Spaces:
Configuration error
Configuration error
test(models): add failing reproducers for the screening-run tables
Browse filesThirty-three metadata assertions covering screening_runs, candidate_scores,
requirement_verdicts, and evidence_spans against the schema in
ARCHITECTURE.md section 6.6.
RED validated: pytest tests/unit/test_screening_models.py -> 33 failed,
AttributeError: module 'app.models' has no attribute 'ScreeningRun'.
The failure is the missing implementation, not a broken fixture.
tests/unit/test_screening_models.py
ADDED
|
@@ -0,0 +1,420 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
+
"""Tests for the Phase 4 screening-run ORM models.
|
| 2 |
+
|
| 3 |
+
These four tables are the audit trail of a hiring decision, so their column
|
| 4 |
+
shapes are part of the contract rather than an implementation detail. The
|
| 5 |
+
schema is specified in ARCHITECTURE.md section 6.6, and three properties in it
|
| 6 |
+
are load-bearing:
|
| 7 |
+
|
| 8 |
+
* ``unique(run_id, candidate_id)`` — a candidate is scored once per run. Without
|
| 9 |
+
it, a retried task silently produces two scores and the ranking becomes
|
| 10 |
+
ambiguous.
|
| 11 |
+
* ``unique(score_id, requirement_id)`` — one verdict per requirement per score.
|
| 12 |
+
The aggregator already rejects duplicate verdicts; this is the same invariant
|
| 13 |
+
enforced one layer down, where a retry actually happens.
|
| 14 |
+
* ``retrieved_chunk_ids`` and ``verbatim_verified`` — the exposure record and
|
| 15 |
+
the anti-hallucination gate. "Why did the model say that?" is unanswerable
|
| 16 |
+
without the first, and a citation nobody checked is worse than no citation.
|
| 17 |
+
|
| 18 |
+
Money and score columns are ``numeric`` rather than float for the same reason
|
| 19 |
+
``Requirement.weight`` is: a stored score that does not reproduce exactly on
|
| 20 |
+
replay is not defensible in a hiring decision.
|
| 21 |
+
|
| 22 |
+
Every case reads table metadata or constructs objects in memory — no database.
|
| 23 |
+
"""
|
| 24 |
+
|
| 25 |
+
from __future__ import annotations
|
| 26 |
+
|
| 27 |
+
import uuid
|
| 28 |
+
from decimal import Decimal
|
| 29 |
+
|
| 30 |
+
from sqlalchemy import Boolean, Integer, Numeric, UniqueConstraint
|
| 31 |
+
from sqlalchemy.dialects.postgresql import ARRAY, JSONB
|
| 32 |
+
|
| 33 |
+
import app.models as models
|
| 34 |
+
|
| 35 |
+
|
| 36 |
+
def _unique_column_sets(table: object) -> set[tuple[str, ...]]:
|
| 37 |
+
"""Return the column-name tuples covered by each unique constraint."""
|
| 38 |
+
return {
|
| 39 |
+
tuple(sorted(column.name for column in constraint.columns))
|
| 40 |
+
for constraint in table.constraints # type: ignore[attr-defined]
|
| 41 |
+
if isinstance(constraint, UniqueConstraint)
|
| 42 |
+
}
|
| 43 |
+
|
| 44 |
+
|
| 45 |
+
# --- screening_runs ---------------------------------------------------------
|
| 46 |
+
|
| 47 |
+
|
| 48 |
+
def test_screening_run_table_is_named_and_tenant_scoped() -> None:
|
| 49 |
+
"""The table must exist and carry `tenant_id` as a non-null filter column."""
|
| 50 |
+
table = models.ScreeningRun.__table__
|
| 51 |
+
|
| 52 |
+
assert table.name == "screening_runs"
|
| 53 |
+
assert table.columns["tenant_id"].nullable is False
|
| 54 |
+
assert table.columns["tenant_id"].index is True
|
| 55 |
+
|
| 56 |
+
|
| 57 |
+
def test_screening_run_starts_queued() -> None:
|
| 58 |
+
"""A run is accepted before it executes, so `queued` is the only safe default.
|
| 59 |
+
|
| 60 |
+
The admission endpoint answers 202 the moment the row exists. Defaulting to
|
| 61 |
+
`running` would make a crashed-before-start run indistinguishable from one
|
| 62 |
+
that is genuinely mid-flight.
