File size: 22,461 Bytes
b400ace | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 | import ast
import os
import re
from copy import deepcopy
from csv import QUOTE_NONNUMERIC
import cv2
import pandas as pd
from rich.table import Table
from src.logger import console, logger
from src.schemas.constants import (
BONUS_SECTION_PREFIX,
DEFAULT_SECTION_KEY,
MARKING_VERDICT_TYPES,
)
from src.utils.parsing import (
get_concatenated_response,
open_evaluation_with_validation,
parse_fields,
parse_float_or_fraction,
)
class AnswerMatcher:
def __init__(self, answer_item, section_marking_scheme):
self.section_marking_scheme = section_marking_scheme
self.answer_item = answer_item
self.answer_type = self.validate_and_get_answer_type(answer_item)
self.set_defaults_from_scheme(section_marking_scheme)
@staticmethod
def is_a_marking_score(answer_element):
# Note: strict type checking is already done at schema validation level,
# Here we focus on overall struct type
return type(answer_element) == str or type(answer_element) == int
@staticmethod
def is_standard_answer(answer_element):
return type(answer_element) == str and len(answer_element) >= 1
def validate_and_get_answer_type(self, answer_item):
if self.is_standard_answer(answer_item):
return "standard"
elif type(answer_item) == list:
if (
# Array of answer elements: ['A', 'B', 'AB']
len(answer_item) >= 2
and all(
self.is_standard_answer(answers_or_score)
for answers_or_score in answer_item
)
):
return "multiple-correct"
elif (
# Array of two-tuples: [['A', 1], ['B', 1], ['C', 3], ['AB', 2]]
len(answer_item) >= 1
and all(
type(answer_and_score) == list and len(answer_and_score) == 2
for answer_and_score in answer_item
)
and all(
self.is_standard_answer(allowed_answer)
and self.is_a_marking_score(answer_score)
for allowed_answer, answer_score in answer_item
)
):
return "multiple-correct-weighted"
logger.critical(
f"Unable to determine answer type for answer item: {answer_item}"
)
raise Exception("Unable to determine answer type")
def set_defaults_from_scheme(self, section_marking_scheme):
answer_type = self.answer_type
self.empty_val = section_marking_scheme.empty_val
answer_item = self.answer_item
self.marking = deepcopy(section_marking_scheme.marking)
# TODO: reuse part of parse_scheme_marking here -
if answer_type == "standard":
# no local overrides
pass
elif answer_type == "multiple-correct":
# override marking scheme scores for each allowed answer
for allowed_answer in answer_item:
self.marking[f"correct-{allowed_answer}"] = self.marking["correct"]
elif answer_type == "multiple-correct-weighted":
# Note: No override using marking scheme as answer scores are provided in answer_item
for allowed_answer, answer_score in answer_item:
self.marking[f"correct-{allowed_answer}"] = parse_float_or_fraction(
answer_score
)
def get_marking_scheme(self):
return self.section_marking_scheme
def get_section_explanation(self):
answer_type = self.answer_type
if answer_type in ["standard", "multiple-correct"]:
return self.section_marking_scheme.section_key
elif answer_type == "multiple-correct-weighted":
return f"Custom: {self.marking}"
def get_verdict_marking(self, marked_answer):
answer_type = self.answer_type
question_verdict = "incorrect"
if answer_type == "standard":
question_verdict = self.get_standard_verdict(marked_answer)
elif answer_type == "multiple-correct":
question_verdict = self.get_multiple_correct_verdict(marked_answer)
elif answer_type == "multiple-correct-weighted":
question_verdict = self.get_multiple_correct_weighted_verdict(marked_answer)
return question_verdict, self.marking[question_verdict]
def get_standard_verdict(self, marked_answer):
allowed_answer = self.answer_item
if marked_answer == self.empty_val:
return "unmarked"
elif marked_answer == allowed_answer:
return "correct"
else:
return "incorrect"
def get_multiple_correct_verdict(self, marked_answer):
allowed_answers = self.answer_item
if marked_answer == self.empty_val:
return "unmarked"
elif marked_answer in allowed_answers:
return f"correct-{marked_answer}"
else:
return "incorrect"
def get_multiple_correct_weighted_verdict(self, marked_answer):
allowed_answers = [
allowed_answer for allowed_answer, _answer_score in self.answer_item
]
