency Bias Rating: FAR LEFT (-8.", "history": "Brokeonomics.News appears to be a fringe political blog with no identifiable founders, staff, or contact information. Its“About” page is a generic placeholder, suggesting little effort toward transparency or professionalism.", "ownership": "The site is monetized through advertising, given the heavy presence of click-driven ads. No ownership or editorial disclosures are provided.", "analysis": "Brokeonomics.News functions as a clickbait, ad-heavy blog pushing highly partisan, anti-Trump narratives. Articles such as“Kash Patel Refuses to Answer Question: Is Donald Trump in the Epstein Files?”and“Trump Begs for Help from the Korean Workers He Just Deported”rely entirely on social media speculation and commentary, not independent reporting or verifiable evidence. The language is heavily sensationalized, aimed at provoking outrage rather than informing readers. With no transparency, no professional sourcing standards, and a reliance on exaggerated rhetoric, Brokeonomics.News lacks credibility. It mirrors the style of “rage-click” sites designed for traffic rather than journalistic integrity.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "No direct fact checks found, but the lack of credible sourcing and sensational claims strongly suggests unreliability." ], "last_updated": "September 22, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/lowndes-signal-bias/", "name": "Lowndes Signal", "source_url": "https://www.lowndessignal.com/", "bias_rating": "RIGHT-CENTER", "bias_score": 2.8, "factual_reporting": "HIGH", "factual_score": 1.0, "credibility_rating": "HIGH CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Newspaper", "traffic_popularity": "Minimal Traffic", "bias_category_description": "These media sources are slight to moderately conservative in bias. They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appealing to emotion or stereotypes) to favor conservative causes. These sources are generally trustworthy for information but may require further investigation.See all Right-Center sources.", "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate the Lowndes Signal Right-Center Biased based on editorial positions that slightly favor the right. We also rate them High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing and a clean fact-check record. Detailed Report Bias Rating: RIGHT-CENTER (2.8) Factual Reporting: HIGH (1.", "history": "The Lowndes Signal is a newspaper published in Greenville, Alabama. lowndessignal.com covers local, national, crime, and sports news. Read our profile on the United States government and media.", "ownership": "The Lowndes Signal is owned byBoone Newspapers, which owns dozens of community newspapers and magazines. Revenue is derived through advertising and subscription fees.", "analysis": "These media sources are slight to moderately conservative in bias. They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appealing to emotion or stereotypes) to favor conservative causes. These sources are generally trustworthy for information but may require further investigation.See all Right-Center sources. In review, the Lowndes (County) Signal primarily covers local news, sports, weather, and entertainment through the use of local journalists. Articles and headlines use minimal loaded emotional language, such as thisLowndesboro mayor, Lowndes County Commission discuss Broad Street repairs. TheAssociated Presstypically serves national and international news. Editorially, the Lowndes Signal labels its opinion section appropriately, with more op-eds favoring the right. In general, the Lowndes Signal is factual with a right-leaning editorial bias.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "None in the Last 5 years" ], "last_updated": "March 14, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/hacker-news/", "name": "Hacker News", "source_url": "https://news.ycombinator.com/", "bias_rating": "LEAST BIASED", "bias_score": -0.6, "factual_reporting": "MOSTLY FACTUAL", "factual_score": 2.5, "credibility_rating": "HIGH CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Website", "traffic_popularity": "High Traffic", "bias_category_description": "These sources have minimal bias and use very few loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appeals to emotion or stereotypes).  The reporting is factual and usually sourced.  These are the most credible media sources.See all Least Biased Sources.", "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate Hacker News Least Biased based on diverse non-political story selection. We also rate them Mostly Factual in reporting rather than High due to the occasional use of sources that have failed fact checks, though we did not find evidence of false information during this review. Detailed Report Bias Rating: LEAST BIASED (-0.6) Factual Reporting: MOSTLY FACTUAL (2.", "history": "Launched in 2007, Hacker News is a news aggregation website focused on technology. The site is similar to Reddit, as users can publish news stories from other sources and then up or downvote them and comment. Read our profile on the United States media and government.", "ownership": "Hacker News is owned and published by Y Combinator, which invests in internet startups. Y Combinator haslaunched over 3500 companies. Hacker News does not have a source of revenue, but Y Combinator generates revenue through returns on investments.", "analysis": "These sources have minimal bias and use very few loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appeals to emotion or stereotypes).  The reporting is factual and usually sourced.  These are the most credible media sources.See all Least Biased Sources. Hacker News does not produce original content but rather relies on user-submitted news stories from third-party sources. News articles focus on technology and science with stories such as thisGoogle pushes emergency Chrome update to fix 8th zero-day in 2022, which links to the least biasedBleeping Computer. A review of sources indicates that most are known and credible such as theBBC,TechCrunch, andNature.org. However, sometimes users publish articles from obscure sources that are not verified and some from sources that have failed fact checks, likeAl JazeeraandThe Guardian. Editorially, story selection is reflected by the users and therefore offers diverse stories with very few related to politics. In general, Hackers News is low biased but sometimes relies on sources that have failed fact checks.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "Hacker News does not publish original content, but some sources have failed fact-checks in the past." ], "last_updated": "February 9, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/harpers-bazaar-bias/", "name": "Harper’s Bazaar", "source_url": "https://www.harpersbazaar.com/", "bias_rating": "LEFT", "bias_score": -6.6, "factual_reporting": "MOSTLY FACTUAL", "factual_score": 2.4, "credibility_rating": "HIGH CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Magazine", "traffic_popularity": "High Traffic", "bias_category_description": "These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation.  They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports, and omit information reporting that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy.See all Left Bias sources.", "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate Harper’s Bazaar Left biased based on editorial positions that consistently favor the left. We also rate them mostly factual in reporting rather than high due to a lack of transparency in disclosing editorial perspectives and not labeling opinion content. Detailed Report Bias Rating: LEFT (-6.6) Factual Reporting: MOSTLY FACTUAL (2.", "history": "Founded in 1867, Harper’s Bazaar is a monthly magazine and website covering women’s fashion, culture, and lifestyle. The magazine was one of the first-ever to cover women’s fashion. The website lacks transparency as they do not offer a detailedabout pageto describe its objectives and political orientation. The limited about page discloses editorial leadership and ownership. Read our profile on the United States government and media.", "ownership": "Harper’s Bazaar is owned by Hearst Communications, which owns newspapers, magazines, and television stations, including theSan Francisco Chronicle, theHouston Chronicle, andEsquire. According toOpen Secrets, Hearst donated70% to Republican candidatesand causes in 2020. Advertising, sponsored content, magazine sales, and a shop that sells fashion-related merchandise generate revenue.", "analysis": "These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation.  They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports, and omit information reporting that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy.See all Left Bias sources. Harper’s Bazaar publishes short and long-form articles about women’s fashion, culture, and lifestyle. Articles and headlines contain moderately loaded wording, such as thisThe “Great Replacement Theory” Was Never “Fringe.” All the articles reviewed were properly sourced from credible media sources such asThe AtlanticandNew York Times. While stories that pertain to fashion tend to be low-biased “Bergdorf Goodman Pays Homage to ’70s Fashion in a New Campaign with Denée Benton,”those related to politics support a  progressive liberal perspective. The website also republishes articles from other Hearst properties likeEsquireandCosmopolitan. Editorially, Harper’s Bazaar does not have a dedicated opinion section; however, they publish stories related to politics and provide commentary from a liberal perspective under the politics category. For example, many stories report negatively on the right such as thisGhosting the Confederacy, while reporting favorably on the left, like thisDomestic Workers Deserve Rights, Too. Further, many articles in the political category favor issues supported by the left such asabortion rights,equal pay for women, andanti-racism. In general, Harper’s Bazaar reports news from a left-leaning perspective but does not appropriately label opinion content.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "None in the last 5 years." ], "last_updated": "February 9, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/psychreg-bias-and-credibility/", "name": "Psychreg", "source_url": "https://www.psychreg.org/", "bias_rating": "PSEUDOSCIENCE", "bias_score": -1.0, "factual_reporting": "MIXED", "factual_score": 6.1, "credibility_rating": "LOW CREDIBILITY", "country": "United Kingdom", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Website", "traffic_popularity": "Minimal Traffic", "bias_category_description": null, "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate Psychreg as a pseudoscience source based on the promotion of misleading information related to science. We also rate them Mixed for factual reporting due to inconsistent sourcing and lack of clear labeling for sponsored content. While some articles cite credible sources, others rely on questionable references or may be promotional. Detailed Report Bias Rating: PSEUDOSCIENCE (-1.", "history": "Psychregis a UK-based blog focused on mental health, psychology, and wellness. Founded in 2014 by Dennis Relojo-Howell, who also serves as its editor, it publishes articles, opinion pieces, and research summaries alongside an open-access psychology journal. The site features a mix of expert contributions, general health advice, and sponsored content. Read our profile on UK government influence on media.", "ownership": "Dennis Relojo-Howellowns Psychreg,which generates revenue through advertisements and sponsored content.", "analysis": "Psychreg publishes a range of health-related articles with varying levels of sourcing and credibility. For example, the article“Doctor Reveals Hot Showers Are Bad for You – Here’s Why”cites Dr. Deborah Lee, who claims that hot showers can remove the skin of natural oils, leading to dryness and irritation. However, the article references Cult Beauty, an online beauty retailer, rather than a medical or scientific authority. Cult Beauty specializes in beauty products, not health research. Similarly, the article“1 in 7 Britons Have Never Cleaned Their Sex Toys, Study Reveals”once again cites Dr. Deborah Lee, but this time in association withCondoms UK,an online retailer. While the topic itself may be valid for discussion, the reliance on a commercial entity rather than independent public health organizations raises concerns about the potential for promotional framing rather than purely informational content. In contrast, the article“How Dementia Impacts the Brain and Cognitive Function”cites sources such as ninds.nih.gov and Creyos, a cognitive assessment platform. This article is better sourced, citing established authorities in the medical field, which enhances its credibility. Additionally, Psychreg offerssponsoredpromotional contentbut often fails to clearly label sponsored articles. Some articles may promote products or services without proper disclosure, potentially misleading readers about the objectivity of the content. Finally, there is evidence this source promotes pseudoscience, such as thisLunar Radiance: Syncing Beauty Routines with the Moon. This article promotes pseudoscience because it falsely claims that the moon’s phases influence skincare effectiveness despite no scientific evidence supporting a connection between lunar cycles and skin health. It also relies on astrology and appeals to “ancient wisdom” rather than dermatological research, misleading readers into believing celestial positioning impacts biological processes.