Commit
·
e620ed4
1
Parent(s):
4f61017
Update readme with new benchmark details
Browse files- README.md +17 -1
- benchmarks/table/table.py +3 -4
README.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -370,7 +370,7 @@ There are some settings that you may find useful if things aren't working the wa
|
|
| 370 |
Pass the `debug` option to activate debug mode. This will save images of each page with detected layout and text, as well as output a json file with additional bounding box information.
|
| 371 |
|
| 372 |
# Benchmarks
|
| 373 |
-
|
| 374 |
Benchmarking PDF extraction quality is hard. I've created a test set by finding books and scientific papers that have a pdf version and a latex source. I convert the latex to text, and compare the reference to the output of text extraction methods. It's noisy, but at least directionally correct.
|
| 375 |
|
| 376 |
**Speed**
|
|
@@ -393,6 +393,13 @@ Marker takes about 6GB of VRAM on average per task, so you can convert 8 documen
|
|
| 393 |
|
| 394 |

|
| 395 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 396 |
## Running your own benchmarks
|
| 397 |
|
| 398 |
You can benchmark the performance of marker on your machine. Install marker manually with:
|
|
@@ -402,12 +409,21 @@ git clone https://github.com/VikParuchuri/marker.git
|
|
| 402 |
poetry install
|
| 403 |
```
|
| 404 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 405 |
Download the benchmark data [here](https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ZSeWDo2g1y0BRLT7KnbmytV2bjWARWba/view?usp=sharing) and unzip. Then run the overall benchmark like this:
|
| 406 |
|
| 407 |
```shell
|
| 408 |
python benchmarks/overall.py data/pdfs data/references report.json
|
| 409 |
```
|
| 410 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 411 |
# Thanks
|
| 412 |
|
| 413 |
This work would not have been possible without amazing open source models and datasets, including (but not limited to):
|
|
|
|
| 370 |
Pass the `debug` option to activate debug mode. This will save images of each page with detected layout and text, as well as output a json file with additional bounding box information.
|
| 371 |
|
| 372 |
# Benchmarks
|
| 373 |
+
## Overall PDF Conversion
|
| 374 |
Benchmarking PDF extraction quality is hard. I've created a test set by finding books and scientific papers that have a pdf version and a latex source. I convert the latex to text, and compare the reference to the output of text extraction methods. It's noisy, but at least directionally correct.
|
| 375 |
|
| 376 |
**Speed**
|
|
|
|
| 393 |
|
| 394 |

|
| 395 |
|
| 396 |
+
## Table Conversion
|
| 397 |
+
Marker can extract tables from your PDFs using `marker.converters.table.TableConverter`. The table extraction performance is measured by comparing the extracted HTML representation of tables against the original HTML representations using the test split of [FinTabNet](https://developer.ibm.com/exchanges/data/all/fintabnet/). The HTML representations are compared using a [tree edit distance] based metric to judge both structure and content. Marker detects and identifies the structure of all tables in a PDF page and achieves an average score of `0.65` via this approach.
|
| 398 |
+
|
| 399 |
+
| Avg score | Total tables |
|
| 400 |
+
|-------------|----------------|
|
| 401 |
+
| 0.65 | 1149 |
|
| 402 |
+
|
| 403 |
## Running your own benchmarks
|
| 404 |
|
| 405 |
You can benchmark the performance of marker on your machine. Install marker manually with:
|
|
|
|
| 409 |
poetry install
|
| 410 |
```
|
| 411 |
|
| 412 |
+
### Overall PDF Conversion
|
| 413 |
+
|
| 414 |
Download the benchmark data [here](https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ZSeWDo2g1y0BRLT7KnbmytV2bjWARWba/view?usp=sharing) and unzip. Then run the overall benchmark like this:
|
| 415 |
|
| 416 |
```shell
|
| 417 |
python benchmarks/overall.py data/pdfs data/references report.json
|
| 418 |
```
|
| 419 |
|
| 420 |
+
### Table Conversion
|
| 421 |
+
The processed FinTabNet dataset is hosted [here](https://huggingface.co/datasets/datalab-to/fintabnet-test) and is automatically downloaded. Run the benchmark with:
|
| 422 |
+
|
| 423 |
+
```shell
|
| 424 |
+
python benchmarks/table/table.py table_report.json --max 1000
|
| 425 |
+
```
|
| 426 |
+
|
| 427 |
# Thanks
|
| 428 |
|
| 429 |
This work would not have been possible without amazing open source models and datasets, including (but not limited to):
|
benchmarks/table/table.py
CHANGED
|
@@ -86,15 +86,14 @@ def main(out_file, dataset, max):
|
|
| 86 |
print('Broken PDF, Skipping...')
|
| 87 |
continue
|
| 88 |
|
| 89 |
-
|
| 90 |
|
| 91 |
with ThreadPoolExecutor(max_workers=16) as executor:
|
| 92 |
results = list(tqdm(executor.map(update_teds_score, results), desc='Computing alignment scores', total=len(results)))
|
| 93 |
avg_score = sum([r["score"] for r in results]) / len(results)
|
| 94 |
|
| 95 |
-
|
| 96 |
-
|
| 97 |
-
data = [f"{avg_score:.3f}", f"{total_time / len(results):.3f}", len(results)]
|
| 98 |
table = tabulate([data], headers=headers, tablefmt="github")
|
| 99 |
print(table)
|
| 100 |
print("Avg score computed by comparing marker predicted HTML with original HTML")
|
|
|
|
| 86 |
print('Broken PDF, Skipping...')
|
| 87 |
continue
|
| 88 |
|
| 89 |
+
print(f"Total time: {time.time() - start}")
|
| 90 |
|
| 91 |
with ThreadPoolExecutor(max_workers=16) as executor:
|
| 92 |
results = list(tqdm(executor.map(update_teds_score, results), desc='Computing alignment scores', total=len(results)))
|
| 93 |
avg_score = sum([r["score"] for r in results]) / len(results)
|
| 94 |
|
| 95 |
+
headers = ["Avg score", "Total tables"]
|
| 96 |
+
data = [f"{avg_score:.3f}", len(results)]
|
|
|
|
| 97 |
table = tabulate([data], headers=headers, tablefmt="github")
|
| 98 |
print(table)
|
| 99 |
print("Avg score computed by comparing marker predicted HTML with original HTML")
|