if marked_answer == self.empty_val:
return "unmarked"
elif marked_answer in allowed_answers:
return f"correct-{marked_answer}"
else:
return "incorrect"
def __str__(self):
return f"{self.answer_item}"
class SectionMarkingScheme:
def __init__(self, section_key, section_scheme, empty_val):
# TODO: get local empty_val from qblock
self.empty_val = empty_val
self.section_key = section_key
# DEFAULT marking scheme follows a shorthand
if section_key == DEFAULT_SECTION_KEY:
self.questions = None
self.marking = self.parse_scheme_marking(section_scheme)
else:
self.questions = parse_fields(section_key, section_scheme["questions"])
self.marking = self.parse_scheme_marking(section_scheme["marking"])
def __str__(self):
return self.section_key
def parse_scheme_marking(self, marking):
parsed_marking = {}
for verdict_type in MARKING_VERDICT_TYPES:
verdict_marking = parse_float_or_fraction(marking[verdict_type])
if (
verdict_marking > 0
and verdict_type == "incorrect"
and not self.section_key.startswith(BONUS_SECTION_PREFIX)
):
logger.warning(
f"Found positive marks({round(verdict_marking, 2)}) for incorrect answer in the schema '{self.section_key}'. For Bonus sections, add a prefix 'BONUS_' to them."
)
parsed_marking[verdict_type] = verdict_marking
return parsed_marking
def match_answer(self, marked_answer, answer_matcher):
question_verdict, verdict_marking = answer_matcher.get_verdict_marking(
marked_answer
)
return verdict_marking, question_verdict
class EvaluationConfig:
"""Note: this instance will be reused for multiple omr sheets"""
def __init__(self, curr_dir, evaluation_path, template, tuning_config):
self.path = evaluation_path
evaluation_json = open_evaluation_with_validation(evaluation_path)
options, marking_schemes, source_type = map(
evaluation_json.get, ["options", "marking_schemes", "source_type"]
)
self.should_explain_scoring = options.get("should_explain_scoring", False)
self.has_non_default_section = False
self.exclude_files = []
self.enable_evaluation_table_to_csv = options.get(
"enable_evaluation_table_to_csv", False
)
if source_type == "csv":
csv_path = curr_dir.joinpath(options["answer_key_csv_path"])
if not os.path.exists(csv_path):
logger.warning(f"Answer key csv does not exist at: '{csv_path}'.")
answer_key_image_path = options.get("answer_key_image_path", None)
if os.path.exists(csv_path):
# TODO: CSV parsing/validation for each row with a (qNo, <ans string/>) pair
answer_key = pd.read_csv(
csv_path,
header=None,
names=["question", "answer"],
converters={"question": str, "answer": self.parse_answer_column},
)
self.questions_in_order = answer_key["question"].to_list()
answers_in_order = answer_key["answer"].to_list()
elif not answer_key_image_path:
raise Exception(f"Answer key csv not found at '{csv_path}'")
else:
image_path = str(curr_dir.joinpath(answer_key_image_path))
if not os.path.exists(image_path):
raise Exception(f"Answer key image not found at '{image_path}'")
# self.exclude_files.append(image_path)
logger.debug(
f"Attempting to generate answer key from image: '{image_path}'"
)
# TODO: use a common function for below changes?
in_omr = cv2.imread(image_path, cv2.IMREAD_GRAYSCALE)
in_omr = template.image_instance_ops.apply_preprocessors(
image_path, in_omr, template
)
if in_omr is None:
raise Exception(
f"Could not read answer key from image {image_path}"
)
(
response_dict,
_final_marked,
_multi_marked,
_multi_roll,
) = template.image_instance_ops.read_omr_response(
template,
image=in_omr,
name=image_path,
save_dir=None,
)
omr_response = get_concatenated_response(response_dict, template)
empty_val = template.global_empty_val
empty_answer_regex = (
rf"{re.escape(empty_val)}+" if empty_val != "" else r"^$"
)
if "questions_in_order" in options:
self.questions_in_order = self.parse_questions_in_order(
options["questions_in_order"]
)
empty_answered_questions = [
question
for question in self.questions_in_order
if re.search(empty_answer_regex, omr_response[question])
]
if len(empty_answered_questions) > 0:
logger.error(
f"Found empty answers for questions: {empty_answered_questions}, empty value used: '{empty_val}'"
)
raise Exception(
f"Found empty answers in file '{image_path}'. Please check your template again in the --setLayout mode."
