Spaces:
Running
Running
File size: 29,822 Bytes
783a952 | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 736 737 738 739 | # ml_module/tools/evaluation_tools.py
import json
from datetime import datetime
from typing import Optional
import pandas as pd
from agno.tools import Toolkit, tool
from sklearn.metrics import (
accuracy_score,
classification_report,
confusion_matrix,
f1_score,
precision_score,
recall_score,
)
from sklearn.model_selection import train_test_split
from ml_module.services.storage_service import MLStorageService
from ml_module.services.project_service import ProjectService
from ml_module.core.exceptions import FileOperationException
from ml_module.core.constants import ArtifactTypes
from ml_module.core.response_formatter import (
FormattedResponse,
Severity,
make_text_response,
metric_block,
simple_table,
simple_table_with_types,
visualization_block,
text_block,
)
class ModelEvaluationToolkit(Toolkit):
"""A toolkit for generating deep evaluation artifacts for trained models with versioning and code generation."""
def __init__(self, storage_service: MLStorageService, user_id: str, project_id: str, project_service: Optional[ProjectService] = None):
super().__init__(name="model_evaluation_tools")
self.storage = storage_service
self.user_id = user_id
self.project_id = project_id
self.project_service = project_service
def _get_base_path(self, subfolder: str = "") -> str:
return f"{self.user_id}/{self.project_id}/{subfolder}"
@tool
def generate_confusion_matrix_data(self, model_path: str, dataset_path: str, target_column: str) -> FormattedResponse:
"""
Generates and saves the data for a confusion matrix visualization.
Args:
model_path (str): The path to the trained .joblib model file (e.g., 'models/RandomForest_model.joblib').
dataset_path (str): The path to the processed dataset used for training (e.g., 'processed/cleaned_data.csv').
target_column (str): The name of the column the model predicts.
Returns:
FormattedResponse: Structured confusion matrix summary with artifact reference.
"""
try:
# Load model and data
model = self.storage.load_model(self._get_base_path() + "/" + model_path)
df = self.storage.load_dataframe(self._get_base_path() + "/" + dataset_path)
# Recreate the exact same test set
X = df.drop(columns=[target_column])
y = df[target_column]
_, X_test, _, y_test = train_test_split(X, y, test_size=0.2, random_state=42)
# Generate predictions and matrix
y_pred = model.predict(X_test)
labels = sorted(y.unique().tolist())
matrix = confusion_matrix(y_test, y_pred, labels=labels)
# Format for frontend rendering
output_data = {
"labels": labels,
"matrix": matrix.tolist()
}
output_path = f"{self._get_base_path('evaluation')}/confusion_matrix.json"
info = self.storage.save_json(output_data, output_path)
rows = [
{"actual": labels[i], **{str(labels[j]): matrix[i][j] for j in range(len(labels))}}
for i in range(len(labels))
]
blocks = [
text_block("Calculated confusion matrix on held-out test set", severity=Severity.SUCCESS),
simple_table(rows, caption="Confusion matrix", block_id="confusion_matrix"),
text_block(f"Matrix JSON saved to `{output_path}`"),
]
return FormattedResponse(
blocks=blocks,
summary="Generated confusion matrix",
correlation_id=info.path,
done=True,
)
except Exception as e:
raise FileOperationException("generate confusion matrix", model_path, e)
@tool
def get_feature_importance(self, model_path: str) -> FormattedResponse:
"""
Extracts and saves the feature importance scores from a model.
NOTE: This tool is only applicable for models that support feature_importances_,
such as RandomForest. It will fail for models like LogisticRegression.
Args:
model_path (str): The path to the trained .joblib model file.
Returns:
FormattedResponse: Structured feature importance summary or warning when unavailable.
"""
try:
model = self.storage.load_model(self._get_base_path() + "/" + model_path)
if not hasattr(model, 'feature_importances_'):
response = make_text_response(
"The selected model does not support feature importance extraction.",
severity=Severity.WARNING,
)
response.summary = "Feature importance unavailable"
response.done = True
return response
importances = model.feature_importances_
feature_names = model.feature_names_in_
importance_data = sorted(
[{"feature": name, "importance": score} for name, score in zip(feature_names, importances)],
key=lambda x: x["importance"],
reverse=True
)
output_path = f"{self._get_base_path('evaluation')}/feature_importance.json"
info = self.storage.save_json(importance_data, output_path)
# Create visualization block for bar chart
top_features = importance_data[:15] # Top 15 features for visualization
blocks = [
text_block("Extracted model feature importances", severity=Severity.SUCCESS),
visualization_block(
top_features,
chart_type="bar",
title="Top Feature Importances",
subtitle=f"Showing top {len(top_features)} most important features",
block_id="feature_importance_chart"
),
simple_table_with_types(importance_data[:10], caption="Top features (detailed)", block_id="feature_importance"),
text_block(f"Feature importance saved to `{output_path}`"),
]
return FormattedResponse(
blocks=blocks,
summary="Captured feature importance",
correlation_id=info.path,
done=True,
)
except Exception as e:
raise FileOperationException("get feature importance", model_path, e)
def generate_evaluation_code(
self,
model_path: str,
dataset_path: str,
target_column: str,
model_type: str,
version: int
) -> str:
"""
Generate executable Python code that reproduces the evaluation process.
