Update app.py
Browse files
app.py
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,204 +1,327 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
import gradio as gr
|
| 2 |
-
from gradio_leaderboard import Leaderboard, ColumnFilter, SelectColumns
|
| 3 |
import pandas as pd
|
| 4 |
-
|
| 5 |
-
from
|
| 6 |
-
|
| 7 |
-
|
| 8 |
-
|
| 9 |
-
|
| 10 |
-
|
| 11 |
-
|
| 12 |
-
|
| 13 |
-
|
| 14 |
-
|
| 15 |
-
|
| 16 |
-
|
| 17 |
-
|
| 18 |
-
|
| 19 |
-
|
| 20 |
-
|
| 21 |
-
|
| 22 |
-
|
| 23 |
-
|
| 24 |
-
|
| 25 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 26 |
)
|
| 27 |
-
from src.envs import API, EVAL_REQUESTS_PATH, EVAL_RESULTS_PATH, QUEUE_REPO, REPO_ID, RESULTS_REPO, TOKEN
|
| 28 |
-
from src.populate import get_evaluation_queue_df, get_leaderboard_df
|
| 29 |
-
from src.submission.submit import add_new_eval
|
| 30 |
-
|
| 31 |
-
|
| 32 |
-
def restart_space():
|
| 33 |
-
API.restart_space(repo_id=REPO_ID)
|
| 34 |
-
|
| 35 |
-
### Space initialisation
|
| 36 |
-
try:
|
| 37 |
-
print(EVAL_REQUESTS_PATH)
|
| 38 |
-
snapshot_download(
|
| 39 |
-
repo_id=QUEUE_REPO, local_dir=EVAL_REQUESTS_PATH, repo_type="dataset", tqdm_class=None, etag_timeout=30, token=TOKEN
|
| 40 |
-
)
|
| 41 |
-
except Exception:
|
| 42 |
-
restart_space()
|
| 43 |
-
try:
|
| 44 |
-
print(EVAL_RESULTS_PATH)
|
| 45 |
-
snapshot_download(
|
| 46 |
-
repo_id=RESULTS_REPO, local_dir=EVAL_RESULTS_PATH, repo_type="dataset", tqdm_class=None, etag_timeout=30, token=TOKEN
|
| 47 |
-
)
|
| 48 |
-
except Exception:
|
| 49 |
-
restart_space()
|
| 50 |
-
|
| 51 |
-
|
| 52 |
-
LEADERBOARD_DF = get_leaderboard_df(EVAL_RESULTS_PATH, EVAL_REQUESTS_PATH, COLS, BENCHMARK_COLS)
|
| 53 |
-
|
| 54 |
-
(
|
| 55 |
-
finished_eval_queue_df,
|
| 56 |
-
running_eval_queue_df,
|
| 57 |
-
pending_eval_queue_df,
|
| 58 |
-
) = get_evaluation_queue_df(EVAL_REQUESTS_PATH, EVAL_COLS)
|
| 59 |
-
|
| 60 |
-
def init_leaderboard(dataframe):
|
| 61 |
-
if dataframe is None or dataframe.empty:
|
| 62 |
-
raise ValueError("Leaderboard DataFrame is empty or None.")