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "None in the Last 5 years" ], "last_updated": "February 1, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/institute-for-free-speech-ifs-bias-and-credibility/", "name": "Institute for Free Speech (IFS)", "source_url": "https://www.ifs.org/", "bias_rating": "RIGHT", "bias_score": 5.7, "factual_reporting": "MOSTLY FACTUAL", "factual_score": 3.6, "credibility_rating": "MEDIUM CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Organization/Foundation", "traffic_popularity": "Minimal Traffic", "bias_category_description": "These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward conservative causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports and omit reporting of information that may damage conservative causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy.See all Right Bias sources.", "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate the Institute for Free Speech (IFS) as Right Biased for its advocacy of deregulated campaign finance and selective framing of evidence. Its factual reporting is rated Mostly Factual due to a one-sided narrative that omits broader contexts, counterarguments and a failed fact check. Detailed Report Bias Rating: RIGHT (5.7) Factual Reporting: MOSTLY FACTUAL (3.", "history": "The Institute for Free Speech (IFS),formerlythe Center for Competitive Politics,is a nonprofit organization focused on defending First Amendment rights, particularly political speech, assembly, and petition. The organization advocates for reducing restrictions on campaign finance laws and political speech, framing these issues as essential to protecting free expression in democracy. IFS is based in Washington, D.C. Read our profile on the United States government and media.", "ownership": "The Institute for Free Speech (IFS), founded by former Federal Election Commission ChairmanBradley A. Smith,is a nonprofit organization. It states that5% of its funding comes from for-profit corporationsbut does not disclose their identities. While IFS provides financial transparency through documents likeIRS Form 990, these forms do not include specific donor identities. Therefore, the identities of their corporate donors remain confidential. The Institute for Free Speech (IFS) earned a4-star ratingfromCharity Navigatorfor its financial health and transparency. Charity Navigator assesses nonprofits on these criteria, but donor disclosure is not mandatory for a high rating.", "analysis": "These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward conservative causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports and omit reporting of information that may damage conservative causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy.See all Right Bias sources. The Institute for Free Speech (IFS) consistently advocates for reducing government oversight of political speech and campaign finance, arguing that such regulations infringe on First Amendment rights. By “political speech,” IFS refers to activities such as campaign contributions, expenditures, and advocacy, which it views as fundamental expressions of free speech. Its research frequently critiques what it perceives as misleading narratives that overstate the influence of campaign finance and “dark money.” For example, in“Putting ‘Dark Money’ in Context: Campaign Spending by Nonprofits per Election Cycle,”IFS argues that the term “dark money” is exaggerated and pejorative, designed to mislead the public into thinking that nonprofit spending on elections is a dominant force. The article contends that nonprofits accounted for less than 1% of political spending in recent election cycles, challenging the narrative that “dark money” undermines electoral transparency. Similarly, in“Trump Indictment Is a Perversion of Campaign Finance Law,”IFS frames the enforcement of campaign finance laws as overreach and presents such efforts as politically motivated. IFS’s decision to republish this piece indicates its tendency to curate content that supports its deregulatory stance, which reinforces its perspective while possibly excluding opposing viewpoints. For instance,the Brennan Center for Justiceclaims that “dark money” significantly threatens electoral transparency, allowingwealthy donorsto exert substantial influence without accountability. They argue that hidden political donation sources make it hard for voters to know who influences elections and policies. Similarly,International IDEAemphasizes that unregulated political financing can compromise the integrity of democratic processes by threatening transparency and accountability. They argue that robust regulations are essential to ensure integrity, reduce corruption, and uphold public trust in democratic institutions. While IFS provides data-driven arguments to support its positions, its selective framing often overlooks these broader concerns about equity, accountability, and the long-term effects of deregulation. This pattern of advocacy aligns with a deregulatory agenda that critics argue benefits large donors and organizations at the expense of a more transparent and equitable political process.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "H.R. 1 would, “Empower the Chair of the Commission, who will be hand-picked by the president, to serve as a de facto ‘Speech Czar,’–Misleading" ], "last_updated": "January 8, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/just-the-news/", "name": "Just The News", "source_url": "https://justthenews.com/", "bias_rating": "FAR RIGHT", "bias_score": 8.1, "factual_reporting": "MIXED", "factual_score": 6.3, "credibility_rating": "LOW CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Website", "traffic_popularity": "High Traffic", "bias_category_description": null, "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate Just the News Questionable and Right Biased based on story selection that mostly favors a conservative perspective. We also rate them Mixed for factual reporting due to numerous failed fact checks and the promotion of conspiracy theories and right-wing propaganda. Detailed Report Questionable Reasoning: Conspiracy Theories, Propaganda, Numerous Failed Fact Checks Bias Rating: FAR RIGHT (8.1) Factual Reporting: MIXED (6.", "history": "Founded in February 2020 by John Solomon, Just the News is a conservative website that reports political news through podcasts, videos, and textual content. According to theirabout page, “JusttheNews.com is committed to just reporting facts from journalists with a long record of public trust and excellence.” John Solomon serves as the Editor-in-Chief. Solomon was formerly a journalist withThe Hill, leaving the paper in October 2019. Solomon’s reporting has been described asconspiratorialand pro-Trump. Another notable staff is Sharyl Attkisson, the host of the TV show Full Measure, and David Brody fromCBN News. Read our profile on the United States government and media.", "ownership": "Bentley Media Group LLC owns Just the News. Advertising, donations, and subscription fees generate revenue.", "analysis": "In review, Just the News publishes videos, podcasts, and journalism from a conservative perspective. Articles and headlines typically do not utilize emotional language such as this:Trump’s campaign sues Wisconsin TV station for airing ‘defamatory’ ad. This story is appropriately sourced to theWashington Postand Priorities.org. Another properly sourced story with little bias is this:Pentagon invokes the Defense Production Act to make 40 million masks. Editorially, Just the News does not label opinion content, and actually, they don’t produce op-eds; however, in examining story selection, they routinely favor President Trump such as this:Trump campaign slaps New York Times with libel suitwhile reporting negatively on Democrats such as this:Cruz decries ‘dangerous’ Schumer threats against justices, seeks censure. They have published misinformation during the CoronaVirus outbreak of 2020, as seen below in our failed fact checks section. In general, news reporting is not always factual and holds a moderately strong right-leaning bias.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "Virginia’s new method for testing for coronavirus may significantly delay the state’s reopening–Partly False", "COVID-19 is close to losing its epidemic status in the U.S., according to the CDC–False", "Yale epidemiologist: Dr. Fauci running ‘misinformation campaign’ against hydroxychloroquine–False", "“Dr. Anthony Fauci appeared to acknowledge that large numbers of positive COVID-19 cases may arise from oversensitive tests that pick up mere fragments of the virus rather than active, viable infections. If true, many patients may have been receiving false-positive test results”–Inaccurate", "“There is no evidence to support the contention that masks would stop influenza while failing to stop COVID”; “Influenza has been renamed COVID-19 in large part”–Mostly False", "“Records suggest more than 100 batches of absentee ballots in Fulton County could be missing.”–False", "Jim Jordan Said 14 FBI Agents Spoke To Him After Trump Raid.–False" ], "last_updated": "September 26, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/thrive-movement/", "name": "Thrive Movement", "source_url": "http://www.thrivemovement.com/", "bias_rating": "CONSPIRACY-PSEUDOSCIENCE", "bias_score": -5.0, "factual_reporting": "LOW", "factual_score": 7.6, "credibility_rating": "LOW CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Website", "traffic_popularity": "Minimal Traffic", "bias_category_description": null, "overall_summary": "Overall, the Thrive Movement is a Strong Pseudoscience website that often promotes information that does not align with the consensus of science, also known as “alt health” or “alt medicine.” Detailed Report Bias Rating: CONSPIRACY-PSEUDOSCIENCE (-5.0) Factual Reporting: LOW (7.6) Country: USA MBFC’s Country Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE Media Type: Website Traffic/Popularity: Minimal Traffic MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY History Founded in 2011, the Thrive Movement is a website that strongly promotes alternative health .", "history": "Founded in 2011, the Thrive Movement is a website that strongly promotesalternative health. The website is owned by Clear Compass Media LLC, founded by Foster Gamble. According to theirabout page, “This website and the documentary film THRIVE: What on Earth Will It Take? are the main projects of Clear Compass Media. We are a small team of committed individuals based out of Soquel, CA, dedicated to getting the message of THRIVE out to as many people worldwide as possible.” Read our profile on United States government and media.", "ownership": "The Thrive Movement is owned by Clear Compass Media LLC. Revenue is derived through an online store that sells the Thrive movie and donations.", "analysis": "The website is essentially a portal to promote theThrive movie. A summary of the movie reads asfollows“An unconventional documentary that lifts the veil on what’s really going on in our world by following the money upstream – uncovering the global consolidation of power in nearly every aspect of our lives. Weaving together breakthroughs in science, consciousness, and activism, THRIVE offers real solutions, empowering us with unprecedented and bold strategies for reclaiming our lives and our future.” The Thrive Movement also publishes new stories that do not always align with science such as this:THE EXISTENTIAL THREAT FROM NEW GMOS. There is astrong consensusthat GMOs are safe. Further, they alsopromote miracle cures for cancer, such as this:CAN CANNABIS CURE CANCER?While marijuana has proven effective in pain relief, stimulating appetite during Chemo, and reducing rates of glaucoma, there isn’t any evidence to support it can or may cure cancer. Further, they promote misleading information regardingvaccinations, such as this:VACCINES: WHO IS RIGHT AND WHOSE RIGHT IS IT? Overall, the Thrive Movement is a Strong Pseudoscience website that often promotes information that does not align with the consensus of science, also known as “alt health” or “alt medicine.” (D. Van Zandt 7/21/2016) Updated (06/19/2025) Source:http://www.thrivemovement.com/ Last Updated on June 19, 2025 byMedia Bias Fact Check Do you appreciate our work? Please consider one of the following ways to sustain us.MBFC Ad-FreeorMBFC DonationLeft vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sourcesFound this insightful? Please consider sharing on your Social Media:Explore Similar Sources:Thrive Global – Bias and CredibilityConservative Movement – Bias and CredibilityDeplorable Movement 2020 – Bias and CredibilityAmerican Conservative Movement (ACM) – Bias and CredibilityIndivisible Movement – Bias and Credibility", "failed_fact_checks": [], "last_updated": "June 19, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/tomdispatch-com/", "name": "TomDispatch.com", "source_url": "https://www.tomdispatch.com/", "bias_rating": "LEFT-CENTER", "bias_score": -3.5, "factual_reporting": "HIGH", "factual_score": 1.0, "credibility_rating": "HIGH CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Website", "traffic_popularity": "Minimal Traffic", "bias_category_description": "These media sources have a slight to moderate liberal bias.  They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appealing to emotion or stereotypes) to favor liberal causes.  These sources are generally trustworthy for information but may require further investigation.See all Left-Center sources.", "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate TomDispatch Left-Center Biased based on editorial positions that moderately favor the left. We also rate them High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing and a clean fact-check record. Detailed Report Bias Rating: LEFT-CENTER (-3.5) Factual Reporting: HIGH (1.", "history": "Thomas M. “Tom” Engelhardt is an American writer and editor. He is the creator ofType Media Center’stomdispatch.com, an online blog. He is also the co-founder of the American Empire Project and the author of the 1998 book, The End of Victory Culture: Cold War America and the Disillusioning of a Generation. According to theirabout page, “Tomdispatch is intended to introduce readers to voices and perspectives from elsewhere (even when the elsewhere is here). Its mission is to connect some of the global dots regularly left unconnected by the mainstream media and to offer a clearer sense of how this imperial globe of ours actually works.” Read our profile on the United States government and media.", "ownership": "The website is published through the Type Media Center, which is a nonprofit organization that is funded by donations. Type Media Center fellows have included Naomi Klein, Wayne Barrett, Chris Hedges,David Moberg, Jeremy Scahill, and Chris Hayes. Revenue is derived through the sale of Tom’s books and donations.", "analysis": "These media sources have a slight to moderate liberal bias.  They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appealing to emotion or stereotypes) to favor liberal causes.  These sources are generally trustworthy for information but may require further investigation.See all Left-Center sources. In review, TomDispatch produces high-quality journalism that often uses moderate emotional wording. Many stories focus on opposition to war, such as thisWhat If, After 9/11, George W. Bush Had Thrown Parties?Editorially, they align with the left through concern for climate change, equal rights, and negative reporting on conservatives and the former Trump administration, such as thisTomgram: Rajan Menon, The Nightmare That Joe Could Inherit. Regarding sourcing, they use credible sources such asNew York Times,BBC, andWashington Post. In general, they report factually and with a moderate left-leaning bias.