)
else:
logger.warning(
f"questions_in_order not provided, proceeding to use non-empty values as answer key"
)
self.questions_in_order = sorted(
question
for (question, answer) in omr_response.items()
if not re.search(empty_answer_regex, answer)
)
answers_in_order = [
omr_response[question] for question in self.questions_in_order
]
# TODO: save the CSV
else:
self.questions_in_order = self.parse_questions_in_order(
options["questions_in_order"]
)
answers_in_order = options["answers_in_order"]
self.validate_questions(answers_in_order)
self.section_marking_schemes, self.question_to_scheme = {}, {}
for section_key, section_scheme in marking_schemes.items():
section_marking_scheme = SectionMarkingScheme(
section_key, section_scheme, template.global_empty_val
)
if section_key != DEFAULT_SECTION_KEY:
self.section_marking_schemes[section_key] = section_marking_scheme
for q in section_marking_scheme.questions:
# TODO: check the answer key for custom scheme here?
self.question_to_scheme[q] = section_marking_scheme
self.has_non_default_section = True
else:
self.default_marking_scheme = section_marking_scheme
self.validate_marking_schemes()
self.question_to_answer_matcher = self.parse_answers_and_map_questions(
answers_in_order
)
self.validate_answers(answers_in_order, tuning_config)
def __str__(self):
return str(self.path)
# Externally called methods have higher abstraction level.
def prepare_and_validate_omr_response(self, omr_response):
self.reset_explanation_table()
omr_response_questions = set(omr_response.keys())
all_questions = set(self.questions_in_order)
missing_questions = sorted(all_questions.difference(omr_response_questions))
if len(missing_questions) > 0:
logger.critical(f"Missing OMR response for: {missing_questions}")
raise Exception(
f"Some questions are missing in the OMR response for the given answer key"
)
prefixed_omr_response_questions = set(
[k for k in omr_response.keys() if k.startswith("q")]
)
missing_prefixed_questions = sorted(
prefixed_omr_response_questions.difference(all_questions)
)
if len(missing_prefixed_questions) > 0:
logger.warning(
f"No answer given for potential questions in OMR response: {missing_prefixed_questions}"
)
def match_answer_for_question(self, current_score, question, marked_answer):
answer_matcher = self.question_to_answer_matcher[question]
question_verdict, delta = answer_matcher.get_verdict_marking(marked_answer)
self.conditionally_add_explanation(
answer_matcher,
delta,
marked_answer,
question_verdict,
question,
current_score,
)
return delta
def conditionally_print_explanation(self):
if self.should_explain_scoring:
console.print(self.explanation_table, justify="center")
# Explanation Table to CSV
def conditionally_save_explanation_csv(self, file_path, evaluation_output_dir):
if self.enable_evaluation_table_to_csv:
data = {col.header: col._cells for col in self.explanation_table.columns}
output_path = os.path.join(
evaluation_output_dir,
f"{file_path.stem}_evaluation.csv",
)
pd.DataFrame(data, dtype=str).to_csv(
output_path,
mode="a",
quoting=QUOTE_NONNUMERIC,
index=False,
)
def get_should_explain_scoring(self):
return self.should_explain_scoring
def get_exclude_files(self):
return self.exclude_files
@staticmethod
def parse_answer_column(answer_column):
if answer_column[0] == "[":
# multiple-correct-weighted or multiple-correct
parsed_answer = ast.literal_eval(answer_column)
elif "," in answer_column:
# multiple-correct
parsed_answer = answer_column.split(",")
else:
# single-correct
parsed_answer = answer_column
return parsed_answer
def parse_questions_in_order(self, questions_in_order):
return parse_fields("questions_in_order", questions_in_order)
def validate_answers(self, answers_in_order, tuning_config):
answer_matcher_map = self.question_to_answer_matcher
if tuning_config.outputs.filter_out_multimarked_files:
multi_marked_answer = False
for question, answer_item in zip(self.questions_in_order, answers_in_order):
answer_type = answer_matcher_map[question].answer_type
if answer_type == "standard":
if len(answer_item) > 1:
multi_marked_answer = True
if answer_type == "multiple-correct":
for single_answer in answer_item:
if len(single_answer) > 1:
multi_marked_answer = True
break
if answer_type == "multiple-correct-weighted":
for single_answer, _answer_score in answer_item:
if len(single_answer) > 1:
multi_marked_answer = True
if multi_marked_answer:
raise Exception(
f"Provided answer key contains multiple correct answer(s), but config.filter_out_multimarked_files is True. Scoring will get skipped."