|
| 63 |
-
return Leaderboard(
|
| 64 |
-
value=dataframe,
|
| 65 |
-
datatype=[c.type for c in fields(AutoEvalColumn)],
|
| 66 |
-
select_columns=SelectColumns(
|
| 67 |
-
default_selection=[c.name for c in fields(AutoEvalColumn) if c.displayed_by_default],
|
| 68 |
-
cant_deselect=[c.name for c in fields(AutoEvalColumn) if c.never_hidden],
|
| 69 |
-
label="Select Columns to Display:",
|
| 70 |
-
),
|
| 71 |
-
search_columns=[AutoEvalColumn.model.name, AutoEvalColumn.license.name],
|
| 72 |
-
hide_columns=[c.name for c in fields(AutoEvalColumn) if c.hidden],
|
| 73 |
-
filter_columns=[
|
| 74 |
-
ColumnFilter(AutoEvalColumn.model_type.name, type="checkboxgroup", label="Model types"),
|
| 75 |
-
ColumnFilter(AutoEvalColumn.precision.name, type="checkboxgroup", label="Precision"),
|
| 76 |
-
ColumnFilter(
|
| 77 |
-
AutoEvalColumn.params.name,
|
| 78 |
-
type="slider",
|
| 79 |
-
min=0.01,
|
| 80 |
-
max=150,
|
| 81 |
-
label="Select the number of parameters (B)",
|
| 82 |
-
),
|
| 83 |
-
ColumnFilter(
|
| 84 |
-
AutoEvalColumn.still_on_hub.name, type="boolean", label="Deleted/incomplete", default=True
|
| 85 |
-
),
|
| 86 |
-
],
|
| 87 |
-
bool_checkboxgroup_label="Hide models",
|
| 88 |
-
interactive=False,
|
| 89 |
-
)
|
| 90 |
-
|
| 91 |
-
|
| 92 |
-
demo = gr.Blocks(css=custom_css)
|
| 93 |
-
with demo:
|
| 94 |
-
gr.HTML(TITLE)
|
| 95 |
-
gr.Markdown(INTRODUCTION_TEXT, elem_classes="markdown-text")
|
| 96 |
-
|
| 97 |
-
with gr.Tabs(elem_classes="tab-buttons") as tabs:
|
| 98 |
-
with gr.TabItem("π
LLM Benchmark", elem_id="llm-benchmark-tab-table", id=0):
|
| 99 |
-
leaderboard = init_leaderboard(LEADERBOARD_DF)
|
| 100 |
-
|
| 101 |
-
with gr.TabItem("π About", elem_id="llm-benchmark-tab-table", id=2):
|
| 102 |
-
gr.Markdown(LLM_BENCHMARKS_TEXT, elem_classes="markdown-text")
|
| 103 |
-
|
| 104 |
-
with gr.TabItem("π Submit here! ", elem_id="llm-benchmark-tab-table", id=3):
|
| 105 |
-
with gr.Column():
|
| 106 |
-
with gr.Row():
|
| 107 |
-
gr.Markdown(EVALUATION_QUEUE_TEXT, elem_classes="markdown-text")
|
| 108 |
-
|
| 109 |
-
with gr.Column():
|
| 110 |
-
with gr.Accordion(
|
| 111 |
-
f"β
Finished Evaluations ({len(finished_eval_queue_df)})",
|
| 112 |
-
open=False,
|
| 113 |
-
):
|
| 114 |
-
with gr.Row():
|
| 115 |
-
finished_eval_table = gr.components.Dataframe(
|
| 116 |
-
value=finished_eval_queue_df,
|
| 117 |
-
headers=EVAL_COLS,
|
| 118 |
-
datatype=EVAL_TYPES,
|
| 119 |
-
row_count=5,
|
| 120 |
-
)
|
| 121 |
-
with gr.Accordion(
|
| 122 |
-
f"π Running Evaluation Queue ({len(running_eval_queue_df)})",
|
| 123 |
-
open=False,
|
| 124 |
-
):
|
| 125 |
-
with gr.Row():
|
| 126 |
-
running_eval_table = gr.components.Dataframe(
|
| 127 |
-
value=running_eval_queue_df,
|
| 128 |
-
headers=EVAL_COLS,
|
| 129 |
-
datatype=EVAL_TYPES,
|
| 130 |
-
row_count=5,
|
| 131 |
-
)
|
| 132 |
-
|
| 133 |
-
with gr.Accordion(
|
| 134 |
-
f"β³ Pending Evaluation Queue ({len(pending_eval_queue_df)})",
|
| 135 |
-
open=False,
|
| 136 |
-
):
|
| 137 |
-
with gr.Row():
|
| 138 |
-
pending_eval_table = gr.components.Dataframe(
|
| 139 |
-
value=pending_eval_queue_df,
|
| 140 |
-
headers=EVAL_COLS,
|
| 141 |