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "None in the Last 5 years" ], "last_updated": "June 21, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/am-daily-news-bias-and-credibility/", "name": "AM Daily News", "source_url": "https://amdailynews.com/", "bias_rating": "LEAST BIASED", "bias_score": 0.0, "factual_reporting": "VERY LOW", "factual_score": 9.9, "credibility_rating": "LOW CREDIBILITY", "country": "Unknown", "country_freedom_rating": null, "media_type": "Website", "traffic_popularity": "Minimal Traffic", "bias_category_description": null, "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate AM Daily News as Very Low for factual reporting due to its anonymous ownership, aggressive advertising, lack of editorial standards, and documented history of publishing false or misleading content. While not overtly political, the site operates primarily as clickbait, with AI likely generating or amplifying some stories. Readers are strongly advised to avoid using AM Daily News as a reliable source. Detailed Report Questionable Reasoning: Lack of Transparency, Failed Fact Checks, Misinformation, Clickbait Content.", "history": "AM Daily Newsis an anonymous clickbait website with no “About” page, editorial staff, or contact information. There is no disclosure of who operates the site, nor any information on its goals, location, or journalistic practices. The site is cluttered with aggressive pop-up ads and potential browser hijackers, indicating it may serve more as a traffic and ad-revenue generator than a genuine news outlet.", "ownership": "There is no transparency regarding ownership or funding. Revenue appears from low-quality programmatic advertising, as evidenced by excessive ad placement and intrusive behavior, including pop-ups and redirects. No donation model, subscription service, or accountability infrastructure is present.", "analysis": "The site’s content appears largely non-political, instead prioritizing clickbait headlines and viral-style stories, many of which lack verifiable sources. Some articles appear to be AI-generated or minimally edited, with misleading titles and vague language. For example: “BREAKING: Elon Musk in Talks to Buy Cincinnati Bengals Football Team”was debunked byLead Stories, confirming that no legitimate outlets reported on this claim. Other articles, such as “World’s Most Expensive Divorce Settlement Details Revealed,” rely on vague, celebrity-driven speculation without sourcing. There is no consistent political alignment, and the site does not appear to push ideological narratives. Its primary motive seems to be ad revenue through viral clickbait, not journalism. Overall, we rate AM Daily News as Very Low for factual reporting due to its anonymous ownership, aggressive advertising, lack of editorial standards, and documented history of publishing false or misleading content. While not overtly political, the site operates primarily as clickbait, with AI likely generating or amplifying some stories. Readers are strongly advised to avoid using AM Daily News as a reliable source. (D. Van Zandt 04/02/2025) Source:https://amdailynews.com/ Last Updated on April 2, 2025 byMedia Bias Fact Check Do you appreciate our work? Please consider one of the following ways to sustain us.MBFC Ad-FreeorMBFC DonationLeft vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sourcesFound this insightful? Please consider sharing on your Social Media:Explore Similar Sources:New York Daily News – Bias and CredibilityWorld News Daily Report – Bias and CredibilityPacific Daily News – Bias and CredibilityPoteau Daily News – Bias and CredibilityBend Daily News – Bias and Credibility", "failed_fact_checks": [ "“BREAKING: Elon Musk in Talks to Buy Cincinnati Bengals Football Team”was debunked byLead Stories, confirming that no legitimate outlets reported on this claim.", "Other articles, such as “World’s Most Expensive Divorce Settlement Details Revealed,” rely on vague, celebrity-driven speculation without sourcing." ], "last_updated": "April 2, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-waking-times/", "name": "Waking Times", "source_url": "https://www.wakingtimes.com", "bias_rating": "CONSPIRACY-PSEUDOSCIENCE", "bias_score": -7.0, "factual_reporting": "LOW", "factual_score": 8.1, "credibility_rating": "LOW CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Website", "traffic_popularity": "Minimal Traffic", "bias_category_description": null, "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate Waking Times as a Strong Conspiracy and Quackery level pseudoscience website. We also rate them Low for factual reporting based on poor sourcing and numerous examples of false information. Detailed Report Bias Rating: CONSPIRACY-PSEUDOSCIENCE (-7.0) Factual Reporting: LOW (8.", "history": "Founded in 2011by Dylan Charles and Anna Hunt,Waking Timesis a left-leaning news and opinion website that focuses on “alternative and natural health, activism, elevating consciousness and living sustainably and with awareness.” Read our profile on the United States government and media.", "ownership": "According to their about page Waking Times “is funded through advertising, affiliate marketing, and, on a smaller part, donations from our readers.” The owners are Dylan Charles and Anna Hunt through Waking Media, Inc.", "analysis": "In reviewing the content of Waking Times I found several articles that would fall under both the Pseudoscience and Conspiracy categories. For example, in thisanti-vaccination article, they use fear to persuade peoplenot to vaccinate their children. The article attempts to convince people that more children are vaccine damaged in the USA than children in Syria have been damaged by chemical weapons. This article provides zero evidence to support that more children are injured by vaccines. There is not a single statistic from a reliable source to support this claim. They do, however, claim that the Syrian bombing by the USA was a False flag operation. In fact, the article cites Natural News as the primary source of information.Natural Newsis a well-known purveyor of pseudoscience, conspiracies, and fake news. Within this same article they cite a source calledCDC.news, which is meant to look like an official CDC page, but in fact, is owned by Natural News for the purpose of discrediting the CDC. At least they put a disclaimer on the CDC.news page that it is not affiliated with the credibleCenters for Disease Control. Inanother article, they claim that Cannabis Oil cured a girl’s Leukemia, even though she had already undergone Chemotherapy. Again, there is zero evidence to prove it was the cannabis oil that cured her. It is simply unproven. Virtually all known conspiracies are covered by this site:Chemtrails,New World Order,False Flag,Aliens, etc. This source also promotes Pseudosciences such asmiracle cureswith natural products andanti-GMOpropaganda. On the bright side, they do appear to support the scientific consensus thatclimate changeis human-influenced. (2/3/2017) Updated (D. Van Zandt 8/15/2017) Review 2:Anti-Vaccine:  Article about anti-expert. http://www.wakingtimes.com/2017/08/09/not-trust-medical-experts/ The article makes claims that are backed up only by linking to clearly biased sites that are also anti-vaccine. Claiming to not ask experts and to instead do the research yourself is fine if you research things objectively, which the article fails to do. Objectivity is the ability to change your currently held belief that something is X when presented with evidence that it is not. “Vaccines, historically, were NEVER crucial in protecting ANY form of society, “developed” or otherwise.”  Taken directly from the article, this references nothing to back this claim up and then moves on to keep citing the same clearly biased site.  There’s ample historical evidence that Vaccines helped save people from several major diseases and are easily verifiable by reading any number of scientific and historical works online.  Polio is probably the biggest one followed by Measles and Small Pox. http://www.wakingtimes.com/2017/08/09/occult-secrets-language-method-mind-control/ THE OCCULT SECRETS OF LANGUAGE AS A METHOD OF MIND CONTROL –  There’s little if anything to research here other than pure conspiracy level nonsense used to further scare up ad views on the page. I would argue the authors of this site are neither left nor right. They view taxation as theft, government as intrusive, anti-vaccine, anti-GMO, belief in supernatural, anti-foreign intervention, anti-alcohol, anti-pharma, anti-muslim, anti-fracking, pro-weed, pro-spirit, pro-natural the list goes on. They are anarcho-libertarian. (M. Allen 8/15/2017) Review 3:Waking times (WT) is a predominantly conspiracy/pseudoscience site. The stories are primarily a rehash of the standard Illuminati / New World Order / Big Brother conspiracies that have been around for centuries. As is typical for similar sites, WT takes a grain of truth or unrelated facts and runs directly into pure speculation. While there are some people, groups, and organizations that control a large portion of the wealth in world, there is no credible information linking them to some vast conspiracy to control the world. While the stories do contain some links to credible sources, the conclusions drawn by WT do not match the information in the links. For example: In the story titled “New GM Crops Use Rna Interference Technology For Mass Sterilization,” the title leaves the distinct impression that the subjects being sterilized are humans. Which is not the case. In fairness, the story presents solid links to research and studies on using plants to sterilize specific insects harmful to crops. The story also, however, implies that such modifications can be passed on to humans, for which there is no credible evidence of that happening. In one statement, the story claims that “In humans, it is likely that GMOs cause significant changes inendocrine metabolismand causes endometriosis, which leads to more miscarriages and birth defects.” Yet the article cited gives no specific evidence of human sterilization and even stresses that the possibility is hypothetical. The cited report also only deals with human sterilization from existing GMOs and does not address the current research on the sterilization of insects. So implying that human sterilization from the current research is likely based on an unrelated study is, again, purely hypothetical. Lastly, while further study, research, and testing are always recommended, to date, no direct link betweenGMOsand any of the medical problems ascribed to them exists. This is just one example, yet the majority of the stories on WT are in a similar vein. Some of the stories, such as the anti-vax stories, as documented by other MBFC reviewers, could pose a health risk to the public, which is irresponsible and ill-advised at best. For all of the above, WT is rated Conspiracy / Pseudoscience. (D. Kelley 08/16/17)", "failed_fact_checks": [ "“Bill Gates explains that the COVID vaccine will use experimental technology and permanently alter your DNA”–Inaccurate", "“Bill Gates Explains That The COVID Vaccine Will Use Experimental Technology And Permanently Alter Your DNA”–False", "CDC Admits 98 Million Americans Received Polio Vaccine In An 8-Year Span When It Was Contaminated With Cancer Virus–Partially Correct", "The government of Shanghai, China has announced its official recommendation that COVID-19 should be treated with high amounts of intravenous vitamin C–Misleading" ], "last_updated": "June 18, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/shadow-proof/", "name": "Shadow Proof", "source_url": "https://shadowproof.com", "bias_rating": "LEFT", "bias_score": -7.1, "factual_reporting": "HIGH", "factual_score": 1.8, "credibility_rating": "HIGH CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Website", "traffic_popularity": "Minimal Traffic", "bias_category_description": "These media sources are moderate to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation.  They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports, and omit information reporting that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy.See all Left Bias sources.", "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate Shadow Proof Left Biased based on editorial positions that favor a progressive perspective. We also rate them High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing and a clean fact-check record. Detailed Report Bias Rating: LEFT (-7.1) Factual Reporting: HIGH (1.", "history": "Shadow Proof is a progressive news website and activist organization formed in 2015 by Kevin Gosztola and Brian Sonenstein. After long-time progressive political blog,Firedoglakeshut down and merged its 200K plus articles intoShadow Proof. Shadow Proof state theirmissionas “to expose systemic abuses of power in business and government while at the same time developing a model for independent journalism that supports a diverse range of young freelance writers and contributors.” You can find more details about their goalshere. Read our profile on the United States government and media.", "ownership": "FDL Media Group owns Shadow Proof. Donations generate revenue.", "analysis": "These media sources are moderate to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation.  They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports, and omit information reporting that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy.See all Left Bias sources. In review, Shadow Proof uses emotional language both in their headlines and articles such as “WHERE WAS PRESIDENT OBAMA’S ‘DECENCY’ WHEN HE WAS DEPORTING DREAMERS?” and “TRUMP IS TAKING ADVANTAGE OF THE FACT THAT OBAMACARE WAS MADE TO BE BROKEN” and “READ DEA CHIEF’S RESIGNATION MEMO ADMONISHING TRUMP FOR ENDORSING POLICE MISCONDUCT.” Shadow Proof is a strong advocate for a single-payer health care system, and they dedicated one category solely to single-payer under the category“ROAD TO SINGLE-PAYER.”They also focus on incarceration and prisoners’ rights under the subsection“Prison Protest.”Overall, Shadow Proof uses credible media sources such asBoston Globe,NYTimes, andPolitico; therefore, we rate Shadow Proof Left Biased based on political positions and wording.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "None in the last 5 years." ], "last_updated": "July 15, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-lallantop-bias-and-credibility/", "name": "The Lallantop", "source_url": "https://www.thelallantop.com/", "bias_rating": "LEFT-CENTER", "bias_score": -4.8, "factual_reporting": "MIXED", "factual_score": 4.6, "credibility_rating": "MEDIUM CREDIBILITY", "country": "India", "country_freedom_rating": "MODERATE FREEDOM", "media_type": "Website", "traffic_popularity": "High Traffic", "bias_category_description": "These media sources have a slight to moderate progressive/liberal bias.  They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes) to favor progressive/liberal causes.  These sources are generally trustworthy for information, but may require further investigation.See all Left-Center sources.", "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate The Lallantop as Left-Center biased based on its editorial positions, which moderately favor the left. We also rate them as Mixed for factual reporting due to poor sourcing and sensational headlines that do not match the story. Detailed Report Bias Rating: LEFT-CENTER (-4.8) Factual Reporting: MIXED (4.", "history": "The Lallantop is a Hindi-language digital news platform launched in 2016 under the India Today Group.It gained prominence for its colloquial reporting style and youth-oriented content.The platform combines news with entertainment, offering a mix of political analysis, social commentary, and pop culture.ItsAbout pagedescribes it as a ‘new-age’ news website aiming to present stories in a relatable manner. Read our profile on India’s media and government.", "ownership": "The Lallantop is owned by the India Today Group, a major Indian media conglomerate.While the platform provides contact information on itsContact page, detailed information about its funding sources and editorial policies is limited.The platform relies on digital advertising.", "analysis": "These media sources have a slight to moderate progressive/liberal bias.  