)
def validate_questions(self, answers_in_order):
questions_in_order = self.questions_in_order
len_questions_in_order, len_answers_in_order = len(questions_in_order), len(
answers_in_order
)
if len_questions_in_order != len_answers_in_order:
logger.critical(
f"questions_in_order({len_questions_in_order}): {questions_in_order}\nanswers_in_order({len_answers_in_order}): {answers_in_order}"
)
raise Exception(
f"Unequal lengths for questions_in_order and answers_in_order ({len_questions_in_order} != {len_answers_in_order})"
)
def validate_marking_schemes(self):
section_marking_schemes = self.section_marking_schemes
section_questions = set()
for section_key, section_scheme in section_marking_schemes.items():
if section_key == DEFAULT_SECTION_KEY:
continue
current_set = set(section_scheme.questions)
if not section_questions.isdisjoint(current_set):
raise Exception(
f"Section '{section_key}' has overlapping question(s) with other sections"
)
section_questions = section_questions.union(current_set)
all_questions = set(self.questions_in_order)
missing_questions = sorted(section_questions.difference(all_questions))
if len(missing_questions) > 0:
logger.critical(f"Missing answer key for: {missing_questions}")
raise Exception(
f"Some questions are missing in the answer key for the given marking scheme"
)
def parse_answers_and_map_questions(self, answers_in_order):
question_to_answer_matcher = {}
for question, answer_item in zip(self.questions_in_order, answers_in_order):
section_marking_scheme = self.get_marking_scheme_for_question(question)
answer_matcher = AnswerMatcher(answer_item, section_marking_scheme)
question_to_answer_matcher[question] = answer_matcher
if (
answer_matcher.answer_type == "multiple-correct-weighted"
and section_marking_scheme.section_key != DEFAULT_SECTION_KEY
):
logger.warning(
f"The custom scheme '{section_marking_scheme}' will not apply to question '{question}' as it will use the given answer weights f{answer_item}"
)
return question_to_answer_matcher
# Then unfolding lower abstraction levels
def reset_explanation_table(self):
self.explanation_table = None
self.prepare_explanation_table()
def prepare_explanation_table(self):
# TODO: provide a way to export this as csv/pdf
if not self.should_explain_scoring:
return
table = Table(title="Evaluation Explanation Table", show_lines=True)
table.add_column("Question")
table.add_column("Marked")
table.add_column("Answer(s)")
table.add_column("Verdict")
table.add_column("Delta")
table.add_column("Score")
# TODO: Add max and min score in explanation (row-wise and total)
if self.has_non_default_section:
table.add_column("Section")
self.explanation_table = table
def get_marking_scheme_for_question(self, question):
return self.question_to_scheme.get(question, self.default_marking_scheme)
def conditionally_add_explanation(
self,
answer_matcher,
delta,
marked_answer,
question_verdict,
question,
current_score,
):
if self.should_explain_scoring:
next_score = current_score + delta
# Conditionally add cells
row = [
item
for item in [
question,
marked_answer,
str(answer_matcher),
str.title(question_verdict),
str(round(delta, 2)),
str(round(next_score, 2)),
(
answer_matcher.get_section_explanation()
if self.has_non_default_section
else None
),
]
if item is not None
]
self.explanation_table.add_row(*row)
def evaluate_concatenated_response(
concatenated_response, evaluation_config, file_path, evaluation_output_dir
):
evaluation_config.prepare_and_validate_omr_response(concatenated_response)
current_score = 0.0
for question in evaluation_config.questions_in_order:
marked_answer = concatenated_response[question]
delta = evaluation_config.match_answer_for_question(
current_score, question, marked_answer
)
current_score += delta
evaluation_config.conditionally_print_explanation()
evaluation_config.conditionally_save_explanation_csv(file_path, evaluation_output_dir)
return current_score
|