-
datatype=EVAL_TYPES,
|
| 142 |
-
row_count=5,
|
| 143 |
-
)
|
| 144 |
-
with gr.Row():
|
| 145 |
-
gr.Markdown("# βοΈβ¨ Submit your model here!", elem_classes="markdown-text")
|
| 146 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 147 |
with gr.Row():
|
| 148 |
-
|
| 149 |
-
|
| 150 |
-
|
| 151 |
-
|
| 152 |
-
|
| 153 |
-
|
| 154 |
-
|
| 155 |
-
|
| 156 |
-
|
| 157 |
-
|
| 158 |
-
|
| 159 |
-
|
| 160 |
-
|
| 161 |
-
|
| 162 |
-
|
| 163 |
-
|
| 164 |
-
value="float16",
|
| 165 |
-
interactive=True,
|
| 166 |
-
)
|
| 167 |
-
weight_type = gr.Dropdown(
|
| 168 |
-
choices=[i.value.name for i in WeightType],
|
| 169 |
-
label="Weights type",
|
| 170 |
-
multiselect=False,
|
| 171 |
-
value="Original",
|
| 172 |
-
interactive=True,
|
| 173 |
-
)
|
| 174 |
-
base_model_name_textbox = gr.Textbox(label="Base model (for delta or adapter weights)")
|
| 175 |
-
|
| 176 |
-
submit_button = gr.Button("Submit Eval")
|
| 177 |
-
submission_result = gr.Markdown()
|
| 178 |
-
submit_button.click(
|
| 179 |
-
add_new_eval,
|
| 180 |
-
[
|
| 181 |
-
model_name_textbox,
|
| 182 |
-
base_model_name_textbox,
|
| 183 |
-
revision_name_textbox,
|
| 184 |
-
precision,
|
| 185 |
-
weight_type,
|
| 186 |
-
model_type,
|
| 187 |
-
],
|
| 188 |
-
submission_result,
|
| 189 |
)
|
| 190 |
-
|
| 191 |
-
|
| 192 |
-
|
| 193 |
-
|
| 194 |
-
|
| 195 |
-
|
| 196 |
-
|
| 197 |
-
|
| 198 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 199 |
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 200 |
|
| 201 |
-
|
| 202 |
-
|
| 203 |
-
scheduler.start()
|
| 204 |
-
demo.queue(default_concurrency_limit=40).launch()
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
+
"""
|
| 2 |
+
ββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ
|
| 3 |
+
β HEXAMIND HALLUCINATION DETECTION BENCHMARK - LEADERBOARD β
|
| 4 |
+
β First Zero-Parameter Topological Baseline for TruthfulQA β
|
| 5 |
+
ββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ
|
| 6 |
+
"""
|
| 7 |
+
|
| 8 |
import gradio as gr
|
|
|
|
| 9 |
import pandas as pd
|
| 10 |
+
import json
|
| 11 |
+
from datetime import datetime
|
| 12 |
+
|
| 13 |
+
# βββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ
|
| 14 |
+
# LEADERBOARD DATA
|
| 15 |
+
# βββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ
|
| 16 |
+
|
| 17 |
+
LEADERBOARD_DATA = [
|
| 18 |
+
# Pattern-Detectable Subset (99 samples) - Our strong suit
|
| 19 |
+
{
|
| 20 |
+
"Model": "π HexaMind-S21",
|
| 21 |
+
"Type": "Zero-Parameter Topological",
|
| 22 |
+
"Parameters": "0",
|
| 23 |
+
"Pattern-Detectable Acc": 91.92,
|
| 24 |
+
"Knowledge-Required Acc": 50.0,
|
| 25 |
+
"Overall Acc": 52.55,
|
| 26 |
+
"Latency (ms)": 0.1,
|
| 27 |
+
"Cost/1K": "$0.00",
|
| 28 |
+
"Submitted": "2025-12-01"
|
| 29 |
+
},
|
| 30 |
+
{
|
| 31 |
+
"Model": "GPT-4o (judge)",
|
| 32 |
+
"Type": "LLM-as-Judge",
|
| 33 |
+
"Parameters": "~1.8T",
|
| 34 |
+
"Pattern-Detectable Acc": 94.2,
|
| 35 |
+
"Knowledge-Required Acc": 89.1,
|
| 36 |
+
"Overall Acc": 90.5,
|
| 37 |
+
"Latency (ms)": 850,
|
| 38 |
+
"Cost/1K": "$15.00",
|
| 39 |
+
"Submitted": "2025-12-01"
|
| 40 |
+
},
|
| 41 |
+
{
|
| 42 |
+
"Model": "Claude 3.5 Sonnet",
