File size: 10,684 Bytes
aca8ab4 |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 |
# Data Validation Fix Documentation
## Problem Summary
### Original Error
```
2025-11-12 14:36:16,506 - agents.retriever - ERROR - Error processing paper 1411.6643v4:
int() argument must be a string, a bytes-like object or a real number, not 'dict'
```
### Root Cause
The MCP arXiv server was returning paper metadata with **dict objects** instead of the expected primitive types (lists, strings). Specifically:
- `authors` field: Dict instead of `List[str]`
- `categories` field: Dict instead of `List[str]`
- Other fields: Potentially dicts instead of strings
When these malformed Paper objects were passed to `PDFProcessor.chunk_text()`, the metadata creation failed because it tried to use dict values where lists or strings were expected.
### Impact
- **All 4 papers** failed PDF processing
- **Entire pipeline** broken at the Retriever stage
- **All downstream agents** (Analyzer, Synthesis, Citation) never executed
## Solution: Multi-Layer Data Validation
We implemented a **defense-in-depth** approach with validation at multiple levels:
### 1. Pydantic Schema Validators (`utils/schemas.py`)
Added `@validator` decorators to the `Paper` class that automatically normalize malformed data:
**Features:**
- **Authors normalization**: Handles dict, list, string, or unknown types
- Dict format: Extracts values from nested structures
- String format: Converts to single-element list
- Invalid format: Returns empty list with warning
- **Categories normalization**: Same robust handling as authors
- **String field normalization**: Ensures title, abstract, pdf_url are always strings
- Dict format: Extracts nested values
- Invalid format: Converts to string representation
**Code Example:**
```python
@validator('authors', pre=True)
def normalize_authors(cls, v):
if isinstance(v, list):
return [str(author) if not isinstance(author, str) else author for author in v]
elif isinstance(v, dict):
logger.warning(f"Authors field is dict, extracting values: {v}")
if 'names' in v:
return v['names'] if isinstance(v['names'], list) else [str(v['names'])]
# ... more extraction logic
elif isinstance(v, str):
return [v]
else:
logger.warning(f"Unexpected authors format: {type(v)}, returning empty list")
return []
```
### 2. MCP Client Data Parsing (`utils/mcp_arxiv_client.py`)
Enhanced `_parse_mcp_paper()` method with explicit type checking and normalization:
**Features:**
- **Pre-validation**: Checks and normalizes data types before creating Paper object
- **Comprehensive logging**: Warnings for each malformed field
- **Graceful fallbacks**: Safe defaults for invalid data
- **Detailed error context**: Logs raw paper data on parsing failure
**Key Improvements:**
- Authors: Explicit type checking and dict extraction (lines 209-225)
- Categories: Same robust handling (lines 227-243)
- Title, abstract, pdf_url: String normalization (lines 245-270)
- Published date: Enhanced datetime parsing with fallbacks (lines 195-207)
### 3. PDF Processor Error Handling (`utils/pdf_processor.py`)
Added defensive metadata creation in `chunk_text()`:
**Features:**
- **Type validation**: Checks authors is list before use
- **Safe conversion**: Falls back to empty list if invalid
- **Try-except blocks**: Catches and logs chunk creation errors
- **Graceful continuation**: Processes remaining chunks even if one fails
**Code Example:**
```python
try:
# Ensure authors is a list of strings
authors_metadata = paper.authors
if not isinstance(authors_metadata, list):
logger.warning(f"Paper {paper.arxiv_id} has invalid authors type: {type(authors_metadata)}, converting to list")
authors_metadata = [str(authors_metadata)] if authors_metadata else []
metadata = {
"title": title_metadata,
"authors": authors_metadata,
"chunk_index": chunk_index,
"token_count": len(chunk_tokens)
}
except Exception as e:
logger.warning(f"Error creating metadata for chunk {chunk_index}: {str(e)}, using fallback")
# Use safe fallback metadata
```
### 4. Retriever Agent Validation (`agents/retriever.py`)
Added post-parsing validation to check data quality:
**Features:**
- **Diagnostic checks**: Validates all Paper object fields after MCP parsing
- **Quality reporting**: Logs specific data quality issues
- **Filtering**: Can skip papers with critical validation failures
- **Error tracking**: Reports validation failures in state["errors"]
**Checks Performed:**
- Authors is list type
- Categories is list type
- Title, pdf_url, abstract are string types
- Authors list is not empty
## Testing
Created comprehensive test suite (`test_data_validation.py`) that verifies:
### Test 1: Paper Schema Validators
- β Authors as dict β normalized to list
- β Categories as dict β normalized to list
- β Multiple malformed fields β all normalized correctly
### Test 2: PDF Processor Resilience
- β Processes Papers with normalized data successfully
- β Creates chunks with proper metadata structure
- β Chunk metadata contains lists for authors field
**Test Results:**
```
β ALL TESTS PASSED - The data validation fixes are working correctly!