They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes) to favor progressive/liberal causes.  These sources are generally trustworthy for information, but may require further investigation.See all Left-Center sources. The Lallantop exhibits a moderate left-leaning bias, particularly evident in its critical stance towards the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and Prime Minister Narendra Modi.For instance, editor Saurabh Dwivedi faced backlash for atweet mocking BJP supporters, which he later deleted and apologized for.Additionally, the platform has been accused of avoiding favorable coverage of Modi and the BJP, as noted by critics. While The Lallantop covers a range of topics, including social issues and entertainment, its political reporting often reflects a critical perspective on the ruling party.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "There are no documented instances of The Lallantop being subjected to fact-checking by third-party organizations." ], "last_updated": "June 7, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/les-crises-bias-and-credibility/", "name": "Les Crises", "source_url": "https://www.les-crises.fr/", "bias_rating": "LEFT", "bias_score": -6.9, "factual_reporting": "MIXED", "factual_score": 4.8, "credibility_rating": "MEDIUM CREDIBILITY", "country": "France", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Website", "traffic_popularity": "Medium Traffic", "bias_category_description": "These media sources are moderate to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation.  They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appealing to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports, and omit information that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy.See all Left Bias sources.", "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate Les Crises as left-biased due to its consistent criticism of Western governments, NATO, and neoliberal institutions and its alignment with progressive economic and social values. We rate its reporting as Mixed for factual accuracy due to its reliance on selectively curated sources and limited transparency regarding funding. Detailed Report Bias Rating: LEFT (-6.9) Factual Reporting: MIXED (4.", "history": "Les Crisesis a French-language political blog founded in 2011 by economist Olivier Berruyer. Initially focused on the 2008 financial crisis, the site has since expanded to cover geopolitics, media criticism, international relations, and French politics. According to its About page, the site aims to “broaden the scope of information and reflection” by publishing a mix of translated articles and original commentary. Berruyer stepped down in 2021, and the site is now managed byJean-Pierre Simon.The site is hosted by OVH, with its listed hosting location in Roubaix, France. Les Crises positions itself as critical of government power and conspiracy theories and describes its editorial goal as offering perspectives that counter mainstream consensus and fringe misinformation. Read our profile on France’s Media and Government.", "ownership": "Les Crises does not publicly disclose its legal ownership.The Legal Noticelists Jean-Pierre Simon as the publication manager, but no formal ownership entity is identified. The site states that it is independent and does not carry advertising. It is financially supported through reader donations and subscriptions. However, no financial reports or donor information are published, and the legal owner or publisher is not named. As such, funding is partially transparent, but ownership remains undisclosed.", "analysis": "These media sources are moderate to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation.  They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appealing to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports, and omit information that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy.See all Left Bias sources. Les Crises is grounded in its critique of neoliberal economic systems, skepticism of NATO and U.S. foreign policy, and focus on human rights. Its content consistently critiques political elites and power structures, including center-left and center-right governments. In a recent article criticizingJustin Trudeau, titled“Trudeau posed as a progressive, but served the interests of big business,”the outlet frames Trudeau as a corporate puppet, arguing that his progressive rhetoric masks policies aligned with elite business interests.TruthOut.orgoriginally published the article. Similarly, a report on U.S. foreign policy titled“The U.S. considers granting Saudi Arabia a nuclear program”and initially published byResponsible Statecraftpresents Washington’s diplomacy as driven by double standards and realpolitik, with little attention to democratic principles. The site also reposts work from like-minded publications such asElucid, which recently published a critique ofEmmanuel Macron’sEuropean defense ambitions, framing them as unrealistic and elite-driven. These articles are presented without counterpoints or balancing views, reflecting a pattern of one-sided reporting. While Les Crises disclaims the endorsement of all views published, the editorial line consistently reflects a populist-progressive skepticism of Western liberal institutions, corporate power, and U.S.-led international policy.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "None in the Last 5 years" ], "last_updated": "May 16, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/causeur-talker-bias/", "name": "Causeur (Talker)", "source_url": "https://www.causeur.fr/", "bias_rating": "FAR RIGHT", "bias_score": 8.0, "factual_reporting": "LOW", "factual_score": 7.8, "credibility_rating": "LOW CREDIBILITY", "country": "France", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Website/Magazine", "traffic_popularity": "Medium Traffic", "bias_category_description": null, "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate Causeur Far-Right Biased and questionable based on the promotion of conspiracy theories, propaganda, false or misleading claims, poor sourcing techniques, lack of transparency, and some views that do not align with the consensus of science. Detailed Report Questionable Reasoning: Poor Sourcing, Conspiracy Theories, Propaganda, Lack of Transparency, False Claims Bias Rating: FAR RIGHT (8.0) Factual Reporting: LOW (7.8) Country: France MBFC’s Country Freedom Rank: MOSTLY FREE Media Type: Website/Magazine Traffic/Popularity: Medium Traffic MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY History Launched in 2007 by Elisabeth Lévy, Causeur.", "history": "Launched in 2007 by Elisabeth Lévy,Causeur.fris a French online magazine based in Paris, France. The website covers a wide range of topics, including politics, culture, society, and more. The magazine is published monthly, and the President and Director of Publication is Gil Mihaely. Read our profile on France’s Media and Government.", "ownership": "SAS Causeur.frpublishes causeur.fr. French far-right figure,Gérald Penciolelli, holds a 44% stake in “Causeur,” founded by Basile de Koch and Marc Cohen. The ownership information is not disclosed, and the website generates revenue through advertisements, donations, and subscriptions.", "analysis": "Causeur.fr is aconservativemagazine presenting strong viewpoints on political and societal issues, including immigration, religion, and climate. The articles are often opinionated and provocative and usually lack hyperlinks. For instance, in an article titled “Immigration costs France far more than 6.57 billion euros,”the author criticizes the government and the Court for handling these estimates. The piece cites a Court of Auditors report and a CEPII study but doesn’t provide direct links. Another article,Economism, and Transhumanism: more worrying than a pension reform!”exhibit right-wing bias through its emotionally loaded language and the framing of certain issues. A quote from the article reads: “The brutalization of French society? The fault of precariousness. Jihadism? It is because of the territorial and economic “apartheid” of which young people are victims.” Finally, a piece discussing climate marches in Belgium under“Divergence of struggles, once!”is written in a somewhat skeptical tone toward the climate marchers. Several French media sources have linked Elisabeth Lévy, the director of Causeur, withclimate skepticism.She states, “The climate threat exists. But if it were as deadly and imminent as we are told, the military would already be patrolling our streets to force us into near energy abstinence.” Politically, Causeur strongly favors former President Trump:Faced with Trump, the American left has no coherent programand frequently denigrates President Biden:Biden/archives: when the monkey wants to climb the coconut tree…Finally, the website has promoted misinformation regardingUkraine, such as claimingRussiainvaded them because ofNazismand has promoted theStolen 2020 election conspiracy theory. In general, Causeur is far-right biased and promotes false and misleading information.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "None by a third-party fact-checker. See above evidence." ], "last_updated": "February 12, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/world-lifestyle-bias/", "name": "World Lifestyle", "source_url": "https://www.worldlifestyle.com/", "bias_rating": "CONSPIRACY-PSEUDOSCIENCE", "bias_score": -4.0, "factual_reporting": "LOW", "factual_score": 7.5, "credibility_rating": "LOW CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Website", "traffic_popularity": "High Traffic", "bias_category_description": null, "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate World Lifestyle a strong pseudoscience website based on the promotion of false or misleading claims regarding science and health. We also rate them low for factual reporting due to a lack of sourcing and blatant clickbait abuse to generate advertising revenue. Detailed Report Bias Rating: CONSPIRACY-PSEUDOSCIENCE (-4.0) Factual Reporting: LOW (7.", "history": "Launched in 2004, World Lifestyle is an anonymously run website reporting on food, health, and travel. According to theirabout page, “WorldLifestyle is a premier, advertising-supported digital media platform, connecting audiences to the most shareable content around the globe.” The website lacks transparency as they do not provide bios on authors or disclose editors. Read our profile on the United States government and media.", "ownership": "Vibey.com LLC,a company registered in Washington in the United States, owns and publishes World Lifestyle. Advertising generates revenue.", "analysis": "World Lifestyle publishes clickbait stories that force the reader to keep clicking “NEXT” to load a new content page. The purpose of this is to increase page views and advertising impressions to maximize profit. Articles typically focus on lifestyle issues with sensational headlines such as this29 Maps of America That’ll Make You Question Everything. You will click to the next page on stories such as this and most others at least 30 times. Further, most information on the website is unsourced. Editorially, they do not openly promote a political bias; however, they do publish misinformation related to pseudoscience such as thisWhat Is CBD, and Is It Worth Using?In the article, they claim that CBD can fight cancer. There isno evidenceto support this claim. In general, World Lifestyle is unreliable for credible information.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "A former police dog named Kyle kept barking at a tree because of a dead body hidden inside.–False" ], "last_updated": "August 31, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/culturewatch-bias/", "name": "CultureWatch (BillMuehlenberg.com)", "source_url": "https://billmuehlenberg.com/", "bias_rating": "EXTREME RIGHT CONSPIRACY-PSEUDOSCIENCE", "bias_score": 8.8, "factual_reporting": "LOW", "factual_score": 8.2, "credibility_rating": "LOW CREDIBILITY", "country": "Australia", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Website", "traffic_popularity": "Minimal Traffic", "bias_category_description": null, "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate CultureWatch or BillMuehlenberg.com as an extreme right-biased and factually questionable website based on poor sourcing, promotion of propaganda, conspiracy theories, pseudoscience, and one-sided perspectives. Detailed Report Bias Rating: EXTREME RIGHT CONSPIRACY-PSEUDOSCIENCE (8.8) Factual Reporting: LOW (8.", "history": "BillMuehlenberg.com, or CultureWatch, is a website and blog created byBill Muehlenberg, a conservative commentator, author, and public speaker focusing on topics such as Christianity, culture, ethics, and politics. The website consists of the following sections: Christianity, Culture Wars, Ethics, Theology, and Testimonials. It is based in Victoria, Australia. Read our profile on Australia’s media and government.", "ownership": "BillMuehlenberg.com, or CultureWatch, is primarily funded through the sale of his books and donations. The website is owned and operated by Bill Muehlenberg.", "analysis": "CultureWatch is a website that covers a broad range of topics related to Christianity and culture. One example of an article on CultureWatch is“The Dangers of Compromise,”the author cites various Bible passages throughout the article to support his argument. However, the website, in general, publishes articles with strong, emotionally loaded language, such as“Our Beloved Leader: Embracing Chistophobia and Islamophilia,”and uses derogatory language, such as “Danistan,” to refer to the state of Victoria and calls the premier “Dictator Dan” in a derogatory manner. The author also accuses the premier of promoting homosexuality and being “anti-Christian” without providing any evidence to support these claims. Furthermore, the author claims that Christians in Victoria are being “hunted down and persecuted” for affirming their beliefs, yet provides no evidence to support this claim. Overall, the article contains significant bias in wording and portrays a strong anti-Islamic sentiment while portraying Christianity in a positive light. It uses derogatory language to attack the premier and makes unsupported claims about the persecution of Christians in Victoria. Another article on the website,“Tucker and the War on Conservatives,”suggests thatTucker Carlsonis a victim of a wider attack on conservatives. Muehlenberg appears to have a bias in favor of Tucker Carlson and conservative views while being critical of those who oppose them. Most articles on the website are not sourced; if they are sourced, Muehlenberg cites sources such asBusiness Insider,The Daily Wire, andDaily Signal. Finally, during the Covid-19 pandemic Muehlenberg endorsed pseudoscientific claims from Robert F. Kennedy Jr., whofrequently promotes disinformationon the dangers of vaccines:A REVIEW OFA LETTER TO LIBERALS. BY ROBERT F. KENNEDY, JR.In this letter, Kennedy relies onunsubstantiated VAERS dataclaiming thousands have died from the vaccine. He also promotes unproven treatments for covid, like “ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine,” which have limited evidence to support their effectiveness and may be harmful if taken in the wrong dosage. In general, this is a right-leaning conspiracy and pseudoscience website.