Loading investigation form…
Hydrating the disease, compound, gene, and metaedge catalogs.
Hydrating the disease, compound, gene, and metaedge catalogs.
Set what you're investigating and how it should run. The choices on this page govern every downstream evidence claim — the page exists to make those choices explicit before any number appears.
The disease, compound, anchor target, and Hetionet relation. These four selections define the prediction task and what evidence will count.
Based on the current selections, this bundle is the most coherent disease-compound-gene-metaedge combination to investigate next.
Why this compound is on the table — mechanism, anchor target, and clinical evidence backdrop. Switch the candidate to refresh.
Select a compound in the investigation parameters to populate mechanism, anchor target, and clinical evidence backdrop.
Pick a preset bundle below. Each card runs the canonical set of algorithms for its category — click and the run is configured. Classical baselines always run alongside quantum / hybrid for direct comparison. For drill-down or per-algorithm customization, use the Algorithm Catalog below.
The 3-hop subgraph the model will see — compound → gene → disease, plus co-target / pathway / variant context. Static SVG in this lite build; full app renders an interactive 3D version.
Every switch that governs an evidence claim downstream. State is inspectable — running with any critical guard off produces a different kind of result and must be visible to anyone reading a report.
Investigations are reusable artifacts. Save a snapshot of the four parameters + run path, then restore it later. State persists in the browser via localStorage.
No saved sessions yet. Tap "Save snapshot" to start a history.
This static demo doesn't run real jobs — there's no FastAPI behind it. The full version posts your selections to /investigations/run and polls /jobs/<id> until completion. To see what an experiment readout looks like, jump straight to the Experiment page.