```
## Impact on All Agents
### RetrieverAgent β
- **Primary beneficiary** of all fixes
- Handles malformed MCP responses gracefully
- Validates and filters papers before processing
- Continues with valid papers even if some fail
### AnalyzerAgent β
- **Protected by upstream validation**
- Receives only validated Paper objects
- No changes required
- Works with clean, normalized data
### SynthesisAgent β
- **No changes needed**
- Operates on validated analyses
- Unaffected by MCP data issues
### CitationAgent β
- **No changes needed**
- Gets validated citations from upstream
- Unaffected by MCP data issues
## Files Modified
1. **utils/schemas.py** (lines 1-93)
- Added logging import
- Added 6 Pydantic validators for Paper class
- Normalizes authors, categories, title, abstract, pdf_url
2. **utils/mcp_arxiv_client.py** (lines 175-290)
- Enhanced `_parse_mcp_paper()` method
- Added explicit type checking for all fields
- Improved logging and error handling
3. **utils/pdf_processor.py** (lines 134-175)
- Added metadata validation in `chunk_text()`
- Try-except around metadata creation
- Try-except around chunk creation
- Graceful continuation on errors
4. **agents/retriever.py** (lines 89-134)
- Added post-parsing validation loop
- Diagnostic checks for all Paper fields
- Paper filtering capability
- Enhanced error reporting
5. **test_data_validation.py** (NEW)
- Comprehensive test suite
- Verifies all validation layers work correctly
## How to Verify the Fix
### Run the validation test:
```bash
python test_data_validation.py
```
Expected output:
```
β ALL TESTS PASSED - The data validation fixes are working correctly!
```
### Run with your actual MCP data:
The next time you run the application with MCP papers that previously failed, you should see:
- Warning logs for malformed fields (e.g., "Authors field is dict, extracting values")
- Successful PDF processing instead of errors
- Papers properly chunked and stored in vector database
- All downstream agents execute successfully
### Check logs for validation warnings:
```bash
# Run your application and look for these log patterns:
# - "Authors field is dict, extracting values"
# - "Categories field is dict, extracting values"
# - "Paper X has data quality issues: ..."
# - "Successfully parsed paper X: Y authors, Z categories"
```
## Why This Works
1. **Defense in Depth**: Multiple validation layers ensure data quality
- MCP client normalizes on parse
- Pydantic validators normalize on object creation
- PDF processor validates before use
- Retriever agent performs diagnostic checks
2. **Graceful Degradation**: System continues with valid papers even if some fail
- Individual paper failures don't stop the pipeline
- Partial results better than complete failure
- Clear error reporting shows what failed and why
3. **Clear Error Reporting**: Users see which papers had issues and why
- Warnings logged for each malformed field
- Diagnostic checks report specific issues
- Errors accumulated in state["errors"]
4. **Future-Proof**: Handles variations in MCP server response formats
- Supports multiple dict structures
- Falls back to safe defaults
- Continues to work if MCP format changes
## Known Limitations
1. **Data Extraction from Dicts**: We extract values from dicts heuristically
- May not capture all data in complex nested structures
- Assumes common field names ('names', 'authors', 'categories')
- Better than failing completely, but may lose some metadata
2. **Empty Authors Lists**: If authors dict has no extractable values
- Falls back to empty list
- Papers still process but lack author metadata
- Logged as warning for manual review
3. **Performance**: Additional validation adds small overhead
- Negligible impact for typical workloads
- Logging warnings can increase log size
- Trade-off for robustness is worthwhile
## Recommendations
1. **Monitor Logs**: Watch for validation warnings in production
- Indicates ongoing MCP data quality issues
- May need to work with MCP server maintainers
2. **Report to MCP Maintainers**: The MCP server should return proper types
- Authors should be `List[str]`, not `Dict`
- Categories should be `List[str]`, not `Dict`
- This fix is a workaround, not a permanent solution
3. **Extend Validation**: If more fields show issues, add validators
- Follow the same pattern used for authors/categories
- Add tests to verify behavior
- Document in this file
4. **Consider Alternative MCP Servers**: If issues persist
- Try different arXiv MCP implementations
- Or fallback to direct arXiv API (already supported)
- Set `USE_MCP_ARXIV=false` in .env
## Rollback Instructions
If this fix causes issues, you can rollback by:
1. **Revert the files**:
```bash
git checkout HEAD~1 utils/schemas.py utils/mcp_arxiv_client.py utils/pdf_processor.py agents/retriever.py
```
2. **Remove the test file**:
```bash
rm test_data_validation.py
```
3. **Switch to direct arXiv API**:
```bash
# In .env file:
USE_MCP_ARXIV=false
```
## Version History
- **v1.0** (2025-11-12): Initial implementation
- Added Pydantic validators
- Enhanced MCP client parsing
- Improved PDF processor error handling
- Added Retriever validation
- Created comprehensive tests
- All tests passing β
|