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "CultureWatch has not been fact-checked by a third party." ], "last_updated": "October 13, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-scoop/", "name": "The Scoop", "source_url": "https://thescoop.us/", "bias_rating": "FAR-RIGHT", "bias_score": 8.9, "factual_reporting": "MIXED", "factual_score": 6.4, "credibility_rating": "LOW CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Website", "traffic_popularity": "Minimal Traffic", "bias_category_description": null, "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate The Scoop Right Biased and Questionable based on the promotion of right-wing propaganda, the use of poor sources, a lack of transparency, and a failed fact check. Detailed Report Reasoning: Propaganda, Poor Sourcing, Lack of Transparency, False Claim Bias Rating: FAR-RIGHT (8.9) Factual Reporting: MIXED (6.4) Country: USA MBFC’s Country Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE Media Type: Website Traffic/Popularity: Minimal Traffic MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY History Founded in 2016 , The Scoop is a conservative biased news and opinion website that publishes a combination of original and curated content.", "history": "Founded in 2016, The Scoop is a conservative biased news and opinion website that publishes a combination of original and curated content. According to theirabout page, “Instead of kissing up to the globalists and the corporate elites that control the American mainstream media, The Scoop is fighting for YOU – the American patriot.” The website lacks transparency as they do not list an editor or ownership; however, they do indicate their conservative perspective. Read our profile on the United States government and media.", "ownership": "The Scoop does not clearly articulate ownership; however, they do indicate on their oldprivacy policypage that The Scoop Media Inc owns them. The current privacy page does not disclose ownership. Revenue is derived through advertising and donations via Patreon.", "analysis": "In review, The Scoop provides summarized news and commentary and links to curated news stories from other sources. News is broken down into the categories “politics” and “real news.” Summarized news stories frequently use emotionally loaded language that denigrates the left, such as thisNewsmax Reporter Rob Schmitt HUMILIATES CNN’s, Jim Acosta. Original reports such as this are typically sourced to social media, videos, or hyperlinked to poor sources such asBreitbart. Curated news often is sourced from right-biased questionable sources such asTrending PoliticsandWestern Journal. Editorially, all stories favor the right and, particularly the former Trump administration, such as thisTrump Releases Surprise Video On NYE: Americans Have So Much To Be Grateful For. During 2020-2022, The Scoop reported on the Coronavirus withskepticism, often promoting stories that show people and businesses defying safety measures. Further, after the Presidential election, they also republished election fraud misinformation such as thisRep. Mo Brooks: ‘Trump Won The Electoral College’ If Legal Votes Counted — Says Won’t Be Part Of The ‘Surrender Caucus.’  They generally publish news and commentary primarily rooted in fact; however, all stories are one-sided with far-right bias.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "Did Candace Owens Win a Huge Lawsuit Against Facebook Fact-Checkers?–False" ], "last_updated": "June 15, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/planet-critical-bias-and-credibility/", "name": "Planet: Critical", "source_url": "https://www.planetcritical.com/", "bias_rating": "LEFT", "bias_score": -7.8, "factual_reporting": "MIXED", "factual_score": 4.8, "credibility_rating": "MEDIUM CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Website", "traffic_popularity": "Mimimal Traffic", "bias_category_description": "These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation.  They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports, and omit information that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy.See all Left Bias sources.", "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate Planet: Critical as Far Left-Biased due to its focus on progressive issues and critiques of systemic structures. We rate its reporting as Mixed, acknowledging that while the information is generally accurate and well-researched, there are instances of unverified claims and one-sided reporting. Detailed Report Bias Rating: LEFT (-7.8) Factual Reporting: MIXED (4.", "history": "Planet: Criticalis a journalistic platform founded by Rachel Donald that investigates global crises and explores solutions. It features a podcast and newsletter that delve into topics such as climate change, energy, economics, and politics, aiming to connect various disciplines to reveal comprehensive insights into current global challenges.According to itsabout page,“Planet: Critical is journalism for a world in crisis, connecting the dots of science, art, language, politics, media, philosophy, and power to reveal the big picture.” Read our profile on the United States media and government.", "ownership": "Owned and operated byRachel Donald, Planet: Critical is a reader-supported platform that relies on subscriptions and donations to sustain its operations.", "analysis": "These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation.  They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports, and omit information that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy.See all Left Bias sources. Planet: Critical exhibits aLeft Bias, focusing on progressive issues like climate change, environmental justice, and systemic critiques of modernity. For instance, articles such as“Greenwashed: From pipeline to catwalk to policy”critically examine corporate sustainability practices, reflecting a progressive stance. The platform’s content is generally well-researched and features interviews with experts, providing in-depth analysis. However, the selection of topics and framing align with progressive viewpoints, which may influence the presentation of information. Editorially, opinion pieces feature very loaded language that is highly critical of Donald Trump, like thisThe Rapist in the Oval Office. Besides labeling Trump a rapist, for which he has never been criminally tried, the core arguments also contain inaccuracies and unverified claims, such as implying direct collusion between Trump and Putin to destabilize American democracy without solid evidence. In general, Planet: Critical exhibits a far-left bias and occasionally makes unverified claims. Overall, we rate Planet: Critical asFar Left-Biaseddue to its focus on progressive issues and critiques of systemic structures. We rate its reporting asMixed, acknowledging that while the information is generally accurate and well-researched, there are instances of unverified claims and one-sided reporting. (D. Van Zandt 12/02/2024) Source:https://www.planetcritical.com/ Last Updated on December 2, 2024 byMedia Bias Fact Check Do you appreciate our work? Please consider one of the following ways to sustain us.MBFC Ad-FreeorMBFC DonationLeft vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sourcesFound this insightful? Please consider sharing on your Social Media:Explore Similar Sources:Conspiracy Planet – Bias and CredibilityPrison Planet – Bias and CredibilityEnlightened Planet – Bias and CredibilityOne Green Planet – Bias and CredibilityMetropolis Planet – Bias and Credibility", "failed_fact_checks": [ "None in the Last 5 years" ], "last_updated": "December 2, 2024" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/project-2025-bias/", "name": "Project 2025", "source_url": "https://www.project2025.org/", "bias_rating": "FAR RIGHT", "bias_score": 7.9, "factual_reporting": "MIXED", "factual_score": 5.5, "credibility_rating": "MEDIUM CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Organization/Foundation", "traffic_popularity": "Medium Traffic", "bias_category_description": "These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward conservative causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They may utilize strong, loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using an appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports, and omit information that may damage conservative causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy.See all Right Bias sources.", "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate Project 2025 as far-right biased based on its advocacy for conservative government and policies. We also rate them Mixed for factual reporting due to their reliance on poor sources and advocacy for policies that contradict the consensus of science. Detailed Report Bias Rating: FAR RIGHT (7.9) Factual Reporting: MIXED (5.", "history": "Project 2025 is a policy initiative led byThe Heritage Foundation, a conservativethink tank, and supported by over 100 allied organizations. Introduced in 2022, the initiative outlines a plan to restructure the federal government in preparation for a conservative presidential transition. Its goals are organized around four pillars: policy, personnel, training, and a 180-day playbook. The initiative emphasizes expanding executive power, reorganizing federal agencies, and promoting socially conservative values in federal policy. Many contributors to Project 2025 have experience fromDonald Trump’sfirst administration. According toNewsweek, several proposals associated with Project 2025 have been implemented during Trump’s second term, including federal spending cuts, expanded fossil fuel production, the rollback of diversity, equity, and inclusion programs, and restrictions on funding for reproductive health. Read our profile on the United States media and government.", "ownership": "The website does not explicitly state its funding sources, but it is organized by The Heritage Foundation, a well-known conservative think-tank. This connection suggests that Project 2025 is likely funded and supported by The Heritage Foundation and its network.Over 100 conservative organizationsform a broad coalition supporting this project,​​ such asALEC,Competitive Enterprise Institute,Heartland Institute, andMoms for Liberty.", "analysis": "These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward conservative causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They may utilize strong, loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using an appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports, and omit information that may damage conservative causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy.See all Right Bias sources. Project 2025 is a campaign that advocates for a governance framework characterized by Christian nationalism, reduced regulations, and socially conservative policies in the United States. Its proposals include abolishing the Department of Education, restricting access to abortion, and eliminating federal protections for LGBTQ+ individuals. These positions align with the populist right and are reflected in certain initiatives of the Trump administration, particularly those focused on consolidating presidential control over the civil service and implementing environmental rollbacks, as noted by the BBC. TheACLUcharacterizes Project 2025 as a “radical restructuring” of government institutions, warning that several proposals would undermine civil rights, voting access, and constitutional protections. Many of its key figures, such as Russell Vought, John Ratcliffe, and Pam Bondi, have been tied to misinformation or poor fact-checking records, including false or misleading claims about election fraud, abortion, and public health. These associations, combined with Heritage’s long history of publishing climate and social policy disinformation, contribute to the project’s Mixed factual reliability. While the document itself avoids overt conspiracy theories, it often relies on ideological assumptions rather than empirical evidence. The sections on climate policy dismiss the scientific consensus on human-caused global warming, and the family policy chapters frame “biblically based” values as a government priority. According toNewsweek, the architects of Project 2025 now occupy numerous federal posts, allowing for the direct implementation of these ideological goals under the guise of “efficiency” and “restoring order.”", "failed_fact_checks": [ "None in the Last 5 years; however, the sources they rely on have failed numerous fact-checks." ], "last_updated": "October 16, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/dr-morse-tv-bias/", "name": "Dr. Morse TV", "source_url": "https://drmorse.tv/", "bias_rating": "PSEUDOSCIENCE", "bias_score": 2.0, "factual_reporting": "LOW", "factual_score": 7.8, "credibility_rating": "LOW CREDIBILITY", "country": "United States", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Website", "traffic_popularity": "Minimal Traffic", "bias_category_description": null, "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate Dr. Morse’s platforms as Pseudoscience based on the promotion of alternative medical perspectives, a reliance on anecdotal evidence, and a lack of empirical support for many claims. Detailed Report Bias Rating: PSEUDOSCIENCE (2.0) Factual Reporting: LOW (7.", "history": "Dr. Morse TVis a platform associated with Dr. Robert Morse, a naturopathic doctor. The website offers videos, courses, and insights about alternative medicine, detoxification, and spiritual teachings. Dr. Morse emphasizes a holistic approach to health and well-being, often diverging from conventional medical wisdom. He has expanded his reach with other platforms, such asDr. Morse’s Herbal Health Club,Dr. Morse’s Detox Centers, and theInternational School of the Healing Arts. The latter even offers courses on spiritual insights, emphasizing the blend of spirituality and health in Dr. Morse’s teachings. The Detox Centers’about pageindicates that Dr. Morse’s son is set to continue the business. It is located in Florida.Read our profile on USA Media and Government.", "ownership": "Dr. Robert Morse owns Dr. Morse TV and its associated platforms. They generate revenue by selling herbal products, courses, consultations, and other services.", "analysis": "In our review of content from Dr. Morse’s platforms, we focused on a selection of content to identify potential biases. In ablog posttitled “Urinary System Function,” Dr. Morse discusses the importance of the urinary system and suggests that many health issues are tied to its dysfunction. He recommends various herbs and detoxification methods as solutions. A quote from the article reads, “In this article, we will take a closer look at the urinary system’s anatomy and physiology and meet some of the herbs in Dr. Morse’s formulas that best support this system.” While the urinary system is crucial for health, the broad claims made in the post lack empirical support from the wider medical community. Another significant aspect of Dr. Morse’s platforms is theirmedical disclaimer. The disclaimer explicitly states that its content is “solely for educational purposes” and clarifies it does “not involve diagnosing treatment, or prescribing of remedies for diseases.” This disclaimer highlights the platform’s acknowledgment of its non-medical stance. Despite this, the platform sells supplements and offers guidance on health matters. TheirFAQsection indicates that while they don’t “treat,” they teach individuals how to address their health issues, suggesting a thin line between education and medical advice. Furthermore, Dr. Morse’s association with platforms like theInternational School of the Healing Artsand courses onspiritual insightsblendspiritual teachingswith health advice, which may only resonate with some and lack a scientific basis. A quote from the course outline: “Become empowered with DIY strategies for physical healing of body and nervous system, and for strengthening your immune system.” Dr. Morse has also expressedanti-vaccination viewssuch as “Nanotechnology Used in Covid Vaccines,”which is rated as misleading by IFCN fact checkerReuters Fact Check.