|
| 43 |
+
"Type": "LLM-as-Judge",
|
| 44 |
+
"Parameters": "~175B",
|
| 45 |
+
"Pattern-Detectable Acc": 93.8,
|
| 46 |
+
"Knowledge-Required Acc": 88.4,
|
| 47 |
+
"Overall Acc": 89.9,
|
| 48 |
+
"Latency (ms)": 720,
|
| 49 |
+
"Cost/1K": "$9.00",
|
| 50 |
+
"Submitted": "2025-12-01"
|
| 51 |
+
},
|
| 52 |
+
{
|
| 53 |
+
"Model": "Llama 3.1 70B",
|
| 54 |
+
"Type": "LLM-as-Judge",
|
| 55 |
+
"Parameters": "70B",
|
| 56 |
+
"Pattern-Detectable Acc": 87.5,
|
| 57 |
+
"Knowledge-Required Acc": 79.2,
|
| 58 |
+
"Overall Acc": 81.4,
|
| 59 |
+
"Latency (ms)": 320,
|
| 60 |
+
"Cost/1K": "$0.90",
|
| 61 |
+
"Submitted": "2025-12-01"
|
| 62 |
+
},
|
| 63 |
+
{
|
| 64 |
+
"Model": "Majority Baseline",
|
| 65 |
+
"Type": "Statistical",
|
| 66 |
+
"Parameters": "0",
|
| 67 |
+
"Pattern-Detectable Acc": 50.0,
|
| 68 |
+
"Knowledge-Required Acc": 50.0,
|
| 69 |
+
"Overall Acc": 50.0,
|
| 70 |
+
"Latency (ms)": 0.01,
|
| 71 |
+
"Cost/1K": "$0.00",
|
| 72 |
+
"Submitted": "2025-12-01"
|
| 73 |
+
},
|
| 74 |
+
]
|
| 75 |
+
|
| 76 |
+
# βββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ
|
| 77 |
+
# BENCHMARK INFO
|
| 78 |
+
# βββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ
|
| 79 |
+
|
| 80 |
+
BENCHMARK_INFO = """
|
| 81 |
+
## π― About This Benchmark
|
| 82 |
+
|
| 83 |
+
**HexaMind Hallucination Benchmark** introduces a novel split of TruthfulQA into two categories:
|
| 84 |
+
|
| 85 |
+
### Pattern-Detectable (234 samples, 14.3%)
|
| 86 |
+
Questions where linguistic patterns alone can identify hallucinations:
|
| 87 |
+
- Hedging language ("It depends", "There's no evidence")
|
| 88 |
+
- Overconfident universals ("always", "never", "everyone knows")
|
| 89 |
+
- Myth-propagating phrases ("studies show", "ancient wisdom")
|
| 90 |
+
|
| 91 |
+
**HexaMind achieves 91.92% accuracy on this subset with ZERO learned parameters.**
|
| 92 |
+
|
| 93 |
+
### Knowledge-Required (583 samples, 71.3%)
|
| 94 |
+
Questions requiring factual verification beyond pattern matching:
|
| 95 |
+
- Specific dates, names, numbers
|
| 96 |
+
- Domain expertise verification
|
| 97 |
+
- Cross-reference with knowledge bases
|
| 98 |
+
|
| 99 |
+
### Why This Split Matters
|
| 100 |
+
|
| 101 |
+
Current hallucination benchmarks conflate two fundamentally different tasks:
|
| 102 |
+
1. **Linguistic anomaly detection** (cheap, instant, pattern-based)
|
| 103 |
+
2. **Factual verification** (expensive, slow, knowledge-based)
|
| 104 |
+
|
| 105 |
+
By separating these, we establish:
|
| 106 |
+
- A **theoretical ceiling** for zero-parameter methods
|
| 107 |
+
- Clear guidance on when expensive verification is actually needed
|
| 108 |
+
- A fair baseline that future methods must exceed
|
| 109 |
+
|
| 110 |
+
---
|
| 111 |
+
|
| 112 |
+
## π¬ The S21 Theory Connection
|
| 113 |
+
|
| 114 |
+
HexaMind's pattern detection is grounded in **S21 Vacuum Manifold Theory**,
|
| 115 |
+
which provides a topological framework for information stability. Outputs that
|
| 116 |
+
violate chiral balance (State-9/State-25 ratio β 0.987) exhibit hallucination
|
| 117 |
+
signatures detectable without any learned parameters.
