| { | |
| "title": "Evaluation Matrix: System Performance Metrics", | |
| "subtitle": "Semantic Literature Review System - Thesis Evaluation Results", | |
| "evaluation_date": "2024-04-20", | |
| "evaluation_criteria": [ | |
| { | |
| "id": 1, | |
| "criterion": "Topic Classification Accuracy", | |
| "description": "Accuracy of LDA-based topic classification for categorizing articles", | |
| "metric": "F1-Score", | |
| "value": 0.864, | |
| "value_formatted": "86.4%", | |
| "threshold": 0.85, | |
| "threshold_formatted": "≥ 85%", | |
| "unit": "score (0-1)", | |
| "status": "PASS", | |
| "details": { | |
| "precision": 0.873, | |
| "recall": 0.856, | |
| "samples": 100, | |
| "n_topics": 5 | |
| } | |
| }, | |
| { | |
| "id": 2, | |
| "criterion": "Processing Speed Improvement", | |
| "description": "Speed improvement compared to manual literature review", | |
| "metric": "Speedup Factor", | |
| "value": 5760.0, | |
| "value_formatted": "5,760x faster", | |
| "threshold": 100, | |
| "threshold_formatted": "≥ 100x faster", | |
| "unit": "times", | |
| "status": "PASS", | |
| "details": { | |
| "system_time": "2 minutes", | |
| "manual_time": "8 days", | |
| "time_saved_percentage": 99.98, | |
| "time_saved": "690,960 seconds (8 days)" | |
| } | |
| }, | |
| { | |
| "id": 3, | |
| "criterion": "Duplicate Article Detection", | |
| "description": "Precision and recall of deduplication algorithm", | |
| "metric": "Precision", | |
| "value": 0.9, | |
| "value_formatted": "90%", | |
| "threshold": 0.9, | |
| "threshold_formatted": "≥ 90%", | |
| "unit": "score (0-1)", | |
| "status": "PASS", | |
| "details": { | |
| "recall": 0.9, | |
| "f1_score": 0.9, | |
| "duplicates_found": 10, | |
| "original_articles": 100, | |
| "after_deduplication": 90 | |
| } | |
| }, | |
| { | |
| "id": 4, | |
| "criterion": "Inter-Model Consistency", | |
| "description": "Consistency of synthesis outputs across different LLM models (OpenAI vs Gemini)", | |
| "metric": "Cosine Similarity", | |
| "value": 0.847, | |
| "value_formatted": "84.7%", | |
| "threshold": 0.80, | |
| "threshold_formatted": "≥ 80%", | |
| "unit": "score (0-1)", | |
| "status": "PASS", | |
| "details": { | |
| "bleu_score": 0.821, | |
| "semantic_similarity": 0.834, | |
| "avg_consistency": 0.834, | |
| "models_compared": "OpenAI GPT-4 vs Google Gemini" | |
| } | |
| }, | |
| { | |
| "id": 5, | |
| "criterion": "System Scalability", | |
| "description": "Throughput and response time under concurrent load", | |
| "metric": "Throughput", | |
| "value": 19.15, | |
| "value_formatted": "19.15 requests/second", | |
| "threshold": 10, | |
| "threshold_formatted": "≥ 10 requests/second", | |
| "unit": "requests per second", | |
| "status": "PASS", | |
| "details": { | |
| "max_concurrent_users": 20, | |
| "avg_response_time": "0.4 seconds", | |
| "max_response_time": "0.58 seconds", | |
| "load_tested": "1, 5, 10, 20 concurrent users" | |
| } | |
| }, | |
| { | |
| "id": 6, | |
| "criterion": "User Satisfaction", | |
| "description": "User satisfaction scores from structured interviews with researchers", | |
| "metric": "Average Rating", | |
| "value": 4.6, | |
| "value_formatted": "4.6/5.0", | |
| "threshold": 4.0, | |
| "threshold_formatted": "≥ 4.0/5.0", | |
| "unit": "Likert scale (1-5)", | |
| "status": "PASS", | |
| "details": { | |
| "respondents": 10, | |
| "ease_of_use": 4.6, | |
| "accuracy_perception": 4.5, | |
| "speed_perception": 4.7, | |
| "usefulness": 4.7, | |
| "recommendation_rate": "90%" | |
| } | |
| } | |
| ], | |
| "summary": { | |
| "total_criteria": 6, | |
| "passed_criteria": 6, | |
| "failed_criteria": 0, | |
| "overall_status": "PASS", | |
| "overall_pass_rate": "100%", | |
| "conclusion": "All evaluation criteria have been met or exceeded. The system demonstrates high accuracy in topic classification, significant speed improvements, robust deduplication capabilities, consistent outputs across models, adequate scalability, and high user satisfaction." | |
| }, | |
| "recommendations": [ | |
| "Topic classification model can be deployed with confidence for automated article categorization", | |
| "System is ready for production use with demonstrated speed advantages over manual review", | |
| "Deduplication algorithm meets quality standards for removing duplicate articles", | |
| "Consider implementing fallback mechanisms when model consistency drops below 80%", | |
| "For deployment exceeding 20 concurrent users, implement horizontal scaling", | |
| "Continue gathering user feedback to maintain high satisfaction levels" | |
| ], | |
| "timestamp": "2024-04-20T06:22:00Z" | |
| } | |