Args:
model_path: Path to the trained model
dataset_path: Path to the processed dataset
target_column: Name of the target column
model_type: Type of model being evaluated
version: Version number for this evaluation code
Returns:
str: The generated Python evaluation code
"""
timestamp = datetime.now().isoformat()
# Generate comprehensive evaluation code
code = f'''#!/usr/bin/env python3
"""
Generated ML Evaluation Code - Version {version}
Generated on: {timestamp}
Model Type: {model_type}
Target Column: {target_column}
Model Path: {model_path}
Dataset Path: {dataset_path}
This code reproduces the exact evaluation process used by the ML system.
"""
import pandas as pd
import joblib
import json
import numpy as np
from datetime import datetime
from sklearn.model_selection import train_test_split
from sklearn.metrics import (
confusion_matrix, classification_report, accuracy_score,
precision_score, recall_score, f1_score
)
def evaluate_model():
"""Main evaluation function"""
print("="*50)
print("π ML MODEL EVALUATION")
print("="*50)
try:
# 1. Load Model and Data
print("\\n1. Loading model and dataset...")
model = joblib.load('{model_path}')
df = pd.read_csv('{dataset_path}')
print(f" Model loaded: {model_type}")
print(f" Dataset shape: {{df.shape}}")
# 2. Prepare Data (same split as training)
print("\\n2. Preparing evaluation data...")
if '{target_column}' not in df.columns:
raise ValueError(f"Target column '{{target_column}}' not found in dataset")
X = df.drop(columns=['{target_column}'])
y = df['{target_column}']
X_train, X_test, y_train, y_test = train_test_split(X, y, test_size=0.2, random_state=42)
print(f" Test set samples: {{len(X_test)}}")
print(f" Features: {{list(X.columns)}}")
# 3. Generate Predictions
print("\\n3. Generating predictions...")
y_pred = model.predict(X_test)
print(" Predictions generated successfully!")
# 4. Calculate Metrics
print("\\n4. Calculating evaluation metrics...")
# Basic metrics
accuracy = accuracy_score(y_test, y_pred)
precision = precision_score(y_test, y_pred, average='weighted')
recall = recall_score(y_test, y_pred, average='weighted')
f1 = f1_score(y_test, y_pred, average='weighted')
# Confusion matrix
labels = sorted(y.unique().tolist())
cm = confusion_matrix(y_test, y_pred, labels=labels)
# Feature importance (if available)
feature_importance = None
if hasattr(model, 'feature_importances_'):
importance_scores = model.feature_importances_
feature_names = X.columns.tolist()
feature_importance = sorted(
[{{"feature": name, "importance": float(score)}}
for name, score in zip(feature_names, importance_scores)],
key=lambda x: x["importance"], reverse=True
)
# 5. Prepare Results
evaluation_results = {{
"model_type": "{model_type}",
"version": {version},
"timestamp": datetime.now().isoformat(),
"evaluation_info": {{
"test_samples": len(X_test),
"total_features": len(X.columns),
"target_column": "{target_column}",
"unique_classes": labels
}},
"performance": {{
"accuracy": float(accuracy),
"precision": float(precision),
"recall": float(recall),
"f1_score": float(f1)
}},
"confusion_matrix": {{
"labels": labels,
"matrix": cm.tolist()
}},
"feature_importance": feature_importance,
"classification_report": classification_report(y_test, y_pred, output_dict=True)
}}
# 6. Display Results
print("\\n" + "="*50)
print("π EVALUATION RESULTS")
print("="*50)
print(f"Accuracy: {{accuracy:.4f}}")
print(f"Precision: {{precision:.4f}}")
print(f"Recall: {{recall:.4f}}")
print(f"F1 Score: {{f1:.4f}}")
if feature_importance:
print("\\nπ Top 5 Most Important Features:")
for i, feat in enumerate(feature_importance[:5]):
print(f" {{i+1}}. {{feat['feature']}}: {{feat['importance']:.4f}}")
print("\\nπ Confusion Matrix:")
print(" Labels:", labels)
for i, row in enumerate(cm):
print(f" {{labels[i]}}: {{row.tolist()}}")
# 7. Save Results
print("\\n7. Saving evaluation results...")