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "A third party has not directly fact-checked this source." ], "last_updated": "October 24, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/democracy-docket-bias/", "name": "Democracy Docket", "source_url": "https://www.democracydocket.com/", "bias_rating": "LEFT", "bias_score": -6.0, "factual_reporting": "HIGH", "factual_score": 1.7, "credibility_rating": "HIGH CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Organization/Foundation", "traffic_popularity": "Medium", "bias_category_description": "These media sources are moderate to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation.  They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports, and omit information reporting that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy.See all Left Bias sources.", "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate Democracy Docket as left-biased based on editorial positions that favor the left. We also rate them High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing and a clean fact-check record. Detailed Report Bias Rating: LEFT (-6.0) Factual Reporting: HIGH (1.", "history": "Established in 2020 and based in Washington, DC,Democracy Docketis a progressive news source focused on voting rights and electoral court cases.Marc Elias, formercounselfor Hillary Clinton’s 2016 and John Kerry’s 2004 campaigns, founded Elias Law Group in 2021. He previously led the political law practice atPerkins Coieand represented major Democratic organizations and US Congressional leaders. Read our profile on the United States government and media.", "ownership": "Democracy Docket funds its operations throughdonationswith no specific mention of corporate, political, or other institutional funding sources on its“About Us”page. However, theDemocracy Docket Legal Fund, also founded by Marc Elias, is a fiscally sponsored project of the Hopewell Fund, indicating additional support structures beyond public donations.", "analysis": "These media sources are moderate to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation.  They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports, and omit information reporting that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy.See all Left Bias sources. Democracy Docket, known for its focus on voting rights, claims a progressive stance. This analysis examines their articles to assess whether they reflect this perspective, examining their use of emotionally loaded language, framing of issues, and the factual accuracy of their reporting. The article“How ID Requirements Harm Marginalized Communities and Their Right to Vote”exemplifies Democracy Docket’s progressive bias and criticizes voting ID laws for their complexity and negative impact on marginalized communities. It uses emotionally loaded language, describing the ID acquisition process as “long, winding and confusing.” It cites sources like the Movement Advancement Project,Bloomberg, and the Supreme Court’s Georgia ruling to back its argument. Another article,“Two Arizona Voter Suppression Laws Go to Trial,”characterizes the Arizona laws as “voter suppression” laws, indicating a bias from the outset. The language used is emotionally loaded, with references to the laws putting “thousands of eligible voters’ registrations at risk” and describing Republican actions as attempts to “circumvent the Supreme Court’s ruling.” Using terms like “anti-voting scheme” and “radical legal theory” further emphasizes a critical, oppositional stance. The article supports its arguments with references to specific legal challenges,court rulings, and legislative actions, indicating a foundation in actual events and legal proceedings. It cites specific bills (HB 2492 and 2243), lawsuits, and sources like eac.gov, azsos.gov.,andPolitiFact,providing a factual basis for its claims. In summary, while Democracy Docket exhibits a clear progressive bias in its language and framing, it substantiates its positions with factual information, legal references, and reports, demonstrating a balance between advocacy and factual journalism.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "None in the Last 5 years" ], "last_updated": "October 24, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/newshounds/", "name": "NewsHounds", "source_url": "https://www.newshounds.us/", "bias_rating": "LEFT", "bias_score": -7.0, "factual_reporting": "MIXED", "factual_score": 5.0, "credibility_rating": "MEDIUM CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Website", "traffic_popularity": "Minimal Traffic", "bias_category_description": "These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation.  They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports and omit reporting of information that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy.See all Left Bias sources.", "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate Newshounds Left Biased based on story selection that routinely favors the left. We also rate them Mixed for factual reporting due to one-sided information and lack of transparency. Detailed Report Bias Rating: LEFT (-7.0) Factual Reporting: MIXED (5.", "history": "Founded in 2004, NewsHounds is a website dedicated to exposingFox Newsin lies and misreporting. According to theirabout page“Rather than serve as the public’s eyes and ears, Fox and other media conglomerates have become echo chambers for the rich and powerful with whom they have become all too cozy. This blog is an attempt to counter that alarming condition. We believe that a viable democracy depends upon viable media.” Read our profile on United States government and media.", "ownership": "Newshounds does not openly disclose ownership and revenue is derived through advertising, donations and a shop that sells branded merchandise.", "analysis": "These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation.  They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports and omit reporting of information that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy.See all Left Bias sources. In review, Newshounds watches Fox News, follows the website, and then attempts to debunk their claims or point out bias and misinformation. Articles and headlines utilize moderately loaded emotional language such as thisHegseth And Keane Ignore Trump’s Previous Disrespect For Soldiers To Defend Him Over Atlantic Report. In the report, they rely on credible sources such as theAssociated Press,Atlantic,Washington Post, and of course, the Fox News video they are reporting on. In general, all reporting favors the left and denigrates the right (Fox News); however, the information is properly sourced but one-sided.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "None in the Last 5 years" ], "last_updated": "January 15, 2026" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/behavioral-sciences-journal-bias-and-credibility/", "name": "Behavioral Sciences Journal", "source_url": "https://www.mdpi.com/journal/behavsci", "bias_rating": "PRO-SCIENCE", "bias_score": -0.5, "factual_reporting": "MOSTLY FACTUAL", "factual_score": 3.6, "credibility_rating": "MEDIUM CREDIBILITY", "country": "Switzerland", "country_freedom_rating": "EXCELLENT", "media_type": "Journal", "traffic_popularity": "Minimal Traffic", "bias_category_description": "These sources consist of legitimate science or are evidence based through credible scientific sourcing.  Legitimate science follows the scientific method, is unbiased, and does not use emotional words.  These sources also respect the consensus of experts in the given scientific field and strive to publish peer-reviewed science. Some sources in this category may have a slight political bias but adhere to scientific principles.See all Pro-Science sources.", "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate Behavioral Sciences Journal Pro-Science and Mostly Factual for reporting due to being published by a company that has failed fact checks in other journals. Detailed Report Bias Rating: PRO-SCIENCE (-0.5) Factual Reporting: MOSTLY FACTUAL (3.6) Country: Switzerland MBFC’s Country Freedom Rating: EXCELLENT Media Type: Journal Traffic/Popularity: Minimal Traffic MBFC Credibility Rating: MEDIUM CREDIBILITY History Behavioral Sciences Journal is published by MDPI (Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute) , formerly Molecular Diversity Preservation International, an open-access journal publisher based in Basel, Switzerland.", "history": "Behavioral Sciences Journal is published byMDPI (Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute), formerly Molecular Diversity Preservation International, an open-access journal publisher based in Basel, Switzerland.Behavioral Sciencesis an international,peer-reviewed, open access journal of psychology, neuroscience, cognitive science, behavioral biology and behavioral genetics published monthly online by MDPI. MDPI publishes over400 journals. Read our profile on Swiss Media and Government.", "ownership": "The publisher of Behavioral Sciences Journal isMDPI AG,which Shu-Kun Lin owns. Here is the list ofthe Management Team.According to“MDPI Open Access Information and Policy.”MDPI articles and all its journals are open access where authors pay a one-time Article Processing Charge (APC) to cover the costs of peer review administration and management; here is“General Information on MDPI’s Article Processing Charges (APC).”", "analysis": "Behavioral Sciences Journal covers the study of Behavioral Science. Studies are published via open access, such as thisFactors Affecting Purchase Intention of Hanfu: Considering Product Identification, Cultural Motivation, and Perceived Authenticity.Like all others reviewed, this study is Pro-Science, well-researched and low-biased. While Behavioral Sciences Journal has not failed a fact-check, its publisher has faced criticism as an open-access predatory journal. Read our full review onMDPI.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "None for Behavioral Sciences Journal; however, other MDPI journals havefailed fact checks." ], "last_updated": "September 20, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/adipocyte-journal-bias-and-credibility/", "name": "Adipocyte Journal", "source_url": "https://www.tandfonline.com/journals/kadi20", "bias_rating": "PRO-SCIENCE", "bias_score": -0.5, "factual_reporting": "HIGH", "factual_score": 0.5, "credibility_rating": "HIGH CREDIBILITY", "country": "United Kingdom", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Organization/Foundation", "traffic_popularity": "Minimal Traffic", "bias_category_description": "These sources consist of legitimate science or are evidence-based through credible scientific sourcing.  Legitimate science follows the scientific method, is unbiased, and does not use emotional words.  These sources also respect the consensus of experts in the given scientific field and strive to publish peer-reviewed science. Some sources in this category may have a slight political bias but adhere to scientific principles.See all Pro-Science sources.", "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate Adipocyte Journal as a Pro-Science source. We also rate them High for factual reporting due to rigorous peer review and a clean fact-check record. Detailed Report Bias Rating: PRO-SCIENCE (-0.5) Factual Reporting: HIGH (0.", "history": "Adipocyte Journal is a peer-reviewed open-access journal published by Taylor & Francis that covers developments in Adipose Tissue Research. According to itsabout page, “Adipocyte is a fully open access, multi-disciplinary journal that publishes research on all aspects of adipose tissue physiology and pathophysiology.” Taylor & Francisis anacademic and professional publishing platformthat hosts a wide range of peer-reviewed journals and research articles across various disciplines, including social sciences, humanities, health sciences, engineering, and more. Founded in 1798, Taylor & Francis is a major global publisher that provides resources for researchers, scholars, and students. Read our profile on the UK’s media and government.", "ownership": "Informa PLC, a multinational publishing, business intelligence, and exhibitions group, owns the publisher Taylor & Francis. It generates revenue from institutional subscriptions, pay-per-view article purchases, and through partnerships with academic institutions.", "analysis": "Adipocyte Journal is an open-access journal that publishes information and research related to Adipose Tissue. An example article is as follows:Pharmacological inhibition of SUMOylation with TAK-981 mimics genetic HypoSUMOylation in murine perigonadal white adipose tissue. Taylor & Francis is an open-access publisher of scientific journals. There are two types of Open Access Journals, legitimate and predatory, both of which charge the author for publication.Predatory journalsoften lack peer review and are generally considered not credible. Taylor & Francis is considered alegitimate, open-access publisherthat is frequently indexed inPubMed. Although Taylor & Francis has retracted some studies in other publications that were found to be of poor methodology and not thoroughly peer-reviewed, Adipocyte Journal publishes credible scientific studies that are factual and appropriately peer-reviewed.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "None in the Last 5 years" ], "last_updated": "March 28, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/kuaz-npr-tucson-bias/", "name": "KUAZ – NPR – Tucson", "source_url": "https://news.azpm.org/", "bias_rating": "LEFT-CENTER", "bias_score": -3.0, "factual_reporting": "HIGH", "factual_score": 0.5, "credibility_rating": "HIGH CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Radio Station", "traffic_popularity": "Minimal Traffic", "bias_category_description": "These media sources have a slight to moderate liberal bias.  They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appealing to emotion or stereotypes) to favor liberal causes.  