Spaces:
Runtime error
Runtime error
Update app.py
Browse files
app.py
CHANGED
|
@@ -50,79 +50,37 @@ def get_completion(query, model, tokenizer):
|
|
| 50 |
# Move model back to CPU to free up GPU memory
|
| 51 |
model = model.cpu()
|
| 52 |
torch.cuda.empty_cache()
|
|
|
|
| 53 |
|
| 54 |
@spaces.GPU()
|
| 55 |
def code_review(code_to_analyze):
|
| 56 |
-
|
| 57 |
-
|
| 58 |
-
|
| 59 |
-
|
| 60 |
-
|
| 61 |
-
|
| 62 |
-
|
| 63 |
-
|
| 64 |
-
|
| 65 |
-
|
| 66 |
-
|
| 67 |
-
|
| 68 |
-
|
| 69 |
-
|
| 70 |
-
1. Understanding of the code:
|
| 71 |
-
- This function attempts to authenticate a user by checking their username and password against a database.
|
| 72 |
-
- It establishes a database connection, constructs a SQL query with the provided credentials, and executes it.
|
| 73 |
-
- If any matching rows are found, it returns true (authenticated); otherwise, it returns false.
|
| 74 |
-
|
| 75 |
-
2. Potential security issues:
|
| 76 |
-
- SQL Injection vulnerability: The username and password are directly inserted into the query without sanitization.
|
| 77 |
-
- Plaintext password storage: The code suggests that passwords are stored in plaintext in the database.
|
| 78 |
-
- Hardcoded database credentials: Connection details are hardcoded, which is a security risk.
|
| 79 |
-
|
| 80 |
-
3. Potential logic vulnerabilities:
|
| 81 |
-
- Multiple user authentication: The function returns true if more than one row is returned, which could lead to authentication issues if multiple users have the same credentials.
|
| 82 |
-
- No input validation: There's no checking for empty or null username/password inputs.
|
| 83 |
-
|
| 84 |
-
4. Suggestions for improvement:
|
| 85 |
-
- Use prepared statements to prevent SQL injection.
|
| 86 |
-
- Implement proper password hashing (e.g., using password_hash() and password_verify()).
|
| 87 |
-
- Store database credentials securely and separately from the code.
|
| 88 |
-
- Implement proper error handling and use constant-time comparison for passwords.
|
| 89 |
-
- Add input validation for username and password.
|
| 90 |
-
- Consider using a single-row fetch instead of num_rows to ensure single-user authentication.
|
| 91 |
-
|
| 92 |
-
Now, review the following code using the same approach:
|
| 93 |
|
| 94 |
{code_to_analyze}
|
| 95 |
|
| 96 |
Provide a detailed review including:
|
| 97 |
-
1.
|
| 98 |
-
2. Potential
|
| 99 |
-
3.
|
| 100 |
-
4. Suggestions for improvement
|
| 101 |
|
| 102 |
Start each section with its number and title."""
|
| 103 |
|
| 104 |
-
full_response = get_completion(
|
| 105 |
|
| 106 |
-
#
|
| 107 |
-
|
| 108 |
-
if response_start != -1:
|
| 109 |
-
response_start += len(code_to_analyze)
|
| 110 |
-
ai_response = full_response[response_start:].strip()
|
| 111 |
-
|
| 112 |
-
# Find the second occurrence of "1. Understanding of the code"
|
| 113 |
-
first_occurrence = ai_response.find("1. Understanding of the code")
|
| 114 |
-
if first_occurrence != -1:
|
| 115 |
-
second_occurrence = ai_response.find("1. Understanding of the code", first_occurrence + 1)
|
| 116 |
-
if second_occurrence != -1:
|
| 117 |
-
ai_response = ai_response[second_occurrence:]
|
| 118 |
-
else:
|
| 119 |
-
# If we can't find a second occurrence, start from the first one
|
| 120 |
-
ai_response = ai_response[first_occurrence:]
|
| 121 |
-
|
| 122 |
-
return ai_response
|
| 123 |
-
else:
|
| 124 |
-
return "Error: Unable to extract the AI's response. Here's the full output:\n\n" + full_response
|
| 125 |
-
|
| 126 |
|
| 127 |
# Create Gradio interface
|
| 128 |
iface = gr.Interface(
|
|
|
|
| 50 |
# Move model back to CPU to free up GPU memory
|
| 51 |
model = model.cpu()
|
| 52 |
torch.cuda.empty_cache()
|
| 53 |
+
|
| 54 |
|
| 55 |
@spaces.GPU()
|
| 56 |
def code_review(code_to_analyze):
|
| 57 |
+
two_shot_prompt = f"""First, understand the given code:
|
| 58 |
+
Analyze the purpose, functionality, input sources, output destinations, and logical flow of the code. Identify any security-sensitive operations.
|
| 59 |
+
|
| 60 |
+
Now, review the following code:
|
| 61 |
+
|
| 62 |
+
{code_to_analyze}
|
| 63 |
+
|
| 64 |
+
Provide a brief understanding of the code.
|
| 65 |
+
|
| 66 |
+
Second, correlate the context with the input code and find vulnerabilities:
|
| 67 |
+
Based on your understanding of the code, identify potential security issues, logic vulnerabilities, and areas for improvement. Consider common vulnerabilities, possible misuse, input handling, and use of security functions.
|
| 68 |
+
|
| 69 |
+
Now, for the same code:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 70 |
|
| 71 |
{code_to_analyze}
|
| 72 |
|
| 73 |
Provide a detailed review including:
|
| 74 |
+
1. Potential security issues
|
| 75 |
+
2. Potential logic vulnerabilities
|
| 76 |
+
3. Suggestions for improvement
|
|
|
|
| 77 |
|
| 78 |
Start each section with its number and title."""
|
| 79 |
|
| 80 |
+
full_response = get_completion(two_shot_prompt, model, tokenizer)
|
| 81 |
|
| 82 |
+
# Return the full response without any processing
|
| 83 |
+
return full_response
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 84 |
|
| 85 |
# Create Gradio interface
|
| 86 |
iface = gr.Interface(
|