|
| 63 |
+
"""
|
| 64 |
+
column = models.ScreeningRun.__table__.columns["status"]
|
| 65 |
+
|
| 66 |
+
assert column.default is not None
|
| 67 |
+
assert column.default.arg == "queued"
|
| 68 |
+
assert column.nullable is False
|
| 69 |
+
|
| 70 |
+
|
| 71 |
+
def test_screening_run_references_the_job_it_screens_for() -> None:
|
| 72 |
+
"""A run without its job cannot be resolved back to what was screened."""
|
| 73 |
+
fk = next(iter(models.ScreeningRun.__table__.columns["job_id"].foreign_keys))
|
| 74 |
+
|
| 75 |
+
assert fk.column.table.name == "jobs"
|
| 76 |
+
assert fk.ondelete == "CASCADE"
|
| 77 |
+
|
| 78 |
+
|
| 79 |
+
def test_screening_run_pins_the_rubric_version_it_was_scored_against() -> None:
|
| 80 |
+
"""Scores are only interpretable against the criteria that produced them.
|
| 81 |
+
|
| 82 |
+
The FK does not cascade: deleting a rubric version that scores reference
|
| 83 |
+
would erase the basis of a decision already communicated to a candidate.
|
| 84 |
+
"""
|
| 85 |
+
column = models.ScreeningRun.__table__.columns["rubric_version_id"]
|
| 86 |
+
fk = next(iter(column.foreign_keys))
|
| 87 |
+
|
| 88 |
+
assert fk.column.table.name == "rubric_versions"
|
| 89 |
+
assert fk.ondelete == "RESTRICT"
|
| 90 |
+
assert column.nullable is False
|
| 91 |
+
|
| 92 |
+
|
| 93 |
+
def test_screening_run_records_the_funnel_stage_counts_as_jsonb() -> None:
|
| 94 |
+
"""The funnel's call-reduction claim is unverifiable without per-stage counts."""
|
| 95 |
+
column = models.ScreeningRun.__table__.columns["funnel_stage_counts"]
|
| 96 |
+
|
| 97 |
+
assert isinstance(column.type, JSONB)
|
| 98 |
+
|
| 99 |
+
|
| 100 |
+
def test_screening_run_cost_is_an_exact_decimal() -> None:
|
| 101 |
+
"""Spend is money; `numeric(10,4)` per section 6.6, never a float."""
|
| 102 |
+
column = models.ScreeningRun.__table__.columns["cost_usd"]
|
| 103 |
+
|
| 104 |
+
assert isinstance(column.type, Numeric)
|
| 105 |
+
assert column.type.precision == 10
|
| 106 |
+
assert column.type.scale == 4
|
| 107 |
+
|
| 108 |
+
|
| 109 |
+
def test_screening_run_token_counters_are_bigint_and_start_at_zero() -> None:
|
| 110 |
+
"""A run that has spent nothing must read zero, not NULL.
|
| 111 |
+
|
| 112 |
+
NULL would force every consumer of the ledger to special-case "not yet
|
| 113 |
+
started" before summing, and one that forgets produces a NULL total.
|
| 114 |
+
"""
|
| 115 |
+
table = models.ScreeningRun.__table__
|
| 116 |
+
|
| 117 |
+
for name in (
|
| 118 |
+
"total_input_tokens",
|
| 119 |
+
"total_output_tokens",
|
| 120 |
+
"cache_read_tokens",
|
| 121 |
+
"cache_write_tokens",
|
| 122 |
+
):
|
| 123 |
+
column = table.columns[name]
|
| 124 |
+
assert column.nullable is False, name
|
| 125 |
+
assert column.default is not None, name
|
| 126 |
+
assert column.default.arg == 0, name
|
| 127 |
+
|
| 128 |
+
|
| 129 |
+
def test_screening_run_completion_columns_are_null_until_it_finishes() -> None:
|
| 130 |
+
"""A queued run has not started and has not completed."""