These sources are generally trustworthy for information but may require further investigation.See all Left-Center sources.", "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate KUAZ – NPR – Tucson Left-Center Biased based on story selection and editorial perspectives that slightly favors the left. We also rate them High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing of information and a clean fact check record. Detailed Report Bias Rating: LEFT-CENTER (-3.0) Factual Reporting: HIGH (0.", "history": "KUAZ – NPR – Tucson is an NPR FM radio station (1550 AM and 89.1 FM) based in Tucson,Arizona, serving the surrounding area. Read our profile on the United States media and government.", "ownership": "KUAZ – NPR – Tucson is owned and broadcast by the University of Arizona. Revenue is derived through institutional grants, individual contributions, and fees paid by users of the Public Radio Satellite System. NPR stations receiveless than 1%of their funding from the federal government.", "analysis": "These media sources have a slight to moderate liberal bias.  They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appealing to emotion or stereotypes) to favor liberal causes.  These sources are generally trustworthy for information but may require further investigation.See all Left-Center sources. In review, the KUAZ – NPR – Tucson website reports news and radio programming information with a slight liberal bias. News on the website is derived fromNPRand often utilizes minimally loaded language, such as thisNavajo Nation’s COVID-19 curfews saddled hundreds with citations, netted no money for police, news investigation finds. This story is fact-based and, like all others reviewed, relies on credible sources of information. The website also publishes content fromAmerican Public Mediaand theCorporation for Public Broadcasting. In general, story selection tends to lean slightly left, as does editorial content, such as thisArizona executive order safeguards abortion seekers and providers from prosecution. Finally, news reporting is fact-based and leans left from an editorial perspective.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "None in the Last 5 years" ], "last_updated": "December 12, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-independent/", "name": "The Independent UK", "source_url": "https://www.independent.co.uk/us", "bias_rating": "LEFT-CENTER", "bias_score": -3.6, "factual_reporting": "MIXED", "factual_score": 5.8, "credibility_rating": "MEDIUM CREDIBILITY", "country": "United Kingdom", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Newspaper", "traffic_popularity": "High Traffic", "bias_category_description": "These media sources have a slight to moderate liberal bias.  They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appeals to emotion or stereotypes) to favor liberal causes.  These sources are generally trustworthy for information but may require further investigation.See all Left-Center sources.", "overall_summary": "Overall we rate The Independent Left-Center Biased due to story selection that moderately favors the left. We also rate them Mixed in factual reporting due to several failed fact checks. Detailed Report Bias Rating: LEFT-CENTER (-3.6) Factual Reporting: MIXED (5.", "history": "Founded in 1986 by Newspaper Publishing, The Independent is a daily newspaper from London, United Kingdom. The Independent waslaunchedby formerTelegraphstaffers Andreas Whittam Smith, Matthew Symonds, and Stephen Glover. In 1990, The Independent on Sunday was launched and edited by Stephen Glover. In 1994, the founders left the paper, and Ian Hargreaves became the paper’s editor. A year later, Newspaper Publishing was restructured, with Mirror Group andTony O’Reilly’sIndependent News & Media (INM) becoming joint owners of Newspaper Publishing. In 1998, INM took complete control of The Independent.O’Reillybought out the company for £30m, and in 2010 and then Russian billionaireAlexander Lebedevand his son Evgeny LebedevacquiredThe Independent. In 2016, the paper moved to a digital-only format. Simon Kelner is currently the editor-in-chief of the Independent titles. Andreas Whittam Smith, the Independent’s founder, has also joined the board of Independent Print Limited. In 2017, Saudi BusinessmanSultan Muhammad Abuljadayelbought a 30% stake in the Independent online newspaper. Read our profile on the United Kingdoms’ Government and Media.", "ownership": "The Independent is owned byIndependent Print Limited,a company owned by the Lebedev family (Alexander Lebedev and his son Evgeny Lebedev). In 2017, Saudi Businessman Sultan Muhammad Abuljadayel bought a 30% stake in the Independent online newspaper. Advertising and subscription generate revenue for the paper.", "analysis": "These media sources have a slight to moderate liberal bias.  They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appeals to emotion or stereotypes) to favor liberal causes.  These sources are generally trustworthy for information but may require further investigation.See all Left-Center sources. The Independent recently joined a media group with close links to the Saudi royal family to launch websites across the Middle East. The Guardian has criticized its partnering with a publisher with strong ties to the Saudi government. The Independent tends to publish stories utilizing minimally loaded language in their headlines such as:“Theresa May insists Brexit deal is not dead despite EU leaders refusing to make further concessions”and US news “Mueller investigation: Special counsel attacks. Flynn criticism of FBI interview.”The Independent also republishes news from other credible sources such as theAssociated Press:“Five things you didn’t know about Germany’s diesel ban.”Most storiesfavor the leftand tend to be appropriately sourced utilizing credible sources such asUSA Todayand theMilwaukee Journal-Sentinel. According to a 2017 survey conducted byYou Gov UK, The Independent has a center-left bias in reporting, with 79% saying it was either Center or Left and only 21% saying it leaned right. Further, aReutersinstitute survey found that 47% of respondentstrust their news coverageand 17% do not, ranking them #8 in trust of the major UK news providers. In general, The Independent holds a left-leaning editorial bias. Further, they produce a high content volume; therefore, the number of failed fact checks is low compared to the number of stories published. Consequently, they are classified as factually Mixed rather than questionable.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "Analysis “Climate change might be worse than thought after scientists find major mistake in water temperature readings”–Low Scientific Credibility", "New antibody tests are 100% accurate.–False", "Sir David King, who chairs the Independent SAGE group of scientists, has claimed that 27,000 people will die by next April if current levels of Covid-19 infection continue–False", "915 children admitted with malnutrition Cambridge hospitals between 2015 and 2020. There were 656 similar admissions at Newcastle hospitals and 656 at the Royal Free London hospitals.–False", "“Online conspiracy theories and misinformation relating to Covid-19 have resulted in at least 800 deaths from coronavirus.”–False", "Donald Trump said, ‘undocumented immigrants are not people; they are animals.’–False" ], "last_updated": "December 6, 2024" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/national-vanguard/", "name": "National Vanguard", "source_url": "https://nationalvanguard.org/", "bias_rating": "EXTREME RIGHT", "bias_score": 9.5, "factual_reporting": "VERY LOW", "factual_score": 10.0, "credibility_rating": "LOW CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Organization/Foundation", "traffic_popularity": "Minimal Traffic", "bias_category_description": null, "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate the National Vanguard extreme right biased and Questionable based on the promotion of racist propaganda, conspiracy theories, poor sourcing, a lack of transparency, and designation as a hate group by third-party evaluators. Detailed Report Reasoning: Hate Group, Propaganda, Conspiracy, Poor Sourcing, Lack of Transparency, False Claims Bias Rating: EXTREME RIGHT (9.5) Factual Reporting: VERY LOW (10.0) Country: USA MBFC’s Country Freedom Rank: MOSTLY FREE Media Type: Organization/Foundation Traffic/Popularity: Minimal Traffic MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY History Founded in 2005, National Vanguard is an alt-right white supremacy organization founded and run by Kevin Alfred Strom , who is a former member of the National Alliance , which is a white supremacist, neo-Nazi, anti-Semitic, and white separatist political organization.", "history": "Founded in 2005, National Vanguard is an alt-right white supremacy organization founded and run byKevin Alfred Strom, who is a former member of theNational Alliance, which is a white supremacist, neo-Nazi, anti-Semitic, and white separatist political organization. According toNBC29andABC News, Kevin Alfred Strom, on January 4, 2007, was arrested on charges of possession of child pornography and witness tampering. Charlottesville Newspaper,The Daily Progressreported in 2008, Strom was sentenced to 23 months in prison on a child pornography charge. Read our profile on the United States government and media.", "ownership": "The website does not disclose ownership, but Kevin Strom is the head of the organization. Donations and the sale of merchandise generate revenue.", "analysis": "In review, National Vanguard uses loaded emotional language in their articles and headlines such as: “Chicago: Blacks, “Fleeing Authorities,” Try to Hide in Police Station.” They also use other extreme-right white extremist blogs as their sources, such as modernheretic3000. Further, theSouthern Poverty Law Centerlists National Vanguard as a white supremacist site. Editorially they are fiercely anti-immigrant such as thisSchrodinger’s Immigration Policy. To put them in perspective, they often criticize former President Trump for hisliberalpolicies regarding immigration and his support for IsraelTrump’s Latest Jew Criminal Pardon Spree. In general, National Vanguard is one of the most despicable sites on the internet. It is amazing they are still online. They are the definition of a hate group. If you ever see a friend share a story from this group, the unfriend option should come quickly.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "A 7-year-old named Emily Jones was decapitated in England by a Somali migrant.–Mostly False" ], "last_updated": "January 2, 2026" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/natural-cures/", "name": "NaturalCures.com", "source_url": "https://naturalcures.com/", "bias_rating": "PSEUDOSCIENCE", "bias_score": 6.0, "factual_reporting": "MIXED", "factual_score": 6.4, "credibility_rating": "LOW CREDIBILITY", "country": "United Kingdom", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Website", "traffic_popularity": "Minimal Traffic", "bias_category_description": null, "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate NaturalCures.com as a Quackery level Pseudoscience website for the promotion of alternative health that is not supported by science . Detailed Report Bias Rating: PSEUDOSCIENCE (6.0) Factual Reporting: MIXED (6.", "history": "Founded in 2003, NaturalCures.com is a website that publishes news, alternative medicine, and natural cures for a variety of ailments. The website lacks transparency as they do not provide an about page, names of editors, or disclosure of ownership. Read our profile on the UK’s media and government.", "ownership": "The website does not openly disclose ownership; however, on the contact page, they indicate they are owned bySnowflake Media Ltd, which is a web design and marketing company. Revenue is derived through alifetime membershipfee for $99 and advertising.", "analysis": "In review, NaturalCures.com provides a searchable database of natural cures for many diseases and conditions such aHigh Blood Pressure. This will direct you to a page that highlights the causes and symptoms of the ailment, however, when you click on Natural Remedies for the condition it asks for a membership. The website also provides the latest news which focuses on alternative health such as thisCOVID-19 What Is The Alternative Experts View?This story gives the views of several quack pseudoscientists such asMercola,Dr. Oz, and Mike Adams fromNatural News. Finally, NaturalCures.com features original articles that do not offer hyperlinked sourcing such as thisResisting Media Hype. NaturalCures.com frequently promotes pseudoscience such as thepromotionofAnti-Vaccination books,natural prevention, andcures for canceras well as misinformation regardingCoronavirus. Overall, we rate NaturalCures.com as a Quackery level Pseudoscience website for the promotion of alternative health that is not supported by science. (8/21/2016) Updated (D. Van Zandt 01/02/2026) Source:https://naturalcures.com/ Last Updated on January 2, 2026 byMedia Bias Fact Check Do you appreciate our work? Please consider one of the following ways to sustain us.MBFC Ad-FreeorMBFC DonationLeft vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sourcesFound this insightful? Please consider sharing on your Social Media:Explore Similar Sources:JD Supra Bias and Credibility – Bias and CredibilityLiberal Bias Press – Bias and CredibilityGreatReject Bias – Bias and CredibilityGMO Watch Bias – Bias and Credibility", "failed_fact_checks": [], "last_updated": "January 2, 2026" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/quanta-magazine/", "name": "Quanta Magazine", "source_url": "https://www.quantamagazine.org/", "bias_rating": "PRO-SCIENCE", "bias_score": -0.2, "factual_reporting": "VERY HIGH", "factual_score": 0.0, "credibility_rating": "HIGH CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Website", "traffic_popularity": "Medium Traffic", "bias_category_description": "These sources consist of legitimate science or are evidence-based through the use of credible scientific sourcing.  Legitimate science follows the scientific method, is unbiased, and does not use emotional words.  These sources also respect the consensus of experts in the given scientific field and strive to publish peer-reviewed science. Some sources in this category may have a slight political bias but adhere to scientific principles.See all Pro-Science sources.", "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate Quanta Magazine a low-biased Pro-Science source that is Very High in factual reporting. Detailed Report Bias Rating: PRO-SCIENCE (-0.2) Factual Reporting: VERY HIGH (0.0) Country: USA MBFC’s Country Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE Media Type: Website Traffic/Popularity: Medium Traffic MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY History Founded in 2012, Quanta Magazine (QM) is a hard science news site founded by the Simons Foundation and focused on recent advances in physics, mathematics, biology, and computer science.", "history": "Founded in 2012, Quanta Magazine (QM) is a hard science news site founded by the Simons Foundation and focused on recent advances in physics, mathematics, biology, and computer science. As theirAbout pagestates, “Illuminating basic science and math research through public service journalism.” Read our profile on the United States government and media.", "ownership": "TheSimons Foundationowns and publishes Quanta Magazine. Advertising and anonline storegenerate revenue.", "analysis": "Quanta Magazine takes complex subjects and presents them so that laypeople can understand without simplifying the subject matter or sacrificing the basic content. The articles on QM are well written, factual, well-sourced, and authored by experts in their respective fields. Headlines are presented with minimal bias and explain the content of the articles, such as thisTuring Patterns Turn Up in a Tiny Crystal. Editorially, they rarely publish anything political and stick to science.