"""
decision_engine.py
==================
Unified decision logic — probability, dominant mechanism, confidence level,
and human-readable interpretation grounded in internal signals.

Prediction is NEVER computed without the explainability analysis being
present first.  This module enforces that ordering.
"""

from __future__ import annotations
import json
from dataclasses import dataclass, field
from typing import Optional

import numpy as np

from explainability_engine import (
    SpliceSignals,
    V4Signals,
    ClassicSignals,
    _classify_risk_tier,
)


# ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
# Result dataclass
# ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════

@dataclass
class DecisionResult:
    variant:                 str
    unified_probability:     float
    risk_tier:               str
    tier_desc:               str
    dominant_mechanism:      str
    confidence:              str

    # per-model
    splice_prob:             float
    v4_prob:                 float
    classic_prob:            float

    # XAI engine metrics
    mutation_peak_ratio:     float
    counterfactual_magnitude:float
    cross_model_locality:    float
    signal_concentration:    float
    explainability_strength: float
    activation_pattern:      str

    # interpretation
    splice_analysis:         str
    protein_analysis:        str
    agreement_analysis:      str
    final_explanation:       str

    # full structured JSON (as string)
    report_json:             str = field(repr=False)


# ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
# Dominant mechanism logic
# ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════

def _dominant_mechanism(splice: SpliceSignals, v4: V4Signals,
                         classic: ClassicSignals,
                         prob_std: float) -> str:
    """
    Determine which mechanism drives the prediction.

    Splice-driven:   splice model dominates AND aura / splice importance elevated
    Protein-driven:  v4 + classic > splice probability by meaningful margin
    Consensus:       all three models agree within 0.10
    Ambiguous:       high disagreement (prob_std > 0.12)
    """
    probs  = np.array([splice.probability, v4.probability, classic.probability])
    p_max  = float(probs.max())
    p_min  = float(probs.min())

    if prob_std > 0.14:
        return "Ambiguous"

    # Splice dominance
    splice_leads  = splice.probability > v4.probability + 0.05
    high_aura     = splice.splice_aura_score > 0.35
    high_splice_i = float(splice.splice_imp.max()) > 0.50
    if splice_leads and (high_aura or high_splice_i):
        return "Splice-driven"

    # Protein dominance
    protein_avg = (v4.probability + classic.probability) / 2
    if protein_avg > splice.probability + 0.05 and float(splice.region_imp[0]) > 0.5:
        return "Protein-driven"

    # Consensus
    if p_max - p_min <= 0.10:
        return "Consensus"

    return "Ambiguous"


# ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
# Confidence level
# ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════

def _confidence(unified_prob: float, prob_std: float,
                ess: float, cf_mag: float) -> str:
    """
    High:     strong signal from all three axes
    Moderate: partial support
    Low:      conflicting or weak signals
    """
    score = 0

    # Model agreement
    if prob_std < 0.05:   score += 2
    elif prob_std < 0.12: score += 1

    # Explainability strength
    if ess >= 0.65:       score += 2
    elif ess >= 0.35:     score += 1

    # Counterfactual magnitude
    if cf_mag >= 0.25:    score += 2
    elif cf_mag >= 0.10:  score += 1

    # Probability extremity
    if unified_prob >= 0.85 or unified_prob <= 0.15: score += 1

    if score >= 5:  return "High"
    if score >= 3:  return "Moderate"
    return          "Low"


# ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
# Human-readable interpretation builders
# ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════

def _splice_analysis_text(s: SpliceSignals, variant: str) -> str:
    parts = []

    tier, _ = _classify_risk_tier(s.probability)
    parts.append(
        f"The splice model classifies variant {variant} as "
        f"'{tier}' with probability {s.probability:.4f}."
    )

    if s.mutation_peak_ratio >= 2.0:
        parts.append(
            f"The conv3 activation peak at the mutation site "
            f"(position {s.mutation_pos}) is {s.mutation_peak_ratio:.2f}× "
            f"the mean window activation, indicating the model is strongly "
            f"attending to the mutation location."
        )
    elif s.mutation_peak_ratio >= 1.0:
        parts.append(
            f"The mutation position ({s.mutation_pos}) has above-average "
            f"conv3 activation (MPR={s.mutation_peak_ratio:.2f}×)."
        )
    else:
        parts.append(
            f"The mutation position ({s.mutation_pos}) does not carry an "
            f"elevated conv3 activation peak (MPR={s.mutation_peak_ratio:.2f}×), "
            f"suggesting the pathogenic signal may arise from broader context."
        )

    if s.splice_risk_donor in ("CRITICAL SPLICE SITE", "SPLICE REGION"):
        parts.append(
            f"The variant lies {s.dist_donor} bp from the nearest GT donor "
            f"dinucleotide (risk: {s.splice_risk_donor}).  "
            f"Splice donor importance score = {float(s.splice_imp[0]):.3f}."
        )
    if s.splice_risk_acceptor in ("CRITICAL SPLICE SITE", "SPLICE REGION"):
        parts.append(
            f"The variant lies {s.dist_acceptor} bp from the nearest AG acceptor "
            f"dinucleotide (risk: {s.splice_risk_acceptor}).  "
            f"Splice acceptor importance score = {float(s.splice_imp[1]):.3f}."
        )