|
| 131 |
+
table = models.ScreeningRun.__table__
|
| 132 |
+
|
| 133 |
+
assert table.columns["started_at"].nullable is True
|
| 134 |
+
assert table.columns["completed_at"].nullable is True
|
| 135 |
+
|
| 136 |
+
|
| 137 |
+
# --- candidate_scores ------------------------------------------------------
|
| 138 |
+
|
| 139 |
+
|
| 140 |
+
def test_candidate_score_table_is_named_and_tenant_scoped() -> None:
|
| 141 |
+
"""The table must exist and carry `tenant_id` as a non-null filter column."""
|
| 142 |
+
table = models.CandidateScore.__table__
|
| 143 |
+
|
| 144 |
+
assert table.name == "candidate_scores"
|
| 145 |
+
assert table.columns["tenant_id"].nullable is False
|
| 146 |
+
assert table.columns["tenant_id"].index is True
|
| 147 |
+
|
| 148 |
+
|
| 149 |
+
def test_candidate_score_is_unique_per_run_and_candidate() -> None:
|
| 150 |
+
"""A candidate is scored once per run.
|
| 151 |
+
|
| 152 |
+
A retried run task that inserted a second row would leave two different
|
| 153 |
+
ranks for one person, and the shortlist would depend on read order.
|
| 154 |
+
"""
|
| 155 |
+
assert ("candidate_id", "run_id") in _unique_column_sets(
|
| 156 |
+
models.CandidateScore.__table__
|
| 157 |
+
)
|
| 158 |
+
|
| 159 |
+
|
| 160 |
+
def test_candidate_score_cascades_from_its_run() -> None:
|
| 161 |
+
"""A score has no meaning apart from the run that produced it."""
|
| 162 |
+
fk = next(iter(models.CandidateScore.__table__.columns["run_id"].foreign_keys))
|
| 163 |
+
|
| 164 |
+
assert fk.column.table.name == "screening_runs"
|
| 165 |
+
assert fk.ondelete == "CASCADE"
|
| 166 |
+
|
| 167 |
+
|
| 168 |
+
def test_candidate_score_overall_is_numeric_five_two() -> None:
|
| 169 |
+
"""`numeric(5,2)` per section 6.6 — a replayed run must reproduce the digits."""
|
| 170 |
+
column = models.CandidateScore.__table__.columns["overall_score"]
|
| 171 |
+
|
| 172 |
+
assert isinstance(column.type, Numeric)
|
| 173 |
+
assert column.type.precision == 5
|
| 174 |
+
assert column.type.scale == 2
|
| 175 |
+
|
| 176 |
+
|
| 177 |
+
def test_candidate_score_raw_weighted_keeps_four_decimals() -> None:
|
| 178 |
+
"""The pre-cap weighted sum is what makes a capped score explainable."""
|
| 179 |
+
column = models.CandidateScore.__table__.columns["raw_weighted"]
|
| 180 |
+
|
| 181 |
+
assert isinstance(column.type, Numeric)
|
| 182 |
+
assert column.type.precision == 5
|
| 183 |
+
assert column.type.scale == 4
|
| 184 |
+
|
| 185 |
+
|
| 186 |
+
def test_candidate_score_cap_applied_is_null_when_no_cap_fired() -> None:
|
| 187 |
+
"""`cap_applied` distinguishes "capped to 40" from "genuinely scored 40".
|
| 188 |
+
|
| 189 |
+
`aggregate_score()` already reports the cap separately from the must-have
|
| 190 |
+
failure; storing NULL rather than 0 preserves that distinction on disk.
|
| 191 |
+
"""
|
| 192 |
+
column = models.CandidateScore.__table__.columns["cap_applied"]
|
| 193 |
+
|
| 194 |
+
assert column.nullable is True
|
| 195 |
+
assert isinstance(column.type, Integer)
|
| 196 |
+
|
| 197 |
+
|
| 198 |
+
def test_candidate_score_records_the_formula_that_produced_it() -> None:
|
| 199 |
+
"""Provenance for replay: the same inputs must be re-derivable."""
|
| 200 |
+
column = models.CandidateScore.__table__.columns["aggregation_formula_version"]
|
| 201 |
+
|
| 202 |
+
assert column.nullable is False
|
| 203 |
+
|
| 204 |
+
|
| 205 |
+
def test_candidate_score_candidate_id_is_a_plain_uuid() -> None:
|
| 206 |
+
"""There is no `candidates` table in this repository yet.