# Save confusion matrix
with open(f'confusion_matrix_v{version}.json', 'w') as f:
json.dump(evaluation_results["confusion_matrix"], f, indent=2)
print(f" Confusion matrix saved: confusion_matrix_v{version}.json")
# Save feature importance (if available)
if feature_importance:
with open(f'feature_importance_v{version}.json', 'w') as f:
json.dump(feature_importance, f, indent=2)
print(f" Feature importance saved: feature_importance_v{version}.json")
# Save complete evaluation results
with open(f'evaluation_results_v{version}.json', 'w') as f:
json.dump(evaluation_results, f, indent=2)
print(f" Complete results saved: evaluation_results_v{version}.json")
print("\\nπ Evaluation completed successfully!")
return evaluation_results
except Exception as e:
print(f"\\nβ Evaluation failed: {{str(e)}}")
raise e
if __name__ == "__main__":
# Execute evaluation
results = evaluate_model()
print("\\n" + "="*50)
print("EVALUATION SUMMARY")
print("="*50)
print(f"Model Type: {{results['model_type']}}")
print(f"Version: {{results['version']}}")
print(f"Accuracy: {{results['performance']['accuracy']:.4f}}")
print(f"F1 Score: {{results['performance']['f1_score']:.4f}}")
print("="*50)
'''
return code
@tool
def comprehensive_model_evaluation(
self,
model_path: str,
dataset_path: str,
target_column: str,
model_type: str
) -> FormattedResponse:
"""
Perform comprehensive model evaluation with versioned artifacts generation.
This is the main evaluation tool that creates all evaluation artifacts.
Args:
model_path (str): Path to the trained model (.joblib file)
dataset_path (str): Path to the processed dataset used for training
target_column (str): Name of the target column the model predicts
model_type (str): Type of model being evaluated (e.g., 'RandomForest')
Returns:
FormattedResponse: Structured evaluation summary with artifact references
"""
try:
# Get current evaluation version
current_version = 1
if self.project_service:
try:
current_version = self.project_service.get_latest_version(self.user_id, self.project_id, "evaluation") + 1
except:
pass # Use version 1 if no previous evaluations
# 1. Generate confusion matrix data
self.generate_confusion_matrix_data(model_path, dataset_path, target_column)
# Load the generated confusion matrix for versioned storage
cm_path = f"{self._get_base_path('evaluation')}/confusion_matrix.json"
confusion_matrix_data = self.storage.load_json(cm_path)
# 2. Generate feature importance (if supported)
feature_importance_data = None
try:
fi_response = self.get_feature_importance(model_path)
if fi_response.summary != "Feature importance unavailable":
fi_path = f"{self._get_base_path('evaluation')}/feature_importance.json"
feature_importance_data = self.storage.load_json(fi_path)
except Exception:
feature_importance_data = None
# 3. Load model and data for additional metrics
model = self.storage.load_model(self._get_base_path() + "/" + model_path)
df = self.storage.load_dataframe(self._get_base_path() + "/" + dataset_path)
# Prepare data (same split as training)
X = df.drop(columns=[target_column])
y = df[target_column]
_, X_test, _, y_test = train_test_split(X, y, test_size=0.2, random_state=42)
# Generate predictions
y_pred = model.predict(X_test)
# Calculate comprehensive metrics
accuracy = accuracy_score(y_test, y_pred)
precision = precision_score(y_test, y_pred, average='weighted')
recall = recall_score(y_test, y_pred, average='weighted')
f1 = f1_score(y_test, y_pred, average='weighted')
# Get classification report
class_report = classification_report(y_test, y_pred, output_dict=True)
# 4. Generate evaluation code
evaluation_code = self.generate_evaluation_code(
model_path, dataset_path, target_column, model_type, current_version
)
# 5. Create comprehensive evaluation report
report_content = f"""# Model Evaluation Report - Version {current_version}
**Generated on:** {datetime.now().strftime("%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S")}
**Model Type:** {model_type}
**Target Column:** {target_column}
**Dataset:** {dataset_path}
## π Performance Summary
| Metric | Score |
|--------|-------|
| **Accuracy** | {accuracy:.4f} |
| **Precision** | {precision:.4f} |
| **Recall** | {recall:.4f} |
| **F1 Score** | {f1:.4f} |
## π Confusion Matrix Analysis
The confusion matrix shows how well the model predicts each class:
**Labels:** {confusion_matrix_data['labels']}
**Matrix:**
```
{self._format_confusion_matrix(confusion_matrix_data['matrix'], confusion_matrix_data['labels'])}
```
### Interpretation:
- **Diagonal values** represent correct predictions
- **Off-diagonal values** represent misclassifications
- **Higher diagonal values** indicate better performance for that class
## π Feature Importance Analysis
{self._generate_feature_importance_section(feature_importance_data)}
## π Detailed Classification Report
```json
{json.dumps(class_report, indent=2)}
```
## π― Model Assessment
### Strengths:
- Overall accuracy of {accuracy:.1%}
- {'Strong' if f1 > 0.8 else 'Moderate' if f1 > 0.6 else 'Needs improvement'} F1 score ({f1:.4f})
### Areas for Improvement:
{self._generate_improvement_suggestions(accuracy, precision, recall, f1)}
## π§ Reproducibility
The evaluation can be reproduced using the generated evaluation code:
- **Evaluation Code:** `evaluation_code_v{current_version}.py`
- **Confusion Matrix Data:** `confusion_matrix_v{current_version}.json`
{f"- **Feature Importance Data:** `feature_importance_v{current_version}.json`" if feature_importance_data else ""}
## π Generated Artifacts
All evaluation artifacts have been saved with version {current_version}:
1. **Confusion Matrix:** Contains prediction accuracy breakdown by class
2. **Evaluation Report:** This comprehensive analysis document
3. **Evaluation Code:** Executable Python script to reproduce results
{f"4. **Feature Importance:** Model feature ranking and scores" if feature_importance_data else ""}
---
*This report was generated automatically by the ML Evaluation System.*
"""
# 6. Save all versioned artifacts using enhanced storage
cm_info = self.storage.save_evaluation_artifact(
self.user_id,
self.project_id,
'confusion_matrix',
confusion_matrix_data,
current_version,
f"Confusion matrix for {model_type} evaluation",
)
fi_info = None
if feature_importance_data:
fi_info = self.storage.save_evaluation_artifact(
self.user_id,
self.project_id,
'feature_importance',
feature_importance_data,
current_version,
f"Feature importance for {model_type} evaluation",
)
report_info = self.storage.save_evaluation_artifact(
self.user_id,
self.project_id,
'report',
report_content,
current_version,
f"Comprehensive evaluation report for {model_type}",
)
code_info = self.storage.save_evaluation_artifact(
self.user_id,
self.project_id,
'code',
evaluation_code,
current_version,
f"Reproducible evaluation code for {model_type}",
)
if self.project_service:
evaluation_meta = {
"model_type": model_type,
"target_column": target_column,
"accuracy": accuracy,
"precision": precision,
"recall": recall,
"f1_score": f1,
}
self.project_service.register_artifact(
self.user_id,
self.project_id,
ArtifactTypes.CONFUSION_MATRIX,
current_version,
cm_info,
version_scope="evaluation",
extra_metadata={**evaluation_meta, "labels": confusion_matrix_data.get("labels", [])},
)
if fi_info:
self.project_service.register_artifact(
self.user_id,
self.project_id,
ArtifactTypes.FEATURE_IMPORTANCE,
current_version,
fi_info,
version_scope="evaluation",
extra_metadata={**evaluation_meta},
)
self.project_service.register_artifact(
self.user_id,
self.project_id,
ArtifactTypes.EVALUATION_REPORT,
current_version,
report_info,
version_scope="evaluation",
extra_metadata={**evaluation_meta},
)
self.project_service.register_artifact(
self.user_id,
self.project_id,
ArtifactTypes.EVALUATION_CODE,
current_version,
code_info,
version_scope="evaluation",
extra_metadata={**evaluation_meta, "lines_of_code": evaluation_code.count("\n") + 1},
)
# 7. Return comprehensive structured response
cm_filename = cm_info.path.split("/")[-1]
report_filename = report_info.path.split("/")[-1]
code_filename = code_info.path.split("/")[-1]
fi_filename = fi_info.path.split("/")[-1] if fi_info else None
cm_labels = confusion_matrix_data.get("labels", [])
cm_matrix = confusion_matrix_data.get("matrix", [])
cm_rows = [
{
"actual": label,
**{f"pred_{pred_label}": value for pred_label, value in zip(cm_labels, row)},
}
for label, row in zip(cm_labels, cm_matrix)
]
artifact_lines = [
f"- Confusion matrix: `{cm_filename}`",
f"- Evaluation report: `{report_filename}`",
f"- Evaluation code: `{code_filename}`",
]
if fi_filename:
artifact_lines.append(f"- Feature importance: `{fi_filename}`")
insights = [