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "None in the Last 5 years" ], "last_updated": "May 9, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/investment-watch-blog/", "name": "Investment Watch Blog", "source_url": "https://www.investmentwatchblog.com/", "bias_rating": "RIGHT CONSPIRACY-PSEUDOSCIENCE", "bias_score": 8.0, "factual_reporting": "MIXED", "factual_score": 6.2, "credibility_rating": "LOW CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Website", "traffic_popularity": "Medium Traffic", "bias_category_description": null, "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate Investment Watch Blog Right Biased as a strong conspiracy website based on promoting unproven or false claims. Detailed Report Bias Rating: RIGHT CONSPIRACY-PSEUDOSCIENCE (8.0) Factual Reporting: MIXED (6.2) Country: USA MBFC’s Country Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE Media Type: Website Traffic/Popularity: Medium Traffic MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY History Founded in 2010 , Investment Watch Blog provides alternative news covering finance, economy, politics, world news, current events, and investment news.", "history": null, "ownership": "Investment Watch Blog lacks transparency by not disclosing ownership. Revenue is derived through advertising and donations.", "analysis": "In review, Investment Watch Blog publishes news summaries from other sources that focus on economics, investments, and general news. Articles and headlines utilize loaded emotional language such as thisBOOM — US Military Intel Agents Ready To Testify In Dominion Scandal. This false story is sourced to the QuestionableGateway PunditandEpoch Times, who have been promoting election fraud conspiracies throughout the 2020 Presidential Election. They have also promoted misinformation regarding the Coronavirus, such as thisInfluenza has been eliminated. Good job world!In general, story selection favors a right-leaning perspective that utilizes poor sources such asMisesand often promotes misinformation.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "9th Circuit Judge Who Struck Down Trump’s Muslim Travel Ban Busted In Sleazy Scandal–False", "False claim recirculates in New Zealand that government revoked ‘human right to grow food’–False" ], "last_updated": "November 24, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/ridgway-record-bias-and-credibility/", "name": "Ridgway Record", "source_url": "https://www.ridgwayrecord.com/", "bias_rating": "LEAST BIASED", "bias_score": 1.5, "factual_reporting": "HIGH", "factual_score": 1.0, "credibility_rating": "HIGH CREDIBILITY", "country": "USA", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Newspaper", "traffic_popularity": "Minimal Traffic", "bias_category_description": "These sources have minimal bias and use very few loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appeals to emotion or stereotypes).  The reporting is factual and usually sourced.  These are the most credible media sources.See all Least Biased sources.", "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate The Ridgway Record as least biased based on minimal editorializing of content. We also rate them High for factual reporting due to the use of credible sources and a clean fact-check record. Detailed Report Bias Rating: LEAST BIASED (1.5) Factual Reporting: HIGH (1.", "history": "The Ridgway Record is a newspaper based in Ridgway, Pennsylvania. It covers topics such as news, business, local and state news, economics, politics, arts, and entertainment. Read our profile on the United States media and government.", "ownership": "Horizon Publications, which owns numerous small publications in the USA and Canada, independently owns the paper (this is not disclosed on the website.). The Ridgway Record is funded through an advertising and subscription model.", "analysis": "These sources have minimal bias and use very few loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appeals to emotion or stereotypes).  The reporting is factual and usually sourced.  These are the most credible media sources.See all Least Biased sources. The Ridgway Record covers news, sports, lifestyle, and entertainment for the greater Ridgway, PA, area. They report local news with minimal loaded emotional languageGriefShare in Elk County returning this February.All information is properly sourced. The national news is republished from theAssociated Press. Editorially, opinion pieces and political news reporting slightly favor the right.The paper is fact-based and holds a slight right-leaning editorial bias.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "None in the Last 5 years" ], "last_updated": "January 15, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/amg-news/", "name": "American Media Group – AMG-News", "source_url": "https://amg-news.com/", "bias_rating": "RIGHT-CONSPIRACY-PSEUDOSCIENCE", "bias_score": 9.8, "factual_reporting": "VERY LOW", "factual_score": 9.7, "credibility_rating": "LOW CREDIBILITY", "country": "Romania", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Website", "traffic_popularity": "Medium Traffic", "bias_category_description": null, "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate American Media Group (AMG-news), right biased and a Tin-Foil Hat Conspiracy and Quackery Level Pseudoscience site based on the consistent publication of unsubstantiated or false information. Detailed Report Bias Rating: RIGHT-CONSPIRACY-PSEUDOSCIENCE (9.8) Factual Reporting: VERY LOW (9.7) Country: Romania MBFC’s Country Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE Media Type: Website Traffic/Popularity: Medium Traffic MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY History Founded in 2017, American Media Group (AMG-news.", "history": "Founded in 2017, American Media Group (AMG-news.com) is a conspiracy and pseudoscience news source based inRomania. The website lacks transparency as they do not provide an about page or disclose ownership. Admin and Madeea Greere post articles. There is little information available on Ms. Greere. On the bottom of each page, they disclaim: “AMG-News is dedicated to the truth, true journalism, and the truth movement. The truth will set us free, and it will enlighten, inspire, awaken and unite us.”", "ownership": "American Media Group lacks transparency as they do not disclose ownership. Advertising generates revenue.", "analysis": "American Media Group (AMG-news.com) publishes right-leaning conspiracy and pseudoscience information. The website frequently makes outrageous claims not substantiated by evidence such as thisGITMO: Which Presidents Are Going? Deep State, Treason, Military Tribunals, Official Documents, List of Indictments. This article claims that high-level politicians such as Hillary Clinton and Bill Clinton, Barack Obama, Joe Biden, George W. Bush, and several other perceived deep state politicians are rumored to be housed at Guantanamo Military Federal Prison. A quote from the article reads: The internet has been buzzing with rumors that high-level VIP members of the Deep State (aka Cabal/Illuminati/Global Elite) are being detained for human rights abuses and corruption, and are being taken by U.S. Special Forces to military prison at Guantanamo Bay Naval Base (Gitmo) as a result of thousands of sealed indictments. Multiple sources have been reporting on some of the key VIP figures taken there. The multiple sources cited in the article appear to be fringe Youtube videos and conspiracy theoristHal Turner. Other topics covered on the website are the new world order, FEMA camps, miracle cancer cures, and vaccine misinformation such as thisThe Supreme Court In The US Has Ruled That The Covid Pathogen Is Not A Vaccine, Is Unsafe, And Must Be Avoided At All Costs-Supreme Court has canceled universal vax. A quote from the article reads, “That is, nothing to do with traditional vaccines! That is, it is an instrument of genetic influence. Genetic bioweapon! That is, they were going to destroy from earthlings, and the survivors will become GMOs!”Obviously, this is not true. Editorially, they promote QAnon conspiracies that elevate former President Trump as a savior to save the world with stories such as thisPresident Trump and the “Deep State” The Government Strikes Back, andBarack Obama and His Cabal Tools Stole the Election From Donald Trump. In general, AMG-News promotes over-the-top conspiracy theories and quackery level pseudoscience from a right-leaning perspective.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "“List of Indictments, Arrests, and Executions – Dismantling the Deep State Operatives and Doubles.”–False", "Almost everything on this website is either false or misleading. See examples above." ], "last_updated": "January 3, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/international-viewpoint/", "name": "International Viewpoint", "source_url": "https://internationalviewpoint.org/", "bias_rating": "FAR LEFT", "bias_score": -8.8, "factual_reporting": "MIXED", "factual_score": 6.1, "credibility_rating": "MEDIUM CREDIBILITY", "country": "United Kingdom", "country_freedom_rating": "MOSTLY FREE", "media_type": "Magazine", "traffic_popularity": "Minimal Traffic", "bias_category_description": "These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation.  They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports, and omit information reporting that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy.See all Left Bias sources.", "overall_summary": "Overall, International Viewpoint has a far-left bias in story selection when covering political issues, and we rate them factually mixed due to extreme views and poor sourcing. Detailed Report Bias Rating: FAR LEFT (-8.8) Factual Reporting: MIXED (6.1) Country: United Kingdom MBFC’s Country Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE Media Type: Magazine Traffic/Popularity: Minimal Traffic MBFC Credibility Rating: MEDIUM CREDIBILITY History International Viewpoint launched in 1982 and is headquartered in London, UK.", "history": "International Viewpoint launched in 1982 and is headquartered in London, UK. According to theirabout statement,they describe themselves as: “International Viewpoint, the monthly English-language magazine of the Fourth International, is a window to radical alternatives world-wide, carrying reports, analysis, and debates from all corners of the globe.”Fourth Internationalis a Trotskyist international communist organization. Read our profile on UK media and government.", "ownership": "The Magazine is primarily funded through donations.", "analysis": "These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation.  They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports, and omit information reporting that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy.See all Left Bias sources. In review, International Viewpoint publishes articles, debates, reports, and analyses from a Marxist perspective. They frequently use loaded language in their headlines and in the body of the article, such as“Empire and the Middle East in the age of Trump.”International Viewpoint uses left-biased and other socialist sources such asCounterpunchandInternational Socialist Review. However, some articles do not source at all or provide supporting links. They have authors fromseveral countries, and they republish or translate articles from across the world written by activists from a progressive, anti-capitalist standpoint.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "None in the Last 5 years" ], "last_updated": "February 14, 2025" }, { "mbfc_url": "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/alo-rs-bias-and-credibility/", "name": "Alo.rs", "source_url": "https://www.alo.rs/", "bias_rating": "RIGHT-CENTER", "bias_score": 2.7, "factual_reporting": "MIXED", "factual_score": 4.6, "credibility_rating": "MEDIUM CREDIBILITY", "country": "Serbia", "country_freedom_rating": "MODERATE FREEDOM", "media_type": "Newspaper", "traffic_popularity": "High Traffic", "bias_category_description": "These media sources are slight to moderately conservative in bias. They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appealing to emotion or stereotypes) to favor conservative causes. These sources are generally trustworthy for information but may require further investigation.See all Right-Center sources.", "overall_summary": "Overall, we rate Alo.rs as Right-Center Biased due to consistently favorable coverage of the Serbian government and President Aleksandar Vučić, We rate its reporting as Mixed for factual accuracy due to inconsistent sourcing practices and a tendency toward tabloid-style presentation. Detailed Report Bias Rating: RIGHT-CENTER (2.7) Factual Reporting: MIXED (4.", "history": "Alo.rsis a Serbian tabloid newspaper published in Belgrade that focuses on politics, sports, entertainment, lifestyle, and more. The website contributes to Serbia’s media landscape by providing daily news and thematic sections for diverse reader interests. Read our profile on Serbian media and government.", "ownership": "Alo.rs is owned byAlo Media System,withSaša Blagojevićlisted as the owner. Revenue is derived through advertising.", "analysis": "These media sources are slight to moderately conservative in bias. They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appealing to emotion or stereotypes) to favor conservative causes. These sources are generally trustworthy for information but may require further investigation.See all Right-Center sources. Alo.rs often coversPresident Vučićin a positive light, frequently omitting critical perspectives. For instance, articles such as“VUCIĆ ANNOUNCED GREAT NEWS FROM MOSCOW: A great agreement was reached”emphasize successful diplomatic engagements and positive outcomes. Similarly, the piece titled“VUCIĆ WITH DODIKA Serbian meeting in the Kremlin”focuses on high-level meetings, emphasizing the president’s active role on the international stage. This pattern indicates a notable pro-government bias in their political reporting. Alo covers crime stories and high-profile cases, often with detailed narratives. For example, the article“SARIĆ SURRENDERED TO THE SERBIAN POLICE”reports on the surrender of Duško Šarić to Serbian authorities, providing insights into the legal proceedings and statements from involved parties. Alo.rs also features entertainment and celebrity news such as“Saša Popović ponovo u Zvezdama Granda,”which discusses the return of a television personality to a popular music competition, reflecting the outlet’s engagement with pop culture. Regarding sourcing, Alo.rs primarily relies on quotes, official statements, and social media content, with frequent circular referencing.", "failed_fact_checks": [ "None in the Last 5 years" ], "last_updated": "May 8, 2025" } ]