    cf = s.counterfactual
    if cf.get("probability_range", 0) > 0.15:
        parts.append(
            f"Counterfactual analysis: swapping the alternate base changes "
            f"the pathogenicity probability by up to "
            f"{cf['probability_range']:.3f} "
            f"(range {cf['min_probability']:.3f}–{cf['max_probability']:.3f}), "
            f"confirming strong position-level causality."
        )

    abl = s.ablation
    dom = abl.get("dominant_feature", "unknown")
    parts.append(
        f"Feature ablation: '{dom}' contributes the largest share "
        f"of the pathogenic signal "
        f"({abl.get(dom.lower().split()[0]+'_pct', '?')}%)."
    )

    return "  ".join(parts)


def _protein_analysis_text(v4: V4Signals, classic: ClassicSignals) -> str:
    parts = []
    v4_tier, _ = _classify_risk_tier(v4.probability)
    cl_tier, _ = _classify_risk_tier(classic.probability)

    parts.append(
        f"V4 model: '{v4_tier}' (prob={v4.probability:.4f}).  "
        f"Classic model: '{cl_tier}' (prob={classic.probability:.4f})."
    )

    avg_mpr = (v4.mutation_peak_ratio + classic.mutation_peak_ratio) / 2
    parts.append(
        f"Average mutation-site activation ratio across protein models: "
        f"{avg_mpr:.2f}×."
    )

    if float(classic.region_imp[0]) > 0.6:
        parts.append(
            "The classic model assigns high exon-region importance "
            f"({float(classic.region_imp[0]):.3f}), "
            "supporting a protein-coding disruption mechanism."
        )
    elif float(classic.region_imp[1]) > 0.6:
        parts.append(
            "The classic model assigns high intron-region importance "
            f"({float(classic.region_imp[1]):.3f}), "
            "consistent with a regulatory or splicing mechanism."
        )

    return "  ".join(parts)


def _agreement_text(splice: SpliceSignals, v4: V4Signals,
                     classic: ClassicSignals, cross_locality: float,
                     prob_std: float) -> str:
    probs = [splice.probability, v4.probability, classic.probability]
    p_max = max(probs)
    p_min = min(probs)
    lvl   = "agree" if prob_std < 0.10 else ("partially agree" if prob_std < 0.18 else "disagree")

    lines = [
        f"The three models {lvl} on pathogenicity "
        f"(probabilities: splice={splice.probability:.3f}, "
        f"v4={v4.probability:.3f}, classic={classic.probability:.3f}; "
        f"std={prob_std:.3f})."
    ]
    lines.append(
        f"Cross-model activation locality score = {cross_locality:.4f} "
        f"({'high' if cross_locality > 0.5 else 'moderate' if cross_locality > 0.0 else 'low'} "
        f"alignment of importance peaks across models)."
    )
    if cross_locality > 0.5:
        lines.append(
            "All three models are attending to the same region of the 99-bp window, "
            "strongly supporting the identified mechanistic signal."
        )
    else:
        lines.append(
            "The models are attending to different sequence regions, "
            "suggesting the signal may be mechanism-specific or context-dependent."
        )
    return "  ".join(lines)


def _final_explanation(result: "DecisionResult") -> str:
    prob_label = (
        "highly pathogenic" if result.unified_probability >= 0.85 else
        "likely pathogenic" if result.unified_probability >= 0.70 else
        "possibly pathogenic" if result.unified_probability >= 0.50 else
        "likely benign" if result.unified_probability >= 0.20 else
        "benign"
    )

    mech = result.dominant_mechanism.lower()
    ess  = result.explainability_strength

    lines = [
        f"Variant {result.variant} is predicted {prob_label} "
        f"(unified probability = {result.unified_probability:.4f}; "
        f"risk tier: {result.risk_tier}) with {result.confidence.lower()} confidence.",

        f"The prediction is driven by a {mech} mechanism.",

        f"Explainability strength score = {result.explainability_strength:.4f} "
        f"({'high' if ess >= 0.65 else 'moderate' if ess >= 0.35 else 'low'} "
        f"overall evidence quality), based on a mutation peak ratio of "
        f"{result.mutation_peak_ratio:.2f}×, counterfactual magnitude of "
        f"{result.counterfactual_magnitude:.4f}, and cross-model locality of "
        f"{result.cross_model_locality:.4f}.",

        f"The conv3 activation pattern is classified as '{result.activation_pattern}', "
        f"and signal concentration at the mutation site is "
        f"{result.signal_concentration:.4f}.",

        f"Model agreement is {result.agreement_analysis.lower()}.",
    ]

    lines.append(
        "⚠  This system is for research use only and should not substitute "
        "for clinical diagnostic testing."
    )

    return "\n\n".join(lines)


# ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
# Main entry point
# ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════

def build_decision(chrom: str, pos: int, ref: str, alt: str,
                   splice: SpliceSignals,
                   v4:     V4Signals,
                   classic: ClassicSignals,
                   cross:  dict) -> DecisionResult:
    """
    Build the unified DecisionResult.  Called AFTER all XAI signals have been
    extracted — this ordering is mandatory.
    """
    variant = f"chr{chrom}:{pos} {ref}>{alt}"

    # Weighted average probability — splice weighted 0.45 (most informative),
    # v4 0.30, classic 0.25
    unified = (0.45 * splice.probability +
               0.30 * v4.probability +
               0.25 * classic.probability)
    unified = round(float(unified), 4)

    tier, tier_desc = _classify_risk_tier(unified)

    prob_std = cross["prob_std"]
    mech     = _dominant_mechanism(splice, v4, classic, prob_std)
    ess      = cross["explainability_strength_score"]
    cf_mag   = cross["counterfactual_magnitude"]
    conf     = _confidence(unified, prob_std, ess, cf_mag)

    splice_txt   = _splice_analysis_text(splice, variant)
    protein_txt  = _protein_analysis_text(v4, classic)
    agreement_txt= _agreement_text(splice, v4, classic,
                                    cross["cross_model_locality_score"], prob_std)

    # Build result skeleton so _final_explanation can reference it
    r = DecisionResult(
        variant=variant,
        unified_probability=unified,
        risk_tier=tier, tier_desc=tier_desc,
        dominant_mechanism=mech, confidence=conf,
        splice_prob=splice.probability,
        v4_prob=v4.probability,
        classic_prob=classic.probability,
        mutation_peak_ratio=cross["mutation_peak_ratio"],
        counterfactual_magnitude=cross["counterfactual_magnitude"],
        cross_model_locality=cross["cross_model_locality_score"],
        signal_concentration=cross["signal_concentration_index"],
        explainability_strength=ess,
        activation_pattern=cross["activation_pattern_type"],
        splice_analysis=splice_txt,
        protein_analysis=protein_txt,
        agreement_analysis=agreement_txt,
        final_explanation="",     # filled below
        report_json="",           # filled below
    )

    r.final_explanation = _final_explanation(r)

    # ── Build structured JSON ─────────────────────────────────────────────────
    cf = splice.counterfactual
    abl= splice.ablation

    report = {
        "variant": variant,
        "prediction": {
            "unified_probability": unified,
            "risk_tier": tier,
            "tier_desc": tier_desc,
            "dominant_mechanism": mech,
            "confidence": conf,
        },
        "model_outputs": {
            "splice": {
                "probability": splice.probability,
                "risk_tier": splice.risk_tier,
                "conv3_peak_at_mutation": (
                    round(float(splice.conv3_norm[splice.mutation_pos]), 4)
                    if 0 <= splice.mutation_pos < 99 else None
                ),
                "splice_importance": {
                    "donor":   round(float(splice.splice_imp[0]), 4),
                    "acceptor":round(float(splice.splice_imp[1]), 4),
                    "region":  round(float(splice.splice_imp[2]), 4),
                },
                "region_importance": {
                    "exon":   round(float(splice.region_imp[0]), 4),
                    "intron": round(float(splice.region_imp[1]), 4),
                },
                "splice_aura_score":      splice.splice_aura_score,
                "dist_donor":             splice.dist_donor,
                "dist_acceptor":          splice.dist_acceptor,
                "splice_risk_donor":      splice.splice_risk_donor,
                "splice_risk_acceptor":   splice.splice_risk_acceptor,
                "counterfactual":         {k: v for k, v in cf.items()
                                           if k != "table"},
                "counterfactual_table":   cf.get("table", []),
                "feature_ablation":       abl,
            },
            "v4": {
                "probability":           v4.probability,
                "mutation_peak_ratio":   round(v4.mutation_peak_ratio, 4),
                "signal_concentration":  round(v4.signal_concentration, 4),
            },
            "classic": {
                "probability":        classic.probability,
                "importance_head":    round(classic.importance_head, 4),
                "region_importance":  {
                    "exon":   round(float(classic.region_imp[0]), 4),
                    "intron": round(float(classic.region_imp[1]), 4),
                },
                "mutation_peak_ratio": round(classic.mutation_peak_ratio, 4),
            },
        },
        "explainability_analysis": {
            "mutation_peak_ratio":           cross["mutation_peak_ratio"],
            "counterfactual_magnitude":      cross["counterfactual_magnitude"],
            "cross_model_locality_score":    cross["cross_model_locality_score"],
            "signal_concentration_index":    cross["signal_concentration_index"],
            "explainability_strength_score": ess,
            "activation_pattern_type":       cross["activation_pattern_type"],
            "model_agreement":               cross["model_agreement"],
            "prob_std":                      cross["prob_std"],
        },
        "interpretation": {
            "splice_analysis":   splice_txt,
            "protein_analysis":  protein_txt,
            "agreement_analysis":agreement_txt,
            "final_explanation": r.final_explanation,
        },
    }

    r.report_json = json.dumps(report, indent=2, default=str)
    return r