File size: 7,026 Bytes
3e9c053 | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 | ---
title: VeriDex
emoji: 🛡️
colorFrom: blue
colorTo: indigo
sdk: gradio
sdk_version: 4.19.2
app_file: app.py
pinned: false
short_description: Multimodal Claim Verification Engine
---
# VeriDex: A Fake News Detection System Using Text Classification and Image Forensics
**Author:** Rakesh Kumar Raut
---
## 📖 Abstract & Overview
AI-generated misinformation has exploded, and automated fact-verification systems are struggling to keep up. Modern Large Language Models (LLMs) churn out text that is almost impossible to tell apart from real language, while diffusion-based image synthesis creates deepfakes so realistic they make false claims look credible. These combined threats create a crucial "Zero-Day window" right after a big event, where independent fact-checks are missing, and evidence-based systems are helpless.
**VeriDex (Verified Deception Index)** is a Hybrid Multi-Modal Credibility Assessment System designed to tackle text from LLMs, AI-generated images, and the Zero-Day problem in one principled and transparent package.
VeriDex runs three independently trained deep-learning pipelines and brings their results together through a mathematically derived **Hybrid Resolution Engine**. Tested on a custom 500-claim adversarial benchmark, VeriDex achieves state-of-the-art results, significantly outperforming text-only and retrieval-only baselines.
---
## 🏗️ Core Architecture (The Three Pipelines)
VeriDex takes a modular approach, with three parallel pipelines feeding into a central Hybrid Resolution Engine. This complementary redundancy ensures that each pipeline thrives exactly where the others fall short.
### 1. Pipeline A: Linguistic Deception Analyzer (HierFND)
Catches linguistic deception based on writing style and text artifacts.
* **Model:** Fine-tuned RoBERTa-base sequence classifier.
* **Training Data:** LIAR, ISOT, and WELFake datasets.
* **Output:** A Linguistic Risk Score ($R_{ling}$) reflecting the probability of the text being machine-generated or stylistically deceptive.
### 2. Pipeline B: Retrieval-Augmented Stance Aggregator (StanceFormer)
Verifies claims against actual evidence via real-time web retrieval.
* **Model:** Fine-tuned DeBERTa-v3-base Natural Language Inference (NLI) model.
* **Mechanism:** The claim triggers a web search API, pulling the top $k=10$ articles.
* **Domain-Credibility RAG:** Each article’s domain gets mapped to a Media Bias/Fact Check (MBFC) credibility multiplier (1.5 for high-credibility, 1.0 for neutral, 0.2 for questionable/satire).
* **Output:** An Evidence Consensus Score ($E_{pro}$) indicating the factual support for the claim.
### 3. Pipeline C: AI Image Forensics (CRAFT)
Pinpoints AI-generated images (deepfakes).
* **Architecture:** Combines a CLIP ViT-B/32 semantic branch with LoRA adapters and a 2D FFT-based **FrequencyBranch**.
* **Mechanism:** Merges 512-dimensional semantic features with 128-dimensional spectral features to catch checkerboard artifacts from GANs and diffusion models.
* **Output:** Image forensic classification (AI-Generated vs. Authentic) powered by a two-layer MLP head.
---
## ⚙️ Hybrid Resolution Engine
The core blend mixes linguistic risk with evidence-based risk using an empirically derived blending weight ($\alpha^* = 0.40$):
$$R_{total} = (R_{ling} \times 0.40) + ((1 - E_{pro}) \times 0.60)$$
This 40/60 split keeps pure text classifiers from missing LLM-generated fakes, while also countering the failures of retrieval-only approaches during the Zero-Day window.
### Fail-Safe Override Mechanisms
Two formal override rules ensure system robustness:
1. **Explicit Debunk Override:** If a highly credible article (weight $\ge 1.4$) strongly refutes the claim and uses terms like `"fact check"`, `"debunked"`, or `"false"`, the system forces $R_{total} \leftarrow \max(R_{total}, 0.90)$. This stops a clever lie from outweighing legitimate fact-checking.
2. **Image Forensics Override:** If an image is flagged as AI-Generated with $\ge 85\%$ confidence, the system forces $R_{total} \leftarrow \max(R_{total}, 0.85)$.
---
## 📊 Empirical Results & Benchmarks
VeriDex was rigorously evaluated on a custom **500-claim adversarial benchmark** encompassing Standard Fake News, Standard Real News, Zero-Day Claims, and LLM-Generated Fakes.
### Integrated System Performance
| Metric | Score | Category Accuracy Breakdown |
| :--- | :--- | :--- |
| **Accuracy** | 94.80% | Standard Fake: 97.5% |
| **AUC-ROC** | 0.965 | Standard Real: 98.0% |
| **Precision (Fake)** | 0.9751 | Zero-Day: 89.3% |
| **Recall (Fake)** | 0.9352 | LLM-Generated: 86.7% |
| **Macro-F1** | 0.9468 | |
> **Comparison to State-of-the-Art (SOTA):** VeriDex beats FakeBERT by +4.8 pp, VeraCT Scan by +3.3 pp, and classical TF-IDF+SVM approaches by +12.8 pp.
### Image Forensics (CRAFT) Performance
Tested on a rigorous cross-generator protocol against 50,000 images (DALL-E 2, Midjourney v5, ProGAN, StyleGAN).
* **In-Distribution Accuracy:** 91.5%
* **Cross-Generator Accuracy:** 84.3% (Outperforming GenDet CVPR 2024 by 4.9 pp)
* **AUC-ROC:** 0.921
---
## 🌟 Novel Contributions
1. **Empirical 40/60 Weighting:** The first systematic grid search (101 configurations) over blending weights for linguistic and evidence information, backed by a bootstrapped 95% confidence interval [0.340, 0.462].
2. **Domain-Credibility RAG:** MBFC credibility multipliers act as continuous weights in evidence aggregation, boosting accuracy by +1.8 pp and blocking echo-chamber manipulation.
3. **Explicit Debunk Override:** A formal fail-safe ensuring high-credibility explicit fact-checks cannot be diluted by text model confidence (+1.4 pp accuracy).
4. **CLIP + LoRA + FrequencyBranch:** A novel parameter-efficient deepfake detector that slashes generalization degradation by 32% compared to CLIP-only setups.
---
## 🚀 Setup & Installation
### Prerequisites
- Python 3.9+
- CUDA-enabled GPU (Highly Recommended for inference speed)
### 1. Clone & Install
```bash
git clone https://github.com/RakeshRautDev/VeriDex.git
cd VeriDex
pip install -r requirements.txt
```
### 2. Environment Variables
Copy `.env.example` to `.env` inside `VeriDex_WebApp` and configure your API keys.
```bash
cd VeriDex_WebApp
cp .env.example .env
```
Edit `.env` to include your search API keys: `TAVILY_API_KEY=your_key_here`
### 3. Model Weights Setup
> [!IMPORTANT]
> Due to GitHub's file size constraints (100MB max per file), heavy binary model weights are **NOT included** in this repository.
>
> You must download the pre-trained weights separately and place them in their respective model directories:
> - `models/fakeNewsModel/pytorch_model.bin`
> - `models/stanceModel/model.safetensors`
> - `models/imageDetectionModel/best_model.pth`
### 4. Run the Web Application
```bash
cd VeriDex_WebApp
uvicorn app:app --host 0.0.0.0 --port 8000 --reload
```
Open `http://localhost:8000/static/index.html` in your browser to access the verification dashboard.
---
## 📝 License
MIT License
|