|
| 207 |
+
|
| 208 |
+
ARCHITECTURE.md section 6.6 declares `candidate_id` as a foreign key, but
|
| 209 |
+
the `candidates` table it points at is unbuilt — the same situation as
|
| 210 |
+
`Requirement.skill_id` and the ESCO taxonomy. Declaring the FK here would
|
| 211 |
+
make the migration unrunnable, so the column is a plain uuid until the
|
| 212 |
+
table exists.
|
| 213 |
+
"""
|
| 214 |
+
column = models.CandidateScore.__table__.columns["candidate_id"]
|
| 215 |
+
|
| 216 |
+
assert column.nullable is False
|
| 217 |
+
assert not column.foreign_keys
|
| 218 |
+
|
| 219 |
+
|
| 220 |
+
# --- requirement_verdicts --------------------------------------------------
|
| 221 |
+
|
| 222 |
+
|
| 223 |
+
def test_requirement_verdict_table_is_named_and_tenant_scoped() -> None:
|
| 224 |
+
"""The table must exist and carry `tenant_id` as a non-null filter column."""
|
| 225 |
+
table = models.RequirementVerdict.__table__
|
| 226 |
+
|
| 227 |
+
assert table.name == "requirement_verdicts"
|
| 228 |
+
assert table.columns["tenant_id"].nullable is False
|
| 229 |
+
assert table.columns["tenant_id"].index is True
|
| 230 |
+
|
| 231 |
+
|
| 232 |
+
def test_requirement_verdict_is_unique_per_score_and_requirement() -> None:
|
| 233 |
+
"""One verdict per requirement per score.
|
| 234 |
+
|
| 235 |
+
`aggregate_score()` raises on duplicate verdicts; this is the same
|
| 236 |
+
invariant at the storage layer, which is where a retry actually races.
|
| 237 |
+
"""
|
| 238 |
+
assert ("requirement_id", "score_id") in _unique_column_sets(
|
| 239 |
+
models.RequirementVerdict.__table__
|
| 240 |
+
)
|
| 241 |
+
|
| 242 |
+
|
| 243 |
+
def test_requirement_verdict_cascades_from_its_score() -> None:
|
| 244 |
+
"""A verdict is a component of one score and cannot outlive it."""
|
| 245 |
+
fk = next(iter(models.RequirementVerdict.__table__.columns["score_id"].foreign_keys))
|
| 246 |
+
|
| 247 |
+
assert fk.column.table.name == "candidate_scores"
|
| 248 |
+
assert fk.ondelete == "CASCADE"
|
| 249 |
+
|
| 250 |
+
|
| 251 |
+
def test_requirement_verdict_pins_the_requirement_it_judged() -> None:
|
| 252 |
+
"""A verdict detached from its requirement text explains nothing."""
|
| 253 |
+
fk = next(
|
| 254 |
+
iter(models.RequirementVerdict.__table__.columns["requirement_id"].foreign_keys)
|
| 255 |
+
)
|
| 256 |
+
|
| 257 |
+
assert fk.column.table.name == "requirements"
|
| 258 |
+
assert fk.ondelete == "RESTRICT"
|
| 259 |
+
|
| 260 |
+
|
| 261 |
+
def test_requirement_verdict_stores_the_chunks_the_judge_actually_saw() -> None:
|
| 262 |
+
"""`retrieved_chunk_ids` is the exposure record.
|
| 263 |
+
|
| 264 |
+
Section 6.6: it is precisely the context the judge saw. Without it, "why
|
| 265 |
+
did the model say that?" cannot be answered after the fact.
|
| 266 |
+
"""
|
| 267 |
+
column = models.RequirementVerdict.__table__.columns["retrieved_chunk_ids"]
|
| 268 |
+
|
| 269 |
+
assert isinstance(column.type, ARRAY)
|
| 270 |
+
|
| 271 |
+
|
| 272 |
+
def test_requirement_verdict_weight_and_contribution_are_exact_decimals() -> None:
|
| 273 |
+
"""The verdict's arithmetic must reproduce the score exactly."""