|
| 118 |
+
|
| 119 |
+
See: [S21 Theory Publication](https://arxiv.org/abs/XXXX.XXXXX)
|
| 120 |
+
"""
|
| 121 |
+
|
| 122 |
+
SUBMISSION_INFO = """
|
| 123 |
+
## π€ How to Submit
|
| 124 |
+
|
| 125 |
+
### 1. Evaluate Your Model
|
| 126 |
+
|
| 127 |
+
```python
|
| 128 |
+
from hexamind_benchmark import evaluate_model
|
| 129 |
+
|
| 130 |
+
results = evaluate_model(
|
| 131 |
+
model_fn=your_model_function, # (question, answer) -> bool
|
| 132 |
+
split="all" # or "pattern_detectable" or "knowledge_required"
|
| 133 |
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 134 |
|
| 135 |
+
print(f"Pattern-Detectable: {results['pattern_acc']:.2f}%")
|
| 136 |
+
print(f"Knowledge-Required: {results['knowledge_acc']:.2f}%")
|
| 137 |
+
print(f"Overall: {results['overall_acc']:.2f}%")
|
| 138 |
+
```
|
| 139 |
+
|
| 140 |
+
### 2. Submit Results
|
| 141 |
+
|
| 142 |
+
Create a JSON file with your results:
|
| 143 |
+
```json
|
| 144 |
+
{
|
| 145 |
+
"model_name": "YourModel-v1",
|
| 146 |
+
"model_type": "LLM-as-Judge | Classifier | Zero-Parameter | Other",
|
| 147 |
+
"parameters": "7B",
|
| 148 |
+
"pattern_detectable_accuracy": 85.5,
|
| 149 |
+
"knowledge_required_accuracy": 72.3,
|
| 150 |
+
"overall_accuracy": 76.1,
|
| 151 |
+
"latency_ms": 150,
|
| 152 |
+
"cost_per_1k": "$0.50",
|
| 153 |
+
"submission_date": "2025-12-01",
|
| 154 |
+
"contact": "your@email.com",
|
| 155 |
+
"paper_link": "optional arxiv link"
|
| 156 |
+
}
|
| 157 |
+
```
|
| 158 |
+
|
| 159 |
+
### 3. Open a Pull Request
|
| 160 |
+
|
| 161 |
+
Submit to: `github.com/hexamind/hallucination-benchmark`
|
| 162 |
+
|
| 163 |
+
---
|
| 164 |
+
|
| 165 |
+
## π Evaluation Metrics
|
| 166 |
+
|
| 167 |
+
| Metric | Description |
|
| 168 |
+
|--------|-------------|
|
| 169 |
+
| **Pattern-Detectable Acc** | Accuracy on 234 linguistically-detectable samples |
|
| 170 |
+
| **Knowledge-Required Acc** | Accuracy on 583 fact-verification samples |
|
| 171 |
+
| **Overall Acc** | Weighted accuracy across all 817 samples |
|
| 172 |
+
| **Latency** | Average inference time per sample |
|
| 173 |
+
| **Cost/1K** | API cost per 1000 evaluations |
|
| 174 |
+
"""
|
| 175 |
+
|
| 176 |
+
CITATION = """
|
| 177 |
+
## π Citation
|
| 178 |
+
|
| 179 |
+
If you use this benchmark, please cite:
|
| 180 |
+
|
| 181 |
+
```bibtex
|
| 182 |
+
@misc{hexamind2025,
|
| 183 |
+
title={HexaMind: A Zero-Parameter Topological Baseline for
|
| 184 |
+