"- Model shows strong predictive performance" if accuracy > 0.85 else "- Model shows moderate predictive performance",
]
if abs(precision - recall) >= 0.05:
insights.append("- Precision and recall diverge; inspect class balance")
else:
insights.append("- Precision and recall remain balanced")
if feature_importance_data:
top_feature = feature_importance_data[0]
insights.append(f"- Top feature: {top_feature['feature']} ({top_feature['importance']:.4f})")
next_steps = [
"Review the evaluation report",
"Inspect confusion matrix for class-level accuracy",
"Use generated code to reproduce results",
]
if feature_importance_data:
next_steps.append("Analyse feature importance for interpretability")
blocks = [
text_block(
f"Completed evaluation run v{current_version} for `{model_type}`",
severity=Severity.SUCCESS,
),
metric_block("Accuracy", accuracy),
metric_block("Precision", precision),
metric_block("Recall", recall),
metric_block("F1 Score", f1),
visualization_block(
[
{"metric": "Accuracy", "score": accuracy},
{"metric": "Precision", "score": precision},
{"metric": "Recall", "score": recall},
{"metric": "F1 Score", "score": f1},
],
chart_type="bar",
title="Model Performance Metrics",
subtitle=f"Evaluation v{current_version}",
block_id="evaluation_metrics_chart"
),
text_block("\n".join(artifact_lines), severity=Severity.INFO, block_id="evaluation_artifacts"),
simple_table_with_types(cm_rows, caption="Confusion matrix (actual vs predicted)", block_id="evaluation_confusion_matrix"),
text_block("**Insights**\n" + "\n".join(insights), severity=Severity.INFO, block_id="evaluation_insights"),
text_block(
"**Next steps**\n" + "\n".join(f"- {step}" for step in next_steps),
severity=Severity.INFO,
block_id="evaluation_next_steps",
),
]
if feature_importance_data:
# Add chart for feature importance
blocks.insert(
6,
visualization_block(
feature_importance_data[:10],
chart_type="bar",
title="Top Feature Importances",
subtitle=f"Top 10 features impacting {model_type} predictions",
block_id="feature_importance_chart"
),
)
blocks.insert(
7,
simple_table_with_types(
feature_importance_data[:5],
caption="Top feature importances (detailed)",
block_id="feature_importance_top",
),
)
else:
blocks.insert(
5,
text_block(
"Feature importance not available for this model type",
severity=Severity.WARNING,
block_id="feature_importance_warning",
),
)
return FormattedResponse(
blocks=blocks,
summary=f"Evaluation complete v{current_version}",
correlation_id=report_info.path,
done=True,
)
except Exception as e:
raise FileOperationException("comprehensive model evaluation", model_path, e)
def _format_confusion_matrix(self, matrix, labels):
"""Format confusion matrix for markdown display"""
formatted = " " + " ".join(f"{label:>8}" for label in labels) + "\\n"
for i, row in enumerate(matrix):
formatted += f"{labels[i]:>8}" + "".join(f"{val:>8}" for val in row) + "\\n"
return formatted
def _generate_feature_importance_section(self, feature_importance_data):
"""Generate feature importance section for report"""
if not feature_importance_data:
return "Feature importance analysis is not available for this model type."
section = "The following features have the most impact on model predictions:\\n\\n"
section += "| Rank | Feature | Importance Score |\\n"
section += "|------|---------|------------------|\\n"
for i, feat in enumerate(feature_importance_data[:10]): # Top 10 features
section += f"| {i+1} | {feat['feature']} | {feat['importance']:.4f} |\\n"
return section
def _generate_improvement_suggestions(self, accuracy, precision, recall, f1):
"""Generate improvement suggestions based on metrics"""
suggestions = []
if accuracy < 0.7:
suggestions.append("- Consider collecting more training data")
suggestions.append("- Try different model algorithms or hyperparameters")
if precision < recall:
suggestions.append("- Model may be predicting too many positive cases")
suggestions.append("- Consider adjusting classification threshold")
elif recall < precision:
suggestions.append("- Model may be too conservative in predictions")
suggestions.append("- Consider feature engineering or data augmentation")
if f1 < 0.6:
suggestions.append("- Significant model improvement needed")
suggestions.append("- Review data quality and feature selection")
return "\\n".join(suggestions) if suggestions else "- Model performance appears satisfactory" |