|
| 274 |
+
table = models.RequirementVerdict.__table__
|
| 275 |
+
|
| 276 |
+
weight = table.columns["weight_at_scoring"]
|
| 277 |
+
assert isinstance(weight.type, Numeric)
|
| 278 |
+
assert (weight.type.precision, weight.type.scale) == (5, 4)
|
| 279 |
+
|
| 280 |
+
contribution = table.columns["contribution"]
|
| 281 |
+
assert isinstance(contribution.type, Numeric)
|
| 282 |
+
assert (contribution.type.precision, contribution.type.scale) == (6, 4)
|
| 283 |
+
|
| 284 |
+
|
| 285 |
+
def test_requirement_verdict_cache_key_holds_a_sha256_digest() -> None:
|
| 286 |
+
"""`result_cache_key` is the 64-hex key `verdict_cache_key()` derives."""
|
| 287 |
+
column = models.RequirementVerdict.__table__.columns["result_cache_key"]
|
| 288 |
+
|
| 289 |
+
assert column.type.length == 64
|
| 290 |
+
|
| 291 |
+
|
| 292 |
+
def test_requirement_verdict_records_whether_the_cache_was_hit() -> None:
|
| 293 |
+
"""The "re-run costs ~0 tokens" claim is measured from this column."""
|
| 294 |
+
column = models.RequirementVerdict.__table__.columns["cache_hit"]
|
| 295 |
+
|
| 296 |
+
assert isinstance(column.type, Boolean)
|
| 297 |
+
assert column.nullable is False
|
| 298 |
+
|
| 299 |
+
|
| 300 |
+
def test_requirement_verdict_override_columns_are_null_until_a_human_acts() -> None:
|
| 301 |
+
"""A human override is recorded beside the model's verdict, never over it.
|
| 302 |
+
|
| 303 |
+
The system never rejects a candidate; a recruiter can overrule any verdict.
|
| 304 |
+
Overwriting `verdict` in place would destroy the evidence that the model and
|
| 305 |
+
the human disagreed, which is exactly what an audit needs to see.
|
| 306 |
+
"""
|
| 307 |
+
table = models.RequirementVerdict.__table__
|
| 308 |
+
|
| 309 |
+
for name in ("overridden_by", "override_verdict", "override_reason", "overridden_at"):
|
| 310 |
+
assert table.columns[name].nullable is True, name
|
| 311 |
+
|
| 312 |
+
|
| 313 |
+
# --- evidence_spans --------------------------------------------------------
|
| 314 |
+
|
| 315 |
+
|
| 316 |
+
def test_evidence_span_table_is_named_and_tenant_scoped() -> None:
|
| 317 |
+
"""The table must exist and carry `tenant_id` as a non-null filter column."""
|
| 318 |
+
table = models.EvidenceSpanRecord.__table__
|
| 319 |
+
|
| 320 |
+
assert table.name == "evidence_spans"
|
| 321 |
+
assert table.columns["tenant_id"].nullable is False
|
| 322 |
+
assert table.columns["tenant_id"].index is True
|
| 323 |
+
|
| 324 |
+
|
| 325 |
+
def test_evidence_span_verdict_id_is_nullable() -> None:
|
| 326 |
+
"""A span can be retrieved and verified before any verdict cites it.
|
| 327 |
+
|
| 328 |
+
Section 6.6 declares `verdict_id fk null`. Requiring it would force the
|
| 329 |
+
pipeline to invent a verdict before it has judged anything.
|
| 330 |
+
"""
|
| 331 |
+
assert models.EvidenceSpanRecord.__table__.columns["verdict_id"].nullable is True
|
| 332 |
+
|
| 333 |
+
|
| 334 |
+
def test_evidence_span_cascades_from_its_verdict() -> None:
|
| 335 |
+
"""Deleting a verdict must not leave orphan citations behind."""
|
| 336 |
+
fk = next(iter(models.EvidenceSpanRecord.__table__.columns["verdict_id"].foreign_keys))
|
| 337 |
+
|
| 338 |
+
assert fk.column.table.name == "requirement_verdicts"
|
| 339 |
+
assert fk.ondelete == "CASCADE"
|
| 340 |
+
|
| 341 |
+
|
| 342 |
+
def test_evidence_span_anchors_to_the_parse_that_produced_the_offsets() -> None:
|
| 343 |
+
"""Offsets are only valid against the resume version they were taken from.
|
| 344 |
+
|
| 345 |
+
A re-parse under a newer parser is a new `resume_versions` row precisely so
|
| 346 |
+
that older offsets stay attributable. The FK restricts deletion for the same
|
| 347 |
+
reason: the span would silently point into a different text.