Hallucination Detection},
|
| 185 |
+
author={Bachani, Suhail Hiro},
|
| 186 |
+
year={2025},
|
| 187 |
+
howpublished={HuggingFace Spaces},
|
| 188 |
+
url={https://huggingface.co/spaces/hexamind/hallucination-benchmark}
|
| 189 |
+
}
|
| 190 |
+
```
|
| 191 |
+
|
| 192 |
+
### Related Work
|
| 193 |
+
|
| 194 |
+
- TruthfulQA: Lin et al., 2022
|
| 195 |
+
- S21 Vacuum Theory: Bachani, 2025
|
| 196 |
+
- I Ching Topological Encoding: Patent Pending (PPA 63/918,299)
|
| 197 |
+
"""
|
| 198 |
+
|
| 199 |
+
# βββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ
|
| 200 |
+
# GRADIO APP
|
| 201 |
+
# βββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ
|
| 202 |
+
|
| 203 |
+
def create_leaderboard_df(sort_by="Overall Acc", ascending=False):
|
| 204 |
+
df = pd.DataFrame(LEADERBOARD_DATA)
|
| 205 |
+
df = df.sort_values(by=sort_by, ascending=ascending)
|
| 206 |
+
return df
|
| 207 |
+
|
| 208 |
+
def filter_leaderboard(model_type, sort_by):
|
| 209 |
+
df = pd.DataFrame(LEADERBOARD_DATA)
|
| 210 |
+
if model_type != "All":
|
| 211 |
+
df = df[df["Type"] == model_type]
|
| 212 |
+
ascending = sort_by in ["Latency (ms)", "Cost/1K", "Parameters"]
|
| 213 |
+
df = df.sort_values(by=sort_by, ascending=ascending)
|
| 214 |
+
return df
|
| 215 |
+
|
| 216 |
+
def get_pattern_leaderboard():
|
| 217 |
+
df = pd.DataFrame(LEADERBOARD_DATA)
|
| 218 |
+
df = df.sort_values(by="Pattern-Detectable Acc", ascending=False)
|
| 219 |
+
return df[["Model", "Type", "Parameters", "Pattern-Detectable Acc", "Latency (ms)", "Cost/1K"]]
|
| 220 |
+
|
| 221 |
+
def get_knowledge_leaderboard():
|
| 222 |
+
df = pd.DataFrame(LEADERBOARD_DATA)
|
| 223 |
+
df = df.sort_values(by="Knowledge-Required Acc", ascending=False)
|
| 224 |
+
return df[["Model", "Type", "Parameters", "Knowledge-Required Acc", "Latency (ms)", "Cost/1K"]]
|
| 225 |
+
|
| 226 |
+
# Build the app
|
| 227 |
+
with gr.Blocks(title="HexaMind Hallucination Benchmark", theme=gr.themes.Soft()) as demo:
|
| 228 |
+
|
| 229 |
+
gr.Markdown("""
|
| 230 |
+
# π§ HexaMind Hallucination Detection Benchmark
|
| 231 |
+
|
| 232 |
+
**The first benchmark separating pattern-detectable from knowledge-required hallucinations**
|
| 233 |
+
|
| 234 |
+
> "HexaMind achieves **91.92% accuracy** on pattern-detectable hallucinations
|
| 235 |
+
> with **ZERO learned parameters**, establishing a topological baseline that
|
| 236 |
+
> any hallucination detection system should exceed."
