Spaces:
Running
Running
Update index.html
Browse files- index.html +16 -12
index.html
CHANGED
|
@@ -1570,26 +1570,30 @@ kbd {
|
|
| 1570 |
<div class="card-header">
|
| 1571 |
<div class="card-header-icon"><i class="fas fa-check-circle"></i></div>
|
| 1572 |
<div class="card-header-title">Classifier Performance Metrics</div>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1573 |
</div>
|
| 1574 |
<div class="card-body">
|
| 1575 |
-
<p class="prose">
|
| 1576 |
<table class="metrics-table">
|
| 1577 |
<thead><tr><th>Metric</th><th>Value</th><th>Description</th></tr></thead>
|
| 1578 |
<tbody>
|
| 1579 |
-
<tr><td>Accuracy</td><td><span class="metric-val">0.
|
| 1580 |
-
<tr><td>
|
| 1581 |
-
<tr><td>
|
| 1582 |
-
<tr><td>
|
| 1583 |
-
<tr><td>
|
| 1584 |
</tbody>
|
| 1585 |
</table>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1586 |
</div>
|
| 1587 |
</div>
|
| 1588 |
-
<div class="card">
|
| 1589 |
-
<div class="card-header">
|
| 1590 |
-
<div class="card-header-icon"><i class="fas fa-vials"></i></div>
|
| 1591 |
-
<div class="card-header-title">MIC Regressor Metrics (per bacterium)</div>
|
| 1592 |
-
</div>
|
| 1593 |
<div class="card-body">
|
| 1594 |
<p class="prose">Separate regression models predict MIC for each organism. Performance evaluated via MSE (log-scale), R², Pearson correlation, and Kendall's tau.</p>
|
| 1595 |
<table class="metrics-table">
|
|
@@ -1663,7 +1667,7 @@ kbd {
|
|
| 1663 |
<div class="card-body">
|
| 1664 |
<p class="prose">This web application provides a streamlined interface for classifying amino acid sequences as Antimicrobial Peptides (AMPs) or Non-AMPs, and for predicting the Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) of potential AMPs against clinically relevant bacteria. AMPs are key components of the innate immune system and represent a promising avenue for combating drug-resistant pathogens.</p>
|
| 1665 |
<div class="section-h3">Model Selection Criteria</div>
|
| 1666 |
-
<p class="prose">Over 225 combinations of feature extraction and selection methods were evaluated across four machine learning architectures for each target organism. The final models were selected based on:</p>
|
| 1667 |
<ul class="prose" style="margin-left:18px;">
|
| 1668 |
<li><strong>High Accuracy, F1-score, and Validation Accuracy</strong> on a held-out test set.</li>
|
| 1669 |
<li><strong>Robustness to sequence length variation</strong> within the 10–100 aa range.</li>
|
|
|
|
| 1570 |
<div class="card-header">
|
| 1571 |
<div class="card-header-icon"><i class="fas fa-check-circle"></i></div>
|
| 1572 |
<div class="card-header-title">Classifier Performance Metrics</div>
|
| 1573 |
+
<<div class="card">
|
| 1574 |
+
<div class="card-header">
|
| 1575 |
+
<div class="card-header-icon"><i class="fas fa-check-circle"></i></div>
|
| 1576 |
+
<div class="card-header-title">MLP Classifier Performance Metrics</div>
|
| 1577 |
+
<div class="card-header-sub">Architecture: Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP)</div>
|
| 1578 |
</div>
|
| 1579 |
<div class="card-body">
|
| 1580 |
+
<p class="prose">Best-trial results from MLP hyperparameter search (trial #49) on AAC + CTD features with RFE selection. Metrics reflect training and validation performance of the final selected model.</p>
|
| 1581 |
<table class="metrics-table">
|
| 1582 |
<thead><tr><th>Metric</th><th>Value</th><th>Description</th></tr></thead>
|
| 1583 |
<tbody>
|
| 1584 |
+
<tr><td>Training Accuracy</td><td><span class="metric-val">0.9941</span></td><td>Proportion of correctly classified sequences on the training set.</td></tr>
|
| 1585 |
+
<tr><td>Validation Accuracy</td><td><span class="metric-val">0.9682</span></td><td>Accuracy on the held-out validation split used during model development.</td></tr>
|
| 1586 |
+
<tr><td>Training Loss</td><td><span class="metric-val">0.0412</span></td><td>Binary cross-entropy loss on the training set (lower is better).</td></tr>
|
| 1587 |
+
<tr><td>Validation Loss</td><td><span class="metric-val">0.1261</span></td><td>Binary cross-entropy loss on the validation set.</td></tr>
|
| 1588 |
+
<tr><td>Loss Gap</td><td><span class="metric-val">0.0849</span></td><td>Difference between validation and training loss — small gap indicates limited overfitting.</td></tr>
|
| 1589 |
</tbody>
|
| 1590 |
</table>
|
| 1591 |
+
<p class="prose" style="margin-top:14px;font-size:12px;color:var(--text-muted);">
|
| 1592 |
+
<i class="fas fa-info-circle"></i>
|
| 1593 |
+
<strong>Architecture:</strong> 1 hidden layer · 256 units · ReLU activation · L2 regularisation (1e-5) · Dropout 0.3 · Learning rate 1e-3
|
| 1594 |
+
</p>
|
| 1595 |
</div>
|
| 1596 |
</div>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1597 |
<div class="card-body">
|
| 1598 |
<p class="prose">Separate regression models predict MIC for each organism. Performance evaluated via MSE (log-scale), R², Pearson correlation, and Kendall's tau.</p>
|
| 1599 |
<table class="metrics-table">
|
|
|
|
| 1667 |
<div class="card-body">
|
| 1668 |
<p class="prose">This web application provides a streamlined interface for classifying amino acid sequences as Antimicrobial Peptides (AMPs) or Non-AMPs, and for predicting the Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) of potential AMPs against clinically relevant bacteria. AMPs are key components of the innate immune system and represent a promising avenue for combating drug-resistant pathogens.</p>
|
| 1669 |
<div class="section-h3">Model Selection Criteria</div>
|
| 1670 |
+
<p class="prose">Over 225 combinations of feature extraction and selection methods were evaluated across four machine learning architectures for each target organism. The final classifier is a <strong>Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP)</strong> trained on AAC + CTD features with RFE-based feature selection. The final models were selected based on:</p>
|
| 1671 |
<ul class="prose" style="margin-left:18px;">
|
| 1672 |
<li><strong>High Accuracy, F1-score, and Validation Accuracy</strong> on a held-out test set.</li>
|
| 1673 |
<li><strong>Robustness to sequence length variation</strong> within the 10–100 aa range.</li>
|