|
| 348 |
+
"""
|
| 349 |
+
column = models.EvidenceSpanRecord.__table__.columns["resume_version_id"]
|
| 350 |
+
fk = next(iter(column.foreign_keys))
|
| 351 |
+
|
| 352 |
+
assert fk.column.table.name == "resume_versions"
|
| 353 |
+
assert fk.ondelete == "RESTRICT"
|
| 354 |
+
assert column.nullable is False
|
| 355 |
+
|
| 356 |
+
|
| 357 |
+
def test_evidence_span_carries_exact_character_offsets() -> None:
|
| 358 |
+
"""`text[start_char:end_char]` is the check `verify_evidence_span()` runs.
|
| 359 |
+
|
| 360 |
+
Both offsets are required: a span with only a start is not checkable, and an
|
| 361 |
+
unverifiable citation is the failure mode this column set exists to prevent.
|
| 362 |
+
"""
|
| 363 |
+
table = models.EvidenceSpanRecord.__table__
|
| 364 |
+
|
| 365 |
+
assert table.columns["start_char"].nullable is False
|
| 366 |
+
assert table.columns["end_char"].nullable is False
|
| 367 |
+
assert isinstance(table.columns["start_char"].type, Integer)
|
| 368 |
+
assert isinstance(table.columns["end_char"].type, Integer)
|
| 369 |
+
|
| 370 |
+
|
| 371 |
+
def test_evidence_span_verbatim_flag_defaults_to_unverified() -> None:
|
| 372 |
+
"""An unchecked citation must never read as verified.
|
| 373 |
+
|
| 374 |
+
Defaulting to True would mean a span inserted before the check ran claims a
|
| 375 |
+
guarantee nobody established — the anti-hallucination gate held open.
|
| 376 |
+
"""
|
| 377 |
+
column = models.EvidenceSpanRecord.__table__.columns["verbatim_verified"]
|
| 378 |
+
|
| 379 |
+
assert isinstance(column.type, Boolean)
|
| 380 |
+
assert column.nullable is False
|
| 381 |
+
assert column.default is not None
|
| 382 |
+
assert column.default.arg is False
|
| 383 |
+
|
| 384 |
+
|
| 385 |
+
# --- construction ----------------------------------------------------------
|
| 386 |
+
|
| 387 |
+
|
| 388 |
+
def test_a_screening_run_accepts_the_fields_the_admission_endpoint_supplies() -> None:
|
| 389 |
+
"""The row the endpoint inserts round-trips onto the instance."""
|
| 390 |
+
run = models.ScreeningRun(
|
| 391 |
+
id=uuid.uuid4(),
|
| 392 |
+
tenant_id=uuid.uuid4(),
|
| 393 |
+
job_id=uuid.uuid4(),
|
| 394 |
+
rubric_version_id=uuid.uuid4(),
|
| 395 |
+
triggered_by=uuid.uuid4(),
|
| 396 |
+
mode="interactive",
|
| 397 |
+
candidate_count=3,
|
| 398 |
+
)
|
| 399 |
+
|
| 400 |
+
assert run.mode == "interactive"
|
| 401 |
+
assert run.candidate_count == 3
|
| 402 |
+
|
| 403 |
+
|
| 404 |
+
def test_a_candidate_score_accepts_exact_decimals() -> None:
|
| 405 |
+
"""Score and pre-cap weighted sum round-trip as exact Decimals."""
|
| 406 |
+
score = models.CandidateScore(
|
| 407 |
+
id=uuid.uuid4(),
|
| 408 |
+
tenant_id=uuid.uuid4(),
|
| 409 |
+
run_id=uuid.uuid4(),
|
| 410 |
+
candidate_id=uuid.uuid4(),
|
| 411 |
+
overall_score=Decimal("40.00"),
|
| 412 |
+
raw_weighted=Decimal("0.8125"),
|
| 413 |
+
cap_applied=40,
|
| 414 |
+
rank=1,
|
| 415 |
+
aggregation_formula_version="v1",
|
| 416 |
+
)
|
| 417 |
+
|
| 418 |
+
assert score.overall_score == Decimal("40.00")
|
| 419 |
+
assert score.raw_weighted == Decimal("0.8125")
|
| 420 |
+
assert score.cap_applied == 40
|