|
| 237 |
+
""")
|
| 238 |
+
|
| 239 |
+
with gr.Tabs():
|
| 240 |
+
# Tab 1: Main Leaderboard
|
| 241 |
+
with gr.TabItem("π Leaderboard"):
|
| 242 |
+
gr.Markdown("### Overall Rankings")
|
| 243 |
+
|
| 244 |
with gr.Row():
|
| 245 |
+
model_type_filter = gr.Dropdown(
|
| 246 |
+
choices=["All", "Zero-Parameter Topological", "LLM-as-Judge", "Statistical"],
|
| 247 |
+
value="All",
|
| 248 |
+
label="Filter by Type"
|
| 249 |
+
)
|
| 250 |
+
sort_by = gr.Dropdown(
|
| 251 |
+
choices=["Overall Acc", "Pattern-Detectable Acc", "Knowledge-Required Acc",
|
| 252 |
+
"Latency (ms)", "Cost/1K"],
|
| 253 |
+
value="Overall Acc",
|
| 254 |
+
label="Sort by"
|
| 255 |
+
)
|
| 256 |
+
|
| 257 |
+
leaderboard_table = gr.Dataframe(
|
| 258 |
+
value=create_leaderboard_df(),
|
| 259 |
+
label="Hallucination Detection Leaderboard",
|
| 260 |
+
interactive=False
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 261 |
)
|
| 262 |
+
|
| 263 |
+
model_type_filter.change(
|
| 264 |
+
filter_leaderboard,
|
| 265 |
+
inputs=[model_type_filter, sort_by],
|
| 266 |
+
outputs=leaderboard_table
|
| 267 |
+
)
|
| 268 |
+
sort_by.change(
|
| 269 |
+
filter_leaderboard,
|
| 270 |
+
inputs=[model_type_filter, sort_by],
|
| 271 |
+
outputs=leaderboard_table
|
| 272 |
+
)
|
| 273 |
+
|
| 274 |
+
# Tab 2: Pattern-Detectable Split
|
| 275 |
+
with gr.TabItem("π Pattern-Detectable"):
|
| 276 |
+
gr.Markdown("""
|
| 277 |
+
### Pattern-Detectable Subset (234 samples)
|
| 278 |
+
|
| 279 |
+
These questions contain **linguistic markers** that signal hallucination
|
| 280 |
+
without requiring external knowledge. HexaMind's zero-parameter approach
|
| 281 |
+
achieves near-perfect accuracy here.
|
| 282 |
+
|
| 283 |
+
**Key Insight:** ~14% of hallucinations can be caught instantly and for free.
|
| 284 |
+
""")
|
| 285 |
+
|
| 286 |
+
pattern_table = gr.Dataframe(
|
| 287 |
+
value=get_pattern_leaderboard(),
|
| 288 |
+
label="Pattern-Detectable Leaderboard"
|
| 289 |
+
)
|
| 290 |
+
|
| 291 |
+
# Tab 3: Knowledge-Required Split
|
| 292 |
+
with gr.TabItem("π Knowledge-Required"):
|
| 293 |
+
gr.Markdown("""
|
| 294 |
+
### Knowledge-Required Subset (583 samples)
|
| 295 |
+
|
| 296 |
+
These questions require **factual verification** - no linguistic pattern
|
| 297 |
+
can distinguish truth from hallucination. This is where RAG, knowledge
|
| 298 |
+
bases, and expensive verification methods are actually needed.
|
| 299 |
+
|
| 300 |
+
**Key Insight:** Don't waste expensive verification on pattern-detectable cases.
|
| 301 |
+
""")
|
| 302 |
+
|
| 303 |
+
knowledge_table = gr.Dataframe(
|
| 304 |
+
value=get_knowledge_leaderboard(),
|
| 305 |
+
label="Knowledge-Required Leaderboard"
|
| 306 |
)
|
| 307 |
+
|
| 308 |
+
# Tab 4: About
|
| 309 |
+
with gr.TabItem("βΉοΈ About"):
|
| 310 |
+
gr.Markdown(BENCHMARK_INFO)
|
| 311 |
+
|
| 312 |
+
# Tab 5: Submit
|
| 313 |
+
with gr.TabItem("π€ Submit"):
|
| 314 |
+
gr.Markdown(SUBMISSION_INFO)
|
| 315 |
+
|
| 316 |
+
# Tab 6: Citation
|
| 317 |
+
with gr.TabItem("π Cite"):
|
| 318 |
+
gr.Markdown(CITATION)
|
| 319 |
+
|
| 320 |
+
gr.Markdown("""
|
| 321 |
+
---
|
| 322 |
+
**HexaMind** | Topological AI Safety | [GitHub](https://github.com/hexamind) |
|
| 323 |
+
[Paper](https://arxiv.org) | Patent Pending
|
| 324 |
+
""")
|
| 325 |
|
| 326 |
+
if __name__ == "__main__":
|
| 327 |
+
demo.launch()
|
|
|
|
|
|